Essay sample library > God and Evil: Can They Co-exist?

God and Evil: Can They Co-exist?

2023-03-16 08:02:53

By asking and asking God, Eli continues to have some degree of faith in God, and therefore is still sacred and human. At the beginning of Erie's autobiography, when he was still at home, faith in Siget Erie's god and confidence in his religion existed and was powerful. Erie is a pious Jew, praying at the synagogue and seriously considering his religion, which deserves small boys for praise. Eli believes that God exists everywhere in the world.

Mackie acknowledges that the defense of Plantinga shows how God and evil coexist, indicating that 'the central doctrine of theology' is eventually logically consistent. However, Mackie does not mean to say how important Plantinga's achievement is. He expressed doubt as to whether Plantinga addressed evil appropriately. Some of Mackie's complaints say that Plantinga only gives the possibility of reason why God allowed evil and suffering and did not provide the basis for his argument or try to make them reasonable It comes from the fact. It is often philosophically insufficient to draft simple possibilities without giving evidence, but it is not clear whether Mackie 's dissatisfaction with Plantinga is perfectly justified. After all, Mackie described the problem of evil as one of logical contradictions.

Because the logic of evil insists that it is logically impossible for God and evil to coexist, Plantinga (or any other theorist) also needs to know the possibility of God and evil coexisting It is to explain the situation of. It exists. This situation does not need to be realistic, it does not even have to be realistic. Plantinga does not need evidence to support the authenticity of his advice. What he needs to do is to provide a logical and consistent account of the way God and evil coexist. Plantinga argues that God and evil can coexist if God has sufficient moral reason to forgive evil. He believes that the morally good cause of God may be related to human access to morally important free will and that this freedom allows for larger things. All requirements necessary for Plantinga to represent (MSR 1) and (MSR 2) are logically possible (ie not contradictory).