The three sociological paradigms are symbolic interaction theory, structural functional theory, and conflict theory. The paradigm is a model or framework of observation and understanding that shapes what we see and how it is understood. This means that these three theories are the way we understand sociology. These three theories work at macro level or micro level. The micro- or local level means that the research group is usually an individual in a social environment. Marko or global level refers to economies of scale interaction. There are three major theories: structural functionalism, symbolic interaction, and contradiction. These theories relate to the major aspects of social life, organized group members, interactions, and conflicts. In all three, the conflict seems to be the most direct. Everyone experienced a conflict in life. The main focus of this theory is how the difference between power structure and power affects people's lives (American Catholic University, 2008). According to the conflict theory of Crossman (2013), the role of compulsion and power in creating a social order is emphasized. This arises from the work of Karl Marx, who believes that social division is a competing group for social and economic resources. A prominent sociological theory contrasting clearly with structural functionalism is the conflict theory. Karl Marx is considered the father of conflict theory. Conflict theory believes that society is best understood as a competition, not as a complex competitive system. Society consists of individuals competing for limited resources (eg, money, leisure, sexual partners etc). A broader social structure and organization (eg, religion, government, etc.) reflects resource competition in their inherent inequality, and some people and organizations have more resources (ie power and influence ) And the position of power in society Sociologists develop a theory to explain social events, interactions and patterns. The theory is a description of the proposal for these social interactions. The theory has various scales. Macro-level theories such as structural functionalism and conflict theory attempt to explain how society functions as a whole. Micro theory such as symbolic interaction focuses on interaction between individuals Symbolic interactions are created through the integration of structural functionalism and conflict theory. Specifically, symbolic interactions are a way of promoting social cohesion (structural functionalism) and social change (conflict theory), how "meaning" is developed into interactions, It is designed to make it clear whether it is embedded in Using the example above, you can use symbolic interactions to explain the differences between competition and structural functionalist's educational approach. For example, if people act on the meaning of education, people who believe (or are taught to believe) that education plays an important role in society as a whole hesitate to structure the social structure.

Jesus is trying to improve individuals and social elements, and hence his teachings are ideally designed to promote the well-being of society as a whole. The four Gospels and the apostolic speech are thoroughly showing the broad sociological knowledge that exists in Jesus' teachings. His message promotes personal reform as well as changes in social structure. Jesus set up a church as a social system, but he did so only after some people became his believers. Three theoretical perspectives of functionalism theory, conflict theory and symbolic interaction theory lead sociological thinking of social problems. These views are seeing the same social problem, but they do so in different ways. Their shared view provides a more comprehensive understanding of social issues than any view. Table 1 "Theoretical Snapshot" is a summary of three viewpoints. Social stability is necessary for a strong society and social stability requires complete socialization and social integration. The social social system plays an important function to ensure social stability. Slow social change is desirable, but rapid social change threatens social order The theory of social confrontation is a major alternative to the functionalist paradigm. Where functionalists see social interdependence and unity, conflict theorists see groups like bourgeoisie and working class battling for power. Conflict theorists stress that compulsion is the cause of social order rather than consensus. At the expense of functionalism, conflict theory is becoming more and more popular in contemporary sociology. Likewise, innovation theory is increasingly popular at the expense of demographic transition theory. However, this paradigm shift has been demonstrated by using inappropriate statistical methods. The logical view of conflict theory, also known as social conflict theory, is a mirror image of functionalism in many respects. Unlike functionalists, they believe that the social order is maintained by value agreement, conflict theorists say that it is unwilling to exercise the power of a social class against other social classes That it will be retained. Marx, Engels, and social class. The theory of conflict was born from the work of Karl Marx (1818 - 1883), based on the fact that society is the struggle phase for power and control. The struggle is mainly in the social stratum for scarce resources, such as the management of production materials (land, factory, natural resources), better distribution of all resources (funds, food, goods).

The three sociological paradigms are symbolic interaction theory, structural functional theory, and conflict theory. The paradigm is a model or framework of observation and understanding that shapes what we see and how it is understood. This means that these three theories are the way we understand sociology. These three theories work at macro level or micro level. The micro- or local level means that the research group is usually an individual in a social environment. Marko or global level refers to economies of scale interaction. There are three major theories: structural functionalism, symbolic interaction, and contradiction. These theories relate to the major aspects of social life, organized group members, interactions, and conflicts. In all three, the conflict seems to be the most direct. Everyone experienced a conflict in life. The main focus of this theory is how the difference between power structure and power affects people's lives (American Catholic University, 2008). According to the conflict theory of Crossman (2013), the role of compulsion and power in creating a social order is emphasized. This arises from the work of Karl Marx, who believes that social division is a competing group for social and economic resources. A prominent sociological theory contrasting clearly with structural functionalism is the conflict theory. Karl Marx is considered the father of conflict theory. Conflict theory believes that society is best understood as a competition, not as a complex competitive system. Society consists of individuals competing for limited resources (eg, money, leisure, sexual partners etc). A broader social structure and organization (eg, religion, government, etc.) reflects resource competition in their inherent inequality, and some people and organizations have more resources (ie power and influence ) And the position of power in society Sociologists develop a theory to explain social events, interactions and patterns. The theory is a description of the proposal for these social interactions. The theory has various scales. Macro-level theories such as structural functionalism and conflict theory attempt to explain how society functions as a whole. Micro theory such as symbolic interaction focuses on interaction between individuals Symbolic interactions are created through the integration of structural functionalism and conflict theory. Specifically, symbolic interactions are a way of promoting social cohesion (structural functionalism) and social change (conflict theory), how "meaning" is developed into interactions, It is designed to make it clear whether it is embedded in Using the example above, you can use symbolic interactions to explain the differences between competition and structural functionalist's educational approach. For example, if people act on the meaning of education, people who believe (or are taught to believe) that education plays an important role in society as a whole hesitate to structure the social structure.

The confrontation theory is defined as a social conflict between two different groups that attempts to achieve the same task but with some degree of inequality. Examples of conflict theory are proven in popular TV programs and movies and are incorporated into the lifestyle of daily life. Three examples that are used are the children's program "Zach and Cody's Suite Life", the regular TV series "Revenge", and the popular YouTube video "American Wealth inequality". The theory of social confrontation is a social theory based on Marxism, and we think that individuals and groups (social class) in society interact based on conflict rather than agreement. Through various forms of conflict, the group tends to acquire different amounts of material and non-material resources (such as rich and poor). A stronger group tends to maintain power and use their power to use groups with less power. Conflicts arising from conflict are solved from time to time, conflict arises with new conflict in the ongoing dialectic, so conflict thinks the confrontation as the driving force of change. In a typical example of historical materialism, Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels believe that all history of human history is the result of conflict between classes that meet their material needs according to society over time I will. Evolution of change, that is, changes in social patterns. production Marx's social theory helps not only to form the academic disciplines of sociology, but also to form some aspects of sociology. Conflict theory thinks capitalist society is based on conflict between social classes. Critical theory argues that science and humanities should be used to study society and that all members of society should be considered as an equal part of society. Marx's theory focuses on economic and social relations, and helps to begin the field of sociology and builds an important basis for all social sciences. Marx's concept of class consciousness is a central part of his class confrontation theory, focusing on social, economic and political relations between workers and owners in the capitalist economic system. Class consciousness means the consciousness of one's social and / or economic class to others, and the economic position of this class in society. Class consciousness is to understand the social and economic characteristics of the class to which the individual belongs and to understand the group's collective interests in a given socio-economic and political order.

This is just one example of how students can get a sense of power at school. Everyone knows that people are considered popular people at school. The popular people feel that they operate schools and even support people of different brands. In some schools this might not seem like a big problem, but in other schools this is a big problem. These labels cause suicide and other student harm to students. After all, it has led to prevention of bullying throughout the United States. Galtung said this inconsistency is "a kind of incompatibility, another goal disturbs another, he explained the theory of his conflict with a triangular model." In a less crystalline form, it is a nonconformity between the objective interests of all parties in society. In its crystal form, the subjective purpose of social behavior is incompatible. "(Galtung, 1992, p.54) Generally, the more obscured the conflict, the more structured the negative symptoms (social distances and structural violence), usually escalation at this stage , Collision is generally attracting attention The high-speed railway thinks the collision is objective, the representation of the structural bisection (asymmetry) Both theories are trying to explain human behavior - conflict and consensual theory. Consensus theory argues that social order can be achieved by sharing norms, beliefs, and values, but the argument theory argues that inequality creates class conflict. Then perceive the world by opposing the opinions that influence how these theories achieve their ultimate goal. The patterns of consensus and conflict differ in many ways, including their social outlook and its value, assumptions about the ultimate goal and means. The logical view of conflict theory, also known as social conflict theory, is a mirror image of functionalism in many respects. Unlike functionalists, they believe that the social order is maintained by value agreement, conflict theorists say that it is unwilling to exercise the power of a social class against other social classes That it will be retained. Marx, Engels, and social class. The theory of conflict was born from the work of Karl Marx (1818 - 1883), based on the fact that society is the struggle phase for power and control. The struggle is mainly in the social stratum for scarce resources, such as the management of production materials (land, factory, natural resources), better distribution of all resources (funds, food, goods).

Social theory is multifaceted. It has a theory to analyze the small interpretation of the ideals of society and small behavior of individuals making up daily life in detail. These theoretical ideal ranges have proven to be useful when trying to elucidate the complexity of society. Using theory as a framework or guide can examine many social epidemics from various perspectives that social theory must provide. This multidimensional approach can be used to discuss the gap. Relationship between social class and educational achievement degree There are many theories about social class and educational achievement degree, but here we focus on conflict theory and functional theory. In this article we will explore the relationship between classroom and performance. It will describe and critically analyze various sociological theories related to the classroom and apply them to educational experience, structure and practice. - Detailed discussion of the three main assumptions of conflict theory. Based on these assumptions, conflict theorists consider stratification based on social class of social class. There are two specific examples that support conflicting views in your discussion. First, the definition of conflict theory: conflict theory: This theory basically says that in society, everyone has a role to maximize their own interests. A prominent sociological theory contrasting clearly with structural functionalism is the conflict theory. Karl Marx is considered the father of conflict theory. Conflict theory believes that society is best understood as a competition, not as a complex competitive system. Society consists of individuals competing for limited resources (eg, money, leisure, sexual partners etc). A broader social structure and organization (eg, religion, government, etc.) reflects resource competition in their inherent inequality, and some people and organizations have more resources (ie power and influence ) And the position of power in society

Society is based on two groups, rich and poor. In the movie 'The way to glory', white people are rich and non-Americans are poor. The belief of conflict theorists is that there is competition for sustainable resources, maintenance of certain inequality, and social change due to conflict (Brinkerhoff 10-11). Conflict theory first emphasizes that conflicts in society are normal lifestyles and that you can understand aspects of change by identifying sources of conflict. Movie essay review of Glory Road. In my link movie de merde my website is splendidly gay. Movie Review Articles How to write Adam Serra Curator Jeffrey Kadrin. Attikas Character Analysis Paper The Philippine Sea Problem Paper in the West is trying as an expressive essay by an adult essay on the planting analysis essay of maize in Afghanistan. A movie article about the glory path of Malcolm Vimeo. I will pay someone else to write my paper basketball slide. Baker Paint Drake University Admission paper Citrus Height Garage Door Repair Fascia Analysis Essay. . God's enthusiasm for the glory of Rumah River Lodge. K paper about love. Screenshot miaow bella. Essay to gandhi dankdiscount com, Angel Movie Analysis Destroy the article Beyond the originality of creativity as a supercut audiovisual paper adaptation of Florida aesthetic laser story. Glory Road Movie Essay Whirlwind Network Solution. Film Analysis Paper Film Prospect Attica Character Analysis Paper Photo of racial inequality prose. Tuskegee pilot film paper blath na mara. I abolished the Gelder Lehrmann Institute through American slavery and the history of Hollywood America. Analysis article on power and glory You begin to experience the wonderfulness and richness of the former Embassy Theater, luxury luxury movies owned by mgm and .m. Road criteria set of glory mccombs Overseas research application paper. The glory of Ikabod closed the article of Milwaukee worldwide. Tian Rongyao The commentary on the movie is an extension of the movie summary Roger Albert to my website. b cd jpg Mickey dankdiscount Com Complete the pursuit of the a cappella choir by the choir

Discuss the three main assumptions of conflict theory in detail. Based on these assumptions, conflict theorists consider stratification based on social class of social class. There are two specific examples that support conflicting views in your discussion. First, the definition of conflict theory: conflict theory: This theory basically says that in society, everyone has a role to maximize their own interests. Some people claim social / political change is due to the group trying to maximize their interests. Webers 'social stratification theory Webers' social theory is based on three main factors: class, position, and power. A substance is an economic order formed by an uneven distribution of matter. The ability to form courses based on skills to generate and purchase on the market. Regardless of color, race or religion, anyone can belong to any class. In a nutshell, most people can say that they are in the first place in the economic order. # 000824068 16 th Week of May 6, 2016, Final Project of Sociology 1.1: As described in stratified ethnic stratification textbooks similar to ours, material or symbolic remuneration From the point of view of access to, it is a structure of inequality among social groups. Essentially, social stratification ranks society people in a vertical arrangement, also known as a hierarchy, and defines it as upper or lower. Regarding ethnic stratification, this means that certain groups of people have some shares Social stratification is a hierarchical arrangement of individuals entering the division in social classes, castes and societies. Modern Western social stratification traditionally includes three major levels of cultural and economic categories: upper class, middle class, and lower class but each class has a smaller class (such as occupation) It can be subdivided. Social stratification is explained in a completely different way in sociology. Supporters of structural functionalism argue that the stratification of class and caste is evident in all societies, so that the hierarchy must help stabilize its existence. In contrast, conflict theorists have criticized the lack of resource inaccessibility and social mobility in a hierarchical society.

As a human, everyone may think that they are unique as there are some common but very unique structures in our anatomy. Human physiology and basic anatomy are constant for everyone. However, there are differences in skin color, appearance, fitness, physical fitness and many other factors. From the generation to the generation, all our characteristics have been formed and changed, but some of them are greatly affected by geographical and environmental changes. The theory of conflict in sociology, first of all, the theory of conflict theory of Marx argues that division of social class based on economic interest leads to large scale of social conflict. The second opinion made by sociologists such as Max Weber and (later) Randall Collins is that not only the economy but also the possibility that politics, race, religion (or group of beliefs) can lead to social conflict and social class There is a claim. Creating status groups and social parties These later sociologists believe that conflicts arise from key social factors, but they are not limited to social classes based on economics. They also believe that conflict is a permanent part of society and can not be ruled out by eliminating the social class of the social class. Weber and its opponents theorists firmly believe that desire for bureaucracy and its order tends to increase and cause conflict, but Marxist theorists insist. Broken road: juvenile violence and crime in sociological theory Sylvia Khromina, University of Massachusetts, Boston, sylvia.khromina001 @ ub.edu In the 1960s, the rise of conflict theory emphasizing the importance of stratification, class, conflict, and material benefits raised interest in Marx. Marxism has various variants, but almost all conflict theorists recognize that Marx's theory raises fundamental questions about inequality, social structure and social dynamics. We will look at Marx's theory from the dynamic aspects of positive feedback and monopoly. In some respects, the most natural entry is the last four presidents of the American Sociological Studies Association: Feigen, Massey, Reskin, and Burawoy

Conflict theory emphasizes the social, political, or serious inequality of a particular social group. Contradiction theory is trying to emphasize ideological aspects inherent in traditional thought These different views have similarities but the contradiction theory does not consider these theories in a unified way. Domination of confrontation means that the group can at least temporarily do so, so the focus of suppressing opposition is the balance of power between competition groups. Structural functionalism and conflict theory Karl Marx and Max Weber were the first conflict theorists from the 19th century to the early 20th century. Following Marx and Weber, in the middle of the 20th century there were three conflict theorists: Luis Sase, Ralph Dahlendorf and Randall Collins. Cossell learned his theory from Simmel. Like Simmel, Cosser considers the conflict sound for society. By contrast, Dahlendorf combines Marcus and Weber's theoretical thought. Darrendorf believes that power is the main feature British Max Gluckman and John Rex developed German conflict theory by Lewis A. Coser, Randall Collins, Ralf Dahrendorf. , Vilfredo Pareto, Georg Simmel, others Founder of European sociology. Karl Marx believes that the state maintains property and makes property struggle a political struggle between owners and lessees, capitalists and workers, and other groups. Material conditions determine the ability of any of these groups to be politically and effectively organized. These material conditions also allow the group to communicate their views to other people in society. Because the owner is obviously advantageous in physical assets, their views are likely to spread. In their conflict theory, Luis Caosar and Ralph Dahlendorf stressed the use of conflict to solve social tensions and maintain interpersonal relations. They are here to follow Karl Marx and George Simmel. For them, violence is a natural manifestation of social change. Because in this process some groups benefit from other groups. In a diverse and open society, tension is resolved by conflict. Violence is the exercise of physical strength to cause injury and property damage. In the social context, there are two kinds of violence. It involves using the physical or psychological powers of national or government people to achieve the goals of the group. This is a violent act of the general public. Meanwhile, domestic authorities such as police and military also exercise force to maintain law and order. This is a legally enforceable enforceability.

William James said, "Whenever you collide with someone, there is a factor that makes a difference between destroying and deepening your relationship, this factor is an attitude." Process mediators should not change party attitudes, but they can show them in various ways, which leads to changes in attitudes and conflict resolution. The mediator needs to understand that there are many contradictions and by understanding these concepts and theories they can mediate the dispute in a more thorough and more appropriate way. The face-to-face negotiation theory focuses on how individuals with individualistic and collectivist culture negotiate in the context of conflict. Based on face management, the theory explains how different culture people manage dispute negotiations to maintain their faces. Self-expression and other concerns explain dispute negotiations among people of different cultures. Group thinking may occur if a very coherent group can not consider alternatives that may effectively solve group dilemmas. Group thinking theorists believe that group members often have similar ideas and are reluctant to share unpopular or different ideas with others. When this happens, the group makes decisions too soon, some of which may result in permanent results Face negotiation theory highlights the conflicting style differences between collectivist culture and individualist culture. Colististic culture gives collective values, so avoid or combine collisions to give others a common aspect. Individualist culture gives individual values ​​and strives to protect themselves in terms of the way they lead conflict. "Framework" is defined as the way we interpret the media presented, and these frameworks serve as a way to organize social meaning. As the media decides how we see and see, they also affect how we interpret the information. In a sense, they tell us what to consider and how to think about it. Face negotiation theory was established by Stella Ting-Toomey to discuss how people with different cultural backgrounds take communication and manage conflicts. In 1985, Stella Ting Toomey explained in the theory that differences and conflicts are usually caused by identity management at the level of individualism and collectivism. Various aspects characterizing individuals or groups are called "faces". As a public image of an individual or a group, society as a whole evaluates according to cultural norms and the value of each culture of people. According to Ting-Toomey, the difference between individualism and collectivist culture is that the former is paying more attention to the individual's face, while the latter pay more attention to the collective welfare (Gudykunst , 2005).

Introduction In order to cultivate the ability to analyze contradictions from various theoretical perspectives, I learned how to carry out various steps and manage responses to them through various theories. What I want to achieve in my paper is an overview of interpersonal relationship theory and the theory of relationship theory. In addition, I will explain when conflict has occurred and how to do when communicating in the situation of conflict. Social exchange theory is a social psychology and sociological point of view that interprets social change and stability as a process of negotiation and exchange between parties. Social exchange theory believes that interpersonal relationships are formed through subjective cost benefit analysis and comparison of alternatives. The theory comes from economics, psychology and sociology. Social exchange theory has many major assumptions in rational choice theory and structuralism. It is often used in business circles to imply accidental and informative processes between bilateral countries, including transactions and simple interactions. Social exchange theory has been applied in various fields. For example, social exchange theory is at the heart of the business concept of relationship marketing. From this perspective, customers are investments that must be properly managed and nurtured. On the other hand, psychologists often analyze relationships within the framework of social exchange. This is because the health of the relationship depends on how the concerned individual measures the cost and revenue of the relationship. Social exchange theory is a psychological and sociological view on why people do what they do. Essentially, people only participate in activities or relationships that will benefit them. If the exchange is not considered fair, the relationship will end. Therefore, people are seen as being purely self-motivated. In the first step, you are moved by fear - to live in defense to avoid punishment. In the second phase, you will be rewarded with incentives - focus on communication that is just the most beneficial for you. In the third phase, you are motivated by responsibility - you no longer care about fairness. Regardless of punishment or reward, you will continue to move forward

Stella Ting-Tommey's "Conflict and Cultural Theory" Introduction This research report is based on an article titled "Toward Conflict and Cultural Theory" in the book "Communication, Culture and Organization Process". In this article, Stella Ting-Toomey explains the relationship between culture and conflict and its low context and high context culture. Summary Ting-Toomey has started this article from resolving conflicts. Conflict is a part of humanity. It comes from a lot of things. Examples of possible conflicts may come from cultural differences. Incorporating culture as a form of existing knowledge, Ting-Toomey introduces the concept of conflict (Goffman, 1955) and grasps the obvious aspects of the people who confront in a universal way. Culture here may differ in their preferences and in how they rescue people from the positive and negative aspects of his or her partner (Ting-Toomey, 1985, Ting-Toomey, 1988, Oetzel and Ting-Toomey, 2003). . In arbitration research, Ogawa (1999) is exploring the role of facials in different cultural environments. Stella Ting-Tommey's "Conflict and Cultural Theory" Introduction This research report is based on an article titled "Toward Conflict and Cultural Theory" in the book "Communication, Culture and Organization Process". In this article, Stella Ting-Toomey explains the relationship between culture and conflict and its low context and high context culture. Summary Ting-Toomey has started this article from resolving conflicts. Conflict is a part of humanity. It comes from a lot of things. - Conflict resolution Many people like to work or participate in teams or teams, but when groups of people work together, conflict can happen. Hazleton explains the conflict as a difference between reality and perceived ideal and what was regarded as ideal (2007). "We reluctantly, carefully, in anger, in nervousness, confidently entered into a conflict, from which it is hit hard, exhausted, sorrowful, satisfied, there is a struggle of victory. There are many confrontational theories in explaining the nature of social confrontation. Since the Bawku conflict depends on the problems contained in these theories, economic conflict theory, human demand conflict theory, relative deprivation theory, long-term social conflict theory (PSC), psycho-cultural conflict theory are theoretical foundations of this research is there. Like all theorists, economists tend to explain the occurrence of conflict in human society through economic interpretation and basically tend to view people as rational and compete materially (Faleti, 2006). This led to desire theory and grievance theory trying to explain social confrontation. Greedy discussion is that social conflict is due to the desires of human beings and the desire for some people (called confrontational entrepreneurs) to benefit from the conflict that makes them participate in war (Collier, 2006) .

Each country fights each other and is trying to maintain peace, but it does not seem to recognize that it is in war situation. People in most countries are struggling to survive every day. War goes back and forth, but if they are united, the country will stand still. During the war most of the country is not affected by what is happening, because as few people are going to war regularly while others are leaving and making a living. Thomas L. According to the theory of conflict, people in their own conflict state enter the society's pyramid structure, the elite survives with popular support, and prevents decent disorder (the ultimate continuous conflict situation) with the necessary structure. It is born in). In essence, conflict theory is trying to explain how powerful people are powerful. Competition is the essential state of mankind, inequality of power is indispensable to the survival of all social structures, is a change through conflict rather than evolution, and war unifies society. In the framework of conflict theory, gender inequality exists because women themselves are weak and can not protect women in the situation of conflict. Therefore, in order to survive, they have to compromise and put in a position that is not very powerful. Conflict theory believes that human behavior in a social context is caused by competing conflicting groups. The theory of opposition came from the work of Karl Marx in the mid-19th century. Marx understands the conflict between social classes, especially those with means of economic production in the asset production society (such as factories and farmers) and those who do not have means of economic production (workers). Later philosophers described different versions of conflict theory; a common theme is that different social groups have unequal powers, even though all groups are fighting for the same limited resources It was. Conflict theory is used to explain various human acts such as educational behavior to maintain or challenge the current situation, cultural behavior of the elderly and criminal acts.

Urwiler, R .; As explained, the model of five basic needs of Maslow's human progress. (2008) is the need for physiological needs, safety needs, social needs, self-esteem needs and self-realization. If the individual lacks the basic physiological needs for survival, like "oxygen, food, water, and warmth", the behavior changes. "When one or more of these basic needs are lost, the priority shifts to meeting the missing requirement" (p. 83). Maslow, A. H. In 1943, psychologist Abraham Harold Maslow showed his theory of human motive. His theory is a popular motivational theory that is widespread. Maslow's theory is based on the level of human needs. Maslow believes that human behavior is related to my needs. It adapts to the nature of the needs. In the hierarchy of needs hierarchy, Maslow has identified the human needs of 5 types / sets ranked by importance and priority. He concluded that when a set of needs is fulfilled, it is no longer an incentive. After that, the next requirement set in hierarchical order is replaced. These requirements in the hierarchy can be compared with pyramids. At the lowest level, there is a first set of requirements that can be described as basic requirements and universal requirements. Next is another need Maslow developed a theory called the level of human demand. This hierarchy is usually represented as a pyramid. What is at the bottom is the necessity of food and evacuation centers - the basic necessity of the human body. At the top of the pyramid is the respected category of self-actualization (reaching your possibilities) at the top. The following is a representation of the hierarchy. Maslow says that people are starting from the lowest level of the hierarchy and the basic motivation comes from satisfying the needs in turn at each level. Unless their needs are met, their motivation always returns to the lowest unmet filled level. Therefore, people without food will not have the motivation to gain respect and respect. The level of demand for Maslow is the psychological theory advocated by Abraham Maslow at the psychological review article "Human Motivation Theory" in 1943. Maslow then extended this idea to include his observation of human natural curiosity. His theory is similar to many other theories of human development psychology, but some of them focus on the stage of human growth. Maslow explains the pattern in which human motives usually move, using the terms "physiology", "safety", "attribute and love", "respect", and "self realization". The aim of Maslow's theory is to reach the fifth level or stage. Necessity of self-actualization

Many people are trying to explain the participation of gangs in today's society. However, there seems to be a thorough explanation of the insufficient coverage to the media and the potential activities of young people who are participating in the gang. As the name suggests, Youth Gang membership is about the youth group who created the gang and participated. Studies have shown that youth gang members are present in modern North America (Bernburg et al., 2006; Lilly et al., 2011; Maclure and Sotelo, 2004; Sims, 1997; Wiley et al., 2013 ; Yoder et al., 2005. There are many theories and data trying to explain youth gangs in the context of abnormal behavior and its lack of control or control. Nonetheless, information sources based on actual data are suitable for proving this unhealthy lifestyle. In this article, we mainly explain the actual data by combining Merton's strain theory and explain the motivation to participate in the gang. - The university is responsible for providing students with a safe learning environment and protecting students in the necessary way. If the security of the campus environment is compromised, students have the right to review their failures and strive to achieve effective solutions. This is standard for all my educational institutions, including American universities, the safety of that university was destroyed in 2001 and has been destroyed for more than a decade. The attitudes and behavior of youth groups and young people are always a big issue in the UK. Research and theoretical research was done to evaluate the emergence of youth street gang. In the past decade, innocent young people were murdered and urged governments and scholars to report discrepancies between gangsters and postal code gangsters and study. Due to the increase in gang violence, the government introduced "gang ban" in "police and criminal law" in 2009. "Gang prohibition" is aimed at stopping youth participation, encouraging and supporting gang-related violence (Ministry of the Interior). According to a survey by the police station association (2007) and pickle (2009), in addition to the gang members participating in the gang, they are also involved in the use and possession of violent weapons. Many people are trying to explain the participation of gangs in today's society. However, there seems to be a thorough explanation of the insufficient coverage to the media and the potential activities of young people who are participating in the gang. As the name suggests, Youth Gang membership is about the youth group who created the gang and participated. Studies have shown that young gang members exist in modern North America (Bernburg et al., 2006; aLilly et al., 2011; Maclure and Sotelo, 2004; Sims, 1997; Wiley et al. - Gang, Affiliation, and acceptance A 12 year old boy. Returning home from school He entered the house from the entrance and noticed his mother was crying She had blood in a paper towel, silence quietly said, " Your father ... he is in the back porch ... his life is very bad. "Why did he feel helpless to go to his room?

Introduction In 1992, Samuel Huntington proposed a theory of lecture that the cultural and religious identity of people will be the main cause of the conflict in the post-Cold War world This theory is "a clash of civilizations" It is called. Therefore, this paper raises criticism against this theory of whether I agree with it, and whether I like or dislike about the whole theory. In general, culture and self-awareness are the first and most important aspects of people's lives in life. Because they bring meaning to them. In 1993, Samuel Huntington wrote in the "foreign affair" that the next world conflict will not happen between conflicts of citizenship, Russia, Germany and the United States, but in conflict of civilizations. Small background: Huntington wrote shortly after the end of the Cold War, the Soviet Union collapsed, the iron curtain collapsed and the Berlin Wall became a historic ruin. His civilization theory is worth considering today. According to Huntington, this is the five elements of civilization. In 1992 after the end of the Cold War, American political scientist Samuel P. Huntington introduced a theory that will become widely popular in international affairs. Huntington called it a "clash of civilizations"; in the international order after the Cold War, cultural and religious identity will be the main driving force for conflict. Huntington breaks the world into seven civilizations Because of the fundamental difference between ideology and culture and the friction with globalization / immigration and social change these civilizations inevitably will conflict differently. He believes that in its greatest powers, the West increasingly challenges the resources and desires of non-Western civilization (ie Islam, Orthodox, China) to shape the world of their image . Emperor was challenged by his subject: secret of conflict. At the same time, major powers such as China and Russia are challenging diplomatic and military domination of the United States. In recent years, correspondence to the "civilized dialogue" theory, Huntington 's "civilization of civilization" has become an international attention. This concept was originally created by an Austrian philosopher Hans Köchler on an article on cultural identity (1972). In the letter to UNESCO, Coquelar said earlier that the UN's cultural organization should discuss the issue of "dialogue between civilizations" (dialogue with different civilizations). In 2001, President Mohamed Khatami of Iran introduced this concept on a global scale. At his initiative, the United Nations declared 2001 as the "Year of Dialogue between United Nations Civilization".

Linda Sims in Accounting and Jose Martinez in Credit Division are in conflict with the use of the administration assistant of the credit division Ruthland King. They all work for a manufacturing company that has made remarkable growth in the past six months. In order to resolve the dispute, it is first necessary to judge what the actual cause of the dispute is. Rankin is very close to accounting, so she sometimes helps Linda with diary assignment. As the company grows, the credit department is expected to process the application faster. Problems related to finance, child rearing and housework. In this case study analysis we will explain the coordinator's report on the dynamics of the conflicting Steve and Cindy relationship. Analysis focuses on the main advantages and disadvantages of marital couple, how couple character affects their situation, and identifying strategies to provide counseling and support to couples. This analysis emphasizes the dispute resolution skills that the couple may be able to solve. Mr. Linda Sims in the accounting department and Jose Martinez in the credit department are inconsistent with the use of administrative assistants of credit division Ruthland King. They all work for a manufacturing company that has made remarkable growth in the past six months. In order to resolve the dispute, it is first necessary to judge what the actual cause of the dispute is. Rankin is very close to accounting, so she sometimes helps Linda with diary assignment. - Stella Ting-Tommey's "Conflict and Cultural Theory" Introduction This research report is based on the article "Toward Conflict and Cultural Theory" in the book "Communication, Culture and Organization Process". In this article, Stella Ting-Toomey explains the relationship between culture and conflict and its low context and high context culture. Summary Ting-Toomey has started this article from resolving conflicts. Conflict is a part of humanity. It comes from many things There were many examples of conflict resolution in history, and the way to solve the conflict was controversial: whether it should be forced or peaceful. Solving disputes in a peaceful way is always a better option. The collision solution curve derived from the analysis model provides a peaceful solution by motivating conflicting entities. If conflict resolution is forced, another dispute may be caused in the future. The Conflict Resolution Curve (CRC) divides the collision type into two separate domains, domains of conflicting entities and domains holding entities (images of CRC). There is some sort of match between target and attacker in this curve. The judgment of their badness is similar to the opponent's CRC. Therefore, before peacebuilding, it is important that all conflicting organizations reach the negotiable point of CRC. If the potential attacker's attack potential is certain, the CRC actually does not exist (ie singular)

Thomas Hobbs first talked about social contracts. Hobbes was the most important British philosopher of the 17th century. Hobbes explained what he called "the natural state". Well, in order to understand the state of nature, if there is no law, police, court, there is no way to force social rules, we need to think about what kind of life will be. This is the state of nature. Everyone needs the same basic content, but not enough to bypass, so everyone will eventually compete for them. In this article, I will briefly introduce the social contract theory by Hobbes, Locke, Rousseau. I will explain what social contract theory is and why. Then according to Hobbes, Locke and Rousseau's paper pointed out the state of nature. It also proposed differences in opinion among these natural state law scholars on social contracts and finally suggested a critical understanding of social contract theory given by Hobbes, Locke and Rousseau. Key words: world literature language, education, law theory, comparative linguistics, political philosophy, law, political law, cultural research, political theory, contact between religion, theology, contact between civilizations, conflict, Islam, philosophy, history, criticism , Renaissance Philosopher Thomas Hobbes and social theory contracts clearly understand these problems. The social contract theory is the basis of the Declaration of Independence, and is the guiding theory of the United States government and many other governments such as the European Union, England, France and so on. The theory is about why people choose to give us rights and power to form government. The government has several objectives. Thomas Hobbes theory Hobbes' social theory is often mistakenly called "social contract theory", and the mistake is "contract". Hobbes' social theory is more properly called "social contract theory". The difference between "Contract" and "Contract" is that contracts are sometimes destroyed whenever a party violates a contract or when contract terms are met. Whatever you do, it will last indefinitely. The western traditional view of "contracts" is like the concept of "marriage". "Death makes us separate." Divorce is almost impossible to invalidate the contract between men and women. Hobbes' theory will go one step further, no matter what the citizens of the country or the sovereign nationals do, social contracts will continue to exist no matter what the party does. In the case of obtaining power by theft, extortion, murder etc.

Critical ethnology: Investigation of minority participation in Canadian criminal justice system Canada's population can be described as a multicultural and diverse personal system. There is no doubt that certain minorities have lifestyles and behavior patterns that conflict or conflict with the police (Fleras & Elliot, 1996). In light of this conflict, Canadian police have increased the number of blacks killed compared to white. Criticize racism theory. Critical ethnology studies racial justice and "ethnic recognition" in the social environment (Babbie, 2007). During the civil rights movement, this concern about race became serious in the mid 1970's. Civil rights activists use this view to change domestic and state laws that give ethnic power to ethnic minorities. Exchange theory exchanging theory was founded by social scientist George Homans to test human behavior through the cost and benefits of decision-making. It approaches social relations from a basic psychological starting point, based on how individuals feel things, how to infer, and how to draw conclusions "(Babbie, 1995) Critical ethnic theory was born when recognizing the use of American racism ideology in 1970. This is a concept of social construction that attempts to show the legal structure including anti-discrimination law that responds to and promotes racial discrimination (Aylward, 1999). Implications of critical ethnic theory will strengthen the use of power in the criminal justice system. Initially, the purpose and purpose of critical ethnic theory highlighted race and power. It fundamentally breaks society by classifying racial ranks. However, the recognition of racial discrimination reproduces inequality and further reduces the rights of ethnic minorities. This concept dismantles the status of ethnic minorities while reconstructing the prejudice of the jury (Aylward, 1999). In the context of Canada, critical racism theory is often applied to racial discrimination, black and more prominent race of indigenous people.

The Middle East conflict, formerly known as Palestine, is now Israel and the Middle East in the 20th century caused great military and political conflict between Arab and Israelis. The areas mentioned by these two groups are exactly their home, smaller than the United Kingdom, the west is surrounded by the Mediterranean, the other is surrounded by neighboring Arab countries. The Israelites thought that it was their home, as they originally lived there, but the Romans dominated the area of ​​63 Ad. Ethnic conflicts in the Middle East are rooted in the history of the world and may be inherent in human nature. This type of conflict is difficult to solve, which is obvious in the Middle East situation. The theory of ethnic conflict explains that it is not territorial, political or economical to impede the achievement of peace between Israel and the people of Palestine. - The economy and the media are changing aspects of culture and language. "With the progress of globalization, the loss of human language is also increasing. There used to be a political confrontation in the Middle East a long time ago. This confrontation has become racial discrimination. The situation between Palestine and Israel is also very controversial. This is because they have committed many terrorist attacks. For example, a 9/11 terrorist attack. Thus, Western countries oppose the Middle East. Americans also believe that Palestinians and Jews are terrorists. Because Middle Eastern countries are often associated with terrorism. People have long distinguished sectarian and religious violence from Hinduism as the lowest class. It is banned by the Indian Constitution, but the rich are still the lowest class racist in the country. Racial discrimination in urban areas is more serious than in rural areas. The most racist question is where most Indians live. For example, there are many wealthy businessmen in India overlooking poor natives.

Picture of game theory if you are determined by a group of people. Decisions are not always important. They must be important to the current situation. This concept is considered as mathematician's game theory. Game theory is categorized into various kinds of games in the tree. Thomas S. Ferguson of the University of California, Los Angeles, says: In fact, this problem is closely related to game theory and optimization problems. Game theory is to study human conflict and cooperation under competitive circumstances. In several ways, game theory is a strategic science, or at least independent competitive participant's best decision in a strategic environment. The main pioneers of game theory are mathematicians John von Neumann and John Nash, and economist Oscar Morgenstern. Move by Nature is an interesting concept that means making decisions and actions in a wide range of players' games without strategic interest in the results. The effect is to add a "natural" player whose actual effect is to act as a random number generator. For example, if a dealer needs to select a license card in a poker game, the dealer plays the role of a natural player. The focus of game theory is a game that acts as a model of interactive context between rational players. The key to game theory is that the reward of one player depends on the strategy performed by another player. The game identifies the player's identity, preferences and available strategies, and how these strategies affect the results. Depending on the model, various other requirements and assumptions may be required. Game theory revolutionized economics by solving important problems in previous mathematical economic models. For example, neoclassical economics is difficult to understand entrepreneurs' expectations and can not deal with incomplete competition. Game theory focuses from steady equilibrium to market process

Values, ethics, beliefs are part of the role of individual self identity. Establishment of these components shapes the nature of human nature, behavior, and self-development purpose. The basis of these basic principles contributed to my wish to become a counselor. In this article I will explain my views on human nature, behaviors, behavioral goals, therapist roles, and counseling methods that you have chosen to actually incorporate. Understanding human nature is a concept of a set of essentially distinctive features, such as thought, emotion, behavior that all people tend to have (Winkler, 1996). When selecting a goal, the therapist must model effectively mature effective individuals. My personal counseling theory is based on pragmatism. In other words, genetics provides a person's personality basis cultivated through his experience and choices to reflect and develop his personality development. Problems and symptoms occur because human genetic characteristics or characteristics conflict with the environment where nature and child rearing conflict. In learning, the expression of genes changes, cultivation eventually appears naturally. My enthusiasm for counseling was always accompanied by dependence and participation in families supporting someone's recovery. I think my personal counseling theory is constantly changing and integrated into this approach. I am open minded to various ways in which various theories and techniques are implemented, and clients can benefit from treatment in various ways. However, my basic theory comes from the combination of cognitive behavioral therapy, rational emotional therapy, and family system theory. Philosophy and concept consist of my theoretical thought, my expectation, counseling, my direct and indirect roles as a therapist, and I plan to use it to attract clients . Ongoing technology Counseling theory and counseling therapy are cornerstones of occupation. Perhaps each consultant has at least one tutorial theory course and the names of major theorists such as Sigmund Freud, Albert Ellis, Carl Rogers are legendary and well known. In this article I will explain the composition of counseling theory, why counseling theory and treatment are very important, and how these theories evolve. It is estimated that more than 350 counseling theories and treatments are being promoted. Most of them have not received much attention and verification, but the core group of about 10 major theories, and minor methods of minor theories have been revised or are less than 50. Most of these theories have the following important elements.

Dr. Alpert, social theory bibliography, Harry. Emile Dülkem and Its Sociology New York: Russell & Russell Inc., 1961. Douglas F. Durchem through the challenger Aristotle's lens. Maryland Lanham: Roman and Littlefield Press. 1994 Dürlhem, Emile. Social division of labor New York: Freedom News. 1933. Elliott, Anthony. Modern social theory Malden, MA: Blackwell Press. 1999. Gain, Mike. Radical sociology of Durkheim and Moss In this article I will explain the two social theories of social structure and social process. It will also cover some branches of these theories; collapse theory, strain theory, cultural prejudice, social learning theory, social control theory, and social reaction theory. It will cover several branches and ideas among these sub theories; differential correlation theory, neutralization theory, neutralization technique and social relation theory. It will also study how these theories are trying to explain the phenomenon of gang violence. Social learning theory is a theory that explains the socialization and its impact on self-development. There are many different theories that explain how people become social, such as psychoanalysis theory, functionalism, conflict theory, symbolic interaction theory. Like other people, social learning theory focuses on the social impact on individual learning process, self-organization, and individual socialization. Social learning theory believes that the formation of human identity is a learning response to social stimulation. It emphasizes the social context of socialization rather than personal thought. The theory assumes that the identity of an individual is not the unconscious product (such as the belief of the psychoanalyst theory) but the result of self-imitation that meets the expectations of others. The development of behavior and attitudes is to respond to the strengthening and encouragement of people around us. In social psychology social identity theory studies the interaction between individuals and social identity. Social identity theory is aimed at specifying and predicting how individuals view themselves as individuals or groups of members. The theory also takes into account the impact of personal and social identity on individual perceptions and collective behavior. The theory of social identity evolved from a series of studies (often referred to as minimal group studies) conducted by British social psychologist Henri Tajfel and colleagues in the early 1970s. Participants are assigned to groups designed to be as arbitrary and meaningless as possible. However, if you are asked to assign a score to another research participant, you will be given more systematic points to the members of the group than members outside the group.

Relationship between rhetoric and social conflict In rhetoric, rhetoric occurs everyday, then we question and shape our personality. How we respond to these responses defines us as a society, which can cause conflict in society. These events challenge our thoughts and allow us to think independently about each problem. If there is no language or contradictory connection, it will be difficult to prove our understanding of these problems. In order to understand the relationship between rhetoric and social conflict, these terms must be completely defined. Rhetoric is the ability to effectively use words to gain a positive or negative response. To create a positive response, one person may attract people sympathizing with the situation, or those currently participating in the same experience. They may use familiar experience and memory to help them recover. One example is Mark Roore's article "Tobacco as a representative ideogram in the debate about cigarette smoke in the environment". Mr. Moore describes two aspects of rights dispute between a smoker and an anti-smoker, but at the time of reading this article, the parties are in line with their ideas and they are sufficient We provide support. Both ideas constitute an ideology, which is repeatedly expressed for that reason. Rhetoric is a way of explaining conflict, conflict is a difference of two or more opinions. It was developed through a wide range of typical interactions between conflict beliefs. An example of this interaction is described in Simmel's article "Competition". "In this article, Simmel sees competition as a conflict between two parties, each party is trying to express an opinion in some way to form a social order.These parties through another series of psychological conflicts, (Simmel 13-55) Another example is the constant desire to win.This theory illustrates a structure developed beyond the original awards Simmel Describes this formulation as a standard or custom in a particular situation, everyone has their own idea, then put them in the value system.

Small consensus on knowledge theory Descartes' meditation primarily involves knowledge issues; that is, if any, you can support anything. In this article we will present quite different questions. This makes the following questions clearer. To understand, why use knowledge and theory? In this regard, Descartes presents several arguments, including simple human interests, concerns about free will, understanding of human motives, and moral value issues. Both theories are trying to explain human behavior - conflict and consensual theory. Consensus theory argues that social norms can be achieved by sharing norms, beliefs, values, but conflict theory argues that inequality creates class conflicts. Then perceive the world by opposing the opinions that influence how these theories achieve their ultimate goal. The patterns of consensus and conflict differ in many ways, including their social outlook and its value, assumptions about the ultimate goal and means. Small consensus on knowledge theory Descartes' meditation primarily involves knowledge issues; that is, if any, you can support anything. In this article we will present quite different questions. This makes the following questions clearer. To understand, why use knowledge and theory? - The consensus theory on the content of criminal law, the way society finds itself, is the product of social needs and values, which is also for the benefit of society. The rule is that the community controls itself for ordering. When a crime is committed, it will be punished when society deems it appropriate. The importance of this crime must be evaluated by the same society and punishment itself. The theory of consensus and conflict differs in their perception, values, means, and goals for society. Consensus theory argues that the world is a society with common norms and beliefs, while conflict theory sees social division due to inequality. Therefore, they have different precedence values ​​and targets. The consensus theory only hopes for harmony and the opposition theory hopes to achieve social change by eliminating inequality. Violent means can also occur in conflict and consensual theory, which is why they are likely to cause war. Even in the process of pursuing consensus, violence may be inevitable, which is why aggression is common in modern society. Consequently, the theory of conflict and consensus shows how the difference in worldview influences the philosophy of a good society and how to achieve it.

Dispute Settlement Article As a nurse, we must have the skills to deal with the conflicts we encounter throughout the day. Other differences may last for weeks or months and will never be handled in the proper way to solve the problem. In the latter case, resentment, anger, and hostility may arise between employees or colleagues. In this article, I will explain the conflict situations and solutions used by the conflict, discuss other ways to solve the conflict, and discuss the most useful conflict theory to use in different groups. Instead of solving the problem in time, avoid delaying the solution (Eason & Brown, 1999). Negative sentiment between PCT and nurse was created by avoiding long discussion of the problem. Avoid the influence of the snowman, increase anger and anger between the two groups Using conflict theory to resolve conflicts is useful for conflict transition theory. According to Chinn (2008) collision transitions are used using collision transition theory before collision occurs. Potential problems are addressed in a constructive way, focusing on possible lessons (Chinn, 2008). Using conversion theory, you can prevent bad emotions against each other. Trying to settle a dispute is not a single person's responsibility (Chinn, 2008). If you use conversion theory in the above cases, the problem will be solved quickly. Management invites the conference and gives everyone the opportunity to express their questions based on the transformation steps and theories described below. If there is a disagreement, the team will take a concrete step to find a solution. Chinn (2008) describes four critical criticisms. Firstly, each member has the opportunity to explain "I am feeling ..." of the conflict ... (Chinn, 2008). In the second step, the group focused on "when (or about) ...". Resolving Conflicts It is inevitable to resolve conflicting file conflicts in files. This is what we have to deal with every day. In most cases, something is wrong when inconsistencies occur. It is usually due to lack of communication and lack of understanding of the responsibility of others. We continue to deal with various personality and attitudes and recognize how to disperse conflict and avoid conflict as a necessary condition to reduce stress in the workplace. The healthcare industry is filled with highly stressed experts, and from time to time our tone and body language may appear in a non-expert way, and let people accept this pressure. Dispute Settlement Article As a nurse, we must have the skills to deal with the conflicts we encounter throughout the day. Other differences may last for weeks or months and will never be handled in the proper way to solve the problem. In the latter case, resentment, anger, and hostility may arise between employees or colleagues. In this article, I will explain the conflict situations and solutions used by the conflict, discuss other ways to solve the conflict, and discuss the most useful conflict theory to use in different groups. There were many examples of conflict resolution in history, and the way to solve the conflict was controversial: whether it should be forced or peaceful. Solving disputes in a peaceful way is always a better option. A conflict resolution curve derived from an analysis model provides a peaceful solution by motivating conflicting entities. If conflict resolution is forced, another dispute may be caused in the future. The Conflict Resolution Curve (CRC) divides the collision type into two separate domains. The domain of the conflicting entity and the domain that holds the entity (the image of the CRC). In this curve, there is some sort of match between the target and the attacker. Their bad judgment resembles each other 's CRC. Therefore, before peacebuilding, it is important that all conflicting entities arrive at negotiable points of CRC. If the attacker's potential for attack is certain, CRC does not really exist (ie singular)

Game Theory of Marriage 1 Summary More than 2 million couples are married each year in the United States, but nearly half of these marriages will divorce. Given the high divorce rate, the use of pre-marriage contracts (also referred to as premarriage contracts in this specification) may also be considered high. But some people enter that Samuel Johnson's so-called 'hope is better than experience' while only 5 to 10% of married couple before marriage have signed a pre-marriage contract. This article is about to explain this paradox Game Theory of Marriage 1 Summary More than 2 million couples are married each year in the United States, but nearly half of these marriages will divorce. Given the high divorce rate, the use of pre-marriage contracts (also referred to as premarriage contracts in this specification) may also be considered high. However, while only 5 to 10% of married couple before marriage have signed a pre-marriage contract, some people enter Samuel Johnson's "hope over experience". This article tries to explain the paradox, After studying husband and wife for many years, psychologist John Gottman proposed a "magic ratio" theory of successful marriage. The theory thinks that for a marriage to succeed, the couple must average the ratio of five positive interactions to one negative interaction. When the ratio becomes 1: 1, divorce is likely to occur. Interpersonal relationships related to negative relationships include criticism, contempt, defense, and obstruction. As time goes on, treatment aims to transform these interpersonal relationship strategies into more aggressive strategies, including complaints, appreciation, acceptance of responsibility and self-peace. Likewise, relationship partners can incorporate positive elements into difficult subjects to avoid emotional disjunction Group tension and conflict In the case of a serious group conflict, conditions of deterioration of interpersonal relationship (IVA) usually exist. Several assumptions have been made for this situation from both therapeutic theory and interpersonal theory perspectives. Since they introduce some new ideas, they will be explained in more detail. For our current purpose, we already have a condition (IVA), a defensive behavior and a representation between X and Y and Z, with group relationships in which different members of the group or different members increase with each other It can be assumed. Subgroups represented by X, Y, and Z

The conflict between one 's will and emotion is a conflict of most people' s will and emotion, a great confrontation in Hamlet 's play, conflict experienced by many characters. Characters like Hamlet, Ophelia, Lertes, Fortinbras have been proved to oppose or confront the same way as most people in their society. The main conflict in the play is the confrontation between Hamlet and Claudius, which symbolizes the conflict between Hamlet and the surrounding society to a certain extent. Disclaimer: The free paper of Hamlet posted on this website was donated by anonymous users and is provided for reference. The free Hamlet research paper (Hamlet Revenge Essay) available on this page should not be regarded as a sample of our online writing service. If you need a new and competent research / writing Hamlet, please use the professional writing service offered by our company. Revenge leads people who behave blindly by anger rather than reasonable reasons. It is based on the principle of one eye, but this principle is not necessarily the theory of intelligence in life. In the Hamlet of William Shakespeare, young Fortinbras, Laertes, and Hamlet have revived their father's death. They all acted emotionally, but their roles were quite different. For this reason, it brought the collapse of two people and the rise of one person. William Shakespeare met the necessary elements of the whole Hamlet conflict by creating an internal conflict that focused on the struggle for revenge on Hamlet's father. In this case, Shakespeare focused on Hamlet's powerful edeps complex. Externally, Shakespeare outlines the external conflicts surrounding the legitimacy of Hamlet's claim to the crown. Hamlet 's inner conflict lies in psychological dissatisfaction with Hamlet' s nominal role. On the internal level, Hamlet seems to delay his revenge because his mother betrayed his father. This is a common concern for him. This inner concern contradicts ghost revenge orders. The internal confrontation of Tabasusum in Hamlet's "The perfect idealism of Hamlet of Prince Shawby" is due to the conflict between his own sorrow and the demand of revenge of the ghost.

Gender is the depth of the mind of modern society, it is a persistent feature of everyday life. It creates standardized actions and features for everyone and makes them account for the smallest actions. Individuals must not go beyond the double gender framework, otherwise they risk the strong opposition to forcing them to return to a culturally designated role. This duality is uncomfortable for the presence of intersex people - because they can not be placed in either 100% of men or 100% of women in the binary range. Eagly (1987) The social role theory focuses on two structural aspects of gender relations. These are the gender departments of the hierarchy based on labor and gender. This theory shows how these factors interfere with beliefs in men and women of society. It indicates that certain traits and actions are necessary for the role of an individual gimmick to be considered capable for that gender. For example, society believes that women are the owner of children and must be a process of child-rearing characteristics. This is due to their biological breeding. The theory argues that for separation of roles it encourages fixed beliefs and fixed ideas. This can be seen in the characteristics related to each gender. Men are expected to be active, courageous, supportive and physical. However, in the case of women, it is considered to be considerate and growing because of the characteristics of child rearing. The stereotypes of men and women are strengthened by the difference in the positions of men and women Functionalism and conflict theory focus on the institutional structure of society to explain gender inequality. However, symbolic interactionism focuses on direct social interactions to understand gender relations in society (Anderson and Taylor 2008). The theory assumes that the interaction between men and women exacerbates gender inequality. According to the theory of symbolic interactions, when men interact with women, it reflects their inequality in society (Thio and Taylor 2012). Symbolic interactionism focuses on the socialization of men and women, that is, how men and women behave. According to Money et al. (2012), both men and women learned the meanings of men and women through the socialization of men and women. Gender and Achievements

Middle East: News Conflict Before we start "Middle East, News Conflict" my readers would like the reader to read a few terms. These are just foods to think about whatever you want. Contradiction: discrepancies between people, concepts, or conflicting or conflicting interests; contradiction. (American heritage) War: open, armed, national state, state or political party is often a state of long-term conflict. & The duration of this dispute. "In the conflict areas of the Middle East and many years" and "long-standing conflict in the Middle East" (In either case there is no prepositional meaning of moving in the main direction, there are cases that it is in China, which is closer to Western China than eastern China It may point to Western China.) It is not an exaggeration to say that the relationship between the Middle East and its surrounding areas is complicated. However, it is impossible to fully understand the political situation, decisions, and conflicts in the Middle East without knowing the relationship to inform them. This interactive visualization by David McCandless and UniversLab is trying to map the relationship between the countries forming the Middle East and the group. Click on a country or group to see its known allies and enemies. Ethnic conflicts in the Middle East are rooted in the history of the world and may be inherent in human nature. This type of conflict is difficult to solve, which is obvious in the Middle East situation. The theory of ethnic conflict explains that it is not territorial, political or economical to impede the achievement of peace between Israel and the people of Palestine. - The economy and the media are changing aspects of culture and language. "With the progress of globalization, the loss of human language is also increasing. The clash between the super powers of the Middle East is very different from that of other global cold warfare. The Cold War has traditionally been regarded as a confrontation of ideology, but the role of ideology in the Middle East has been deprived by other factors (especially economics and nationalism). Press. (Rather than the feelings of "anti-communism" and "anti-capitalism"). Generally, the roles of the United States, China and the United States in the Middle East can be divided into two broad categories: military support and small-scale support. When evaluating these roles, please consider how each superpower contributes to the Arab-Israeli conflict.

Conflict is about power and comes from a power struggle to maintain or acquire power Power demands are the reality of life, use or abuse, assertion or denial, ownership or refusal. However, the struggle for many people to gain control and power can cause internal confusion and conflict between one person and others. In the era of the tragic witch trial, Kruger's Burg was a drama that showed power based on moral, legal, and religious dynamics and caused inner, social and religious conflicts. Introduction Professor Paul Kennedy wrote in his book "Increase / Decrease of the Great Kingdom: Economic Reform and Military Conflict", showing how predictable and decisive is the increase and decrease of the main power between 1500 and 2000. In this book, he proposes parameters to measure the prospects and indicators of the rise and fall of the major power of the world. In addition, the discussion is presented with empirical research by major countries of the world, including the political and economic aspects of the major powers. In this research, I will explain by evaluating increase and decrease from 1500 to 1980. Responses from the US Strategy Paper and China and Russia have confirmed that geopolitical competition between the major powers is rising. However, none of this leads to an automatic conclusion that a strong power conflict will occur at any time in the near future. From the viewpoint of the prism of power transfer theory, the choice of the US military against diplomatic strategies and decision-making may open up a path to military conflict. If hegemonic forces decide to check their decline by strengthening tensions with other great powers within the system, the risk of conflict will increase. As long as there is life, conflict happens. All species on this planet will experience conflict in the fight for survival. Wild plants and animals strive for limited food, space, spouse and often cause conflict. Humans are much more complicated. In addition to food, space, sex, we want strength, fame, money and cause more conflict. In democratic society, not only are differences of opinions anticipated, but each citizen is responsible for expressing themselves without fear or hesitation. If we want to live and work in such an environment, we know how to manage conflicts as an important skill in learning.

How people respond and how personal responses (Agnew 2011, Pg 608) every response to criminals, for example, escape from the crime of fear that criminals are slowly losing, escape from illegal acts There is a possibility that it will lead to various results such as having confidence in owing to the fact. This theory emphasizes the importance of personal characteristics and life experiences in social interaction rather than focusing on how society functions and influences each group. The general criminal theory of Gottfredson and Hirschi (1990) provides an exclusive and reactive interpretation of the criminal decision-making process. According to general criminal theory, criminal decision is a function of two factors, low self-control and opportunity. It is highly likely that individuals with low self-management who have opportunities for crime are involved in criminal acts. General theory helps to clarify some important aspects of crime and crime, but that fact that many criminals intentionally seek and create rather than wait for criminal opportunities to be realized It does not take into consideration. (Albanese, 2000). This is why the general theory of crime is not a general theory, but one of the reasons for the author's argument. Corresponding author: Glenn · D · Walters, Kutstown University, 15200 Kutztown Rd. , Pennsylvania, Kutztown, 19530, USA. E-mail: walters@kutztown.edu Gottfredson and Hirschi developed the theory of general crime. According to their theory, criminal acts and criminals are different concepts. Criminal acts are considered opportunities and illegal activities are considered beneficial. Crime occurs when they promise reward with minimal pain or punishment. Offenses that provide simple and short-term satisfaction are often committed. The number of criminals will vary depending on the number of opportunities, but the number of offenders may remain the same (Siegel 1998) The main focus of criminal study - crime and criminal study - is the cause of people's crime. The social and psychological theory of crime is the two most common views on how criminal behavior evolves. According to literature review of journals of human behavior in the social environment, criminal psychology played an important role in shaping ways society thinks about crime and crime and developing policies related to these issues. Illegal acts are caused by an imbalance of identity, self and superego. The conflict between the three personality elements allows individuals to develop defense mechanisms to cope with conflict. As a result, it may lead to problematic behavior or illegal behavior. Erik Erikson extended Freud's theory and interpreted illegal acts as an "identity crisis" caused by internal confusion.

Marxism represents the political, economic, social theory created by Karl Marx and accepts the notion that struggle between various social classes is the main factor in determining history. Additionally, Marx believes that the working class ultimately overcomes the aristocratic or socialist ideals that he recorded in his publication "Communist Manifesto." Likewise, I think that the overall motivation and theme of Emily Bronte 's novel "Wuthering Heights" is the origin of Marxism, and the conflict between social classes has brought about most of the incident. The theory of social confrontation is a social theory based on Marxism, and we think that individuals and groups (social class) in society interact based on conflict rather than agreement. Through various forms of conflict, the group tends to acquire different amounts of material and non-material resources (such as rich and poor). A stronger group tends to maintain power and use their power to use groups with less power. Conflicts arising from conflict are solved from time to time, conflict arises with new conflict in the ongoing dialectic, so conflict thinks the confrontation as the driving force of change. In a typical example of historical materialism, Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels believe that all history of human history is the result of conflict between classes that meet their material needs according to society over time I will. Evolution of change, that is, changes in social patterns. production Marxists explain the history of "civilized" society by collective warfare between producers and people producing social goods or services. In terms of Marxist capitalism, this is a conflict between capitalists (bourgeoisie) and wage laborers (proletariat). For Marxists, the root of class confrontation is that the control of social production necessarily requires control over the class producing goods - in capitalism this is the exploitation of workers by bourgeoisie. According to Marxist theory, capitalist society is a suppressed proletariat - wage labor class wage used by bourgeoisie to produce goods and services - and bourgeois rule - owns the bourgeois dominance class - important Looks like a class for profit. I conflict. Creating and extracting wealth by diverting surplus goods (profits) generated by proletariat. This kind of class conflict usually manifests itself in resistance to social productive production relations, leading to a short-term crisis situation where bourgeoisie manages the alienation of labor experienced by proletariat.

The purpose of this paper is to provide a timely educational theory that avoids "bias" in the current ideological controversy as much as possible. It initially proposes a basic definition that distinguishes the concept of "education" from other processes of human learning and formation, but this approach allows for divergence of various features underlying literary arguments I will. Then, this paper introduces the two - dimensional structure of education and links this structure to Schwarz 's universal value theory. To further clarify the advantages of this theory, this white paper proposes four common types of education and links them to Schwartz 's Value Scale (SVS). Some think that educational theorists and practitioners can use the concept of education that is provided as a common framework to think and study about education. Sociological Theory of World Education Judy Davis SOC 101 Allen Lips Comb World Sociology Theory of World Education March 1, 2010 There are various sociological theories in the United States and elsewhere in the world. Through the history of education, this institution has met both economic and political needs. The need for these two aspects also defines the function of education. "In the world, education is a large and complex social system, one of sociological theory of sociology is conflict theory, conflict theory includes attention to people's wealth and class, conflict theory We believe that change in society is beneficial, focusing on social order is the opposite, in the story of women and their children conflict theory threatens to homeless women, conflict theory is a way for people of the upper class to It is to give power to lower class people. Relationship between social class and educational achievement degree Although there are many theories about social class and educational achievement degree, here we focus on conflict theory and functional theory. In this article, we will examine the relationship between classroom and performance. It will explain and critically analyze the different sociological theories related to the classroom and apply them to educational experience, structure and practice. - Detailed explanation of the three main assumptions of conflict theory. Based on these assumptions, conflict theorists consider stratification based on social class of social class. There are two examples that support conflicting views in your discussion. First of all, the definition of conflict theory: conflict theory: this theory is basically that in society, everyone has a role to maximize their own interests.

Common sense and conflict Michael Eisner is an American entertainment executive, leadership from the 1980s to the 1990s revitalized Walt Disney. Eisner was born in New York City and studied literature and theater at Denison College. After graduating in 1964, he worked as a staff member for six weeks at NBC and then worked at the CBS programming department for a while. He began his career at ABC, joined the programming assistant in 1966, spent the next decade, eventually becoming the senior vice president of Primetime Production and Development. The problem of conflict is more or less related to every society. Proof of life, conflict does not apply to events that can be managed effectively based on experience and common sense of life. Because families are the oldest human interchange institution, the problem of family conflict is worth emphasizing. This is a unique phenomenon. It is unique in that some people interact for a long time (several years), that is, in most people's lives. In a closely interactive system like a family, there is no conflict, conflict, or crisis. I can not provide general rules for resolving conflicts between common sense and empirical theory. Each camp won the battle and won. However, I would like to talk about common sense triangles. It is an interesting story. The theory seems to oppose ordinary observations is also correct. Because it is evolution theory itself. The mistake that contradicts the theory of evolution and common sense is not a theory itself, but a misleading meaning derived from evolution theory. STEPHEN JAY uses CVISION PDFCompressor's watermark evaluation version for PDF compression, OCR, Web optimization As society consists of many groups, each group consists of at least one kind of benefit shared by its members, so in any sense social conflict is not a conflict between individuals and society, Conflict class, occupation. A concept of a group or group, or even a racial boundary. (Dewey 1973: 65) 82 From this and some other similar citations, the reader impressed that for Dewey social conflict basically means when groups compete based on opposite profits, but similar You may get. Conflict: Two classes compete for scarce resources, two countries fight in controversial areas, and two religious experts seek to maximize the number of believers, or two groups. Concept of this group-based conflict and control

Human heart often experiences internal contradiction, followed by internal struggle to achieve a certain balance or consistency (Hall, 1998). Cognitive dissonance serves as a motivation for people to act in a way that effectively reduces discord and restores balance. Leon Festinger's cognitive disharmony theory explores this situation and the follow-up behavior that people take in order to balance between ideals. Cognitive dissonance focuses on people's way to confront contradictions in their minds by actively pursuing consistency. There are two differences between cognitive dissonance theory and self-recognition theory. First, unlike the cognitive disharmony theory, self-recognition theory does not assume that some motivational state (eg, reduction of discrepancy) is necessary due to a change in self-knowledge. In fact, in self-recognition theory, you only need to guess your attitude and belief by considering the trend of the environment and your behavior, that is, the change in self-knowledge. The second self-perception theory recognizes that if the inner clues of previous convictions are ambiguous or weak, they can use their own actions to infer self-perception. Self-perceived clarity and inconsistency with their free choice of action Cognitive dissonance theory: In the current perspective (1969), Elliott Aronson associates cognitive dissonance with self-concept: when conflict between cognitions threatens a person's positive self-image, the spirit is created by the pressure created The reinterpretation of the original Festinger and Carlsmith's research, using a paradigm of induction law compliance, suggests that discrepancies exist between the perception that "I am an honest person." "I lied to find an interesting job." Study cognitive dissonance: Personal inference or public place? (1971) maintaining cognitive consistency rather than protecting the individual's self-concept has reported how people protect his or her public self-image Unadjusted Self-Recognition: If a lawyer has to defend an innocent customer for a customer who is considered guilty, he may experience cognitive dissonance. From the perspective of "Cognitive dissonance theory: current perspective" (1969), if a lawyer's misleading statement about his guilty client contradicts his identity as a lawyer and a sincere person, the lawyer You may encounter recognition. Disorderly. In "Gestalt theory of motivation" (1960), social psychologist Darryl Bem proposed a theory of self-perception, and even if they collide with others, people do not think much about their attitudes. Self-cognitive theory suggests that people develop their attitudes by observing their own actions and conclude that their attitudes lead to behavior observed by self-recognition; in particular, internal clues are ambiguous or weak When. Hence this person is in the same position as the observer and he has to rely on external clues to guess his inner state

Freud's psychological theory Sigmund Freud (1856-1939) is a famous neuroscientist who established the psychology psychoanalysis school. One of his theories is that the mind is made up of three parts, identity, super self, and self. According to Mr. Freud, the identity card is a demon on your shoulder, which represents the most primitive urges of starvation, sex, violence etc. On the other hand, the super ego is another innocent angel on the shoulder. It determines morally correct and wrong depending on how society teaches individuals. The psychoanalytic personality theory of Sigmund Freud considers human behavior to be the result of the interaction between the three elements of identity, self, and superego. This theory called Freud's Personality Structure Theory highlights the role of unconscious psychological conflict in the formation of behavior and personality. The dynamic interaction between these basic parts of thinking is thought to develop through five different stages of psychological development. However, in the last century Freud's view was criticized, because in part it used gender as the main driving force for personality development. Http://oer2go.org/mods/en-boundless/www.boundless.com/psychology/textbooks/boundless-psychology-textbook/personality-16/psychodynamic-perspectives-on-personality-77/freudian-psychoanalytic-theory- Personality - 304 - 12839 / index.html Freud's psychological theory Sigmund Freud (1856-1939) is a famous neuroscientist who established the psychology psychoanalysis school. One of his theories is that the mind is made up of three parts, identity, super self, and self. According to Mr. Freud, the identity card is a demon on your shoulder, which represents the most primitive urges of starvation, sex, violence etc. On the other hand, the super ego is another innocent angel on the shoulder. - Personality is a broad and intense theme, either people understand or do not understand at all. Many people in research psychology are also studying their own personal views on various people and their persons' analysis. These views range from the founder or genuine first known person to the subject Freud to the person who takes his perspective and moves in various directions. Among the more relevant psychologists are Skinner and Roth who deeply explore personal psychology. Jekyll, a relationship between Hyde and Victorian society, imitates the concept Sigmund Freud later explained in his theory of structure in his mind. Freud's mind structure theory divides human psychology into three parts: identity, self, and super self. A common image used as a metaphor of Freud's theory is iceberg. Only a part of the iceberg is visible, and the wave contains most of its vast space. On the surface of the water there is a self, which is part of the human mind, conscious and rational. Under the conscious water, the rest of the iceberg is divided into super ego and identity. Between self and the area of ​​identity there is a superego, or "our moral part" (Hefner), which encourages the grid and strengthens the rules. The frozen depth of the iceberg retains its identity. Reflecting the individual's desire, id is far from the shore of consciousness: the most primitive part of the heart

There is no doubt that conflict is inevitable in our lives. There are various forms of conflict, from discussions with brothers and sisters to solving fiscal problems using computers. Scholars believe that disputes can not always be solved, but it refers to conflict management. I would like to focus on three major strategies for managing conflict: avoidance strategies, challenge strategies, and cooperation strategies. Do you manage your differences by establishing personal and cooperative relationships rather than hurting them? Discrepancies and conflicts of opinion like this may occur between individuals or between groups. The following are five strategies for managing the stress situation in conflict management theory. Everyone is not a "free size" solution. Which situation is most suitable for a particular situation depends on various factors such as assessment of the extent of the dispute. Contradiction is an idea, principle, or a difference between people, a disagreement, or a contradiction. In conflict management, there is a problem centered on interpersonal conflict. This kind of conflict is a disagreement between mutually related individuals and explains how your actions create others' influences or influences. The relationship between the two people is very good, they have participated in various activities for two years, and they will not think they will interfere with each other's territory. Sometimes their workloads overlap, but they can work together and complete them. These two people work in the same place when they are chatting. They often talk about what everyone shares with others, such as their beliefs, volunteer activities, school functions and goals. They act as if they have never cooperated You can make good use of differences and conflicts. Team members need to be able to positively challenge their differences and differences in their work and use them to come up with better solutions. Because the differences are often based on good ideas, they are willing to express these differences. At the same time, they must be able to see this as a question requiring creativity and mutual respect, eliminating this opinion divergence from individuals. Find members with different backgrounds and different perspectives. Obviously, the more reference frames that can bring problems and communities, the better. Various teams bring various skills and perspectives to work in various ways, such as background, training and culture. Choosing team members and seeing what they bring to the mix can make a more dynamic and creative team.

Keynesian theory Keynesian theory can greatly appreciate the Great Depression. This is important for understanding the Great Depression. First, when the world depression was influenced globally, economists had to explain it and develop treatments. The majority of economists believe there are complicated reasons for large and unwieldy things like the Great Depression. Keynes came up with an incredibly simple explanation of the depression. Indeed, when he shared his theory with Franklin Roosevelt and proposed a solution, the president was told that they refuted them with the word "too easy". The explanation of Keynes's depression is this: Keynesian theory was developed after John Maynard Keynes (1936) followed Fisher's theory. Keynes said the economy has independent investment capabilities. An important aspect of Keynesian theory is that savings and investments must be the same, but the post savings and investment decisions are made by different decision makers, and that savings should be equivalent to previous investments . According to Trygve Haavelmo (1960), the "Keynesian" approach does not place much emphasis on the nature of the "coordination" of investment. Instead, they tend to adopt a more "behavioral" attitude toward investment decisions. In other words, the Keynesian approach considers investment to be "to do" by capitalists. Every year, consumption of workers and "investment" of capitalists are considered natural. Keynesian economics (also known as Keynesian theory) is macroeconomic theory based on the 20th century British economist John Maynard Keynes. Keynesian economics believes that private sector decision making can result in inefficient macroeconomic outcomes and thus the public sector should focus on central bank monetary policy actions and government fiscal policy to stabilize the economic cycle We will actively take policy response including actions. It outputs. The theory that supports Keynes' economics first appeared in "General Theory of Employment, Interest, and Money" published in 1936; Keynes's interpretation was controversial, and some school had his legacy Insisted. To understand that we need to explore the relationship between central bank theory and free banking theory and the historical conflict between all supporters. After John Maynard Keynes, the central banking industry is often referred to as Keynesian theory and claims that the central government should manipulate money in order to work advantageously for economic growth, economic recession, or economic recession I will. . The idea is that by increasing the money supply during the recession, the central bank can stimulate expenditure and infrastructure development and stimulate the economy from the era of recession. Reason for not expanding bit coins: How to make a bit coin a product currency motivating existing financial system to achieve global currency balance

Trust and distrust (18 months after birth) Failure - There is a problem with doubtful, personal relationship Identity and role confusion (12 - 20 years old) Failure - rebellion, substance abuse, children's game behavior Familiarity and isolation (18-25 years old) fail - immature emotions may deny the need for personal relationship Unsuccessful generation and stagnation (21 - 45 years old) - I can not point attention to anyone other than self Honesty and despair (45 years old - death) failure - difficulties of aging and death, feeling of hopelessness (2-4 years) Think about psychological images, symbolic games, develop your own language (4-8 years) self-centered (8 - 12 years old) Improving logical thinking, improving moral judgment, and logical improvement of digital and spatial functions (12 years old - adult) acquire adult logic, reasoning, future plan, concept, or abstract thinking Empathy, respect, truth, concreteity, conflict, self-disclosure, immediacy of relationship, self-quest Development theory provides a set of guiding concepts and concepts to describe and explain human development. Some developments focus on the formation of specific qualities, such as the theory of moral development of Kohlberg. Like Ericsson's theory of psychosocial development, other development theories focus on the growth that occurs throughout the life cycle. The developmental theory includes psychoanalysis theory, learning theory and cognitive theory. These theories attempt to explain much of human behavior, but in the face of modern research these theories are often considered to be outdated and incomplete. Psychologists and researchers often use macro theory as the basis for exploration, but also consider smaller theory and recent research. Development theory suggests a systematic approach to thinking about human beings from infants to young people, from adults to the elderly, and how to carry out the changes they experienced in this experience. Different developmental theories account for different types of changes. Jean Piaget's influential theory explains how people's intellectual development evolves over time. The theory of Lawrence Kolhberg explains the evolution of morality as people grow, and the theory created by Eric Erikson and Robert Kegan explains the change of self identity and nature with maturity . We explained in detail the early human development at our children's development theme center, and you may want to see it for a while. In this article, we compare and contrast the three development theories learned through the course, social learning theory, psychoanalysis theory, and psychosocial theory. Development theory helps to understand children 's behavior, and some may seem very different, but they can share many similarities. These theories help people understand the progress of their childhood and the different stages they occur. These three theories help parents understand what happens at various stages of their child's life. Discuss important concepts of these theories and how they can help children's cognitive, physical and emotional development. In addition, better understanding your child's development helps you to help and help your child maximize their potential at all stages.

Introduction of the First Phase of the Game Theory Project Over the past 20 years, decisions regarding expansion of the transmission network became more difficult. In fact, the electricity sector is segmented, and the electricity market is now a competitive market. Therefore, the transmission expansion plan no longer meets the traditional planning criteria. As a result, a new technology to cope with the transmission extension problem TEP has been developed. Various optimization techniques, such as genetic algorithm (GA), tabu search (TS), several heuristic and metaheuristic techniques are often used to solve TEP. In fact, this problem is closely related to game theory and optimization problems. Game theory is to study human conflict and cooperation under competitive circumstances. In several ways, game theory is a strategic science, or at least independent competitive participant's best decision in a strategic environment. The main pioneers of game theory are mathematicians John von Neumann and John Nash, and economist Oscar Morgenstern. Move by Nature is an interesting concept that means making decisions and actions in a wide range of players' games without strategic interest in the results. The effect is to add a "natural" player whose actual effect is to act as a random number generator. For example, if a dealer needs to select a license card in a poker game, the dealer plays the role of a natural player. The focus of game theory is a game that acts as a model of interactive context between rational players. The key to game theory is that the reward of one player depends on the strategy performed by another player. The game identifies the player's identity, preferences and available strategies, and how these strategies affect the results. Depending on the model, various other requirements and assumptions may be required. Game theory revolutionized economics by solving important problems in previous mathematical economic models. For example, neoclassical economics is difficult to understand entrepreneurs' expectations and can not deal with incomplete competition. Game theory focuses from steady equilibrium to market process Games and strategies have been studied for thousands of years, but the game theory we used today was obtained in the book "Game Theory and Economic Behavior" published by John von Neumann and Oscar Morgan Stern in 1944 It was. Strict definition game theory can provide important insight. Logic and mathematics are struggling. However, if indicators and values ​​allow it, there is a possibility that the best choice proposed in game theory will balance terrorism such as arms race competition and cold war. Von Neumann collaborated with the Manhattan Project and co-authored this basic book while creating an atomic bomb. After World War II, he was extremely enthusiastic about running nuclear weapons against the Soviet Union before showing his nuclear capability in 1948. He imagined that preventive war would save more lives than war between two nuclear weapons. He also promoted intercontinental ballistic missiles to expand the scope of nuclear weapons to fight the world. Von Neumann is admired as the term "mutual guarantee of destruction" (MAD)

Thomas Hobbs first talked about social contracts. Hobbes was the most important British philosopher of the 17th century. Hobbes explained what he called "the natural state". Well, in order to understand the state of nature, if there is no law, police, court, there is no way to force social rules, we need to think about what kind of life will be. This is the state of nature. Everyone needs the same basic content, but not enough to bypass, so everyone will eventually compete for them. In this article, I will briefly introduce the social contract theory by Hobbes, Locke, Rousseau. I will explain what social contract theory is and why. Then according to Hobbes, Locke and Rousseau's paper pointed out the state of nature. It also proposed differences in opinion among these natural state law scholars on social contracts and finally suggested a critical understanding of social contract theory given by Hobbes, Locke and Rousseau. Key words: world literature language, education, law theory, comparative linguistics, political philosophy, law, political law, cultural research, political theory, contact between religion, theology, contact between civilizations, conflict, Islam, philosophy, history, criticism , Renaissance Philosopher Thomas Hobbes and social theory contracts clearly understand these problems. The social contract theory is the basis of the Declaration of Independence, and is the guiding theory of the United States government and many other governments such as the European Union, England, France and so on. The theory is about why people choose to give us rights and power to form government. The government has several objectives. Thomas Hobbes theory Hobbes' social theory is often mistakenly called "social contract theory", and the mistake is "contract". Hobbes' social theory is more properly called "social contract theory". The difference between "Contract" and "Contract" is that contracts are sometimes destroyed whenever a party violates a contract or when contract terms are met. Whatever you do, it will last indefinitely. The western traditional view of "contracts" is like the concept of "marriage". "Death makes us separate." Divorce is almost impossible to invalidate the contract between men and women. Hobbes' theory will go one step further, no matter what the citizens of the country or the sovereign nationals do, social contracts will continue to exist no matter what the party does. In the case of obtaining power by theft, extortion, murder etc.

Social contracts are trying to explain why individuals agree to form an organized government. People are willing to abandon previously enjoyed freedom in a natural state in which the government does not intervene in their pursuit and are believed to respond to individual attempts to protect the behavior that is most appropriate for their interests. In this case, moral and political obligations rely on contracts or agreements among people to form the society where they live. As philosophers advocating social contract theory think that individuals exist before the government, the government concretely meets and satisfies social contract theory. In this article, I will briefly introduce the social contract theory by Hobbes, Locke, Rousseau. I will explain what social contract theory is and why. Then according to Hobbes, Locke and Rousseau's paper pointed out the state of nature. It also proposed differences in opinion among these natural state law scholars on social contracts and finally suggested a critical understanding of social contract theory given by Hobbes, Locke and Rousseau. Key words: world literature language, education, law theory, comparative linguistics, political philosophy, law, political law, cultural research, political theory, contact between religion, theology, contact between civilizations, conflict, Islam, philosophy, history, criticism , Renaissance Imagination of social contract by Hobbes, Locke, Rousseau. Social contract theory is one of the oldest philosophical theories about the origin of the country. The first inspiration of this concept is said to originate from a biblical deal between God and Abraham, and later Greek Socrates, which was written mainly by Thomas Hobbes, John Locke, and Jean-Jacques Rousseau It is a work. . Social contracts are ethical and / or political obligations that rely on the formation of social contracts or consensus among people. The social contract theory has three main stages of development, namely the natural state, contract or contract, and civil society. These three stages provide a fundamental difference between Thomas Hobbes, John Rock, Jean-Jacques Rousseau's theory.

Everyone has family conflicts. Occasional tension and quarrels are a normal part of family life. Whether it is your parents or brothers and sisters, you can take several measures to prevent the conflict from getting worse. However, if you feel that it is insecure or impossible for you to solve it yourself, you should be helped Friends, work, exams, housework, and even your personal style have pressure and expectation. Yes, your annoying brother or sis knows exactly which button you should press to see red. The possibilities that make these conflicts more difficult to handle are as follows. There are several ways to deal with family conflicts. This is what you can do. Even if they only give you the time to think about what to do next to you, this is also the beginning. It may sound foolish, but walking away and counting ten is a good way to avoid saying you regret. There is also time to respond to better answers. It does not solve the problem, but it may be a good thing to get some headspace with a friend or yourself. Try to exercise or relax Doing a different view can help you understand the cause of the conflict. It can also help you identify some useful strategies for you to solve it or deal with it. If you are fighting with your parents, please try to have a calm conversation with your parents in order to understand what is happening. When you see that you are taking such a mature approach to the problem, they may be impressed, especially if you launch it. Even with annoying brothers and sisters, clear and calm communication is the best way to solve the problem in most cases and achieve an agreement that is right for everyone. Listening to what others have said and accepting their opinion may be as effective as your point of view. (It's easier than to say, but worth it! If you can not compromise, you need to agree to "Do not agree". Remember, depending on your personal experience, beliefs and values, you can have your own opinion and you do not always agree with your family If you think you are in danger, please visit the emergency help page. You do not have to solve this problem yourself. There are many services that you can contact you in the best way to help you develop a solution. It is best to leave family disputes at home. If there is contradiction among families in the workplace, I urge you to work outside. If that is not possible, please follow the non-family situation. In some cases you need to bind them or ask them to go home on the same day. Under no circumstances should you participate in a dispute. If you stand on one side, you are now part of a conflict. The same rules apply when you deal with family and non-families. In order to become an effective administrator, you need to have the ability to be fair and reasonable in your business. Regardless of how much love a family has, the whole family experiences confrontation. Family conflict is different from other types of conflicts for several reasons. First of all, families are already very emotional. These emotions can quickly exacerbate the conflict. Secondly, since families are participating in long-term relationships, it is necessary to communicate with each other on a daily basis. Finally, families are often isolated, follow their rules and resist external interference. These characteristics can lead to long-term, tangled, painful conflicts. In extreme cases, family conflicts can lead to things like divorce and domestic violence. On the other hand, families keep conflicts, avoid problems and try to remove each other. Family conflict theory has various assumptions. If family members interact, there is no way out of conflict. As a family, conflicts of interest. In addition, families will feel the change and growth of society through conflict. Second, these theories assume that family changes and conflicts are always present in predictable and normal family relationships. According to theory, because the conflict is ubiqui

Industrial Relations System Theory Introduction Labor relations is an interdisciplinary field that includes research on employment relationships between labor union organizations and non-association organizations. There are various industrial relations theory, but the first and most influential theory is proposed by John Thomas Dunlop. As a labor economist, Dunlop reworked the work of sociologists and established a framework for labor relations. He developed institutional theory, emphasized the interrelationships between institutions and actions, allowing people to understand and explain rules of industrial relations. Labor-management relations can basically be regarded as a system of regulations regulating employment and behavior that individuals do in the workplace. The theory of industrial relations system proposed by Dunlop (1958) creates rules and practical rules for managing the degree to which negotiation practices are allocated and how the parties contribute to each other Explain the function as a system. Labor relations are more or less written in formal or informal form, legislative and statutory orders, trade union rules, labor agreements and arbitral awards, social meetings and management decisions (Dunlop, 2006). "Rules" in industrial relations can be defined, logical, or obscure and illogical. But the only problem with labor relations is that it does not pay sufficient attention to the distribution of power between management and labor unions. These are single, systematic, contradictory, Marxist and social behavior theory. Salamon (2000) considers the theory of labor relations as unified, pluralistic or pluralistic, Marxist, institutional and social. Green (1994) classifies industrial relations theory as follows: a single point of view and recent variants, a viewpoint of new unityism, conflict theory including Marxism and pluralism perspective, a systematic approach and comparison Viewpoint of social behavior. Everyone can not provide a perfect perspective, but each explains an understanding of our subject. All these topics have various variations. Green generally argues that a viewpoint, viewpoint, or theory is proposed, which is modified based on changes in experience, criticism, and circumstances. Essay.com/ Theorem of Orthodox concept of employment and labor relations Orthoconference of theoretical methods of employment and labor relations Dunlop gave his goal in the general theory of proceeding with labor-management relations preface, labor-management relations test front (Fajana, 2000), but this goal has not been achieved yet. Fajana (2000, p.21) says, "Although a large number of labor-management relations theories have been accepted in industrial relations knowledge systems, each valid theory emphasizes only some aspects of this field. There is no theoretical labor-management relationship. " Dunlop praised with pioneering efforts, but is there a universal / unified theory about industrial relations? This is a worthy question for labor relations scholars and practitioners. Essay.com/ Theorem of Orthodox concept of employment and labor relations Orthoconference of theoretical methods of employment and labor relations

Organization theory is a series of knowledge concerning the examination and analysis of the internal operations of the organization and the interaction with the external environment. This knowledge can be created through practical experience or scientific investigation. Organization theory also focuses on applying this knowledge to design and management organizations. Contrary to what the term "organization theory" means, the literature in this research field is full of various organization theory. The theory changed the way organizations organize their thoughts and understandings, while providing different perspectives about the world of observation and because different organizations behave differently (Robbins & Barnwell 2002). The purpose of this white paper is to understand the various theories used in organizations that produce different results in the fields of organizational power, control, conflict, and structure, and how organizations achieve goals and objectives It is too hard or too soft. Since viewpoints and information differ if viewpoints are different, we explore key viewpoints and explain how each viewpoint is supported by various assumptions defining how to understand and interpret the organization. The ideas to be discussed and contrasted are modernism, critical theory and postmodernism. There are various ways to display organizations, each producing different insights, knowledge, and perspectives. According to ontological and epistemological assumptions, different theories and perspectives seem more applicable. This white paper will focus on similarities and differences between theories through an organizational social structural model. On the other hand, post - modernists think that the social world other than personal assistance is just a name, concept, and label used to form structured reality. (Burrell and Morgan 1979) Postmodern supporters believe that an organization is a "fictional" existence Organizational Structure and Innovation The aim of this theory is to explore the organization from a modernist point of view to a symbolic interpretation by applying culture, power and structure. In this article we will explain the differences and similarities between modernism and symbolic interpretation. Modernist 's modern opinion points out that the goal can be achieved by discovering the truth. The effectiveness of the organization's profitability depends on the CEO's leadership and decision-making capacity. However

Security dilemmas can be used to explain and forecast racial disputes in specific countries. Paussen's view is supported by the belief that the basic principles of realism clearly understand the relationship between security dilemmas and their ethnic conflicts. It is impossible to deal fairly with international relations because I think that the general security dilemma is mainly based on realism theory. I believe that liberalism provides important insights about disputes Pausen could not solve. We will publish this comment to the German political scientist, International Security Specialist Stefan Wolff, especially in the management, resolution and prevention of ethnic conflicts. He is currently a professor of international security at Birmingham University in the UK. How does he respond? I think this is a fairly short-sighted view of what happened in Europe at the end of World War II. On the other hand, there is no attempt to create a completely homogeneous society; in fact, most of the countries with the most population exchanges are still multi-ethnic. Thus, for example, Slovakia has about 10% of Hungary's population still concentrated in the southern part of the country, Poland still has about 200,000 to 250,000 Germans living in part of Silesia Living in Belarus and Ukraine Either racial or ethnic conflict is always an interesting topic as both issues have a convincing influence in the field of security and steadily increasing even after the end of the Cold War. Ethnic conflicts still need to be tackled in the right way so that solutions can be found to overcome the misunderstandings accompanying it. When discussing the most important issues of ethnic conflict, we misunderstood what might constitute a racial conflict, or whether it might be collectively related to ethnic conflict It tends to be. Likewise, we can not depart from ethnic and racial discussions or conflict-related facts. Therefore, it creates serious problems. Is ethnic conflict inevitable?

Conflict is part of life. In fact, there are no conflicts, and in the case of individuals and communities there is no progress. And it may not even make us a reality. Through conflict, we learn to control our emotions, to give ourselves the opportunity to learn and grow. It also allows us to open our minds to other ideas and opinions. In the meantime, we may have to face a tough decision and make a mistake, but all of this helps us think of other people as a better individual by growing wisdom . The confrontation is caused by the challenge of our own basic needs. Some of these needs are as follows. Fun, freedom, self-powers, and the ability to have self. Conflict is part of life. There are many ways to understand conflicts. Right / wrong things will not lead to growth or understanding. If we are trying to judge who is right or wrong in our lives, we will never overcome the conflict and will continue to live in our personal ability. Conflicts do not necessarily lead to violence, communication and mediation. We need to implement conflict management skills. Identifying the emotions involved is important for conflict resolution. It is very difficult for individuals to talk without conflict, and the growth of all families occurs through conflict. Changes in conflict and human life are important indicators for family's normal development and growth. An important aspect of conflict is how to manage it. Families should learn how to manage conflicts, so that they do not lead to marginalized relationships. In theory, there are many reasons and solutions to emphasize the establishment of conflict. Families differ in various things from the point of view of adults, such as what to eat at dinner and how to raise children. The family's interests, degree of hostility, personality, personality, and how we express and respond to conflict vary. For example, in nuclear families, mothers and fathers may have conflicting goals, such as how to use wages. Companies first influence the potential for confusion and conflict by promoting growth and welfare. We know that growth and welfare are extremely important in conflict. Society of growth, development, and welfare never experiences conflict. Countries that have ended the conflict are unlikely to experience repeated disputes even as they develop and develop. "As early as the 1830s and 1840s, humanitarian entrepreneurs such as Charles Hindley in the UK and Daniel Legrand in France take cooperative actions at the international level to regulate working conditions so that workers are not provided Proposal that improvement of national circumstances will be disadvantageous in terms of competition in the international market. "

The theory of criminal science is based on the view that it is the theory of conflict and the fundamental cause of crime is social and economic power working in society. The critical theory of culture, especially literature, aims to face the society, history, and the power and structure of ideology that creates and constrains it. Label theory refers to how an individual's self-identification and behavior are determined and influenced by the terms used for description and classification. Life history theory focuses on the lifestyle of health promotion or exposure to harmful effects and the duration of exposure to these effects. Rational choice theory and its assumptions about human behavior are incorporated into many criminal logic theories and criminal justice interventions. The theory of rational choice comes from the work of Cesare Beccaria in the second half of the 18th century. Since then, the theory has expanded to include other aspects such as expansion, deterrence, prevention of crime by circumstances, daily activity theory. Rational choices are applied to various crimes such as robbery, substance abuse, vandalism, white-collar crime and so on. In addition, neuropsychological literature suggests that neurobiological mechanisms exist in our "rational choice". Rational choice theory, also known as selection theory or rational behavior theory, is a framework for understanding and often formalizing social and economic behavior. The basic premise of rational choice theory is that the overall social behavior is generated by the actions of individual entities, and each entity is making personal decisions. The theory also focuses on determinants of individual choice (methodological individualism). And rational choice theory assumes that there are options available in the available choices that make it possible to say which choice you prefer. These settings are considered perfect (you can always say that either of the two options is better, neither is it bad), you will pass (option A is better than option B, Option B is better). Option C, and A better than C Rational choice theory, also called rational behavior theory or selection theory, is based on the assumption that individuals choose the action plan that is most suitable for their preference. Rational choice theory is used to simulate human decision making, especially in the context of microeconomics, and helps economists better understand the social behavior of individual behaviors. Personal preference Rational choice theory is increasingly used in other fields including evolution, political science, and war.

According to Hatch and Cunliffe (2006), organization theory (OT) research has three main points: modern, symbolic interpretation and postmodern. Each of these ideas has its own assumptions and methods. Hatch and Cunliffe provide a primer on the concepts and characteristics of the three OT perspectives. Tsoukas and Knudsen also wrote a comprehensive manual that summarizes various aspects of the meta-theoretic point of view. In this article, the author discusses the basic concepts of the three perspectives, compares Tsoukas and Knud, introducing why Hatch and Cunliffe, why organization theory has multi-viewpoint importance. Literature review consists of three parts, a theoretical point of view (existing theories and concepts explaining the research problem), an empirical point of view (actual research published on or around this subject), and a conceptual framework of research It is most divided. . The conceptual framework is a conceptual diagram of researchers that combines theoretical and theoretical literature theoretically and theoretically and details a logical coherent description explaining the nature of the research. Along with the findings, it is the researcher's first contribution to the field. Three theoretical perspectives of functionalism theory, conflict theory and symbolic interaction theory lead sociological thinking of social problems. These views are seeing the same social problem, but they do so in different ways. Their shared view provides a more comprehensive understanding of social issues than any view. Table 1 "Theoretical Snapshot" is a summary of three viewpoints. Social stability is necessary for a strong society and social stability requires complete socialization and social integration. The social social system plays an important function to ensure social stability. Slow social change is desirable, but rapid social change threatens social order

In order for the political theorist to fully theorize the political structure, theory and strategy, he must first demolish the foundation of society. By disassembling society at the outset, theorists can reconstruct society while explaining each constituent element of society, and then theory of effective political structure. Locke, Hobbes, Aquinas, Machiavelli each build a political theory based on this theory. And the core of each theory is a comment about human conflict. In this article, I will briefly introduce the social contract theory by Hobbes, Locke, Rousseau. I will explain what social contract theory is and why. Then according to Hobbes, Locke and Rousseau's paper pointed out the state of nature. It also proposed differences in opinion among these natural state law scholars on social contracts and finally suggested a critical understanding of social contract theory given by Hobbes, Locke and Rousseau. Key words: world literature language, education, law theory, comparative linguistics, political philosophy, law, political law, cultural research, political theory, contact between religion, theology, contact between civilizations, conflict, Islam, philosophy, history, criticism , Renaissance Rock 's political theory is based on the theory of social contract. Unlike Thomas Hobbes, Locke believes that human nature is characterized by reason and tolerance. Like Hobbes, Locke believes human nature allows people to be selfish. This is obvious with the introduction of currency. In the state of nature, everyone is equal and independent, and everyone has natural rights to protect their "life, health, freedom or wealth". Although suggesting other origins, most scholars follow the phrase "pursuit of life, freedom, and happiness" in the "American Independence Declaration" of Rock 's rights theory. John Locke, in particular in two government papers, incorporates the laws of nature in his many theories and philosophies. Although the effect of lock understanding is usually based on Hobbes' contract theory, there is a much more similar discussion as to whether his concept of natural law is more similar to Aquinas (filtered by Richard Hook) or Hobbes is there. The theory of people who fix Hobbes. . Mr. Rock stated that if the ruler could not defend "life, freedom, property" by breaking the natural law, thinking that as a matter of course, it could overthrow the existing state and create a new state , Hobbes' provision.

After Suharto finished the long dictatorship regime in 1998, Indonesian religious and ethnic conflicts have increased dramatically. Author Jacques Bertrand insists that religious and ethnic conflicts define a national model of Indonesia. This brought three critical moments during the withdrawal from Suharto's sovereignty. These three important moments define the "citizenship provision" of Indonesia and give the organization its structural and procedural importance (Bertrand, 20). When Suharto died as a dictator, major political and social changes consumed Indonesia and threatened the territory of Indonesia. In the latter part of the 20th century conflicts within the border became increasingly dominant. One-third of all countries are experiencing domestic conflicts. Most, if not most, such conflict involves violence at the racial boundary. Based on recent theoretical and empirical studies, we provide evidence that existing ethnic groups influence social conflict. Our analysis also points to specific impact channels. In particular, two different ethnic groups, differentiation - differentiation, influence the conflict, which shows that the former has more influence. "Private" (robbery, government subsidies, infrastructure, etc.) Existing data seems to strongly support the existing inter-group dispute theory Ethnic identity and national identity may conflict in countries with multiple ethnic groups. These conflicts are often referred to as ethnic and national conflicts. One of the famous nationality - citizen's conflict is a struggle between the Australian government and the Australian indigenous people. The Australian government and most cultures impose policies and frameworks to support most European cultural values ​​and English-speaking languages. The culture and language of Aboriginal is not supported by the state, it was almost eradicated by the state in the 20th century. Because of these confrontations, indigenous peoples have little or no recognition as Australian national identity, but their ethnic identity is important. Constructivists are descriptions of racial and ethnic conflicts. National and national identities are built socially through social, economic and political processes such as colonization and conquest. Ethnic conflict is a product of the factors that form the identity of the people, it is not a factor of the race itself. If the proportion of the state's population between the ages of 15 and 24 is too high, there will be an increase in young people. It occurs when the infant mortality rate decreases and the birth rate rises. This youth expansion has increased the working age population; however, it has not been converted to more employment opportunities and has led to serious unemployment. This leads to a young adult male group "prolonging dependence on parents, reducing self-esteem and contributing to frustration." This has enabled young people to "pursue social and economic progress with alternative, non-legal means". This means that opportunity cost to participate in armed movement is low.

"There is an irreversible clash between life and business, there is always a conflict between peace and chaos.It can not be learned either, but it can affect both.In the 20th century Businessman's Night) In theory, the team should work like a well-functioning machine, like most state-of-the-art machines, the wisest people achieve the stated goal of doing work It should be able to work peacefully, but forgetting the oil, you may miss the scheduled maintenance items and the machine may decelerate or stop completely. The Sudanese conflict dates back to the 14th century. The main cause of today's conflict is the ideology, race and resource competition between people and the Sudanese government (Snyder, 2007). Darfur civilians are often subjected to torture, rape, and murder, war is an important part of their history. This is not how people should be forced to live and how the government manages them. The United Nations calls on the current conflict in the area as "the most serious humanitarian crisis in the world today" (Kim, Torbay, Lawry, 2007, 353). In 2005, former Prime Minister Tony Blair started an initiative to encourage the international community to accept responsibility for the Darfur crisis. He said, The conflict in Darfur proved to be a humanitarian crisis. Some were called massacres, others were called the most serious humanitarian crisis. Any conflict varies for political, economic, ecological, and ethnic reasons. However, as conflict theory claims that resource competition is the main cause of conflict, we intend to deal with economic problems. West Darfur has a population of about 17 million people, mostly African farmers from the Fur, Masalit and Zaghawa. The other population of Darfur consists of Arab nomad groups. Black and Arab tribes in Africa are Muslims, but they have a long history of conflict over land, crops and resources. It is often said that the battle in Darfur is racially motivating Arabs and black armed groups and civilians in confrontation, but the other side of the conflict, the farmer who resolved and the land that failed Nomads have a cause.

Looking for word conflicts in the dictionary, you can see some negative reactions. Descriptions such as conflict and disagreement, contradiction and opposition, conflict, conflict, controversy, conflict, opposition between benefits and principles, or against Random House (1975). It is no wonder that people tend to avoid entering conflict zones because of the negative reputation associated with this term. D. Jordan (1996) argues that there are two types of contradictions. It is defined as good, cognitive conflict (type C contradiction), harmful, defined as contradiction of emotion (type A contradiction). Resolution of motivation and confrontation Conflict in the workplace does not promote employee motivation. It is important to build trust and provide satisfaction to the work that is important to motivate employees. Effective dispute settlement is important to the success of the organization, but it is only one aspect of employee motivation. There are several motivational theories that help organizations understand workplace relationships, organizational behaviors, and employee impacts ... Competitive solution solutions within the group have been studied, analyzed, and discussed over the years Until recently, psychologist started rolling a wider range. Until then, the study of human relationships was more or less reserved for political scientists, historians, and experts such as lawyers and diplomats. Therefore, the developed theory provides deeper insight, as many social science studies are based on previous research. Do you have any disagreement with your colleagues? You may have had it one or more times. Conflict in the workplace is very common; few offices work all the employees together. Consequently, conflict resolution is an important part of the workplace and leaders need to be familiar with dispute resolution techniques. If conflicts are not resolved, productivity and teamwork will be adversely affected. Using a dispute resolution strategy at work will help maintain a healthy work environment. To resolve the conflict, you need specific leadership skills, problem solving skills, and decision-making skills.

"Cities in emerging developing countries are old and new comparative studies, rural survivors, and innovative technologies in the west.This combination can be seen not only by people but also by residents of these cities." Breese, 1969) When discussing whether modern society represents the "progress" of traditional society, we have returned to one of the earliest foundations of modernization theory. In short, the traditional society often has "primitive", "retrograde", "hard social structure" and its economy is said to be limited to "rural and agricultural level". It is said that these characteristics adversely affect development. Development theory is a collective or collective vision of the theory about the best way to achieve ideal social change. These theories use various social science fields and methods. In this article I will explain various theories and the latest developments of these theories. According to the theory being studied, there are various interpretations about the development process and its inequalities. Analysis of Rostow model is a national level analysis. The model is influenced by the country's innovation activities, looking at national economic development. Wallerstein's three-part world system theory is an analysis at the international level. It focuses on the characteristics of the three parts of the world and the international relations between the various parts. Wallerstein's three-part world system theory is a socialist opinion because it gives priority to differences in position and conflict. Development theory is an interdisciplinary approach to promote domestic economic growth. Development theory spread after the Second World War when the former colony won independence but lacked institutions and knowledge to participate in the world economy without a colonial ruler. Development comes from the first country in the world. The driving force is that economic growth leads to a positive development of people's daily lives. However, with the development of the world economy, development theory has become like a new form of colonialism. Organizations such as the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund have weakened state sovereignty by implementing structural adjustment programs in developing countries. These SAPs are derived from neoliberal liberal market principles, ignoring the history of European and American capitalism and ignoring the general well-being of the people.

In 1979, psychologist Urie Bronfenbrenner announced "ecology of human development" and detailed his theory called ecological theory in detail. Ecological theory, also known as the development of background theory or human ecological theory, specifies five different types of nested environmental systems: microsystems, intermediary systems, external systems, macro systems, and time systems . Each of these systems affects individuals, especially children. Ecosystem theory, also known as background development or human ecology theory, identifies five environmental systems with which individuals interact. This theory provides a framework for community psychologists to study personal relationships in communities and broader societies. The ecological theory was developed by Urie Bronfenbrenner. This theory is often referred to as the ecological / system framework. External system: A link between the social environment in which individuals have no positive role and the direct background of individuals. For example, the parent's or child's experience at home may be affected by other parent's experience in the workplace. Parents may receive promotions that require more travel, which increases the conflict with other parents and they may change how they interact with their children. Bronfenfrenner's ecological theory U.S. psychologist Russian-born American psychologist Urie Bronfenbrenner (1917-2005) has developed the ecosystem theory of human development. This paradigm is introduced in "Ecology of Human Development: Experiments of Nature and Design" (1979). Bronfenbrenner insists that interaction with others and the environment is the key to human development. - Over the past 30 to 40 years, much research has been done on the climate and environment of the classroom. Researchers such as Lorin W. Anderson, Sid F. Bourke, Rudolf Moos, Barry Fraser, Urie Bronfenbrenner, etc. make a significant contribution to the impact of the classroom environment on the students.

With all of these available revenue sources, it is clear that a few men are trying to apply for a college degree. Equal wages are even higher, men tend to make more impulsive decisions; they decline the university. Regardless of the type of education you pursue, men and women have equal opportunities at school. Based on my school experience I have never seen a young girl without restricting or restricting young boys. I have never seen a gender-specific curriculum, and I have never seen a difference in the type of education between men and women. The curriculum on gender and conflict means that the two areas of interest are interrelated. In this article we will look at the relationship between gender and conflict and explain the important reasons for understanding this relationship to understand the dynamics of gender and the dynamics of conflict. If you do not understand it, you will not be able to understand others. Understanding this relationship is an opportunity to change the power structure not only in disruptive force but also in a positive way If disputes are managed well, gender analysis of conflict understands peace It will help. Prospective customer C. Approach of feminist and gender conflict. An important conflict analysis focuses on gender conflict approaches, ie gender inequality and conflict. The approach of gender conflict is closely related to feminism, ie advocates of women and men's social equality. Imagine a society from a broad abstraction perspective. E. Symbolic interaction is a framework of theoretical construction that regards society as a product of personal interaction. Structural functions and social confrontation methods share macro-level direction, which means that they focus on a broad social structure that affects society as a whole. In contrast, symbolic interactions have micro-level directionality and focus on social interaction patterns in specific environments. The major players developing this approach include Max Weber, George Herbert Mead, Irving Gofman, George Homans, and Peter Brow. Functionalism and conflict theory focus on the institutional structure of society to explain gender inequality. However, symbolic interactionism focuses on direct social interactions to understand gender relations in society (Anderson and Taylor 2008). The theory assumes that the interaction between men and women exacerbates gender inequality. According to the theory of symbolic interactions, when men interact with women, it reflects their inequality in society (Thio and Taylor 2012). Symbolic interactionism focuses on the socialization of men and women, that is, how men and women behave. According to Money et al. (2012), both men and women learn the meanings of men and women through gender socialization. Gender and Achievements

Introduction Marxism is a method of social evaluation, aiming at social conflict and class relationship, using the materialistic interpretation of historical development and the dialectical view on social remodeling. Marxist evaluation applies economic and socio-political research, they apply to the investigation and evaluation of capitalist development, and the role of class struggle in systematic economic change (Walicki, 1997). Marxism is based on materialistic knowledge about social progress and human society takes care of the economic activities necessary for its survival (McLellan, 2007). Marxism is a method of socio-economic analysis, using the materialistic interpretation of historical development to examine class relations and social conflict and adopt the dialectical view of social transformation. It came from works of German philosophers Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels of the 19th century. According to Marxist theory, capitalist society is a suppressed proletariat - wage labor class wage used by bourgeoisie to produce goods and services - and bourgeois rule - owns the bourgeois dominance class - important Looks like a class for profit. I conflict. Creating and extracting wealth by diverting surplus goods (profits) generated by proletariat Marxism is a socio-economic analysis method derived from Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels. It analyzes class relations and social conflicts using dialectical views on interpretation of materialism and historical development of social transformation. Marxist analysis and methodology influenced political ideology and social movements. Marxist history and understanding of society is based on archeology, anthropology, media research, political science, theater, history, sociology, art history and theory, cultural research, education, economics, geography, literary criticism, aesthetics, criticism It is divided into. It is used by scholars such as psychology and philosophy. Socialism from the 19th century to the 20th century was studied as an ideological development. The main topics are utopia socialism, Marxism, anarchism, German social democracy, Russian Marxism, Chinese Marxism. Prerequisite: Course attribute including AP or IB credit G4. In the seminar we will discuss the main topics and problems of the 20th century American civil rights movement. In addition to exploring the lives and roles of popular characters such as Martin Luther King, Rosa Parks, Malcolm X, Jesse Jackson, I will also learn about the contributions of important but less noticeable characters. Charles Houston, Major Evers, Ella Baker, Clifford Dur, Septima Clark etc. The focus was on the formation of a national association for the public's promotion at the Niigara meeting in 1909, from non-violent protests in the 1950s and 1960s, and finally to the legal strategy for the black people at every stage of the movement You should concentrate. The movement of power is over.

The game theory is said to have been introduced by Emile Borel in 1921. Borel is a French mathematician who published a paper on game theory. From this point of view, according to the article "game theory", Borel can be called "the first mathematician devising an organized game system" and evidence that Borel did not develop his idea any further there is. That's why most historians admire John von Neumann. Von Neumann was born in Budapest, Hungary in 1903. When reading about encryption currency, game theory does not expect you to encounter. After all, is it really accompanied by "game" or "theory"? The theory of cryptographic currency game exists and you can see that it is indispensable for understanding. This is especially true if you are trying to analyze the security of these cryptographic currencies and to invest this in the best possible way. Since Satoshi Nakamoto established Bitcoin in 2008, the field of encryption currency continues to grow at a very fast pace. Within 10 and 10 years, there are 877 kinds of encryption currencies (as of June 15, 2017), each with its own distinctive features and value propositions. It is almost impossible for the degree of cryptographic economic development to catch up. In addition, many people inevitably question the safety and incentives of these coins to exchange millions of dollars worth of tokens a day. In fact, this problem is closely related to game theory and optimization problems. Game theory is to study human conflict and cooperation under competitive circumstances. In several ways, game theory is a strategic science, or at least independent competitive participant's best decision in a strategic environment. The main pioneers of game theory are mathematicians John von Neumann and John Nash, and economist Oscar Morgenstern. Move by Nature is an interesting concept that means making decisions and actions in a wide range of players' games without strategic interest in the results. The effect is to add a "natural" player whose actual effect is to act as a random number generator. For example, if a dealer needs to select a license card in a poker game, the dealer plays the role of a natural player.

Shaw and McKay (1942) concentrated their research into the city of Chicago, Illinois, which is growing rapidly in the early 1900s. Cullen and Agnew (2011) point out that the population of Chicago has doubled from 1 million in 1890 to 20 years. According to Cullen and Agnew (2011), in this era of rapid expansion, research has begun to make a different way of thinking about crime. Cullen and Agnew (2011) point out that researchers are beginning to believe that crime is not understood when studying the characteristics of individual crime, but understanding of the environmental characteristics of criminal life and interactions is beginning to be believed There. In this article I will explain the two social theories of social structure and social process. It will also cover some branches of these theories; collapse theory, strain theory, cultural prejudice, social learning theory, social control theory, and social reaction theory. It will cover several branches and ideas among these sub theories; differential correlation theory, neutralization theory, neutralization technique and social relation theory. It will also study how these theories are trying to explain the phenomenon of gang violence. Social learning theory is a theory that explains the socialization and its impact on self-development. There are many different theories that explain how people become social, such as psychoanalysis theory, functionalism, conflict theory, symbolic interaction theory. Like other people, social learning theory focuses on the social impact on individual learning process, self-organization, and individual socialization. Social learning theory believes that the formation of human identity is a learning response to social stimulation. It emphasizes the social context of socialization rather than personal thought. The theory assumes that the identity of an individual is not the unconscious product (such as the belief of the psychoanalyst theory) but the result of self-imitation that meets the expectations of others. The development of behavior and attitudes is to respond to the strengthening and encouragement of people around us. In social psychology social identity theory studies the interaction between individuals and social identity. Social identity theory is aimed at specifying and predicting how individuals view themselves as individuals or groups of members. The theory also takes into account the impact of personal and social identity on individual perceptions and collective behavior. The theory of social identity evolved from a series of studies (often referred to as minimal group studies) conducted by British social psychologist Henri Tajfel and colleagues in the early 1970s. Participants are assigned to groups designed to be as arbitrary and meaningless as possible. However, if you are asked to assign a score to another research participant, you will be given more systematic points to the members of the group than members outside the group.

Personal Story: Social Conflict If some of us want to end a quarrel, it will be easily solved. In retrospect, it made me unbelievable to act in my own way. This situation has come to my mind over and over again and again. And I revealed the new end of the discussion. This is a perfect example of a similar scene around the world - the most fundamental social conflict we have is the easiest to solve. I will challenge someone to say it, if he or she does not confidently discuss with his or her loved ones or close friends. The general principles common to conflict theory are: (1) the main unit of analysis is social structure, (2) conflict is popular among social organizations, (3) people with similar social conditions, collective (4) The right of use Their own power maintains their power; (5) The unfairness of wealth, power, and prestige, coupled with the helpless exploitation of the strong, is a conflict between them (6) Understanding of society requires understanding of political economics. 7) The conditions of social organization, control and exploitation have the influence of alienation, depression and frustration to individuals; (8) Humans are architects of social organizations. These conflicting theoretical principles also apply to sports deviations. Specifically, this white paper defines deviations from competition using objective criteria. The lesson of today is the way of social conflict. We define it and discuss several thinkers who contributed to this approach. Let's now define a method of social confrontation. I believe that the way of social confrontation is a method of social theory and characterized by various inequalities and conflicts that leads society to cause people to cause social behavior and bring about change. Marx is a practitioner working in a way of social conflict, "philosophers can only explain the world, the important thing is to change the world." I will understand that this view is about change. This view clearly emphasizes structure-functional aspects

Complex interdependence theory arises as a response to realism theory. There are many parts of complex interdependence theory, but they are summarized in a simple definition of "the range of complete and complicated interactions between modern states" (49). According to realism, the concept of complex interdependence challenges the concept of state sovereign realism, since the only factor motivating the state is the survival of sovereignty. The names and concepts behind the theory of interdependence are similar to the concept of "complex interdependence" that is often discussed in the field of international relations, but the theory of conflict and peace has three main features I think. Along the reality of world economic development. They are "lack of hierarchy between problems" and are the secondary role played by the military in the development of the world economy. In short, even though the economy is at the center of discussion of today's development and globalization, the state of military and existence is still essentially connected with many countries. This is based on the fact that the country with the highest gross domestic product (GDP) is often the country with the most military spending compared to the ranking and military expenditure of the top 20 countries with the highest GDP. Complex interdependence explains that the state is not the most important entity and foreign policy decisions should not be based on military strength. "The complex interdependence theory is concerned that the expansion of the relationship between the two countries (probably the outcome of trade between the two countries) is exposed to each other's activities and sensitive to their needs." Zero sum game: reality The liberalists who think politics do not consider politics to be a zero-sum game, instead of following their military method of relying on justice to settle disputes.

Last year, Mr. Diamond has differences and conflicts among employees. We think that we need to take useful solutions, stop disputes as much as possible and try to limit conflict. I will now tell you what my conflict is and how to solve it. First of all, we must see the cause of the conflict. The goal between individuals and individual groups is sometimes impossible to achieve. Some of us did our best to set the company's set goal to earn ten dollars a month. Resolution of motivation and confrontation Conflict in the workplace does not promote employee motivation. It is important to build trust and provide satisfaction to the work that is important to motivate employees. Effective dispute settlement is important to the success of the organization, but it is only one aspect of employee motivation. There are several motivational theories that help organizations understand workplace relationships, organizational behaviors, and employee impacts ... Competitive solution solutions within the group have been studied, analyzed, and discussed over the years Until recently, psychologist started rolling a wider range. Until then, the study of human relationships was more or less reserved for political scientists, historians, and experts such as lawyers and diplomats. Therefore, the developed theory provides deeper insight, as many social science studies are based on previous research. Do you have any disagreement with your colleagues? You may have had it one or more times. Conflict in the workplace is very common; few offices work all the employees together. Consequently, conflict resolution is an important part of the workplace and leaders need to be familiar with dispute resolution techniques. If conflicts are not resolved, productivity and teamwork will be adversely affected. Using a dispute resolution strategy at work will help maintain a healthy work environment. To resolve the conflict, you need specific leadership skills, problem solving skills, and decision-making skills.

Because of the violence that has occurred in recent years, the future of Sudan is uncertain. Since Sudan became independent from Britain in 1956, colonialism left a big mark in the country as their politics has been dominated by the military regime which supports the Islamic government. At that time, the new government tried to turn the political system working for the UK into a system that served ethnically diverse countries. In terms of area, Sudan is the largest country in Africa with an estimated population of approximately 39 million. According to the Africa Bureau of Africa, the population of Sudan is one of the most diverse countries on the African continent. The conflict between Southern Cordovan and Sudan's Blue Nile River is also called the Third Sudanese Civil War and is an ongoing armed conflict between the southern southern Sudan and people in southern Sudan. Liberation movement - North (SPLM - N), a subsidiary of the Sudan People 's Liberation Movement in South Sudan (SPLM). After a couple of years after the civil war with the Sudanese government and the Sudanese People's Liberation Movement Rebels, on 9th July 2011 the south Sudan's pre-independence battle began again in Southern Cordova. In September it spread to the adjacent Blue Nile province. The Sudan People's Liberation Movement and the newly independent Sudan People's Liberation Movement split and opposed the inclusion of the southern two countries in Sudan against the lack of democratic elections. In March 2012, after a collision with the Sudanese army in South Sudan, South Sudan troops seized the Hegrig field with the land claimed by Southern Cordan fans' Sudan and South Sudan territory. South Sudan evacuated on March 20 and two days later the Sudan troops entered the hegelig. In December 2013, the President condemned 10 others trying to raise a coup with President Mahar, so a political struggle between President Kiel and his former vice president Kmachar occurred. As the civil war in South Sudan was triggered, the battle broke out. The Uganda army was deployed to fight the South Sudan government army and rebel factions. As part of the UN Mission of South Sudan (UNMISS), the United Nations has a peacekeeping force in the country. The Government Development Authority (IGAD) between the Sudan People's Liberation Movement (SPLM) and the Sudan People's Liberation Movement mediated a number of opposition faction agreements and was subsequently abandoned. Influence of Sudan This conflict is one aspect of competition between the Sudanese government and Uganda. According to this theory, Sudan hires Connie and his child soldiers to destabilize Uganda. In 1993, the Lord 's resistance army was weak and negotiating for peace, but at this time the Sudanese government appeared. The war between Sudan and Uganda was intense, and the Sudanese government began to support the Lord's resistance army by providing supplies and weapons in 1994 (Blattman, 2007). Prior to this action, Museveni (President of Uganda) backed Sudan 's rebels to destabilize Sudan. Sudan is doing the same for Uganda now (Blattman, 2007). Relationship between

In Philip Roth's "evilness of man", Ross uses various conflicts and hints in the story to explore the reasons chosen to solve human nature and conflict. In the opening ceremony and closing ceremony, many conflicts have been discovered and resolved. Conflict includes white and black, good and evil, ideology and ambition, loyalty and betrayal. In 1998 Roth used the Berkshire community and Little Athena Academy as the world's microcosm. He used these conflicts and classical and literary suggestions to reveal all possible decisions and future outcomes of the past. In the mid-20th century when contemporary social psychology developed, research on conflict became part of mainstream. Kurt Lewin believes that conflict is an indispensable part of human behavior and social psychologists can reveal all aspects of this phenomenon. Editorial Volume "Solving Social Conflicts" (Lewin, 1948) proposed and analyzed various types of conflicts from within to group using psychosocial conceptual framework. Based on Lewin's theory, Germany was one of the pioneers of contemporary social psychology and began to develop the theory of cooperation and competition, the basic concept of conflict research (Deutsch, 1949a and b). Meanwhile, the knowledge about conflict began to become clear, and the classic textbook theory and problems of Krech and Catchfield (1948) were divided into two chapters of conflict. The claims of ancient Asia and recent research have raised questions about psychoanalytic assumptions about the universality of psychological conflict. Asian psychologists agree that conflict is the impulse of "ordinary" people. However, they believe that at a higher level of superhuman development, these conflicts can be largely dissipated, which indicates that there is no evidence of existence. Conflict or aggressive conflict "(Wilber et al., 1986), p. 214) Recent research suggests that the answer lies in an ancient conflict between sexes. Investing as much energy and resources as possible for the mother (or the owner-providing parent) is the greatest benefit of the father (or the sperm providing parent). However, balancing the necessity of pregnancy with maintaining their own health is the greatest benefit for the mother. In humans, this conflict left a mark on our DNA. Certain placentas do not invade the mother's tissues at all. However, the vascular placenta - all menstrual species - passes through the uterine wall and sticks to the mother's blood. Once the invasion is complete, the placenta can control the whole body of the mother by releasing hormones to the bloodstream. Therefore, women need to establish a defense system that regulates the invasion of the placenta.

Karl Marx introduced materialism to society. Karl Marx helped this theory, formed equality among societies, and sent a better social life. In the era of Karl Marx, he found a big social gap between bourgeoisie and the workers. Bourgeoisie enjoys the results of labor and workers contribute to the labor force. Bourgeoisie introduces the important power of production based on the terms of Marx including capital, land, labor and the social relationship of production refers to division of labor and implicit class relationship. Marxism represents the political, economic, social theory created by Karl Marx and accepts the notion that struggle between various social classes is the main factor in determining history. Additionally, Marx believes that the working class ultimately overcomes the aristocratic or socialist ideals that he recorded in his publication "Communist Manifesto." - Most people have a prejudice about the relationship between social class and crime. A general assumption is that low-level teenagers are more likely to engage in illegal activities than higher-level colleagues. Criminalists have done extensive research to investigate the social demographic characteristics of criminals, which often produce contradictory results. Introduction Karl Marx, also a philosopher, is widely known for his social, social and social relationship theory. Karl Marx emphasizes the economic structure and how it affects other parts of the social structure from a materialistic point of view. Human society progresses through the dialectic of class struggle. In other words, the three aspects that constitute the dialectic, namely papers, opponents, The most influential socialist thinker of the 19th century was Karl Marx. Karl Marx can be regarded as a great philosopher, social scientist, historian or revolutionary. Marx proposed the so-called conflict theory. In conflict theory, we examine how specific social interactions arise through conflict. People are participating in conflict everyday to gain more power than other people in society. Karl Marx is known for studying the conflict between different classes. Karl Marx introduced several extreme ideas and theories to society through his work. Karl Marx introduced materialism to society. Karl Marx helped this theory, formed equality among societies, and sent a better social life. In the era of Karl Marx, he found a big social gap between bourgeoisie and the workers. Bourgeoisie enjoys the results of labor and workers contribute to the labor force. Bourgeoisie introduces the important power of production based on the terms of Marx including capital, land and labor, whereas social production relations mean division of labor and labor.

Effectively managing conflicts and negotiating business conflicts is an individual that we experience everyday. Conflict can occur at work, at school, at home, or even within ourselves. I think it is an effective way to deal with conflicts or to avoid conflicts, how personal concerns or unfamiliar things are. Unless life threatening, I always think that not all intertwine within time to avoid the problem. The Free Special Report on Harvard University Law School Negotiating Program - Effective Dispute Resolution Strategy to Avoid Litigation - a non-traditional dispute management method that allows well-known negotiators to turn partners into partners discovered. Preliminary surveys on the culture of the other party are important when preparing for international negotiations, but knowing him or her as an individual may be more important. Study each other's occupation, occupational experience, organization, education, specialty field, personality and negotiation experience to the extent possible. To further eliminate stereotypes, before discussing with each other, we will discuss and understand each other over time. Effectively managing conflicts and negotiating business conflicts is an individual that we experience everyday. Conflict can occur at work, at school, at home, or even within ourselves. I think it is an effective way to deal with conflicts or to avoid conflicts, how personal concerns or unfamiliar things are. - In this article, take a look at the following article. Let's see the confrontation between short stories and poetry. Kay Boyle's astronomer's wife's short story is drawing a wife as a person who dreams of "being there" by watching the stars day and night. Astronomers spend more time in bed than his wife, and his wife is looking after him, and his head is in the sky. Negotiation negotiations are an important form of conflict management in organizations and social environments. Therefore, research on communication theory in conflict management is focusing on communication behavior, the type and strategy of successful negotiations. As part of a management dispute, the negotiations require the parties to exchange solutions including off-court reconciliation, commercial contracts, collective bargaining agreements (Womack, 1990, 32).

Social contracts are trying to explain why individuals agree to form an organized government. People are willing to abandon previously enjoyed freedom in a natural state in which the government does not intervene in their pursuit and are believed to respond to individual attempts to protect the behavior that is most appropriate for their interests. In this case, moral and political obligations rely on contracts or agreements among people to form the society where they live. As philosophers advocating social contract theory think that individuals exist before the government, the government concretely meets and satisfies social contract theory. In this article, I will briefly introduce the social contract theory by Hobbes, Locke, Rousseau. I will explain what social contract theory is and why. Then according to Hobbes, Locke and Rousseau's paper pointed out the state of nature. It also proposed differences in opinion among these natural state law scholars on social contracts and finally suggested a critical understanding of social contract theory given by Hobbes, Locke and Rousseau. Key words: world literature language, education, law theory, comparative linguistics, political philosophy, law, political law, cultural research, political theory, contact between religion, theology, contact between civilizations, conflict, Islam, philosophy, history, criticism , Renaissance Imagination of social contract by Hobbes, Locke, Rousseau. Social contract theory is one of the oldest philosophical theories about the origin of the country. The first inspiration of this concept is said to originate from a biblical deal between God and Abraham, and later Greek Socrates, which was written mainly by Thomas Hobbes, John Locke, and Jean-Jacques Rousseau It is a work. . Social contracts are ethical and / or political obligations that rely on the formation of social contracts or consensus among people. The social contract theory has three main stages of development, namely the natural state, contract or contract, and civil society. These three stages provide a fundamental difference between Thomas Hobbes, John Rock, Jean-Jacques Rousseau's theory.

INTRODUCTION: The President of the United States has set a goal to build good relations with foreign countries and further improve existing relationships with allies during the term of office. Some people think that this is to prevent conflict between these countries but others believe this is the United States threat assessment to choose their friends and enemies. The conflict between two democracies practicing democracy is called democratic peace theory. However, research is beginning to show that democratic peace theory is ineffective and needs to be finished as a model of how international relations are formed or destroyed. The theory of democratic peace is very divisive among political scientists. It is rooted in the idealistic, classical liberal tradition and the realism theory which was once dominant. However, the theory of democratic peace is more widely accepted, and in some democracies the policy change has been achieved. In the United States, the presidents of the two major parties have expressed support for this theory. Democratic party member Bill Clinton said in a 1994 congress speech as follows: Republican George W. Bush said: "I am very strong, democracy is democracy, I do not plan to fight each other. The theory of democratic peace is the theory which shows the essence of democracy, democracy never fights each other. The reason is that democracies externize their norms and fight only for justice. Each country can be categorized according to whether it accepts the current situation or accepts the revisionist. I mean, I want to change it. The revisionist country tried to fundamentally change the rules and practices of international relations and felt the current situation is disadvantageous. They believe that international systems are primarily Western creatures and will help to strengthen the present reality. Since maintaining the current situation is now beneficial, Japan is an example of a country that has changed from revisionist countries to maintaining the status quo. Although war may aid the construction of the country before the transition to peace and security democracy, war is a serious obstacle to democratization. The consent of democratic peace theory argues that democracy appeared before peace, but historical evidence is contrary. In most cases, peace is before democracy. There are few people who support the assumption that democracy brings peace, but strong evidence of the opposite assumption that peace brings democracy. Christian Wellsel 's human rights empowerment theory argues that existing - security security will lead to cultural values ​​of liberation and support for democratic political organizations. This is consistent with the theory based on evolutionary psychology. The so-called equality theory finds that people have psychological preferences for strong leadership and form of authoritarian government when there is war and collective danger.

The political world affects almost every aspect of our daily life. Whether it is by a law enforcement body or by protection of the masses or to carry out its myriad duties with funds collected by taxpayers, the government judges the citizen Let's see. Government actions are often ridiculed or hurt, but it is the result of people's own activities in government systems. Therefore, many people may not agree with the work being done by Congress or the direction the President is leading us, but the situation is the same. Hobbes' social contract theory has two responsibilities: (1) political theory to prove the existence of the government and (2) moral theory prescribing our moral obligations. As a political theory, Hobbes' social contract theory thinks that the government is human creation, not God's creation. The complete reason for the presence of the government is the role as a peace guardian. But even if we are the government founders, even if they are not satisfied with the work they are doing, they will never be allowed to beat them after they are established. The reason is that we must give absolute and irrevocable authority to us in order to ensure the effectiveness of the government in peacekeeping operations. For Hobbes, if the government has some drawbacks, they will not be able to enforce these laws. Philosopher Thomas Hobbes and social theory contracts clearly understand these problems. The social contract theory is the basis of the Declaration of Independence, and is the guiding theory of the United States government and many other governments such as the European Union, England, France and so on. The theory is about why people choose to give us rights and power to form government. The government has several objectives. Thomas Hobbes theory In this article, I will briefly introduce the social contract theory by Hobbes, Locke, Rousseau. I will explain what social contract theory is and why. Then according to Hobbes, Locke and Rousseau's paper pointed out the state of nature. It also proposed differences in opinion among these natural state law scholars on social contracts and finally suggested a critical understanding of social contract theory given by Hobbes, Locke and Rousseau. Key words: world literature language, education, law theory, comparative linguistics, political philosophy, law, political law, cultural research, political theory, contact between religion, theology, contact between civilizations, conflict, Islam, philosophy, history, criticism , Renaissance Hobbes' social theory is often mistakenly called "social contract theory", and the mistake is "contract". Hobbes' social theory is more properly called "social contract theory". The difference between "Contract" and "Contract" is that contracts are sometimes destroyed whenever a party violates a contract or when contract terms are met. Whatever you do, it will last indefinitely. The western traditional view of "contracts" is like the concept of "marriage". "Death makes us separate." Divorce is almost impossible to invalidate the contract between men and women. Hobbes' theory will go one step further, no matter what the citizens of the country or the sovereign nationals do, social contracts will continue to exist no matter what the party does. In the case of obtaining power by theft, extortion, murder etc.

Born in Frankfurt, Germany in 1902, Erik Erikson is the mother of one unmarried Jew. He was brought up by an artist's colony by his mother and ultimately decided to make his pediatrician his stepfather, but Ericsson seeks his biological father's identity for life . (Erik H. Erikson's earliest work, Capps of 2008, mother, depression, humor). In 1929, Ericsson started psychoanalysis with Anna Freud, and in 1933 he and his wife and children first emigrated to Denmark and then moved to the United States (Caps, mother, melancholy and Erik H. Humor). Erik Erikson is a psychologist who did most of his work in Freud during the 1930s and 1950s. He is a student of Freud and is greatly influenced by the latter's character development theory. However, unlike his predecessor, Ericsson paid great attention to the social environment in human psychological development. Therefore, his theory is often called psychosocial theory of personality development. According to Ericsson's theory, everyone experienced several distinct and different quality stages during their life from life to death. According to him, these stages are common, and it is said that the age at which a person moves from one stage to another stage is quite common. But please do not forget that Ericsson knows little about other cultures and societies. Therefore, the universality of his theory may be questioned and suspected. Erik Erikson (1902-1994) Erikson is a new Freud, Danish American psychoanalyst who emphasizes culture more than any other Freud. He is known for his socio - cultural theory and its influence on human development. Ericsson has evolved the stage of Hayes' homosexuality of Freud into eight stages of human socialization characterized by internal conflict. Ericsson believes consistency between beliefs and values ​​is very important in building individuality and believes frustration in early childhood is directly reflected in cultural religion and rituals (Lindholm 2001). Erik Erikson is a psychodynamic researcher who lived between 1902 and 1994. He developed a theory dealing with the stage of human development and is known as the New Freud style. The new Freudists are "people who refreshed Siegmund Freud's theory" (Massey, 1986). His theory states that "society and culture are challenging and shaping us" (Feldman, 2011). - Emotions stimulate human life. Whether a person chooses to act on their feelings reflects their true character. In the novel "Red Letter", Nathaniel Hawthorne explains the quality of human emotion through his personality. His individual character represents the moral qualities that people can relate throughout their lives. In the whole novel, Hawthorne reveals the emotions and minds of his role conflict.

Ethnic conflicts in the Middle East are rooted in the history of the world and may be inherent in human nature. This type of conflict is difficult to solve, which is obvious in the Middle East situation. The theory of ethnic conflict explains that it is not territorial, political or economical to impede the achievement of peace between Israel and the people of Palestine. The Camp David Summit in July 2000 is the latest attempt to promote sustained peace and a clear example of the possibility that ethnocentricism can hamper success. Such 'remembrance' is part of any ethnic conflict. In the Middle East, racial differences can be traced not only to the times of the Bible, but also to the Christian Crusade and after the Second World War. In Northern Ireland, a historical confrontation between Protestantism and Catholics is repeated at annual festivals, which often become violent. Sri Lankan school children said that the promise of the Buddha is that Sri Lanka is a special refuge in Buddhism, rebuilding Buddhist Sinhalese on the island, and the important thing between Prince Sinhara and Eritari Tamir He said he was reminded of the collision. Advantage For Serbs and Croats, the invasion of Europe by the Sultan of the Ottoman Empire, accompanied by the ethnic division policy of the Austrian-Hungarian empire, the atrocities of the racial regime during World War II and the conflicts of Partisan, It became reality reality. Ethnic conflicts in the Middle East are rooted in the history of the world and may be inherent in human nature. This type of conflict is difficult to solve, which is obvious in the Middle East situation. The theory of ethnic conflict explains that it is not territorial, political or economical to impede the achievement of peace between Israel and the people of Palestine. - The economy and the media are changing aspects of culture and language. "With the progress of globalization, the loss of human language is also increasing. Today, Middle East is a field of war, ethnic conflict, economic crisis. Today's situation in the Middle East is unstable, unpredictable and unstable both politically and economically when the ancient Mesopotamia peaked or in the glorious era that was at the time of significant progress of the Ottoman Empire (Fieldhouse, 2006). . The history and dynamics that caused these events are complicated, and there is not one thing due to the political and economic recession of this region. Nonetheless, we can strongly argue that Western imperialism is not an important cause of the current Middle East problem. The modernization and democratization efforts initiated by the Western colonial powers of the Middle East have not completely failed: Turkey is its greatest success (Lewis, 1995)

In order for war activities to meet the requirements of fair war theory, it is necessary for the legal system to implement justice to call for action. These systems strengthen accountability between parties to war and manage the overall cost, effectiveness and possibilities of war. Although this requirement is ideally noble, it relies on unauthorized assumption of authority. Legal authority may support war, but intent may simply conflict with other aspects of war theory. Historians and philosophers formed the theory of war just for centuries. However, the most systematic description of the theory of justice war was developed by St. Thomas Aquinas in his Summa Theologicae. According to the theory of war of justice, the moral reality of war can be divided into two parts. War was judged twice. The first visit refers to the reasons of domestic battle, and the second time refers to the means used in the actual battle. (Walzer, 21) The first verdict was called jus ad bellum, or justice. The second sentence is called a wartime trial, or justice in war. Jus ad bellum provides guidelines for assessing whether war is fair or unfair but wartime rules outline the correct behavior in warfare. Jus ad bellum does not mean jus in battle. Likewise, jus in battle does not need jus ad bellum. Justice warfare may be done unfairly so that it is possible to fight legitimate warfare. Only war theory and law distinguish between reason (jus ad bellum) relying on war and rational behavior in war (jus in war). Most statements of the theory of justice warfare have four principles, each with its own label. Rational hope for justification, legal authority, right intent, necessity or final means, proportionality and success There are three principles in rule of war: three types of discrimination, necessity or minimum force, and Proportionality. These principles represent a comprehensive understanding of the morality of war, in a compressed form that is 300 years ago and the basic structure is almost the same. Since it develops synchronously with the state system based legal system, not the individual, its existing form theory is very different from the classical theory it belongs to.

According to Karl Marx's alienation theory, alienation is defined as "to separate things belonging to one another or to conflict between appropriately harmonious ones". Alienation can also be defined as alienation from his or her society. Alienation occurs because people feel different or abnormal about their class, group, organization, or other members of society. The types of alienation are as follows. Self exclusion, social forced alienation, race, society, politics, economy, compulsory alienation, alienation by physical features, alienation of families, Marx 's alienation theory is related to the separation of logically integrated ones. Marx thinks alienation is a universal result of capitalism. Marx 's alienism theory is based on his observation that in the capitalist production mode, workers are constantly losing their determination to life and fate by depriving themselves of the right to view themselves as behavior managers. - Leadership and McDonarization are two very interesting topics to understand how they assisted the Aravinds Hospital litigation. They help Aravind Hospitals understand how to use different leadership styles and how their efficiency improves and we regard this social enterprise as one of the best companies in this field . Marx's alienation theory is based on the relationship between workers and production means. It outlines the four main aspects of alienation of workers in today's society: alienation from labor products, alienation from work processes, deprivation of creativity, and alienation from others. Marx developed this theory in 1844, but in fact, it is more suitable for today's mass production, advanced society. To evaluate whether I am marginalized, I will use indicators related to each of the four categories supported by Marx 's first theory. In addition, research on work satisfaction is done frequently; I will use those indicators to determine if they are alienated.

The way people behave in conflict is a strong indicator of whether peaceful resolution is the result of conflict management (Eunson, 2007). Conflict management is defined as the process of focusing on conflicting actions, relationships, and circumstances (Jeong, 2010) to establish and maintain stable communication among opposition parties. Some people think that they will find a peaceful solution (REF) when all the people involved in the conflict meet their individual results. In the field of international conflict theory, the value of cultural differences in dispute management applications such as intercultural negotiations and dialogue dispute settlements are recognized, but research to understand the influence of cultural differences on individual decision making process There has been almost no work done so far. . Assuming that the outcome of this study is universal to human behavior, decision - making theory will minimize the impact of cultural society on cognitive processes. On the contrary, the theory of ethnic conflict emphasizes "regional common sense" or the cultural constraints implied by society, which may be part of unconscious cognitive processing. Understanding how regional common sense affects decision-making processes presented in conflict situations can play an important role in effective conflict change initiatives The face-to-face negotiation theory focuses on how individuals with individualistic and collectivist culture negotiate in the context of conflict. Based on facial management, the theory explains how different culture people manage dispute negotiations to maintain a face. Self-expression and other concerns explain dispute negotiations among people of different cultures. Group thinking may occur if you do not consider alternatives that a very coherent group might effectively solve group dilemmas. Group thinking theorists believe that group members often have similar ideas and are reluctant to share unpopular or different ideas with others. When this happens, the group makes decisions too soon, some of which may result in permanent results Special consideration is needed regarding conflict management among parties in different cultures. In addition to the fundamental cause of daily conflict, when members of culture can not understand the differences in communication practices, traditions, and cultural decisions in the processing of ideas, "misunderstandings, and such counterproductive There will be a false confrontation. In fact, this has been observed in commercial research literature. For example, in the study of Kozan mentioned above, I pointed out that the Asian culture is more likely to use a harmonious conflict management model. If political parties working in a harmonious way conflict with political parties using more confrontational models, there will be misunderstandings beyond that confrontation itself.

Juvenile delinquency has become a big controversy dating back to the 19th century. The law is always written to suit society's best ideas to deal with illegal youth. The focus of this article is to tie the story of two conflicting Ottawa Valley teenagers with different sociological theories. First, briefly summarize this article and then associate it with theories of cultural conflict, control theory, distortion and label theory. In sociology, there are three major theories of functionalism, conflict theory, and symbolic interaction theory. This article focuses on two theories, functionalism and conflict theory. The goal is to explain two of the three theoretical perspectives and apply it to the analysis of social stratification. How to achieve this goal is to compare and contrast these assumptions and analyze the impact of two theories on social stratification. Then I will explain which of the two that is consistent with my personal sociological point of view is more my opinion. Functionalism is how many people observe the world in sociology. It clearly shows ... shows more content Sociological Theory One of the theories of sociology is conflict theory. Conflict theory includes people's attention to wealth and class. Conflict theory believes that social change is beneficial and contrary to social order. In the story of women and her children, conflict theory plays an important role in this situation. The upstream police threatened the homeless woman. The theory of conflict is an ongoing struggle for people of the upper class to provide power to the people under India. The word Dalit means "broken people". Symbolic interaction theory focuses on how the language shapes all Indian identities and as a result it becomes a lower class like Dalit. An oppressive system arises from embedding symbols in individuals and collective minds. Therefore, the theory of symbolic interaction explains why Dalit's suppression continues even if the caste system is officially and legally abolished.

Structural contradiction is a positive contradiction that may lead to better team cohesion and decision-making. There are two possibilities of collision occurring during group decision making. These are contradictions of type C, or contradictions between cognitive and type A, emotional contradictions (McWilliams & Williams 2014). Type C's inconsistency contradicts the explanations and opinions of other people. Group members with C type conflicts do not agree with other members based on their past experience and expertise. The conflict of people in the team's decision means the occurrence of identity-oriented problems, where individual beliefs and ethics play an important role. This type of conflict limits the ability of the team to achieve quality decisions and prevent team members from mutual recognition, thereby reducing the effectiveness of team decisions. (A) limiting cognitive handling of new information, (b) reducing acceptance of ideas from other unwelcome people, (c) reducing tolerance, (d) hostile to each other's intent and action (E) to interfere with effective communication and cooperation within the team, (f) to spend time and effort secured for the implementation of substantive decisions (Baron, 1991, 1997) Social confrontation is divided into functional type and dysfunction type. Functional conflicts primarily doubt the manager's assumptions in decision making and the conflict of dysfunction is similar to everything that diminishes personal attacks and team efficiency. Because the understanding of the team's knowledge and consensus has increased, functional contradiction is better suited for higher quality decision making. In economics we believe that if we can make our own decisions freely and reasonable, they will act according to rational choice theory. Rational choice theory believes that people always make choices and lead to the best situation. Considering all available considerations including costs and benefits for themselves, the reasonableness of these considerations is from that person's own perspective, so that other people have problems with it, unreasonable I do not judge it to be

By 1948 there was a lot of tension in the Middle East. In fact, this tension started before the 19th century and began with the difference between religion and nationalism between Jews and Arabs. After the Romans dominated the Jews, this led to the Jeshi diaspora. After all, after the formal establishment of the Israeli state, most Jews returned to this area that led to Arab-Israel liberation war including Arab countries such as Egypt, Syria, Iraq, Jordan. It attacked Israel to recapture the land originally owned by Palestine. Ethnic conflicts in the Middle East are rooted in the history of the world and may be inherent in human nature. This type of conflict is difficult to solve, which is obvious in the Middle East situation. The theory of ethnic conflict explains that it is not territorial, political or economical to impede the achievement of peace between Israel and the people of Palestine. The Camp David Summit in July 2000 is the latest attempt to promote sustained peace and a clear example of the possibility that ethnocentricism can hamper success. There used to be a political confrontation in the Middle East a long time ago. This confrontation has become racial discrimination. The situation between Palestine and Israel is also very controversial. This is because they have committed many terrorist attacks. For example, a 9/11 terrorist attack. Thus, Western countries oppose the Middle East. Americans also believe that Palestinians and Jews are terrorists. Because Middle Eastern countries are often associated with terrorism. People have long distinguished sectarian and religious violence from Hinduism as the lowest class. It is banned by the Indian Constitution, but the rich are still the lowest class racist in the country. Racial discrimination in urban areas is more serious than in rural areas. The most racist question is where most Indians live. For example, there are many wealthy businessmen in India overlooking poor natives. However, it is a mistake to focus on the number of armed conflicts in the Middle East. The most prominent thing about the Middle East conflict is their number, not their duration. Many people have been running for decades and there are few signs of solutions. Some people believe that armed conflict in progress in this area is a sign of despair in the Middle East, but conflict is actually reminiscent of other things. Many military measures on which the Middle East is dependent are often a bad way to solve problems. Regional problems

Society consists of mutually related parts, which together keep social stability stable. This stability is threatened by dysfunctional behavior and institution Social development is useful for functional organizations (families, schools, governments, etc.) and contributes to it stably. When an organization becomes tense, all other organizations in the system are affected and will not function properly. Society is characterized by social inequality, social life is a fight against scarce resources. Social arrangements will benefit several groups while sacrificing other groups In addition to the view on Markus' s economic struggle (bourgeois and proletariat), Weber uses power and fame as a cause of inequality. In terms of conflict, people think that there are several different areas of conflict. (Economy, Ethnicity, Gender) Society is the sum of individual and group interactions. Learning behavior by exchanges with others, how to define the situation as people's basis for their actions Members of society get meaning from symbols that can change from person to person - this is called "interpretation" Because we have global communication and post industrialization, the theory used in history can not explain social life properly. What do you think is the cause of the more general conflict in our society? Economics? race? sex? What else is there? Societies characterized by industrialization, consumerism and worldwide communication are questioning existing assumptions about social life and the nature of reality. What is the advantage of analyzing society in a narrow range (symbolic interactionist). What are the advantages of a broader view of society (such as the role of functionalism and opposing views)? Does society stay stable and trying to maintain this approach (such as functionalism), or do you think conflict is our natural condition (Marx and other confrontational theorists etc). The term "function" is not related to positive, negative, correct, or incorrect, but is related to whether something will result in prolonging the duration of the social system. The three perspectives highlighted here - functionalism, conflict, and symbolic interaction - are the foundation of sociological theory and help organize our discourse with nonhuman animal rights. People claiming the rights of non-human animals are trying to release other animals and end their racism (based on systematic repression against their existence by their species). By revealing the signs of repression by nonhuman animals in human society, sociological views are related to the fight against speciesism. These views are not independent, but they interact and interact. The sociological view of basketball has three paradigms in sociology. There are perspectives of conflict theory, point of view of symbolic interaction, and point of structural functionalism. From a conflict paradigm point of view, this article focuses on gender and the assumption that girls lack the same strength and endurance as men. WNBA (Women's National Basketball League) is not as highly respected as men in the NBA (National Basketball League). Another question Karl Marx and functionalism theory have something in each of the three sociological perspectives that can be supported. From the perspective of conflict theory, the ruling parties judge social order and structure to be accurate. Symbolic interactionism focuses on social interaction. Since society consists of various social structures, the social interaction that affects society is surely justified. Functionalism theory makes large scale or macroscopic observation of social structure or institution

The political world affects almost every aspect of our daily life. Whether it is by a law enforcement body or by protection of the masses or to carry out its myriad duties with funds collected by taxpayers, the government judges the citizen Let's see. Government actions are often ridiculed or hurt, but it is the result of people's own activities in government systems. Therefore, many people may not agree with the work being done by Congress or the direction the President is leading us, but the situation is the same. Hobbes' social contract theory has two responsibilities: (1) political theory to prove the existence of the government and (2) moral theory prescribing our moral obligations. As a political theory, Hobbes' social contract theory thinks that the government is human creation, not God's creation. The complete reason for the presence of the government is the role as a peace guardian. But even if we are the government founders, even if they are not satisfied with the work they are doing, they will never be allowed to beat them after they are established. The reason is that we must give absolute and irrevocable authority to us in order to ensure the effectiveness of the government in peacekeeping operations. For Hobbes, if the government has some drawbacks, they will not be able to enforce these laws. Philosopher Thomas Hobbes and social theory contracts clearly understand these problems. The social contract theory is the basis of the Declaration of Independence, and is the guiding theory of the United States government and many other governments such as the European Union, England, France and so on. The theory is about why people choose to give us rights and power to form government. The government has several objectives. Thomas Hobbes theory In this article, I will briefly introduce the social contract theory by Hobbes, Locke, Rousseau. I will explain what social contract theory is and why. Then according to Hobbes, Locke and Rousseau's paper pointed out the state of nature. It also proposed differences in opinion among these natural state law scholars on social contracts and finally suggested a critical understanding of social contract theory given by Hobbes, Locke and Rousseau. Key words: world literature language, education, law theory, comparative linguistics, political philosophy, law, political law, cultural research, political theory, contact between religion, theology, contact between civilizations, conflict, Islam, philosophy, history, criticism , Renaissance Hobbes' social theory is often mistakenly called "social contract theory", and the mistake is "contract". Hobbes' social theory is more properly called "social contract theory". The difference between "Contract" and "Contract" is that contracts are sometimes destroyed whenever a party violates a contract or when contract terms are met. Whatever you do, it will last indefinitely. The western traditional view of "contracts" is like the concept of "marriage". "Death makes us separate." Divorce is almost impossible to invalidate the contract between men and women. Hobbes' theory will go one step further, no matter what the citizens of the country or the sovereign nationals do, social contracts will continue to exist no matter what the party does. In the case of obtaining power by theft, extortion, murder etc.

Terror Management Theory (TMT) is a concept of social psychology, and humans have pain and anxiety in the meaning of death and inevitability of death. TMT shows that this anxiety and psychological distress are being controlled through cultural beliefs and investment in the world view. It is said that the fear of this death (or fear) is peculiar to humans and does not exist in any other species. To cope with this dilemma, humans invest in cultures and belief systems. Self-esteem is also an important part of protecting individuals from the fear of death. According to TMT, experiencing this fear may affect human behavior, perception and cognitive function. That leads to an increase in group thinking both inside and outside, possibly changing the concepts and stereotypes of ethnic and religious. It also adversely affects human self-esteem. The papers of Pyszczynski, Greenberg, Solomon, Arndt, and Schimel (2004) emphasize the conflict between two self-esteem theory of self-demand - the terror management theory (TMT) and social measurement theory (ST). TMT considers self-esteem as defense against anxiety of death, and ST regards it as a warning for social exclusion. We have found that there is a match between the two approaches, but we believe that each approach provides an incomplete description of self-esteem by establishing it but promoting it from restricted phenomena . Specifically, these two theories primarily explain self-esteem or self-intervention in self-esteem, primarily due to the limited view on psychological needs on which motivation for self-esteem is based . Terror Management Theory (TMT) is a social psychology theory originally proposed by Jeff Greenberg, Sheldon Solomon, and Tom Pyszczynski and is summarized in their book "The Worms in the Core" I will. (2015) Although it suggests that basic psychological conflict arises from self-defense instincts, death is inevitable and recognizes that it is somewhat unpredictable. This confrontation creates terrorism and manages terrorism by incorporating cultural values ​​and symbolic systems that provide persistent meaning and value to life. The Terror Management Theory (TMT) emphasizes that humans can respond to their perception of their own mortality through terrorism and people's beliefs about the human meaning can protect them from this terror. It is based on the view that it has sex. (Greenberg & Arndt, 2011). There is some strong evidence to prove the accuracy and applicability of this theory. For example, studies have shown that the outcome of self-esteem of an event is generally consistent with their assumption about how the same event accepts or rejects those events to others (Leary , Tambor, Terdal, & Downs, 1995).

The Middle East conflict is a dispute with Arab countries such as Israel and its neighboring countries, Egypt, Lebanon, Syria, Jordan, Iraq and Palestine. Its history can be traced back to the collapse of the Ottoman Empire until the First World War, and war has continued since the 1930s. This is a complex dispute due to political, territorial and religious elements in conflict. Among the documentaries I saw were something biased among Arabs and Palestinians. Especially the documentary "Occupation 101". Ethnic conflicts in the Middle East are rooted in the history of the world and may be inherent in human nature. This type of conflict is difficult to solve, which is obvious in the Middle East situation. The theory of ethnic conflict explains that it is not territorial, political or economical to impede the achievement of peace between Israel and the people of Palestine. The Camp David Summit in July 2000 is the latest attempt to promote sustained peace and a clear example of the possibility that ethnocentricism can hamper success. There used to be a political confrontation in the Middle East a long time ago. This confrontation has become racial discrimination. The situation between Palestine and Israel is also very controversial. This is because they have committed many terrorist attacks. For example, a 9/11 terrorist attack. Thus, Western countries oppose the Middle East. Americans also believe that Palestinians and Jews are terrorists. Because Middle Eastern countries are often associated with terrorism. People have long distinguished sectarian and religious violence from Hinduism as the lowest class. It is banned by the Indian Constitution, but the rich are still the lowest class racist in the country. Racial discrimination in urban areas is more serious than in rural areas. The most racist question is where most Indians live. For example, there are many wealthy businessmen in India overlooking poor natives. However, it is a mistake to focus on the number of armed conflicts in the Middle East. The most prominent thing about the Middle East conflict is their number, not their duration. Many people have been running for decades and there are few signs of solutions. Some people believe that armed conflict in progress in this area is a sign of despair in the Middle East, but conflict is actually reminiscent of other things. Many military measures on which the Middle East is dependent are often a bad way to solve problems. Regional problems

Prediction violation theory predicts and explains the influence of nonverbal behavioral violation on interpersonal outcome such as charm, reliability, persuasive power, smooth dialogue. Interactions in interpersonal relationships are strongly dominated by expectations and violations of these expectations may cause an evaluation process that may be affected by the compensation of offenders. Violations of interpretation and evaluation will determine whether they are positive or negative violations. Positive violations are expected to produce more favorable results, while negative violations are more advantageous than positive and negative confirmations, respectively. Many theoretical propositions are supported by experience. Some of the opposite discoveries led to the revision of the theory. This theory also applies to some nonverbal violations such as personal space, eye contact, attitude, touch, participation, immediate violation. The theory also produced investigations of various arousals caused by the meaning and violation of illegal acts. Judee Burgoon is a research communication professor at the Information Management Center of Eller School of Management, University of Arizona. She was a member of the International Friendship Association and received the ICA Stephen B. Chaffee Professional Achievement Award, the National Telecommunications Association Honorary Scholar, Mark L. Nap personal communication award. Her current research is widely supported by external funds, and its center is automatic fraud detection of interpersonal fraud. She published eight books devoted to over 300 chapters on nonverbal communication of interpersonal relationships. The theory of predictive violation initiated by Judee Burgoon explains the individual's reactions to colleagues' unpredictable behavior and many of the implications of individual misuse or personal space infringement. Burgoon defines an individual space as "an invisible variable volume space surrounding an individual that defines a preferred distance between an individual and another person" (Griffin, p. 85). - Introduction If you are like me, you are not used to the teacher's "comfort". I was always trying to be kind to my teacher, but it always made me uncomfortable; I would ignore their attempt or accept it to get better results. What if I am trying to build a closer relationship? Will this make me a better position? In my dilemma, I have decided to study and resolve this conflict. The dissatisfaction avoidance theory (EVT) is a communication theory that analyzes how individuals respond to unexpected violations of social norms and expectations. This theory was proposed by Judee K. Burgoon in the late 1970s and continued throughout the 1980s and 1990s as "Nonverbal Expectation Violation Theory" based on Burgoon research prototype study. Burgoon's research first analyzed the personal distance and personal distance expectations and how much responded to individual distance violations responded and was influenced by the relationship with the criminal. When other researchers began paying attention to social behavioral expectations other than nonverbal communication, the theory was later changed to the current name.

The wonderful theory of Parson The theory of Talcote Parsons is based on what is often called "structural functionalism". However, after his proposal by Robert Merton (Coser 1975), Parsons himself preferred the term "functional analysis". In most cases, "structural functionalism" is the preferred label. It focuses on the functional requirements or requirements of the social system that the system must survive and the corresponding structure that fulfills those needs. Merton's first foil in architecture is Talcott Parsons, whose behavior theory Merton is classified as "Grand Theory". (Parsons strongly oppose this classification.) Middle distance theory is usually built by applying theoretical construction methods to empirical research, and it creates general propositions about the social world. . Examples of intermediate range theory are reference group theory, social mobility, normalization process, role conflict, and the formation of social norms. The medium-sized approach plays an important role in transforming sociology into increasingly experienced areas Robert K. Merton added significant improvements to functionalism. He basically agreed to Parsons' theory. But he acknowledges that Parsons' theory is problematic and that it is too general. Merton tends to place more importance on middle distance theory than macro theory, which means he can handle some of the limits of Parsons' theory. Merton believes that any social structure can have many functions, some of which are more evident than others. He identified three major limitations: functional unity, universal functionalism, and essential. He also proposed the concept of bias and distinguished between dominant and potential functions. The obvious function includes recognized and anticipated results of any social model. Potential function refers to unrecognized unconscious result of social model. The MR K method was developed by R K Merton and contrasted with every aspect of social life, in particular the abstract theory of the whole system at Talcott Parson. Therefore, it opposes the theoreticalization of social theory such as functionalism and conflict theory. MRT is a sociological theoretical method combining theory with empirical research. They are built by applying a theoretical building method to empirical data. These create general statements about social phenomena under study, which can be verified by data

Waitress tried to avoid conflict by carefully handling dick and waiter, regardless of his rude manner. The waitress acts professionally and reflects satisfying customer service. Dick maintained her excellent performance against the waitress and made her feel stressed. In the video, Dick feels the need for electricity through a spiritually controlled waitress. This need arises from his desire to encourage her and feel her power. The need for power arises from personal values ​​in discipline, personal prestige and competitive behavior. In the demand hierarchy and ERG theory we believe that the specific requirements are unique, but in the acquired demand theory of McClelland we believe that demand is acquired or learned based on our living experience. His work is paying particular attention to performance, affiliation, necessity of power, and how these needs affect management success. Cognitive theory, also called process theory, attempts to separate the way of thinking used to judge whether to act in some way or not. Expectation theory holds that considering three issues when deciding how much effort should be spent in a given direction: effort - performance forecast (our efforts are required Possibility to lead to a level of performance)) Performance leads to specific outcome) and potential ability (various outcomes and expected value of remuneration) The strengths and weaknesses of demand theory and expectation theory acquired by McClelland have played an important role in today's work environment as active employees are more productive employees. However, as employee demands become stricter and needs grow higher than before, we need to continually improve employee motivation. Incentive strategies can be most affected by employee concerns and values ​​(Greiner 1986, p. - Again, we need to emphasize leadership as an interactive system that includes leaders, followers, and contextual variables. The main focus of the contingency model on the effectiveness of Fender's leadership is the interaction between the leaders' leadership style and the superiority of the leader to the situation. Leader style can be thought of as a change between a very task-oriented approach and a relationship-oriented approach.

Psychoanalyst Eric Ericson 's theory of psychosocial development explains how the human identity evolves in 8 steps from birth to death as human identity evolves. Each is done in a predetermined order, the previous stage is based on the previous stage and builds the foundation for the future stage (Wiki Media). Each stage has a specific "crisis" or conflict, which is a turning point in private life and must be adjusted before proceeding to the next stage. If conflicts are handled well, individuals will gain "self-power" in the form of corresponding virtues. The theory of psychosocial development of Erik Erikson emphasizes developmental socio-cultural determinants and presents them as 8 levels of psychosocial conflicts (often referred to as psychosocial development stages of Erikson), and no one Must overcome or successfully resolve these stages. Adapting to the environment According to Erik Erikson's theory, we all encountered a crisis that contributes to psychosocial growth at every stage of Erikson's psychosocial development. Whenever we encounter such a crisis we have no choice but to confront it and find a way to solve it. Failure to overcome this crisis may have a major impact on our psychosocial development Erik Erikson is a psychologist who developed a psychosocial development stage. "The theory of psychosocial development of Erik Ericsson is one of the most famous personalities theories in psychology Ericsson is very similar to Sigmund Freud, but thinks that personality develops in a series of stages Unlike the theory of sex psychology, Ericsson's theory explains the impact of social experience throughout the lifecycle "(Cherry, 2014). There are other psychologists who have their own development theory like Sigmund Freud and Jean Piaget, but I agree that there is the best Erik Erikson. After talking about my parents and what they remember, I seem to have reached all my development milestones without any problems or problems. Erik Erikson's theory of psychosocial development throughout the lifecycle, like Sigmund Freud, organizes personality development in a series of stages (Cherry, 2011). Ericsson's psychosocial theory covers the development of personality from birth to death; other development theories clearly focus on childhood (Harder, 2009). The eight phases of Erikson's psychosocial theory distinguish human success from the next developmental stage by successfully overcoming the crisis and struggle at specific development stages (Hutchison, 2011, p.

Gender is the depth of the mind of modern society, it is a persistent feature of everyday life. It creates standardized actions and features for everyone and makes them account for the smallest actions. Individuals must not go beyond the double gender framework, otherwise they risk the strong opposition to forcing them to return to a culturally designated role. This duality is uncomfortable for the presence of intersex people - because they can not be placed in either 100% of men or 100% of women in the binary range. Eagly (1987) The social role theory focuses on two structural aspects of gender relations. These are the gender departments of the hierarchy based on labor and gender. This theory shows how these factors interfere with beliefs in men and women of society. It indicates that certain traits and actions are necessary for the role of an individual gimmick to be considered capable for that gender. For example, society believes that women are the owner of children and must be a process of child-rearing characteristics. This is due to their biological breeding. The theory argues that for separation of roles it encourages fixed beliefs and fixed ideas. This can be seen in the characteristics related to each gender. Men are expected to be active, courageous, supportive and physical. However, in the case of women, it is considered to be considerate and growing because of the characteristics of child rearing. The stereotypes of men and women are strengthened by the difference in the positions of men and women Functionalism and conflict theory focus on the institutional structure of society to explain gender inequality. However, symbolic interactionism focuses on direct social interactions to understand gender relations in society (Anderson and Taylor 2008). The theory assumes that the interaction between men and women exacerbates gender inequality. According to the theory of symbolic interactions, when men interact with women, it reflects their inequality in society (Thio and Taylor 2012). Symbolic interactionism focuses on the socialization of men and women, that is, how men and women behave. According to Money et al. (2012), both men and women learned the meanings of men and women through the socialization of men and women. Gender and Achievements

Examining the educational theorist and the present practical abstract This article chose three educational theorists, Benjamin Bloom, Jean Piaget and Levy Vygotsky, and tried to study their most famous theory. These are the educational goals of Bloom, cognitive development of Piaget, and the near-term development of Vygotsky. After briefly explaining each theory, compare it with another theory. Finally, the author ponders on the practical application of these theories in the classroom environment and discusses how these philosophies fit the authors' current practice. The setting is to carefully examine the inequality and injustice that often occurs in the education itself. As we all know, critical theorists of education track the corruption of their origins by revealing institutional structure and inequality processes in educational practice. Critical theorists simply can not be satisfied simply by observing and explaining discriminatory practices in education and trying to revolutionize the educational process by suggesting recommendations that make them more equal (Gibson, 1986). Among the new social inequalities, New Marxism includes the status and power in the analysis of traditional Marxism. Apple (1979) and Giroux (1981), famous criticism educational theorists, formed a comprehensive critique education theory centered on various forms of governance (Gibson, 1986). Conflict theory thinks that the purpose of education is to maintain social inequality and to maintain the power of those who rule society. Conflicting theorists believe that functionalist has the same function as education. Functionalists believe that education is a beneficial contribution to orderly society, but conflict theorists believe that the educational system permanates the present situation by transforming the lower class into a compliant worker . Both functionalist and conflict theorists agree on ordering the educational system, but they do not agree on how it is ranked. Functionalists argue that schools are ranked according to their merits and conflict theorists believe that schools are divided along different classes and races. According to conflict theorists, the school is training working classes to accept the status as a low member of the social class. Conflict theorists call this educational role "hidden road".

Jimmel's Conflict Theory Jimmel's conflict theory may apply to residents of "Jasper's two towns". Because the murder of James Bird caused racist conflict and forced the town to review their collective identity. Conflict theory interprets disputes as an interactive form, a more informative way to integrate people into society, and conditions necessary for social change. The advantage of conflict is to promote social development, problem solving, and innovation. Two towns in Jasper, George Foster Peabody Award in 2004 and Alfred in 2004 I DuPont Silver Button. It won the 2002 Pan African Film Festival Excellent Documentary Award, the Hot Docs Canada International Film Festival Best International Documentary Silver Award (2002), and the 2002 Double Take / Full Frame Award. And the winner of the 3rd Anthony Radziwill Documentary Achievement Award for the 2002 independent project. The two towns of Jasper were aired at the POV of PBS and the film and director was screened at Oprah Winfrey which is a night view with Ted Copper. Black and white America ", hosted by Ted Coppel Documentary writers Max Williams and Whitney Moral adopted a unique (and controversial) approach that the young black men of Jasper, Texas, killed three white robbers in 1998. After a brutal atrocity, the story behind this story is classified as a story: Williams, an African American director interviewed the black natives, his white colleague Dow asked questions to the white citizen Did. For the most part, filmmakers were able to get a very frank and honest response from Jasper citizens. Once an older white businessman acknowledged that he did not think that N words were mean or aggressive. Later, the black business leader commented, "It is not possible to distinguish between the differences of white minds." In short, the Caucasian respondents seem to be optimistic about racial relations. The other thing I would like to add is that its impact and relevance has not diminished.

Education is the most important part of human life. According to Vissing, the social system influences the structure, process and results of education (Vissing, 2011). Education helps people acquire knowledge and skills that play a role in everyday life. Educational institutions aim to disseminate information, provide skills, form attitudes and beliefs, and penetrate norms and values ​​(Vissing, 2011). Education is important for the functions of the country and local government. Functionalism, conflict, and interaction are important sociological theories for people. Influence of sociological theory on education Crystal Taylor - Johnson SOC 101: Professor of Sociology Christine Henderson 22 November 2010 Education is the most important part of human life. Without good education people will have trouble in everyday life just to pass through. There are three theories that can help to understand education. Most people think that the theory is only someone's opinion, but education has various theories to support it. Sociological Theory of World Education Judy Davis SOC 101 Allen Lips Comb The Sociological Theory of World Education on March 1, 2010 There are various sociological theories in the United States and elsewhere in the world. Throughout the history of education, this institution has met both economic and political needs. These two aspects of demand also determine the function of education. "In the world, education is a large and complex social system, one of sociological theory of sociology is conflict theory Conflict theory includes attention to people's wealth and class, conflict theory I believe that change in society is beneficial.The focus on social order is contrary, and in the story of women and their children conflict theory is threatening homeless women.

Exhibiting a variety of letters to the readers Sophocles tragedy drama "Antigone": static and dynamic, flat and round, they are mainly drawn by display technology. Charlie Paul Siegel believes that there are mainly letters in the two dramas (and a conflict of interpretation of the readers) in "Sophocles human conflict praise and antigone": This is a concept of It does not mean that it does not involve questions. Role of Kryon and Antigone. However, it is too complicated to reduce these problems to a single pair of vertical enough. Antigone - The feature illustrated the tragedy of Sophocles, and the Antigone has illustrated the type of shape, whether it is drawing static or dynamic, flat or round, and skills by indicating an explanation. Overall, the overwhelming presence of violence and human: Martin Heidegger of 'Sophocles People Carol' s Antigone 'quite complicated theory theory of destruction of the character of Cleon, explained that the conflict of existence - possible collapse If you have sex, do nothing, if you are not afraid: disaster. Readers will be presented with diverse display of characters Characterization Sophocles tragedy drama "Antigone" Antigone-: static and dynamic, flat and round, they are mainly drawn by display technology. In "Sophocles human conflict praise and antigone", Charles Paul Siegel thinks that there are mainly letters in two dramas (and a reader's interpretive conflict): it is called anti-Ge It is not that Nie has no conceptual problem. There are complex ways in life. Even among friends, enemies and families the problem is developing everyday for people of all walks of life. Do not agree, cause collisions, fight for what we believe. Even if it means to step on someone's toe along the way, this is part of the human nature. The idea of ​​Aristotle's complex function dates back to 335 BC. Poetry is the work that survived for the first time in drama theory. He analyzed the tragedy and theorized each tragedy

Educational theory This article focuses on functionalism, Marxist and dialogist's educational theory and outlines the points; it will also criticize each theory. Although these theories are quite different, they all have similarities: how much the social class of a person contributes to their performance in school, and on the type and importance of the occupation they engage in How will it affect? Sex Sociological Theory of World Education Judy Davis SOC 101 Allen Lips Comb World Educational Sociology Theory on March 1, 2010 There are various sociological theories in the United States and elsewhere in the world. Throughout the history of education, this institution has met both economic and political needs. These two aspects of demand also determine the function of education. "In the world, education is a large and complex social system, one of sociological theory of sociology is conflict theory Conflict theory includes attention to people's wealth and class, conflict theory I believe that change in society is beneficial.The focus on social order is contrary, and in the story of women and their children conflict theory is threatening homeless women. Educational theory is not a single theory, it is a general term for many theories and assumptions covering learning and retention of information. The term "educational theory" refers to the theory that explains the application, interpretation, and purpose of learning and education. Educational theory is also known as pedagogy, education and learning theory. These theoretical configurations explore ways that we can learn best so that educators can apply relevant research results to applied practice. Educational Theory Educational theory can refer to canonical or descriptive theory of education. In the former case, it means the assumption about what should be theory. The latter means "a hypothesis or a series of hypotheses verified through observation and experimentation". It can be regarded as the concept of descriptive theory of education. A sexual scheme linking various "individual details" ... For example, educational culture theory uses the concept of culture to systemize and unify various facts about people's learning and various facts It shows a method. There is behaviorism education theory from educational psychology and functionalism education theory from educational sociology. ----------------- Main article of economy: Educational economics

This section historically provides some discussion on certain US national and local power. You may also be interested in the "Learning ability" section of this website covering methodological issues. Power is based on ideological, economic, military and political networks - Michael Mann's "IEMP model". This is the way I prefer, and when applied to the United States, class domination theory is born. 4 Major competitors of network theory: pluralism, national autonomy theory, elite theory, Marxism I compare unsustainable psychological hypothesis of conspiracy theory with compulsion theory. It leads them to make mistakes about important issues. Historical background in power structure research, detailed criticism of pluralism, criticism of structural Marxist This is my opinion on Mills' classic "power elite" 50 years since its publication in 2006. It is better than ever for a higher level of social ladder, but it is not good for the rest of society. How is the event developed? The theory of Mills is too narrow to consider the possibilities of civil rights movement and other social movements of the 1960s. This document is C. Unlike more sociological articles about Wright Mills & Floyd Hunter, we focus on some weaknesses of power research by political scientists. The theory of power dependence is the common name of the social exchange theory originally proposed by Richard Emerson (1972). Dynamics of the theory develops mainly on the power, the use of power, the balance of power, and depends on the central concept of dependence. Interdependence increases people's possibilities by unifying people ... The title "practical theory" emphasizes the everyday nature of behavior The method of social and cultural theory in the second half of the 20th century Performance, dependence on tacit knowledge, and implicit understanding. . In addition, these methods highlight the 'material' features of behavior and culture. To answer this question, three different theories will be used: realistic force balance theory, economic interdependence theory and misunderstanding theory will be used to determine which method can better explain China's response to fishery conflict To see. In order to verify these theories, this article introduces the relationship between China and North Korea after the Korean War in three phases. Cold War (1950-1990), Cold War (1991-2009), and Recent (2010-2012). In this paper, by analyzing the history of fishery conflict, we will explain the aging of China's response to North Korea's two fisheries conflicts. Institutional politics identifies 'theory of power, transfer of power, relationship of economic interdependence and war, dispute transfer theory, domestic alliance theory, and the nature of decision making under risk and uncertainty' There is (Levy, 1998). Development economist Laws Stewart (2002) emphasized the importance of gender in the cause of war in international relations theory that these factors lie at the level of structure and interpersonal relationship from the global system to domestic internal dynamics Is emphasized. And the priority and personality of men causing conflict (Sjoberg, 2013)

Event 1 - Conviction Concerning Shares of Martha Stewart Martha Stewart was recently convicted of selling shares illegally. The officials were convicted of conspiracy, interfered with the judiciary and filed two false crimes against an investigator attempting a long verdict. We can analyze her situation from 5 different theoretical perspectives. Focusing not only sociology but also psychology and biology, we can see her situation in various ways. First, from a biological point of view, we can think of it as an evolution theory. Sociological Theory of World Education Judy Davis SOC 101 Allen Lips Comb World Educational Sociology Theory on March 1, 2010 There are various sociological theories in the United States and elsewhere in the world. Throughout the history of education, this institution has met both economic and political needs. These two aspects of demand also determine the function of education. "In the world, education is a large and complex social system, one of sociological theory of sociology is conflict theory Conflict theory includes attention to people's wealth and class, conflict theory I believe that change in society is beneficial.The focus on social order is contrary, and in the story of women and their children conflict theory is threatening homeless women. Let's think of a magnificent theory at once. Conflict theory is macro theory. Macro theory is a sociological theory aimed at studying the greater social, global and social aspects of sociological phenomena. This theory was founded by German philosophers, economists, sociologists, and revolutionaries (1818-1883). Marx is a testimony to the repression of the poor by elite members. The lack of patience to his capitalist ideals highlights these powerful actions of inhumane exploitation of the commons. For him, struggle is the birth of all human society. Later on, another German named Max Weber (1864-1920; pronounced "Veybur") further developed this sociological theory and put it in a more gentle position. Weber further studies capitalism, but it is opposed by Marx completely rejecting it.

The student's class, the race can decide whether he or she accepts liberation or oppression education. It is widely believed that students with poor background can not receive liberation education and can not provide for future children. On the contrary, students with wealthy careers can receive liberal education and provide such education for future children. Therefore, in our society there must be a tendency to force suppression education for lower grade students. Relationship between social class and educational achievement degree There are many theories about social class and educational achievement degree, but here we focus on conflict theory and functional theory. In this article we will explore the relationship between classroom and performance. It will describe and critically analyze various sociological theories related to the classroom and apply them to educational experience, structure and practice. - Detailed discussion of the three main assumptions of conflict theory. Based on these assumptions, conflict theorists consider stratification based on social class of social class. There are two specific examples that support conflicting views in your discussion. First, the definition of conflict theory: conflict theory: This theory basically says that in society, everyone has a role to maximize their own interests. In this article we will look at the differences between the two main sociological problems caste and class. Both are related to social stratification systems. According to caste and class, humans are divided into several different groups. These are not human biological or physical structures, but they are created by society. An individual's social position can be defined and identified based on his caste and class. The main difference between caste and class is that caste is vesting status and class is established position. Let's take a closer look at these terms. In Max Weber's terminology, caste and class are both status groups. Caste is considered to be a genetic group with fixed ritual status, but social class is defined from the viewpoint of production relations. Social class is a group of people with similar socio-economic status related to other classes of society. Individuals and families classified as part of the same social class have similar lifestyle opportunities, fame, lifestyle, attitudes and so on. The class system differs from other forms of hierarchy in many respects such as slavery, inheritance system, caste system. In early textbooks such as Maclver, Davis, Bottomore, it was observed that caste and class are highly antagonistic. They are opposite each other. "Class" represents a "democratic society" with equal opportunities, but "caste" is positive.

Many theorists are trying to explain the reasons for the end of the conflict. I found that one theory was more successful than the others. Because each conflict is different, it is difficult to create an effective theory for all conflicts. The conflict can be ethnic or religious, but it can also be resources and territory. William Zartman asserts maturity maturity and mutual harm to explain the end of the conflict and its reasons. Throughout this article his theory will be analyzed through the conflict between the agreements of Northern Ireland, Cambodia and Oslo. Looking at the idea of ​​deadlock due to mutual harm (Zartman, 2003), he thinks that as all the stakeholders believe that the conflict has matured when this moment arrives at last, we will explore the possibilities of tentacles I will. As compliance negotiations begin, asymmetric and symmetric conflicts face many problems. (Aggestam, 2002) pointed out that the resulting peace agreement could be intentionally ambiguous to ensure that the parties sign a new solution. In the case of Northern Ireland this is a fact and all major parties involved make very different interpretations of the agreement. But as Aggestam said, about the interpretation and execution of members of the Northern Ireland union, where actors demand disarmament of Republican paramilitary personnel before they can be established in the agreed place Because we are discussing. Political structure and behavior The timing of the government's open Kurdish policy is also worth a brief discussion. One of the best known ideas on the timing of the start of the peace process is the "perception of parties" on mutual harm deadlocks, the "mature instant that is related to the past or relevant highest correlation to come" It comes from the idea of ​​Zartman about the moment of ". "Recent disasters have been avoided." But the opening of Kurds policy has nothing to do with "mature moment" "Mature moment" in Turkish Republican history is justice and promotion of power by the development party government . "The parties are involved in conflict and can not be escalated towards victory, so it is time for all parties to strive to" do not get in the way ". However, the domestic and international situation has not allowed the government at the time. Achieve "not to get in the way"