St. Thomas Aquinas I chose to write about St. Thomas Aquinas as I thought it was interesting to hear about his life. St. Thomas Aquinas's research still has a lot of knowledge. I also know that he is called a church doctor, I want to know more. I am interested in St. Thomas Aquinas. It is because he is misunderstood by his colleague and is also known as "dam cow". I want to know how people are misunderstood and become an outstanding philosopher. Thomas Aquinas: St. Thomas Aquinas, who lives between 1225 and 1274, is an important theologian whose work is still being read and cherished by believers around the world. Thanks to his Summa Theologica ("Theological Summary") and Summa to the Gentiles, he was honored as one of the greatest philosophers in the history of the Catholic Church. Summa Theologica was not complete, it became a basic text of the world of theology, and summarized the teachings of the church at that time. His work also stimulated a philosophical school about them: Thomos principle St. Thomas Aquinas I chose to write about St. Thomas Aquinas as I thought it was interesting to hear about his life. St. Thomas Aquinas's research still has a lot of knowledge. I also know that he is called a church doctor, I want to know more. I am interested in St. Thomas Aquinas. It is because he is misunderstood by his colleague and is also known as "dam cow". "I am blushing and I am very scared to show that I am not educated." St. Patrick was caught by Irish pirates when St. Patrick was 16 years old. They took him to Ireland and was sold as a slave in Dalida. There, his work is leaning to the sheep. St. Patrick 's master, Milchu was the high priest of Druid, a sect of heathen who dominated the religious influence on Ireland. St. Patrick believes that his slavery is a trial of his faith in God. In his six-year prison sentence, he had a problem deeply.

The third argument of Aquinas's third aikinas is that there must be something that must exist, it is likely to be God. He began to argue that not everything should exist because things are born every day and die. By stating this, we can conclude that there is nothing for a while if not everything exists. But he kept telling me that if there is nothing for a while, something can not come from something, so today there will be nothing as well. The third method of Aquinas defines two kinds of objects in the universe: a coincidence and a necessary existence. A coincidence existence can not exist without an unnecessary existence. Aquinas believes that the coincidence will eventually become the existence of all the existence of the coincidence. This is called a necessary existence, it is what we call God. The fourth argument is a very interesting observation about the quality of things. For example, one of the two buildings is more beautiful than the other. Therefore, for these two objects, one person has better beauty than the other. This is called quality level. From this Aquinas it is concluded that for a given quality, there must be a perfect standard for measuring all of these qualities. This perfect standard is God The important step in Aquinas 'Third Way' is not that there is a necessary conclusion, but this is only the first stage of discussion. The important step is to distinguish between "self" and the necessary "other". Aquinas believes that certain features of the universe such as celestial bodies must exist, so he will not be surprised to find assuming something that our current physics must exist . But celestial bodies, like other physical assumptions, can only be required in the sense of derivation. Their need is ultimately caused by something external. The most interesting and convincing form of cosmological argument is the "third way" of Aquinas, a coincidence argument. Its power comes from the use of both permanent and changing ways. Centuries ago, Epicuras expressed a problem of metaphysics: "There was something obviously there, something was not there." Therefore, it must not begin. Eternity must be recognized by everything, theologians, atheists, and agnostics. But the material world can not be this eternity. It is obviously a coincidence, it is fluid and it is rotten. How can we explain all the eternities of a corrupt entity? If all existing incidents / events are dependent on previous incidents / events etc, this will not give enough explanation.

St. Thomas Aquinas wrote: "From the time of Aristotle, nobody would have such a powerful influence on the world of thinking like St. Thomas Aquinas" Born in Italy in 1225 as a nobleman family , It was separated from Aristotle for 900 years. He accepted his first education at the Monte Cassino monastery and continued his trip to the University of Naples. In 1243 he joined the orders of the Dominican Abbey in Cologne. His most influential teacher widely writes about theological problems and state science in another Dominican, Albertus Magnez, especially in biology. According to the tradition of this age, St. Thomas Aquinas was sent to Monte Cassino Monastery where he was trained among the Benedictine monks at the age of five. At Wisdom 8:19, St. Thomas Aquinas is said to be a "witty child" and he "gets a good heart." In Monte Cassino, this strange little boy repeatedly raised the question "What is God?" St. Thomas Aquinas has completed primary education at the Benedictine Palace in Naples for the next 5 years. During those years, he studied Aristotle's work and later became an important starting point for St. Thomas Aquinas to explore his own philosophy. In the Benedictine palace, which is closely related to the University of Naples, Thomas began to be interested in the order of a more modern monastery. In particular, in stark contrast to the more traditional view and the protected lifestyle observed at the Monte Cassino monastery, he particularly likes those who emphasize spiritual service life. Today is the feast of St. Thomas Aquinas. A lot of articles about this great saint are written, and their contribution to the theology of the church is huge. In fact, among all theologians in the history of the church, St. Thomas Aquinas occupied the site of theological research. Pope Pius IX stole up all night to encourage all members of the church to study cuckoo and learn St. Thomas to understand and deepen the spiritual life: this doctrine and reverence It is not impossible to find the extent of doctor's excellence, and he is given the sun as a device; he brings the light of learning to the minds of people, and to inspire their souls and will Use virtue.

Thomas Aquinas - biographical paper Thomas Aquinas is known as the "Dominican philosopher and theologian" of his era. He is also an Italian self-government pastor of the Catholic Church and he is also known as "Doctor Angelics, Doctor Commune, Doctor University." Nonetheless, Thomas was born in 1224 in Aquinas, a small town in the southern part of Italy, born a nobleman. His parents, Count Aquino and Countess Teano, were Henry VI and Frederick II, and relatives of King Aragon, Castile and France. St. Thomas Aquinas I chose to write about St. Thomas Aquinas as I thought it was interesting to hear about his life. St. Thomas Aquinas's research still has a lot of knowledge. I also know that he is called a church doctor, I want to know more. I am interested in St. Thomas Aquinas. It is because he is misunderstood by his colleague and is also known as "dam cow". "I am blushing and I am very scared to show that I am not educated." St. Patrick was caught by Irish pirates when St. Patrick was 16 years old. They took him to Ireland and was sold as a slave in Dalida. There, his work is leaning to the sheep. St. Patrick 's master, Milchu was the high priest of Druid, a sect of heathen who dominated the religious influence on Ireland. St. Patrick believes that his slavery is a trial of his faith in God. In his six-year prison sentence, he had a problem deeply. St. Thomas Aquinas is known for his beliefs and reasoning. St. Thomas Aquinas was declared a saint in 1323, but died in 1274. At the same time, religion is still an important concept. Crusades are being carried out at the present time, and the promotion of Christianity is done everywhere. St. Thomas Aquinas is a pastor of the Catholic, and many churches and doctrines are still taught in the church. Catholic theology tells us that the world belongs to man in Genesis 1:28, "It is rich and diverse, fills the earth, suppresses it, crushes it, sea fish and sky birds, and on the earth To dominate any moving creatures. In his final notice on August 4, 1879, Aeterni Patris of Pope Leo XIII stated that theology of Thomas Aquinas is the final interpretation of Catholic doctrine. Therefore, he instructed the priests to use Thomas' doctrine as the basis of their theological position. Leo XIII also issued an order that all Catholic sacred schools and colleges must teach Thomas' doctrine Thomas did not talk about the topic, and the teacher said "to teach conclusions in harmony with his thoughts "In 1880, St. Thomas Aquinas was declared as a patron of all Catholic educational institutions.

Aquinas is a dilemma of war, killing some of the themes related to "law", "morality", and "politics". Aquinas summarizes the justification of war through three standards: war is done by a legitimate authority, and war is because the enemies have done something serious mistake and the purpose of war is to rectify the mistake It is only that. We also saw that Aquinas said it was reasonable if God tried to kill innocent people. Aquinas believes that one of the aims of streamlining the war is that legitimate authorities declare it. Christianity requires action. It insists on protecting innocent people. In the 13th century, St. Thomas Aquinas defended the defense of self defense, but also against the murder of innocent civilians. According to Daniel H. Weiss, a scholar at the University of Cambridge, "Akinas has no meaning if it caused a death of innocent people, whether deliberate or indirect." The Baptist church generally separates Catholics' views on shooting methods. Some people are politically opposed to gun control because they are Republicans, others are unreliable because they understand society that does not accept God. However, such objections are collapsing. A survey conducted by the National Gospel Association in August reported that one of the six evangelical leaders lived in families with guns, but nearly 55% had a stricter gun We supported the law. Thinkers have been thinking when war is morally justified, but the war theory of modern justice is only a revision of Thomas Aquinas theory of the 13th century. The morality of war depends on the reason for starting it and its behavior after it began. To do war, it must be fired by an army with legitimate authority Must fight for the correct intention Should be more likely to succeed Response is proportional and in the last resort It must be. The army must use a balanced force to distinguish between combatants and innocent civilians. Thomas Aquinas seems to prefer a dichotomy. On the other hand, he condemned the subject to kill the ruler, and in the following sentence, he backed the murder. Thomas Aquinas said that for Ayos he seemed to have killed the enemy, it is just, but not a tyranny ruler. He used another example of the Old Testament to solve this misunderstanding that even an apostate, people who killed Joza's Joas were executed. Their children were able to escape according to the law. Thomas Aquinas believes that it is certainly dangerous if the individual is attempting to die for rulers personally for the ruler for the community and its rulers (De Regimine Principum, caput vi)

Plato and Aquinas: Perspectives on education The field and concept of education is a broad and long-standing philosophical theme. For centuries, educated people and the public have regretted, argued, discussed and discussed their status in society. For decades, the value and demand of education has consumed the world of politics. To educate young people in the future you need a lot of energy and money. The school we know today is a relatively new concept within the time frame, but since the early days of humanity there has been a wider educational concept. The fable of the cave is one of the most famous passage in the history of Western philosophy. This is a short excerpt from the beginning of Volume 7 of the "Republic" of the book. Plato speaks of the parable in the context of education; it is about the essence of philosophy education that ultimately provides insight into Plato's educational outlook. Socrates is the protagonist of the Republic and Glaucon told Glaucon about the cave fable Glaucon is one of Plato 's brothers. Socrates, the seventh republic book, told Socrates that he was an interlocutor of him, imagining a group of prisoners trapped together as they were children of underground caves. Their hands, feet and neck are very tight and can not move. Only the rear wall of the cave can be seen in front of their eyes. Socrates said: Understanding Plato's first work, in the cave fable, Socrates formed an understanding between appearance and reality and the deception we used through the use of the shape. In the cave, the experience of prisoners is limited to the emotions their senses can convey to them, the shadows on the walls and their bonds; these emergence is the idea they have to form. When one of the prisoners begins to question his reality, he leaves the cave and walks into the sun. This prisoner The cave fable is an extended metaphor that provides insight into Plato's educational outlook. People in the cave portray us as society, and Plato suggests we are a prisoner in the cave just by shadows of things. However, the cave also represents the state of mankind, and we all begin with a cave. According to Ronald Nash, Plato believes Plato will use the cave to symbolize the physical world; things are not always the same world, there are more worlds people think. The outside world is expressed as thought, thought, and reality world - throughout the world of thought Plato is talking about unimportant forms, and these nonphysical forms represent higher, more accurate reality . In other words, "According to Plato, our senses only pursue the reality of shadows, shapes, or ideas of reality.This kind of reality is accurately identified only by rational feelings, not physical emotions it can".

Aquinas's third method for modeling summaries: The third method is Aquinas's most interesting to five arguments about the existence of God, even if it has invalid and erroneous assumptions It is an insight. However, with the help of somewhat weak modal logic, the third pass can certainly be transformed into an effective and reasonable argument. Even if not, most of the interruption to Aquinas' third road may be correct. For example, you do not need to assume that something does exist at some point, and you need to assume that a coincidence does not exist at some point. After studying St. Thomas' work, I have read five ways of reading this paper, St. Thomas Aquinas, Plato's lifetime, and most importantly St. Thomas Aquinas. This will help make this article easier. Aquinas is designed by God that you can not move anything on your own, what you can not bring on yourself, causing accidental creatures, completeness is included in God, the way of working in the universe is a smart designer It is. In addition, Aquinas was working on these principles throughout his life and was studying the work of other philosophers such as Aristotle, Plato, Parmenides, Platynus, Abichenna and Bloc, Ruth, then he We followed the principles outlined in 5 ways. Today is the feast of St. Thomas Aquinas. A lot of articles about this great saint are written, and their contribution to the theology of the church is huge. In fact, among all theologians in the history of the church, St. Thomas Aquinas occupied the site of theological research. Pope Pius IX stole up all night to encourage all members of the church to study cuckoo and learn St. Thomas to understand and deepen the spiritual life: this doctrine and reverence It is not impossible to find the extent of doctor's excellence, and he is given the sun as a device; he brings the light of learning to the minds of people, and to inspire their souls and will Use virtue. In January 1274, St. Thomas Aquinas began hiking to Lyon in France. In the process, he became sick at the Cistercian Monastery in Fossanova, Italy. The monk hopes that St. Thomas Aquinas will stay in the castle, but feeling that his death is approaching, Thomas stayed in the monastery rather and said, "If the Lord wants to take me away, instead of an amateur It is better to find a religionist.

In the history of the Western world, few people have had a great influence on Aquino · Thomas' human learning. He wrote dozens of different publications, including his famous SummaTheologiæ on various topics from angels to philosophy; from law to theology, Thomas established his permanent position in academic history . Thomas never wrote this subject directly, but it also influenced the moral field through his "happiness theory" which is part of his summary. Providing a summary of St. Thomas Aquinas 'existence and essence' should be seen as the most noble and most courageous pursuit seen as rude and reckless acts. "The star should be attached only by the fact that the sacred" Thomas Aquinas "and" Metaphysics "appear in one sentence, but this paper is a promising idea that the number of pages is very short (page 45) Each chapter has at least This makes it easier for people to review and review the entire article many times as it re-digests the material on average four times until some concepts fit within it. Combining traditional theological principles with modern philosophical thinking, the article by St. Thomas Aquinas touches medieval intellectuals and church authorities with problems and fighting in everyday life. Perhaps this was the reason why it was invincible in terms of the philosophical influence of the time, and then why they continued to be the cornerstone of contemporary thinking - from theologians, philosophers, critics, believers is there Today is the feast of St. Thomas Aquinas. A lot of articles about this great saint are written, and their contribution to the theology of the church is huge. In fact, among all theologians in the history of the church, St. Thomas Aquinas occupied the site of theological research. Pope Pius IX stole up all night to encourage all members of the church to study cuckoo and learn St. Thomas to understand and deepen the spiritual life: this doctrine and reverence It is not impossible to find the extent of doctor's excellence, and he is given the sun as a device; he brings the light of learning to the minds of people, and to inspire their souls and will Use virtue. After studying St. Thomas' work, I have read five ways of reading this paper, St. Thomas Aquinas, Plato's lifetime, and most importantly St. Thomas Aquinas. This will help make this article easier. Aquinas is designed by God that you can not move anything on your own, what you can not bring on yourself, causing accidental creatures, completeness is included in God, the way of working in the universe is a smart designer It is. In addition, Aquinas was working on these principles throughout his life and was studying the work of other philosophers such as Aristotle, Plato, Parmenides, Platynus, Abichenna and Bloc, Ruth, then he We followed the principles outlined in 5 ways.

1) Aquinas does not require everyone to have justified reasons to believe in their beliefs. He explained that there is human reason (God is the Trinity) and the reason of nature (the existence of God), which takes into account the truth of God. He discussed the limitations on human intelligence. He explained that facts can be deduced. When people can not understand, he believes they will have a better understanding of God. He explained that many people are unsuitable for achieving the highest level of knowledge, that is to understand God. St. Thomas Aquinas I chose to write about St. Thomas Aquinas as I thought it was interesting to hear about his life. St. Thomas Aquinas's research still has a lot of knowledge. I also know that he is called a church doctor, I want to know more. I am interested in St. Thomas Aquinas. It is because he is misunderstood by his colleague and is also known as "dam cow". "I am blushing and I am very scared to show that I am not educated." St. Patrick was caught by Irish pirates when St. Patrick was 16 years old. They took him to Ireland and was sold as a slave in Dalida. There, his work is leaning to the sheep. St. Patrick 's master, Milchu was the high priest of Druid, a sect of heathen who dominated the religious influence on Ireland. St. Patrick believes that his slavery is a trial of his faith in God. In his six-year prison sentence, he had a problem deeply. St. Thomas Aquinas is known for his beliefs and reasoning. St. Thomas Aquinas was declared a saint in 1323, but died in 1274. At the same time, religion is still an important concept. Crusades are being carried out at the present time, and the promotion of Christianity is done everywhere. St. Thomas Aquinas is a pastor of the Catholic, and many churches and doctrines are still taught in the church. - Starting from the demographics data in the neighborhood, it is clear that the population density is still higher than the overall average, although the population of the Madison region is lower than the overall average of Grand Rapids. This means that the community is crowded. When completing walking in the neighborhood, team members noticed that most houses start and end at a few feet away.

Everyone has a natural feeling of right and wrong. This meaning will lead people, culture and even the whole country to act in some way. Thomas Aquinas calls it a natural law of nature. God has established the laws of nature to make people more ethical. As a result of careful study, the natural law, including all the provisions of the law, turned out to be inconsistent with certain laws that exist today, especially abortion. "Natural law is determined by reason" (Aquinas IV, 94, 1) and it is given to everyone. Let's summarize his view as the theory of natural law developed by Thomas Aquinas is widely regarded as a representative of the position of modern times. In Summa theology, Aquinas says what is called law is (1) reasonable in the sense of leading action, (2) appointing common interests, (3) legislative legislation by appropriate things; (4) Formally promulgated (I - II, q. 90). The eternal domination of the world dominated by God 's heaven satisfies these criteria in the demo (q.91, a.1). However, the natural law is part of God's rationality that human wisdom can mainly be obtained. Do not confuse with the order of the physical or biological world. The law can be predicted only by the similarity with the order found in irrational entities (q.91, a.2 ad 3) The roots of the natural moral law are in the world of ancient Greece and Rome. In this article, Thomas Aquinas and moral law theory are emphasized. St. Thomas Aquinas (1224 - 1274) is an important philosopher and theologian of Christianity, his moral theory is absoluteism and moralism, that it focuses on the ethics of action I mean it. In his work that summarized theology, Aquinas states that God created natural law as a moral code that exists within the purpose of nature. "The law is only a common reason for the common interests of people. By St. Thomas Aquinas (1225-1274), the natural law was instantly integrated systematically into the Christian theological tradition led by Western Europe. His position is often considered a paradigm because Aquinas has a very important influence on the tradition of natural law - a reaction that limits both tradition and excessive theology. Aquinas began discussing the legal nature of Summa Theologiae and defines the law as "rules of behavior and metrics, ie people are induced or limited" (Summa, Part 2, Part 1, Question 90, answer 1). This is something other than a practical reason indication (2.1.91.1) to manage the complete community rulers. Appropriate law is always aimed at general good, is in compliance with Aristotle, the purpose of human life, the common interest is happiness (2.1.90.2). Then Aquinas differentiates between the four laws.

The purpose of this book is to summarize and present the teachings and thoughts of Thomas Aquinas (1224-26 to 1274), the Dominican priest, one of the greatest philosophers in the West, and Christian theologians. Aquinas' books are always related to his philosophy and theology, but Aquinas himself did not do such an arbitrary division, and this book allows him to see it as a whole. Let's connect it to the writers of early and late. The authors point out that all the main conclusions of Aquinas may be included in the first one. Thomas S. Hibbs is an eminent professor of Dean and Ethics and Culture at the Baylor College Hall of Fame. He published many books about Thomas Aquinas and art and movies. He also wrote articles about the Wall Street Journal, New Atlantis, Chronicles of Higher Education, and The National Review Online. 19 Roger Scruton dedicated to the center of death: Wagner's Tristan and Isolde (New York: Oxford University Press, 2003), 7. Roger Scruton is a major conservative in the UK and the United States. His book celebrates Wagner's vision unconditionally and proves that modern conservatives are tempted by a romantic vision. Of course, Thomistic project (Thomas Aquinas philosophy and theological thinking). A little. To some extent, please select the results of previous actions that are not considered to have a will. As modern thought has views of two competing wills, this is complicated, one of which is not a modern opinion but a minority view, but it has a convenient function that does not destroy itself. I talked about it. The choice of Thomistic plan is based on knowledge of two conflicting products. It is considered the ultimate purpose, a means of happiness, and we can not choose to oppose in a way that is not self-refusing. Everything we do is for happiness. "But Tom, I can do something that deliberately makes me unhappy!" Yes, but that's because you think it better for you to be unhappy. Plato and Aristotle did a good job. Based on the idea of ​​Aristotle, the throne of the 13th century theologian Thomas Aquinas said that all living beings are eager to something good, or their "end-to-end". Regardless of whether they recognize it or not, all living things are moving toward their intended purpose. Their understanding of the principles or principles of internal motivation. "Directionality" of Thomas Aquinas occupies the majority of the world. Any discussion on the human soul requires careful consideration as to what it means to go to the items we want. To discuss it, we need to focus on communities, not individuals. Brown thinks that relationship is one of the most important excuses worthy to maintain "soul".

Thomas Aquinas is essentially confirmed in the teachings of the Catholic Church. Born in Italy's aristocratic family in 1225, Thomas is one of at least nine children. He started his education at Monte Cassino Monastery and was a highly educated person who went to Naples University thereafter. Thomas firmly believes in God and is keen to prove the reality of God. Throughout his life, Aquinas has produced a lot of work on this subject, and the most famous are Summa contra Gentiles and Summa Theologica. As a great theologian and philosopher, he left a legacy to us. I have found Akinas' theory that the existence of God is very interesting. It is easy to understand and logical. Summa Theologiae is one of the best works of Aquinas. St. Thomas is also a writer, writing a lot of comments on Aristotle and other theological and philosophical themes. Aquinas divides his argument into five ways to prove the existence of God. The first method is sports debate. There are many things that are changing, but not all of a sudden starts. St. Thomas Aquinas recognizes that some people doubt the existence of God because they do not admit or explain the existence of God by logic. His first two methods are based on logic and two nature observations and prove that God exists for those who alone can not accept or believe. The first way Aquinas is based on sports. He called it the most obvious way. The first argument from the discussion of movement tries to prove that the existence of God is the first unwavering pioneer. Well, as a problem of sensory observation, some things in the world are dynamic. Aquinas said that whatever the sport is, it is touched something else. Then Aquinas defines the type of movement as a reduction from something that is actually potential and there is nothing that can make this movement the same with the potential reality of the first object Is called. Outside

Introduction Critics have long considered that philosophy and religion can not be integrated. In their argument, they discovered that many religious groups are in conflict with the soundness claimed in the field of philosophy. For those trying to adjust these two areas, they encounter complex questions about credibility and justification. However, the work of ancient (medieval philosopher) and religious thinkers and scholars also faced difficulties, but the two outstanding works are trusted by most scholars and modern philosophers, if not all It was. Among the important philosophers related to empiricism are Aristotle, Thomas Aquinas, Francis Bacon, Thomas Hobbes, John Rock, George Berkeley, David Hume, and John Stuart Mill. Recently, positivists such as Mach, Vienna Circle, logical positivists, and most followers of analysis philosophy are empiricists. The central concept of scientific and scientific methods is that all evidence must be based on observable evidence by sensory or sensory extension empirically or empirically. It is distinguished from philosophical usage of empirical philosophy by using adjective "experience" or adverb "experience". Experience refers to the use of working assumptions used in combination with natural science and social science and can be tested or experimentally tested. In this sense, the scientific statement is the subject of our experience and observation and is derived from them. Aquinas and Aristotle. Thomas Aquinas inherited Augustine's theological tradition, including his definition of evil and Aristotle's philosophy - theological tradition. When Akinas obtained a doctorate in Paris University in 1256, the Department of Philosophy made Aristotle the "philosophus" (Philosophus). Like the Apostle Paul is the authority of the Bible, Aristotle is also the authority of philosophy. Thoughters were still reading the texts of Plato, Aristotle analyzed the discussion and provided a clear logical way to propose important new ideas in physics, metaphysics, knowledge theory, ethics, and spiritual philosophy They offered to them. Aquinas tried to combine the new Aristotelian with the teachings of traditional Stoic and Neo-Platonic. Even in the era of military and geopolitical confusion, like Augustine, Aquinas is basically optimistic. For him like Augustine, the human body is not to be despised.

Have you ever walked 9000 miles so far? Thomas Aquinas performed very well when traveling in Europe. Thomas has a complex career with a complex childhood. Thomas Aquinas has many achievements / achievements. Without St. Thomas Aquinas, history is completely different. If there is no common law without common law, the US government will not be the same. Aquinas was born around 1225 in Roccasta and I am in Italy today. He was born after Francisco 's death in Assisi. St. Thomas Aquinas I chose to write about St. Thomas Aquinas as I thought it was interesting to hear about his life. St. Thomas Aquinas's research still has a lot of knowledge. I also know that he is called a church doctor, I want to know more. I am interested in St. Thomas Aquinas. It is because he is misunderstood by his colleague and is also known as "dam cow". "I am blushing and I am very scared to show that I am not educated." St. Patrick was caught by Irish pirates when St. Patrick was 16 years old. They took him to Ireland and was sold as a slave in Dalida. There, his work is leaning to the sheep. St. Patrick 's master, Milchu was the high priest of Druid, a sect of heathen who dominated the religious influence on Ireland. St. Patrick believes that his slavery is a trial of his faith in God. In his six-year prison sentence, he had a problem deeply. St. Thomas Aquinas is known for his beliefs and reasoning. St. Thomas Aquinas was declared a saint in 1323, but died in 1274. At the same time, religion is still an important concept. Crusades are being carried out at the present time, and the promotion of Christianity is done everywhere. St. Thomas Aquinas is a pastor of the Catholic, and many churches and doctrines are still taught in the church. - Starting from the demographics data in the neighborhood, it is clear that the population density is still higher than the overall average, although the population of the Madison region is lower than the overall average of Grand Rapids. This means that the community is crowded. When completing walking in the neighborhood, team members noticed that most houses start and end at a few feet away. Thomas Aquinas once entered the Pope 's office, the Pope sat on the table, counted the money, and accumulated it among various denominations. He said to Aquinas, "Look, Thomas, the church can not tell it any longer", I have neither silver nor money. "Thomas replied," Take your bed anyway and walk. "Oh, we are very good at streamlining the gap. "Poor people are poor because they are lazy, as if this is their hungry children, or" Do not donate to the poor who may be begging.

Aquinas prove the fifth way of existence of God. A simple summary of Akinas' fifth way to prove the existence of God. Mr. Hume quotes an objection to answer this argument in design. What is the answer to John Hick's argument from the evil of Hume? Is he correct? Thomas Aquinas proposed five different logical arguments to prove that God uses scientific assumptions and basic assumptions of nature to exist. In the fifth of his famous "five ways" Aquinas proposed the hypothesis that all natural bodies will go to the end. The fifth method of Aquinus to prove the existence of God by showing how God leads all the natural things. The fifth method explains how we observe natural body behavior. All actions directed towards the purpose are under the guidance of knowledge-based or something with knowledge. But many natural people lack knowledge. "Therefore there are some wise beings and all the natural things are directed towards their end, this is what we call God." Using the analogy of Oak and Perry's watchmaker By, I will prove that the existence of God is genuine. Whether the fifth method of Aquinas prove the existence of God is decisive. It is clear that everything in the universe must have a designer, whether it is an oak or a clock manufacturer's analogy. To Aquinas it is logically assumed that inanimate objects like planets may never be organized and there is clearly a lack of wisdom to do so. They are commanded by wise men, it is God Thomas Aquinas presented five different logical arguments to prove that God used scientific assumptions and basic assumptions of nature to exist. In the fifth of his famous "five ways" Aquinas proposed the hypothesis that all natural bodies will go to the end. Since the object is constantly moving in the best way to accomplish this, the path must be designed. Of course, God is the ultimate designer of the universe. The next natural assumption is that the universe and all life are constantly moving in the best way towards this goal, as God created the universe, including humans, for purpose or purpose. The theory of scopos is called "discussion from design" or "discussion from fine adjustment". This argument is usually beneficial to the individual gods that the writer uses to prove this. It began in the fifth street of St. Thomas Aquinas and was developed throughout history. One of the most famous developments of this idea is William Paley's analogy called "analogy of clock artisans", after which F.R's thoughts continue. The tenant named it "human principle". Aquinas is a theologian of the main work published in the latter half of the 13th century, the most famous of which is "Summa Theologica". Of the approximately 3,500 pages of books, the most famous one so far is Aquinas's "five ways" with only 2 pages. Scopos theory is the fifth road of Aquinas and its layout is as follows.

Thomas Aquinas was an influential Dominican monk, theologian, and philosopher, who lived between the years 1225 and 1274. Aquinas was born in a small town called Roccasecca in Italy. As Aquinas follows the academic tradition, he gains knowledge through dialectical reasoning. After studying Aristotle and neoplastic tonicity, Aquinas adopted his own theology. The theology of Christ in Aquinas is compatibility of faith and reason in proveing ​​the existence of God. Aquinas wrote several works, especially his theology, and he wrote Summa Theologica and Summa contra Gentiles. During the 14th century, scholars' energy was increasingly absorbed in theological arguments between the Franciscan society in accordance with the tradition of Saint Augustine and the Dominican people following Thomas Aquinas. Duns Scotus criticized the Dominican people and developed a new form of academicism, the Scotsmanship. It dominates the will to intelligence. At Christian university, we have lost the interest in Aberisim, the development of over formalism, the development of artificial terms, the expansion of discussions on subtle aspects of theological problems, and the creativity of academic philosophy. Attempts to "simplify" the critic of William Occam and the academic philosophy of Durandus will only advance the discussion further. Thomas Aquinas was an influential Dominican monk, theologian, and philosopher, who lived between the years 1225 and 1274. Aquinas was born in a small town called Roccasecca in Italy. As Aquinas follows the academic tradition, he gains knowledge through dialectical reasoning. After studying Aristotle and neoplastic tonicity, Aquinas adopted his own theology. The theology of Christ in Aquinas is compatibility of faith and reason in proveing ​​the existence of God. - Title: Rainbow 6 Author: Tom Clancy # Pages: 740 People: John Clark is a former seal seal, Rainbow Six Commander Alistar Stanley where the other two roles are being executed, and Captain of the second team And there are more Mingo (D) Chavez. Clark's wife is sand, her daughter Pazie and Din get married, Patzie is pregnant. Another hero is Dimitriy Arkadeyevich Popov; he is a former KGB agent, now "Special Advisor".

Locke, Aristotle, and Aquinas are top of history, and many philosophers outline their views on perfect society. However, until recently, few people advanced into religiously tolerant waters. One of the philosophers is John Roc. Rock was written in the second half of the 17th century and claimed to completely separate the church from the state. He insists on unprecedented tolerance to all believers. Rock's view extends across Europe and the Americas, but it is not unanimously approved. Many of the early philosophers opposed Locke. Two such philosophers are Aristotle and Thomas Aquinas. Aquinas did not agree in three major areas: mandatory Imagine what you are taught by the best master of ideas about this planet. It is dead, but it still exists in a wonderful book. If you can imagine such a place, you will imagine wonderful books and liberal arts education. Some of the world's most famous discoveries are made through university research. Due to the invention of telegraph, discovery of AIDS, the origin of the Internet, and the latest advances in stem cell research, our national universities are the center of knowledge and discovery and 56% of our basic research is done at university I will. Aquinas and Aristotle. Thomas Aquinas inherited Augustine's theological tradition, including his definition of evil and Aristotle's philosophy - theological tradition. When Akinas obtained a doctorate in Paris University in 1256, the Department of Philosophy made Aristotle the "philosophus" (Philosophus). Like the Apostle Paul is the authority of the Bible, Aristotle is also the authority of philosophy. Thoughters were still reading the texts of Plato, Aristotle analyzed the discussion and provided a clear logical way to propose important new ideas in physics, metaphysics, knowledge theory, ethics, and spiritual philosophy They offered to them. Aquinas tried to combine the new Aristotelian with the teachings of traditional Stoic and Neo-Platonic. Even in the era of military and geopolitical confusion, like Augustine, Aquinas is basically optimistic. For him like Augustine, the human body is not to be despised.

In this article, we will look at Thomas Aquinas's source of ultimate happiness and discussion of happiness in Summa Contra Gentiles chapters 27 to 37. I will discuss various happiness first described by Gentiles Aquinas and how they meet the definition of happiness at first glance. Then I will see why he denies these pursuits as a source of true happiness. Second, even if it is impossible to achieve full understanding in this world, I note that God's understanding of Aquinas is the ultimate source of human happiness. Providing a summary of St. Thomas Aquinas 'existence and essence' should be seen as the most noble and most courageous pursuit seen as rude and reckless acts. "The star should be attached only by the fact that the sacred" Thomas Aquinas "and" Metaphysics "appear in one sentence, but this paper is a promising idea that the number of pages is very short (page 45) Each chapter has at least This makes it easier for people to review and review the entire article many times as it re-digests the material on average four times until some concepts fit within it. In this article, we will look at Thomas Aquinas's source of ultimate happiness and discussion of happiness in Summa Contra Gentiles chapters 27 to 37. I will discuss various happiness first described by Gentiles Aquinas and how they meet the definition of happiness at first glance. Then I will see why he denies these pursuits as a source of true happiness. According to Mr. Saint Augustine and Thomas Aquinas, the last outcome of this man is happy. Place, Aquinas agrees with Aristotle. Happiness can be achieved not only by the result of reasoning behavior but also by good reason for pursuit of behavior like habits. It is a virtue. Conversely, habits and actions that usually lead to happiness are caused by Aquinus according to the law. It is a natural law and a sacred law. In other words, these laws are based on the first cause or are caused by Aquinas.

When I was a child raised in Jamaica, I often hear that people are referring to what they do as a profession. Always work without receiving formal education such as plumbing and agriculture, these work is very pleasant for these people. For example, woodworking is a field that people choose to do for his affection for it. However, these people earn their living through these professions. My father is a carpenter, yes, he supports us by doing whatever I want, building a house. Is my father lucky enough to find the skill he likes and rewards for? In 1974, I interviewed the work of theological education in Notre Dame. Things were going well until the professor of the recruitment committee asked me what I wanted to teach. I said I would like to teach Aristotle and Aquinas seminars. Answer quickly: "Why does Protestant want to teach a course on Catholic thinkers?" I replied that Christianity did not start in the 15th century. I think that Aquinas is not a property of a Roman Catholic, but a resource for all Christians, whether Protestant or Catholic. The purpose of this book is to give an overview of the teachings and thoughts of Thomas Aquinas (1224-26 to 1274), the Dominican Friars, one of the greatest philosophers in the West and Christian theologians. Aquinas' books are always related to his philosophy and theology; however, Aquinas himself did not do such an arbitrary division, and this book can see as a whole introducing him mostly I will. Let's connect it to the author thinking about it early and late. The authors point out that all the main conclusions of Aquinas are in the first one. Thomas Aquinas was an influential Dominican monk, theologian, and philosopher, who lived between the years 1225 and 1274. Aquinas was born in a small town called Roccasecca in Italy. As Aquinas follows the academic tradition, he gains knowledge through dialectical reasoning. After studying Aristotle and neoplastic tonicity, Aquinas adopted his own theology. The theology of Christ in Aquinas is compatibility of faith and reason in proveing ​​the existence of God. - Title: Rainbow 6 Author: Tom Clancy # Pages: 740 People: John Clark is a former seal seal, Rainbow Six Commander Alistar Stanley where the other two roles are being executed, and Captain of the second team And there are more Mingo (D) Chavez. Clark's wife is sand, her daughter Pazie and Din get married, Patzie is pregnant. Another hero is Dimitriy Arkadeyevich Popov; he is a former KGB agent, now "Special Advisor". 1225 Thomas Aquinas, the most influential scholar theologian, teaches at the University of Paris. The ultimate truth can only be revealed by studying the Bible's revelation, but Aquinas believes in thinking about God through natural order. His two biggest works are Summa contra Gentiles and Summa Theologica, both of which try to find Christian faith in rational principles. His philosophy emphasizes human involvement, the lifetime of the order of things, and individual involvement in personal amortization.

"Thomas Aquinas: the founder of academic theologians and the integration of medieval Christianity" restored understanding of thought and education. Aquinas was certainly an intellectual in his era, understanding the meaning of education, meaning it became a teacher. His beliefs and studies show that he is not only a great theologian but also a person who understands the nature of education and reforms it to make it wiser for others . Thomasicism or Aquinas' philosophy explains how people think about two different ways from a single method; one is supernatural and the other is natural. The work of Thomas Aquinas was made as an active teacher in his 20 years (1252 - 1273). These are all Latin, including several large theological papers, as well as recorded discussions on theological and philosophical issues ("controversial problems" and "Quodlibetal problems"), and several Bible book reviews on Aristotle It is. Comments on 12 papers, and comments on Boethius, pseudo Dionysius and anonymous Liber de Causis. There are about 40 miscellaneous articles, letters, sermons, and short papers on philosophical themes and religious themes. The philosophical view of Aquinas can be found in almost all of his books (hence the "book of the author" is read like a philosopher's argument), but there are also more obvious papers for philosophers. These are described in detail at the end of this entry. St. Thomas Aquinas I chose to write about St. Thomas Aquinas as I thought it was interesting to hear about his life. St. Thomas Aquinas's research still has a lot of knowledge. I also know that he is called a church doctor, I want to know more. I am interested in St. Thomas Aquinas. It is because he is misunderstood by his colleague and is also known as "dam cow". "I am blushing and I am very scared to show that I am not educated." St. Patrick was caught by Irish pirates when St. Patrick was 16 years old. They took him to Ireland and was sold as a slave in Dalida. There, his work is leaning to the sheep. St. Patrick 's master, Milchu was the high priest of Druid, a sect of heathen who dominated the religious influence on Ireland. St. Patrick believes that his slavery is a trial of his faith in God. In his six-year prison sentence, he had a problem deeply.

Aquinas's cosmology shows that the cosmological argument of God's presence by Thomas Aquinas is also called the third. This is three of five ways of Akinas masterpiece "The Summa" (5 ways). There are five ways: indifferent movers, free believers, possibility and necessity, kindness, truth and nobility, and the last way of object theory. The first three "methods" are various variants of cosmological argument. Discussion of cosmology is formed around the distinction between inevitable existence and accidental existence. Among the three arguments to prove the existence of God, I think that Akinus's cosmological argument is based on empirical evidence, and that simple and practical attention is accepted in both history and science I will find out what was proved. Aquinas initially stated that the existence of God is not a trivial preliminary question, so we need to test the influence of God, and even though we can not completely understand the essence of God, the existence of God Can be observed to prove. - Executive summary This report covers the evaluation of myIT Labs software. It provides insight into why the software does not meet the expectations of intended use of Microsoft Word and Excel. This is based on a weekly test Cosmological argument refers to the process of controversy from the "world" to the universe - the existence of God. Discussion of cosmology basically uses five methods for St. Thomas Aquinas to exist in God. First, the cosmological argument says there is a reason to decide each event, and it is important that everything starts. Therefore, there must be a first reason to not need the cause before called God. Mr. Leibniz also said there is enough reason to explain that there must be a existence that can positively exist, raising the question "why something is in place of something" To argue. Philosopher Samuel Clark proposed a contemporary cosmological argument slightly different from Akinas' famous cosmological argument. But like Aquinas, Clark 's premise is that every creature we encounter must have a reason. Contrary to Aquinas, Clark distinguishes between coincident existence and necessary existence. The contrast that he painted is this: if the existence of a person results from a cause, it depends; otherwise it is independent. Our experience shows that there is a chain dependent on existence, but as Clark noted, they are (1) caused by the necessary existence, or (2) not as an aspect of continuation that does not exist There is no doubt. Starting with a need / independent presence, or part of an infinite series, it runs out the possible logical origin of any life continuation

Among the three arguments to prove the existence of God, I think that Akinus's cosmological argument is based on empirical evidence, and that simple and practical attention is accepted in both history and science I will find out what was proved. Aquinas initially stated that the existence of God is not a trivial preliminary question, so we need to test the influence of God, and even though we can not completely understand the essence of God, the existence of God Can be observed to prove. Aquinas provides five ways to prove transcendence through empirical evidence. Philosophers call this a first element theory or cosmological theory Initial supporters of this reasoning include Plato, Aristotle, St. Thomas Aquinas. The premise is that each event must have a reason, for this reason, there must be reasons one after another. Assuming that this kind of return has no end, this series of events becomes infinite. However, an infinite number of causes and events are meaningless (causality cycle can not exist, it is not an infinite causal chain). There is something something - the first reason - can not be solved on its own. This requires some kind of "unconditional" or "supreme" - a philosopher calls it a god The grounds for the discussion of Karam is a practical infinite impossibility, unlike other cosmological arguments of Thomas Aquinas, the impossibility of fundamental ordered infinite regression and the use of Leibniz and Clark . Principle of good reason. "...... There is a reason to cross the universe and to make the universe ubiquitous.Our whole universe exists by something that transcends it and it is greater than it.It is the most important so one is not a secret" God " And said the doctrines are creators of the heavens and the earth. " Thomas Aquinas (1224 - 1274) has a cosmological argument called "kinetic theory". He said that sports can not move oneself but must move. The promoter can not return to indefinitely. Therefore, there should be a motive to move. This indifferent mover is a god. The advantage of cosmological argument is its simplicity and ease of understanding. In other words, there are countless reasons for the incident. Some arguments about God's existence require more thought and training on terms and concepts, but this argument is basic and direct. In addition, asserting objects does not exist, so it must be reasonably logical.

Aristotle and Aquinas are one of political theorists, and discussions on the rule of law are fierce. From the beginning of political philosophy to enlightenment, there are various opinions on how the rule of law should be. In particular, the two thinkers - Aristotle and St Thomas Aquinas - are probably the most influential people. On the surface, they claim that the rule of law plays an important role in society. However, as a result of thorough analysis, people have found Aristotle's view in quite contrast to Aquinas' view. In this article, first, to clarify the difference between Aristotle and Aquinas, we outline Aristotle's argument that supports and opposes the rule. Aquinas and Aristotle. Thomas Aquinas inherited Augustine's theological tradition, including his definition of evil and Aristotle's philosophy - theological tradition. When Akinas obtained a doctorate in Paris University in 1256, the Department of Philosophy made Aristotle the "philosophus" (Philosophus). Like the Apostle Paul is the authority of the Bible, Aristotle is also the authority of philosophy. Thoughters were still reading the texts of Plato, Aristotle analyzed the discussion and provided a clear logical way to propose important new ideas in physics, metaphysics, knowledge theory, ethics, and spiritual philosophy They offered to them. Aquinas tried to combine the new Aristotelian with the teachings of traditional Stoic and Neo-Platonic. Even in the era of military and geopolitical confusion, like Augustine, Aquinas is basically optimistic. For him like Augustine, the human body is not to be despised. Thomas Aquinas learned most of his direction from Aristotle's virtue to understanding, but Aquinas has some challenges (or advantages) that Aristotle does not have. Aquinas makes Augustin an important predecessor, but in Augustine we face a special thinker. It was mature intellectually and psychologically before the experience of conversion. This experience has greatly changed his understanding of good and evil in human life. Aquinas recognizes the importance of children's moral education, but our young role does not necessarily play a role in us. In the opinion of Aquinas, the cause of nurturing a good character lasts throughout his lifetime and will never be completed perfectly. In addition to these, Aquanas was drawn on the wider canvas of Biarritz

The story of the revival of Aristotle in recent academic moral philosophy is well known. By the middle of the 20th century the ethics theory was dominated by Utilitarian and Cantist versions. Although focus is on attention, results, rules, intention, obligation, rights, the central issue of Aristotle's method - virtue, happiness, contemplation, summation - are just historical curiosity. Since then, thanks to an insightful writer influenced by Aristotle and Aquinas, Aristotle's tradition has been evaluated as at least a viable alternative to moral philosophy, if not the previous authority. However, an interesting thing happened on the way back to Aristotle. As the current headline "Medical ethics" implies, focus is always on the concept of perfect habits, Aristotle's own metaphysical framework is relatively underestimated. Especially lacking is virtue that virtue positions moral actors as gods. Elizabeth Anscom, who usually follows the revitalization of modern Aristotle, actually uses virtue instead of the more essential theological concept. Moral law means legislators, but virtue, Anskom suggests not. Alasdair MacIntyre's "Virtue behind" is an epoch-making text in the revival of virtue theory. It also utilizes all available knowledge resources - political and social theory, literary criticism, history and psychology, even post - modern attention to the story - in addition to traditional metaphysics and theology Ignoring the role of God in Aristotle's moral philosophy can be understood as part of an easy-to-understand concession to the modern rhetorical situation, but can not be ignored for a long time From the perspective of Aristotle, morality Reflection is inevitable. The earth has a theological direction. For Aristotle and Aquinas, God is the subject and meditation mode, is also the best way of life, God is also the author or designer of perfect humanity virtue, Aristotle is serious, whether happiness comes from God , And whether it is possible to become a friend of God The role of these problems in Aristotle, the moral thought of Aquinas, and the continuation of relevance to modern moral and political thinking are the focus of these volumes. Virtue's End gathered 9 essential articles on the nature and relationship of the theological commitment of moral theory, practical reasons, and the metaphysical framework of Aristotle's ethics. In the question of discussion: What does it mean to know benefits? What is the basis of the moral law? What role does the concept of God or God play in real reasoning and human behavior? What is the relationship between Moral of Aquinas and Aristotle? How to build friendship with God? Contributors include: Kevin Flannery, Christopher Kaczor, Antonio Donato, Anthony J. Lisska, Fulvio di Blasi, Giacomo Samek Lodovici, Robert A. Gahl, Marie I. George, Daniel McInerny Through this article, the objective framework covering Aquinas' moral philosophy is already clear. Indeed, Akinus believes that Aristotle's eudaimonism is suitable for his own theological purpose. Aquinas not only agrees that humans seek their own happiness, but also agrees that virtue is necessary to achieve happiness. However, Aquinas has important differences between the depiction of the ultimate happiness and Aristotle. Aquinas believes that the integrity of morality is synonymous with our ultimate goal, but his structure is combined with God's supernatural or supernatural combination (ST IIa II ae 17.7; 23.3; 23.7) . Along the teachings of Christianity, he also acknowledged that we can not achieve victory through our own calm efforts. Aquinas' assertions on this claim are as follows. Happiness that we often tackle are two kinds of imperfect happiness and perfect happiness. Incomplete happiness is the state we achieve through the natural human ability. Aristotle's work "Nicekema Ethics" consists of many books on Aristotle's ethics - better life ethics. The first book reveals the relationship between Aristotle's be

Five proofs of St. Thomas Aquinas on the existence of God's scientific reasoning made incredible the human beings in all sectors of knowledge. For St. Thomas Aquinas, his passion includes scientific reasoning about God. The existence, simplicity, and will of God are only a part of the theme that Aquinas explored at Summa Theologica. Through discussions involving these specific themes, Aquinas formed the argument that God has the power to be present and be willing to know that it exists and exists in this particular world. Thomas Aquinas proposed the integration of medieval philosophy and his work "Summa Theologica" proved this In the first part, Aquinas provided five evidence for the existence of God. He discusses the reality and intangibility of God as an indifferent promoter and explains how God acts through his thoughts and wishes In this article, we will first briefly explain the five evidences of the existence of God by St. Thomas Aquinas. Then I discussed the relevance of these five evidences that existed in modern times. Finally, I will conclude. The first and most fundamental way given by Aquinas is proof from a movement perspective. Changes that have occurred on the planet are forward-looking and experiential. Now, everything in motion is touched something; indeed, there is no change unless it is changed to something possibly. Besides, something moves according to what actually exists; to change yourself is simply to bring the possibilities from reality to reality. Finally, in this article we briefly explain the five evidences of St. Thomas Aquinas on the existence of God. Then I discussed how to see his evidence in modern society and whether his arguments still apply to modern society. In fact, his evidence is not directed to the transformation of atheists, so it needs to be developed in more detail and deeply. His argument seems to provide a good basis for further development into modern appropriate discussion. St. Thomas is a theologian, Christian, so he firmly believes in God. His belief in God can promote the development of his argument and prevent him from entering very detailed details. In addition, during the Aquinas times, many people believed in God and it was different from the present age. Nevertheless, the contemporary disciples of Aquinas can explain the recent theory and explain the five evidences of Aquinas in a more obvious way, defending Aquinas' claim (Copleston, 2003, 343 ).

Protinus, Augustine, Aquinas, K. Waitira and self Self Abstract: Today, the relationship between "people" and "myself" is recognized in many respects, but it is not necessarily analyzed. The necessity of linking it with the human reality has brought to the study of philosophical anthropology of four thinkers of ancient, medieval and late modern times. It seems that the role of "I" in humans depends on greater objectivity. Aurelius Augustine - more commonly known as St. Augustine - is Neoplatonic Protono and Aquinas, but in the blood of Jews - Christians, Sir Thomas Aquinas is more common. His philosophy is to combine the philosophical tradition of Greece and the Jewish-Christian religious tradition of the Roman Catholic Church. Augustine recognizes the difference between the body and mind. In Augustine's opinion, God is the ultimate source, "the origin of all of us", it is considered to be "existence, kindness, equal to the truth". (Stanford 2000). The god of Augustine is an immutable god and ties everything down and down through a commanded rational command Classicism is related to the tradition of writers such as Plato, Aristotle, Prototino, Augustine, St. Anthony, Maimonides, Averoy, Thomas Aquinas. Contrary to this tradition, today there are philosophers such as Alvin Plantinga (refusing sacred simplicity), Richard Swinburne (sacred simplicity and refusal of eternity). Philosophers like David Bentley Hart recently defended classicism itself. But there is a considerable difference in the eternal nature of holiness. Plato, Protino, Augustine, Poitius, Anselm, and Akinas believe that everyone transcends time as God does the universe. From an eternity point of view, these thinkers say that a series of time events are all faithful to God, so that his causal influence can be obtained through a single eternal act at any point in history I will. On the other hand, Aristotle may consider God's eternity as an eternal lifetime, and Duns Scotts criticizes Aquinas's non-temporal view strictly because time itself is dynamic and impossible Coexist with God as a whole

As a devout Christian, Thomas Aquinas naturally believes in God, but he wants to prove the existence of God to those who can not accept things by faith alone. As a result, he presented five proofs that claimed to prove the existence of God. All evidence always begins, there is a starting point, Aquinas insists that it must be God. That is the beginning of everyone. The first evidence does not adequately explain that Aquinas claims that God exists and that the fifth evidence can be used alone to prove the existence of God. I have found Akinas' theory that the existence of God is very interesting. It is easy to understand and logical. Summa Theologiae is one of the best works of Aquinas. St. Thomas is also a writer, writing a lot of comments on Aristotle and other theological and philosophical themes. Aquinas divides his argument into five ways to prove the existence of God. The first method is sports debate. There are many things that are changing, but not all of a sudden starts. St. Thomas Aquinas has five ways to prove the existence of God. The first is to prove the existence of God through the idea of ​​exercise. By studying Aristotle's work, he concluded that moving objects had to be moved by other things and powers. Therefore, he said that there must be an "indifferent propeller" (God) who first puts things in action. Some are touched by another, some are considered animals, others are considered passive. The fact that moving from one person to another does not exclude the fact that it may be touched by others, and the other fact is that it is a trigger. Among medieval scholars, Thomas Aquinas got a famous unfair axiom from Athenedo (Deanima, 3.8): "Nothing of the intelligence is the beginning of the meaning. Aquinas said that the existence of God is a reasoning of sensory data (De Anima, 3.8) He uses a variant of Aristotle's "active intelligence" concept, which is interpreted as the ability of him to derive a general meaning from certain empirical data . In response to the most famous "continental rationalism" by John Locke (1632-1704), he proposed a new one in the "Human Understanding Papers" (1689) in the latter half of the 17th century. The only knowledge that human beings can have is posteriority, that is, based on experience, a way of thinking about the impact

Intelligence can potentially recognize all bodies. Therefore, it must be physical or it can be limited by substance. Because intelligence acts independently without a body, things will exist in the same way that they act, so intelligence has to rely on to survive. Therefore, Aquinas insists that the soul itself is not healthy. Aquinas believes that intelligence needs illusions to create thinking. These illusions are created by matter. St. Thomas Aquinas is an academic tradition, some theories are integrated into the doctrine of Roman Catholicism, and the human soul is in the form of entities. Controversy Quaestiones · De Anima, or the Roman Institute of Dominican Medal Shengsabina held between 1265 and 1266 grade St. Thomas · Aquinas College, the predecessor of Angelicum, Adnus Pope, "The issue of soul controversy" 1268 At the time, at least Aquinas wrote the first book of plural form Deianima of Sententia liber, 1267 Dominica colleague Aquinas translated Greek translation Aristotle's Deanima, Aquinas comment Completed by Moerbeke Viterbo William. Like Aristotle, Aquinas believes that man is the unification of the two basic principles of form and substance. Because the soul is a real form, it is the first reality of material creatures with the potential of life. St. Thomas Aquinas I heard about his life, so I chose to write about St. Thomas Aquinas, which proved to be interesting. Knowledge of St. Thomas Aquinas' research is still there. I also know that he is called a church doctor, I want to know more. I am interested in St. Thomas Aquinas. Because he is misunderstood as a colleague and is also called "dam's cow". I am afraid to show my lack of education very much. "When someone seems to be Confessio, St. Patrick wanted to know how to be so misunderstood, when he was in Ireland It was captured by pirates. They took him to Ireland and was sold as a slave in Dalida. There, his work is inclined to sheep. St. Patrick Master Milchu is a high priest of Druid, religion dominates the influence on Ireland, is a pagan denomination. St. Patrick believes that his slavery is a test of the faith of God against him. He was suffering deeply in a prison for six years.

In St. Thomas Aquinas' s "Existence and Essence" he wrote a chapter to discuss ways to find essence in complex issues within his book. "Forms and substances are found in complex substances like human souls and bodies, but none of these can be said to be essential." Aquinas not only recognizes forms but also essential substances But in metaphysics Aristotle said that essence exists in the form of matter. Providing a summary of St. Thomas Aquinas 'existence and essence' should be seen as the most noble and most courageous pursuit seen as rude and reckless acts. "The star should be attached only by the fact that the sacred" Thomas Aquinas "and" Metaphysics "appear in one sentence, but this paper is a promising idea that the number of pages is very short (page 45) Each chapter has at least This makes it easier for people to review and review the entire article many times as it re-digests the material on average four times until some concepts fit within it. St. Thomas Aquinas wrote "existence and essence" for philosophy students. For modern readers who do not have a philosophical background this will be an ambitious career, but for those who understand Aristotle's metaphysical or academic philosophy, this is recommended. Clear, concise, and informative. As Aquinas reminds us in the first sentence of this book, "a few first errors will eventually evolve to a large extent." So, how do you understand the most basic concepts used in metaphysical discourse? Misunderstanding here can lead to serious problems, whether you work at the philosophy of the late Middle Ages or work with Aristotle's own work. I will emphasize this: I do not think that the value of Aquinas as an interpreter of Aristotle is fully realized; existence and essence are to understand Aristotle as well as to understand Aquinas Also worth it. value

In order to talk about Thomas Aquinas' political philosophy or to describe the so - called Thomas political theory in detail, it is necessary to understand the scope and breadth of the whole Thomas corpus. In order to discover Akinas' teachings on political issues and human life as a political animal, it is necessary to put together various forms of work in one piece. As Aquinas's political life theme comes closer, there may be double temptation to some extent. To a certain extent, the reader may study the Thomas discussion on the components (or work) of the political problem and claim that this single text is established. Foundations of Akinus' political theory Today is the feast of St. Thomas Aquinas. A lot of articles about this great saint are written, and their contribution to the theology of the church is huge. In fact, among all theologians in the history of the church, St. Thomas Aquinas occupied the site of theological research. Pope Pius IX studied cuckoo and put up all night to encourage all members of the church to learn St. Thomas to understand and deepen the spiritual life. It is not impossible to find the extent of the doctor's excellence, and he is given the sun as a device; he brings the light of learning to the minds of people, to inspire their souls and will It uses virtue. After studying St. Thomas' work, I have read five ways of reading this paper, St. Thomas Aquinas, Plato's lifetime, and most importantly St. Thomas Aquinas. This will help make this article easier. Aquinas is designed by God that you can not move anything on your own, what you can not bring on yourself, cause accidental creatures, completeness is included in God, the way of working in the universe is a wise designer It is. In addition, Aquinas was working on these principles throughout his life and was studying the work of other philosophers such as Aristotle, Plato, Parmenides, Platynus, Abichenna and Bloc, Ruth, then he We followed the principles outlined in 5 ways. Many of the historical figures of St. Thomas Aquinas have influenced the creation and development of Christianity. St. Thomas Aquinas is one of the most important people among these people. He shared a new idea of ​​philosophy and theology and wrote an influential work that changed the way the Catholic Church worked. He pioneered precedent that lasted nearly a thousand years. St. Thomas Aquinas was born in Italy in the 13th century. - In the utopia of Thomas More, the author details the adventures of Sir Thomas More, passing through Antwerp in Belgium, Peter Giles and Raphael Haisley. During the service to Kingdom of King Henry VIII in the UK, Thomas Moore visited Antwerp in Belgium where he met Peter Gilles and Raphael Hill (he is a utopian philosopher).

I chose to write the evidence of St. Thomas Aquinas to quote the movement as evidence of the existence of God. I must admit that the expression is a bit confusing, but I think it is also from the perspective of ability, behavior and behavior. Ability is also the possibility of object behavior. You can not convert this possibility into actions unless other objects are already running. In the example used in books, the possible objects considered wood are warm weather. In the first proof of the existence of God by Akinas, he pointed out that there is movement in the world first, and pointed out that there is no reason for that movement. He defined that exercise as "reduction of something from possibility to reality" (Aquinas 25). Here he stipulates that possibility can not cause movement, only reality has this ability. As with the cigarette example, this is a very pleasant past time and can not be ignited without the help of games and writers (reality). In addition, cigarettes are unreasonable to shine and ignite at the same time, so we can not have both possibility and reality. However, the cigarette may be very cold. Looking at this, Aquinas said all actions must be established in existing behavior, to reduce the real possibilities. It is all good, but the focus of the discussion is an infinite return. The first action or "initiator" is required. There is no action Essay.com/Aquinas Evidence for the existence of God - paper explains the five evidences of Aquinas in the existence of God and casts doubts about its validity Proof of the existence of the God of Aquinas - Explain the five evidences of the existence of the God of Aquinas and doubt its validity Thomas Aquinas proposed the integration of medieval philosophy and his work "Summa Theologica" proved this. He discusses the reality and intangibility of God as an indifferent promoter and explains how God acts through his thoughts and wishes Even though the first initiator was present, Dawkins did not even understand the purpose of the five evidences of Aquinas; it did not prove that the promoter is a God of Christians. This is exactly right. Aquinas did not intend to use five proofs as a comprehensive defense of Christianity. He is only using them as five ways to identify our predecessors, cause, necessity, complete existence, and the existence of governor. It is not yet decided whether this existence has the attributes we gave to Christian God. This is the reason Aquinas keeps his claim with Summa, where he is based on the existence of God as the basis for determining the simplicity of God, the completeness of God, the goodness of God, Please work on one aspect of Aquinas and put aside untrusted side as it is without actually showing it.

Therefore, it is not yet known whether it is possible to create what always existed. "Thomas Aquinas has proved this belief from a philosophical standpoint that helps people understand the existence of God, after the main sources he said how he believes in Catholic faith The most important thing that he might have written is that his book is called Summa The biggest achievement of Thomas Aquinas is the "summary" of his book, It is one of the first books that proved the existence, so it helps to create his position in history. Today is the feast of St. Thomas Aquinas. A lot of articles about this great saint are written, and their contribution to the theology of the church is huge. In fact, among all theologians in the history of the church, St. Thomas Aquinas occupied the site of theological research. Pope Pius IX stole up all night to encourage all members of the church to study cuckoo and learn St. Thomas to understand and deepen the spiritual life: this doctrine and reverence It is not impossible to find the extent of doctor's excellence, and he is given the sun as a device; he brings the light of learning to the minds of people, and to inspire their souls and will Use virtue. After studying St. Thomas' work, I have read five ways of reading this paper, St. Thomas Aquinas, Plato's lifetime, and most importantly St. Thomas Aquinas. This will help make this article easier. Aquinas is designed by God that you can not move anything on your own, what you can not bring on yourself, cause accidental creatures, completeness is included in God, the way of working in the universe is a wise designer It is. In addition, Aquinas was working on these principles throughout his life and was studying the work of other philosophers such as Aristotle, Plato, Parmenides, Platynus, Abichenna and Bloc, Ruth, then he We followed the principles outlined in 5 ways.

Does God exist? People have asked this question for centuries. Christians, Jews, and Muslims all say that God exists. They will claim he is all creator and taller than people. Others would argue that God does not exist, or that God is not a Christian, as Jews and Muslims have said. Both Anselm and Aquinas mentioned this issue: Anselm of his "Proslogion" and Aquinas of his "Summa Theologica". Anselm and Aquinas have the same view on the essence of God, but Anselm lacks evidence to support his argument. The existence of the god of Anselm rejects the refusal of the existence of the god of Anselm, and if the only evidence of the existence of God is Akinus's five ways and anselm's ontological argument, as Anselm offers Seem. The best reasoning I am not saying that Anselm 's view is better or even effective, but in view of the proof of Aquinas and Anselm, Anselm' s view is better. Indeed, Anselm believes that the existence of God is based on the concept of God. He goes through discussion ... there are many arguments about the existence of God to try to prove the existence of God. In this article we will discuss ontological discussions, cosmological arguments, empirical discussions, such as avoiding errors and design arguments. There is much criticism about each of these, and the existence of God can not prove that it might be stronger than those who speak more strongly. The definition of God arguing is a God of Christians. Thomas Aquinas objected to Anselm 's argument when presenting five evidences about the existence of God in his Summa Theologica. He believes that people can not understand the nature of God and hence can not imagine God as proposed by Anselm. Existential arguments are meaningful only to those who fully understand the essence of God. Aquinas believes that only God can fully understand its essence and that only he can use this argument. His refusal of ontological debate has caused other Catholic theologians to reject this argument. The "trivial" proof of Thomas Aquinas helps to better understand ontological arguments. In the original ontological argument, Ansell regards existence as one of the essence of God, but Aquinas rejects it. Because we do not know the essence of God. Here he separates the essence from existence. Ansem emphasizes in his ontological argument that ontology is the same as essence. Descartes is "father of rationalism". For him, knowledge can only be obtained through reason, rather than sensory experience. The standard of truth is the "clear and clear" standard. Descartes derived God 's existence from his concept of innate concept. This means that we have created some natural ideas in this world. One of the ideas is a thought of perfect existence. Descartes said that we are limited and incomplete. How can we get a perfect existence? He explained that these ideas were directly embedded in God by our mind. Therefore, we are born with some natural ideas. This shows the existence of God

"No matter what is moved, it is touched by other things, the possibility is only touched by reality" (Archie). A good example is "Real oak creates acorns" (Archie). There must be a starting person in order to take action. He thinks that depriving reality is like taking away the possibility; they go hand in hand. Good examples are as follows. "The reason why the student is likely to be awake is that he drank for (actually) breakfast. St. Thomas Aquinas is known for his beliefs and reasoning. St. Thomas Aquinas was declared a saint in 1323, but died in 1274. At the same time, religion is still an important concept. Crusades are being carried out at the present time, and the promotion of Christianity is done everywhere. St. Thomas Aquinas is a pastor of the Catholic, and many churches and doctrines are still taught in the church. Catholic theology tells us that the world belongs to man in Genesis 1:28, "It is rich and diverse, fills the earth, suppresses it, crushes it, sea fish and sky birds, and on the earth To dominate any moving creatures. St. Thomas Aquinas I chose to write about St. Thomas Aquinas as I thought it was interesting to hear about his life. St. Thomas Aquinas's research still has a lot of knowledge. I also know that he is called a church doctor, I want to know more. I am interested in St. Thomas Aquinas. It is because he is misunderstood by his colleague and is also known as "dam cow". "I am blushing and I am very scared to show that I am not educated." St. Patrick was caught by Irish pirates when St. Patrick was 16 years old. They took him to Ireland and was sold as a slave in Dalida. There, his work is leaning to the sheep. St. Patrick 's master, Milchu was the high priest of Druid, a sect of heathen who dominated the religious influence on Ireland. St. Patrick believes that his slavery is a trial of his faith in God. In his six-year prison sentence, he had a problem deeply. St. Thomas Aquinas (1225 - 1274) is one of the most famous medieval philosophers, known as the church 's best theologian and philosopher. Like contemporaries, Aquinas focused mainly on theological issues, but what made him most distinctive was a concept that seemed to be two contradictions - in his perfect combination Deduced reasoning he is linked to Catholic doctrine today, but he has deeply influenced modern philosophy in many fields, especially in the fields of metaphysics, ethics and natural law.

The philosophical criticism of Augustine and Aquinas: the relationship between the soul and the body The relationship between the human soul and the body has been a subject of mysticalization of philosophers, scholars, scientists and humans for centuries. People are always concerned about their own position as an individual in this world, and they try to determine the exact nature or state of the physical form. They care about their happiness in this secular environment and their spiritual happiness; most people are shocked that they can not get rid of the mistakes they make in their bodies. This paper makes a comparative analysis of the philosophical principles of the two philosophers. These are the philosophy of Thomas Aquinas and the philosophy of Augustine. The author compares the beliefs and principles of the two philosophers with respect to faith and reason, God's existence, knowledge theory, and analytical expression of its basic philosophical method and conclusion. The idea of ​​Thomas Aquinas and Augustine mimics their philosophical heroes, Plato and Aristotle's gestures. Augustine refers to heaven and Aquinas refers to the earth as evidenced by the nature and extent of knowledge as evidenced from their epistemology or perspective. But their ideas are intertwined. There are similarities and differences in the epistemology of the two philosophers detailed in the comparative analysis. Aquinas and Aristotle. Thomas Aquinas inherited Augustine's theological tradition, including his definition of evil and Aristotle's philosophy - theological tradition. When Akinas obtained a doctorate in Paris University in 1256, the Department of Philosophy made Aristotle the "philosophus" (Philosophus). Like the Apostle Paul is the authority of the Bible, Aristotle is also the authority of philosophy. Thoughters were still reading the texts of Plato, Aristotle analyzed the discussion and provided a clear logical way to propose important new ideas in physics, metaphysics, knowledge theory, ethics, and spiritual philosophy They offered to them. Aquinas tried to combine the new Aristotelian with the teachings of traditional Stoic and Neo-Platonic. Even in the era of military and geopolitical confusion, like Augustine, Aquinas is basically optimistic. For him like Augustine, the human body is not to be despised.

The ontological argument proposed by Descartes and the cosmological argument proposed by Aquilel Descartes which is often referred to as the father of modern philosophy is a discussion of Anselm attempting to prove God only through the meaning of the word "God" Developed. The presence of. An ontological argument is a transcendental argument that uses logic to prove that the initial definition is correct. The basis of these arguments depends on the understanding of the essence of the human god. The definition of Anselm's god is "an extremely perfect existence", which is the basis of his argument. Descartes is not the first philosopher who suggested an ontological argument. Early versions of this discussion were criticized by monks who were strongly defended by St. Anselm in the 11th century and then named St. Thomas Aquinas named Gauniro (modern in Anselm). Parameter version) Since Aquinas' criticism is considered to be destructive, ontological arguments have disappeared for centuries. Therefore, Descartes was surprised to find that he should try to restore it. Although he insists that he is not used to the evidence version of Anselm, Descartes seems to advocate his own argument to stop traditional objections. Recently, Kurt Gödel, Charles Hartshorne, Norman Malcolm, and Alvin Plantinga are presenting many ontological arguments being discussed, and these discussions provide an interesting link to St. Anselm, Descartes, and Leibniz's initial discussion I'm waiting. The most interesting of these are Gödel and Plantanga; however, in these cases it is unknown whether these authors should argue that these arguments are proof of the existence of God. Criticism of the ontological argument began with Gauniro at the same time as St. Anselm. Perhaps the most famous criticism of ontological debate is due to Emmanuel Kant in his criticism of pure reason. Most notably, Kant argues that ontological arguments are at risk by implicit assumptions that "existence" is a predicate. But as Bertrand Russell said, it is easy to be confident that ontological arguments are less accurate than what they are doing. A: The discussion of ontological arguments is based on rationality, not world observation (cosmology theory, objective argument etc.). Specifically, the reason for the ontology controversy is ontology. The first and most popular form of this discussion dates back to St. Anselm in the 11th century. He first pointed out that the concept of God is "existence, not imaginable existence". Since existence is possible and existence is bigger than it does not exist, God must exist (If you do not exist God, you can imagine a larger being, but it is self destruction. So, God must exist, Descartes has done a lot of the same, beginning with the idea of ​​perfection.

The purpose of St. Thomas' Dereno is to provide practical guidance on how to exercise authority on Christian King. The king imitates God by taking the people guided by him to their correct purpose, and this is nothing but a common virtue. The instantiation of this citizen's moral practice belongs to the innermost polarity of political society For St. Thomas, leading the citizens to common interest is a real concern of the king. After studying St. Thomas' work, I have read five ways of reading this paper, St. Thomas Aquinas, Plato's lifetime, and most importantly St. Thomas Aquinas. This will help make this article easier. Aquinas is designed by God that you can not move anything on your own, what you can not bring on yourself, cause accidental creatures, completeness is included in God, the way of working in the universe is a wise designer It is. In addition, Aquinas was working on these principles throughout his life and was studying the work of other philosophers such as Aristotle, Plato, Parmenides, Platynus, Abichenna and Bloc, Ruth, then he We followed the principles outlined in 5 ways. Aquinas' Chesterton sounds worth reading, and it does so. This is a fun and exciting introduction to St. Thomas Aquinas (1226 - 1274), his life and work. Born to a nobleman, he went out to become all the priests, and his philosophy and theology influenced Western thought. Other Aquinas writers admire that this excellent work is the shortest introduction until the writing day of the 1930s and may still exist. The theology of Aquinas was not covered with space and complexity, but his remaining thoughts were, and in such short books space was allowed. Chesterton's usual fun and word play make everything easy From 1245 to 1252, St. Thomas Aquinas continued studying at the Dominican of Naples, Paris, Cologne. He was appointed German Cologne in 1250 and continues to teach theology at the University of Paris. Under the guidance of St. Albert the Great, St. Thomas Aquinas was later awarded a doctorate theology from the theater. Consistent with the prophecy of the sacred hermit, Thomas proved him to be a modelist, but irony is that his humility is sometimes accidentally mistaken for his classmates as he is stupid. After reading the Thomas paper and thinking that it was wonderful, Professor St. Albert in Thomas defense said: "We call this young man a fool, but the bark of his doctrine will someday .the whole world!"

This content is available through online browsing (free) program dependent on page scan. Screen readers can not currently scan, so please contact JSTOR user support for access. We will provide PDF copy of your screen reader Beginning with St. Thomas Aquinas, and finally starting with the latest development of international human rights, narrative, natural law, natural law. From Aquinas to international human rights, to quite unconditional problems and fields, including fairly traditional interpretation of natural law. Evolutionary Natural Law Contents: St. Thomas: Integrating Nature into Natural Law / Martin and the Law for Natural Law / New Natural Law and Natural Law of Evolution / International Human Rights, Natural Law and Rock / Conclusion: Limits of Evil and Natural Law June 2010 Hard cover The relationship between Aristotle and Natural law may be due to interpretation of his work by Thomas Aquinas. However, whether Aquinas correctly read Aristotle is controversial. According to one person, Aquinas is confusing Aristotle's natural rights and natural rights proposed in Volume 4 of Eudemia's ethics. According to this interpretation, the influence of Aquinas is an unfortunate way to influence some of the early translations of these places, but recent translations made these translations more text. Aristotle noted that natural justice is a kind of political justice, particularly a plan of justice for distribution and justice established under the highest political community. Germany did not discuss this and showed in politics that the highest government may not control the country at all.

In order for the political theorist to fully theorize the political structure, theory and strategy, he must first demolish the foundation of society. By disassembling society at the outset, theorists can reconstruct society while explaining each constituent element of society, and then theory of effective political structure. Locke, Hobbes, Aquinas, Machiavelli each build a political theory based on this theory. And the core of each theory is a comment about human conflict. In this article, I will briefly introduce the social contract theory by Hobbes, Locke, Rousseau. I will explain what social contract theory is and why. Then according to Hobbes, Locke and Rousseau's paper pointed out the state of nature. It also proposed differences in opinion among these natural state law scholars on social contracts and finally suggested a critical understanding of social contract theory given by Hobbes, Locke and Rousseau. Key words: world literature language, education, law theory, comparative linguistics, political philosophy, law, political law, cultural research, political theory, contact between religion, theology, contact between civilizations, conflict, Islam, philosophy, history, criticism , Renaissance Rock 's political theory is based on the theory of social contract. Unlike Thomas Hobbes, Locke believes that human nature is characterized by reason and tolerance. Like Hobbes, Locke believes human nature allows people to be selfish. This is obvious with the introduction of currency. In the state of nature, everyone is equal and independent, and everyone has natural rights to protect their "life, health, freedom or wealth". Although suggesting other origins, most scholars follow the phrase "pursuit of life, freedom, and happiness" in the "American Independence Declaration" of Rock 's rights theory. John Locke, in particular in two government papers, incorporates the laws of nature in his many theories and philosophies. Although the effect of lock understanding is usually based on Hobbes' contract theory, there is a much more similar discussion as to whether his concept of natural law is more similar to Aquinas (filtered by Richard Hook) or Hobbes is there. The theory of people who fix Hobbes. . Mr. Rock stated that if the ruler could not defend "life, freedom, property" by breaking the natural law, thinking that as a matter of course, it could overthrow the existing state and create a new state , Hobbes' provision.

The female statue in the Canterbury story, the daughters of Bergmeister and Thomas Aquinas are the dominant statues of women and women of a medieval society. From the perspective of disliking sexism or feminism, certainly the standards of the 20th century are common among knowledgeable clergy. Theologian Thomas Aquinas' work represents this view. However, the religious beliefs of European monasteries and universities occupy the written record of this era, but the only view of women's proper role is not Thomas's sexism. Jeffrey Chaucer's "Canterbury Tales" Analysis Jeffrey Chaucer's "Canterbury Tales" is a series of stories spoken by various pilgrims heading to the tomb of St. Thomas in Canterbury. On the way, they decided to compete to judge the best stories behind different roles. A story can help a character kill time and entertain himself. - Humanity and the Canterbury Story When Geoffrey Chaucer wrote a work of The Canterbury Tales, he took a long way. He tells 2 papers to 30 pilgrims on his way to Canterbury and plans to speak 2 talks from each pilgrim on the way back from Canterbury. Among them, he completed 24. But in these stories, Joe Depicts depicts pilgrims and their stories with wonderful realism Canterbury Story Summary The Canterbury Story is a collection of stories from the story of a pilgrimage to St. Thomas Beckett Canterbury Cathedral. The poet joined the group of pilgrims vividly described in ordinary preface, gathered at the Tabad Hotel in the suburbs of London to go to Canterbury. From a knight to a humble farmer's position, they are representatives of British society of the 14th century. The organizer held a story contest to tell Joe's Canterbury Story. The Canterbury Story was written by Jeffrey Jory at the end of the 14th century. This masterpiece is the greatest classic in the history of British literature, and still and still still very popular. Many manuscripts survived, this is the first print by William Caxton. This is a story that the pilgrim traveling together is talking about going to Canterbury and respecting St. Thomas Beckett. Joe's monk's analysis in the Canterbury story Jeffrey Joe's "Canterbury Tales" is one of the most respected and famous stories in literature. Because of Joe's portrayal of stories, stories, creations, and clever writing, it has been very successful in the world of literature. In the preface of the story, José explained Flair as a greedy adoptor. - Morality of Joe's "Canterbury Tales" When Joe Welt wrote "Canterbury Tales", he had some morality in his mind. Does Joseph often deal with one out of seven people? It is fatal. It is also a crime. The story of a humorous mirror is no exception. The story is about a carpenter licking a young, beautiful woman than him.

According to Aquinas' work, Summa Contra Gentiles, people think that he believes in magic, even though he does not directly believe in magic. But he told the reader that the magician will exercise their magic not only through the way of God and heaven but also through the path of heavenly bodies. They may not only use the power of God to help them do magic, but they can not use the heavenly way to do just that, they go hand in hand . However, he explained that the magic from the "celestial body" is magic of nature. Aristotle's "more sacred" words showed a strong response in Summa Contra Gentiles III (17). He writes, "The benefits of all things are on God, so it is the best good, God is a common interest." For St. Thomas, the community is at the center of human prosperity. According to him, the real purpose of human "politics" is to promote the goodness of human relations. Ignatius undoubtedly studied Aquinas in Paris, where he may have accepted the concept of 'common interest'. In the teachings after Ignatius, this became a "more general concern". This sentence appears many times in the Jesuits Constitution (eg paragraphs 618 and 623), a definitive framework for identifying missions and ministries. The Summa Theologiae of St. Thomas Aquinas is undoubtedly one of the wonderful works of Western traditional theology. But why do you talk about Summa in a series dedicated to the wonderful work of philosophy? Thomas accepted medieval adage, "Grace makes perfection of nature, neither destroying it nor putting it aside." Make a good philosophical analysis and discussions dealing with many of the same themes such as God, humanity, and moral life. Summa is mainly a theological work, but it is filled with philosophy. A. D Switching to day 13, Albertus Magnus School and his student Thomas Aquinas: Summa Contra Gentiles, philosophy tried to combine Aristotle with the doctrine of the church. Together with Aristotle on the 13th BC, we will turn our attention to the square church doctrine. It brought the spirit of rational analysis. The church does not have control. Clearly, as sermons are read by the masses, some people refuse to support public opinion, because literacy rates have increased, while others have taken preaching more seriously. The same was seen in the English spiritual crisis of the 19th century. Something in Italian historical work of the 14th century Thomas Aquinas proposed a highly developed and difficult trinitarian theory (Summa Contra Gentiles 4.1-26, Summa Theologiae I. 27-43). God is "pure behavior", that is, there is no possibility in any way. God is also very simple, there are no obvious parts, attributes or actions. But we can really say that God understands and is pleased. These sacred processes are reflections and trinity. It is the first substance Aristotle said, and in common with the essence of God, it has "a relationship with God". Because the Holy Trinity people have a sacred character, they are more closely related to a mere symbolic thing (eg the same twin), but I think he is not the same as anyone else ) Aquinas has developed Augustine's view that the Trinity "human" is personalized by their relationship. In a word of a commentator,

At first glance, the words "traditional" and "traditional" seem like the same concept. However, the precise definitions of these two words are different, as they are further investigated, examined and reviewed. "Traditional" has more importance and meaning than the word "traditional". Likewise, "truth" and "truth" do not represent exactly the same principle. Indeed, since the Middle Ages philosophers and religious scholars have discussed the origins of the latter two doctrines. From Aristotle, Al - Ghazali * to Jean Buridan, philosophers have been thinking about paradoxes of choice or free will. It can take many forms, but there are still big themes. In the case of Aristotle, it is between food and drink. In Al Ghazali, it is between two identical dates. For Buridan it is a dilemma to place hay and hungry cockroaches between a haystack and a bucket with water. ** Within the probabilistic nature of the universe, you can make right or wrong decisions, even if you fully or fully understand the problem you are facing. Even if it was simply lucky, we might be right. However, we may be wrong, regardless of whether we believe it has fully utilized rationality. However, the decision to commit our mistakes in the past may be due to this inherent bias, and we strongly demand that we learn. The position of the evidentiary may be explained as "a reasonable proof that such beliefs are reasonable only if there is sufficient evidence." For example, Aquinas and Bertrand Russell agree that belief in God is reasonable only when there is sufficient evidence, but regardless of whether such evidence exists or not, it is reasonable. There is a difference. Since these discussions often stipulate that subjective religious experience is not a reasonable proof, the religious truth must be justified on the basis of non-religious evidence. William Kingson Clifford wrote as follows. "One of the most powerful positions of evidence is as follows." Always believe everything, everyone, without any evidence, for everyone. That is wrong. Recent evidence supporters include Antony Flew ("Estimate of Atheists", 1972) and Michael Scriven (Key Philosophy, 1966). They all rely on Ockhamist's view that belief in X is impossible without evidence of X.

The importance of a new religious order spreading new ideas and customs in the 12 th and 13 th centuries is as important as the early history of Christianity today. There were three philosophers and theologians to allow Christians to go beyond the great and rich realm of early doctrine. To discuss the three of God, their ideas and knowledge are deep insights into the new and new traditions of their followers and congregations. These new orders by St. Francis and St. Dominic and these imitators maintain and disseminate the faith between human spirit and social instinct during the Empire. The story of St. Francis of Assisi Many people are familiar with or have been to San Francisco, California's major city, but there is a story behind the city's name. Story of the life of St. Francis of Assisi. The origin of the word San Francisco is St. Francis. This means that the name of this saint comes from. Long ago, in 1181 a boy was born in the outskirts of Assisi, Italy. - Smart Martin Luther King once said, "To die for something, it is not the best to die for life." - Martyr. If someone is still preaching after receiving torture using their faith, it means they are receiving a call from the Lord. Even if you suffer from torture, shooting, beating, or even killing you can not stop the purpose. His faith affects his courage and has influenced us as a way of human life today. St. Clair of Assisi (born July 16, 1194 - August 11, 1253, occasionally spelled as Claire, Claire etc) is the first believer of St. Francis of Assisi. It is one. In the Franciscan tradition she founded the religious order of the women's monastery "People's Medal" and was the first guide to the monaster known to be written by women The rules of their lives I wrote down. After she died, the order she made was renamed St. Clair Medal and today it is called poor Claire. Her vacation is August 11 Dominican medals or Dominican people were well known in the 15th century, but they were known by the French Spanish priest, St. Dominic de Guzman, and on 22 December 1216 Pope Honorius III (1216-27) It was a Roman Catholic religious organization founded by. ) Approval The order includes the monks, nuns, active sisters, and non-expert dominican (who was formerly known as uncle) who are not engaged in the profession. This order has been designed to disseminate the gospel, to oppose the heresy known for its intellectual tradition, and has created many major theologians and philosophers. The Dominican Republic Order is led by the commander and now is Father Bruno Caldor. Members of the ordinance usually have a letter O.P. representing their ordinary decor, meaning the name of the missionary, after their name.

Criticism of Aquinas' cosmological argument The third view of Aquinas shows that the world consists of coincidence. There must be a period of absence (unless it happens accidentally as a barbarous fact) because there is one reason for every coincidental existence, that is, another coincidental existence. Therefore, chances are unlikely to exist unless there is a necessary existence that leads to things that are not coincidence. Aquinas called this god. The question of Aquinas' opinion is that the doctor believes that the substance is eternal, so there is no need for existence necessary to cause a coincidence. The first three proofs of the existence of Akinas' God are today's editions called cosmological arguments. Cosmological arguments are actually discussions, not discussions. This argument implies the existence of accidental things, things that may not exist, and refers to the existence of discontinuity or necessary existence, the existence of God as the source of the ultimate cause or existence. Aquinas proves that the fourth way of God is a gradual change seen in things. It must take into account the fact that all natural objects have some kindness, truth, nobility and all others perfection. The gradation of things may be better in a sense. So, we must have these perfect sources, pure goodness and truth. Cosmological argument refers to the process of controversy from the "world" to the universe - the existence of God. Discussion of cosmology basically uses five methods for St. Thomas Aquinas to exist in God. First, the cosmological argument says there is a reason to decide each event, and it is important that everything starts. Therefore, there must be a first reason to not need the cause before called God. Leipnitz also raised the question "why is something in place of something?"

In this article, I will explore two arguments about the subject of the existence of God. In particular, I will focus on St. Thomas Aquinas' effective causal argument about the existence of God and the opposite of Bertrand Russell. After analyzing Aquinas' claims and Russell 's objections, we show how Russell' s objection failed. Aquinas said there are five ways to prove the existence of God, one of which is through effective causation. His premise is that all the effects we observe must be caused by other factors. The first argument about the existence of monotheism is St. Ansel's ontology. Anselm believes that perfection needs to be present. Monotheism god exists because it is perfect. However, St. Thomas Aquinas dismissed this claim. Descartes and Libby Chin reconfirmed and expanded Anselm 's argument, but later Kant believed that its existence was not a true predicate. Norman Malcolm provided further discussion. Because someone can not be perfect. Even if it exists in some way it may be perfect, but there is no such thing. But I think that it is better for true goddess and god than monotheists. St. Thomas Aquinas presented five arguments to prove the existence of God. However, this article focuses on the fifth argument. The fifth argument is considered a theoretical argument and pointed out that those lacking wisdom act for purpose. The fifth argument satisfies the existence of the god of Aquinas, but among modern readers Aquinas will argue that it ignores the laws of physics. - Our initial work was group discussion, but at first it was difficult, but I found it easier to imagine it. Teamwork helped improve my communication skills, but I confirmed that I have a lot to learn, and communication between me and my partner is really necessary for the success and completion of the discussion.

Key words: schoolism, theology, Christianity, nursing scientist, Saint Augustine, St. Thomas Aquinas, God, reason and belief, double theory, cosmology Discussion, design discussion. Aristotle's death created a vacuum in Greek's knowledge culture 1. Who will first advocate Christian theology? (A) St. Thomas Aquinas (b) Saint Augustine (c) Apostle Paul (d) St. Francis 2. What are the characteristics of Augustine's philosophy? (A) reason can understand God (b) reason can not be understood 3. Which of the following Augustine did not hold? (A) God gives us reasons (b) Reason is the soul's eyes (c) Wisdom means having a god (d) Reason does not lead to God 4. According to St. Thomas Aquinas, (a) his plan is not an important position (b) it is given a final position (c) it does not stimulate any aspect of reality (d) Time unable to prove creation 5. Reveal theology according to Aquinas: (a) It may be wrong and hence incomplete (b) True speculative science (c) A person understood by the relationship. If Aquinas did not mention God's existence, which of the following will be proved? (C) depart from the concept of perfection (d) from the concept of God as the most imaginable being Dr. Radykrishnan was born in Tillathani, the presidential palace of Madras of the time on September 5, 1888, graduated from Madras Christian College in 1906 and completed the master's course. In 1921, he was appointed a professor of philosophy and occupied the department manager of psychology and moral science at the George V of University of Calcutta (1921-1932). Several former students and friends are said to have asked Dr. Radhakrishnan to celebrate his birthday on September 5 during his tenure as President of India. He answered with customary humility and said that it was better to celebrate all teacher's contributions on that day, so he was taught as a teacher's day in India on September 5. Delhi, Mumbai, Madras and Krebpur IIT are just a few of India's top engineering schools. The first IIT, IIT Kharagpur was founded in 1951. This IIT was established in accordance with the instructions of Governor Jogendra Singh, a member of the Viceroy Executive Committee. Since that time, many IITs were established and established in India to promote excellence of advanced technical education. At the moment, 23 IITs in India are functioning correctly. Between 4 and 8 semesters, the B Tech course is offered by IIT, and the first year logo is a course structure common to each student. General courses include the foundations of electronics, physics and chemistry. The IIT joint test is conducted every year and is the only entrance examination that falls into one of 23 IITs. IIT Madras was founded in 1959. The university is one of the most important national universities in the field of advanced technical education, basic research and applied research. IIT Madras is an independent campus surrounded by 250 hectares of beautiful forests at residential universities with nearly 460 faculty members, 4,500 students, 1,250 managers and support staff. Arrangement: Madras Indian Institute of Technology is one of India's most famous technical education and research institutions. Several top recruiters are 3DPLM Software Solutions Limited, Bank Bazaar, Citicorp Service India, Deloitte, Essar Group, FMC Technologies India PVT Limited, Hewlett Packard, Infosys Limited, ITC Limited, ONGC.

The category of Aristotle's things is called "ambiguous" and they have common names, but the definition corresponding to the name is different. Therefore, the actual male and the person in the picture can be called "animals", but they have common names, but because the definition corresponding to the name is different, they are all arbitrary names . His definition in the case applies only to that situation, in the sense that everyone should define each animal as an animal. Aristotle's classification is a very important philosophical study. Not only is it the pillar of Aristotle's own philosophical theory, it has unparalleled influence on the systems of many great philosophers in the Western tradition. A series of doctrines in this category, which I call classificationism, provides a framework of Aristotle's various philosophical studies, from Aristotle's physics to time theory to metaphysics and even discussions from expansion. He refused Platonic moral philosophy in his ethics at Nikoma. Beyond his own work, Aristotle's taxonomy brought something like primitive man, porphyry, Aquinas, Descartes, Spinoza, Leibniz, Rock, Berkeley, Hume, Kant, Higg. The attention of various philosophers such as Brentano and Heidegger differently accepts, defends, modifies and rejects their central debate. It seems strange to quote Aquinas in articles about Aristotle's category, but I do it for two reasons. First, as Ackrill and Furth commented, Aristotle's plan was severely criticized by scholars and philosophers. But Aquinas' comments on quality shows that a truly talented translator - indeed Aristotle's interpreter is not as big as Aquinas - can satisfy many criticisms. Secondly, and more importantly, Aquinas' attention to quality category suggests its deep historical importance in one of the most important facts of the Aristotle category, ie metaphysical speculative development . In this respect, it can be compared with metaphysical 20th century quantifiers. It is difficult to imagine the analytical metaphysics of the 20th century, regardless of whether the quantifier has the final philosophical significance.

Does God exist? As humanity appears on the planet and it may possibly continue to this day and tomorrow, this question allows people to think and present evidence to present the most satisfactory answers I will. Early in the 12th century, St. Thomas Aquinas provided "five ways" to prove the existence of God, but I was convinced that other people would see the same "light" in this discussion . Please provide sufficient answers to 'the essence of God' (Bailey and Martin, 2011, 37). The second way that Aquinas prove that God exists is based on the nature of an effective causal relationship. It points out that God is the cause of unresolved. Because causality itself creates results, the causal relationship itself is "to become". However, effective causation is only the result of the outcome, or the fact that it can be fully activated or potential. Therefore, it is effective to validate the results for practical reasons. In an observable world, we find a sequence of valid causes, but we can not find out if we have found something that effectively causes ourselves. This sort of thing must precede itself, it is impossible. If you eliminate the cause of eliminating that influence, there will be no last member or intermediate member of the series unless there is a first member. Therefore, we see the existence of one thing depends on another thing. Overall, this unresolved cause exists and is called God. The second premise Aquinas later insisted that no one could be a valid reason for himself. Why is self-causal relationship impossible? For convenience, please consider what it means (although this is not the only self-causal form in Aquinas' mind). To achieve something, people need certain causal power. But unless it exists, things can not have causal power. However, if something caused its own cause, that is to say that it is to achieve its own existence, it must exist before that and is impossible (ST Ia 2.3). Therefore, the third assumption is that each valid reason requires a prior reason. Aquinas shows us how to distinguish between the existence or existence of living beings and the operation they perform. God lets creatures exist in such a way that they are the real cause of their own actions. For Aquinas, God works in every natural work, but the autonomy of nature does not mean that God's power and activities are diminished, but instead it represents his good. It is important to recognize that the causal relationship of God and the biological causal relationship play fundamentally different roles. In Summa contra Gentiles, Aquinas says, "The same effect is not due to the cause of nature and the power of God, but partly due to the elements of nature, completely by different ways and the same thing. That effect is entirely attributable to the product, the whole of which is attributed to the principal agent. "(23)

Perhaps Oklahoma's William is best known for his metaphysical nominalism and 'Okkam's razor'. William of Oakham was born between 1285 and 1287 and soon was named Spade in Surrey, England. Since historians know little about Occam's birth and childhood, we must infer the date by writing from events in his life. He is a medieval British philosopher and a Franciscan monk. In Occam (Beckert) Franciscan family, Occam estimated the past few years as a young age. William of Occam, also known as William O'Cham, William of Occam, is a British philosopher of the 14th century. Historically, Occam has become an outstanding opponent of Thomas Aquinas (1224 - 1274). Comprehensive and accused by the Catholic Church. Aquinas and Okam are different in most problems, but there are many other critics in Aquinas, and Occam does not criticize Aquinas like any other person. But for fairness, Occam was the power of great change at the end of the Middle Ages. He is a brave man with a very sharp mind. His philosophy was extreme in his era and continued to provide insight into the current philosophical argument. In academic philosophy Occam's William insists on the method and content of reform, but its purpose is to simplify. William had included some of the previous theologians, in particular most of the work of Duns Scotus. William of Oakham from Duns Scotus came up with his view of sacred total tolerance, his view on grace and defense, his epistemology, and most of his moral beliefs. But he also prescribed his understanding of universality, his reactions to Scots on the formal distinction (ie "applied to creation"), and the simplicity he admits and repented ing. It is the opposite. Ockham Razor An attractive similarity between William Okamem and David Hume, such as the general view of causality. Answer: Occam Hume's David Hume William did not deny a causal relationship. He accepted it. However, he says that empirical methods can not logically prove their necessity. For Hume, causality is what human beings naturally believe.

There must be a first manufacturer to make the first one a reality. God became the first effective cause, which opened the link between cause and result. Everything that is not God hangs over there. All that exists from this causal chain is because they are derived from God. Next, there is no infinite causal linkage as something can not be caused by itself. Aquinas thinks that one reason can not be caused by itself, because it must exist before it is produced. The primary reason for Akinas' second argument is to try to provide reasonable evidence about the existence of God. In order to assemble his argument, Aquinas points out his doubtless effective solution, in other words, setting a series of premises that God's intervention is like creating the universe There. The first of these premises is an eternal exercise debate. It can not be the cause itself, so that the machine can not build its own power as infinitely. In other words, according to the law of nature (sufficient reason), the effect can not produce exactly the same effect. As a result of this premise, a series of causal relationships and long causal relationships should exist. Religious philosophy Thomas Aquinas gave us five proofs of the existence of God. His second evidence is called cosmological argument. Please experiment. 1) There are several causes. 2) There is nothing that can cause itself. 3) It is impossible to return to the cause. 4) Therefore, there must be a first reason to be unresolved. 6) Therefore, God exists. Eternal, perfect love. These features are not explained in this discussion. 2) How can we know that infinite return of cause is impossible? When Aquinas first proved the existence of God, he first pointed out that there is movement in the world and pointed out that there is no reason for that movement. He defined that exercise as "reduction of something from possibility to reality" (Aquinas 25). Here he stipulates that possibility can not cause movement, only reality has this ability. As with the cigarette example, this is a very fun past time and can not be ignited without the help of games and writers (reality). In addition, cigarettes can not have both possibility and reality, as it is irrational to shine and ignite at the same time. However, the cigarette may be very cold. Looking at this, Aquinas said all actions must be established in existing behavior, to reduce the real possibilities. It is all good, but the focus of the discussion is an infinite return. The first action or "initiator" is required. There is no action Essay.com/Aquinas Evidence for the existence of God - paper explains the five evidences of the existence of Akinas' God and casts doubts about God's validity Proof of the existence of the God of Aquinas - Explain the five evidences of the existence of the God of Aquinas and doubt its validity

If at least the example is stronger than the creed, I rarely need to point out that Pink does not truly believe what he wrote. He lived in a cave and found a group of highly barbarous people eating the meat and blood of the animals he killed during hunting; after leaving them through his example and according to his teaching Generation people, they entered very civilization Discipline (third person singular now rule, now participle introduction, simple past and past participles assumption) In the last article, I wrote five major rules about Buddhism, Pancasila. This is the most fundamental thing that non-professional Buddhists should know. As this is the first commandment, I am one of the doctrines of obeying the killing prohibition. So in this article, I would like to develop lessons for Buddhists to understand and practice it properly. According to the above five points, plants and microorganisms do not have thought and perception, can not move anywhere, and microbes such as bacteria can not be seen with the naked eye, so these points can not be satisfied. They can certainly not be called "beings" but only in the Buddhism related to the first commandment. There are only humans and animals here, because they have ideas and perceptions, they can move anywhere and can see with the naked eye. Therefore, we can call humans and animals a perceptual being. The main rule "to protect innocent human life" leads to secondary rules such as "do not stop" or "do not euthanasia". Secondary discipline comes from the main rules; theoretically, they are easier to explain than the main rules. Aquinas allows you to create detailed information about them, such as dealing with the situation. There are even more exceptions. Natural law also examines the function of individual body parts related to our overall purpose. I believe that Aquinas is wrong to use something other than other functions and purposes; the purpose of the genitals is breeding, contraception is incorrect. Trivial precepts do not directly follow the main rules, they need good judgment and wisdom to accomplish and obey. When there was a reason to ask, Aquinas permitted the change of the second commandment, he called the killing in war "the smaller of two evils". Natural law consists of the rule of the eternal law which dominates the behavior of existence with reason and free will. According to Aquinas, the first rule of natural law is to do good and avoid somewhat empty demands of evil. It is worth noting that Aquinas has a moral theory of natural law. According to Aquinas, good and evil are derived from the rational nature of human beings. So good and evil are objective and universal. However, Aquinas is also a legal theorist of natural law. In his view, human laws (ie, laws enacted by humans) are effective only when their content is consistent with the content of natural law. It comes from the law of nature, but if it deviates from the law of nature, it is no longer a law but a perverted law "(ST I - II, Q. 95, A. II)

A rule is a rule or direction that usually has religious grounds that determine how to act and act. Discipline is a small life course usually taught to children by authorities such as parents, teachers, religious figures. They are not as simple or practical as "eat your vegetables"; they tend to be heavier and exaggerated. In Hamlet, the character "Polonius" casts some options to his son Rirtis "not borrowers or lenders" or "listen to everyone", but your voice is very small. "Of course, Hamlet killed him with his own poison blade, so Laertes did not live long enough to benefit from the holy advice of Polonius." The main rule "to protect innocent human life" leads to secondary rules such as "do not stop" or "do not euthanasia". Secondary discipline comes from the main rules; theoretically, they are easier to explain than the main rules. Aquinas allows you to create detailed information about them, such as coping with the situation. There are even more exceptions. Natural law also examines the function of individual body parts related to our overall purpose. I believe that Aquinas is wrong to use something other than other functions and purposes; the purpose of the genitals is breeding, contraception is incorrect. Trivial precepts do not obey the main rules directly, they need good judgment and wisdom to accomplish. When there was a reason to ask, Aquinas permitted the change of the second commandment, he called the killing in war "the smaller of two evils". Natural law consists of the rule of the eternal law which dominates the behavior of existence with reason and free will. According to Aquinas, the first rule of natural law is to do good and avoid somewhat empty demands of evil. It is worth noting that Aquinas has a moral theory of natural law. According to Aquinas, good and evil are derived from the rational nature of human beings. So good and evil are objective and universal. However, Aquinas is also a legal theorist of natural law. In his view, human laws (ie, laws enacted by humans) are effective only when their content is consistent with the content of natural law. It comes from the law of nature, but if it deviates from the law of nature, it is no longer a law but a perverted law "(ST I - II, Q. 95, A. II)

In "Suma Theologica" by St. Thomas Aquinas, Aquinas can combine Christian doctrine and Aristotle 's philosophy, and through observation, use the senses and empirical spirit to confirm the existence of God. Aquinas believes that philosophy and theology are intertwining and complement each other in pursuing the existence of God. He has mainly poured many theological doctrines from St. Augustine and Aristotle's ideals like pioneers to confirm his claim to the existence of God. There are many arguments about the existence of God to try to prove the existence of God. In this article we will discuss ontological discussions, cosmological arguments, empirical discussions, such as avoiding errors and design arguments. There is much criticism about each of these, and the existence of God can not prove that it might be stronger than those who speak more strongly. The insisting definition of God is a god of Christianity ... I have found Akinas' theory that the existence of God is very interesting. It is easy to understand and logical. Summa Theologiae is one of the best works of Aquinas. St. Thomas is also a writer, writing a lot of comments on Aristotle and other theological and philosophical themes. Aquinas divides his argument into five ways to prove the existence of God. The first method is sports debate. There are many things that are changing, but not all of a sudden starts. St. Thomas Aquinas has five ways to prove the existence of God. The first is to prove the existence of God through the idea of ​​exercise. By studying Aristotle's work, he concluded that moving objects had to be moved by other things and powers. Therefore, he said that there must be an "indifferent propeller" (God) who first puts things in action. Some are touched by another, some are considered animals, others are considered passive. The fact that moving from one person to another does not exclude the fact that it may be touched by others, and the other fact is that it is a trigger.

St. Thomas Aquinas (1225 - 1272) is basically Aristotle. His theology is the ruler of the Catholic Church, his comment on Aristotle represents a wonderful cultural resource, and now it is more recognized. As a Catholic, he tried to prove the existence of God. But what about? Thomas Aquinas noticed that some people doubted the existence of God. Their logic does not allow or explain his existence. St. Thomas Aquinas I chose to write about St. Thomas Aquinas as I thought it was interesting to hear about his life. St. Thomas Aquinas's research still has a lot of knowledge. I also know that he is called a church doctor, I want to know more. I am interested in St. Thomas Aquinas. It is because he is misunderstood by his colleague and is also known as "dam cow". "I am blushing and I am very scared to show that I am not educated." St. Patrick was caught by Irish pirates when St. Patrick was 16 years old. They took him to Ireland and was sold as a slave in Dalida. There, his work is leaning to the sheep. St. Patrick 's master, Milchu was the high priest of Druid, a sect of heathen who dominated the religious influence on Ireland. St. Patrick believes that his slavery is a trial of his faith in God. In his six-year prison sentence, he had a problem deeply. When I tried to select a customer, I finally chose Thomas Beckett. I was born in England and I wanted to find a British saint. After reading a lot of British saints, I tried to make a decision between Thomas More and Thomas Beckett. Both are Henry, the king's best friend. Both were placed by their king at their place, and they thought they would agree with everything the king wanted. Both chose not the power of the world but the truth of Catholic faith, and both were killed. The company must be good and reminds people that the relationship between church and the country is always mediocre.

Whether the United States is transcendental has historically controversial. St. Thomas Aquinas is one of the people who is discussing this topic. In order to fully understand this question, you first have to understand Thomas Aquinas, which defines it as beauty and extremists, and finally how to solve the problem. "Is beauty far?" Already been thought. Thomas Aquinas is a theologian who lived between the year 1224 and 1274. He was born to a nobleman and in the early days he spent in the Kingdom of Sicily. Today is the feast of St. Thomas Aquinas. A lot of articles about this great saint are written, and their contribution to the theology of the church is huge. In fact, among all theologians in the history of the church, St. Thomas Aquinas occupied the site of theological research. Pope Pius IX stole up all night to encourage all members of the church to study cuckoo and learn St. Thomas to understand and deepen the spiritual life: this doctrine and reverence It is not impossible to find the extent of doctor's excellence, and he is given the sun as a device; he brings the light of learning to the minds of people, and to inspire their souls and will Use virtue. After studying St. Thomas' work, I have read five ways of reading this paper, St. Thomas Aquinas, Plato's lifetime, and most importantly St. Thomas Aquinas. This will help make this article easier. Aquinas is designed by God that you can not move anything on your own, what you can not bring on yourself, causing accidental creatures, completeness is included in God, the way of working in the universe is a smart designer It is. In addition, Aquinas was working on these principles throughout his life and was studying the work of other philosophers such as Aristotle, Plato, Parmenides, Platynus, Abichenna and Bloc, Ruth, then he We followed the principles outlined in 5 ways.

Lenora Spahn 9/22/00 Thomas Jefferson I. Thomas Jefferson A. Shadwell, Virginia, April 13, 1743. B. Death - July 4, 1826 II. Background A. William & Mary College Education University (1760-1762), a five-year apprenticeship study of George Weiss's law. B. Occupation - Let's start practicing your own laws. In the early 20th century, historian and philosopher Martin Grabman was the first scholar who studied the philosophical thinking of scholarism, and the reaction and development of Thomas Aquinas' thought was not a single coherent coherent saw. The entire organic appearance. Grabmann has many works in Germany, but only Thomas Aquinas (1928) has an English version. But Grubbman's idea contributes to academic philosophy and modern understanding of Aquinas' important role. After studying St. Thomas' work, I have read five ways of reading this paper, St. Thomas Aquinas, Plato's lifetime, and most importantly St. Thomas Aquinas. This will help make this article easier. Aquinas is designed by God that you can not move anything on your own, what you can not bring on yourself, cause accidental creatures, completeness is included in God, the way of working in the universe is a wise designer It is. In addition, Aquinas was working on these principles throughout his life and was studying the work of other philosophers such as Aristotle, Plato, Parmenides, Platynus, Abichenna and Bloc, Ruth, then he We followed the principles outlined in 5 ways. St. Thomas Aquinas I chose to write about St. Thomas Aquinas as I thought it was interesting to hear about his life. St. Thomas Aquinas's research still has a lot of knowledge. I also know that he is called a church doctor, I want to know more. I am interested in St. Thomas Aquinas. It is because he is misunderstood by his colleague and is also known as "dam cow". "I am blushing and I am very scared to show that I am not educated." St. Patrick was caught by Irish pirates when St. Patrick was 16 years old. They took him to Ireland and was sold as a slave in Dalida. There, his work is leaning to the sheep. St. Patrick 's master, Milchu was the high priest of Druid, a sect of heathen who dominated the religious influence on Ireland. St. Patrick believes that his slavery is a trial of his faith in God. In his six-year prison sentence, he had a problem deeply.

The roots of the natural moral law are in the world of ancient Greece and Rome. In this article, Thomas Aquinas and moral law theory are emphasized. St. Thomas Aquinas (1224 - 1274) is an important philosopher and theologian of Christianity, his moral theory is absoluteism and moralism, that it focuses on the ethics of action I mean it. In his work that summarized theology, Aquinas states that God created natural law as a moral code that exists within the purpose of nature. "The law is only a common reason for the common interests of people. Natural law is a judicial moral theory that claims that law should be based on morality and morality. Natural law considers that the law is based on "right" things. Natural law is "human discovery" by reason and using choices between good and evil. Therefore, natural law finds its strength in discovering universal standards of morality and morality. Greeks - Socrates, Plato and Aristotle emphasized the difference between "phyxis" (φ) and "law", "custom" or "custom" (nomo, nouveau). The place stipulated by law differs, but the "birth" place should be the same. Aristotle (384 - 322 BC) is regarded by many as the father of the "natural law". In rhetoric, he thinks that in addition to the "specific" law each person established for himself, there is also a "common law" or "higher law" based on nature (rheet 1373 b 2 - 8). The roots of the natural moral law are in the world of ancient Greece and Rome. In this article, Thomas Aquinas and moral law theory are emphasized. St. Thomas Aquinas (1224 - 1274) is an important philosopher and theologian of Christianity, his moral theory is absoluteism and moralism, that it focuses on the ethics of action I mean it. In his work that summarized theology, Aquinas states that God created natural law as a moral code that exists within the purpose of nature. "The law is only a common reason for the common interests of people. Natural law is an understanding of moral law, which can be obtained through nature, through rationality or through moral rationality unrelated to nature. Natural law is universal and common to all humans. It is beyond the difference between cultural, religious, and moral laws in different forms. It is often understood as a fundamental source of normality and if it is ethically rational, it must derive a positive code of ethics. As an objection to the positive law, natural law is the standard for the defense of political and biblical laws.

St. Thomas Aquinas (1225 - 1272) is basically Aristotle. His theology is the ruler of the Catholic Church, his comment on Aristotle represents a wonderful cultural resource, and now it is more recognized. As a Catholic, he tried to prove the existence of God. But what about? Thomas Aquinas noticed that some people doubted the existence of God. Their logic does not allow or explain his existence. St. Thomas Aquinas I chose to write about St. Thomas Aquinas as I thought it was interesting to hear about his life. St. Thomas Aquinas's research still has a lot of knowledge. I also know that he is called a church doctor, I want to know more. I am interested in St. Thomas Aquinas. It is because he is misunderstood by his colleague and is also known as "dam cow". "I am blushing and I am very scared to show that I am not educated." St. Patrick was caught by Irish pirates when St. Patrick was 16 years old. They took him to Ireland and was sold as a slave in Dalida. There, his work is leaning to the sheep. St. Patrick 's master, Milchu was the high priest of Druid, a sect of heathen who dominated the religious influence on Ireland. St. Patrick believes that his slavery is a trial of his faith in God. In his six-year prison sentence, he had a problem deeply. When I tried to select a customer, I finally chose Thomas Beckett. I was born in England and I wanted to find a British saint. After reading a lot of British saints, I tried to make a decision between Thomas More and Thomas Beckett. Both are Henry, the king's best friend. Both were placed by their king at their place, and they thought they would agree with everything the king wanted. Both chose not the power of the world but the truth of Catholic faith, and both were killed. The company must be good and reminds people that the relationship between church and the country is always mediocre.

Instinctively, humans know that there is greater power in the universe. But there are people who doubt this instinct and, of course, we can not prove this existence logically. St. Thomas Aquinas wrote five evidences about the existence of God in his Summa Theologica. Summa Theologica deals with pure concepts; this evidence depends on the world of experience - people can see themselves. Among these proofs, God logically prove that existence exists reasonably for its existence. In his memorial work Summa Theologica and Summa Contra Gentiles, Aquinas provided a total of five proofs of God's existence. The first two proofs begin with the observation of the physical universe. Because they come from the study of the universe, they are called cosmological arguments. Most of the Aquinas version of the cosmological argument was borrowed from Aristotle. Aquinas' cosmological argument includes the first two of the five evidences about the existence of God, the "five ways". His first two methods are based on two proofs of logic and observation of nature. In this article, we will first briefly explain the five evidences of the existence of God by St. Thomas Aquinas. Then I discussed the relevance of these five evidences that existed in modern times. Finally, I will conclude. The first and most fundamental way given by Aquinas is proof from a movement perspective. Changes that have occurred on the planet are forward-looking and experiential. Now, everything in motion is touched something; indeed, there is no change unless it is changed to something possibly. Besides, something moves according to what actually exists; to change yourself is simply to bring the possibilities from reality to reality. Thomas Aquinas proposed the integration of medieval philosophy and his work "Summa Theologica" proved this In the first part, Aquinas provided five evidence for the existence of God. He discusses the reality and intangibility of God as an indifferent promoter and explains how God acts through his thoughts and wishes Thomas Aquinas objected to Anselm 's argument when presenting five evidences about the existence of God in his Summa Theologica. He believes that people can not understand the nature of God and therefore can not imagine God as proposed by Anselm. Existential arguments are meaningful only to those who fully understand the essence of God. Aquinas believes that only God can fully understand its essence and that only he can use this argument. His refusal of ontological debate has caused other Catholic theologians to reject this argument.

Despite the logic of creating such evidence, there are still people who refuse to admit that God exists. Those people believe that modern science can challenge these five evidences. They say they are hiding behind their slight facts and they say that evidence is no longer applicable as they are not made with existing technology and progress. But what they can not understand is that facts do not rely on science but depend on logic and observations of the world. Mountain castle In this article, we will first briefly explain the five evidences of the existence of God by St. Thomas Aquinas. Then I discussed the relevance of these five evidences that existed in modern times. Finally, I will conclude. The first and most fundamental way given by Aquinas is proof from a movement perspective. Changes that have occurred on the planet are forward-looking and experiential. Now, everything in motion is touched something; indeed, there is no change unless it is changed to something possibly. Besides, something moves according to what actually exists; to change yourself is simply to bring the possibilities from reality to reality. After studying St. Thomas' work, I have read five ways of reading this paper, St. Thomas Aquinas, Plato's lifetime, and most importantly St. Thomas Aquinas. This will help make this article easier. Aquinas is designed by God that you can not move anything on your own, what you can not bring on yourself, cause accidental creatures, completeness is included in God, the way of working in the universe is a wise designer In addition, Aquinas was working on these principles throughout his life and was studying the work of other philosophers such as Aristotle, Plato, Parmenides, Platynus, Abichenna and Bloc, then Ruth At last I followed the principles outlined in his five ways. Most of St Thomas' thinking tries to understand Aristotle's philosophy and Christian legitimacy. His five evidences about the existence of God "tolerate" Aristotle's argument about the principle of existence and the principle of existence (research of existence and its principle is called metaphysics in philosophy). Let's look at some of the foundations of Aristotle in St. Thomas' philosophy before digging down the five methods of Aquinas. Aristotle and Aquinas also believe in the importance of sensory and sensory data in the process of perception. Aquinas never wrote something that is not the first sense in her head. People who prioritize perceptual data in an information-based process are called empiricists. Empirical data is data that is recognized and usually tested. Unlike rationalist Anselm, Aquinas does not rely on nonempirical evidence (such as the definition of the word "God" or "perfection") to prove the existence of God. St. Thomas observes the material world around him and tries to explain why things are like them, from effect to career. He will argue that God is the ultimate cause of all of these. For Aquinas, God's argument as the main reason (the first reason) is not a blind faith, but a philosophical and theoretical need. This is based on arguments and evidence of reasons. This is a posterior discussion, which means that it will continue even after considering the existence of the physical universe.

In modern society, people of society with specific ability or reasonable knowledge know that there are specific laws that control how the world functions. Examples from the world can be observed in the form of gravitational law, or the angle of the triangle will always be up to 180 degrees. We know these things because we admit that certain rules are only a part of our universe as long as we can think for ourselves. Also, we can see that these rules are functioning all over the world in our daily life, for example, we can see how objects react when falling, so these rules are certain I also understand. We will solve these answers ... show more Moral life is a life living according to reason. Aquinas basically concluded that humans should do good and evil should be avoided. As a medieval scholar, Thomas Aquinas showed that people's reasons are believed to have their beliefs and rationality coming from God, or give the god the best tools to provide a living together It was. Regarding ethical issues, Akinas believes that people should blindly observe their common sense or observe commands written in the Bible. Natural law attempts to show how to combine both rational and intellectual, and people involved in determining whether it is ethical can also be faithful to God at the same time. Another part of Aquinas's theory is related to the theory of natural law which is Akinas' conscience of conscience. Aquinas believes that conscience is a means of distinguishing between good and evil. Aquinas generally believes that people tend to do good deeds and avoid evil lives. Conscience is the reason for deciding conscience between conscience and evil and evil, not a voice that stimulates something. Indeed, the approach of natural law to moral theory is not the only one of Aquinas ethics, it is not the best. Especially since Aquinas (especially the pressure on the legislation by the legislative parliament Fiat), changes in the meaning of "law" can inherently mislead the moral constraints of Aquinas. Legal status He generally defines the law (theological encyclopedia I-II, 90, 4 ° C) as "by those who are responsible for the promulgation of the community for public good reasons." "Rationality" is the keyword of this definition. The correct reason (rectal ratio) is the justification of moral judgment in Aquinas' mind. "In the case of will activities, the closest standard is a human reason (the rule is close to human), but the highest standard is the eternal law. It can be achieved through observing its design through the natural order of the world - and by evaluating the law of morality for human reasons. Natural law is also a moral theory and is therefore a non-essential way of morality, meaning that the behavior itself is inherently good or evil, so the outcome of the behavior is irrelevant. Because natural law is judged by weather, it is consistent with world design, everything is created with purpose and special design; fulfilling this purpose is "good" for all purposes. Followers of natural law think that homosexuality is not good as the final goal of gender (the expected final product) is the birth of a child, but because this is an impossible partner of the same sex, If you do not meet the design goal the ultimate goal, that is disappointing.

Lenora Spahn 9/22/00 Thomas Jefferson I. Thomas Jefferson A. Shadwell, Virginia, April 13, 1743. B. Death - July 4, 1826 II. Background A. William & Mary College Education University (1760-1762), a five-year apprenticeship study of George Weiss's law. B. Occupation - Let's start practicing your own laws. In the early 20th century, historian and philosopher Martin Grabman was the first scholar who studied the philosophical thinking of scholarism, and the reaction and development of Thomas Aquinas' thought was not a single coherent coherent saw. The entire organic appearance. Grabmann has many works in Germany, but only Thomas Aquinas (1928) has an English version. But Grubbman's idea contributes to academic philosophy and modern understanding of Aquinas' important role. After studying St. Thomas' work, I have read five ways of reading this paper, St. Thomas Aquinas, Plato's lifetime, and most importantly St. Thomas Aquinas. This will help make this article easier. Aquinas is designed by God that you can not move anything on your own, what you can not bring on yourself, cause accidental creatures, completeness is included in God, the way of working in the universe is a wise designer It is. In addition, Aquinas was working on these principles throughout his life and was studying the work of other philosophers such as Aristotle, Plato, Parmenides, Platynus, Abichenna and Bloc, Ruth, then he We followed the principles outlined in 5 ways. St. Thomas Aquinas I chose to write about St. Thomas Aquinas as I thought it was interesting to hear about his life. St. Thomas Aquinas's research still has a lot of knowledge. I also know that he is called a church doctor, I want to know more. I am interested in St. Thomas Aquinas. It is because he is misunderstood by his colleague and is also known as "dam cow". "I am blushing and I am very scared to show that I am not educated." St. Patrick was caught by Irish pirates when St. Patrick was 16 years old. They took him to Ireland and was sold as a slave in Dalida. There, his work is leaning to the sheep. St. Patrick 's master, Milchu was the high priest of Druid, a sect of heathen who dominated the religious influence on Ireland. St. Patrick believes that his slavery is a trial of his faith in God. In his six-year prison sentence, he had a problem deeply.

Various forms of cosmological arguments on the cosmological argument of the existence of God are recognized arguments against the existence of God, which is also called the first argument. The basis of cosmology is the first reason the universe exists, this is God. It has taken many forms and has been presented in many ways in the past. Many philosophers are proposing such philosophers such as Plato, Aquinas, Socrates, Hume, Kant, their views. Like most arguments about the existence of God, cosmological arguments exist in many forms; here two are discussed: cosmological arguments of time, Kalam (ie the first argument), and division Discussion of style. The main difference between these two arguments is that they avoid the first opposition to the argument and cast the question "is there a reason for that existence in God?" Then suppose that God exists to explain the existence of the universe and we will not take us anywhere. Without God, we have an entity that we can not explain, there is a universe; there is an entity with God, we can not explain, that is God. Discussion that is most widely accepted and criticized about the existence of God. My purpose in this article is to explain why cosmological arguments are proof of the existence of God, to understand that it is the importance of posteriori posteriori discussion, and to my common argument It is to observe the position of. First of all, as a living person on earth, we can safely conclude that the majority of things that exist today have their cause. I confirmed that there is a reason. There are many arguments about the existence of God to try to prove the existence of God. In this article we will discuss ontological discussions, cosmological arguments, empirical discussions, such as avoiding errors and design arguments. There is much criticism about each of these, and the existence of God can not prove that it might be stronger than those who speak more strongly. The insisting definition of God is a god of Christianity ... I have found Akinas' theory that the existence of God is very interesting. It is easy to understand and logical. Summa Theologiae is one of the best works of Aquinas. St. Thomas is also a writer, writing a lot of comments on Aristotle and other theological and philosophical themes. Aquinas divides his argument into five ways to prove the existence of God. The first method is sports debate. There are many things that are changing, but not all of a sudden starts.

The existence of the god of Anselm rejects the refusal of the existence of the god of Anselm, and if the only evidence of the existence of God is Akinus's five ways and anselm's ontological argument, as Anselm offers Seem. The best reasoning I am not saying that Anselm 's view is better or even effective, but in view of the proof of Aquinas and Anselm, Anselm' s view is better. Indeed, Anselm believes that the existence of God is based on the concept of God. He did it through the argument of "reducing ridiculous things" - he reduced absurdly. Antism 's ontological argument is intended to be the first evidence of God' s existence. Start with the assumption that Anselm does not depend on experience, then draw conclusions of the existence of God through purely logical means. His purpose was to counter the fool who said that there was no God in his heart (Psalm 14: 1). This fool has two important features. The following is an attempt to clarify the discussion presented in Chapter 2 of Proslogium. The discussion in chapter 3 is quite different, and in some ways it is more interesting. After completing this page, you may try to produce similar gloss with the second parameter. This is not easy. This argument is very complicated. But you may think that this is a useful exercise The existence of the god of Anselm rejects the refusal of the existence of the god of Anselm, and if the only evidence of the existence of God is Akinus's five ways and anselm's ontological argument, as Anselm offers Seem. The best reasoning I am not saying that Anselm 's view is better or even effective, but in view of the proof of Aquinas and Anselm, Anselm' s view is better. Indeed, Anselm believes that the existence of God is based on the concept of God. He goes through discussion ... there are many arguments about the existence of God to try to prove the existence of God. In this article we will discuss ontological discussions, cosmological arguments, empirical discussions, such as avoiding errors and design arguments. There is much criticism about each of these, and the existence of God can not prove that it might be stronger than those who speak more strongly. The definition of God arguing is a God of Christians.

St. Thomas Aquinas to prove the existence of God is a comparison of St. Thomas Aquinas, one of the greatest theologians ever. He realized that some people doubt the existence of God, as logic does not allow or explain the existence of God. As a devout Christian, he naturally believes in God, but he wants to prove the existence of God to those who can not accept things by faith alone. Therefore there are five proofs that God exists in St. Thomas Aquinas. All evidence is based on natural logic and observation. There is much debate about the existence of God about the existence of God. For a long time everyone wanted to prove the existence of God. Some people think that God exists and is proved by many philosophical or scientific foundations and religious reasons. On the other hand, others do not believe in the existence of God, and their foundation is proved from many theoretical and scientific point of view. Many people try to prove the existence of God with reason. After Descartes proves its existence, people will consider the truth about the essence of God, evidence of the existence of God, and the nature of material objects. The main task in Descartes' meditation is to design a system that allows him to understand the truth. He wants to lay the foundation of all further philosophy The medieval society believed that humans existed because God wants them to exist. Descartes does not doubt the existence of God, I doubt that the existence of man is God's desire. He has a problem because he proved the existence of God using a series of theorems. He proved that thought is the essence of thinking. At that time the revolution supports the new idea of ​​"I think myself". It gives independent thinking and free will to human institutions, leading the age of enlightenment. For Descartes, thought proves that our existence is a conscious entity. By solving the survival problem, the thinkers of the 18th and 19th centuries established mathematical and scientific identity. Equivalent thoughts and consciousness do not satisfy thinking thoughts. Beyond the era of reason, we continue to doubt our existence In this article, I will explain how Descartes uses his existence to prove the existence of God. It is based on "I think that God's thought is in my heart" and "I think so". - First of all, I must say that God believes that he has a universal church, the church of God. To my knowledge, many of the people who claim to be God's saints are not.

Please fill in the mind map of the word document launched for you, using the following sources. Q: Discuss your answers from the mind map in two groups and select the three ways medieval Europe influence the world today. Show your findings to classes in PowerPoint demo of the next lesson Christianity dominated the history of medieval Europe. That philosophy affects actions, ideas and values ​​about justice and punishment. That worker - mainly the pastor - has preserved many old and medieval documents. That tradition had a great influence on music, art and architecture. Latin is the official language of an ancient Roman. It became a medieval European language for official documents and church worship. Until recently, it was still a language commonly used in many Roman Catholic worshipers. Latin is the basis of many of the English words that are used today. Even scientists use Latin to classify the fields they study. For example, the parliamentary conference in Australia can advise the king and can be traced back to those who were later called the Great Council. This led to a conference to talk about important matters between aristocrats and the general public. In 1350 when it was called Diet, it was divided into two groups. Noblemen met in a certain place, civilian met in a different place. This arrangement later evolved into the UK House of Representatives, the Senate and its House of Representatives, and the House of Representatives. The Hereford world map is the world's oldest surviving world map, which was produced in the early 1300s of the European Renaissance. In the second half of the Middle Ages, the influence on the drawing became wider. As the exploration increased, Europe began to develop into an international continent; the Islamic world's influence on architecture can be seen on a wide range of trips. - In the transgender space of the video "Hermaphrodites Speak", I feel that something is missing, I want to tell others that surgery is unnecessary and I infringe on my body. Something. In my thesis I will refer to the conditions and policies of birthrate redistribution surgery. But lacking in the ancient Greek world is one of the most important influences on us and luxury goods today. Christianity. In order to understand the attitude toward modern people's luxury goods, I need to go over the ancient world to enter the Middle Ages - from the collapse of the Roman era to the formation of the 15th century, by that time the condition of the modern consumer society has broken It was. The way I follow is luxurious - the social and political problems of the Greeks - and because it also becomes a religious and moral matter, the result is attractive. Christianity turns luxury into a deadly sin European medieval political philosophy is deeply influenced by Christian thought. Roman Catholics also have philosophy dependent on theology, so it has much in common with Islamic thought. Perhaps the most influential medieval European political philosopher is St. Thomas Aquinas who only saved by Muslims and helped reintroduce Aristotle 's work preserved with Aberos' comments. Those uses of Aquinas have defined the agenda of academic political philosophy and have dominated European ideas for centuries.

Since the beginning of history, there has always been conflict and differences. And it brought a fight and a showdown. Since the emergence of these hostilities, the problems that caused conflict and battle themselves were explained in textbooks and filled up on the Internet, but the time to think about many soldiers and people who endangered our lives It did not take. To gain a deeper understanding of safety and freedom history and what these veterans did for us, we interviewed Christian Vastler, a black veteran, a desert storm and the Iraq war. Christians have different views on time violence and nonviolence. In present and in history, Christianity has four views and practices regarding violence and war: nonresistance, Christian pacifism, Justice war theory and Crusades (Holy War or Preventive War). The early church of the Roman Empire adopted a non-violent position during the war. Because it is desirable to mimic the life of Jesus' sacrifice. The concept of "war of justice", restricted use of war, is thought to be tolerated, it is derived from Romans and Greek thinkers such as Cicero and Plato who are not early Christians . This theory was later adapted by Christian thinkers like Saint Augustine. And, like other Christians, he borrowed most of the reasons for Roman writers like Cicero and Roman law. The concept of "jihad", the fight itself, may be regarded as a form of confession and spiritual feat, not appearing before the 11th century. Under certain conditions, the concept of war rationales can be traced back to Romans such as Cicero and Plato and Greek thinkers. But its importance is related to the Christian medieval theory which starts with Hippo Augustine and Thomas Aquinas. According to Jared Diamond, Augustine in Hippo is important in describing what Christian is a legitimate war and how to combine peace doctrine of peace with the need for war in certain situations I played a role. In part inspired by Cicero's work, Augustine corrects neighboring countries' mistakes to protect the country, and if the tyrant loses power, it thinks that war can prove to be reasonable . The theory of justice war is seen as a product of classical Greek and Roman ideology, but reflections are seen in other traditions. Hippocratic Christian theologian Augustine says that war is terrible, but it is necessary, in the face of certain dangers and justifications, if war is being done properly in the pursuit of peace It is thought. Later, Thomas Aquinas proposed conditions for considering war. Many of the rules established in the tradition of war of justice are incorporated into modern international law like the Geneva Convention and the UN Charter.

Color Code: Blue - Critical Analysis of Purple for the Discussion of Red - Orange in Your Discussion / Key Figures In the 13 th century, Thomas Aquinas developed his own natural moral law system with Aristotle's work . Aquinas believes that our goal is perfect not only in eudaimonia but also in the world after death ... I will continue to read the natural law - "The advantages of natural law outweigh its weak points." (40 points) Unfortunately, natural law theory has many weaknesses, the main reason for the Catholic version is its essential sectarianism. For example, why a rational person chooses Catholic Natural Law instead of Islamic law and indigenous peoples law. Are they the same "nature"? How do you know which is better? The charm of God inherent in Catholic Natural Law thought also expels atheists and agnostics, and they are by no means a minority in contemporary society. He is a devout, conservative Roman Catholic (and admits this), but attempts to establish a sectarian natural law theory rather than being able to use sensible people as the basis of law. Finnis does this by constructing his theory about seven "basic goods" that all benevolent people can recognize, such as friendship, the right of life. Natural law is a legal moral theory that believes that law should be based on morality and morality. Natural law considers that the law is based on "right" things. Natural law is to "discover" human beings by using reason to choose good and evil. Therefore, natural law has the ability to discover certain universal standards of morality and morality. Greeks - Socrates, Plato and Aristotle emphasized the difference between "phyxis" (φ) and "law", "custom" or "custom" (nomo, nouveau). The place ordered by law is different, but the "birth" place should be the same. Many people consider Aristotle (384 - 322 BC) a father of the "natural law". In rhetoric, he thinks that in addition to the "specific" law each person establishes for himself, there are also "common law" or "higher law" depending on the nature (rheet 1373 b 2 - 8).

The theological virtue of philanthropy is centered around three important elements (Velde, 2006). These elements are charity, faith, and hope. In order to gain charity, beliefs and hopes should be active at some important level to ensure that there is a way to achieve the goal. Charity is an important aspect of activating elements of faith and hope. However, to some extent these three elements are not separated. Hope and faith are independent. But charity depends on the individual's ability to have confidence and hope. The important concept that Aquinas tried to define was the theological virtue of charity. With this effort, he wishes to draw out a fundamental understanding of charity virtue from a theological point of view. To understand this concept, Aquinas borrowed much from other sources to help broaden his argument about the theological virtues of charity. Even though he was one of the best theologians of the time, he never thought of it. Charity is the greatest at the end of three theological virtues, the other two are faith and hope. It is often referred to as general definition of love and confusion in general understanding and the latter word, but charity groups are not only subjective feelings but also objective actions against others' will. Like other theological virtues, charitable organizations are supernatural in the sense that God is its origin and purpose. As a priest, John A. Hutton, SJ. In his "Contemporary Catholic Dictionary", charity is a kind of "supernatural virtue injected, people who worship God for their own benefit and loves others for God". Will action and charity will increase our love for our God and our companions; but charity is a gift from God, so we can not get this virtue at first through our own actions. Theological virtue of faith, hope, and charity (love) is a virtue directly related to God. These are not gained by human efforts, but are injected into our bodies as gifts from God from the beginning of baptism. They allowed us to live with the Holy Trinity. Faith, hope, and charity influence human virtue by increasing the stability and strength of our lives. Each of the Ten Commandments prohibits certain kinds of evil, but each commandment shows a virtue that can help us avoid these evils. Generosity, mental poverty, kindness, pure soul, temperament, and tenacity overcome the so-called seven deadly or capital crime pride, greed or greed, jealousy, anger, desire, bulimia, laziness or laziness It helps to avoid other evil and evil guilt

Aquinas replied to this discussion in two parts. First of all, he believes that God's revelation is more certain than obvious to mankind, because God is different from man and omniscient. The only reason that it seems less secure is that it exceeds the human ability to fully understand God's certainty. The second reaction of Aquinas is that sacrament contains more important topics, then includes other sciences and hence is more important. He believes that all other sciences will indirectly seek the same goals as the sacred doctrine seeks directly for eternal happiness. You may not know or understand, but the "anti-gays" feeling is not "black" in history. Before and after Christianity and Muslims decided that we were enemies of the country, SGL people existed in every era of history, including Africa. You may not like it, but the anti-gay law comes from colonialism in Africa and America, South America. Contemporary Anti - Homosexuality is a continuation of the colonial period of Africa. The colonial code or 'the criminal convictions law is based on the legal documents of the British empire such as the Indian Penal Code 377 A imposed and imposed on these countries during the colonial era. "So, why are these feelings Do you survive to people? Why does Uganda still want to kill us? Why will you intentionally imitate religion in emerging countries after Christianity? Before Kim Il Sung governed, North Korea was a place of revival of Christianity in the early twentieth century. A great many Christians live here, and many churches are dotted with the current North Korean capital Pyongyang, even known as "East Jerusalem". Christian's son and grandson of Christian's pastor Kim Il-sung are familiar with Christianity and, instead of worshiping the Japanese emperor, Christians have martyred during Japanese colonial rule of 1910-1945 I witnessed what I have chosen. Christianity and Islam arrived in China in the 7th century. Christianity did not settle until the missionaries of the Jesuits reintroduced Christianity in the 16 th century. Early in the 20th century, the Christian community continued to develop, but since 1949, foreign missionaries were expelled from the country, and the church was governed by the government-controlled institutions. In the latter half of the 1970s, Christian religious freedom was improved and a new group of Chinese appeared 508,532 China saw the secular idea that began in the Confucian era, the home of humanism and secularism It is made.

On the other hand, Tom Jones not only lacks respect for external tokens, it is easy to forget to take off the hat or to break the master's method, but the command and role model of his master is completely unnoticed . He believes that the different discoveries of these gentlemen will modify their different imperfections; and these two will get complete criteria of true religion and virtue, especially with his help . Let's live in an excelent distant place but not skilled human beings, read and think about the teaching of the gospel and our Savior example, and look for a real church. Ask about it with arrogance and oppressive power; among those who constantly master the soul and physical control; among the people faithfully employed by bold rebel armies, they study how to destroy their companions If their crimes, but their mistakes, he does not want to be kind to the Inquisition, wants to carry out a massacre or wants to seek mercy, he can not find a real church in the Roman Church. In the last article, I wrote five major rules about Buddhism, Pancasila. This is the most fundamental thing that non-professional Buddhists should know. As this is the first commandment, I am one of the doctrines of obeying the killing prohibition. So in this article, I would like to develop lessons for Buddhists to understand and practice it properly. According to the above five points, plants and microorganisms do not have thought and perception, can not move anywhere, and microbes such as bacteria can not be seen with the naked eye, so these points can not be satisfied. They can certainly not be called "beings" but only in the Buddhism related to the first commandment. There are only humans and animals here, because they have ideas and perceptions, they can move anywhere and can see with the naked eye. Therefore, we can call humans and animals a perceptual being. The main rule "to protect innocent human life" leads to secondary rules such as "do not stop" or "do not euthanasia". Secondary discipline comes from the main rules; theoretically, they are easier to explain than the main rules. Aquinas allows you to create detailed information about them, such as coping with the situation. There are even more exceptions. Natural law also examines the function of individual body parts related to our overall purpose. I believe that Aquinas is wrong to use something other than other functions and purposes; the purpose of the genitals is breeding, contraception is incorrect. Trivial precepts do not obey the main rules directly, they need good judgment and wisdom to accomplish. When there was a reason to ask, Aquinas permitted the change of the second commandment, he called the killing in war "the smaller of two evils".

Aquinas' philanthropic view shows that philanthropy can not be legislated, but the use of welfare in modern society seems to be a legislative act to provide charitable work to disadvantaged people. According to the legal point of Aquinas, charitable organizations passing through welfare law seems inappropriate. As the purpose of welfare is not charitable itself, it does not belong to the definition of philanthropic projects provided by Aquinas, so it is so, as described in the "Law Theory". The charity's view of Quiner's legal relationship is not contradictory. Prior to the 20th century, social welfare programs were mainly in the fields of charitable organizations, especially religious charities. But by the middle of the 20th century government agencies transcended charitable organizations and became the primary tool for public well-being. Like other forms of North American citizenship, most of social welfare-related responsibilities are assigned to state and state governments, and these governments have strengthened the bureaucracy of child welfare. These individuals are responsible for intervention if the child is ignored or abused; the case worker often tries to maintain the integrity of the family, but children who live in a dangerous environment often I will be taken away. The government plans to start development under the guidance of the Roosevelt regime. New Deal (1933-1936) brought dozens of social welfare bills including the Social Security Act of 1935. The social welfare program has expanded to include housing, recreation, cultural activities, social insurance and child welfare programs. During the Second World War (1939 - 1945), many social workers were given war related work to develop services for communities affected by war. Social workers in these missions will help soldiers and their families cope with injuries and other medical problems. From this work we will create a special classification of military social workers. The private welfare state has two divisions: charity and social welfare projects, and employee benefits. Charity projects and social welfare projects have a long and diverse history. In the 1960s, the government began to fund more and more services through private agencies. As the reliance on public funds increases, the private sector is gradually becoming a government provider, which has a big impact on their work. Employee benefits constitute another department of the private welfare state. These dates originate mainly from the time after World War II. The labor union has expanded due to the legalization of the Wagner Act in 1935 and the decision of the National Labor Relations Commission in 1949.

Choose the two philosophers we read and compare them with those most important to you. It is one. Use a reference to the text to explain the idea clearly. Bay shows that these philosophers agree with this particular view (eg, each of these philosophers agree ... a reference in the text to prove that this is the case Use the). Do you agree with the view presented by the philosopher? Why. The two philosophers I chose were Kant and Thoreau, and transcendence. The transcendental theory is defined by the Webster Dictionary as a philosophical emphasis on a priori conditions of knowledge and experience, or for ignorance or emphasis of the final reality. In his details of Libin de Causis (Lect. 1), Aquinas described a series of philosophical studies: logic, mathematics, natural philosophy (physics), moral philosophy, and finally metaphysics. The reality that is first considered in this course is the physical world. (At the beginning of the next century, John Duns Scotus criticized Thomas who tried to build his metaphysics and his method on the basis of physics.) The interpreter is the order to follow when Aquinas himself learns philosophy It is arguing whether to think or not. Or did he just report on how the philosopher taught it? In any case, the philosophical study of moving objects in Aristotle's sense is important for Aquinas. His works (De Principiis Naturae, Part 2 of Summa Contra Gentiles, De Aeternitate Mundi's paper) have considerable personal consideration for the world's bodies. Between the 1970s and the 1980s more and more moral philosophical literature brought a rational approach to animal therapy ethics. Such a first book is Peter Singer's Animal Liberation (1975), and my book "Animal Rights and Human Morality" (Rollin, 1981), Tom Reagan's Animal Rights Case (1983) and "Moral, rational and animals" of Steve Sapo Qi Si (1987). These books discuss animal studies from the perspective of moral theory, and claim a higher animal moral status. In particular, I pointed out that eliminating animals from our moral mechanisms and concepts is logically unreasonable for two reasons. "Revised" environmental philosophy is the use of important concepts and theories of normative philosophy, but extends it to include nonhuman animals in the moral community. It is accomplished by giving moral status (or moral status) to non-human animals. "Animal ethics" is such a revised position (see the Animal Morals section). Feminist animal ethicists oppose the same practices (eg agriculture, biopsy, hunting at the factory). Neither is a feminist two animal ethics version, Utilitarian version of Peter Singer (1975) and right wing version of Tom Regan (1982). Singer object against these customs. Because they bring unnecessary suffering and suffering to all beings. Reagan opposed them because they violated what he calls "the theme of life" of the right of life. However, feminist animal ethics is a further step forward by providing a gender perspective on such practices and animal protection (see feminist animal ethics care described in section 3.8).

Key features of cosmological argument The cosmological argument began with Plato and since then it has been defended and attacked by many great philosophers. One of the supporters is Leibniz. Cosmological arguments are basically discussions on causation. Its main supporter is Thomas Aquinas, but Gotfried Leibniz also proposed a simplified version of Aquinas' cosmological point. The main critics of the discussion include David Hume and Bertrand Russell who question the rationale for discussion. Kalām's cosmological argument is a contemporary expression of the cosmological argument about the existence of God, named after Warrior Lane Craig in his "Calm Cosmology" by Karam (medieval Islamic academic philosophy) It was done. (TheKalāmCosmologicalArgument, 1979) promoted. This argument is a variant of Aristotle's indifferent promoter, which was named after the medieval Islamic academic philosophy and because of the possibility of Craig's opposition to the actual infinite existence Craig became a philosophy of the 11th century Go back. Home Argalari Like most arguments about the existence of God, cosmological arguments exist in many forms; here two are discussed: cosmological arguments of time, Kalam (ie the first argument), and division Discussion of style. The main difference between these two arguments is that they avoid the first opposition to the argument and cast the question "is there a reason for that existence in God?" Then suppose that God exists to explain the existence of the universe and we will not take us anywhere. Without God, we have an entity that we can not explain, there is a universe; there is an entity with God, we can not explain, that is God.

Criticism of God's existence Since the beginning of the recorded history, countless philosophers have been thinking about whether God exists or not. One philosopher, St. Thomas Aquinas, proposed his own theory about the existence of God. In his article "There is a god that exists", he said he can prove the existence of God through his five arguments. His five arguments derive from stepwise to design, from the movements, from the first effective reason, from the possibilities and necessities. When Aquinas began publishing his articles, he challenged two objections. But under Eagleton 's roaring, there is a potentially relevant criticism. After all, some complicated theology is about whether God exists, and more importantly about the essence of God. Eagleton understands this and tries to explain the difference between the concept of God and other worlds. Jewish - For Christians, God is not what Algiers can say. He is neither "principle" nor "presence" in substance. In a sense, the type of religion insists that God does not actually exist exactly. Instead, he is a condition of any physical possibility including ourselves. He is the answer to why, nothing, not all. God and the universe do not complement, only my ankle and my left foot do not constitute a pair of things The existence of God has been debated for thousands of years, and important discussions have been carried out. Believing that God is reasonable is another story, just as God confidently believed in himself, this topic brought a lot of debate. It is one thing to discuss whether God is true or not, and it is another matter to discuss whether it is reasonable to believe that God is reasonable. There may be no convincing evidence or evidence that God exists, but I believe it. Philosophical thought for such a question about the meaning of the word "God" and the existence of God is to try to clarify this situation in a reasonable way. Defining "rationality" is almost as difficult as defining God, but in the first part of this article I will introduce some restrictions on the reasonable exploration of our subject I proposed the basic rule. In the remainder of this article I will explain the philosophical concept of God trying to meet the requirements set out in my regulations with varying degrees of success. This article will not have any position, regardless of whether it can rationally prove the existence of God. It raises the previous question - the definition of God; only when we are convinced that God's idea is consistent, we can reasonably decide whether there is a fit for this idea You can ask Despite the "meaningless" pain, the problem of existence of omnipotent omniscient God is a very controversial matter. In this article we assert that such a god exists in the article against Wilhelm about evil. There is a god that is omnipotent, omniscient, almighty kindness. God has created our world, and it has every reason, including pain. As this is a correct remark, people need to agree on the second assumption (Rowe, 230). If there is an omnipotent, omnipresent God, he will prevent meaningless suffering. However, it is wrong to say that such a god does not exist, as the first premise is incorrect. There is no "pointless" pain at all, so the first assumption is incorrect. Essay.com/ Demonstration of articles about William Row's evil to prove that a full-fledged god exists Prove that omnidirectional god exists for articles about evil of William Roe

As an artist of a young artist and a young artist as a portrait of an artist, Stephen DeDalus defines the beauty and artist's understanding of his art. Steven uses his aesthetic theory and St. Thomas Aquinas and theory borrowed from Plato. Discourse can be divided into three main parts: 1) Definition of beauty and art. 2) Aesthetic understanding and qualification 3) Artist's view of his work. I will explain how the first two parts of his aesthetic theory are related to Steven. As a young artist, young artist portrait painter covers many fields and has various themes as a portrait of a young man. The theme of the novel is the artistic development of the artist Stephen, which is related to the development of artists in the linguistic life. Steven experienced the voices of many Irish and his educational writers. - Portrait of young artists: Einstein science and Joyce artist relations Joyce and Einstein have made a great contribution to their respective fields, but many new mysteries were answered as answers to the questions. As an artist of a young artist and a young artist as a portrait of an artist, Stephen DeDalus defines the beauty and artist's understanding of his art. Steven uses his aesthetic theory and St. Thomas Aquinas and theory borrowed from Plato. Discourse can be divided into three main parts: 1) Definition of beauty and art. 2) Aesthetic understanding and qualification 3) Artist's view of his work. - James Joyce's artist, as an important element of a portrait of a young artist, as a portrait of a young man, provides a Catholic introspective quest of Irish. To provide the reader with a correct explanation, Joyce penetrated the story through vivid images and various language devices. In this article, we will conduct a detailed analysis of the work by examining its important elements. James Joyce James Joyce 's novel "Portrait of Young Artists" (1916) as a portrait of a young artist is fully interested in the development of the hero Stephen Dedalus. - James Joyce's portrait of young artists, James Joyce's "Young artist of Young Artist" shows the proposed art model. How to read this art After Stephen D'Dalus' s lifetime, Joyce expresses the artist 's view of the world using Stephen' s direct recognition.

History of St. Thomas Hospital St. Thomas's operating theater was originally built in 1106 by the monastery church for general hospitality. It is used not only for treating people, but also for bed and breakfast hotels. It was destroyed by fire in 1212 and rebuilt in 1215 in 3 years. But it was placed elsewhere on Borough High St 6reet as conditions would be better. After 650 years, this is a planned railroad. Today is the feast of St. Thomas Aquinas. A lot of articles about this great saint are written, and their contribution to the theology of the church is huge. In fact, among all theologians in the history of the church, St. Thomas Aquinas occupied the site of theological research. Pope Pius IX stole up all night to encourage all members of the church to study cuckoo and learn St. Thomas to understand and deepen the spiritual life: this doctrine and reverence It is not impossible to find the extent of doctor's excellence, and he is given the sun as a device; he brings the light of learning to the minds of people, and to inspire their souls and will Use virtue. Since the organization of St. Jude Children's Hospital is based on the vision of the founder Danny Thomas who created the hospital to treat a devastating sick child, the child does not die at the dawn of life (St Jude Children 's Research Hospital, 2010). In cooperation with ALSAC, Danny Thomas gained the money needed to create a hospital from the beginning, and worked hard to create an environment that welcomes everyone. His vision is that hospitals, doctors and researchers who eat children are not threatened by healthcare providers will eat with their patients, and hospitals will continue to work as a child while the patient is fighting catastrophic illness (St. Jude Children's Studies) Hospital, 2010) Guy and St Thomas Hospital is one of the most demanding NHS Foundation trusts with approximately 900,000 patient assistants each year. They offer various hospital services to the communities of Lambeth, Southwark and Lewis Ham. They also offer special services to patients in London, southeastern, and other regions. Compared to John Lewis Partners' private company, Guy's and St Thomas Hospitals are managed by a board of directors consisting of part-time directors and executive officers. It is headed by Chairman and CEO. They are welcomed as the busiest foundation trust fund. They responded to the cultural and ethnic diversity of the group they serve.

The subjective factors of beauty include judgment rather than opinion. Many people think that beauty is exactly visible. St. Thomas Aquinas saw beauty with supernatural and natural orders. Aquinas lists the attributes of beauty found in nature. These are unity, balance, clarity. We will see how these beautiful attributes are visible and inspired by the mind. First, the notion of unity follows Aristotle's argument that it can not add or detach anything to the perfect art work. The definition of beauty is a characteristic of a person, animal, place, thing, or idea and provides a perceptual experience of happiness, meaning, or satisfaction. Beauty has a negative impact on most people. Beauty is explained by us both inside and outside. Because of our beauty, our pride is greatly hurt, especially for girls. Beauty is not always related to our appearance, but it also relates to our inner personality. First, the United States has a negative impact and a positive influence on everything. By observing the definition of beauty, I am convinced that beauty has all sorts of positive aspects, because the positive side is obvious. Everyone notices beauty in various ways ... See more "I think that beauty is defined by society.The definition of beauty starts from a young age according to social norm.It definitely decides who I am and how beautiful.Growth is inside Beauty that will surely enhance my external beauty This is a social structure determined by hegemonic ruling class Obesity is not necessarily healthy but it is not necessarily a lean farmhouse but economically stable people Although the situation is opposite, the appearance that imitated beauty is always a powerful ruling class or elite, once a member of the royal family, now it is a wealthy celebrity I am. " What do you jump out when you read the definition above? For me, it contains the word "or". Many of the definitions of beauty are focused on happiness only, but this definition says that beauty can bring happiness or satisfaction. Satisfaction means the willingness to see you, that you need to be relieved, and that you want to soothe. Therefore, beauty does not necessarily mean "beautiful". Beautiful things can meet the needs of less beautiful people. You need to find similar injuries as others, you need to sympathize with your compatriots and loneliness, you need to experience the anger of others to know the way to go ... beautiful, the world is hard to think It was found in the place

Messages to the church and all believers continue to James' s letter. James challenged his readers to live a life to please God. In order for Christians to be rooted in their own life, the information of James 2 is very important. There are two controversial topics in James 2. James 2 talks about how to achieve human faith through behavior. In the previous chapter, James 1:22 states a sentence "However, not only the crowd, but please cheat this word yourself." The cliff emphasizes "reunion without compromise". He said that the difference between Catholic and Protestant opinion about objective subjective religion and subjective religion or faith and work is the result of sin. Cliff said: "Only when we have God's coincidence we will match, we will be with each other only when we are with God. Only when it is consistent with God, we are in accord with God. " Two-sided coins: Thomas Hobbs vs. John Locke always has two aspects, including people and government, like science and belief. Thomas Hobbes and John Rock give the opposite impression of people, society, and government, but they are all British. Hobbes was born on April 5, 1588 and died on December 4, 1679; he is known today for his work in political philosophy. John Rock died on 29 August 1632 and died on 28 October Recalling the problems of faith and reason, it showed the direction of medieval philosophy. At one end of the spectrum, theologians such as Tetoliang believe that the religious truth must be discovered only by faith without reasonable guidance. This is the position of faith. In addition, Aquinas believes that reason can uniquely discover many of the truths we learned through faith. Nonetheless, for Aquinas, we absolutely need faith and he does not claim any similar reasonable position to deny the value of faith. In this section we will explore the extremes of this discussion with the writing of two early modern philosophers. Cherbert's Edward Herbert is the only rational aspect, Blaise Pascal is in an independent faith.

John Courtney Murray once said "This is a great traditional force that has promoted our republic, I think it is one of the doubts ... How did this tradition evolve today? .. Is there a basic fact of this special agreement, of course, the big truth behind the statements of this political objective - usually in Lincoln's words "This is a country under God" - a premise of political life , Theology is the existence of God, then another truth of mankind, the essential truth of mankind, that man is sacred. One of the most influential contributors to this declaration is a member of a religious group known as an American priest, John Courtney Murray, Jesuits. Prior to that, he claimed that Catholic moral theology based on the law of nature is consistent with the ideals of the American Revolution. At the time of writing this article he was ordered not to write this subject as it was considered a dangerous opinion by the Vatican authorities. However, at the Second Vatican Council, Murray became one of Bishop's most influential consultants and became a declarative architect. William Lee Miller also attributed this view to Father John Courtney Murray, the principal architect of the Vatican II Religious Freedom Declaration. Murray believes that the first revision of the US Constitution comes from enlightenment rather than religious principles, and from the cautiousness and social needs of pluralism. After that, he asked Williams for help and laid the foundation for the religious principle of freedom of religion (Miller, First Liberty, 184). According to an article by John Courtney Murray, S. J. Together with "The Composition of the Middle Ages from God's Quest" (1964), Thomas Aquinas is an endless science and Christianity by helping people understand his beliefs and discoveries in different ways Fill such gaps. First, Thomas Aquinas believes that the universe was created by God, but this does not mean that it is perfect like Almighty God. The universe is merely the expression of love to the human race of God, but its strengths and weaknesses do not limit God's greatness.

An important idea on the creation of God's cosmological argument has three important ideas in cosmological arguments, each written by a different philosopher and having different views on the reasons for existence. Let's look at different perspectives. Thomas Aquinas is one of the greatest theologians in the world. He believes that Aristotle 's philosophy is the foundation of Christian better than Plato' s theory. Aquinas believes that in order to prove the existence of God it is only for people to see the surrounding world and that the world can not exist because there is no ultimate power to support it. Nick Ludwig's Thesis # 6 A cosmological argument about God's existence is a philosopher's common philosophy and a non-philosopher of the world today. It tries to explain the existence of God through our observations and reality. Cosmological arguments are a successful way to prove that the presence of God and this superior existence is the creation of the universe. The first reality of cosmological argument is that facts exist. Some people think that the source of all existence is God, but I think that this idea is correct. In order to continue creation, I think that being the first reason is to become God. The universe must have a beginning, and this argument supports the beginning for higher existence. The horizontal form of this discussion of this discussion explains that for everything with a beginning it has reasons for it In the case of the Kalam cosmological argument, the difference between the universe and God is that there is a beginning in time for the universe. Everything that has time to start claiming by Kalam Cosmological Argument will exist. When there is a beginning of time in the universe, that argument concludes that the universe has its cause, the reason is God. The existence of unaffected God is consistent with the initial assertion of this discussion since there is no time to start. "There is a reason for everything that has time to start." In discussing the above simple cosmological argument

The existence of God is always controversial. This is the last theme of the discussion as everyone seems to have an opinion on it. I look at the traditional discussion of the existence of God, discussions to endure the test of time, and see each discussion in turn, and finally by looking for truly useful discussion logic behind each discussion I will analyze. Response to criticism and criticism. The first argument about the existence of God I see is a cosmological argument, often referred to as the "first cause" argument. There are many arguments about the existence of God to try to prove the existence of God. In this article we will discuss ontological discussions, cosmological arguments, empirical discussions, such as avoiding errors and design arguments. There is much criticism about each of these, and the existence of God can not prove that it might be stronger than those who speak more strongly. The insisting definition of God is a god of Christianity ... I have found Akinas' theory that the existence of God is very interesting. It is easy to understand and logical. Summa Theologiae is one of the best works of Aquinas. St. Thomas is also a writer, writing a lot of comments on Aristotle and other theological and philosophical themes. Aquinas divides his argument into five ways to prove the existence of God. The first method is sports debate. There are many things that are changing, but not all of a sudden starts. St. Thomas Aquinas has five ways to prove the existence of God. The first is to prove the existence of God through the idea of ​​exercise. By studying Aristotle's work, he concluded that moving objects had to be moved by other things and powers. Therefore, he said that there must be an "indifferent propeller" (God) who first puts things in action. Some are touched by another, some are considered animals, others are considered passive. The fact that moving from one person to another does not exclude the fact that it may be touched by others, and the other fact is that it is a trigger.

These methods discussed the philosopher, questioned his argument and ultimately invited controversy in cosmological arguments. However, the cosmological argument is not a legitimate argument against the existence of God. The conclusion does not follow the premise theoretically. The point of cosmological argument discussion is the primary reason. Like the above (Aquinas), the world can not be infinite. And there must be a first reason called God. This is the second method of Aquinas and it is an effective reason. Aquinas uses his physical observations on the earth to present his theory and nothing can exist. The argument of Kalam cosmology is a modern expression of the cosmological proof of the existence of God. It is named by William Lane Craig (William Lane Craig) of Kalam (Islamic medieval Schola) by his "Cerre Ermu's cosmology" (TheKalāmCosmologicalArgument, 1979). This argument is a transformation of the facilitator without being moved Aristotle 's mind. That is because Craig named Medieval Islamic Schola opposed the possibility of actual infinite existence, so the idea dates back to the philosophy of the 11th century Home Al Gazzari Like most arguments about the existence of God exist in many forms such as cosmological arguments. Discussion 2 here: Time, Kalam cosmological arguments (that is, the first cause argument), as well as emergency modal arguments. The main difference between these two arguments is that they are opposed to the introduction of doubt at first to avoid the way of arguments: if he exists, on the one hand, God considers Why is it supposed to be "cause God has reason for his existence?", And assume that God exists to explain the existence of the universe and does not permit us anywhere. Without God, we can not explain God, with entities that we can not explain there is a certain universe, and God has a physical presence In the case of Kalam's cosmological argument, the difference between the universe and God is that the universe is the beginning of time. Everything that has time to start claiming by Kalam Cosmological Argument will exist. When there is a beginning of time in the universe, the argument concludes that the universe has its cause, the reason is God. There is no time to begin Presence that is not influenced by God is consistent with the original argument of this discussion. "There is a reason for everything that has time to begin." Therefore, the existence of God that can not be explained does not cause problems. Discussion of the simple cosmology above Emmanuel Kant argued against the use of "necessary existence" throughout the discussion of cosmology and therefore concluded that a necessary existence exists. Kant has an absolutely necessary process of existence in an attempt to prove the existence of nonexistent existence of the universe argument, abstract "impossible", (critic B 621) "absolutely incredible" I believed it. Kant pointed out that he is called "absolutely necessary existence" existence exists, there is a need to be contradictory to logically deny its existence. The only existence that meets this condition is the most real, or the best existence, including all perfect beings present. This concept is at the center of ontological argument (see ontology). Argument argument, although perfect being exists that is determined by that concept, there really is nothing that exists this way. One must start with the existence of

St. Benedict was widely regarded as the father of Western monastic life, whose scripture was written in Montecassino in the middle of the sixth century. St. Benedict often practiced himself well in the early form of the eastern monastery and shaped this sacred way of life in today's western world. Domination of St. Benedict became an important guide to his vision of monastic life and a religious life. The "rule" and the creation of a large number of faithful followers ensured the geographic spread of St. Benedict's idea and words and survived for centuries since then. In the seventh and eighth centuries when Benedict was living in Rome, the influence of control could be expanded freely. After the first destruction of Montecassino, this long-term "banishment" in such a prominent position eventually resulted in aggressive exposure of the Benedictine Association. After the death of St. Benedict XVI, the first person who accepted and disseminated the rules and the Benedictine monastery was St. Gregory the Great, later became a dialogueist of Pope Gregorio I. St. Gregory the Great sent St. Augustine as a missionary from the second half of the 6th century to the beginning of the 7th century, north of St. Augustine, where he changed many Anglo-Saxon and Gallians. From the 7th century to the 8th century, St. Boniface and St. Willie Brod spread Christian and Benedict's lifestyle to Germany and Scandinavia, and even Iceland. From the 8th century to the 9th century Charlemagne and his later son Louis Devotions greatly supported the vision of St. Benedict and the Abbey. From the 10th to the 11th century, the Benedictine monastery became a major form of Western European monastic life. Some of the organizational reforms and differences also occurred after many monasteries since the early Middle Ages, but the basic concept of life at the Benedictine Abbey remained unchanged. Centuries later, the Benedictine abbey spread to other parts of Europe and the world, arrived in North America in the mid-nineteenth century and arrived in South America, Africa, China and other parts of Asia in the 20th century. Thomas was born in a castle on the hill, in Rokkaselka in 1225, and the Benedictine Monastery in Monte Cassino is not visible between Rome and Naples. At the age of five, he entered Monte Cassino and his study began. When the monastery became a battlefield - not the end - Thomas moved to the University of Naples by his family. It was here that he was exposed to "new" Aristotle and missionaries, or recently established Dominican medals. He became the Dominican Republic, protested his family, finally went north, studied for a short period in Paris, then studied with Albert the Great in Cologne, the interest in Aristotle might have strengthened Thomas himself. not. After going back to Paris, he completed his research, got a master's degree and served as one of the President of the Dominican Republic for this seminar for three years. Two years later he was assigned to Naples. The relatively short lifetime of Thomas Aquinas (1225 - 1274) began with a castle on the hill called Roccasecca between Rome and Naples. At the age of 5, Aquinas entered the Benedictine monastery in a place not far from Monte Cassino and began receiving education. Later, Aquinas moved to the University of Naples where he contacted a new group called Missionary or Dominican. He eventually became a Dominican, and he was dissatisfied with his family. Aquinas continued to study at Cologne, Albert the Great - it was this association that made him deeply accept Aristotle's philosophy. Aristotle's philosophy is what Akinas prefers. He tried to use reasonable arguments to defend the theology of Christianity. He supported Aristotle 's metaphysical doctrine, Augustine' s change to a medieval tradition.

To some extent, the claims of existence of God fight each other and ask which is more convincing. There are two types of discussion, empirical and rational discussion. Anselm, Perry, and Aquinas are three important leaders in the philosophical world that have found an argument about the existence of God. The question to be asked is a more persuasive, rationalistic evidence of Anselm, or an empirical discussion. First let's see the contents of each argument. There are many arguments about the existence of God to try to prove the existence of God. In this article we will discuss ontological discussions, cosmological arguments, empirical discussions, such as avoiding errors and design arguments. There is much criticism about each of these, and the existence of God can not prove that it might be stronger than those who speak more strongly. The insisting definition of God is a god of Christianity ... I have found Akinas' theory that the existence of God is very interesting. It is easy to understand and logical. Summa Theologiae is one of the best works of Aquinas. St. Thomas is also a writer, writing a lot of comments on Aristotle and other theological and philosophical themes. Aquinas divides his argument into five ways to prove the existence of God. The first method is sports debate. There are many things that are changing, but not all of a sudden starts. St. Thomas Aquinas has five ways to prove the existence of God. The first is to prove the existence of God through the idea of ​​exercise. By studying Aristotle's work, he concluded that moving objects had to be moved by other things and powers. Therefore, he said that there must be an "indifferent propeller" (God) who first puts things into practice: "When something changes itself, the same exist is viewed as moving and moving Some are touched by another, some are regarded as animals, others are considered passive, even if you move from there to others it can be touched by others It does not exclude the fact that it is not, and the other fact is that it is a trigger. Aquinas proved for the first time that the existence of God is a demonstration of exercise for the first time. His conclusion from Aristotle's observation is that everything moving in the universe is touched by something else. Aristotle believes that the promoters in this series must start with the first or prime mover and the promoter itself will not be moved or acted by other agents. Aristotle sometimes called this driving force "God". Akinus thinks that is the god of Christianity. The second of the five approaches, a causal discussion is based on Aristotle's concept of a valid cause, an entity or event responsible for a change in a particular thing. Aristotle made a decision, the father borne a child, the sculptor carved a statue. All valid reasons must have reasonable reasons for themselves and since there are no restrictions on the effective chain of valid causes, all changes occurring all over the world have initially unchangeable causes There is no doubt.

"God has perfected the doctrine of those who are destined to be saved because of his prophecies about all events," the Bible has two very good clauses to define what fate is 1: 5 says: "In my womb, I know you, Before you were born I pulled you away. I will give you as a prophet in all the nations I appointed him. " How to choose him before time; he is doomed to his work. Three predefined principles with many variations have been developed. Concepts (related to Half Perracianism, certain nominalism and aluminism) are based on destiny as the basis of fate and teach God who is destined to save those future beliefs and benefits. The opposite extreme is the concept of double fate, usually determined by John Calvin, particularly related to Dod, and appears in St. Augustine and Martin Luther. Some works and Jansen's idea. According to this concept, regardless of their faith, love, strength, or absence, God has decided who will be saved and who will die from eternity. Saxon monk of the nineteenth century Orbet's Gottschalk believes that God has designated some people to go to hell and some people to heaven. He was condemned at several meetings, but his view is still very popular. Irish theologian John Scott Eliugena wrote an objection to Gottschalk. Eliugena gave up Augustine's teaching about fate. He wrote that the fate of God should be equal to his prophecy to people's choice. In the 12th century, Thomas Aquinas taught that God only defines certain people as a beautiful vision based on their merit rather than the favor of their creatures. Aquinas also believes that people can freely make their own crimes and choose to bear all responsibility to them. According to Aquinas, God will take various actions. He directly sincerity, indirectly killing bad results of good things, and forgiving only bad things

Human Inference There is one thing in common between John Roke and Karl Marx. They all believe in human reasoning. They believe that humans have the ability to become reasonable and intelligent, they learn not only from the surrounding people but also from the surrounding people. However, Niccolo Machiavelli opposed Locke and Marx. He thinks that human beings are absurd and such orders are not confusing. Three people recognized a lot about life and society, but in general everyone became radical, and changed the world in the next several centuries. Natural rights are born from mankind and are comprehensive principles applied to all acts. The right of nature is based on a common aspect of human beings, and each life of life is the human life which is the ultimate personalization of human beings and the relativeness of agents. Understanding of general concepts of natural rights includes abstraction and inaccuracy based on consideration of humanity. Natural rights provide a self-directed background common to all acts of human prosperity. General functions create universal standards; some are irrefutable and essential. Natural rights provide a field of legitimate defense. According to Thomas Aquinas, is it our virtue? Nature is defined as what we were born. Because the reason is the essence of human nature, it is reasonable in nature. 6 Reason is natural for people, people are defined as people. Therefore, nature is considered natural for human beings, and the property proposed by Summa Theologica is ours. In the Bible there is a Bible that virtue is essentially within us. In Matthew 4:23, "Jesus went to all Galilee, taught them at their synagogues, told the gospel of the kingdom, healed various diseases and diseases. Using reasonable natural light, we will discover and acquire the truth of natural reason. The natural light of reason is the power of wisdom, everyone is reliant on human beings. By demonstrating their original wisdom, humans can discover, validate, and organize many natural and reasonable truths. Aquinas believes that humans have discovered many such truths and believes that humans can find more. Human beings have made progress in understanding the truth of the reason of nature, but Aquinas believes that some facts are completely beyond the wisdom of the whole human race.

Religion and the existence of God From the beginning, the existence of God has been questioned. Religion thrives when the universe answers questions that can not be answered, and people can find comfort in their answer. As science develops and responds to these questions in a natural way rather than a supernatural answer, many people are no longer seeking the cause of things from God or religion, and they are beginning to pay attention to science. According to many scientists and all experts, God is dead. Interaction between reason and belief is an important topic in religious philosophy. It is closely related to some other issues in religious philosophy, but it is different: the existence of God, sacred attributes, evil problems, sacred behavior of the world, religion and morality, religious experience and religion A problem of religious pluralism. . In addition, analysis of interactions between religion and reason will also provide resources for metaphysical and philosophical arguments in other areas such as ontology and epistemology. Regardless of culture and religion, God and sacred existence are the subject matter of many religious people's minds. Since religion dominates the earlier life before philosophy, the phenomenon of existence of God has been supported by people for a long time. Philosophy tries to provide more knowledge about works related to the existence of God and the existence of God, while religion promotes religious values ​​and builds close relationships between man and God will do. St. Thomas Aquinas recognizes the importance of God and believes that God is the source of existence, the foundation of human movement and life, not a valueless abstract theory of human life. This paper critically prove the theory of the existence of God as claimed by St. Thomas Aquinas and at the same time study the pros and cons of the argument trying to question Aquinas' allegations.

Aineas showed a tough virtue by Christian's "Labor of Love" (2.881) and "Exile" (3.197). Virgil is a heathen, but it is called "spirit of nature's Christianity" by Tetoliang. He was one of the great writers of the early Christian church. Even Dante, in his 'Comedy of God', Virgil led him through the spiritual realm. In order to become a good Christian, there must be virtue. Virtue helps people approach to heaven by doing "good things" and doing good things. Aeneas is a kind person. The next third of the book explores the ethics of Christian faith. He raises four major virtues: attention, justice, moderation, and tenacity. After touching on these, he went into three theological virtues: hope, faith and charity. Rui also explained that morality consists of three layers, the relationship between people, the motives and attitudes of people themselves, and a contrasting worldview. His most important point is that Christianity "requires you to love your neighbor like yourself". He pointed out that everyone loves themselves unconditionally. Even if you do not like yourself, people still love them. He writes that Christians must apply this attitude to other people even if they do not like them. Louis called this a big secret. He will fall in love with them now when a person acts as if he loves others. Thomas defines the four main virtues to be cautious, gentle, fair, and difficult. The main virtues are natural, revealed in nature, and they are binding on everyone. There are, however, three theological virtues of faith, hope, and charity. Thomas also expressed virtues as incomplete and complete virtues. Perfect virtue is every virtue of charity, and charity completes basic virtue. People other than Christians can show courage, but that makes courage for temperament. Christians will show the courage of charity. Unlike other virtues of their purpose, ie God, these are somewhat supernatural. In the Catholic and Episcopal Church, courage is also one of the seven gifts of the Holy Spirit. For Thomas Aquinas, tenacity is a virtue that eliminates any obstacles that will prevent the will from following the cause. Thomas Aquinas believes that courage is a virtue with the Christian virtue of Summa Theologica. In order to understand the true courage of Christianity, someone needs to show the virtues of faith, hope, and consideration. Courage is a natural virtue and Saint Augustine does not regard this as a Christian virtue. Thomas Aquinas believes that courage is a virtue of the beauty of Christian mercy. Only by compassion and charity we can call the natural virtue of courage a Christian virtue. Unlike Aristotle, Aquinas' courage relates to endurance, not a brave battle.

The ontological argument is aimed to prove that the existence of God is a transcendental argument. The salient feature of the Cartesian argument is its simplicity. This argument is deductive based solely on the reason, without physical evidence of God who is objective and inevitable to prove the existence of God. Even if there is no more information such as "There are three aspects in a circle" or "She is single", it may be written incorrectly. There are many arguments about the existence of God to try to prove the existence of God. In this article we will discuss ontological discussions, cosmological arguments, empirical discussions, such as avoiding errors and design arguments. There is much criticism about each of these, and the existence of God can not prove that it might be stronger than those who speak more strongly. The insisting definition of God is a god of Christianity ... I have found Akinas' theory that the existence of God is very interesting. It is easy to understand and logical. Summa Theologiae is one of the best works of Aquinas. St. Thomas is also a writer, writing a lot of comments on Aristotle and other theological and philosophical themes. Aquinas divides his argument into five ways to prove the existence of God. The first method is sports debate. There are many things that are changing, but not all of a sudden starts. St. Thomas Aquinas has five ways to prove the existence of God. The first is to prove the existence of God through the idea of ​​exercise. By studying Aristotle's work, he concluded that moving objects had to be moved by other things and powers. Therefore, he said that there must be an "indifferent propeller" (God) who first puts things in action. Some are touched by another, some are considered animals, others are considered passive. The fact that moving from one person to another does not exclude the fact that it may be touched by others, and the other fact is that it is a trigger. Aquinas proved for the first time that the existence of God is a demonstration of exercise for the first time. His conclusion from Aristotle's observation is that everything moving in the universe is touched by something else. Aristotle believes that the promoters in this series must start with the first or prime mover and the promoters themselves will not be moved or acted by other agents. Aristotle sometimes called this driving force "God". Akinus thinks that is the god of Christianity. The second of the five approaches, a causal discussion is based on Aristotle's concept of a valid cause, an entity or event responsible for a change in a particular thing. Aristotle made the decision, the father gave birth to a child, and the sculptor carved a statue. All valid reasons must have reasonable reasons for themselves and since there are no restrictions on the effective chain of valid causes, all changes occurring all over the world have initially unchangeable causes There is no doubt.

Does God exist? St. Thomas Aquinas wrote several important works. Some of them are as follows. Controversy over the power of God, Dionysius' game about the name of God, and controversy over psychobiology. Most of Akinas' work is written to prove the existence of God. Aquinas always believed that everyone should have the Creator, and the only viable solution is God. Based on this idea, the third path of Aquinas was written. Aquinas argues that in his world immortal confrontation, human rationalism can not prove the impossibility of the eternal creation of the universe. "Does God exist?" Fortunately, Richard Dawkins wrote a new book "God's Thoughts". This is exactly the answer to this question. After all, the answer is "No, God does not exist" (Do not deny that Dawkins reached his conclusion before the card won the World Series). Power is not enough to convince some experts. Literary critic Terry Eagleton provides an example of his idea for London Book Review. Eagleton's comments are discussed in some of my favorite blogs: 3 Quarks Daily, Pharyngula, Uncertain Principles, Valve (2), There is much debate about the existence of God about the existence of God. For a long time everyone wanted to prove the existence of God. Some people think that God exists and is proved by many philosophical or scientific foundations and religious reasons. On the other hand, others do not believe in the existence of God and their foundation is proved from many theoretical and scientific point of view. Many people try to prove the existence of God with reason. After Descartes proves its existence, he will think the truth about the essence of God, evidence of the existence of God, and the nature of material objects. The main task in Descartes' meditation is to design a system that allows him to understand the truth. He wants to lay the foundation of all further philosophy How does God exist? Does he exist? Does not he exist? These questions can be discussed in myriad theories that there are reasons why he exists, methods that do not exist, or do not exist, and there is no way to do it. Theologians argue that God exists and there is a reason to believe that God exists. On the other hand, agnostics, atheists, and followers will think that there is no reason to believe that God exists. For some people, they have no doubt about the existence of God ... the existence of God was a problem since the concept of God was imagined. Descartes tried to prove the existence of God, argued against his theory of the devil, and showed that there is no doubt that there is some external existence. He is looking for a definite certainty, the foundation on which he can base on all his beliefs and know that they are real facts. Descartes' overall project is to find a definite certainty that he can be based on all his knowledge and beliefs. Foundation

"It is true that all succeeding bats, like other secular ones, are uniquely bored in the hands of God ... But according to the general's conclusion he is always (always) I win the struggle of justice ... Prove ... Because they have won many victories ... The enemies of God's people sometimes have a fair quarrel against the people of God. "- James VI and I , Free liberal arts Commercial Code (1598) years) "Some [legitimate king] ... very likely to be blocked due to some unnatural theme of rebellion, but their reputation Are behind them, and some will not surpass this in the autumn that they are suitable for pestilence Except for shame to everyone, application for all generations Before the French Revolution, ancient philosophers wrote about tyrant because tyranny was seen as the greatest political threat to Greek and Roman civilization. An analysis of theologians like Thomas Aquinas distinguishes between a fightingman who may be killed by someone and a legitimate ruler who abuses power - the latter in Aquinas, but the medieval philosophers also have the concept of tyranny It seems that it is punished only by public institutions occupied by. Salisbury's John is the first medieval Christian scholar to protect the tyrant In the beginning of the century, James I of England opposed the right of pope 's right in a series of controversial works, assassination of French Henry IV led to strong concern about theological teachings related to despotism I caused it. Henry and James pursued a peaceful religious settlement policy in various ways aiming at healing the damage caused by the Protestant Reform eventually. Progress in these directions seems to happen during the 12th Armistice, but the conflict after 1620 has changed the situation; the situation in Western Europe and Central Europe after Peace in Westphalia is Protestant and Catholic It led to the area of ​​religion and religion. Although the minority is more stable, it maintains deep-rooted differentiation Indirect responsibility for "atrocities" and other atrocities in civil warfare 23 This is one of many cases where the story explores political themes such as tyranny, rape and self-defense, and the concept of positioning I will not. Resist the authority of authority within the scope of women. The heroine experienced a series of adventures, camouflaged her attempt to escape the rape of the prince, and the prince happens to get married, but as she still follows, the story goes through these political present themes Exploring her passionate pursuit in various countries Resistance has a long and troublesome family tree. In the history of Western political thought it may first appear in discussions on tyranny, that is, atrocities deprive power from the malfunctioning king, and these kings do not belong to them Hmm. From the 19th century to the early 20th century, anarchists and other people combined it with a fundamental - politically and socially changing concept. (On the contrary, socialists and communists usually prefer the word revolution, but this is also due to worship in 1789 and the French Revolution). Recently, this term appeared with various political backgrounds. French resistance organization, Nazi and the guerrilla war against that monster. In the mid-century, fans of Mahatma Gandhi and Dr. Martin Luther King still today explained their efforts that are common among non-violent supporters as nonviolent resistance.

Concept of despotism in literature All social contractor theorists and classical thinkers believe that tyranny is unfair or inequitable as a person (or government) with unrestricted power to the body I will. They each have some opinion on the influence of tyranny politics, but they have different views on preventing and causing tyranny. Finally, Locke has the most effective ideas compared to Plato and Hobbes. Based on American democracy, they are equally great minds, but analysis of locks may be the only rational means to propose prevention. John Adams initially used the term "majority tyranny" to represent the outcome of domination of majority democracy, but the broader concept can go back to the Plato Republic. This fear of "majority tyranny" also became the ideological grounds of the American political regime; Thomas Jefferson says, "Democracy is just a rule of mob, and 51% is the other By asking for a national vote, Cameron left a very complex international dilemma in the hands of the people, and the people did not understand the results of the decision consistently - And I could not count on it -. He acknowledges that only 52% of qualified voters are low educational backgrounds, frequently changing votes by populist represent other irreverent decisions on behalf of young people not listed and other workers in the UK did. Before the French Revolution, ancient philosophers wrote about tyrant because tyranny was seen as the greatest political threat to Greek and Roman civilization. An analysis of theologians like Thomas Aquinas distinguishes between a fightingman who may be killed by someone and a legitimate ruler who abuses power - the latter in Aquinas, but the medieval philosophers also have the concept of tyranny It seems that it is punished only by public institutions occupied by. Salisbury's John is the first medieval Christian scholar to protect the tyrant In the Greek-Roman world, tyranny is a form of authoritarian rule where one person exercises power without legal restrictions. In ancient times, the term tyrant was not necessarily derogatory but represented a holder of absolute political power. In modern usage, the term tyranny is often derogatory and means illegal possession or use of such power. For ancient Greeks, the tyrant was not necessarily a bad ruler; in his original form (tyranny) the word was used to explain a person with absolute and personal power in the country . The rule is governed by the Constitution and the law. Some tyrants are predators who held power by their own efforts, others are elected to rule, others are imposed by external intervention.

St. Anthony is not all the great writers who can correctly say what he or she is saying. This is what Gaeniolo thinks when he wrote His criticism of St. Anselm's argumentative argument and that if you imagine something more important than anything else in understanding, it does not exist I point out that it is not necessary. Gaunilo said it is foolish to believe that something exists because it is understood. He said that there should be another explanation. In this article, I will first explain Anselm's theory and Gaeniro's assertions. First I will briefly explain them. An ontological argument of St Anselm and Thomas Aquinas Purpose: We will do some exercises through appeal and response. 1) Firstly read the St. Anselm's text carefully and try to reconstruct the discussion based on the premise and conclusion. 2) St. Anselm challenges his answer and strives to answer it. Are there objections? What is your reply? 3) Read Summa Theologica 4) Do you think Aquinas's claim is more persuasive than Augustine? 5) Please rewrite one of Aquinas' claims in your own words 6) Try one or more other opposing opinions on ontological arguments. 7) You can think of some good answers to your objections. If not, why do you think so? Test deadline designation% essay writing October 10 classroom 300-500 word length 15 short sentence 1 July classroom 500-1000 word length 15 papers 2 19 December 1000-1500 presentation scheduled to be announced 20 announcement 15 5 th week Date of registration from The first and most famous ontological debate was proposed by St. Anselm of Canterbury on the 11th. Century C. E. St. Anselm argues that in Proslogion, it leads to the existence of God from the notion of existence, not without a bigger concept. St. Anthom believes that if such existence does not exist, it can be imagined that a larger being, that is, a presence without a bigger existence - can be imagined. But this is ridiculous: there can not be anything bigger than an unthinkable one. So there is a bigger existence, not a god but a presence. The ontological debate was originally proposed by St. Anselm in the 11th century. It shows the existence of God through a deductive and a priori position. God is an existence, not a bigger one. This is the reaction of St. Anselm to the fool in the Psalms, I believe that God does not exist. Archbishop of Canterbury and St. Anselm of Benedict's Medicine explained that God exists in the mind and he is not the greatest being. But God exists in the heart and reality. It becomes a "thoughtlessly" existence, which means that God must exist.

The times change and people come and go, but their fears are constant, he said about the waves of fear that occurred in the 1950s. In 1692, Salem citizen was afraid to believe they were wizards, and in 1950 the "red" panic destroyed thousands of lives claimed as Communists. Two witches were arrested, and many were killed in Salem, but the red panic blacklisted people who were persecuted. Anxiety is fear. Medieval theologian Thomas Aquinas described fear in his great textbook "Summa Theologiae". It is very attractive as it transcends the power he fears. "Let us break up the definition of Akinas in part of it, the characteristic of fear is the physical experience of" endogenous atrophy ". People's limbs are getting cold, shaking, shrinking from danger, etc. Aquinas explained this in a very medieval way. "When looking at the inhabitants of the town, when they are attacked by fear, they leave the suburbs and prepare them for the inside as much as possible ... ... fearing the body, the heat inside and the important spirit will shrink as well." Psychology was used to control the population and the brave new world in 1984. Among the former, it was used to cause great fear among the population of Oceania, in particular the fear of the inner party. At the same time, in the "brave new world", human happiness is thought to be the easiest way to control all people with the body and take actions contradictory to brave New World faction drugs . In both societies, class-driven thinking helps to stop the masses, opponents can be treated to complement the fear of each culture and the nature of entertainment centers. Historically, society has focused on major achievements and growth. Today, society is focusing on fear. Even the playing cards slogan "Let America be great again" is a statement based on delicate fear, the word "again". This means that we have lost something, and we should come back. scared. But what about us? Are you scared? Personally, are we under the rule of fear? I think that we are not personal. There is no individual, life and breathing are deep, panic and fear are eternal. From the smallest country town to the largest big city, the individual is not afraid of the next breath

Tradition is one of the important concepts of anthropology and it can be said that anthropology is a study of "tradition in traditional society". However, there is no "traditional theory" because the type of tradition that most anthropologists need to discuss is unnecessary. The only difference is technology. But there are different opinions; scholars like Pascal Boyer believe that the theory that defines tradition and develop it is important to this subject. It is difficult to distinguish different traditions of knowledge. Tradition has tradition, tradition is related to each other, but it is only adjoining, so it is a spouse traveler. There are also some traditions with a long history of debate. What matters is whether the tradition of knowledge is alive or dead. If you are starting a research project, this is clearly true - you want to keep on living. If you want to know Aristotle's view of artificial intelligence, it is also important that Aristotle's tradition is dead. It depends on whether Aristotle's "authority" can be trusted or not. Because tradition is dead, their expertise does not help you. It is also important to lose the tradition of knowledge. This will give you the idea of ​​traditional possibilities. Today's Jewish and Christian traditions are not Jewish and Biblical Christianity or dark days. Thomas Aquinas (1225 - 1274) rediscovered Aristotle 's rational philosophy and incorporated this philosophy into the Christian tradition. Therefore, Western civilization has Renaissance, rational era, and enlightenment. The post-modern left wing has a second irony of modern conservative religious contempt. If religious beliefs are understood as mystical beliefs, the remaining postmoderns are at least as religious as Christian conservatism. The left does not oppose religion and mysticism, but against the Western Jewish - Christian tradition, especially the most mysterious religion of the day. Because it enters Aristotle through Aquinas.

Aquinas' philanthropic view shows that philanthropy can not be legislated, but the use of welfare in modern society seems to be a legislative act to provide charitable work to disadvantaged people. According to the legal point of Aquinas, charitable organizations passing through welfare law seems inappropriate. As the purpose of welfare is not charitable itself, it does not belong to the definition of philanthropic projects provided by Aquinas, so it is so, as described in the "Law Theory". The charity's view of Quiner's legal relationship is not contradictory. Prior to the 20th century, social welfare programs were mainly in the fields of charitable organizations, especially religious charities. But by the middle of the 20th century government agencies transcended charitable organizations and became the primary tool for public well-being. Like other forms of North American citizenship, most of social welfare-related responsibilities are assigned to state and state governments, and these governments have strengthened the bureaucracy of child welfare. These individuals are responsible for intervention if the child is ignored or abused; the case worker often tries to maintain the integrity of the family, but children who live in a dangerous environment often I will be taken away. The government plans to start development under the guidance of the Roosevelt regime. New Deal (1933-1936) brought dozens of social welfare bills including the Social Security Act of 1935. The social welfare program has expanded to include housing, recreation, cultural activities, social insurance and child welfare programs. During the Second World War (1939 - 1945), many social workers were given war related work to develop services for communities affected by war. Social workers in these missions will help soldiers and their families cope with injuries and other medical problems. From this work we will create a special classification of military social workers. The private welfare state has two divisions: charity and social welfare projects, and employee benefits. Charity projects and social welfare projects have a long and diverse history. In the 1960s, the government began to fund more and more services through private agencies. As the reliance on public funds increases, the private sector is gradually becoming a government provider, which has a big impact on their work. Employee benefits constitute another department of the private welfare state. These dates originate mainly from the time after World War II. The labor union has expanded due to the legalization of the Wagner Act in 1935 and the decision of the National Labor Relations Commission in 1949.

A summary of justice theory in medieval philosophy: I discussed the acceptance of the classical definition of "justice" in the philosophy of Plato, Aristotle, Cicero, and Urpia by Latin medieval philosophers. In the 12th century you can see the differences that arise between philosophical discrimination and theological discourse like Peter Abelard's work. In the 13th century, in the philosophical writing of Thomas Aquinas we have found the most important philosophical definition of "justice". Aquinas avoided some Aprilia related to Aristotle's theory of justice. Medieval philosophy is of course very strong against the philosophy of nature and philosophy of science - but it is not completely influenced by Aristotle. For example, refer to medieval causality theory and articles by St. Thomas Aquinas. Especially since the 14th century, an increase in the use of mathematical reasoning in natural philosophy will pave the way for the rise of modern science later. Important figures in this development include William Heytesbury and William of Ockham. Other important contributors to medieval natural philosophy include Albert of Saxony, Dietrich of Freiberg, Nicholas of Autrecourt, Nicole Oresme, Robert Grosseteste, and William Crathorn. The medieval philosophy is known as the medieval or medieval philosophy and continued from the decline of the Western Roman Empire in the 5th century BC to the 16th century Renaissance. The medieval philosophy, understood as an independent philosophical research project, began in Baghdad in the mid-eighth century and began in the French Charlemagne District Court in the last quarter of the eighth century. Part of it is partly re-ancient cultures developed in ancient Greece and Rome during the classical period, due in part to the need to solve theological problems and the combination of God's doctrine and secular learning It is defined as a discovery process. Academic philosophy school taught by a scholar (or school) of medieval university around 1100 - 1500. Academic philosophy is trying to harmonize the philosophy of ancient classical philosophers with medieval Christian theology. The main purpose of academic philosophy is finding answers to questions, or resolving conflicts. It is best known for its application in medieval theology, but it is used in classical philosophy and other research areas. It is not a philosophy or theology itself, but a learning tool and method that emphasizes dialectical reasoning. Science believes that science takes precedence over other knowledge acquisition methods. This term is often used in derogatory ways and refers to scientific progress that some degree of trust or speaker considers excessive. Scottishism is a philosophical school and theological system named after John Dunscott. It severely criticized the old Franciscan school and Thomasism

The theological virtue of philanthropy is centered around three important elements (Velde, 2006). These elements are charity, faith, and hope. In order to gain charity, beliefs and hopes should be active at some important level to ensure that there is a way to achieve the goal. Charity is an important aspect of activating elements of faith and hope. However, to some extent these three elements are not separated. Hope and faith are independent. But charity depends on the individual's ability to have confidence and hope. The important concept that Aquinas tried to define was the theological virtue of charity. With this effort, he wishes to draw out a fundamental understanding of charity virtue from a theological point of view. To understand this concept, Aquinas borrowed much from other sources to help broaden his argument about the theological virtues of charity. Even though he was one of the best theologians of the time, he never thought of it. Charity is the greatest at the end of three theological virtues, the other two are faith and hope. It is often referred to as general definition of love and confusion in general understanding and the latter word, but charity groups are not only subjective feelings but also objective actions against others' will. Like other theological virtues, charitable organizations are supernatural in the sense that God is its origin and purpose. As a priest, John A. Hutton, SJ. In his "Contemporary Catholic Dictionary", charity is a kind of "supernatural virtue injected, people who worship God for their own benefit and loves others for God". Will action and charity will increase our love for our God and our companions; but charity is a gift from God, so we can not get this virtue at first through our own actions. Theological virtue of faith, hope, and charity (love) is a virtue directly related to God. These are not gained by human efforts, but are injected into our bodies as gifts from God from the beginning of baptism. They allowed us to live with the Holy Trinity. Faith, hope, and charity influence human virtue by increasing the stability and strength of our lives. Each of the Ten Commandments prohibits certain kinds of evil, but each commandment shows a virtue that can help us avoid these evils. Generosity, mental poverty, kindness, pure soul, temperament, and tenacity overcome the so-called seven deadly or capital crime pride, greed or greed, jealousy, anger, desire, bulimia, laziness or laziness It helps to avoid other evil and evil guilt

The ontological debate of Anselm is shown in Chapter 2 of Anselm 's Proslogion. The actual discussion is as follows. (1) If God exists only in understanding, we can think of it as being bigger than God. (2) We can not consider existence larger than God. (3) So it is not that God exists only in understanding. (4) God exists in reality, or God exists in understanding. (5) Therefore, God exists in reality (conclusion). If this argument is in the form of a conclusion argument, it is as follows. In the case of P, since Q is neither P R nor P, the R parameter is modus tollen and is valid because it is modus tollen. In this article I intend to argue that Anselm 's ontological debate about the existence of God is sufficient to establish the necessary existence of the biggest existence that can be imagined. To achieve this goal, I believe Anselm's premise is correct, and his conclusion is in accordance with his premise correctly. I also defend Anselm 's assertion by proveing ​​that the opposition to Anselm' s claim is not convincing. My focus is against Gaunillo against Anselm's argument. Essentially, Gauinilo's objection is that Anselm's assertion can be modified to prove the existence of any concept by merely making this concept more than all other possible concepts . One of the most important attempts to prove the existence of God in the general debate of the existence of God is the ontological argument of St. Anselm theologian of the 11th century. The view of Anselm is that God is defined as the greatest existence that must be imagined and must exist, as absent entities lack the fact that they lack its great attributes. But critics wonder if their existence really contributes The existence of the god of Anselm rejects the refusal of the existence of the god of Anselm, and if the only evidence of the existence of God is Aquinas 'five ways and anselm' s ontological argument, Anselm offers the best inference I am not saying that Anselm 's view is excellent or even effective, but from the viewpoint of Aquinas and Anselm' s proof, Anselm 's view is better. Indeed, Anselm believes that the existence of God is based on the concept of God. He goes through discussion ... there are many arguments about the existence of God to try to prove the existence of God. In this article we will discuss ontological discussions, cosmological arguments, empirical discussions, such as avoiding errors and design arguments. There is much criticism about each of these, and the existence of God can not prove that it might be stronger than those who speak more strongly. The definition of God arguing is a God of Christians.

Part of the culture from person to person or generation to generation depends on family, such as how to celebrate the holiday. Tradition (a simple modern tradition of the third person, a tradition of the current participle, a tradition of simple past and past participle) Tradition is one of the important concepts of anthropology and it can be said that anthropology is a study of "tradition in traditional society". However, there is no "traditional theory" because the type of tradition that most anthropologists need to discuss is unnecessary. The only difference is technology. But there are different opinions; scholars like Pascal Boyer believe that the theory that defines tradition and develop it is important to this subject. It is difficult to distinguish different traditions of knowledge. Tradition has tradition, tradition is related to each other, but it is only adjoining, so it is a spouse traveler. There are also some traditions with a long history of debate. What matters is whether the tradition of knowledge is alive or dead. If you are starting a research project, this is clearly true - you want to keep on living. If you want to know Aristotle's view of artificial intelligence, it is also important that Aristotle's tradition is dead. It depends on whether Aristotle's "authority" can be trusted or not. Because tradition is dead, their expertise does not help you. It is also important to lose the tradition of knowledge. This will give you the idea of ​​traditional possibilities. Today's Jewish and Christian traditions are not Jewish and Biblical Christianity or dark days. Thomas Aquinas (1225 - 1274) rediscovered Aristotle 's rational philosophy and incorporated this philosophy into the Christian tradition. Therefore, Western civilization has Renaissance, rational era, and enlightenment. The post-modern left wing has a second irony of modern conservative religious contempt. If religious beliefs are understood as mystical beliefs, the remaining postmoderns are at least as religious as Christian conservatism. The left does not oppose religion and mysticism, but against the Western Jewish - Christian tradition, especially the most mysterious religion of the day. Because it enters Aristotle through Aquinas.

They have no ability to understand or understand what justice is and what is right. If there is a natural law, these people will be abused after all because they have a mental disorder and can not understand. These people need to be cared for without being abused. Regardless of whether these people commit a crime, they are likely to act morally wrong. In order to solve this problem, "What is the first thing that can be thought about is facts about property or facts about property law?" For social constructors, property rights do not exist independently of human practices or legal practices. Instead of sacred we create property rights by establishing a legal system to ensure that people have certain legal rights to the physical world. On the contrary, for liberals, the facts on property exist irrespective of human laws and practices, indeed human laws and practices should be shaped to respect the natural rights of property. All forms of natural law theory are consistent with overlapping theories and we believe there is a relationship not to be of a certain type between law and morality. Therefore, according to this view, if the moral concept is not mentioned, the concept of the law can not be completely revealed. Overlapping articles may not be ambiguous, but they can be described in many different ways. The strongest structure of overlapping papers form the basis of Aquinas and Blackstone's classical naturalism. Aquinas distinguishes the four laws: (1) eternal law, (2) natural law, (3) human law, (4) sacred law. The eternal law consists of the law governing the nature of the eternal universe; as Susan Dimock (1999, 22) says, people are "science including all the orders of the universe (physical, chemical, biological , Psychology, etc.) Law "

If I asked myself about my feelings about school two years ago, I would like to teach, I will say to you "I do not like going to school." When I was 18 years old, I did not see any signs of the future and seemed to have nothing important to me. I decided to be a teacher because I did not want to become a teacher until the end of 2003. What changed my mind is that in my life a series of events and people have had a positive and negative impact on me. This turning point in my life started from my high school grade of my high school. In the early days of course creation, I had many ideas about what I should teach. I would like to teach user experience research, but the topic itself is too wide. I am trapped in so-called analysis. My goal research goal is too wide, so even if I try to solve some problems, I have not solved anything yet. With this idea I was creating an outline for weeks, so I could not complete the course. As I mentioned above, the important thing is to narrow my attention and give priority to the overall situation of what I really want to teach; center + specifically I have my own goals, I would like to limit the idea and tell me what the goal is. Immediately after entering the semester, I learned what I wanted to teach and why. When I noticed this, I tried to explain myself, but it sounded ridiculous and sounds clumsy and caught up in my own excitement. I noticed that I do not want to tell people how to use my camera; instead I wanted to teach everyone a viewpoint. In 1974, I interviewed the work of theological education in Notre Dame. Things were going well until the professor of the recruitment committee asked me what I wanted to teach. I said I would like to teach Aristotle and Aquinas seminars. Answer quickly: "Why does Protestant want to teach a course on Catholic thinkers?" I replied that Christianity did not start in the 15th century. I think that Aquinas is not a property of a Roman Catholic, but a resource for all Christians, whether Protestant or Catholic. After taught for seven years, I would like to teach another course that I think is good for my students. This topic is about the essay. I am teaching the difference in the current class. I contacted the dean and he requested a syllabus. A week after the submission, he answered the comment: This is the academic of our school. In this school, I just share them. Thinking will discourage them

Currently, anxiety affects more than 40 million people worldwide, two-thirds of which are never treated. Anxiety is today thought to be the most common psychosis in the United States. Anxiety is a series of mental disorders that can affect anyone regardless of age, height, weight, sex or race. However, depending on these combinations, there is the possibility of exposing people to greater risk. These diseases are very harmful and may also affect relationships, social life and employment opportunities. Anxiety is fear. In his great textbook Medieval theologian Thomas Aquinas "Theology Theory" explains fear. Terror is the "shrinking" of a long body as much as a human being's "soul of passion," the future of evil, there is "beyond the power of his fears, it is very attractive. "Let's break down the definition of Aquinas as part of it.The character of fear is the physical experience of" inner atrophy ". Human limbs are cold, swinging, shrinking from danger, etc. In a very medieval way of this description Aquinas: "Prepare for the interior area that resembles this contraction, fearing to catch when seeing residents of the city, leaving the suburbs, and where possible Things ... .... In the fear of the body, the internal fever and the important spirit will shrink as well. Two different things about anxiety and fear. Fear always pay special attention to certain things. Anxiety is ambiguous, universal and diffuse. Philosopher Martin Heidegger believes that anxiety understands the possibilities. For entrepreneurs, anxiety is a precious feeling, because it is possible, we can adapt everything possible, we can go wrong. In order to cope with anxiety, it is necessary to clarify whether your control is under your control. Those not under your control are not worth emphasizing. An ancient Stoic philosopher says that all this is in the hands of fate. Do not concentrate on what you can not control, but concentrate on what you can control. Extra energy should reduce your anxiety and reduce it Anxiety disorders are characterized by excessive fear or anxiety, which is difficult to control, adversely affects everyday functions and affects significantly. Anxiety is a threat of future expectations, while fear refers to the actual or perceived threat of emotional reactions. These diseases can range from specific fears (called phobias), such as fear of flying or public talk, to more general concerns and tensions. Anxiety disorders usually develop in childhood and follow adulthood. Specific anxiety disorders including generalized anxiety disorder (GAD), panic disorder, separation anxiety disorder and social anxiety disorder (social phobia)

A. According to Aristotle, which explains the meaning of the concept of "rule of law", "The rule of law is superior to any individual". The rule of law is related to the principle of justice. In other words, everyone in society (including citizens and government officials) is bound by law and these laws are managed fairly and fairly. The purpose of the rule of law is to prevent arbitrary governance. Aristotle's approach to the rule of law remains influential. His question is that it is best to be dominated by the best people or the best laws, but he is realistically dealing with the problem, not only in the type of law being considered, but also in the system He pointed out that it depends. Please enter. Legislative planning and management (Politics 1282b) He acknowledges that depending on the case it is difficult enough to deal with the general rules that require focused focus on specific judges. However, these incidents are minimized and legal training and legislation should continue to play a role in the way they are handled. Aristotle's discussion on the general desirability of rules and their treatment of external history continues to influence modern law (see Scalia 1989 and Solum 1994). Aristotle and Aquinas are one of political theorists, and discussions on the rule of law are fierce. From the beginning of political philosophy to enlightenment, there are various opinions on how the rule of law should be. In particular, the two thinkers - Aristotle and St Thomas Aquinas - are probably the most influential people. On the surface, they claim that the rule of law plays an important role in society. But after thorough analysis, people discovered Aristotle's ... Mike W civilization. 1: second, 121-10 Dr Maria Maria Farina, Plato and Aristotle, three men are considered to be the typical foundation of ancient Greek philosophy. Not only are they responsible for the enlightenment of Greece, they are also foretelling the speculation of Christ there. Plato, a disciple of Socrates, became the first person to record his teacher's philosophy, which was handed over to Aristotle. This guide will help ancient people in the process of intellectual evolution.

Key Benefits of Cosmological Discussion There are many advantages in proving the theory and method to prove the existence of God in the cosmological argument. Many of these benefits come from such scholars, Copleston, Aquinas, and Leibniz. One of the main advantages of cosmological arguments is the method of movement obtained from Aquinas. Like most arguments about the existence of God, cosmological arguments exist in many forms; here two are discussed: cosmological arguments of time, Kalam (ie the first argument), and division Discussion of style. The main difference between these two arguments is that they avoid the first opposition to the argument and cast the question "is there a reason for that existence in God?" Then suppose that God exists to explain the existence of the universe and we will not take us anywhere. Without God, we have an entity that we can not explain, there is a universe; there is an entity with God, we can not explain, that is God. Craig / Column Cosmology One of the most controversial topics in human history is whether God exists or not. Since there are several different reasoning and secondary discussions in this main argument, there are often discussions. People who believe in the existence of God will discuss how God acts and whether there is more than one. People who do not believe in the existence of God will discuss how the universe exists or whether it has always existed. In this article, I will explain Craig's assertion about the existence of God and keep Craig's assertion. In the case of the Kalam cosmological argument, the difference between the universe and God is that there is a beginning in time for the universe. Everything that has time to start claiming by Kalam Cosmological Argument will exist. When there is a beginning of time in the universe, that argument concludes that the universe has its cause, the reason is God. The existence of unaffected God is consistent with the initial assertion of this discussion since there is no time to start. In discussing the above simple cosmological argument

So evil is in the world, where God does not destroy demons: the biggest challenge is human beings and evils is the problem of evil, omnipotent omnibus can be said to have absolutely good faith ("God"). The main argument is that the number of suggestions of solutions that people are having to fight with the problem and if it has the freedom to try various solutions, that is the only living thing, and interferes with God You are responsible for not relying on God to resolve the problem, not a person (bad) yourself. The problem of evil in the world can not deny the existence of evil, just as human beings experience pain and just as suffering the same each day. It is widely believed that there are two different types of evil in nature (based on God) and morally (based on humans). Moral evil, when caused by humans, such as September 11, World War, Holocaust, if it occurs, human beings and others as other human tragedies related to pain of cause. We also apply evil to animals through testing and hunt without bringing happiness. Dojeon is based on inequality also in biological life based on the good and evil intentions of his past life and shows that it exists between heaven and earth. In Buddhist beliefs, "reason" promises the biological behavior of good and evil in their lives, "fruit" is the result of actions occurring in good and evil return and subsequent life. Donjon does not think that this statement is enough to persuade people Thomas Aquinas proposed a world after monotheism's death in order to solve the problem of evil and to preserve the existence of evil. The premise behind this theory is that God is suffering from evil and human judgment that human life is short and the world after death is infinite and ethics behavior and eternal heaven or hellman Can be awarded based on the suffering of. Aquinas said that posterity has great interest in protecting evil and suffering in the present life. The Christian author Randy Alcon (Randy Alkoon) compensates for the pain of insisting on a paradise of enjoyment on the earth

1300 ~ 1350, proposal for middle English <Latin precepta, rules, name using Presceptus, pre-cepse of past participle, foresight, literal meaning, pre-acquisition, equivalent to prae-pre- + -cep-, combined Take + at the end of the shape with + at the end of the cape C14: Prohibition from Latin prayceptum maxim, from praecipere to admonish, take from prae + capere There are disciplines or moral training in several disciplines to guide correct action (sikkhāpada). Traditionally, Theravāda 's layman took five precautions (lifelong or period) in front of the monastery after evacuating with three jewels. An amateur occasionally takes a series of eight extended fields including a virgin with special occasions such as religious holidays. It is often said that it is believed to date back to the Buddha, but Vipassana meditation, promoted by Vipassana, can be traced back to the 19th and 20th centuries. According to Basswell, in the 10th century Vipassana was no longer practiced in the seat tradition as Buddhism collapsed and believed that liberation could not be achieved any longer before Maitreya 's arrival. It was reintroduced in the 18th century by Myanmar Medawi (1728-1816) (Myanmar). In the last article, I wrote five major rules about Buddhism, Pancasila. This is the most fundamental thing that non-professional Buddhists should know. As this is the first commandment, I am one of the doctrines of obeying the killing prohibition. So in this article, I would like to develop lessons for Buddhists to understand and practice it properly. According to the above five points, plants and microorganisms do not have thought and perception, can not move anywhere, and microbes such as bacteria can not be seen with the naked eye, so these points can not be satisfied. They can certainly not be called "beings" but only in the Buddhism related to the first commandment. There are only humans and animals here, because they have ideas and perceptions, they can move anywhere and can see with the naked eye. Therefore, we can call humans and animals a perceptual being. The main rule "to protect innocent human life" leads to secondary rules such as "do not stop" or "do not euthanasia". Secondary discipline comes from the main rules; theoretically, they are easier to explain than the main rules. Aquinas allows you to create detailed information about them, such as dealing with the situation. There are even more exceptions. Natural law also examines the function of individual body parts related to our overall purpose. I believe that Aquinas is wrong to use something other than other functions and purposes; the purpose of the genitals is breeding, contraception is incorrect. Trivial precepts do not directly follow the main rules, they need good judgment and wisdom to accomplish and obey. When there was a reason to ask, Aquinas permitted the change of the second commandment, he called the killing in war "the smaller of two evils".

A legitimate war theory claims that war is justified morally or legally. St. Augustine 's justice war theory has four most important principles, also known as beliefs, principles and beliefs. Saint Augustine was born in the year 354 AD and incorporated Christian teachings in the year 386 AD during the decline of the Roman Empire. St. Augustine believes that everything was done by God; therefore all that is done is good and perfection. St. Augustine believes in evil for the collapse of humankind and the introduction of sin to the world. Just the classical theory of warfare began with the theology of Christianity. St. Augustine is believed to have presented the theory of war and justice for the first time. The saints believe that it is necessary to refer to the Bible and to do some wars to correct the evil. St. Thomas Aquinas has modified to create three standards for legitimate warfs that the Augustine version needs to be executed with justified legitimate intent and correct intent for a war. The moral defense of war is expressed in legitimate words, but the moral behavior of war is expressed in war. The theory of justice war is a set of military battle rules A legitimate war theory claims that war is justified morally or legally. St. Augustine 's justice war theory has four most important principles, also known as beliefs, principles and beliefs. Saint Augustine was born in the year 354 AD and incorporated Christian teachings in the year 386 AD during the decline of the Roman Empire. St. Augustine believes that everything was done by God; therefore all that is done is good and perfection. - The philosophical criticism of Augustine and Aquinas: the relationship between the soul and the body The relationship between the human soul and the body has been the subject of mysticalization of philosophers, scholars, scientists and humans for centuries. People are always concerned about their own position as individuals in this world, and they try to determine the exact nature and state of the physical form.

As a group, brainstorm the similarities and differences between you and a Mexican or Colombian student. (We may refer to apparent similarities and differences, but this is not the main point you emphasize.) You can think about similarities such as thought, family life, educational importance, interests, hobbies We should address differences. Please use the provided paper to organize your answer in Venn diagram. Please be sure to write your name on Venn diagram Everyone should pay the same attention - that is, do not concentrate most of you in other people or others. Find a balance point • In addition to identifying comparative people, it also determines the overall point of doing it. In other words, what is your message? • Can you give a general opinion on the person you choose to compare with yourself and yourself? • Regardless of whether your paper focuses on differences or similarities, you need to clarify the relationship between A and B in your paper. Your referrals include reference frames, reasons for comparison, and sentences. The two basic ways of organizing the body of a paper are personalized methods, discussing all A, then discussing the whole B, or a method of point-by-point discussion (function one by one) It refers to A's point. An alternative for B's comparable points ï, ¢ Example (Point by Point) After talking about yourself easily, I will contact other students in the same or different way. I repeat it again • Always ties your point of view to your discussion or keypoint so that the audience can see clearly how each part logically and systematically advances your discussion  - Your conclusion should summarize the key points in your story and emphasize your statement of statements in new words. Transition phrases are likewise compared, likewise, likewise, likewise, likewise relatively, correspondingly, likewise, likewise, in combination with this. On the contrary, nevertheless, it nevertheless nevertheless, nevertheless, nevertheless, nevertheless, conversely, or conversely, nevertheless nevertheless still a truth II. Body paragraph (point-by-point method) A. Key point statement B. Point A with evidence C. Point with evidence B D. Link A and B E. Conclusion Comparative analysis as a writing technique is not the easiest task to achieve. This is very rewarding and requires a detailed explanation of the material, but the final result is worth it. With the help of comparative analytical techniques, how different are similar things and vice versa is the same. Good Comparative Analysis It takes time and effort to write a paper, but following the guidelines will help you get the best results! As mentioned earlier, comparative analysis requires some caution with regard to its main concept. In order to convince the reader, you need to find true common points or differences, depending on the type of comparison you have chosen. This is the problem - you have to look into the two principles you compare in detail. To emphasize major similarities and differences, you need to understand the topic. This paper makes a comparative analysis of the philosophical principles of the two philosophers. These are the philosophy of Thomas Aquinas and the philosophy of Augustine. The authors compare the philosophical beliefs and rationality, the existence of God, the theory of knowledge, and the analytical expression of their basic philosophical methods and conclusions. The ideas of Thomas Aquinas and Augustine mimic their philosophical heroes, Plato and Aristotle's gestures. Augustine refers to heaven, Aquinas shows gestures towards the earth, and each epistemology and opinion relates to the nature and extent of knowledge. But their ideas are intertwined. There are similarities and differences in the epistemology of the two philosophers detailed in the comparative analysis.

The Christian doctrine of Hugo Meynell and Hugo Meynell is a clear example of the growing interest in aerobics. Menel believes that Christian doctrine has four common objections and that faith in God is morally unrelated; there is no reason to believe in Christian special claims for non-Christian religion . Menel also said that the Trinity's incarnation, atonement, and doctrine have no meaning, and the doctrine of Christian life after death is based on an inexplicable view of the nature of human nature - and according to his own view these Comments are satisfactory. Careful research on some central Christian teachings is now orderly. The term "Christian doctrine" refers to a central, well-developed doctrine on Christian faith and practice. There are many doctrines that make up sacred teachings, but at least two are the basis of Christianity and are thoroughly analyzed by Aquinas. These include Avatar and Trinity. Aquinas believes that these two doctrines are essential to Christian doctrine and must be believed to receive salvation (see ST IIaIIae 2.7 and 8, respectively). Therefore, it would be beneficial to explore what these doctrines claim. For those seekers who have experienced "organized religion" and "tradition", Christian doctrine may seem complex and ritualized. Some Christian churches actually hinder the clear expression and understanding of Christian doctrine. The only effective Christian expression for "Church" or "Unchurch" seekers is through the Bible. When we believe that Jesus Christ will commit our sins, we are in front of God. Regardless of whom we do, we can be saved in the same way. Because everyone sinned, they do not meet the criteria of God 's glory. But now, God has declared us innocent with his kind goodwill. He did this through Christ Jesus, and Christ Jesus freed us by committing our sins. Because God sent Jesus to punish our sins and to satisfy the wrath of God against us. We are with God when we believe that Jesus bleeds, we sacrifice our life for us (Romans 3: 22-25) and after three days it will rise from the death.

Analysis of "The man he killed, reconciliation and dreamer" Among the poems chosen Thomas Hardy, Walter Whitman, and Siegfried Sassoon share a common view. Bad feelings, feeling buried deep inside the heart. Even though the mind is condensed due to distortion of war, flash of regret, a place to dream, there are still other reasonable minds. These poems represent hope and I hope war is not necessary. They show that men have to kill, so they kill. The settlement comes from the Greek vocabulary based on Arasso. The general meaning of this expression is "change" or "exchange". The settlement involves changing the relationship between God and man. It assumes that the relationship has collapsed, but it has now changed from a state of hatred and division to a state of harmony and fellowship. In Romans 5: 6-11, before the reconciliation we were helpless, unbelievable, sinners and enemies, and we were told that we were angry with God (9 ). Change and settlement make us a new creature. "So, if someone is in Christ, he is a new creation, old things have disappeared and new ones have come!" (2 Corinthians 5: 17) The settlement relates to the relationship between God and man. God reconciles the world with himself (2 Corinthians 5:18). The settlement happens through the cross of Christ or the death of Christ. In Corinthians 5: 18, "God makes us reconcile with God through Christ" (God 5: 1). Therefore, we are no longer enemies, they are unbelieving, sinners and helpless. Instead, God's love has been poured into our hearts through the Holy Spirit that God has given us (Romans 5: 5). This is a change in the general condition of our lives. According to the tradition of Pauline, in the 5th century AD, Augustine of Hippo regarded Christ as a New Testament mediator between God and man, and became a conqueror of sin. After the collapse of Adam, he believed that Christ is the reason and reason for the reconciliation of man and God, and saw the way of Christian salvation in Christ. By believing in Christ, Augustine believes that salvation will be provided to people who are worthy. In the 13th century, Thomas Aquinas aimed to regain Godfather's teachings about the Holy three role in the redemption economy. In the opinion of Aquinas, angels and humans were made from the beginning for salvation. For Aquinas, Christ's suffering pours grace of salvation and all its virtues beyond humanity.

Magna Carta, rumors of St. Francis, and Summa Theologica of Thomas Aquinas are the most important works of the Middle Ages. These documents explain the civilization of the time to the reader. This article first explains why Magna Carta, Summa Theologica of Thomas Aquinas, and Admonition of St. Francis are very important. In this article we also summarize the quality and characteristics of these three documents. Magna Carta was used to relax nobility. Magna Carta: Today, Magna Carta is one of the most prominent and long-standing public policy in history. John I of England proposed it in 1215 and signed it Magna Carta proposed the idea of ​​checking government power first. The main purpose of Magna Carta is the king himself, advertising that he is no longer claiming to be beyond the law. Magna Carta has a history of over 800 years. America's Constitutional Ideal: After 550 years, the American Constitution has summarized this principle into an era in which this principle was enlightened and a new land. The US premise is that people should be involved in the development of laws that affect public policy and its rights. This is a novel form of government that determines policies using balanced legal creation, not aristocratic power. With this typical form of government, people can choose public policy leaders to define policies. Magna Carta has a strong influence on the US Constitution and the State Constitution. However, the impact was expressed as Magna Carta by Americans in the 18th century. Magna · Kata is considered widely accepted by citizens of the right to regain repressive rulers. Because of this tradition, most state constitutions include a statement of rights designed to ensure that individual citizens receive a list of provincial government protections and exemptions. Because of this political belief, the United States also partially passed the "rights bill".

A legitimate war theory claims that war is justified morally or legally. St. Augustine 's justice war theory has four most important principles, also known as beliefs, principles and beliefs. Saint Augustine was born in the year 354 AD and incorporated Christian teachings in the year 386 AD during the decline of the Roman Empire. St. Augustine believes that everything was done by God; therefore all that is done is good and perfection. St. Augustine believes in evil for the collapse of humankind and the introduction of sin to the world. Just the classical theory of warfare began with the theology of Christianity. St. Augustine is believed to have presented the theory of war and justice for the first time. The saints believe that it is necessary to refer to the Bible and to do some wars to correct the evil. St. Thomas Aquinas has modified to create three standards for legitimate warfs that the Augustine version needs to be executed with justified legitimate intent and correct intent for a war. The moral defense of war is expressed in legitimate words, but the moral behavior of war is expressed in war. The theory of justice war is a set of military battle rules A legitimate war theory claims that war is justified morally or legally. St. Augustine 's justice war theory has four most important principles, also known as beliefs, principles and beliefs. Saint Augustine was born in the year 354 AD and incorporated Christian teachings in the year 386 AD during the decline of the Roman Empire. St. Augustine believes that everything was done by God; therefore all that is done is good and perfection. - The philosophical criticism of Augustine and Aquinas: the relationship between the soul and the body The relationship between the human soul and the body has been the subject of mysticalization of philosophers, scholars, scientists and humans for centuries. People are always concerned about their own position as individuals in this world, and they try to determine the exact nature and state of the physical form.

Fundamental Principles of Human Nature Fierce arguments about how humans develop their behavior, thought, reasoning, and other abstract features have been controversial for centuries. Experience and sensory theory of John Rock 's "blank state" and the evolutionary biology of Edward Wilson and innate gene theory are effective and can be applied to the development of humanity. Two aspects of this controversial subject are partially correct through scientific research on the human genome (Powell). Humanity is a common quality of humans who act according to specific human principles. Human needs are an important part of humanity. Values, beliefs, customs differ by country and even within groups, but in general, everyone has some basic needs. As an administrator or leader, we must understand these needs. Hypothesis: Administrators of Theory X believe that people are inherently tired of their work, they want to avoid responsibility, and are not compelled, managed, guided, and intimidated to achieve results There is no doubt. Thus, actual administrators may be interested only in a limited licensing scheme, subject to simple remuneration and punishment within well-defined limits. Human reason is able to understand some general principles for porting the essence of human beings. The first principle of natural law is "to be kind and to pursue to avoid evil" (q 94, a 2, p. 47). All other natural laws depend on this. Aquinas seems to mean that some rules of natural law are norms of this rule. These other rules include (page 48): "Whatever the means to defend human life and protect it from its obstacles, it is a natural law", in other words, a sufficient reason for moral or legal regulation Is to promote the protection of human life. Behind this there is the fact that all living things tend to survive.

Who am I? Where did the world come from? What is my view on these issues? At first glance these seemingly simple questions and simple answers, the truth is that I began to develop my position for the whole semester. The answer to these questions turned out to be based on my understanding of Thomas Aquinas, Immanuel Kant, and Socrates philosophy. From these philosophers, I began to believe that I was born with natural morality, believed that God created me and the world, is a relative experientist. Let's find the answer in your life. Most important is what is Jesus' practice? Jesus said, "If someone listens to my words and does not believe him, I will not judge him, I am not to judge the world, but to save the world - I am the last Just to judge him on the day (John 12: 47-48) These are great statements There are many opportunities today to be attracted to political discussion Jesus also faces this challenge Jesus and Samaritan women who talked began to discuss whether the place of right worship was the town of Jerusalem or the city of Samaria (John 4) The disciples wanted to talk about the formation of Israel's political kingdom (Acts 1: 4-8) Every time Jesus ignores this question and focuses on his message - bringing salvation and new life to all without discrimination Jesus is to blame Rather than come, salvation The we came for. We will follow in Jesus! 47 "If someone listens to my words but I do not keep it, I can not judge that person, not to judge the world, but to save the world.49 I talk alone Because I am sending my father to say what I said, he knows that his order leads to eternal life.How my father tells me I said what I should do. "

Through our history, we have evolved and developed to the extent that we can explain the world we live in. Epicurus to Thomas Aquinas, from Aristotle, one of the best kings they taught, Alexander the Great, Sartre and Colonation are all looking for our reasons on this earth. Even our own hands will either drive or live to live us. When discussing the meaning of life, we must consider that all doctrine, argument, opposition, thought and emotion can only be explained and defined through the human perspective. Humans are fighting for the unimaginable High Stakes. At least today, billions of people are suffering. In the worst case, there are 400 million (or more) potential human, superhuman or postmortem whose presence is dependent on what we are doing and now. All complex civilizations that may be in the future, possible future experience, art and beauty depend on the present Human sufferings occur every day in all kinds and ways around us. We do not always see it, but it does not mean that it does not exist. When we see it, we usually ask ourselves ourselves. Yes, that makes sense. Since we are reading four readings, I can answer this question. However, as I deeply dug in this issue, I saw four readings with different views on the meaning or the meaning of pain. When you look at the definition of a verb (to feel or experience pain, persistent damage or loss), you can see that the pain is caused by multiple actions. Each reading describes different ways of suffering. With their basic knowledge, some people explain mental pain, but others describe the body, but each reading is more profound than some pain. The epic of Gilgamesh explains the pain caused by death.

The concept of war and how it is proved to be a rather difficult topic must be emphasized in all moral and sociologically important steps. The main thing is to see "the theory of war of justice" and see how it applies to the real world. In order to be able to enter the "war of justice", the country must meet six criteria with Jus ad Bellum (to participate in the war). The standards are as follows. "Legitimate reasons", "Correct intent", "Appropriate authority and public declaration", "Ultimate means", "Possibility of success", and ultimate "ratio". Historians and philosophers formed the theory of war just for centuries. However, the most systematic description of the theory of justice war was developed by St. Thomas Aquinas in his Summa Theologicae. According to the theory of war of justice, the moral reality of war can be divided into two parts. War was judged twice. The first visit refers to the reasons of domestic battle, and the second time refers to the means used in the actual battle. (Walzer, 21) The first verdict was called jus ad bellum, or justice. The second sentence is called a wartime trial, or justice in war. Jus ad bellum provides guidelines for assessing whether war is fair or unfair but wartime rules outline the correct behavior in warfare. Jus ad bellum does not mean jus in battle. Likewise, jus in battle does not need jus ad bellum. Justice warfare may be done unfairly so that it is possible to fight legitimate warfare. Only war theory and law distinguish between reason (jus ad bellum) relying on war and rational behavior in war (jus in war). Most statements of the theory of justice warfare have four principles, each with its own label. Rational hope for justification, legal authority, right intent, necessity or final means, proportionality and success There are three principles in rule of war: three types of discrimination, necessity or minimum force, and Proportionality. These principles represent a comprehensive understanding of the morality of war, in a compressed form that is 300 years ago and the basic structure is almost the same. Since it develops synchronously with the state system based legal system, not the individual, its existing form theory is very different from the classical theory it belongs to. For centuries, the teachings of the Church on peace and war have been influenced by the theory of war of justice. The theory of war of justice is a philosophical theory that states that war must be avoided absolutely, but if there are correct conditions war can be proved justified. The pioneers of this theory are Saint Augustine and St. Thomas Aquinas. St. Augustine wrote: "The commandments against the murder are not destroyed by war-witters because of God's authority." St. Thomas advanced one step further and cited three conditions of war of justice indeed. He said that for just cases, it was initiated by the appropriate authorities and needed to make a war to act with the correct intentions (For further information on this, see Summa Theologica II - II, Q. 40). In the summary of the theory of justice war, the doctrinal questions and answers of the Catholic Church indicate the following.

Comment: This quotation was not found in Thomas Jefferson's paper. Some people think this is an interpretation of Jefferson's claim in the Declaration of Independence. ... ... any form of government destroys these objectives, people have the right to change or abolish it and establish their own rights. The government said ... "Although such interpretation seems to have taken radical fundamental freedom from the original version, this quote is much more like commentary by Martin Luther King in the famous letters of Birmingham Prison. "People must not only observe the law but also bear fair moral responsibility. However, there are two kinds of unfair law: law. I agree with St. Augustine's view ... "Unfair law is not merely legal ..." The unfair law contradicts the norm of ethics law. Place it in terms of St. Thomas Aquinas: an unfair law not rooted in the eternal laws and the natural laws of human laws. It only improves legal personality. It is illegal to reduce legal personality. All apartheid laws are unjust because separation separates the personality of soul and damages. It separates into false sensations of inferiority and gives erroneous feelings of superiority by separation. The use of the Jewish philosopher Martin Bouver's words, Apartheid 'I - that' replaced 'I - you' relationship relationship, and ultimately a shrinking person to the state of things. Therefore, separation is not only political, economic and socially perfect, but morally wrong Aristotle has no unfair law that is not law (lex inuista non est lex). Because even if the law he follows is illegal, people are legitimate. Aristotle said, "There is something like an unfair law so legitimacy can not provide standards, even if we comply with the law, we are injustice of the law itself" ( Kraut 103). This interpretation of Aristotle has rejected the concept of heterogeneity behind the relationship between natural law and practical law - Aquinas believes that once the moral law is known, it violates the natural moral law. No man law is invalid and not binding. (As they did not exist) There are two types of law: justice and injustice. Saint Augustine said: "Unfair law is not a law at all." There is a set of criteria to judge whether the law is fair or unfair. The fairness law is a law that harmonizes with the law of God. On the contrary, the unfair law is a law incompatible with God's law and natural law. If the law enhances the character of a person, that law is fair. If laws lower individuals and their personality, that law is unfair. Martin Luther King stated that separation is injust because "distorting the soul and hurting the personality" (King). People involved in separation have a false sense of superiority over the oppressed people. As a result, oppressed people feel inferiority complex. Therefore separation is unjust and immoral and should be condemned as sin against God and man. A famous Existential Theologian Paul Tillich defines sin as being separated from God. Separation is separation, separation is sin

The extent to which fear responds to death in medieval religious culture. This survey analyzes the response to death in the medieval religious culture. Because it can be said that the relationship with death differs depending on the social class, it is difficult to respond in general to death. Since death is common among farmers, there are few sources that record it. Evangelism can infer the response to death, and these sermons affect lower - class beliefs. On the other hand, nobility provides a record of death and can be claimed from these sources. Anxiety is fear. Medieval theologian Thomas Aquinas described fear in his great textbook "Summa Theologiae". It is very attractive as it transcends the power he fears. "Let us break up the definition of Akinas in part of it, the characteristic of fear is the physical experience of" endogenous atrophy ". People's limbs are getting cold, shaking, shrinking from danger, etc. Aquinas explained this in a very medieval way. "When looking at the inhabitants of the town, when they are attacked by fear, they leave the suburbs and prepare them for the inside as much as possible ... ... fearing the body, the heat inside and the important spirit will shrink as well." The historical era of medieval Britain is a strong religious era, and Christianity provided a strict identity and purpose in life. Beliefs to heaven, hell, and judgment, as well as the constant fear of sin and curse are very real. The church manipulates the devout faith of the believer by selling fake sacred objects and religious hobbies. Amateurs think they need to get these items to purify their sins and to enter heaven without the pain of purgatory. The medieval drama greatly enhanced these beliefs, and they are purely liturgical. A moral play is initially done at a religious festival, warning the audience about sin and redemption, and anthropomorphization of mental illness. They all fight for the soul of the original good guy and have a very similar narrative structure like good and evil. Essay.com / "The difference between medieval and modern times is a degree rather than a strict classification." Discuss this idea in the context of the two authors you read. (Everyone and Dr. Faustas) "The difference between the Middle Ages and early modern times is a degree rather than a strict classification." Discuss this idea in relation to the two authors you read. (Everyone and Dr. Faustas) The main aspect of the similarity of medieval culture between the West and Persia is based on religious beliefs about the dignity of life (8). This idea began with Western and Persian culture Christianity and Islam / Seupoleism (9). As part of the belief in the two traditional concepts of death, emphasis is placed on maximizing the value of defending innocent lives, accusing themselves or murdering others. Since the beginning of the eighteenth century, this period is characterized by using fear instead of lamenting the dead to accept and accept death, according to Aries. At this time, death is like sex and not considered ordinary and very familiar in the reality of human life, but it is fearful to uplift and fear. In this new picture, the family and friends around the deceased did not see death (or the moment before the verdict).

When reviewing this year's theme "Responding to limits and possibilities of the body", this article explores how Christian's manifestation of manifestation affects medical practice. Specifically, I insist that humans are understood as concrete and exciting bodies. This means that medical practice needs to accommodate the dual nature of people. In addition to therapeutic therapy aimed at restoring health, practice of health management must also meet certain mental needs. Therefore, in this article I emphasize the importance of regaining the Christian tradition of "healing the soul". First of all, this paper answers questions about how the human body relates to ourselves. I will introduce Thomas' method of understanding human expression. According to Aquinas, humans are substances. In his classical word he claims that "the soul is in the form of a body", which makes a human two complex. In this embodiment, people are "individual substances in the category of rational animals". The body should be understood as belonging to the essence of mankind. Likewise, the soul is defined as "the first principle of life". It is neither physical nor physical, it is a physical act. The soul is the principle of human vitality and animation. According to Aquinas, part of our nature is spiritual so the soul is perfect in our body. Human being a single substance that exists from the body and the soul. The soul is the reason for understanding the material influence of existing human beings. Therefore, the fact that the human body is composed of living human tissues makes human soul completely present in every part of man. If we can prove that human beings are best understood as a complex - while embodying the spirit and motivating the body - we will focus on the influence of modern medical practice. As a motivated body, people with chronic illness are susceptible to physiological limitations. Therapeutic drug therapy is essential for restoring human health. At the same time, treatment must sympathize with the limit imposed by the recession. As a specific spirit, people with chronic illness are vulnerable to the existence of despair, mental depression and spiritual indifference. In the medical community, further "treatment" is necessary to meet these needs. In this section we demonstrate that medical acts need to develop free ways to deal with the human mental nature by regaining the tradition of "healing souls" of ancient Christians. The body and concrete sociology broadly outlook on the concept of "body" including a wide range of dynamics including "human" and "non-human", morphology, human reproduction, anatomy, body fluids, biotechnology, genetics I have. It is usually related to health, illness, and the body theory of politics, society, culture, economy and ideology. There is a research committee specializing in 'body in social science' in international search organizations. The relationship between human thought and the social background that it produces and the impact of ubiquitous ideas on society When German theorists, especially Max Scherrer and Carl were many in the 1920s, this term first Was widely used. Mannheim published numerous articles on this If we can prove that human beings are best understood as a complex - while embodying the spirit and motivating the body - we will focus on the influence of modern medical practice. As a motivated body, people with chronic illness are susceptible to physiological limitations. Therapeutic drug therapy is essential for restoring human health. At the same time, treatment must sympathize with the limit imposed by the recession. As a specific spirit, people with chronic illness are vulnerable to the existence of despair, mental depression and spiritual indifference. In the medical community, further "treatment" is necessary to meet these needs. In this section we demonstrate that medical acts need to develop free ways to deal with the human mental nature by regaining the tradition of "hea

So far, there are 32 states in the United States, 18 states are executing the death penalty, and 18 states do not execute the death penalty ("countries with death penalty"). In 2012, there were only 43 people in the 760,739 cases of about 14827 murder cases and serious attacks ("1960 - 2012 American crime"), only 43 people ("2012 execution list") executed. These numbers do not seem to be joined together. In 2012, 100,000 people, Michigan State which is a non-death sentence ("State and State murder rate"), Murder of the United States per about 8 percent. There are many people with religious views on capital punishment. Most religious groups have forgiven and forgotten, so they do not keep the death penalty. What do you think if a murderer is sent to prison when a loved one is killed? Compared with the death sentence, it is troublesome to send him to prison. If life does not have the sympathy for the killer, we should not have any sympathy for his life, if he sinned, always waste of living money to him Will keep Over time, Christianity changed the perception of the death penalty, and different Christian denominations did different teachings. Many early Christians strongly oppose the death penalty and the magistrate who executed the death penalty may be expelled from the church. In the 5th century, the attitude began to gradually relax. In the 13th century, the death penalty is the form of "legitimate killing," Thomas Aquinas (Thomas Aquinas) in centuries, it became the standard Catholic doctrine of the problem. Protestant reforms for the death penal defense, between Martin Luther and John Calvin, but Quakers, brothers and Mennonites have opposed them since its establishment. Since the Second Vatican Council, the Roman Catholic Church generally opposed the death penalty, and in August 2018, in all cases as if the catechism of the Pope Francis Catholic Church was clearly unacceptable for inviolability and dignity Attack attacks attacks. people I found a CNS article - (Catholic Church, State of Virginia, 13 August.) "Why did the pope say that the death penalty is" unacceptable "- the death penalty stance of the church reasonable, historical With respect to the power of national administration of perspective, long-standing tradition will be established teaching and reality of the Bible. Humans are to gain dignity from God themselves. We are made of our own images and images (Genesis 1: 26). We can not change what we are doing or what the government is doing. Therefore, the fact that the state receives punishment for his right and wrong does not impair human dignity. It can not be done alone

Only with the promotion and expansion of the spirit influenced by the complex relationship with the substance, you can realize the alliance kingdom and joy. They reflect, reverse and change according to the nature of the alliance and challenge the people's general intuition about hierarchy, advantage, rise and fall. In the whole poem, the prophetic character inspires readers to the spiritual field method through the basic soul body, praise and praise story - thus providing a dynamic drama in autumn. Scotz attributed Aquinas the following argument about the infinite of God: if the form is restricted by substance, it is restricted. A simple God is not limited by the problem. Therefore, God is not restricted. As Scotts pointed out, this is a false argument. (This is an example of denying the leader.) But beyond the paradox, simplicity does not make us infinite. As Scotz says, "If the entity is finite or infinite, it is not by chance itself, but since it has its own limited or infinite integrity of itself" (Introduction 1 , D). 1, part 1), q.1-2, n.142). Since finite is not a result of synthesis, simplicity does not need to be infinite. From another point of view, the infinite concept of Aquinas is negative and relevant. Infinity is not bound by other things. This is "inner perfection". To find infinity is inherent in every life. It is infinite to give us freedom. Everything lacking infinity is a limit, hence death. The life of all life and the biography of all beings is only to achieve this infinite struggle. Therefore, with infinite existence scale, there is no existence high and low. Because all creatures eventually get infinite. Our top priority is not to hate the existence. Even core criminals and terrorists are fighting for freedom, but the policies of action they choose are wrong - the way to destruction. We must hate evils freed by these actions. In the process of struggle, they become active and unlimited in infinite scale life How was God done correctly? Nothing wrong, everything is sacred orders. Even in the darkness, confusion, warfare surrounding us, this is a choice of "free will". If we exercise our free will to eliminate our spirit, we must pay karma to wait for us. This is the righteousness of God, it is perfect. Regardless of the size, we are completely responsible for every good behavior and bad behavior. For those who already feel sacred and know that God exists for those who know that everything goes well even in the storm. God will never forsake you, but you can not give up yourself, your life's purpose, your responsibility, and your mission's mission. Remember that when you feel that each of us has a dark evening soul and we feel we can not continue anymore, you choose to follow this way close to God.

Key features of the cosmological argument of the existence of God Cosmological argument comes from the word cosmos, which refers to the world or the universe as a well-organized and perfect system. A cosmological argument is a classical argument that attempts to prove the existence of God and this argument is based on the fact that the existence of the world needs to be explained. A cosmological argument is an argument that begins with the existence of the universe and prove the existence of God. Like most arguments about the existence of God, cosmological arguments exist in many forms; here two are discussed: cosmological arguments of time, Kalam (ie the first argument), and division Discussion of style. The main difference between these two arguments is that they avoid the first opposition to the argument and cast the question "is there a reason for that existence in God?" Then suppose that God exists to explain the existence of the universe and we will not take us anywhere. Without God, we have an entity that we can not explain, there is a universe; there is an entity with God, we can not explain, that is God. Discussion that is most widely accepted and criticized about the existence of God. My purpose in this article is to explain why cosmological arguments are proof of the existence of God, to understand that it is the importance of posteriori posteriori discussion, and to my common argument It is to observe the position of. First of all, as a living person on earth, we can safely conclude that the majority of things that exist today have their cause. I confirmed that there is a reason. There are many arguments about the existence of God to try to prove the existence of God. In this article we will discuss ontological discussions, cosmological arguments, empirical discussions, such as avoiding errors and design arguments. There is much criticism about each of these, and the existence of God can not prove that it might be stronger than those who speak more strongly. The insisting definition of God is a god of Christianity ... I have found Akinas' theory that the existence of God is very interesting. It is easy to understand and logical. Summa Theologiae is one of the best works of Aquinas. St. Thomas is also a writer, writing a lot of comments on Aristotle and other theological and philosophical themes. Aquinas divides his argument into five ways to prove the existence of God. The first method is sports debate. There are many things that are changing, but not all of a sudden starts.

In today's modern Western society, it is not easy to identify Christianity, which is becoming increasingly popular, with any religion. From the beginning of enlightenment, the perception of the existence of the people of God and the role of God in our world has changed dramatically today. Many people can only focus on the concept of reason or allow humans to use their senses to draw conclusions about the world around them, trying to understand phenomena in their environment . But some people seem like beliefs, others believe that the concept of higher powers is the reason for our existence. In our culture, faith and reason are controversial. Religious apologies from every background will argue that faith and reason are perfectly compatible. Many people say that science and reason is a way to understand the content and the way of the universe, and faith tells us the reason. If this discussion is held in court, that belief will be the murder weapon against complete blindness of confirming prejudice. Faith and reason are two ideologies that exist in different levels of conflict or compatibility. The reason is based on reasons and facts. Faith is inspiration, revelation, or believe in authority. The term faith may refer to beliefs that are held regardless of beliefs, reasons or evidence lacking reasons or evidence, or otherwise. Or may refer to belief based on some evidence. The Catholic Church also teaches that true faith and right reasons can work together and must work. . John Paul II, Fides et Ratio ("Faith and Reason") The relationship between faith and reason also takes a different position as well. One example is belief that faith and reason are compatible and work together, which is the view of Thomas Aquinas and the orthodox view of Catholic natural theology. According to this view, rationality establishes certain religious truths and beliefs "guided by reason" that, according to Aquinas, "sacred truths beyond all powers of human reason" It is possible to obtain. Another position is the belief that that belief is "independent, in a sense, rationality, even though it is not a direct conflict." This view is famous by theologian Tertullian (AD 160-230). Modern philosophers such as Kierkegaard, William James, Wittgenstein are related to this label. In particular, Kiakegaard believes that it is necessary for religion to adopt irrational beliefs to bridge the gap between humans and God. In two different conceptual ways, the dynamics of the relationship between faith and reason also looks the same. According to the initial view, it can be thought that God's natural knowledge belongs to the field of religion. The concept of God arises from a religious experience as a form of faith or belief - as the concept of God comes from a religious experience relating to Jewish and Christian revelation. In this case, the natural knowledge of God is "a downward path" from faith to reason, which proves the rationality and universality of faith to God. Who is God connected to? Other universal and inclusive concept that is the cause of nature. Depending on the specific philosophical method or field being used

There are many articles, blogs, books, videos that specialize in cheating and business. When a person enters "injustice" or "adultery" in the search engine, the title such as "how to judge whether your spouse is fraudulent", "how to prove that you are doing wrong" Is displayed. Your spouse will cheat you and scam him what to do "and". "People are also buried in news clips that specialize in latest celebrity cheating scandals, posts by social media, blogs. There are many suggestions on how to arrest a cheat husband and how to identify a wife and a wife. There is an entire book devoted to recovering after other important frauds, and much of reality is centering around rock and roll relationships. The law itself has been changed to take into account the cultural obsession for cheating. As spyware evolved and suspicious spouses started to monitor their partners technically, laws were established to protect the spouse's privacy. Some technical monitoring methods are illegal in various fields, and delusions spouses use a number of electronic spy technologies to aim for partner's lives. However, it seems that a large amount of unauthorized information is focused on finding betrayal, or recovering from cheating after discovering a loved one. In contrast, there is much less information on why people first cheat. Here are six reasons that people strive to be loyal to human relationships. Being at the forefront of medieval ideology is an effort to harmonize the relationship between theology (belief) and philosophy (rationality). There is a difference in the relevance between knowledge gained through revelation and information that we have observed naturally using our own thoughts and senses. According to Avirois's "Double True Theory", these two kinds of knowledge are opposite. The revolutionary view of St. Thomas Aquinas denies the theory of Averos and claims that "both knowledge comes from God," hence it is compatible. According to Thomas' ideology, they can not only be compatible but can also cooperate. He believes that revelation can lead reason and prevent mistakes while believing reveals and reveals the mystery of faith. The work of St. Thomas Aquinas continues to discuss the role of faith and reason in perceiving and proving the existence of God. Many theologians systemize the relationship between theology and philosophy and try to express it as four forms. The first form is that faith is superior to reason, the second form is more reasonable than faith, and the third form is to pursue harmony between faith and reason. These four figures represent the view of the world in people's history. With only the Bible, the revelation and the faith, it is recommended that a person who believes in the preference oppose the reason for that person. People are contradicting because there is a big risk of applying reasoning to theological grounds and beliefs. They believe that there is a mistake in the philosophy itself, and that philosophy has limitations. These people believe that if theologians use the wrong reason to explain the revelation then then that revelation is not a revelation and that revelation will damage that personality.

The beginnings of Christianity did not have any form of art record in the first 2 centuries of Christianity. Christians gather in groups on private phones and offer simple services. In these services they eat wine and bread and remind us of Christ's sacrifice on the cross. (Ram 175) The symbol of Christianity is a major art form in the early years of Christian art. Egyptians, Greeks, Roman artists have various symbols representing different things. In all the "Christian" cults that exist, "Christian Science" is the most inaccurate name. Christian science is not a Christian, nor is it based on science. Christian Science denies the truth of the system called "Christian." Indeed, Christian science is opposed to science and points to a mysterious new era of spirituality as a way to physical and mental healing. Christian science should be recognized and rejected as its anti Christian worship. Christian science is one of the most interesting things among the cults based on all the Bible in America today. It not only denies the fundamental doctrine of Christianity, it completely reinterpretes the Bible. It completely redefines Biblical culture and terminology and removes thousands of Bibles from historical and biblical backgrounds. The result is a non-Christian mixture of metaphysics and philosophical thinking. Christian science is very strange in the Bible so if you do not use words such as Jesus, Trinity, Love, Mercy, and Sin, you will never doubt that it has something to do with the Bible. In addition, the book "Science, Health and Biblical keys" is the backbone of the spiritual knowledge of Christian scientists and is read in the rhythm of pseudo-logical words which slows the sense when reading . Christian Science Christian? of course not Today Jewish and Christian traditions are not Jewish and Christianity of the Bible, a dark era. Thomas Aquinas (1225 - 1274) rediscovered Aristotle's reasonable philosophy and incorporated this philosophy into the Christian tradition. Therefore, Western civilization has Renaissance, rational era, and enlightenment. To the left of the postmodern is the second sarcasm of ridicule of contemporary conservative religious rebellion. If religious beliefs are understood as mystical beliefs, the remaining postmoderns are at least as religious as Christian conservatism. The left does not oppose religion and mysticism, but against the Western Jewish - Christian tradition, especially the most mysterious religion of the day. Because it enters Aristotle through Aquinas.

It should be unique to the system of moral beliefs or human nature, beliefs that can be found through reasons rather than through revelation The philosophical principle, that is, the legal system and the authority of a specific law comes from the rationality of its rationality, and in fact there is no power in an unreasonable legal system. New Culture Literacy Dictionary, 3rd Edition Copyright © 2005 Houghton Mifflin Harcourt Publishing Company. Houghton Published by Mifflin Harcourt Publishing Company. Copyright Two definitions of natural law compete. The first one considers natural law as "rethinking the rationality of nature". The second is to understand the natural law as "writing in the mind". First to understand rational reflection elements of natural law - Natural law is based on nature, but it is well known by reason. Furthermore, because it is made up of scientific research including anthropology, the nature of reasonable reflection has nothing to do with the everyday nature of experience. The essence of reasonable natural law is human nature, it is human nature and may be the best development. Human beings achieved their goals and their development goals When we focus on the recipients of natural law, our human beings, the theory of natural law of Aquinas is that natural law constitutes the basic principle of human practical reasons and has this position . Born (ST Iaaeae 94, 2). The concept of the law of nature constitutes the basic principle of practical reasons, and for Aquinas the rules of the law of nature have universal nature constraints (ST IaIIae 94, 4), the rules of natural law are as follows It is universalized. Understanding: Nature (ST IaIIae 94, 4; 94, 6) The ambiguity of the natural law of natural law is based on a figurative relationship between the law of nature and the regulation of the authority of human activity. In the latter usage, the "law of nature" refers to legal and moral principles, its scope is universal and is said to detain human behavior. In medieval Christian theology, natural law was considered to be a system given by God, but from the beginning of the religious reform, people will appreciate the eternal foundation of natural law in human nature and reason I tried it. For example, Leviathan at Thomas Hobbes shows the reasons for establishing political authority, as the "law of nature" shows the reasonable justification of social contracts. Since the 18th century, legal theories tend to be contrary to the notion of natural law - traditional, social and historically formed legal features are often more emphasized. However, since the end of the Second World War, the increase in the moral authority of human rights is largely due to the tradition of natural law.

The university teacher and the high school teacher agree much with the most important writing skills for the students, but they differ in terms of grammar and skills. According to the latest results of the ACT National Curriculum Survey, university teachers consider these to be the most important skills for college students, but high school teachers consider these skills as least important. This obvious discontinuity may be one of the reasons that many first grader college students need assistance for improving writing skills. According to a recent survey, it is necessary for half of today's university freshmen to attend at least one auxiliary class and more than one in four will take individual tutoring courses. Dr. Cynthia Schmeiser, vice president of development for ACT, says: Nonetheless, the difference between college expectations and high school education is noteworthy as many high school graduates do not seem to have all the skills necessary to succeed in college courses. Grammar was an important topic in school. The teacher asks the students to make chart statements on the board. Then everything stopped. High school graduates can not express adverbs with adjectives. What has happened - explain why the chart is art for such a long time - why art goes on and it disappears overnight. Believe it or not, for many philosophers it is an important time to go beyond the century. Everyone from Plato to Aquinas gave their impressions of beauty, truth and beauty. The transcendence of the 19th century was actually quite different from the medieval transcendent that was determined by Aquinas. Explain this topic The university teacher and the high school teacher agree much with the most important writing skills for the students, but they differ in terms of grammar and skills. According to the latest results of the ACT National Curriculum Survey, university teachers consider these to be the most important skills for college students, but high school teachers consider these skills as least important. This obvious discontinuity may be one of the reasons that many first grader college students need assistance for improving writing skills. According to a recent survey, it is necessary for half of today's university freshmen to attend at least one auxiliary class and more than one in four will take individual tutoring courses.

In the previous answer I was quoted quite well to explain how Dr. King distinguishes between fair law and fraud law. I will add another quotation in the letter. Gold quotes the word of St. Thomas Aquinas From the citation of this quote and the previous answer, the king finds that he believes that the law is higher than the law of mankind. For him, if it helps better people, that law is consistent with a higher law. If it does not meet these criteria, this is an illegal law. This definition of justice and injustice shows one of the civic difficulties that does not comply with unfair legislation to us. Most Americans today agree that the law against the king is unfair and not obliged. However, there is no objective way to judge which laws are fair and unfair. From today, it may be argued that the law permitting abortion should be unfair and disobedient from only two examples, while insisting that the law against gay marriage is unfair can do. . It is impossible to say objectively whether the right of abortion or same-sex marriage is "improving the person's personality" or "rooted in eternal law". This means that the idea of ​​civil disobedience is somewhat dangerous as it allows someone to violate their law only because their moral values ​​do not comply with these laws It means. In response to a nonviolent demonstration that the eight white matter clerics blamed in Alabama and called it a vandalism act, Dr. King revealed the difference between fair law and fraud law. He defines fairness as artificial law. This is consistent with the law of God and is also called the moral law. On the other hand, the unfair law is an artificial law that departed from the law advocated by God's law. He further described the words of St. Aquinas in detail: "The law of illness is a law of human beings not rooted in eternal and natural laws." For example, he describes the unfair law as a law that lowers personality, justifies the difference, imposes it on a few people excluded from law. Contrary to the above, he illustrated the law as a law to make law of identity Henry David Thoreau and Martin Luther King Jr. stated that in the name of unfair legislation in the famous article "Letters from Birmingham Prison", they comply with fair laws and illegally violate It was. Guide to the law. Likewise, Henry David Thoreau wrote in his famous article "civil disobedience" that people should not do unfair legislation, they should do what their conscience has told them. In "Letters from Birmingham Prison", Martin Luther King Jr. raised legal issues. He argues that there are two kinds of laws: "Justice and injustice" (King 320), and one is morally responsible for complying with not observing illegality. He agreed with Saint Augustine's view. "Unfair law is not a law at all" (King 320) He proved that moral and unfair law is immoral using justice definition of two laws. Some of the main definitions of the two laws he uses are: "A fair law is an artificial code that is consistent with moral law or God's law" (King 320), "Unfair laws are human The law of. It is not rooted in eternal law and law of nature. Another definition he is using is a group of major powers, "Unfair law obliges to obey the minority, but does not bind itself." I want to force some people to obey and obey them. "(King 321)

In Summa Theologiae, the medieval theologian Thomas Aquinas said that laziness is "a slowness of the mind, neglecting to start tenderness ... its effect is evil if it is so repressive to mankind. (2 , 35, advertisement 1) Even if it sacrifices God's known will, laziness is a desire for ease. No matter what we do in our lives, we need to work hard. All what we do is a means of redemption. As they have devoted a lot of effort, the lazy people do not want to do what God wants. Laziness is sinful when you slow down, you may even stop using the means of salvation A lazy man committed a lazy fatal crime - he was punished in hell as he was thrown into a snake hole. Like other punishments for deadly sins, there seems to be no connection between laziness and snakes. How about putting lazy things in cold water or boiling oil? Why will not they get up from bed to go to work? I believe that idleness is the most "deadly" crime. Laziness is harmful to individuals, but it usually does not have a major impact on society. Since it was originally included in seven deadly sins, the definition of laziness changed dramatically. In fact, it was first called a sin of sorrow. It is in the early days of Christianity and is characterized by depression: depression, boredom or laziness. In the mezzanine house, the customary examples of laziness and laziness are narrator, lazy, introvert, intellectual, usually part of the land. He wants the world to be different. He believes the world should follow his passion for science and art. But he never made artistic or scientific works at his three "work" times. "The narrator acknowledged that he was unhappy and unaware, he said," It was accused by not doing anything forever "(page 125). Melancholy is not only regarded as a symbol of sin, but it is considered sinful in a depressing state; in Latin, Latin lazy deadly sins are widely defined from laziness to melancholy. In fact, many clergy wrote about the people suffering from Acadia and explained that they are depressed. For example, Cassis thus states "lazy" monks as follows. "He looked worried like this and he sighed that the brothers did not come to see him. Next, as if it was too late to set up, the unfairness of the heart The confusion occupied him, like a dirty dark. " Prior to the 19th century, the term closest to "boredom" was heart failure, also known as a lazy "deadly sin". According to Thomas Aquinas (1225-1274), one of the best "psychologists" believes that sin is repressive sorrow, so he is not doing anything because it is heavy for the person's heart. "Evagrius Ponticus writes that people with heart failure hate Dr. Nicholas Lombardo for another explanation of heart failure. Our will will become uneasy after God knows something and does not need anything. "

Over time, there has always been a question about the existence of God and the creation of the supernatural existence of the universe. There are many discussions and explanations explaining whether God exists or not. One such interpretation is a theoretical argument, which explains the existence of God based on the design and purpose of known things. For example, we know that there are trees and plants that need sunlight and water. Those trees and plants grow from the ground and the ground is part of the earth. There are many arguments about the existence of God to try to prove the existence of God. In this article we will discuss ontological discussions, cosmological arguments, empirical discussions, such as avoiding errors and design arguments. There is much criticism about each of these, and the existence of God can not prove that it might be stronger than those who speak more strongly. The insisting definition of God is a god of Christianity ... I have found Akinas' theory that the existence of God is very interesting. It is easy to understand and logical. Summa Theologiae is one of the best works of Aquinas. St. Thomas is also a writer, writing a lot of comments on Aristotle and other theological and philosophical themes. Aquinas divides his argument into five ways to prove the existence of God. The first method is sports debate. There are many things that are changing, but not all of a sudden starts. An argument about the existence argument argument argument of God is an a priori argument. These arguments try to prove the existence of God from the meaning of the word God. Anselm of Canterbury introduced an ontological argument to his work 'Proslogion'. The classic argument of Anselm is based on two principles, the most important of which are St. Anselm and Rene de Carte of the above Canterbury. - Cosmological argument tries to prove the existence of God by showing that there are no myriad reasons for the existence of objects. It states that everything must have the last unresolved cause. The reason for this unknown reason is declared to be God. Such discussion is believed to be the reason for understanding us and the existence of the universe. There are several forms of cosmological argument, but basically it is as follows. Like most arguments about the existence of God, cosmological arguments exist in many forms; here two are discussed: cosmological arguments of time, Kalam (ie the first argument), and division Discussion of style. The main difference between these two arguments is that they avoid the first opposition to the argument and cast the question "is there a reason for that existence in God?" Then suppose that God exists to explain the existence of the universe and we will not take us anywhere. Without God, we have an entity that we can not explain, there is a universe; there is an entity with God, we can not explain, that is God.

Exploring the evidence of the existence of God Christians can present many arguments to prove the existence of God or cast doubts. Why are we here? What is the purpose of our existence? Thomas Aquinas is a Catholic theologian. The universe is designed to be quite complicated and well designed and is considered to be unlikely to happen by chance. Nature is very complex, but everyone is well integrated and there must be a creator. But, if the Creator believes so many people are intangible, intangible, tasteless, and silent, how can we prove that this God is the truth? Among the three arguments to prove the existence of God, I think that Akinus's cosmological argument is based on empirical evidence, and that simple and practical attention is accepted in both history and science I will find out what was proved. Aquinas initially stated that the existence of God is not a trivial preliminary question, so we need to test the influence of God, and even though we can not completely understand the essence of God, the existence of God Can be observed to prove. - Executive summary This report covers the evaluation of myIT Labs software. It provides insight into why the software does not meet the expectations of intended use of Microsoft Word and Excel. This is based on a weekly test There is much debate about the existence of God about the existence of God. For a long time everyone wanted to prove the existence of God. Some people think that God exists and is proved by many philosophical or scientific foundations and religious reasons. On the other hand, others do not believe in the existence of God and their foundation is proved from many theoretical and scientific point of view. Many people try to prove the existence of God with reason. After Descartes proves its existence, he will think the truth about the essence of God, evidence of the existence of God, and the nature of material objects. The main task in Descartes' meditation is to design a system that allows him to understand the truth. He wants to lay the foundation of all further philosophy The medieval society believed that humans existed because God wants them to exist. Descartes does not doubt the existence of God, I doubt that the existence of man is God's desire. He has a problem because he proved the existence of God using a series of theorems. He proved that thought is the essence of thinking. At that time the revolution supports the new idea of ​​"I think myself". It gives independent thinking and free will to human institutions, leading the age of enlightenment. For Descartes, thought proves that our existence is a conscious entity. By solving the survival problem, the thinkers of the 18th and 19th centuries established mathematical and scientific identity. Equivalent thoughts and consciousness do not satisfy thinking thoughts. Beyond the era of reason, we continue to doubt our existence

Like a mathematical proof, we can not prove the existence of God to anyone. In my opinion, rational theory is too limited to understand other things than human experience. Throughout history many rational arguments have been advocated, but if you do not believe in God, you will never do. Cosmological arguments are classical arguments against the existence of God. This is also called the first cause parameter. The rationale for the argument is the first reason behind the existence of the universe. There are many arguments about the existence of God to try to prove the existence of God. In this article we will discuss ontological discussions, cosmological arguments, empirical discussions, such as avoiding errors and design arguments. There is much criticism about each of these, and the existence of God can not prove that it might be stronger than those who speak more strongly. The insisting definition of God is a god of Christianity ... I have found Akinas' theory that the existence of God is very interesting. It is easy to understand and logical. Summa Theologiae is one of the best works of Aquinas. St. Thomas is also a writer, writing a lot of comments on Aristotle and other theological and philosophical themes. Aquinas divides his argument into five ways to prove the existence of God. The first method is sports debate. There are many things that are changing, but not all of a sudden starts. Among the three arguments to prove the existence of God, I think that Akinus's cosmological argument is based on empirical evidence, and that simple and practical attention is accepted in both history and science I will find out what was proved. Aquinas initially stated that the existence of God is not a trivial preliminary question, so we need to test the influence of God, and even though we can not completely understand the essence of God, the existence of God Can be observed to prove. - Executive summary This report covers the evaluation of myIT Labs software. It provides insight into why the software does not meet the expectations of intended use of Microsoft Word and Excel. This is based on a weekly test Before attempting to explain and evaluate the moral argument about God's existence, it is beneficial to understand the purpose of God's existential argument. Of course, though the views on this are diverse, most contemporary supporters do not believe that theoretical arguments are "proof". They should provide effective arguments and prerequisites that reasonable people can not deny. Such success criterion obviously sets high criteria for success and supporters of the argument of the writer can hardly meet philosophical discussions of interesting conclusions in areas other than formal logic such criteria Correctly point out. Is the premise of these arguments reasonable, at least for reasonable people, more reasonable than rejection?

Generally, it is difficult to live a Christian life. This gives up from the bottom of our hearts and means to give up on all the temptations of God and your Savior all over the world and against "health". Instead of taking a walk in the park, you need lifelong discipline and love to approach this life. The devil can easily attract your heart to all these secular pleasures, but imagine if the devil is not your only enemy. What if people around you, your family, your friends and even the government increase these hardships of these Christians? I am very tired, but I am very happy. I am very happy because there is hope. I am very happy because I am a Christian. I am convinced that I am a Christian. Because Christian faith is based on eternity in front of the Creator. I promise that long ago that I and other Christians face suffering in the world, so I am very happy. I am very happy because I can never promise life's peaceful life by exchanging faith in God on Earth. The commitment is that I face a disaster. I face suffering, but I am convinced that I can not accept anyone. Jesus already beat the world. Even my most sinful days, I know that my Savior is always with me. I am deeply aware that the best things in this life can compare me with eternal glory. I remember that the United States is not a heaven. The heart of Christian faith is the reality and hope of Jesus' salvation. Christian faith is faith in God of salvation revealed by Jesus of Nazareth. The Christian tradition consistently matched this god with the God of the Three, identifying this redemption as transcendental and apocalyptic sin, finality and realization of human existence in life without death. This may be a project without compromise in Christian beliefs. The question of discussion is the relationship between salvation and activities in our world. Careful research on some central Christian teachings is now orderly. The term "Christian doctrine" refers to a central, well-developed doctrine on Christian faith and practice. There are many doctrines that make up sacred teachings, but at least two are the basis of Christianity and are thoroughly analyzed by Aquinas. These include Avatar and Trinity. Aquinas believes that these two doctrines are essential to Christian doctrine and must be believed to receive salvation (see ST IIaIIae 2.7 and 8, respectively). Therefore, it would be beneficial to explore what these doctrines claim.

As DOUGLAS ADAMS once wrote: "The universe is great, it is really big." But if our Big Bang theory is correct, the universe is much smaller. In fact, there is nothing to exist. About 13.7 billion years ago, time and space were born naturally. What is the matter with you? Or, to put it another way, what is there? This is a big problem, perhaps the biggest problem. It is very difficult for the universe to think of nothing at all, making it harder to think about nothing. From a scientific point of view, this is a very rational issue. After all, some basic physics shows you and the rest of the universe is absolutely impossible. The second law of thermodynamics, existence of physics law Most of the resonance shows that disorder or entropy tends to increase. Entropy measurement is a method of rearranging system components without changing the overall appearance. For example, molecules in a hot gas can be placed in many different ways to create the same overall temperature and pressure, making the gas a high entropy system. In contrast, you are a low entropy system because you can not reconstitute the living thing molecules to non-living things. According to the same logic, nothing is the best entropy state - you can move as you like, it still seems nothing Aquinas insisted that according to Aristotle's statement, there must be something to explain why the universe exists. Since it can be imagined that the universe does not exist under different circumstances - it is a coincidence - there must be a reason for its existence. And this reason can not be just another accident, it must be something that must be present. In 1714, the German philosopher Gottfried Leibniz made a similar argument against his "appropriate rational principle". "If there is no justifiable reason, we can not find facts of real existence or actual proposition, so in most cases these reasons can not be understood unless otherwise stated." Discussion: "Why Is there something more than? There is a good reason ... in the substance ... this is the reason why it is necessary for the existence of that existence. " Discussion of cosmology can only infer the existence of God from the assertion about the entire universe. This argument is based on the statement that God must exist in order for the universe to need a cause. The existence of the universe requires explanation, which is this interpretation by positively creating the universe through the existence of the universe - usually considered to be a god. Aquinas insisted that according to Aristotle's statement, there must be something to explain why the universe exists. Since it can be imagined that the universe does not exist under different circumstances - it is a coincidence - there must be a reason for its existence. And this reason can not be just another coincidence, it must be something that must be present.

We have to reform the law to make divorce more difficult. It will eliminate the construction of the family, or as head rest. Several discussions have emerged, but depending on view, the answer is still different. Because marriage is a sacred stage in our life and composed of people who love women, they choose to get married. [If the article "If divorce is more difficult"] points out that life decisions should not be made based on what others want to do. By eliminating the no-fault divorce law, the best way to reduce divorce rates is to make divorce more difficult. In this way people will really make promises when they decide to get married. In addition, there should be some divorce. Therefore, a couple married to a child is much more difficult to divorce than a couple marrying a child. Free marriage counseling should also be offered before marriage and divorce. Finally, the marriage law should be at the federal level, not at the state level. Therefore, each state must comply with the same law. I think this will work. If you marry and make divorce more difficult, marriage will be a real decision. The number of people marrying may decrease, but that person will get married longer There is a danger of marrying both men and women. However, I believe that men are legally dangerous than women. False negligence divorce law became reality, 70% of divorce started by women. The Dependent and Child Care Support Law makes divorce more attractive for women, but in marriage where the husband is at home women are increasingly hit by spousal support obligations. Women are also likely to have the custody of their children, and if they support their aid, some states put their father in prison. Men are also concerned that a biased domestic violence law permits men to be arrested when their wife strikes him and informs the police. Liberalization of the divorce law is not without objection, especially in the United States. In fact, in the United States, certain conservative religious organizations lobby the law to limit divorce. In 2011, in the United States, the divorce reform consolidation was formed by saying, "We are committed to supporting efforts to reduce unnecessary divorce and promote healthy marriage." The immutable and unchanging mystery of the Roman Catholic Church - one of them - is elaborately produced by St. Thomas Aquinas and is based on the concept of natural moral law complemented by the God 's laws presented. In the course of history, the Orthodox shared a part of the doctrine of Dr. Angelicus.

This is the two main differences - responsibility is what must be done for the existence of society, and charity is optional and does not help. This is the difference that singer wants to erase or at least ambiguous. He wants to provide financial assistance to those who need distant assistance, not an ethical charity. Indeed, Singer argues that everyone with a reasonable amount of resources needs to donate a large proportion of their assets and assets and lower their capacity to "marginal utility level" ( Singer 32). The general conclusion of Singer is that the distinction between responsibility and charity is confusing. Usually, we think that charity is optional and responsibility is not so. Singer said that it is not a charity project to help other people who need help. This is the responsibility. In fact, you have to sacrifice lots of luxury items in your life to help. "If we keep on using old clothes, we will not give money a salvation of famine at the expense of precious things" (p.555) It is morally wrong not to help as much as possible. I will. The singer quotes St. Thomas Aquinas, one of the most important writers of Christian morals, and draws similar conclusions about people's moral obligations. This distinction between domestic judicial obligations and global (or general) charity obligations diverts global justice arguments. We need to ask what charity can do - what rich country will rely on charity to become rich? Indeed, Singer's theory of personal ethics is fully compliant with any theory of justice. This is enough to explain the problem with his approach. However, in the recent discussion, the concept of global social justice is emerging. International philosophers and political theorists of the international economy, as singer told about charity, especially in the world of economic globalization, patterns of production and consumption, and politics and consumer choice, the border restricts the demands of justice I believe that should not be. The result is usually the same. Quite a few people who live in the boundaries of a particular country

Christian believes in the dignity of life. This means that since God created all the lives in his own image, all lives should be evaluated like anyone else, whether it is a newborn baby or a fully mature adult is. Our meaning and our claim to protection arise from our position in the image of God, not from our "quality of life", gifts and abilities. By believing in the dignity of life, Christianity gained information on personality issues. In particular, the Roman Catholic Church believes that personality was given from the moment of concept. This is because they have confirmed the principles of teaching of natural law and the subsequent influence on key rules such as the following determined by Aquinas. G. The innocent life must be protected. Natural law is moral For the Catholics (and indeed for many Christians), the core of the argument about the essence and meaning of human life is the sanctity of human life. For believers, God is the origin of all life and is the lasting of all lives. Therefore, the dignity of human life is greater than the sum of parts of life. In a sense, this dignity is not unique to humans. Human dignity is not given by one human behavior, another's judgment, or regulation. Instead, it is blessed by God. Because the origin of life is in God, it is kind of consciousness that is closely related to sacred concepts Man is not the rule of life, but the manager of life, this is a gift from others. Explain the understanding of the principles of Christian life by referring to related examples. The belief in the dignity of life lies at the center of all moral arguments about embryo experimentation, abortion and euthanasia. This is a Christian faith that all life is a sacred gift from God and humans can not destroy or test it freely. Everyone created "Imagodei" with the image of God, and it has intrinsic value. The good starting point is when the Bible says when studying why they believe this.

As I learned through course studies and lectures, due to my prejudice against Anselm 's ontological debate. I hope that Descartes aside these prejudices, present two articles on his "first meditation" to explore the two aspects of the discussion and try to reach independent conclusions. However, I would like to get the same conclusion as before - that is, ontological arguments can be argued based on fundamental differences between concepts of existence in our minds and concepts of reality I can do it. The ontological debate was first criticized by Gaunilo of Modern Marmoutiers of Canterbury Anselm. He believes that ontological arguments can be used to prove the existence of something using full island analogies. This discussion was also criticized by famous Catholic philosophers Thomas Aquinas, David Hume and Emmanuel Kant. In order to correctly understand ontological arguments, it is necessary to identify the meaning of philosophers when talking about 'possible world'. "Possible world" may refer to facts contrary to facts. For those in "a possible world", it simply means that its existence is logically possible. Perhaps the most complicated and challenging argument for the existence of God is an ontological argument proposed by Anselm of Canterbury. According to Anselm, God exists in God with the most perfect concept of existence - the existence which can not be imagined - because there are essentially perfect and nonexistent beings as large as existence. Everything is perfect, no one exists. This discussion has a lasting influence on philosophers; some believe it will try to 'define' the existence of God while others keep it and continue developing a new version I will. Ontological arguments are transcendental arguments. These arguments try to prove the existence of God from the meaning of the word God. Anselm of Canterbury introduced an ontological argument to his work 'Proslogion'. The classic argument of Anselm is based on two principles, the most important of which are St. Anselm and Rene de Carte of the above Canterbury. If he does not exist you can still think of a larger being (as you said that there is no God other than this existence). Presence must be one of the attributes of God. Because by removing it it is still possible for you to understand the bigger god (the god that exists). The most common problem with this discussion is that it only seems to enumerate the existence of God's attributes and does not seem to indicate it. This argument seems to indicate that any fact you can imagine should be true.

I oppose the ability of science to prove that I believe in God is absurd. Science does this by showing that it can not answer even simple questions about where the law came from and how they are formed. If science can not even answer this simple question, how does it answer more difficult questions? Science can not answer the question of whether God exists or not, so it can not make belief in God unreasonable. Since the scope of science is limited, I have questions that I can not answer. Hume's claim is intended to show that faith in God is literally irrational. It is beyond the realm of reason. Hume does not support faith, but points to the status of God. Those who accept Hum's position for the God in the investigation understand that believing in God has no reason to support it, so it must float in the air as if it were a wizard's trick It is. We will face the consequences of this theological belief. But for most theologians their beliefs will collapse if they understand that their faith in God is not supported by reason. I oppose the ability of science to prove that I believe in God is absurd. Science does this by showing that it can not answer even simple questions about where the law came from and how they are formed. If science can not even answer this simple question, how does it answer more difficult questions? Science can not answer the question of whether God exists or not, so it can not make belief in God unreasonable. - When God created the heavens and the earth, he also wanted to create something reflecting his image. He wants to create more things. The earth was created by him, and in doing so, he believes that creating a human can benefit the planet and beyond all around it. In Genesis 1: 26-27, God talks about how he created humans in his image. The degree of agreement between science and religion can be seen in the science of religion and experience. To believe that God created the world, that is, to create a human, can lead him to arrange for human understanding of the world. This is undertaken by the doctrine of image dei. In Thomas Aquinas' words, "Because human beings are considered to be statues of God due to their intelligent nature, this property can be embodied in the image of God for imitation of God ".

Cosmological discussion of the cosmological argument of the existence of God tries to prove the existence of God by observing the universe. This is not a logical one, it is an experiential postmortem and an observation of the world, so the result may be clear or not clear. There are three forms of discussion: behavior, causality, and existence. These are also the first three of the five methods proposed by Aquinas and I believe that he can clarify the existence of God. Kalām's cosmological argument is a contemporary expression of the cosmological argument about the existence of God, named after Warrior Lane Craig in his "Calm Cosmology" by Karam (medieval Islamic academic philosophy) It was done. (TheKalāmCosmologicalArgument, 1979) promoted. This argument is a variant of Aristotle's indifferent promoter, which was named after the medieval Islamic academic philosophy and because of the possibility of Craig's opposition to the actual infinite existence Craig became a philosophy of the 11th century Go back. Home Argalari Like most arguments about the existence of God, cosmological arguments exist in many forms; here two are discussed: cosmological arguments of time, Kalam (ie the first argument), and division Discussion of style. The main difference between these two arguments is that they avoid the first opposition to the argument and cast the question "is there a reason for that existence in God?" Then suppose that God exists to explain the existence of the universe and we will not take us anywhere. Without God, we have an entity that we can not explain, there is a universe; there is an entity with God, we can not explain, that is God. Discussion that is most widely accepted and criticized about the existence of God. My purpose in this article is to explain why cosmological arguments are proof of the existence of God, to understand that it is the importance of posteriori posteriori discussion, and to my common argument It is to observe the position of. First of all, as a living person on earth, we can safely conclude that the majority of things that exist today have their cause. I confirmed that there is a reason. McCloskey has many different kinds of arguments about the existence of God. Every discussion has a concept about God. Each discussion takes a different approach. I will focus on cosmology and objective arguments. As we all know, the scopostauri is derived from a sacred argument from order in the universe to the existence of God (1). In the order of the universe created by wise existence, they think it is ... the claim of existence of God is truth, and reason is true. In philosophical discussion, any description is less important or controversial. But this is the position I proposed in this article. A reasonable and true equation is the core of the discussion I am studying here, which is an ontological argument against the existence of God. There are several versions of ontological arguments about the existence of God.

Since it is very difficult to define certain words in English, giving meaning to them is a fierce discussion among thinkers. The way to define such an abstract word, its definition and purpose greatly depends on country, language, language, and people. Before others can propose more precise definitions than current leaders, people can only want to grasp the concept of these words. The reason for defining these words is the same as those changes, because their meaning is based on the final result of the opinion. McDowell: I do not think he even heard what we said, as we often say. The country under God is indivisible and has freedom and justice for all. Justice for all people means economic, social and criminal justice. This is what the Democratic Party of Japan is representing, it is in everyone. McDowell: I think it depends on what happens at that time. First of all, I do not know if it happened before the 2018 election. If he is somewhat elastic that we can weaken the structure and texture of our government and our lifestyle, that is definitely it. I think that the happiness of this country comes from all kinds of party game skills. Justice is one of the most important moral and political concepts. That word comes from the words of Latin, meaning rights and laws. The Oxford English Dictionary defines "ordinary people" as "usually morally correct action" and gives the word "fair" as a synonym for "giving each person their own rights". However, philosophers transcend the definition of etymology and dictionary, such as the nature of justice being regarded as the character of personality and the quality of ideal political society, and how it is applied to moral and social decision making I think that I want to do it. This article will focus on the concept of justice in Western philosophy. These will be the largest theories of ancient Greece (Plato and Aristotle), medieval Christianity (Augustin and Aquinas), two early modern times (Hobbes and Hume), and two modernities (Kant and Mill). And some modern (role and some successors)

The power structure of the medieval Christianity allowed the church to use religion as a tool and excuse excuses to systematically suppress some parts of society in order to establish their control. This reflects the theory of Marx and Freud, as well as in the Middle Ages as well as during the Industrial Revolution. For the purposes of this document, a medieval time frame of 1000 to 1400 was established. This will focus on the influence of religion of a particular era rather than trying to broaden the subject. The teachings of the church have influenced everyone in the feudal society, from the king to the farmers. The greatest influence on medieval society is the Christian church. It formed the medieval culture and organization. After the collapse of the Western Roman Empire, it was the institution that left the oldest institution in Western Europe. The church soon changed the german rulers and gave guidance to them to build a new society. However, the Germans also influenced the church. We need to adjust to meet the needs of new members that are very different from the Romans of the Eastern Empire. In medieval Byzantine Oriental and Latin western priesthood politics, the influence of Christian doctrine has strongly penetrated every aspect of life, so church and state agencies, Sashedium and Regnum use traditional Latin I can not avoid it. It is closely related to each other. In the West, however, after at least the 19th century command dispute, the Pope tried to exert a strong political influence on Eastern secular rulers, especially the Holy Roman Emperor, based on the 4th century Constantinople. Emperor Byzantine obviously dominated his main church official, the patriarch https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/157E213F7321C56DCF22E860A6450D4D / S0009640700035320a.pdf / church-and-state-in-the-byzantine-empire-a-reconsideration-of- - Problem, caesaropapism.pdf Roman Emperor Constantine I acknowledged the world in the legal recognition of the Christianity of the Empire. It is often associated with efforts to establish a union of Christianity in the Middle Ages, but this type will appear anywhere in the national, social, political and economic programs. Please be baptized as a Christian. Therefore, its historical expression varies as Jefferson USA and Hitler Germany Germany. The other three types proposed by Niebuhr are rejection and noncritically support variants of mediation themes between the world. "Christ on Culture" recognizes the continuity between the world and faith. This may be the belief of St. Thomas Aquinas that grace and supernatural do not destroy nature, but to complete it.

The cosmological argument about the existence of God is based on the principle of causality. This basically means that the universe is the influence of career, this is God. One of the oldest and most famous supporters of the cosmological controversy outlines his argument for the existence of God in an article titled "Five Ways". The first way he insisted was to deal with that movement. Aquinas said that in order for something to move, it must be moved. It will not move without external force. Discussion that is most widely accepted and criticized about the existence of God. My purpose in this article is to explain why cosmological arguments are proof of the existence of God, to understand that it is the importance of posteriori posteriori discussion, and to my common argument It is to observe the position of. First of all, as a living person on earth, we can safely conclude that the majority of things that exist today have their cause. I confirmed that there is a reason. Before attempting to explain and evaluate the moral argument about God's existence, it is beneficial to understand the purpose of God's existential argument. Of course, though the views on this are diverse, most contemporary supporters do not believe that theoretical arguments are "proof". They should provide effective arguments and prerequisites that reasonable people can not deny. Such success criterion obviously sets high criteria for success and supporters of the argument of the writer can hardly meet philosophical discussions of interesting conclusions in areas other than formal logic such criteria Correctly point out. Is the premise of these arguments reasonable, at least for reasonable people, more reasonable than rejection? Discussion of Rene Descartes on the existence of God Rene Descartes's debate about the existence of God is related to his rationalistic deduction reasoning. Descartes concluded that the truth about the existence of God exists in His idea about the completeness of God and the essence of God (as a complete existence that must exist to be perfect). - All moral arguments about the existence of God are based on the principle that all of us share common sense of morality. Despite cultural differences, in a broad sense, people all over the world have ambiguous thoughts about right and wrong; a moral argument to the existence of God is that this mutual understanding is evidence of the existence of God I will say that. Immanuel Kant advocated this argument (not a moral argument); a god as a source of objective morality

Christian apology theory tradition has a long history. It has spread since the early days of the Church and is a custom that has been witnessed in the history of the Bible. We will see the long-term practice of Christian apologies from the work of the Justin Martyrs of the 2nd century to the recent G. K. Chesterton, C. S. Lewis, Ravi Zacharias, William Lane Craig 's work. These works of Apologetic are made up of resurrection, prophecy of the Old Testament, archaeological data, evidence of miracles, changes in the nature of dramatic life (those who oppose faith become actually believers and become faiths), and Continue to show a lot of other evidence supporting Christianity Proposition The tradition of apology theory attracts convincing evidence to support Christian information The Christian apology theory tries to build a bridge between disbelievers by proposing that Christianity is true, rational, and suitable for reason and evidence. Christian's apologyist Francis A. Schaefer in the second half of the 20th century saw Christian's apology as "evangelism". It is a way to prepare the heart and soul for the Christian message (the gospel). Oxford University theologian Alistar E. McGrath best summarized the relationship between apology and evangelism. "... Christian apocalypse represents a serious and continuous approach to the" ultimate problem "caused by culture, people, individuals. Is participation aimed to show how Christian faith can give meaningful answers to these questions? As John the Baptist prepared the way of the arrival of Jesus of Nazareth, the teaching of nursing is opening a way to evangelism ... evangelism ... Please send me a personal invitation letter. The apology or defense of Christian religion dates back to the 1st century, but the formal science of apology is a more recent development. In this chapter, we will explore the history of nursing education in three stages. First, we discuss the teaching in detail in the New Testament itself. Secondly, we pay close attention to the main advocates before reform, especially Augustine, Anselm, Thomas Aquinas. Third, we will take a more general overview of apologetic teachings from religious reform to the present In the next chapter, we consider the defense philosophy of some contemporary Christian thought in more detail I will do.

The way Jesus accepted on his way to Calto must first go through Gethsemane (Hebrew Olive Press). Here, Jesus experienced true "fear, pain, pain, and sorrow" in mankind. The feeling that Jesus felt during that night was genuine. According to James Keating and Thomas White who are using Thomas Aquinas, Jesus has two properties of humanity and divinity. Both are sad. They explain that everyone has two kinds of will and this will be a nervous situation. This is the first time to enter Gethsemane (Matthew 26: 36-46). This is the first time for Jesus, his father, and anyone who brought him now and to date. Unless there are forbidden fruits, it is like a garden of Eden. It is in front of us that Jesus is wisdom and the tree of life is a complete realization. There are no other trees. We will accept him or accept later for sleep. From the time we made the choice, all the most difficult problems we encountered were left to Jesus' hands that we did not do for ourselves. Should I run away from the garden? Should I follow my own wishes? Or, whatever happens, should I be faithful to the life of God? Jesus' prayers in the garden have always fascinated me. This description is in Matthew 26: 36-46, Mark 14: 32-42, Luke 22: 39-46, John did not actually mention prayers, but I told John 18 I will add. Please find help with 1-11. I also strongly urge chapter 74 of the desire as an adventist church on the seventh day to give insight on the time Jesus spent in prayer. When the moment of death of Jesus finally arrived, he knew it (Matthew 26: 18). He fully understands that these all bring pain and suffering to sinners' punishment, but he deliberately and voluntarily submitted himself. John 18: 4, when the soldiers came to arrest him in the garden of Gethsemane, "Jesus knew everything he came and went out and said," Who are you looking for Do you? He was willing to surrender to them. That is the time scheduled by God at his moment. Matthew 26: 47-56 explains how Jesus was arrested in the garden of Gethsemane. One of his twelve disciples (one of his best friends) Judas came to him with a large group of people swinging swords and sticks. When they put their hands on Jesus, the man with him pulled out the sword, beat the slaves of the high priests, and cut off his ears. Even though it meant to hurt other people, this person did many things in the same situation. The Gospel of John tells the story that an adult woman was posted by Jesus and dragged into Jesus by Pharisees - trying to break Roman law and Moses' law. So they forced women to stand before Jesus, they appealed: "In the law Moses ordered these women to be tied with stones.How do you say Jesus? "

Media and war justice The war theory has some moral content, but its nature and application has important practicality. Both sides of the war want to claim that their cause is fair. They set war goals as "justice" to gain the support of the people and the international community. Even the shoguns will predict the fairness of the war and let the soldiers fight the enemies for a longer time. Therefore, "justice" or "righteousness" of war is important for any military intervention. Historians and philosophers formed the theory of war just for centuries. But the most systematic description of the theory of war of justice was developed by St. Thomas Aquinas in his Summa Theologicae. According to the theory of war of justice, the moral reality of war can be divided into two parts. War was judged twice. The first visit refers to the reasons of domestic battle, and the second time refers to the means used in the actual battle. (Walzer, 21) The first verdict was called jus ad bellum, or justice. The second sentence is called a wartime trial, or justice in war. Jus ad bellum provides guidelines for assessing whether war is fair or unfair but wartime rules outline the correct behavior in warfare. Jus ad bellum does not mean jus in battle. Likewise, jus in battle does not need jus ad bellum. Justice warfare may be done unfairly so that it is possible to fight legitimate warfare. Only war theory and law distinguish between reason (jus ad bellum) relying on war and rational behavior in war (jus in war). Most statements of the theory of justice warfare have four principles, each with its own label. Justification, legal authority, right intent, need or last resort, reasonable hope for proportionality and success. The rule of war contains three principles: discrimination, necessity or minimum force, and proportionality. These principles express comprehensible understanding of the morality of war, in a compressed form that the basic structure is almost the same as 300 years ago. Since it develops synchronously with the state system based legal system, not the individual, its existing form theory is very different from the classical theory it belongs to.

In pursuit of utopian man in 1516, Sir Thomas Moore announced his utopia. He shares the satisfaction of the system by writing the perfect world realizing the world's best general wealth. Moore created "utopia", but this may not be a new concept. Since the beginning of time humanity has dreamed of a better world. People always wanted to do something better to create a happier, more peaceful life. Throughout history, various leaders, terrorists and civilians are trying to create their own perfect world. In self-centered life, he continued to build the Tower of Babel. After 5000 years of civilization, by reasonable movement of Plato, Aristotle, human exploration for knowledge did not reach utopia, nirvana or paradise. The merits of Quintilian's rhetoric, the fusion of realism and Aquinas Catholic, Erasm of Christian Humanism Erasmus; Calvin Evangelical Protestant; Independent Rousseau, Froebel and Pestaloch children children; Pansophism is not a view of Comenius militant rebellion Dubois And Frey 's idea of ​​rebuilding. Beyond the universe, I can not keep pursuing human transcendence, but I can not find the ultimate truth, it can not find out why the existence of mankind exists. People will "understand" until they have decided to reveal the truth to the people of the boat that God created, "the full-fledged expectation of creation enthusiastically joined us with the pain of my life Because I know about the whole creation and labor, I am waiting for the Son of God to be revealed "(Romans 8: 19-22) Thomas Mr. Utopia, Analysis of the author of Utopia, Thomas is a much more complex history man. Thomas More's utopia utopia is described as a perfect society on the idealized island community, one of the most influential books of Western literature. Utopia: Utopia Written by More Thomas UK based articles Social good dreams, perfect society and the American society now insist it, in this article, now achieved in this article, and discounts You can earn orders And discounts (Code gac 15 gets 15%.) In the 16th century, books on Thomas Details book is an excellent article ideal leader of the same name, including fantasy socialist utopia I will present a community Throughout history, various leaders, civilians, terrorists are trying to create such a perfect utopia world. I also propose articles about utopia readers / utopia readers of goods. A utopian reader on utopian literature. Utopia Reader is built around the single volume anthology of writing the full range of Utopia. "Utopia Reader" The book provides an overall sketch of the utopia's history by the quality of the rich text for the reader. In addition, the reader has utopia, a brilliant utopia thought and history about convincing articles. Utopia Reader highlights the whole book with photos and illustrations. Utopia on paper provided by a skilled writer on our website. If you like the style of my writing, you can further order Utopia of the topic of the article. Utopia is seeking papers on Sir Thomas for his book published in 1516 on utopia

As a jihad as World War II, there are several factors to consider when discussing whether World War II is a legitimate war or a jihad. The Thomas Aquinas Justice War Theory contains six criteria or conditions that war has to meet in order to be considered reasonable. First of all, since the consequences of war involve the people of the country, their opinions must be discussed and debated in the Diet, as the war must be initiated and controlled by the authority of the state or ruler. Before World War II began, World War I (1914 - 1918) was widely believed that there were no such global conflicts, so in the "war that ends all wars" It was thought that there was. Size During the two world wars during the two world wars, the First World War was often called the "Great War". The outbreak of World War II in 1939 proved that humanity may "pass" hope for demand for such a broad global war. With the advent of the Cold War in 1945 and the spread of nuclear weapons technology to the Soviet Union, the possibility of World War III became more rational. During the Cold War, military authorities in many countries forecasted and planned the possibility of World War III. The scene ranges from normal war to a restricted or comprehensive nuclear war What is the cause of the Cold War? A series of geopolitical factors that appeared after the Second World War made Russia confront World War II in the United States and the Soviet Union and the United States became allies that broke Nazi Germany. However, did the two countries that fought in the same region become fatal enemies in distrust of the Cold War in a few years, and this distrust became dominant over the next few years? During the Tehran meeting, "Big Three" collided with other Eastern European countries bordered by Poland and Germany. As Stalin was weak enough to allow Germany to attack the Soviets many times, I believed that the independent nation is a security threat to Russia. Britain and the United States are not under the rule of Communism, I hope that these countries are independent.

Everyone who lives believes in at least one thing. It may be believed that the sun is rising to the east or something sufficiently hard will allow you to go through the solid walls as though no one was there. One of the beliefs is based on facts and the other is based on delusions. Natural law does not allow people to simply pass through hard walls. In other words, some beliefs are reasonable and some are not so. Some people think that believing in God is unreasonable, but I think that the belief that there is a greater existence called God may be a reasonable belief. Discussion of the School poster is the strongest argument about the existence of God. That argument is based on probability, and a small opportunity that even life and the whole universe must first exist. People have always believed that natural selection is acceptable for the evolution of life, but this theory does not explain certain aspects of the universe. "Since natural selection is not a chemical principle but a biological principle, we must rely on other principles to explain why living things come from inanimate objects." 5 On how life exists Proposal opportunity base. Considering this, the probability that the correct chemical reaction occurs at the proper timing is the probability of 1/10 to 1/10. Because this is so big, there are too many things that are likely to happen. The ontological argument does not prove the existence of God, or the necessary existence or even the first reason. On the other hand, discussion of cosmology and object theory provides compelling evidence that this existence exists. When two arguments are applied together, it becomes more persuasive. If the cosmological argument is proved to be necessary, the objective argument helps to support the conclusion that the necessary existence has "conscious wisdom". "In other words, if the necessary existence is continuation of things and the fact survives, we can infer reasonably that this continuation is intentionally meaningful in the world." 7 Plato and Aquinas expressed their views clearly and stated the reason why there is only one God. A key argument to help them prove that God is the goodness of God. Neither believe that God exists not only with absolute power but he is good, or he is a carrier or good. Plato advocates the claim that the existence of God and its existence only mean a single thing, and that his good is expected to be seen. Plato is very kind, not simply reaching this conclusion desiring that God should be good, but he can draw out this conclusion. In other words, the most beautiful and great form of the earth just reflects God. There is a standard, he is a god

... Snowflakes of 1940 who painted novels, Pané Evino (bread and wine in 1937, revised to Vino E. Pain in 1955) and socialist hero in Christian spirit Please help to share their suffering. Pane e vino According to the teachings of the Catholic Church, the whole Christ, the body and the blood, the soul and the divinity are in the Eucharist, every aspect of bread and wine, every part of bread and wine (the essence of bread or wine lies in ordinary In every part of bread and wine, the essence of Christ is in every part of the devotion and change of the Lord and the communion, not the communion, but when the sanctuary is moved, not the impression or the imagination, the intellectuals It is only perceived through the eyes of. He came to us in the sacrament of the Eucharist. He puts his body and blood in regular bread and wine. We can watch bread and wine and smell. You can taste bread and wine by touching it. Bread and wine We can eat and drink. We consume sacrifices instead of ourselves. When we eat them, bread and wine bind us, and his body and blood bind us. He believes in the word he promised "Dedicate it to you for forgiveness of sin." He forgives our sins. He strengthened our faith. He reinforces our weak soul. He gave us a new life and eternal salvation Bread and wine do not separate the "elements" of dinner. They go to wine in turn from bread. This sequence imitates the natural progress of human life. We started a new day at the bread and finished it with wine. We can bake bread in a few hours; wine needs cultivation, preparation, and aging for many years. As James Jordan said, bread is an alpha food and wine is an omega drink. Bread is native and wine is eschatological. The communion wine makes it possible for us to understand the good things of the future, the pleasures flowing from the heavenly broken bread. Natural foods are digested and become us. Thomas Aquinas said that spiritual food is the opposite: it turns us into ourselves. Accepting bread, we become bread of the world. After drinking the blood of the grapes, we will summon to follow him according to the testimony of Christ's suffering.

In Plato's words, "What is beautiful except beauty and beauty except beauty?", This beauty shape is invisible, eternal, unchangeable, unlike visible world, change Then, I lose my beauty. Formal theory assumes the whole world like these things that exist outside of time and space. - Augustine 's death is a very natural event, and everyone will experience death in various ways, but the same applies. When Augustine was a little boy, his father died, and he confessed it with a small explanation. Later in his life, he lost his dear friend and his beloved mother. Over time, his spiritual maturity and death will have different influences on Augustine every time. Augustine explored beauty in the darkness and finally found God and beauty itself which is the source of beauty in his sins. As a beautiful lover, or as a beauty god - Augustine is very attractive for us today. Augustine said that this beauty loved us, chased us, broke through our defenses, lootted us and changed us. This beauty has the ability to breach our blindness and glow through our blinds, attract us to leave ourselves and endanger the adventure of love with God. As a Christian thinker, St. Augustine (354-430) attributed the origin of beauty, kindness, and existence to God, the Creator. Beauty, and kindness and existence come from the Creator. Augustine maintains the platonic appearance, goodness, goodness, completeness, and uniformity of other virtues. A reasonable understanding of the order and harmony of the universe, and an understanding of beauty are places of purification, and where the soul rises to a sacred area. Thomas Aquinas (c.1225 - 1274) expresses beauty and excellence in meaning (ratio), but they are the same thing (theme), and I think that it is actually difficult to distinguish. It is said that they are one because God is the only source of beauty, goodness and goodness. He raises elements of beauty: perfection (overall sexy), harmony (devita ratio), clarity (clarita)

Introduction of morality, virtue, and public image According to Robert's dictionary, the term "public" refers to "it belongs to things people generally care about, belongs to a social or political community and is done with their own name A person who plays a public role or plays an important role in social or political life. For these definitions it is possible to identify different categories of public people who have more or less important roles: politicians like government ministers make laws for their country and make important decisions To do. In the Republic of Plato there are so-called four red shirt virtues of wisdom, justice, tenacity and moderation. These virtues also dominate the Aristotle's moral theory (see below). Virtue theory is included in historical research by moral historians such as Livy, Plutarch, Tacitus. The concept of Greek virtue was conveyed through Rome 's philosophy of Xeros and later incorporated into Christian moral theology by St. Ambrose of Milan. During the semester, St. Thomas Aquinas provided the most comprehensive consideration of virtue from his thesis on Summa Theologiae's theological point of view and Nicomachean's morals. In his work "People and Citizens", Thomas Hobbs included virtue in the category of human moral virtue and virtue. Hobbes outlines moral virtue as a citizen's virtue and this virtue is beneficial to society as a whole. These moral virtues are justice (that is not to break the law) and charity. Courage, cautiousness and moderation are listed as male virtues. Thus, Hobbes means that these virtues invest only in private goods, not in public interests or charitable. Hobbes explained courage and attention as power of the mind, not courtesy of kindness. These virtues always mean to act for personal interests and plus and / or negative impacts of society are mere byproducts. It comes from Leviathan's claim that the state of nature is "loneliness, poorness, hatred, savage, short lives". Hobbes also uses tough ideas as a virtue concept Virtue (Latin: virtus, ancient Greek: areρετή "arete") is moral excellence. Virtue is considered to be morally superior, so it is the property or quality considered as the basis of principle and excellent morality. Personal virtues are an important feature that can promote the greatness of both groups and individuals. The opposite of virtue is a bad habit. The main strengths of the four classics are temperament, attention, courage, and justice. Christianity has acquired three theological virtues (charity) of faith, hope, and love from 1 Corinth. These together constitute seven virtues. Four brahmavihara ("Shenzhou") of Buddhism can be regarded as virtue in the sense of Europe. The Japanese Bushido's Code has ten advantages including honesty, courage and kindness.

A non-assignable right: Defense overview of public choice: A recent analysis of the concept of nontransferable rights (ie analysis of the rights of nontransferable life) is aimed at the selection of individuals who have rights Convert to limit. In this paper, we believe that this structure is contrary to intuition and conflicts with the concept of modern rights. I present another (slightly ambiguous) view that nontransferable rights are considered to be arbitrary rights and there is no need to choose the purpose of selection. The difference between nontransferable and legal rights is that one person's birth is given to everyone and the other is legally authorized. Nontransferable rights replace government legal and cultural norms. These natural rights include the right to think about yourself, the right to life, and the right to self defense, and they run through everyone's life. On the other hand, the legal right is the right created, recognized and protected by the government. In the United States, legal rights include rights such as voting rights, fair trials of alleged crime or civil faults, and protection from unfair search and seizure. Because specific legal rights are stipulated by the laws of each jurisdiction, the legal rights vary depending on the country or state in which they reside. As new laws are deemed necessary or more appropriate, legal rights may be changed, paused, or canceled. Natural rights and legal rights are two kinds of rights. Natural rights do not depend on specific cultures, laws and customs of government, and are thus universal and indivisible (can not be abolished or restricted by human rights law). Legal rights are the rights granted to people under a specific legal system (amended, abolished, or restricted by human rights law). The concept of natural law is related to the concept of natural rights. Natural law first appeared in the philosophy of ancient Greece and was mentioned by Rome philosopher Xicero. It was later mentioned in the Bible and then developed into the Middle Ages by such Catholic philosophers like Albert the Great and his student Thomas Aquinas. With the development of society, natural rights are used to establish social contracts, laws to establish specific rights to individuals or groups, and finally to prove the government to protect legal rights. The concept of non-assignable rights left that mark in the world, there are many controversies and different beliefs about what these rights are. Philosophers and scholars with broad beliefs generally agree that nontransferable rights are something that people can not get even in the hands of the government.

3 election views election overview 3 conditional election 4 overview 4 conditional election and lethalism 4 conditional election and quasiperiodism 5 James Alnius and John Wesley 6 unconditional election 8 overview 8 double unconditional election 8 orbe 8 Gottschalk Ulrich Zwingli 9 Martin Luther 9 John Calvin 10 Single Unconditional Election 10 Augustine 10 Thomas Aquinas 12 Conclusion 13 Election Summary Gregory A. Boyd and Paul R. Eddie announce scenarios in their book did. I will hit the girl and kill her. The voting rate of the middle election in 2017 was the worst of the three. In 2017, middle-aged older people voted for 9% compared to 12.0% in the 2016 middle election and 19.1% in the autumn election in 2016. Of the 382 inhabitants of the Pforzheimer House with the highest voting rate, only 69 people voted (only 18% of the votes cast). First of all, let's check if the voter's vote rate is related to the number of candidates in the campaign. It is suggested that if more candidates are elected, the vote rate can be increased. Perhaps there are more options and more people believe that their voting will change if the elections are more competitive. Candidates themselves may try to make people vote for them as they face more competition. Malcolm E. Jewell of the University of Kentucky wrote a research article on the voter turnout rate of the governor in 1977 and judged that there were three types of variables affecting voter turnout rate. Social economics, attitude and sensitivity, and politics. This article relates to the primary election, but for the same reason the voting rate is relatively low, so in this case I hope the primary election and the general election are equal. He said that if attitudes and opinions are caused by political events within the state, there may be major differences between the states. Using the results of Jewell's research, in order to study the importance in the voting rate, we study different causes of cross-state diversity in attitudes. I am particularly interested in the state's pride as it can be proud of the state government and possibly increase the vote rate. There are mainly three types of elections. With the first two parliamentary elections and administrative elections, the Swiss referendum was able to support candidates on behalf of the government. Parliamentary elections are organized around a proportional multi-party voting system, and administrative elections are directed to individuals immediately around the mass vote, individuals with the most votes win. The third election, referendum, includes policy issues. Two seats will be selected. Before the election, the Social Democratic Party and the Christian Democratic Party hosted it. The Liberal Party and the People's Party were doing very well. They won 27.1% together, 2.1% more than Christian Democrats. The second seat is the People's Party even though there are fewer votes than the Christian Democratic Party. Only one representative like Needwalden State elected them by majority decision.

The unique characteristics of natural law and situation ethics The theory of natural law and situation ethics is not concrete, and the influence of the modern "new natural law" led by American philosopher Germerme Grizes seems to be very large. However, despite modern corrections, these two concepts are fundamentally deep in human thought. However, they were developed at the end of the second century. Summa Theologica of St. Thomas Aquinas in the 13th century developed definitions of Aristotle and Cicero's "law of nature" and "situation ethics". The conclusion was created by Joseph Fletcher in the early days. 1960's "Natural law theory" is the appropriate ethical theory, politics, civil law labeling theory and religious moral theory. These views that have some funny effects may be legal, political, religious morality, but these effects are not the attention of our attention. We will focus on the ethical theory of nature's law. In this thesis we have two central goals. First, it aims to determine the decisive characteristics of the moral theory of nature's law. Secondly, it develops an accurate view of the main theoretical choice when facing not only as part of the difficulty of these options, for each of the functions within the constraints set by these definitions We aim to identify some of the natural law theorists. However, it does not try to repeat the history of the idea development of nature's law. (Very useful detailed history of the law of nature, see Crow 1977 until the beginning of the present age The unique characteristics of natural law and situation ethics The theory of natural law and situation ethics is not concrete, and the influence of the modern "new natural law" led by American philosopher Germerme Grizes seems to be very large. However, despite modern corrections, these two concepts are fundamentally deep in human thought. - Aristotle identifies the motivation of three friendship: availability, joy, and good. He thinks that when people seek friendship, they will look for those who deserve their feelings based on one of these three motivations. Whether his argument is correct is controversial. Many people may oppose the simplification of this complex theme. However, his theory is important in the context of volume 8.

The most important contribution to the Eucharist was difficult to harmonize the material world with faith, especially in the reception of the Eucharist and the bread and wine which is actually the body and blood of Christ. Father Sergius Bergakov and the Holy Grail of communion studied the most important contributions to the Eucharist of the Orthodox theologians. While acknowledging the interpretation of Thomas Aquinas and the material and accidental differences of Aristotle, he insisted on interpretation of the sacrament based on the "proper Christianity" and the gospel. Thin Communion Theology is a practical theological problem. The Eucharist is not a substitute for food. We will do the Eucharist in order to stimulate our interest in the real thing and increase our pleasure for things. The thicker the theology of our dinner, the more we can talk. "Taste the Lord, and seeing is good." Evidence is eating. Okay ... Here is a really simple lesson. The sacramentic theology is to believe in the sacrament (especially baptism and communion) to mediate grace for us. When we are baptized, according to sacred theology we associate with the death of Christ in some strange way ("sacrament" means "mystery") (read Roman Chapter 6, Please read all the chapters). If we participate in the Holy Communion or, according to theology of the sacrament, we call it communion, we will participate in the body and blood of Jesus in a mysterious way (John 6: 22-71, or more Briefly, John 6): 52 - 58; likewise, there is 1 Corinthians 10:16 and many other clauses, but now it is enough that we can save our other sacrament in the Western Church There are also, I want to pay attention to these two now From the perspective of the Chalcedonian theology of most Western and Orthodox churches, the teachings of Nestorias have backed up the communion debate since. Protestantism was condemned to regain Nestori 's heresy when Protestant Reform, when some groups denied the reality existence and the exchange of attributes between the two properties. Screenwriters and editors of New World Encyclopedia rewrote and completed Wikipedia articles according to the New World Encyclopedia standard. This document conforms to the terms of the Creative Commons CC-by-sa 3.0 license (CC-by-sa) and can be disseminated using appropriate attribution. Under the terms of this license, you can refer to the New World Encyclopedia Contributor and the Spontaneous Volunteer Contributor of the Wikimedia Foundation.

Lifestyle is a problem explored by various scholars such as religion, science, literature, and has invited intense debate since its establishment. Philosophers began to solve the related problems of Aristotle and St. Thomas Aquinas. Wells strongly believes in the scientific production side and the possibilities of mankind. At the same time, he is strongly aware that the scientific knowledge that passed into the hands of bad people may lead to evil caused by darkness. When suggesting the concept of closing a door, it presents a completely opposite idea as the door is opened. With this knowledge, you can reopen the closed door. This shows that a has two aspects. "Our experience in the world is due to a short experience." [1] This statement by Marie Mulvey-Roberts illustrates why the body is so common in terroristic depiction of the Gothic body; we It exists only in our body Terrorism can be defined as excitement of shocking or horrible temptation [1]. In appropriate circumstances and context, physical or representative forms of the body can of course trigger these emotions. This article Dr. Morrow is an American SF horror film in 1996. This is the third major movie that I modified from Dr. Morrow 's novel by H. G. Wells in 1896. This movie is under the supervision of John Frankenheimer (who started shooting a half week after the start of shooting), starring Marlon Brando, Val Kilmer, David Turris, Fairy Bark. Former directors Richard Stanley and Ron Hutchinson In 2010, the United Nations negotiator David Tewris was hit by an air accident in the Java Sea and eventually rescued by a passing ship. After speaking to him that the ship had no radio, he promised Douglas that the captain took him away and took him to Timor, but when they arrived they were called "Morrow Island" It was. When he was the destination of Montgomery, he suggested that Douglas was with him. Montgomery is a right-handed and servant of Dr. Morrow. It was Montgomery that rescued Predic from the emergency boat a second time and rescued him again after Dr. Moran refused access to the island. Montgomery has received several medical training and has worked on Moller for 10 years. He did not disclose how he came there, apparently he seems to want to return to civilization. Dr. Morrow is the owner of the island and manages what he calls "a certain biological station". He has a strong manners and ambiguous about what he did. He has a clear authority over his small island compound, and a very strange worker on the island is afraid of him and obeying him. Take care that he does not say too much, and careful that all the doors are locked.

This world is influenced by great good deeds and evil deeds. These actions have extreme ranges on both sides, showed a friendly way to help your neighbors build a fence, and instead came down to the Holocaust. The parties seem to be acting according to their own wishes. Evil and kindness can also occur in ways that are not monitored at first glance, such as finding a lot of money on the ground and destroying your town with tornadoes. For some reason, the state of the world is an act of good and evil. In the worship of the church today, we are thinking "rational discussion". It is essentially an elaborate "god of the gap", the gap is no longer scientific, it is philosophical. These include "difficult" called knowledge problems, other ideological problems, and consciousness, even Hume 's "should" problems. ~ Sunni Islam's most important and influential theologian ~ Ab'Hâmid Muhammadibn Muhammad al-Ghazâlî (1058-1111) attacked counterfeiting. These are Muslim philosophers who follow Aristotle's tradition. A similar idea in Christianity eventually reached the doctrine of Thomas Aquinas (1225 - 1274). Especially, al-Ghazali wrote as follows even though it opposed the principle of scientifically necessary cause and effect relation. Just because there is the idea that science has revealed that "God is in the gap", why can not you find the "god" with the blank? Atheist Bradley agreed and he wrote, "It does not mean that all the gaps in the future will be buried just because past gaps are filled by further natural science investigation ... Science Looking at the history of it, we can see that all the scientific theories we currently support are proved wrong. If Hawking really succeeded in trying to scientifically explain the first moment of the universe's history, it correctly destroyed the "god of the gap". But the God of Christian theology is not a blank God who satisfies the current scientific ignorance, it interacts with the first moment of the history of the universe and is not a person who withdraws from a safe distance after that. Although the use of Hawking's M theory may ultimately be effective, Christian theologians will also doubt about where the M theory itself comes from while applauding. God is a law of physics, who creates and maintains scientific assumptions but does not explain

The two early philosophers who contributed to today's educational philosophy were Abu Hamind ibn Muhammad al-Ghazali and Moses Maimonides. Some of their strongest concerns are student's free time, educational method, and their attitude toward teacher-student relationship. Two philosophers presented similar views, and some of them were different. Al Ghazali is one of the most influential educational thinkers in Islamic history. He is known as a student who wants to learn, a teacher who shares his knowledge, and a scholar who discovers more knowledge in the Islamic world. Al-Ghazali also had a significant influence on Christian medieval philosophers and Jewish thinkers such as Mimonides. According to Margaret Smith, "It is no doubt that Gazzari's work would first attract the attention of these European scholars," the largest of these Christian writers influenced by Al Ghazali St. Thomas Aquinas (1225) - In 1274 he studied Islamic writers and acknowledged them their debt.He learned at the University of Naples when the influence of Islamic literature and culture was dominant . The more popular Ben Hilomo is a Yemenian scholar and a philosopher, influenced by Nethanel ben al-Fayyumi, Maimonides, Saadia Gaon, al-Ghazali. Relationship between "pure brother's letter" and Ismailism shows that recruitment of this work is one of the main reasons for "Jewish Ismailism" discovered in Yemen · Judaism in late medieval times . "Jewish Ismy rhythm" includes adaptation of several Isaac teachings on cosmology, Judaism for prophecies and interpretations. Between 1150 and 1550, many purely compatriots affected Jewish philosophers and writers in Yemen. In midrashim of the two Yemeni philosophies written between 1420 and 1430, traces of some pure brotherhood doctrines and their digital destiny were discovered: Zerahyah ha-Rofé's Midrash ha-hefez ( "Happy learning") (a / k / a Yahya Hoter ben Solomon's Al-Tabib) and Siraj al-'uqul ("intellectual light") The ideological characteristic of Muhammad Al-Ghazali is the characteristic of the wasatiyyah school. His ideas were recognized by other well-known and influential people, including Yusuf Al-Qaradawi, Abdel-Haleem AbuShaqua, Hasan al-Turabi. Together they represent evolutionary tendencies of modernism, Al-Ghazali said that Islam shows an important meaning of equality between men and women. He insists that rather than the tradition created by God, people will delay women's development and make them religious and ignorant. Ghazali argues that women are denied remarks in the community and are limited to domestic services. He also sought a change in the Islamic general idea and misrepresented a re-evaluation of the cultural tradition resulting from the Islamic faith.

The theory of war "War can not prove that death is justified!" Born in Catholic and Republican families, I have a right and wrong moment to make such statements on the table I learned. Because of my belief, I was photographed because I did not support the death penalty This is an example of saying the right thing at the right time. However, it is said that the United States is in war situation to support freedom and to support the president 's decision. It is a very wrong idea to say that this war can not prove that death is justified. The theory of war of justice is to first evaluate the defense of moral and political standards (defensive or aggressive) of war, but critics say that the justice of war is estimated in war theory I point out. According to political and ethical standards, the justice of the first war needs contemplation. Pacifists deny war and that any form of violence is morally allowed, but like the other positions mentioned above, there are various opinions here. Means (defender) while other people do not recognize violence or any form of war (absolute pacifists). From the perspective of pacifism, other moralists are aware of the use of war as a means of supporting, defending or securing peace, but such a position is not limited to war defense, deterrence, It may allow attacks and intervention. The theory of justice warf is a theory that prove warfies based on specific circumstances and scenarios and based on national doctrine, tradition, or historical review. The tradition that suggests the theory of war of justice was attributed to ancient Greek society. It was developed by various Christian theologians and various thinkers who later conceptualized different ways to use common concepts to justify war. In other words, war keeps good intentions and uses sublime intentions. This theory supports the use of power by looking back on the moral and moral correctness of World War. A legitimate war theory claims that war is justified morally or legally. St. Augustine's justice war theory has four most important principles, also known as beliefs, principles, or beliefs. Saint Augustine was born in the year 354 AD and adopted the teachings of Christianity in the year 386 AD during the decline of the Roman Empire. St. Augustine believes that everything was done by God; therefore all that is done is good and perfection. - The philosophical criticism of Augustine and Aquinas: the relationship between the soul and the body The relationship between the human soul and the body has been the subject of mysticalization of philosophers, scholars, scientists and humans for centuries. People are always concerned about their own position as individuals in this world, and they try to determine the exact nature and state of the physical form.

Generally, I believe that I have something worthy to offer by every generation, and through social collaboration, something really nice so that action can be taken as soon as possible rather than later You can form. Reach the real value regardless of your age All generations, including teenagers, middle-aged people and grandparents, have their own worth. All generations have paper worth providing >>> Click here <<< Each generation has some valuable things to offer prose America America Avenue Zipper 10001. Norman Online Homework Help English Course Middle School Algeria responds to Paper Proposal Note 3 entry paper, Alfred University, Alfred, writing about cheap Samsung Galaxy statistics. Carder Road zip 10004 All the generations are worth providing what is worth providing articles online in Ontario Proposing my thesis for $ 10 at some 15 zipper on 15th Street 15 cheap about abortion Examples of article of West zip 10001 appendix, Washington square, West postal code 10014, Admission Paper Writing Skills E 8th Street zip 10003 which requires editing literature reviews of each paper, paper on Oneida structured paper methodology application letter There are some valuable information that you can provide. New York Schoharie cheats on 81st Street Eastern Zip Code 10028 There are some valuable things that you can provide papers on how to write research papers that are different from other types of writing on each postal code. 120th Street, East zip 10035 Behavioral Economics Case Study Order a periodical publication that is about to expire. Sparkill's St. Thomas Aquinas College has some valuable information to provide papers to each generation. Each generation has paper worth offering Each generation has several valuable things to offer paper 10th Street, West zip 10011 apa format research paper format example gis paper thesis English Literary paper ias. All generations are making a phone call, collecting professional Bard College, Annandale-on-Hudson Madison, writing a job guide Enright Road 's zip 10004, upload paper for writing buss 4 Bradhurst Avenue zip 10039 Employers of nursing care behavior at a price disclose some valuable things that can provide some valuable information that each generation can provide appropriate information. Cheap sex education paper

In order to understand the sacred command theory, we must first understand the nature and morality of God. Let's see things that make ethics ethical first. Understanding what makes moral action makes it possible to try to understand the author's view of moral command theory. Understanding this perspective will allow us to analyze the authors' perspectives in detail and present the arguments that the author has to oppose. Sacred Command Ethics is a theory that states that the moral content of an act is equivalent to whether it is ordered by God or not. Sacred instruction theory is the meta-cognitive theory only if the act is mandatory, as long as it is directed by God. Sacred command theory is often said to have been confirmed by "Euthyphro's Dilemma" (because it first appeared in Plato's dialogue Euthyphro). Philosophers often discuss the sacred command theory as ethical theory based on pure reason, but that theory also raises questions about the relationship between reason and belief, such as: The philosophy of Erkegaard is shown. He discussed Abraham 's dilemma for his son' Isaac 's "leap of faith". It is beyond the moral realm. Sacred instruction theory is a moral theory that proclaims that God's will is the basis of morality. Based on sacred command theory, if God or God master it, things are morally right or wrong, mandatory, allowed or not allowed. In God's command theory, it is moral or immoral to do acts, divine orders or ban. In addition to God's command to do something, another aspect of divine command theory believes that behavior is moral, if God has motivation. In this motivation of sacred command theory it can be said that in addition to religious documents, some people can have the motivation to practice morality. Sacred instruction theory (also known as theological autocracy) is a meta ethical theory that proposes that a morally good position is equal to whether it is God's command or not. The theory asserts that morals are ordered by God and that human morals are to obey his orders. In ancient times and modern times, believers of monotheism and polytheism often accepted the importance of the order of God in establishing morality. Historically, characters such as Saint Augustine, Dan Scott, Thomas Aquinas have proposed sacred command theory of various versions, but recently Robert Merrihew Adams proposed. God's comprehensive "modified sacred instruction theory" whose morality is related to human correctness and misunderstanding.

Compared with the present age, medieval ordinary people seem to care more about God, especially the sacred view of the individual. Perhaps this is because if people's lives are used to fear Viking or black plague plundering, people have more hope of getting a happy future, and if the bars are adjustable Because the TV is larger than 32 inches, it seems that I want to find something better. A predictable but interesting side effect of this heavenly thought is the paradox of exploring sins. Aquinas's answer to the evil problem Why is evil and sin in the world? Because evil is the inevitable consequence of freedom of will, God can not order sin. "God is responsible for sinful behavior, but there is no responsibility for crime" 296, Aquinas is distinguished from the concept of eternal, natural and human law. Something becoming a habit, and finally naturally produced and tested by customs ... is cleaned by the weight of the law "(420) Traditional correspondence is that God imposes evil as penalty for sin. The first problem with this reaction is that evil does not seem to be distributed according to sin. There is no reason to believe that people hit by lightning are guilty than those who were not hit by lightning. Furthermore, even a baby suffers. But since the baby has not committed a crime, there is nothing to punish them for. That is why I am using a baby. Now some theologians have said that the baby can be punished with the original sin, but if you think about it, it will be unfair. Long ago, the government punished the whole family for the crime of a family member. But today I think that this is savage. Therefore, the original sin can not be a valid reason to allow God to suffer and die a baby. Answer: The term "original sin" means Adam's disobedience from the diet of right and wrong trees and the crime of its influence on other parts of mankind. Original sin is "our sins and sins in the eyes of God, which is a direct result of Adam's sin in the Garden of Eden." Even before growing to commit a conscious crime, God. There are three main points that can solve this influence. The concept of original sin plays an important role in Adolf Hitler's psychoanalysis. The original sin tells us that as a human being, we are born with the ability to become evil (guilty) or commit evil acts. However, we also recognize that our abilities are reasonable beings given to us through nature's law to overcome the wishes of evil. Therefore, people are not necessarily born with evil, but there may be natural wishes of people who want to overwhelm rational thinking. The boundary between congenital and contextual or intentional and structural seems to be ambiguous - a single category that both parties seem to rely on the other Form. Hitler is an example of this ideology

The basic belief for Christianity is God's perfect good. God can not do evil, all his actions are completely pure. But this principle raises many questions about obvious pain and cheating spreading around the world. Where does evil come from? Furthermore, how can evil exist when the only eternal entity is perfect, innocent, and ultimately a good god? This problem is related to God's sovereign rationale and leads to more difficult problems including human responsibility and free will. Augustine Theology, named after the theologians, philosophers, and the Hippocampus St. Augustine in the 4th and 5 th centuries (according to some Christian sects) a Christian economy aimed at answering evidence of evil It is learning. Therefore, it tries to use the evil evidence of the world to explain the possibility of Almighty (Almighty) God and Almighty (all good) God. Many variations of this theology were proposed in history; their similarity was first explained by a 20th century philosopher John Hick who classified them as "Augustin". They normally argued that God was totally (ideally) kind and he created the world from nothing; and this evil is the result of human ingenuous sins. Evil entering the world is often interpreted as punishment for sin and lasts for human will abuse of free will Hippo Augustine is the first person who developed mysticism. He refuses the idea that the evil itself exists, but regards it as a good corruption caused by human free will. Augustine believed that there was material hell as a punishment for sin, but he believed that those who chose to receive the salvation of Jesus Christ would go to heaven. In the thirteenth century, influenced by Augustine, Thomas Aquinas proposed similar theology based on the fact that God is kind and evil. He believes that the existence of good will enable evil through human error. Augustine also influenced John Calvin, who supported Augustine's view that evil is the result of free will and that sin destroys human nature and requires God's grace to give moral guidance Gave.

Possibility of turnover into evil and good According to Kant, extreme evil is a deep defect of our species, even the best people will not forgive. Although it is impossible to judge this evil, Kant still insists on the possibility of changing evil through good human resources into good. But how can we make a fundamental evil to mankind? I have detailed the various problems arising in the concept of Kant's transformation while exploring certain resources in his mind to clarify and solve this difficulty. What is good and evil? Evil lacks kindness. It is the only possible living condition because it does not exist in reality and people always have the right to choose between good and evil. For example, an ordinary knife is not evil like it is now, but it is evil going into the hands of criminals. The doctor can use the same knife to save lives. God gives people the opportunity to decide how to handle this knife. I experienced many fights in the long history of humanity. But most importantly it may be a battle between evil and kindness, neat and immoral, altruism and egoism, love and hatred. We face this battle in our daily life, trying to distinguish between evil and good and evil. People choose a value system and trace it in life. Tenderness is important to our mental health and evil is like poison. Kindness is not merely a moral responsibility, it is primarily the nutrition of our soul. Goodwill means peace, love, respect, attention, and mutual aid It is not evil. Without evil there is no good way to exist. They complement each other, there is no one, you can not have another one. Unfortunately, evil always seems to outweigh that profit. This is reflected in various literary era of history. There are various ways to show good and evil. When someone is kind or considerate, it can be beautiful. - Hippo Augustine (354-430) is one of the most influential thinkers in Christianity. He has contributed many ideas and ideas to Christian theology. One of his most important contributions is the concept of "original sin" and his concept of "evil". These concepts have evolved over the years. Augustine painted their evolution in his 13 autobiographies he wrote in his 40s. In most of the Western intellectual history, studies of evil are reserved for theology. From Augustine and Aquinas to Luther and Calvin, Christian thinkers are crazy about "evil problems", how good a god in our world can have bad things. When Immanuel Kant introduces the concept of extreme evil that exists outside the bounds of reason and will, the eternal problems of evil are released from the exclusive grasp of the church. Perhaps because of its mixed religious and secular qualities, our evil concept creates almost mysterious power in society's impulse to create order from chaos and despair It was. As Susan Neyman wrote in his groundbreaking research, "evil in modern thinking", "The problem of evil can be expressed in terms of theological or secular terms, but basically it is It is understandability of the whole world.

The mission of religious practitioner Amasa Dempster from his career to private life, religion consumes every aspect of life in Amasa Dempster. He is known to the citizens of Deptford. Which imposes his own religious view on everyone and everything he encounters. After Paul was born, when Paul became sick, his behavior showed that his emotions and religious beliefs often exceeded rationality. He crouched on the floor near Mary 's bed and prayed eagerly for Paul if he took him to heaven. I am a religionist. Religious leaders are powerful people. Commercial and political leaders expressed dissatisfaction with Cardinal Hymesin as he influenced the majority of the population. The local pastor and pastor are very respected, so their demands inherit the power of work. My family believes that having a son or daughter's religious career is a noble honor. Personal friendship with the pastor, pastor, and nun is precious. Clergy perform an active role in the worldly world. One example is Brother Andrew Gonzales who is currently secretary of DECS. Villagers and tribal leaders are his community totalitarian. The chief is not only a political figure but also a religious leader. And he is usually the main business person of the community. When state politicians engage in commercial activities using their political status, this is not considered corruption as Westerners have seen. In a very clear sense, socialism in the 20th century was only a form of tribalism or feudalism. The attraction of socialism to political leaders is that it proves complete control of their economy. Today's war theory is a complex developed from the ideas advocated by various religious figures. In the 5th century, St. Augustine talked about the empire being legally expanded that the murder can be justified in God's city. In the 13th century, St. Thomas Aquinas proposed just a more complicated doctrine of warfare in his Summa Theologica. He insisted that only the following three conditions are required: it must be ordered by the competent authorities; the cause must be justified; The fifth "C" - community - is the ultimate instantiation of the matrix world, where the sharing of ideas constitutes the same cautious form of authority as national sovereignty. As long as it can be organized into meaningful associations, overseas representatives and religious organizations are categorized into cross-border categories. For example, China, India and Jewish overseas representatives are rich cultural and financial districts spanning each continent, contributing $ 540 billion in remittances recorded in 2014. Thanks to the Internet that WikiLeaks founder Julian Assangi believes that the Internet community can return to an authorized group, these are the largest of the "cloud community", their sum and scale It is expanding. A nearly universal digital utility company such as Facebook is more aware of the constitutionally transparent It is expected to become a high member support community.

Anselm Anselm was born in 1033 by aristocratic parents in Aosta, Italy. He and his mother always have a strong relationship, but his relationship with his father is very different. They will never succeed. Anselm wanted to be a priest since he was a young boy. As a child, he imagined that heaven would stay on the Jupiter Hill outside his home, which might help plow this dream. Anselm did not want to become a monk any longer after a short period later, but when he was fifteen he did not become a priest. St. Anselm was born in Ostapiemonte in 1033. Anselm knew that he wanted to be a monk when he was very young. After Anselm's father forbade to follow his dream of becoming a monk, Anselm left the house in his early twenties. Anselm emigrated to France, where he became a monk in 1060. A few years later, Anselm became a precedent for Abbott. At 1093, A. A. Anselm was enshrined as an archbishop. The next few years was a tension and confusion between Anselm and the King about money and other issues ... St. Ansel brought problems to Rome where he was less helped than he thought. In the meantime, King William died and St. Anselm returned to England. The new king made great emphasis on St. Anthony and never denied his view or opinion on important issues. Nevertheless there are still problems like money that need to be solved by Rome. Even if there is a difference in a problem, St. Anthony and the King still have a good relationship. An ontological argument was originally developed by Anselm of Canterbury, a clergy and philosopher of the 12th century. Philosophers and scholars have found several different clues to Anselm's work. The simplified version of Anselm's proof was very popular in modern times (17th - 18th century), which was used with a few examples by Descartes, Spinoza, and Leibniz. A simplified discussion is this: Kant provides two major arguments for this proof. His first critique was traditional criticism. And it was used by Aquinas and many other medieval philosophers. Kant's argument depends on the following assertions: whether it is always two separate problems, one thing. We can say what you like about the essence and essence of things. It is always a matter of asking whether there is something with this essence or essence.

John Locke, Berkeley, Hume are both experienced philosophers. They all have different opinions, but I agree with three things; the only source of real knowledge is unreliable inappropriate knowledge paths unless it is based on a solid foundation of sensory experience A certain sensory experience Evidence indicates that natural thinking in the mind is learned from experience. Each of these philosophers formed some of the most fascinating concepts of our relationship with the surrounding world. Empiricism, a belief in the realization of knowledge through sensation, is the universal belief of several great contemporary philosophers. Perhaps the most famous empiricists are John Locke, George Berkeley and David Hume who are considered to be one of the most influential philosophers in the past 500 years. Due to the importance of experience in philosophical principles, each philosopher can be regarded as an experientist. More specifically, the empirical perspective of rock can be seen from his view on the primary and secondary nature of objects. David Hume Hume, David, 1711-76, Scottish philosopher, and historian. Hume brings empiricalism of John Rock and George Berkeley to the logical extremes of fundamental skepticism. He denied the possibility of certain kinds of knowledge and found a series of emotions in his mind and believed that the causal relationship in nature was entirely from B's introduction. The answer to the theme is drawn by the time committee named as illusion by David Hume, and the time committee named human by himself. In the era of modern philosophy, when the influence of Descartes was still important, David Hume brought the argument of killing the Descartes I created and skipping it like a ghost in human perception. You can see not only the theme but also the contrast between Hume and Descartes. Among the important philosophers related to empiricism are Aristotle, Thomas Aquinas, Francis Bacon, Thomas Hobbes, John Rock, George Berkeley, David Hume, and John Stuart Mill. Recently, positivists such as Mach, Vienna Circle, logical positivists, and most followers of analysis philosophy are empiricists. The central concept of scientific and scientific methods is that all evidence must be based on observable evidence by sensory or sensory extension empirically or empirically. It is distinguished from philosophical usage of empirical philosophy by using adjective "experience" or adverb "experience". Experience refers to the use of working assumptions used in combination with natural science and social science and can be tested or experimentally tested. In this sense, the scientific statement is the subject of our experience and observation and is derived from them.

Our world has more and more serious problems; it is not fast. Unfortunately, I bother everyone, sometimes more. For this reason our world is suffering severely. Shooting, crime of hatred, and war are part of the result of this widespread misfortune. Some people may say that there is no hope for our world, but that is it. To end this misfortune, everyone should eat, drink, eat goldfish, and have plenty of sunshine. People may ask that Skittles can do it. When the problem should be Skittles to do. Many people think that the secret of happiness and satisfaction is in the future. Happiness is a white rabbit, check his pocket watch, and then move forward a few steps. It's a good job to graduate, it's time for the next pay raise or promotion, it is looking for that person to get married, it is to buy a car or a house. In any case, we will consider that. It is not here. There are things that I can say about goals, wishes, and expectations. These can create healthy hope, ideal driving force, and intrinsic need to improve themselves. But they are not happy - both now and the future. Again, our goals and desires are not happy. According to the definition, happiness is emotion. Future events are not emotions Usually, I am wondering myself of the secret of happiness. Plato insists that only people living in moral virtues feel happy. Aristotle wrote that happiness - human progress - is the only thing that can be evaluated independently. Aquinas believes that God is inherently happy. In her study Sonja Lyubomirsky discovered that 40% of our happiness was inherited, 10% indirect, but 40% is totally our own self-control. In everything, scratches ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, Material property, promotion of work, and recognition of others. These things are obtained after being chased, so what? Satisfied mind is a very precious blessing. This is the real secret of happiness. Satisfaction is jewelry, change everything into money, yes, I want to become wealth. Greed is an ulcer that eats the most wealthy robe and the most expensive treasure; a drop of water, the more it drinks, the more thirsty it is thirsty. It is not contradictory to work hard to meet our requirements and improve it. Satisfaction is obtained. It is not our natural talent, but it is the product of discipline. The world is a school and we have to learn from it. The best lesson we can learn is to meet

On 2 September 1939, Britain and France declared a war against Germany. There are many reasons for the beginning of the war, but whether they make sense. In this article we will analyze whether reasons leading to the Second World War are appropriate. Augustine is a medieval Christian leader who designed the theory of war of justice. Then Christian thought Thomas Aquinas adapted this theory and then formed the basis of the conditions of the United Nations justice war. In order to evaluate whether war is rational it is necessary to achieve the theoretical criterion of only war. In the 20th century, the theory of justice war experienced Renaissance, primarily through the invention of nuclear weapons and the involvement of the United States in the Vietnam War. The most important contemporary texts are Michael Wolzer's justice and unfair war (1977), Barry Pakkins and Michael Dockrill War (1979), Richard Norman Ethics, Murder and War (1995), Brian Ole Includes war in the war and international justice (2001). "War and Massacre" by Michael Walzer (2001), War and Justice, and Thomas Nagel, "War and Murder" by Elizabeth Anskom, and many other pioneering articles (generally published in journals) Ethics or philosophy and public relations World War II was one of the most expensive wars of the 20th century. Prior to the war the world experienced a major economic crisis and was in danger of political instability. The time lag between the two wars had a major impact on stability in Europe and Asia. Most countries are putting too much emphasis on the domestic situation of their own countries to recognize international problems, which has created a vulnerable world society. New alliances and treaties are trying to further suppress potential warfare. However, the importance of these women during the Second World War during World War II was due to all the different work they did. During World War II, women lost their loved ones, including husbands, boyfriends, and sons (Reynoldson 5). They may have lost their father in the war. They even lose their mothers. What is the role of women in World War II? There was a lot of shortage during the Second World War (Reynolds 13). There are various opportunities for women. They can work outside

God will tell us that it is clearly the perfect reason for our own interests to do these things; because he loves us, he will do bad things to us I do not want to give it. The objection to the sacred command theory is that if you allow God to torture the innocent children of the world it is morally correct and it does not mean anything. Because God creates us and never applies such torture to us, especially the children. Sacred instruction theory is the meta-cognitive theory only if the act is mandatory, as long as it is directed by God. Sacred command theory is often said to have been confirmed by "Euthyphro's Dilemma" (because it first appeared in Plato's dialogue Euthyphro). Philosophers often discuss the sacred command theory as ethical theory based on pure reason, but that theory also raises questions about the relationship between reason and belief, such as: The philosophy of Erkegaard is shown. He discussed Abraham 's dilemma for his son' Isaac 's "leap of faith". It is beyond the moral realm. Sacred instruction theory (also known as theological autocracy) is a meta ethical theory that proposes that a morally good position is equal to whether it is God's command or not. The theory asserts that morals are ordered by God and that human morals are to obey his orders. In ancient times and modern times, believers of monotheism and polytheism often accepted the importance of the order of God in establishing morality. Historically, characters such as Saint Augustine, Dan Scott, Thomas Aquinas have proposed sacred command theory of various versions, but recently Robert Merrihew Adams proposed. God's comprehensive "modified sacred instruction theory" whose morality is related to human correctness and misunderstanding. Philosophers have proposed God's theory of command in various forms including William Ockham, St. Augustine, Dan Scott, John Calvin. This theory usually tells that moral truth does not exist independently from God, but morality is determined by God's order. A stronger version of theory argues that God's ordering is that good behavior is the sole cause of morality, but a weak change makes God's command a significant part of a larger reason. This theory considers good behavior to be morally good due to God's orders and many religious believers agree with some form of God's command theory. Because of these prerequisites, believers believe that moral obligation is to obey God's orders; morally correct is God's desire

Because it is a sign that God loves us, reconciliation and punishment for forgiveness is important to Catholics. God expressed his love by sending His only son, Jesus, to save the world from sin. When Jesus was abandoned on the cross, someone wrote that he appealed to his father to forgive us, and Jesus' resurrection is said to be a sign of our forgiveness. Jesus preached forgiveness in various ways, including parable stories, crosses, and prayers. In this way, Christ as the head of mankind will affect forgiveness of their sins, reconciliation with God, liberation from punishment, liberation from devils, and the opening of the door of heaven. Provided by internal work, Aquinas combines Anselm and Abelard 's theory. The doctrine of the sacrament obeys Christianity; the sacrament is "effective from words of incarnation." They are not only a sign of the sanctification, it brings it. Because of human sensitivity, they inevitably bring a spiritual gift in a perceptual manner. Res sensibiles is a problem, system discourse is the form of sacraments The settlement has many spiritual influences. One is a reconciliation with God, and confessors restore grace. Also please allow eternal punishment due to the deceased's sin. The forgiveness time penalty is also a result. In the settlement, peace and calm conscience and spiritual peace will also affect individuals. In addition, the spiritual power is also increasing. Besides that, it also communicates with the church. Death, sin and punishment have two sides. They have committed sins and have eternal punishment and have time to punish their sins. The settlement is the act of God's mercy to settle the guilt of sin and eternal punishment. Purgatory and atonement solves the punishment of sin and the exercise of God's righteousness. The Roman Catholic teaching also believes that sin is double. Sin is a malicious act or an immoral act immediately and affects the laws of God and the inevitable consequences, the conditions created by criminal acts. Sin can alienate God and the community. Therefore, the Catholic Church insists on reconciliation between God and the Church.

Book Review of European Politics in the 17th Century Two magazines that I chose to comment on are history and theory, a study of historical philosophy, published at the Wesleyan University and the Renaissance Forum. I will read two historical book reviews on two different places and topics. The first book is about the Marxist historian's book about the reasons and incentives of the French Revolution before and after the revolution and the class problem of the French Revolution written by Jack Amari Rio and Bruce Norton. In the 17th century, Europe experienced a series of thought, knowledge and belief changes that influenced society, influenced politics and brought about cultural change. This is a revolution of thought, understanding how nature works, and desire to understand the laws of nature. Advancement of knowledge has brought out powerful waves emerging from astronomy and mathematics, expanding customs, culture and social behavior of the times. In the history of Europe this period was called scientific revolution. Historians are discussing when the revolution will begin, when will it end, who is the protagonist, and how it will develop, so this expression is controversial. Some historians agree with Nicolaus Copernicus numbers and sun-centered theory (1473-1543) to show the beginning of the scientific revolution, but I believe it comes from Francis Bacon (1561) . Scientific method of -1626) and his explanation. Europe changed greatly from the 17th century to the 18th century. In many ways, this change is the result of changes in intellectuals in natural history and scientific methods. The scientific revolution caused by philosophers such as Bacon, Newton, Descartes, and others caused a dramatic change in European arts and literature. - By the end of the 17th century, a new revolution is about to begin when Protestant Reform movement is over in most parts of Europe. It is now known as the "scientific revolution" - it is mainly due to the combination of two main factors. First, the famous revolution before the reform showed that it is not special that it doubts public opinion, and sometimes it even welcomes it. Since the 17th century, enlightenment attempted to remove European censorship system. And it found a political dictatorship combined with religious traditionism. In the 1930's, Alexis de Tocbil was surprised that ordinary people seeking political freedom in the United States continue to be religiously religious and continue to be religious. This is not a typical combination of Europe in his time. Even so, we should recognize that the core principles of the strict medieval theological political system that contemporary people oppose is the application of intention (or sovereignty) to the trials of wisdom. Thomas Aquinas insisted on adhering to this principle in "German", that is, contemporary devotion to freedom of speech ultimately depends on this principle. Justice is completely dependent on will. That is God. "

Historian Frederic William Maitland likes to remind scholars of his generation "to think medieval thinking". In order to evaluate the performance of Louis XI, we must think about his idea. We can not evaluate what we believe we achieved in this era. It always leads to wrong conclusions. From an independent point of view, Louis is the golden king. His government is beatless to anyone. His international reputation is not only himself and his makers but also arbitrators of other countries, while William Chester Jordan ensures that Languedoc can acquire Languedoc, while " I am convinced that it is "quick." Assimilation His ideas exhausted him. According to a story, he ate with French Louis XVI (later "St. Louis"), but when others were talking, he looked at the distance that was lost. Suddenly he shouted at the table and crashed. "Oh, there is a debate like to destroy Manichae!" Thomas said at the beginning of his huge Summa Theologica (or "Theological Knowledge Summary"). Thomas emphasizes that the distinction between philosophy and theology and the distinction between reason and revelation are not contradictory, but he continues to emphasize. Both are the source of knowledge, all come from God Louis XV (1214 - 1270) King and the French king and saints Gial and chic, showivinism and impulses are all words that explain the rule of French Louis XV. He showed a heroic personality, but he also seemed blindly to the contribution of those who did not share their value. He acted to fight corruption, but he had complicated relations with Jews and Muslims. Although he would like to imitate Jesus' poverty by acting as a monk, it is satisfying to think of repentance and humility as the goal of his life. He wore a shirt of hair beneath the royal robe and even gossip fought himself to suppress the desire for food and sex. He is known for his sympathy for the enemy and the generosity of the poor. He was a sponsor of the French university and repeatedly invited Thomas Aquinas for dinner. He did it in 1248 as he promised God that he would fight the Crusaders when he recovered when he died in 1244. The actions of his battle reflect his piousness After the Muslims occupied Jerusalem in 1244, King French Louis XVI organized the 7th Crusade. Rui spent four years of planning and by the end of August 1248 Louis and his army headed for Cyprus. While waiting for reinforcements, the army spent the winter in Cyprus. The fleet departed at the end of May and stopped at Damietta on June 5, 1249. On June 6, the citizens of Damieta got into a panic. The Crusaders waited for reinforcements at Damietta in the summer. On 20th November 1249, the military began to enter Cairo. In the spring of 1250, they attacked Cairo. Rui surrendered to the Egyptian in April 1250. Damieta was abandoned and paid ransom

In this article, we will explore all aspects of the literary movement first appeared in the 19th century, the existentialism. It will discuss different climates that existed during the literary movement, including society, politics and economics. Combining the basic dictionary definition and the numerous interpretations that the author derived from existentialism, the information provided will deepen the understanding of the origin, popularity and breadth of the subject matter. In this article I will explore the work of famous existent writers, including Jean-Paul Sartre, Franz Kafka, Luigi Pirandello, Albert Camus, covering the whole period of existentialism. In this article, we briefly outline the history of existentialist thinkers, then discuss how empathicistic challenges place emphasis on freedom of choice in the world, and finally in response to my reaction We must take responsibility. It exists. How these dilemmas lead to loss of anxiety, guilt, inertia, motivation, responsibility for "interests" and existing choice are ontological anxiety, natural reaction to real life, Choosing to live in nature or return to a lonely world as you avoid resolving conflicts with the dilemma. Existential pathology will contrast with this Existential notes 4 Historical existentialism belongs to the 19th century to the 20th century as a unique philosophical and literary movement, but elements of existentialism are found in Socrates's thought (and life), the Bible, and research You can do. Many philosophers and writers before the modern era. Pascal's first major problem in predicting modern existentialism was Bryce Pascal, a French philosopher of the 17th century. Pascal refused the strict rationality of his contemporary traitor, Descartes, and was interrupted at his "Pensees" (1670), aborting the system philosophy that assumed the interpretation of God and humanity was pride. Like the later existent writer, he sees human life in the form of public opinion: the combination of man and self is itself a paradox and contradiction. In history, many thinkers have embodied the existentialist tradition. In that there is Augustine, believing that "the truth is in the hearts of people." In opposition to the reasonable nature of Thomas Aquinas Duns Scotus insisted that in his famous statement "There is a reason not to know the inside", the human will must be the basis of every statement . Kierkegaard, Nietzsche, and those who chased it opposed the delusive reality that we could foresee the difference between the truth and the reality in Western culture and understand it in an abstract and transcendental way. They protest strongly to dry intellectuals, but they are neither simple activists nor anti-rational. Other campaigns that subvert antinomicism and thought to emotions should not be confused with existentialism.

The known world is influenced by the spread of the gospel of Jesus Christ, which was accomplished with great enthusiasm by the church of the 1st century. These early Christians first told the good news of Jesus Christ to Israel, spread to the heathen world and burn the world. The Bible says that apostle Paul was elected to bring the messages of the gospel remedy to Christianity by the Christ, whereas the apostle Peter was commanded to bring Christ's death and resurrection to Jewish brothers It is. As a member of the St. Thomas Aquinas Catholic Church in the Shreveport parish, we will review our mission to spread the gospel of Jesus Christ to the local Catholic college community in Ruston, Louisiana. We are welcomed and serving in the spirit of God and Assisi St. Francis dedicated to this community. This is a poetry of salvation, politics, and theology, this poem is intertwined with the voice of the end of the world Jesus of the Gospel and the Christ of the victory of the resurrection, one is the Christ of the Lord Jesus the earth and the Lord of the Lord . I am a natural therapist. It is a miniature poetic gospel, the victory of Christ in suffering, and the ultimate victory. So I think it is safe to prove that the Islamic culture shows us the most rich amount and quality of Jesus in other cultures than Christianity. The religions of any other world I know of do not invest much in the history of Jesus and everlasting Christ. In such dangerous and narrow days, we need to emphasize this tradition. The lesson of this story is clear. A religion often functions as a hinterland of another religion, depending on another religion to complement its proof. This interdependence is no longer an important example compared to the situation of Islam and Jesus. In the purest meaning, the word "gospel" can be defined as "good news" and the gospel of Jesus Christ is like this. Jesus Christ, the son of an innocent god, lived a perfect life, died with tragic death on the tree cross, three days later bridging sinners and innocent gods and rising. For Gap white Americans this is not only good news but also good news for every tribe, tongue and country. The gospel of Jesus Christ is the only thing that unites everyone on earth. In Galatians 3: 28 "There is neither a Jew, a Greek, a slave nor a freedom, neither men nor women, because you are all in Christ Jesus."

Akinas' claims are as follows: If the universe is infinite, there are infinite days. It is never impossible to reach the end of a series of infinite days, so today will never come. However, as today has arrived, the past can not be made unlimited. Time starts from the beginning of the universe, this is happening. Since it generates an event, there should be a first reason. The first reason is God. Tannant said that there is a coincidence in the world. Discussion of cosmology first derives from examining some of the universe's experience and metaphysical facts and then something outside the universe inevitably leads to its existence. There are various types of cosmological arguments, and their defenders include some of the best thinkers across the history of philosophy, including Plato, Aristotle, Ibunsina, Argazari, Mimonides, Aquinas, Descartes . And Leibniz. Three versions of many attention-grabbing discussions are the Thomistic Contingency argument, the Leibnizian's complete reason argument, and the kalam argument. Thinkers thinkers like Gottfried William Leibniz and Samuel Clark reaffirmed cosmology. Leibniz (1646-1716) proposed a principle to strengthen for just cause, according to which "facts can not exist or exist in reality, there is no good reason to make it a reality, There is no other "(Monadology), § 32). The complete reason must exist outside this series of events and must exist in what we call God's requisite existence. inside that. Samuel Clark also used the principle of just reason in his cosmological argument (Rowe 1975: chap.2). Another type of cosmological argument is Leibniz's perfect justification theory, hence the name of German philosopher Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz (1646-1716). In this discussion, you will answer the question. For Leibniz, what is present must have an explanation or "sufficient reason" and the interpretation of what is present must be based on its own nature or the needs of other projects. The argument is that the interpretation of the universe must be in transcendental God. Because the universe itself does not have the need to exist and God exists.

One of the oldest traditions of religious ethics is the war of justice. "Justice war theory" regulates the conditions of war. The opposition based on the theory of justice war is different from pacifists. Opponents oppose a certain war, but not against all wars. Their opposition is based on the principle of justice rather than the principle of pacifism (Becker 926). In the monotheistic religious tradition of Christianity and Islam, one of the divine (or Allah's) roles is to restrict or control the invasion between humans. Historians and philosophers formed the theory of war just for centuries. However, the most systematic description of the theory of justice war was developed by St. Thomas Aquinas in his Summa Theologicae. According to the theory of war of justice, the moral reality of war can be divided into two parts. War was judged twice. The first visit refers to the reasons of domestic battle, and the second time refers to the means used in the actual battle. (Walzer, 21) The first verdict was called jus ad bellum, or justice. The second sentence is called a wartime trial, or justice in war. Jus ad bellum provides guidelines for assessing whether war is fair or unfair but wartime rules outline the correct behavior in warfare. Jus ad bellum does not mean jus in battle. Likewise, jus in battle does not need jus ad bellum. Justice warfare may be done unfairly so that it is possible to fight legitimate warfare. In this 5th series on the Christian Justice War tradition, we will learn three main areas of Justice War theory. Moral requirement after the end). I will also study how the tradition of warfare really applies to terrorism and use of nuclear weapons. Just the Christian tradition of war theory began on August 5th of August. We do not seek peace for war, but we will fight war with saying that there may be peace. Therefore, you can defeat the people you oppose in peace. And lead them to peaceful prosperity. "

Religion has existed for countless centuries. Christianity is one of the world's major religions, people are criticized, fought and sacrificed in war, but it continues to exist until today. The purpose of this paper is to research the source of religion, understand doctrine, observe spreading all over the world, and decide its place in people today. As you approach this article through a fact report, I will explain these points and why we need to understand this religion and other religions that existed before our generation. Multimedia materials History of Christianity: universities and monasteries. 2000 DVD. Insight media. 30 minutes This video explores the relationship between the Christian monastery and the establishment of a university. Monastery 1988. Insight media. 21 minutes Discuss the importance of monasteries and monasteries in the development of the university and the influence of Abelade and Thomas Aquinas. Saints and scholars: Portrait of Abelard. 2003 DVD. BBC production 50 minutes The teachings of Peter Aberrad led him to be tested as heathen Exploring the trivial truth of Church 's prehistoric professor Edward Panocian and' God of history '. The will of God has always been a source of comfort for Christians at all times, but as a subject of Christian history education, it deserves special consideration. With this in mind, the author proposes a dual purpose. It is to reveal the importance of history to the lives of Christians by summarizing the broad pattern of Christ's control over the history of Christ. Examples and methods Her students History of Christianity started very soon, probably as early as Luke - act, which was the main cause of the Apostolic era. Writing history is very popular among medieval Christian priests and clergy. They wrote about the history of Jesus Christ, the history of the church, the history of their supporters, the history of the dynasties of local rulers. In the early Middle Ages, historical texts often used year or chronicle to record events every year, but this style often interfered with the analysis of events and causes. An example of this type of sentence is the Anglo - Saxon Chronicle which is the work of several different writers. It started during the reign of Alfred the Great in the late nineteenth century, but it was still updated in 1154.

Regardless of wealth, race, religion, the monarchy of the remnants representing the entire population is the best form of government. When a genetic monarch can act as a social conscious without political means, it is ideal for the elected council to manage the country without the need for charm and fame. When you separate charm from politics, you gain a constitutional monarchy, it is the government's best form. Thomas Aquinas talked about the low tide of the Supreme Court and the judgment, and what his policy prose De Regno - On Kinship can do for human beings. "... ... as the kingdom government is the best, the tyrant regime is the worst. Constitutional monarchy is the form of government where the monarch is head of state in the guidelines of written, unedited, or mixed constitutions. This form of government is different from absolute monarchy. Absolute monarchs are the source of state power, they are not subject to the application of any constitution and have the authority to manage their respective governments. Most constitutional monarchies adopt a parliament system where the principal owes strict ceremonial duties or holds reserves, depending on the Constitution. Under the current constitutional monarchy, there are Prime Ministers who serve as prime ministers and exercise effective political power. The Middle Eastern countries with constitutional monarchies are generally considered to be democratic. Example: Jordan, Kuwait, Morocco, Bahrain are considered constitutional monarchies For example, if the power of the monarch is restricted by the constitution, the constitutional monarchy is monarchy. The constitutional monarchy has two forms. It is a monarchy of parliament and a double monarchy. The current constitutional monarchy is primarily related to Western European countries such as the UK, the Netherlands, Belgium, Norway, Denmark, Spain, Luxembourg, Monaco, Liechtenstein, Sweden etc. The double monarchy is a type of constitutional monarchy in which the power monarch is restricted by the Constitution and the National Assembly, and he (constitutional) has constitutional restrictions on freedom of decision. Currently in Morocco, Kuwait, Jordan, the King has extensive administrative and legislative power The constitutional monarchy is a monarchy in the form that the monarch exercises power according to the written or unwritten constitution. Constitutional monarchy is different from absolute monarchy (the monarch has absolute power). Because the monarchy has to exercise its power within the limits established by its established legal framework. The monarchy's constitutional system comes from a country like Morocco and the Constitution gives sovereign power a lot of discretion, but in countries like Japan and Sweden the monarch does not hold official power.

Al-Ghazâlî, Causal Relations and Knowledge Abstract: In the 17th discussion of Tahâfutal-Falsafa, some articles in Arabic philosophy led to a discussion of causality by al-Ghazâl and Ibn Rushd (Averroës) in his Tahâfut AL - Answers to Tahâfut One of the frequently asked questions is that Al Ghazal can be called a coincidence, that is, whether he limits causality to God by chasing other Carmian thinkers. The problem that has not been fully solved in previous studies is that both al-Ghazâlî and Ibn Rushd believe that there is a decisive problem in the 17th discussion. Causal theory is enough to explain human knowledge. ~ Sunni Islam's most important and influential theologian ~ Ab'Hâmid Muhammadibn Muhammad al-Ghazâlî (1058-1111) attacked counterfeiting. These are Muslim philosophers who follow Aristotle's tradition. A similar idea in Christianity eventually reached the doctrine of Thomas Aquinas (1225 - 1274). In particular, the Gazarians opposed the scientifically necessary causal relationship principle and wrote: "According to our opinion, there is no connection between what is actually considered to be the cause and what is considered to be an influence.Inevitable connection ... thirsty is that you are drinking or full It does not mean a feeling, it is not hot contact with fire, it is not a gentle sunrise, it is neither a dagger nor a drug recovery nor a medicine.All experience existing in astronomy is linked to science and crafts such as laxatives etc I am in Through understanding the causal relationship, we will let nature work for us. However, analytical insight may affect unconscious causal relationships. Psychoanalytic therapy is based not on narrowly defined "causes and consequences" like physical medicine but on the use of known causal relationships. Instead, its effect is to overcome the causal relationship itself. The idea of ​​Habermas is not easy to understand. He is clearly thinking that analytical treatment actually impairs the causal relationship between oppression and its neurological symptoms. Analysis may say that patients can be saved from causality. It enhances the patient from the material world of causality to a more purely intellectual or spiritual domain where normal causal relationships transcend. Psychoanalysis is actually the theory of liberation. A less well-known method of causal relationship is causal modeling. The idea here is to make assumptions about the causal structure of the world, then to test whether these assumptions are consistent with the data, or to estimate the strength of different causal effects Observative ( Non experimental) to use data. Adam Kelleher wrote a wonderful series on causative data science. I recommend you read this. The causal relation is the causal relationship of Jewish pearls. In my experience, most data scientists have extensive experience building machine learning models and offline evaluations. Data scientists have far less experience of online evaluation and experiments. The explanation is simple. You can download the data set from Kaggle, train the model and evaluate offline in minutes. On the other hand, access to the real world is necessary for online evaluation of the model.

C. Lewis abolishes the abolition of human beings by humans and may be the best defense measure of natural law published in the 20th century. Glory of Christianity - Although it is not original, it clearly expresses the knowledge of the subject, so skillful tradition of natural law is included in all of Greco Roman and Judea, so this book is a great idea is. Interestingly, Lewis defense of objective morality is not due to the ideas of huge Western ideas (Plato, Aristotle, Augustine and Aquinas), but also draws on the wisdom of the East, including Confucius, which also includes . The abolition of humans was written by C. S. Lewis in 1943. The subtitle is "think about education, especially upper English teaching." C. Lewis was born in 1898 and died in 1963 (the same day as Robert F. Kennedy). He is a novelist and nonfiction writer and the most popular nonfiction is the "Narnia national story". Lewis told him that Plato and Aristotle agreed with philosophy, that they are a classic, "Classical apocalyptic world." Lewis is also a friend of JRR Turkien. The abolition of humanity ranked 7th among the 200 great works of the 20th century. In "abolition", Lewis wrote two opposing opinions: "Green Book World" and "Lord of the World". At the end of "abolition of mankind", C. S. Lewis shows how the main religion absolutely agrees with a specific ethic. In today's cultural warfare Christians found that they frequently stand up with Jewish, Muslim and Hindu believers. Christian missionaries seem to suggest "moral" and other philosophical indicators. But when we ask: While the Christian says, the other system "to find God" said, "Because God found you" Christian gospel, we are moral life Because we are not to acquire to save, we "Why should we be moral?" It has been saved. We are only saved by grace, but this kind of grace necessarily happens in moral life.

Philosophy 103: Introduction to logic in essence: Explain some of the uses of logic and distinguish a priori arguments from inductive arguments. I. Logic is a study of the methods and principles used to distinguish between correct inferences and false reasoning. B. Logic is different from psychology, normative norms or normative discipline, not descriptive discipline. That is, it prescribes how people should deduce; it does not matter how rational a person is. In order to discuss the nature of logic and perception, we need to know the definition of logic and perception. Logic is based on accurate reasoning science and art, the science and art of purely formal thought, the law to be followed by the purely thought process, the formation of general concepts and science of application, generalization, judgment, classification, reasoning, system It is defined as a general agreement. Science, correct reasoning (Brainydictionary.com). In other words, the use of logic and our thinking allows us to logically identify and infer what we present each day. This means using logic to distinguish good discussion from the poor discussion, and we can justify the truth of these arguments through a fair standpoint. I think this is almost impossible. Because everyone has some kind of stereotype or other perceptual barrier and prevents certain facts from being disclosed. (Brainydictionary.com) In order to find the position of Hegel's logic (dialectic) in our own perception, here we have to describe the necessary concept of logical nature and the occasional concept of natural existence, and thus we You can attack two birds - concept and object - with stone. Let's first consider the ideal inevitable logic found in Hegel's philosophy, then our natural logic, and finally the relationship between the two. Because of this difference, Hegel logic limitation will come out, but this limitation is also a fruitful use. The concept of Hobbes' nontransferable right and fascist's law of nature is as logical as the notion of nontransferable rights and ordinary natural laws and in fact is more logical. You can not make a decision between these two different concepts of natural law for pure reasons but you can easily make a decision by relying on facts. As Locke pointed out in his article on tolerance, jihad is not a real way to redemption, they are like other wars. One group defines the other as an enemy and uses organized violence to steal their land and money. The reason is not a concept of good but simple and simple evil. St. Thomas Aquinas pointed out the same thing 400 years ago of Rock, despite the fact that he further expressed in diplomacy.

History is an event that researchers record in chronological order. Since the beginning of the world many things happened in politics, society, history, and the economy. In this article we will look at the Western world in history. Specifically, we will investigate the period between 500 BC and 1500 AD. Please check the most important people, events, sports and events. This era was the middle ages of the era that Europe experienced in this era. In the meantime, I experienced 500 Christian calendar year and 900 year Christian era even in the age of darkness. This course focuses on the theme of the history of 100,000 BC. It considers the evolution of humanity, hunting - the formation of society, and the emergence of great civilization. It notes the exercise of authority in architecture, government, writing, religion, philosophy, art, science and technology. The comparative approach reveals how the world's cultures differ, how they share, how they differ, and what they exchange in the formation of the modern world. Focus on non-Westerners This course covers the history of medieval Europe around the AD 500 - 1500 AD. It will also introduce the rise of Christianity to the students as the religion of the world in the Roman Empire eventually dominating Western Europe and interacting with the Middle Ages, Judaism, and Emerging Muslims. One of the characteristics of the Middle Ages is the centrality of religion to politics, society, and culture, so this course is a combination of religious research and historical research. Sidonius Apollinaris, Brab's Labia, Bede, Einhard, Bingen's Hildegard, Thomas Aquinas, Christine de Pisan, Petrarch and other research sources are the foundation of course composition. This course is only available through the European research program. Prerequisites: Open only for students enrolled in the European research program History is an event that researchers record in chronological order. Since the beginning of the world many things happened in politics, society, history, and the economy. In this article we will look at the Western world in history. Specifically, we will investigate the period between 500 BC and 1500 AD. Please check the most important people, events, sports and events. This era was the middle ages of the era that Europe experienced in this era. - "A person living with a sword dies with a sword" This sentence shows that those who are trying to fight always die for their aggressiveness. The power of good or evil possibly affects human behavior. Often, power loses moral value and leads people to see the situation from a more strategic point of view. They think about how their decision will give them more power

In the magnificent romantic story of Edmund Spenser, The Faerie Queene, the author brings the reader with a naive red cross knight to find a sacred path. In the holy journey of the Red Cross knight he met two completely different women who influenced him to become a kind person. The first woman the Red Cross met was Una. Una is an innocent, pure and true woman. Una is beautiful and elegant, but it seems to be a powerful force to lead the Order of the Red Cross into a better life. Spencer is known for his huge epic "Fairy Quin." Spencer devoting efforts to Queen Elizabeth (the role she represents) devised a work composed of 12 books. Prior to the death of 1599, Spencer was able to complete the first six books (and started the seventh draft). The representative work of Spencer is the epic "The Faerie Queene". The first three books of Faerie Queene were published in 1590 and the second three books were published in 1596. Spenser initially stated that he wanted the poem to consist of 12 books, so today the version of this verse is incomplete. . . Still, it is still one of the longest verses in English. This is an allegorical work that you can read in some level of fable, including praise to Queen Elizabeth I. In a completely allegorical context, this verse follows some knights in the investigation of several virtues. In Spencer's "Letters from the author", he says that the entire epic is "wrapped in a fable-like design" and that "the purpose behind Elf Quinn is" to make good and gentle discipline " It is pointed out. Is it a gentleman or a nobleman? " In a letter to Spearer's Sir Walter Rowley in 1590, Spencer contains a preface to "Fairy Quinn" which describes the allegorical expression of virtue in King Arthur's wonderful "Fairy Land" I will. This letter is presented as a preface to the epic in most published versions and outlines the plans for 24 books. Twelve of them exhibited 12 "public virtues" centered on King Arthur. Although the influence of Thomas Aquinas and the tradition of the medieval allegory can be observed, Spencer raised Aristotle as a source of these virtues. Since the credibility of the prediction made in his letter to Raleigh is not absolute, it is difficult to predict how this work will be done, as the first Faculty Quinn appeared in 1590. Many differences from the plan. Publication

The paradigm's argument that religious experience as proof of the existence of God is the nature of "descendants" is hence inductive. This means that the discussion uses data and evidence to draw conclusions. Discussion of experience must include a feeling of encounter, so experience of encounter is seen, felt, perceived, and therefore makes our experience exist (Hume). It seems normal that these experiences seem to exist widely throughout society. Discussion of religious experience is an argument from the experience of God to the existence of God. This argument asserts in a powerful way that only experiences of existence are possible and that phenomena of religious experience can prove the existence of God. Because people experience God, they must possess God; the case is closed. In a weaker form, this argument only claims that religious experience constitutes evidence of the existence of God. Richard Swinburn defends this form of argument and proposes credibility principles The obvious fact about the existence of God is that some people claim to have experienced God. It is these religious experiences being used by philosophers to discuss the existence of God. - The following documents provide the rationale for the existence of God. By proving that the world of atheists can not explain the prerequisites of the laws of logic, atheists can not even explain reasonable arguments about the existence of God. "Opposed impossibility" is the only best proof that the requisite truth of the existence of God, that God's revelation to us allows us to use logic. This can be transformed into the following form using only the required truth. L: (logic law) G: (God exists) If L requires GL = G rule of reasoning " A) The argument of cosmology is to prove the existence of God. In this type of discussion, I am looking for reasons rather than design. This is based on experience, so this discussion is a posteriori argument. Thomas Aquinas divides important ideas into three methods. The first way is exercise / change. You can not move or change yourself. This must be a god, as the first move must be touched by others. "Our senses are definite and obvious, there are things in the world that are moving, now it is impossible for any movement to move by another movement, therefore one should move and move If it is just moved, it must be moved by another thing, but he can not continue to be infinite, I understand that it is God. "

Expressionism and opposition to realism - Kant, Davidson and Roti (1) Abstract: The concept of expressionism and anti-expression is introduced in the discussion of contemporary philosophy of Richard Drotti to explain him and the new pragmatism I was wrong. Attitudes towards traditional epistemological problems Roti means that the history of philosophy indicates that there is no final answer to traditional knowledge, truth, and representation; therefore, they are rejected It should be. Richard Rorty argued that contemporary analytical philosophy in a philosophical and natural mirror inadvertently imitates scientific methods. In addition, he condemns traditional epistemological viewpoint of expressionism and its corresponding theory, which depends on knowledge and independence of observer phenomena and passivity of natural phenomena and consciousness. As a supporter of anti-fundamentalism and anti-essentialism in the framework of pragmatism, he responded to postmodernism of traditionalism and relativism, but he responded to most postmodern ideas and his social liberalism I opposed the commitment. This 144 page book has a title that may lead people to introductory, but while summarizing McIntyre 's theme, the author also considers other philosophers such as Donald Davidson, especially Richard Roti Use. In order to understand McIntyre's idea, readers unfamiliar with Davidson and Rorty may find it difficult to understand this material. These essays are very broad, including a paper on the concept of justice in MacIntyre, an explanation of his liberalism, his interpretation of Aquinas, and criticism of his Enlightenment. The last chapter is written by MacIntyre himself; entitled "Partial Response to My Critics", it provides McIntyre's response to some of the criticism raised by other authors. (Motivation to interact with McKintal's critics is rare and worthy of praise) From Peirce and James to Rorty and Davidson, pragmatists have sought empiricism to purify Descartes' remains. For example, they claim that empiricism deprives the spiritual understanding Rock, Berkeley, and Hume inherited from Descartes. According to this Cartesianism, thinking is completely subjective and private that its content of "thinking" or "impression" is irrevocable, completely separated from the objective world being publicized when they express ing. . Accepting this world of mind, experientists have to face the long series of difficult questions - loneliness, skepticism, realism, idealism -.

The final stage of human education - From nihilism to the kingdom: There is a reason to believe that our current situation is not dark like some people. I show how to understand the historical process through the division of the modern (Aquinas), modern (Hegel) and late modern (Nietzsche) of human history. Hegel and Nietzsche adequately recognize the end of the modern era and the negative state of postmoderns must precede the perfect positive state. "Niger rhythm is standing at the door," Nietzsche wrote. "Is this the most wonderful day for all guests?" This year was 1885 or 1886, Nietzsche was writing a notebook not intended to publish its contents. Discussion about nihilism - what is most important in our most basic commitment, or differentiated and valuable life is that the world is an abyss of meaning rather than the meaning of protection given by God. There is no ongoing treatment for the work that is supposed to be published in life. But a few years ago in 1882, German philosophers published a possible answer to the problem of the ultimate source of nihilism. "God is dead," Nietzsche is writing in a famous "Gay Science" passage. "God is still dead, we killed him." Dance star is the way Nietzsche explains the idea of ​​Ubermensch or "Superman" or his ideal of humanity. Nietzsche is often related to nihilism, probably due to his controversial mention of "God is dead". But Ubermensch is actually his solution to nihilism. RM also explicitly opposed suicide. This is also a result of extreme nihilism. He warned that he said that "ordinary is not ordinary, usually luxurious." It means that social acceptance rewards only those who meet the necessary conditions. As a result, the way to self-actualization is opened. But for Ubermensch, we do not have such standards and choose to build our own value system, so their value system naturally leads to self-actualization. But like RM Wrap: From nihilism (/ naɪ (h) ɪlɪzəm, niː - /; from "Latin nihil" means "none") is a philosophical point denying or lacking faith in meaningful aspects of meaning. The most common thing is that nihilism is presented in the form of existential nihilism, it believes that life has no objective meaning, purpose, or essential value. Moral Nichlast claims that there is no inherent morality and that the recognized moral values ​​are abstract. Nihilism may take the form of epistemology, ontology or metaphysics, which means knowledge is impossible in its immediate sense, or that reality does not actually exist.

Sexual view of Saint Augustine The famous St. Augustine Caba was called the cornerstone of Christian theology by Catholics and Protestants. Many of his views have been experienced intense debate for centuries, so Christians see it as an authoritative interpretation of the Bible. But Christians should ask if this loyalty is reasonable in all circumstances. For example, Augustine 's idea of ​​sexuality after marriage is very narrow, limiting behavior and emotion. Today Christian regards this as part of the beauty of sexual intercourse. The view of St. Thomas Aquinas is the same as that of Saint Augustine. St. Augustine encountered pagan accusations and challenges. And they focused on the view as an independent but relevant field of church and state: they occupy different fields and have different values. St. Achinus redefines the relationship between faith and reason and believes that "people are social animals and the superior wisdom of rulers legalizes his rule." (E.E. pg) Sexual view of Saint Augustine The famous St. Augustine Caba was called the cornerstone of Christian theology by Catholics and Protestants. Many of his views have been experienced intense debate for centuries, so Christians see it as an authoritative interpretation of the Bible. But Christians should ask if this loyalty is reasonable in all circumstances. For example, Augustine's thought on sexual behavior after marriage is very narrow and restricts behavior. St. Augustine St. Augustine (AD 354-430), also known as Hippo Augustine, created his own image through his work and teachings. He was born on a tag stud in North Africa on November 13, 354. He was born in a middle class family. His father Patricas was a heathen and later became a devout Christian. His wife Monika converted to Christianity. Augustine 's mother has worked on the Roman Catholic church, and she continued working hard for his son' s conversion. Augustine saints, scholars and schizophrenic patients: mental illness in Irish countryside. Nancy Shaper - Hughes 28th November 2011 Anthropology 1103-001 Shaper - Hughes, Nancy 1979 Saints, scholars and schizophrenia: University of California Press "People generally have schizophrenia in schizophrenia I will withdraw from the phenomenon of escape believing or believing that it is like a conflict or pain that can not be resolved "(Nancy cites Hill, Lewis B 1955)

My Faith In my life, I have many experiences that shaped my personality. One of those moments occurred in my 3rd grade of my high school. It is this time that I decided to join the high school athletics team. I have played a lot of sports like golf, basketball, wrestling, and football, but I have not participated in the competition yet. So I decided to try it. This seems strange, but some of the conditions between the seasons and the seasons are very useful for learning some simple concepts of Christian faith. I found my belief is important to me. My faith is the intellectual heritage of Thomas Aquinas and Avila Teresa. This means that Joan of Arc and Loyola Ignatius are fearless. This means fundamental sympathy for scarRomero and Dorothy Day. This means that thousands of nuns, pastors, brothers, sisters, and amateurs are working every day to repay the world around them. For everyone, this means love. Is it perfect? Absolutely not, but no one can do that. In addition, I know that I am not the only child of Catholic, not the last child. Whenever someone leaves the Catholic Church due to the position of the Church against the LGBTQ's right, another voice says "no" and the church does not have a place we use. When I converted to Catholicism in my twenties, I caught my faith like a sword to fight the world and the enemies of the church. Arrogant, proud, victor - like a Catholic, I am a young man. This is not the fault of the church. This is my fault. Then it was all deprived. In my humiliation, I accepted this belief for the second time and made me embarrassed on a cold winter day as a warm coat. On the day I entered Orthodox Church, my Ukrainian born Godfather said to me.

In Summa Theologiae, medieval atheist Thomas Aquinas told jealousy. "There is a spiritual life based on things and souls, the soul leads to that spiritual life, I become sad." (2, 36, advertisement 3) "Hell Tourist Guide" says that "jealousy" is dominated by the moon constellation and is "key behind every advertisement". By the way, this book actually refers to the website of seven crimes. All of your friends are buying it. If you are the only person you miss, please imagine this! Every sin has its own punishment. This is especially true for slander. Jealousy is an obscene 4-letter word in the human spirit. Someone may want to have fun with adultery or murder, lying, but can you imagine that someone would like to be jealous? But we did that even if it was not fun. It is both a deadly sin and a tragic punishment. "Where there is ambition and selfish ambition, there is a chaotic evil" (James 3:16). You are a sin that you can not bear to anyone. But everyone is like this. Martin Luther said: "Too many Christian sinners have their happiness and saints' pleasure. He is one of the most unfortunate reasons. It must be the most boring of the seven sins. God's embarrassment brought down the angels. The devil exists through bondage! Jealousy turned down our first parents. The devil licked their happiness, tempted Eve, seduced Adam and brought sin to mankind. As David was very popular and successful, he led him to kill David to Saul. It is enviable that scribes and Pharisees persecuted Christ, condemned him, and eventually let him cross in Cal. Therefore, the continuity of results will continue to exist.

Augustine and Peter Brown The early church of Augustine's Hippo by the Oak Public Library, Stack 270.2 Brown Q5. As Augustine always attempted to fight heresy that bothered the early church, he realized that many of his colleagues and congregations had a belief not to doubt the Catholic Church. They also believed that he also realized that this did not have them have a firm foundation. (Brown, 354) His contribution to the doctrine of Catholic writing theology helps to strengthen the authority of the Church against controversial topics. As one of the most prominent figures of the early church, Saint Augustine was not only acknowledged for his leadership but also because of his knowledge and influence on the ideas and teachings of the Christian church . As a pastor, he was an important leader of the early African church; as a philosopher, he brought a new approach to the doctrine of church through the idea of ​​pagan philosophy (TeSelle 892). These accomplishments made him join Thomas Aquinas and other great church philosophers. Augustine and Peter Brown The early church of Augustine's Hippo by the Oak Public Library, Stack 270.2 Brown Q5. As Augustine always attempted to fight heresy that bothered the early church, he realized that many of his colleagues and congregations had a belief not to doubt the Catholic Church. They also believed that he also realized that this did not have them have a firm foundation. - Why is Protestant reform considered to be a major event in the history of the Church? Protestant reform is a major event in the history of the Church. This is a protest of people against the Pope and the church leaders. They want to change. People have learned that the church has not told them the truth about Jesus and his faith. It had a big impact on Europe and the world. In the eleventh century in Europe, there are churches or cathedrals in every town. An important rhetoric after Quintilian was Saint Augustine, a bishop of African Hippos who lived around the year 400 AD. St. Augustine presented one of the most pressing questions for the early Christian church. What to protect and what should be thrown away. Polytheist culture taken by Christians. Rhetoric is particularly doubtful, as many of the people in the church believe that no company is trying to profit in any way, including speaking publicly to believers. In "Christian doctrine", especially Volume 4, St. Augustine believes that rhetoric should be used by Christians - indeed, it induces beliefs and inspires people's beliefs There is a high demand. Saint Augustine is really important. As elements of rhetoric, there are not too many witnesses, testimonies, rituals or rituals, or nonverbal signs such as pictures, icons, clothes.

The genius of the 1300s was on the verge of change in the 1300s. People pay higher price for education, but literature has already passed on to people, art is starting to reflect life. Aquinas, Dante, Giotto are geniuses of intellectuals, literature and art of the 1300s. These people are ahead of their time by bringing a humanitarian side to their work. They are interested in humans as beings of this world and the afterlife. These people really showed a transition from the Middle Ages to the Renaissance. Look at the pardon: Joe's genius Canterbury story collection is a masterpiece of literature, an outstanding writer Jeffrey Joe. I am trying to achieve various goals. Joe wrote his story in the late 1300's. This made him the beginning of the decline of the Middle Ages. Historically, we know that for the emerging business sector the middle class has just begun to form. - There was a pastor who did not know anything about the virtue and honor of being a saint, but he felt it is his sacred right to preach the Bible to the world. He often wants to find out who committed the crime and correct the crime. However, a distorted man does not have the right to honest others' virtues. As a result, there is no other man in the village suitable for the job, so many people despise the pastor. In the 1300's, the first Japanese drama was developed and played - there is no drama. It comes from the original religious ceremony involved in singing and dancing. By the end of the 1300 's, playwright Zeami Genki did not make drama. Today as well, it is the way he was originally performing and is being implemented as a combination of dancing and chanting to past literary and poetic themes. From the 1500's to the early 1600's, the middle class began to appear in Japan. Along with the emergence of this middle class there were literary works focusing on these middle classes and their daily lives. In Japanese cities, many poems include humor and sexual themes. These works and their era (1603-1867) were called the Tokugawa era. Art in the 1300s and early 1400s. In the early 1300s, Florentine painter Giotto became the first artist who drew nature realistically. He made luxurious mural painting (wet plaster) for the church in Florence, Padua, Assisi. Giotto creates realistic figures and tries to show real emotions. - The relative lack of Madonna and the classic art of children in the 1400s Rorling Pastor influenced the development of European art outside Italy. Since painters have few examples of classic ancient imitations, they are often influenced by the late Middle Ages Gothic style.

The humility of intellectuals is a personality characteristic that enables virtue, intellectually discreet people to think and reason. It seems to be related to an open attitude, a sense of own mistakes, and a healthy understanding of others' intellectual liabilities. If the humility of the intellectuals represents the extremes of the extremes, then the associated malice is the arrogance of the intellectuals, closed ideas, overconfidence in their views and intelligence, and (on the other hand) their own intellect Excessive timidity at even means embarrassment to intellectuals. Humble philosophy and theology projects focus on various philosophical and theological issues related to intellectual humility. This project better understands the essence and value of modesty of knowledge, embraces and develops recent empirical research on topics related to humility and knowledge of knowledge, intellectual humility such as relationships with other virtues and vices I will investigate the problems related to. The broader virtue recognition theory, the role of humility in disagreement, the relationship with religious pluralism, and the influence it has on the hidden problems of God. This project will lay the foundation for further research on how to foster greater knowledge and humility in individuals and civil society. In the eleventh century, philosophy and theology developed and intellectual activity became active, also called the 12th century Renaissance. The problem of knowledge discussed in this era is the relationship between faith and reason, the existence and simplicity of God, the purpose of theology and metaphysics, and the problem of knowledge, universality and personality. Rediscovery of Aristotle inspired philosophical discourse - his work emphasizes empiricism and rationalism and will eventually be translated to more than 3,000 pages. Scholars such as Peter Abelard (d.1142) and Peter Lombard (1164) are introducing the logic of Aristotle to theology In at least the classical era, theology and philosophy developed separately. In fact, the independence of the philosophy at this time was remarkable, as compared with the subordinate status of the theologians in the western medieval Latin America. However, between theology and philosophical controversy, two traditions were born. The attack on Ash'arite theologian Aristotle's natural philosophy is particularly beneficial for causal philosophy. These attacks took advantage of the recurrence of debate in the early modern causation discussion. Since 1100, academic philosophy has dominated the medieval philosophy with its technical style and philosophy in an effort to protect theology. As Aquinas said, philosophy is God mother of theology. Some philosophers have thoroughly attacked academic philosophy because they created useless controversy and rationalist philosophy beyond true faith. However, this radical attack has rarely delayed the momentum accumulated by academicism for centuries. But the writing of academic tradition by other philosophers will help to advance the wedge between philosophy and theology and thus help to end control of scholarism. Two of them are John Duns Scotus and Ockham's William.

"If the devil goes away from me, I am anxious that my angel will escape." Rainer Maria Rilke wrote this article to explain the human nature. He stated his view on human behavior and people's way of thinking. Without evil, people do not know exactly what is good. Everyone has qualities of right and wrong. It is balanced and it is stable for everyone. In the absence of a person, humans will not be able to distinguish or understand whether their behavior is correct or wrong. It is not evil. Without evil there is no good way to exist. They complement each other, there is no one, you can not have another one. Unfortunately, evil always seems to outweigh that profit. This is reflected in various literary era of history. There are various ways to show good and evil. When someone is kind or considerate, it can be beautiful. - Hippo Augustine (354-430) is one of the most influential thinkers in Christianity. He has contributed many ideas and ideas to Christian theology. One of his most important contributions is the concept of "original sin" and his concept of "evil". These concepts have evolved over the years. Augustine painted their evolution in his 13 autobiographies he wrote in his 40s. In most of the Western intellectual history, studies of evil are reserved for theology. From Augustine and Aquinas to Luther and Calvin, Christian thinkers are crazy about "evil problems", how good a god in our world can have bad things. When Immanuel Kant introduces the concept of extreme evil that exists outside the bounds of reason and will, the eternal problems of evil are released from the exclusive grasp of the church. Perhaps because of its mixed religious and secular qualities, our evil concept creates almost mysterious power in society's impulse to create order from chaos and despair It was. As Susan Neyman wrote in his groundbreaking research, "evil in modern thinking", "The problem of evil can be expressed in terms of theological or secular terms, but basically it is It is understandability of the whole world.

Evaluation of Gender Issues in Practice of Social Work: A Summary of Women's Feminisation A better issue is that our society is trying to ensure that gender equality is not only for males and females but for human quality, It is to ask what you can do. "Every woman is born as an incomplete, incomplete male student because her father is sick, weak, or in a state of crime when pregnant." - St. Thomas Aquinas Simone de Beauvoir's This work titled "Impact" Second Sex "has allowed mainstream society to recognize the rejection of women's theories on women's development and socialization. Summary Planning and gender analysis during the project design period are based on the process of evaluating the impact of development activities on women and men and on sexual relations (economic and social relations between men and women built and strengthened by social institutions) is. . It is important to increase the sustainability and effectiveness of their activities or to identify priority areas of action to promote gender equality to ensure that males and females are not disadvantaged by development activities Can be used to. In the implementation, monitoring and evaluation process, gender analysis helps to assess differences in male-female participation, benefits, and effects. Three executions of WWOOMMEENN, GGEENNDDEERR, and DDEEVVEELLOOPPMMEENNTT :: KKEEYY IISSSSUUEESS Evaluation of Gender Issues in Practice of Social Work: A Summary of Women's Feminisation A better issue is that our society is trying to ensure that gender equality is not only for males and females but for human quality, It is to ask what you can do. "Every woman is born as an incomplete, incomplete male student because her father is in sickness, weakness, or crime when she gets pregnant." - 1. Historical significance of the feminist "feminism" Is usually said that "Eve is drawn to make" extra bone "from Adam, and it is said that women have always been considered inferior to men. However, as Barnes said, the "minimum standard of feminism" should include the same status as men, the idea of ​​rights and roles.

All passionate temperament rises from the appetizing appetite passion and ends with them. For example, anger rises from sorrow, and after vengeance it ends with joy. - St. Thomas Aquinas Richard III is an inquiry deeply exploring the psychology of post-traumatic stress disorder, the center of exploration is Richard's idea. Post traumatic stress disorder, post traumatic stress disorder are anxiety disorders that may develop after severe physical injury or severe physical injury or exposure to a test. Post-traumatic stress disorder "post-traumatic stress disorder is a mental illness that people remember repetitiously or have a dream of a terrible experience" ("post traumatic stress disorder" 710). The explanation of post traumatic stress disorder mainly focuses on the way in which psychological trauma experience is affected. When a person is facing an overwhelming trauma, the brain can not handle information or emotion correctly (Cohen Web). Post traumatic stress disorder changes the body's response to stress. Hundreds of different types of psychiatric disorders, fourth edition are posted in the mental disorder diagnosis and statistics handbook. (DSM - IV) One of them is called post - traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). According to this study post-traumatic injuries usually experienced and witnessed life-threatening events such as military attacks, natural disasters, terrorist attacks, serious accidents and rape, and other violent personal attacks It occurs later. Post traumatic stress disorder, that is exactly that. The first response to this disease would be the pressure for over-application and trauma experience. Kay Jankowsi (2010) said posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) can be traced back to ancient times. History Medical literature literature began with civil war, where PTSD-like disease was called "Dakosta syndrome" (Jankowsi 2010). - Many people emphasize their lives everyday, but that may be inevitable. People who joined our armies or people in the army may have experienced various kinds of pressure during the fight. This type of stress is known as "Posttraumatic Stress Disorder" (PTSD). Post traumatic stress disorder is a common brain disease for many reasons. Post traumatic stress disorder affects various parts of the brain, which may also affect the ability of individuals to function properly.

Aristotle's work remained viable and it had a great impact on future moral philosophers. St. Thomas Aquinas and most other Christian philosophers are greatly influenced by Aristotle's work. Indeed, people who follow the current "virtue ethics" movement are inspired by Aristotle himself. The dictionary of Arête & Eudaimonia's Greek word "Eudaimonia" means happiness. More precisely, it means "good life" and "excellence". Aristotle believes that achieving happiness is the ultimate goal and maximum goal of human life (Carreras, 2011). In the book "Nicmarkan Ethics" Aristotle will use his distribution to build the best way to live and be happy. Aristotle said: "So, virtue is a country that decides on average for our average, that is the average between the two vices, one is surplus, Aristotle is Nicomacare in morality Talked about human virtue, courage, calmness, generosity, grandeur, magnificence, and calmness - through the third book from the beginning of Nicomachean ethics Aristotle distinguishes between pain and happiness, Aristotle believes in the pursuit of human happiness; traditionally being rebutted in the modern secular environment Aristotle will soon be able to fight against all extremes All human activities should be beneficial, as the actions of the people insisted that they are for good. We usually think that happiness is excitement and satisfy or feel the smile's impulse, but the ancient philosopher regards happiness as virtue. According to Aristotle, happiness is the purpose of achieving ourselves. For humans, this means participating in rational activities, thinking, living with honesty, justice, courage and confidence. This is quite different from the concept of modern happiness. We tend to regard happiness as an emotional state that can control the achievement's climax and feel the pressure and pain of the world. It is exciting and happy, but it is fleeting. On the other hand, Eudaimonia is an eternal existence state.

For thousands of years, human beings have been thinking about supremacy. Part of the origin of this omnipotent desire for these sacred entities derives partly from our desire to seize the truth of the universe in which we live. We will return from there as part of this universe physically surrounds us and consumes us perfectly at the end of our lives. However to some extent there is another eternal part of the universe that can be separated from the world of transient problems we understand very easily, but in other respects it is separable unexplored. Power is closely related. Aristotle (383-322 BC) also proposed a view of the cosmic creators who are often called "immovable ancestors" in his work "metaphysics". For Aristotle, like Plato, the "things" underlying the universe always exist and always exist (it follows the phrase Parmenides' famous "I can not do anything because I do nothing".) Aristotlez Proposed a potential controversy of the composition of the universe (essence or matter) Prime Mover starts organizing the movements of ousia as a center of charm, not through the performance, so that is an indifferent motive. In his metaphysics Aristotle discussed the meaning of "existence". Aristotle believes that "presence" refers primarily immobile initiators and assigns one to each movement in the sky. Because the motive knowledge imitates it, every motive to move is always thinking about your own meditation, and all things that adapt to the second meaning of "existence" are moving by moving the origin of that action itself I will. (Or should). Completeness is not one of his attributes, as Aristotle 's God' s definition is entirely due to this existence, complete existence is not incomplete but can only consider integrity. According to Aristotle, God is in a state of "stagnation" without being affected by change and imperfection. "Indifferent actor" is quite different from the concept of God found in most religions. An important belief in Aristotle's astronomical research is the movement of "indifferent God's theory of motion" that maintains observable movements of the celestial bodies. Aquinas explained Aristotle's section. There, the promoter is God and the angel is the planetary movement. An important theme of Akin 's literary philosophy of this day is his belief that the size of the universe is a perfect ball that revolves around the center of the permanently placed earth. Such confidence is created by reference to the Bible like "the world is firmly established and can not be moved" (Bible 96: 10) to confirm the position of the church. This theory has existed for centuries, after Copernicus (1473-1543), which has been endorsed by scientists and philosophers, proposed the modern astronomical theory (Frova 26), Galileo is in his dialogue with Simplicio It will be described as.

The mission of hope for the future is to help families get the academic and spiritual benefits of Catholic school education in the Archdiocese of San Antonio. I am very excited to be able to set up the best downhill events and overtime donation partner Over the Edge. Please show your love and gratitude to the world for Catholic school education. Download our logo and put your name and title or maximum achievement on it and share it with the world! I am a child of a Catholic school! Future positioning can be defined as individual ideas, beliefs, plans, and hope for the future. People develop beliefs and hopes for the future through their own life course, but in adolescence and adolescence, people are in the period of life that tends to choose the direction of education and careers, I have special meaning to ideas and plans. And other core aspects of life. Positioning in the future can be divided into three parts: cognition, motivation and emotion. An emotional factor is the degree of optimism and pessimism about the future and is the aspect which is most studied about the future direction. The emotional element of the future orientation is also the focus of this research. Thomas Aquinas supports such observations on the relationship between hope, future and the past. Since hope is based on possibility (the desired objective is "suitable for the future, difficult to obtain"), it may be corrected from past experiences or modified by past experiences. The ability to do something is easy, the result is hope ("Summa Theologica, I-II, 40.5"). This is a desired cognitive or rational factor. Experience shapes our hopes and our actions provide information for our experiences. He can not live without hope so that people can not live without their dreams. If the dream reflects the past, I would like to summon the future. Does this mean that our future can be built on past rejections? Of course, you do not need to make such a choice. Both are not contradictory. The opposite of the past is not the future but the lack of the future; the opposite of the future is not the past but the lack of the past. I lose sacrifice equal to the others. memories. Time: after the war. This place is in Paris. A young man is struggling to adapt to his life. His mother, his father, and his sister were gone. He is alone. I am on the verge of despair. But he did not give up. Instead, he is trying to find a place in his life. He got a new language. He made several friends, and they think that evil memory will be an evil shield; believe that memory of death will be a shield to death.

The intrigue of the movie and passion of all passion in the making of BBC by Shakespeare 's Richard III was born and ended with a persistent appetite passion. For example, anger rises from sorrow, and after vengeance it ends with joy. - St. Thomas Aquinas Richard III, Shakespeare created evil incarnation. The evil hero conspired against relatives, planned a political acquisition, made the widow widow, assassinated children, abandoned all evil acts. We saw Richard's bluff with delight and joy of evil, and every boast comment gave us instructions. If a bad person becomes attractive, even more fun, his blatant atrocities Film Production by Ron Crane Shakespeare 's Richard III Rockland' s film has illustrated the role of Richard III as a devil genius. The use and symbol of the economy in his Richard's depiction fully reflects the characteristics of the missing text in several respects. A stable even and stable stable scene in the movie clarifies this. About the stable scene in the movie The first thing I noticed is the monochrome color scheme. - "Cold Blood" is a tragic story about Eugene Hickcock and Perry Edward, two people who escaped the law after killing the whole family and finding money. At the time of writing this book, Truman Capote only used facts to create real novels. He has thousands of notes on this subject, but his problem is to make his book look like a novel. He does this by adding a dialogue and explaining the emotions of the character. Richard as an anti-hero: How much Richard realized this prototype? In the play of William Shakespeare of Richard III, Richard was portrayed as physical deformation and psychological influence. People believe that his inner soul reflects his physical deformation. Richard is considered to be the protagonist of the show, but that is very contradictory. - Introduction Fyodor Dostoyevsky's underground memo (1864/2008) is a diary written by an anonymous narrator (page 7) that calls himself "malicious" and "unattractive". As the narrator 's self - hatred characterized by self - alienation is very obvious, he is often referred to as an underground man by critics (Frank 1961, p. 1). But this underground man is the central character of Dostoevsky's novel and represents the subversion of a typical brave hero. Shakespeare's evil king, Richard III, is an actor, a completely evil actor who began to appreciate his skills through the skill of the stage. In his Shakespeare as a dramatic thinker, Richard Moulton announced that Richard was amazed by his stage director: "Richard became an evil artist: the natural feeling of participating in crime That passion Whether it is a desire or a fear and a regret - it gives a masterpiece of appreciation for art "(40). Robert Weimann compares the role of Richard Gloucester with John of Shakespeare King. "These two figures all showed outstanding performance needs and play a" desperately "role. Role, "discovery", and better or better

Why do you think Chaucer includes Justinus and a placebo? What is the contribution of the latter discussion to the entire story? There are many factors gathered by the readers to keep the readers away from the characters in the story, especially from the complex and ambiguous series of shots they are seeing. They are all smaller or larger types or allegories. Justinus and Placebo are anthropomorphic allegories representing abstract attributes of good proposals and bad suggestions. It is derived from satirical and contemporary recommendations of the courts. There, there is told the recipient, usually the Prince, how to choose good counselors and avoid compelling their motivation as their own progress. In January, "Discussion" (1474) between two friends, placebo and Justinas announced that he decided to marry his soul (1400-1405). Now, this so-called controversy has brought about a sarcastic existence that existed since "marriage debate", but businessmen - and some commentators - did not fully know this, and he was one of his goals It is one. Basically speaking, there is no discussion about "debate about marriage", and "hoolynesse" or "dotage" which is a substitute for merchants in this case includes a distinction without distinction. When placebo praised the decision of January (1478 - 1518), Justinus warned him that he should not hurry to do a tough and dangerous deal (1521 - 65), and they correctly won January The concept of marriage was defined. A sanctified way for men to meet (status). "Betting is more like steak than old beef" (1420) Like Justinus, as I pointed out already, I cite Bath's wife ironically, but Justinus is not worthy to argue against (1655ff.), But readers like Justinus may think unknown. Institution (1685) - 87) In fact, however, the issue of "two blessings" in January is a true theological problem in the 14th century. Dante discussed this in the fourth article of De Monarchia and Convivio The most authoritative index of the 13th century is the tradition of Albert the Great and Thomas Aquinas and of course also included in his two paradises. Medium, the land of Plugatrio and the land next to it. Indeed, from a traditional theologian's point of view, January stated the problem in the wrong way as he began with an irrational premise - Justin tried to destroy him - the marriage is a perfect Earth We guaranteed happiness The manuscript of Diodorus ceased at the end of the 4th century BC and the surviving sources became very fragmented. For a continuous story, we have to go to the epic of Pompeius Trogus by the later Latin writers Justinus, but his explanation is relatively short, contemporary readers tell us the sequence of events he describes It may confuse. In the absence of a satisfactory continuous record Plutarch 's parallel life provides important insights into some of the most influential figures of the era: Dmitryus, Pirhus, Alatus, Ajis and Clemens. Plutarch has often been pointed out as a biographer, not a historian - but when he wrote his life he examined various modern history.

The 17th century saw the so-called "heroic" era in the development of contemporary natural law theory. Starting with 1 Hugo Grotius, Protestant thinkers began experimenting with the idea of ​​academic natural law, creating a unique and highly successful tradition of natural law that dominates Europe. Political thinking From the 18th century, the success of this tradition may seem like a matter of course, but this retrospective view is often the first pioneer in trying to harmonize the legal thought of nature with rigor It covers the area that faced the real challenge. Protestant theology Early in the 17th century, Thomas Hobbes thought that the essence of human beings was not that people could deduce therefrom the laws of nature, or that the natural law deduced so that he deduced is the ruler We believe that we do not impose any important restrictions on the power of social order to reinvent society according to their own hopes and social order is purely the creation of state power. In the natural state, Hobbes argues that this is a war against everyone, life is "poverty, loneliness, hatred, barbarism, and shortness". This is, of course, a direct contradiction to the usual natural law argument that humans are social animals, living peacefully with his compatriots, and being quietly trading with them. The 17th century saw the so-called "heroic" era in the development of contemporary natural law theory. Starting with 1 Hugo Grotius, Protestant thinkers began experimenting with the idea of ​​academic natural law, creating a unique and highly successful tradition of natural law that dominates Europe. Political thinking - "Eleeing: The legal intent was broken?" "It is the first and only legitimate goal of a good government to pay attention to life and happiness, not their destruction." Thomas Jefferson.) Modern medical technology advancement service deprives individuals of their right to die. However, euthanasia may be claimed to have emerged for the purpose of restoring this right. The word "euthanasia" comes from Greek, "eu" means "good" and "thanatos" is converted to "death" In the 13th century, Thomas Aquinas believed that the rule of law represented God's natural order and was determined by God's revelation and human reasons. In the 17th century, British jurist Sir Edward Coco insisted, "The king should not be under the person, but should be under God and law." Regarding the legislative power of England, Coca-Cola states that "if Congressional act violates common rights or reasons, or if it dislikes or dislikes enforcement, it controls and controls it as invalid "I said. · Alexander Hamilton argued that in the "federalists" the rule of law applies to justice. 78. Judge that "There is no authority or will and judgment only".

The analysis of my thesis is limited to the study of two dramas "Virtue" and "Vulture". My research is relatively amazing Violent and cruel correlation inherent in human nature for many years. Both "Medea" and "TheVultures" are tragic 2. Dennen JMGVD. Attack Theory: Frustration - Theory of Attack (F - A). Default journal, 2005 5. Euripides: Medea and other plays; translated the introduction of Phillip Vellacott. Penguin Book 8. The playwright went to the present Shanta Gokhale in the center malathi drama in 1843. Published by Naveen 9. Front line: Vols 25 - No. 12: 7 - 20 June 2008. Gowri, Ramnarayan wrote his lifetime, Ob. the publisher 12. Front line: vol. 25 - No. 12: June 7 - 20, 2008, written by Rownarayan's Gowri for lifetime, ob. the publisher Advances in Consumer Research Advertising Consumption, Market and Culture Journal Advertising Research Journal Interactive Marketing Consumer Behavior Journal International Advertising Magazine Consumer Marketing Journal International Market Research Journal Consumer Research Journal Psychology and Marketing Consumer Psychology Journal In this term A member of a team who writes and presents a shopping marketing plan. Marketing plans can be created at different levels of the organization (ie, the entire organization, business units, or product / product line) and at different levels of detail (draft and complete financial details). Your job is to create the first draft of "people" or marketing plans for new product concepts that you think will bring you the greatest benefit to your business. In the first two weeks of the term, your team will be assigned to the company Syllabus: MKTG 102A Marketing Introduction Business School St. Thomas Aquinas College Michael Murphy, Dean IJCNS (International Journal of Computer and Network Security) is one of the leading international journals publishing new ideas, state-of-the-art research results, and basic advances in computer science and communication networks and cyber security. IJCNS is a monthly magazine that publishes articles and provides new theoretical results. Papers submitted to IJCNS should explain the original and previously unpublished works that are not currently being reviewed by other conferences, seminars or journals. SC 17 is the best international conference to demonstrate various ways in which high performance computing, networking, storage, and analysis can make progress in scientific discovery, research, education, and business. This is also the fastest list among the top 500 supercomputers (China won again this year). We welcome Ugo Plouviez. He joined the team as a leader in Java development. Over the years in Singapore and Hong Kong, Ugo has gained excellent expertise in Java technology for financial technology. He is at the forefront of Java and cloud technology, constantly solving real-time memory analysis, high-frequency trading, mission-critical software challenges. With iExec, Ugo solves iExec's refactoring and building problems, making it scalable, robust, secure, and efficient.

E.H. Carl originally explained that Hans Morgenthau's work is too realistic and too little utopianism. For this evidence, this article examines Carl's "Twenty Years' Crisis: 1919-1939" and Hans Mogenenthau's "Intergovernmental Politics". This article will focus on three important themes. The relationship between the role of utopianism and its realism, the concept of realism as a commitment, and the value to our knowledge of life. At this time, this article regards Morgenthau's work as valuable regardless of discipline, whether it is state protection or diplomacy. The 20th century is considered to be the cornerstone of classical realism. Scholars such as E. H. Carr and Hans Morgenthau have developed this theory. It is known for pursuit of power in international disorder and pessimistic view of the world. The paper argues that classical realism is either immoral or immoral, mainly focusing on Hans Morgans and his critics' debate. First, it will define classical realism and establish its main argument. Secondly, it explores the meaning of "immorality", "immorality", and "moral". It then studies the position of morality in realism (if any), and finally it will compare how realists and liberals treat morality. answer Several of the greatest thinkers of history devoted most of their work to this problem, but fail to provide a comprehensive explanation yet: Thucydides, Hippo Augustine, St. Thomas Aquinas, Clausewitz, E .; H. Carr, Morgenthau ... This list is still in progress. The truth is, there is no clear answer However, putting realism under positivism is not without problems. "What is History" by E. H · CAR is a prudent critique of positivism, and Hans Morgan's goal in "scientists and power politics" is to be able to scientifically study international politics / power politics It is to destroy the idea. Morgenthau's belief in this area is part of his reason that it was classified as a "classical realist" rather than a realist. According to liberalism, individuals are basically kind and can make meaningful cooperation to promote positive change. Liberalism believes that the country, non-governmental organizations, and intergovernmental organizations play an important role in international systems. The state is a sovereign state, but they have many benefits, not necessarily single and autonomous. Liberalism emphasizes the interdependence of state, multinational corporations, and international organizations

In January 2010, I was fortunate to be able to take classes called "Connect church leaders" at the Presbyterian Center in Louisville, Kentucky. This course is aimed at studying how the leadership of Presbyterian churches is linked to the Presbyterian Church and the churches that make up the organization and closely working with the General Assembly Missions Council (GAMC) It is aimed to study how it is formed. My job is to be in the Public Relations Office with the Secretary General, and I am very happy to be involved in my career in broadcasting and broadcasting. Kentucky Wesleyan University and Unified Methodist Church have a long tradition. Thousands of non-professional leaders, incumbent (and retired) pastors, and conference leaders completed undergraduate education at Kentucky Wesleyan University. In addition, Wesleyan is proud of the two special graduates and their UMC leadership: Albert Sweazy '40 and Bishop Ed Tullis' 39 This is by no means a thorough explanation of the planting of European delegations and churches. Instead, the following summary shows hundreds of conversations with some of the most influential Christian leaders throughout the continent, my own observations on living in the African continent over the past 18 months, and 20 European countries It reflects my Christianity of. Cooperation of church and organization In January 2010, I was fortunate to be able to take classes called "Connect church leaders" at the Presbyterian Center in Louisville, Kentucky. This course is aimed at studying how the leadership of Presbyterian churches is linked to the Presbyterian Church and the churches that make up the organization and closely working with the General Assembly Missions Council (GAMC) It is aimed to study how it is formed. - Augustine and the early church Augustine Cover Peter Brown Live Oak Public Library, Stack 270.2 Brown Q5. As Augustine was always trying to fight the heresy that had plagued the early church, he noticed that many of his colleagues and congregations had no doubtful beliefs about the Catholic Church. They also believed that they believed that this did not make them have a firm foundation As one of the most prominent figures of the early church, Saint Augustine was not only recognized for his leadership but also because of his knowledge and influence on the ideas and teachings of the Christian church . As a pastor, he was an important leader of the early African church; as a philosopher, he brought a new approach to the doctrine of church through the idea of ​​pagan philosophy (TeSelle 892). These accomplishments made him join Thomas Aquinas and other great church philosophers.

Exploring the religious and philosophical thinking of Ulysses, Ulysses and the greatness of God has explored the subject of religion and philosophy. Hopkins' "Greatness of God" may be more religious, and Tunisian "Ulysses" is more philosophical. From the former, the concept of "god" is clearly the best recognized leader, although different beliefs are interpreted in different ways. Hopkins himself is a devout Christian, which is evident in his sub-text. Religious philosophy is a philosophical exploration of religious problems. Conceptual analysis of various concepts of God, philosophical arguments that support and oppose the existence of God (or God), epistemological consideration on rationality of religious beliefs, philosophical consideration of theological arguments in religious philosophy, and Problems of life after death in religious philosophy Among the many topics in it. The Western religious philosophy can be traced back to Plato (eg Plato 1977) and Aristotle (Aristotle and Lawson - Tan Reed 1998), but during the Middle Ages, concerns were raised due to religious problems by philosophers became. Augustine in 2006, Aquinas 1274 and Anselm 1979 were classics of that era. The classic of the modern world is Gaskin 1998/2009. In the late 20th century, religious philosophy was born from hibernation. Philosophers study the essence of religion and religious beliefs. Western philosophers focus on ideas related to the existence and nature of the gods, the core of the Western religion. The core of the Western religious philosophy is an obvious contradiction in the claim of God's existence or proof and the description of the nature of God. In the last century, philosophers from all over the world have focused on investigating religious beliefs, religious languages, and the nature of religious thought. Indeed, some philosophers have made critical reflections and dialogues on the nature or nature of the religion itself. This article addresses religion in a traditional way and in a more modern way. It examines issues related to the existence and nature of God and takes into account the nature of religious beliefs

Mr. Murphy is ready to teach because the Bible is on the desk and the face has a smile. He taught us about our faith and God. He said he seemed to have no other teacher. I was very excited the next day. Since then, Mr. Murphy has inspired me to help me grow intellectually. Mr. Murphy is a religious teacher for St. Thomas Aquinas High School teenager and the elderly. My first year with him was to capture our view on personal beliefs and beliefs. He introduced us a new way of learning. "Islam is my religious belief, but I believe my religious belief is my personal career, it manages my private life, personal morality.The religion of these people This is the best way as philosophy is between them and the god they believe. If we discuss religion here, we have too many differences from the new wealthy ... ... I If they raise religious beliefs, we will participate in discussions and best ways to get away from discussion and differences ... Put your religious beliefs in the closet. " "This is not a big deal for me.I am not a religious human being.I think that religion is irrelevant to survival.It took me to church when I was a child.I believe in God. I believe that religion is a way human beings pull things out of people and afflict them.The religion is a personal choice and it is your choice if religion is needed.This is my I am part of my life, I believe that there is a higher presence, but I am not in the church - I am listening to the minister or obeying the rules of the church But I think that it will not save from hell. I think that I am a spiritual person. Religion is my personal personal. But I do not think I am tied to a solid doctrine. My religious belief is consistent with the philosophy of my life; it allows me to choose to obey what I think is right, correct, or true to my situation. In addition to expecting my religion to be an invisible guide, I will not regard my religion as the focus of my life. It may lead my decisions and beliefs, but it does not rule my decisions and beliefs. In this era it is very rare for individuals to have their own personal religious beliefs and beliefs. In most cases, it is not even classified as religion. Religion requires a lot of people. It is a highly reproductive individual who regards the community as a deciding factor in advancing religious beliefs and integrating them into life. - ... Ashley takes care of my parents and grandparents mainly at home. Ashley's parents said he began to worry when she got sexual prematurity at 6 years of age. They told their doctors at Seattle Children's Hospital to reduce their growth process to minimize the height and weight of her adults. They also talked about the other two treatments that I believe can improve the quality of Ashley's adult life.

In order to understand grace theology of full grace, seeing Augustine, Aquinas, Luther, Rana, Segundo and BOFF, they understand what kind of grace they are, yes. There are some valid points in their grace theory, but there are also invalid points. Augustine took a personal attitude and believed in Massa 's death. Basically, it meant that the whole body was cursed. He said that you can choose good and evil before the original sin. In addition, it is said that Augustine has a double reservation. In other words, there are just people who want to go to heaven before they are born. Justification presupposes two things, sin and grace. There is no sin, there is no need to argue: There is no grace nor possibility. From Genesis 3, Biblical chapter presupposes human sin: God's grace has found his climax in Jesus Christ and the work of the Holy Spirit, and is revealed in the covenant promises of God . We have to look at each one in turn. First, the death and resurrection of Jesus Christ is the focus of the covenant that is expected in the Old Testament, remembered in the New Testament. The incarnation of grace permits justification: sin is handled on the cross and the blood of the New Testament is exhaled. According to the Bible, sin is a punishment approach to sin: in the garden of Gethsemane, Jesus to the cross itself, the purpose of Jesus, by drinking his anger, so that his people do not drink it, father Following the rescue of. 8 Justification and redemption are not the same. Justification assumes the goal of dealing with sin Others find comfort in grace. Grace is an important central concept, especially for Christians. For many Christians blessing means forgiveness for the crime they commit and it means a crime to commit. In the Roman Catholic church, confession plays a central role. Sinners acknowledge their sins and accept prayers in the pastor and reconcile with God. This is part of the settlement and will be done on a regular basis. However, some people are not satisfied with this. They seek deeper satisfaction and recognize that they are missing. Despite strong emotions and experiences, strict abstinence behavior discipline, they have the same desire and are the same old man. The desires we experience are contrary to God's will. In other words, it is a craving for sinful something. See James 1: 14. It is also called "sin of the flesh".

The theory of war The theory of war is an acceptable ideology in the context of war, covering every aspect of war, such as reasonable reasons, treatment of prisoners, large tactics. These are all divided into two different categories; one is the right to wage and the act of war. Much of the impact of war theory involves many Christian ideals that reflect the influence of religion on the world. Some of the first known ideas on war theory can be traced back to Indian epic Mahabrarata in 400 B. Besides establishing the theory of war directly, rather than focusing on how war should cooperate We will establish the principle to apply. Just the classical theory of warfare began with the theology of Christianity. St. Augustine is believed to have presented the theory of war and justice for the first time. The saints believe that it is necessary to refer to the Bible and to do some wars to correct the evil. St. Thomas Aquinas has modified to create three standards for legitimate warfs that the Augustine version needs to be executed with justified legitimate intent and correct intent for a war. The moral defense of war is expressed in legitimate words, but the moral behavior of war is expressed in war. The theory of justice war is a set of military battle rules Only war theory and law distinguish between reason (jus ad bellum) relying on war and rational behavior in war (jus in war). Most statements of the theory of justice warfare have four principles, each with its own label. Justification, legal authority, right intent, need or last resort, reasonable hope for proportionality and success. The rule of war contains three principles: discrimination, necessity or minimum force, and proportionality. These principles express comprehensible understanding of the morality of war, in a compressed form that the basic structure is almost the same as 300 years ago. Since it develops synchronously with the state system based legal system, not the individual, its existing form theory is very different from the classical theory it belongs to.

The UK defines the political system as a set of formal legal systems constituting "government" or "state". 1 As mentioned above, the political system is an important part of every government or country. Plato discovered that each type of political system has a complementary constitution that dominates human body and soul (Republic 544e). Similarly, Aristotle acknowledged that examples of each political system could be found in families and communities (NE VIII.10, 1160b). Aristotle never agrees with Plato's Republican regime's evaluation. His politics is mainly against the Republican argument. Aristotle described three different regimes, the kingdom's power, aristocracy, and politics. These administrations deviated the institutions associated with them. Tyranny, oligarchy, democracy. The power of Aristotle's kingdom is the most popular regime, but it is not the best imaginable regime for rapid changeover to oppressive power. Hanwang is fundamental, this is one of the best principles. The Hanwang team has a prominent citizen, the king himself. This is in stark contrast to the dialogue of the king of Plato's philosopher, but the king of such a regime does not need many philosophers like a tyrant. In Plato and Aristotle, nobility is characterized by the same system. Aristotle is often said to be the opposite of his teacher Plato (eg Athens Academy of Rafael). He criticized the system described in the Republic of Plato and the law, and called the formal theory "empty vocabulary and poetic metaphor". He is generally considered to pay more attention to observation and practical attention. In the Hellenistic era, when the logic of Stoic spread, Aristotle's reputation was not large, but later freelance critic wrote his work, ultimately to Islam, Judaism, and medieval Christian philosophy I pushed forward. It made a big contribution. His influence is this, Avicenna called him "master"; Maimonides, Alfarabi, Averroy and Aquinas are "philosophers". Plato, Aristotle. Aristotle is a student of Plato. Despite being taught by Plato, they have different theories and perspectives. Their morals are classical and traditional in classical Greece, but Aristotle details the road of virtue and happiness. The political theory of Pluto's utopia society is different from Aristotle's view of "the best state of every society". Their metaphysical theory is completely contrary and very contradictory. Plato and Aristotle have come from the same age

Abstract of artificial intelligence and astronomy: Recently, as I became more computer based I noticed an interesting similarity between computer mechanics and the metaphysical aspects of the university that made Aquin. Supporters who do not have artificial intelligence theory may be interested, but this article extends some of the similarities of Aquinas. The philosophical newsgroup on the internet is titled "comp.ai.philosophy". For example, the problem of this group is constantly changing. The proximity to human consciousness of artificial intelligence (especially computers). First, there are two types of artificial intelligence. It is a computer that can execute artificial intelligence, every human ability. This is in contrast to artificial narrow intelligence that a computer with artificial intelligence can do with human but can do only in a narrow range. - Steven Mnuchin Strategy finance minister Ben Thompson recently laughed at many Twitter posts as lack of understanding about AI was lacking. He said he does not care about artificial intelligence automation, but autonomous vehicles will move from the coast to the coast in the near future. We are not doing "strong" artificial intelligence (also known as artificial intelligence) that can still accomplish all the intellectual tasks human beings can accomplish. However, a significant advance in artificial intelligence over the past few years shows that strong artificial intelligence can be achieved in the near future. Artificial intelligence requires appropriate machine learning algorithms, data and computational power. Most of today's most promising artificial intelligence techniques use neural networks. Neural networks can be small and simple, or large and powerful. The larger the neural network, the stronger it is. To achieve the limits of neural networks, and today's artificial intelligence functions, you need to use powerful computer chips. Currently, artificial intelligence is mainly directed to convolution neural network, generated confrontation network (GAN), and deep learning. We classify all of these different machine learning methods as artificial intelligence, but they are quite limited. Whenever you create a GAN or a neural network, it is common to program the system to learn over time and divide it into so-called epochs. However, the system itself is not learned. We are forced to learn it

The two early philosophers who contributed to today's educational philosophy were Abu Hamind ibn Muhammad al-Ghazali and Moses Maimonides. Some of their strongest concerns are student's free time, educational method, and their attitude toward teacher-student relationship. Two philosophers presented similar views, and some of them were different. Al Ghazali is one of the most influential educational thinkers in Islamic history. He is known as a student who wants to learn, a teacher who shares his knowledge, and a scholar who discovers more knowledge in the Islamic world. Al-Ghazali also had a significant influence on Christian medieval philosophers and Jewish thinkers such as Mimonides. According to Margaret Smith, "It is no doubt that Gazzari's work would first attract the attention of these European scholars," the largest of these Christian writers influenced by Al Ghazali St. Thomas Aquinas (1225) - In 1274 he studied Islamic writers and acknowledged them their debt.He learned at the University of Naples when the influence of Islamic literature and culture was dominant . The more popular Ben Hilomo is a Yemenian scholar and a philosopher, influenced by Nethanel ben al-Fayyumi, Maimonides, Saadia Gaon, al-Ghazali. Relationship between "pure brother's letter" and Ismailism shows that recruitment of this work is one of the main reasons for "Jewish Ismailism" discovered in Yemen · Judaism in late medieval times . "Jewish Ismy rhythm" includes adaptation of several Isaac teachings on cosmology, Judaism for prophecies and interpretations. Between 1150 and 1550, many purely compatriots affected Jewish philosophers and writers in Yemen. In midrashim of the two Yemeni philosophies written between 1420 and 1430, traces of some pure brotherhood doctrines and their digital destiny were discovered: Zerahyah ha-Rofé's Midrash ha-hefez ( "Happy learning") (a / k / a Yahya Hoter ben Solomon's Al-Tabib) and Siraj al-'uqul ("intellectual light") The ideological characteristic of Muhammad Al-Ghazali is the characteristic of the wasatiyyah school. His ideas were recognized by other well-known and influential people, including Yusuf Al-Qaradawi, Abdel-Haleem AbuShaqua, Hasan al-Turabi. Together they represent evolutionary tendencies of modernism, Al-Ghazali said that Islam shows an important meaning of equality between men and women. He insists that rather than the tradition created by God, people will delay women's development and make them religious and ignorant. Ghazali argues that women are denied remarks in the community and are limited to domestic services. He also sought a change in the Islamic general idea and misrepresented a re-evaluation of the cultural tradition resulting from the Islamic faith.

Views on human reasons The human reasons are definitely topics that can have multiple perspectives from different individuals. Descartes believes that reason is the ultimate cornerstone of human knowledge, and Pascal believes that rationality alone can not allow someone to gain knowledge. He feels the reason is limited. Both of them will do their best to support their own ideas and show their views to others. Descartes believes in feeling and believes that people can only understand things through the content of thinking by human reason. The theology of Ash'ari was founded by Abu al-Hasan al-Ash'ari. Ash'ari theology highlights various ideas, but the most obvious is God's revelation for human reasons. As described in the Qur'an, the human reason can not develop morality, which is entirely derived from the command of God. This theology also explains the sacred almighty that transcends the human will's free will. In Ashari, the Qur'an is believed to be eternal and not created. Basically, the teaching of Assuri's theology says that the content of the Quran on God should be understood directly as the truth, even though certain kinds of statements can not be perfectly conceptualized. Aristotle believes that human function is a reasonable life; this is the best and most unique of all human activities. 'Distribution is the real self of all men' because it is the best part. The reason is, in the highest sense, the person's self. Therefore, humans achieve the ultimate goal by rationally obeying. Aquinas has developed his idea of ​​Aristotle's human purpose into his own idea; he believes he is a Christian and hence human beings will be created in the "image of God". It is perfect. This is a comprehensive development of the image of God in us, therefore it is consistent with God. But we can not achieve this perfection on the earth, it will be perfect in the afterlife, so we have to work hard to achieve this goal on the planet. We divide the truth God admits into two categories. Some of the truth to God goes beyond all power of human reasons, like God to three and one. Even human reasoning can reach other things such as the existence and unity of God and philosophers proved this under the guidance of the light of natural reason. The first type of truth that can only be obtained by reason is the one that he calls faith assumption, including the truth of the existence of God and the truth of God. The second type of truth is called a mystery of faith, can only be obtained by faith, and contains the trinity doctrine. In our current life, "knowledge and understanding starts with sense", he believes that only human reason can not get these truths (ibid).

After discussing the dangers and benefits of getting a young woman who received a married placebo and Justinus, they asked their friends for comments in January. Placebo [Latin, "Please"] praise him and tells him that he has the right to marry a young woman. Justinus [L. According to my experience as a married man, I warned that "only one" would risk him and advised him not to get married. He did what he wanted to do in January but eventually suffered. Their speech is about bad advice and good advice. In January, "Discussion" (1474) between two friends, placebo and Justinas announced that he decided to marry his soul (1400-1405). Now, this so-called controversy has brought about a sarcastic existence that existed since "marriage debate", but businessmen - and some commentators - did not fully know this, and he was one of his goals It is one. Basically speaking, there is no discussion about "debate about marriage", and "hoolynesse" or "dotage" which is a substitute for merchants in this case includes a distinction without distinction. When placebo praised the decision of January (1478 - 1518), Justinus warned him that he should not hurry to do a tough and dangerous deal (1521 - 65), and they correctly won January The concept of marriage was defined. A sanctified way for men to meet (status). "Betting is more like steak than old beef" (1420) Like Justinus, as I pointed out already, I cite Bath's wife ironically, but Justinus is not worthy to argue against (1655ff.), But readers like Justinus may think unknown. Institution (1685) - 87) In fact, however, the issue of "two blessings" in January is a true theological problem in the 14th century. Dante discussed this in the fourth article of De Monarchia and Convivio The most authoritative index of the 13th century is the tradition of Albert the Great and Thomas Aquinas and of course also included in his two paradises. Medium, the land of Plugatrio and the land next to it. Indeed, from a traditional theologian's point of view, January stated the problem in the wrong way as he began with an irrational premise - Justin tried to destroy him - the marriage is a perfect Earth We guaranteed happiness

Until I was a teenager, when I was very young, I think American dreams are to have a beautiful car, a boat, a big house of one or two dogs, to live a happy life, Making money, some confectionery of men with some children and my arms. It looks good. Particularly money and a part of candy for men. When I was young, I feel that I learned sometimes how good they brought me on my birthday, based on my parents' preferences or happening at random times. It is ridiculous to think that I measured my parents' love and my happiness in the material things I received in my childhood. Happiness is happiness, happiness or contentment. They will feel happy when people are successful, safe, or lucky. "Pursuit of happiness" is the foundation of this country, and various people feel happy for various reasons. Whenever you do something that leads to happiness, people usually want more things. No one complained that I felt so happy. Obviously, feeling happiness at a particular moment and feeling happiness in a lifetime are quite different between having a good time and having a better life. Most Americans argue that pursuing happiness is their indivisible right, as the founder's father said. However, early philosophers such as Aristotle, Plato, Socrates, Rock, Aquinas, Mill did not introduce this concept as early belief that happiness was the most fundamental of all human searches It was. In Tolstoy's book "War and Peace", a Russian writer told his character, Pierre Beshof, "People were built for happiness, happiness is in mind, satisfaction with simplicity I am doing it. " Human's needs, and all misfortune is not from poverty but from excess "(trans. Louise and Aylmer Maude, 1176) So we often realize that ourselves are trying to get extra things I think that we are not satisfied with what we have and I think that happiness comes from having more things or getting more Individuals are booming. People's happiness experiences are often related to the correct lifestyle. The experience of happiness and misfortune of a person is an indicator of the person's objective position or internal supervisor in pursuing that person's life and its value. The belief that a person is prosperous is usually the product of that person's reasonable and appropriate behavior in life. Of course, he may be wrong or irrational, and his activities may not really advance his existence. When people are happy, they have a motive to act further in life - The problem in pursuing the feeling of "happiness" is that the "happy" state that we explain is emotions and emotions. Emotions and feelings are short lived and fickle. When someone falls into a traffic jam, you usually do not feel "happy" for at least that moment. "Happiness" does not explain the emotional state you are if you love a person who is ill or injured. Our human emotions are decaying, flowing, even by people who are most self-conscious and self-managing. I am lucky enough to hear the most amazing story behind the mask people go to work everyday. A real story of personal fighting, suffering, victory, courage, and resilience. I am looking at the undeveloped possibilities and complexities behind those who only know from the "title" in the organization's mining order, so I am sitting there with an emotional and reverent idea I will.

Summary of zero concept in Aristotle's philosophy: This article shows that Aristotle created the first zero concept in the history of human thought. He rejects this concept because it obviously contradicts his basic principle of metaphysics and logic. The origin and development of mathematical symbols are closely related to the development of mathematics itself and the development of philosophy. This is because philosophy provides the driving force for investigating and creating good mathematical symbols with appropriate. Thomas Aquinas (around 1225 - 7 March 1274) incorporated Aristotle's philosophy into Christianity and established a Christian philosophy on the philosophical foundation of Christianity. This had a decisive influence on Aristotle's influence on Western history. By the death of Aristotle in 322 BC, the classical philosophy ended until the 3 rd century AD was called the Hellenistic era. In the first half of this period (until the middle of the 1st century BC), practical philosophy became flourishing, the three developed school styles or philosophy styles were stoicism, epicureanism, skepticism. In the second half of the Greek era, religious orientation was adopted and New Platonism was admired. Koin n nnoia is a term from St. Philosophy, influenced by Aristotle, from influential Greek philosophy in Rome. This refers to a common concept or common concept that can be born or passed through the sensory impression of the soul. Unfortunately, few of the actual Stoic texts are left and understanding of technical terms is limited. Koinósnoûs is the term used in the epic philosopher epitectus (III.vi.8). C.S. Lewis (1967, p. 146) believes that this is similar to intelligence in "common sense" of modern English meaning, "basic psychological equipment of ordinary people". He pointed out that sensus might be a translation of noûs (eg in the Vulgate Bible), but he only found an obvious Latin text case showing this obvious meaning This is a fable writer It is an article by Phaedrus. In etymology, the term metaphysics is not useful. It means "things after physics"; this was the one Aristotle's early students used to quote Aristotle's articles on what he called "the first philosophy", in Aristotle did. The first editor of the German editor was Andronis of Rhodes as the title of this paper. Aristotle distinguishes two issues for philosophers: Firstly, to examine the nature and character of what exists in the natural world or in a rational world; secondly, to explore the characteristics of "existence" and "characteristics" It is to explore the characteristics of. A substance without movement, or the most authentic substance, is an understandable reality in which everything in nature is causally related. Aristotle is not indifferent to the facts of natural philosophy and metaphysical philosophy, but likewise he does not mind any circumstance to build empirical test theory.

From the beginning angels played an important role in Christianity and other Western religions. They are often regarded as supporters of scriptures, but the essential characteristics of the essence of the stories mentioned in these verses. Therefore, angels still play an important role in Christianity, and many parts of the world and the characteristics of multidimensional god (patella 59) are shown. In the Christian tradition the development of the angel's role is influenced not only by the Christian and Christmas decor angel depicted in the Bible stories and movies, but they also play an important role It is. Angel: superhuman mediation between sacred area and human area. Angels exist in Judaism, Christianity, Islam. Perhaps the most famous angel Gabriel, he has shown as the Messenger of God in the Quran, the Hebrew scriptures, the New Testament Christianity and Islam himself. Theological arguments about the nature of angels range from tradition to tradition (Smith and Green 1995: 49-50). Episcopal family members: the reform in the 16th century originated in the UK, and when Roman Catholic church broke Henry VII, later refused the papacy hegemony. (: 102 Mead et al. Al.2005) Some people said the English church is an "intermediate way" between Catholic and Protestant because the two traditions influenced the theology and practice of the church in England I think. The church of the UK church has the English church and the UK church in the United States. For more information on anglican families, please click here Christian religion is the most common in Los Angeles (65%), according to the Pew Research Center survey in 2014. Perhaps because of the establishment of the Franciscan monk of Roman Catholic, Los Angeles Roman Catholic Archbishop leads the country's largest archbishop. Cardinal Roger Mahoney was responsible for overseeing the construction of the angel 's Maria Cathedral, and the cathedral opened in downtown Los Angeles in September 2002. Construction of the cathedral shows the maturity of the city's Catholics and the Latin community. There are many Catholic churches and churches in Los Angeles. According to the traditions of Judaism and Christianity, so much fallen angels, like faithful angels, God says, God makes many of angels called sin and rebellion about one-third did. In his book St. Thomas · Aquinas, attention Catholic theologian name, "Theology thesis is saying": "Because it goes against angels more loyal than the faithful angels of fallen angels, it became natural order, natural The reverse order in sequence is less frequent than natural order.

Use virtue and attention: As mentioned above, attention is a mother of all virtues and a model. As Oscar did not act cautiously in the movie, he did not exercise any other advantage. Oscar did not act cautiously as there were no doctors or non-experts. He did not have a doctor as he did not listen to his best friend Angie's advice. Angie found Lenny hiding in the garage and found out that Oscar did not tell the truth. She cleansed the public to live a luxurious life and advised him not to live by telling a lie. Attention is the fourth "major virtue" that complements the moral virtue of justice, moderation, tenacity. It helps individuals to develop effective action plans, to act gently or to act bravely. Attention is not only smart, it can be used to choose a means to achieve bad results and good means. Attention is always associated with moral virtue as it is the personality and habit of choosing the best way to achieve a good goal. For Aristotle (about 350 BC / 2002), attention is also moral virtue and temperament, courage and justice. He stated that moral virtue is in stark contrast to intellectual virtue and emphasizes making its owner a good person; moral virtue can not be used for the purpose of evil. For example, some people may not agree whether it is appropriate to be brave in some circumstances, but this does not diminish the courage shown. In the absence of "page 189", "It is impossible to have excellence in the main sense" is to refer to the ability to pursue value in a manner suited to a particular situation. Unlike intellectual virtue, practical wisdom or attention, it is tightly integrated with moral virtue and can not be abused for malicious purposes because it drives moral virtue. There are several different habits and patterns of virtues. Aquinas used Aristotle's four main virtues (justice, courage, temperament, and attention) and added Christianity, faith, and charity to them (St. Paul 1 Corinthi 13). The other patterns are seven It includes fatal sin and seven virtues. For more information, see "Christian philosophy" and "Biblical law in Christianity". Confucianism and philosophy emphasize the maintenance and appropriateness of relations as the most important consideration in ethics. Morality is the need to be a relationship of people. It is worth noting that your delinquency to others is inversely proportional to their distance from you. In other words, you owe everything to your parents, but you are not responsible to strangers in any way. This can be seen as an understanding of the fact that it is impossible to love the whole world simultaneously and simultaneously at the same time. This is called Relation Ethics or Situational Ethics.

Steve Jobs was born in San Francisco, California on February 24, 1955 and died on October 5, 2011. He is an influential, innovative global leader and welcomed as a dreamer of our time, the Wall Street Journal named him "a 10-year-old man." In 2007, Fortune magazine ranked Jobs as the most powerful businessman among the top 25. US President Barack Obama (2011) said in a novel by Steve Jobs, "The world has lost foresight and Steve's success may not exceed the world, Steve Jobs is Apple's co-founder and CEO, and founder and CEO of W. He is a co-founder and CEO of Apple. Who is Steve Jobs? We told him that he is a genius, but we do not understand the word, and we did not say the meaning of that word. Steve Jobs is a thinker. Thinkers of the same meaning, Heidegger and White, Rock and Descartes, Hobbes, Cervantes, Leonardo da Vinci, Aquinas, Caesar, Alexander, Aristotle, Plato are all thinkers. I am included in Leonardo da Vinci, Caesar and Alexander, although they are not usually thought of as philosophers. Leonardo da Vinci is considered a scientist and an artist, but he is not a philosopher, not a thinker. Caesar and Alexander are considered actors, especially conquers and leaders. However, they all have a place of classical thinking. When I read the biography of Da Vinci, I remembered the way Steve Jobs worked. Jobs considers the intersection of technology and art as the birthplace of creativity. It is clear that Da Vinci came from a similar place. It is no coincidence that the two great thinkers, the two innovators driving all humanity into work, found their inspiration in the same place. This is a resonance for me as I see the truth of this understanding every day in Myplanet. Another modern change leader who changed the flow of modern technology is Jobs. As a creative thinker, Jobs met his high-tech opponent Steve Wozniak in high school. With the passion for Wozniak's electronics and pursuit of Job's constant innovation, the two companies revolutionize personal computing and can open the stage of future generations of Apple computers. As a leader of change, Jobs ignited his trust in his leadership through a series of initiatives aimed at achieving success. His relentless vision of bringing personal computing to all through miniaturization and innovative applications has led to the launch of unique and powerful personal computing devices such as iMac and iPod.

Faith is a powerful word. That word may evoke a strong emotion and cause intense debate. However, when people try to explore the subjects deeper, they need more definite definitions. It seems easy for people's interests to draw attention. That is the meaning of having faith. Many philosophers deal with the concept of faith. Evidence on this is in Kirkegaard's "Fear and Trembling" and "Nietzsche's Gay Science". These works will provide readers an attempt to answer the above questions. What does "belief" mean? I do not think this implies what you mean. Faith is neither a wishful idea nor an easy thing to believe. Faith is not a guarantee of faith in the absence of evidence. Faith is certain and can come from the evidence. This is trust to someone or something. Every time you sit in the kitchen chair you are confident. You are very confident about the chair, I have never thought about whether it will hinder you when you sit. Please read Chapter 11 of the Hebrews again. Faith in the Hebrews is not a belief in something of the past but promises to look forward to meeting hope for future results. Looking back on the past events, we believe that the event is a witness to a true witness. Do not just believe that there is no evidence. This is the basis of heretics. So you need to be confident, but what is faith? For Tolstoy, "believing is to understand the meaning of human life, faith is the power of life, he believes in something if a person is alive." He discovered this belief . Or people who are intellectuals but poor and uneducated. The meaning of simple life for simple people ... This is what Tolstoy accepts. The meaning exists in simple life and religious beliefs. Thinking - I understand and sympathize Tolstoy's view, but I can not accept his solution. I wrote a lot to this blog on why I refused to resolve the meaning of life in religion. Do not repeat what I said many times before Greek 's great novelist Nikos Kazantzakis speaks to me. I found my belief is important to me. My faith is the intellectual heritage of Thomas Aquinas and Avila Teresa. This means that Joan of Arc and Loyola Ignatius are fearless. This means fundamental sympathy for scarRomero and Dorothy Day. This means that thousands of nuns, pastors, brothers, sisters, and amateurs are working every day to repay the world around them. For everyone, this means love. Is it perfect? Absolutely not, but no one can do that. In addition, I know that I am not the only child of Catholic, not the last child. Whenever someone leaves the Catholic Church due to the position of the Church against the LGBTQ's right, another voice says "no" and the church does not have a place we use.

Resolution on New Year's Health is a major factor of the membership of the gym purchased in January. However, Jim has not offered free members to overweight or unhealthy people. In the gym, individuals are not allowed to continue to use the gym for one-time purchase. In order to gain membership in the gymnasium, an individual must pay a fixed fee every year for those who want to become members. The gift of salvation is entirely different from members of a gym or club. The Catholic Church taught a deadly act while rejecting the classical carinist's view known as "double fate". Those who believe that God was chosen for eternal life are considered to be inevitable and therefore considered to be destined to be saved by God, but the destroying people are not destined to curse. According to the Catholic church, God decided not to let anyone go to hell, so it is necessary to withdraw from deliberate God (fatal crime) and continue to the end. "Catholic is generally disappointed with human trials, speculate or predict the will of God Statement by the Catholic Encyclopedia on Booking: Completely denying human freedom is recognizing many Calvinist theology. For example, double destiny is destined to an eternal curse, is irrelevant to its behavior, and is completely depraved. Behavior Do not accept their own will - even the call of faith. This part of free will manifest itself in an attempt to defend the omniscience of God and the motive of sovereignty. However, this movement seems not to be necessary. Because of omniscience, this framework seems to confuse prediction with a strong premise. Regardless of the relationship between God and time, this deterministic view is likely to be avoided. If God does not make it in time, he will be visible soon and will notice the free actions taken by individuals without having to prejudice them. Eternity: Traditionally, God is considered to be eternal in the sense of time - that is, God is eternal or exists outside the time (Augustine, Poitius, and the views supported by Aquinas ). Another way of thinking is that the eternal nature of God is transient in time, so that God exists eternally or in time and has an infinite period in both time directions. Creator and maintainer of the world: God makes the world exist (physical and insignificant), and protects the world and everything there. So, without a moment when God exists, there is no creation at a particular moment. Furthermore, the creation does not have its causal power and responsibility at that moment unless it is provided by God at that moment.

Aristotle identified three motives for friendship: useful, happy, and kind. He thinks that when people seek friendship, they will look for those who deserve their feelings based on one of these three motivations. Whether his argument is correct is controversial. Many people may oppose the simplification of this complex theme. However, his theory is important in the context of volume 8. Friendship based on friendship between the two is considered by Aristotle to be the lowest form of friendship (Aristotle 220). All three friendships of Aristotle are beneficial, but only those who are based on virtue and have a common core values ​​can last long. "Perfect friendship is friendship of virtue," he wrote. "Because these are compatible with each other, it is per se suitable." Aristotle's scheme is not only foresightable but also practical. Ask yourself: Which category does your relationship belong to? Having some (and perhaps most) friendship is primarily for practicality and pleasure, but it is important to understand that these friendships fulfill different objectives and have a shorter lifespan than the ultimate friendship . so. Friendship after these deserve to be protected and cherished. They will not show overnight, they need a lot of energy to maintain - as Aristotle wrote, "the lack of dialogue breaks many friendships" - but from these friendships It's easy to get beyond what you get What you put Aristotle identified three motives for friendship: useful, happy, and kind. He thinks that when people seek friendship, they will look for those who deserve their feelings based on one of these three motivations. Whether his argument is correct is controversial. Many people may oppose the simplification of this complex theme. However, his theory is important in the context of volume 8. - ... Aristotle's work has remained practical, which has had a great impact on future moral philosophers. St. Thomas Aquinas and most other Christian philosophers are greatly influenced by Aristotle's work. In fact, people who follow the current "virtue ethics" movement are inspired by Aristotle himself Arille & Eudaimonia's Greek "Eudaimonia" means happiness. Rather, it means "good life" and "excellence"

INTRODUCTION The medieval world represented by Thomas Aquinas firmly believes religious teachings and regards the "large chain of existence" as a concept that gives society an absolute structure. Bay Philosophy World c. The common difference between them is d. Becker's claim is me. Philosophers of the 18th century are more like today's human beings, the 13th century theologians. II. He insists that philosophers of the 18th century tried to deconstruct paradise cities of old religious order (possibly unconsciously) and to reconstruct it on the earth. Becker was known for his 18th century philosopher urban heaven (1932) and held four lectures on enlightenment at Yale University. He argues that the philosophy in the "rational time" is more dependent on Christian hypotheses than what they admit, and exerts influence, but it is particularly attacked greatly. In this part, I explain the interests of this book in part (p.47): In the 13th century, keywords will definitely be God, sin, grace, salvation, heaven and so on; in the 19th century , Facts, facts, evolutionary progress; in the 20th century relativity, process, coordination, function, complexity This entry discusses philosophical idealism as a movement in the 18th and 19th centuries, though it was predicted in several aspects of the philosophy of the 17th century. Epistemological idealism (the content of human knowledge inevitably determined by the structure of human thought) and ontological idealism (epistemological idealism conveys the truth, thought related to it)). In this article, after discussing the pioneers, the idealistic version of the 18th century by Berkeley, Hume, Kant, the German idealist movement of the 19th century, then the idealism of British and American, and then the idealism of later Focus on attacks. Summary Moore and Russell In the 18th century, many great philosophers discussed human rights. In addition to Jean Jacques Rousseau, which has had a great influence on the French Revolution, German philosopher Immanuel Kant believes that the most basic human rights are "freedom" - he believes that all other rights are in front of the law I said that it comes from equality wait. In support of such an ideal concept, a smart contract called "DAO - Local Government Organization" gathered about $ 160 million. But something went wrong and some funds were stolen by hackers. It is obvious that this problem is related to the application (track), not the block chain itself.

Seeing the beauty of Christ: The blessed paradox I. Introduction A. Center Psalm Psalm 27: 4 "I have one thing to ask the Lord, I will seek, Life looks at the beauty of the Lord Then ask at his temple: "The word used here by David" Beauty "is the word" Noam "meaning brilliant or pleasant. C. The reason Jesus Christ is very respectable, precious, very beautiful and very glorious is that Jonathan Edwards calls "a stunning combination of all kinds of excellence". The beauty and excellence of Christ is not a simple matter. Seeing the beauty of Christ: The blessed paradox I. Introduction A. Center Psalm Psalm 27: 4 "I have one thing to ask the Lord, I will seek, Life looks at the beauty of the Lord And ask to his temple. "The word" beauty "used by David here is the word" Noam ". - My weekend family left childhood, I like to escape from my daily life alone with my family or close friends. There is a pathway in the old battlefield forest, I will walk the dog and change the scenery. Pond, my friends, and I go to throw stones to see someone they can leave the most distant place It was a coincidence that I was born and grew up with these five crazy families. I have opinions, so I can call them beauty right now, and you know that the word is beautiful, it is an eye, not a bystander's mind. We have a very strict mother and a father who is open minded. This is a natural service to parents. Of course, because we are doing our best, I do not think there is any reason why any of the five people complain or oppose it. "Crazy Family" is basically included: Mom, your typical African iron woman. She received other illusions, such as lieutenant and chief commander. Is it all military? Yes, the house is military. She always insists on having a clean body and a clean soul. Her idea is that as a value and tradition it means that it is penetrating into a true African man or woman. Everyone who passes her life camp is different from others. She is truly a genuine jewel They said that beauty lies in the eye of the beholder. Beauty is caused by people bringing happiness, things, situations. If this is the case, and in business, the happiness in the eyes of the spectators is the experience the customer will feel when interacting with your brand. It is a beautiful business to provide a company that constantly brings joy and a customer experience. Philosophers such as George Santayana and Thomas Aquinas have studied the concept of beauty for a long time; to understand what beauty is, just as it is

Former prisoners of war lawmaker John McCain is working hard to oppose President Trump's attitude towards torture. When discussing the method of interrogation called the water battle that was banned in Congress, the presidential election president said, "I love it, I do not think it is strong enough." And argue that torture does not produce reliable intelligence. What do you think? Read the rest and vote below. The cards nominated a parliamentary member Mike Pompeo (R-Kan.) To lead the CIA, and he said that he will regain the water. The American Civil Liberties Union is strongly opposed to the stance of Pompeo's voice against torture, which is believed to be an infringement of the constitution and international law. Torture is an unacceptable evil. Except for two cases. One is a time bomb. An innocent life is being threatened. The bad guy you caught has information that can save your life. He refused to disclose. In this case, selection is easy. The second exception to the rule that there is no torture is high value information with the possibility to save lives, to obtain information from high-value enemies. This situation lacks the clarity of the black and white of the time bomb scene. We do not know much about the length of the fuse and the nature of the next attack. However, I know that the danger is great. I know what I must do, but I do not know the location or method - I do not know until I get the information. When dealing with a massive terrorist attack, the position for torture by Berl Falbaum may not be black and white. Let's assume that the United States captured enemy spies He knows that hundreds of thousands will be killed when starting a nuclear attack in major US cities. Should the United States torture spies to get information and rescue the American cities? ... Unfortunately, not abstract concepts, no matter how beautiful it is, we must act according to reality. Indeed, we live in a world where there are people who oppose our approach to the value of human lives. Is torture reasonable in the world after 9/11? FRONTLINE gathered groups of legal thinkers to answer this question. Some of them have studied the problem of torture together for a joint project with Harvard Law School and the Kennedy government graduate school of Harvard University. The organization reported that it is sometimes called "torture and streamlining" strategy, trying to establish some restrictions and monitoring procedures for the use of "highly mandatory measures". " Is the problem of interlacing meaningful? "The problems are: Is war meaningful?" It seems that this is appropriate as torture is the subject of war. The theory of fair war can be used to justify torture because it can accept certain circumstances. St. Thomas Aquinas (1225-74) stated 'jus ad bellum' and he believed that the conditions that the war had to fulfill were reasonable. War has to be ordered by a legitimate authority, it must be fired for good reasons and the intention of the war people should be good at defeating evil (Almond, 1998, p. 197). Of course, the problem with using this theory of justice war is that conditional satisfaction is subjective. However, if torture is done by a legitimate government, torture may be morally justified if its overall goal is good and has the best intent.

Bishop of Hippo Augustine was one of the greatest theologians of his time. He is still considered to be the most advanced. He was brought up in a dismissed house, but as time went on he found out the truth. He is always an excellent student. He completely acquired Latin; however, he did not catch the Greeks. He is also very embarrassed about his speech - if you want, he will use the rhetorical black band. After teens turmoil and rebellion, he found a heretic and participated for a while. He traveled in Milan, landed for a while, and met the bishop. Sant Augustine in Hippo (354 - 430 BC) was an Algerian - Roman philosopher, Rome / early medieval theologian. He was one of the most important early persons in the development of Christianity in the West and was an important person in the bringing of Christianity into the rule of the former pagan Roman Empire. He is often the father of Orthodox theology, the greatest of the four Latin church fathers (and St. Ambrose, St. Jerome and St. Gregory). Unlike scholars after Aristotle adopted Aristotle as Christian thought as a classic model, Augustine developed a system of philosophy and theology using Plato and Neoplatinic elements to support Christian legitimacy did. Many of his works have had a major impact on the medieval world view. The medieval Christian philosophy is based on the work of Bishop Augustine Bishop and theologian Thomas Aquinas and understands the evil from the viewpoint of the absolute Bible and the error of the Bible and Plato and Aristotle high their concept of Summum bonum I am evaluating. The influence meditation is a way to understand good ideas. The background of the important enlightenment of the "good" research is its significance in the study of "good, true and beauty" seen in Immanuel Kant and other enlightened philosophers and religious thinkers. These discussions were made by Kant, especially in the context of his practical rational criticism. Saint Augustine has a deep and complicated character. He is a philosopher, a theologian, a mysticist, a poet, a lecturer, a debater, a writer and a shepherd. Many of his qualities praise each other, saying "Heather Bishop" of Pipp XI "Almost none or only a few people can start from humans until today". Shepherd, he defined himself as "a servant of Christ and servants of the servant of Christ". His life embodies these words as all the consequences: to make the most of the need of the believer. Ask for a redemptive request ("I do not want to be saved without you"); ask God to prepare for his flock for death; even if they abuse him for not having love for him . In a nutshell, he is the shepherd in a perfect sense.

Introduction This article examines the influence of the Catholic Church on specific schools; the school is St. Francans College of Craia. "The church has been deeply involved in education, which has great influence on the essence of already developed educational models." Coolahan (1981) examined the influence and effect and result of the Catholic Church on school To do. Today the school came here. First I will look at Saint Francine and its historical and religious background. As a member of the St. Thomas Aquinas Catholic Church in the Shreveport parish, we will review our mission to spread the gospel of Jesus Christ to the local Catholic college community in Ruston, Louisiana. We are welcomed and serving in the spirit of God and Assisi St. Francis dedicated to this community. The Catholic University is a learning center of three schools that reflects the life and mission of Jesus Christ. St. Agnes, St. Clair, Saint Ignatius Loyola, inspired by the community of the Catholic University trying to confront the reality of our lives. Acknowledge everyone's dignity and value and celebrate. Foster relationships based on integrity and compassion, forgiveness and love. Engender is full of hope for a better future. In order to realize and realize their vision, the Catholic University community aims to: We will offer various educational opportunities to meet the needs of students. Build a positive learning environment and promote high achievement standards. Increase responsibility, self-control and respect others. Maintain a safe, peaceful and cooperative environment. Trust each other, believe in yourself and make a better contribution to our world essay.com/Analyse and the latest research information - research report on training and development at the Catholic University Analysis and presentation of research information - Investigation report on cultivation and development of Catholic University In 1944, the tragic car accident led to Clair's only child, 19-year-old Stanford's senior. Claire relied on the Bishop Fulton scene for spiritual guidance and was included in the Roman Catholic Church in 1946. Later, her writing energy concentrates on her spiritual life. She wrote a script of a movie focused on the life of two nuns and came to Maron to receive Oscar (1949) for the best movie recommendation. She played an important role in the establishment of the Atomic Energy Commission and was appointed as the American ambassador to Italy, becoming the first American woman to join her as the world power. In 1981 President Reagan appointed Clair as a member of the President 's diplomatic advisory committee and received the President' s Medal of Freedom in 1983.

The phrase "philosophy" is derived from the two roots of "philosophy" and "Sophia." Philo means love, Sofia means wisdom. Therefore, philosophy means love for wisdom. In fact, philosophy requires investigation, pursuit and quest of wisdom. Many great philosophers call philosophy an art of thought. Other people simply define it as a systematic study of human emotions and thoughts. It is worth noting that many fields that have been philosophical so far have been separated into independent fields. Ancient Western philosophy is generally divided into three periods. Initially, all the thoughters before Socrates were called PreSocratics, the second period covered the life of Socrates, Plato and Aristotle, and the last period encompassed various developments of philosophy including Stow. Ge School, Epicurean School, Skeptics, Neopra Tonics, Aristotle School. The end of ancient philosophy meant that Christianity had spread in the sixth century, but Socrates before the Greek philosopher was called the former Socratic philosopher or the former Socratic philosopher. They were the first Western philosophers to become active in the 5th and 6th centuries BC. In ancient Greece. These philosophers are able to consistently and comprehensively describe all the natural phenomena and events in human life without resorting to myths of the original principle (arkhöh; ἀρχή; origin or Try to discover the starting point). The phrase "modern philosophy" is a philosophical terminology that refers to a specific period in the history of Western philosophy (ie the philosophy of the 20th century and the 21st century). However, this expression is often compared with modern philosophy (pointing to the early stages of Western philosophy), post modern philosophy (which refers to the criticism of continental philosophers against modern philosophy), and non - technical use of phrases. Recent philosophical work The modern age was a very innovative era in Western philosophy. New spiritual and material theory, new concept of God, new political philosophy, and civil society theory are proposed. This period was from the end of the 15th century to the end of the 18th century (about 1500-1800). Books published by philosophers such as Descartes, Rock, Hume, Spinoza, Leibniz, and Kant will form an understanding of our modern philosophy. The early modern philosophical roots can be traced back to the 1200s - maturity and speculation of academic tradition. The philosophy of Thomas Aquinas (1225-1274), Occam (1288-1348) and Brydan (1300-1358) emphasizes the ability of human rationality. With such abilities, we can fully understand secular and sacred things.

Aristotle's work remained viable and it had a great impact on future moral philosophers. St. Thomas Aquinas and most other Christian philosophers are greatly influenced by Aristotle's work. Indeed, people who follow the current "virtue ethics" movement are inspired by Aristotle himself. The dictionary of Arête & Eudaimonia's Greek word "Eudaimonia" means happiness. More precisely, it means "good life" and "excellence". Aristotle believes that achieving happiness is the ultimate goal and maximum goal of human life (Carreras, 2011). In the book "Nicmarkan Ethics" Aristotle will use his distribution to build the best way to live and be happy. Aristotle said: "So, virtue is a country that decides on average for our average, that is the average between the two vices, one is surplus, Aristotle is Nicomacare in morality Talked about human virtue, courage, calmness, generosity, grandeur, magnificence, and calmness - through the third book from the beginning of Nicomachean ethics Aristotle distinguishes between pain and happiness, Aristotle believes in the pursuit of human happiness; traditionally being rebutted in the modern secular environment Aristotle will soon be able to fight against all extremes All human activities should be beneficial, as the actions of the people insisted that they are for good. We usually think that happiness is excitement and satisfy or feel the smile's impulse, but the ancient philosopher regards happiness as virtue. According to Aristotle, happiness is the purpose of achieving ourselves. For humans, this means participating in rational activities, thinking, living with honesty, justice, courage and confidence. This is quite different from the concept of modern happiness. We tend to regard happiness as an emotional state that can control the achievement's climax and feel the pressure and pain of the world. It is exciting and happy, but it is fleeting. On the other hand, Eudaimonia is an eternal existence state.

The opinion on the second question is quite different. The laws that Platon and Aristotle, the two most influential ancient Greek writers, went there do not have any exceptions. But if one adopts the Bible's view, God can not only enact the Law but also pray to attract people to make exceptions - to cure the late stage illness and to bring drought ahead of time Finished, the Olympic campaign regained it. Contrary to Descartes' viewpoint, almost all Christian thinkers believe that God must be able to interrupt the law in order to achieve miracles. Natural law, natural law There is a natural law that supports the contents of law. We can build this through science, philosophy, and theology. It is not affected by the whim of capital fantasy, and if it is infringed by the government, free men may legally rebel to restore good governance. Because it is the foundation of tyranny, the government can not simply legislate to achieve what it wants to exist. Presence of permanent and elite institutions (such as the House of Representatives and the Senate) as a trial of enthusiasm for democracy at the decentralizing lower house. These remains will be sitting for a long time, preferably consisting of very rich or powerful people who are not interested in being bought. They are looking at long term. They are not "experts", experts are just men, it is easy to purchase. In other words, he is a democratic politician. John Locke, in particular in two government papers, incorporates the laws of nature in his many theories and philosophies. Although the effect of lock understanding is usually based on Hobbes' contract theory, there is a much more similar discussion as to whether his concept of natural law is more similar to Aquinas (filtered by Richard Hook) or Hobbes is there. The theory of people who fix Hobbes. . Mr. Rock stated that if the ruler could not defend "life, freedom, property" by breaking the natural law, thinking that as a matter of course, it could overthrow the existing state and create a new state , Hobbes' provision. Some people think this is a false problem. They say that the political philosophy of rock is not entirely based on natural law but based on natural rights like Thomas Hobbes' philosophy. This may be the biggest controversy in today's rock interpretation. Natural law theory thinks that humans are bound by moral law. Morals are fundamentally responsible, and everyone must abide by the responsibilities of natural law. Thomas Hobbes devised a new approach His morality is not in the workplace, but at the right time, everyone has the right to protect themselves and pursue their own interests. I want to do

Dogma of grace of reason and faith Jesus is a model of human existence. The positive confrontation of Jesus in loyalty to God is related to the revelation of the existence of human beings. I pass you that Christ died for our first important important sin, according to the Bible, he is that I was accepted and buried, This is the third of his before Corinth I explained one, but the day has come back. Gay "is not really for a service, not for a service, it is a really perfect person for the service," he said. On defense 7 John Calvin - just for the nature of defense - - Christ and UNITED double graveler leads to her justification and trade union of believers in Christ but the process of revitalizing the Trent Council on justification Began - The essence of justice to prove the nature of defense - God must be free to give or maintain a gift of grace - - Las Orbase Gothic Cover Wiley · Blackwell 2010 8 Preview Salvation Guarantee Augustine's Doctrine: Double Fate Catholic Discussion: Thomasism, Moline Doctrine and Jeannenism - Aquinas - Monastery School - Jeannisum Protestant Discussion: Calvinist Doctrine and Amini - John Calvin - 5 Calvin Complete Human Falls and Attractions Unconditional election of limited limited compensation At the grace · saints patience Willie · Braut Quwel 2010 Alistair McGrath, Christian theology: Introduction Chapter 14 Humanity, sin and grace Willie Blackwell 2010 The claim (Section VI) is rather based on the cooperation of the proposed human and God's grace than the passive acceptance of the Protestant doctrine of grace. Protestant understanding of "faith of loneliness" is one of the sacred doctrines of simple caring trust in human compassion, the board rejects "useless self-confidence" Protestant, no one gained the grace of God I pointed out that I can not know. In addition, the Council, contrary to Protestant teachings, the grace of God is forfeited by human sin If one insists that it is necessary to preserve more faith in Christ, the doctrine center of justification is rejected. Does this mean becoming a righteous person and being saved by grace? Whatever you do, it means justice and redemption, regardless of what it is. Therefore, regardless, people say that salvation is necessary shameless for the people of the visible church, he said: People not only get help but also get justice through the grace of faith, this Well, through work, it belongs to visible religious behavior Well. Likewise, those who believe in addition to members of communion need salvation

Everyone in the brain smiles at a certain time, looking at humor, laughter, itch. The first laughter appeared at 5 to 4 months old (8). Before I can talk. The average adult laugh 17 times a day (4). Even monkeys and baboons have a look similar to a human smile. But, in fact, why do we laugh? Why can not we hurt ourselves? Why are parts of the brain responsible for laughter and humor Why do some people say that they do not have a sense of humor? In the last century, Max Eastman (1936) developed an early theory of a humorous game that humor is in itching of animal games, especially chimpanzees. He thinks, "We have an instinctive tendency to laugh when entering the world and have this feeling to respond to interesting pain" (45). According to Eastman, in humor and drama, we take a selfless approach to what we can take seriously. In the late 20th century, Ted Cohen (1999) wrote about the social benefits of jokes, and many psychologists confirmed that Aquinas' sense of humor is moral. The chapter "Character and Virtue: Handbook and Classification" of the American Psychological Association is "humorous" under "the power of transcendence". Participation in humor can increase tolerance to ambiguity and diversity and promote creative problem solving. Everyone in the brain smiles at a certain time, looking at humor, laughter, itch. Before we could talk, the first laughter appeared at the age of approximately 3.5 to 4 months (8). The average adult laugh 17 times a day (4). Even monkeys and baboons have a look similar to a human smile. But, in fact, why do we laugh? Why can not we hurt ourselves? What part of the brain is the cause of laughter and humor - Hamlet's destructive humor is fun, exciting, sometimes cynical and destructive. Humor 's humor insulted all the people around him. It was very cynical and led to his disappointment. When Hamlet insulted the people around him, the people he insulted were uncertain about his remarks. When Hamlet criticized Bolonis in his words, he made Polonius look like a fool, and Polonius did not know that he was deceived. First of all, laughter is not the same as humor. Laughter is a physiological response to humor. Laughter consists of two parts - a set of gestures and sounds. When we laugh, the brain makes us do both activities at the same time. When laughing lively, many parts of the body, even the muscles of the arms, legs, trunk change. Philosopher John Morel wonders if the first human laughter began as a gesture of mutual relief in a dangerous process. Laughter may show trust to fellows due to relaxation caused by short laughter. "When people feel open and free, laughter happens when people feel comfortable with each other, the more laughing, the more relations within the group," Morreall said.

Modern Thinkers: Plato, Aristotle, Augustine, Aginas Question 1: Discuss the democracy of Greek city politicians, especially Perinopolis, Plato, Aristotle of Athens. It also describes the fate of Greek city states in the context and history of Socrates, Plato and Aristotle. Between Pellicle, Plato and Aristotle, Greece was divided into various constitutions, from military dictatorship of Sparta to direct democracy of Athens. Augustine is an excellent philosophical character between Plato and Thomas Aquinas, this period lasted 1600 years and covered even the lives of famous thinkers like Aristotle. Augustine introduced the fusion of Platonism and Christianity through his Apuleius, Plotinus, Porphyry reading. One of the things he allowed us to integrate Platonic's philosophical tradition with Christianity was that the latter was not a philosophy but a set of historical beliefs. The basic idea of ​​Christianity is that God created our world and then lived through Jesus of Nazareth. Jesus lived in a particular place in the world at a specific time and lived a special historical process. To believe in Christians, including believing in this, and to live in Jesus the way God tells us through Jesus, in particular in the Gospel of John, is also referred to as a signature or "Tao." Modern Thinkers: Plato, Aristotle, Augustine, Aginas Question 1: Discuss the democracy of Greek city politicians, especially Perinopolis, Plato, Aristotle of Athens. It also describes the fate of Greek city states in the context and history of Socrates, Plato and Aristotle. - In "Protagoras", Socrates and Protagora are discussing why participating governments are open to the whole people, but technical problems such as health, art, buildings, etc. require qualified persons. Discussion assumes that honesty and sharpness are necessary virtues for democracy, that citizens must rely on proper functioning and apply. Many people refer to Socrates, Plato, Aristotle, or Stoic School as another source of wisdom for atheists. Socrates, Plato, Aristotle or Stoic seems to be a good choice for organized religion, if you are thinker and tolerant of philosophical thinking and life. This is the essence of religious organizations and religious organizations must be good people or not at different times. While Aristotle desires the meaning beyond the faith of God in connection with the philosophical thinking of Socrates, Plato, Aristotle, or Stoic, science with theology at the apex of speculative science is called natural philosophy ( Biology etc). , Mathematics and theology. Likewise, Stoic Chrysippus claims that theology is the realization or aim of philosophy.

Please fight for the place with the first effective cause and something with God. Why do some people firmly believe that God exists? St. Achinas does not believe there must be a valid first reason to conclude that God is the cause. I will assume that Aquinas has to do such a big jump for one reason and that this reason must be God. From a scientific point of view, using substances as the first reason is not so rational. After all, according to the law of conservation of matter, substances can not be created or destroyed. First thing is the first thing: Laura Ingraham foolishly makes fun of Hogg being rejected by college. No need to choose; in addition to choosing a fight, she fought with him for no reason. As far as I know, Ingraham chose to fight. Even if you despise someone - in this case, the malicious puppy Hogg can not stand it anymore - you'll never throw the first punch. You never do unnecessary atrocities and you never try to attack anyone. In other words, we still need to defend Ingraham. We can not kill anyone who is not good for this teenage monster personally or economically. Inglamham is worth burning with social media; she should not ruin her career. This is too much. But this is the nature of the beast, this is the way we fight now. Do you want this? No, of course not. But we are here to welcome the corner Fortunately, counterattacks are not too late. People are awake from sleep and are rising to resist the political bias of Silicon Valley companies and mainstream media elites. For the first time, we emphasized the desire to witness the global harmony of labor and technology, and to spread the truth at a deep philosophical and intellectual level. Thousands of everyday patriots are participating in this wonderful human experiment and giving precious time. In the face of all difficulties of institution establishment, they dominate voice Many of us have experience with organizations that place emphasis on results. Initially people were proud of fire rather than fire protection. A fantasy game is underway that loses the power to improve efficiency and quality and continues to work for a long time. Next is the competitive advantage and team morale. In the next two weeks, I will not be very tolerant of behaviors that show lack of trust or behavior that focuses on individual self. I encourage conflicts, promote clear promises and I hope that all of you have accountability to each other. When I see it, I will demand bad behavior, and I would like to see you doing the same thing. I do not have time to waste

Discussion Socrates is a controversial person. He is depicted as many different characters such as the elderly voice of a voice, such as the cleverness of a great philosopher. The real nature of Socrates is questionable. He is talking about his life view and his life philosophy. Several discussions he spoke were very striking when lying. These arguments are brute and are very obvious throughout his dialogue. According to his dialogue, he felt there were two different lies. Discussion on lying: people should be allowed to make choices based on truth. If one wants a young partner for chemical appeal and worries about older spouses being culturally different, or is afraid of getting sick soon, this is their right. Also lying about age builds your liars relationship, which usually brings more lies. And this assumes that you have not been found all. If on the first day you seem to be older or more ambiguous than you said, even if he / she likes your company, that person will not trust you and will break the relationship maybe. This article shows the authenticity of the relationship between the doctor and the patient, but it is not for flat or insensitive communication. This estimate is always for the truth and lies. However, these arguments support the need for humanitarian clinical judgment about what is being said, time, manner and content. Probably the best way to summarize this discussion is to discuss this topic with a sensitive and humanitarian doctor. Dr. Cicely Saunders, the founder of the hospice movement. Every patient needs to explain his illness and if he wishes to cooperate with his own treatment or to reduce the burden of fear of unknown, this is easy to understand and convince him. Whether to diagnose in a promising situation or to confirm a poor prognosis Although the arguments advocated by Kant and Saint Augustine are effective, they are not always logical and are not always applicable to all situations in accepting liars' non-intelligence. St. Thomas Aquinas agrees with St. Augustine and Kant, lying separately constitutes a mistake or sin; however, he further classifies three different lies. The first one is polite or profitable lies. Secondly, a liar is considered a joke. Finally, the most serious thing is that a mischievous lie is told to others by malicious intent. This is a lie the ancestor of Osprey said. Therefore, Akinus defined the lie as "the heart of one person, and others said that." This is a good definition for Kant and Augustine's total ban on lies. Another way to oppose their view is to argue from a moral point that a lie may not be a real lie. In this case, I think that it is no problem to lie.

Many people have experienced and learned new things for many years. The young generation continues to introduce new and interesting things, generations that they have never thought of before. The three major generations I would like to discuss are the X generation, the Y generation, and of course the Z generation. Each generation of these generations has some useful and important things. For example, my parents' teenagers experienced totally different things. There are things that the young generation can not imagine, but I can teach younger generations more about morality and values. Generation (1963 - 1978). At the beginning of their generation, an event that will forever affect the lives of all people will be a civil rights movement. Judging from the years of hatred and discrimination in front of them, the X generation has fortunately witnessed a contrast between two different anti-civil rights worlds and those who support the movement. People who can see all cultures and religions start fighting not only for generation X, which is the generation of their children, but also for their own rights, not to shrink generations. Now that we see such a powerful era, the X generation's view no longer has a meaningless influence on other races, religions, and minorities, and this generation is the same as child acceptance and equality I will inherit my viewpoint. Generation X also provides the young generation with excellent traditions and respects they have learned from baby-boomer generation. However, compared to 80 years ago, the X generation was able to decompose the tradition into a few extreme states. Generation X can accept foreign cultures and religions, but they accept it. All generations have paper worth providing >>> Click here <<< Each generation has something worth having to offer prose America Avenue Zipper 10001. Paper proposal note 3 Answers to entries, Alfred University, Alfred. All generations are worth providing what is worth providing online articles to Ontario Carder Road zip 10004 Someone proposed my paper at $ 10 on 15th Street 15th zipper and reviewed literature on cheap abortion 30th Street West zip 10001 Appendix, Washington Square, West Zip 10014, Admission Paper Writing Skills E 8th Street zip 10003 article example Each generation is valuable to provide paper on Oneida Structure Paper Methodology Application Letter There are some information. New York Schoharie cheats on 81st Street Eastern Zip Code 10028 There are some valuable things that you can provide papers on how to write research papers that are different from other types of writing on each postal code. 120th Street, East zip 10035 Behavioral Economics Case Study Order a periodical publication that is about to expire. Sparkill's St. Thomas Aquinas College has some valuable information to provide papers to each generation.

I believe in multipurpose, omnipresent authors. It is easiest to understand that this is a form of men and other similar people, but I think this is not the case. God is perfect. God is perfect because he created perfection. This leaves only two choices; everything is perfect as God created it. Everything is not perfect compared to God. People are far from perfection and are actually the most imperfect people in the kingdom of God. Although only human beings can deliberately commit sin, other creatures on Earth can not commit that it is wrong, but treat as an instinctive act rather than a crime like a crime is. . Complete to God, complete to God. ■ Treat God completely. These are the expressions found in the Old Testament. They all show a relationship. The choice or purpose of God in mind is to trust and obey God from the bottom of our hearts. The first words of the New Testament quickly brought us to a very different level and opened up to us what Christ brought us. Not only is it perfect for God but also God is perfect, this is the beautiful future we bring to us. It reveals an endless enrichment of the meaning of word completion in the heart of God. It quickly gave us the only criteria for targeting and judgment. It eliminates all hope Now, the will of God is the perfection of God himself - sanity, justice, purity, kindness, truth; everything contrary to the integrity of thought, speech, action is sin. The perfection of the people and the will of God, the completeness of God is the sanctity or perfection of the human soul, the more it obeys God's will, the more holy and perfect it is. Therefore, contradiction with God is to be deformed, the strange deformation of the human body is no more humiliating, it is not so terrible - but it is humble and ugly compared to the deformity of the soul. When the soul is different from God, when it departs from the completeness of God is not pure, not pure, not just and unfair, not just the truth, the error, but the mercy, not the cruel but the opposite: The malformations and ugliness that can be attacked are very terrible In deciding the content of God's thought, Aristotle used the form of discussion known in metaphysics as a complete metaphysical doctrine. God is considered perfection and Aristotle simply incorporates God's perfect teachings into his logical conclusion. The perfect being can only think about perfect ideas. Every imperfect thing is perfect and not contradictory. Therefore, the only content of thinking deserving to be considered by perfect divinity is itself. So God is thinking about himself. If he wants to think about something other than himself, he will think of imperfection. This shows that God does not consider the world. When Aquinas thinks about himself, I believe that God understands the world indirectly.

Scientist Aristotle (384 - 322 BC) has developed a number of important theories that form the basis of modern physics. One of the theories is Aristotle's theory of motion. Through his work Aristotle tried to explain how objects in the universe move. Many of his theories have proved inaccurate, but they provide the foundation for future theory, and ultimately lead us to understand today's movements. To understand the theory of Aristotle's general movement in general, you must first understand the classification of his substance. Aristotle's scientific theory and movement thought are quite incorrect. Aristotle thought that it was necessary to explain why the movement occurred and why the movement changed. The true correct idea is that motion does not need to be explained, but it only changes the movement that requires a physical reason. Aristotle gave three grounds for the movement: many theories about Aristotle's movement are not true. As he said, the movement said it had to be caused by force. To explain why the arrow flew around after the strings were not pushed, he said that the air was pushed forward rushing forward behind the arrow. The arrow shot in the vacuum room does not fall to the floor immediately as you leave the bow, so you can see that this is wrong. Aristotle's exercise explanation can be found in physics. Through this movement, Aristotle (384 - 322 BC) understood any form of change. He defines movement as a reality of possibility. Initially, the definition of Aristotle seemed to contain contradiction. However, an commentator on Aristotle's work, such as St. Thomas Aquinas, argues that this is the only way to define movement. In order to fully understand the definition of Aristotle's movement, it is necessary to understand his meaning through reality and possibility. Aristotle (384 - 322 BC) presented a discussion about the existence of God (which can be said to be a God beyond God). Aristotle's debate begins with changes in visible movements and things around us. Based on his theory of causation in movement, change, and physics, Aristotle continues to provide evidence that there are pioneers of all other promoters which themselves are not touched in any way. The first immovable mover is a hypothesis designed to explain the persistence of movement and the changes around us. "Discussion from exercise" is not a dialectical exercise, it can provoke God's irrational recognition, but proved to be proved according to the proof standard proposed by Aristotle in the post hoc analysis. In later metaphysical work Aristotle separated the animal-free animal from the substance and treated it as malicious or mind. People think that this is what they think. Both Plato and Aristotle have a common view.

Torture is a process that exerts pain on others to force others to say something contrary to their will. The word "torture" comes from the Latin "torquere", which means distortion. Torture can be psychological as well as mental pain. Torturing individuals before enlightenment is perfectly legal, but now it is illegal to torture someone under any circumstances. In this article, I will prove why torture is not accepted regardless of conditions. It is very difficult to judge whether torture is acceptable. From another point of view, it can be said that everyone has their own opinion when considering the problem, but this is very contradictory. It is well known that there are thousands of torture cases, such as preventing terrorist attacks and obtaining important information, and in some cases being tortured. Clearly, there are other ways to obtain useful information that can save lives, but it also proves that no one can receive torture, so be honest. Some of them are lying when they are tortured, and some do not say anything. Many experts believe that torture is effective, but the other side of the problem remains unclear. Because even an innocent person may be tortured and murdered by mistakes. In this case, torture is unacceptable Is the ultimate goal acceptable? Torture should not be as imaginable as slavery. In principle, since the end of World War II, governments around the world have agreed to prohibit torture even during war and terrorist acts. International treaties on torture and other inhumane and degrading acts are one of the most widely ratified treaties. Supporting these practices is not for the US alone; it is minimal in extreme cases ("torture and necessity principle"). According to a survey of abused prisoners in October 2006 by BCC, more than a third of nine countries believe that torture is allowed to some extent if they can save their lives ("Is that appropriate?"). In addition, two ethical theories were used in discussing whether torture was right or wrong: morality and Utilitarianism ("torture and rights") The question "Do torture makes sense?" Is "whether war can prove to be justified". This is appropriate as torture is the subject of war. Just the theory of war can be used to justify torture because it can accept certain circumstances. St. Thomas Aquinas (1225-74) stated 'jus ad bellum' and he believed it was reasonable to meet the conditions of war. War has to be ordered by legitimate authority, it must be fired for good reasons, and the intention of war veterans should be good at defeating evil (Almond, 1998 , P. 197). Of course, the problem with using this theory of justice war is that conditional satisfaction is subjective. However, if torture is done by a legitimate government, torture may be morally justified if the government's overall goal is good and has the best intent.

The role of social commentary on art and literature often is controversial. After the publication of the Satan poetry of Satan Rushdie - a book outlining the history of Muslims in the UK - an appeal to the death of the author was raised. Although it is not uncommon for modern critics to have problems, past artists are often criticized for their opinions and works of art. For example, Dostoevsky was banished for years and was mostly executed due to his view. Imagine being taught by the best master of ideas about this planet, such as Plato, Jefferson, Franklin, Rock, Voltaire, Dostoevsky, Dickens, Aristotle, Aquinas etc. It is dead, but it still exists in a wonderful book. If you can imagine such a place, you will imagine wonderful books and liberal arts education. Some of the world's most famous discoveries are made through university research. Due to the invention of telegraph, discovery of AIDS, the origin of the Internet, and the latest advances in stem cell research, our national universities are the center of knowledge and discovery and 56% of our basic research is done at university I will. I have witnessed the importance of art and humanities as professional artists, curators and art professors at the university. They play an important role in shaping our perspectives and enriching our lives. Art and humanity are neither tools for personal expression nor celebration of celebrations, but we will challenge our perception of society. Art and humanities science stimulate, challenge and expand our ideas. They encourage us to think critically and let us experience the world through the reality of others. Art is a universal language that helps us understand diversity, culture and the most complicated problems. Art is what makes us humans This is a beautiful idea recognizing the influence of the Earth's space, the moon, and the Earth's perspective on art and culture, as the human beings first turn their eyes on the sky. Recognizing the importance of art and artists, SpaceX and Maezawa can inspire and inspire human curiosity and encourage us to broaden our horizons. More importantly, they can help all of us get the space. Space tourism is not a new concept, and companies that provide such trips often claim they are "democratizing" the universe. McDonald's Douglas engineer Charles Walker was the first civilian to participate in the space mission and he did it three times between 1984 and 1985 at a price of $ 40,000 (about $ 97,000 today) . In 2001, California billionaire billionaire Dennis Tito spent $ 20 million ($ 28.5 million) on an 8-day trip by Russian rocket based on Virginia's space adventure.

The existence of God "I can not think of anything obviously opposed to myself, but I can think of the opposite of the proposition" God exists ". (Thomas Aquinas) Some say that God is the omnipotence of the universe and the omniscient being. In other words, God is omnipotent, knows and manages the universe, but only to prove the existence of God, it's just ridiculous. People who laugh always are not always right. There is much debate about the existence of God about the existence of God. For a long time everyone wanted to prove the existence of God. Some people think that God exists and is proved by many philosophical or scientific foundations and religious reasons. On the other hand, others do not believe in the existence of God and their foundation is proved from many theoretical and scientific point of view. Many people try to prove the existence of God with reason. After Descartes proves its existence, he will think the truth about the essence of God, evidence of the existence of God, and the nature of material objects. The main task in Descartes' meditation is to design a system that allows him to understand the truth. He wants to lay the foundation of all further philosophy The medieval society believed that humans existed because God wants them to exist. Descartes does not doubt the existence of God, I doubt that the existence of man is God's desire. He has a problem because he proved the existence of God using a series of theorems. He proved that thought is the essence of thinking. At that time the revolution supports the new idea of ​​"I think myself". It gives independent thinking and free will to human institutions, leading the age of enlightenment. For Descartes, thought proves that our existence is a conscious entity. By solving the survival problem, the thinkers of the 18th and 19th centuries established mathematical and scientific identity. Equivalent thoughts and consciousness do not satisfy thinking thoughts. Beyond the era of reason, we continue to doubt our existence

The Indian retail industry has undergone a major transformation as traditional markets shift to new forms such as department stores, supermarkets, supermarkets, and specialty shops. Urbanization, double income households, increase in household income, increase in foreign lifestyle, increased consumer confidence, health consciousness, convenience of one stop shopping are the main factors shopping at large shopping malls. The purpose of this research is to investigate the impact of large shopping centers on large shopping centers. Small and medium retail business unit of Coimbatore. The results of the survey indicate that trade growth and progress were adversely affected in some commercial activities. Advances in Consumer Research Advertising Consumption, Market and Culture Journal Advertising Research Journal Interactive Marketing Consumer Behavior Journal International Advertising Magazine Consumer Marketing Journal International Market Research Journal Consumer Research Journal Psychology and Marketing Consumer Psychology Journal In this term A member of a team who writes and presents a shopping marketing plan. Marketing plans can be created at different levels of the organization (ie, the entire organization, business units, or product / product line) and at different levels of detail (draft and complete financial details). Your job is to create the first draft of "people" or marketing plans for new product concepts that you think will bring you the greatest benefit to your business. In the first two weeks of the term, your team will be assigned to the company Syllabus: MKTG 102A Marketing Introduction Business School St. Thomas Aquinas College Michael Murphy, Dean IJCNS (International Journal of Computer and Network Security) is one of the leading international journals publishing new ideas, state-of-the-art research results, and basic advances in computer science and communication networks and cyber security. IJCNS is a monthly magazine that publishes articles and provides new theoretical results. Papers submitted to IJCNS should explain the original and previously unpublished works that are not currently being reviewed by other conferences, seminars or journals. This article has been quoted many times. Recently in a literary review of magnetic field (MF) technology. This review was published in the January 2018 issue of the International Journal of Advanced and Applied Science, including 59 references on MF technology research. For some unrealistic things, this is a lot of research. The chemical industry is one of the largest and most important industries in the world. The United States is the world's largest producer of chemical products. Including the pharmaceutical industry, chemical production in 2016 exceeded $ 767 billion. According to the Economic Analysis Department, the added value of US chemicals in 2016 exceeded $ 387 billion. - American Chemical Industry - Statistics and Facts

Definition of philosophy Personal or moral philosophy is how to live or how to act. People who claim that the philosophy of our life is "lifetime", "at horn", or some cliches are often heard. Though the definitions are correct, these people use the phrase "philosophy", but the words closely related to our past, present and future great thinkers are different. The philosophy for people pursuing knowledge, meaning of life, and the truth of everything means bigger and less concise. This is a more extreme definition of philosophy. This definition begins with the philosophy of the turn of the century. Resistance to the metaphysical philosophy system is rising. The metaphysical system of philosophy will explain everything from the perspective of a wonderful idea such as "thinking" and "spirit". This reaction is primarily contrary to idealistic philosophy, which is a highly developed metaphysical philosophy. Details about this are displayed in the fifth definition. Language analysis emphasizes rejection of metaphysics and accepts simple but useful scientific verification of modern standards. Their central argument is that only the logical truths and empirically verified descriptions make sense. In this case, what does scientific verification mean? This can be said to be the case if you can verify or copy experiments. We now turn to the definition of some philosophy. These are historical methods, the philosophy of criticism, philosophy of language analysis, philosophy of change planning, a series of questions and answers to philosophy, and philosophy of world view. In the process, we analyze the definition and draw some conclusions about this analysis. Remember our question: What is philosophy? According to this method, philosophy is actually a study of a historical person who is regarded as a philosopher. Everyone is regarded as a philosopher, such as Socrates, Plato, Aristotle, Augustine, Thales, Filo, Protino, Aquinas, Kant, Eligina, Hume, Marx, Hegel, Russell, Whit Genstein. As many of their views are quite diverse, what happens together? One answer lies in their common problems and concerns.

A brief review of Thomas Aquinas 'practical view, Carlos Ranos' comment, Héctor Zagal 's response to Aristotle' s practical philosophy. Finally, we compare these views with the grandchild's "art of war". One of the books I am reading now is the grandson's "art of war". Sun Zi is a military general and strategist living in ancient China, one of the most important historical figures in East Asia. "Art of War" is a collection of solar military tactics that covers the daily tactics that he created. "The art of war includes diplomacy, human relations, loyalty, avoidance of battle, perseverance, preparation, strategy etc. Even today (even after 2500), my grandchildren's teachings are fierce competition and embarrassing Because it is the case, it is still important. When we think of "art of war", we are definitely related to grandchild's manuscript "art of war". But "art of war" is not a kind of writing itself, it is also a long time research department before grandchild work. If we translate the meaning of "art of war" directly, it is actually an ordinance in military organization, not an aesthetic expert. Therefore it can be said that in any orderly military country it is practicing the art of war. However, Sun Jin's work is enough to make people recognize the name "art of war". Thus he became the main father of war research. As early as the 5th century BC, in the competition of many different warlord countries, he was the first person to use and notice the overwhelming ability of Sun Jin at the military leadership in the Land Jindom. Sun Jin prove his ability by winning every fight he participated. Then he made the Land Kingdom particularly strong. The art of war began with a central role played by grandchildren himself. After collecting Wang Wu and the audience, the king asked the grandson (the sun) to use the king's beggar to perform experiments to control the movement of the army. My grandson agreed to do this and patiently patiently explained some simple instructions after dividing the women into two companies, each of which was one of the king's favorite nephews. How - Ronald, Grassberg 47, after the order was issued, the women suddenly laughed. After repeating his instructions and getting the same result, Sun Tzu ordered the heads of the two men to scare Ho-Lu. According to the king's request, because of the sweet taste, grandchildren clearly responded that the commander accepted his appointment and did not need to accept all sovereign orders. Toward a language of intercultural forces: grandchild's war art as model text by Ronald Grasberg and Prince Machiavelli

Exploring the religious and philosophical thinking of Ulysses, Ulysses and the greatness of God has explored the subject of religion and philosophy. Hopkins' "Greatness of God" may be more religious, and Tunisian "Ulysses" is more philosophical. From the former, the concept of "god" is clearly the best recognized leader, although different beliefs are interpreted in different ways. Hopkins himself is a devout Christian, which is evident in his sub-text. Religious philosophy is a philosophical exploration of religious problems. Conceptual analysis of various concepts of God, philosophical arguments that support and oppose the existence of God (or God), epistemological consideration on rationality of religious beliefs, philosophical consideration of theological arguments in religious philosophy, and Problems of life after death in religious philosophy Among the many topics in it. The Western religious philosophy can be traced back to Plato (eg Plato 1977) and Aristotle (Aristotle and Lawson - Tan Reed 1998), but during the Middle Ages, concerns were raised due to religious problems by philosophers became. Augustine in 2006, Aquinas 1274 and Anselm 1979 were classics of that era. The classic of the modern world is Gaskin 1998/2009. In the late 20th century, religious philosophy was born from hibernation. Philosophers study the essence of religion and religious beliefs. Western philosophers focus on ideas related to the existence and nature of the gods, the core of the Western religion. The core of the Western religious philosophy is an obvious contradiction in the claim of God's existence or proof and the description of the nature of God. In the last century, philosophers from all over the world have focused on investigating religious beliefs, religious languages, and the nature of religious thought. Indeed, some philosophers have made critical reflections and dialogues on the nature or nature of the religion itself. This article addresses religion in a traditional way and in a more modern way. It examines issues related to the existence and nature of God and takes into account the nature of religious beliefs

The nature of God and the miraculous evidence of the Bible, Christians believe in miracles. There are many examples of the involvement of God for the Jews, but they are regarded as miracles. For example, when the Jews fled from Egypt in the Old Testament (Exodus), God intervene several times; when they were trapped between the Red Sea and the Army of the Pharaoh, God knows that they will cross It seemed that the sea was separated so that it could be done. When they were hungry in the desert, he distributed ways they could eat; Jericho fled the way, and when they roamed around the streets for seven days, God destroyed the streets. Miracles are logically based on the concept that God exists as a natural author. Litigation against miracles can result from two different arguments, 1) eliminated by the personality of God, or 2) naturally eliminating them. Therefore, this analysis is that litigation against miracles is in the middle of two different fields of religion and science. Religion is a place where miracles exist, interpretation of supernatural existence, essence above faith, and ultimately sacred existence. Science tries to deny the existence of miracles by refuting ordinary natural processes A miracle in the sense of stopping the law of nature will not happen today. Early miracles exist to confirm what is called the word of God. Our prayers today are to make God choose two or more possible future in the way we think is good for us. When miracles happened before the century, miracles are always used to emphasize God or Jesus and their message - not for the glory of the human agent who seems to be running them. This is quite different from the motivation of today's "belief therapist". For Aquinas, he believes that God is an intervention, so there are three possibilities for miracles to happen. The first of these three miracles was confirmed by Aquinas as what God did, and nature could not. An example of the Bible is that the sun stops in the sky, Joshua 10: 13. This is considered physically impossible by today's standards. Miracles of this type are regarded as "naturally impossible" because they contain types of events that can not be interpreted logically. The second type is what God does and nature is thought to be able to accomplish it, but it is not done in the order in which they occur, for example cockroach healing and Mark 1:31 betrayal The description. The Bible can make his work miraculous as he may have proved that his healing abilities can heal the hearing impaired in a shorter time. essay.com/Miracles - Identify philosophers and confirm understanding of the word miracle. Examine the arguments that can be used to misunderstand the beliefs to miracles. How do you believe that the miracle is still strong? Miracles - Identify philosophers and test understanding of the word miracle. Examine the arguments that can be used to misunderstand the beliefs to miracles. How do you believe that the miracle is still strong? Miracles are surreal or supernatural events in the material world that transcend all known human beings and nature's power and often can not be explained by natural laws. God has never violated his own words or the laws of nature that he has set, but has the privilege to replace them. Instant healing is always a miracle. Mark 8: 22-26, Jesus came to Bessa, a small town on the northeastern coast of Galilee. Some people regard him as a blind man and ask Jesus to touch him. Jesus grabbed the blind by hand outside the town. If surrounded by unbelief, especially if he is raising J Lu's daughter, Jesus will isolate those he serves (Matthew 9:25; Mark 5: 40; Luke 8: 54 ). ) This is an example of the resurrection from the death of Tbilisi by Peter at Acts 9:40.

Abstract of contemporary cosmology and philosophy and the beginning of the universe: Since the 1970's, the theme of 'origin of the universe' has been controversial in physics and cosmology. This suggests that this interesting question is being studied scientifically and is probably a solution. The aim of this paper is to answer questions about whether the origin of the world has been removed from the hands of philosophers (and theologians) and transferred to the field of science, and whether science can solve this problem by itself is. Cosmology is a metaphysical study of the structure and nature of the entire universe. Cosmology is a field of ancient philosophy that focused on the origin of the universe. Since the beginning of the recorded history (without any doubt) human beings have been fascinated by the questions raised by the investigation of the universe and the birth of the universe. People are often wrong, but from the uncertainty they think of many incompatible answers, but there are some common patterns and reasons for these conclusions. Differences in these conclusions may reflect differences in the economic, social order and environment of different civilizations. The main focus of this paper is the development of authoritarian thought, especially the development of Ionian rationalists. Before the development of the Greek civilization, people doubtless speculated that the world exceeded the direct experience, but their survey records could not survive. Essay.com/ Cosmology and cosmology in the world of ancient Greece: Discuss the origin and development of Greek cosmology and cosmology from the 8th century BC to the 5th century BC Cosmology and cosmology in the ancient Greek world: an argument about the origin and development of Greek cosmology and cosmology from the 8th century BC to the 5th century Discussion of cosmology first derives from examining some of the universe's experience and metaphysical facts and then something outside the universe inevitably leads to its existence. There are various types of cosmological arguments, and their defenders include some of the best thinkers across the history of philosophy, including Plato, Aristotle, Ibunsina, Argazari, Mimonides, Aquinas, Descartes . And Leibniz. Three versions of many attention-grabbing discussions are the Thomistic Contingency argument, the Leibnizian's complete reason argument, and the kalam argument. In the case of the Kalam cosmological argument, the difference between the universe and God is that there is a beginning in time for the universe. Everything that has time to start claiming by Kalam Cosmological Argument will exist. When there is a beginning of time in the universe, that argument concludes that the universe has its cause, the reason is God. The existence of unaffected God is consistent with the initial assertion of this discussion since there is no time to start. "There is a reason for everything that has time to start." Therefore, the existence of God whose cause is unknown causes no problems. In discussing the above simple cosmological argument

Everyone is connected and not everyone in God knows this. After death, humans will go to heaven or hell. "For everyone, death is either the door to the lives of God and his people, or the door to the withdrawal from what ultimately satisfies human needs" (Sire, 41). It depends on whether they believe in the teaching of God and live by them. If people do not recognize the religion itself, it is not important that they follow the same path. Christian's view of the world is a consistent view of life, quite different from naturalism, naturalism, materialism, existentialism, polytheism, paganism, mysticism, or decompositionism. This theological view provides direction and direction facing the plurististic approach to spirituality and secularism and truth and morality of the new era. Fear of the future, suffering, illness, and poverty, based on Christ's redemption work and God's great Christian worldview. In addition, the view of the world of Christians provides meaning and purpose to every aspect of life. Existentialism escapes from despair of nihilism. Existentialism basically has two forms, atheism and theology. Atheistic existentialism is a reexamination of naturalism. At least it escaped the suicidal tendency of nihilism. This world view again denies the existence of God. I oppose this. Because I feel that God is real and inner. However, it explains the world as a purpose. Because the world around us can understand through science and logic. I agree with the fact that we can understand the universe through observation and experiment. I think that science and logic can lead the most important people even to see God in the universe and become a creator of the universe. Existentialism can be atheistic, theological (or theological), or unknown. Some existentialists, such as Nietzsche, argue that "God is dead" and claim that the concept of God is outdated. Even if they feel that they can not prove it, others like Kierkegaard are very religious. An important element of existentialists is freedom of choice whether to believe or not. Existential themes appeared in early Buddhist and Christian writings (including Saint Augustine and St. Thomas Aquinas). In the 17th century, Bryce Pascal believed that Pascal would be meaningless, boring and miserable without God, as we thought of later existentialists, even if Pascal was different from them. . His contemporary John Rock claims individual autonomy and self-determination, but they actively pursue liberalism and individualism rather than reacting to existentialist experiences.

The dialect of Purgatorio V is in this article, and it seems that modern criticism is not often considered as the basis for understanding the deeper meaning of poetry. However, it includes three stories of memorable characters, especially in its second part, some of the most brilliant journeys. As a whole cantica feature, and in particular with the first cantos, we can see that the three souls we encounter here are in the limiting state between the Earth and the Earth according to the two existence forms, their domain definition. Celestial body. 39 Quaestio de Purgatorio, 8, p. 521b, Aquinas, Summa theologiae, Volume 5, edited. Author: Institutum Studiorum Medievalium Ottaviensis (Ottawa: Commissio Piana, 1945), V, Supplementum's tertiary partis: â € -dicendum QUOD acerbitas poenae proprie respondet quantitati culpae, SED diuturnitas respondet radicationi culpae subiecto. Therefore, in a traditional way, It is wrong to say that the concept of moral discipline does not apply to the afterlife. See the editor Purgatorio. Durling and Martinez (Oxford: Oxford University Press), p. 10. The author of Supplementum clarifies the scope to "time punishment" rather than merely treatment ethics to eliminate the root cause of pollution and sin. The dialect of Purgatorio V is in this article, and it seems that modern criticism is not often considered as the basis for understanding the deeper meaning of poetry. However, it includes three stories of memorable characters, especially in its second part, some of the most brilliant journeys. As a whole cantica feature, and in particular with the first cantos, we can see that the three souls we encounter here are in the limiting state between the Earth and the Earth according to the two existence forms, their domain definition. Celestial body. Canto XXXIII has a more twisted metaphor - you remember with Purgatorio's Canto XXX III. Dante continues to sink in the Lethe River and then enters the Eunoe River. There are two rivers, one is a forgotten river and the other is a memorable river, Dante continues to say that they are really - he says that the two streams are truly from the same source I came here. Purgatorio's Canto XXX III stands for instability, flowing quality water, liquidity, memory, and forgetfulness.

From the beginning, the community suffers from problems caused by past human understanding. As a more sophisticated, principle belief in the existence of God during driving, to explain this confusion, the human form about their existence. Over time, excellent social, academic members have proposed several ideas of a unique understanding of complex topics like God. Students who have learned to endure the challenges of time and the theoretical explanation of these theories have been highly evaluated by this century's leading scholars. Discussion about the existence of God of William Perry and David Hume is called theoretical argumentation or design theory. Discussion from design is an argument about the existence of God and the existence of certain creator based on the idea of ​​order and purpose in the universe. Hume adopted a method against design argument, Paley defended it. Both Hume and Paley are making very strong claims, but we will reach the conclusion to distinguish which philosopher is taking a stronger position. God tried to use his argument to prove that God is the only designer of the Creator and the Universe with the Paley argument about the existence of "design argument". He looks at the universe and compares it with a clock maker to which God compares. In this discussion, Perry insisted that the universe designed and created it, only extremely great wisdom, very complex and orderly. Paley believed that everything would appear that the design can guess that it is actually an intelligent design product. If you look at the watch, for example, it is possible to decide one of the two method designs. If you had experience before people checked the watch to see, they can say that it is a good design. If the watch showed intelligent design marks, such as smooth surface or unique complex parts, you can guess some of the smart watches again Hume vs. essay.com/Paley This is the induction argument about origins and the nature of God, religion and the universe Hume vs. Paley This has arguments of induction about the origin and nature of God, religion and the universe St. Thomas Aquinas, who knows the existence of God, uses the argument argument as one of the five ways that William Paley's most quoted argument is. Perry likened the watch to the universe and many of the parts ordered adjustments to achieve several objectives. Watch complexity, meaning intelligent design as order and purpose, he means the complexity of the universe, and the purpose of order also means its intelligent design. As he suggested, he built its argument and is an analogy argument

In the case of anti-monarchy The monarchy is an ideal form of government, it is a paradox. The ideas of Al-Farabi and Aquinas regarding the government are wrong and there are plenty of irreparable loopholes. In modern times, the concept of monarchy turned counterproductive contrary to intuition. Democratic Republic and a highly educated and authorized middle class combination can solve the dilemma of how to build a perfect government. Although Arab philosopher's view is quite interesting, Al-Farabi said, new technologies and new ideas regarding the idea of ​​completing a single rule are obsolete. For example, if the power of the monarch is restricted by the constitution, the constitutional monarchy is monarchy. The constitutional monarchy has two forms. It is a monarchy of parliament and a double monarchy. The current constitutional monarchy is primarily related to Western European countries such as the UK, the Netherlands, Belgium, Norway, Denmark, Spain, Luxembourg, Monaco, Liechtenstein, Sweden etc. The double monarchy is a type of constitutional monarchy in which the power monarch is restricted by the Constitution and the National Assembly, and he (constitutional) has constitutional restrictions on freedom of decision. Currently in Morocco, Kuwait, Jordan, the King has extensive administrative and legislative power Constitutional monarchies are also called restricted monarchies or parliamentary monarchies. The most restricted parliamentary monarchy is called the Republic's coronation formula in terms of the power it can enjoy. In the constitutional monarchy, the power of the monarchy is restricted to the power stipulated in the Constitution. Unlike absolute power, the absolute power of the constitutional war veteran is dominated by the monarch. Absolute power means that the governor has the right to act in a way that it considers appropriate, without oversight and review of the act. The constitutional monarchy is a monarchy in the form that the monarch exercises power according to the written or unwritten constitution. Constitutional monarchy is different from absolute monarchy (the monarch has absolute power). Because the monarchy has to exercise its power within the limits established by the established legal framework. The monarchy's constitutional system comes from a country like Morocco and the Constitution gives sovereign power a lot of discretion, but in countries like Japan and Sweden the monarch does not hold official power.

A few months ago, I had to ask myself, "What is Apollo Getex?" That is a matter of knowledge. "(Horton 640). There are many arguments that can be used to protect faith, but I will focus on four arguments: ontology, natural theology, accuracy of the scriptures, and personal miracles. The first is ontological theory. In the 2nd century, Luca proposed three main types of Christian care: providing a prototype of the 1st century: apologies related to pagan faith (Christianity is true, paganism is falsehood), Judaism Apologies related to political authority (Christianity is innocent against any violation of Roman law); apology related to political authority (Christianity stands for real realization of Judaism). Therefore, the teaching of the apology came from the New Testament (see the section on teaching tasks in the next Bible incidents), in the second century to address the challenge of entering the Greek - Roman world beyond the culture boundary It further developed. Through Christian history, Apollo Getsics is always adapting to new cultural issues The apologies or defenses of Christian religion dates back to the 1st century, but formal apology science is a more recent development. In this chapter, we will investigate the history of nursing education in three stages. First, we discuss the teaching itself in detail in the New Testament. Secondly, we pay close attention to the main advocates before reform, especially Augustine, Anselm, Thomas Aquinas thinking. Third, we will give a more general overview of apologetic teachings from religious reform to the present In the next chapter, we will consider the defense thought of several contemporary Christian thinkers in more detail.

For thousands of years, people believe that our universe is limited. The Shapley-Curtis debate was held in Washington in 1920, thought that our Milky Way was the only galaxy in the universe, but Curtis believes there are many other galaxies in the universe. Specific evidence of the galaxy prove each theory. However, in 1929, Edwin Hubble provided observational evidence, and he concluded that there are millions of galaxies in the universe next to our Milky Way. Over the past 100 years, we have made tremendous progress in cosmology. Discovery of general relativity and expansion of the universe have destroyed the old picture of the eternal eternal universe. Instead, general relativity theory predicts that the universe and time itself starts with the big bang. Also, I anticipate that the black hole will end. Discovery of the cosmic microwave background and black hole observation supports these conclusions. This is the explanation of our universe and the big change of reality itself. General Relativity Theory predicts that the universe must come from the era of high curvature in the past, but it can not predict how the universe appeared from the Big Bang. Therefore, general relativity theory itself can not answer the central question of cosmology. Initially expand with growth rate Despite discovering that the expansion of the universe and its influence on the possibility that an astronomer decided to create an event, finding the medieval natural theological type of God by identifying the first cause It is not close to trying. Astronomers may have discovered the first effect, but it is not so, and therefore it must be the first reason Anselm and Aquinas asked. However, there are many scientific articles (from nihilo) that discussed the events right after the Big Bang, and all types of substances we know (baryons, electrons, photons, etc.) are made up of these papers. Quantity? It is said that understanding substance creation is still possible now. Astronomical observations also indicate that the expansion of the cosmic expansion only occurred once Before discovering dark energy, scientists have two models on how the expansion of the universe works. In one scene, there is enough material in the universe to decelerate to the extent that it starts to pull in like a baseball and all collapses in the "big bang". In other cases, it may be too little to stop the expansion. Everything will drift forever, always late or slow, but it will not stop - just like a spaceship. The galaxies will be separated from each other until they become invisible. With the annihilation and the end of countless generations of stars, the universe will continue to expand. If you like it, it will end in a huge, dark, cold state: "Great Cold"

Comparison of Jesus and Paul's teachings on interpersonal relationships with human beings In my paper on interpersonal relationships with humans, Paul proves more direct and proves that Jesus is more affectionate and tolerant in his teachings and orders To do. It is indomitable. Jesus and Paul have similar views on what should be included in the relationship between people and people, but the way personal information is provided is different. When Jesus talked to people, he conveyed a more forward-looking and refreshing tone. Essence of interpersonal relationships Human beings communicate with each other. What is the right way to distribute power and resources? Are humans cooperative, personal, collaborative, or general? Do human beings obey traditional authority or should they participate? Does the organization place importance on diversity or homogeneity? How to decide how to resolve conflicts? 1. Adaptive Culture: Focusing on the external environment, innovation, creativity, risk, flexibility, and change are key factors for success. This type of organization creates change in a positive way to predict response and problems. Examples given by Daft are e-commerce companies such as Amazon.com and Buy.com. These companies need to change rapidly according to customer's needs There are natures in domestic and foreign laws. Only gravity, radio waves, electricity will be generated (heartbeat, breathing, digestion, etc.). Other, more subtle but equally powerful laws create templates for interpersonal relationships. They are interdependent, altruistic, well-balanced, harmonious and interrelated. However, humans are blessed with self, and under that influence, we strive to fulfill their desires. The ego makes us believe that we can hurt others or use us to get what we want. Self-guide as we follow the left line and separate ourselves more and more from each other Therefore, philosophy essentially allows humans to adapt to interpersonal, ethnic and international relations. It contributes to social order and world peace. The concepts of human rights and rights derived from human rights declarations and human rights declarations derive from philosophical thinking such as St. Thomas Aquinas, Thomas Hobbes, John Rock, Jacques Rousseau. Philosophical and political realm of Nigeria: As a country, Nigeria has experienced various political regimes. Certainly human beings are political animals but without the help of philosophy the politics practiced in Nigeria can not even develop or develop. Our politicians need at least a little philosophy to be truly reasonable in all transactions. "In the field of politics, a certain level of philosophy is especially necessary to properly evaluate our political heritage. Humanities and Social Sciences Journal 10 (1): 40-46, 2015 ISSN 1818-4960 © IDOSI Press, 2015 DOI: 10.5829 / idosi.hssj.2015.10.1.1152

The earliest element of cosmological argument was developed during (Boeree) in 400 years in 200 years BC world-renowned philosophers Plato and Aristotle. In the latter half of the 13 th century medieval philosophy St. Thomas Aquinas wrote "five ways" to expand my thought. Since then, cosmology has become one of the most widely accepted and important arguments for the existence of God. My purpose in this article is to explain why arguments of cosmology are reasonable evidence of God's existence, it is important to understand posterior derivation arguments, explain my position against the opposite common argument is. One of the most controversial cosmological arguments about the topic of human history, Craig / Khalam is whether God exists. There are often discussions as this main argument has several different reasoning and secondary discussion. Those who believe in the existence of God discuss how God acts or one or more. People who do not believe in the existence of God will claim how the universe exists or always exists. In this article I will explain Craig's argument about the existence of God and observe Craig's argument. Like most arguments about the existence of God exist in many forms such as cosmological arguments. Discussion 2 here: Time, Kalam cosmological arguments (that is, the first cause argument), as well as emergency modal arguments. The main difference between these two arguments is that they are opposed to the introduction of doubt at first to avoid the way of arguments: if he exists, on the one hand, God considers Why is it supposed to be "cause God has reason for his existence?", And assume that God exists to explain the existence of the universe and does not permit us anywhere. Without God, we can not explain God, with entities that we can not explain there is a certain universe, and God has a physical presence Discussion that is most widely accepted and criticized about the existence of God. My purpose in this article is to explain why arguments of cosmology are reasonable evidence of God's existence, it is important to understand posterior derivation arguments, explain my position against the opposite common argument is. First of all, as a human living on earth, we can safely conclude that most existing ones have the reason. We will make sure there is a reason behind

Human condition Hannah Arendt's book "Human condition" is investigating the relationship between "vita activa" and three basic human activities (labor, work, behavior). Arendt considers these three activities to be "coincident with one of the basic conditions that life on the earth gives to human beings" and constitutes politics (7). Everywhere in the book, Arendt finally pointed out that our main political activities are to discover other people's views on political life, then to go forward with studying these ideas together. Hannah Arendt's "The Human Condition" is a beautiful book about the importance of democratic behavior and freedom against the threat of totalitarianism. It is related to the influence of Christianity on capitalism, that is, how viewpoints on the goodness of Christianity contribute to the understanding of our private property. As a basic overview of Aristotle 's theory of virtue, he detailed the possibility of a happy life by applying the virtues outlined by Aristotle. Like Thomas Aquinas, Christian thinkers choose Aristotle's virtue theory and replace his virtue with Christian virtue. Therefore, he can live a good life only when he exercises the Christian virty that he grew up in the Bible. About Human philosophy: Hannah Arendt and her talker (politics, philosophy) 2012 Spring semester 4 units Joel Alden Schlosser conducted detailed research on "Human Situation" (1958) by Hannah Arendt, the most theoretical theory It was. One of the influences of the work. During the 20th century, this course will study the great work of Arendt in his context: in the history of political thought, in the political controversy of the 1950s and today of urgently related political thought Inside. In addition to "human condition", we also worked by several thinkers who clearly discussed with Arendt, as well as a number of supplementary materials including works of historians, artists, theorists, and critics of the 1950s Also read. More than this, this will help us to place Arendt in the intellectual life of the 20th century, and it also will give us some important issues of Alerent's book and her general thought Give a different perspective on. Hannah Arendt's "human condition" is an example of the interrelationship of this subject. She started reviewing the theme that formed the title of her book "from our recent experience and the advantageous position of recent fear" (page 5). According to the mis-current, some of Marx's core ideas formed a central idea of ​​reference and discussion throughout the book. Overall, miserrent discovered that much of Marx's analysis is deep and fruitful. Nonetheless, she confessed to be clearly Marx's honorable profession, but in that profession's occupation - often combined - along her plagiarization (p. 79) - she said "basic Through the red line (104 pages) of Marx's idea that found "opened" and "contradiction", it led to "an absurd patent" (page 102). Human condition of Marx and Hannah Arendt: W. A. ​​Source: ethics, volume. 73, No. 1, (October 1962), pp. 47-55: Publications of University of Chicago Stable: http: //www.jstor.org/stable/2379799Visit: 18/04/2008 10: 40

At first glance, bread and wine seems to be a beautiful portrait with the utmost care of Mussolini's young Italian revolutionary Pietro Spina. Spina's life is very similar to the author's life. Firm decisively anti-fascist, forced expulsion, flirting with communism, and finally accepting non-communist revolutionary socialism. Therefore, the author watches his protagonist as well as his emotions. He did. He is in sharp contrast to the pure determination of Spina and "catching a person at the same time". Bread and wine do not separate the "elements" of dinner. They go to wine in turn from bread. This sequence imitates the natural progress of human life. We started a new day at the bread and finished it with wine. We can bake bread in a few hours; wine needs cultivation, preparation, and aging for many years. As James Jordan said, bread is an alpha food and wine is an omega drink. Bread is native and wine is eschatological. The communion wine makes it possible for us to understand the good things of the future, the pleasures flowing from the heavenly broken bread. Natural foods are digested and become us. Thomas Aquinas said that spiritual food is the opposite: it turns us into ourselves. Accepting bread, we become bread of the world. After drinking the blood of the grapes, we will summon to follow him according to the testimony of Christ's suffering. He came to us in the sacrament of the Eucharist. He puts his body and blood in regular bread and wine. We can watch bread and wine and smell. You can taste bread and wine by touching it. Bread and wine We can eat and drink. We consume sacrifices instead of ourselves. When we eat them, bread and wine bind us, and his body and blood bind us. He believes in the word he promised "Dedicate it to you for forgiveness of sin." He forgives our sins. He strengthened our faith. He reinforces our weak soul. He gave us a new life and eternal salvation

Medieval myths: Norma · Loret Goodrich publisher: Penguin group, the story type found in the book 1961) is a medieval story. They include kings, queen and knight, fighting war, including dragons and beautiful girls. One of my favorite myths is Beowulf of the Scandinavian mythology titled Beowulf and The Fiend Grendel. The story is about the Kingdom of Denmark ruled by a king called Hrothgar. Hrothgar is a great king and praised by people all over the world. In medieval myths, Cockaigne is a sufficient land and work is forbidden, the house is made of pie and sausage, and the wine flows through the river, and the roasted goose and roasted fish prepared are eaten It is likely to be. According to the Dutch historian Herman Pleij, due to the medieval poor, Cockaigne is a famous paradise far from suffering in everyday life. Today, the City of Utrecht in the Netherlands is trying to recognize that citizens' basic needs are not necessarily pure illusions when they are met without duty obligations. Therefore, local governments are planning experiments to provide monthly guaranteed income to 250 Dutch citizens currently receiving benefits from the government. The two-year trial period is scheduled to begin provisionally in January next year, and we plan to receive a fixed amount of 960 euros a month (about US $ 1,100) in some citizens of Utrecht and some neighboring cities. The myth of medieval churches against science is unlikely to disappear - as it is partly compatible with other precious myths about the Middle Ages because it is easy to manufacture. Anyone who has heard about the emergence of Galileo before the Inquisition, "Tetelius' challenge -" What is the relationship between Athens and Jerusalem? ", These two points can be straight. The needs of all people is a wonderful assumption that Galileo was the one accused of medieval churches and did his best. (In fact, as explained in myths Chapter 8, the early modern Catholics condemned Galileo and used the new Bible Scripture view which would surprise Augustine and Thomas Aquinas. Even in modern countries, medieval churches, ancient towns, ancient tribes, all of the extensive human cooperation is rooted in common myths that exist only in the collective imagination of people. The church is rooted in a common religious myth. Two Catholics who have never met are believed to believe that God is a physical body and that they will be able to be crucified to redeem our sins so in order to build a hospital You can gather in the Crusade or collect funds. The country is rooted in common national myths. Because we believe in the Serbian state, the hometown of Serbia, the flag of Serbia, two Serbs who have never met each other can endanger their lives and save each other. The justice system is rooted in common legal myths. However, since the two lawyers who have never met believe in the existence of law, justice, human rights, and the cost of payment, they can cooperate to protect those who do not know at all.

Among these subsidies are housing slips, medical insurance, transportation, parenting, etc. After the dissolution, household income decreased by 15%, but the poverty rate rose (Wolfinger, N, 2005). The legislation indicates that the marriage classification approved by the Welfare Department contributes to the reconciliation of marriage. Everett infringes freedom of personal choice by spending $ 1.5 billion to promote marriage through promoting domestic violence, investing money in the plan, and forcing marriages by forcing people to marry You can claim that you can. Liberalization of the divorce law is not without objection, especially in the United States. In fact, in the United States, certain conservative religious organizations lobby the law to limit divorce. In 2011, in the United States, the divorce reform consolidation was formed by saying, "We are committed to supporting efforts to reduce unnecessary divorce and promote healthy marriage." The immutable and unchanging mystery of the Roman Catholic Church - one of them - is elaborately produced by St. Thomas Aquinas and is based on the concept of natural moral law complemented by the God 's laws presented. In the course of history, the Orthodox shared a part of the doctrine of Dr. Angelicus. As has long been recognized, the publication of Putting Asunder played an important role in promoting the divorce law reform implemented in the divorce reform law of 1969 - in particular to a widely-defined "very important" consensus Influence. Reform - and abandonment of Asunder will surely have a decisive impact on the form of the law. But to what extent does this bill realize the principle that the archbishop group has established reform assistance? (European Commission, 1998) The main reform of the law amendment (marriage and divorce) law in 1976 was to ban non-Muslim polygamy. Prior to this, non-Muslim men were able to choose polygamy according to their customary law. For example, in China's customary law, unlimited polygamy is permitted. It also allows Chinese men to unilaterally divorce their wives for seven reasons: as long as the law amendment (marriage and divorce) law is enforced in 1976, the law amendment is democratic It was a method of negotiation. We set up a special committee of the National Assembly and traveled nationwide to listen to various opinions before drafting the law

Emmanuel Kant's Moral Metaphysical Foundation In his publication 'Foundations of Moral Metaphysics', Immanuel Kant provided the reader with a thesis claiming that morality can be derived from the principle of absolute order did. The most powerful argument to support his argument is the difference between daily work and daily work. To build his thesis, Kant first distinguished experience from 'a priori' concept. The concept of experience is the idea that we get from the experience of the world. Kant, Emmanuel. Foundation of moral metaphysics Cross Lewis Whitebeck, Indianapolis, Bobs - Merrill, 1969. The page number referring to this work is the limit number of Beck referring to the page number of the standard version Königlich-PreußischeAkademiederWissenschaften (Berlin, 1902-38). In Germany, he began an important modern Kant interpreter, and the German idealist movement he began was Dieter Henrich, who has several British works. P. F. Strawson's The Bounds of Sense (1966) played an important role in determining Kant's contemporary acceptance in Britain and the United States. Recent English-speaking interpreters include Luis Whitebek, Jonathan Bennett, Henry Allison, Paul Guya, Kristin Cols Guard, Steven Palmquist, Robert B Pipin, Rogers Crouton, Rudolph McClell and Beatrice Long Enes Immanuel Kant is a German philosopher of the 18th century and is widely known for his accomplishments and works such as "critique of pure reason" and "basic moral metaphysics". Kant developed a moral theory that depends on reason rather than emotion, called moral law. Kant is not anti-religious, but he wants a moral system not covered by religious, emotional or personal interpretation. - Saint Augustine and Aquinas believe that this town is also a moral town. This city will help the physical and mental ransom of mankind. Their mind about fair cities necessarily requires moral law. When it is broken, the law demands punishment. Their thoughts on the justice system can easily lead to religious tyranny. Kant's ethics is based on Emmanuel Kant, "Foundations of The Moral Metaphysics" (1785). He discusses moral decisions based on free will. When acting. His view is regarded as dualism, as it tries to fill the gap between existentialism and contractors. (Stanwick & Stanwick, 2009). One advantage of this framework, regardless of the outcome, is that judgment is at the beginning of the decision-making process. But if you think that action is good at the beginning and the end, the result will have a negative effect, and it may be viewed as a disadvantage as the result is not taken into account.

In the article "God of existence", this article explains the difference between the existence and the nature of the weather, not the existence or existence of God. This argument is much more like Thomas Aquinas 'cosmological argument, and Anthem' s ontological argument. The existence of God can be separated from the essence of God, but if God exists or does not exist, the discussion will continue to be discussed. This argument clearly shows that the existence of God is exemplified by examples like mountains and valleys. There is much debate about the existence of God about the existence of God. For a long time everyone wanted to prove the existence of God. Some people think that God exists and is proved by many philosophical or scientific foundations and religious reasons. On the other hand, others do not believe in the existence of God and their foundation is proved from many theoretical and scientific point of view. Many people try to prove the existence of God with reason. After Descartes proves its existence, he will think the truth about the essence of God, evidence of the existence of God, and the nature of material objects. The main task in Descartes' meditation is to design a system that allows him to understand the truth. He wants to lay the foundation of all further philosophy The medieval society believed that humans existed because God wants them to exist. Descartes does not doubt the existence of God, I doubt that the existence of man is God's desire. He has a problem because he proved the existence of God using a series of theorems. He proved that thought is the essence of thinking. At that time the revolution supports the new idea of ​​"I think myself". It gives independent thinking and free will to human institutions, leading the age of enlightenment. For Descartes, thought proves that our existence is a conscious entity. By solving the survival problem, the thinkers of the 18th and 19th centuries established mathematical and scientific identity. Equivalent thoughts and consciousness do not satisfy thinking thoughts. Beyond the era of reason, we continue to doubt our existence

According to Dave's teachings, philosophy is still in the development stage and trembling with philosophical thinking in mind. Describing the diversity of culture, experience seems older than most students and seems environment friendly. It is difficult to think inside the box; tradition does not fit my educational platform. Platform needs to include not only the content in the book but also more. In addition to the mixture of essentialism and behaviorism, emphasis on progressiveism will always exist. As in the 17th century, in the 18th century, responsibility for the main religious order was to teach philosophy in New Spain according to its specific doctrinal orientation. The Franciscan party adopted the philosophy of Thomas Aquinas' Dan Scott and the Dominican people. Jesuits tend to accept contemporary philosophy. In the 17th century the Jesuits led to a new Spanish education and cultural trend. Their work is not only because they adopt contemporary European ideas in their own way, but also in the 19th century not only because they are adaptively creatively to their own situation. However, in 1767, when the order of the Jesuits reached the highest, it was expelled from the territory of the Spanish royal family. This is a major blow to Mexican intellectuals who cause Mexican nationalism more and more and have opposed Spanish rule. Educational philosophy Webster's dictionary says, "Teachers are those who teach especially for life." This definition is not completely correct for teachers. As a teacher, you not only teach students, teachers are parents, social workers, nurses, and even friends. Excellent teachers can play all these roles and succeed through educational history. I went to public school and I got good and bad ugly. We are all fighting philosophy. When we practice our ideas, we will work hard to change our philosophy. I believe that philosophy can change certain circumstances at any time In order to become an educator we have to know the situation we can change our philosophy and our core beliefs not. However, in order to achieve this, we must understand what philosophy is and what it is not.

Unfortunately, under the influence of plague, researchers said, "No, they are my lymph nodes and are swollen." These are difficult times, treatment is not useful, it is black death It is time of sickness. Black death destroyed everything it touched. Black death was an event, and it turned out that the whole Europe was a contagious disease of the glandular plague. The town was abandoned and even the whole major cities were treated as ghost towns. Many religious changes occurred in Europe in the 16th century. These changes occur because Christian churches have enacted laws that are not Bibles as follows. The pastor sell redemption certificates. These are thought to reduce the punishment of sin after death. There are many Christian churches such as Nepotism (specifying an important position among multiple positions in the church) and absenteeism (bishops and pastors do not live in their parish or parish) There is abuse of. In 1517, a German monk named Martin Luther attacked the sale of redemption slips. Protestant reform is a Christian reform movement, members want to reform Catholic church practice, especially sale of education and redemption certificates. Addiction is the abandonment of penalties for admitted and forgiven crimes. Medieval religious scholars and theologians such as Alberts Magnus and Thomas Aquinas regard the Catholic saints' achievement as the basis for the redemptive voucher's indulgence. In 1220, "Ministry of Finance" was established from the incentive income for the Catholic Church to use. However, there was considerable abuse in later medieval times, such as professional "forgiveness" to sell redemption certificates unlimitedly. Criticism of hobby by Luther is not merely an academic one. Since the Middle Ages, the Catholic Church has abrogated the form of Christian confession as a form of pardon since he has achieved a ban such as prayer and fast, but in Luther the church sells redemption slips directly as a source of income . . The indulgence file displayed below contains a space to enter the name of "Contributor". As a pastor, Luther believes that the sale of a redemption voucher weakens the personal motive of his sheep to seek God's grace, and uses their sacred pursuit of power and the redemption of the God of wealth. Luther was especially angry with the fact that John Steetzel, an agent of the Pope, put it on a German soil in a public place, the latter said "The soul jumped out of the purgatory's spring when a coin enters the safe" It was called. For Luther, monetization of this belief is the practice of abusing a church within his jurisdiction and he is responsible for reporting to his boss.

Analysis of Aristotle's view on causality A: The teaching of Aristotle's cause-and-effect tells us that Teacher's Platon who believes that we can recognize objects as our soul remembers perfection from the area of ​​the shape It is the opposite. Its format is that Aristotle believes that we recognize its purpose is its four main reasons: important reasons, valid reasons, formal reasons, and the ultimate cause. The last reason is completely different from the other three reasons. Material, effective and formal reasons are related to the existence of certain things, but the ultimate reason is the reason for its existence. Causality - The causal discussion mainly includes comments about Aristotle, mainly physics, heaven, generation and corruption. The method of this subject area is unique in the Middle Ages, a reasonable investigation of the universe is seen as a way to approach God. Evidence of the existence of God by Duns Scotus is based on the concept of causality. The problem of personalization personalization is to explain how to personalize or digitally distinguish the members given to it. A problem arises when it is necessary to explain how individual angels of the same species differ from each other. Angels are irrelevant and their differences in numbers can not be explained by the different things they make. The main contributors to this discussion are Aquinas and Scotts. In this article, we outline Aristotle's argument about this position and critically analyze this point. Most importantly, I present my own reason to agree with Aristotle, show that happiness (eudaimonia) is the purpose of life and is achieved through good reasoning based on each individual's lifestyle . According to Aristotle, the core standard of eudaimonia is an excellent activity, including the use of rationality (Irwin). First of all we have to ask: What is happiness? Happiness can be defined as completely different from person to person. It can be defined as celebrating a special birthday with a family or watching lively movies with friends, but these things even make people prosper, we succeed in life I will not let it. According to Aristotle, we should try not to have a good time but to create a better life for ourselves.

Mikhail Sergeyevich Gorbachev showed tradition and leadership in initiating political, economic and social reform for the Soviet Union. Through reform, he actively changed and influenced the lives of many people, and started "revolution", after that he seems to have led his bondage and led to the end of the Soviet Union. In 1985, Mikhail Sergeyevich Gorbachev became secretary general of the Soviet Union (Soviet Union Soviet Union), also known as the Soviet Union. Then he steadily began to grab power and began reforms making the Soviet Union a better place for living and free people. On March 2, 1931, Secretary-General Soviet Mikhail Gorbachev (1985-91) was born. He is in charge of rebuilding (reforming) the Soviet economy, openness and information (Glasnost). Mikhail Gorbachev emerged as an expert on agricultural problems within the Communist Party. Prior to being born in Moscow State University in 1950, Gorbachev was born into a family of farmers as a partner. He joined the party in 1952, graduated with a law degree in 1955, became a full-time political party official. In 1967 he graduated from the Stavropol Agricultural Research Institute and was elected the party central committee in 1971. He was promoted to the leader of the party committee in 1978 and earned a reputation as an innovator of the agricultural committee committee. Mikhail Gorbachev was born on March 2, 1931 in the famine of Stavropol's meadow. He worked in the Youth Communist Party Federation and the Communist Party Youth Federation and joined the Communist Party in 1952. He studied the law at Moscow State University and in 1955 graduated with his wife, Reisa. In the second year, Gorbachev became the first secretary general. Stavropol's Communist Youth League, he continues to rise in the government. In 1964, his mentor Krakow became the head of the agricultural department of the Central Committee, and three years later Gorbachev obtained a degree from the Stavropol Agricultural Research Institute. In 1970 he was elected the first secretary of the Stavropol regional party and was promoted to the Central Committee. Raisa studied the proprietary system used by Krasnodar. It gives people cash reward for greater harvest, and her husband draws attention for the success of the new Ipatovsky harvesting method. Chernenko died in March 1985 and soon was replaced by Androop 's favorite Mikhail Gorbachev. Gorbachev was the youngest member of Politburo at the age of 54 and remarkably contrasted with his previous generation. Gorbachev is a devout Marxist, but has a history of independent thinking and receives education from Aquinas to Rousseau in Western political theory. He was always a harsh administrator and he highly appreciates the need for serious reforms to stop the Soviet economic recession now threatening domestic and international policy goals.

The pros and cons of the evil of Augustine and Theodicy of Eleanor are not of God. Because the creation of God is complete perfection. In the Bible Genesis, he believes that evil is caused by what God can do. God himself is powerful, but after creating the world he himself will not be able to control the actions created by humans when they change it. Originally honored as a form of John Hick's theology in evil and divine love, the theology of Augustine was written in 1966, when he classified theology and subsequent development of Augustine as "Augustin" It was. Hick distinguishes Augustine's theology which attempts to treat God as all responsibility against evil, based on the fact that Hibk is responsible for the free will of mankind and people for evil but is beneficial for human development To do. Augustine's theology is the answer to the evil evidence problem, which raises concerns that if the god is omnipotent and omnipotent, the world should not be evil. Evil proof can cast doubt on God's nature and his existence - he is omnipotent, benevolent or not. Theodicy attempts to harmonize the evidence of evil with the existence and nature of God by providing an effective interpretation of its occurrence. Hippo Augustine is the first person who developed mysticism. He rejects the idea that evil itself exists, but I regard it as good corruption caused by human free will. Augustine believed that there was material hell as a punishment for sin, but he believed that those who chose to receive the salvation of Jesus Christ would go to heaven. In the thirteenth century, influenced by Augustine, Thomas Aquinas proposed similar theology based on the fact that God is kind and evil. He believes that the existence of good will enable evil through human error. Augustine also influenced John Calvin, who supported Augustine's view that evil is the result of free will and that sin destroys human nature and requires God's grace to give moral guidance Gave. What is the evil essence of Augustine? Compare the evil concept of Augustine with manicure. Which do you think is closer to your truth? It is enough whether Augustine's interpretation of the sermon is accurate, or whether there are loopholes in his theory. Please describe your perception of the world's evil, its cause, and possible solutions to avoid it. What role did Augustine 's friends play in that change? Do you think that Augustine is an intrigued intellectual, or is he academically interested? Specifically, what is the change of Alipius after the sincere change of Augustine? How does Nebridius try to keep him away from Manichae, and Nebridius is still Manichee himself? What is the view of Augustine's secular friendship?

Anyone who knows the ultimate goal of life, please ask the answer is "happy". According to Aristotle, Thomas Aquinas, Dante, achieving the state is the ultimate goal of all beings. This is how they define happiness: complete state. The means by which happiness and humanity can achieve it is the subject of Dante's poetry 'comedy'. In this verse, Dante started his journey in hell, where he saw the souls of those who refused to be happy because they refused to know God or refused to know God . Dante was born in Florence. He is the son of Bailey's son Alighiero II and Alighiero's first wife, Bella's son. Paradiso XXII.109-17, Dante will say to us that his birthday is a sign of Gemini. According to the Julian calendar system which was used until the standard of the 16th century, the sun was in Gemini from May 14th to June 13th in 1265. Dante formed the sonnet of the ciascun 'alma presa entintil core and finally became the first poem by Vita Nuova. At Vita Nuova, Dante will prove that he wrote Sonnets at the age of 18, that is 1283 (VN III.1 - 9). In the next few years, he wrote other poems that will eventually be included in the Vita Nuova prose framework written from 1292 to 1293. Inferno (pronounced "hell" in Italian) is the first part of the 14th century epic "Divine Comedy" by Italian writer Dante Alighieri. Purgatorio and Paradiso follow. Under the guidance of the ancient Roman poet Virgil, Inferno tells the story of Dante's journey through hell. In this verse hell is depicted as torture of nine concentric circles within the Earth; it is "to deceive or malice them by bending to savage food appetite and violence or by distorting their human wisdom In the area of ​​those who reject their spiritual value, as a fable, the comet of God represents the journey of the soul to God, and hell explains the recognition and refusal of sin. Inferno is just a big story written by Dante Alighieri. The whole story consists of Inferno, Purgatorio and Paradiso and is called God 's comedy. Those three pieces tell the story of Dante through hell, purgatory, and heaven; it is easy to distinguish by reading the headings of each part. Dante wrote these poems around 1300. There are many different translations originally written in Latin that Dante said. Dante Durante degli Alighieri (aka Dante) was born in Florence, Italy in 1265. He is an Italian poet, prose prose, literary theorist, philosopher, political thinker. He is best known for his epic "Divine Comedy", which is translated into different languages ​​and is considered a masterpiece of world literature. Devine comedy is made up of three parts. Inferno, or "hell", Purgatorio and Paradiso. Each of these parts corresponds to the imagination of Dante's spiritual journey.

In this course, we will introduce Christian teachings as Christian subjects in great detail about various expressions and backgrounds. Contemporary nursing background (postmodern and new atheism) has also been carefully considered Discussion about various defense methods continues, but the number of people claiming that the era of education has ended is increasing more and more. Those thinkers believe that apology theory assumes ideal of reasonable knowledge. It is the foundation of contrary to modern rationalism Christianity. With the emergence of virtual death of modern rationalism and the emergence of postmoderns, the teachings of antichristian rationalism and Christian rationalism are considered to be outdated. On the other hand, other Christian thinkers believe that the situation in modern times is more complicated. They believe they did not give rationalist ideals because postmodernism qualified it. They concluded that the place is still nursing instruction, but it must take into account the latest developments in post modern thinking. The Christian apology theory tries to build a bridge between disbelievers by proposing that Christianity is true, rational, and suitable for reason and evidence. Christian's apologyist Francis A. Schaefer in the second half of the 20th century saw Christian's apology as "evangelism". It is a way to prepare the heart and soul for the Christian message (the gospel). Oxford University theologian Alistar E. McGrath best summarized the relationship between apology and evangelism. "... Christian apocalypse represents a serious and continuous approach to the" ultimate problem "caused by culture, people, individuals. Is participation aimed to show how Christian faith can give meaningful answers to these questions? As John the Baptist prepared the way of the arrival of Jesus of Nazareth, the teaching of nursing is opening a way to evangelism ... evangelism ... Please send me a personal invitation letter. The apology or defense of Christian religion dates back to the 1st century, but the formal science of apology is a more recent development. In this chapter, we will explore the history of nursing education in three stages. First, we discuss the teaching in detail in the New Testament itself. Secondly, we pay close attention to the main advocates before reform, especially Augustine, Anselm, Thomas Aquinas. Third, we will take a more general overview of apologetic teachings from religious reform to the present In the next chapter, we consider the defense philosophy of some contemporary Christian thought in more detail I will do.

The main arguments of Shapley 's cosmic view Harlow Shapley are as follows. (1) The Milky Way is very large and its diameter is about 300 thousand light years. This measurement is very intense compared to previous measurements. (2) The sun is not the center of the Milky Way, but about 60,000 light years apart. This is because it was observed that globular clusters are concentrated in half of the sky. In addition, the distance of variable stars means that globular clusters are far away. Over the past 100 years, we have made tremendous progress in cosmology. Discovery of general relativity and expansion of the universe have destroyed the old picture of the eternal eternal universe. Instead, general relativity theory predicts that the universe and time itself starts with the big bang. Also, I anticipate that the black hole will end. Discovery of the cosmic microwave background and black hole observation supports these conclusions. This is the explanation of our universe and the big change of reality itself. General Relativity Theory predicts that the universe must come from the era of high curvature in the past, but it can not predict how the universe appeared from the Big Bang. Therefore, general relativity theory itself can not answer the central problem of cosmology. Why is the universe like this? Initially expand with growth rate Despite discovering that the expansion of the universe and its influence on the possibility that an astronomer decided to create an event, finding the medieval natural theological type of God by identifying the first cause It is not close to trying. Astronomers may have discovered the first effect, but it is not so, and therefore it must be the first reason Anselm and Aquinas asked. However, there are many scientific articles (from nihilo) that discussed the events right after the Big Bang, and all types of substances we know (baryons, electrons, photons, etc.) are made up of these papers. Quantity? It is said that understanding substance creation is still possible now. Astronomical observations also indicate that the expansion of the cosmic expansion only occurred once Before discovering dark energy, scientists have two models on how the expansion of the universe works. In one scene, there is enough material in the universe to decelerate to the extent that it starts to pull in like a baseball and all collapses in the "big bang". In other cases, it may be too little to stop the expansion. Everything will drift forever, always late or slow, but it will not stop - just like a spaceship. The galaxies will be separated from each other until they become invisible. With the annihilation and the end of countless generations of stars, the universe will continue to expand. If you like it, it will end in a huge, dark, cold state: "Great Cold"

Philosophy and faith can constitute a troublesome combination. People want to believe in higher powers, life after death, and why bad things happen to good people. But from a philosophical standpoint, I do not understand this. There is never an answer to a philosophical question. I think this is the source of faith. Philosophers such as Hume, Wittgenstein and Plantinger point out that although our discussion has no logical argument, they still exist and are norms. Neculetism The philosophy that doubts the existence of God is related to the lack of evidence, but at the same time a strong illusion is philosophy, a collection of illusions leading to the environment formed by human consciousness, all humans live there There. Non-materialistic is a philosophy that believes there is no important purpose, but all reality is a construct of imperfect perception. Immoral human race should try to pursue perfect eternal aesthetic philosophy. Another name for immortal immortalization (or eternal life) is the concept of a potential infinite or indefinite period. Throughout history, mankind has longed for eternal life. Whatever form of infinite or infinite human life it will take, or even if it is possible, it is subject to much speculation, fantasy, and discussion. See also inductive reasoning. One of the biggest contributions of Thomas was to incorporate Aristotle's philosophy into the Catholic church theology. Thomas believes that reason and faith are one and support one another, and it is believed that the Bible and the fathers of the Church and Aristotle's inference combine the inference of the Aristotle with a unified system and Christianity I understand the revelation of. His most famous work is Summa Theologica, 5 volume masterpiece. St. Thomas Aquinas introduced the classical way of teaching the Bible. Looking back on Gregory's words, the Bible transcends all science. "Despite explaining the facts in the same sentence, it reveals a mystery." Spiritual meaning, fable, truth, morality, praise of life, and the final event to be achieved I will clarify the purpose. The details of his seven sacramas are still our standard today.

John Rock is the most influential role in American history, thought and practice. Without the influence of his work, the United States can not have the basis of nontransferable rights, stable governance, and quality of life. However, rock is still widely known and has not been studied by a new generation of Americans. His most influential writing "Government's Second Paper" laid the foundation of the American government system in theory and system. And it has enjoyed a history of over two centuries. Founder of the United States relied heavily on the many principles taught by John Rock. Many of Locke's second government's principles can be easily found because the speech declaration has some wording and order differences. As seen in the US constitution, many thoughts about the legitimate role of the government can be found in Locke 's study. - "It is John Adams who generally pointed out that in any society, people without property are not familiar with public service for correct judgment and depend on others to have their own will" . That attitude led the founder to establish a political regime of modern America. As for what type of institution is required for modern contemporary students, the answer seems to be always "democracy". John Rock (1632-1704) links the long tradition of medieval political thought with Thomas Aquinas. His philosophical work brought about a great revolution in the second half of the 18th century. Rock is the founder of an American intellectual. In particular, in his "Letters on Tolerance" (1689) and "The Second Paper of the Citizen's Government" (1690), he created the American establishment principle expressed in the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution. The root of philosophy. In his work in America, Rock established a theory harmonizing the freedom and political order of individual citizens. Democracy developed in the reign governed by human natural rights is the cornerstone of the founder's declaration. Donald Dornberg wrote in "Our People: John Rock, Collective Constitutional Rights and Government's Permanent Challenge". "The widespread impact of John Rock's history is immeasurable It is clear that some of the most important frameworks for establishing the United States come from locks.

Identify at least one point in this article, which claims that the author is important for understanding the role of entrepreneurs in society. The main point Schumpeter emphasized is that capitalism is an evolutionary process. He explained that as a concept of eternal movement, "not only that but it is never static." Schumpeter continues to point out that the evolution of capitalism is not due to the fact that economic life continues in society and the natural environment, and that is the main reason for the constant evolution of capitalism due to war and recovery Absent. revolution. Joseph Schumpeter and destruction of creativity JTBD's roots can be traced back to the introduction of Joseph Schumpeter and its creative destruction for at least 75 years. Schumpeter acknowledged that new technological innovations steal customers from existing products and ultimately will replace them. For a while, horses and boats are our personal means of transport. After all, the train replaced the horse, but then the car and the aircraft superseded those trains and ships. The client's work also includes another wonderful insight by Schumpeter, which is almost always ignored. Schumpeter believes that competition should not be measured only with products of the same "type". He insists that competition can happen from anywhere. You may think that you are alone in the market or have superiority in the market, but competitors unknown to you might steal your customers. The only indication of your problem is to reduce sales. This view conflicts with the so-called Joseph Schumpeter's big gap. In 1954 Schumpeter's "Analysis of Economic Analysis" showed a big gap between the five years of economic thought between the decline of Greek-Roman civilization and the work of Thomas Aquinas (1225 - 1274). Breakthrough. However, in 1964, Joseph Spangler's "Islamic Economic Thought: Ibn Kardun" was published in the magazine "Comparative Studies of Society and History" and attracted the early Muslim scholars the attention of the modern Western side It was. A big step. The work of Joseph Schumpeter is different from the scientific work of most of his contemporaries. He integrated various knowledge courses in history, politics, and mathematics in economics studies. Schumpeter 's methodology is different from the conceptual foundation of neoclassicalism, his thoughts on innovation, entrepreneurial spirit, and economic cycle are A. It is as important as the concept of Marshall's free competition. In "economic development theory", Schumpeter focuses on the analysis of internal factors that develop economic development theory and lead to the development of the economic system, unlike many economic theory representatives who were studying the static equilibrium conditions at the time I am counting on you. . In the neoclassical theory, the word "development" is already new and only the equilibrium state of the economy is taken into consideration.

"I ended the obvious existence of God, and my existence is always full of God in my life. Evidence for the human soul to know something other evidence and something I can not use it. " The existence of God "You can not think something clearly against yourself ... ... But you can say that the opposite of the proposition" God exists "... ... Therefore, there is no saying the claim of the existence of God "(Thomas · Aquinas) Some people say that God is the omnipotence and omniscient existence of the universe, in other words, God is omnipotent and omniscient and the universe Although it manages, it seems that proving the existence of God caused ridiculous things ... When answering questions about God, the argument of evil is a very unique argument. Most of the discussion is trying to prove the existence of God, while this argument tries to do the opposite Oh, and I really emphasize the word try. Another I think is special One reason is that it is not just a parameter, but a series of three parameters, In my opinion this argument is rather weak, proving that its purpose is not to prove something but prove its role Shall we do not have. All variations of moral argument begin with the observation of moral thoughts or experiences and lead to conclusions about the existence of God. Some of these discussions present the moral facts they claim through human experience and believe that God is the best explanation for these things. Other versions explain some of the objectives that human beings should try to achieve only when God exists. Many of the moral arguments are based on moral norms, which indicates that objective moral truths exist and that the existence of God is necessary to give authority to them. In many cases, they believe that ethics seems to be binding - obligations are considered more than just preferences, but rather believe that obligations are established regardless of other factors and benefits. To make morality binding, God must exist. From the most general form, the moral normative argument is as follows.

When I entered the toilet, bliss put his finger deep into my throat. She felt knuckles touch the throat. She was like a gag, ice cream, biscuits, and the rest of the dessert. I threw her body and wiped my mouth. Her eyes are full of wet pain. I could burn her throat with acid. Her body is shaking. Bliss can hear distant sounds through the wall. The room feels black and small. Pushing her body out of the ground, the face of Bliss drips. She looked at her bones. The burning flames and dark black smoke beneath her body almost prevented her from opening them again, as she awaked her from happiness and awakened her to hell on the planet. Face, terrible, blistering pain - When her eyes were opened, her skin tore open, she shouted - Early rays of dawn echoing evil bombs and exploding in the air Traditionally in the past, hell was called or considered a place. Some claim that they reject the figurative interpretation of Biblical account of hell and attributed hell to hell and others claim that hell is a clear place, but rather that the place is unknown To argue. Pope Benedict XVI preached on March 25, 2007: "Jesus came to tell us that we all want us to be in heaven The love of his heart , Many media reported the explanation of this sentence by Richard Owen, claiming hell is a place of reality, but in the Catechism of the Catholic Church (1035), Benedict declared that in his congregation He led the production as a religious doctrine "The main penalty of hell is to always be isolated from God": ii Joseph Huntheim wrote in the Catholic Encyclopedia of 1910, "Theologians generally accept that hell really is in the Earth, the Catholic Church makes no decision on this subject It can be said that hell is a clear place, but we do not know "He cites St. Augustine in Hippo, hell is underground, St. Gregory's hell is either on earth or underground Said. Aquinas' Summa theologiciae suppl's postmortem supplement. Q97 A4 wrote speculation about the position of hell as a speculation. As Augustine said (De Civ. Dei xv, 16), "No one knows which part of the world is hell unless the Spirit of God reveals this to someone"

Our world has more and more serious problems; it is not fast. Unfortunately, I bother everyone, sometimes more. For this reason our world is suffering severely. Shooting, crime of hatred, and war are part of the result of this widespread misfortune. Some people may say that there is no hope for our world, but that is it. To end this misfortune, everyone should eat, drink, eat goldfish, and have plenty of sunshine. People may ask that Skittles can do it. When the problem should be Skittles to do. Many people think that the secret of happiness and satisfaction is in the future. Happiness is a white rabbit, check his pocket watch, and then move forward a few steps. It's a good job to graduate, it's time for the next pay raise or promotion, it is looking for that person to get married, it is to buy a car or a house. In any case, we will consider that. It is not here. There are things that I can say about goals, wishes, and expectations. These can create healthy hope, ideal driving force, and intrinsic need to improve themselves. But they are not happy - both now and the future. Again, our goals and desires are not happy. According to the definition, happiness is emotion. Future events are not emotions Usually, I am wondering myself of the secret of happiness. Plato insists that only people living in moral virtues feel happy. Aristotle wrote that happiness - human progress - is the only thing that can be evaluated independently. Aquinas believes that God is inherently happy. In her study Sonja Lyubomirsky discovered that 40% of our happiness was inherited, 10% indirect, but 40% is totally our own self-control. In everything, scratches ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, Material property, promotion of work, and recognition of others. These things are obtained after being chased, so what? Satisfied mind is a very precious blessing. This is the real secret of happiness. Satisfaction is jewelry, change everything into money, yes, I want to become wealth. Greed is an ulcer that eats the most wealthy robe and the most expensive treasure; a drop of water, the more it drinks, the more thirsty it is thirsty. It is not contradictory to work hard to meet our requirements and improve it. Satisfaction is obtained. It is not our natural talent, but it is the product of discipline. The world is a school and we have to learn from it. The best lesson we can learn is to meet

There is no doubt that Aristotle's theory and principle has influenced Western civilization for decades. According to Hergenhahn (2009), the philosopher De Anima is considered the first article in the history of psychology, so it is an important part of psychology. In this book, Aristotle is trying to define the heart and soul, the spirit. Later he established his theory of psychology based on the definition of psychology. To develop his own definition of mind and soul, Aristotle advocated empirical studies of behavior as its theoretical evidence. Aristotle (384-322 BC). Aristotle developed his own moral and psychology, and systematically defined the soul and its attributes. But the most important thing for psychological theory is that Aristotle developed a systematic approach to the experience of natural science. In combination with Christianity, this Aristotle philosophy has become the framework of most medieval academic philosophy, like Poitius and Thomas Aquinas' work. The empirical framework of psychology research reflects Aristotle's tradition Psychology is a very ancient science and exists from a very old age in human history. Because of the dissatisfaction of the old definition, a new time theory appeared. As a result, all "systems" of psychology have different motives and different perspectives on facts and novels. Therefore, we use various research methods, techniques and goals to define what each system considers to be true. This is tested by example of behaviorism and psychoanalysis in two different psychological systems. Throughout the history of psychology many theories emerged to help explain every aspect of human behavior. Some examples of these methods include classical conditioning and adhesion theory. Some theories focus on a small part of human behavior (called mini theory), others comprehensive theory designed to explain all human psychology (macro theory and Called as). The success of predictive behavior is also one of the best ways to understand if you understand the underlying cause of behavior. Prediction makes it possible for psychologists to guess human behavior without having to understand the mechanism behind this phenomenon. For example, if researchers find that they can predict a high school dropout rate using a particular fitness test score, this information can be used to estimate the number of students dropping out in a particular group each year.

Patriarch in Biblical Interpretation In the opening paragraph of her article "The God to Patriarchal in Biblical Interpretation", Phyllis Libble is about her language in the Hebrew Bible and the liberation movement of the women in front of him I said there was. Ideological work is considered "impossible and unethical" for many people. (Trible, "Depatriarchalizing", 30) Some people think that some people believe that these two phenomena have no meaning to each other. : Most of the included poems are written to clarify the gender of women as scapegoats. Biblical or Biblical is a different usage of the interpretation of different authors of the Bible. It can be considered to be the same as a dictionary definition of literal meaning: "having a correct character or literal meaning" is literally "based on the basic or precise meaning of one or more words." Alternatively, , You can refer to a historical grammatical approach that tries to reveal the meaning of the text by considering not only grammatical terms but also grammatical aspects, cultural historical context, and literature. Emphasize quoting of words in the text without denying the literary aspect, the type of text, or the relevancy of the figure (eg fable, parable, analogue or metaphor). It is not necessarily a single paragraph of a particular paragraph It does not lead to complete agreement on interpretation. The explanation of the original argues that the text of the Bible should be interpreted in terms of its "grammatical structure" and the "general meaning" conveyed by its historical background. The literal meaning corresponds to the author's intention. This interpretation is usually (but not necessarily) related to believing in the Bible's inspiration, according to which the individual words of God's information are sacred chosen accordingly. The extreme form of this view was criticized because they did not fully consider the unique personality of the style and vocabulary found in various Bible authors. The influential fourth century Biblical scholar Jerome supports the Biblical literal interpretation of the excessive behavior of what he considers as a fable. Lilla's leading protagonists, Thomas · Aquinas, John Collette, Martin Luther, John Calvin, later claimed literally meaningful superiority.

Pastors and scientists have been faced with many questions I can not answer. I have provided several different alternatives as a way to answer these questions. Many people turned to "religion" to answer some of these questions, and some turned to "science". After careful consideration and research, I began to agree with scientists' supporters. I participated in many wonderful discussions about my beliefs, but none of them are as interesting as my pastor. Advocates of all scientists do not tend to reduce ethics to evolution. Sam Harris introduced science at the book "The Moral Landscape" in 2010 and expressed his opinion against the evolutionary ethics project as a whole. But he wants to replace it with a scientific part. Under Harris' ethical framework, the core criterion for judging whether action is moral is whether it contributes to the happiness of conscious creatures. Harris' idea has all the problems that had plagued pragmatism philosophy from the beginning. Since Utilitarians have been around for a while, Harris insists on challenging the fact - a difference in value, more precisely a problem of merely avoiding value by focusing on facts. Here, we came to the dilemma facing science. The supporters now may argue that if philosophy has such a status it really must become part of science. The current problem is that arbitrarily redefining "science" to include something that science can be presented as evidence against it, has become completely less important. To make matters worse, it aligns ideas with science that should not be compatible. For example, it originated in Aristotle, and the idea developed by Thomas Aquinas is very sophisticated. Outside the time there are uninduced causes and space to maintain the causal relationship of scientific research. Today 's scientist' s argument claims that the only opportunity for reason is often equal to science and reason. However, it seems to be against the reason. We insist that science can do things we can not do. As a scientist, I will never deny that scientific discoveries have a significant influence on metaphysics, epistemology and ethics, and that all those interested in these topics need scientific reading and writing. However, the argument that science and science can solve many years of problems in these areas has caused countless problems.

Regardless of whether it is pleasure, sorrow, awe, power, wisdom, worship, or plea, many moments of life require a way of communication that transcends ordinary everyday ways. Poems are powerful, meaningful, using images, repetition, contrast, structure, ideas, than any other method. Psalms are defined as sacred songs sung to music (Vines 497). This is very attractive to us, learning moral lessons with elements of poetry, and helping to approach God. Augustine said Psalm 59:11 ("But do not kill, our lord, our people will forget") that Jews can not confront the massacre as a witness to the Christian world I insist. He also said that the Jews were cursed but ultimately converted to Christianity Kane. Augustine is an excellent philosophical character between Plato and Thomas Aquinas, this period lasted 1600 years and covered even the lives of famous thinkers like Aristotle. Augustine introduced the fusion of Platonism and Christianity through his Apuleius, Plotinus, Porphyry reading. One of the things he allowed us to integrate Platonic's philosophical tradition with Christianity was that the latter was not a philosophy but a set of historical beliefs. The basic idea of ​​Christianity is that God created our world and then lived through Jesus of Nazareth. Despite the strong interest in the creative use of the Jewish Bible by Pseudo Philo, there is little talk about the author's "David Psalm" (LAB 59: 4). Indeed, there are few articles on the LAB section, except for John Strugnell's re-establishment of Psalm's Hebrew Vorlage (1965) and Howard Jacobson's two volume review (1996). The purpose of this document is to show that LAB 59: 4 constitutes a complex interpretation of text along the full interpretation strategy of Pseudo Philo. In accordance with the method proposed by Bruce Fisk (2001), I attempted to find a reasonable original textual relevance of poetry including LAB and followed the interpretive skills that attracted the author to read these poems . Paying utmost attention to the Psalms also gives hints on how the Pseudo-Philippines established the connection between "Psalms of David" and the events of life in David.

In order for war activities to meet the requirements of fair war theory, it is necessary for the legal system to implement justice to call for action. These systems strengthen accountability between parties to war and manage the overall cost, effectiveness and possibilities of war. Although this requirement is ideally noble, it relies on unauthorized assumption of authority. Legal authority may support war, but intent may simply conflict with other aspects of war theory. Historians and philosophers formed the theory of war just for centuries. However, the most systematic description of the theory of justice war was developed by St. Thomas Aquinas in his Summa Theologicae. According to the theory of war of justice, the moral reality of war can be divided into two parts. War was judged twice. The first visit refers to the reasons of domestic battle, and the second time refers to the means used in the actual battle. (Walzer, 21) The first verdict was called jus ad bellum, or justice. The second sentence is called a wartime trial, or justice in war. Jus ad bellum provides guidelines for assessing whether war is fair or unfair but wartime rules outline the correct behavior in warfare. Jus ad bellum does not mean jus in battle. Likewise, jus in battle does not need jus ad bellum. Justice warfare may be done unfairly so that it is possible to fight legitimate warfare. Only war theory and law distinguish between reason (jus ad bellum) relying on war and rational behavior in war (jus in war). Most statements of the theory of justice warfare have four principles, each with its own label. Rational hope for justification, legal authority, right intent, necessity or final means, proportionality and success There are three principles in rule of war: three types of discrimination, necessity or minimum force, and Proportionality. These principles represent a comprehensive understanding of the morality of war, in a compressed form that is 300 years ago and the basic structure is almost the same. Since it develops synchronously with the state system based legal system, not the individual, its existing form theory is very different from the classical theory it belongs to.

All laws promoting personality are fair. The law that respects personality is unfair. "(Letters from King Birmingham) Kim uses St. Thomas Aquinas to attract the pastor with unjust and fair legal expertise" Separation distorts the soul and hurts the personality, so all apartheid methods It is unfair, it gives a separatist a false sense of superiority and separates the wrong inferiority complex. "(King's letter from Birmingham) Martin Luther King, Martin Luther King was born on Tuesday, January 15, 1929 in Atlanta, Georgia. His parents are Martin Luther, Sr. And Alberta King. He was born in a world where isolation is law. His childhood best friend, White, is not allowed to play with him when he is in school. Blacks could not be eaten in a separate bathroom, drank from a fountain and eaten in a "white alone" restaurant ... Martin Martin Luther King, leader of role model: management team: leader suggested: Nana Akhobadze "Leadership is an impact process that helps individual groups achieve their goals" (Peter G. Northouse, 2010). By definition, in order to achieve this "process", the individual (follower) group should motivate team members, motivate and frankly work to achieve common goals. This is perfectly correct Today, blacks and whites are in school, work, and public places. In the era when Martin Luther King (Jr.) lived, blacks were discriminated, so there were only "white people" in the place. Martin Luther King (Jr.) Was born in 1929 to 1968 and was born in Atlanta, Georgia. In his era, whites were sitting in front of the bus, but the blacks were sitting behind the bus for that color. However, if there is no place for white men to sit, it is necessary for black men to stand up from their seats and sit a white man there. When Martin Luther King (Jr.) Led black men to treat equally, "white" police came to the march and sometimes spray them with fire hose. . Sometimes, they are badly struck and some of the protesters are dead.

If the perception of how best to preserve humans changes, the rules will obviously change - even if they appear to be clear and unchanging. As a demonstration, we may look back on the history of abortion briefly. There was a fear that the human life could be absolutely killed in the era after a large whirlpool. Our number is small, the situation in the house is very bad. At that time, human fetus was told that "life exists", according to the law abortion is generally criticized as "killing". A brief history of the incident. Speluncean explorer vs. Stopher County (4300) Comprehensive Entity Court incident is about 5 Speluncean Explorers. After the landslide closed the entrance, the explorer was locked in the cave. Twenty days later, these explorers sent a message of help to the rescue team. As the doctors outside the cave say, explorers are exhausted their supplies, there is no way to survive in the cave because their distribution and conditions are not supported. In addition, one of the explorers told the doctor on behalf of the remaining doctors and asked if they could survive by eating one of them, and the doctor agreed. It is further recommended to throw a die to decide who can eat. After that, Whitmore was eaten. On the 32nd day it was pointed out that survivors were rescued and killed Whetmore. Four survivors were sentenced to death by the Supreme Court for killing Roger Whetmore. According to Aquinas' law definition, "Law is the result of how reasoning achieves common interests (for everyone)." In the case of the Speluncean explorer, the people trapped in the cave were not within the jurisdiction of Newgarth, so they become their own society. "To achieve common interests of everyone" applies only to men in the cave as they are the only ones within their jurisdiction. - Determine whether the actions performed by the agent are correct or incorrect. Lon L. Fuller filed a lawsuit to evaluate the ethical definition of correct behavior in the 1949 article "Speluncean Explorers Litigation." Ethical studies of correct behavior consist of two main moral theories: Dentology (backward / original) and objective (forward / end). Both have religious and non-religious elements

Foreword The book "Reform of the Middle Ages and the British Queen" is based on the facts of Norman, Planta, the Tudor dynasty from the Norman conquest of 1066 to the death of Elizabeth I in 1603. Among the 32 biographies summarized here are four princesses who tried to rule or rule in their own way. These queen rulers are Emma Matilda, Mrs Jane Gray, Queen Mary I and Queen Elizabeth I. They are paying the same attention in previous works (2005) of writers who live in the UK, same as men. This poem was dedicated to Elizabeth I. Elizabeth I played the role of Fairy Queen Gloriana and Bellefobe in the poem. Spencer added Sonnets to the poem and devoted it to Sir Christopher Hatton, Sir Burley, Count Oxford, Count County Abbey, Count Cumberland, Essex Count, Deep O E, Earl and Ossori, Admiral Charles Howard, Hensden Sir, Wilton's Greton, Lord Buckhurst, Sir Francis Worthingham, Sir John Norris, Countess Pentrock Walter Sir Lee (with her brothers Sir Sidney Sidney) and Mrs. Karoo In a letter to Spearer's Sir Walter Rowley in 1590, Spencer contains a preface to "Fairy Quinn" which describes the allegorical expression of virtue in King Arthur's wonderful "Fairy Land" I will. This letter is presented as a preface to the epic in most published versions and outlines the plans for 24 books. Twelve of them exhibited 12 "public virtues" centered on King Arthur. Although the influence of Thomas Aquinas and the tradition of the medieval allegory can be observed, Spencer raised Aristotle as a source of these virtues. Since the credibility of the prediction made in his letter to Raleigh is not absolute, it is difficult to predict how this work will be done, as the first Faculty Quinn appeared in 1590. Many differences from the plan. Publication

Design Theory Many philosophers have been discussing design controversies for centuries. Design theory shows that the world presents design elements, things adapt to some general purpose or purpose, and this design shows that the world is a work of designers - god. The two main philosophers who discussed this were Aquinas and Perry, but many others tried to support them in other ways, for example Swinburn and the probability. This is a design theory for theological research related to intelligent design movement and design controversy. In retrospect, I was amazed at the many relationships between design discussion and science, religion, and other longstanding issues in the philosophy of theology. My intelligent design analysis touches issues such as beliefs, relationship between reason and science, problems of nature and evil, nature of reality, and the nature of God. For me, the broad meaning of the factors behind the discussion of design controversy is one of the greatest returns for this research. I started my analysis from the classical discussion of William Paley's Natural Theology (1802) and used an understanding of the design argument as an analogy. This is an example of the design theory in traditional religious philosophy, it is important to understand the similarities and differences between intelligent design and Perry's discussion. The famous classes of Paley are as follows: When crossing the wasteland, I will put my feet on the stone and assume I was asked how the stones came there It is always there There is; probably it is difficult to show the absurdity of this answer. However, I should find a watch on the ground and ask the place how the watch is located. I hardly thought about what I said earlier, and for the things I know, the watch may always be there. But why should not this answer be used for watches and stones?

Angel overview Angel overview: "Angel is spirit," Saint Augustine declared. St. Thomas Aquinas believes that angels are pure spirits and do not take any space without any material or quality, but Thomas believes that angels can freely take their bodies It is. The purpose of an angel is the same as a human purpose. Love the Lord and serve the Lord. But angels are not material creatures, they may come from different dimensions, so they can serve the Lord in many different ways. Angels have greater will and wisdom than us. An overview of the series is here, fan, Clary Fray participated in Brooklyn Academy of Art. On 18th birthday she learned that she was Shadow Hunter. Born of angel 's blood, he is a person who can protect humans from the devil. That night, Clary's mother, Jocelyn, was kidnapped by a cheating group of Shadowhunters named Circle. Their leader is Joslyn's ex-husband, Valentin Morganstein. When her mother was away, Clarie looked to Luke, who seemed to have been betrayed, although she trusted. Clary rescued her mother in a group of Shadow Hunters and discovered the power she did not know. Clary was brought to the world of devil hunt by mysterious, narcissistic and charming Shadowhunter Jace and her loyal and strange friend Simon. Lupton made a critical analysis of Angelou's 5 volumes autobiography. For each, she explains a general outline of the story background. Next, we analyze from various perspectives such as the story of "the heart of women" and explain the story structure of the discovery pattern. Then there is the development of the plot. The focus is to reveal the characteristics of the theme, then develop the character, and reveal the personality of the character as the story evolves. Then it is to decide the topic of the story topic

By definition, the revelation of Christian revelation is to reveal facts and theories through religious events previously hidden. For Christians, revelation is primarily related to God's revelation to his people. God told us, but we also have to think about what he showed us to us, and we choose whether to accept his love . God did not leave us to us. The act of his love is still our motivation to accept God. The interpretation of historism sees a broad view of the history of the apocalypse; interpretive interpretation mainly refers to the era of the apocalypse (the 1st century), or recent events of the Roman Empire. Future decline; Mirrorists believe that Apocalypse describes future events; Apocalypse refers to struggle between spiritual allegory and good and evil, not real people or events Idealism or symbolic interpretation of. The view of "symbolic history" (in most cases the official view of the apocalypse adopted by the medieval church) has been read down to the Middle Ages. In general, these views understand the 1000 year view of the text. Therefore, some people have come to understand what is happening in the history of Christians by the viewpoint of such Apocalypse. This interpretation style considers the late event as having achieved 'forecast' in the history of Christianity. In the apocalypse, it is called the "continuous history" view. Thomas Aquinas first described generic revelation and special revelation with two Christian revelations. General revelation takes place by observing the order in which they are created. These observations can logically derive important conclusions such as the existence of God and attributes of God. General revelation is also element of Christian 's apology theory. Specific details such as trinity and incarnation have been made clear in the teachings of the Bible and can not be inferred unless inspired in particular. On the one hand, a compatriot believes that evolutionary science and theology are compatible and treat them as complementary revelations of God. Since God is his own specific revelation in Christian faith and is also essentially the source of his general revelation, the discovery of science and theology can not truly contradict, contradiction is obvious It must be. It is faithful to God's solution to the truth. Nicozisin (Fr. George) is compatible

Introduction Aristotle (384 BC - 322 BC) is a Greek philosopher. He is a student of Plato and a teacher of Alexander the Great. Together with other Greek philosophers like Plato and Socrates, he is considered one of the most important figures in Western philosophy. Educational philosophy "Everyone who meditates on human art believes that the fate of the empire depends on the education of young people." - Aristotle Aristotle is considered to be the father of realism and scientific method. Thomas Aquinas (around 1225 - 7 March 1274) incorporated Aristotle's philosophy into Christianity and established a Christian philosophy on the philosophical foundation of Christianity. This had a decisive influence on Aristotle's influence on Western history. By the death of Aristotle in 322 BC, the classical philosophy ended until the 3 rd century AD was called the Hellenistic era. In the first half of this period (until the middle of the 1st century BC), practical philosophy became flourishing, the three developed school styles or philosophy styles were stoicism, epicureanism, skepticism. In the second half of the Greek era, religious orientation was adopted and New Platonism was admired. Research on Aristotle's philosophy has influenced the thought of the late Neo-Renaissance. One of the main focus of Aristotle's philosophy is the concept of his systemic logic. Aristotle's goal is to propose a universal process of reasoning that allows people to learn everything possible about reality. The initial process describes objects based on object characteristics, presence state, and actions. In his philosophical paper Aristotle is also discussing ways human beings can get information about things through deductions and reasoning. For Aristotle, reasoning is a reasonable argument, his deductive theory that "when one is decided, the other must appear for their existence" is what philosophers are now calling The basis of syllabic theory is logical. Arguments for inferring conclusions from two or more other forms of some premise

Surprisingly, in the Middle Ages and the Renaissance every aspect of society has changed over a long period of time. Between the Middle Ages and the Renaissance there are many major changes related mainly to art and religion. In general, the ideals and themes of the Renaissance are becoming more secular. In the Middle Ages, people seem to focus on the church, God and the Hereafter; focusing more and more secular focus on the Renaissance: people and the earth's life. The Renaissance era was remembered as the Greek and Roman era of resurrection and the ancient European era. But what brought about this resurrection. The medieval or medieval was the predecessor of the Renaissance. Gothic and Romanesque architecture can be seen throughout Europe during the Middle Ages. Since the Renaissance, the Middle Ages could express the differences across Europe. Religion, ideology of the transformation of the whole culture, the government ultimately led to the occurrence of the Renaissance to express their skills in architecture, science, art and so on. The Renaissance humanist disregards the Middle Ages, thought of the savage "middle" between the ancient Greek and Roman cultures of the era, as well as the "resurrection" and the classical culture of the Renaissance. Modern historians believe that the medieval era is one of the development of philosophy and was deeply influenced by Christian theology. As one of the most famous thinkers of this era, Thomas Aquinas, his own philosophers, philosophers and critics are not always considered "lack of truth and precise wisdom" The Middle Ages and the Renaissance were two of the most famous eras in European history. Despite the intertwined history, there is a big difference in the European culture of the Middle Ages and the Renaissance. These are hindering Europe in the general history as an era of great education and social progress, or simply as soon as possible to reproduce that potential fully. Europeans are looking for a system suitable for evolving and changing countries. The experience and the continent are ready to fruition the modern future for the future, combined with the educated medieval and Renaissance.

Sister Donna was born in Queens, New York and lives in a two-bedroom apartment in New York with his parents, brother and sister. Sister Donna has a wonderful memory of an Italian-Irish-American family closely related to her. She listens to her grandparents, aunts and uncle stories, and likes to stay with them. She remembers the time to play outside the nearby friends and in the summer I am looking forward to the beautiful beaches of Long Island. Donna studied at St. Nicholas Grammar School, Bishop Reilly High School and St. Francis High School in the New York train school. "I have great teachers at grammar schools and high schools, some of them religious women who swear to speak, they are my role models and leaders." After graduating from high school, Sister Donna studied at the Queen's College in New York for two years and was later transferred to the University of Houston in 1978. She graduated with a bachelor's degree in secondary education in 1980. "I came across the Minister of the University of Houston and the Dominican sister on campus and I like the experience of the Dominican men and women who work together in the ministry Peters, he is my leader I am a friend In July 1982 Sister Donna entered the monastery. Donna sisters taught science and taught at St. Pius X High School from 1980 to 1983. In 1983, she went to work as a pastor at Benta Wave Hospital. In the meantime, she attended St. Thomas University and received a clinical pastoral education certificate in 1984. In 1985, she returned to St. Pius X High School as a scientific department, teacher, and head of the coach. During this time, Sister Donna also received a master's degree in systematic theology from the Aquinas Institute in St. Louis, Missouri. In 1988, she worked as a student, teacher and instructor for three years at the University of St. Agnes. In 1994, Sister Donna received a master's degree in private school management from the University of Boston. For twenty-five years, Donna's sister served as principal and principal of St. Pius X. "I have extensive experience and have built up all the great relationships with my students, family and colleagues." I am enjoying the experience of all the ministers and growing up. " In 2016, the sisters of Donna were elected Prioress of the Dominican sister in Houston, and in June of that year began to lead the team minister. Sister Donna currently lives in Houston and enjoys traveling, sports, cooking, technology, genealogy research. Thank you for considering the gift to the Dominican sister in Houston! The gift to our team's annual fund sports partner will support our active department in education and school management, social work, judicial advocacy, and campus and parish ministry. The gift from this year's foundation will also help to take care of the retired sisters who serve others. Doing gifts from the Guatemala mission school to us helps to ensure that our poor students receive good Catholic education. We are very grateful to the wonderful donors who make donations every year. All gifts are different to ensure that our mission is successful. Thank you for supporting Dominican Houston sisters. May God bless you, heal you and fill you with light For 125 years I have served in Houston, Galveston, Sabine, and other parts of Texas, California, and Guatemala. The two preparatory schools of St. Agnes University and St. Pius X High School in Houston continue to grow. Today, our members are about 66 people, of which one third is the Minister of Education, others are the Ministry of Dioceses, religious education, social welfare, Ministry of Campus, counseling, medical, law, family and women's services I am in. Music and art, the mission of Guatemala, retreat work, community organization and refugee support She entered the monastery in September 1963. "In the summer of my junior and senior year I have decided that God wants me to join the sister of the Dominican sister of Houston." In 1968,

I remembered it when I was a child, but I asked "Why" in my life. What is the purpose of life? Why are we here? What is the purpose of life? What is going on? Is it really God? I always left these problems to myself, and eventually drove them out of my mind. I grew up with a Christian family, so I should not question such questions or doubt my faith. This is the world. Because God is doing this. I am really excited to be able to take this course. Because it ultimately gives me the opportunity to exercise my personal thoughts and beliefs. I agree with Socrates "Uncensored life is not the case ... agreed to display more content This responsibility includes personal and social responsibility. At the personal level, we have to take care of ourselves and keep healthy and happy individuals. In the social aspect, I firmly believe in this sentence and tell others what you want them to do. Observing this rule will help society operate as smoothly as possible without causing too many conflicts. Also, there is no misfortune or rude worth in any of our shirts in my lifetime. As a human being, we can make a conscious personal choice and be responsible for our actions, beliefs, emotions, and attitudes. And I think we need to use these abilities Since I am in the field of medicine, all the science courses taught to me to believe that science is the answer. However, after completing this course, I noticed that science can only get answers so far. Science can not explain problems such as the existence of God. This is where philosophy enters. Philosophy continues to deepen, trying to give us a logical explanation. Science continues to attract my interest but I chose to accept science and gave us some answers. Learn from experience. Often we test this when we grow up. If you put your hand on the flame, the flame will get hot and you will not touch it. Fire always gets hot. There is no other way. There is always a chemical involved Papers on basketball and football wallpapers Turn Creation Papers New Year's Target Article mba Marathi Votes Papers Important My Life Philosophy Papers azadipyrromethene Comprehensive Papers Cultural Differences Relationship Psychology Papers Memory Thomas Thomas Aquinas is the author of the Middle Ages essay Money American History Regency Paper Supreme Court Introductory Concerning Case Education Persuasion Prose Prose Introduction Creator, Sigma 24 105 f 4 Art Review Essay Articles Paper Legislature Words Lara Essay University of Smithsonian University Harvard University PhD thesis or thesis World EU Law Research Parentage Relationship Paper A paper on direct and indirect influences of the essay paper chamaecrista nictitans description article malicious film analysis thesis mari de natalie thesis research paper and its importance Paper on logging in the fashion industry. Part of a research paper domestic violence The paper essay of my life and goals, the best essay to write the website legal philosophy is the prospect ambition of my life. Good article English article Global warming paper research paper immunization formulation evaluation criteria learning 2 paper life future city researcher papers ppt. Essay praises most corporate declaration of independence zusammenfassung, my funny family article was kidnapped. Quoting an example of a paper article on the educational background of green marketing research papers developed an example of a love story with a short essay. Writing essay Hard work Home school Essay of ancient Egypt Friendship of mummy Wikipedia is forever the essay theme. Detroit Michigan research paper on green marketing music thesis. British Indian tourist papers on libraries mean an example of the subject of a university thesis. My favorite article topic Heart philosophy My future home article kannada Educational research paper is my paper on natural paper work, summer paper Writing articles Jack London white epub Happy life thesis Thesis Is not a research paper research strategy . Pap

Since its founding by our Lord 2000 years ago, the Catholic Church has become a defender of world peace. But in the Catholic tradition, peace is not simply a lack of war and conflict, but rather it is mankind arranged according to God's eternal law. "Outline of church social theory" states as follows. "Before becoming a human project that is consistent with God's gift to mankind and God's plan, peace is primarily a fundamental attribute of God:" Lord is peace "(Judgment 6:24) Creation, this Is a sacred glory, a desire for peace. God creates everything, all creatures form a harmonious whole and is beautiful in every respect Peace is built on the main relationship between everyone and God. After voluntary divine acts of the order, the world experienced exposure to bloodshed and division. Violence appeared in interpersonal relationships and social relations. Peace and violence can not coexist, and we can not participate where there is violence. - Outline of the Association of Churches, 488 There are lots of information about church documents, what the Pope desires, and promoting world peace. See the Resources section below for links to many documents you can read online. For centuries, the teachings of the Church on peace and war have been influenced by the theory of war of justice. The theory of war of justice is a philosophical theory that states that war must be avoided absolutely, but war is justified if there is a right condition. Two pioneers of this theory are Saint Augustine and St. Thomas Aquinas. St. Augustine wrote: "The commandments for murder are not destroyed by the war-witters because of God's authority." St. Thomas advanced one step further and cited three conditions of war of justice indeed. He stated that war is necessary for a fair incident initiated by the proper authorities and completed with the correct intention (For further information on this, see Summa Theologica II - II, Q. 40 please). In the summary of the theory of justice war, the doctrinal questions and answers of the Catholic Church indicate the following. Damage to the state or international community by the invaders shall be permanent, serious and reliable. Even using weapons will not create more serious evils or obstacles than evils to be eliminated. The power of the modern destruction method is very important in evaluating this situation. " The roots of pacifism. The last element of the new lens for poverty, peace, and Catholic education on the earth of Pope Francisco is to reintegrate nonviolence at the heart of Catholic education about war and peace. In the early church, pacifism was the main theme of Christian theology. However, in most of the history of the church, nonviolence is a heroic but unrealistic choice, eccentric in our heritage, which has been replaced by the powerful war logic of St. Augustine. The renewal, recovery, and transformation initiated by Pope Francis in the Catholic doctrine of poverty, peace, and the earth is firmly rooted in the doctrinal tradition of the Church. But they are a rich prospect covering topics such as the great threats to the human race by the Southern Church - the majority of the Catholics of today's world - exclusion, pacifism, our general family protection, and globalization It brings about. St. Francis of Assisi must be very happy Since its founding by our Lord 2000 years ago, the Catholic Church has become a defender of world peace. But in the Catholic tradition, peace is not simply a lack of war and conflict, but rather it is mankind arranged according to God's eternal law. "An overview of the social theory of the church" is primarily a fundamental attribute of God before becoming a human project matching God's human gift and God's plan: the Lord is peaceful "(Jdg 6): 24). Glory reflection, desire for peace God creates everything that exists, all creatures form a harmonious whole, and all aspects are good. After the voluntary act of mankind changed the order of God, the wor

In 2002, Haspel became part of the CIA's overseas detention facility in Thailand where she supervised cruel interrogation and then abandoned these interrogation records. Advertising groups like Amnesty International say that her nomination has shown that the government can tolerate torture and international law violations and that Hasper records should disqualify her from the CIA leadership It was. As a secret official of the CIA in 2002, Gina Haspel supervised the torture of the two suspect terrorists and later joined to destroy their brutal interrogation videotapes in a secret prison in Thailand. . However, Haspel is well received by the CIA and intelligence community community. Many people including former National Intelligence Director James Clapper highly appreciate her choice "I am very pleased that Pompio has chosen Gina Haspel as Vice Chairman and he has chosen an excellent selection of veterans of experienced brokers who are widely respected by workers and technicians. Pompio's right arm. " Critics say that this appointment further strengthens the public ignorance of the Trump regime 's human rights and the rule of law. Gina Hasper, Director General of the Central Intelligence Committee of the Trumps, supervised the torture acts of the Bush era. He hit his head against the wall until one eye could not be seen. https://t.co/LHvUvuxirB McCain: "In the past decade, torture received by detainees during detention in the US was the darkest chapter in American history.Hasper tells us about the nature and degree of involvement in the CIA interrogation process during the verification process It was necessary to explain. " Other people praise Haspel's choice. Many Americans take a realistic political attitude towards dealing American enemies abroad and believe that torture is sorry but sometimes necessary. Mike Pompeo will be a good SecState and Gina Haspel will be the best choice for leading the CIA. Is torture reasonable in the world after 9/11? FRONTLINE gathered groups of legal thinkers to answer this question. Some of them have studied the problem of torture together for a joint project with Harvard Law School and the Kennedy government graduate school of Harvard University. The organization reported that it is sometimes called "torture and streamlining" strategy, trying to establish some restrictions and monitoring procedures for the use of "highly mandatory measures". " Is the problem of interlacing meaningful? "The problems are: Is war meaningful?" It seems that this is appropriate as torture is the subject of war. The theory of fair war can be used to justify torture because it can accept certain circumstances. St. Thomas Aquinas (1225-74) stated 'jus ad bellum' and he believed that the conditions that the war had to fulfill were reasonable. War has to be ordered by a legitimate authority, it must be fired for good reasons and the intention of the war people should be good at defeating evil (Almond, 1998, p. 197). Of course, the problem with using this theory of justice war is that conditional satisfaction is subjective. However, if torture is done by a legitimate government, torture may be morally justified if its overall goal is good and has the best intent. Is torture reasonable? "A typical example of controversy is the" time bomb "as to whether or not the terrorists should be tortured. It assumes that human information can save hundreds, thousands or hundreds of thousands of lives. When our country is in danger, the last known way when thousands to millions of lives are on line is to get information about imminent. Should information about tragic events that may end American life be used? Many people believe that torture should be used to combat terrorist attacks in the United States.

1931-1945 Nazi Germany, we go to mess with things to see if we will accept unjust laws. In 1933, it began the boycott of SA of the first Jewish shop. The German people of the new law never feel unreasonable treatment as the degree of anti-Semitism increases rapidly over time. Crystal night occurred in 1935, this is the first time the Jews were massacred publicly. The Germans did not show any signs of sympathy again. Hitler knows that he can now do whatever he wants with things. Introduced in 1941, the final concentration camp was slaughtered by millions of Jews. It began with all boycott Jewish shops. I can not help doubt whether German people tolerate this corruption of the law, the modern history of the whole world of Germany is different Since your work as a politician is not discrimination against the members of the community who serve anyone's interests, the Germans do not care about public because they do not do those things in line with the interests of the population of the Jews Unjust laws are legislation, which lawmakers intend to serve the interests of the public committee to soothe politicians and members and other authorities, will not draw any public attention. But when the proposition is also called, however, the law is just a trial to appease politicians who do not care about the public, how then did you feel the German people of the new law, unfair treatment? As you can see from the sentence, at least most of the public agrees with this policy Torture has become a number of countries -, a good example (you refer SA in a large organization with basically a state-sponsored thugs composition), therefore the cost of intolerance law, For those who disagree with him he was beaten "Unfair law is not merely legal." It is not only harmful just because it is an unfair law, only individual rights that may confront tolerance and obedience, but also harmful to social welfare. Therefore it is true that everyone is responsible for resisting them and even resisting them. As we know in the 1960s, some citizens decided not to comply with their own unfair and wrong laws. Without their resistance, no civil rights movement or anti-war will happen. Is abortion allowed for fair or unjust laws? Until today, "unjustified law" is "law," so whether the law allows for the legitimacy of abortion and false legal issues and basic justice, or the nature of social discovery. It can take appropriate action. How to find social justice to this question persuasive answers? * Nicholas T. Nikas is the Bioethics Defense Fund (BDF), president and legal advisor. Law of 1986 Arizona State University Law School, JD in 1981, Master of International Relations of the Government and Notre Dame, BA, Government and International Relations, Notre Dame University, 1979. BDF to address mission abortion and other issues There is a public utility legal, educational institution, commercialization of biotechnology of human life and other problems, laws for life. Life conscience issues and health rights (www.bdfund.org) However, there are two kinds of unfair law: law. I agree with St. Augustine's view ... "Unfair law is not merely legal ..." The unfair law contradicts the norm of ethics law. Place it in terms of St. Thomas Aquinas: an unfair law not rooted in the eternal laws and the natural laws of human laws. It only improves legal personality. It is illegal to reduce legal personality. All apartheid laws are unjust because separation separates the personality of soul and damages. It separates into false sensations of inferiority and gives erroneous feelings of superiority by separation. The use of the Jewish philosopher Martin Bouver's words, Apartheid 'I - that' replaced 'I - you' relationship relationship, and ultimately a shrinking person to the state of things. Therefore, separation is not only political, economic and socially perfect, but morally wrong

At the heart of today's deepest and unsustainable debate is the problem of human nature and dignity. What does it mean to be a person? How will we deal with others and respect our own personality? What is the meaning of body and sex? Do freedom obey obedience or dignity and dependence? This course covers these basic questions. This is the most basic thing we offer. It is designed for individual wealth, not academic unit. I have neither an exam nor a homework. Anyone who is interested and thinks that they do not mind can benefit from it. We tried to leave much space for questions and discussions. Regarding the content, the course is consciously in line with long-term philosophy (ie Plato, Aristotle, Augustine, and Aquinas), but from recent Christian thoughters (Newman, Pie, Wodzilla, Greece etc). Deerbrand, Crosby) has excellent adaptability to special concerns and problems of contemporary people. The course will be held from 8: 00-9: 30 at the West Chester's home. Each lecture is recorded online, and it will be made public to people who can not participate directly after 1 to 2 days. Registered students can listen to these lectures at a convenient time and discuss them online. (Of course, I can also get it by e-mail.) I do not need to read the course, but if you want to dig deeper, I suggest you start with one of the following. John F. Crosby, human self. Since this course is highly dependent on this book, reading this book increases the proficiency of most of the material covered and deepens it. C. S. Lewis, abolish human beings. A very pleasant interpretation that the essence of objective value and it is important for human prosperity Josef Pieper, Basics of Leisure Culture In particular, the second half of this book, the relationship between internal and transcendence is very good about "Philosophical Law". Carol / Wodzilla, love and responsibility. The main point of this book is very harmonious with Crosby's self. I especially recommend chapter 3 on chastity, shame and moderation. Dietrich von Hilde brand, heart. In this book, Von Hilde brand makes an important contribution to the understanding of this person by returning "emotion" (a place where emotional living exists) to a legal position besides intellect and will, It is. On the other hand, human philosophy takes the same objective as research, humanity, and his inner and social world. However, the program is quite different from the Geisteswissenschaften program, as it follows a general philosophical approach (testing of thought, analysis and classification, a priori reasoning, and reduction of absurdity, contemplation, and insight). In addition, the output of human philosophy is different from the output of Geisteswissenschaften, in a sense it is primarily descriptive and tells why humans are like this or normative. Presented in the internal and social world Philosophy allows humans to change some basic beliefs. Most of what we do, even if we explain it, is based on our basic beliefs. Therefore, the work of philosophy is to question the beliefs contradictory to human reasons. The conviction convicted before "reasonable result" must be abandoned. Therefore, philosophy helps shape and improve our mental abilities. Humanities and Social Sciences Journal 10 (1): 40-46, 2015 ISSN 1818-4960 © IDOSI Press, 2015 DOI: 10.5829 / idosi.hssj.2015.10.1.1152 Given that human philosophy and Geisteswissenschaften are fundamentally similar, they have the same subject of exploration; they differ with respect to the other two fundamental aspects, procedures and outputs. While Geisteswissenschaften aims to acquire descriptive knowledge using empirical and quantitative methods for the research of that subject, human philosophy uses theory and reflex method to explain explanatory and normative knowledge I aim to master. These two differences are ultimately factors that make human philosophy different from Geisteswissenschaften.

Anderson's game, Orson Scottka's novel is a form of anti-gay advertisement. James Campbell's article "Hunter of Murder: Ender's Game and Heterosexual Issues" is exploring Orson Scott Card's way. Puberty is the moment of social interaction. During school, sports and other activities, these social environments are platforms for fellow groups to make people who form children, accept or abandoned their children. "The peer group is defined as follows. When a person is called "mature" it does not necessarily mean that the person must be an adult. In Ander 's game, Orson Scott Card, maturity is a thematic subject. However, the main character consists mainly of children. This brings us The Ender game written by Orson Scott Card provides a futuristic environment in which the government selects, regulates and trains young geniuses and wins "bugs" or infinite battle with aliens. Ender, the protagonist The Orson Scott card novel "Enders games" is dominated by the moral and motive of the hero. Aliens had taken a very logical strategic approach to their problems before starting dialogue with the aliens. He chose "The real thing is not a game, Anders' thoughts are too tired to deal with this, they are not the light spot in the air, but the real ship he fought, the real thing he destroyed It's a ship ... I forgot ... " When the card keeps track of Ender's experience, he also allows enders to retreat, meditate and prepare through the giant's game equipment mainly. This game is a metaphor for the development of Andel's psychology when he retired himself for an internal understanding of what happened outside. As he learns to rely on internal reactions to gain strength and understanding, he often informs the transition between stages as he enters the game. As the tension strengthened, Ender tried to heighten community awareness as a dragon of himself and his soldiers. But as before, adults refuse to stay on a statically accepted platform within the community; they change the rules, so each victory only creates new parameters for subsequent tasks . Last year when I read the Orson Scott Card novel "Ender's Game" for the first time, I thought about this conversation well, but when I read "Ender's Game and Philosophy" I thought more. Wittkower and Lucinda Rush were published before the long-awaited Hollywood movie. In the article collected in the book, there is a title like "Is the murderer a murderer?" "What does St. Thomas Aquinas do?" (Aquinus, a theologian of the 13th century often appeared in this series and he proposed a concept called "dual effect principle." Your action It has a moral responsibility for known but unexpected effects. The Ontenscott card's Enders game is one of the most famous books of the 21st century. It is also one of the few books that won the Hugo and Nebula Awards. The Ender game is about a young planner named Ender given responsibility to instruct the IF Fleet to end the war. Throughout the book, many children are subjected to tremendous pressure. Adults have repeatedly said that they can not tolerate this pressure. I received from an adult Radford 's book speculated that Card wrote Ande' s game as an apology of Adolf Hitler. She pointed out some similarities between Ender's biography and Hitler - they are all third children, they are virgins until 37 years old and they are near their sisters. genocide. In the same fantasy commentary on the card, he denied Radford's claim. He said he did not know the Hitler biographical information quoted by Radford. This similarity is "very slight coincidence." He said Ender wanted to be Hitler's moral opposition: Hitler knows what he is doing; Ender does not. Hitler is going to destroy, but Ender does not destroy it. Hitler felt he had no moral qualities; Ender spent the rest of his life feeling the guilt he felt to eliminate the bug.

Today, in the 21st century people have always pursued money and lived life, but only these values ​​are important. They have to stop and think about their life goals, their philosophy of life. This article introduces my life philosophy. First of all, the most important thing for me is my family. According to my regulations, they are always in the first place and I can trust me just as I can trust them. I was brought up by a kind person from my parents, I always treat other people, help, and live in harmony with my religious commandments. The next step on my philosophy of life is a correct attitude. That means I have a lot of confidence in myself, and I accept the challenge and I believe in the ultimate success. Optimism is very important in people's lives, we can not forget it as it helps overcome the difficulties. Having friends is also important, but the important thing is to choose and surround yourself with kind and faithful people. My philosophy of life tells me that I am myself and I must listen to my heart. I believe that men should grow their own, each time to experience new things, always use opportunities to increase knowledge to become conscious and intellectual. In summary, I believe that the best way to achieve happiness is to be loyal to your family and friends, as the philosophy of life says. Papers on basketball and football wallpapers Turn Creation Papers New Year's Target Article mba Marathi Votes Papers Important My Life Philosophy Papers azadipyrromethene Comprehensive Papers Cultural Differences Relationship Psychology Papers Memory Thomas Thomas Aquinas is the author of the Middle Ages essay Money American History Regency Paper Supreme Court Introductory Concerning Case Education Persuasion Prose Prose Introduction Creator, Sigma 24 105 f 4 Art Review Essay Articles Paper Legislature Words Lara Essay University of Smithsonian University Harvard University PhD thesis or thesis World EU Law Research Parentage Relationship Paper A paper on direct and indirect influences of the essay paper chamaecrista nictitans description article malicious film analysis thesis mari de natalie thesis research paper and its importance Paper on logging in the fashion industry. Part of a research paper domestic violence The paper essay of my life and goals, the best essay to write the website legal philosophy is the prospect ambition of my life. Good article English article Global warming paper research paper immunization formulation evaluation criteria learning 2 paper life future city researcher papers ppt. Essay praises most corporate declaration of independence zusammenfassung, my funny family article was kidnapped. Quoting an example of a paper article on the educational background of green marketing research papers developed an example of a love story with a short essay. Writing essay Hard work Home school Essay of ancient Egypt Friendship of mummy Wikipedia is forever the essay theme. Detroit Michigan research paper on green marketing music thesis. British Indian tourist papers on libraries mean an example of the subject of a university thesis. My favorite article topic Heart philosophy My future home article kannada Educational research paper is my paper on natural paper work, summer paper Writing articles Jack London white epub Happy life thesis Thesis Is not a research paper research strategy . Paper bullying school statistics Australian international business research papers improve short paragraphs of my ideal nationwide essay. Passing the exam What is the article about the middle term article? Thesaurus text for the Arabic c # on an example of the outline of the German prospectus newspaper for biography of the thesis (the computer in the future of the educational article)

Mary's Perfect state Dominica sister was founded in 1958 and its history dates back to Vietnam. Dominican sisters, born in St. Dominic before the 8th century, saved the soul with a willingness to work in order to faithfully preach the truth and to praise God. With the motto of Dominican Republic's motto "Thinking about the results of our thoughts, making others think," we will live together with holy masses for Catholic education, Etiquette of Time, Eucharist, Sacred Rosary, Promises ongoing research and apostolic missionary work, preachers and family health care nurses The Dominican sisters now have 99 members dedicated to Galveston - Houston Cathedral, the Beaumont Parish of Victoria, 10 small parishions of Fort Worth Texas, 15 schools, 3 family health care facilities. . If you want to work with us to build a history of God's love and service, any Catholic woman between the ages of 18 and 35 welcomes you to apply Sister of Benedict club, Benedict's sister, Idaho, sister of Mount Lacy Benedict. Angel sisters of the Dominican Republic San Jose Sister of the Dominican Republic St. Raphael Sin Sinawa Virgin of the Dominican Republic Virgin Mary Charity Sister Redwood City Saint Francis Sister Caroonette Saint Joseph Sisters Oregon St Mary Sisters Jesus Introduction Sisters, San Francisco Sacred Heart League Gloria Mary Jones and Carl Sister, members of Dominican Republic's sisters, agree that the depth of spiritual pursuit is common to sisters and the millennium. Jones' sisters recently moved from the main character of the sister community of Fremont's Dominican Republic to one of the poorest communities in eastern Auckland, the city, a monastery with a large immigrant population. The agricultural community of the city called Canticle Farm, two blocks away, lives in Franciscan style. Jones' sisters visited the Millennium Festival from a nun and a Nones project. On February 29, 1925, DoñaDede, born in a middle class family in Salcedo in the Dominican Republic, is the second child of four sisters. Unlike her sisters, she has never been to college and has been replaced by a more traditional housewife role, including family business to help farming and livestock management. She is married to three children, one of which is the present Minister of Environment and Natural Resources, Jaime David Fernandez, and Vice President of the Dominican Republic. Mary Aquinas (Nimitz) became a sister of the missionary (Dominican) of the University of California, Dominica. She taught biology for 16 years, served as the dean of the university for 11 years, served as principal for one year, served as vice president for faculty research for 13 years, and then became a college emergency correspondence coordinator. On February 27, 2006, she continued her work until she died of cancer. At the end of 1965, Nimitz caused a stroke due to pneumonia. In January 1966 he left the Oak Naval Hospital in Oakland (Oak Knoll) and returned to the Navy's dormitory. On the evening of 20th February he died at Quarters One on Yerba Buena Island in San Francisco Bay at the age of 80. On the funeral on February 24th, he was in a small chapel on the Treasure Island of the adjacent naval base, Nimitz was buried in the Golden Gate National Cemetery in San Bruno.

When making medical decisions, patients are required to have autonomy in thinking, intention, and behavior Program therefore, the decision-making process has to be released from forcing and fraud. For patients In order to make informed decisions, she / she must understand all the risks, benefits and possibilities of the program. Succeeded. Because ART is highly technical and can have high emotions, it is difficult for patients to expect. Please consider that the burden and benefits of new or experimental treatments need to be distributed equally among all groups. Society This procedure is within the spirit of the current law and is required to be fair for all participants. In evaluating justice, health care providers must consider four main areas: fair distribution of poor resources, competitive necessity, rights and obligations, and potential with established laws Conflict. Reproductive technology creates an ethical dilemma because everyone can not receive treatment equally. The purpose of the program is to do good for the patients involved. Seek medical professionals to develop and maintain skills and knowledge, update ongoing training, consider all patient's personal situation, and pursue net interests Request the program not to harm the patient involved and other people in the community. The hypothesis of infertility experts is that they do not harm by pursuing greater profits, or at least do not reduce harm. However The success rate of reproductive aid technology is limited, the overall result is uncertain, and the patient's emotional state can be adversely affected. In some cases, it is difficult for a doctor to successfully apply the principle of innocence. The principles of medical ethics, and the views of the AMA Council on ethics and justice constitute AMA medical ethics. To compare comments on modernization with comments released before June 2016, please check Concordance. Doctors face an ethical dilemma, which points to the importance of developing codes for the medical community Medical ethics refers to the basic principles of medical professionals' work. Everyone who enters the medical world is bound by the ethics established by medical professionals (right principle and wrong principle). Although there are laws to protect patients, ethical rules impose high demands on health care workers. Medical ethics is based on Hippocratic Oath. Hippocrates was a Greek doctor (circa 460 - 377 BC) and was known as "father of medicine". Hippocrates pledged to respect doctors who teach them and ask the doctors to tell their education to others. It requires physicians to pay close attention and respect their patients and medicine as an artistic practice. Oath is for those who are trying to acquire a medical degree. Historically, Western medical ethics can be traced back to the responsibility of ancient doctors such as Hippocrates' oath and early Christian doctrine. The first code of medical ethics, Formula Comitis Archiatrorum, was published in the fifth century during the reign of Theodoric King the Ostrogothic. From the Middle Ages to the early modern era, this field was influenced by Islamic scholarships such as Ishaq ibn Ali al-Ruhawi (first book specializing in "medical ethics"), Avicenna's Medical Canon, Muhammad ibn Zakariya ar-Razi It was. (Known as Rhazes in the West), Jewish thinkers such as Maimonides, Roman Catholic scholars such as Thomas Aquinas, and case - oriented analysis of Catholic moral theology (sophistication). These intellectual traditions continue to exist in Catholic, Islamic and Judaism medical ethics.

Footnotes of Jewish philosophers on reasons and revelations are erroneous summaries. Reason and revelation are sources of different truth. They are inconsistent or complementary. This article attempts to answer these ancient questions from the perspective of the Jewish pluralism. I think that the two most important representatives of the Jewish main thought school, the rationalist Maimonides, Moses Mendelsohn and Hermann Cohen, and the fundamental view of anti-rationalist Judah Hallevi and Solomon Levi Steinheim I will mention. Philosophy - tradition includes a method of religion or ultimate reality, unrelated to the events of the Bible but unrelated to events, rather than the basis of a revelation-based approach, rather than the Bible, rather than the Bible Yes. World and experience, Augustine, Aquinas, Anselm, Kant, Heart Shawn, Alfred North Whitehead - History, but not cross section. Theology of the Old Testament was discovered in the confession of the Old Testament God's activity in history is the most legitimate form of the Old Testament theological discourse and therefore God, Psalm, and JEDP theology. There is no need to summarize. It only understands the process. Apocalypse The Apocalypse is the only book that is difficult to explain in the New Testament. There are several reasons. First, there is a very different interpretation of the overall timing of the book. Some people think that most people are pure history. Some people think much of the future. Second, the Apocalypse has many hints on the Old Testament. Implication is a phrase and reference in the Old Testament, and no one clearly states that he quoted the Old Testament. So, when John refers to the Old Testament, he is not usually saying that you are doing this. Third, the use of symbolic words in the Apocalypse is more than in other parts of the Bible. Apocalypse is a literary form known as the end of the world Philosophical theory believes that God exists (or must exist) and is independent of the teachings and revelations of a particular religion. Some philosophical experts convinced the existence of God through philosophical controversy others believed that they had religious beliefs that they could not need or be supported by rational arguments. Theological non-cognitiveism considers religious languages, in particular words like "god" (the capital), cognitively meaningless. It is cited as evidence that there is no such thing as "god", hence it is the basis of atheism. There are two main arguments: Kenilsson uses semantic verifiable theory to conclude that religious languages ​​are meaningless as it proves weak atheism because it can not be proved

Today's children who relieve the fear of our children are faced with a more hostile world in a larger world than their parents. For this reason today's children are experiencing greater fear and worry. Fears of abuse, violence, drugs, AIDS, divorce, etc. are issues that are rarely considered during the growth period, but it is common among children today. Amidst these concerns, the fear of AIDS is one of the few factors that can be reduced by the efforts of parents and teachers. As mentioned earlier, the easiest way to alleviate children's fear of AIDS is to make children aware of the facts of illness, fear of spreading and preventing infection. Trying to "hide" or "do not speak" about AIDS makes it easier for a child to become a victim of an unrealistic myth and furthermore that they make a wise and wise decision It makes it difficult. Children have two types of fear, fall and cry. They surmounted these childhood fears and overcame most of them. Our experience tells us that many fears are unfounded and we protect ourselves from unreasonable fears. Thanks to our imagination and the environment, we can see the danger which actually does not exist or has been magnified 100 times. Whether it is a conversation, a movie, or a vivid imagination, some of the terrible impressions come from anxiety and fear. Other results are beginning to suffer from anxiety and anxiety. In addition, when lazy thoughts join what they are seeing, they tend to fill the heart with anxious images, change thoughts, cause changes such as physical depression; tremor, vasoconstriction, pale , Shortness of breath, psychedelic feeling, palpitations etc. Unlike cyber attacks and direct fear of bear attacks, anxiety is often confused by its own existence; the purpose of fear is still unpredictable. The person you care about is bad and sick of something - he does not know anything - it does not work. This question should be expressed according to Aquinas' explanation. How will the digital era make people the antenna to detect future future evils more nervously? In the digital age, useful skills and assets are gathered in the hands of a few people and leased to many people. We make monthly payments through the combination of strong currencies, that is impossible to do this without money, attention, personal information, and the convenience of these same numbers.

There are many great philosophers from the beginning to the end. Socrates, Thomas · Aquinas, and Descartes lived at different times. This gives each of them different insights to help them create their philosophy and philosophical principles. Every philosopher takes a different approach on how to convey their thoughts and teachings. There are so many differences that the three have one thing in common. Love of wisdom and necessity to share with others. Socrates is a great philosopher of ancient Greece. Socrates is a philosopher who teaches many young people. Socrates taught Plato another great philosopher. This great philosopher lived in the 5 th century BC. Socrates was mistakenly condemned and sentenced to death, but his knowledge still exists. Socrates was born around 470 BC. Socrates was born in a poor family. Socrates was born in the village by the side of Lycabettus. His father is an excellent sculptor. When he got older, his father taught him how to become a sculptor, but his work has not always been accepted from the customer's point of view. His mother is a middle-aged wife. She helped send a lot of children to Athens. In Athens, young people like Socrates usually have a primary level ... show more content Socrates was a great philosopher who had an incredible influence even at that time philosopher and today's philosopher. In the Bethlehem era he lived in Athens from 469 BC to 399 BC. He taught his life philosophy to anyone who cared about listening to him on the street. His philosophy is basically that everyone is responsible for their moral attitude. He is criticizing democracy. He made some simple questions that were difficult for those who were considered sensible at the time. His teachings are based on discovering the truth, understanding life, and talking about elements that make up a better life. Socrates was tried for many accusations of his teaching and philosophy. Who knows that today's Socrates trial has such influence on philosophy? Socrates, an ancient Greek philosopher, said that "uncensored life is not worth living." By definition, philosophers are "lovers of wisdom" (Greek "philo" = love and "sophia" = from wisdom). Even without teaching philosophy, have you ever wondered why many of your professors have a doctorate or "doctorate"? Philosophy is the oldest discipline and there is no natural boundary.

If she thinks that all love is directed to her, she enters the market without the market of Debra's life. She spent many nights thinking about why she even tried to find a man. She always thought she was suspecting that she might be a "man." He may be wearing a perfect smile or perfect clothes. He may take her to the best restaurant or may buy her the most expensive gift. All of these people make Debra feel empty. She is working to become a "perfect woman" depicted in all magazines and talk shows. This story is the myth of the city. In reality, no one wakes up in the bathtub without a kidney, but the organs are sold, sometimes it is pleased, sometimes it is not. This is not a legitimate market like trading of corn. This is a black market that occurs under dangerous circumstances. This is less secure for donors, but this procedure is not completely secure for the recipient. This black market is called organ trafficking. In this review we are considering whether trafficking needs to be included to include the federal trafficking victim protection law (TVPA) in the definition of trafficking to strengthen law enforcement. First, I will introduce some facts related to human trafficking. It also introduces myths and reality of organ trafficking. The comment shows the definition of trafficking in federal law and international treaties. Organ trafficking and TVPA: Why does one word create a difference between international law enforcement agencies Elizabeth Puglies Markets are always known for trading goods, products, goods or services. The stock market in which listed stocks are traded is called "stock market" because it is a place where stocks are traded. The housing market is where the house is sold ... Do I need to continue? Commonality is money, products and services are sold by money, so there are convenient clauses. There is an order book in the stock market consisting of the opposite purchase order and sale order. The order is a market mechanism, not a product or tool for trading, so it is not called "order market". Even the foreign exchange market, currency trading, the market is foreign exchange, not "order market". The suitability of the product / market created by venture capitalist Marc Andreessen, in his own words is "in an excellent market for products that can satisfy this market". In this case, the "good" market is basically an important and growing market, that product or service can solve your problem. In order to meet market demand, your product needs to solve certain problems. This blog will guide you through the steps we take to find a successful entrepreneur, regardless of whether we are working with an agency. Also, Ojala Naeem, managing director of Rej, founder and CEO of Aquinas of Hugh Seaton, and cofounder of refinery. Janis Collins. We also share their ideas to help encourage entrepreneurs who want to turn their ideas into business.

When it first appeared in 1936, bread and wine shocked the world with exposure to the Italian fascist state. This brave work witnessed the truth of all the egalitarian regime by courageously returning from the 15 years of exile to summarize the story of the farmers of their home Abruzzi to the revolutionary movement, Peter Rospina - this is today With Mussoorie Related Warnings Italy This twentieth century masterpiece is amazingly calm and humorous, bringing vivid dramas to pastors and farmers, students and revolutionaries, rustic girls, and desperate women. Strive hard for the world. As Orwell and Coronation among writers who insist on combining the desire of social transformation with the value of political freedom, silicon is one of the main voices of our era and bread and wine is his maximum It is a novel. As Owen Howe pointed out in his introduction, "Bread and wine will tell people of all ages, and they want to contemplate the destiny of humanity of this century from the bottom of my heart." Eric Mosbacher translation, introduction of Owen Ho and Barrynikov's writing Bread and wine do not separate the "elements" of dinner. They go to wine in turn from bread. This sequence imitates the natural progress of human life. We started a new day at the bread and finished it with wine. We can bake bread in a few hours; wine needs cultivation, preparation, and aging for many years. As James Jordan said, bread is an alpha food and wine is an omega drink. Bread is native and wine is eschatological. The communion wine makes it possible for us to understand the good things of the future, the pleasures flowing from the heavenly broken bread. Natural foods are digested and become us. Thomas Aquinas said that spiritual food is the opposite: it turns us into ourselves. Accepting bread, we become bread of the world. After drinking the blood of the grapes, we will summon to follow him according to the testimony of Christ's suffering. He came to us in the sacrament of the Eucharist. He puts his body and blood in regular bread and wine. We can watch bread and wine and smell. You can taste bread and wine by touching it. Bread and wine We can eat and drink. We consume sacrifices instead of ourselves. When we eat them, bread and wine bind us, and his body and blood bind us. He believes in the word he promised "Dedicate it to you for forgiveness of sin." He forgives our sins. He strengthened our faith. He reinforces our weak soul. He gave us a new life and eternal salvation

Hippo Augustine (354-430) is one of the most influential thinkers in Christianity. He has contributed many ideas and ideas to Christian theology. And that has had a lasting impact on Christian faith system. One of his most important contributions is the concept of "original sin" and his concept of "evil". These concepts have evolved over the years. Augustine painted their evolution in his 13 autobiographies he wrote in his 40s. An important part of confession is his understanding of Augustine's conversion to Christianity and the constant development of right and wrong. Augustine of Hippo, Hippo's bishop, or Saint Augustine (November 13, 354 - 28 August 430) is one of the most important people in the development of Christianity. His writings such as "Confession" and "City of God" show the depth of his faith and the theological skills of trained rhetoric. His interpretation of God's teachings, free will, evil, original sin, grace, light and destiny are the norms of most Christians. His confession is often called the first Western autobiography. His God town defended accusations of heathens and accused the collapse of the Roman Empire. As mentioned in John Hick's book "The God of Evil and Love", in his Augustine theology Hippocrus Augustine (354-430 BC) basically requires God in Genesis It focuses on the story. The creation of the world and its goodness; the evil is only the result of the fall of mankind (the story of Eden's Garden, Adam, Eve does not obey God and causes human sins inherent). Augustine said that natural disasters (evils that exist in natural disasters such as natural disasters) are caused by fallen angels and moral evil (evils caused by human will) is a result of human alienation from God I said there was. Please choose to deviate from the path of his choice. Augustine believes that God creates good, so we believe that God can not create evil in this world, and all evil concepts are just good departures or absences. Evil can not be an independent and unique substance. For example, blindness is not another existence, it is simply lack or lack of vision Hippo Augustine is the first person who developed mysticism. He rejects the idea that the evil itself exists, but I regard it as a good corruption caused by human free will abuse. Augustine believed that there was material hell as a punishment for sin, but he believed that those who chose to receive the salvation of Jesus Christ would go to heaven. In the thirteenth century, influenced by Augustine, Thomas Aquinas proposed similar theology based on the fact that God is kind and evil. He believes that the existence of good will enable evil through human error. Augustine also influenced John Calvin, who supported Augustine's view that evil is the result of free will and that sin destroys human nature and requires God's grace to give moral guidance Gave.

After the fight over a dozen, the war is clearly an important part of the "Lord of the Rings". However, even in this case, all the roads have reached Augustine. Because he is considered to be the founder of the legitimate war theory we know. Augustine is a 15th century theologian and bishop of Hippo. His view on war and morals is particularly important for the development of the theoretical values ​​of the Christian Justice War. However, Turkien had a long life in the trenches of the First World War, and there was also a strong emotion on war. As a devout Catholic, he believes in Augustine's legitimate war theory. Historians and philosophers formed the theory of war just for centuries. However, the most systematic description of the theory of justice war was developed by St. Thomas Aquinas in his Summa Theologicae. According to the theory of war of justice, the moral reality of war can be divided into two parts. War was judged twice. The first visit refers to the reasons of domestic battle, and the second time refers to the means used in the actual battle. (Walzer, 21) The first verdict was called jus ad bellum, or justice. The second sentence is called a wartime trial, or justice in war. Jus ad bellum provides guidelines for assessing whether war is fair or unfair but wartime rules outline the correct behavior in warfare. Jus ad bellum does not mean jus in battle. Likewise, jus in battle does not need jus ad bellum. Justice warfare may be done unfairly so that it is possible to fight legitimate warfare. Only war theory and law distinguish between reason (jus ad bellum) relying on war and rational behavior in war (jus in war). Most statements of the theory of justice warfare have four principles, each with its own label. Rational hope for justification, legal authority, right intent, necessity or final means, proportionality and success There are three principles in rule of war: three types of discrimination, necessity or minimum force, and Proportionality. These principles represent a comprehensive understanding of the morality of war, in a compressed form that is 300 years ago and the basic structure is almost the same. Since it develops synchronously with the state system based legal system, not the individual, its existing form theory is very different from the classical theory it belongs to.

Locke, Berkeley, Hume's Enlightenment began with unmatched confidence for human reasons. The success of the new science through the elimination of the natural world of Locke, Berkeley, Hume influenced philosophical efforts in two ways. The first is to place the foundation of human knowledge in the human mind and put it in encounter with the physical world. The second is to direct the attention of philosophy to an analysis of the mind that can achieve cognitive success. John Rock set a tone of enlightenment by affirming the basic principle of empiricism: nothing in intelligence was in the past. Empiricism, a belief in the realization of knowledge through sensation, is the universal belief of several great contemporary philosophers. Perhaps the most famous empiricists are John Locke, George Berkeley and David Hume who are considered to be one of the most influential philosophers in the past 500 years. Due to the importance of experience in philosophical principles, each philosopher can be regarded as an experientist. More specifically, the empirical perspective of rock can be seen from his view on the primary and secondary nature of objects. David Hume Hume, David, 1711-76, Scottish philosopher, and historian. Hume brings empiricalism of John Rock and George Berkeley to the logical extremes of fundamental skepticism. He denied the possibility of certain kinds of knowledge and found a series of emotions in his mind and believed that the causal relationship in nature was entirely from B's introduction. The answer to the theme is drawn by the time committee named as illusion by David Hume, and the time committee named human by himself. In the era of modern philosophy, when the influence of Descartes was still important, David Hume brought the argument of killing the Descartes I created and skipping it like a ghost in human perception. You can see not only the theme but also the contrast between Hume and Descartes. Among the important philosophers related to empiricism are Aristotle, Thomas Aquinas, Francis Bacon, Thomas Hobbes, John Rock, George Berkeley, David Hume, and John Stuart Mill. Recently, positivists such as Mach, Vienna Circle, logical positivists, and most followers of analysis philosophy are empiricists. The central concept of scientific and scientific methods is that all evidence must be based on observable evidence by sensory or sensory extension empirically or empirically. It is distinguished from philosophical usage of empirical philosophy by using adjective "experience" or adverb "experience". Experience refers to the use of working assumptions used in combination with natural science and social science and can be tested or experimentally tested. In this sense, the scientific statement is the subject of our experience and observation and is derived from them.

The concept of Renaissance art is enhancing the interpretation of humanism in this field. Some students do not hesitate to talk about human artistic art and humanitarian art as far as they are tied to the visible arts. Whether it is traditional or contemporary, we are considering typical passion. In their case, many performers and artistic performances show information on sources, preferences and values, not only in humanists but also in rich communities of knowledgeable collections of humanists. The Renaissance humanist disregards the Middle Ages, thought of the savage "middle" between the ancient Greek and Roman cultures of the era, as well as the "resurrection" and the classical culture of the Renaissance. Modern historians believe that the medieval era is one of the development of philosophy and was deeply influenced by Christian theology. As one of the most famous thinkers of this era, Thomas Aquinas, his own philosophers, philosophers and critics are not always considered "lack of truth and precise wisdom" Renaissance was a new era full of special achievements meaning "regeneration". Renaissance is rediscovery of works of ancient Greeks and Romans by humanists. In this age humanity's personalization began, people started to pay attention not to hierarchical Christianity but to secular aspects is the medieval bondage. Ordered formal medieval society collapsed, Europe emerged from the age of darkness. Revival https://www.studymode.com/subjects/which-labels-for-the-middle-ages-best-describe-the-era-between-500-and-1400-in-europe-the-dark-ages- Feudal age of Europe's most faithful, or most golden age ages - page 1. Html Labels and research papers label "What is the best medieval beliefs describing the era of the feudalism of the golden era of the European 500 to 1400 or the European dark era era" The Renaissance in Italy and Britain is characterized by the prosperity of humanism and emphasizes more than authoritarianism which recognized rhetoric, poetry, history, grammar, moral philosophy and so on. Humanist's interest in these areas is the same as their behavior in learning and the motivation to explore is in the center of the Renaissance. However, in addition to new progress, the Renaissance regressed in the classical era when ancient Romans and Greeks showed how to learn and live. In fact, the Renaissance used the word "medieval" from the Renaissance era, trying to abandon the age of classical and Renaissance. For the Renaissance thinker, for centuries, it was not worth between two great eras.

There is much debate about the existence of God about the existence of God. For a long time everyone wanted to prove the existence of God. Some people think that God exists and is proved by many philosophical or scientific foundations and religious reasons. On the other hand, others do not believe in the existence of God and their foundation is proved from many theoretical and scientific point of view. Many people try to prove the existence of God through rational argument. The Western tradition of the philosophical debate about the existence of God began with Plato and Aristotle, and those arguments are now classified as cosmology. St. Anselm presented other arguments about the existence of God and he proposed the first ontological argument; Ibn Rushed (Averus) and Thomas Aquinas each had their own cosmological argument (with Karam discussion and First Way); RenéDescartes once said that the existence of a merciful God is logically necessary, because the evidence of sensation is meaningful. John Calvin advocates a spirit of sensation that allows everyone to understand the existence of God. There is much debate about the existence of God about the existence of God. For a long time everyone wanted to prove the existence of God. Some people think that God exists and is proved by many philosophical or scientific foundations and religious reasons. On the other hand, others do not believe in the existence of God and their foundation is proved from many theoretical and scientific point of view. Many people try to prove the existence of God with reason. After Descartes proves its existence, he will think the truth about the essence of God, evidence of the existence of God, and the nature of material objects. The main task in Descartes' meditation is to design a system that allows him to understand the truth. He wants to lay the foundation of all further philosophy Second argument about the existence of God. Because Descartes believes that existence is perfect, it can become a predicate to God. First, I will explain what the ontological argument of the existence of God is. Next, I will explain why Descartes decided to incorporate God into his philosophical approach. As a predicate of God existence reveals some truth about God. Ontology seeks to prove the existence of God from a transcendental point of view

For centuries it is not a self-evident principle that the question of the existence of God has been thought of as "God exists" or "God does not exist". For the purposes of this article, God is defined as "the creator and ruler of the universe and the source of all moral authority, the highest existence". Discuss the three main logical arguments of the existence of God, including the design theory, the cosmology, the proof of St. Thomas Aquinas, then whether to refute whether it is legitimate evidence that God does not exist Decide. Christmas is the opposite. Herod against the baby, this is truly against Rome's rebellion, which is really against Rome, which is indeed against the power of God, this is really God for power. Or it is weak against a weak person, weak against a strong person, the weakest against a strong person. What good do you get from Bethlehem? No good things come from Jerusalem, Rome, London, New York, San Francisco. Good things come from rich, celebrities, beautiful women, strong people. From the glorious elite, from a powerful institution. The high priest made clear the new truth of the temple. Institution is the best Perhaps I think that this is the view of our religious beliefs. No Do people really believe in God when people say they believe in God very accurately? Do you truly truly, truly, truly, really trust God? They gave us the same answer after a year, which indicates that they are not supplementing it. This is what they truly believe. Don Lee of Los Angeles Times: I will ask about economic impact. In the survey of 2006, there is a possibility that it may be approaching the peak of the business cycle, I think that recession is starting to be seen one year later. But two years later I will tell us what kind of model and economic cycle you have seen over the past 100 years and how it will tell us how people's religious beliefs will advance I want to know. But we believe that God is truly God. In Isaiah, God answered this question and emphasized that there was only one god. "Only one god" has no influence on us as we did before and our god does not compete with any other gods. We think and talk about God's end three and a half years later. I think you can say that we inherited all the thoughts and beliefs concerning this god. However, in the case of Isaiah monotheism - there is only one God - is a revolutionary concept. But what does this mean for us? We live in a place called the Christian nation, and our state ritual follows God and thinks of our national anthem and coronation ceremony. Do monotheism bring natural effects?

Main idea on cosmological argument about the existence of God A) The rationale of cosmology is to prove the existence of God. In this kind of discussion, I am looking for reasons rather than design. This is based on experience, so this discussion is a posteriori argument. Thomas Aquinas divides important ideas into three methods. The first way is exercise / change. You can not move or change yourself. This must be a god, as the first move must be touched by others. Kalām's cosmological argument is a contemporary expression of the cosmological argument about the existence of God, named after Warrior Lane Craig in his "Calm Cosmology" by Karam (medieval Islamic academic philosophy) It was done. (TheKalāmCosmologicalArgument, 1979) promoted. This argument is a variant of Aristotle's indifferent promoter, which was named after the medieval Islamic academic philosophy and because of the possibility of Craig's opposition to the actual infinite existence Craig became a philosophy of the 11th century Go back. Home Argalari Like most arguments about the existence of God, cosmological arguments exist in many forms; here two are discussed: cosmological arguments of time, Kalam (ie the first argument), and division Discussion of style. The main difference between these two arguments is that they avoid the first opposition to the argument and cast the question "is there a reason for that existence in God?" Then suppose that God exists to explain the existence of the universe and we will not take us anywhere. Without God, we have an entity that we can not explain, there is a universe; there is an entity with God, we can not explain, that is God. Nick Ludwig's Thesis # 6 A cosmological argument about God's existence is a philosopher's common philosophy and a non-philosopher of the world today. It tries to explain the existence of God through our observations and reality. Cosmological arguments are a successful way to prove that the presence of God and this superior existence is the creation of the universe. The first reality of cosmological argument is that facts exist. Some people think that the source of all existence is God, but I think that this idea is correct. In order to continue creation, I think that being the first reason is to become God. The universe must have a beginning, and this argument supports the beginning for higher existence. The horizontal form of this discussion of this discussion explains that for everything with a beginning it has reasons for it

Augustine uses his autobiographical type, finally accepting Christianity and showing his views on how to accept his work as Christian as a "Christian". The beauty of his book is that it demonstrates his mysterious and elegant behavior depicting the event, even though it is presented as autobiography, and these events will demonstrate his journey to God. He issued many ideas, but focused mainly on his views on the origin of sin, grace, free will. To a certain extent, Augustine states a free will that can not be understood without considering the nature of sin and grace. As Augustine is committed to fighting heresy within the church, his research on these subjects forms an understanding of the Christianity of the Trinity, former sin, grace, free will and fate. His views on marriage and sexuality set examples to the values ​​of the single birth family of the Catholic Church and the leadership of the church (he believes the department devoted to living as a single means). Over the years, Augustine's extensive research has influenced other Christian theologians such as John Calvin and Martin Luther. Augustine, Francis of Assisi, Brother Lawrence, Johann Sebastian Bach and Sukhona Truth (Preludees Bible and Theology Studies): An Important Person in the History of the Church The original sin is a Christian doctrine of Augustine. In other words, everyone is born with sin. This means that they did bad things and were born with an inner urge to violate God. This is an important doctrine of the Roman Catholic Church. St. Augustine deeply explained the concept of original sin and was officially identified as part of the Roman Catholic doctrine of the 16th century by the Trent Council. The second understanding goes well with human psychology. Looking at it like this, as people at the time of tempting the evil surrounding the prevalence of the "surrender" community tend to be original sin and are not good, it means that everyone finds a tempting anti It helps to explain why it is difficult. As the Bible says: In this article we will examine the evil view of St. Augustine. St. Augustine believes that God created the perfect world, but the creatures of God have left free from God with free will. This is the origin of evil of the world. Augustine thinks that the punishment for the sin that accompanied the saying that the evil is present simply thinks that he is evil is transmitted in the free nature of all living wills not thinking of being unaffected It is. According to Augustine, God does not conflict with justice, so making evil exist in the world. He did not create evil, but it was not that victim. He has just granted it to exist Hippo's Augustine is the first person to develop mysticism. He refuses the idea that the evil itself exists, but he considers it to be a good corruption due to the abuse of human free will. Augustine believed that there was a serious hell as a punishment for sin, but people who chose to receive the salvation of Jesus believed that he would go to heaven. In the thirteenth century, influenced by Augustine, Thomas Aquinas proposed a similar theology based on the fact that God is kind and he is evil. He believes that the existence of goodness allows evil to exist through human error. Augustine also influenced John Calvin, Augustine, he supports the view that evil is the result of free will, and that sin is the result of God's destruction to destroy humanity and give moral guidance We need grace

Does it need to be within the broad range of each generation, or is it specific to each generation? Especially in the 1990s, music has big individual differences almost every ten years. You can talk about the experience of the more unfortunate / terrorist that affects culture in some way, such as Vietnamese veterinarians and their way of handling when returning home. It is very unfair, but rather than talking about generations in a broad sense, it is a point about examples that influence culture in some specific way and in some way and work with those cultures. Each generation has paper worth offering Each generation has several valuable things to offer paper 10th Street, West zip 10011 apa format research paper format example gis paper thesis English Literary paper ias. All generations are making a phone call, collecting professional Bard College, Annandale-on-Hudson Madison, writing a job guide Enright Road 's zip 10004, upload paper for writing buss 4 Bradhurst Avenue zip 10039 Employers of nursing care behavior at a price disclose some valuable things that can provide some valuable information that each generation can provide appropriate information. Cheap sex education paper New York Schoharie cheats on 81st Street Eastern Zip Code 10028 There are some valuable things that you can provide papers on how to write research papers that are different from other types of writing on each postal code. 120th Street, East zip 10035 Behavioral Economics Case Study Order a periodical publication that is about to expire. Sparkill's St. Thomas Aquinas College has some valuable information to provide papers to each generation. All generations have paper worth providing >>> Click here <<< Each generation has something worth having to offer prose America Avenue Zipper 10001. Paper proposal note 3 Answers to entries, Alfred University, Alfred. Carder Road zip 10004 All the generations are worth providing what is worth providing articles online in Ontario Proposing my thesis for $ 10 at some 15 zipper on 15th Street 15 cheap about abortion Examples of article of West zip 10001 appendix, Washington square, West postal code 10014, Admission Paper Writing Skills E 8th Street zip 10003 which requires editing literature reviews of each paper, paper on Oneida structured paper methodology application letter There are some valuable information that you can provide.

Several people say the pride of pride is the most important of seven deadly sins. Pride is the entrance to the deadly soul through all the other evils. Pride is an excessive belief in your ability, which hinders the recognition of the personal grace of God. It is called the sin of all other people. Pride is also known as vanity Medieval theologian Thomas Aquinas talked about pride. Influence " The pride is dominated by the sun's astronomical constellation. It is "a mother of all sin ... a thin line between justice and self-righteousness". By the way, this book actually refers to the website of seven crimes. On page 6! Among the seven deadly sins, there is conscience only with pride. In one country, that community is proud of himself. Of course it is a good thing. However, when Michael Eric Dyson appeared in Pride, these virtues became fatal crimes. There is a remedy for Pride crime. This might seem contradictory, but a humble male or female knows their pride and try to overcome it with seriously discreet humility. Corrective action requires careful, mature and continuous conscience examination. The example of humility is very precious. Read the saints' lives, you will see many examples of humility and humility. Ask God to help you to see your sins. I often regret it. Complain yourself with your humility. Repent and believe the gospel When talking about the redemption of pride, we mean the sin of "the mother of all other sins." The Bible says that pride is the first sin committed by Satan, "the father of the lie", and "the prince of the world". Satan is stronger than God and is trying to rule all humanity. Because it has the power to destroy us, we are all afraid of sound pride. • When saying "I know it all", "pride of superiority" and "spiritual pride" appear. I know better than anything else about what is best for me. "Or, if they say that they are smarter than others, there will be" pride of wisdom ". This is blind! For example, this happens when young people ignore or entertain teachers and police. Pride also supports the authority of the education of the Church, that is, the rejection of Magisterious, although the pastor, the authoritarian, or the rule applies to others, but that rule does not apply to me I will

Desire, eating, greediness - three of seven deadly sins - are considered one of the most serious crimes of humanity. These customs were originally elements of religion such as Roman Catholicism and Christianity, but since that time they have been deeply rooted in Western culture. It is often thought that these principal sins cause not only their own sin but more "evil" behaviors. Are these crimes so terrible? Desire, eating out, greed can make America successful and happy. Lust of desire and overeating, etc. has traditionally been regarded as excessive sin. Greedy, however, often applies in particular to the acquisition of material wealth. St. Thomas Aquinas said that greed is "a sin of God, just as human beings condemn the eternal ones for time, just like all human sins." It overestimates the existence of secular aspects rather than non-material or spiritual aspects. Greedy is a huge variety of greed, such as betrayal and betrayal for personal interests, theft of goods, theft, robbery, fraudulent acts such as Madoff aimed at manipulating others for illegal manipulation of personal interests I can explain the act. Where does greed come from? Greed is like desire and big eating. But greed, in particular, is used to gain wealth. Greed may include looting or theft of items or things, especially by violence, fraud or authority manipulation, theft or robbery. (Add quotation) Greed is very common with locking hose. This story represents a young middle-class British woman without luck. Her appearance was successful, but she was suffering from the sense of failure; family expenditure exceeded its importance. So people are concerned about money. Her child, son Paul and two sisters feel the concern of this money Greed is brothers and sisters who love it, big eating, desire, but this is the relationship between love and hatred. Are you ready for every penny of pressure you buy at the auction? Welcome to greedy domain! I am not ready to throw away worn-out jeans, do you have more than a dozen? Greedy approval! Sloths may be our favorite - just fill yourself in a pillow. I do not do anything because I do not want to do anything. What does it mean when it tells you that there is nothing you can not do perfectly as anxiety wants it to you? Doing nothing, it's best to roll back your Tumblr feed throughout the day - it will not disappoint you like the results of your own shit

Humans are rational animals. This means that we have a body capable of self-action, perception, eating, and also we have heart. In our era, there is a tendency to confuse the heart with the nervous system. That is, some philosophers believe that whenever classical scholars use the word "heart" they are actually talking about the brain and their neurons. For those who think that this explanation is inadequate, it is strongly recommended that you read the answers to the following questions from St. Thomas Aquinas. As the author of the question said, it is important to understand the uniqueness of humanity before answering questions about purpose and fate. We define the soul as a human depiction. This description is a unique human property of a particular atom. This is a difficult problem as it is usually thought that the soul is infinite rather than finite. But in a sense something is infinite and in other ways limited. We can allow the soul to be infinite in certain important aspects (like its lifecycle), but we can assert that the length of human depiction is limited . The length of the description is related to the concept of human complexity. Therefore, the resulting understanding has both a noble face and a shameful face. Human clear features are reflected in how humans interact with members of other groups. As a person, you need to be involved in reflecting relationships such as empathy, compassion, compassion, interest, friendship, love, help, kindness, fairness, reaction and nonviolence. Likewise, humanity means compassion, kindness and sympathy for people and animals, especially when they feel pain or suffering. If a person shows a degree opposite to these qualities, he / she may be deemed inhumane or inhuman. Definition of inhuman acts is the atrocity and destruction of others, which is a positive relationship with others and defines the human race. We are all members of the same species, but there is a tendency to distinguish between humane acting people and people who act inhumane. Aristotle defines human as a reasonable existence. Today, many people may not agree with this definition, but reason is an important part of mankind. It is difficult to define rational things, but we do not define it. Thinking is essentially a part of mankind. Thoughts are displayed in various fields such as science, philosophy, religion, politics, ethics, lifestyle, culture. These are not all separate compartments, but they are interrelated and are necessary to develop the whole human life.

A 16 - year - old girl with red hair and soft porcelain skin is sitting on a park bench and is reading an old and very familiar book. The girl's name is Meggy, she is reading the Bible. When she read it, she heard snoring of bicycle spokes pass by her. The bicycle stopped in front of her, she was familiar with Harry's familiar voice, and her class boy called her. "What are you reading, carrots?" He talked to her in teasing. "My Bible" She smiled and looked up at him and answered. An ontological argument is an argument trying to prove the existence of God through abstract reasoning. The beginning of the discussion is an explanation of the concept of God. When we talk about "God", what we are talking about is "perfect existence", which is the meaning of the word "god". Of course, God is superior to God who is not God. So, God is a perfect being that God exists. If the integrity of God is part of the concept of God, the existence of God will be implied by the concept of God if the completeness of God means the existence of God. When we talk about "God", we need to talk about the existence of existence. To say that God does not exist contradicts ourselves; it is actually nonsense. Thomas Aquinas made an important distinction in reasonably proving the existence of God: we can naturally know that God exists, there is an infinite and complete existence to create the universe. The universe may have footprints of the Creator, but God is neither an existence nor thing in the universe. Nonetheless, knowing the existence of God will help many thinkings by recognizing its natural dependence on the Creator and eliminating the main obstacles to faith. Prove the existence of God through reason and nature. Summa Theologica, often referred to as "discourse to God", presents philosophical arguments about the existence of God, the attributes of God, the nature of God, and so forth. Summa Centra Gentiles provides a series of detailed philosophical arguments about the existence of God. - I want to find beauty in an ugly and terrible world. Shakespearean fans. Keats explained Shakespeare's genius as follows: the quality of people and the negative ability when he is in an uncertain state. Unpleasant, suspicious, irritating facts and reasons none

According to the National Mental Health Coalition (NAMI), nearly 73% of mental health students are experiencing a health crisis on campus, but more than 34% of students say this is not known at their university. Many college students may not know where to get help when they can experience depressive symptoms or control their symptoms. Fortunately, there are lots of useful resources inside and outside the campus. Since this mental health nonprofit organization nationwide has branch offices on university campuses throughout the country, students can discuss their subjects frankly and ask for appropriate support. As campus demand for mental health professionals continues to increase, universities are seeking more psychologists and psychiatrists to meet these needs. Please check with your school if you have a counseling and psychology office at St. Thomas Aquinas College Many campus health centers such as the Louisville University Health Center provide a variety of mental health services to help students solve problems and seek help. In UL, students receive assistance for depression, emotional problems, panic attacks, anxiety, eating disorders and other symptoms. Nami has multiple chapters to raise awareness of mental health issues on the university campus, advocate services, and help students find resources In a course like the Mind Works at the University of Michigan, you can discuss general issues, learn how to deal with it, interact with other students, and help your mental health needs. The national nonprofit organization is working hard to reduce the number of suicide among university students and establish a hotline among various resources. If students need immediate help on mental health issues, please call the text '741-741' or 1-800-273-TALK (8255). The University of Ohio offers this guide for students with symptoms of anxiety and depression. Students with extreme psychological distress can call 1-800-273-TALK 24/7 for support and guidance from trained professionals. Undergraduates who are veterans may be dealing with post-traumatic stress disorder and other anxiety and depression. SVA provides information on campus resources and domestic support systems. The hotline is open from 8 AM to 8 PM. EST helps students find treatment every day in the community. If your campus does not have enough resources or waiting lists, please contact your health care provider about options. They can introduce you to psychologists or psychiatrists in your insurance network. There are many ways to treat depression, but in either case you should discuss with medical professionals before taking any action. The most common ones are as follows. Although it seems impossible to add a self-care program to a congested schedule, in order to be able to handle it on its own, it takes immediate effect by taking time in one day It is important to consider all the advantages. In addition to managing mental health experts and your symptoms, many of these simple tips can help students improve their overall thought and quality of life. College students have many signs and symptoms of depression, such as drastic changes in sleep patterns, loss of interest in what was previously considered happy, frequent absences. If left untreated, these repeated symptoms lead to poor performance and graduation failure, often leading to student suicide. Eating disorders such as anorexia, bulimia, and bulimia often occur in college students of both men and women. Many students change their diet and develop one of these diseases (sometimes unconsciously) due to the transition to university and social stigma centered on attractive body shapes. According to reports, 10-20% of female students and 4-10% of boys students are subject to torture. Many college students are experiencing a certain recession in college life. However, most students do not have enough information to understand the meaning of depression. According to the Natio

In the 1600s, the Catholic Church became a powerful monopolist with wealth and land comparable to the most powerful European countries. Power and wealth create corruption and the government approves corruption to reduce profits. This church and state combination is designed to stop instigating to eliminate all threats to religious monopoly. The religion of the country can not be divided. Since religion dominates the lives of people, the church tries to rule the hearts of people. Philosophy and Religion Roger Williams, William Penn, John Leyland, Thomas Jefferson, James Madison and other leaders have a decisive role in the struggle for freedom of conscience. The United States is a country based on ideals and beliefs, and it is a basic democratic principle. If free experiments in the US continue, each generation must understand and affirm these principles. Today the fundamental diversification of American faith makes it difficult to define religion without excluding religions that do not conform to the selected definition. But if citizens understand the role of religion in American public life and want to support all religious freedom, we must recognize that faith is essential for many Americans. Explosion proof type. 1: When someone was asked, he helped write the first, so after making a lot of contributions to the American tradition of religious freedom between Roger Williams, William Penn and Thomas Jefferson, Thomas · Jefferson, James Madison ", said the amendment is not enough. "In fact, you can write a long American study of Jefferson and religious freedom, but this is not enough that you need to display Williams and the explosion pane 1 of knowledge.We do not have health insurance When expanding ... ... it may be that concentration camp, it is 2, and in the "New York Times" best-seller list, led the first three volumes in the US in the year after Obamacare. In addition, the Nazi society began during the Weimar Republic and the discussion is focused on. Because medical and doctors disproportionately participated in Nasikism and the Holocaust, social medicine led to Nazism. Plato, Jefferson, Franklin, Rock, Volterre, Tudo Dostoevsky, Dickens, Aristotle, Aquinas etc .: Master of the greatest ideology was taught, Imagine walking on this earth and it died, it still exists in a wonderful book I will. If you can imagine such a place, you will imagine a wonderful book and Liberal Arts Education. Some of the world's most famous discoveries are made through university research. After looking at the latest progress of discovering the invention of telegraph, AIDS, the origin of the Internet and stem cell research, the university is the center of knowledge of our country, 56% of all basic research is done in university I understood that it was.

Knowledge, Power, and Domination In this article we propose to study problems that arise from the relationship between knowledge and power, especially those that control who knows and disseminates knowledge to society. This theme was discussed at a medieval thinker from a Christian tradition such as Plato's work and Islam, Jew, and Muslim (Ibn Rashid), Moses Maimonides, St. Thomas Aquinas. Comments, their views are briefly outlined here. RP: Yes, like Foucault, who is controlling the knowledge as to the real problem? One of his many contributions is that knowledge is power. People who control discourse have power. It is not that there is a group of masterminds to send it, but it penetrates the entire system. It is supremacy - in the sense of the present world - people buy it. Why do people in Kansas continue voting for those who oppress them? They are listening to FOX News, because they are on air, they just accept it. Therefore, the focus of criticism of Futuralcan is to clarify the aspect of power of discourse. This replaces Marxism, which is considered too ignorant, replacing the philosopher who ties alliances with Western countries in the form of social science, such as Geertz, which is considered ideological as conservative is. Contrary to the interpretation of knowledge as a tool of power of Francis Bacon ("knowledge is power"), Foucault argues that control dominates knowledge and that knowledge is used for control. Definition of power of Foucault (1980) is neither positive nor negative, is repressive and productive, is power as a relationship rather than power, exercises power to society as a whole, and the definition of power of Foucault With each part and level, every micro level of social relations. One of the central characteristics of Foucault's theory of power is that he distinguishes information / knowledge from the truth. Socially recognized organizations and experts will create "knowledge", a different kind of knowledge. Please use the power as a mechanism to gather, organize, and organize people's lives, activities, actions, existence, absenteeism etc. These are a kind of knowledge. With Foucault's argument, the relationship between power and knowledge is much closer than the well-known bacon engineering model. "Knowledge is power" means that knowledge is a tool of power. The point of view of Foucault is that at least for human research, goals of power and goals of knowledge are inseparable. The exam also put individuals into the "documentary field". The results of the test are recorded in a document that provides detailed information on the individuals under test and allows the power system to manage them (school absentee records, hospitalized patient records etc). Based on these records, the controller can create the underlying categories, mean values, and specifications of knowledge. This exam turns an individual into an "incident" - in two ways, a scientific example and a subject of concern

Introduction From the dawn of consciousness, humans have tried to understand their surroundings and their place in the world. From the first naturalistic investigation of flora and fauna on the earth drawn on the rock walls of the cave thousands of years ago, to the very complicated investigation of the quantum physics of today's particle accelerator adventure, human curiosity is unmanned Could it be. Through the numerous questions and answers that the organization is seeking, human beings have created and discussed broad concepts of "science", "rationality", "philosophy" and "religion" for centuries. The medieval synthesis of Thomas Aquinas (1224-74) formed the terminology for Christian theology and the early modern causal controversy between Aristotle's science and metaphysics. Aristotle (384 - 322 BC) clearly distinguished scientific knowledge (science) from faith (legal thinking). Scientific knowledge is to prove the necessary relationship between cause and its influence from intuitive and obvious premises unrelated to experience - proof of scientific explanation and reason of demonstration The earliest cause of the concept of conflict between science and Christianity was the early scientific theory, which contradicted Aristotle's philosophy and academic integration of theology, so this study appeared to threaten Catholic theology . But gradually the new science has been more consistent with Christianity than Aristotle of the "pagan" it was replaced by 1 historian Andrew Dickson White and John Draper his thesis - now the war Recently, a proposal that the historian's trust has been lost as a power struggle between a new scientific elite and a governor of higher education (usually a Christian clergy) a unilateral and partial Motivation 2 Many historians (many different religious beliefs including atheists) indicate that modern science is prosperous only in most Christian Europe (see the Bible roots of modern science). These historians point out that the foundation of modern science relies on the assumption that the universe is created by rational creator (see why science goes well). The orderly universe can be presented entirely only if it is made by an orderly creator. But, if there is no creator, or if Zeus and its gang are responsible, why is there an order? Therefore, Christian 's strong faith is not only a barrier to science but also this foundation is the foundation. (See Refusing Newton just because there are no alternatives?

Catholic priest Don Benedetto, opened by Ignazio Silone novel Bread and Wine, is sitting outside his modest house. This is his 75th birthday and he is waiting for some former students to celebrate this opportunity. Don Benedetto was a socialist in Fascist Italy in the early 1930s and refused to seek a compromise from the regime. A new war on the expansion of the African empire comes Three former students arrived. Everyone has a place of new social order, and the pastor unfortunately reflects the moral compromise that people will make to survive. Then the conversation was directed to former students and classmates Pietro Spina who did not compromise. As a student, he is an idealist, considerate, and very faithful to justice. He became a socialist, later expelled to various places in Europe, where he lived and worked under harsh conditions. It is said that he recently returned to Italy to work for Communists. The scene moved to Spina's hometown, in fact, he returned here. He was very sick and hidden by former comrades. When he was able to move, Spina left the village to pretend to be a pastor named Don Paul Spada. As a dong pole, Spina leaves for the mountain village of Pietro Sekka in the Abruzzo region. Along the way, he encountered a young, unmarried woman, Bianchina, who apparently died of miscarriages and mental pain due to complications caused by fear of a permanent curse. In touch with compassion, "Tang Paul" told her that everything was forgiven The next day, Don Paul went to a hotel in Pietrosek. There, he wanted the air of the mountain to help him recover. The life of Pietrosecca is very difficult; farmers are poor, extremely superstitious, politically innocent, and they do not want to change their situation. There is only one family of substances, the Colamartini family. Miraculously resurrected Bianquin came to Pietro Sekka and are looking for a thoughtful pastor who will save his life. When they talked, Christina Colamartini came and two young ladies acknowledged each other as former students. Don Paolo has a complex relationship with two women. Bianquin According to the teachings of the Catholic Church, the whole Christ, the body and the blood, the soul and the divinity are in the Eucharist, every aspect of bread and wine, every part of bread and wine (the essence of bread or wine lies in ordinary In every part of bread and wine, the essence of Christ is in every part of the devotion and change of the Lord and the communion, not the communion, but when the sanctuary is moved, not the impression or the imagination, the intellectuals It is only perceived through the eyes of. He came to us in the sacrament of the Eucharist. He puts his body and blood in regular bread and wine. We can watch bread and wine and smell. You can taste bread and wine by touching it. Bread and wine We can eat and drink. We consume sacrifices instead of ourselves. When we eat them, bread and wine bind us, and his body and blood bind us. He believes in the word he promised "Dedicate it to you for forgiveness of sin." He forgives our sins. He strengthened our faith. He reinforces our weak soul. He gave us a new life and eternal salvation Bread and wine do not separate the "elements" of dinner. They go to wine in turn from bread. This sequence imitates the natural progress of human life. We started a new day at the bread and finished it with wine. We can bake bread in a few hours; wine needs cultivation, preparation, and aging for many years. As James Jordan said, bread is an alpha food and wine is an omega drink. Bread is native and wine is eschatological. The communion wine makes it possible for us to understand the good things of the future, the pleasures flowing from the heavenly broken bread. Natural foods are digested and become us. Thomas Aquinas said that spiritual food is the opposite: it turns us into ourselves. Accepting bread, we become bread of the world. After drinking the blood of the grapes, we will summon to fol

The history of Europe ranges from about 500 years to 1400 to 1500, traditionally known as the Middle Ages. This term was originally used by scholars of the 15th century to identify the period from their time to the decline of the Western Roman Empire. This period is usually considered to have its own internal difference. Early or late or early, centrally or advanced, and slow It was thought to be an era of uninterrupted ignorance, superstition and social repression, but the medieval period is now considered a dynamic period, during which the concept of Europe as a unique cultural unit has emerged . The ancient to medieval times, political, social, economic, and cultural structures were greatly rearranged on behalf of the Germans who established the kingdom in the former Western empire. A new form of political leadership was introduced, the population of Europe gradually became Christianized, and the monastery was established as an ideal form of religious life. These developments matured between the rulers of Charlemagne's rule and Carolingian rule in the 9th century, and they oversized the wide-ranging cultural renaissance known as Carolingian Renaissance. In the Middle Ages or the Middle Ages, the Middle Ages grew more dramatic. This period was characterized by economic and territorial expansion, population and city growth, the emergence of national identity, and the reorganization of secular and church-like institutions. This is the era of Crusades, Gothic art and architecture, the Pope's monarchy, the birth of the university, the revival of the ancient Greek thought, and the highly intellectual achievement of St. Thomas · Aquinas (about 1224-74). Traditionally, in the 14th century, the power of the medieval civilization was exhausted, and the late medieval period was characterized by recession and collapse. Europe suffered from war, famine, and plague in the 14th century, but many potential societies, knowledge and political structures have not yet been compromised. In the 15th and 16th centuries, Europe experienced a renaissance of knowledge and economics, often referred to as the renaissance. It laid the foundation for subsequent expansion of European culture after that. Many historians question the traditional dating of the beginning and the end of the Middle Ages, but this is not accurate under any circumstances and can not be found in any years or even centuries. Some scholars claim to extend the period defined as late stage (c.250 - c. 750 ce) to the 10th century or later, and the medieval period is about 1,000 to 1800 years Some people are proposing to extend them. Some scholars believe that it was included in the Middle Ages, the Renaissance and reform began in ancient times and ended in the second half of the 16th century. While some important medieval concepts disappeared during the Renaissance, not all important medieval concepts disappeared. Still present - one that still exists - One of the key ideas is that people are defective fundamentally and irreversibly. We look at the world around us, check that the turtle is not defective, the crow is defect free, the mosquito is not defective, and the squid is not defective - indeed, any species in the world are defective There is none. Although this has no meaning, it passes the knowledge test of the Middle Ages. This is reasonable - of course it is supported by authority. This is reasonable as it provides us with an excuse for our desperate need. We are destroying this world - please eat it - but this is not our fault. This is because of human nature. We made it very bad, what can you expect? The Renaissance was used to describe the era when Europeans began to ignore the medieval restrictive idea. During the Renaissance this term refers to the French translation of the Italian word "rinascita", an extreme large scale change that occurred from the 15th to the 16th century. The Renaissance brought the medieval death and the first manifestation of thei

Hedonists do anything to get their happiness. Regardless of the price, hedonists will buy it for their own enjoyment. They also believe that happiness is the only benefit in life and that pain is the only evil. Therefore, they want to maximize their happiness and minimize pain in their lives. Hedonists believe it is a high reputation when they show off their brand and expensive ones. Sometimes they only buy things without knowing whether it is useful or not. Hedonism is now a habit, and even a lifestyle. In philosophy, there is an interesting theme called hedonism. "Happiness" which is the joy of Greek (hdon) is the theory that happiness or happiness is the greatest concern and is the main objective of human life. It refers to a series of theories about what is good for humans and the motivation to make humans act in their own way. There are many thought experiments in hedonism. Among many things, one of the interesting experiments I found is The Experience Machine. "Experience Machine" created by philosopher Robert Nozick in his work "Anarchy", "Country", "Utopia" is a beautiful thinking experiment for the world of virtual reality. The term "hedonism" means the happiness theory and happiness at the highest level of life. Hedonism is the doctrine that happiness is the only benefit. (Bank) The criminal justice system has two forms of hedonism, psychological hedonism and moral hedonism. Moral hedonism means not just seeking happiness, but also seeking happiness. Because happiness itself is a good thing. (Bank) Psychological hedonism is about people who pursue happiness and enjoyment of life, to get happiness and to avoid suffering. (Bank) For years, philosophers have tried to distinguish between psychological hedonism and moral hedonism. What psychological hedonism is necessary? When dealing with psychological hedonism, the motive of a criminal justice expert is to maximize his or her happiness and suffering. They pay attention to the moral values ​​in our daily life. Hedonism played a role in understanding people's behavior. According to the bank's explanation, only happiness is worth the search and happiness is a good thing. Everyone is seeking happiness in various ways. The word "hedonism" comes from the "happiness" of ancient Greek. Psychological or motivated hedonism insists that only happiness or pain motivates us. Moral or evaluation hedonism insists that only happiness has value or value and that only pain or dissatisfaction diminishes or opposes value. Jeremy Bentham claims psychological and moral hedonism using the first two sentences of his book "Introduction to moral and legislative principles". Only governance can point out what we have to do and we can decide what we are about to do. The controversy about hedonism was also a feature for centuries before Bentham and continued after him. Other major contributors to the hedonistic debate are Plato, Aristotle, Epicuras, Aquinas, Butler, Hume, Mill, Nietzsche, Brentano, Sidgwick, Moore, Ross, Broad, Lyle, Tiszam

What determines what action taken by any agent is wrong or wrong? Lon L. Fuller filed a lawsuit to evaluate the ethical definition of correct behavior in the 1949 article "Speluncean Explorers Litigation." Ethical studies of correct behavior consist of two main moral theories: Dentology (backward / original) and objective (forward / end). Both have religious elements and non-religious elements. Ontology theory includes sacred instruction theory (religion) and cantism (non-religion), but the theory of purpose theory has natural law theory (religion) and utilitarianism (non-religion) theory. A brief history of the incident. Speluncean explorer vs. Stopher County (4300) Comprehensive Entity Court incident is about 5 Speluncean Explorers. After the landslide closed the entrance, the explorer was locked in the cave. Twenty days later, these explorers sent a message of help to the rescue team. As the doctors outside the cave say, explorers are exhausted their supplies, there is no way to survive in the cave because their distribution and conditions are not supported. In addition, one of the explorers told the doctor on behalf of the remaining doctors and asked if they could survive by eating one of them, and the doctor agreed. It is further recommended to throw a die to decide who can eat. After that, Whitmore was eaten. On the 32nd day it was pointed out that survivors were rescued and killed Whetmore. Four survivors were sentenced to death by the Supreme Court for killing Roger Whetmore. This is related to "Splusson Explorer incident" written by Lon Fuller for Harvard Law Review. This is an experiment that gives a hypothetical case of a cave explorer that Fuller is trapped in a cave and uses the opportunity to eat so that they can kill and avoid others to survive to avoid hunger To do. He wrote five judges who opposed the case. I do not intend to explain the reasoning of all the judges, but a judge believes that the "murderer" of the case is beyond the scope of social law and therefore under the natural conditions and natural law, We insist on confidence. According to natural law, it is reasonable to kill people to accept the rules and survive others. According to Aquinas' law definition, "Law is the result of how reasoning achieves common interests (for everyone)." In the case of the Speluncean explorer, the people trapped in the cave were not within the jurisdiction of Newgarth, so they become their own society. "To achieve common interests of everyone" applies only to men in the cave as they are the only ones within their jurisdiction. - Determine whether the actions performed by the agent are correct or incorrect. Lon L. Fuller filed a lawsuit to evaluate the ethical definition of correct behavior in the 1949 article "Speluncean Explorers Litigation." Ethical studies of correct behavior consist of two main moral theories: Dentology (backward / original) and objective (forward / end). Both have religious and non-religious elements

Important form 3 Fides et Ratio, one or both. In the Middle Ages we saw an era of deep roots in Christianity. Almost every aspect of life is imprisoned and dominated by the church. In the meantime people began to wonder whether the existence of God could be proved by faith, reason, or Thomas Aquinas faith and reasoning. Academic societies and religions have different opinions. Faith and rational beliefs and reasons can be regarded as opposite. Faith is an element of faith, and individuals do not necessarily need reasons without acknowledging the reason. For example, when a person tries to explain them, they believe that the reason of God is not reasonable. They may not even be criticized. The reason is built as an expression, on the other hand. Faith is basically what we believe, just as we have learned in the church. What is the reason? In our culture, faith and reason are controversial. Religious apologies from every background will argue that faith and reason are perfectly compatible. Many people say that science and reason is a way to understand the content and the way of the universe, and faith tells us the reason. If this discussion is held in court, that belief will be the murder weapon against complete blindness of confirming prejudice. Discussions between faith and reason may be another way for people to simplify things. This may be an excuse. Because of personal prejudice, people may want to stick to extreme, but that is reason and belief. But faith is more than just believing in God's behavior. Faith is starting to be used in the life of everyone, whether they are atheists, theologians or agnostics. That is as useful as its reason. Faith can not be regarded as an extreme opposite of reason. It must be seen as a reasonable companion Faith as a potential rationality: In this view, all human knowledge and reason are regarded as dependent on faith. Faith in our senses, faith in our rationality, faith in our memories, and beliefs in the explanation of events that other people take. Therefore, faith is considered reasonably necessary condition, it is inseparable. According to RenéDescartes, reason is based on the realization of the absolute truth of "I think this is the beginning", it does not require faith. All other rationalizations are established from this understanding and will be forged at any time new evidence arrives.

We are based in New Zealand and offer bicycle rental, cycling and camper rental services in North Island and South Island. Since 1996 we have been helping people from tour buses, discovering the pleasure of open roads and sharing our wonderful landscapes with thousands of overseas travelers and New Zealanders. Our goal is to make your adventure plan as simple as possible and make it as stress free as possible. Choose a bike suitable for voluntary exploration, choose a comprehensive bicycle vacation that fits your level, or you can find a suitable camper and bicycle rental method. You will never forget the adventure We have a bicycle for you to ride, including weekend cruises, bike tours over multiple days, off road challenges. We offer leading brands for travel bicycles, hybrid cars, mountain bikes, road bikes, bicycle accessories and children's bicycles. Find a bicycle> Our self-service bicycle tour is designed to help you explore New Zealand at your own pace. We provide bike, route details, map, and you provide timetable. Find self-propelled bicycle tours> Stressless cycling tour of all abilities. Our sightseeing was carefully planned to combine various cycling including mountain biking and comfortable accommodation with amazing views of the north and south islands. Find guided bike tours> When you really want to cover some basics, we can offer you a wonderful campervian contract. Even if you add a bicycle, ask for advice, go to see what you are, you are ready for a magnificent adventure. Find a camper> I highly appreciate Qualmark Endorsed. Qualmark is the official quality mark of the tourism industry in New Zealand. We make regular independent evaluations by travel experts and confirm that there are important elements necessary to provide excellent travel experiences. The luggage storage service of Auckland or Christchurch branch is a free service for Natural High bicycle rental and travel customers during the cycling adventure in New Zealand. For other bicycle travelers, you can read our luggage storage price and terms here. Please note - storage space is subject to availability and we reserve the right to refuse to store items. Sydney not only attracts customers with its unique attractions, but also has a warm atmosphere. Local people are known for their hospitality and cheerful personality, their own sense of humor, and the love of vocabulary. Surprisingly, the local people are known for their high sense of responsibility and efficiency, due to their attitude towards this free and seemingly boring life. Sydney, known as "Harbor City", is a noisy, creative, populated, multinational metropolis, whose residents can miraculously maintain a special Australian relaxation and relaxation model I will. The bustle of the city can easily be forgotten. It is also known as the natural nature of many parks, colorful parrots, Possum, seagulls, most famous ibis, "bin chickens". Another time will be discussed. But we are concerned In her wonderful new publication Nature Restoration, journalist Florence Williams wrote that nature is a seemingly infinite demand and welcomed in modern life. She notes that nature not only improves our subjectivity but also presents convincing cases that we can greatly reduce our fighting and avoid stress by changing our biology Did. This makes sense when you think of the deep history of our species. Modern urban life, and all the digital technologies that accompany it, are relatively new to us. E. O. Wilson, an entomologist at Harvard University, generally thinks that this biological hypothesis is thought to have a natural tendency to seek out relationships with nature and other forms of life. Wilson believes that as a species we grow in nature, it is biologically programmed to attract it. Aquinas 'human philosophy research by Robert Pasnau and its highly accessible research is a welcoming starting point from the tragic trend of medieval masterpiece philosophers' poverty.

Webster's dictionary defines hedonism as a "happy ethical theory that can be thought of in various ways with respect to personal or social well-being, key interests and goals of correct behavior" or "" people always act like this " It is. The theory says "Ask for happiness, avoid suffering." I consider that by considering this definition, further study of John Stuart Mill's theory of hedonism in theory, hedonism is not a distinctive or unique way of thinking . In philosophy, there is an interesting theme called hedonism. "Happiness" which is the joy of Greek (hdon) is the theory that happiness or happiness is the greatest concern and is the main objective of human life. It refers to a series of theories about what is good for humans and the motivation to make humans act in their own way. There are many thought experiments in hedonism. Among many things, one of the interesting experiments I found is The Experience Machine. "Experience Machine" created by philosopher Robert Nozick in his work "Anarchy", "Country", "Utopia" is a beautiful thinking experiment for the world of virtual reality. When philosophers discuss hedonism, they are most likely to refer to a more specific theory about value hedonism, especially hedonism of happiness. As a value theory (best known as value hedonism), hedonism thinks that all the only happiness is inherently worthwhile and that only pain is inherently worthless. The term "essentially" is an important part of the definition and is the most comprehensible compared to the term "instrument". If it is worth it, it is inherently worthwhile. Happiness is considered to be of essential value. Even if it does not bring other benefits, it is still a good experience. Money is an example of goodness; its value for us comes from what we can do with it (something we can buy using it). If no one has sold anything, the fact that large amounts of money are not worthwhile indicates that funds are not of essential value. The word "hedonism" comes from the "happiness" of ancient Greek. Psychological or motivated hedonism insists that only happiness or pain motivates us. Moral or evaluation hedonism insists that only happiness has value or value and that only pain or dissatisfaction diminishes or opposes value. Jeremy Bentham claims psychological and moral hedonism using the first two sentences of his book "Introduction to moral and legislative principles". Only governance can point out what we have to do and we can decide what we are about to do. The controversy about hedonism was also a feature for centuries before Bentham and continued after him. Other major contributors to the hedonistic debate are Plato, Aristotle, Epicuras, Aquinas, Butler, Hume, Mill, Nietzsche, Brentano, Sidgwick, Moore, Ross, Broad, Lyle, Tiszam

Roman Catholic theology has seven deadly crimes, also called seven deaths or seven major crimes, which stimulate other crimes and further unethical behavior. Pope Gregory I was first counted in the 6th century and detailed by St. Thomas Aquinas in the 13th century. It is understood to include illegal sexual desire, (4) jealousy, (5) cannibalism, normal alcoholism, (6) anger or anger, (7) laziness. These can be overcome by seven corresponding advantages of (1) humility, (2) charity, (3) chastity, (4) appreciation, (5) moderation, (6) patience, and (7) diligence I will. Seven deadly sins can be regarded as a tendency to sin and separation from God. For example, desire may result in misfortune, which may result in some less careful and ethical thinking that is a deadly sin or is categorized as a venous crime. Deadly sin is a popular theme of European medieval moral drama, literature and art. Seven sins: How severe they are, seven sins are important aspects of Christian religion. The medieval religion is very important and the central feature of the lives of those living in this era. In the beginning of the 14th century, Burr's Robert Manning wrote an educational text poem to tell people to avoid seven sins. In a while, in the late 16th century Edmund Spencer wrote a book called The Faerie Queene and the first volume, Canto. Analysis of seven deadly sins, even at any age or young, he or she may have heard of seven deadly sins at some point in their life. Regardless of whether they are hearing this at church, at home, or at school, the seven sins are somehow integrated into each individual's life in some way, shape or fashion. In this article I will explain what seven sins are, how they are defined, the virtue they condemn, and the examples of the seven major crimes of the human world. The dead king is as incomplete as Claudius and is sharing sin. Therefore, the ghost is a human being, not sacred, and the revenge it sought reflects the world, not the next world. Ghost's revenge request is a problem for Hamlet. Hamlet believes that the vision may be "a sincere ghost" (I.iv.151), or may be "power of the devil and the devil" that is likewise as simple (II.ii. 610). Ghost Command Hamlet " His eyes are very destructive and may lead to someone committing one of seven sins. Seven crimes are classified as deadly and if they are not forgiven they will declare hell to sinners after death. Briefly, the seven sins are anger, greed, laziness, pride, desire, jealousy, and overeating. Five of the seven crimes appeared in the novel "Red Letter" written by Nathaniel Hawthorne. But you can claim that everyone symbolically represents seven deadly sins related to today's religion, that you are on us. In this short and meaningful story, the slope explains how red death seals blood and destiny in such bloody details. He talked about pain, fear, bloodshed. In addition, the red death explained in the short story as a plague immediately kills the patient and makes it alienate. Explain the red and blood scenes flowing through the pores and create a strong visual effect

Most people are not confused about their existence because they have neither witnessed nor experienced God. In Western theology there are three theories to prove the existence of God. These theories are ontological arguments, cosmological arguments, and objective arguments. St. Anselm in the 11th century and Descartes in the 17th century used ontology arguments to prove the existence of God. For them, God is supreme, "He does not need anything but needs all being and happiness" (PG. Exploration of ontological arguments For about 1000 years, ontological arguments have attracted the attention of philosophers. The order of ontology arguments from thinking to reality is revolutionary. This is an argument that does not actually require a corresponding experiment and does not require empirical data for operation. - Early elements of cosmological argument were developed by world famous philosophers Plato and Aristotle between 400 and 200 BC. The medieval philosopher St. Thomas Aquinas extended their thoughts when writing "five ways" in the latter half of the 13 th century. Since that time, cosmological arguments have become one of the most widely accepted and critical arguments against the existence of God. Immanuel Kant gives the traditional definition of ontological debate. He contrasts ontological arguments (indeed any discussion related to existence) to cosmological and physiological theoretical arguments. According to Kant, the ontological debate is an argument based on a priori reasoning. Graham Oppy defines the ontology as "the sole prerequisite of analysis, a priori and necessity" and "existence of God" that Graham Oppy thinks "there is no urgent reason to deviate from the traditional definition" It draws the view that it draws out the conclusions of. However, Oppy acknowledges that not all "ontological features" (analytical, necessity, priority) of ontology arguments are present in all ontology arguments. The definition of an ontological argument that "proposed a better point" would only take into account the consideration "within the scope of a perfect theological view of the theory". An argument about the existence argument argument argument of God is an a priori argument. These arguments try to prove the existence of God from the meaning of the word God. Anselm of Canterbury introduced an ontological argument to his work 'Proslogion'. The classic argument of Anselm is based on two principles, the most important of which are St. Anselm and Rene de Carte of the above Canterbury. - Cosmological argument tries to prove the existence of God by showing that there are no myriad reasons for the existence of objects. It states that everything must have the last unresolved cause. The reason for this unknown reason is declared to be God. Such discussion is believed to be the reason for understanding us and the existence of the universe. There are several forms of cosmological argument, but basically it is as follows.

Great theorists and philosophers of knowledge networks such as Stoic Sc ​​hool, Skeptics, Aristotle, St. Thomas Aquinas, Descartes, Spinoza, Locke, Hume, Berkeley, Kant, Burt. Lan Russell, Darwin, Freud, and all the science of the 20th century are all working hard on being a matter of knowledge. Do you have knowledge? "Knowing" and "knowledge" are powerful concepts Before receiving text and criticism, I think it is natural that I know what knowledge is. Then, I have a simple question. After reading "American scholars", I remembered that the class was asked "What is the relationship between nature and knowledge?" There is no answer. A consumer-centered knowledge network is a knowledge network that focuses on the knowledge consumers are interested in and controlled by consumers. There must be a very gray portion between all knowledge and consumer-centered knowledge, but knowledge-oriented processes, including consumer interests, are important. The Consumer Knowledge Network is a platform for consumer-centered knowledge-based applications. One of the ongoing discussions is knowledge gathering through knowledge mining (knowledge of mining) and clearly constructed knowledge. Specifically, we wait to convert to an explicit knowledge structure expressed as a semantic web, or automatically generate enough knowledge structures by text mining, data mining, and even knowledge mining ? Consumer-centric knowledge network - Consumer application vision for software agent technology - Implementation of consumer-centered knowledge-based computing The knowledge network is part of the semantic web and focuses on knowledge. A knowledge network is not just a collection of static coding knowledge. Always knowledge is constantly being created through active processes and services. Software agents play an important role in supporting the generation of knowledge networks and new knowledge. Knowledge networks are not just information repositories, they should be viewed as platforms for knowledge - based applications. Consumer-centric knowledge network - Consumer application vision for software agent technology - Implementation of consumer-centered knowledge-based computing Consumer networks are part of a network that focuses on consumer interests compared to consumer networks and consumer knowledge networks become part of the semantic web or knowledge network that focuses on consumer interests Let's see. The consumer web is driven by user navigation, but the consumer knowledge web is driven by the activities of software agents representing consumers. In order to emphasize the center of software agent technology in achieving vision, the assumed network should really be called a consumer / agent knowledge network. Not only is a software agent used for implementation, but each consumer is a consumer / agent knowledge Web as a partnership in which software agents working on behalf of consumers are essentially part of the minds of consumers It is necessary to conceptualize. Consumer-centric knowledge network - Consumer application vision for software agent technology - Implementation of consumer-centered knowledge-based computing

Many theologians, scientists and philosophers discuss the role of faith. Throughout history many things have been discussed and explained about whether religion is logical or completely absurd. In this article, I will focus on the role of faith through Christian philosophers Sorean Kierkegaard and Paul Tillich 's lens. Faith plays an important role in the theology of Kiagogo and Tirich; I will examine the explanation of their faith and compare and contrast those clauses. The best examples of religious existentialism are the philosophy of St. Augustine, Blythe Pascal, Paul Tillich, Soren Kierkegaard. Religious existentialism thinks that the reality, essence of the two levels is the basis of existence. Religion is the greatest concern in this view. Paul Tillich is an important existential theologist after Kierkegaard and Karbat and it helps to apply existentialism concepts to Christian theology and introduce existential theology to the public. His breakthrough work "Brave Courage" follows Kierkegaard's anxiety and absurd life analysis, but raises the allegation that modern people must achieve themselves through God's stupid living I will. Rudolf Bartmann used the existential philosophy of Kiakegaard and Heidegger to make Christian mythical by interpreting the concept of Christian myth as a concept of existentialism. Review religious beliefs and incredible problems, paying particular attention to the existentialist challenge to religion. Readers were religious critics and advocates: Camus, Buber, Kierkegaard, Teilhard de Chardin, Sartre, Nietzsche, Tillich and Bonhoffer. How do modern Western theology understand faith in God? What is the meaning of the word "god" - or what do you mean? How do you believe evil reality? The answer to these questions will be the main focus of our work after reading the works of representative Jews, Christians, and heretical religious thinkers since the Second World War. Examples will come from liberalism, processes, feminism, extreme perspectives, and so on. Paul Johanisti (1886-1965) is a theologian and Christian's existentialist philosopher. Together with contemporary Carl Bath, Tillich is one of the most influential Protestant theologians of the 20th century. The attitude of Tiruh against Protestant theology is very systematic. He tried to connect culture to faith so that "faith does not have to be unacceptable to modern culture, contemporary culture is not necessarily unacceptable to faith". Therefore, the position of Tillich is apologetic and trying to come up with a specific theological answer that applies to everyday life. Tillich tried to balance revelation and reason with protecting revelation without violating rationality (by confirming that Thomas Aquinas says that faith is very reasonable)

The issues of faith and reason and the relationship between them have been discussed through civilization. Recently, from the mid-eighteenth century to the early nineteenth century, the main character of this discussion was Thomas Pain. Pain's work between the American and French revolution helped his country join the revolution and ultimately achieve liberty. Therefore, for practical reasons, during this time the pane must be regarded as an influential figure. But Pain is equally important as it helps him influence the country and change it. One of the biggest contributions of Thomas was to incorporate Aristotle's philosophy into the Catholic church theology. Thomas believes that reason and faith are one and support one another, and it is believed that the Bible and the fathers of the Church and Aristotle's inference combine the inference of the Aristotle with a unified system and Christianity I understand the revelation of. His most famous work is Summa Theologica, 5 volume masterpiece. St. Thomas Aquinas introduced the classical way of teaching the Bible. Looking back on Gregory's words, the Bible transcends all science. "Despite explaining the facts in the same sentence, it reveals a mystery." Spiritual meaning, fable, truth, morality, praise of life, and the final event to be achieved I will clarify the purpose. The details of his seven sacramas are still our standard today. The issues of faith and reason and the relationship between them have been discussed through civilization. Recently, from the mid-eighteenth century to the early nineteenth century, the main character of this discussion was Thomas Pain. Pain's work between the American and French revolution helped his country join the revolution and ultimately achieve liberty. Therefore, for practical reasons, during this time the pane must be regarded as an influential figure. But Pain is equally important as it helps him influence the country and change it. The era of reason is an era of fundamental change in American lifestyle. In the meantime, Thomas Paine and Benjamin Franklin were enthusiastic writers. Thomas Paine firmly believes in human rights and governments and religions can not deprive human beings of the right freedom. Meanwhile, Benjamin Franklin is a self-made man who incorporates hard work and continuous self-development into lifestyle. His own life reflects his beliefs in mankind. Pain focuses on progress throughout the country, while Franklin is more concerned about improving it. Regardless of their differences, these people have laid the foundation for a free society in which individuals freely pursue personal happiness and freedom.