Is torture ever justified?

In 2002, Haspel became part of the CIA's overseas detention facility in Thailand where she supervised cruel interrogation and then abandoned these interrogation records. Advertising groups like Amnesty International say that her nomination has shown that the government can tolerate torture and international law violations and that Hasper records should disqualify her from the CIA leadership It was.

As a secret official of the CIA in 2002, Gina Haspel supervised the torture of the two suspect terrorists and later joined to destroy their brutal interrogation videotapes in a secret prison in Thailand. .

However, Haspel is well received by the CIA and intelligence community community. Many people including former National Intelligence Director James Clapper highly appreciate her choice

"I am very pleased that Pompio has chosen Gina Haspel as Vice Chairman and he has chosen an excellent selection of veterans of experienced brokers who are widely respected by workers and technicians. Pompio's right arm. "

Critics say that this appointment further strengthens the public ignorance of the Trump regime 's human rights and the rule of law.

Gina Hasper, Director General of the Central Intelligence Committee of the Trumps, supervised the torture acts of the Bush era. He hit his head against the wall until one eye could not be seen. https://t.co/LHvUvuxirB

McCain: "In the past decade, torture received by detainees during detention in the US was the darkest chapter in American history.Hasper tells us about the nature and degree of involvement in the CIA interrogation process during the verification process It was necessary to explain. "

Other people praise Haspel's choice. Many Americans take a realistic political attitude towards dealing American enemies abroad and believe that torture is sorry but sometimes necessary.

Mike Pompeo will be a good SecState and Gina Haspel will be the best choice for leading the CIA.

Is torture reasonable in the world after 9/11? FRONTLINE gathered groups of legal thinkers to answer this question. Some of them have studied the problem of torture together for a joint project with Harvard Law School and the Kennedy government graduate school of Harvard University. The organization reported that it is sometimes called "torture and streamlining" strategy, trying to establish some restrictions and monitoring procedures for the use of "highly mandatory measures". "

Is the problem of interlacing meaningful? "The problems are: Is war meaningful?" It seems that this is appropriate as torture is the subject of war. The theory of fair war can be used to justify torture because it can accept certain circumstances. St. Thomas Aquinas (1225-74) stated 'jus ad bellum' and he believed that the conditions that the war had to fulfill were reasonable. War has to be ordered by a legitimate authority, it must be fired for good reasons and the intention of the war people should be good at defeating evil (Almond, 1998, p. 197). Of course, the problem with using this theory of justice war is that conditional satisfaction is subjective. However, if torture is done by a legitimate government, torture may be morally justified if its overall goal is good and has the best intent.

Is torture reasonable? "A typical example of controversy is the" time bomb "as to whether or not the terrorists should be tortured. It assumes that human information can save hundreds, thousands or hundreds of thousands of lives. When our country is in danger, the last known way when thousands to millions of lives are on line is to get information about imminent. Should information about tragic events that may end American life be used? Many people believe that torture should be used to combat terrorist attacks in the United States.