Natural vs. moral evil

A new article based on the market forum based on the Christian Science Society, physicist David Snooker 'Think about evil'.

... To solve this problem, I must first use a few paragraphs to distinguish between the two evils: natural evil and moral evil. Evil in the natural world is physically unpleasant and it is extremely extreme and unbearable. This includes pain and illness, hurricanes, floods, famine, parasites and so on. All these kinds of things can happen to us regardless of human moral choice. The situation may be exacerbated due to poor moral choice, but it will exist anyway.

Moral evil includes decisions with a morally competent being. A lot of articles on how to define moral evil were written: Some people think that it is fundamentally related and rebellious against God. With this definition, obviously God can not do bad things. However, this shows arbitrary good and evil. We define all things God does and it is not evil. But if we believe that God is eternal in its personality, we hope for absolute good and evil standards and believe that he will always obey

Augustine of Hippos of the 4th century pointed out that good and evil are not symmetrical. Good belongs to itself, evil involves destruction of good deeds. This makes it easier to define evil. "Good" is difficult to define: It includes all good things like beauty, order, existence, life, meaning and so on. Creating a detailed list of good news is a hard work. But if you understand some kindness intuitively, you can define moral evil as something to destroy good ones.

Here we have to be careful to use some nuances. What is evil that always destroys profits? If so, that change contains something no longer exists and it is replaced by something else, so everyone who wants to change is bad. As you have seen, it is a good thing to replace a good one with another good one. Temporary pain during exercise is an alternative to health and physical fitness comfort. More

Of course, naturalistic atheists can not truly distinguish between evil and morals of nature. This fact is an important structural support in his view of the world.

Nature's evil. Contrary to moral evil, natural evil is evil created by manipulation of the natural processes, in which case we can not make morally accountable for anyone. Typical examples of natural disasters are natural disasters such as cyclones and earthquakes causing major pain and loss of life, diseases such as leukemia and Alzheimer's disease, disorders such as blindness and hearing loss. However, you need to perform important identification at this point. Human error or negligence has brought many things that are usually conveyed as natural evil. For example, lung cancer can be caused by massive smoking; the loss of human life caused by the earthquake is mainly due to positioning irresponsible urban planners finally undulating and positioning their work on disjointed obstacles. A careless approach that might prevent droughts and floods

There are various kinds of evil. Two of them are moral evil and natural evil. Nature's evil includes things like pain and pain, and moral evil involves making mistaken decisions. Moral evil depends on the use of human will. Nature's evil has nothing to do with this. The main difference between these two evils is that people can not control the evil of nature, moral evil depends on their will. Some even say that physical evil is necessary for human beings. Without painful evil, people will not be warned about disease or danger. In life, sometimes bad people are better than "good" people. Why is this? Some say that this is a trial of the soul, and rewards are waiting for us. Because their mistakes can also lead to mutual pain, the human family is one and their members will help each other through their good behavior. For example, what happened to Jesus? He suffered for all the sins of mankind and saved them through all these.

When discussing natural evil evil philosophical issues, there is usually a difference between moral evil and natural evil. The moral evil (roughly speaking) is evil caused by the bad behavior of a human being (or other created creature), while the natural evil (at first glance) evil (hurricane, tornado Such as evil). . In natural forest fires, deer burns are examples of natural evil. It is important to understand that response to the problem of moral evil is not necessarily a good response to the problem of natural evil.