Introduction beyond evil: In my opinion, the problem of evil is the best starting point for a fruitful dialogue with contemporary philosophy recognized as a traditional Christian concept. It is a threat. Therefore, first outlines malicious problems in the most probable way, introduces Augustine's approach to that solution, and then conducts a critical analysis. From Spinoza and Nietzsche, third, it shows that this is more philosophical The problem of evil is expanding beyond human suffering, such as abuse, illness, and evil animals. This version of the problem includes animals suffering from natural evil such as violence and fear that animals face predators, natural disasters, and the history of evolution. Following the expression by Charles Darwin, this is also known as Darwin's evil problem. The second version of the evil problem that applies to animals and the avoidable pain they encounter are caused, for example, by atrocities of animals and by other people. It was shot dead. The problem of such evil has been used by scholars such as John Hick to oppose reaction and defense against evil problems. Unethical but conscious victims Introduction beyond evil: In my opinion, the problem of evil is the best starting point for a fruitful dialogue with contemporary philosophy recognized as a traditional Christian concept. It is a threat. So, I first outline the problem of evil in the most possible way, introduce Augustine's approach to that solution, and then try to do a critical analysis; ... there is a problem of evil, It is a simple and simple fact. Discussion on the evil (and pain) problem proves this fact. The argument over evil shows that God has full power and full power. It shows that God is kind. In other words, he is hoping that only kindness exists. But look at all evil and evil in the world. The god of all good is completely inconsistent. God's almighty is that you can do whatever he wants. So, if God can do anything what he wants, why then?

Bad question A) For some reason, it can cause philosophical problems for religious believers. (10) B) Outline two solutions to these two problems and comment on their success (10) A) The problem of suffering exists from the beginning, as a religious philosopher thinks. The crime of the Garden of Eden has been guilty. The first problem about evil is that we believe that classical theology has certain attributes. These are as follows. · God is omnipotent (omnipotent) · God is love (universal) · God knows (omniscience) · God created the former Nilo (since there is nothing) God is infinite The problem of evil has two branches. Evil logic problem (LPOE) seeks to prove that the existence of evil contradicts the existence of omnipotence and omnipotent existence. The evidence evidence question (EPOE) tries to prove that the existence of an amount or kind of evil contradicts the existence of somewhat effective and benevolent entity. Of course, not all Gods are considered omnipotent, omnipotent, or either. Many gods are morally defective, positive evil, simply indifferent, and not omnipotent. The evil logical matter does not apply to these gods, but evidence of evil evidence still holds true. This is consistent with the idea of ​​evil. That is, there are defective evil, irrelevant, or totipotent entities compatible with reality and the existence of omnipotent and omnipotent entities is not. The problem of evil can be formulated in various ways. Indeed, the 'problem' pointing to evil may be more accurate. Recipes are interpreted as logical problems. Regarding the logic of evil, it is claimed that these two arguments, (1) that Almighty and Almighty God exists, and (2) the existence of evil is logically incompatible. Since evil exists on the surface, it is claimed that God (usually understood to be omnipotent and omnipotent) does not exist. In the latter part of the 20th century, logical arguments became dominant. But by the end of the century religious philosophers generally believed that the logic was rebutted. One of the reasons is that there must be hidden or unspecified assumptions as claims (1) and (2) are not clearly contradictory. But what is that?

Is there a satisfactory way to adjust omnipotence and loving God and the presence of evil of nature? (Ie not evil caused by human free will) abuse. One of the core assertions of the Jewish Christian tradition is the existence of Almighty and Almighty God. To oppose this is to observe that people and animals suffer evil. From common sense, we can deduce from this observation that there is no god imagined from this tradition. If he exists, he will cease from evil. The problem of evil in philosophy What is the classic "evil problem" ("three difficulties") in the Western philosophy / theological tradition? The problem of evil is how to harmonize the existence of evil with omnipotence, omniscience, and the presence of the Almighty God. Greek philosopher Epicuras detailed this trilemma in ancient times and summarized it in modern David Hume. Epicuras advocates a trilemma to counter the concept of almighty The problem of evil has two branches. Evil logic problem (LPOE) seeks to prove that the existence of evil contradicts the existence of omnipotence and omnipotent existence. The evidence evidence question (EPOE) tries to prove that the existence of an amount or kind of evil contradicts the existence of somewhat effective and benevolent entity. Of course, not all Gods are considered omnipotent, omnipotent, or either. Many gods are morally defective, positive evil, or simply indifferent, and not omnipotent. The evil logical matter does not apply to these gods, but evidence of evil evidence still holds true. This is consistent with the idea of ​​evil. That is, there are defective evil, irrelevant, or totipotent entities compatible with reality and the existence of omnipotent and omnipotent entities is not. The problem of evil can be formulated in various ways. Indeed, the 'problem' pointing to evil may be more accurate. Recipes are interpreted as logical problems. Regarding the logic of evil, it is claimed that these two arguments, (1) that Almighty and Almighty God exists, and (2) the existence of evil is logically incompatible. Since evil exists on the surface, it is claimed that God (usually understood to be omnipotent and omnipotent) does not exist. In the latter part of the 20th century, logical arguments became dominant. But by the end of the century religious philosophers generally believed that the logic was rebutted. One of the reasons is that there must be hidden or unspecified assumptions as claims (1) and (2) are not clearly contradictory. But what is that?

The problem of evil is how the omnipotent, omnipotent, full force god can exist when evil seems to exist. The problem of evil gives way to the idea that if it exists, God must be evil in order to send someone there. I believe that neither concept believes that God can exist in the presence of evil and that God is not evil. I believe that hell exists because God is holy and justice. The bigger thing is that anyone can go to heaven. I will try to answer bad questions about heaven and hell. The problem of evil in philosophy What is the classic "evil problem" ("three difficulties") in the Western philosophy / theological tradition? The problem of evil is how to harmonize the existence of evil with omnipotence, omniscience, and the presence of the Almighty God. Greek philosopher Epicuras detailed this trilemma in ancient times and summarized it in modern David Hume. Epicuras advocates a trilemma to counter the concept of almighty The problem of evil has two branches. Evil logic problem (LPOE) seeks to prove that the existence of evil contradicts the existence of omnipotence and omnipotent existence. The evidence evidence question (EPOE) tries to prove that the existence of an amount or kind of evil contradicts the existence of somewhat effective and benevolent entity. Of course, not all Gods are considered omnipotent, omnipotent, or either. Many gods are morally defective, positive evil, or simply indifferent, and not omnipotent. The evil logical matter does not apply to these gods, but evidence of evil evidence still holds true. This is consistent with the idea of ​​evil. That is, there are defective evil, irrelevant, or totipotent entities that are compatible with reality and the existence of omnipotent and omnipotent entities is not The problem of evil can be formulated in various ways. Indeed, the 'problem' pointing to evil may be more accurate. Recipes are interpreted as logical problems. Regarding the logic of evil, it is claimed that these two arguments, (1) that Almighty and Almighty God exists, and (2) the existence of evil is logically incompatible. Since evil exists on the surface, it is claimed that God (usually understood to be omnipotent and omnipotent) does not exist. In the latter part of the 20th century, logical arguments became dominant. But by the end of the century religious philosophers generally believed that the logic was rebutted. One of the reasons is that there must be hidden or unspecified assumptions as claims (1) and (2) are not clearly contradictory. But what is that?

There is a problem of evil. This is a simple and direct fact. Discussion on the evil (and pain) problem proves this fact. The argument over evil shows that God has full power and full power. It shows that God is kind. In other words, he is hoping that only kindness exists. But look at all evil and evil in the world. The god of all good is completely inconsistent. God's almighty is that you can do whatever he wants. So, if God can do anything what he wishes, why can not he do all the good things and things? The problem of evil in philosophy What is the classic "evil problem" ("three difficulties") in the Western philosophy / theological tradition? The problem of evil is how to harmonize the existence of evil with omnipotence, omniscience, and the presence of the Almighty God. Greek philosopher Epicuras detailed this trilemma in ancient times and summarized it in modern David Hume. Epicuras advocates a trilemma to counter the concept of almighty The problem of evil has two branches. Evil logic problem (LPOE) seeks to prove that the existence of evil contradicts the existence of omnipotence and omnipotent existence. The evidence evidence question (EPOE) tries to prove that the existence of an amount or kind of evil contradicts the existence of somewhat effective and benevolent entity. Of course, not all Gods are considered omnipotent, omnipotent, or either. Many gods are morally defective, positive evil, simply indifferent, and not omnipotent. The evil logical matter does not apply to these gods, but evidence of evil evidence still holds true. This is consistent with the idea of ​​evil. That is, there are defective evil, irrelevant, or totipotent entities compatible with reality and the existence of omnipotent and omnipotent entities is not. The problem of evil can be formulated in various ways. Indeed, the 'problem' pointing to evil may be more accurate. Recipes are interpreted as logical problems. Regarding the logic of evil, it is claimed that these two arguments, (1) that Almighty and Almighty God exists, and (2) the existence of evil is logically incompatible. Since evil exists on the surface, it is claimed that God (usually understood to be omnipotent and omnipotent) does not exist. In the latter part of the 20th century, logical arguments became dominant. But by the end of the century religious philosophers generally believed that the logic was rebutted. One of the reasons is that there must be hidden or unspecified assumptions as claims (1) and (2) are not clearly contradictory. But what is that?

One of the oldest dilemmas in philosophy is one of the biggest threats to Christian theology. The problem of evil is bothering the world's largest thought, but it is still clearly close to the hearts of the most common people. If God is good, why is there evil? The following article explains the problem of evil related to God, examines the reaction of Christianity to the problem, and concludes that the existence of God is perfectly compatible with the existence of evil. The body's "evil problem is usually divided into logic and evidence problems." The core of each problem is incompatible to believe that the existence and existence of God is evil. The problem of evil has two branches. Evil logic problem (LPOE) seeks to prove that the existence of evil contradicts the existence of omnipotence and omnipotent existence. The evidence evidence question (EPOE) tries to prove that the existence of an amount or kind of evil contradicts the existence of somewhat effective and benevolent entity. Of course, not all Gods are considered omnipotent, omnipotent, or either. Many gods are morally defective, positive evil, simply indifferent, and not omnipotent. The evil logical matter does not apply to these gods, but evidence of evil evidence still holds true. This is consistent with the idea of ​​evil. That is, there are defective evil, irrelevant, or totipotent entities compatible with reality and the existence of omnipotent and omnipotent entities is not. The problem of evil can be formulated in various ways. Indeed, the 'problem' pointing to evil may be more accurate. Recipes are interpreted as logical problems. Regarding the logic of evil, it is claimed that these two arguments, (1) that Almighty and Almighty God exists, and (2) the existence of evil is logically incompatible. Since evil exists on the surface, it is claimed that God (usually understood to be omnipotent and omnipotent) does not exist. In the latter part of the 20th century, logical arguments became dominant. But by the end of the century religious philosophers generally believed that the logic was rebutted. One of the reasons is that there must be hidden or unspecified assumptions as claims (1) and (2) are not clearly contradictory. But what is that? Some philosophers believe Plantinga 's obvious victory over the evil logical problem is somewhat easier. The solution to his evil logic problem solved them and they were suspected of being fascinated by certain tricks. For example, JL Mackie is one of the best atheist philosophers in the mid-20th century and is an important representative of evil logic. To truly abandon our general view on the conflict between good and evil, we show that the problem of evil does not show that the central concept of the theory logically contradicts I admit it. But whether this can provide a real solution to the problem is another matter. (Mackie 1982, 154 pages)

Because of our freedom of freedom, we argue that we have evil in this world and do not fully answer the concept of "evil problem". To say that there is evil in this world is the same as saying making a wrong decision in this world. Decisions as bad as evil have no form. God can not do bad things because all decisions God makes are good decisions. Human beings started evil. Indeed, the first people (Adam and Eve) continue to produce evil as everyone eventually comes from them. The problem of evil in philosophy What is the classic "evil problem" ("three difficulties") in the Western philosophy / theological tradition? The problem of evil is how to harmonize the existence of evil with omnipotence, omniscience, and the presence of the Almighty God. Greek philosopher Epicuras detailed this trilemma in ancient times and summarized it in modern David Hume. Epicuras advocates a trilemma to counter the concept of almighty The problem of evil has two branches. Evil logic problem (LPOE) seeks to prove that the existence of evil contradicts the existence of omnipotence and omnipotent existence. The evidence evidence question (EPOE) tries to prove that the existence of an amount or kind of evil contradicts the existence of somewhat effective and benevolent entity. Of course, not all Gods are considered omnipotent, omnipotent, or either. Many gods are morally defective, positive evil, simply indifferent, and not omnipotent. The evil logical matter does not apply to these gods, but evidence of evil evidence still holds true. This is consistent with the idea of ​​evil. That is, there are defective evil, irrelevant, or totipotent entities that are compatible with reality and the existence of omnipotent and omnipotent entities is not The problem of evil can be formulated in various ways. Indeed, the 'problem' pointing to evil may be more accurate. Recipes are interpreted as logical problems. Regarding the logic of evil, it is claimed that these two arguments, (1) that Almighty and Almighty God exists, and (2) the existence of evil is logically incompatible. Since evil exists on the surface, it is claimed that God (usually understood to be omnipotent and omnipotent) does not exist. In the latter part of the 20th century, logical arguments became dominant. But by the end of the century religious philosophers generally believed that the logic was rebutted. One of the reasons is that there must be hidden or unspecified assumptions as claims (1) and (2) are not clearly contradictory. But what is that?

Deductive question of evil One of the main philosophical arguments about the existence of God includes evil. There are two basic expressions in this question. One is deductive and the other is inductive. The deductive form of the question requires the following things. Is the existence of evil logically compatible with inevitable compassion and inevitable totality? One of the philosophers discussing this issue is Richard Gale. According to Gael, I start with outlining the deductive problem of evil in this article. Then I dispute deductive arguments and try to prove that the existence of evil is logically compatible with the existence of kindness and totipotency. One-person concentration Evil philosophical problems can be expressed in two ways. 2 Each expression violates the existence of God. One version of the problem is "evil logical problem" (hereinafter referred to as LPE). LPE is an a priori argument. Considering the evidence, the deductive argument tries to prove that the conclusion must be correct. LPE can be expressed as follows. The job of the person who refused the LPE and EPE parameters is to explain why these parameters failed. My goal is to briefly discuss the response to LPE called "limited defense of the gods" (hereinafter called LGD). LGD is not a general response to LPE. I explained the objection to LGD, and then argued that objections are not convincing. First, I will detail some of the most detailed LPE versions I used. Evil Logic Problems and Restricted God's Defense Darren Hibbs Nova Southeast College, hibbs @ nova.edu Reflecting on the problem of evil led to a philosophical debate called "argument of evil". There are two types of discussion: Deductive version is designed to ultimately prove that God does not exist - a shadow beyond reasonable doubt. It is impossible to assume that the existence of God is irrational, since the purpose of the recursive version is simply to judge that God is unlikely to exist. Why do you think these propositions are contradictory? Well, serious presence will absolutely oppose all sufferings. All ignorant people will know all kinds of suffering. Almighty people can prevent any suffering. So even if there is God Almighty, Omniscience, and Almighty God there is no pain. So, if there is a god there is no suffering, and if there is suffering there is no god. If there is an omnipotent, omniscient, perfectly good god, why is there evil? The problem of evil is the most widely recognized objection to theology in Western and Oriental philosophy. There are two general versions of this problem: a deductive version and a logical version claiming that any evil existence (irrespective of its role in generating profit) is incompatible with the existence of God; and the actual Probability version claiming it from an evil point of view God's number and severity are unlikely to exist. Since it is widely recognized that thoroughly good existence may allow or cause some harm in morally compelling circumstances (such as causing collapse and causing pain in children), deductive problems Currently not very common. The hotter discussion involves the possibility (or even the possibility) of numerous evils in the universe.

The problem of evil in philosophy I am considered to have the god of the world who is always responsible for everything that happens in our daily life. This belief is most meaningful to me and makes me feel complete. But I also know that some people in this world do not believe in the existence of God and have logical arguments like evil to support them. Philosophers such as Hume and Maggie believe that if God is gentle, omnipotent, and omniscient, he will not let evil exist. The problem of evil in philosophy What is the classic "evil problem" ("three difficulties") in the Western philosophy / theological tradition? The problem of evil is how to harmonize the existence of evil with omnipotence, omniscience, and the presence of the Almighty God. Greek philosopher Epicuras detailed this trilemma in ancient times and summarized it in modern David Hume. Epicuras advocates a trilemma to counter the concept of almighty Then there is discipline sometimes called "religious philosophy". This is a philosophy of man and discusses some problems that influence religion in philosophy like evil problems ("Why is the world evil if God is holy and omnipotent?" ? "). These questions can be answered only by leaving all our thoughts to God's sovereignty. For example, why does God seek permission for existence? Answer: Punish or forgive it for its own glory. This wonderful fact has a very deep meaning. Of course, since human philosophy is not satisfied with the answer, it invented various irrational alternatives. Perhaps one of the oldest and most challenging theological problems in Christian philosophy is to ask why the world has so much evil though God was omnipotent and perfectly kind. It is often referred to as "problem of evil" in philosophical world, or "Cong question" as C. S. Lewis said. Numerous theological and philosophical arguments, books and seminars are studying this problem. There are many reasons for people to check "painful problems" - some are sincere doubts, some are outside their painful heartache. By finding answers to this question, while many people discover new aspects of God's personality and deepen their faith in God, others simply face this problem to abandon their faith did.

"God whispers to us in our happiness and speaks to us in our conscience, but we shout in our pain.This is what he is doing to evoke the world of hearing loss Megaphone "on page 91 Throughout history, humanity must fight against the problem of evil. This is one of the biggest problems in the world. There is no doubt that the world of human faith, then evil and suffering is not doing any more challenges. The problem can be briefly stated: if God is a god of omniscience, why can he forgive evil. If God is very kind, why can he allow such bad things to happen? Why did he allow bad things to happen to the good people? The problem of evil in philosophy What is the classic "evil problem" ("three difficulties") in the Western philosophy / theological tradition? The problem of evil is how to harmonize the existence of evil with omnipotence, omniscience, and the presence of the Almighty God. Greek philosopher Epicuras detailed this trilemma in ancient times and summarized it in modern David Hume. Epicuras advocates a trilemma to counter the concept of almighty The problem of evil has two branches. Evil logic problem (LPOE) seeks to prove that the existence of evil contradicts the existence of omnipotence and omnipotent existence. The evidence evidence question (EPOE) tries to prove that the existence of an amount or kind of evil contradicts the existence of somewhat effective and benevolent entity. Of course, not all Gods are considered omnipotent, omnipotent, or either. Many gods are morally defective, positive evil, or simply indifferent, and not omnipotent. The evil logical matter does not apply to these gods, but evidence of evil evidence still holds true. This is consistent with the idea of ​​evil. That is, there are defective evil, irrelevant, or totipotent entities that are compatible with reality and the existence of omnipotent and omnipotent entities is not The problem of evil can be formulated in various ways. Indeed, the 'problem' pointing to evil may be more accurate. Recipes are interpreted as logical problems. Regarding the logic of evil, it is claimed that these two arguments, (1) that Almighty and Almighty God exists, and (2) the existence of evil is logically incompatible. Since evil exists on the surface, it is claimed that God (usually understood to be omnipotent and omnipotent) does not exist. In the latter part of the 20th century, logical arguments became dominant. But by the end of the century religious philosophers generally believed that the logic was rebutted. One of the reasons is that there must be hidden or unspecified assumptions as claims (1) and (2) are not clearly contradictory. But what is that?

Satan and the problem of evil Now, the snake is the most unwieldy animals made by the Lord God. The snake asked the woman, "Is God truly saying to you not to eat from the garden tree?" The woman replied: "We can eat fruit in the garden," You can not eat it, you can not even touch it, so that you will not die. But snake said to the lady: "Of course, you will not die No, the moment you eat it, your eyes are opened and you know what is wrong like God Let's see (Genesis 3: 1-5) snakes, devils, underworld, king of darkness, collapsed In short, Job is an article about evil. This book starts with God and Satan and talks about Job, "completely upright", "Afraid of God, Avoid evil" (1: 1). Satan tells God that Job is kindly because Job is rich; if he suffers, he will surely curse your face (1:11). God accepted that challenge and Satan was allowed to destroy the life of Job. Likewise, many scholars believe that this part is not included in the original work but has been added by later editors. God's explanation - if you can call it - is that the only person who is human can not understand his behavior. He asked Job about the question of rhetoric - did Job kill the big beast and the dragon like him? And until the end of Chapter 41 we began to describe a very long and poetic walk of these two mythical creatures Is it possible to resolve the evil more intelligently outside the religious background of God and Satan? maybe. For some people, this will release the drama from the discussion and make it a more ambiguous and consistent monotheism. Evil is a monster in the framework of any knowledge. It has strange power: temptation, mystery, terrible appeal. Shakespeare fully understood this when he created Iago among secular and unwilling malignant ones. In 1939, at the beginning of the Second World War, Albert Camus wrote in his note: "The dominance of the beast has begun." In the past year or two, regardless of how dominance of the beast is In some places: wonderful days, miraculous relief. But as Jung thinks, different people live in different centuries. Today as well, there are things that have gentle conflict over the centuries of the world yet. The war in the Gulf region is a part of the centuries of conflict and the cultural premise that has been going on for centuries. Last Thursday, we discussed the problem of evil. We talked about how we understand evil (for example, as a demon / devil, as a manifestation of its influence, as a manifestation of our personal sin). There are various ways of thinking about evil, but some of them are duplicated, some of which are mutually exclusive. Talking about ways to understand evil without relying on "correct understanding" is to preoccupy with the wisdom of people who gave a lot of thought without pretending that we have really satisfying answers It is a healthy way. This is a topic that Christians should always say "I do not know." I think the Miroslav Wolf is correct: God can not truly succeed.

In the beginning God created the world. He created the earth, air, stars, trees, human animals, heaven, angels, and every spiritual being. God looked at these things and said they were okay. But if everything God created is good, then please come from a bad place. How does evil spread to the general situation? St. Augustine was the seventh confession of confession, looking back on the existence of evil and the theological problem that it formed. In order for evil to exist, the God of the Creator has to give it. Evil question based on St. Augustine and Christian St. Augustine wrote many topics still relevant today in his confession. This document documents the development of Augustine's faith and the development of Christian philosophy, and one of the most interesting is his argument about the nature of evil. Christianity predicts some important ideas Augustine has established in his philosophy and in his context he devises a thorough and persuasive argument against the evil problem that treats evil as misunderstanding Proposed. Augustine encountered these problems in his "confession" and "city of God". St. Augustine deals with the problem of natural evil in God's city in a simple and sensible way. Many parts of this article deal with this problem, but I think this section summarizes the best content (from Book 1, Chapter 10). For those who kill the famine directly, it has been saved from the disease of this world like a good disease; only people who are hungry are taught to live more simplely and get used to faster things. " This is a problem of evil. When Augustine said: "God can not abolish evil, he can not abolish evil, Augustine sums this most effectively," Augustin said evil, light Like the darkness without darkness, I think that it is a lack of kindness and does not exist, it is simply a lack of goodness. "He asked for interpretation of the existence of God in the Bible and was shown in Genesis I believe that mankind has fallen from grace, as it is, showing the origin of evil. He believes that evil has gone into the world. Because humans deliberately deviate from God and that good. This shows that morality and evil of nature are the result of sinful human sins

Voltaire said, "Metaphysical considerations include the nature of possibilities and necessities, I will violate my basic assumption that God chose the best from all possible worlds" I said. In Candido, the character in the book Pangloth said ... "Everything is the best, if there is a volcano in Lisbon, there is nothing else there, since things can not exist there, there is none The place is good for everything "(Voltaire 30). Through Pangloss, he had experienced so much pain (or evil) that he believed that God's thought produced all these pain for 'b'. The problem of evil in philosophy What is the classic "evil problem" ("three difficulties") in the Western philosophy / theological tradition? The problem of evil is how to harmonize the existence of evil with omnipotence, omniscience, and the presence of the Almighty God. Greek philosopher Epicuras detailed this trilemma in ancient times and summarized it in modern David Hume. Epicuras advocates a trilemma to counter the concept of almighty Theodicy is a specific issue of theology and philosophy trying to solve the problem that arises when trying to harmonize the existence of evil observed in the world with the existence of perfectly good God (or almighty, almighty) It is department. "Almighty" "Theodicy" also refers to any attempt to solve this problem. In recent years, a new approach has emerged and takes a different approach. Instead of trying to eliminate disturbing contradiction, accepting the contradiction between evil reality and omnipotent and gentle god, thinking as a way to actually exclude evil, or to better understand the essence of God, or both I can. The problem of evil has two branches. Evil logic problem (LPOE) seeks to prove that the existence of evil contradicts the existence of omnipotence and omnipotent existence. The evidence evidence question (EPOE) tries to prove that the existence of an amount or kind of evil contradicts the existence of somewhat effective and benevolent entity. Of course, not all Gods are considered omnipotent, omnipotent, or either. Many gods are morally defective, positive evil, or simply indifferent, and not omnipotent. The evil logical matter does not apply to these gods, but evidence of evil evidence still holds true. This is consistent with the idea of ​​evil. That is, there are defective evil, irrelevant, or totipotent entities that are compatible with reality and the existence of omnipotent and omnipotent entities is not

The problem of evil was a problem that philosophers always tried to answer for centuries. That is simply why evil exists in our world if God exists and is complete and almighty. Two great philosophers, Gottfried Leibniz and Nicolas Malebranche, tried to answer this question with their own solution. They all answered the same questions, but their views were very different. Specifically, we oppose whether the world is the best world created by God. The problem of evil in philosophy What is the classic "evil problem" ("three difficulties") in the Western philosophy / theological tradition? The problem of evil is how to harmonize the existence of evil with omnipotence, omniscience, and the presence of the Almighty God. Greek philosopher Epicuras detailed this trilemma in ancient times and summarized it in modern David Hume. Epicuras advocates a trilemma to counter the concept of almighty The problem of evil has two branches. Evil logic problem (LPOE) seeks to prove that the existence of evil contradicts the existence of omnipotence and omnipotent existence. The evidence evidence question (EPOE) tries to prove that the existence of an amount or kind of evil contradicts the existence of somewhat effective and benevolent entity. Of course, not all Gods are considered omnipotent, omnipotent, or either. Many gods are morally defective, positive evil, or simply indifferent, and not omnipotent. The evil logical matter does not apply to these gods, but evidence of evil evidence still holds true. This is consistent with the idea of ​​evil. That is, there are defective evil, irrelevant, or totipotent entities that are compatible with reality and the existence of omnipotent and omnipotent entities is not

The problem of evil in the study of religious philosophy "God is a complete creator with all things omnipotence" "There is evil in the world" a) Explain these two statements and show why they are considered contradictory (20) This problem is often seen as a matter of how the existence of God is in harmony with the existence of evil in the world. It is considered a logical problem because it is based on the obvious contradiction involved in having three incompatible beliefs. The problem of evil in philosophy What is the classic "evil problem" ("three difficulties") in the Western philosophy / theological tradition? The problem of evil is how to harmonize the existence of evil with omnipotence, omniscience, and the presence of the Almighty God. Greek philosopher Epicuras detailed this trilemma in ancient times and summarized it in modern David Hume. Epicuras advocates a trilemma to counter the concept of almighty The problem of evil has two branches. Evil logic problem (LPOE) seeks to prove that the existence of evil contradicts the existence of omnipotence and omnipotent existence. The evidence evidence question (EPOE) tries to prove that the existence of an amount or kind of evil contradicts the existence of somewhat effective and benevolent entity. Of course, not all Gods are considered omnipotent, omnipotent, or either. Many gods are morally defective, positive evil, simply indifferent, and not omnipotent. The evil logical matter does not apply to these gods, but evidence of evil evidence still holds true. This is consistent with the idea of ​​evil. That is, there are defective evil, irrelevant, or totipotent entities compatible with reality and the existence of omnipotent and omnipotent entities is not. The problem of evil can be formulated in various ways. Indeed, the 'problem' pointing to evil may be more accurate. Recipes are interpreted as logical problems. Regarding the logic of evil, it is claimed that these two arguments, (1) that Almighty and Almighty God exists, and (2) the existence of evil is logically incompatible. Since evil exists on the surface, it is claimed that God (usually understood to be omnipotent and omnipotent) does not exist. In the latter part of the 20th century, logical arguments became dominant. But by the end of the century religious philosophers generally believed that the logic was rebutted. One of the reasons is that there must be hidden or unspecified assumptions as claims (1) and (2) are not clearly contradictory. But what is that?

The problems of God and evil can read the Mainichi Newspaper and turn the news on TV and radio to understand the evil going on in our world. Banks are deprived, cars are stolen, violent murder and rape are taking place. Somewhere in the world, people felt aftershocks of the earthquake. Cancer causes millions of deaths each year, but other debilitating diseases continue to affect many people and can not heal their suffering. President Bush said that our country is fighting the evil war. Perhaps the most difficult problem regarding the relationship between morality and God's faith is the problem of evil. If God exists and is totally omnipotent and completely gentle, why does God allow a horrible evil like the Holocaust? Why do holy ones forgive evil? This problem came from ancient origins and has long been discussed by Abraham's religious philosophers and theologians in relation to the collapse of mankind, both literally and metaphor, from Eden to the expulsion of Adam and Eve . Critical evaluation of the summary of evil problems and how we weaken the traditional features of God. This article will attempt to review the philosophical dilemma of the existence of evil, God exists, if there is evil, if so, this god can be declared perfect Is it? The epistemological problem that appeared was the understanding of my God and the validity of the existence of God. What is good and bad? The Merriam-Webster dictionary defines evil as follows. a: Moral ... Why is there evil on the earth? This is the central point about the problem of evil. Atheists and theologians are trying to explain this problem in their own philosophical view. Epicurean's evil paradox shows a dilemma for the recognition of traditional Judaism and Christianity of God and evil. This tradition supports the following three propositions: "God is omnipotent (including omnibus), God is completely gentle, evil exists" (Pojman 69). Evil public weakens God's totipotency The Christian theology evil problem also plagues the world's largest thought, but it is still clearly close to the hearts of the most common people. If God is good, why is there evil? The following article explains the problem of evil related to God, examines the reaction of Christianity to the problem, and concludes that the existence of God is perfectly compatible with the existence of evil. It is my heart that "the problem of evil is often divided into logic and evidence problems."

Swinburn believes that the evil existence in the world is consistent with the omniscience, totipotency and the existence of all good gods in his essay "Why does God forgive evil"? First, Swimburn's claim is based on two basic types of evil: morality and nature. Moral evil includes all evils caused by human behavior, whether deliberate or negligent, including all evil that is not caused by human beings or is not permitted by human evils . Moral hazards such as abortion, murder, terrorism, theft, etc. are human's unethical behavior, the evil of nature, Haiti, earthquakes such as Hurricane Katrina, wildfires and HIV / AIDS etc. Send back Evil in broad sense, including all natural and moral evils, is often quoted as evil in the context of theology, as when discussing the problem of evil. The problem of evil is to explain the problem of evil in the world created by the all-powerful, omnipotent, all-good God. If the creator has these attributes, there seems to be no evil in the world. But there is evil in the world. Therefore, there is a reason to believe that there is no universal, versatile, all-friendly creator. The problem of evil can be formulated in various ways. Indeed, the 'problem' pointing to evil may be more accurate. Recipes are interpreted as logical problems. Regarding the logic of evil, it is claimed that these two arguments, (1) that Almighty and Almighty God exists, and (2) the existence of evil is logically incompatible. Since evil exists on the surface, it is claimed that God (usually understood to be omnipotent and omnipotent) does not exist. In the latter part of the 20th century, logical arguments became dominant. But by the end of the century religious philosophers generally believed that the logic was rebutted. One of the reasons is that there must be hidden or unspecified assumptions as claims (1) and (2) are not clearly contradictory. But what is that? Regarding the rough topography, we discussed above, there are two different forms of evil discussion. The first is a logical problem of evil. According to the logic of evil, the coexistence of evil and God is logically impossible. The world where God exists will be a world without evil. So anyone who believes in God's presence and evil will commit an implicit contradiction. The second is evidence of evil. According to evidence of evil, coexistence between God and evil is logically possible, but the latter is evidence against the former. Discussion of evidence is sometimes used to infer the best interpretation (ie the induction from evil), and sometimes the probability (ie the induction from evil). In any case, facts about the existence, nature, and distribution of evil in the world are provided as strong evidence for the theological truth.

Evil Issues The Jewish / Christian tradition is based on the belief that there is a supernatural individual, he is the ultimate creator, and all other existence can be attributed to their existence. The three main features lie in this (God?), Completely good (all power), completely strong (full power), and all known (omniscience). This is the basis of Western religious thought, and forming the subject of this article is the relationship between these features and evil. The problem of evil in philosophy What is the classic "evil problem" ("three difficulties") in the Western philosophy / theological tradition? The problem of evil is how to harmonize the existence of evil with omnipotence, omniscience, and the presence of the Almighty God. Greek philosopher Epicuras detailed this trilemma in ancient times and summarized it in modern David Hume. Epicuras advocates a trilemma to counter the concept of almighty The problem of evil has two branches. Evil logic problem (LPOE) seeks to prove that the existence of evil contradicts the existence of omnipotence and omnipotent existence. The evidence evidence question (EPOE) tries to prove that the existence of an amount or kind of evil contradicts the existence of somewhat effective and benevolent entity. Of course, not all Gods are considered omnipotent, omnipotent, or either. Many gods are morally defective, positive evil, or simply indifferent, and not omnipotent. The evil logical matter does not apply to these gods, but evidence of evil evidence still holds true. This is consistent with the idea of ​​evil. That is, there are defective evil, irrelevant, or totipotent entities that are compatible with reality and the existence of omnipotent and omnipotent entities is not

In "Why is not God interventioned to prevent evil?", The author points out the fact that "there is no opportunity to create virtue like courage, compassion if there is no pain" . For example, an alcohol-dependent parent threw a 5-year-old child on the street and the child eventually suffered a car. Some people say that God did not help children as God wants someone to gain courage from this situation. Discussions about virtues can also be linked to the assertion that God wants to "establish moral urgency" (Johnson 122), they feel the need to help stop the catastrophe I will. There is a problem of evil. This is a simple and direct fact. Discussion on the evil (and pain) problem proves this fact. The argument over evil shows that God has full power and full power. It shows that God is kind. In other words, he is hoping that only kindness exists. But look at all evil and evil in the world. The god of all good is completely inconsistent. God's almighty is that you can do whatever he wants. So, if God can do anything what he wants, why then? The problem of evil can be formulated in various ways. Indeed, the 'problem' pointing to evil may be more accurate. Recipes are interpreted as logical problems. Regarding the logic of evil, it is claimed that these two arguments, (1) that Almighty and Almighty God exists, and (2) the existence of evil is logically incompatible. Since evil exists on the surface, it is claimed that God (usually understood to be omnipotent and omnipotent) does not exist. In the latter part of the 20th century, logical arguments became dominant. But by the end of the century religious philosophers generally believed that the logic was rebutted. One of the reasons is that there must be hidden or unspecified assumptions as claims (1) and (2) are not clearly contradictory. But what is that? Regarding the rough topography, we discussed above, there are two different forms of evil discussion. The first is a logical problem of evil. According to the logic of evil, the coexistence of evil and God is logically impossible. The world where God exists will be a world without evil. So anyone who believes in God's presence and evil will commit an implicit contradiction. The second is evidence of evil. According to evidence of evil, coexistence between God and evil is logically possible, but the latter is evidence against the former. Discussion of evidence is sometimes used to infer the best interpretation (ie the induction from evil), and sometimes the probability (ie the induction from evil). In any case, facts about the existence, nature, and distribution of evil in the world are provided as strong evidence for the theological truth.

As we normally understand, I do not believe in evil. What we think about evil is that God has misused the good given. Since the soul has to experience himself as a specific thing, we have even experience of being regarded as evil. In other words, in this relative situation, you can not get hot without cold, short stature can not be high, you can not live without what you do not have. The problem of evil in philosophy What is the classic "evil problem" ("three difficulties") in the Western philosophy / theological tradition? The problem of evil is how to harmonize the existence of evil with omnipotence, omniscience, and the presence of the Almighty God. Greek philosopher Epicuras detailed this trilemma in ancient times and summarized it in modern David Hume. Epicuras advocates a trilemma to counter the concept of almighty The problem of evil has two branches. Evil logic problem (LPOE) seeks to prove that the existence of evil contradicts the existence of omnipotence and omnipotent existence. The evidence evidence question (EPOE) tries to prove that the existence of an amount or kind of evil contradicts the existence of somewhat effective and benevolent entity. Of course, not all Gods are considered omnipotent, omnipotent, or either. Many gods are morally defective, positive evil, simply indifferent, and not omnipotent. The evil logical matter does not apply to these gods, but evidence of evil evidence still holds true. This is consistent with the idea of ​​evil. That is, there are defective evil, irrelevant, or totipotent entities compatible with reality and the existence of omnipotent and omnipotent entities is not. The problem of evil can be formulated in various ways. Indeed, the 'problem' pointing to evil may be more accurate. Recipes are interpreted as logical problems. Regarding the logic of evil, it is claimed that these two arguments, (1) that Almighty and Almighty God exists, and (2) the existence of evil is logically incompatible. Since evil exists on the surface, it is claimed that God (usually understood to be omnipotent and omnipotent) does not exist. In the latter part of the 20th century, logical arguments became dominant. But by the end of the century religious philosophers generally believed that the logic was rebutted. One of the reasons is that there must be hidden or unspecified assumptions as claims (1) and (2) are not clearly contradictory. But what is that?

In the absence of God, the claim of evil was a controversial issue in the discussion of religious philosophy. This question is trying to explain how some evil in the world allows the evil of the world to happen when traditional gods have the ability to block these events, knowledge, and ability. But in order to delve into this particular discussion, we must first decide what qualities the traditional God should have. The god of "traditional" monotheism as found in Judaism - Christian religion should be omnipotent, omniscient, and omnidirectional. The problem of evil in philosophy What is the classic "evil problem" ("three difficulties") in the Western philosophy / theological tradition? The problem of evil is how to harmonize the existence of evil with omnipotence, omniscience, and the presence of the Almighty God. Greek philosopher Epicuras detailed this trilemma in ancient times and summarized it in modern David Hume. Epicuras advocates a trilemma to counter the concept of almighty The problem of evil has two branches. Evil logic problem (LPOE) seeks to prove that the existence of evil contradicts the existence of omnipotence and omnipotent existence. The evidence evidence question (EPOE) tries to prove that the existence of an amount or kind of evil contradicts the existence of somewhat effective and benevolent entity. Of course, not all Gods are considered omnipotent, omnipotent, or either. Many gods are morally defective, positive evil, or simply indifferent, and not omnipotent. The evil logical matter does not apply to these gods, but evidence of evil evidence still holds true. This is consistent with the idea of ​​evil. That is, there are defective evil, irrelevant, or totipotent entities that are compatible with reality and the existence of omnipotent and omnipotent entities is not

Approximately 65 million people died during World War II, about 27 million people died in British famine in India, about 25 million people died in the fall of the Ming dynasties, about 20 million people died in Stalin's dictatorship It is. According to the Central Intelligence Agency, three people were murdered by the Boston marathon bombing ("Boston Marathon Terrorist Attack"), and 1,039 people were murdered each year ("World Profile"). Have you ever wondered how many of these 829 people were actually killed and deprived of their lives? Evil in the world is evil in the sight of the bystanders, sometimes the daily reality. In order to raise a problem of evil, you first need to know the existence of evil. As God shows that he is omnipotent and shows all knowledge and all goodness, how can the same god make evil exist and cause bad people to do bad things? Our suffering and suffering of others express vividly the existence of evil in our world. Most of us are fighting the cause of evil in several ways in our lives. Evil is divided into two forms, moral evil and natural evil. Moral evil is brought about by the wrong choice that was created by our free will. Nature's evil is a bad thing to people, regardless of whether they are worth it or not. "We must say that God is not entirely kind, and that he is even an authorized or even an evil writer, or even if it is totally nice to be able to stop it if at all possible "(Fitzgerald) This reaction to evil questions is logical. "People are perfectly good" and "x is good" so there is no real meaning in the "perfectly good" world. This is because the meaning of evil (or "bad") is included in the concept "good". Logically speaking, claiming "x is good" is the same as claiming "not x is not good", that is, saying "x is not bad" (or "bad"). . Therefore, saying "x is good" presupposes the difference between the two types of good and evil. This means that the concept of our "evil" is included in the concept of "good".

The matrix written and instructed by Lary and Andy Wachowski is a 1999 SF action movie and is considered one of the most skeptical and imaginative movies ever. It depicts the complex narrative of the future of dyskinesia that the reality perceived by most people is actually an imitated person created by an artificial intelligence machine using human being suppressed as an energy source. The protagonist of this story was released from the matrix, but it is a character named Cypher (a.k.a.). There is no problem returning to the queue (Andy and Lary Wachowski). Betrayal of Cypher, like the history of the novel and other characters, caused his strong opposition to suffering, introduced the philosophy of evil. One of the most obvious characters that might resemble Cypher is Jewish Jewish, one of 12 disciples of Jesus Christ. Like Judas was a disciple of Jesus, Cypher was a follower of Morpheus, but both decided to betray them ... in her sentence the evil of slavery was mentioned. In 'Uncle Tom's Hut' there is a conflict between evil slavery and love for Christianity. Characters like Tom and Eva represent Christian nobles; by contrast, Les Gets is a materialization of slavery and there is no passion for slavery. Although Harriet Beecher Stow mainly mentioned slavery immorality, she also argued that only the power of love can release the United States from the evil system of slavery. Another type of evil that plays an important role in discussing the problem of evil recently is terrible evil. Since Marilyn Adams (1999: 26), this may be defined as an evil "participation" (ie action and pain) that constitutes a simple aspect that doubts whether participant life is possible Because it is included) "As an example of this evil, I was cited in Adams" raped a woman, I cut psychological physical torture from my arm. The ultimate goal is to collapse and betray one person more deeply. Loyalty, Ivan Karamazov explains child abuse, child pornography, parents' incest incest, death from starvation, and nuclear bombs in densely populated areas "(p.26) Betrayal is also a "human-like" problem, it is also a problem of philosophers. Philosophers must be able to reveal the notion of betrayal, compare it with other moral concepts, and critically assess the situation of betrayal. At a practical level, people should be able to honestly admit betrayal and reduce its impact. It is not dealt with and attacked by it. What we need is a conceptually clear explanation of betrayal, not only distinguishing reality, simply being regarded as betrayal, but also systematic guidance for the evaluation of so-called betrayal in real life Offers.

St. Augustine took a long time to find out where the evil came from, the cause and cause of its existence. Manichees presented him with the first solution to the problem of Devil Augustin. Augustine of Manizhes is "a spectator of nine years" (Melchert, p. 230). Manichheit is a cult led by Persia named mani during the first century. Combining Christianity with Zoroastrianism, their beliefs have had a tremendous impact on early Christians. Evil question Saint Augustine was one of the first people who truly solved evil problems in the sense of Christians. After dismissing Manichaeol for his dissatisfaction with the question, he deduced a reasonable solution to the problem of evil that will give peace of mind of Christianity. Saint Augustine lives between 354 and 430. In this era of his life, his world is a place of instability and pain. The Roman Empire is a symbol of power and falling. He lost St. Augustine, who lived from the second half of the 4th century to the first half of the 5th century, made a very interesting view on the concept of evil. Observation of the first evil by Augustine followed the teachings of manicure. Their idea is that there are two kinds of almighty powers, good and evil, and a constant fight. According to Manichaen Dualists, the two powers are equal. Augustine later refused the idea and developed his own theory about the nature of evil. Saint Augustine's view of evil is simply poor. Augustine believes that evil is not another strength but a lack of goodwill. This view contradicts Manichan's view. Augustine regards evil as emptiness, not as a substance. This emptiness is like "nothing" in the "no end stories" that inherit the existence of that infection. Past existence includes sky, because evil erodes it In the confession of Saint Augustine, this great philosopher experienced many problems and feelings related to sin. He seems to be dark, blind and confused as a boy when trying to seek peace of mind. As he had to live in two different worlds, Augustine was upset when he was a child. These worlds include Christian faith of his mother and all other worlds. These two worlds confuse and confuse the childhood of Augustine. Augustine 's father is a heathen, his mother is a Christian, they all want the world to succeed in the world. When confused, he began to ask questions that could not be answered, say "For example, humans often feel uneasy but they need to feel something ... more content

Free articles available online are great, but they do not follow the guidelines for your specific writing task. If you need a custom term paper on philosophy: Evil issue, you can hire professional writers to write high quality genuine paper for you. Free papers can be tracked through Turnitin (theft detection program), but our custom document passes the theft test. Our writing service saves you time and results Christian theology The evil problem also plagues the world's greatest thought, but it is still clearly near the hearts of the most common people. If God is good, why is there evil? The following article explains the problem of evil related to God, examines the reaction of Christianity to the problem, and concludes that the existence of God is perfectly compatible with the existence of evil. The body's "evil problem is usually divided into logic and evidence problems" in my heart A seemingly contradictory problem between Eros' solution and evil reality is often called theology. God learns to try to solve the apparent tension, often called the evil problem. But the problem of evil is certainly a series of problems. As with many major problems, it is sometimes useful to divide them into components. As you can see, evil is actually spreading not only to the moral world but also to the natural world. When humans do bad things to each other, this is a moral evil. However, so-called natural disasters are often considered evil because they cause all pain. Earthquakes, tides and floods are all examples of things called natural disasters. Evil is divided into two forms: moral evil and natural evil. Moral evil is brought about by bad choices arising from our free will. Nature's evil is a bad thing to people, regardless of whether they are worth it or not. "We have to say that God is not completely kind and admit that he is an evil writer, or we must say that God is not omnipotent. I can not "(Fitzgerald) This correspondence to the problem of evil is logical. "People are perfectly good" and "x is good" so there is no real meaning in the "perfectly good" world. This is because the meaning of evil (or "evil") is included in the concept of "good". Logically speaking, claiming "x is good" is the same as arguing that "not x is not good", that is to say "x is not bad" (or "bad"). . Therefore, saying "x is good" is based on the difference between the two types of good and evil. This means that the concept of our "evil" is included in the concept of "good".

So evil is in the world, where God does not destroy demons: the biggest challenge is human beings and evils is the problem of evil, omnipotent omnibus can be said to have absolutely good faith ("God"). The main argument is that the number of suggestions of solutions that people are having to fight with the problem and if it has the freedom to try various solutions, that is the only living thing, and interferes with God You are responsible for not relying on God to resolve the problem, not a person (bad) yourself. The problem of evil in the world can not deny the existence of evil, just as human beings experience pain and just as suffering the same each day. It is widely believed that there are two different types of evil in nature (based on God) and morally (based on humans). Moral evil, when caused by humans, such as September 11, World War, Holocaust, if it occurs, human beings and others as other human tragedies related to pain of cause. We also apply evil to animals through testing and hunt without bringing happiness. Dojeon is based on inequality also in biological life based on the good and evil intentions of his past life and shows that it exists between heaven and earth. In Buddhist beliefs, "reason" promises the biological behavior of good and evil in their lives, "fruit" is the result of actions occurring in good and evil return and subsequent life. Donjon does not think that this statement is enough to persuade people Thomas Aquinas proposed a world after monotheism's death in order to solve the problem of evil and to preserve the existence of evil. The premise behind this theory is that God is suffering from evil and human judgment that human life is short and the world after death is infinite and ethics behavior and eternal heaven or hellman Can be awarded based on the suffering of. Aquinas said that posterity has great interest in protecting evil and suffering in the present life. The Christian author Randy Alcon (Randy Alkoon) compensates for the pain of insisting on a paradise of enjoyment on the earth

Evil question based on St. Augustine and Christian St. Augustine wrote many topics still relevant today in his confession. This document documents the development of Augustine's faith and the development of Christian philosophy, and one of the most interesting is his argument about the nature of evil. Christianity predicts some important ideas Augustine has established in his philosophy and in his context he devises a thorough and persuasive argument against the evil problem that treats evil as misunderstanding Proposed. St. Augustine made a very important philosophical contribution to defend the Christian philosophy. One of the contributions involves a philosophical problem of evil. By the time of St. Augustine, philosophers questioned about the ideas proposed by Christians, the evil created in the world created by a completely kind God. The problem is easy to understand, but it is more complicated to solve. St. Augustine made quite a few good ideas to explain the problem. The problem of evil has been mainly answered, but there are still many people who do not believe in the interpretation of this controversy by St. Augustine. For me, this is sufficiently grounded and the problem of evil is inherent in understanding the overall situation that Christianity has to offer. essay.com/St. Augustine's important philosophical contribution to protect Christian philosophy Evil question based on St. Augustine and Christian St. Augustine wrote many topics still relevant today in his confession. This document documents the development of Augustine's faith and the development of Christian philosophy, and one of the most interesting is his argument about the nature of evil. Christianity predicts some important ideas Augustine has established in his philosophy and in his context he devises a thorough and persuasive argument against the evil problem that treats evil as misunderstanding Proposed. In this article we will look at Saint Augustine's view of evil. St. Augustine believes that God created a complete world, but God's creation has turned from God with free will This is the origin of evil in the world. Augustine believes that it is impossible to say that evil exists, and evil comes from the free nature of any biological will, along with the pain caused by punishment as sin. According to Augustine, it does not conflict with his righteousness, so God allows evil to exist in the world. He did not create evil, but it was not a victim of it. He just allowed it to exist

The evil problem of the evil problem proved by free will defense indicates that it is impossible to call the existence of God's three completions due to the existence of evil. If this proves to be correct this argument will argue against the cosmological argument of God's existence. Cosmological controversy points out that everyone can not depend on infinite regression (can be considered impossible), so there is a trigeman self dependence called God to start the universe dependence . In addition to Plantinga 's free will defense there are other arguments that claim to destroy or refute the logic of evil. The defense of Plantinga's free will is best known among these reactions at least in part because it has worked out thoroughly on the problems and problems of God, freedom and evil and solution. Contrary to theology (justification of God's behavior), Pluntinger proposed a defense and proposed a new proposition to prove that the Almighty, Almighty, Omniscient God created moral evil . The world is logically possible. It is noteworthy that Plantinga does not need to argue that his new proposition is correct, but it is logically valid. Thus, Plantinga's approach not only attempts to show that the new proposition is effective, but that the argument is reasonable, seems reasonably seemingly, or there is a good reason to do it The point is different from the conventional theory. The evil problem of the evil problem proved by free will defense indicates that it is impossible to call the existence of God's three completions due to the existence of evil. If this proves to be correct this argument will argue against the cosmological argument of God's existence. Cosmological controversy points out that there is knowledge of Sanquany's independence as not everyone can become a dependent family without infinite return (considered impossible). That is the first true solution to the problem of evil in the sense of Christian. After dismissing Manichaeol for his dissatisfaction with the question, he deduced a reasonable solution to the problem of evil that will give peace of mind of Christianity. Saint Augustine lives between 354 and 430. In this era of his life, his world is a place of instability and pain. The Roman Empire is a symbol of power and falling. He lost

St. Augustine took a long time to find out where the evil came from, the cause and cause of its existence. Manichees presented him with the first solution to the problem of Devil Augustin. Augustine of Manizhes is "a spectator of nine years" (Melchert, p. 230). Manichheit is a cult led by Persia named mani during the first century. Combining Christianity with Zoroastrianism, their beliefs have had a tremendous impact on early Christians. Evil question Saint Augustine was one of the first people who truly solved evil problems in the sense of Christians. After dismissing Manichaeol for his dissatisfaction with the question, he deduced a reasonable solution to the problem of evil that will give peace of mind of Christianity. Saint Augustine lives between 354 and 430. In this era of his life, his world is a place of instability and pain. The Roman Empire is a symbol of power and falling. He lost St. Augustine, who lived from the second half of the 4th century to the first half of the 5th century, made a very interesting view on the concept of evil. Observation of the first evil by Augustine followed the teachings of manicure. Their idea is that there are two kinds of almighty powers, good and evil, and a constant fight. According to Manichaen Dualists, the two powers are equal. Augustine later refused the idea and developed his own theory about the nature of evil. Saint Augustine's view of evil is simply poor. Augustine believes that evil is not another strength but a lack of goodwill. This view contradicts Manichan's view. Augustine regards evil as emptiness, not as a substance. This emptiness is like "nothing" in the "no end stories" that inherit the existence of that infection. Past existence includes sky, because evil erodes it In the confession of Saint Augustine, this great philosopher experienced many problems and feelings related to sin. He seems to be dark, blind and confused as a boy when trying to seek peace of mind. As he had to live in two different worlds, Augustine was upset when he was a child. These worlds include Christian faith of his mother and all other worlds. These two worlds confuse and confuse the childhood of Augustine. Augustine 's father is a heathen, his mother is a Christian, they all want the world to succeed in the world. When confused, he began to ask questions that could not be answered, say "For example, humans often feel uneasy but they need to feel something ... more content

Glinus seems to be contradicted by noting that universality is present at the same time as existence of evil, and introduces his investigation on natural evil claims and its answers. He said that this contradiction continues to seem to have many reasons for supporting theology through free will. Free will decide that I can choose to do the wrong things or do the right things, and because freedom brings uncertainty to my choice, God will evade evil caused by the exercise of free will There is no responsibility for it (Gelinas 2009, p. When discussing natural evil evil philosophical issues, there is usually a difference between moral evil and natural evil. Moral evil (roughly speaking) is evil brought about by the bad behavior of human beings (or other creative creatures), but natural evil is caused by illegal forces (eg hurricanes, tornadoes), droughts, etc. It is (evil) evil caused. ) In natural forest fires, deer burns are examples of natural evil. It is important to understand that response to the problem of moral evil is not necessarily a good response to the problem of natural evil. According to the history of this problem and contemporary concern, moral evil is the key to the problem, not the evil of nature. The evil of the natural world may not be evil but may be considered part of nature. However, some people think that it is possible to accept acceptance of God's moral evil, and some believe that this evil may have a purpose or interpretation related to the existence of the best existence, but God is in the universe There is no good reason to have evil of. Evil in broad sense, including all natural and moral evils, is often quoted as evil in the context of theology, as when discussing the problem of evil. The problem of evil is to explain the problem of evil in the world created by the all-powerful, omnipotent, all-good God. If the creator has these attributes, there seems to be no evil in the world. But there is evil in the world. Therefore, there is a reason to believe that there is no universal, versatile, all-friendly creator. Evil is divided into two forms, moral evil and natural evil. Moral evil is brought about by the wrong choice that was created by our free will. Nature's evil is a bad thing to people, regardless of whether they are worth it or not. "We must say that God is not completely kind, and that he is even a permissible or evil writer, or even if it is totally kind, if possible, I have to say that God is not omnipotent. I can not stop it. "(Fitzgerald)

Arevalo 1 Philosophy of Michael Arevalo / Extra Credit 02-03-02 Evil Issue The evil question points to the phrase "no one will make a bad thing after this life and death". The immediate problem is whether the description is correct or not. Depending on how you defined the terms "good" and "person", this statement may be interpreted as inaccurate or accurate. First of all we have to define the words "good" and "human". The problem of evil in philosophy What is the classic "evil problem" ("three difficulties") in the Western philosophy / theological tradition? The problem of evil is how to harmonize the existence of evil with omnipotence, omniscience, and the presence of the Almighty God. Greek philosopher Epicuras detailed this trilemma in ancient times and summarized it in modern David Hume. Epicuras advocates a trilemma to counter the concept of almighty The problem of evil has two branches. Evil logic problem (LPOE) seeks to prove that the existence of evil contradicts the existence of omnipotence and omnipotent existence. The evidence evidence question (EPOE) tries to prove that the existence of an amount or kind of evil contradicts the existence of somewhat effective and benevolent entity. Of course, not all Gods are considered omnipotent, omnipotent, or either. Many gods are morally defective, positive evil, simply indifferent, and not omnipotent. The evil logical matter does not apply to these gods, but evidence of evil evidence still holds true. This is consistent with the idea of ​​evil. That is, there are defective evil, irrelevant, or totipotent entities compatible with reality and the existence of omnipotent and omnipotent entities is not. The problem of evil can be formulated in various ways. Indeed, the 'problem' pointing to evil may be more accurate. Recipes are interpreted as logical problems. Regarding the logic of evil, it is claimed that these two arguments, (1) that Almighty and Almighty God exists, and (2) the existence of evil is logically incompatible. Since evil exists on the surface, it is claimed that God (usually understood to be omnipotent and omnipotent) does not exist. In the latter part of the 20th century, logical arguments became dominant. But by the end of the century religious philosophers generally believed that the logic was rebutted. One of the reasons is that there must be hidden or unspecified assumptions as claims (1) and (2) are not clearly contradictory. But what is that?

It is widely believed that the problem of evil is the most unfavorable problem for monotheists. This is also the main opposition to the existence of God as a whole. It is easy to understand this question. If God is a perfect omnipotent omnipotent god, why do we live in the imperfections and denial worlds? Why bad things happen? Especially for the good people of the world and for millions of innocent people suffering every day. Gottfreid Leibniz is a philosopher who aims at this problem and wants to point out that evil and the existence of God are compatibility of evil. (1) if God is all-powerful and all-intelligence Since many defenders believe this is a convincing and reasonable criticism of preaching, the problem of evil against religion is rare. Therefore, it is often thought that the problem of evil is one of the greatest threats to religious beliefs, and many religious writers compete for various solutions. "If a single drop of pain taken while looking for an almighty benevolent God's signature is used to gather evidence to darken the creator's role, what range can not be seen in the animal kingdom Devourer and Devourer, most creatures are equipped with prey-tormenting tools There was discussion on Karma theory and how it answers questions of evil and theoretical problems related to it. The problem of evil is an important issue in monotheism and there are two beliefs: (1) there is a god who is absolutely kind and considerate (whole circumference), (2) God absolutely knows everything (no ) I do not know) and they are all powerful (all omnipotent). Then the problem of evil is stated in a statement like "Why are you aware of in the whole world, omnipotence can bring evil and suffering to God?" Max Weber extends evil problems to the oriental tradition Then there is discipline sometimes called "religious philosophy". This is a philosophy of man and discusses some problems that influence religion in philosophy like evil problems ("Why is the world evil if God is holy and omnipotent?" ? "). These questions can be answered only by leaving all our thoughts to God's sovereignty. For example, why does God seek permission for existence? Answer: Punish or forgive it for its own glory. This wonderful fact has a very deep meaning. Of course, since human philosophy is not satisfied with the answer, it invented various irrational alternatives. Epicurus first described the problem of evil in detail. David Hume cited Epicuras in his dialogue on natural religion (1779) to state this argument as a series of questions: "God wants to prevent evil, but he is helpless. Do you have both abilities and intentions, then bad guys, can not he also help? So why do you call him a god? For example, a personal Christian god is logically inconsistent These atheists propose deductive arguments against the existence of God God is a person who is aware of integrity, creative status, immutability, omniscience, versatility, versatility, transcendence, personality (Individual) Does not exist, Unnecessary, Justice, and Mercy

During my high school my English teacher asked an interesting question about the class. "What is the biggest problem in the world today?" Before I thought of many ideas, it seemed easy, such as world hunger, global warming, corruption. Politics, the threat of war, unemployment, even even natural disasters. The actual answer is "money". The answer to "money" has been explained by many questions, such as uneven distribution of wealth, deficiencies in government expenditure regulation, banknote overprints, but I met after moving to Davis. The most serious problem is inflation. I remembered that money was the source of all evil when I was young, but later I changed it to "love for money is the root of all evil". I remember thinking that the world can reach places where money is no longer needed. Somewhere in the date of my Zeitgeist documentary, I heard Jacque Fresco's view in this language. I fall in love with the idea that money is not necessary for progress in society, and it actually hinders the whole society. But somewhere, adult life has begun. When I face the bill, I need to support myself, dress myself, and avoid myself; I can not get enough money. It was in my heart. Is there enough? Can you eat enough? Can you eat better things? Can you buy better clothes? Can I purchase a loft? Penthouse? I felt that money was the source of all evil, I came a long way. This is the root of all the problems I encountered during my growth. I know the power of money, and money love is often a source of pain and destruction. I know that money has two different values. Market value and mental value I work everyday to balance the two. I hope that pursuing money someday when you have children, will be like a game. A person who combines ideas such as brawls and investment. It's just a game that remembers the game you win each day. A game in which they are never confined or forced to play. They will be proud of the game, and in the process of success, they will generously teach them what they have learned. What did they earn?

The existence of evil 6 years ago, a small girl in my church approached me, asked why the devil existed and why the bad things had happened. I am a little confused right now, I do not know what to say. What I think is that humans need scapegoat to deal with adverse events. In any case, blaming the disadvantages of the devil is a simple and obvious way. Everyone has to do is wash away the whole problem saying the devil is the cause of this situation. Critical evaluation of the summary of evil problems and how we weaken the traditional features of God. This article attempts to review the philosophical dilemma of the existence of evil. The epistemological problem that appeared was the understanding of my God and the validity of the existence of God. What is good and bad? The Merriam-Webster dictionary defines evil as follows. a: Moral ... Why is there evil on the earth? This is the central point about the problem of evil. Atheists and theologians are trying to explain this problem in their own philosophical view. Epicurean's evil paradox shows a dilemma for the recognition of traditional Judaism and Christianity of God and evil. This tradition supports the following three propositions. Evil public weakens God's totipotency The existence of evil of nature (that is, evil is not due to abuse of human free will)? One of the core assertions of the Jewish Christian tradition is the existence of Almighty and Almighty God. To oppose this is to observe that people and animals suffer evil. From common sense, we can deduce from this observation that there is no god imagined from this tradition. If he exists, he will cease from evil. This reasoning is called evil by those who claim to be one of them.

The existence of evil in the US kills 10 children every day; people are killed without meaning; Columbine High School; more than a third of junior high school students in Cascade County use illegal drugs and more than half of children I am drinking alcohol. Innocent foreigners are being cleared (Kosovo); Holocaust; Hiroshima; Vietnam; poverty, starvation and depression in the third world countries; capitalism; deterioration and ignorance of the environment; media; Oklahoma City; single bomber; Fire, tornado, hurricane, volcano, airplane accident, family / child abuse, illness, congenital disorder, mental disorder. Critical evaluation of the summary of evil problems and how we weaken the traditional features of God. This article attempts to review the philosophical dilemma of the existence of evil. The epistemological problem that appeared was the understanding of my God and the validity of the existence of God. What is good and bad? The Merriam-Webster dictionary defines evil as follows. a: Moral ... Why is there evil on the earth? This is the central point about the problem of evil. Atheists and theologians are trying to explain this problem in their own philosophical view. Epicurean's evil paradox shows a dilemma for the recognition of traditional Judaism and Christianity of God and evil. This tradition supports the following three propositions. Evil public weakens God's totipotency The existence of evil of nature (that is, evil is not due to abuse of human free will)? One of the core assertions of the Jewish Christian tradition is the existence of Almighty and Almighty God. To oppose this is to observe that people and animals suffer evil. From common sense, we can deduce from this observation that there is no god imagined from this tradition. If he exists, he will cease from evil. This reasoning is called evil by those who claim to be one of them. If God is omnipotent, he can prevent evil; if he is as good as he can, he will stop it. So why is there evil? The existence of evil means that God is not omnipotent, or he is not completely kind. If traditional Gods must exist at the same time, the existence of evil means that no such god exists. Of course, unless there is sufficient moral reason God forgives evil - perhaps to prevent greater sin, or to gain greater profit. But obviously meaningless evil examples can increase infinitely and some evils have inconceivably insignificant imperfections to justify their permissions incredibly. However, there may be accompanying goods, and our limited thinking can not be imagined merely. Probably; but there is a price for this solution. If we can not understand what God is forgiven, we also do not suggest that God exists or even exists.

There are many aspects of evil. One of them involves racial discrimination and inequity that many people must face. Below are some of the incorrectly documented corruption. Between 1923 and 1947, many Chinese were sent to work in Canada to support themselves and their families in China. Men from China and Hong Kong will travel to Canada leaving their wives and children. Many jobs are open to the Chinese, but most, if not all, work is a dangerous job with a low salary. The problem of evil can be explained as a problem to harmonize the existence of God's faith and evil. But the evil problem has many aspects as well as the wicked itself. For example, it can be expressed as an empirical question or a theoretical question. In the former case, the problem is that it is difficult to accept or maintain the love and trust of God, even in the face of evils that get confused and disturbing deeply. Alvin Plantinga (1977: 63 - 64) explains this problem eloquently. Evil is a subjective word, saying something is evil, he may or may not agree, but there is evil that fears of all reasonable creatures are fearful. When people face a common evil, there will be objective unity between them, ie complete destruction of all the threats they know. When there is such a threat, the difference in detaching men is put on hold and overcome. The movie series "Lord of the Rings" says people can overcome their differences, no matter how extreme they are, although they face evils that could destroy them I insist. When united, these differences can strengthen each other and become units of unity rather than destruction. The evil they face is terrible for all participants and their hatred and hatred are more destructive and dangerous. Christians believe that evil exists, unlike many Buddhists who believe evil is an illusion. Evil is an objection to good and true, painful for man. This is worth overcoming. There are two kinds of evil moral evil and natural evil. Moral evil happens because of human choice, but the evil of nature happens when humans pass nature (hurricanes, tornadoes, earthquakes, fire etc). Johnson's answer - "Whether this is necessary for the baby, it is not right to forgive it, otherwise the child did not change this fact in heaven, why is this needed, and we have a god There is no excuse for not doing anything. "(115 A)

Every day in the United States 10 children were shot, people were killed meaninglessly, over one third of Columbine High School, junior high school students in Columbine High School, Cascade County used illegal drugs, and more than half drank alcohol . People are being purged (Kosovo); Holocaust; Hiroshima; Vietnam; poverty, starvation and depression in the Third World countries; capitalism; deterioration and ignorance of the environment; media; Oklahoma City; single bombs; earthquakes, fires, tornadoes , Hurricane, Volcano, Airplane Accident, Family / Child Abuse, Illness, Congenital Disorder, Mental Disorder. why? why? why? ... the problem never changes, it is asked again and again ... View More In other words, some people call evil sin or pain, others think that it is a separation from God, others are incarnation in the form of Satan. My purpose is not to discuss the form that evil can take in private life, even if it appears periodically. The fact of the core is that there are still all forms of evil, and anyone who does not want to believe this reality can live frankly at another level. Anyway, or they just live in a state of refusal! With this in mind, what I want to achieve in this article is to first explore the idea that evil is a relative term that exists in every situation. That's right! Like I wrote the last sentence, I can see the wheels turning in your heart. But do not worry. I will clarify soon. From this point of view, I ask the wisdom of those trying to answer these ridiculous questions on the first page, lead more conclusions through personal interviews, and become my Christian with my life experience In order to end it in a personal way. This topic sometimes makes me feel sick. I often look and try to answer the evil I saw, yes, I answer the evil I did. This evil sometimes makes me completely helpless and thoughtful. But as I write this article I know that there are some new insights, so I will never give up hope. The problem of evil is the question of how to harm the existence of evil with omnipotence, omnipotence, omniscience God (see Theism). The assertion of evil insists that God does not exist or has not all three attributes due to evil. Traditionally, the opposite attempt was discussed under the heading of theodicy. In addition to religious philosophy, the problem of evil is also important in the field of theology and ethics. Evil problems usually form in two forms. It is a logical problem of evil and evidence of evil. Discussion in a logical form attempted to show the logical impossibility in the coexistence of God and evil, and the form of evidence is that, when considering the evil of the world, it is almighty, omniscient and perfectly good God Try to show. . The problem of evil has two branches. The Evil Logic Problem (LPOE) seeks to prove that the existence of evil contradicts the existence of Almighty and Almighty. Evidence of evil (EPOE) seeks to prove that the existence of an amount and / or kind of evil contradicts the existence of somewhat effective and benevolent entity. Of course, not all Gods are considered omnipotent, omnipotent, or either. Many gods are morally defective, a bit bad or indifferent, and many are not omnipotent. The evil logical matter does not apply to these gods, but evidence of evil evidence still holds true. This is consistent with the idea of ​​evil. In other words, there are flawed, evil, meaningless, or incompetent beings that are compatible with reality, and the presence of omnipotence and omnipotence never exists. There is nature's evil (ie not caused by abuse of human free will)? One of the core assertions of the Jewish Christian tradition is the existence of Almighty and Almighty God. To oppose this is to observe that people and animals suffer evil. From common sense, we can deduce from this observation that there is no god imagined in this tradition - he will cease to be evil if he exists. This reasoning is called evil by those who claim to be one o

There are many aspects of evil. One of them involves racial discrimination and inequity that many people must face. Below are some of the incorrectly documented corruption. Between 1923 and 1947, many Chinese were sent to work in Canada to support themselves and their families in China. Men from China and Hong Kong will travel to Canada leaving their wives and children. Many jobs are open to the Chinese, but most, if not all, work is a dangerous job with a low salary. The problem of evil can be explained as a problem to harmonize the existence of God's faith and evil. But the evil problem has many aspects as well as the wicked itself. For example, it can be expressed as an empirical question or a theoretical question. In the former case, the problem is that it is difficult to accept or maintain the love and trust of God, even in the face of evils that get confused and disturbing deeply. Alvin Plantinga (1977: 63 - 64) explains this problem eloquently. Evil is a subjective word, saying something is evil, he may or may not agree, but there is evil that fears of all reasonable creatures are fearful. When people face a common evil, there will be objective unity between them, ie complete destruction of all the threats they know. When there is such a threat, the difference in detaching men is put on hold and overcome. The movie series "Lord of the Rings" says people can overcome their differences, no matter how extreme they are, although they face evils that could destroy them I insist. When united, these differences can strengthen each other and become units of unity rather than destruction. The evil they face is terrible for all participants and their hatred and hatred are more destructive and dangerous. Christians believe that evil exists, unlike many Buddhists who believe evil is an illusion. Evil is an objection to good and true, painful for man. This is worth overcoming. There are two kinds of evil moral evil and natural evil. Moral evil happens because of human choice, but the evil of nature happens when humans pass nature (hurricanes, tornadoes, earthquakes, fire etc). Johnson's answer - "Whether this is necessary for the baby, it is not right to forgive it, otherwise the child did not change this fact in heaven, why is this needed, and we have a god There is no excuse for not doing anything. "(115 A)

The cruelty and immorality of the animals being tested are still necessary evils. Opponents believe that animal research is untrustworthy, obsolete, money is wasted. Many activists believe that animal experiments are illegal. I do not agree to make an animal experiment illegal. We agree that we have made great progress in technology and that technology provided a number of alternative means for animal studies, but unfortunately, several cases where animal testing is still needed Yes. Stopping using animals in their research limits their ability to fight disease and ultimately puts themselves in danger. The problem of evil is expanding beyond human suffering, such as abuse, illness, and evil animals. This version of the problem includes animals suffering from natural evil such as violence and fear that animals face predators, natural disasters, and the history of evolution. Following the expression by Charles Darwin, this is also known as Darwin's evil problem. The second version of the evil problem that applies to animals and the avoidable pain they experience are shot from eg atrocities of animals. The problem of such evil has been used by scholars such as John Hick to oppose reaction and defense against evil problems. Unethical but conscious victims Evil problems usually form in two forms. It is a logical problem of evil and proof of evil. The logical form of the discussion attempts to show the logical impossibility in the coexistence of God and evil and the form of evidence is that when we consider the evils of the world, we have an omnipotent omniscient and perfectly good god Try to show. . . The problem of evil has also been expanded to non-human life forms, including animals suffering from natural evil and human abuse. The problem of evil has two branches. Evil logic problem (LPOE) seeks to prove that the existence of evil contradicts the existence of omnipotence and omnipotent existence. The evidence evidence question (EPOE) tries to prove that the existence of an amount or kind of evil contradicts the existence of somewhat effective and benevolent entity. Of course, not all Gods are considered omnipotent, omnipotent, or either. Many gods are morally defective, positive evil, simply indifferent, and not omnipotent. The evil logical matter does not apply to these gods, but evidence of evil evidence still holds true. This is consistent with the idea of ​​evil. That is, there are defective evil, irrelevant, or totipotent entities compatible with reality and the existence of omnipotent and omnipotent entities is not.

Goodwill and evil religious beliefs are usually associated with God's thoughts. Evil is usually associated with devil's thought. Since childhood Christian has been taught as a general course for children's activities such as Sunday school and prayer club such as the concept of good and evil and the theme of God on the theme of God. Christian believes that God created the universe, and I believe this means that the world was created with the intent of good. "God placed them in the sky heaven, lighted them on the ground, dominated day and night, and separated light from the dark. Why or who is responsible for it in the world? How can we harmonize the good faith of God with the existence of evil? Even without theological grounds, even from a secular point of view, evil constitutes a problem of understandability of the world. In this course, ancient and medieval thinking provides a historical analysis of the various ways related to these problems and their solutions. We started the investigation from the Hebrew Biblical monism and then looked at the changes brought about by the Persian culture and the Helenaization of the Mediterranean basin after Alexander's process of conquering dualism. Dualism is a theoretical system or ideology system that recognizes two independent, mutually unintelligible principles, sometimes complementary and sometimes contradictory. At the same time, we believe that the rationalization of "we" is a matter of evil against "others" or religious intolerance. Christian religious dualism between good and evil is not perfect dualism. Because God (good) inevitably destroys Satan (evil). Early Christian dualism was primarily based on Plato's binaryism (see New Platonism and Christianity). Based on the concept of non-material Christian soul, there is a soul-physical distinction. Both atheism and dualism mean faith in two equally powerful gods with complementary or antisense properties, but atheism means harmony, but atheism is good and evil, brightness and darkness Such as competition and mean opposite. Or summer and winter. For example, the semiotropic system is a god of creativity and others are destructive (see theodicy). For example, in the original concept of Zoroastrianism, Ahura Mazda is the ultimate spirit and Ahriman (Angra Mainyu) is the ultimate evil spirit. Among the many themes that reflect evil through religion, evil is only good poverty, without evil there is no evil, evil is a necessary means to get evil, without evil it is a universe Evil in Better is better It is better and this evil is due to the free will of mankind and God sometimes like good things sometimes in bad things in their free choice to humans . Philosophers also explore the origin and essence of evil. The questions they are studying include when people can consciously and deliberately make evil, and when they can properly control individual responsibility for malicious acts. Many ancient philosophers speculated that evil is fantasy, alienation, alienation, or isolation from God.

Possibility of turnover into evil and good According to Kant, extreme evil is a deep defect of our species, even the best people will not forgive. Although it is impossible to judge this evil, Kant still insists on the possibility of changing evil through good human resources into good. But how can we make a fundamental evil to mankind? I have detailed the various problems arising in the concept of Kant's transformation while exploring certain resources in his mind to clarify and solve this difficulty. What is good and evil? Evil lacks kindness. It is the only possible living condition because it does not exist in reality and people always have the right to choose between good and evil. For example, an ordinary knife is not evil like it is now, but it is evil going into the hands of criminals. The doctor can use the same knife to save lives. God gives people the opportunity to decide how to handle this knife. I experienced many fights in the long history of humanity. But most importantly it may be a battle between evil and kindness, neat and immoral, altruism and egoism, love and hatred. We face this battle in our daily life, trying to distinguish between evil and good and evil. People choose a value system and trace it in life. Tenderness is important to our mental health and evil is like poison. Kindness is not merely a moral responsibility, it is primarily the nutrition of our soul. Goodwill means peace, love, respect, attention, and mutual aid It is not evil. Without evil there is no good way to exist. They complement each other, there is no one, you can not have another one. Unfortunately, evil always seems to outweigh that profit. This is reflected in various literary era of history. There are various ways to show good and evil. When someone is kind or considerate, it can be beautiful. - Hippo Augustine (354-430) is one of the most influential thinkers in Christianity. He has contributed many ideas and ideas to Christian theology. One of his most important contributions is the concept of "original sin" and his concept of "evil". These concepts have evolved over the years. Augustine painted their evolution in his 13 autobiographies he wrote in his 40s. In most of the Western intellectual history, studies of evil are reserved for theology. From Augustine and Aquinas to Luther and Calvin, Christian thinkers are crazy about "evil problems", how good a god in our world can have bad things. When Immanuel Kant introduces the concept of extreme evil that exists outside the bounds of reason and will, the eternal problems of evil are released from the exclusive grasp of the church. Perhaps because of its mixed religious and secular qualities, our evil concept creates almost mysterious power in society's impulse to create order from chaos and despair It was. As Susan Neyman wrote in his groundbreaking research, "evil in modern thinking", "The problem of evil can be expressed in terms of theological or secular terms, but basically it is It is understandability of the whole world.

In a word, "Author Maria Cristina Mena expresses the truth about the world," Although the keyboard of the piano is black and white, it sounds like one million colors. People may have different skin color, religion, background, etc, but they together create masterpieces, humans. However, today, masterpiece, human beings are divided. Social life is harmed by rash discrimination that may be directly related to immigration, violence and social tension. The racial discrimination defined in the Merriam-Webster dictionary considers race to be a major determinant of human identity and ability and racial discrimination creates the inherent advantage of a particular race. This is an unacceptable concept. Part of the reason is how white people handle the term 'racial discrimination'. Racism itself is an evil act rooted in colonialism, exploitation, torture, betrayal, and atrocity, and whites can not rule their ancestors over 100 years now. Do evil. The act that continues to occur under the name of racial discrimination is a horrible crime against humanity. They have to end now. However, racism is also a system created around these crimes against humanity, designed to keep power and autonomy away from blacks. This system is maintained at all levels, and in all public and private systems. Racism and Caucasian supremacy are in law, rule, education, and media. We all teach that through books, music, and television, white is always better than black. Light always beats the darkness. White is pure and black is bad I understand many people think that racism is the root of all evil. That is why they can blame the victory of cards with white supremacy and ignorance. That's why some voters are terrible, but they can keep Clinton's policy. They do not know what they did! But can the system like racial discrimination exist in a vacuum? Can we really distinguish the concept of racial discrimination and indivisible capitalism exploitation? The fact that wealth is concentrated in the hands of a few people is not a small problem, but a system of design, and racism is one of the tools that a few people are squeezing a lot of people It is not.

Christian 's good and evil beliefs about the origin of good and evil are two very different, very powerful ones. In Christianity, God is a representative of goodness, truth, and love, and Satan, the fallen angel, is representative of evil, hatred, frustration. Explain God with words like purity, truth, and light. God does not cause harm and suffering, but loves to take care of other people. God is the Creator of the Universe. Because God is so perfect, he must share what he already has. Christianity has fought against the problem of evil. As we know today, as we know today there are multiple beliefs about why there is evil in the first century before Paul's Christianity. Professor Bad Ehrman is one of the earliest Christian's most capable historians. In "lost Christianity" he summarizes some of the different different main beliefs of primitive Christian about the source of evil: Hindu and Buddhism interpret evil as a result of Karma. Even though our actions seem to be unfair, even if the current sufferings seem to be unfair, karma will serve the judiciary for a long time. This is not fair - it is a delay penalty. The operation of Karma can be seen as an explanation of intent without intent, but the problem of evil does not exist in this belief system. There is no fundamental contradiction between the concept of sacred or universal law and the existence of pain. Is that person basically good or evil? Perhaps the beliefs about good and evil are more appropriate in your value theory (see below), but this question is very important to your people's perception. Western ideas based on Christian principles basically convict corrupt people and always resist the nature of evil, but even today some believe in this belief, but the environment and this kindness Opportunity to express. Perhaps more generally, humans are basically neither good nor evil, but morally neutral at birth, whether people follow the path of good and evil depends on external influence and will.

The evil of Iagos has been written with various villains, but the most dangerous of all these works is Iago. Most opponents of Shakespearean plays have a clear motivation to solve this problem. On the other hand, I 'm not the only one who dislikes the world, especially Othello, in most cases. Judging from the reasons of Othello's all confrontation, he is the protagonist of the play. All the problems he caused were lies, betrayal and manipulation. Mrs. Macbeth, Mrs Macbeth, Brutus and Julius Caesar, Hamlet and Ophelia, Othello and Lago, Satan of the lost paradise, Duke of the last Duchess, Andrea Salto and Lucrezia: All evil roles We are deep enough If you look, there is no doubt, it is inherently evil 1. However, everyone is consistently devoid of moral qualities motivated by their role research. Why is this? First of all, research on the role of evil or failure of art presents a set of criteria in which the character is considered evil or failure. In order to judge the behavior to be evil, a criterion to make judgment is necessary. If we can not tell what to do with Macbeth, we will never know that he did something wrong. When Allen closed the article about evil, she discovered various types. There is a fundamental evil in the form of Macbeth and Hitler, she found the mediocrity of evil in Adolf Eichmann; evil that can take care of this person, our malice, our emotions, we The fourth evil, which is called "stumbling" by Jesus as "scandalon" is a sort of evil that human powers can not eliminate and real evils should never have it Thing. Born - "For him, he had a grinding stone around his neck and was thrown into the sea," It is not Donald Trump to manifest true evil, as we judge evil, As long as we lose our ability to accept in the political world, we are like this. "As long as indifference proves our mediocrity to evil, we are like this.

There was a problem with the nature of good and evil throughout human existence. Many scientists, philosophers, and theologians are very interested in these problems. Through the confession of Augustine and E. O. Wilson's "Looking for Nature" you can see the nature of good and evil from two different perspectives. In his "confession", Augustine proposed a discussion about trying to define evil. God is all authors. Augustine said, "If you are not there," there is nothing that exists (Book 1, Chapter 2). Let's check the definitions of good and evil before starting this article. What is good and bad? We do good things for others by helping them when needed. When we have cruel intentions against others and make them suffer, evil can be regarded as the cause of action. There are some considerations and experiences in our lives that doubt the existence of good and evil. We may deny this makes no sense, but that actually happens. Talk about experience and let individuals suspicion the reality of good and evil. For this purpose, we can say that doubt is the greatest doubt in history. Why is this? Just because there are manuals on good and evil. Then, what if you see an old lady trying to cross the road? I can say with confidence that this woman will help me cross the street. Good, evil and evil Initially, the definition of good and evil is simple and straightforward. According to the New Oxford American Dictionary, good is defined as "moral justice; justice", evil is defined as "very immoral and malignant". It really exists. Some people think humans are perpetrators of evil. Some people think the world is not a bad place, but in reality evil and pain are necessary. Through the definition of textbooks evil is morally wrong and hinders the realization of good. If this is evil, what is good? This is moral excellence, kindness, elegance, and considerable effort. Philosophers discussed what is evil, and why it has existed for thousands of years. They had several questions. These problems are caused by the nature of God. He is considered omnipotent, omniscient, and omnipotent. If so, why does not he stop evil? In addition, people should be created in the statue of God, but why are they morally wrong? There is only one answer if you believe that God exists. Evil exists as God forgives it, and there is a moral evil.

Before any county declared a war with Germany, they successfully passed the birthplace of Hitler in Czechoslovakia, Albania, Western Poland and Austria. It had already begun before the Nazis broke the World War II. Britain was first announced, followed by France, Australia and New Zealand. The war started with the continuation of Europe. Although the war was announced in Germany, allies signing the three methods were attacked by Italy and Japan and were announced to the right backward. Even if war was announced, Germany is still overthrowing the country. Q: If you teach people to talk, will bad guys use it? Hitler did not use rhetoric? A: Everyone is using rhetoric for the moral purpose of pure evil to pure virtue (such as eloquence of MLK). Advocates of hardcore cards will have difficulty hijacking this guide for their own purposes. Because, if they have extensive philosophical and humanitarian education required by profound rhetorical research, 99% of them will reject the cards. Ultrame partem priced arma facundiae Ethiamushi, non-eastern classmate's Eh dam id haberi malum, present state In "God and evil", McCloskey studied five general solutions to the problem of natural evil. In this article, evil in the natural world is called physical evil. The five proposed solutions suggest that physical goodness (happiness) requires physical evil (pain), physical evil is God's punishment for sinners, physical evil belongs to God It is warning and memories to humans. Evil on the ground is the result of the law of nature, its effect is generally good, eventually the physical evil increases the overall benefit. Regarding the first solution offered, McCloskey shot down it quickly. It does not include all natural objects and evil. He said, "Illness and madness are evil, but health and reason are possible without disease or mental disorder." He severely limits God's power as it continues to explain how irrational this argument is in its main argument. Several questions may be asked about the solution to Tillich's evil problem. Once he said that physical evil did not provide a real problem as it was the natural meaning of biological finiteness. However, this is not a solution to the problem. The evil of physics must be evil and the fact that they are related to the limits of the existence of all living things is of no use at all. 52 Creation is finite and if finite is evil, God is the creator of evil 52 By accusing the world for evil about the natureful irrational aspects of God, Tillich is the god of this god Introduce dualism into gender. Sexuality is hardly considered to be satisfactory. It is religious or intellectual. This concept suffers from all the deficiencies of the ultimate metaphysical dualism. Tillich has marked such a huge disparity with God between the bottom of the abyss and God, and there is little point of contact between the two. Chapter 5 "Comparison of God's Concepts in Paul Tillich and Henry Nielsen Wiman's Thought"

Because there are various scenarios, racial discrimination is a topic that does not like discussion. People, culture, and faith are afflicted by past events. In today's society, young people and the elderly have experienced some form of racial discrimination. The theme of racial discrimination is a different view of people. Some people think that this is good, others do. The beginning of racial discrimination began in the era of ancient civilization and brought about short-term effects such as the depression of the injured people and the long-term effects of Jewish abuse in the attack on 11th September 2001. I understand many people think that racism is the root of all evil. That is why they can blame the victory of cards with white's superiority and ignorance. That's why some voters are terrible, but they can keep Clinton's policy. They do not know what they did! But can the system like racial discrimination exist in a vacuum? Can we really distinguish the concept of racial discrimination and indivisible capitalism exploitation? The fact that wealth is concentrated in the hands of a few people is not a small problem, but a system of design, and racism is one of the tools that a few people are squeezing a lot of people It is not. This is an unacceptable concept. Part of the reason is how white people handle the term 'racial discrimination'. Racism itself is an evil act rooted in colonialism, exploitation, torture, betrayal, and atrocity, and whites can not rule their ancestors over 100 years now. Do evil. The act that continues to occur under the name of racial discrimination is a horrible crime against humanity. They have to end now. However, racism is also a system created around these crimes against humanity, designed to keep power and autonomy away from blacks. This system is maintained at all levels, and in all public and private systems. Racism and Caucasian supremacy are in law, rule, education, and media. We all teach that through books, music, and television, white is always better than black. Light always beats the darkness. White is pure and black is bad Why is racism so sweet? Today it gives power. Racial discrimination is a terrible prejudice that once studied racial discrimination, people learn to live together, if it is not necessary evil, then it is inevitable from then. However, the civil rights movement and the independence movement around the world changed this. In the 1960s, the redefinition of racial discrimination in public consciousness was evident evil and was the worst of all social evils. America suddenly fell into a moral dilemma. The public's perception of the past racial discrimination of the country has compromised its moral authority by confirming that the principle of democracy and the rule of law are not sufficiently corresponded. Only strict ethical accounting can restore legitimacy. Therefore, reimbursement - repaying public sins - becomes a moral requirement for new political and cultural liberalism

The concept of good and evil in the east of Eden is a magnificent novel about personal morals in the eastern part of Eden - whether men and women have the right to choose between good and evil. Eastern of Eden, polite, this is not Steinbeck's best novel. It is not a long shot. Steinbeck failed to solve the moral problem. It seems as though he was thinking about life, but not too deep. "Oriental Garden of Eden" is the story of the third generation bestseller from the civil war to the seventy years of the First World War, a family of three generations of the American family, and these contradictions confuse us and fictional concentration . Too many topics. The idea of ​​good, evil and evil in the eastern part of Eden is described in East Eden of John Steinbeck. This can be seen through a general understanding of the external conflict in the novel, the conflict of character, and the conflict between good and evil. The confrontation between the main character Cathy and Adam reflects the concept of good and evil in their relationship. Like Caesar, Cathy caused a huge battle between Adam and his brother Charles. East of Eden is the twelfth novel by John Steinbecks, he wrote on two young sons, Tom and John Steinbeck. This is a magnificent story in the narrow Salinas Valley in Northern California, a story of the fate of the intertwining of the two families, Trusk and Hamilton. John Steinbeck, the author of the novel, believes that the eastern part of Eden is his wonderful work and claims that all his other works are ways of writing this work (Broome 66). One of the themes of the novel is a consistent struggle of mankind on the way to good and evil. Steinbeck depicts the inevitable struggle of good and evil in society, but it also focuses on the struggle occurring within each individual. The purpose of this paper is to analyze how John Steinbeck's novel "The East of the Garden of Eden" explains the fight between good and evil.

Dalrymple's paper Theodore Dalrymple, in a 2004 City Daily article, expressed the view on the dramatic decline in the quality of life in the UK. He believes that society has accepted the idea that people are not responsible for their own problems. What brought about the decline of British society was "moral paralysis of intellectuals and political elites" that has long led to social dynamics. According to the author, doctors are retiring after criminal justice criminals and victim career, but there are some general misunderstandings that can explain the continued decline of British society. The point that I initially misunderstood is that ... the concept of displaying more content Dalrymple's paper Theodore Dalrymple, in a 2004 City Daily article, expressed the view on the dramatic decline in the quality of life in the UK. He believes that society has accepted the idea that people are not responsible for their own problems. What brought about the decline of British society was "moral paralysis of intellectuals and political elites" that has long led to social dynamics. According to the author, doctors are retiring after criminal justice criminals and victim career, but there are some general misunderstandings that can explain the continued decline of British society. The first misunderstanding is that "evil" has the recognition that tyrant and tyrant are committed, as the tyrant studied in human history. Secondly, the idea of ​​the medical community participating in social decline by participating in "two ridiculous dances" is an idea. This means that a serious predictable problem caused by an individual who made an incorrect choice is conceptualized and regarded as a medical disorder such as depression. The following points are rarely those who specifically target evil, but it is pointed out that all evils in modern life (at least nonviolent society) are actually caused by people's choice in life I will. Fourth, the idea of ​​judging moral choices and irresponsible behaviors is "wrong." Finally Psychiatrist Anthony Daniels remembered the evil Evil evil Evil Theodore Dalrymple, 14 years prison hospital work. Daniels pointed out that people are inherently evil and others in society are not. Every evil encounters a new evil, the old evil disappears. Humans take normal action until new evil is promoted and accepted. The better the behavior of a person, the more they are noticed, the more they will not get worse. Many of the examples given and used in this article are diagnostic of "evil frivolity". It shows that this is the idea of ​​making you happy or happy in the process of sacrificing and paining to others. Daniels stated and explained that there is no need to take responsibility for the conversation with the man who abandoned her child. , Barbarous, hopeless and abusive, "they told me. This is really not just the mediocrity of flirtation of evil. It is a long-term suffering of others who are overjoyed by themselves rather than others who are responsible to others. Her recent boyfriend does not want to take him or her home, so she sent her 14-year-old child to the door. What is better expression used to explain the attitude of intellectuals who are seeing only human liberty and expansion of choice in this behavior? Is this another clue in the tapestry of rich living? The article "Evil Evil" by Theodore Dalrymple analyzes the cause of human suffering. His work as a psychiatrist in the slums of the UK provided him with a good analytical point to analyze this topic "closer to the foundation of human survival". His conclusion is that British citizens are willing to participate in their own suffering. Their articles lacked moral responsibility, extreme individualism, and lack of cultural expectation, and these three repetitions were missing. Dalrymple started his article by showing the spirit of a prisoner released from prison, and he thought he repaid his debt to society. To compare his opinion with Dalrymple, compare

One of the main arguments against the existence of God in modern Western philosophy on the existence of God is the problem of evil. It is based on the fact that the extent of evil of the world can not be harmonized with the nature of God's love. "If God loves it perfectly, God has to abolish all evil: If God is omnipotent, God must be able to abolish all evils, so it is completely a hobby There is no way. "Therefore, this caused difficulties for people with both Jewish - Christian - Islamic gods, all love and almighty qualities. The problem of evil is how to harm the existence of evil with omnipotence, omnipotence, and the god of omniscience (see Theism). The assertion of evil insists that God does not exist or has not all three attributes due to evil. Traditionally, opposing attempts have been discussed under the headings of the theory. In addition to religious philosophy, the problem of evil is also important in the field of theology and ethics. Evil problems usually form in two forms. It is a logical problem of evil and proof of evil. The logical form of the discussion attempts to show the logical impossibility in the coexistence of God and evil and the form of evidence is that when we consider the evils of the world, we have an omnipotent omniscient and perfectly good god Try to show. . Simply put, logic argues that God and evil can not coexist. The logical argument is not that evil does not provide evidence for God, nor is it that God is unlikely to be in the evil world than the world without evil. And evil is mutually exclusive, if it exists, the other is not. Moreover, since evil seems to exist, God does not exist. It has some initial reliability, but the logical argument has been proved to be a double flaw. On the one hand, the defense of free will (proposed by Plantanga excerpt), that the omnipotent God may not be able to achieve a morally fun world, and the world has the possibility of evil There is no good God can forgive the evil, natural law, free will, construction of the soul. There seems to be a series of potential reasons.

A man wakes up to his family, a wife and two children. They ate a nice breakfast together, he quit his job and started having fun on his day. As time went on he was busy working in the office even after the usual one hour lunch break. As time passed, he finally quit his job, and his work partner asked him to go drinking beer. Because he missed dinner, he mitigated the burden and came up with the danger of relaxing with his colleagues. He is not expected to laugh with friends by drinking 4 cups of beer until 11 o'clock. God is omniscient, omnipotent, omnipotent, and I wonder what morally good reasons exist to prove that God forgives evil. We know that evil exists in our world, but it is also a god God is also a source of evil and good. We decided that God is a free creator of Almighty and kindness in the whole world, but suffering and evil. God can not stop evil. If so, he will not be omnipotent. He can stop the evil of our world, is not he happy? If this is the case, then he will not be kind. Critical evaluation of the summary of evil problems and how we weaken the traditional features of God. This article will attempt to review the philosophical dilemma of the existence of evil, God exists, if there is evil, if so, this god can be declared perfect Is it? The epistemological problem that appeared was the understanding of my God and the validity of the existence of God. What is good and bad? The Merriam-Webster dictionary defines evil as follows. a: Moral ... Why is there evil on the earth? This is the central point about the problem of evil. Atheists and theologians are trying to explain this problem in their own philosophical view. Epicurean's evil paradox shows a dilemma for the recognition of traditional Judaism and Christianity of God and evil. This tradition supports the following three propositions: "God is omnipotent (including omnibus), God is completely gentle, evil exists" (Pojman 69). Evil public weakens God's totipotency

The problem of evil is simple. Almighty, omniscience, omnipotence, if there is a perfect god, why is there evil? Evil is always a major hurdle for people claiming noble living. Because pain is a normal aspect of life on the planet (not limited to other parts of the universe), keeping loyalty sort of fair, and only God has challenged, he is filled with pain and injustice You can see the world. The problem of evil challenges the greater divinity, suggesting that higher entities can not exist with evil. The problem of evil is how to harm the existence of evil with omnipotence, omnipotence, and the god of omniscience (see Theism). The assertion of evil insists that God does not exist or has not all three attributes due to evil. Traditionally, opposing attempts have been discussed under the headings of the theory. In addition to religious philosophy, the problem of evil is also important in the field of theology and ethics. Evil problems usually form in two forms. It is a logical problem of evil and proof of evil. The logical form of the discussion attempts to show the logical impossibility in the coexistence of God and evil and the form of evidence is that when we consider the evils of the world, we have an omnipotent omniscient and perfectly good god Try to show. . Is there a logically possible world that Almighty people commit crimes? If the Almighty is God, is not it so if the Almighty is someone other than God? What if you can not instantiate with a wonderful existence (GB) instead of a GCB? Since GB does not have to have all well-formed properties, we can imagine a GB that has excellent properties of omnidirectionality, not excellent nature of omnidirectionality. It is logical that such a person is logistically likely to commit crime, so allowing him to accomplish the fact that he did and actually committing a crime. By studying the attribute of totipotency without resorting to omni - directionality, you can see that omnipotent people who own it possess the ability to realize the world where they do evil. However, if the GCB is not omnipotent, he is not a GCB. Because the GCB needs to have all excellent attributes including totipotency. The theory is clearly wrong

If you are a theologian, you believe evil is wrong God is powerful and you can free the world from its evil. He gave us free will, so I did not, but decided whether to follow the path of evil. If evil is thought of as a way to David to see the evil, you are God because there is evidence of evil in the world will believe that should not be there, he will drive out the evil from the world without having to suffer otherwise I guess. There was no god back then. Before you study the views on Leibniz of wicked problems, you will need to make some stage setting in order to find whether the Leibniz is what the problem is think of evil. Looking back at any of today's philosophical textbook, the problem of evil in modern philosophy is you can see that the standard regarded as atheistic discussion. Atheists believe that God can not exist because God and evil are incompatible and evil is clearly present. Some of the philosophers, but admits that incompatibility, which are claimed in the discussion of the above is too strong, still exist and exist even compatible with even the evil of God, the presence (or duration, amount, or universal,) evil We believe that we should prove to be at least Give us a convincing indirect evidence that God does not exist Taking into account the problems arising from the views on Leibniz of wicked problems, in the past few decades, they've received a sustained academic attention for obvious significance for Leibniz. Especially over the past few years - perhaps not by chance, but celebrating the 300th anniversary since Theodicy was published in 2010 - gives Levniz a number of explanatory notes on the details of dealing with evil problems and related topics To have Leibniz's attitude towards the classic evil problem is similar. The evil problem of Leibniz can be expressed as follows. If God is the best and the creator (or author) of the best universe, why is there so much pain and sin in the world? Leibniz claims that this obvious paradox is not a real problem. Leibniz created the term "theology". This means trying to harmonize the supreme and kind character of God with the evil of the world. Therefore, Theodicy of Leibniz is mainly to propose ways to solve the problem of evil. But his view on this subject can be found in many texts. (For details on the evil problem, see the article "Evil proof problem" and "Evil logic question")

God's Word does not turn evil into conscience, but is sometimes called God's voice. For many people this seems pretty simple. This seems to be something that anyone with knowledge can arbitrarily check with sincerity, perhaps encouraging themselves and other people to play their role. But men have an inner guidance light, which reflects God's thoughts. Whether it is right or wrong, it is a fundamental concept with broad meaning. Objection 1: It seems that God does not exist; if one of the two opposition is infinite, the other will be completely destroyed. But the word "god" means that he is infinitely gentle. So, if there is a god there is no evil to be found, but the world has evil. Therefore, God does not exist. Response to challenging 1: As stated by Augustin (Enchiridion xi): profit from evil. "This is part of the infinite goodness of God, he should allow evil and create good from there. If God is omnipotent, he can prevent evil; if he is as good as he can, he will stop it. So why is there evil? The existence of evil means that God is not omnipotent, or he is not completely kind. If traditional Gods must exist at the same time, the existence of evil means that no such god exists. Of course, unless there is sufficient moral reason God forgives evil - perhaps to prevent greater sin, or to gain greater profit. But obviously meaningless evil examples can increase infinitely and some evils have inconceivably insignificant imperfections to justify their permissions incredibly. However, there may be accompanying goods, and our limited thinking can not be imagined merely. Probably; but there is a price for this solution. If we can not understand what God is forgiven, we also do not suggest that God exists or even exists. So how does goodwill created by a kind God turn into evil? Augustine did not know, I did not know. "Look for effective reasons not to find malice, this is not a matter of efficiency, it is a problem of defects, from the highest to the missing defects, this is the reason why this begins to look for such defects - reasons for lack It is not an effective reason, it is like seeing the darkness or listening to silence. (12.7) There is no evil, there is no reason to turn into evil (all causal relationships are sacred and orderly, so good) The most remarkable is that since God created real reasonable creatures with true free will, worship of their God will be the source of glory.In the end, evil The root is a mystery, a mystery, and all arguments of Augustine and Pelagian never tempted to pretend that he solved it.

The relationship between good and evil is more than the faith that people give to them. Good and evil coexist, there is no advantage without evil. Good things to society are considered good. On the other hand, if it does not contribute to society, it will be regarded as evil. The words good and evil have something to do with moral decision makers. When a person finds happiness in something, they call it a good thing. On the other hand, if it brings pain to them, they call it evil. The first set of poems uses their fruits to define good and evil. Good people and good deeds bring good results, evil people and evil acts produce evil fruits. From fruits, you can know people's heart and sincerity. The fact that is particularly important in their tradition is the Confucian Christian fruit and the Holy Spirit. The second is the definition of good and evil clauses by purpose and purpose. Purpose may mean to obey objective standards: Dharma or God's will or heaven's way. Or you can know the intention and intuition of your heart. People can know good and evil by defining the purpose and intent to define good and evil even if the results are invisible. But as the intention is usually hidden, it may have to be made clear by test, like the final choice. Good, evil and evil Initially, the definition of good and evil is simple and straightforward. According to the New Oxford American Dictionary, good is defined as "moral justice; justice" and evil is defined as "very immoral and malignant". It really exists. Some people think humans are perpetrators of evil. Some people think the world is not a bad place, but in reality evil and pain are necessary. The main problem of "problem of evil" is to see what is evil. Evil is often seen as opposed to good, forming the shade of the magnet and the sun. Defining evil in this way brings logical problems to theologians: Why does God create evil? God created gravity, light, magnetism, etc. Why did he create evil? The most logical answer is that God does not create evil. As long as there is no lack of good, evil does not exist by itself. Likewise, God created light, did he "create" the darkness? No, the darkness itself does not exist. Darkness is just the term we are using to represent the relative lack of light. It is fully defined in the form of deprivation: the lack of others

"The rope of the article was still moving; the child was still alive and still lighter ...... Half a day I spent half of the time I was there, between life and death, in front of us Dying slowly and suddenly .... behind me, I heard the same person asking: "I heard the inner voice of which I answered him," Here he If he is - he is hanging on this gallows base. "" What kind of child could be the benefit (Wiesel, 1982) may be merit. He did not recognize identifiable crimes. Almighty, omniscience, totally good How can such a thing happen to God? JL Mackie "Evil and Almighty" philosopher JL Mackie wrote an article about the highly convincing evil problem called "evil and almighty" that is trying to prove 1 of the next premise Must be false to keep them consistent with each other. # 1 God is omnipotent. # 2 God is morally perfect. # 3. Evil exists. The problem of evil is the interpretation of transcendental arguments that aims to prove that God does not exist. - Good and evil midnight image and evil Yuehan province Brent Garden 1 in the garden of the most powerful function at midnight is brilliant with the use of books. Berendt has a way to make everything he wrote lively. Readers are not only reading articles about savanna, they are still alive. As the book advanced, the letters in the book became brilliant. Their actions are formed in front of the audience In this article focusing on the omnipotent paradox, this paradox itself proves the absurdity of having the main content with the Almighty God. Only as a way he met with debate "evil and almighty" tragic content as a background information paradox reference to Mackie's thesis. I define a general example of the omnipotent proposal of paradox to stone and it repeats the universal description of its omnipotent paradox. In the second part of my paper, I try to solve the omnipotent paradox, considering rebuilding the definition of the problem presented by Almighty paradox, which fails at the classification level. After breaking the terminology itself and observing the limit of omnipotence, if there is eternal omnipotence, I will consider whether it is reasonable to solve this paradox. John Rice says Limo base "evil and almighty" in his article that the problem of evil clearly shows that (1) God is omnipotent, most important parts of three theological positions b) God is completely kind, (c) there is evil. McKee also proposed two other principles during the discussion on commonly used evil issues. In these (a) "Good things always exclude evils as always as good as possible against evil things", (b) (McKee) 90 "Almighty thing is to restrict what Can not ")

Visitors: Although God wants to prevent evil, can not you? Then he is helpless. He's okay, is not it intended? Then he is evil. Is he capable and pleased? Then, where does evil come from? Can not he help? So why are you calling him God? "Why do not we talk about the Old Testament? Will not you explain all the stories of the Old Testament to me? Wait a moment, it's rape, homicide, slavery, homosexuals and There are a lot of people killing the gods, we should not rape or possess 10 slave slaves, he will be depressed Epicurus said that God hopes to prevent evil and can not do it or can not do it, or does not want it, or does not want it, or is pleased or not pleased, or is willing to delight. If he is willing and helpless, he is weak and it does not match God's personality. If he is competent and reluctant, he is malicious and does not adapt to God's personality. If he is glad and can not do it, he is not a god at all because he is a vicious and weak person. If he wants to fit God alone and is capable, what sources are evil? Why did not he stop them? (Lactantius, de Ira Dei (313 AD); Epicurus's first evil problem version formula Epicurus first described the problem of evil in detail. In his dialogue on nature's religion (1779), David Hume cited Epicurus to state this argument as a series of questions: "God wants to prevent evil, but is helpless And is he helpless, does he have both abilities and intentions then is it evil? Can neither he nor help, then why is he calling him God? , The God of a personal Christian is considered to be a logically contradictory quality These atheists are proposing deductive arguments against the existence of God God is the integrity of the creator We insist on incompatibility between specific features such as status, invariance, omniscience, totipotency, omni-directionality, transcendence, personality etc. Personal existence), justice, justice, compassion

This is your answer. Before you reach the conclusion, it should be able to help you write one or two paragraphs. Even though my knowledge is very small, I can confidently claim that "Private tuition is necessary evil". Even though they are evil, these individual lessons still exist. As long as there is an existing educational screening system, as long as 100,000 people are receiving competitive entrance examinations, parents and students go to private teachers as long as excessive pressure is placed on the trademark and proportion. It must be. Today, even excellent students need guidance, and any tests must understand the problem solving skills. There are too many students in the class of the school. Some schools may not have enough or competent teachers to handle 45 to 50 students. Therefore my parents have to ask for help from a private teacher and class. In each city, the number of individual lessons is increasing. People advertise mentors. The best coaching school is very expensive and difficult to attend. It is shocking to see parents taking a 3 year old child to the kindergarten entrance course. Personal instruction and mentoring programs are an important part of student life. The popularity of private tuition fees is certainly a direct influence, proof of the inefficiency of education in this country where academic achievement is conspicuous. This evil may affect children's childhood. But by having them do excellent experts in their chosen field, it helps shape their future career. A personal story is an evil paper that is necessary for studying domestic publicity activities. When the voters of the last year cut taxes, the sheriff released most of the prisoners' tuition. Low 14 Responsive Tuition: Evil thesis Within a certain range, private student fees are required for evil papers. Scoring and teaching online paper Teacher Pearl Essay Question and Answering Method and Essay Writing 39; 2007 Papers on personal tuition fees are evil necessities - Papers on private tuition fees are evil - 1324540 Private classes and wise needs There is no evil essay necessary for child restrictions, generally reducing the private tuition fee associated with the pro-life of the abortion of the old swimming paper is a necessary evil essay for literary expenses. Please bring a draft of your thesis today. Here you can ask questions, answer questions, and even discuss the answers. Summary - This story is about Mathematician teachers who joined Elizabeth, a highly authoritative and personal tuition fee essay necessary for evil 467627. A paper on personal tuition fee is necessary. The result is probably meaningful: the evil paper needs the smaller of the smaller personal stories - the evil paper needs Gabriel Ryan from Baton Rouge to find a private story Answers to the search query Tuition is required for an evil paper looking for - M4 NetPrivate tuition is required for an evil paper. Outubro 29, 201 Not classified. - Deccan Heraldtrends Is it more than just test phobia? I will explain several reasons. If I pay attention to that class,

4. As a cause or source of pain, injury, or destruction: social evil of poverty and injustice 9. The power to bring evil and harm (sometimes capital): evil is powerful in the world [Old English yfel, Germanic; Old Frisian squid, Old high German ubiquitous evil, Old Irish adbal excess] Initially the evil impulse was as fragile as spider clues but eventually it became as tough as a cart - Babylonian Talmud Evil behaviors such as crushed rotten eggs stink the nostrils of all Bartlett's American dictionary. The evil of the journey of life is like a hill warning travelers during the trip. Both look better in the distance, but it will be far more difficult to overcome than I expected to approach - Charles Caleb Colton Evil like poison has their usage, and diseases other diseases can not reach - Thomas Paine Our sin is like our shadow. - Sir John Sackling (He is a wonderful man but completely corrupt, he is shining like a dirty squid under the moonlight - John Randolph Very awful [crime] It is like a painting of atrocities and lives of martyrs of foxes - Jonathan Valin The deputy is as famous as the skunk and is caused by an unfortunate extreme - Bartlett's American Dictionary Futures repeat the way the wind wanders, dusts others' eyes and spreads themselves - William Shakespeare The philosophical world calls this irritating problem "evil problem". So, the philosophical dictionary (Penguin, 1999) says, "There is evil in the world, bad things happen to people, people do bad things." Furthermore, "There is an imbalance between virtue and happiness between sin and suffering: evil prosperity and good people should meet evil destiny, evil will happen." This question was first published in the 18th century It may be the most famous summary of philosopher David Hume. Skeptics. He says, "The old question of epiculus is still untouched, I hope to prevent evil, but I can not, then he is helpless, he is okay, he is not intentioned, then he is competent It is competent (Dialogue on Natural Religion, Part X, 1779) Because of our free freedom, I assert that we have evil in this world and do not fully answer the concept of "evil problem". To say that there is evil in this world is the same as saying a wrong decision in this world. Decisions as bad as evil have no shape. God can not do bad things because all decisions God makes are good decisions. Human beings started evil. - The problem of evil The foundation of the Jewish / Christian tradition is to believe that there is a supernatural individual, that he is the ultimate creator, and that all other existence is due to their existence. The three main features of this existence (God?) Are completely good (full strength), completely strong (full strength) and all knowledge (omniscience). Theodicy is a particular area of ​​theology and philosophy, aimed at harmonizing the existence or suffering of evil in the world by believing in God, omnipotence, and kind God. Therefore, it recognizes the existence of evil, God is both capable of eliminating good and evil, and then attempts to explain why he does not. One of the most famous expressions is the performance of Gottfried Leibniz in 1710. He is optimistically insisting that our world is the best among all possible worlds, and it must be the best and the best Because it is a god created by the perfect world, it is the balance The world that was taken

B. C. Johnson: Why is not God involved to prevent evil? 1) According to Johnson, what is the problem of evil? What do you mean? The evil question is that even though they say that they forgive evil and kind God, their ideas will not play a role in the real world, even if they insist that they are forgiving them There is no problem, either. The reasons they advocate (evil is essentially indispensable, evil exists in contrast, evil makes us morally urgent, disasters and evil robs themselves) is meaningfully discussed by Johnson For example. This situation is not that good. Christians believe that God is omnipotent, that he should be able to stop / get rid of evil. Johnson also writes that the excuses used by Christians can be changed to allow evil gods to overcome good gods. It shows that God can not do everything well, and the problem of evil is better than theology. Theologians, like him, have no excuse to believe in a gentle god. I can not explain to him how much this summer hero course helped me. It really is something I will always rely on to help. Finally, I am not only able to spend a summer course, I can not prosper through the course hero. So, if God is strong and infinitely good, if you do not intervene to save the baby (not harming yourself) you will be considered wrong, why God will stop this baby's pain Is not there? Johnson, from this contradiction, can conclude that God can not do everything well. But if he is okay and the baby does not stop hurting, Johnson thinks that he is unlikely to become strong. B. C. Johnson: Why is not God involved to prevent evil? 1) According to Johnson, what is the problem of evil? What do you mean? The evil question is that even though they say that they forgive evil and kind God, their ideas will not play a role in the real world, even if they insist that they are forgiving them There is no problem, either. The reasons they advocate (evil is essentially indispensable, evil exists in contrast, evil makes us morally urgent, disasters and evil robs themselves) is meaningfully discussed by Johnson For example. This situation is not that good. Christians believe that God is omnipotent, that he should be able to stop / get rid of evil. Johnson also writes that the excuses used by Christians can be changed to allow evil gods to overcome good gods. It shows that God can not do everything well, and the problem of evil is better than theology. Theologians, like him, have no excuse to believe in a gentle god. In "Why is not God intervening to prevent evil," the authors point out the fact that "there is no opportunity to create virtues such as courage, compassion without suffering" (Johnson 122). For example, an alcohol-dependent parent threw a 5-year-old child on the street and the child eventually suffered a car. Some people say that God did not help children as God wants someone to gain courage from this situation. - In his essay "Why God forgive evil," Swinburn believes that the existence of evil in the world is consistent with the existence of God of omniscience, almighty and all-goodness. First, Swimburn's claim is based on two basic types of evil: morality and nature. Moral evil includes all evils caused by human behavior, whether deliberate or negligent; evil of nature is evoked by all evils not caused or forgiven by human beings Including.

In Thomas Hardy's work "Fatalism", Albert Eliot defines nature as a "conscious agent, usually evil" as many Hardy novels (Elliot 85) show. This is less severe than Woodlanders. Like many of Hardy's works, this novel shows the fight between nature and human effort - so it sometimes seems natural that it is a direct force against the happiness of men and women. novel. Between Woodlanders, there are not so many characters that control their own destiny and subsequent happiness, but more power, especially among Woodlanders, to work in space. "Evil people are developing various resources around philosophy, literature, social science - the evil depiction of Augustine is a lack of goodness, a sociological study involving torture of existence and police -" A cautious and sensitive quest for many of the various problems raised by evil question '(not all issues) - John Gray, literary comment All pages are engraved with fear and fear Brutality is It is reflected - sometimes accompanied by cold anger accompanied by coolness Book author James Dows forces to think carefully about the ethics of the story - true - we rape men, women, children, Torture, face-to-face with men who kill, where do I look? In Thomas Hardy's work "Fatalism", Albert Eliot defines nature as a "conscious agent, usually evil" as many Hardy novels (Elliot 85) show. This is less severe than Woodlanders. Like many of Hardy's works, this novel shows the fight between nature and human effort - so it sometimes seems natural that it is a direct force against the happiness of men and women. novel. Between Woodlanders, there are not so many characters that control their own destiny and subsequent happiness, but more power, especially among Woodlanders, to work in space. Woodlanders are small jewels written by Thomas Hardy, and I am fortunate to be able to find it in a recent book. This is a 19th century novel and may seem surprising given the modernity of the novel's conspiracy. Problem, illegal pregnancy, murder, divorce; It seems strange to imagine that these topics can be freely explored outside of the novel, but here they are also in The Woodlanders. The central problem of the romantic entanglement of the novel is a recurring problem. Novel heroine, Grace Melbury, promised her childhood friend Guilly Winterbone when she was a young child, and went to a high end boarding school. A woman suitable for farm life comes back. Her expensive education gave her an expensive hobby and made her too sophisticated and knowledgeable to be a simple Jill's wife. I think they are willing to love one another, but this tragic reality invades this pair.

When we were born for the first time, we were bad as a baby in the mother 's arms. By reading "Flying King" and understanding the various tragic events in history, I came to the conclusion that humans are a little evil. Nonetheless, we think that this is not a citizen environment that has received our daily education, but we think that our thinking and experience is bringing "the darkness of the human mind" ( Golding 202). "This is not his own enemy to let himself go to the way of evil, but his own heart" (Buddha). It is taught that God is the only one, the best in design, intention, and law, and does not need to participate in evil or need to participate because of this kind of God's worship and loyalty. We learn to trust this god to its fullest and rely on His will and preparations to get rid of all forms of evil. We believe that Christians can not trust God excessively and can not expect infinite love. We are taught that sin, superstition, sin, and disease belong to the same blood relationship, not descendents of God, but descendants of carnal ideas. We are taught that the mission of holy Christ is to demonstrate practical and unobtrusive salvation from all these other and other afflictions of mankind. So, we expect to get more things through Christ and get more. Good and evil are mere degrees problem. Take our own life as an example. We said we saw how good we thought we were in our childhood, but they are really evil, and how much is evil looks like. How will these ideas change? How does the idea go up? We once thought it was very good, and now we do not think it is very good. Good and evil are superstition, not exist. The only difference is the degree. This is totally Atoman's performance, he is appearing in everything; it is called evil only when it is very thick, and calls it good when it is thin

The themes of good and evil are explored in Frankenstein 's Mary Sherry chapters 16 and 17. The concept of "good and evil" creates new lives not only in today's society but also in unnatural ways like some ideas and cloning behind medical advances indicated by "Frankenstein" It also includes the ethical problem of. What? Born to advance in science, we should leave nature. In chapter 16 and chapter 17, Frankenstein told something the monster told him when he met the seafarers. But most readers of Frankenstein extracted the obvious theme of good and evil in the novel of Mary Sherry; others are the themes in which social corruption and abuse of science were emphasized in the story I believe. Shelly used various themes in her book which was very popular during Frankenstein 's writing. In her novels, readers can refer and distinguish Mary Shelley 's life, similarity between events of that period, and her unique things. Long-lasting novel, Frankenstein Mary Sherry's life seems to have been associated with tragedy from the beginning, with three children, her mother, her husband and two suicide deaths. From her pain and misfortune, Shelley can convey the psychological image of social phobia and human evil. It is said that there is a kind of "connection" between the appearance of some novels and the date and her private life. In her novel "Frankenstein", Mary Shelly discusses the theme of birth and creation, the need for appearance and dating, love and acceptance. The theme being explored in Frankenstein is related to today's modern world. Through the events, circumstances and consequences of the novel, Shelly supports and faces attitudes and values ​​in her text, so that the reader challenges, thereby allowing the reader to look back at their life .

Normally, evil caused by human free action (moral evil) distinguishes evil belonging to nature (natural or physical evil). Moral evil seems to be our responsibility, so the natural evil has largely disappeared in secular arguments. (It exists in different forms in painful problems.) However, experience has shown that the two are intertwined with each other. Moral evil is causing the suffering of the victim, seems to be the only way for suffering to pay for sin. But evil seems to be more serious than the difference between agents and victims. Paul Ricoeur (1985) describes "a passive strange experience to achieve the heart of evil behavior." As mentioned by Simone Weil, the most extreme form of pain is felt. The notes on these categories are in order. Historically, they were the remains of the closed system of Kalpa (cut) and Poena (punishment), and St. Augustine from Hippo insisted that it could immediately protect all evil. All natural suffering including death, even carnivores are understood as punishment for male (or angel) crime These crimes are not defined as damage to other living things, It is harm caused by disobedience or rebellion. . Ignoring the victims, this system eliminates the central problem of contemporary discussion and innocent pain Conceptually, most arguments about moral evil support the philosophical dilemma of human liberty, which is also threatened by scientific development. By restricting discussions to intentional individual behavior, these theories also obscure the evil of society and culture (and completely naturalize). When discussing natural evil evil philosophical issues, there is usually a difference between moral evil and natural evil. The moral evil (roughly speaking) is evil caused by the bad behavior of a human being (or other created creature), while the natural evil (at first glance) evil (hurricane, tornado Such as evil). . In natural forest fires, deer burns are examples of natural evil. It is important to understand that response to the problem of moral evil is not necessarily a good response to the problem of natural evil. Nature's evil. Contrary to moral evil, natural evil is evil created by manipulation of the natural processes, in which case we can not make morally accountable for anyone. Typical examples of natural disasters are natural disasters such as cyclones and earthquakes causing major pain and loss of life, diseases such as leukemia and Alzheimer's disease, disorders such as blindness and hearing loss. However, you need to perform important identification at this point. Human error or negligence has brought many things that are usually conveyed as natural evil. For example, lung cancer can be caused by massive smoking; the loss of human life caused by the earthquake is mainly due to positioning irresponsible urban planners finally undulating and positioning their work on disjointed obstacles. A careless approach that might prevent droughts and floods There are various kinds of evil. Two of them are moral evil and natural evil. Nature's evil includes things like pain and pain, and moral evil involves making mistaken decisions. Moral evil depends on the use of human will. Nature's evil has nothing to do with this. The main difference between these two evils is that people can not control the evil of nature, moral evil depends on their will. Some even say that physical evil is necessary for human beings. Without painful evil, people will not be warned about disease or danger. In life, sometimes bad people are better than "good" people. Why is this? Some say that this is a trial of the soul, and rewards are waiting for us. Because their mistakes can also lead to mutual pain, the human family is one and their members will help each other through their good behavior. For example, what happened to Jesus? He suffered for all the sins of mankind and saved them through all these.

The problem bothering Saint Augustine as a youth is the problem that plagues many people today. The problem is as follows. God seems to be the cause of evil. Because he is the Creator of all things. Now that evil is a reality, God seems to be the cause of evil. Although Augustine appears to be logical about this reasoning process, he insists that a good god may be the cause of evil. Among this resistance, he showed much reverence even before he was completely converted. He will not accept the faithful notion that God is the cause of evil. Even if he can not solve the problem, he is still faithful to God. When we ask questions about God, we should remember this. We should not ask this question. Just as we put God in the box of defendant and ask him to explain ourselves to us. Many people are doing this. When they saw how many evil things have happened to the good people they have reached the conclusion that God does not exist or that God does not care. This is a kind devout devout. People should not be addicted to this with honesty and integrity. Even in the worst case, Augustine has never worked this way. I will return to the problem. Augustine did not want to say that God is the cause of evil. Also, I do not want to say that evil is not a reality. From his own experience he reveals that evil is a real factor in his life and the lives of other people. He eventually solved the problem by discovering evil It is a reality to a certain extent, but it is neither a real reality nor a perfect existence. This is a kind of poverty like blindness. Let's review Whether it is blind or vision, this is a big difference for a single human being. But blindness is not a complete reality, not strictly speaking. Totally blind is the lack of quality that should be present in the organs of the eye. In other words, blindness is defects, defects, and imperfections. The lack of this technical name is the word "poverty". Now evil is a sort of poverty. Our human behavior should have been a lack of goodwill. If we do not obey the God's will and do not obey, we will take actions devoid of good wisdom deserving it. Creatures should follow their creator. Then, evil behavior is disorganized, flawed. Here, people are carriers, not gods. Through this solution, St. Augustine maintains the glory of God as a creator of good, while confirming that evil is a reality. It is not a complete reality or existence, but on the contrary, it is a type of poverty, the reason being that person's will. Therefore, human will will eventually cause the moral evil of the world. It is due to the disobedience of Adam and Eve who brought evil to mankind. Through human sin, death is brought to men. Indeed, angels brought evil to the universe by rebelling against God. But their evil did not touch humans until Adam and Eve heard the snake in the garden. Therefore, if you want to oppose the fact that people die of earthquakes and other natural disasters, let's blame men. It is a moral evil of evil that brings physical evil of huge death to the world. The problem of evil was first told by Greek philosopher Epicurus 371 - 270. Since then, many philosophers and theologians have fought against the evil problem on the existence of God. Like the French philosopher Jean-Paul Sartre 1905-1980, God does not exist. Theodicy is a field of theology dealing with dealing with opposition to the existence of nature and moral evil, defending the quality of God. The sermons of Augustine and Elen sought to prove this by proveing ​​evil of nature. There are two main types of evil, nature and morality, completely different. Natural disasters are natural disasters that occur worldwide. They have no perfect or artificial reasons, and John Hick expresses it as "evil unrelated to human behavior" in the "god of evil and love". Therefore, many people believe that God is the cause of these disasters. Richard Swinburn is "Do you have a god"? ' I agree with Augustine 's logic that free will is the

The problem of evil and STN God's evil makes you realize the reason why STN God forgives evil and pain in the world. The basic setting for the problem of evil is omnipotent, completely gentle, eternal, and creator of this universe, but separated from it (STN) or evil omniscient God. Atheists believe there is no sacred god because there is evil. Theologians are divided into two categories in order to believe in believing in God theory or not STNing God, or for believing that there is a reason for God to bring evil into the world. Critical evaluation of the summary of evil problems and how we weaken the traditional features of God. This article attempts to review the philosophical dilemma of the existence of evil. The epistemological problem that appeared was the understanding of my God and the validity of the existence of God. What is good and bad? The Merriam-Webster dictionary defines evil as follows. a: Moral ... Why is there evil on the earth? This is the central point about the problem of evil. Atheists and theologians are trying to explain this problem in their own philosophical view. Epicurean's evil paradox shows a dilemma for the recognition of traditional Judaism and Christianity of God and evil. This tradition supports the following three propositions. Evil public weakens God's totipotency There is a problem of evil. This is a simple and direct fact. Discussion on the evil (and pain) problem proves this fact. The argument over evil shows that God has full power and full power. It shows that God is kind. In other words, he is hoping that only kindness exists. But look at all evil and evil in the world. The god of all good is completely inconsistent. God's almighty is that you can do whatever he wants. So, if God can do anything what he wants, why then? In short, this is an "evil question". "Why are personal and thoughtful gods creating a world of evil?" "Why does God want people to make evil acts free?" "The omniscient love to God certainly will not allow evil to exist in his world." The reaction above is gathered up in the essence of God - love - the desire for humanity - love. Look at the logic: How does God acknowledge love without the possibility of evil? God may have built a robot, except that he will never say 'I love you, I love you, I love you.' But such creatures will not be able to establish real love relationship. The Bible says that God wants to have a true love relationship with his creation: "My young children, we should not love in words, we should love with our tongue Love is not true unless you have the ability to not love.If you can choose to choose to love God rather than love a person, this is true of God I will make love relationship possible.

The intrigue of the movie and passion of all passion in the making of BBC by Shakespeare 's Richard III was born and ended with a persistent appetite passion. For example, anger rises from sorrow, and after vengeance it ends with joy. - St. Thomas Aquinas Richard III, Shakespeare created evil incarnation. The evil hero conspired against relatives, planned a political acquisition, made the widow widow, assassinated children, abandoned all evil acts. We saw Richard's bluff with delight and joy of evil, and every boast comment gave us instructions. If a bad person becomes attractive, even more fun, his blatant atrocities Film Production by Ron Crane Shakespeare 's Richard III Rockland' s film has illustrated the role of Richard III as a devil genius. The use and symbol of the economy in his Richard's depiction fully reflects the characteristics of the missing text in several respects. A stable even and stable stable scene in the movie clarifies this. About the stable scene in the movie The first thing I noticed is the monochrome color scheme. - "Cold Blood" is a tragic story about Eugene Hickcock and Perry Edward, two people who escaped the law after killing the whole family and finding money. At the time of writing this book, Truman Capote only used facts to create real novels. He has thousands of notes on this subject, but his problem is to make his book look like a novel. He does this by adding a dialogue and explaining the emotions of the character. Richard as an anti-hero: How much Richard realized this prototype? In the play of William Shakespeare of Richard III, Richard was portrayed as physical deformation and psychological influence. People believe that his inner soul reflects his physical deformation. Richard is considered to be the protagonist of the show, but that is very contradictory. - Introduction Fyodor Dostoyevsky's underground memo (1864/2008) is a diary written by an anonymous narrator (page 7) that calls himself "malicious" and "unattractive". As the narrator 's self - hatred characterized by self - alienation is very obvious, he is often referred to as an underground man by critics (Frank 1961, p. 1). But this underground man is the central character of Dostoevsky's novel and represents the subversion of a typical brave hero. Shakespeare's evil king, Richard III, is an actor, a completely evil actor who began to appreciate his skills through the skill of the stage. In his Shakespeare as a dramatic thinker, Richard Moulton announced that Richard was amazed by his stage director: "Richard became an evil artist: the natural feeling of participating in crime That passion Whether it is a desire or a fear and a regret - it gives a masterpiece of appreciation for art "(40). Robert Weimann compares the role of Richard Gloucester with John of Shakespeare King. "These two figures all showed outstanding performance needs and play a" desperately "role. Role, "discovery", and better or better

Ignorance will breathe life when you see a small amount of evil but ignored. Evil is grown up and strengthened, gradually taking over the potential profitable possibilities. But when evil is everywhere and it is difficult to gain good, the same evil is now normal. During wartime, the good man became a murderer, the bad guy became a habit. The nuances between good and evil are blurred to meaningless smear in the eyes of reality. Now, good people are defending their liberties and families, as well as destroying families of unknown individuals who are dead. The problem of evil is how to harm the existence of evil with omnipotence, omnipotence, and the god of omniscience (see Theism). The assertion of evil insists that God does not exist or has not all three attributes due to evil. Traditionally, opposing attempts have been discussed under the headings of the theory. In addition to religious philosophy, the problem of evil is also important in the field of theology and ethics. Evil problems usually form in two forms. It is a logical problem of evil and proof of evil. The logical form of the discussion attempts to show the logical impossibility in the coexistence of God and evil and the form of evidence is that when we consider the evils of the world, we have an omnipotent omniscient and perfectly good god Try to show. . The problem of evil has two branches. Evil logic problem (LPOE) seeks to prove that the existence of evil contradicts the existence of omnipotence and omnipotent existence. The evidence evidence question (EPOE) tries to prove that the existence of an amount or kind of evil contradicts the existence of somewhat effective and benevolent entity. Of course, not all Gods are considered omnipotent, omnipotent, or either. Many gods are morally defective, positive evil, simply indifferent, and not omnipotent. The evil logical matter does not apply to these gods, but evidence of evil evidence still holds true. This is consistent with the idea of ​​evil. That is, there are defective evil, irrelevant, or totipotent entities compatible with reality and the existence of omnipotent and omnipotent entities is not.

What is the definition that evil is usually believed by people? Religious gods become demons of other religions. This is the case of many devils posted on this site. The initial focus on creating this site was about Jewish evil concept - Christianity. (1) related to the Jewish - Christian Devil (including biblical writings, non-normative writing or Christian fictional works such as Dante Hell, John Milton's paradise, or many Fausto myths) (2) listed on the devil list by demonists of the 14th - 14th centuries (such as Pseudomonarchia daemonum (1583) or Dictionnaire Infernal (1863)) or included in the magic text (eg Goetia) The emergence of mysterious customs, general beliefs to devils and demons, and various demonic phenomena such as fortune-telling, magic, necromantics, etc. are characteristics of the environment of ancient Israel, a permanent danger Jehovah's faithful Pollution to believers. The Old Testament "Witch" (Exodus 22:18; Deuteronomy 18: 10) is correctly called "witch" at NIV, but women trafficked with common mysterious behavior The term used to describe. . The so-called "witches" and "media" are expressed as "having a familiar spirit (Heb.'ov)", ie "one of them (0 r is considered sacred)" (See Leviticus 19: 31). 20: 6; and 20: 27) It is said that a woman consulted by Saul was "a woman acting as a demon woman of God" (1 Sam From the early days, the incarnation of the devil was always a problem in the Christian devil and theology. A very early form devil avatar is an idea of ​​the possession of a devil who tries to explain that the devil enters the human body for a certain purpose or simply to punish him for doubt of sin. But this quickly got a larger proportion and I tried to explain how the devil would induce people to bring them into sexual relations with them or to guide them to commit other crimes. For Christian scholars, the devil does not necessarily have to appear in a visible form or a possible form. Sometimes possession

The difference in the way humans recognize objects is part of the human complexity. Things considered to be evil for one person can be considered beneficial to others, and vice versa. William Golding's Lord of the Flies raised the issue of good and evil when innocent boys were placed on the islands that are bearing the weight of society. How will they affect past influences? Their behavior is right and wrong. The behavior of a boy is neither a good question nor a bad question, it is an action to survive. This article explores William Golding, which is the three elements of natural evil in the fly's lord, from savage changes to civilization to beasts and wars to the island. Golding expresses evil through his role, through their actions and symbols. The island is the greatest representation of evil as it is where the whole novel occurs. - Lord of the Flies: A story of a fateful journey Humans never saw their true perfect example. Through some of his own mistakes, he can never reach the ideal height he desires to achieve. "Holy" Michelangelo named after the modern biographer Georgio Vasari was never complete his masterpiece on the ceiling of the Sistine Chapel. When it was discovered, Pope Julius II prayed when he saw this "holy perfect work". William Golding believes that all human beings are born with evil but are dominated by social restrictions. At Golding 's novel "The Lord of the Flies", school boys collided with an airplane on the island where school boys landed during the Second World War, and were obliged to live without adult supervision. Pig hunting and killing is the way boys use to get meat and they use chant and dance to celebrate. Golding's theory is supported through progress as a natural evil face and beyond the boy Over the centuries philosophers have discussed whether human beings were born to be evil. William Golding raised this problem with his real novel "The Lord of the Flies". During the Second World War, the novel was on the tropical island, at the beginning of the novel the boys from the UK flew to safe places and their planes were shot down. Adults can not survive, boys can manage and save. In the flies of the Lord, William Golding uses symbolism in the form of snails to represent the concept of society. The relationship between these boys and snail shells is constantly evolving and shows the theme of the golding.

Ignorance will breathe life when you see a small amount of evil but ignored. Evil is grown up and strengthened, gradually taking over the potential profitable possibilities. But when evil is everywhere and it is difficult to gain good, the same evil is now normal. During wartime, the good man became a murderer, the bad guy became a habit. The nuances between good and evil are blurred to meaningless smear in the eyes of reality. Now, good people are defending their liberties and families, as well as destroying families of unknown individuals who are dead. The problem of evil is how to harm the existence of evil with omnipotence, omnipotence, and the god of omniscience (see Theism). The assertion of evil insists that God does not exist or has not all three attributes due to evil. Traditionally, opposing attempts have been discussed under the headings of the theory. In addition to religious philosophy, the problem of evil is also important in the field of theology and ethics. Evil problems usually form in two forms. It is a logical problem of evil and proof of evil. The logical form of the discussion attempts to show the logical impossibility in the coexistence of God and evil and the form of evidence is that when we consider the evils of the world, we have an omnipotent omniscient and perfectly good god Try to show. . The problem of evil has two branches. Evil logic problem (LPOE) seeks to prove that the existence of evil contradicts the existence of omnipotence and omnipotent existence. The evidence evidence question (EPOE) tries to prove that the existence of an amount or kind of evil contradicts the existence of somewhat effective and benevolent entity. Of course, not all Gods are considered omnipotent, omnipotent, or either. Many gods are morally defective, positive evil, simply indifferent, and not omnipotent. The evil logical matter does not apply to these gods, but evidence of evil evidence still holds true. This is consistent with the idea of ​​evil. That is, there are defective evil, irrelevant, or totipotent entities compatible with reality and the existence of omnipotent and omnipotent entities is not.

The article I chose today to show the evil of the world depicting the evil of the world relates to a person named Abner Louima. The man was arrested in 1997 and appealed in New York as accused as being beaten at the station's toilet. When he was in a cell, a 19 - year - old witness, Conelle Lugg, heard a cry and beat the walls of the bathroom. Then the policeman pushed Louima into his pants and saw blood come out of him. I will wind up. One of the most interesting questions in Phil 300's world is "If God exists, why is the world bad?" "If God created the universe and us, it should not be asked, and the problem of the devil is thought to be the cause of atheism, but the problem of evil is not considered to be a correct argument ... If there is evil in nature (that is, evil is not due to the human abuse of free will), one of the core arguments of the Jewish Christian tradition is that of Almighty Almighty God There is evidence: From common sense, we can deduce from this observation that there is no God imagined from this tradition - if he exists, he will stop evil There is evil in this world. I thought the evil man won a long time on the hill of Jerusalem. An evil man thought that it won this year in my life. But evil was not only defeated, it was crushed. And 'suffering and testing may last for a while, a happy sunrise will bring happiness. The only way I want is whether Jesus is the truth and whether he is risen from the death or not. You may think that I am absorbed in believing such a thing. Even my wife thinks I am crazy from time to time (but I've been needing her more than ever in the last five years). But unless you have suffered never, you can not understand the need for infinite hope. Without hope it makes no sense. Because of our freedom of freedom, we argue that we have evil in this world and do not fully answer the concept of "evil problem". To say that there is evil in this world is the same as saying making a wrong decision in this world. Decisions as bad as evil have no form. God can not do bad things because all decisions God makes are good decisions. Human beings started evil. - The problem of evil The basis of the Jewish / Christian tradition is to believe that there is a supernatural individual, that he is the ultimate creator, and that all others exist due to their existence. The three main features of this existence (God?) Are perfectly good (full strength), completely strong (full strength) and all knowledge (omniscience).

JR R. Good, evil, and moral Turkien's "Lord of the Rings" comment: It is very prudent that this student does not summarize Turkien's "Lord of the Rings". The main purpose of the students is to explain ethical themes that can be found in books. In the first half of this article I will explain Turkien's view on the nature of good and evil and in the second half I will explain his view on personal morality. It is an excellent work. The introduction of Lord of the Rings, writer JRR Tolkien was called by one of the best books ever and recently, in the opinion poll of UK channel 4 (O'hehir) "The best book of the 20th century" I won the title. No matter how few religious beliefs are there, religion is one of the themes of JRR. Turkien's book "The Ring Scholarship". The story of trilogy "Lord of the Rings" is the way of good and evil. Unlike Heinlein, Tolkien does not criticize a particular culture, but criticizes the evil that actually occurs in the world we live in. As J.R.R. Heinlein criticized Western culture, another important theme is sexual theme. "Strangers" are also the first works of this type of public and sexual transactions (Science fiction). "(Stuber 53). Heinle shows how human beings are" approaching "using sex. "Sex, sex is used as a bond of love and trust." Heinlein is paying attention to exposure and destruction of asphyxerious libido (Cansler 227). Americans think that sexual activity is a private act, but Stranger in a Stranger encourages gender (Drucolli 226) In Final Fantasy, elements of the "Lord of the Rings" trilogy of Ring King VIII J.R.T. Tolkien can be said to be the most influential work in contemporary fantasy literature. Since its publication half a century ago, a wonderful historical story of the surreal world against evil and its strange character and place that changed its wonders attracted and attracted readers. - Kurt Vonnegut's Cat's Cradle Satire and Fantasy In this article I chose two terms to describe Cat's Cradle. I think irony and fantasy are two terms very suitable for this novel. This book is ridiculed in the concerns of the 1960 's and is certified as satire. For example, the cuba's missile crisis was a major problem in the early 1960s. Religion is taken seriously and families are more seriously hurt

Evil exists. Since the emergence of civilization, this strange problem confuses philosophers, and today is still a subject of intense debate due to the theological significance inherent in that statement. For many people on this planet, the source of life is a versatile, versatile, omniscient God who created the universe in 7 days, as described in the Bible. But evil still exists. How are these two assumptions established at the same time? Of course, all the love God would want to do something about this problem, and if he wishes Almighty God can compensate for this. In our universal understanding, "evil" depiction methods regard it as hatred, negative, and potentially hateful. Contemporary psychology does not take into account the relationship between God and evil psychology, making conversation centering on humanity firmly. Because of such bad damage, television is neither bad nor bad, "it is ignored." A series of evidences suggest that this content is important. "She said" There is ample evidence that educational television is "good for children, there is strong evidence that violence is related to anti-social attacks." Contemporary psychology does not take into consideration the relationship between God and evil psychology, making it hard for him to speak about the power of evil is meaningless and unnecessary. It causes such bad injuries and pain. Carl Gustav Jung believes that the unconscious part of the heart contains personal motives and experiences that individuals do not know. Evil behaviors human beings can be explained by the work of at least an unconscious mind. That job is to help those who perform these actions understand what is going on in their own minds. The human heart is a dark and complicated place and the source of many individual evils is out of the scope of conscious mind control; these are often childhood events, oppressed sex acts, suppressed relationships or deaths It happens by failure of itself. And fail Essay.com/ Critical response to the depiction of "evil" in art. I draw prototypes of various media. Significant reaction to the depiction of 'evil' in art, depicting prototypes of various media

The existence of God may mean too many people; but his existence means that he can dominate human evil and morality. Humans are born every day, every minute, every hour. I hope that every born person grows oneself, creates something, and eventually becomes a contributor to society. To do this, you can fight many people who can fight every day. It is evil and moral, or it may be the existence of God that can rule either one or the other. Yes. There are various kinds of evil. Two of them are moral evil and natural evil. Nature's evil includes things like pain and pain, and moral evil involves making mistakes. Moral evil depends on the use of human will. Nature's evil has nothing to do with this. The main difference between these two evils is that people can not control the evil of nature and moral evil depends on their will. Some people say physical evil is necessary for human beings. Without painful evil, people will not be warned about disease or danger. Sometimes bad people in life are better than "good" people. Why is this? Some say that this is a trial of the soul, and there are rewards waiting for us. Because their mistakes can lead to mutual pain, the human family is one and their members will help each other through their good behavior. For example, what happened to Jesus? He suffered for all the sins of mankind and saved them through all these. When discussing natural evil evil philosophical issues, there is usually a difference between moral evil and natural evil. Moral evil (roughly speaking) is evil brought about by the bad behavior of human beings (or other creative creatures), but natural evil is caused by illegal forces (eg hurricanes, tornadoes), droughts, etc. (Seemingly) bad) caused by natural wildfires, deer burns are examples of natural evil. It is important to understand that response to the problem of moral evil is not necessarily a good response to the problem of natural evil.

Changes in how humans perceive things are a complex part of mankind. Things considered to be evil for a person can be considered beneficial to others. The fight between good and evil was the theme of William Golding's "Lord of the Fly". At that time, a group of innocent boys trapped in the island tried to build civilization from scratch. The problem is that their behavior is wrong, but the boys themselves have committed evil. The main boys of the flies are not evil, but become a barbarian for the struggle for their fear and survival, and are suppressed by their instincts, so they will live in front of their morality. The king of flies by William Golding was written by William Golding in 1954. This is an attractive book exploring the concept of human behavior when exempting society. Golding achieved this by hiding a group of British boys students on a remote island during the war. In the meantime boys evolved from civilization and handed over to barbarians. - Importance of beasts at William Golding's "The Lord of the Flies" There is a big theme everywhere in the book "The Lord of the Flies". This article explores William Golding, which is the three elements of natural evil in the fly's lord, from savage changes to civilization to beasts and wars to the island. Golding expresses evil through his role, through their actions and symbols. The island is the greatest representation of evil as it is where the whole novel occurs. - Lord of the Flies: A story of a fateful journey Humans never saw their true perfect example. Through some of his own mistakes, he can never reach the ideal height he desires to achieve. "Holy" Michelangelo named after the modern biographer Georgio Vasari was never complete his masterpiece on the ceiling of the Sistine Chapel. When it was discovered, Pope Julius II prayed when he saw this "holy perfect work". How is the evil of "Flying King" drawn? William Golding depicts the human evil in the flies of the fly using the fable. A fable is a story of potential meaning and meaning. William Golding used two levels of allegory, one related to World War II, as it was written, and one related to Jesus Christ and the Garden of Eden. For the end of World War II, the important aspect of the novel is its writing time. This means that Golding experiences and sees the cruelty and suffering of mankind. William Golding has a theory on why people do evil. This is called "original sin" or "inner evil". He believes that you have a certain amount of profit and some amount of evil in your heart when you were born. There are many characters that have been proved evil. One of them is Roger. ... Read more

Introduction The reality of evil is a constant problem in this world and society. This is a challenge for those who express their own view of the world. But this is one of the most important reasons why having a clear world view is very important. It is noteworthy that any view of the world suffers from this constantly discovered problem. To explain the imperfect world, please find a perfect world view that is simple and easy to fit. However, even if there are no problems or unresolved problems, you should give a reasonable bad answer. There are evil things in the world such as massacres of individuals and individuals, trafficking and trafficking, rape, and various forms of abuse. These are the majority of people agreeing as unjust evil in today's society. The definition of evil is related to pain, evil, evil, or harm. It also talks about immorality, but everyone's moral is different. Morality is based on recognition and religion. Because not everyone believes in the same religion or has the same awareness, because people should be able to express their belief rationally. Human trafficking was regarded as humanitarian infringement about 200 years ago, but today it is seen as an example of modern slavery. This slavery, known as trafficking, is a hidden evil that affects everyone, especially women and children. Every year, millions of men, women, and children are victims and exploiters of labor and sexual purposes. Usually, they wish to be tempted by erroneous promises, slavery and poverty, while hoping that they and their families have a better future. Some authors consider trafficking as a criminal act of a multinational organization (Bruckert and Colette, 2002). Others consider it to be a public health problem or a human rights issue within the framework of modern slavery or forced labor (Ruggiero, 1997, ILO, 2005, Bales, 2005). Despite considerable opposition, trafficking in human beings is still increasing. It is difficult to evaluate the degree of success in this fight against evil. Trafficking can only be prevented if society is actively involved. Since poverty and inequality are regarded as the driving force of trafficking, they must be overcome and relying entirely on the law to stop trafficking will be in vain. In addition, it includes personal abuse, trading and transportation; this is produced by various means including physical forces. The problem is complicated and the trafficking trafficking protocol has been successful to some extent in dealing with this problem. Furthermore, as the problem is complicated, it is difficult to respond appropriately. Therefore, various government authorities, civil society, human rights activists, and scholars need to participate more.

Pecola as the most discerning-evil victim answered the question of Pecola Breedlove's cast in her community as a victim's victim and the most tiring Toni Morrison got even more difficult problems I am trying to solve it. Although not mentioned, this problem is in Pecora with whole novels and her cyclical story style. Morrison has talesed a story aimed at answering this question by gathering all the power that will help to cause a social accident. The story of the blue eyes seems to have many themes. All topics and conflicts always seem to include the role of Pecola Breedlove. Look for the subject of identity. The theme of Pecola is also a victim. Among all the characters in the story, due to the many harsh environments she has to experience in her life, we can certainly sympathize with Pecora. Perhaps her rape is the most tragic and dramatic experience Pecora experienced, but she continues her life. Pecola as the most discerning-evil victim answered the question of Pecola Breedlove's cast in her community as a victim's victim and the most tiring Toni Morrison got even more difficult problems I am trying to solve it. Although not mentioned, this problem is in Pecora with whole novels and her cyclical story style. Morrison has talesed a story aimed at answering this question by gathering all the power that will help to cause a social accident. Morrison's Family Relations Tony Morrison's blue eyed eye "The Bluest Eyes" is a story about the life of a young black girl, Pecola Bladorov, who grew up after the First World War. . She prayed with the blue eyes and "Please make her beautiful", which in turn was accepted by her family and associates. The main problem of this book is the ugly concept that "darkness" has neither value nor beauty. This view will be handed down at birth and become a cultural barrier. Promoting a good family relationship to promote a healthy and meaningful family relationship is important for adolescent life. Families are not only important for connection between people and the past, they are also powerful and powerful agents that provide teenagers the most love and care they need. Young people can establish good family relationships in various ways. First of all, teenagers should respect each family member and care for each family member. This includes older elderly people Among this tragic novel, Tony Morrison's "blue eyes", 11-year-old black girl, Pecora Breed Love are victims of race, dislike themselves, and her father got pregnant It was. Pecola grew up in an abused and unloved family. She is keen to disappear from the earth to get rid of her problems. Writers frequently emphasize cultural or social value using letters alienated from culture. In the tragic story "The Bluest Eyes", the authors show social problems existing through the story. Throughout the hero's life of Pecola Breedlove, the writer offers clear examples of racial discrimination, gender discrimination, social class influence in the 1940's.

Why is evil? After World War II and the Holocaust, many Jews and Christians wondered why God tried to make this happen. I feel that many people are alienated. God had abandoned them in some way when God was the most distressed. The world needs to explain why God causes what he calls "children" to make it happen. This needs to explain why evil exists in the world that should be created by the versatile, all-loving God who has plagued religious believers for centuries. Christianity has fought against the problem of evil. As we know today, as we know today there are multiple beliefs about why there is evil in the first century before Paul's Christianity. Professor Bad Ehrman is one of the earliest Christian's most capable historians. In "lost Christianity" he summarizes some of the different different main beliefs of primitive Christian about the source of evil: Hindu and Buddhism interpret evil as a result of Karma. Even though our actions seem to be unfair, even if the current sufferings seem to be unfair, karma will serve the judiciary for a long time. This is not fair - it is a delay penalty. The operation of Karma can be seen as an explanation of intent without intent, but the problem of evil does not exist in this belief system. There is no fundamental contradiction between the concept of sacred or universal law and the existence of pain. Why is evil on earth? This is the central point about the problem of evil. Atheists and theologians are trying to explain this problem in their own philosophical view. Epicurean's evil paradox shows a dilemma for the recognition of traditional Judaism and Christianity of God and evil. This tradition supports the following three propositions. Evil public weakens God 's almighty qualities ... Christian theology. The problem of evil is bothering the world's largest thought, but it is still clearly close to the hearts of the most common people. If God is good, why is there evil? The following article explains the problem of evil related to God, examines the reaction of Christianity to the problem, and concludes that the existence of God is perfectly compatible with the existence of evil.

This sentence makes a lot of sense, as Jack began to show excessive control over the boy when cruelly beating Wilfred. Ralf began to be brainwashed when he realized that there was no problem with helping Jack. . This sentence shows how Jack began to rule. First of all it is to force kidnapping boys and defeat Wilfred. This excessive control Jack expressed in his novel supports the idea that human beings were born to be evil. How is the evil of "Flying King" drawn? William Golding depicts the human evil in the flies of the fly using the fable. A fable is a story of potential meaning and meaning. William Golding used two levels of allegory, one related to World War II, as it was written, and one related to Jesus Christ and the Garden of Eden. For the end of World War II, the important aspect of the novel is its writing time. This means that Golding experiences and sees the cruelty and suffering of mankind. William Golding has a theory on why people do evil. This is called "original sin" or "inner evil". He believes that you have a certain amount of profit and some amount of evil in your heart when you were born. There are many characters that have been proved evil. One of them is Roger. ... Read more "Flying King" is a mere abstract tool of Golding, you can build human concepts in the minds of readers. In the whole novel, it is said that everyone is evil. This evil is inevitable, it is said that it will make everyone evil. When a king of fly represents all evil at a certain point in the book, this theory is called "The king of fly spreads like a balloon" (page 158). Together with this idea, religious symbolism was used inevitably to fight evil. At some point in the book, Golding has Simon. This is a stick attached to the pig's head, imagining speaking and representing evil of all human beings. Simon tried to spread this bad knowledge to others, but he was killed. This is a direct reference to the death of Christ, which implies the Bible.

Compared with the present age, medieval ordinary people seem to care more about God, especially the sacred view of the individual. Perhaps this is because if people's lives are used to fear Viking or black plague plundering, people have more hope of getting a happy future, and if the bars are adjustable Because the TV is larger than 32 inches, it seems that I want to find something better. A predictable but interesting side effect of this heavenly thought is the paradox of exploring sins. Aquinas's answer to the evil problem Why is evil and sin in the world? Because evil is the inevitable consequence of freedom of will, God can not order sin. "God is responsible for sinful behavior, but there is no responsibility for crime" 296, Aquinas is distinguished from the concept of eternal, natural and human law. Something becoming a habit, and finally naturally produced and tested by customs ... is cleaned by the weight of the law "(420) Traditional correspondence is that God imposes evil as penalty for sin. The first problem with this reaction is that evil does not seem to be distributed according to sin. There is no reason to believe that people hit by lightning are guilty than those who were not hit by lightning. Furthermore, even a baby suffers. But since the baby has not committed a crime, there is nothing to punish them for. That is why I am using a baby. Now some theologians have said that the baby can be punished with the original sin, but if you think about it, it will be unfair. Long ago, the government punished the whole family for the crime of a family member. But today I think that this is savage. Therefore, the original sin can not be a valid reason to allow God to suffer and die a baby. Answer: The term "original sin" means Adam's disobedience from the diet of right and wrong trees and the crime of its influence on other parts of mankind. Original sin is "our sins and sins in the eyes of God, which is a direct result of Adam's sin in the Garden of Eden." Even before growing to commit a conscious crime, God. There are three main points that can solve this influence. The concept of original sin plays an important role in Adolf Hitler's psychoanalysis. The original sin tells us that as a human being, we are born with the ability to become evil (guilty) or commit evil acts. However, we also recognize that our abilities are reasonable beings given to us through nature's law to overcome the wishes of evil. Therefore, people are not necessarily born with evil, but there may be natural wishes of people who want to overwhelm rational thinking. The boundary between congenital and contextual or intentional and structural seems to be ambiguous - a single category that both parties seem to rely on the other Form. Hitler is an example of this ideology

Christian faith to good and evil Christians may believe many different things about the power of good and evil. The Roman Catholic Church taught that God is beautiful and perfect. They teach God to completely love; they also teach that God has the power to do something (all omnipotence). However, there are all kinds of wrongs that can cause people to suffer. These include moral evils such as floods, illnesses, hurricanes, fires, earthquakes, natural evils. Christianity has fought against the problem of evil. As we know today, as we know today there are multiple beliefs about why there is evil in the first century before Paul's Christianity. Professor Bad Ehrman is one of the earliest Christian's most capable historians. In "lost Christianity" he summarizes some of the different different main beliefs of primitive Christian about the source of evil: Hindu and Buddhism interpret evil as a result of Karma. Even though our actions seem to be unfair, even if the current sufferings seem to be unfair, karma will serve the judiciary for a long time. This is not fair - it is a delay penalty. The operation of Karma can be seen as an explanation of intent without intent, but the problem of evil does not exist in this belief system. There is no fundamental contradiction between the concept of sacred or universal law and the existence of pain. Is that person basically good or evil? Perhaps the beliefs about good and evil are more appropriate in your value theory (see below), but this question is very important to your people's perception. Western ideas based on Christian principles basically convict corrupt people and always resist the nature of evil, but even today some believe in this belief, but the environment and this kindness Opportunity to express. Perhaps more generally, humans are basically neither good nor evil, but morally neutral at birth, whether people follow the path of good and evil depends on external influence and will.

Evil is divided into two forms: moral evil and natural evil. Moral evil is brought about by bad choices arising from our free will. Nature's evil is a bad thing to people, regardless of whether they are worth it or not. The problem of evil is that "We are either helpless to say that God is not entirely good, he is even telling the author about permission or even evil, or he is helpless to stop it, if he is capable, Even if it is said to be evil, it is totally good, we must say that God is not omnipotent "(Fitzgerald 340) This is a big problem for religious revelation, as they believe in God with good goodness and Almighty. Why is this god forgiving evil? In this article we will provide, explain and evaluate the Hippo Augustine of Hippo. See more This is similar to removing garbage from wooden wheels. The more the slice is deleted, the worse the wheel, but it is still the wheel. Likewise, good people may not be so good due to corruption, but as long as some form of good remains, he still exists. In our mind this little immortality is like the god of all creatures. People can corrupt as they can make morally wrong choices and deprive us of our interests. This is due to our free will. God created human ability to make choices according to their own needs; this is called free will. Without freedom, the world will be a very boring place. Imagine not to make your own decisions. Because God does not want this, he gives us the ability to think. We are reasonable, mainly making the right decision, but bad decisions lead to evil. Conscience works as a moral compass in our mind, keeps us away from the choice of evil and tries to lead to good. Our conscience may be part of the little things that can not be destroyed in our hearts. But sometimes conscience is not enough to guide us. freedom There are various kinds of evil. Two of them are moral evil and natural evil. Nature's evil includes things like pain and pain, and moral evil involves making mistaken decisions. Moral evil depends on the use of human will. Nature's evil has nothing to do with this. The main difference between these two evils is that people can not control the evil of nature, moral evil depends on their will. Some even say that physical evil is necessary for human beings. Without painful evil, people will not be warned about disease or danger. In life, sometimes bad people are better than "good" people. Why is this? Some say that this is a trial of the soul, and rewards are waiting for us. Because their mistakes can also lead to mutual pain, the human family is one and their members will help each other through their good behavior. For example, what happened to Jesus? He suffered for all the sins of mankind and saved them through all these. Nature's evil. Contrary to moral evil, natural evil is evil created by manipulation of the natural processes, in which case we can not make morally accountable for anyone. Typical examples of natural disasters are natural disasters such as cyclones and earthquakes causing major pain and loss of life, diseases such as leukemia and Alzheimer's disease, disorders such as blindness and hearing loss. However, you need to perform important identification at this point. Human error or negligence has brought many things that are usually conveyed as natural evil. For example, lung cancer can be caused by massive smoking; the loss of human life caused by the earthquake is mainly due to positioning irresponsible urban planners finally undulating and positioning their work on disjointed obstacles. A careless approach that might prevent droughts and floods When discussing natural evil evil philosophical issues, there is usually a difference between moral evil and natural evil. Moral evil (rough) It brings evil, drought etc, where evil is natural, (seemingly) bad behavior caused by illicit power (for example, hurricane, tornado) by humans (creation or other living things). In natural forest fires, deer burns are examples of natur

Macbeth 's power problem "Everyone greedy to you is poisoned" (Slide 126) In the Shakespeare play' Macbeth ', a person named Macbeth murdered the famous King Duncan in search of power. But during his reign, Macbeth showed he could not seize the power and responsibility to become a king. Pursuit of power and maintenance of power are the roots of his collapse. Macbeth does not mean to have authority outside Cody's Thane. When Macbeth was king, he was not wisely using his authority. One of the most important person among William · Shakespeare's "Lady · Macbeth" and "Macbeth 's" Macbeth "is Mrs. Macbeth. In the introduction of the fifth act of the first act, Mrs. Macbeth was brought in to the play. In this monologue, after reading the letter from her husband Macbeth, Mrs Macbeth commented on her idea and told her about the witch's prophecies about the possibility of royal power. - Power of the Macbeth Witch The myth and religion include sacred or evil creatures with incredible power. William Shakespeare has a witch with strange power in his play "Macbeth". These witches have a devil's power to set the event process in the plot and enhance the story's hobby. Macbeth 's power problem "Everyone greedy to you is poisoned" (Slide 126) In the Shakespeare play' Macbeth ', a person named Macbeth murdered the famous King Duncan in search of power. But during his reign, Macbeth showed he could not seize the power and responsibility to become a king. Pursuit of power and maintenance of power are the roots of his collapse. Macbeth does not mean to have authority outside Cody's Thane. - Fate is the fate of a person, not human understanding, it is a greater power to transcend human understanding. Destiny is so powerful that you can control the results of people before life happens. You can see how many people are victims of destiny and how they look in the future, but they do not fully grasp the results. Even just the power of Macbeth, there are various kinds of power. But sometimes people with power are not the best people to have this power. This is especially true for Macbeth at William Shakespeare. Through the script, three witches and Mrs Macbeth were the most influential people in Macbeth 's life. The more power a person has, the more they rot. - Power aspiration in Macbeth of William Shakespeare * Undead work of his desire for Macbeth 's fate and power was confirmed and destroyed by three witches and Mrs. Macbeth. All acts committed by Macbeth affect the whole kingdom. Macbeth 's honesty and understanding of success brought this destruction. This power aspiration leads to Macbeth, the evil that exists for everyone, just like any other person.

In Arthur Miller's "Chura", the main character Abigail Williams is a wicked and confident girl who is trying to get what he wants. Abigail defended her name and life by evil means. The most powerful portrayal of evil in 'Chura' by Abigail Williams. Evil is shown in many ways through Abigail. Abigail used three main methods to achieve evil desire. Abigail shows her evil through riots, craziness, and accusations Abigail was a prostitute who killed evil evil. Her relationship with John Proctor and her hostility towards Goody Proctor arise from her evil sensual attitude. Abigail loves John, but John has only a desire for her due to her marriage. When Abigail talked about John and their relationship, this desire became clear. Did you have a dream? When she ran out me, I saw your face, then you loved me, you have done it now! (22) Then John replied: "Before I find you again I will cut my hand." John knew that he repented his way by doing the wrong thing It was. Run away and stay with him. Abigail deliberately handed over to John Procter, even if he was already married. This shows that Abigail 's desire for John is the desire for ordinary prostitutes of the world pleasure. Abigail is evil and uses her spirit to control the situation. Through constant lies and threats, this madness becomes obvious. Abigail expressed respect for the surface, but she concealed anger and rude. She replied that she wanted to protect her name, lied to Paris in the first act, "Nobody is naked! You made a mistake yourself, Uncle!" (11). She is also very aggressive and powerful, and other girls are afraid of her. When Mary Warren suggested that they should acknowledge Dansin The village of Salem is ruled by men, but it is dominated by the power of God. Abigail warned Mr. Danfoss "Using the common fear of the devil," ... you are so powerful that wisdom does not go up with the power of hell "(108). page). By doing so, Abigail will be sent to Salim's sinners to salvation, as if she was the messenger of God, as if her words were ultimate, in her words It is planting fear for people who are against it. In this drama, the fear of supernatural power is particularly evident Abigail wants to convince everyone that if they dare to oppose her, they may be victims of evil spirits It is. The fear of demons is great, but the fear of God is also heavy. She did not acknowledge that Rebecca nurse was lynched, she cried: "What should I do?" (P. Rebecca nurse is brave because she is not afraid of death and is not afraid of evil spirits, but she is really afraid of the wrath of God. When we read the Word of God, we accept that word as a Holy Spirit in the form of life. And the Holy Spirit is a word, killing our emotions directly and indirectly killing evil forces. The word we accepted as the Holy Spirit became a sword to kill the enemy. Clearly, the sword of the Holy Spirit kills our emotions; in fact, it uses our emotions to kill demons in the air. John Proctor came to know what Betty's problem is. He faced Abigail and said that he was only pretending that Betty is sick or possessed by a demon. When Proctor and Abigail made this conversation, it was clear that they had a relationship, Abigail worked with the Proctor family, and Proctor's wife, Elizabeth, was sick. Abigail tried to cheat with Proctor, but he said firmly that their relationship had ended. Abigail blames Elizabeth for his behavior, one day they said they would gather again.

According to Christian faith, the power of good and the power of evil Most Christians believe that the devil or Satan is the power of evil and that God is the power of good. Satan is an old Middle Eastern word meaning "plaintiff". Satan appeared at various times in the Bible contrary to God. Satan, in the form of a snake, tempted the Adam and the Eve to eat the apple, so they did not obey God. Satan also tested Job again and even tempted it to abandon his ministry to Jesus (but failed). According to Maloney (1976), the belief in Eye of Evil is the most common belief in the world, even beyond the three major monotheistic and surprisingly incompatible beliefs. In this belief, human beings have very real power not only through action but also by applying evil to others through appearance. Therefore, evil is unique to man. Evil is not a devil but comes from self - or both, but it must be there for everyone. It is not a bright picture of human nature, then mass murder, rape, homicide, defamation, liars, serial killer, news of war ... the pictures you get are not very bright Is humanity an inner evil? Still like weeds, what about environmental protection? Or like demons, external, external forces? The reason why the devil is evil is Eden's universal belief in the Old Testament about the temptation of Christ in the new times. Devils, demons, ghosts are often mentioned in the Quran. The idea for this temptation was developed by "CS Lewis' wisdom and resourceful" The Screwtape Letters ". These are said to teach young demons a letter, but this is a question about how we deceive ourselves. To prove the irony of protecting yourself - Behaviors of interest to make others pay. At the time, people believed in good and evil, but some pop singer screamed "I do not believe in good and evil". "If God is good, it will continue, so the problem of evil is presented to Christians in the form of complex questions, if he is strong enough to block malicious acts, He must become a god of evil himself, because he does not do anything, even if he has that ability. "But the Bible did not create the world in the present state of God Evil is caused by human selfishness.The Bible says that God is a god of love He wants to be a man who creates people and eventually loves him But true love can not exist as long as it is not free to accept the love of God or to refuse it through free choice.This choice is a very realistic possibility of evil I will make it.

Racism is not new, it has existed for thousands of years. Even a book full of love and peace, it brings some racial circumstances. Around 1140 BC, a wonderful new widow and her mother-in-law came to Jerusalem, began their lives, accepted by the people of God. Unfortunately, widowed loose is not a "chosen" person. She is Moab, considered a Jewish heathen. Ruth wants to clean up at the scene, so she and her mother-in-law can eat, Jewish women avoided. This is an unacceptable concept. Part of the reason is how white people handle the term 'racial discrimination'. Racism itself is an evil act rooted in colonialism, exploitation, torture, betrayal, and atrocity, and whites can not rule their ancestors over 100 years now. Do evil. The act that continues to occur under the name of racial discrimination is a horrible crime against humanity. They have to end now. However, racism is also a system created around these crimes against humanity, designed to keep power and autonomy away from blacks. This system is maintained at all levels, and in all public and private systems. Racism and Caucasian supremacy are in law, rule, education, and media. We all teach that through books, music, and television, white is always better than black. Light always beats the darkness. White is pure and black is bad I understand many people think that racism is the root of all evil. That is why they can blame the victory of cards with white's superiority and ignorance. That's why some voters are terrible, but they can keep Clinton's policy. They do not know what they did! But can the system like racial discrimination exist in a vacuum? Can we really distinguish the concept of racial discrimination and indivisible capitalism exploitation? The fact that wealth is concentrated in the hands of a few people is not a small problem, but a system of design, and racism is one of the tools that a few people are squeezing a lot of people It is not. Why is racism so sweet? Today it gives power. Racial discrimination is a terrible prejudice that once studied racial discrimination, people learn to live together, if it is not necessary evil, then it is inevitable from then. However, the civil rights movement and the independence movement around the world changed this. In the 1960s, the redefinition of racial discrimination in public consciousness was evident evil and was the worst of all social evils. America suddenly fell into a moral dilemma. The public's perception of the past racial discrimination of the country has compromised its moral authority by confirming that the principle of democracy and the rule of law are not sufficiently corresponded. Only strict ethical accounting can restore legitimacy. Therefore, reimbursement - repaying public sins - becomes a moral requirement for new political and cultural liberalism

JL Mackie's "evil and omnipotent" philosopher JL Mackie wrote an article about a very compelling evil called "evil and omnipotent" and that one of the following premises must be fake I tried to prove. To keep them consistent with each other. # 1 God is omnipotent. # 2 God is morally perfect. # 3. Evil exists. The problem of evil is the interpretation of transcendental argument, its aim is to prove the absence of God. In addition to Mackie's three main premises, he also introduced several "quasi-logic" rules that provide further evidence of his claim. The logical argument makes the theory impossible because the existence of evil is logically incompatible with the existence of omnipotent, omnipotent God. J. L. Mackie argues from this viewpoint and claims that the nature of Theists is incompatible with the existence of evil. In his essay "Evil and Almighty", McGee defines evil as all kinds of pain and suffering, and definitions of evil universally accepted by philosophers. Then he proposed the following premise: JL Mackie's "evil and omnipotent" philosopher JL Mackie wrote an article about a very compelling evil called "evil and omnipotent" and that one of the following premises must be fake I tried to prove. To keep them consistent with each other. # 1 God is omnipotent. # 2 God is morally perfect. # 3. Evil exists. The problem of evil is the interpretation of transcendental argument, its aim is to prove the absence of God. In addition to Mackie's three main premises, he also introduced several "quasi-logic" rules that provide further evidence of his claim. In "Evil and Almighty", J. McKee attacks the view of the existence of God by showing the weakness of the theologian's possible solutions to the evil problem. When he published a free will argument, his most influential argument involved the relationship between omnipotent paradox and the totipotency and kindness of God. One possible solution to the problem of evil is that there is no need for good or good without evil. There are two problems with this solution. Because it disputes God's versatility and kindness. Then God should not think that there is no totipotency, or at least his totipotency is not limited, as God can not do good without evil. Because God restricts his power, he does not create what he binds. The second solution criticized by Mackie is that it is necessary to insist that evil is a means to get good.

Dr. Gimbaldo uses contextual perspectives to understand, manage and prevent antisocial behavior. This view contrasts with traditional trends. Traditional trends place evil in personal trends and observe internal factors and characteristics of the person. Contextual differences, unlike propensity, often use experimental and laboratory studies to prove life phenomena, while other ideas are used to show these answers either archives or related data May be used. I have taught smart college students because the whole society as a whole is determined to be very inclined, but it is difficult to understand the analysis of evil, prejudice, or any pathological behavior by the situationist . Good deed, bad guys do bad things. This is part of our institutional thinking. This is the complete meaning of psychiatry. This is the complete meaning of medicine. This is the complete meaning of the legal system. This is the complete meaning of the religious system. We place a good heart on people's mind and put bad people in mind. It is deeply rooted in the way we think, but this is sometimes true, but it is necessary to recognize that there may be powerful but subtle social forces in the given environment I assert there is potential change force Abigail Rosenthal nominated for the Pulitzer Prize is a philosophical question about evil from a literary point of view. How can we recognize it? How can I resist it? After examining the philosophical and psychological literature on malicious matter, Rosenthal decided that the answer was not satisfactory, so I used a literary approach to solve the problem. By doing so, Rosenthal shows what evil is, and how it is a long-term threat to us. In the first chapter, Rosenthal believes that we live according to an ideal rational story. The reason is the ability to look back and forth on our lives to find "ideal clue for your life", not Ruthenthal's ruthless consistency (for example, acting at the highest efficiency as its intended goal) (6). ) It is a lifelong curious attitude towards the meaning of life rather than finding clear answers or getting absorbed in an unreasonable way.

As an agnostic, Elman represents an agnostic. Since agnosticism can not deal effectively with the mystery problem of evil, it is important to solve this view to solve the mystery of evil. They have faith, but I hope that pain and suffering have clear purpose, especially in the context of our own existence. The desire to deliberately give pain repeatedly guided the culture of seeking God (or god) for worship in exchange for custody in the event of a disaster. The existence of evil in the world is a mystery. Christians have already raised fantasies about evil and human free will, but others just accepted this mystery. If you are an atheist and you are interested in evil, you need a small step to say that God must have some evil elements, or God's thought is evil It is necessary to step on. A man who is afraid of God is a man who can not hate God by accepting God for all the evils of the world. But it is actually another iteration of monotheistic thinking In an eerie scene at the beginning of "work" please let God and Satan speak to each other like a satiric gentleman gamblers met by accident at Saratoga in a wonderful essay on the mystery of evil. God seems to carefully blind Satan, and indeed, ask Satan, what did you do for yourself? Satan has taken a wise answer, but indeed, I check the world around the world. Then God and Satan made a formidable ironic bet about how much pain the yoke cracked and cursed God before. Of course, we need to ask ourselves. "Why does God send evil spirits to torture someone?" I hope that Satan will do this. The answer may be found in the first two chapters of Job. There I read that Satan must first obtain permission from God to bring great suffering to saints. Satan is the direct cause of Job's suffering, but Satan is helpless without God's permission. Just because God allows it, work is entrusted to Satan 's hands. I think that it is also in our text, so the author can say that this is a "demon from the Lord". God is not a direct cause of Saul's troubles, but he ultimately controls. This may be quite different from what we have found in the New Testament:

There are many evils of good and evil in the world of Christian faith. The suffering in the world is caused by human evil, but there is also a kind of distress caused by things in our world such as hurricanes and earthquakes This is called evil of nature. When people deliberately abuse or dishonor the world, this is called moral evil. Natural disasters are caused by natural disasters such as floods. Christianity has fought against the problem of evil. As we know today, as we know today there are multiple beliefs about why there is evil in the first century before Paul's Christianity. Professor Bad Ehrman is one of the earliest Christian's most capable historians. In "lost Christianity" he summarizes some of the different different main beliefs of primitive Christian about the source of evil: Hindu and Buddhism interpret evil as a result of Karma. Even though our actions seem to be unfair, even if the current sufferings seem to be unfair, karma will serve the judiciary for a long time. This is not fair - it is a delay penalty. The operation of Karma can be seen as an explanation of intent without intent, but the problem of evil does not exist in this belief system. There is no fundamental contradiction between the concept of sacred or universal law and the existence of pain. Is that person basically good or evil? Perhaps the beliefs about good and evil are more appropriate in your value theory (see below), but this question is very important to your people's perception. Western ideas based on Christian principles basically convict corrupt people and always resist the nature of evil, but even today some believe in this belief, but the environment and this kindness Opportunity to express. Perhaps more generally, humans are basically neither good nor evil, but morally neutral at birth, whether people follow the path of good and evil depends on external influence and will. The good and evil of the good people Flannery O'Connor uses all elements of humor, irony, and public opinion in the system of evil and redemption of Christian faith. My daughter is 12 years old and loses her leg in a hunting accident and has a tree's leg instead of Joy's personality, but this is not clear. It is becoming increasingly clear that the physical pain of Joey closely resembles everywhere in the story. Trapped in the desert island, the plane crashed. This classic novel intertwines with many themes related mainly to the inner evil of the existence of human beings and the malicious nature of human beings. Among the "flying kings", Golding showed a gradual change in boys from civilized, polite to savage and ceremonialized beasts. From

To what extent is the novel, Dr. Jekyll and Hyde's strange case explores the concept of mankind including right and wrong. This article faces the problem of right and wrong, and its usage and theory in the book "Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde's dirty case". The story is based on Mr. Utterson, a longtime friend of Dr. Jetyll seeking the truth and connection between Jekyll and Hyde, and finally recognizes that they are actually the same person. Dr. Robert Luis Stevenson's doctor Dr. Jarrell and Mr. Hyde's through the story of Robert Luis Stevenson's "Strange case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde" good and evil in Mr. Hyde's strange case, We advocate his view - among us, we all have dark evil aspect, waiting for the evil to appear. He realized this idea using two heroes, Dr. Jekyll and Haid. Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde's strange incident was the first Gothic novel published by Scottish author Robert Louis Stevenson in 1886. This work is also known as Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde, Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde's strange case, or simply Jekyll and Hyde. This is about a strange incident between London's lawyer named Gabriel John Utterson and Evil Edward Hyde who investigated his old friend Dr. Henry Jekyll. With the influence of the novel, using the phrase "Jekyll and Hyde", it will be part of the language, using words that point to people with unexpected duality. Normally very good, sometimes shocking evil Dr. Robert Stevens Jekyll and Dr. Hyde's strange incidents Dr. Jekyll and Dr. Hyde's strange affair showed Jekyll as a symbol of the power of good and evil of two human beings, Jekyll and Hyde's confrontation . These characters give life to the inner fight between the two forces of the soul. In this story, Jekyll explains the good aspects of humanity. He is the protagonist of the novel. Dr. Jekyll is a smart, tall, dignified middle-aged man. People who know him respect him. Strange case of Jekyll and Hyde? Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde's strange incident Question: What Stevenson proposed the concept of humanity with the novel "Dr. Jekyll and Hydo's strange incident"? Throughout Stevenson's lifetime, he saw them from two different perspectives. After that, he wrote a split personality novel called "Strange case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde" and continued to show his experience. This article will comment ... And Stevenson 's doctor Jekyll and Mr. Hyde' s use of binary concept 'Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde' were written by Robert Louis Stephenson in the 19th century. This was written when the Victorian society had many strong moral values. These values ​​are extremely strict and influence every aspect of the Victorian lifestyle. Rebellion against aggression, fighting, and oral discussion is more common. Hostile acts can even be regarded as evil

When Ralf saw the navy officers on the island rescue them, he noticed that he returned to civilization. The shock pondered what happened to him. Rescue does not produce happiness, but instead he desperately desires what he has experienced. The fact that he is awake is that he is never the same. He lost his innocence and learned himself and the evil in the whole from his experience on the island. Ralph's revelation about the innocence of juveniles and the loss of social order can be revealed by the collapse of the democratic government, the killing of pigs, and the death of pig and Simon. This article explores William Golding, which is the three elements of natural evil in the fly's lord, from savage changes to civilization to beasts and wars to the island. Golding expresses evil through his role, through their actions and symbols. The island is the greatest representation of evil as it is where the whole novel occurs. - Lord of the Flies: A story of a fateful journey Humans never saw their true perfect example. Through some of his own mistakes, he can never reach the ideal height he desires to achieve. "Holy" Michelangelo named after the modern biographer Georgio Vasari was never complete his masterpiece on the ceiling of the Sistine Chapel. When it was discovered, Pope Julius II prayed when he saw this "holy perfect work". William Golding believes that all human beings are born with evil but are dominated by social restrictions. At Golding 's novel "The Lord of the Flies", school boys collided with an airplane on the island where school boys landed during the Second World War, and were obliged to live without adult supervision. Hunting and killing pigs are the way used by boys to get meat and they are using chant and dance to celebrate. Golding's theory is supported through progress as a natural evil face and beyond the boy Over the centuries philosophers have discussed whether human beings were born to be evil. William Golding raised this problem with his real novel "The Lord of the Flies". During the Second World War, the novel was on the tropical island, at the beginning of the novel the boys from England flew to safe places and their planes were shot down. Adults can not survive, boys can manage and save. In the flies of the Lord, William Golding uses symbolism in the form of snails to represent the concept of society. The relationship between these boys and snail shells is constantly evolving and shows the theme of the golding.

Please do not see evil. Robert Bell New York: Crown Press, 2002. The attack on the World Trade Center on 11th September 2001 shocked the world. Many people are dying, and the wounds remain in the hearts of people. No whether it can predict the whole, but Robert Bell can avoid it in his book "I can not see evil." This book is a memory of those who joined the CIA to satisfy his curiosity about what happened in the world, and the problems faced by the CIA and the internal stories he had never heard before It began to realize. . In Shakespeare's "Macbeth", we are seeing a lot of evils; I am seeing evil people, but I am seeing evil behavior. We can see - most - everyone has an evil desire. But only truly evil people will work on this impulse and make moral mistakes. The behavior of evil does not necessarily mean the soul of evil, but Mrs Macbeth is obviously not evil. They had doubts before her and her husband finished the murder. If someone doubts the sin they want to commit, how can pure evil exist? The problem of evil is how to harm the existence of evil with omnipotence, omnipotence, and the god of omniscience (see Theism). The assertion of evil insists that God does not exist or has not all three attributes due to evil. Traditionally, opposing attempts have been discussed under the headings of the theory. In addition to religious philosophy, the problem of evil is also important in the field of theology and ethics. Evil problems usually form in two forms. It is a logical problem of evil and proof of evil. The logical form of the discussion attempts to show the logical impossibility in the coexistence of God and evil and the form of evidence is that when we consider the evils of the world, we have an omnipotent omniscient and perfectly good god Try to show. . The problem of evil has two branches. Evil logic problem (LPOE) seeks to prove that the existence of evil contradicts the existence of omnipotence and omnipotent existence. The evidence evidence question (EPOE) tries to prove that the existence of an amount or kind of evil contradicts the existence of somewhat effective and benevolent entity. Of course, not all Gods are considered omnipotent, omnipotent, or either. Many gods are morally defective, positive evil, simply indifferent, and not omnipotent. The evil logical matter does not apply to these gods, but evidence of evil evidence still holds true. This is consistent with the idea of ​​evil. That is, there are defective evil, irrelevant, or totipotent entities compatible with reality and the existence of omnipotent and omnipotent entities is not.

Since human beings' creation, people have sought knowledge and learning. As the Snake of the Garden of Eden tried to eat the apple forbidden by Eve to good and evil trees, she promised to be as clever as God, and humans continued to fight this endless pursuit. Some people are seeking wisdom to live beautifully upright lives. Other people just want to use the power that knowledge can bring for their sinful purpose. The tree of life is mentioned in Genesis; it is different from the tree of knowledge of good and evil. After Adam and Eve did not obey God by eating fruit from right and wrong trees, they were driven out of the Garden of Eden. However, staying in the garden is a tree of life. A small angel with a flame sword was placed on the east side of the garden to prevent them from entering the tree in the future. (Genesis 3: 22-24) In the proverb, the tree of life is related to wisdom. "For them, the tree of life is to capture her, the tree of life is to capture her." (Proverbs) 3: 13-18) 15: 4 The tree of life is in a calm relationship. "The tongue of comfort is the tree of life, but the one that is remote is the scar of the soul." This story - literally - is as old as they came. In ancient Hebrew, the forbidden trees that end human beings in heaven are called :,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, ,,,,,,,, Humanity, the Bible began to tell us that we faced a basic choice: to make the world good (literally "meaning for us") and evil (not literally) Dare to divide it or accept life. The story says that humans have insufficient choice. But this oldest moral dilemma has brought us an impossible situation. Because there is no harmless friendship between man and nature in the world. If this is actually a fundamental problem, we have no relationship but we can only give it up. Because without a real version human beings can not survive from this tree and still can not survive. Our existence arises from our unique ability to adjust our creative abilities to remake nature only by separating good and evil among people.

Evil is a harmful force and it can harm people who adopted it and its victims. In Macbeth of William · Shakespeare, the main characters Macbeth and Macbeth were put under evil control. Evil commits distorted violence to people and forces them to control their bodies and minds. "In Macbeth, evil is contrary to human nature, opposite human nature, evil comes from human heart" (Pilkinton). Macbeth succumbed to evil by his imperfection and greed, and he thereby disrupted the chain of prescribed existence. The easiest way to ignore practical problems is to blame it for "evil". What is evil? Is greed is evil? Is selfish evil? Madness? It will undoubtedly make each of these things manageable. "Evil" pretends not to pretend that we are the natural force we can never control, but how to cope with real resistance. Is effective implementation of measures to manage access to high lethal weapons effective? Can we achieve measurable differences by making people experiencing suspicious ideas and behaviors more susceptible to proper mental healthcare? Is it possible to ease social tension by strengthening efforts to fight poverty? In his evil ship, Lawrence Thomas believes that madness can not do bad things (p. 98). Thomas' view of non-experts, psychiatrists, philosophers about the relationship between evil and insanity is common. In this section we will consider whether to eliminate insanity. A part of the problem with evaluating the idea that madness can not do bad things is that it is not always clear that we use the word "crazy" to point to us. According to the short Oxford English dictionary, crazy people are in a state of mind eliminating normal perception, behavior and normal social interaction, they are angry, mental or mentally ill. But "crazy" Thomas and others believe that madness can not do bad things, but there is no reason to hold that. I am sick. G. A person with obsessive-compulsive disorder or spider phobia can not do bad things

Discuss Stevenson's depiction of the nature of good and evil and the duality of personality. Jekyll and Haid are novels about a man named Henry Jekyll. Dr. Jekyll drank medicine twice to double himself, Mr. Hyde. Dr. Jekyll is a considerate man. Mr. Hyde is evil. When Jekyll lawyer Mr. Utterson saw the widow of Dr. Jekyll, his doubt appeared. Dr. Jekyll 's will, when Dr. Jekyll disappeared, he was all suspicious because Mr. Jekyll left everything he left behind. When discussing men, there was always an old question "Is men naturally good or not bad?" There are many arguments that people were born of evil. There are many objections that people were born to be good people. Which one? Are people naturally good and evil? This is the reason I am here. I will present a discussion on both sides, perhaps there will be some very different arguments and then share my view on me. The purpose of this paper is not to tell you which is right and which is bad, but to make people think about his nature. I conducted a questionnaire at the Internet Forum and naturally asked what people think is a man. 33% of people believe that men were born for good and evil, 28% think men are neither good nor evil, 28% believe that men are born as evil . When I asked this question, I thought that people would say only "good" or "bad". I will not let them say "no" or "both." I was most surprised that "good" is very low and "evil" is very high. Is human nature evil? Is possible. Many people think that humans are completely selfish, just by looking for themselves. Hsün Tzu said that human nature is obviously evil. Hsün Tzu wrote in 300 BC "Human nature is evil". Tzu believes that the essence of human beings is inherently bad and needs to be taught by teachers to overcome this problem. He does not fully understand what human nature is. Tzu also believes that if a person is missing something on their own, they will look for something that others are missing. The last time he spoke was how to distinguish between good and evil. Hsün Tzu believes that the nature of man is evil of nature, but in part it is correct, but he does not believe in Mencius's view. The reason for Tzu Chi applies to people in everyday life, because when they are born they do not know good and evil, he says that when people say they look for attributes missing from the people around him he is right I think.

Computer fanatics - Good or bad Adolf Hitler, Benito Mussorini, Charles Manson, and David Colleche are all fanatics of certain characters. These fanatics did not give any beneficial side effects to people, but they caused death, and one of them was world war. Some fanatics have helped our way of life and added fanatics through entertainment, but the fanatics are not necessarily bad. Fanatic enthusiasts like Michael Jordan and Larry Bird made basketball more interesting. Fanatic people are enthusiastic or passionate people who are not extreme and critical. You may ask why Apple and Google are different. This blog focuses on the endless battle between the two rival companies and their enthusiastic fans. This name also refers to good and evil, or the ancient war between David and Goliath. Or more evil and evil, like giants and Goliath. Perhaps we can resolve which one is better and continue our daily life. Please also send a topic's suggestion Good and evil - The big struggle between good and evil seems to be paradoxical. It is good to exist, but there is no evil. "Evil", we mean the opposite of good and the opposite. Power to oppose equality and inconsistent power. But that is not the case. On the contrary, what we call evil is a lack of good. When it becomes good and evil, we are not saying that there is no evil in the world, but it says that it does not exist. It is the same as light and dark. The presence of light not only proves the existence, it can measure and artificially create it. But the darkness does not exist. There are no particles or waves called "darkness". Darkness is what happens when there is no light. There is no light. Things without "good" always cause "bad" ones. Even my problem will be subject to scrutiny by philosophy of good and evil. Who decides what is good? Who decides what is wrong? We classify goodwill as a simple one. There is no direct harm to other people. Evil is directly related to specific events and behaviors deliberately made to hurt other people. You do not need to get into the Internet deeply and know that the block chain has been done numerous times with malicious intent. Silk Road was never evil, but people are using scattered markets and encryption currencies for drug trafficking, child pornography, weapons trafficking, trafficking and assassinations. Some of these incidents are rare, but other incidents such as child pornography and drug trafficking are prevalent throughout dark networks. Narcotics and drug users are not bad, but some drug suppliers are taking dangerous actions. We found that a large amount of MDMA purchased from Silk Road is a bath salt

Fear evils human heart. In William Golding 's novel "Lord of the Flies", British boys became fugitive on uninhabited islands. When these boys lived on the island, rumors about the beast spread. And, I revealed the boys' atrocities. Compared to Simon, the moral worsening of the boy becomes more obvious, Simon is a pure soul and despite epilepsy he travels to dangerous mountains and discovers the truth of the beast . Symbols of religion such as Simon, Lie and Life of the fly indicate that when good and evil conflict, fear and ignorance become dangerous enemies of reason. When we (the author) talk about evil, we choose to associate fear with evil (harmful behavior). As long as it is related to evil, Socrates believes fear is an expression of ignorance. For Socrates, wisdom includes understanding what is the right of fear and what fear of fear is. In other words, fear itself is not wrong, harmful or bad. The fear of man grows bigger and hence has a strong life and its own influence. Fear is related to Socrates ignorance, which often prevent us from getting better knowledge. Through fear we are prohibited from trying to get better knowledge. Through fear, we often simplify our responsibility for moral reasoning quickly and easily. This is especially true if you have to choose ethics in the most terrible situation. Therefore, even if it is a product of ignorance, fear may be partly a factor of moral weakness. For Socrates, the only thing to worry about is unethical behavior. Evil is a problem for me. I grew up in a house incorporating the concept of Hannah Arendt's evil mediocrity. My parents told me that "evil" comes from ignorance, fear, and lack of cautious independent thinking and is not part of Satan's power and evil spells. But this is semantics. So I replaced the word "evil" with "lazy and frightening ignorance". Britney Howard is the lead singer of Alabama Shakes, and I am a bit crazy about her. This week she received an interview with Fresh Air, a rare soul. Listening to her story depicting her obvious difficult childhood without suffering, sadness, or self refusing is really confusing. Even Triglos seems to be dissatisfied with Howard's coolness. This is a wonderful interview Evil includes all moral and natural evil. Modern philosopher Marcus Singer further defines this as "the worst condemnation word imaginable". We do not deny that evil continues to appear in a very visible form in the world. After analysis, the existence of evil forms inconsistency with the existence of God. If God is truly aware, he already knows that something evil is going to happen. In such a case, what he does is to omnipotence and to do so so that his ubiquitous character prevents these evils from happening

Let's think about a bystander who has nothing to do with fire. But even if he was able to save the child without hurting himself, he refused help. Can such bystanders be called okay? of course not. If we do not think that humans are good in this situation, what is the reason why we can continue to observe the good of the Almighty God? [1] Sometimes, when people encounter difficulties, no one can help them, they will not help them. Given his infinite power, in these circumstances God can certainly help them without risking themselves ... so if God is a man he is in trouble I can not help people. Even if it is a general legal condition, it is considered infringement. [2] First of all, God has certain moral rights against the life we ​​do not have. Philosopher Richard Swinburn wrote that "As author of our existence, God has the right to us, we do not have the rights to our brothers." [3] Similarly, parents have certain rights to their children, and they do not have these rights to other children. Because God is the creator and maintainer of everyone, God decides how long we can live. God eventually deprived everyone of their lives. This is called death. I recognize this when the surgeon returns someone to life. He can say that he is "playing a god". God allows everyone to die; when is the problem? We live everyday - not as a right - by God's mercy Second, since we are guilty of sin, we do not have the moral right to God. When the apologen RC sprawl was asked why God allowed a good man to do bad things, he said, "I have not seen a good person yet, I do not know it." [4] I will do so. There is no moral basis for [1] Poiman, Lewis P. "B.C. Johnson" Why does not God interfere to prevent evil? "Philosophy: Seeking the truth New York: Oxford University, 2002. 91-92 [4] Quoted from Rhodes, Ron. If God is good, why does bad things happen? Eugene, or. : Harvest House, 2004. 68 In short, this is an "evil question": "Why do personal and thoughtful gods create a world of evil?" "Why does God give mankind the freedom of sin?" The reasons for atheists "The god of love will not allow evil to exist in his world", the essence of God - love - and desire for humanity - summarized in love There. Look at the logic: How does God acknowledge love without the possibility of evil? God might have created a robot unless you say forever that "I love you, I love you, I love you." But such creatures will not be able to establish a true love relationship. "My young children do not use words, do not use your tongue, do not use actions and truth" (1 John 3:18). As long as you do not have the ability to love, love is not true. If you can choose to choose to love God rather than love God, you can establish a true love relationship with God. Evil questions are sometimes interpreted as a result of free will. That is the power given by God. Free will is the cause of both good and evil and is also free will and may be abused like personal behavior. People with free will decide to "cause pain and behavior in other bad ways," Boyd said, and that is not God, it is they who made this choice. In addition, free will insist that God prevents evil from logically contradicting by forcing and limiting free will. In order to formulate a modified discussion, first let's ask under what conditions God will evil without intermediate knowledge luxury. The condition that God requires to allow one evil E is necessary for E (or some evil) to logically be caused by the occurrence of a certain overload, or ensured not exceeding evil about it. But this is not a sufficient condition. The hypothetical scenario is such that there are objectively good reasons to believe that no further benefit is gained or that greater evil is not hindered. In this case, if he allowed E to happen, God is obviously responsible for serious recklessness and negligence - this is not a property that one wishes to be attributed to a complete existence. Therefore:

Sarah, evil hostess Eve faced poor Sarah and showed her pregnancy with Abraham, but Sarah had to trouble at Abraham's house. To understand Sarah's decision to transfer Hagall to Abraham, embarrassment to Sarah's reaction to Hagar's concept, anger, and why Sarah has true responsibility for negative circumstances in relation to Hagar I can. Genesis at 11:30, initially we regret Sarai's absurd things. Maleficent (/ məlɛfɪsənt / or / məlɪfɪsənt /) is a fictitious person who appeared in the 16th animated movie "Summer Beauty" (1959) by Walt Disney Pictures. She was an evil fairy tale, confessed as an "evil mistress", but she was not invited to be baptized, and she was "invited to the axle of the spinning car with his finger" before the sunset, Princess Aurora I cursed. . The foundation of Maleficent is a villa that appears in "Little Briar Rose" talking about Charlie Perot's fairy tale "The Sleeping Beauty"'s evil fairy godmother and the Grimm Brothers story. Eleanor Audrey once provided the voice of Mrs. Tremaine to the evil stepmother of Cinderella (1950). Maleficent is animated by Marc Davis After the sleeping beauty of 1957 was invited to be baptized, Motherficent cursed the innocent baby, the grandmother of the evil fairy. The self-proclaimed "all evil mistress" was later reworked as a tragic hero after 55 years, and she and the king were a lover until he and his betrayal lost her wings. This evil witch was named after the words "malicious" and "malicious." Please create a new adjective against the word "charity", answer the word "gorgeous", please show me the meaning of one of the most evil Disney characters in the version depicted. A powerful witch she teaches, its spells are irreversible to everyone, love of respect and dignity is a very important key to survive. To explain the problem of magic and evil, Hawthorne used erotic hostess Hibbins. Although governors of Billingham and Wilson are unconsciously flawed, Mr. Hibbles worships "black people" badly and openly. Hawthorn and her brother, the governor of Bellingham, lived in a mansion, and he wrote that Hibbins's "disproportionate appearance seems to shadow the new look of the house" (115) . The mistress of Boston hostess Hibbins, often referred to as a witch, is only accepted for her brother to be a famous leader, Govenner Bellingham. Hawthorne distinguishes Hibbins' performance in the masses from Hester's performance and reminds the reader the hidden and hidden society of villain society.

Horse goodness and evil are resonating with the work of Scottish poet Edwin Muir, a concept of good and evil. Good and evil, guilt and innocence are also among the darkest illusions in Muir 's important poem "Horses". But this poem is not destroyed by art. Many of those poems are so. "Horses" talked about new horses that came back suddenly after a catastrophe and regained "old friendship" with the surviving people. The narrator accused the "old world" that caused the damage: in the twelve months after the 7 - day war the world was asleep, and in the night a strange horse came. Theme: Good and evil create society Paragraph 1: Central idea: The conflict between the two themes of good and evil is wonderful. This sentence: Through a common story of how to draw good and evil through the hero and the enemies' point of view, create ethics and perspectives, and how social perspectives change with time. The second paragraph: Theme sentence: Explain the general story of good and evil through opposing opinion with the hero. Paragraph 3: Thematic Sentences: Show important morals and opinions among good and evil stories. Paragraph 4: Topic sentences: As a result of the passage of time, the reality brought by good and evil has changed. Paragraph 5: Conclusion: Good and evil represent two different ideas. Good and evil - The big struggle between good and evil seems to be paradoxical. It is good to exist, but there is no evil. "Evil", we mean the opposite of good and the opposite. Power to oppose equality and inconsistent power. But that is not the case. On the contrary, what we call evil is a lack of good. When it becomes good and evil, we are not saying that there is no evil in the world, but it says that it does not exist. It is the same as light and dark. The presence of light not only proves the existence, it can measure and artificially create it. But the darkness does not exist. There are no particles or waves called "darkness". Darkness is what happens when there is no light. There is no light. Things without "good" always cause "bad" ones. Even my problem will be subject to scrutiny by philosophy of good and evil. Who decides what is good? Who decides what is wrong? We classify goodwill as a simple one. There is no direct harm to other people. Evil is directly related to specific events and behaviors deliberately made to hurt other people. You do not need to get into the Internet deeply and know that the block chain has been done numerous times with malicious intent. Silk Road was never evil, but people are using scattered markets and encryption currencies for drug trafficking, child pornography, weapons trafficking, trafficking and assassinations. Some of these incidents are rare, but other incidents such as child pornography and drug trafficking are prevalent throughout dark networks. Narcotics and drug users are not bad, but some drug suppliers are taking dangerous actions. We found that a large amount of MDMA purchased from Silk Road is a bath salt

Contradiction between sex and evil Goodness and evil are one of the most common traditional themes in literature. Dealing with evil is a fundamental struggle mankind must deal with. Sometimes evil comes from the character, sometimes other characters are the source of evil; but evil is something the character can not always overcome. In two Russian novels, "sin and punishment" of Fyodor Dostoevsky and "Master and Margarita" of Mikhail Bulgakov are different for men and women. How to deal with their problems. As a manuscript architect and fictitious writer (at Novel Master and Margarita), Master reveals the main problem of literary immortality, through which it reveals true artists from censorship and oppression society. It was released. It is very cumbersome. In the novel, the torture of the master is reflected in the passion of Jesus Christ, so the pain will be eternal. The two lonely personality "contradicts society because of an unorthodoxic view, disappointed with the world order (called" Jesus ") whether it is Master's Christ or Margarita, the Master is a certain I would like to destroy the manuscript. For example, Yeshua tells Pontius Pilate the way he wants, but can not take himself to the work of burning Matthew Levi, Matthew Levi follows him everywhere and writes everything he says (16). But Warrand strongly opposed Master - "It is impossible. Pontius Pilate is depicted as ruthless in "Master and Margarita" by Mikhail Bulgakov, but it is complicated humanly, this novel explains him and he is a member of Jesus of Saul (Janeus in the novel), he I noticed my affinity and spiritual need for myself and gave him reluctantly and passively to kill him. People Here, Pilate exemplifies that "weakness is the most vicious habit". Therefore, as an example, in the allegorical interpretation of the work "wash hands" by silently or positively participating in the crime All men. Joseph Stalin. In Bulgakov 's novel, Pilate has the title of the Jewish fifth prosecutor and Golden Gunnight.

... Art quoted often "Humanity is bad". Since Mencius believes that humans are leaning naturally into moral behavior, as the author of this article, Xunzi is thought to attack his outstanding predecessors. The truth is that Xunzi is strongly opposed to this immoral attitude. Hsün Tzu said that human nature is obviously evil. Hsün Tzu wrote in 300 BC "Human nature is evil". Tzu believes that the essence of human beings is inherently bad and needs to be taught by teachers to overcome this problem. He does not fully understand what human nature is. Tzu also believes that if a person is missing something on their own, they will look for something that others are missing. The last thing he talked about was how to distinguish between good and evil. Hsün Tzu believes human nature is evil of nature, but it is partially correct, do not believe Mencius's point of view, Tzu believes that humans are looking for attributes not found in other people . The reason for Tzu Chi applies to people in today's everyday life, because people do not know right and wrong when people are born, he thinks he is right, he thinks people have their own attributes to people around them I could not find it. I conducted a questionnaire at the Internet Forum and naturally asked what people think is a man. 33% of people believe that men were born for good and evil, 28% think that men are not children for right and wrong, 28% believe that men were born for good and evil. When I asked this question, I thought that people would only say "good" or "bad". I will not let them say "no" or "both." The most surprising thing about me is that "good" is very low and "evil" is very high. Are humans naturally evil? Is possible. Many people think that humans are completely selfish, just by looking for themselves. When discussing men, there was always an old question "Are people nature good or bad?" There are many arguments that people were born to evil. There are many objections that people were born to be good people. Which one? Are humans naturally good and evil? This is the reason I am here. I will present a discussion on both sides, perhaps there will be some quite different arguments and then share my view on me. The purpose of this article is not to explain which is right and which is wrong but to make people think about people and their nature.

"If the devil goes away from me, I am anxious that my angel will escape." Rainer Maria Rilke wrote this article to explain the human nature. He stated his view on human behavior and people's way of thinking. Without evil, people do not know exactly what is good. Everyone has qualities of right and wrong. It is balanced and it is stable for everyone. In the absence of a person, humans will not be able to distinguish or understand whether their behavior is correct or wrong. It is not evil. Without evil there is no good way to exist. They complement each other, there is no one, you can not have another one. Unfortunately, evil always seems to outweigh that profit. This is reflected in various literary era of history. There are various ways to show good and evil. When someone is kind or considerate, it can be beautiful. - Hippo Augustine (354-430) is one of the most influential thinkers in Christianity. He has contributed many ideas and ideas to Christian theology. One of his most important contributions is the concept of "original sin" and his concept of "evil". These concepts have evolved over the years. Augustine painted their evolution in his 13 autobiographies he wrote in his 40s. In most of the Western intellectual history, studies of evil are reserved for theology. From Augustine and Aquinas to Luther and Calvin, Christian thinkers are crazy about "evil problems", how good a god in our world can have bad things. When Immanuel Kant introduces the concept of extreme evil that exists outside the bounds of reason and will, the eternal problems of evil are released from the exclusive grasp of the church. Perhaps because of its mixed religious and secular qualities, our evil concept creates almost mysterious power in society's impulse to create order from chaos and despair It was. As Susan Neyman wrote in his groundbreaking research, "evil in modern thinking", "The problem of evil can be expressed in terms of theological or secular terms, but basically it is It is understandability of the whole world.

Good and evil are written to answer the following questions. In the story of the garden of Eden, people will understand the difference between good and evil by eating the knowledge tree nuts. This knowledge seems to make Adam and Eve more like God than human beings, like human beings. It is important to human survival how much it faces the task of distinguishing between good and evil and choosing action accordingly. ... How do we know its value and what to do. Good and evil - The big struggle between good and evil seems to be paradoxical. It is good to exist, but there is no evil. "Evil", we mean the opposite of good and the opposite. Power to oppose equality and inconsistent power. But that is not the case. On the contrary, what we call evil is a lack of good. When it becomes good and evil, we are not saying that there is no evil in the world, but it says that it does not exist. It is the same as light and dark. The presence of light not only proves the existence, it can measure and artificially create it. But the darkness does not exist. There are no particles or waves called "darkness". Darkness is what happens when there is no light. There is no light. Things without "good" always cause "bad" ones. Even my problem will be subject to scrutiny by philosophy of good and evil. Who decides what is good? Who decides what is wrong? We classify goodwill as a simple one. There is no direct harm to other people. Evil is directly related to specific events and behaviors deliberately made to hurt other people. You do not need to get into the Internet deeply and know that the block chain has been done numerous times with malicious intent. Silk Road was never evil, but people are using scattered markets and encryption currencies for drug trafficking, child pornography, weapons trafficking, trafficking and assassinations. Some of these incidents are rare, but other incidents such as child pornography and drug trafficking are prevalent throughout dark networks. Narcotics and drug users are not bad, but some drug suppliers are taking dangerous actions. We found that a large amount of MDMA purchased from Silk Road is a bath salt What is good and evil? Evil lacks kindness. It is the only possible living condition because it does not exist in reality and people always have the right to choose between good and evil. For example, an ordinary knife is not evil like it is now, but it is evil going into the hands of criminals. The doctor can use the same knife to save lives. God gives people the opportunity to decide how to handle this knife. I experienced many fights in the long history of humanity. But most importantly it may be a battle between evil and kindness, neat and immoral, altruism and egoism, love and hatred. We face this battle in our daily life, trying to distinguish between evil and good and evil. People choose a value system and trace it in life. Tenderness is important to our mental health and evil is like poison. Kindness is not merely a moral responsibility, it is primarily the nutrition of our soul. Goodwill means peace, love, respect, attention, and mutual aid

In the absence of God, the argument of evil was a widely controversial issue in the discussion of religious philosophy. This question, the traditional God is how some sort of disaster in the world, the ability to stop these events, knowledge, trying to explain what happens when you have the ability. Judaism - "traditional" as seen in the Christian God of monotheism is the Almighty, it should be totally non-directional. If God contains these three features, he wants to stop evil in this world. How does he know? Incomplete arguments are a form of evil debate. Evil discussion, the presence of the evil of the world is strong, is the assertion that there is also a conclusive to prove that God does not exist. Discussion from imperfection is the form of an evil argument that focuses on the imperfections of the world and believes the world can better prove that it was not made by God. The second task to advocate incomplete discussion is to confirm that the world is not perfect. Of course, this discussion is very reasonable; there are many ways to think the world might be better. For example, there are few wars in the world, few unpleasant diseases, or less destructive volcanic eruptions. How about an article based on the fact that there is some evil in the world or an article based on the assumption that at least some natural disasters are included in the world turn into a bad debate that is not abstract? Next, more information will be included. But, in fact, people still show that most of the detailed information on the evil discovered in the world has nothing to do with the evil debate and a little reflection shows how unbelievable this assumption is I believe there is. So, for example, let's consider the world of billions of natural disasters. Is this the starting point for an evil debate? If billions of people if uniformly distributed tens of millions of life, that life is very happy and ecstatic. So it is not easy to see serious bad problems. The argument that escapes from the point of evil is to abstract as much as possible from detailed information on crimes in the world, and the argument that people actually take on such information is not important. But obviously is this correct? For a person, the world will be better without much of evil, but against absolute evil, it is not so. Therefore, dissatisfaction experienced by people trying to solve the problem, will Some people claim to be much more than that to reach the solution. Because of such shortcomings, the world is a better place. Alternatively, some people think that the world will be better if people suffer from disorders including pain and develop satisfying personalities such as perseverance and courage.

The good and evil of mankind Socrates, a famous philosopher, said that "Uncensored life is not worth it". In this idea, the problem is "Is humans inherently evil?" My family is asking. It is called one of the unresolved questions. The determinists have reached the conclusion that we are dominated by the laws of science, and we are not able to do anything because we are naturally evil. Evil is just a painful act. In this article we assert that human beings were born with instinctive evil reaction to "fear and chaos". When philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche (1844 - 1900) wrote his book of 1886 ("Beyond evil and evil: translated as an overture to the future philosophy") Good and evil ") English ), He criticized the previous philosophers for adhering to the concept of traditional and arbitrary good and evil, he did not approve of whether it was right or wrong with black and white, or as a direct opposition He considered that morality is based on developing happiness and developing a more complex moral system. Nietzsche's last book and "Zarathrustra" are as popular as "Beyond Good and Evil" and "Prelude to Future Philosophy". In this book, Nietzsche believes imagination, self-assertion, danger, originality and "value creation" are the qualities of true philosophers "(Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, page 7). Nietzsche believes that the deep perspective of life is beyond good and evil. In other words, good and evil are simple perspectives and exist only in the common minds of mankind. Existentialism has many tricks, but the view of good and evil is one of the foundations of philosophy. Nietzsche is the first book to publish about these topics. This proves that Nietzsche is the beginning of existentialism. Because all existentialists regard this as a common belief as well as existentialism. This is the third book I read Nietzsche. The first part is a collection of various works, the second part is "Antichrist". In addition to good and evil, Nietzsche tried to generalize his entire philosophy into books. I do not know if I've called Nietzsche to write a summary, but in this book I explained his principle in black and white, so I could put together some parts. If the modern (19th century) people no longer believe in God, or at least they want to slightly reduce his influence, their next logical step is the concept of free will. In the world after enlightenment, people know whether there is really a string of God pulling our strings like a doll. If they do not believe it, the next logical step is free will. Nietzsche rejects free will, but believes in the will of power

Carol A. Senf used a critical theoretical lens when choosing Brag Stoker's Dracula. Most literary critics interpret this popular myth as a conflict of good and evil and try not to focus on more specific literary issues such as story methods, character formation, style. Important article of Carol Senf 'Vampire: the invisible face in the mirror' believes that Stokes' novels "conquer evil around the good and evil, but centered on similarities between them" (Senf 421)) Good and evil - The big struggle between good and evil seems to be paradoxical. It is good to exist, but there is no evil. "Evil", we mean the opposite of good and the opposite. Power to oppose equality and inconsistent power. But that is not the case. On the contrary, what we call evil is a lack of good. When it becomes good and evil, we are not saying that there is no evil in the world, but it says that it does not exist. It is the same as light and dark. The presence of light not only proves the existence, it can measure and artificially create it. But the darkness does not exist. There are no particles or waves called "darkness". Darkness is what happens when there is no light. There is no light. Things without "good" always cause "bad" ones. Even my problem will be subject to scrutiny by philosophy of good and evil. Who decides what is good? Who decides what is wrong? We classify goodwill as a simple one. There is no direct harm to other people. Evil is directly related to specific events and behaviors deliberately made to hurt other people. You do not need to get into the Internet deeply and know that the block chain has been done numerous times with malicious intent. Silk Road was never evil, but people are using scattered markets and encryption currencies for drug trafficking, child pornography, weapons trafficking, trafficking and assassinations. Some of these incidents are rare, but other incidents such as child pornography and drug trafficking are prevalent throughout dark networks. Narcotics and drug users are not bad, but some drug suppliers are taking dangerous actions. We found that a large amount of MDMA purchased from Silk Road is a bath salt Good and evil are very worried, good and evil can sometimes not overlap. The only conflict in the world is not based on good and evil but based only on two groups with different / dissenting opinions. The concept of good and evil is always determined by rulers, not morals and beliefs. If Hitler wins the war, the alternative version of our race may be killed and enslaved by millions of people, entirely called good and noble.

I have the choice every day. These choices will ultimately become part of ourselves and our position. We then ask ourselves what the problem is to make the choice good and what it is bad. How to make a decision between the two What is the boundary between a good choice and a bad choice? All of us have the choice, but what is the psychology behind these good and bad choices? Through my research I found that what is considered good and evil behavior, the three main factors behind making choices, and that all decisions are based on two different beliefs It was. Looking at the civil war from the perspective of Marxist and capitalist economics is not a racist; a struggle lens through the eternal spirit of good and evil; through behavioral psychology, war history and lenses of American nationalism . It is not a racist to make a framework that does not care about race yourself. Other frameworks for you are your goals, in addition to moral evil, to you for economic reasons of slavery, political reasons of slavery, religious reasons of slavery, and psychosocial reasons of slavery Tell you. It is to end racial discrimination and slavery, they need their own solutions. It may be frustrating to tell you why it is so difficult for many people to reject racist policies because they should not be blamed. "Good and evil" is a very common dichotomy in religion, ethics, philosophy, and psychology. In the culture influenced by Manichaelim and Abraham's religion, evil is often regarded as an alternative to good, in which good is overcome and evil should be defeated. In culture inspired by Buddhism spiritually, good and evil are regarded as part of the duality of conflict Sky n is emptiness in the sense of understanding good and evil is not real 2 It is a principle. Empty duality and realize one Good behavior and bad behavior are meme. Both are possibilities that may spread from person to person because we unknowingly imitate others. It turns out that someone is acting in a good way and being influenced to act in a good way. Or you can see that someone behaving maliciously and becoming evil by being influenced. In order for our thief to succeed, they must be alert for leakage of actions. If the trustworthy behavior within the group leaks to the way they deal with the outside world, the day of their robbery ends. If unreliable behavior outside the gang leads to the gang, the gang will explode.

Climate change has been a concern of mankind for the past two decades. In my opinion, this is the best example of the influence of our actions on the earth. Most countries have taken some efforts and preventive measures to protect the Earth from further damage. Forest deterioration and global warming have various forms of influence on our lives, but ignoring this problem, the Earth and its inhabitants will reach a more critical time in their lives Become. In my opinion, the prevention of further climate change is the most important precaution at the moment. The blog post by the chairman of the Least Developed Countries (LDCs) Group in the UN Climate Change Negotiations highlighted some fundamental issues related to climate change negotiations. First, some state-of-the-art countries accounted for 42% of the world's carbon footprint, with the least impact. Ironically, the least mastered LDC received the greatest blow. Secondly, in 2010 most developed countries spent more than $ 400 billion on loans to the fossil fuel industry, but only $ 1.5 billion to help developing countries adapt to climate change I did not spend it. "They provide major contributors to climate change caused by humans by providing more than 250 times support to the people they are most afraid of." Adaptation to climate change (Parents) The argument that global environmental problems, in particular climate change, constitutes a new type of issue is not new. Clearly, climate change is challenging for human ability to cope without problems. The real world challenge comes from our technology, the structure of an economic system that requires an unprecedented scale and deepening of correspondence. Determining the four characteristics of the super evil problem is indeed a useful contribution. But the most important reason to define a new type of problem, like Ritter and Weber's paper, is to focus attention on new type of policy correspondence. Levin et al. Suggests that people dealing with the problem of super evil need to ask: Chapter 2 deals with climate change as an evil problem, chapter 3 introduces social chaos theory to study climate change, and Chapter 4 uses it as a means to treat complex science as a bad problem. Splitting the problem in climate change; Section 5 considers possible strategies to find a solution to the climate change problem and section 6 concludes the conclusion. Discussion about climate change is inherently political. It is shaped by a network of power and occurs in political places influenced by political behavior. These include contradictory rules designed to compromise other rules in other agreements, strategic contradiction, the choice of the most profitable international place for their policy, the priority of the transfer of government power policies Administrative authority on

Mason: Good ratio. Evil Freemasonry is a secret organization appearing in the community and applies to men of all races and nationalities. Many inter-actors seem to believe in higher ones called God, but in more detailed details of this organization, the higher your degree is, the more you believe in your higher life (TheForbiddenKnowledge.come) Philosophers I think that this organization must worship both God and Satan. The whole article is to provide ideas and reasoning to both parties. Good and evil - The big struggle between good and evil seems to be paradoxical. It is good to exist, but there is no evil. "Evil", we mean the opposite of good and the opposite. Power to oppose equality and inconsistent power. But that is not the case. On the contrary, what we call evil is a lack of good. When it becomes good and evil, we are not saying that there is no evil in the world, but it says that it does not exist. It is the same as light and dark. The presence of light not only proves the existence, it can measure and artificially create it. But the darkness does not exist. There are no particles or waves called "darkness". Darkness is what happens when there is no light. There is no light. Things without "good" always cause "bad" ones. Mason: Good ratio. Evil Freemasonry is a secret organization appearing in the community and applies to men of all races and nationalities. Many inter-actors seem to believe in higher ones called God, but in more detailed details of this organization, the higher your degree is, the more you believe in your higher life (TheForbiddenKnowledge.come) Philosopher I believe that this organization must worship both God and Satan - far more than the age established more than 500 years ago, today's Sikhism religion is worldwide There are more than 20 million people. Sikhism always prefers the condemnation of faith and God's message, real life, human equality, social justice and superstition and blind rituals. Sikhism is open to everyone through the teachings of Sikh scriptures and the ten masters included in Sri Guru Granth Sahib, a master of life. The conflict the king did is freedom and slavery, justice and injustice, good and evil, and conflict between God and Satan. Judging from the founding philosophy of that country, yes, breaking the Jim Crow regime is deep and glorious moral victory. But the moral glory of the first stage of victory naturally creates a strong temptation to see the problem of the second stage, from a similar morality and simplicity perspective. Your opinion

Evil is divided into two forms, moral evil and natural evil. Moral evil is brought about by the wrong choice that was created by our free will. Nature's evil is a bad thing to people, regardless of whether they are worth it or not. The problem of evil is that "God is not completely kind, and he has to say that he is an author of evil or is not omnipotent, he could not stop it." Fitzgerald 340). There are various kinds of evil. Two of them are moral evil and natural evil. Nature's evil includes things like pain and pain, and moral evil involves making mistakes. Moral evil depends on the use of human will. Nature's evil has nothing to do with this. The main difference between these two evils is that people can not control the evil of nature and moral evil depends on their will. Some people say physical evil is necessary for human beings. Without painful evil, people will not be warned about disease or danger. Sometimes bad people in life are better than "good" people. Why is this? Some say that this is a trial of the soul, and there are rewards waiting for us. Because their mistakes can lead to mutual pain, the human family is one and their members will help each other through their good behavior. For example, what happened to Jesus? He suffered for all the sins of mankind and saved them through all these. Nature's evil. In contrast to moral evil, the evil of nature is the evil created by the manipulation of the natural processes, and under this circumstance no one can be held morally responsible. Typical examples of natural disasters are natural disasters such as cyclones and earthquakes causing large pain and loss of life, diseases such as leukemia and Alzheimer's disease, disorders such as blindness and hearing loss. However, important identity check is necessary at this point. Natural evil usually caused by human error or negligence usually results in many things. For example, lung cancer can occur due to a large amount of smoking; the loss of human life caused by the earthquake is mainly due to the irresponsible city planner eventually becoming wavy and placing a job on a disjunction that breaks down . An inadvertent approach that may prevent drought and flood Evil is divided into two forms, moral evil and natural evil. Moral evil is brought about by the wrong choice that was created by our free will. Nature's evil is a bad thing to people, regardless of whether they are worth it or not. "We must say that God is not entirely kind, and that he is even an authorized or even an evil writer, or even if it is totally nice to be able to stop it if at all possible "(Fitzgerald)

With "Beyond Good and Evil", Nietzsche argues how he believes in democracy. The principle of democracy consists of people who believe in equality or democracy. These principles bring equality, restrict life to the universal truth, and Nietzsche does not agree at all. He believes that these principles make people a large group. In this cow herd, people follow each other and do not have the power, leading to the collapse of individual rights and instincts. In addition to good and evil: "The problem at the beginning is not an open question, the fatal problem of truth value ultimately leads to the affirmation of truth and the complete affirmation of life and humanity - (Nicice's Mission, 24). When Berkowitz claimed that Nietzsche declared the denial of 'willingness to science' because Nietzsche made a "comfortable lie" (Nietzs sche: Ethics of ethicists, 238) (see preface, n.3) Berkowitz misunderstood BGE 24. Nietzsche did not criticize the will of the free spirit within this saying, but rather from a world in which such a situation is evident from a world of certain error-free "real world" or outlook It reminded me that I never escaped to no world. https://the-eye.eu/public/concen.org/UChicagoPress.Ebook.Pack-2016-PHC/9780226259819.UChicago%20Press.Nietzsche%27s%20Enlightenment_%20The% 20Free-Spirit%20Free-Spirit%20Trilogy% 20of% 20the% 20Middle% 20Period.Paul% 20Franco.Oct% 2C2011.pdf With "Beyond Good and Evil", Nietzsche argues that our moral has been defined and redefined many times, so it seems meaningless at first glance. Unlike Plato, Nietzsche accepts no form of power to produce a perfect image. However, we define "good" and "bad". When he said that "God is dead" he said he died as a result of enlightenment as a universal source of human morality. Because form and ideals must be objective, Plato's morality can only be used in a single world view. The need to state morality beyond good and evil is a rejection of Platonic's paradigm. Even now after more than 100 years of tracking down the problem, the Western society is still platonic and it is headed toward micro religion. When we believe that I am better than good and evil, what do we truly believe. We believe that people are the means, not the purpose. According to Aristotle, Kant certainly will end everyone's life. But in order to transcend right and wrong, we must believe that all of what we do to others is their weakness. They are the means we control, enrich and give power. Perhaps you think you know this. What about you? Is not this what happened in the US? People have become a means. Purpose of "economic growth", "national security", and "shareholder value". So are they the end of 'making the United States great'? The end that can be handled - Clean - the way most people think it is appropriate

Writer Claudia Gray said: "Self-knowledge is better than day self management" (Goodreads). Today, evil and sin exist in our world. And the temptation they bring is tied to the spiritual existence of many people. Finding the source of all evils is an incomprehensible concept, but understanding your free will helps to understand and save the evil of the world. Through this book, St. Augustine confesses "I think about the concept of evil and sin and look for the roots of their existence" (August 15). In this article we will look at Saint Augustine's view of evil. St. Augustine believes that God created a complete world, but God's creation has turned from God with free will This is the origin of evil in the world. Augustine believes that it is impossible to say that evil exists, and evil comes from the free nature of any biological will, along with the pain caused by punishment as sin. According to Augustine, it does not conflict with his righteousness, so God allows evil to exist in the world. He did not create evil, but it was not a victim of it. He just allowed it to exist Where did it come from? How does evil spread to the whole picture? St. Augustine was the seventh confession of confession, looking back on the existence of evil and the theological problem that it formed. In order for evil to exist, the God of the Creator has to give it. This is fundamentally incompatible with Christian's perception that God is good. Logically, this will lead people to believe that there is not evil in the sense of creation. Augustine concluded that the evil itself was not formal but a result. Saint Augustine's view of evil is simply poor. Augustine believes that evil is not another strength but a lack of goodwill. This view contradicts Manichan's view. Augustine regards evil as emptiness, not as a substance. This emptiness is like "nothing" in the "no end stories" that inherit the existence of that infection. In the past, the existence of good has become empty. Evil will erode it. Augustine believes that all sentimental existence is good and that all sensibility existence is likely to be damaged. Even if the existence is partially corrupt, existence is still only good, as evil does not exist by itself, it is simply a lack of good. All sentient beings have free will and their kindness may change: "But they may not decrease as their Creator, so their profits may decrease "Owner exists, because they exist in each other, it is good that they exist.

Likewise, it can prevent humans from suffering from natural disasters, that is to save people from the effects of hurricanes, tornadoes, earthquakes, and so on. 2 The Second Answer The First Answer: In all religions there is a general thing related to God. Attribution As we all know, God is kindness (full power), almighty (all power) and omniscience (omnipotence), which together constitute the concept of God (Tooley, 2013) . If God exists, he must be those, it means he will notice the pain, and he will be good enough to stop and prevent unnecessary suffering. This argument is like this. Given the evil of this world, omnipotent, omniscient, perfectly good god is impossible. Or, in other words, how can all the love, omniscience, omnipotent God commit evil acts? It is the responsibility that it conveys the week in which it looks like this. This means that God should behave. If you make the wrong choice, how can people have the freedom to make choices? We will have a controllable God if God hinders our lack of freedom every time someone makes evil, not the final meaning. We are God's disease game. But that is not the case. We have the power of great good and great evil. Power like God If God is omnipotent and omnipotent, it will create the universe in a way to create the heavens: all free will, painless, bad. But there is evil and pain. Therefore, God does not exist, it is not omnipotent, nor kind. 6. These arguments have been used as evidence for believing in God by many philosophers 7, 8. Theologians try to explain why good gods produce evil and pain. The most popular defense is that humans can have free will. However, since the whole universe and nature are full of pain, violence and destruction, it seems that any human-centered explanation does not work. " Evil and suffering in our world seems to pose a serious challenge to the existence of faithful God. If God is lost, God seems to know all the horrible things that happen in our world. If God is omnipotent, God can do something for all evil and suffering. Furthermore, if God is morally perfect, God will certainly want to do something. However, we found that our world is full of countless evils and sufferings. These facts about evil and suffering seem to contradict Orthodox theologians who believe there is a perfectly gentle god. The challenge of this apparent confrontation has been called a problem of evil.

In Charles Dickens, Christmas Carol, Ebenezer Scrooge lives in the owner of accounting firm dissatisfaction abusing people around him. Scrooge could not live a fulfilling life in a satisfying way but now it is isolated and we are not in a hurry to correct his past mistakes. Through the three ghost arbitration, Scrooge departs to past, present and future Christmas and transforms from a greedy to a considerate, caring person. At the beginning of the story, Dickens contrasts the harsh character of Scrooge with "free and gentle gentleman" (Dickens 31). Freedom is the ability to choose. Classical philosophers and atheist thinkers have always believed that there is a "purpose" in life. Do this by doing good and avoiding evil. Therefore, the purpose of freedom is "good". But the best "good" is love and freedom is love or love. Freedom is like money. You want to make it "flower". It is not money to make you happy, but something you can earn with money. Likewise, freedom will be spent or "lost". Only by losing your freedom (through your commitment to love) you can truly achieve freedom. Therefore, married people have used freedom to gain freedom to provide things. Frankly is a book about evil. God creates the world, God is completely gentle, Human is free, Evil produced by freedom is larger than the scourge of freedom. According to Voltaire, to talk about human free will mean that free will is like cost-effectiveness analysis. People believe that the benefits of giving freedom to humans do not go beyond cost. Voltaire said that the evil problem seems to have a simple solution. You can claim that God creates the world of evil and may belong to it. Leibniz, on the other hand, thinks that his optimism on evil is the opposite of Voltaire. He believes not only that good deeds of the world outweigh the evil but also that good and evil are very relevant and that God can never improve the overall proportion of good and evil. In order to understand Candide, you need to look at the extension time.

Evil, the power of nature, dominates and causes evil. (Www.Dictionary.com) Evil is a very complicated problem that many people think is unpleasant, but there is evidence that evil exists, it exists from the beginning. Over the years, researchers have investigated many aspects related to evil, and unfortunately the results are often in the sight of a bystander. Television and newspapers show the work and influence of evil forces everyday. From the beginning, money and ignorance have caused a chain reaction leading to pain beyond human perception. On narrow planets, expansion of responsibility of evil changed the moral background. Microevil to kill a child becomes part of a macroscopic creature. All evil inhale the same air and have the same circulatory system. They pass through the world's arteries from the Coca plants of Colombia farmers to the Washington mother's brain, from there to her fingers, and to the clothes dryer that kills children with morning cartoon. Many writers say that higher achievement of evil is to convince people that it does not exist. Ivan Karamazov's bitter psychology is somewhat different: "There is no devil, but if that person created him, he created him with his own image and image." A strangely worn gentleman-style character, he recently wrote an evening gown and open vest, stating the cold he came into space This is to provide a profound story that is invisible like the air we breathe in. The world is a very dangerous place and it is more dangerous than before. It is full of evil people. Criminals are everywhere, you have to protect yourself. This is a relationship with our madman, we are the only insane person. scared. Refuse the story of fear. It only adds to the ugliness of the world. Courage to choose the possibilities, deceptive power, and humility about deadly actions and failures. "How can I help you? How can I serve and what is the small part that can be joined together?" Ask yourself. No matter how humble and unrelated, do this. We are in the information age. With the help of the Internet, almost everything is within our capacity. Air is not the only element of our breathing, we are full of information too. It surrounds us. It develops around our senses. Like the air, these data will influence us, our body and mind, which will affect the majority of our time today. In a room filled with information on television, radio, internet, social media, books, etc., you know exactly what a positive person should do. He will not benefit from these things. In other words, you simply omit everything, concentrate only on key points, and retain resources that will help you achieve your main goal. why? As he was planning early, he knew the danger of traces of information, he was ready for information warfare, ready to overthrow the destruction.

I have the choice every day. These choices will ultimately become part of ourselves and our position. We then ask ourselves what the problem is to make the choice good and what it is bad. How to make a decision between the two What is the boundary between a good choice and a bad choice? All of us have the choice, but what is the psychology behind these good and bad choices? Through my research I found that what is considered good and evil behavior, the three main factors behind making choices, and that all decisions are based on two different beliefs It was. Looking at the civil war from the perspective of Marxist and capitalist economics is not a racist; a struggle lens through the eternal spirit of good and evil; through behavioral psychology, war history and lenses of American nationalism . It is not a racist to make a framework that does not care about race yourself. Other frameworks for you are your goals, in addition to moral evil, to you for economic reasons of slavery, political reasons of slavery, religious reasons of slavery, and psychosocial reasons of slavery Tell you. It is to end racial discrimination and slavery, they need their own solutions. It may be frustrating to tell you why it is so difficult for many people to reject racist policies because they should not be blamed. "Good and evil" is a very common dichotomy in religion, ethics, philosophy, and psychology. In the culture influenced by Manichaelim and Abraham's religion, evil is often regarded as an alternative to good, in which good is overcome and evil should be defeated. In culture inspired by Buddhism spiritually, good and evil are regarded as part of the duality of conflict Sky n is emptiness in the sense of understanding good and evil is not real 2 It is a principle. Empty duality and realize one Good behavior and bad behavior are meme. Both are possibilities that may spread from person to person because we unknowingly imitate others. It turns out that someone is acting in a good way and being influenced to act in a good way. Or you can see that someone behaving maliciously and becoming evil by being influenced. In order for our thief to succeed, they must be alert for leakage of actions. If the trustworthy behavior within the group leaks to the way they deal with the outside world, the day of their robbery ends. If unreliable behavior outside the gang leads to the gang, the gang will explode.

A new article based on the market forum based on the Christian Science Society, physicist David Snooker 'Think about evil'. ... To solve this problem, I must first use a few paragraphs to distinguish between the two evils: natural evil and moral evil. Evil in the natural world is physically unpleasant and it is extremely extreme and unbearable. This includes pain and illness, hurricanes, floods, famine, parasites and so on. All these kinds of things can happen to us regardless of human moral choice. The situation may be exacerbated due to poor moral choice, but it will exist anyway. Moral evil includes decisions with a morally competent being. A lot of articles on how to define moral evil were written: Some people think that it is fundamentally related and rebellious against God. With this definition, obviously God can not do bad things. However, this shows arbitrary good and evil. We define all things God does and it is not evil. But if we believe that God is eternal in its personality, we hope for absolute good and evil standards and believe that he will always obey Augustine of Hippos of the 4th century pointed out that good and evil are not symmetrical. Good belongs to itself, evil involves destruction of good deeds. This makes it easier to define evil. "Good" is difficult to define: It includes all good things like beauty, order, existence, life, meaning and so on. Creating a detailed list of good news is a hard work. But if you understand some kindness intuitively, you can define moral evil as something to destroy good ones. Here we have to be careful to use some nuances. What is evil that always destroys profits? If so, that change contains something no longer exists and it is replaced by something else, so everyone who wants to change is bad. As you have seen, it is a good thing to replace a good one with another good one. Temporary pain during exercise is an alternative to health and physical fitness comfort. More Of course, naturalistic atheists can not truly distinguish between evil and morals of nature. This fact is an important structural support in his view of the world. Nature's evil. Contrary to moral evil, natural evil is evil created by manipulation of the natural processes, in which case we can not make morally accountable for anyone. Typical examples of natural disasters are natural disasters such as cyclones and earthquakes causing major pain and loss of life, diseases such as leukemia and Alzheimer's disease, disorders such as blindness and hearing loss. However, you need to perform important identification at this point. Human error or negligence has brought many things that are usually conveyed as natural evil. For example, lung cancer can be caused by massive smoking; the loss of human life caused by the earthquake is mainly due to positioning irresponsible urban planners finally undulating and positioning their work on disjointed obstacles. A careless approach that might prevent droughts and floods There are various kinds of evil. Two of them are moral evil and natural evil. Nature's evil includes things like pain and pain, and moral evil involves making mistaken decisions. Moral evil depends on the use of human will. Nature's evil has nothing to do with this. The main difference between these two evils is that people can not control the evil of nature, moral evil depends on their will. Some even say that physical evil is necessary for human beings. Without painful evil, people will not be warned about disease or danger. In life, sometimes bad people are better than "good" people. Why is this? Some say that this is a trial of the soul, and rewards are waiting for us. Because their mistakes can also lead to mutual pain, the human family is one and their members will help each other through their good behavior. For example, what happened to Jesus? He suffered for all the sins of mankind and saved them through all these. When discussing natural evil evil philosophical issues, ther

The Buddha once said, "This is not his own enemy or enemy, human's own heart, it will take him to the path of evil." In my opinion, people are inherently evil, and he is succumbing to corruption in human society. I think human beings have the ability to distinguish between good and evil based on factors learned from other people in the surroundings. From the beginning, humans have accumulated power through communities, political parties and villages. Throughout history you can infer that humans are evil for many congregations, rituals, and the overall culture that preceded the Christian era. People themselves are evil. More precisely, people are born to be evil. Golding helped to strengthen Freud's theory through his novel 'The Lord of the Flies'. The boys participated in the unconscious spirit, making the island more important. By golding, the ideological side and the world itself are narrowed down to a small island of opposite personality, which allows the author to solve very common problems and themes. Golding shows an amazing example of unconsciousness of society in a specific world. From the days of Adam, Eve, Snake, even among the most "perfect" people, society has a bad trail. Today's society has doubts about the problem; basically, this supports the fact that humans were born of evil, as humans are the cause of evil. William Golding 's novel "Lord of the Fly" introduces a group of British boys who stranded to a tropical island to explain the malignant nature of humanity. "Lord" talks about the changes the boys experienced as the boys gradually adapt to the new freedoms and responsibilities found in "society". William Golding's society is essentially the basic philosophy of evil that can be interpreted as a characteristic of Simon, a beast among boys, and a way used to kill Ralph. William Golding's novel "The Lord of the Flies" uses a group of people hanging on desert islands to explain the malicious nature of human beings. The Lie's fly deals with the changes the boys experience as they gradually adapt to social freedom. - Both sides of the man who was exposed to William Golding were kidnapped by his experience in the British Navy during the Second World War when he wrote the King of Fries (Beetz 2514) . Golding told his book: The theme is to try to follow social failures to the defects of human nature. Morality is a form of society that has to rely on the moral character of individuals, independent of any political system, whether clearly logical or respected.

Are you faced with compulsive or addictive behavior in your life? How to destroy evil trees and make the Bible understand how the wrong choice of our ancestors plays an important role in our lives. In addition, this book reveals some persistent solutions to overcome the most serious poisoning. You may understand that this is the result of Adam and Eve eating right and wrong trees. They were told that they could eat trees other than good and evil trees. Of course we know them as their descendants, as long as you tell us, humans do not do what we want to do. Strangely, at this stage of the human story, we are naturally naturalist and nonmeter. Having knowledge of good and evil seems to mean that you can see things that are considered "life" in at least two ways. There is no self-consciousness where there is no shame so that Adam and Eve feel ashamed of each other. This story - very literally - is as old as they came. In ancient Hebrew, forbidden trees that end humans in heaven are called. ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, Human beings, humans, the Bible we face fundamental choices We are starting to tell us what we are doing: The world says good (literally "worth for us") story tells us that our choice is inadequate. But this oldest moral dilemma has brought us an impossible situation. Because without a world there is a harmless friendship between man and nature. If this is actually a fundamental problem, we have no relationship, just give up, without any version of reality, human beings can not survive from such trees and still can not survive. Our existence arises from our unique ability to adjust our creative abilities to rebuild nature only by separating good and evil among people.

The good and evil forces of Flannario Connor are hard to find good and evil. Good and evil. It is guilty and innocent. These are just a few of the many themes that surround everyone's life. Everyone has their own opinion about a specific problem, and they rely on their values, judgments and beliefs to see their difficulties. Quote from Flannery O'Connor: "I am looking at it from the perspective of Christian legitimacy, meaning that the meaning of life is focused on the redemption of Christ and what I see about the world I will do it. "402)). Flannery O'Connor uses the symbolism that "it is difficult to find a good person." Flannery O'Connor who wrote "Good people are hard to find" is a short story depicting family trips to Florida. They met a criminal who escaped from a prison, misfit. This story should be interpreted as a fable and O'Connor uses the symbol to skillfully convey information such as class consciousness and lack of spiritual belief among humans. - In her speech, Flannery O'Connor made a speech entitled "Writing Short Stories". "I think most of you tell stories ..." (O'Connor # 2 PG). She died at lupus in 1964, she was only 39 years old. Shortly thereafter, she became a literary idol. O'Connor is struggling to understand that people think that writing a novel as a chore, one of "the most difficult literary forms" (O'Connor # 2 PG) Flannery 's turning point and O'Connor' s good turning direction is a useful tool that brings unexpected changes and can add a twist to the story. Among Flannario Connor's "Good people are hard to find", satire has been used as a very effective literary tool; it leads the story to think or to come out of us I will. O'Connor rebuts against words and circumstances ironically in this story and reveals a different truth from "we" that the reader believes to be true. - A prolific writer, Flannery O'Connor, famous in 1953, wrote a short story entitled "Good people find it hard to find" (Scott 2). But it was published in her second short story in 1955 two years later. This special collection made writers an important voice in the American literary circle until she reached 39 when she met her sudden death in 1964.

Othello's Evil Personality William Shakespeare's 'Othello' brings a big threat to the audience, mainly on the wicked island of Iaco, whose evil influence penetrates the lives of the surrounding victims. In Shakespeare along the river, Frank Kelmode explained the type of evil of the ancient. The ancient deity god - the form of familiar abstract evil - Iago was wearing contemporary demon costumes. As explained to Rodrigo at the end of the first act, the naturalist ethic of Iagu is the Montaigne version of the bad guys. We support. There are bad people in this world such as greed, skill, arbitrariness, jealousy. William Shakespeare 's Othello' s Iago is a malignant and vicious character. He uses human kindness, honesty, and ignorance to gain what he wants. When Othello 's personality and position was higher, he became embarrassed and decided to exclude Othello. I saw the inner sin. Othello is kind, but he does not know his own evil or embarrassment, so he can not control it. I 'm using Othello's trust to use Othello to exploit Othello's true character by using it. Othello's Evil Personality William Shakespeare's 'Othello' brings a big threat to the audience, mainly on the wicked island of Iaco, whose evil influence penetrates the lives of the surrounding victims. In Shakespeare along the river, Frank Kelmode explained the type of evil of the ancient. The ancient deity god - the form of familiar abstract evil - Iago was wearing contemporary demon costumes. - Full treatment of Othello women Sadly, gender discrimination has brought an ugly heart to Othello's obvious tragedy of William Shakespeare. Let's learn about this problem in this article. William · Shakespeare: "Tragedy", Paul Jorgensen said Othello's gender discrimination "prostitute scene" (4.2), pessimistic and cruel. Even tears of tears and warm tenderness Othello of William Shakespeare is a tragedy, Othello is the Moorish city of Venice. I was a friend of Othello, but Othello relied on him for promoting Michael Casio to the lieutenant. Iago then began his evil and malice behavior against Othello. This leads to Othello's jealousy and killing his wife's Desdemona. Othello committed suicide afterwards. Through the use of images, irony, and symbolism, Shakespeare shows the theme of power to be destroyed. Shakespeare explains the theme and uses images to show the story full of rhetoric to the audience

The book "The Bluest Eyes" really reflects that the author is thinking about the growth of Morrison as a black woman in the city of Georgia. The purpose of this novel is not to bring a black girl into the neighbor of the neighborhood of Georgia where he lives This is a heartwarming story. But about this difficult and confused life. A black girl. There are no real heroes or goals, only one girl is trying to understand the world in which he lives. Pecola as the most discerning-evil victim answered the question of Pecola Breedlove's cast in her community as a victim's victim and the most tiring Toni Morrison got even more difficult problems I am trying to solve it. Although not mentioned, this problem is in Pecora with whole novels and her cyclical story style. Morrison has talesed a story aimed at answering this question by gathering all the power that will help to cause a social accident. Morrison's Family Relations Tony Morrison's blue eyed eye "The Bluest Eyes" is a story about the life of a young black girl, Pecola Bladorov, who grew up after the First World War. . She prayed with the blue eyes and "Please make her beautiful", which in turn was accepted by her family and associates. The main problem of this book is the ugly concept that "darkness" has neither value nor beauty. This view will be handed down at birth and become a cultural barrier. Promoting a good family relationship to promote a healthy and meaningful family relationship is important for adolescent life. Families are not only important for connection between people and the past, they are also powerful and powerful agents that provide teenagers the most love and care they need. Young people can establish good family relationships in various ways. First of all, teenagers should respect each family member and care for each family member. This includes older elderly people The Nobel laureate Tony Morrison has published numerous novels on the themes of violence, oppression and personal relationships. Her most famous two novels are "the most blue eyes" and "beloved". The blue eyes (1970) is the story of Pecola, an African-American girl who grew in the 1940's. Novels also treat incest and child of hearing impaired. A beloved person (1987) was inspired by the true story of a slave woman who killed her child instead of sending her to slavery, Margaret Ghana. In the novel, Seth was bothered by the ghost of her child 's "beloved". This is a complex story about the psychological impact of oppression.

Young Goodman Brown talks about good and evil in "Young Goodman Brown". Nathaniel Hawthorne thinks of the problem of good and evil, suggesting that true evils will condone and condemn the sins of others without seeing their own crimes. He studied that sin is part of mankind and does not have the idea of ​​escaping it. In many of the symbols he uses in this story, each symbol has a deep meaning. In the constant battle of innocent youth with a test of faith, they represent good and evil. When the story begins, Young Goodman Brown tells his young wife to say good-bye to him (211). Nathaniel Hawthorne's young Goodman Brown's revelation Nathaniel Hawthorne's criticism and reflection on young Goodman Brown focuses on the theme of good and evil. Critics are talking about interpretation of the main character's consciousness, such as whether Brown is awaking or dreaming. Surely, he believes that he believes in righteousness separates him from the community, he lives and suffers and dies. Hawthorn's interpretation of Brown's "middle-aged crisis" is ambiguous and certainly gives the reader many different opinions about the cause and cause of a particular matter. Hawthorne used symbolism in his allegorical story "Young Goodman Brown" Nathaniel Hawthorne's short story "Young Goodman Brown" uses danger and mystery to express the battle between good and evil. Young Goodman Brown entered the night at night and began to realize the cruel truth. Everyone is born to have a danger of giving up faith, to be evil. After reading this story, the reader may be wondering about the young Goodman Brown's decision to go to evil. - In the majority of Flannery O'Connor's short story, I feel that it is difficult for many characters to see the ultimate reality of life. They often grasp the distorted reality, but not everyone does the same. Misfit and grandmother are the best examples of the story that "it is difficult to find a nice person." "Young Goodman Brown" by Nathaniel Hawthorne tells stories about exposing true evil and losing faith. It is obvious to me that what I absorbed from this story is that everyone thinks it is good, no matter how good we think. "The self-refusal and self-curse Brown" which is the hero of this story began metaphorical errands he planned to face his own evil. As he was not ready to accept this as part of the nature of others, he refused it instead and eventually prescribed his own destiny.

Good or bad The subject of the journal has caused a lot of debate for a long time. When we were born, we are good or bad, or whether we cultivated it. Many people think that we have a natural tendency of evil. Other people think we were born to be a good person. To make things clearer, I will describe the definition of the meanings of "good" and "evil" in this journal. "As described later," good "means" to protect social rules and ethics for centuries. " "Evil" means "intentional or ignorant behavior of social regulations". Good and evil - The big struggle between good and evil seems to be paradoxical. It is good to exist, but there is no evil. "Evil", we mean the opposite of good and the opposite. Power to oppose equality and inconsistent power. But that is not the case. On the contrary, what we call evil is a lack of good. When it becomes good and evil, we are not saying that there is no evil in the world, but it says that it does not exist. It is the same as light and dark. The presence of light not only proves the existence, it can measure and artificially create it. But the darkness does not exist. There are no particles or waves called "darkness". Darkness is what happens when there is no light. There is no light. Things without "good" always cause "bad" ones. Even my problem will be subject to scrutiny by philosophy of good and evil. Who decides what is good? Who decides what is wrong? We classify goodwill as a simple one. There is no direct harm to other people. Evil is directly related to specific events and behaviors deliberately made to hurt other people. You do not need to get into the Internet deeply and know that the block chain has been done numerous times with malicious intent. Silk Road was never evil, but people are using scattered markets and encryption currencies for drug trafficking, child pornography, weapons trafficking, trafficking and assassinations. Some of these incidents are rare, but other incidents such as child pornography and drug trafficking are prevalent throughout dark networks. Narcotics and drug users are not bad, but some drug suppliers are taking dangerous actions. We found that a large amount of MDMA purchased from Silk Road is a bath salt

By asking and asking God, Eli continues to have some degree of faith in God, and therefore is still sacred and human. At the beginning of Erie's autobiography, when he was still at home, faith in Siget Erie's god and confidence in his religion existed and was powerful. Erie is a pious Jew, praying at the synagogue and seriously considering his religion, which deserves small boys for praise. Eli believes that God exists everywhere in the world. Mackie acknowledges that the defense of Plantinga shows how God and evil coexist, indicating that 'the central doctrine of theology' is eventually logically consistent. However, Mackie does not mean to say how important Plantinga's achievement is. He expressed doubt as to whether Plantinga addressed evil appropriately. Some of Mackie's complaints say that Plantinga only gives the possibility of reason why God allowed evil and suffering and did not provide the basis for his argument or try to make them reasonable It comes from the fact. It is often philosophically insufficient to draft simple possibilities without giving evidence, but it is not clear whether Mackie 's dissatisfaction with Plantinga is perfectly justified. After all, Mackie described the problem of evil as one of logical contradictions. Because the logic of evil insists that it is logically impossible for God and evil to coexist, Plantinga (or any other theorist) also needs to know the possibility of God and evil coexisting It is to explain the situation of. It exists. This situation does not need to be realistic, it does not even have to be realistic. Plantinga does not need evidence to support the authenticity of his advice. What he needs to do is to provide a logical and consistent account of the way God and evil coexist. Plantinga argues that God and evil can coexist if God has sufficient moral reason to forgive evil. He believes that the morally good cause of God may be related to human access to morally important free will and that this freedom allows for larger things. All requirements necessary for Plantinga to represent (MSR 1) and (MSR 2) are logically possible (ie not contradictory).

What is the difference between good and evil? what would you like. What is evil? These are the questions we asked at least once in our short lives. That's right. That is a bad mistake. We will waste our lives and think about these meaningful problems. I think that the definition of good and evil can be defined by the economic services offered to the public. For example, the difference between Charity Crusaders * and Stuff Mart *, Mom and Pap Cafe * and McDoogles *, Joe's Barber Shop and Bidel Basson Hair Salon * believe in good and evil, good and evil through these stores. Companies are very obvious. Good and evil - The big struggle between good and evil seems to be paradoxical. It is good to exist, but there is no evil. "Evil", we mean the opposite of good and the opposite. Power to oppose equality and inconsistent power. But that is not the case. On the contrary, what we call evil is a lack of good. When it becomes good and evil, we are not saying that there is no evil in the world, but it says that it does not exist. It is the same as light and dark. The presence of light not only proves the existence, it can measure and artificially create it. But the darkness does not exist. There are no particles or waves called "darkness". Darkness is what happens when there is no light. There is no light. Things without "good" always cause "bad" ones. Even my problem will be subject to scrutiny by philosophy of good and evil. Who decides what is good? Who decides what is wrong? We classify goodwill as a simple one. There is no direct harm to other people. Evil is directly related to specific events and behaviors deliberately made to hurt other people. You do not need to get into the Internet deeply and know that the block chain has been done numerous times with malicious intent. Silk Road was never evil, but people are using scattered markets and encryption currencies for drug trafficking, child pornography, weapons trafficking, trafficking and assassinations. Some of these incidents are rare, but other incidents such as child pornography and drug trafficking are prevalent throughout dark networks. Narcotics and drug users are not bad, but some drug suppliers are taking dangerous actions. We found that a large amount of MDMA purchased from Silk Road is a bath salt

Humans are born to be good people. Or we were born to be evil. The essence or essence of a person is the essential and permanent feature of that individual. Being a good person is a person who thinks about others in front of them, shows goodwill to each other, and makes good choices in life. Become a bad person against something or just think about them, they do not care about the outcome of their actions. Rousseau says, "I think that human beings were born and raised as gentle people (because they were left to him), which is a negative way, he is not for his own purposes, but the risk of corruption b The good and evil of mankind Socrates, a famous philosopher, said that "uncensored life is not worth it". In this idea, the problem is "Is humans inherently evil?" My family inquires. That is called one of the unresolved questions. The determinists have reached the conclusion that we are dominated by the laws of science and we can not do anything to be naturally evil. Evil is just a painful act Even my problem will be subject to scrutiny by philosophy of good and evil. Who decides what is good? Who decides what is wrong? We classify goodwill as a simple one. There is no direct harm to other people. Evil is directly related to specific events and behaviors deliberately made to hurt other people. You do not need to get into the Internet deeply and know that the block chain has been done numerous times with malicious intent. Silk Road was never evil, but people are using scattered markets and encryption currencies for drug trafficking, child pornography, weapons trafficking, trafficking and assassinations. Some of these incidents are rare, but other incidents such as child pornography and drug trafficking are prevalent throughout dark networks. Narcotics and drug users are not bad, but some drug suppliers are taking dangerous actions. We found that a large amount of MDMA purchased from Silk Road is a bath salt Have you been born to be good and evil? That's a good question. The Merriam-Webster dictionary defines "intrinsic" as "belonging to nature and customs, including the composition and characteristics of something". Therefore, the environment and teaching may affect our thoughts and actions. Whether it is good or bad is to ask which condition is part of our basic nature or nature. I think that the baby is crying because he left the safe and predictable place and just entered a place where good and evil fight for the world where everything occurs, an eternal struggle. It is not because it can cry for reasons of birth, because it is inherently selfish and care for your own needs.

If God is so great, why is the world he created created considered by some people to be terrible. According to most good God, the Lord means greedy and moral existence. But the problem is why he was allowed to commit such a terrible crime or misjudgment. He made him in the world. It can be said that more people will give up on their beliefs due to the problem of evil, not for other reasons. The problem of evil creates three fundamental assumptions of God's totipotency, omniscience, and completeness. Because unknowns are attractive and frightening, religion can be a theme for many people. This is an unpredictable subject. The problem of arbitrariness is that sacred command theory seems to be based on morality by God's quirkiness. If the theory of God's order is true, then God's command seems unable to be recognized by morality or morality. But how is this morally arbitrary order the foundation of morality? Because sacred command theory is not the only ethical theory in Christian tradition, even if these objections are considered successful, you do not need to pay too much attention. But theologians are attracted to God's instruction theory and therefore there is a theological reason for trying to defend it. God is a creator of all things and is therefore claimed to be the creator of our moral obligation. God is claimed to have sovereignty and has the right to tell us the way to live my life. As a political obligation theory, God's command is confronted with two general problems. First of all, it presupposes the existence of a certain nature of God; secondly, the order of God's orders is not necessarily clear. Knowing what we should provide Caesar is Caesar and God, being a god, this is one thing, and the other is to know how Caesar should be. But for Christians, the main challenge is to harmonize Paul 's writings with the alarming fact that rulers are often hostile to Christianity. The action taken was skeptical. One response to this challenge is that they must endure hostile or evil rulers. However, other reactions left room for disobedience

The realization of the evil Tony Morrison's blue eyes tells the dirty story of a colored young girl Pecora. Morrison draws the paradox of the family of picture books that incorporates the history of folk songs of many colored towns into the true definition of the family. Through a strong metaphor and emotion, the ugliness of ethnic tension overcomes the pursuit of beauty, and this time I call for love. When she was sent to live with Claudia (talker) and her family, a 12-year-old Pecora from a broken family was first introduced. Pecola as the most discerning-evil victim answered the question of Pecola Breedlove's cast in her community as a victim's victim and the most tiring Toni Morrison got even more difficult problems I am trying to solve it. Although not mentioned, this problem is in Pecora with whole novels and her cyclical story style. Morrison has talesed a story aimed at answering this question by gathering all the power that will help to cause a social accident. Morrison's Family Relations Tony Morrison's blue eyed eye "The Bluest Eyes" is a story about the life of a young black girl, Pecola Bladorov, who grew up after the First World War. . She prayed with the blue eyes and "Please make her beautiful", which in turn was accepted by her family and associates. The main problem of this book is the ugly concept that "darkness" has neither value nor beauty. This view will be handed down at birth and become a cultural barrier. Promoting a good family relationship to promote a healthy and meaningful family relationship is important for adolescent life. Families are not only important for connection between people and the past, they are also powerful and powerful agents that provide teenagers the most love and care they need. Young people can establish good family relationships in various ways. First of all, teenagers should respect each family member and care for each family member. This includes older elderly people In The Bluest Eye of Toni Morrison, Pecola is anxiously intent on blue eyes. She worships Shirley Temple and hates her brown skin, even her own mother thinks she is ugly. She was tortured at school. She believes that whiteness is the key to being loved. She is crazy about candies, and her package is printed with a girl picture of a blonde blue eye named Mary Jane. I hope her eyes turn blue by eating candy. She also appealed to God. But after she was raped by her father and gave birth to his child, she desperately accepted her blue eyes and was completely avoided by her community. Everyone was licking her blue eyes, so she decided to shun. Perhaps she has a deep rooted knowledge about the fixation of blue eyes rather than white skin, it means that she needs to change the world, not her. She can not change the world, so she chooses to look at it differently.

Christians believe in good and evil religious education A.) Explain that Christians may believe in the power of good and the power of evil B.) Explain how Christians are affected by these beliefs C I need to suffer. Do you agree? A.) Please describe Christians who believe in the power of good and the power of evil Christian God is considered to have both love and omnipotence. Christianity teaches that there is a power of evil in addition to the power of good - Traditionally this is Satan (or Lucifer), an Archangel sent to hell without following God (Luke 10: 1). Christianity has fought against the problem of evil. As we know today, as we know today there are multiple beliefs about why there is evil in the first century before Paul's Christianity. Professor Bad Ehrman is one of the earliest Christian's most capable historians. In "lost Christianity" he summarizes some of the different different main beliefs of primitive Christian about the source of evil: Hindu and Buddhism interpret evil as a result of Karma. Even though our actions seem to be unfair, even if the current sufferings seem to be unfair, karma will serve the judiciary for a long time. This is not fair - it is a delay penalty. The operation of Karma can be seen as an explanation of intent without intent, but the problem of evil does not exist in this belief system. There is no fundamental contradiction between the concept of sacred or universal law and the existence of pain. Is that person basically good or evil? Perhaps the beliefs about good and evil are more appropriate in your value theory (see below), but this question is very important to your people's perception. Western ideas based on Christian principles basically convict corrupt people and always resist the nature of evil, but even today some believe in this belief, but the environment and this kindness Opportunity to express. Perhaps more generally, humans are basically neither good nor evil, but morally neutral at birth, whether people follow the path of good and evil depends on external influence and will. The good and evil of the good people Flannery O'Connor uses all elements of humor, irony, and public opinion in the system of evil and redemption of Christian faith. My daughter is 12 years old and loses her leg in a hunting accident and has a tree's leg instead of Joy's personality, but this is not clear. It is becoming increasingly clear that the physical pain of Joey closely resembles everywhere in the story. Trapped in the desert island, the plane crashed. This classic novel intertwines with many themes related mainly to the inner evil of the existence of human beings and the malicious nature of human beings. Among the "flying king", Golding showed that the boy gradually changed from a civilized and polite to a savage and ceremonialized beast. From

"Emily's Rose" and "Evil Probability" are compared by William Faulkner's short story "A Emily for Rose" and Shirley Jackson's "Evil Probability". The author created similar characters and scenes to show a bold image of evil. Both Emily Grierson and Adela Strangeworth are female and have similar characteristics, but the motivation is totally different. Their story takes place in a near town that plays an important role in their evil motives. Emily Grierson and Adela Strangeworth showed similarities and differences in developing their behavior and revealed that there is a possibility of evil among them. Emily Rose Roman is not; Emily Rose Romano is untitled; paper proposal and artist's statement written by Alex Stewart's student to write a dissertation project. A comparison of roses' themes is a yellow wallpaper and a source of sweat (even if you simply use some important quotes or the same paper sentence or paper sentence and its reasons (topic sentences)) "Rose for Emily "or" barn "by William Faulkner" A good person is hard to find "pass". Given the mission of "Emily's rose" above, you may have arguments to talk about the problem. "Emily's Rose" and "Evil Probability" are compared by William Faulkner's short story "A Emily for Rose" and Shirley Jackson's "Evil Probability". The author created similar characters and scenes to show a bold image of evil. Both Emily Grierson and Adela Strangeworth are female and have similar characteristics, but the motivation is totally different. Their story takes place in a near town that plays an important role in their evil motives. - "Scorpio Story" by American writer Samuel Clemens (aka Mark Twain) is a short story that "the views sanctified by serious conditions are very different". "It is not a loose, spontaneous development of a story, but against a study of a complete plot" (Feinstein 1) Emily's Roses and Yellow Wallpaper William Faulkner's "Emily's Rose" and Charlotte Perkins Gilman's "Yellow Wallpaper" are two short stories with many similarities. That story tells the emotional and psychological experiences of the two ladies living together. Exclusion environment The women presented in these two stories are crazy, lonely, and are controlled by others. All of these suggest different vocabulary. Crazy has a different meaning than many people. These reading methods are completely different, but still can be explained with this word. The lottery used a crazy society and reaction, roses for Emily are crazy mentally ill women, and swimmers are crazy mixes of past events. That's why we need to process the information posted on the stories you read. I usually have it

The problem of evil and suffering brings true problems to religious believers. It is because they force to accept the claim of disputes that they can not reconcile logically. Religious believers often question the nature of God and whether it is the type of God that we guide as we believe. St. Augustine said that unless God can not stop evil and pain, if he can not stop evil and pain, he is not that strong, so it is not everything. However, Augustine does not actually think this is true, he considers it to be the problem he wants to solve. Brothers of Theodicy and Dostoevsky Karamazov Since the beginning of religious thinking, omnipotent, perfectly legitimate, perfectly merciful God has been plagued by believers in evil and painful worlds. Atheists often present this paradox to prove that such a god can not exist. Therefore, theology is an invalid position. Theodicy is a division of the philosophy aimed at preserving religion by harmonizing the existence of what is called omnipotence, the perfectly righteous god and the world's evil and suffering. Theodicy is a specific department of theology and philosophy aiming to harmonize the beliefs of the Almighty, Almighty and Merciful God and the existence of evil and suffering in the world. Therefore, it is aware of the existence of evil, God is both able to eliminate good and evil, then try to explain why he does not. One of the most famous expressions is Gottfried Leibniz in 1710, he is optimistically our world is the best among all possible worlds, and unless it is the best and most balanced one I assert that it will not. Because it is a god created by the perfect world That's the world From Augustine. One of the main insistence of unbelievers against the existence of God is the existence of evil and suffering in the world. The word "evil" is often used to indicate morally wrong things. Philosophers differentiate between moral evil and natural evil. Moral evil arises from human behavior that can be pursued morally, the evil of nature arises from the failure of nature, and nature causes disease and famine. Saint Augustine

Othello's evil and good life are often used as a way of defining who you are. Shakespeare tested his role in the famous play "Othello". Adding symbols of twist and color of words makes it possible to maximize the individuality of Othello, Iago, and Deademona, and maintains a balance between inner good and evil. When this famous Shakespeare work accomplished this, judgments of good and evil were realized, and there was nothing better than the resolution because of the large amount of emotional clearance. Othello's evil is comparable to the evil of William · Shakespeare's tragic "Othello". The ominous aspect of the drama is sometimes too heavy and has a melancholy effect on the audience. In real life, Truman Capote shared many talents and hobbies with Harper Lee. "In the early 1930's, Nelle Harper Lee and Truman Capote became Big Leads in Monroeville, Alabama." They like to write, so Amasa has two older underwood typewriters (The Big Read ). In classics, Truman's name is Charles Baker. They often call him Dear. Othello's Evil Personality William Shakespeare's 'Othello' brings a big threat to the audience, mainly on the wicked island of Iaco, whose evil influence penetrates the lives of the surrounding victims. In Shakespeare along the river, Frank Kelmode explained the type of evil of the ancient. The ancient deity god - the form of familiar abstract evil - Iago was wearing contemporary demon costumes. - Full treatment of Othello women Sadly, gender discrimination has brought an ugly heart to Othello's obvious tragedy of William Shakespeare. Let's learn about this problem in this article. William · Shakespeare: "Tragedy", Paul Jorgensen said Othello's gender discrimination "prostitute scene" (4.2), pessimistic and cruel. Even tears of tears and warm tenderness Othello of William Shakespeare is a tragedy, Othello is the Moorish city of Venice. I was a friend of Othello, but Othello relied on him for promoting Michael Casio to the lieutenant. Iago then began his evil and malice behavior against Othello. This leads to Othello's jealousy and killing his wife's Desdemona. Othello committed suicide afterwards. Through the use of images, irony, and symbolism, Shakespeare shows the theme of power to be destroyed. Shakespeare explains the theme and uses images to show the story full of rhetoric to the audience Ralph Berry believes that Othello has various "symbolic explanations" (Berry 3). Othello 's view by William Shakespeare is that the play has an obvious arrangement for good and evil. The author wrote that there are three main categories in the theme of good and evil; "... evil, anthropomorphization in Iago ... good, desdeemona" and "Othello as a symbol of evil subversion" sexual drama "(Berry 3) Berry is approaching the paper by studying the diverse relationships among key figures.The title of his article is "Othello's model". The pattern he wrote was the conversion of good and evil in many relationships of drama.

Society believes that if something is good or evil it is immutable. This is very inaccurate. Some clues that the characteristic society is describing as good may actually be a big fraud. For example, appearance, reputation, humanity. Many sources such as Dr. Jekyll and Dr. Hyde's strange incident, "Continuous Murderer, Evil and We", and Philip Simbaid's Interview "Why are good people doing bad things" Can be supported. The true personality of a person. In the dictionary, the definition of evil is morally wrong or bad, malicious. William Golding's Lord of the Flies demonstrates that everyone in society gets better and better and can bring out everything to the fullest. This book positively traces the social problem to humanity and savageness in mankind. Golding shows that people lacking parental controls and rules lost human nature because society and civilizations lost the characteristics they have given them. Society believes that if something is good or evil it is immutable. This is very inaccurate. Some clues that the characteristic society is describing as good may actually be a big fraud. For example, appearance, reputation, humanity. - Music can shake your world, stimulate your ideas, and change your view. When you think of the first rap music. Lil Wayne said that calling himself the best rapper without hesitation must be alive. "My picture should be in the dictionary next to the defined definition" (Wayne, "Shoot Me Down"). Lil Wayne is an important force in the world of rap In this book, Boy Scouts are the weakest for social good and evil. In the process of the story, the scout was exposed to good and evil through thugs, fire and Boo Radley. When the scout saw Atticus facing the mob, at first it feels they are ready to hurt him and in this opinion this group should be a bad person. Scout tried to stop the confrontation and by doing so, awakened Mr. Cunningham's benefit. The reader saw the Scout change some of Mr. Cunningham's words in the following sentence: "Then he went straight and waved his hands." Please let us know, "He cried" (Lee pg. 154). Mr. Cunningham's behavior is humanitarian, unlike the way he behaves in the mob. The whole mob is very bad, but everyone is very good. Scout brought the individual out of the mob and profit from the bad guys. Another example of a scout that encounters good and evil is a fire. 69)

Satan eats fruit works at three different levels based on evidence of original text convinced of Eve by his dialogue and reasons for the relationship between good and evil, and how human beings can interact with reality even further I persuaded it. And perceive the reality. It seems to be completely separate, but in reality there is a tightly intertwined relationship between the three, which in the end confirms our existence and the reason for the fall. Satan succeeded in tempting Eve as a result of fraud and jealousy when he talked to Eve. In addition to good and evil: "The problem at the beginning is not an open question, the fatal problem of truth value ultimately leads to the affirmation of truth and the complete affirmation of life and humanity - (Nicice's Mission, 24). When Berkowitz claimed that Nietzsche declared the denial of 'willingness to science' because Nietzsche made a "comfortable lie" (Nietzs sche: Ethics of ethicists, 238) (see preface, n.3) Berkowitz misunderstood BGE 24. Nietzsche did not criticize the will of the free spirit within this saying, but rather from a world in which such a situation is evident from a world of certain error-free "real world" or outlook It reminded me that I never escaped to no world. https://the-eye.eu/public/concen.org/UChicagoPress.Ebook.Pack-2016-PHC/9780226259819.UChicago%20Press.Nietzsche%27s%20Enlightenment_%20The% 20Free-Spirit%20Free-Spirit%20Trilogy% 20of% 20the% 20Middle% 20Period.Paul% 20Franco.Oct% 2C2011.pdf In "Beyond Good and Evil", Nietzsche accuses past philosophers that they lack critical awareness and accept blind doctrines when considering moral premises. Especially since people believe that not only different expressions of the same basic impulse that are directly expressed by malignant people but also good people are against malignant people, To condemn the establishment of a grand metaphysical system. This work entered the meaning of "beyond good and evil", which left the influence on Nietzsche's traditional morality, in order to support his view that Nietzsche should see shamefulness to face knowledge perspective and danger We adopted a destructive criticism for. Positive way of terms. contemporary Good and evil - The big struggle between good and evil seems to be paradoxical. It is good to exist, but there is no evil. "Evil", we mean the opposite of good and the opposite. Power to oppose equality and inconsistent power. But that is not the case. On the contrary, what we call evil is a lack of good. When it becomes good and evil, we are not saying that there is no evil in the world, but it says that it does not exist. It is the same as light and dark. The presence of light not only proves the existence, it can measure and artificially create it. But the darkness does not exist. There are no particles or waves called "darkness". Darkness is what happens when there is no light. There is no light. Things without "good" always cause "bad" ones.

Introduction of occupational problems in calculation 2 Introduction of tax disputes 2 Ethical problems relating to tax exemption 6 References 7 Introduction "Google's slogan" Do no Evil "is a Google employee Paul Buchheit or Google engineer Amit Patel proposed at the meeting Did. The value of the company was at the beginning of 2000 or 2001. In 2004, Google changed the slogan from "not doing evil" to "not doing evil". Google also comprehensively said: "Do the right thing: do not do bad things, it is honesty" (Moses, 2008). Purchasing hashes: If you have problems with professional computing (for example, you own a big data company and you do not know how to handle a large amount of data), using MAN you can use data in the MATRIX network Can be processed. Hash, you will be rewarded based on your contribution. Applications are the most important factor affecting the liquidity and value of block chain network assets. For example, Ethernet, the open source public chain with the most accessible application, resulted in high-speed distribution of ETH tokens and a sharp rise in prices. The same applies to MATRIX. From the beginning, we have acquired numerous high-quality applications and partners. Hiding the complexity of consumers while maintaining business security and flexibility is a challenge for business leaders and IT professionals. Virtual Client Computing - (Public) Application Remoting and Desktop Delivery solution from the cloud is a newcomer. However, there is also a problem here. The impact of Windows 10 is big. At this point, the organization is investigating, migrating, or using Windows 10. For a variety of reasons, there is a limit to using Windows 10 as the core foundation for application remoting in the public cloud and desktop virtualization - licensing is one of them. More and more companies and individuals are transferring data, applications, and services for cloud computing. Increased use of cloud computing has brought many challenges to forensic researchers. Unlike traditional forensic computing surveys, cloud environments are shared among multiple users, and systems are usually located in multiple physical locations. In other words, law enforcement agencies may not be able to access servers, networks, and media devices. It really requires standards. Furthermore, I conclude that the greatest challenge of forensic investigation is not a technical problem but a legal problem. The necessity of law enforcement authority restrictions, counseling and legal training seems to have been ignored. In addition, jurisdictional restrictions and lack of international cooperation will increase the time and expense of cross-border surveys. Therefore, international cooperation on cloud forensics needs to be strengthened.

Iago is the most evil character in Shakespeare's work, the most evil character in Shakespeare's literature is Iago. He is a ruthless antisocial force. Other characters can not even approach his evil. Most of the enemies that appear in Shakespeare plays have good reasons to solve the trouble they cause. Iago is not a majority; he is full of hatred of the world, especially Othello. It is the only reason that I have had a conflict at Othello. The evil of Iagos has been written with various villains, but the most dangerous of all these works is Iago. Most opponents of Shakespearean plays have a clear motivation to solve this problem. On the other hand, I 'm not the only one who dislikes the world, especially Othello, in most cases. Judging from the reasons of Othello's all confrontation, he is the protagonist of the play. All the problems he caused were lies, betrayal and manipulation. Among all the characters appearing in Shakespeare 's literature, the most evil person is definitely Iago. He is a ruthless antisocial force. Other characters can not even approach his evil. Most of Shakespeare's opponents of plays have good reasons to solve the problem. In most cases, Iaco, especially Othello, does not hate the world. Iago is the whole cause of Othello's conflict. If he never took part in the play, Othello will marry Digimonia and they will live happy eternally. From the beginning of the game to the end, he will cause a conflict. He is directly or indirectly responsible for the deaths of Othello Desdimona, Emilia, Cassio and Roderigo. This happens to be all the protagonists. I believe that Shakespeare is not the only one who wants to make Iago 's personality evil. I want him to symbolize it more. All the problems he caused were lies, betrayal, manipulation and profound unknown hatred. In Othello, Iagu is definitely one of Shakespeare's most evil characters among all the characters we introduced. Other characters can not even approach his evil. Most characters in Shakespeare's plays have good reasons to solve the problems they cause. I 'm not the majority, on the contrary, he just hates the world, especially Othello. Iago is the whole cause of Othello's conflict. If he never took part in the play, Othello will marry Desedemona and they will live happily eternally. From the beginning of the game to the end, he will cause a conflict. He is directly or indirectly responsible for the deaths of Othello Desdemona, Emilia, Cassio and Roderigo. All these happen to be the hero. I believe that Shakespeare is not the only one who wants to make Iago 's personality evil. I want him to symbolize it more.

"Job": An attempt to prove Almighty, childlike God's behavior "The Old Testament Job" is a story and the Hebrew authors justify the irrational behavior of a malicious God at first sight I will try to prove that. Job asked why "good" suffered. The unusual behavior of the so-called merciful God must be reasonable from the eyes of his followers, and in doing so God is considered to be only Almighty Children. The original meaning of the word Satan is "opponent", and what he contained in the Bible is more negative of the advocate after the Old Testament trying to prove God's mercy by attribution to reality It represents behavior (such as persecution of Job). . Dirty work to test the spirit who is the advocate of the energetic devil. This entity was regarded as evil until the Persian conquest of the introduction of the Hebrew into the dualism of Aurea-Mazda (Good God) and Ahriman (evil God). It later appeared as a binary principle of Manicaism in Christianity. The Manichaeic equation is simple: God = good, evil = evil. However, it was not until the year 447 that Toledo Parliament announced that the legitimate existence of the devil was a reality existence. In my opinion, "Job's" is widely misunderstood - this is a classic piece of the Hebrew Bible, an orthodox (correct belief) and theological essence when treating evil philosophical problems openly It seems to be. For that part, "work" represents an essential criticism of the Biblical theology in the Hebrew Bible itself (therefore, not only is God considered as the Creator of the Universe, it is also regarded as a moral God ). . Why moral God does not stop the problem of evil holy discourse. But "Job" is actually ignoring the philosophical problems of theology, focusing on the practical and psychological problem of dealing with pain and suffering, in essentially right (right behavior) I would like to propose something.

Free will As we have seen, the definition of free will may be misunderstood and easily distorted. For the purposes of this article, free will is defined as the ability to unconditionally select emotions, emotions, or behaviors. I believe it 100% since I first understood the meaning of free will from the beginning. I have the right and ability to choose what I like. In addition to thinking that I have a free will, I hear other things, I feel that they do not clearly understand free will. Free will is the ability to make choices based on your wishes. Free will has two theological views: compatibility and liberalism. Compatibility is the position that people only have freedom, as it allows a person to be free and his sin hinders him from freely choosing God. (1 Corinthians 2:14; Romans 3: 10-12; Rome) 6: 14) - 20). The libertarian free will is the position that even though he is sinful, a sinner who is not saved can still choose God freely (John 3:16; 3:36). The fate of God does not mean that we can not make a choice of free will. Because God is omnipotent, God is planned by our choice. He knows what we are going to do. He has no choice but to do his best. Therefore, whatever you choose to do with your own free will is well-known. But his knowledge does not mean you can not choose freely God's free will is important to solve the problem of evil. If God chooses evil even if he has free will, it may have created life as well: free will, never evil. If God does not have free will, but still is good, free will may not be kind, so there is no need to create evil to give human free will. If God, angels, and other heavenly creatures have free will in a place without evil and pain, it is not a fact that God makes evil exist, as it is a necessary side effect of free will. " Monotheism and free will: God, determinism and fate of love, god, human, free will and evil validity selection: free will and determinism God has no free will: 2 freedom will forgive evil Proof and cause of suffering? Theological problems and heaven, heaven and Niana: The existence of free will in heaven proves that free will does not require evil Bible (NIV). While maintaining readability NIV is the best translator for accuracy. Many writers, editing of many previously published books. I prefer quoting from NIV, but I have to quote KJV where I quote the Bible. Because it is not protected by copyright, NIV is so. Book Review

"Everyone is born with great desire for starvation.Which question is which of the two want to be most hungry?" - Enrique Vega. This sentence raises the problem we were not thinking about. We never grow up and we say we want to be evil or kind. It comes from all experience and choice. In "Fly King", many extreme events, such as killing each other for excitement, will let the boys choose to have a malicious identity. Identity is one of the themes of William Golding's "The Lie of the Lord". Because it shows us the fight to become moral, honest and kind, or dishonest and evil by external conflict. Symbol of the Lord of the Flies In the Lord of Hawaii by William Golding, boys trapped in the island are exposed to many unique elements symbolizing ideas and concepts. By using symbols such as beast, pig's head and even pig's specifications, Golding says that while human beings are released from social rules and contraindications, their evil nature's power dominates their existence It makes it possible. - The Lord of the Lord of the Lord of the Lord of evil is a clear understanding of Golding's view of human nature. Whether this view is right or wrong is controversial. This image is the golding for the reader Human being born to become unhappy. "Flying King" is just a mere abstract tool of Golding, you can build the concept of inner evil in the essence of human in the mind of the reader. The king of flies by William Golding was written by William Golding in 1954. This is an attractive book exploring the concept of human behavior when exempting society. Golding achieved this by hiding a group of British boys students on a remote island during the war. In the meantime boys evolved from civilization and handed over to barbarians. - Importance of beasts at William Golding's "The Lord of the Flies" There is a big theme everywhere in the book "The Lord of the Flies".

In the American society, there are now many binary files that are used to conquer people into standard categories such as sex and gender. Society may treat a person as a man or a woman, but this does not necessarily mean how that person's appearance looks like outside their genetic composition. Sex is a biological composition of male or female. For example, female DNA has an XX chromosome, the reproductive system has eggs and vagina, and women have functional breasts. Even more frustrating is that you can easily fix this problem. Take evil as an example. According to Gregory Maguire 's novel "evil: the life and age of the west evil witch", the musical found a complex hero who keeps her complicated. His anger makes perfect sense like Mareficent: her community made her angry from birth from her skin color. When she finds corruption in her land, she can choose whether to accept the current situation or asylum. Instead of returning to the community that refused her, she insisted on making a wrong decision with a complicated and messy gun, which ultimately led to her disappointment. The story of Elfava is a tragedy, it is a true investigation of empathy and right and wrong. One of my favorite books is "evil: the life and age of the evil witch of the west", Gregory Maguire. Among them, Maguire talks about the history of the evil witch of the West from her point of view. There are many questions about what is evil, and who defines it. In this book, an evil witch is born with green skin marked as a devil from people around her. She hated her when she grew up. And that in turn talked about terrorism. Composer and songwriter Stephen Schwartz discovered the writer's 1995 novel "Evil: Life and Era of the West Evil Witch" on holidays and saw the possibility of its dramatic adaptation. However, Maguire abandoned the rights of Universal Pictures, which plans to develop a live-action movie. In 1998, Schwartz persuaded Maguire to transfer production rights and called Schwartz "passionate demands" to world-renowned producer Mark Pratt to run Schwartz's own expectations. Platt is said to have signed a joint producer of the project between Universal and David Stone.

The basic belief for Christianity is God's perfect good. God can not do evil, all his actions are completely pure. But this principle raises many questions about obvious pain and cheating spreading around the world. Where does evil come from? Furthermore, how can evil exist when the only eternal entity is perfect, innocent, and ultimately a good god? This problem is related to God's sovereign rationale and leads to more difficult problems including human responsibility and free will. Augustine Theology, named after the theologians, philosophers, and the Hippocampus St. Augustine in the 4th and 5 th centuries (according to some Christian sects) a Christian economy aimed at answering evidence of evil It is learning. Therefore, it tries to use the evil evidence of the world to explain the possibility of Almighty (Almighty) God and Almighty (all good) God. Many variations of this theology were proposed in history; their similarity was first explained by a 20th century philosopher John Hick who classified them as "Augustin". They normally argued that God was totally (ideally) kind and he created the world from nothing; and this evil is the result of human ingenuous sins. Evil entering the world is often interpreted as punishment for sin and lasts for human will abuse of free will Hippo Augustine is the first person who developed mysticism. He refuses the idea that the evil itself exists, but regards it as a good corruption caused by human free will. Augustine believed that there was material hell as a punishment for sin, but he believed that those who chose to receive the salvation of Jesus Christ would go to heaven. In the thirteenth century, influenced by Augustine, Thomas Aquinas proposed similar theology based on the fact that God is kind and evil. He believes that the existence of good will enable evil through human error. Augustine also influenced John Calvin, who supported Augustine's view that evil is the result of free will and that sin destroys human nature and requires God's grace to give moral guidance Gave.

Young Goodman Brown's concept of "Goodman Brown", Nathaniel Hawthorne is guilty by showing the same sacred thought that is considered a saint to Goodman Brown and making people feel guilty. We saw the view of purity and immorality. Goodman Brown's naming is a moral problem that everyone must face between good and evil. We want to challenge evil water everyday. This story reflects the existence, and everyone has their own decisions and decisions. According to Nathaniel Hawthorn 's role, young Goodman Brown, "There is nothing good on the planet, sin is just a name" ("YGB" 329). Hawthorn's dark lighting style shows his role in the long-term war of good and evil. An example of "minister's black veil" is Pastor Hooper, "the most sad man in all prisons, his own heart" ("MBV" 341). In "Young Goodman Brown", Hawthorne took the title to a dark place. There I said, "I walked on a dull path covered with the darkest trees in the forest, and it barely stood on one side, and after" ("YGB" 325), it passes through a narrow path and closes immediately. In addition to the themes of good and evil, Nathaniel's Hawthorne premonition tone clarifies the struggle between humans and temptation; he isolates his personality and is vivid in order to expose the vulnerability of human conditions I will use images and themes. Young Goodman Brown's concept of "Goodman Brown", Nathaniel Hawthorne is guilty by showing the same sacred thought that is considered a saint to Goodman Brown and making people feel guilty. We saw the view of purity and immorality. Goodman Brown's naming is a moral problem that everyone must face between good and evil. We want to challenge evil water everyday. - "Young Goodman Brown" by Nathaniel Hawthorne describes a story about exposing true evil and losing faith. Nathaniel Hawthorne left "Young Goodman Brown" and got a lot of explanations. What I absorbed from this story is that everyone has evil, no matter how good we think.

Is there a god? ... A big problem, billions of people have not yet proven that this is the truth, but you can find out if there is a real god. Evidence of the answer, we can find the truth through a search and thinking a little without judging it. Even if you are not sure, you have to ask for yourself. As the Bible says that someone has seen God, there is some evidence here. Jesus also said in the Bible: "You find me and find me. We need to observe the development of two interesting, completely different discussions about the evidence of God's existence. John Schellenberger developed the so-called "the opposite of God against hiding". Schellenberger thinks that perfect love must belong to the sacred existence of any individual, and this perfect love needs to open personal relationships with sacred existence. Sherenberg then argues that the fact that many unbelievers of this beloved God will not resist God's disclosure proves the opposite sacred existence against the existence of individuals (whether through religious experience or through discussion) . Holy existence or God will become more obvious (see Shellenberg 2007; answer, see Taliaferro 2009) If there is a philosophical problem that needs to be discussed until the end of time, it is the existence of God. When discussing the existence of God, we must consider all arguments that support and oppose the existence of God. Discussions that are most frequently discussed when discussing God is a matter of evil. Evil is defined as the existence of human suffering and suffering. If there is a god, everyone knows that all of this god is love and is omnipotent, how can we have evil in the world? How can God make things not deserving human suffering and suffering? There are many arguments to argue, but there are two prominent ones. First, God created the best world. Evil plays an important role in our world and there are some evils in the world that may not be evil. Second, the moral evil of our planet is due to the free will of mankind. Because God has given us freedom, this is a necessity of the complete world. Then there is moral evil due to human race. The existence of God is always controversial. This is the last theme of the discussion as everyone seems to have an opinion on it. I look at the traditional discussion of the existence of God, discussions to endure the test of time, and see each discussion in turn, and finally by looking for truly useful discussion logic behind each discussion I will analyze. Response to criticism and criticism. The first argument about the existence of God, I

Usually, when we think about the world our mind comes to mind. What we do not often remember is that the word world is more important than the earth. Webster's New World Dictionary points out that the real definition of the word world is "part of the earth, personal experience, opinion ...". In fact, remember this definition. So they are in their own world. Every world has its own problem. Fly Lord was published by William Golding in 1954. Today's Lord's flying is a well-known literary criticism. For literary criticism in books, many schools require students to read "Flying King". In this article we discuss three themes and literary criticisms: good and evil, a symbol of personality, and character maturity. Another topic of Golding's Lord of the Flies is the conflict of good and evil. - In this article I will explore the three elements of William Golding, Lord of the Fly, the change from civilization to barbarians, beasts, and the natural evil of the island war. Golding expresses evil through his role, through their actions and symbols. Since it is where the whole novel occurs, the island becomes the biggest representative of evil. By writing "Flying King", Golding strives to pursue the symbol of humanity. Basically the dialogue between Simon and Lord of the Fly represents a human conflict between good and evil. For this confrontation, many characters are fighting for decision-making. For example, when Piggy was angry with Ralph because Ralph got angered by Piggy, Golding noticed that Ralph "during the two apologies or even insults" (23). In many TV cartoons, angels and demons floating on both sides of the character metaphorically represent the human inner conflict between good and evil. The correct decision of angels and devils to discuss the role should be so. Whether you choose an angel or a devil party depends on the cartoon character. In Hebrew, Beelzebub or devil means king of fly. This reinforces the idea that the beast / flying king is a symbol of the devil.

Beowulf: Wiglaf Wiglaf and the other Beowulf warriors saw Beowulf start the fight against the dragon. However, when the battle appears to be directed to Beowulf, all fighters escape except Wiglaf. But the purpose of Wigraph in this verse is not just to help people in Beowulf. As a good warrior, Wigglef shows the importance of heroism to society and the necessity to be true to relatives and lords. He thinks he is willing to sacrifice his life to repay the gift he received from his Lord, but more importantly, he says that between the warrior and the Lord It symbolizes the necessity of cooperation Heroic poetry In the first part of Beowulf, the young hero Hrothgar is helped by the young hero Beowulf. However, in the second part, Beowulf himself is an old king and is helped by Wiglaf. The problem is that Wiglaf is exactly a true Anglo-Saxon warrior, or like Beowulf, he can be called a superhero. In this article we will analyze this problem by comparing the apostrophe used in Beowulf and Wiglaf. It is clear that Beowulf has various nicknames. Women of Beowulf essay. Beowulf Beowulf is an epic written in the Anglo-Saxon era - an introduction of women in the Beowulf essay. There are many female characters in epics such as Grendels Mother and Wealtheow, but it is clear that men and their problems are the focus of this story. Just because you need to guess without knowing the audience may be difficult. Beowulf: Translating and commenting on Sellic Spell Editing Christopher Tolkien, Houghton & Mifflin, Christopher Tolkien, Houghton & Mifflin quotes, of course, only two translations in articles on quoted Works pages. Sometimes I remember it through writing service Epic usually presents the situation of good and evil, life and death. Epic poetry Beowulf has these two things. When Beowulf and Wiglaf beat Grendel, his mother and the dragon showed evil, their behavior indicated this. Good and evil always lead to life and death. In most cases, good life and evil die. In Beowulf, good is beat down evil. Beowulf is called Gevers and Danes, a very generous, kind and strong person who provides something for people's survival. These functions will help classify Beowulf as a true epic hero

Unlike other small prophet's books, this book is different from other small prophet's books, as it is not God to tell his people through the prophets, the prophets represent people and solve (or challenge) God I will. The Israelites are evil, and God punishes them again for their heresy. It seems to be a constant cycle, these people collapse, persecuted, and repent. In this case, God used an evil country, the Chaldeans to punish the Israelites. During 25 years between the collapse of Nineveh (612 BC) and the collapse of Jerusalem (586 BC), the Prophet Habakke apparently wrote Habakkuk. Habakkuk may grow during the reign of Josiah. He could have witnessed much of the reform he had taken during the reign of Judah. But Josiah was the last righteous king to sit on the throne of Judah. People who obey him are evil people. When Josiah died, all his reforms died with him. Judah has few traces of religion. The prophet Jeremiah told the evil of Judah before Jerusalem was beaten by the Babylonians (or the Chaldeans). Summary - Habakkuk's statistic is that Habakkuk questioned the integrity of his own people, Israel. He asked God's judgment to come upon them because of their evil. When God declared to destroy the Assyrians in answering Habakkuk 's plea, Habakkuk left the question of why God would overcome God' s people by wicked people. God did not answer his questions directly. Habakkuk left a doubt, but even if he did not "get it", with new understanding, he had to rely on living faith alone (H 2: 4). Now, as we review Habakkuku, how do you explain the change of the prophets? What happened to Habakkuk between Chapters 1 and 3? We must first point out that this change is not immediate, but as a result of the process, a somewhat painful process. Habakkuk does not understand what God does. As he apparently failed to deal with his people's sins, he was angry with God. He could not understand how God used the Chaldeans to judge Jews. Through a series of events, God changed the mind of Habakkuku In the last article on Habakkuk we saw that the prophet began dialogue with God. Habakkuk has two problems. Mainly Israel is living in sin, and Habakkuk does not understand why God did not do anything to change them. In addition, when God answered for solution, he crushed Israel with the Chaldeans. God tells Habakkuk that it gets worse before it gets better. This is what we experienced with God. Pure strangeness of thinking about his way. If God is a kind and loving God, why does he allow all the fears and wars around us? It is not a problem as we have settled it, in fact it can even be fought against God in doubt. I would like to continue using Habakkuk as a model idea. How do you explain the surrounding situation? How do we solve the problem in the right way? Again let Habakkuk ask questions, and God answers the rest of the chapter.

"Minister's Black Bail" - Contradiction, Climax and Resolution Nathaniel Hawthorne's "Minister's Black Veil" will be reviewed to determine contradictions, climaxes and resolutions within the story. Conflict, including evil and sin, pride and humility, is the direction that Clarisse Swisher prefers in Nathaniel Hawthorne. Biography: "Hawthorn himself is focusing on the problem of evil, the essence of sin, pride and humility, contradictory.13 In the view of the reader, the central conflict - the relationship between the hero and the opponent (Abrams 225) - is an inner conflict in the story, a spirit within the minister - a moral conflict. What is the collision of Nathaniel Hawthorne's "Minister's Black Bale"? Is it settled after the climax? This article is aimed at addressing these problems. Hugo McPherson described the nature of Hawthorne's conflict in "Hawthorne Use Myth". Everything he said is ultimately related to "inner area". Because the heart is a meeting place. All power - spirit and matter, light and darkness, will compete for the superiority of humanity. "Minister's Black Bail" - Contradiction, Climax and Resolution Nathaniel Hawthorne's "Minister's Black Veil" will be reviewed to determine contradictions, climaxes and resolutions within the story. Conflict, including evil and sin, pride and humility, is the direction that Clarisse Swisher prefers in Nathaniel Hawthorne. Biography: "Hawthorn himself is focusing on the problem of evil, the essence of sin, pride and humility, contradictory.13 In the view of the reader, the central conflict - the relationship between the hero and the opponent (Abrams 225) - is an inner conflict in the story, a spirit within the minister - a moral conflict. "Minister 's Black Veil" - External, Internal Collision According to literary critic' s evaluation, Nathaniel Hawthorne 's short story "Minister' s Black Veil" is treated equally in the story, conflicting both internal and internal It contains. The purpose of this paper is to explore the two types of conflict that occurred in the story. R. W. B. Lewis hinted at the inner and outer contradictions in his statement in "Returning to Lime: Hawthorne".

The main focus of Nathaniel Hawthorne's story 'Young Goodman Brown' is that evil is better than victory. So-called good guys are tempted by evil and allow you to turn yourself into a bad guy. This is very similar to what happened in Hawthorne's "red letter", but both of them committed sins, succumbed to this and succumbed to the power of the devil. In this novel, the area where the devil lives is strictly parallel to the area of ​​"Young Goodman Brown". The theme of Young Goodman Brown is to develop an interpretation of the theme of "Young Goodman Brown". Due to the author 's confused style, a clear concept with the theme "Young Goodman Brown" is not easy. As AN Kaul mentioned in Hawthorne's "Introduction" - a collection of essential essays: Hawthorne got a lot with various types of avoidance, misunderstanding, and congestion. Regarding his legendary legend and faded novel, in short, since he seems to give up his important interests often, Puritan man, when young Goodman Brown crossed the forest, he highlighted the young Goodman Brown's potential (potential significance). During his trip, young Goodman Brown encountered a man, and eventually greeted a snake staff member. Coincidentally, Young Goodman Brown met some people he knew from society. When drawing a man who used a snake as an employee as a devil, a young Goodman Brown noticed that many people around him are sinners. This led Young Goodman Brown to question decent people around him. This shows how Nathanial Hawthorne uses a hidden dark image as the potential of Young Goodman Brown. Young Goodman Brown's concept of "Goodman Brown", Nathaniel Hawthorne is guilty by showing the same sacred thought that is considered a saint to Goodman Brown and making people feel guilty. We saw the view of purity and immorality. Goodman Brown's naming is a moral problem that everyone must face between good and evil. We want to challenge evil water everyday. - "Young Goodman Brown" by Nathaniel Hawthorne describes a story about exposing true evil and losing faith. Nathaniel Hawthorne left "Young Goodman Brown" and got a lot of explanations. What I absorbed from this story is that everyone has evil, no matter how good we think.

In his essay "Evil and Almighty", McGee has built a view on the possibility of the existence of God with the characteristics of Lord religion, namely Christianity, Islam and Judaism. These features include that God is omnipotent, that you can stop evil with omnipotent tenderness, want to destroy evil, or be completely kind. Mackie systematically completed his logical response to the logical thinking process and to all possible types of criticism and alternative solutions. Summary: As you all know, J. L. Mackie is famous for having no objective value. I would like to investigate Mackie's explanation of what objective value really is, then consider his argument against those subjects and try to understand one of them. Specifically, I would like to see if his argument applies to Kant's objective value. Therefore, this conversation is both Kant's explanation and McKee's explanation (at least when I understood them). McKee believes that objective value (if any) has a strange causal relationship. Specifically, these entities have the ability to make them conscious of their motivation (whatever their meaning, they follow their recommendations). Does Kant believe that objectively valuable entities have such power? Is this power strange in metaphysics? J. L. Mackie defends moral skepticism in three specific arguments. His initial argument came from cultural relativism. McGee saw the problem that what we call objective moral belief seems not to form our culture. Rather, our culture seems to form our specific moral beliefs like monogamous. Therefore, moral subjectivity is the most rational explanation of moral beliefs to imitate our culture. His second argument against moral realism is that there is something strange or counterintuitive in the description of objective moral fields someone might give. There are three differences in this discussion. First, there are metaphysical questions, or questions based on odd states claimed by realists. For McGee, the wonder of this field is arguments against it. Secondly, there is a relationship problem as it is not clear how this field relates to natural objects and human behavior.

Macbeth 's strange sister is controlled and operated; it looks more beautiful than it looks. While admiring the evil magic goddess Hecut, they are evil agents often associated with evil spirits. The drama "Macbeth" focuses on the death of Scott Tarun, once a noble, through the power of chaos named Macbeth. The evil that has plagued Macbeth everywhere in William Shakespeare's Macbeth is ultimately the result of three strange sisters brought magic, predictive and inexplicable influences, human beings are unruly eventually You will face confusion in the face of power. Status Michael Fassbender's "small and handsome" version of "Macbeth" has no problem. "Double, double, hard work, trouble" is one of the most memorable poems with three witches, a frothing cauldron, and cunning eyes. A group of strange sisters are still talking regularly in a mystery, giving Macbeth evil eye, walking in the fog Scotland wilderness. However, the movie erases the dark magic of rotation in the play, this change itself induces pots, complicating Macbeth 's freedom, will, and guilt. When behavior began, the witch continued to play an ambiguous theme that doubled the entire drama. When they throw material into the cauldron, they sing "double, double, difficult, and awkward" - they remind them that the speech is full of dual meaning, paradox and ambiguity (IV i 10). The ghost summoned by the witch gave Macbeth an ambiguous message, and they seemed to know very well that he understood only half of them. Macbeth himself acknowledged earlier that "the stone is known to move and the tree can speak" (III iv 122), but these ghosts give Macbeth a wrong sense of security. He regarded Phantom's words as faces and forgot to study how their predictions are realized. At the same time, Macbeth and Banco met three witches while on their way home - Hagus stirred the blackened cauldron. And indicated the arrival of Macbeth: "Double, double, intense, and problem." The witches will become the first man by predicting Macbeth, the new Cawdor Tana, and the Scottish king scared the couple. And Banquo will become the king's father. Then the dark shadows disappeared and Banque and Macbeth guessed these strange predictions. When the witch left, the arrival notice of the king's two kings was that Macbeth was named on behalf of the actual abandoned coder turn. Macbeth was surprised to learn that the first witch's prophecy was instantly realized and believed in the final realization of the second woman. If he could be the Thaw of Cawdor, perhaps he could also rule over the whole of Scotland.

One of the most famous conflicts in the world is between Palestinians and Israelis. Since Israel became a citizen in 1948, conflict has occurred between them. Over the years, conflict between Palestinians and Israelis was intense. Many important issues have led to continuous conflicts between the two countries, and they have not yet found solutions. The main problem between Palestinians and Israelis is the unresolved issue of Palestinians without independent houses. Conflict between Palestinians and Israelis In the context of growing domestic conflicts to achieve elastic peace in a divided society and the collapse of traditional conflict resolution means this paper will focus on peacekeeping and conflict resolution I propose a two track approach. Orbit is represented by the formation of peace, which is defined as a determination to find a solution to conflict at the political leadership level. Another trajectory of peacebuilding has been the marking game of Palestinians and Israelis almost uninterrupted except for this type of tag including suicide bombings, Qassam rockets, Hellfire missiles, and Hellfire missiles during the past 60 years It means that I've been involved in. Tank This article examines how public opinion affects the complexity of such tagged games and that the response to Palestinian invasion is somewhat violent regardless of who leads the Israeli government I will try to prove it. There is no explosive or permanent conflict, as between the Israelites and the Palestinians. The power of Israel and Palestine for centuries has been replaced in Palestine, and the two cousins ​​have conflicted in the 20th century. Who really belongs to Palestinians? This problem brought about many years of bloodshed and terrorism. - Humans are one of the drama clearly contrasted with the medieval moral drama, concept of good and evil. Through the script, the idea that comes up repeatedly is the confrontation between Mercy ("good" personality) and the role of Mischief which is the concept of "evil". The contradiction between good and evil is to achieve the goal that will affect humanity. Compassion affects the concentration on the judgment of the human divine so that humans can live eternal life in heaven If the problem is a conflict between Palestinians and Israelis, it is the most recent conflict, starting with the large resolution of the Palestinian Jews in the 20th century and the subsequent establishment of the Israel state. In the eyes of most Muslims this is caused not by religion but by the evacuation and deprivation of many Palestinians, including Muslims and Christians, because the Israeli state was formed. Pay attention to the reasons for this problem positively.

Young Goodman Brown In the story of a young Goodman Brown, the hero found more ideas by adventure to the forest. Young Goodman Brown left the town of Salem, Massachusetts in the forest, confronted the temptation of evil, conquered. But the artistic nature of this story is that Goodman Brown discovered, realized, and became something. In "Young Goodman Brown", the hero experienced a period of self realization, and ironically, he was extremely worried about the evil he was concerned about. The theme of Young Goodman Brown is to develop an interpretation of the theme of "Young Goodman Brown". Due to the author 's confused style, a clear concept with the theme "Young Goodman Brown" is not easy. As AN Kaul mentioned in Hawthorne's "Introduction" - a collection of essential essays: Hawthorne got a lot with various types of avoidance, misunderstanding, and congestion. Regarding his legendary legend and faded novel, in short, since he seems to give up his important interests often, Puritan man, when young Goodman Brown crossed the forest, he highlighted the young Goodman Brown's potential (potential significance). During his trip, young Goodman Brown encountered a man, and eventually greeted a snake staff member. Coincidentally, Young Goodman Brown met some people he knew from society. When drawing a man who used a snake as an employee as a devil, a young Goodman Brown noticed that many people around him are sinners. This led Young Goodman Brown to question decent people around him. This shows how Nathanial Hawthorne uses a hidden dark image as the potential of Young Goodman Brown. Young Goodman Brown's concept of "Goodman Brown", Nathaniel Hawthorne is guilty by showing the same sacred thought that is considered a saint to Goodman Brown and making people feel guilty. We saw the view of purity and immorality. Goodman Brown's naming is a moral problem that everyone must face between good and evil. We want to challenge evil water everyday. - "Young Goodman Brown" by Nathaniel Hawthorne describes a story about exposing true evil and losing faith. Nathaniel Hawthorne left "Young Goodman Brown" and got a lot of explanations. What I absorbed from this story is that everyone has evil, no matter how good we think.

Augustine's political concept For Augustine, political life is a necessary evil. Why is it evil, and why is it necessary? So how does his argument affect his political theory? Introduction In order to better solve this problem, it is prudent to first discuss the fundamental beliefs of Saint Augustine. As we have to remember that St. Augustine was the first theologian, his faith was firmly rooted in the teachings of Christianity. He accepted the teachings of the Bible. Attempt of political restriction to link Augustine's Jean Beske Elsuten and Augustine to Arent's evil concept: "Augustine does not think that evil is a demon, but lacks kindness, contradiction is Nothing to imagine even making the Holocaust an ordinary thing of extreme evil. "Augustine's philosophical heritage is based on the contribution of these 20th century characters and the successor to modern critical theory It continues to influence. From a historical perspective, Augustine 's political thought has three main points: firstly, political Augustineism, secondly, Augustine' s political theology, Third, Augustine 's political theory Augustine's political concept For Augustine, political life is a necessary evil. Why is it evil, and why is it necessary? So how does his argument affect his political theory? Introduction In order to better solve this problem, it is prudent to first discuss the fundamental beliefs of Saint Augustine. As we have to remember that St. Augustine was the first theologian, his faith was firmly rooted in the teachings of Christianity. - Peter Brown 's commentary on Cava Augustine Papa Brown' s Cava Augustine is an intensive academic work outlining the entire life of the Catholic bishop. University of California Berkeley published this research in 1967. My edition is the second paperback found in the University Library in 1973. One of the main treasures of the Russian National Library is the work of Augustine, founded in Hemma, North Africa, home of St. Augustine, where he became a bishop. This book contains the earliest known copy of Augustine's main work, "About Christian doctrine". In the beginning of the 5th century, St. Jerome completed his job of life - translated the Bible into Latin. From Greek - the Old Testament is translated from Jerome into Hebrew, New Testament. The West Church received the most famous Latin translation, and in 1000 years later in the Trent Committee of 1546 it was regarded as the Catholic Church's standard translation under the name of Wulgate (in Latin, Biblia Vulgata is "Mandarin" is). Since the 7th century almost all European Biblical books correspond to Jerome translation Jerome does not limit itself to Biblical translation.

It is important to regard it as a prisoner and not watch out for real prisons. The important question is a metaphor of prisoners and guards. What does it mean to be a prisoner? What does it mean to be an advocate? Security guards are those who restrict the freedom of others and control and control others using that role. In the summer of 1971, Philip Zimbardo, Craig Haney, Curtis Banks conducted psychological experiments and tried simple questions. What will happen if you place a good person in evil places - Humans overcome the victory of evil or evil? In order to investigate this problem, college student volunteers were tested in advance and randomly assigned to the role of prisoners or security guards at simulated prison at Stanford University. Those students know that they are mentally healthy and have participated in the experiment, but they will soon become security guards as sadism and prisoners show signs of acute stress and depression. After only six days, the two week study of this plan becomes out of control and must be terminated to prevent further prisoner abuse. The dramatic performance of this social situation force is related to many institutional environments like Iraq's Abu Ghraib prison. This dramatic study is known as the Stanford Prison Experiment. It is a new movie theme supervised by Kim Patrick Alvarez by Tim Talbott. I am very pleased to be able to consult with the filmmakers on the production of the Stanford prison experiment and I am satisfied as to how they held the essence of this situation demonstration demonstration. Physical prisons, personality, rules, and costumes will soon become psychological prisons and will capture it in the minds of everyone. By next day, no one could view it as a prison, not as an "experiment." This is really a drop to hell, hourly, everyday, and shift. It happens very quickly. There is nothing in the film that can extend the reality; it represents Stanford County Prison as the Stanford County Prison I experienced. The Stanford Prison Experiment is a study aimed at determining the psychology of imprisonment. This is a simulation experiment conducted at Stanford University in Stamford, California. This is known as a classic psychological experiment against prisoners and even explains the abuses of prisoners abusing Muslim prisoners at Abu Ghraib prison in Cuba. The problem is to know whether evil is superior to humans or human being is being suppressed by evil. Another problem is the determination of the outcome of placing an ordinary person in an evil place such as a prison. Simulation of prison living was done by students of Stanford University during the summer semester of 1971. Let's also consider the infamous Stanford prison experiment. The experiment was conducted by Professor of Psychology Philip Zimbardo in 1971. And that divided 24 Stanford college students into two groups: security guards and prisoners. These groups began following immediately assigned roles. To force the identity of the group, security guards use their numbers instead of their names to point to prisoners and begin to punish their unruly behavior. As the experiment progressed, the way of punishment became more exploited. Security guards began attacking prisoners with fire extinguishers, banning sanitary buckets to use the toilet, forced to take off the mattress or take off the mattress and go to bed on concrete floor. Prisoners also begin to internalize their roles through passive psychological torture.

Answer: The word Omni Benevolent comes from the Latin Omni (meaning "everything") and kindness (meaning "good" or "charity"). When we say that God is ubiquitous, we say that we are absolutely kind and without action and motivation about God, that thought, emotion, or something purely kind It is not. He says, "Everything is fine." The Bible provides numerous testimony about the goodness of God, including Jesus himself, when insisting that no one other than God is truly kind (Mark 10: 18). This can only do good things, but can only mean that God is all-purpose or perfectly kind. To believe in the perfect existence, we must admit that God is omnipotent. If God is completely self-reliant, independent of necessity, "cause not caused" and "moving person", he must also be completely kind. If God is just a gentle and powerful being, not perfect, there will be accidental factors. In other words, we can imagine a more merciful being - and those with more gentleness will be bigger than God. Because the goodness of anything is measured by its completeness, God must be completely kind, so it is omniscient and omnipotent. All three aspects of him must be in order so that we can envision any of the three The most common objection to God is totipotency, almighty and omniscience assertions are evil. If God is omnipotent and omnipotent and completely gentle, why is there evil? Philosophers are discussing this problem indefinitely. Some people solve problems by saying that Lucifer and the free will of the human being afterwards are causes of evil and that God is not the cause of evil. People may ask, "Why did God create a being able to choose evil?" A typical answer to this is "because he wishes to be able to make human choices." Philosophically, ubiquity of God is a complex problem. The problem of evil is complicated. But we know that in order for God to be God, we must be omnipotent, omnipotent and full of knowledge. And the real problem is to believe in the Bible which regards God forever (Psalm 106: 1,135: 3, Nahum 1: 7). The message he sends to the sinner through Christ is "good news" (Luke 2:10), and the revelation to Christ for him is called "our good and love, the Savior of God" Titus 3: 4, ESV). Goodness of God leads us to repentance (Romans 2: 4) Good is one of the fruits of the spirit that he lives (Galatians 5: 22), and brings goodness through faith in the fruits of our lives I will. (Thessalonians 2: 11) Get more insight from your Bible study - Let's start using Logos Bible software for free! Related Topics But what does this mean to us for predicting God like totipotency, omniscience, totipotency, totipotency? As I said before, John believes these are modal differences. Why do not you consider these parts? Well, they do not take effectiveness (only with limited material). Looking at the chart of Aristotle's existence category, the substance can be subdivided into a limited infinite existence. If things are eligible for a particular quality, it is considered a limited existence or substance. If I am a "animal" quality person, my ability (or force) will be effective and limited. God needs to be born infinitely, so his infinite existence is not limited by whatever quality quite differs from him. On the contrary, he is the best among all sentimental beings, and his quality is only a reflection of his modal status. Answer: The word Omni Benevolent comes from the Latin Omni (meaning "everything") and kindness (meaning "good" or "charity"). When we say that God is omnipotent, we say that God is absolutely kind, actions about him are motivated, thoughts, emotions, and nothing else are purely good . He says, "Everything is okay." Besides God Himself, when insisting that nobody is really gentle, the Bible provides a lot of testimony about the goodness of God, including God Himself (Mark 10:18). This can only do good things, but can only mean that God is all-purpose or perfectly kind. The most common objection to God is t

One of the things that philosophers are good at is to ask big questions and not usually provide answers. However, Saint Augustine takes a more direct approach to his guesses and often provides a solution to his problem. He told such a topic to the heathens of the city of God. In this article, Augustine solves the problem of free will and expands his view. He points out that humans can possess God's full knowledge of God. And that man reveals by defining foresight, free will, and how they can interact well (Augustine, 198). In Augustine and free will research papers Augustine may wish to indicate that he believes he has decided to make a morally demanding person that God will be given free will. Augustine believes that it is best for God to bring evil rather than completely banning evil. The redemption of Christ is the benefit of Adam's sin. At the same time, the omniscient God knows that some people will use the freedom of will to commit a crime. Sin is the price of freedom, and if they can not freely invade cheating, humans can not enjoy the gift of free will. In De libero arbitrio it is not certain whether his free will will be part of God's plan to master his biology moral maturity, or Adam's punitive outcome. But as the teachings of Augustine developed, one element of fate was a quiet entry into Augustine's thought, which eased the absolute freedom of will. 3 Kava Augustine and Pelagian claim "freedom of will" - Augustine's natural human freedom confirms human free will by weakness and incompetence of sin - Pelagius's complete freedom and perfection Wiley-Blackwell 2010 4 as innocent as a crime of perfection of responsibility (judicial) Inherited the essence of grace - Augustine's generosity, injustice, necessary gifts - the ability of the nature of God and the nature of Pelagius The foundation of divine will and the teachings of salvation - Augustine: Holy promise of grace - Pelagius: As a good work to fulfill Willy's duty - Blackwell 2010 Alister McGrath, Theology of Christianity: Introduction Chapter 14 Humanity, Sin and Grace Wiley - Blackwell 2010 In this article we will look at Saint Augustine's view of evil. St. Augustine believes that God created a complete world, but God's creation has turned from God with free will This is the origin of evil in the world. Augustine believes that it is impossible to say that evil exists, and evil comes from the free nature of any biological will, along with the pain caused by punishment as sin. According to Augustine, it does not conflict with his righteousness, so God allows evil to exist in the world. He did not create evil, but it was not a victim of it. He just allowed it to exist

At Nathaniel Hawthorne's "Young Goodman Brown", he recreated the most remarkable Puritan era. That's the Salem Witch trial. He contains several historical names related to the trial, some of which are even his own ancestors. These historical facts are important to his story as it creates a sense of anxiety, doubt, superstition, and a practical connection with reality among readers. It also allows modern readers to investigate the problem and see the impact of this belief system and its visible and visible effects. Nadi el Hawthorn's young Goodman Brown. A classic that helps to define this American classic, short story can be read online for free here. Young Goodman Brown is often categorized as a horror story about people who encountered unexpected darkness on the road. William Faulkner 's Emily Rose. Faulkner first published a short story in 1930. There is a complete copy that you can read (this is the first of the three stories of the file). Rose Emily is a nonlinear story that begins with a funeral, moves forward to make it in time to explore the lives of the southern families, and adapts to the changing fate after the civil war. "Young Goodman Brown" by Nathaniel Hawthorne tells stories about exposing true evil and losing faith. It is obvious to me that what I absorbed from this story is that everyone thinks it is good, no matter how good we think. "The self-refusal and self-curse Brown" which is the hero of this story began metaphorical errands he planned to face his own evil. As he was not ready to accept this as part of the nature of others, he refused it instead and eventually prescribed his own destiny. Nathaniel Hawthorne's "Young Goodman Brown" is a story of a man named Goodman Brown who has a strong Puritan faith. Goodman Brown brought his wife to the depths of the forest with faith in a dark night led by strangers. Goodman Brown held several secret gatherings in the forest and some of his villagers were there. At this point in the story, Goodman Brown found out that he solved the hidden part of the villagers' life. "Tonight you should inform you of their secret behaviors ..." (946) Young Goodman Brown's concept of "Goodman Brown", Nathaniel Hawthorne is guilty by showing the same sacred thought that is considered a saint to Goodman Brown and making people feel guilty. We saw the view of purity and immorality. Goodman Brown's naming is a moral problem that everyone must face between good and evil. We want to challenge evil water everyday. - "Young Goodman Brown" by Nathaniel Hawthorne describes a story about exposing true evil and losing faith. Nathaniel Hawthorne left "Young Goodman Brown" and got a lot of explanations. What I absorbed from this story is that everyone has evil, no matter how good we think.

It is important to regard it as a prisoner and not watch out for real prisons. The important question is a metaphor of prisoners and guards. What does it mean to be a prisoner? What does it mean to be an advocate? Parents are people who restrict the freedom of others and use that role to control and control others. In the summer of 1971, Philip Zimbardo, Craig Haney, Curtis Banks conducted psychological experiments and tried simple questions. What will happen if you place a good person in evil places - Humans overcome the victory of evil or evil? In order to investigate this problem, college student volunteers were tested in advance and randomly assigned to the role of prisoners or security guards at simulated prison at Stanford University. These students know that they are mentally healthy and participating in the experiment, but they will soon show signs of academic stress or depression by sadism and prisoners. Just six days later, it was written by Marcel Appels. This dramatic study is known as the Stanford Prison Experiment. It is a new movie theme supervised by Kim Patrick Alvarez by Tim Talbott. I am very pleased to be able to consult with the filmmakers on the production of the Stanford prison experiment and I am satisfied as to how they held the essence of this situation demonstration demonstration. Physical prisons, personality, rules, and costumes will soon become psychological prisons and will capture it in the minds of everyone. By next day, no one could view it as a prison, not as an "experiment." This is really a drop to hell, hourly, everyday, and shift. It happens very quickly. There is nothing in the film that can extend the reality; it represents Stanford County Prison as the Stanford County Prison I experienced. The Stanford Prison Experiment is a study aimed at determining the psychology of imprisonment. This is a simulation experiment conducted at Stanford University in Stamford, California. This is known as a classic psychological experiment against prisoners and even explains the abuses of prisoners abusing Muslim prisoners at Abu Ghraib prison in Cuba. The problem is to know whether evil is superior to humans or human being is being suppressed by evil. Another problem is the determination of the outcome of placing an ordinary person in an evil place such as a prison. Simulation of prison living was done by students of Stanford University during the summer semester of 1971.

The following are additional materials for students, covering various theories in literature. "When the tongue of the flame is folded / It is in the knot of the fire of the crown / All kinds of fire will be fine when the fire is integrated with roses." - S.S. As defined by Alvin Plantinga, Theodici is "the answer to why God allows bad questions". Theodicy is defined as a theological structure that attempts to support the response of God to the problem of alleviating the evidence of evil, the omnipotence and the existence of almighty divinity. Another definition of sacredness for the existence of evil is proof of the goodness of God and the will of God. The word theodicy comes from the Greek ΘεόςΤheos and δίκηdikē. Teos is translated as "god", and Dike can be translated as "trial" or "judgment". Therefore, theododie means literally "to protect God". Answer: Theodicy is a division of philosophy dealing with evil according to the existence of God. If God is fair, holy, and kind, how does evil and suffering exist? This is the problem that business theory has. The statement of the most famous "evil problem" in history is attributed to the philosopher Epicuras of ancient Greece. Or it colors a specific word in the sense that it is not a parameter. Therefore, to truly understand the concept of theodici, we must carefully define his technical terms and then stick to these definitions. The priesthood politics of Augustine was originally honored as a form of John Hick's theology in God's evil and love, originally written in 1966, where he called Augustine's theology and subsequent development "Augustin" . Hick is an Augustine theology trying to get rid of God's responsibility for all evils of human free will and Eirin who has been proved to be justified by its benefits to human development but regards God as an obligation to evil Theology distinguishes it from. . Augustine's theology is the answer to the evil evidence problem, which raises concerns that if the god is omnipotent and omnipotent, the world should not be evil. Evil evidence can cast doubt on the nature and its existence of God - he is omnipotent, not benevolent, or does not exist. Theodicy attempts to harmonize the evidence of evil with the existence and nature of God by providing an effective interpretation of its occurrence.

The social and political aspects of Kipling and Dickens' composition style began in the Victorian era from 1830 to 1901 and are known in various ways. These aspects are distributed among writers and writers of this era. As Queen Victoria succeeded Britain successfully, the Victorian name was called London, and the city of London expanded from about 2 million to 600 when she died. Charles Dickens and Rudiad Kipling are representatives of the Victorian literature, each paying attention to certain social and political problems of that era, and these issues are revealed in their stories. The work of Charles Dickens was greatly influenced by his own experience and British social and political situation of the 1800s. After a fiery childhood, Dickens spends most of his life on journals, novels, journals, and speech whirlwind. He was born in a middle class family and was promoted to one of the most famous and famous writers in the UK by waving his ink pen and became synonymous with a self-made man who criticized their deteriorating social and political situation It was. And what was sympathizing for everyone is the change that occurred in the UK (1812 - 1870). The social and political aspects of Kipling and Dickens' composition style began in the Victorian era from 1830 to 1901 and are known in various ways. These aspects are distributed among writers and writers of this era. As Queen Victoria succeeded Britain successfully, the Victorian name was called London, and the city of London expanded from about 2 million to 600 when she died. - Evil, power of nature, governance and evil. (Www.Dictionary.com) Evil is a very complicated problem that many people think is unpleasant, but there is evidence that evil exists, it exists from the beginning. Over the years, researchers have investigated many aspects related to evil, and unfortunately the results are often in the sight of a bystander. Television and newspapers show the work and influence of evil forces everyday

As far as I remember, God is supervising everything that happens in the world and is said to be a merciful God who forgives human sins without mercy. If asked, most Christians will say "God is good", and even more so, he is tolerant. Puritans and sulfur Puritans and the revenge of God were replaced in good faith. This new era of Christian idealism was useful for today's "misplaced" society, but in the end it is wrong, as the Bible shows. I will not give this answer to anyone. If you think that it is Majid, Pierrot, Georges, Devil Director, God Himself, Human Conscience, these answers are all right. But if you want to know who sent the tape, you do not know the movie. This question has been raised to avoid doing real questions raised in the movie. People just ask "whodunnit?" These narrative methods usually require answers as I chose to use the type, thriller structure to solve the problem of condemnation and conscience. But my movie is not a thriller. The problem of evil is related to the essence of God. Many people think that God is kind, but hardly anyone thinks that God is not a good possibility but a malignant, malicious god. The question is, if God is kind to everyone, why should he create a world full of evil and pain? There are quite a lot of pain in this world, many people think it is difficult to believe that he is a good person if God exists. There is a view that a kind and omnipotent god will give pain to the world and perhaps to get more items. But to be honest, there are worldwide things worse than good, so the possible engines are not that high. Therefore, to explain the essence of the problem of evil, we must consider the possibilities of the evil God and the merciful. God wants to prevent evil, but can not you? God can stop evil, but do not feel like doing this? Or is God willing to stop evil and be delighted?

As an experientist and a skeptic, he demanded that "human reasons, blind and narrow boundary weaknesses be fully understood." (131) There is no right to speculate theology because humans have no historical knowledge of science or the universe. He is "the only scientific subject that can contradict contradiction, material compliance, causal, expanded, spatial, temporal, and behavioral thinking, in essence varying amounts of substance, certainty or evidence" It continues to ask for. In the dialogue on nature and religion of David Hume, Philo claims that "such idea of ​​God" is consistent with the essence of the world. God formed the world and everything in it. Therefore abstract logical parallelism exists between the essence of the world and the essence of God. Philo's argument can answer Gretchen's challenge. As long as Gretchen is given an explanation of how God has so many evil evidences in the world she will see this as a satisfying reaction. Discussion as to whether God exists or not is a long-term argument over centuries. In David Hume's "Natural Religious Dialogue", this problem is solved through dialogue and discussion between Hume's fictional role Cleanthes and Philo. The argument advocated by Cleanthes is that the existence of God can be confirmed by humans and presented in the form of "design controversy". Philo then made several opposing views to explain why this discussion failed. In this article we will discuss the design theory of Cleanthes and detail criticism of Philo's position on Cleanthes. In a dialogue on David Hume's natural religion, he evaluated two general evil ways and design controversies. The two versions of the "sin problem" are the first stronger version called the logical problem of evil as they apply to the presence or absence of God, and the second version which is not bad is called evil . Evidence Problems The logic of evil says that there is no evil if God is an omnipotent, omniscient, all encompassing being. Because there is evil, there should be no god. The evil problem of the evidence is Hum's accepted version. We can think that the existence of evil is part of a series of evidence to evaluate the existence of God and based on the evidence we can not conclude that God is perfect. Hume allows complete God's possibility, but to say this argument is not enough for us to reach that conclusion

"Unless specific measures are taken to solve Israeli and Palestinian problems, you really can not begin fighting against fear." Perhaps Hawke is the most complicated problem in today's world . First, the Israel - Palestinian conflict. Israel continues to take over the land from the Palestinians and they are afraid of being present due to terrorist acts by the Palestinians, so there seems to be no solution. When it comes to this problem, the world seems to be split. There is no explosive or permanent conflict, as between the Israelites and the Palestinians. The power of Israel and Palestine for centuries has been replaced in Palestine, and the two cousins ​​have conflicted in the 20th century. Who really belongs to Palestinians? This problem brought about many years of bloodshed and terrorism. - Humans are one of the drama clearly contrasted with the medieval moral drama, concept of good and evil. Through the script, the idea that comes up repeatedly is the confrontation between Mercy ("good" personality) and the role of Mischief which is the concept of "evil". The contradiction between good and evil is to achieve the goal that will affect humanity. Compassion affects the human's focus on God's judgment so that humans can live the eternal life of the sky During the conflict, Palestinian violence was of concern to the Israelites. Israel, the United States and the EU call the Palestinian extremist violence against Israeli civilians and military as terrorism. The motivation behind the Palestinian violence against Israeli civilians is multifaceted and not all violent Palestinian groups have agreed to a specific problem. Nonetheless, the common motive is the desire to destroy Israel and replace it with the Arab state of Palestine. The most famous Islamic organization like Hamas regards the conflict between Israel and Palestine as a religious jihad. Israel - the Palestinian conflict is part of the Arab-Israel conflict, a continuing conflict between Israel and the Palestinians. Israel - the Palestinian conflict is by no means a simple bilateral conflict, all Israelis (and even all Israeli Jews) also have opinions, and all Palestinians have another opinion. In both communities, people advocating for the complete elimination of individuals and groups of other communities, people advocating solutions in the two countries, people advocating a single worldly bicentic solution I will. The conflict between the two may never find the media of happiness, and the war continues in this land.

Sleeping, it is difficult to endure it for about one-third of the time to rob it, but the result of dealing with insomnia is even more difficult. We have not slept for a while, but for Macbeth this is a continuous problem. . Insomnia causes loss of concentration on the victim's problem, causing social interactions, and other similar problems that ultimately hurt the victim, or in the case of Macbeth he is the victim of his decision. There are light and darkness in the symbol of the drama. An example of the guilt of Macbeth and the insomnia of short-term night travel of Mrs. Macbeth is an example. Macbeth could not escape from the fear of his behavior in the dark, and he suffered from the fear he found. Meanwhile, Mrs Macbeth is afraid of darkness and uses light to try to dispel the devil. In the fifth act of the first act, Mrs. Macbeth asked the news that the king is coming. "The sound of the crow's call is not only thought to bring about death, but the crow itself symbolizes death, darkness, and evil. In Macbeth, birds symbolize the unfortunate events such as death and fall. The first sentence Mrs Macbeth said (1, 5), when Duncan entered her house, said that the behavior of the crow means his death. Mrs Macbeth knew that Macbeth had killed Duncan from quotation 2 (Acts 2 and 2). I shouted the owl. The third reference (third scene, scene 4) symbolizes Macbeth 's inversion. This illness and evil show that Macbeth became unnatural. Shakespeare used Macbeth 'insomnia to show how unnatural Macbeth came. Because Macbeth is suffering from insomnia, sleep is a natural recovery. This also shows that Macbeth is unnatural. The above natural image includes love and loyalty, unnatural rebellion and betrayal of Macbeth 's death of King Duncan. Earth and Death "Shakespeare achieved all of the evil behavior of Macbeth with the night of the play. Night images are used to convey evil and unnatural creatures related to magic of the day like owls and bats. We know that Macbeth and his wife are unnatural without children and King Duncan, Bangko and Road McDuff have a natural family. Please check the use of natural images at ACTTETH steps 3 and 4. How does SHAKESPEARE use natural images to support the main theme of the game?

The pros and cons of the evil of Augustine and Theodicy of Eleanor are not of God. Because the creation of God is complete perfection. In the Bible Genesis, he believes that evil is caused by what God can do. God himself is powerful, but after creating the world he himself will not be able to control the actions created by humans when they change it. Originally honored as a form of John Hick's theology in evil and divine love, the theology of Augustine was written in 1966, when he classified theology and subsequent development of Augustine as "Augustin" It was. Hick distinguishes Augustine's theology which attempts to treat God as all responsibility against evil, based on the fact that Hibk is responsible for the free will of mankind and people for evil but is beneficial for human development To do. Augustine's theology is the answer to the evil evidence problem, which raises concerns that if the god is omnipotent and omnipotent, the world should not be evil. Evil proof can cast doubt on God's nature and his existence - he is omnipotent, benevolent or not. Theodicy attempts to harmonize the evidence of evil with the existence and nature of God by providing an effective interpretation of its occurrence. Hippo Augustine is the first person who developed mysticism. He rejects the idea that evil itself exists, but I regard it as good corruption caused by human free will. Augustine believed that there was material hell as a punishment for sin, but he believed that those who chose to receive the salvation of Jesus Christ would go to heaven. In the thirteenth century, influenced by Augustine, Thomas Aquinas proposed similar theology based on the fact that God is kind and evil. He believes that the existence of good will enable evil through human error. Augustine also influenced John Calvin, who supported Augustine's view that evil is the result of free will and that sin destroys human nature and requires God's grace to give moral guidance Gave. What is the evil essence of Augustine? Compare the evil concept of Augustine with manicure. Which do you think is closer to your truth? It is enough whether Augustine's interpretation of the sermon is accurate, or whether there are loopholes in his theory. Please describe your perception of the world's evil, its cause, and possible solutions to avoid it. What role did Augustine 's friends play in that change? Do you think that Augustine is an intrigued intellectual, or is he academically interested? Specifically, what is the change of Alipius after the sincere change of Augustine? How does Nebridius try to keep him away from Manichae, and Nebridius is still Manichee himself? What is the view of Augustine's secular friendship?

In Hume's dialogue on nature's religion, we are to discuss the purpose of God and its nature, more specifically the three roles that humans can infer God and its nature Was introduced. Three words, Demea, Philo, and Cleanthes, are involved in discussions on this issue, but they all help to support their views on this issue. The focus of discussion was the "design theory" proposed by Cleanthes, Demea and Philo tried to destroy it. Discussion as to whether God exists or not is a long-term argument over centuries. In David Hume's "Natural Religious Dialogue", this problem is solved through dialogue and discussion between Hume's fictional role Cleanthes and Philo. The argument advocated by Cleanthes is that the existence of God can be confirmed by humans and presented in the form of "design controversy". Philo then made several opposing views to explain why this discussion failed. In this article we will discuss the design theory of Cleanthes and detail criticism of Philo's position on Cleanthes. In a dialogue on David Hume's natural religion, he evaluated two general evil ways and design controversies. The two versions of the "sin problem" are the first stronger version called the logical problem of evil as they apply to the presence or absence of God, and the second version which is not bad is called evil . Evidence Problems The logic of evil says that there is no evil if God is an omnipotent, omniscient, all encompassing being. Because there is evil, there should be no god. The evil problem of the evidence is Hum's accepted version. We can think that the existence of evil is part of a series of evidence to evaluate the existence of God and based on the evidence we can not conclude that God is perfect. Hume allows complete God's possibility, but to say this argument is not enough for us to reach that conclusion In the dialogue on nature and religion of David Hume, Philo claims that "such idea of ​​God" is consistent with the essence of the world. God formed the world and everything in it. Therefore abstract logical parallelism exists between the essence of the world and the essence of God. Philo's argument can answer Gretchen's challenge. As long as Gretchen is given an explanation of how God has so many evil evidences in the world she will see this as a satisfying reaction.

The myths of wolves, witches, fairies swept the world, and everyone was shaped by culture, time and other strange events that people could not explain. These strange creatures have scared the viewers around the world over time. One of the most widely-known and changed myths in culture is the vampire myth. The vampire changed from a horrible, almost omnipotent, foul creatures to a mysterious, romantic and unmistakable sexy universal symbol. The vampire story is here as a sub genre of Gothic, and I will explain that the vampire story is undoubtedly a sub-genre of Gothic. I also try to solve the annoying problem of whether the vampire story is part of horror gothic or part of horror gothic. To emphasize my view and observation, we refer to two scenes in a short story titled "Vampire" by John Polidori. - As a model of the Gothic novel in the Gothic novel, seven gable houses need to contain many elements. All of them are focused on dark, frightening and mysterious thoughts. The actions of Gothic novels are usually done in "destroyed, abandoned or residential buildings or castles", including "secret passages", "doors" and "compartments". Mary Sherry 's Frankenstein is a Gothic style representative that influences movies and literature, especially the TV program "Vampire Killer Buffy". The type of novel can be determined by identifying features in Gothic customs and novels, such as an ominous environment, an interest in unconscious and abnormal psychology, and the atmosphere of fear and fear. These features can also be seen in "Buffy the Vampire Slayer" and proved the influence of the novel. Vampire killer buffy and horror type are usually horrible, more specific vampire type will be the theme of good and evil against evil. The hero represents good and the villain represents evil. Buffy is a hero and this evil vampire killer buffy matches because evil vampire she killed (in this concentrated focus) represents evil. There is also a cliché of this type, good is always more important than evil. - The type of horror of the story of Stevenson and Green RL, in many respects they belong to, but Stevenson's "Body Maroder" and Graham Green's "party end" is a short story One of the horror kind It is department. Through this article we will compare the differences and similarities between the two horror stories.

We can deduce generalization from our rich experience on humans and their projects and hence human nature is often the case when humans try to complete their project can do. Beyond creative qualities (as nature creator must exist outside nature to avoid causal circulation) by forgiving. We lose our freedom to do such generalization because there are no other examples of celestial plans to compare our nature. And there is no knowledge of transcendental creatures to understand their typical intentions. Critical evaluation of the summary of evil problems and how we weaken the traditional features of God. This article will attempt to review the philosophical dilemma of the existence of evil, God exists, if there is evil, if so, this god can be declared perfect Is it? The epistemological problem that appeared was the understanding of my God and the validity of the existence of God. What is good and bad? The Merriam-Webster dictionary defines evil as follows. a: Moral ... Why is there evil on the earth? This is the central point about the problem of evil. Atheists and theologians are trying to explain this problem in their own philosophical view. Epicurean's evil paradox shows a dilemma for the recognition of traditional Judaism and Christianity of God and evil. This tradition supports the following three propositions: "God is omnipotent (including omnibus), God is completely gentle, evil exists" (Pojman 69). Evil public weakens God's totipotency What is the characteristic of God? Millard Ericsson talked about the characteristics and attributes of God. "When we talk about the attributes of God, we refer to the nature of God, the nature of God that constitutes His nature." 1 Instead of Ryrie, it is God's personality, his "perfection Because all the qualities and attributes of God are perfect 2 In this part of our study, God's attributes - his characteristics - think of his completeness. When considering the characteristics of God, I think that good similarity is to see couples. One of the advantages of marrying is that you can probably meet someone in an intimate way during other lives. With this growing knowledge, we can learn ways to better serve and love him or her.

St. Augustine's "free will" details in detail the relationship between God and free will and evil. At the beginning of the first volume, he asked a question, "God is not the cause of evil" (Cahn 357). From this question, he can judge that he is looking for a connection between God and evil (sin). It is inferred that in the text it is connected through free will. He believes that God does not create evil but that evil is just a lack of good. Then it explains in further detail that God is not the source of evil through the interpretation of his crime and the way it is caused by excessive desire and the good intentions misused by human beings (Cahn 360). Explain and show more ... But Augustine's assertion that God's hands are "clean" evil is logically reasonable, as he is not direct creator of evil, all is essentially good. The evaluation of Augustine's free will is the cause of evil, which is also reasonably reasonable argument. By providing examples of abused slaves, his natural desire (Cahn 360) killed his master, and he showed that evil was completed through the "free will" of slaves. This is indicative of God, because he gave human freedom and did not participate in evil. Because if he gave free will, the creation of evil is completely entrusted to the hands of slaves. If you give a person a free will to decide whether or not God can maintain justice through temptation, this clearly shows that this is true. What people make in their own minds depends on their surroundings and themselves (various factors), and what they have decided to do (free will) is completely in their hands. This logic indicates that free will is the cause of evil. However, there are major factors, I do not agree with most of my argument and do not reveal it. The main problem is that God is omnipotent, but it gives human free will. This is a big contradiction in itself, and Augustine tries to answer this question by saying "God knows this". Here, the view of Hobbes' freedom is quite different from Augustine's view of freedom of freedom. According to Augustine, God gives humans free will and they will be able to do well in the world. Without free will, there is neither good nor bad. People must be able to choose between acting correctly or acting wrong. If a person chooses to act erroneously, they choose a negative choice of free will. But because they can have bad things with free will, they can also do the right thing, their free will choose the right choice. When discussing the will, Augustine said that the will can not be defined by good or evil; it is just a good or evil way. Augustine argues that if he does not have the freedom to choose his will, he will not be free to achieve good. Because people can do good things, they need to have free will Augustine and the acts of freedom and evil neglected eternal and temporal love and made them submissive to them. This is done by free choice of choice. . . Free will allows sin, but people can live in justice 1. This is a brief summary of Augustine's consideration of (1) the origin of sin and (2) the purpose of giving humans the freedom to choose their will. . Augustine's statement is caused by the concept of human freedom and sacred activities, as it seems to be very insightful, but since free choice of will result in confusing issues that continue to exist in philosophy I will not stop all problems.

How William · Shakespeare presented Oslo · Shakespeare in the first performance successfully imitated his depiction of Othello's personality. He is a person who is opposed to quality, a zoologist, a passionate alien, and is regarded as a trustworthy, noble and respected general of the Venetian army. Shakespeare is interested in the whole problem of the actor who plays a role, and they can convince the viewer that they are neither saints nor women. William Shakespeare's speech "Othello" Shakespeare in Oslo's Isago, Othello, and Desdemona announced the friendship between Iago and Othello as a lie from the beginning of the script. Shakespeare showed us that he was pretending to serve Othello for his purpose. After that Othello trusted Iago perfectly and was able to speak with confidence. Through the script, Shakespeare shapes the reaction of the audience and wants to be like Othello women. Oshero women of Shakespeare are described as property, "prostitutes", and generally as obedient beings, but with some exceptions. In the eyes of men who dominated the play, they are only sexual, but sometimes they remove this label and show that women can go far beyond this. In today's society, women are more admired, valuable and worth than Shakespeare's woman portrayal. Every one of the three women in the drama Othello dessert of tragedy of William · Shakespeare 'Othello', the wife of hero is De Mona. She is a beautiful, intelligent, healthy, and pious person. This article analyzes her. In the first acting scene 1, Iago persuaded him to take Rejected Desderonna's pursuer Rodeligo to the house of Deademona's father, Bravantio, in the middle of the night. At one point two people shouted loudly to Othello and his daughter elope. Shakespeare's incomparable evil Othello Shakespeare's tragedy "Othello" disturbed the audience due to the intense evil associated with the development of the plot. Let's explore the character of evil in the play, especially Iago. His literary commentary, Shakespeare's tragedy, A C. Bradley made a detailed analysis of the characteristic and evil brand of ancient: Isago is the best place in Shakespeare's evil character

The deep meaning of the young Goodman Brown, "Young Goodman Brown" written by Nathaniel Hawthorne, should be interpreted at a psychoanalytic level, not a religious level. According to my observation, "Young Goodman Brown" is probably the first publication that suggests a difference between thought and personality theory. Religion is a direct theme of the entire story, but "Young Goodman Brown" seems to be a parable that has a deeper meaning. In order to correctly explore my position on the dynamics of "Young Goodman Brown", it is necessary to understand Freud's structural model. Puritan man, when young Goodman Brown crossed the forest, he highlighted the young Goodman Brown's potential (potential significance). During his trip, the young Goodman Brown encountered a man and finally gave a snake staff. Coincidentally, Young Goodman Brown met some people he knew from society. When drawing a man who used a snake as an employee as a devil, the young Goodman Brown noticed that many people around him are sinners. This led Young Goodman Brown to question decent people around him. This shows how Nathanial Hawthorne uses a hidden dark image as the potential of Young Goodman Brown. Young Goodman Brown's concept of "Goodman Brown", Nathaniel Hawthorne shows the same sacred thought as a saint in Goodman Brown, guilty by making people feel guilty We are pure I saw a view of monity and immorality. Goodman Brown's naming is a moral problem that everyone must face between good and evil. We want to challenge evil water everyday. - "Young Goodman Brown" by Nathaniel Hawthorne tells stories about exposing true evil and losing faith. What I absorbed from this story is that everyone has evil, no matter how good we think.

When placed in the authority of others, this new force makes it possible for individuals to be fair and ethical, or to claim that the real color will be revealed. The researcher group led by Stanford University psychologist Philip G. Zimbardo designed and implemented an unusual experiment of fulfilling the role of a prisoner or security guard using the setting of a simulated prison to judge the power of social conditions. Psychological influence and behavior (1971). This dramatic study is known as the theme of a new movie supervised by Stanford Prison Experiment, Tim Talbot's Kyle Patrick Alvarez. I am very pleased to be able to consult with the filmmakers on the production of the Stanford Prison experiment and I am satisfied as to how they held the essence of this contextual demonstration. Physical prisons, roles, rules, and costumes will soon become psychological prisons in the minds of everyone with problems. By next day, nobody could look at it as a prison, not as an "experiment." This is really a drop to hell, hourly, everyday, and a shift. It happens very quickly. There is nothing in the film that can extend the reality; it represents Stanford County Prison as the Stanford County Prison I experienced. The Stanford Prison Experiment is a study aimed at determining the psychology of imprisonment. This is a simulation experiment at Stanford University in Stamford, California. This is known as a classic psychological experiment against prisoners and even explains the abuses of prisoners abusing Muslim prisoners at Abu Ghraib prison in Cuba. The problem is to know whether evil is superior to humans or human being is being suppressed by evil. Another problem is the determination of the outcome of placing an ordinary person in an evil place such as a prison. Simulation of prison living was done by students of Stanford University during the summer semester of 1971.

The biggest question: Why does Jim Holt like asking questions rather than big questions? In the book "Why the world exists", he raised the greatest doubt in dialogue with scientists and theologians. Jim Holt raised fundamental doubts as to why something exists and what is not. He raised doubt on the source of all the contents of this book. In this book, I do not want to know that Jim Holt himself is in a state of nothing. Next is a big problem. Does God exist? An atheist and a naturalist (they will not accept this material world and things that transcend the universe) say "no". A number of volumes are written about this problem, historical discussion is fierce, but it is not difficult to answer. In order to pay proper attention, you must do this question first: why do we have something in place of what? In other words, how do you and everything around you go here? God's claim is very simple. Last month, I no longer deny the pain and confusion of the world, but I cease to see it, at that time I have the power to doubt God's legitimacy. For me, the problem is not that God exists in this great universe, but it may exist in some way, but it is unnecessary to obtain evidence that it is concerned about our small life Is difficult. The idea of ​​good religion is equivalent to heaven and evil, equivalent to hell, a rustic interpretation of the balance of life. When expression is good, positive, negative or bad suffer, it leads to imbalance. The reverse is also true. But what people choose to believe is that both good and evil are unbalanced. Our war world reflects our dispersed mind. Good deeds seem to be covered with evil behavior

The epic "Beowulf" on the impact of Glendell's life is the first poem written in English. In this poem, Glendell has attacked the flos girl kingdom for 12 years. Every night, Glendale goes to Mead Hall to eat 30 men. Beowulf decided to become a magnificent hero who heard the problem and handled the problem himself. So he and the other four men got on the boat in the place where Grundell was. When he got there, he did not seem to want Hrothgar to think that Hrothgar could not handle the problem alone. John Gardner 's Grundel is a revised heroic epic Beowulf, but the view changed. Beowulf 's opponent and Gardner' s work - Glendell 's nominal features, Glendell' s opinion. In Glendell, Gardner is personalizing Grundel by emphasizing the similarity between Glendell's life and human life. Beowulf 's hero "... Devil" (Heaney 100) makes this seemingly opposite, strange character easier to understand through Gurdel' s human emotions, human development, and human reflections on Godner 's reflection on human defects. These words explain Monster Glendell which is truly evil entity. Only magnificent heroes with strength, courage and confidence can beat this powerful enemy. The name of the hero is Beowulf. He showed them all through the epic. Beowulf's first magnificent heroic character is confident. Beowulf was confident in talking to Unferth at Heorot Hall. Beowulf says, "But I can see that he is different from myself, I will teach him the shape of the guitar. The epic "Beowulf" on the impact of Glendell's life is the first poem written in English. In this poem, Glendell has attacked the flos girl kingdom for 12 years. Every night, Glendale goes to Mead Hall to eat 30 men. Beowulf decided to become a magnificent hero who heard the problem and handled the problem himself. So he and the other four men got on the boat in the place where Grundell was. - In 1971, American writer John Gardner wrote Glendell. John Gardner succeeded in talking the classic epic "Beowulf" along with a creative planner. He captures the reader by giving fun instructions and chaos, good and evil, hero and monster opinion. And you can see the monster's point of view. On July 21, 1933, John Gardner was born in Batavia, New York. He is a missionary and a son of a diary. His mother teaches English. At John Gardnus, Glendell's main character, Grundel, was very confused about his life. He did not notice that he was looking for his own goal of life and that his aim is to become a villain. Humans in the novel are afraid of Glendar. For them, he is a beast. As a natural reaction of our human beings in fear, we tend to get rid of the causes that fear us. In many cases, humans tried to kill Glendell as he was considered a bad man until Beowulf accomplished that goal. The role Beowulf and Glendell played in the story can be easily deciphered. Beowulf is pure and gentle, Glendell is pure evil. One reason why Beowulf is so famous is that it is one of the first stories of good and evil, or light and dark. In the modern story of good and evil, there is a superhero. They will use these powers to benefit the world and help innocent people. In most cases, there is a villain

The argument supported in this article is Anselm's "Proslogian" which insists God in a way that is less complicated than Monologian. Inevitably, Proslogian has been criticized by other famous philosophers. Some of them are also taken up in this article. If a fool understands, there is nothing more than this, he will understand the existence of God. To help fools understand the existence of God, the attributes of the divine God will also be discussed. Over the centuries, Christianity has been powerful, spreading the presence of a merciful God, and he first grasped power. There are omnipotence, omnipotence, omnipotence, omniscience, omnipotence, omnipotence, and the like of the divine attribute of God. Every philosopher resolves the existence of God by either argument, paradox, and logic or reason - based evidence that affirms or refutes it. One contradiction with the existence of the whole god is a problem of evil. Evil includes all moral and natural evil. Modern philosopher Marcus Singer further defines this as "the worst condemnation word imaginable". We do not deny that evil continues to appear in a very visible form in the world. After analysis, the existence of evil forms inconsistency with the existence of God. If God is truly aware, he already knows that something evil is going to happen. This natural urge to human sanctification is thought to have certain consequences. Because we basically sanctify these attributes when we give God attributes of man, so that all goodness or evil of our religion will be made of all of our good or evil It is only reflection. Our desire is God's desire, but there is no borders. Our actions are actions of God, but they have no effect. I made a superman blessed with human qualities, but there is no artificial restriction. We shape our religion and culture, society and government according to our own human urges and these convictions convince us ourselves that it is of God Prove the existence of God through reason and nature. Summa Theologica, often referred to as "discourse to God", presents philosophical arguments about the existence of God, the attributes of God, the nature of God, and so forth. Summa Centra Gentiles provides a series of detailed philosophical arguments about the existence of God. - I want to find beauty in an ugly and terrible world. Shakespearean fans. Keats explained Shakespeare's genius as follows: the quality of people and the negative ability when he is in an uncertain state. Unpleasant, suspicious, irritating facts and reasons none

My research theme is the scroll of the Dead Sea, determinism and free will, or coexistence of moral evil with nature's evil and dualism text. I am very interested in this issue as I am very interested in discussions between scholars and scientists. When applied to religious background, it seems to be a particularly complicated problem, which can not be resolved rationally or scientifically. When deciding to know what surprised the ancients, this topic was close to the center of my personal interest. Dualism: Understanding of reality exists at two extremes. Metaphysical dualism thinks that the universe exists in two opposite (and sometimes inconsistent) reality - heart and material, or spirit and substance, or yin and yang. Moral dualism assumes a conflict between universal benefits and universal evil and hostile evils (eg believing that God and Satan are equal and opposed). Eadie, Betty: A writer of a new-era of bestsellers, accepted by the light and the heart of awakening. As an active member of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, Edie claims that he died, went to heaven, and returned to her body (see experience of near death). Her book contains a combination of a new era and Mormonistic faith. Dualism is always a characteristic of many religions and philosophies. Recognizing that the universe has both spiritual and physical aspects, dualism usually regards the spiritual world as good and the material world as evil. But since the Hebrew Scriptures did material creation very well (Genesis 1: 31) and believed that there was evil spirit (1st Sam 16: 14), those who supported dualism gave the Old Testament I could not refuse. However, since the work of the New Testament is based on the same principle, only distortion can be used to support dualism. Dualism is defined as a two-part state. It usually refers to people who have two views on nature: material (physical) and spiritual (soul). Dualism thinks the problem is evil, only spirit or soul is good. I will look at how the different parts of the Bible show the separation of the soul and the body. It exists in many ways, including sexual, political and social aspects. The most common message is that the soul is the most important part of man. It is also clear that both Christians and the author of the Bible believe that the soul is an independent spirit and is only contained within the body. To be philosophical dualism means that there are two different entities or substances in the universe - material, mental, physical, and spiritual. The great difference between the ancient Greeks and the soul is in adage. "The body is a grave." Therefore evil is a result confined to a limited body by an infinite soul. For example, Plato is a strong dualism because it expresses the idea that the soul is independent of the physical existence. A reasonable soul, like a tank or a tank, is a spiritual substance different from the body in which it lives. Dualism played a major role in the European Renaissance when Descartes fully described this idea as substance entity and material expanding substance. This dualism makes it possible to realize all the mathematical science of physics and all the facts of the material world are explained based on measurements.

In the philosophy of the early modern philosopher Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz (1646-1716), the existing world is the best world that God would have created. Leibniz's debate on the best doctrine of all possible worlds is now often referred to as Leibniz's optimism but his work Théodicée (1710; Theodicy) is shown in his most complete form I will. Protect the justice of God (see theodicy). Therefore, this argument is based on Leibniz's solution to the problem of evil, or God is omnipotent in the whole world, omniscient, omnidirectional (completely good), evil (including sin and suffering without suffering ) An obvious contradiction between obvious facts. In a rough overview, the arguments are: Because God is omnipotent and omniscient, we know which world is the best and can create it. And because he is omnipotent, he chooses to create that world. In the opposite opinion, because the number of possible worlds is infinite, the possible world is not considered to be the best (for a given good world there will always be another, better world). A possible world of good world, and then God will not create the world at all because God has no reason enough to create the world instead of the other world. But since he created the existing world, it must be the best world. It is easy to imagine that there is no world of evil in the world, so opposed to the idea that the existing world is not the best among all possible worlds, Leibniz tells us that whether the world with little evil can really be imagined I believe it is suspicious. Due to the nature of the interrelated events, any evil world not including the existing world may inevitably contain other larger forms of evil. Furthermore, although this world has evident evil, according to the sacred standard of good, unlike ordinary concepts, it may actually be the best. Voltaire's most famous piece, Candide, is full of stories phrases. "If this is the best of all possible worlds, what else is it?" Candide asked in Chapter 6. The word "the best in the best world" comes from the philosopher Leibniz, but Voltaire is familiar with repeatedly using this phrase in Candide. Another statement in the novel is that French readers will be welcomed soon: in chapter 16, Candide who dressed in the new world of Jerusalem and his servant Cacambo, a succumer of a succulent Found in the hands: Let's eat some Jesuits "): At that time in the French Jesuits was not very popular, its expression quickly became a slogan Candide does not believe that Cunegonde is the best figure in all possible worlds, but no one will be with her, rather than a world without problems. The problem is that the best world among the possible worlds of Candide lives in El Dorado with Cunegonde? The answer is "No". It is simply because there are no best worlds in all possible worlds. Frankness will never exist, it will just be better. There will always be something that will make Candide's life better, so it will never be a beautiful world. Visualize perfection with Candide "Everything is the best possible ..." Imagination is wonderful, perfection and shine are intertwined in a wonderful world - Utopia, guess the absolute beauty of humanity , Harmony and universal tolerance Does this "perfection" mean "the best world"? What do you think that the evil world drawn on "Candide" is reported as "utopia"? The conclusion reached is not safe, as the best of all possible worlds shows that "everything is the best".

Defense of free will Defense of free will is an attempt to solve the problem of moral evil. Humans have free will of God as conditions of true morality, trust, love, etc, but it is also possible to bring moral evil into the world. There are many questions about God's problem. A lot of people are asking such questions - why God gives humans the ability to know freely that they will misuse them. Free will is a condition of true humanity. One of the weaknesses of free will defense is its applicability to evils faced by animals or contradictory applicability and accompanying animal suffering. Some scholars like David Griffin point out free will, or take greater goodwill through free will and do not apply to animals. In contrast, some scholars accepted applying "free will" to the human background, but proposed an alternative "free creatures" defense and the animals benefit from their body freedom Can be obtained. The dangerous cost they are constantly facing. In addition to defending the free will of Plantinga there are other arguments that claim to destroy or refute the logic of evil. The defense of Plantinga's free will is best known among these reactions at least in part because it has worked out thoroughly on the problems and problems of God, freedom and evil and solution. Contrary to theology (justification of God's behavior), Pluntinger proposed a defense and proposed a new proposition to prove that the Almighty, Almighty, Omniscient God created moral evil . The world is logically possible. It is noteworthy that Plantinga does not need to argue that his new proposition is correct, but it is logically valid. Thus, Plantinga's approach not only attempts to show that the new proposition is effective, but that the argument is reasonable, seems reasonably seemingly, or there is a good reason to do it The point is different from the conventional theory. Alvin Plantinga's Free Will Defense was developed by American analytic philosopher Alvin Plantinga, John A. O'Brien, emeritus professor at the University of Notre Dame and published the final version of the 1977 book "God, Freedom". . It is evil. Plantinga 's argument is the defense of the evil logic that philosopher JL Mackie started in 1955. And ubiquitous, logically incompatible. Along with the existence of evil. In 1982, McKee acknowledged that Plantanga 's defense successfully refuted his claim in "theological miracle", but he did not claim that the evil was put on hold.

Throughout the history of literature, writing is virtually romantic, so we are seeing many authors' insights on mysterious and ambiguous topics in love and relationships. Three short stories by three American independent writers talk about such things. Charlotte Perkins Gilman of "Yellow Wallpapers", Kate Chopin of "Storm", and Nathaniel Hawthorn of "Young Goode" Brown. The relationships presented in each story are unique in their own persuasion, but the same basic theme is executed. Puritan man, when young Goodman Brown crossed the forest, he highlighted the young Goodman Brown's potential (potential significance). During his trip, young Goodman Brown encountered a man, and eventually greeted a snake staff member. Coincidentally, Young Goodman Brown met some people he knew from society. When drawing a man who used a snake as an employee as a devil, a young Goodman Brown noticed that many people around him are sinners. This led Young Goodman Brown to question decent people around him. This shows how Nathanial Hawthorne uses a hidden dark image as the potential of Young Goodman Brown. Young Goodman Brown's concept of "Goodman Brown", Nathaniel Hawthorne is guilty by showing the same sacred thought that is considered a saint to Goodman Brown and making people feel guilty. We saw the view of purity and immorality. Goodman Brown's naming is a moral problem that everyone must face between good and evil. We want to challenge evil water everyday. - "Young Goodman Brown" by Nathaniel Hawthorne describes a story about exposing true evil and losing faith. Nathaniel Hawthorne left "Young Goodman Brown" and got a lot of explanations. What I absorbed from this story is that everyone has evil, no matter how good we think. Nathaniel Hawthorne's "Young Goodman Brown" is an allegorical work that warns of the possibility of mankind's evil. Hawthorn believes that the most evil things a person can deliberately strengthen their hearts and completely ignore the emotions of others, thus ignoring their humanity. In the story, a young good guy Brown committed this unforgivable sin. He decided to continue the evil journey through various opportunities, and he ended his relationship with faith when he did not exactly end in the way he wanted. Hawthorne uses symbols to indicate that people are prevented from becoming young and good people. Hawthorne recorded Brown 's departure, his trip in the forest, and his arrival ceremony.

The concept of "God's theory" represents the problem of suffering in the world interpreted as a sacred state. There are two aspects to this problem. It is to understand the pain and deal with the pain. Do not ask for contemporary comprehensive theory in ancient literature. But the two aspects of this problem are consistent with the understanding of modern concepts and the way the New Testament world encounters and copes with suffering. Because it is mainly to grasp the reality of God's mercy and omnipotence and the reality of the evil of the world (three difficulties), he is the cause of God until the enlightenment and the work of the philosopher form a firm shape (Theory) begs. Like Leibniz. In fact, this era has brought about many changes in dealing with theoretical problems. For example, in the early days, by contrasting the reality of suffering with certain features of God, people wanted better understanding of divinity. After the occurrence of contemporary problems of theology in the Enlightenment, the important question was how to fully believe the existence of God existence. In contemporary discussion, a practical approach to painful problems emerges in many theoretical and traditional aspects. Today, as the problem itself is not appropriate, only the intellectual learning of this problem is condemned by indifference and cynicism. For victims, rationalization is in vain. On the contrary, by streamlining evil, it is somewhat reasonable and its existence is accepted. "In the presence of a child burned in the Auschwitz concentration camp, speech should not be said whether it is theology or not." The theme of the cross of the Christ made a central contribution to the discussion. In particular, this theme provides appropriate material to explain the suffering of so-called divine theology. In this case, the cross of Christ is neither the Lord's nor the Lord, but as a common pain to express God's sympathy, agreement, and suffering, not as a place where Christ replaces the world's sins It does not seem. Partly due to the contribution of the subject of the cross, the suffering of divine theology forms one of the core practical ways to solve the problem of suffer now. French philosopher Voltaire criticized Leibniz 's theological concept in his Lisbon poem (Lisbon' s disaster poetry) and the massive destruction of the innocent life caused by the Lisbon earthquake caused God ' World "was not provided. Voltaire also included the theme of earthquake / theology in his novel Candide. In Catholic Encyclopedia (1914), Konstantin Kempff believes that after Leibniz's work philosophers believe that they call their work "evil" problem of evil, the philosophy of God under the discipline of theology He believes that he is. We will deepen human understanding of God. The concept of "God's theory" represents the problem of suffering in the world interpreted as a sacred state. There are two aspects to this problem. It is to understand the pain and deal with the pain. Do not ask for contemporary comprehensive theory in ancient literature. But the two aspects of this problem are consistent with the understanding of modern concepts and the way the New Testament world encounters and copes with suffering. Because it is mainly to grasp the reality of God's mercy and omnipotence and the reality of the evil of the world (three difficulties), he is the cause of God until the enlightenment and the work of the philosopher form a firm shape (Theory) begs. Like Leibniz. In fact, this era has brought about many changes in dealing with theoretical problems.

If God loves us, why must he afflict us? The central issue of Shadowlands is challenging traditional religious and ethical practices. This is a question sent by many people and there are few satisfactory answers. Before answering the question and investigating the relationship with Shadowland, first define the problem and understand its meaning more clearly. The core of the problem is the doubt of the goodness of God that "if God loves us". It is clear from the beginning that God has been tried and criticized for this issue. Why is there so much pain? Without God we can only blame the current situation. If God is there, why does he continue pain and pain? Do not mind, does he know? Or is he mind understanding it, but is not enough resources or strength to eliminate it? Some people think about this problem and become atheists or agnostic. But they replace a single question with another question; they do not ask questions; "Why are there something like kindness, neatness, correctness, sanctity, purity?" -? Because the pain is very sincere, people will naturally start asking questions like "Why does God make evil?" Or, "If God is so powerful and very kind, why is there so much pain in the world?" If they do not believe in the existence of God, or if they do not know that they are God, answer the question "Why does God forgive evil?" Please be useless discussion. Please take some time to share who God is. It is best to spend time to share the character of God if they believe that God exists. Pain and pain make us question the existence of God. Atheists try to discuss the existence of God with three facts about God. They insist that human suffering itself proves that God does not exist. They argue that if God is omnipotent, he has power to stop human suffering. However, the pain continues daily. They believe that suffering should not be forgiven. Due to disasters such as earthquakes and hurricanes, the suffering of today's world is intense. God is allowed to suffer pain and suffering - it is certainly a mystery. But we must remember that God is not the source of evil nor the source of all suffering. Sometimes he will suffer for our needs - spiritual training (Hebrews 12: 4-11). Occasionally pain is only because we live in a corrupted world, and hence Satan. More importantly, it is important to remember that God does not regard the suffering, evil, and death of the world as a result of sin no matter how we understand the pain. Instead, God overcomes it through the life, death, and resurrection of Jesus Christ. God brings suffering, evil, and sin to myself - it becomes materialization of Jesus Christ, and in the end suffers and dies for all humanity. God knows the depth of our pain, and to some extent no one can understand or understand, so do not get bored. When we are hurt, God's damage exceeds our understanding.

In "Goodman Brown", Hawthorne convinces the reader that Goodman Brown has learned the truth about the world and how bad it is. In the story, the story of Goodman Brown makes you believe that he really saw evil in the world and know that it is hidden behind everyone's mask. Even if this person seems to be sacred and religious he will make you understand that evil is around us and that most people will never discover the truth. The role of Young Goodman Brown by Nathaniel Hawthorne reveals much about the evil of the people in the town where he lives, his own, and the reality behind the evil. The theme of Young Goodman Brown is to develop an interpretation of the theme of "Young Goodman Brown". Due to the author 's confused style, a clear concept with the theme "Young Goodman Brown" is not easy. As AN Kaul mentioned in Hawthorne's "Introduction" - a collection of essential essays: Hawthorne got a lot with various types of avoidance, misunderstanding, and congestion. Regarding his legendary legend and faded novel, in short, since he seems to give up his important interests often, Puritan man, when young Goodman Brown crossed the forest, he highlighted the young Goodman Brown's potential (potential significance). During his trip, the young Goodman Brown encountered a man and finally gave a snake staff. Coincidentally, Young Goodman Brown met some people he knew from society. When drawing a man who used a snake as an employee as a devil, the young Goodman Brown noticed that many people around him are sinners. This led Young Goodman Brown to question decent people around him. This shows how Nathanial Hawthorne uses a hidden dark image as the potential of Young Goodman Brown. Young Goodman Brown's concept of "Goodman Brown", Nathaniel Hawthorne shows the same sacred thought as a saint in Goodman Brown, guilty by making people feel guilty We are pure I saw a view of monity and immorality. Goodman Brown's naming is a moral problem that everyone must face between good and evil. We want to challenge evil water everyday. - "Young Goodman Brown" by Nathaniel Hawthorne tells stories about exposing true evil and losing faith. What I absorbed from this story is that everyone has evil, no matter how good we think.

This content is available through online browsing (free) program dependent on page scan. Screen readers can not currently scan, so please contact JSTOR user support for access. We will provide PDF copy of your screen reader The concept of "God's theory" represents the problem of suffering in the world interpreted as a sacred state. There are two aspects to this problem. It is to understand the pain and deal with the pain. Do not ask for contemporary comprehensive theory in ancient literature. But the two aspects of this problem are consistent with the understanding of modern concepts and the way the New Testament world encounters and copes with suffering. Because it is mainly to grasp the reality of God's mercy and omnipotence and the reality of the evil of the world (three difficulties), he is the cause of God until the enlightenment and the work of the philosopher form a firm shape (Theory) begs. Like Leibniz. In fact, this era has brought about many changes in dealing with theoretical problems. French philosopher Voltaire criticized Leibniz 's theological concept in his Lisbon poem (Lisbon' s disaster poetry) and the massive destruction of the innocent life caused by the Lisbon earthquake caused God ' World "was not provided. Voltaire also included the theme of earthquake / theology in his novel Candide. In Catholic Encyclopedia (1914), Konstantin Kempff believes that after Leibniz's work philosophers believe that they call their work "evil" problem of evil, the philosophy of God under the discipline of theology He believes that he is. We will deepen human understanding of God. The concept of subjectiveism is extended mainly by Weber's consideration and ethical consideration of his religious theme. These distinctions represent ways to understand how to establish a correct relationship with supernatural forces, how to explain evil, how bad things happen to people who seem to be good I will. "There is a separation of different aspects with respect to the class, by contrast, the claim of fate emphasizes that the privilege is a concept of deserving blessings." Therefore, these two differences are only in the class structure in society No, it can be applied to sects and races. Religious internal isolation