Rawls and King on Civil Disobedience

In John Rawls' justice theory, he defines disobedience of citizens. Change, Government. Rawls said citizen's disobedience is a refusal to comply with certain laws; this is usually due to the need to change government and state policies and laws. Civil disobedience necessitates advertising, nonviolence, and the proper attention of the law they are about to cancel.

Pastor Martin Luther King and John Rawls philosopher John Rawls proposed various reasons for civil disobedience. According to natural law theory and modern consensual theory, the law may require legal citizen disobedience. According to Rawls, this article explains the reasons for disobedience. In addition, I will explain the explanation based on Martin Luther King Jr.'s legal disobedience. Finally, I will explain civic disobedience and ideas of violence.

Two concepts of civil disobedience, Martin Luther King Jr. and John Rawls, Martin Luther King's review of the concept of civil disobedience (Martin Luther King Jr.) seems to be a radical extremist However, in the history he has not been portrayed on this subject. The definition of John Rawls' civil disobedience is very passive, so I doubt if he is quietly opposed to this behavior. Martin Luther King Jr. sought civil rights for blacks in the 1960s, but Rawls did not have a specific target group with his "social contract" theory.

However, Rawls may be called a prolific writer; his theory of when to participate in civil disobedience is unfounded in reality. Unlike Martin Luther King, Rawls lives in an isolated academic environment. Rawls is part of a privileged majority. Rawls speaks from the perspective of most people. Martin Luther King Jr. spoke from the perspective of a black man who struggled for racial equality in the 1960 's. The cultural gap between the two is reflected in their philosophy and the view of life. Rawls is a white privileged majority member and is anxious to change minorities. Martin Luther King Jr., who is afraid of his life due to civil rights struggle, makes the issue of civil disobedience even more urgent