Free-Will Defense

Defense of free will Defense of free will is an attempt to solve the problem of moral evil. Humans have free will of God as conditions of true morality, trust, love, etc, but it is also possible to bring moral evil into the world. There are many questions about God's problem. A lot of people are asking such questions - why God gives humans the ability to know freely that they will misuse them. Free will is a condition of true humanity.

One of the weaknesses of free will defense is its applicability to evils faced by animals or contradictory applicability and accompanying animal suffering. Some scholars like David Griffin point out free will, or take greater goodwill through free will and do not apply to animals. In contrast, some scholars accepted applying "free will" to the human background, but proposed an alternative "free creatures" defense and the animals benefit from their body freedom Can be obtained. The dangerous cost they are constantly facing.

In addition to defending the free will of Plantinga there are other arguments that claim to destroy or refute the logic of evil. The defense of Plantinga's free will is best known among these reactions at least in part because it has worked out thoroughly on the problems and problems of God, freedom and evil and solution. Contrary to theology (justification of God's behavior), Pluntinger proposed a defense and proposed a new proposition to prove that the Almighty, Almighty, Omniscient God created moral evil . The world is logically possible. It is noteworthy that Plantinga does not need to argue that his new proposition is correct, but it is logically valid. Thus, Plantinga's approach not only attempts to show that the new proposition is effective, but that the argument is reasonable, seems reasonably seemingly, or there is a good reason to do it The point is different from the conventional theory.

Alvin Plantinga's Free Will Defense was developed by American analytic philosopher Alvin Plantinga, John A. O'Brien, emeritus professor at the University of Notre Dame and published the final version of the 1977 book "God, Freedom". . It is evil. Plantinga 's argument is the defense of the evil logic that philosopher JL Mackie started in 1955. And ubiquitous, logically incompatible. Along with the existence of evil. In 1982, McKee acknowledged that Plantanga 's defense successfully refuted his claim in "theological miracle", but he did not claim that the evil was put on hold.