St. Augustine's "free will" details in detail the relationship between God and free will and evil. At the beginning of the first volume, he asked a question, "God is not the cause of evil" (Cahn 357). From this question, he can judge that he is looking for a connection between God and evil (sin). It is inferred that in the text it is connected through free will. He believes that God does not create evil but that evil is just a lack of good. Then it explains in further detail that God is not the source of evil through the interpretation of his crime and the way it is caused by excessive desire and the good intentions misused by human beings (Cahn 360). Explain and show more ...
But Augustine's assertion that God's hands are "clean" evil is logically reasonable, as he is not direct creator of evil, all is essentially good.
The evaluation of Augustine's free will is the cause of evil, which is also reasonably reasonable argument. By providing examples of abused slaves, his natural desire (Cahn 360) killed his master, and he showed that evil was completed through the "free will" of slaves. This is indicative of God, because he gave human freedom and did not participate in evil. Because if he gave free will, the creation of evil is completely entrusted to the hands of slaves. If you give a person a free will to decide whether or not God can maintain justice through temptation, this clearly shows that this is true. What people make in their own minds depends on their surroundings and themselves (various factors), and what they have decided to do (free will) is completely in their hands. This logic indicates that free will is the cause of evil.
However, there are major factors, I do not agree with most of my argument and do not reveal it. The main problem is that God is omnipotent, but it gives human free will. This is a big contradiction in itself, and Augustine tries to answer this question by saying "God knows this".
Here, the view of Hobbes' freedom is quite different from Augustine's view of freedom of freedom. According to Augustine, God gives humans free will and they will be able to do well in the world. Without free will, there is neither good nor bad. People must be able to choose between acting correctly or acting wrong. If a person chooses to act erroneously, they choose a negative choice of free will. But because they can have bad things with free will, they can also do the right thing, their free will choose the right choice. When discussing the will, Augustine said that the will can not be defined by good or evil; it is just a good or evil way. Augustine argues that if he does not have the freedom to choose his will, he will not be free to achieve good. Because people can do good things, they need to have free will
Augustine and the acts of freedom and evil neglected eternal and temporal love and made them submissive to them. This is done by free choice of choice. . . Free will allows sin, but people can live in justice 1. This is a brief summary of Augustine's consideration of (1) the origin of sin and (2) the purpose of giving humans the freedom to choose their will. . Augustine's statement is caused by the concept of human freedom and sacred activities, as it seems to be very insightful, but since free choice of will result in confusing issues that continue to exist in philosophy I will not stop all problems.