The Problem of Evil

In "Why is not God interventioned to prevent evil?", The author points out the fact that "there is no opportunity to create virtue like courage, compassion if there is no pain" . For example, an alcohol-dependent parent threw a 5-year-old child on the street and the child eventually suffered a car. Some people say that God did not help children as God wants someone to gain courage from this situation. Discussions about virtues can also be linked to the assertion that God wants to "establish moral urgency" (Johnson 122), they feel the need to help stop the catastrophe I will.

There is a problem of evil. This is a simple and direct fact. Discussion on the evil (and pain) problem proves this fact. The argument over evil shows that God has full power and full power. It shows that God is kind. In other words, he is hoping that only kindness exists. But look at all evil and evil in the world. The god of all good is completely inconsistent. God's almighty is that you can do whatever he wants. So, if God can do anything what he wants, why then?

The problem of evil can be formulated in various ways. Indeed, the 'problem' pointing to evil may be more accurate. Recipes are interpreted as logical problems. Regarding the logic of evil, it is claimed that these two arguments, (1) that Almighty and Almighty God exists, and (2) the existence of evil is logically incompatible. Since evil exists on the surface, it is claimed that God (usually understood to be omnipotent and omnipotent) does not exist. In the latter part of the 20th century, logical arguments became dominant. But by the end of the century religious philosophers generally believed that the logic was rebutted. One of the reasons is that there must be hidden or unspecified assumptions as claims (1) and (2) are not clearly contradictory. But what is that?

Regarding the rough topography, we discussed above, there are two different forms of evil discussion. The first is a logical problem of evil. According to the logic of evil, the coexistence of evil and God is logically impossible. The world where God exists will be a world without evil. So anyone who believes in God's presence and evil will commit an implicit contradiction. The second is evidence of evil. According to evidence of evil, coexistence between God and evil is logically possible, but the latter is evidence against the former. Discussion of evidence is sometimes used to infer the best interpretation (ie the induction from evil), and sometimes the probability (ie the induction from evil). In any case, facts about the existence, nature, and distribution of evil in the world are provided as strong evidence for the theological truth.