The Relationship Between Justice and the Good

Among many smart philosophers, the relationship between justice and good has been discussed for thousands of years. Many theorists will explain the exact features and try to outline the moral distribution of property. From the beginning of the First World War to the present, a liberal view has emerged in various ideological theories and continues to influence political thoughts in rights, equality and freedom. With this emergence, the two very influential liberal political philosopher theorists Robert Nojic and John Rawls took a fundamentally different approach to justice and good relations.

These philosophical principles include justice, the existence of right and wrong, and the relationship between people and the environment and their interactions. The most important is the choice of freedom. The leadership of Muslim scholars shows that their views differ. Everyone can infer a different ideological way. Meanwhile, a precedent led by Sahab (a companion of a prophet) indicates that they believe that Islamic law is not only a set of rules but also a value system that certain rules are overwhelming concrete signs It is. Value ... The development of the Al-Maqasid theory has made remarkable progress until the days of Al Ghazālī (d.5005H) and Al Shatibi (d.790H)

Understanding part of the distribution of justice, personal relationship products and general relationship products can reasonably adapt to different accurate measurement concepts (Gheaus 2018). Indeed, friendship has become one of many resources for distribution of justice (Cordelli 2015a), and believes that it is possible to pay attention as a fundamental ability, to form and maintain meaningful relationships It is (Nussbaum 2000: 82 - 83). A good family relationship including child rearing is considered to be a major contributor to at least some people's happiness (Arneson 2014)

Some arguments support the conclusion that certain personal relationship products are similar to the main products in the sense that John Rawls used this term. That is, distribution is a commodity of justice. The first reason is that several personal relationship products are multipurpose: no matter what people want, people need to pursue them a valuable concept of life (Kittay 1999; Brake 2017; Cordelli 2015 a, 2015 b). It is often necessary to pursue a life plan, and development and exercise of moral power is necessary to be included in the primary product list, which is not sufficient condition. Ultimately, oxygen, water, food can not survive, but they are not included in the main product list. (Page 138)