Explanation for the Existence of God, by Using Aquina's Second Way: Efficient Causation

Does God exist? As humanity appears on the planet and it may possibly continue to this day and tomorrow, this question allows people to think and present evidence to present the most satisfactory answers I will. Early in the 12th century, St. Thomas Aquinas provided "five ways" to prove the existence of God, but I was convinced that other people would see the same "light" in this discussion . Please provide sufficient answers to 'the essence of God' (Bailey and Martin, 2011, 37).

The second way that Aquinas prove that God exists is based on the nature of an effective causal relationship. It points out that God is the cause of unresolved. Because causality itself creates results, the causal relationship itself is "to become". However, effective causation is only the result of the outcome, or the fact that it can be fully activated or potential. Therefore, it is effective to validate the results for practical reasons. In an observable world, we find a sequence of valid causes, but we can not find out if we have found something that effectively causes ourselves. This sort of thing must precede itself, it is impossible. If you eliminate the cause of eliminating that influence, there will be no last member or intermediate member of the series unless there is a first member. Therefore, we see the existence of one thing depends on another thing. Overall, this unresolved cause exists and is called God.

The second premise Aquinas later insisted that no one could be a valid reason for himself. Why is self-causal relationship impossible? For convenience, please consider what it means (although this is not the only self-causal form in Aquinas' mind). To achieve something, people need certain causal power. But unless it exists, things can not have causal power. However, if something caused its own cause, that is to say that it is to achieve its own existence, it must exist before that and is impossible (ST Ia 2.3). Therefore, the third assumption is that each valid reason requires a prior reason.

Aquinas shows us how to distinguish between the existence or existence of living beings and the operation they perform. God lets creatures exist in such a way that they are the real cause of their own actions. For Aquinas, God works in every natural work, but the autonomy of nature does not mean that God's power and activities are diminished, but instead it represents his good. It is important to recognize that the causal relationship of God and the biological causal relationship play fundamentally different roles. In Summa contra Gentiles, Aquinas says, "The same effect is not due to the cause of nature and the power of God, but partly due to the elements of nature, completely by different ways and the same thing. That effect is entirely attributable to the product, the whole of which is attributed to the principal agent. "(23)