Justice

Justice must be strong and you should seek support for the weak. How society "distributes" its wealth among its constituents. These are the problems. There are three basic aspects to this problem. The tolerance system gives individuals the right to make a living as a human being as an individual. In the Puritan system, people are required to have an intention to contribute at least to society in order to earn their living income. Finally, in personal opinion, we claim that individual ownership is sacred. Nobody can force him to take away his goods.

Three related issues for institutions responsible for the scope of justice, justice for the distribution of wealth and other goods, and justice are the central issue of the worldwide justice problem. When these problems are solved in a situation that is not ideal, they are part of "Process Ethics" which is a division of political ethics. Is there an objective moral standard applied to all humans, regardless of their culture, race, sex, religion, nationality or other characteristic features, as moral universalists have claimed? Or does ethical standard only apply to limited background such as culture, country, community, voluntary association?

When applying ethics in the field of criminal justice, we (general people) wish that all criminal justice experts are faithful to ethical standards, and apply for justice in a reasonable way. Therefore, criminal justice experts are forced to live and work in an environment where moral ambiguity becomes standard. But the question still exists, what are the moral and ethical standards? "Ethics is a study on what to do, the terms" moral "and" moral "are often used interchangeably. The word moral comes from Greek ethics. Morale from Latin - means customs, customs, or social norms Unfortunately, since morals and morals are not simply an explanation of behavior, customs or current practice, these deductions may be slightly misleading . (Ian Kerridge, Michael Lowe, John McPhee, 2005 p.1)