Income Equality in the United States? Think Again

The rich leads, but the middle class workers are left behind. If the minimum wage is consistent with inflation, it will reach $ 10.74 today. However, not only is the minimum wage stagnating, in general, the wages of the majority of people, including the middle class, have not kept pace with inflation. Therefore, in order to keep up with middle-class families without delay, we need to do some full-time jobs while reducing many things that make up American dreams, such as home ownership and retirement.

When considering how to reduce inequality in the United States, it is useful to divide the income into three parts: income from work, income from income and social welfare. From a mathematical point of view, inequality can be reduced only by balancing the income distribution of each bucket, moving income from nonqualified buckets to equalization buckets, or a combination of the two. With this framework in mind, the first thing I have to do is to revolutionize the national labor law in such a way as to encourage massive unionization of the labor market as a whole. Under the new labor system, all workers and employers in each division will collectively negotiate to determine the terms of employment in that department. By strengthening the workers' bargaining power and claiming collective wages, this reform will transfer some income from the owner to the workers and will also reduce the income distribution of the workers.

Income inequality is a sustained problem in the United States. It has a big influence on American American dreams. America's dream is that everyone is equal and have equal opportunities. The majority of what happens in America does not match American dreams, but women are not equal in the workplace. They are under the so-called "glass ceiling". Women are not promoted in the workplace and have not received the same pay as men. This has also led to the exploitation of low-income countries in high-income countries. Over the years, even the poorest countries have improved the living environment all around the world. Nonetheless, there is still a big difference between high-income countries and low-income countries. High-income countries are defined as countries with a very rich economic system, most of which have rather high incomes, but low-income countries are defined as low economic systems.

Some people think that the United States has done little to secure equal opportunities as income inequality in today's politics becomes more prominent. Today, many economists use low social and economic liquidity among generations as evidence of these trends. The second principle of philosopher John Rawls' justice points out that there is inequality as long as social inequality improves the overall happiness of the most wealthy members of society. However, it is said that the current income and opportunity inequality in the US violates Rawls' second principle of justice.