Scales of Justice

The founder established a special law in the United States that gives citizens the freedom that the British refused to give to them. Documents written by the founder's father when they traveled to the country made it possible for them to enjoy the freedom of speech and religion. However, the Bill of Rights also gives citizens the right to justice. Many judges have exploited this right by expressing opinions on the case before hearing all the evidence against the parties. This principle, called judicial discretion, helps to weaken the standard system of judicial standards.

A: The principle of 'blindness justice' symbolizes the public statue that the image of the statue of justice lifts the courts nationwide. Her eyes are blindfolded and have a scale of justice to express the ideals of the rule of law regardless of wealth, power, fame. However, in many cases crime victims in the United States feel pendulum has removed their rights. I focused on legislators on both sides of the aisle to focus on the victim's rights and to use the legislative and supervisory powers of the Senate Judiciary Committee. The ultimate goal is to listen carefully to abuses, trafficking, sexual violence, sexual assault on military and college campuses, and criminal voices of illegal immigration.

As long as we (the public) have our own range of justice, justice is never effective. Justice is a package of morality, humanity, equality. In criminal cases, we will consider these three major factors. When you face justice, morality and humanity must be your turn. When a person commits a crime, it has many influences. For example, we study moral factors; victims may abuse their sons, and in the pain he may have committed a crime. Therefore, it is unfair to have this person take full responsibility for his misconduct. The judicial system has to balance ethics, humanity, and quality on the same scale. Weighing and evaluating each of these three elements of justice is by no means fair. Therefore, justice is nominal and theoretically valid, in fact it is not.

Understanding whether or not the crime victim is satisfied (or dissatisfied) with the criminal justice system is not the same as understanding the reasons. In order to clarify this problem, I made three scales. Each scale contains several sacrificial problems. These measures measure perception of the overall satisfaction with the criminal justice system, the extent to which the victim feels informed about their rights, and the adequacy of the victim's impact statement. They are called Victim Satisfaction Scale, Informed Victim Scale, Victim Impact Scale.