Evil - Moral And Natural Evil

Normally, evil caused by human free action (moral evil) distinguishes evil belonging to nature (natural or physical evil). Moral evil seems to be our responsibility, so the natural evil has largely disappeared in secular arguments. (It exists in different forms in painful problems.) However, experience has shown that the two are intertwined with each other.

Moral evil is causing the suffering of the victim, seems to be the only way for suffering to pay for sin. But evil seems to be more serious than the difference between agents and victims. Paul Ricoeur (1985) describes "a passive strange experience to achieve the heart of evil behavior." As mentioned by Simone Weil, the most extreme form of pain is felt.

The notes on these categories are in order. Historically, they were the remains of the closed system of Kalpa (cut) and Poena (punishment), and St. Augustine from Hippo insisted that it could immediately protect all evil. All natural suffering including death, even carnivores are understood as punishment for male (or angel) crime These crimes are not defined as damage to other living things, It is harm caused by disobedience or rebellion. . Ignoring the victims, this system eliminates the central problem of contemporary discussion and innocent pain

Conceptually, most arguments about moral evil support the philosophical dilemma of human liberty, which is also threatened by scientific development. By restricting discussions to intentional individual behavior, these theories also obscure the evil of society and culture (and completely naturalize).

When discussing natural evil evil philosophical issues, there is usually a difference between moral evil and natural evil. The moral evil (roughly speaking) is evil caused by the bad behavior of a human being (or other created creature), while the natural evil (at first glance) evil (hurricane, tornado Such as evil). . In natural forest fires, deer burns are examples of natural evil. It is important to understand that response to the problem of moral evil is not necessarily a good response to the problem of natural evil.

Nature's evil. Contrary to moral evil, natural evil is evil created by manipulation of the natural processes, in which case we can not make morally accountable for anyone. Typical examples of natural disasters are natural disasters such as cyclones and earthquakes causing major pain and loss of life, diseases such as leukemia and Alzheimer's disease, disorders such as blindness and hearing loss. However, you need to perform important identification at this point. Human error or negligence has brought many things that are usually conveyed as natural evil. For example, lung cancer can be caused by massive smoking; the loss of human life caused by the earthquake is mainly due to positioning irresponsible urban planners finally undulating and positioning their work on disjointed obstacles. A careless approach that might prevent droughts and floods

There are various kinds of evil. Two of them are moral evil and natural evil. Nature's evil includes things like pain and pain, and moral evil involves making mistaken decisions. Moral evil depends on the use of human will. Nature's evil has nothing to do with this. The main difference between these two evils is that people can not control the evil of nature, moral evil depends on their will. Some even say that physical evil is necessary for human beings. Without painful evil, people will not be warned about disease or danger. In life, sometimes bad people are better than "good" people. Why is this? Some say that this is a trial of the soul, and rewards are waiting for us. Because their mistakes can also lead to mutual pain, the human family is one and their members will help each other through their good behavior. For example, what happened to Jesus? He suffered for all the sins of mankind and saved them through all these.