The biggest question: Why does Jim Holt like asking questions rather than big questions? In the book "Why the world exists", he raised the greatest doubt in dialogue with scientists and theologians. Jim Holt raised fundamental doubts as to why something exists and what is not. He raised doubt on the source of all the contents of this book. In this book, I do not want to know that Jim Holt himself is in a state of nothing.
Next is a big problem. Does God exist? An atheist and a naturalist (they will not accept this material world and things that transcend the universe) say "no". A number of volumes are written about this problem, historical discussion is fierce, but it is not difficult to answer. In order to pay proper attention, you must do this question first: why do we have something in place of what? In other words, how do you and everything around you go here? God's claim is very simple.
Last month, I no longer deny the pain and confusion of the world, but I cease to see it, at that time I have the power to doubt God's legitimacy. For me, the problem is not that God exists in this great universe, but it may exist in some way, but it is unnecessary to obtain evidence that it is concerned about our small life Is difficult. The idea of good religion is equivalent to heaven and evil, equivalent to hell, a rustic interpretation of the balance of life. When expression is good, positive, negative or bad suffer, it leads to imbalance. The reverse is also true. But what people choose to believe is that both good and evil are unbalanced. Our war world reflects our dispersed mind. Good deeds seem to be covered with evil behavior