No Justice in Democracy

In ancient Greece, city states and people called out to society through democracy. Democracy in Athens aims to bring benefits to people through justice. Unfortunately, this does not always happen. In Hercula, practice of democracy contradicts its basic principle. The degree of justice a person can obtain depends largely on their position in Greek society. In many cases the population voting of the people will benefit a few people who are most affected and the policies they adopt will not support fair morality.

Comparing justice and democracy, the former proved more useful in promoting social equality. At the same time, it does not exclude justice, but it is supported by democracy. In fact, justice can use democracy as a means of achieving greater social equality while preventing unreasonable outcomes. American philosopher John Rawls proposed the two principles of justice: principle 1 is freedom and equality, principle II is a combination of equal opportunity and discriminatory treatment. The aim of principle 2 is to achieve justice based on fair value that can not be achieved by democracy alone 51. Therefore, in addition to guaranteeing the action taken by the major countries through democratic procedures, the results must be guaranteed. Their behavior is based only on the principle of justice

Returning to the foundation of equal opportunities, Lewis Brandis Justice states as follows. "Democracy depends on two pillars: First, everyone will enjoy the principles of pursuit of life, freedom, happiness Promote the development of civilization" Three years ago, Alan Kluger was in the White House He resigned as Chairman of the Economic Advisory Council and was concerned that income inequality leads to unhealthy opportunities. The same goes for the need for equality of data and the resolution of data equality. This is unknown at this moment, but in all areas of life and work, income, difference between women's wages and equal opportunities are important.