Ripe Moments and Mutually Hurting Stalemates

Many theorists are trying to explain the reasons for the end of the conflict. I found that one theory was more successful than the others. Because each conflict is different, it is difficult to create an effective theory for all conflicts. The conflict can be ethnic or religious, but it can also be resources and territory. William Zartman asserts maturity maturity and mutual harm to explain the end of the conflict and its reasons. Throughout this article his theory will be analyzed through the conflict between the agreements of Northern Ireland, Cambodia and Oslo.

Looking at the idea of ​​deadlock due to mutual harm (Zartman, 2003), he thinks that as all the stakeholders believe that the conflict has matured when this moment arrives at last, we will explore the possibilities of tentacles I will. As compliance negotiations begin, asymmetric and symmetric conflicts face many problems. (Aggestam, 2002) pointed out that the resulting peace agreement could be intentionally ambiguous to ensure that the parties sign a new solution. In the case of Northern Ireland this is a fact and all major parties involved make very different interpretations of the agreement. But as Aggestam said, about the interpretation and execution of members of the Northern Ireland union, where actors demand disarmament of Republican paramilitary personnel before they can be established in the agreed place Because we are discussing. Political structure and behavior

The timing of the government's open Kurdish policy is also worth a brief discussion. One of the best known ideas on the timing of the start of the peace process is the "perception of parties" on mutual harm deadlocks, the "mature instant that is related to the past or relevant highest correlation to come" It comes from the idea of ​​Zartman about the moment of ". "Recent disasters have been avoided." But the opening of Kurds policy has nothing to do with "mature moment" "Mature moment" in Turkish Republican history is justice and promotion of power by the development party government . "The parties are involved in conflict and can not be escalated towards victory, so it is time for all parties to strive to" do not get in the way ". However, the domestic and international situation has not allowed the government at the time. Achieve "not to get in the way"