Organizational Justice

The existence of human beings occurs in social institutions, communication and cooperation among people is a necessary condition for coexistence. The advantage of participating in these agencies is either economic, social emotional, or a combination of the two. Economic benefits provide a means of obtaining material products and comfort, social emotional benefits provide individuals with the status and value of the group. How these benefits are distributed in society is extremely important to individuals (Schminke, Ambrose, & Noel, 1997).

Organizational justice refers to "fairness and ethical handling of individuals within an organization". Organizational justice is a term commonly used by organization psychologists and refers to the way an organization handles employees fairly and fairly. " The dictionary defines "justice" as "popular Oxford New Age elementary school dictionary". However, in everyday life the term justice is used to mean "should" or "justice". In organizational science research, justice is considered to be built socially. In other words, actions are considered to be cognitive behaviors of individuals based on empirical research.

In the context of human resources management, organizational justice is a recently developed concept, but it is widely used to organize the research and management framework. In this regard, organizational justice can be defined as the extent to which an employee of a particular company views the organization's events as being fair or unfair. This means that employee perception of the organization's processes, policies, and instructions is contrary to the organization's own perception and constitutes the organization's justice (Redman and Wilkinson 2001). Some of the employees may think that they are unfair to them while developing a policy that the company considers reasonable, and therefore regarding the performance, output, and productivity of each employee It is necessary to negotiate the "unfair" problem. And discussion.

Organizational justice refers to the recognition of the fairness of employees and history has historically started with Adams' work on the theory of fairness. The theory of impartiality is the historical root of organizational justice. According to Adams, if things do not proceed as intended, people suffer cognitive dissonance. It predicts individuals to be moved by the sense of fairness. The theory states that men and women are in a state of continuous and endless social comparison with alleged individual groups. The traditional theory of Adams assumes that the reaction to injustice is formally more dynamic and it is necessary to reduce the degree of pain and discordance caused by inequality.

In the literature on systematic justice, judicial judgment is based on assessment of treatment by authorities or decision makers, and fellow action does not affect discourse. This suggests that only top-down collapse may cause an unfair view of the interaction (Pearson et al., 2000, 2001). Overall, organization theory supports the concept of undeveloped stimuli from above, that is, the individual from a higher position may lead to perception of inaccuracy of the interaction.