Is Torture Ever Acceptable?

Torture is a process that exerts pain on others to force others to say something contrary to their will. The word "torture" comes from the Latin "torquere", which means distortion. Torture can be psychological as well as mental pain. Torturing individuals before enlightenment is perfectly legal, but now it is illegal to torture someone under any circumstances. In this article, I will prove why torture is not accepted regardless of conditions.

It is very difficult to judge whether torture is acceptable. From another point of view, it can be said that everyone has their own opinion when considering the problem, but this is very contradictory. It is well known that there are thousands of torture cases, such as preventing terrorist attacks and obtaining important information, and in some cases being tortured. Clearly, there are other ways to obtain useful information that can save lives, but it also proves that no one can receive torture, so be honest. Some of them are lying when they are tortured, and some do not say anything. Many experts believe that torture is effective, but the other side of the problem remains unclear. Because even an innocent person may be tortured and murdered by mistakes. In this case, torture is unacceptable

Is the ultimate goal acceptable? Torture should not be as imaginable as slavery. In principle, since the end of World War II, governments around the world have agreed to prohibit torture even during war and terrorist acts. International treaties on torture and other inhumane and degrading acts are one of the most widely ratified treaties. Supporting these practices is not for the US alone; it is minimal in extreme cases ("torture and necessity principle"). According to a survey of abused prisoners in October 2006 by BCC, more than a third of nine countries believe that torture is allowed to some extent if they can save their lives ("Is that appropriate?"). In addition, two ethical theories were used in discussing whether torture was right or wrong: morality and Utilitarianism ("torture and rights")

The question "Do torture makes sense?" Is "whether war can prove to be justified". This is appropriate as torture is the subject of war. Just the theory of war can be used to justify torture because it can accept certain circumstances. St. Thomas Aquinas (1225-74) stated 'jus ad bellum' and he believed it was reasonable to meet the conditions of war. War has to be ordered by legitimate authority, it must be fired for good reasons, and the intention of war veterans should be good at defeating evil (Almond, 1998 , P. 197). Of course, the problem with using this theory of justice war is that conditional satisfaction is subjective. However, if torture is done by a legitimate government, torture may be morally justified if the government's overall goal is good and has the best intent.