Functionalist/Conflict/Symbolic Interactionalist/Postmodern

Society consists of mutually related parts, which together keep social stability stable. This stability is threatened by dysfunctional behavior and institution

Social development is useful for functional organizations (families, schools, governments, etc.) and contributes to it stably.

When an organization becomes tense, all other organizations in the system are affected and will not function properly.

Society is characterized by social inequality, social life is a fight against scarce resources. Social arrangements will benefit several groups while sacrificing other groups

In addition to the view on Markus' s economic struggle (bourgeois and proletariat), Weber uses power and fame as a cause of inequality.

In terms of conflict, people think that there are several different areas of conflict. (Economy, Ethnicity, Gender)

Society is the sum of individual and group interactions. Learning behavior by exchanges with others, how to define the situation as people's basis for their actions

Members of society get meaning from symbols that can change from person to person - this is called "interpretation"

Because we have global communication and post industrialization, the theory used in history can not explain social life properly.

What do you think is the cause of the more general conflict in our society? Economics? race? sex? What else is there?

Societies characterized by industrialization, consumerism and worldwide communication are questioning existing assumptions about social life and the nature of reality.

What is the advantage of analyzing society in a narrow range (symbolic interactionist). What are the advantages of a broader view of society (such as the role of functionalism and opposing views)?

Does society stay stable and trying to maintain this approach (such as functionalism), or do you think conflict is our natural condition (Marx and other confrontational theorists etc).

The term "function" is not related to positive, negative, correct, or incorrect, but is related to whether something will result in prolonging the duration of the social system.

The three perspectives highlighted here - functionalism, conflict, and symbolic interaction - are the foundation of sociological theory and help organize our discourse with nonhuman animal rights. People claiming the rights of non-human animals are trying to release other animals and end their racism (based on systematic repression against their existence by their species). By revealing the signs of repression by nonhuman animals in human society, sociological views are related to the fight against speciesism. These views are not independent, but they interact and interact.

The sociological view of basketball has three paradigms in sociology. There are perspectives of conflict theory, point of view of symbolic interaction, and point of structural functionalism. From a conflict paradigm point of view, this article focuses on gender and the assumption that girls lack the same strength and endurance as men. WNBA (Women's National Basketball League) is not as highly respected as men in the NBA (National Basketball League). Another question

Karl Marx and functionalism theory have something in each of the three sociological perspectives that can be supported. From the perspective of conflict theory, the ruling parties judge social order and structure to be accurate. Symbolic interactionism focuses on social interaction. Since society consists of various social structures, the social interaction that affects society is surely justified. Functionalism theory makes large scale or macroscopic observation of social structure or institution