Although the theory of evolution is widely accepted by most scholars and intellectuals, it is clear that the fact that scientific facts have been used to "support" is only a theory when carefully studied. Inaccurate information, erroneous philosophers, and in some cases ordinary ignorance contribute to this "scientific religion". It is nothing but creation of Genesis. please do not. It is a scientifically provable fact and the word of God is pure and absolute truth, so it should be seen as more than a fable or a story. The controversy between evolutionism and creative evolution and creationism dates back to the publication of the origin of Darwinian origin in 1859, which laid the foundation for life evolution. Scientists continue to find more evidence to support Darwin's conclusion; organisms are produced by a common ancestor modified by the natural selection mechanism, leading to species evolution into the environment. The following is the main geological topic Creation and Evolution Since the announcement of the origin of Darwinian origin in 1859, the United States has discussed evolution and creation. Recently, discussions on whether to incorporate creativity in the public school curriculum as a theoretical alternative or combined with evolutionary intensification have intensified this argument in the United States. When such unstable problems are discussed, other problems are raised ... denying this fact, the world will not develop. Evolution theory can be verified compared to creationism. Because of the theory, evidence, and increased acceptance in today's society. In order to discuss the absolute nature of evolution, we must fully understand the history of this groundbreaking knowledge. Evolution is often described as a long-term change. Scientists generally believe that the evolution of the world has led to several theories.

I personally believe in the creation of a young Earth and at the same time did not claim on the first day I mentioned in Genesis including Genesis 1: 1-2. There may be a time difference between Genesis 1: 1-2 and Genesis 1: 3, but there is no evidence that that state is the same. But for Christian believers, this should not be a problem of discord. Because the people holding the first pass are different eras and are still faithful to the Bible. This will cause Driscoll and Breshears to be mistakenly called "historical creation". What has been linked to the centuries of academic interpretation is the creationism of the young Earth and has dominated this field. As a ministry, GotQuestions.org officially adheres to the young Earth creationism. We truly and completely believe that the creationism of the young earth fits best to the Biblical account of creation. However, we recognize that the former Earth creation is an effective view that Christians can hold. In any way, it should not be regarded as a heresy of the earth creationism of the past, in any way, an old earth creationist is not a brother and sister of Christ. Our view is always suited to the challenge and it inspires us to find more Bible to confirm that our faith is consistent with the Bible. There are many world views of creationists. Young earth creationism and gap creationism believe that human beings are created by God, but the young earth creationism argues that the Earth was remodeled by the flood at under 10 years of age, and the gap creation theory is a scientific It is an era that is accepted into. Progressive Creationism believes that humans are created directly by God based on primate anatomy, but intelligent design and theological evolution may lead to what looks like evolution to God's intervention Includes various beliefs based on. The first scientific and earth historical view we discuss is a recent or literal view. This position is often called scientific creationism, creative science, or young earth creationism. Young Earth creationists believe that the Earth and the Universe are just tens of thousands of years old, and Genesis gives us a brief explanation of God's creative activities. The second position, progressive creationism or old creationism thinks that the earth and the universe have billions of years of history. Progressive creationists, however, believe that God created certain (innocent) innocence in the history of the earth for billions of years. They do not believe that the era of Genesis is pointing to 24 hours, but a long-term indefinite day.

Evolutionism and creative evolution theory are based on science and more detailed evidence, creationism is a belief based theory. It is by no means convincing, it is a factor influencing ideas and theory supported by scientists. Therefore, you can not truly compare one; you need to choose what you think you are the truth at the same time. Since human life began, there was a problem that bothered the greatest philosophers and scientists. Since then I have learned that the discussion is much more complicated than simple evolution and creativity. There is a series of beliefs about this problem, but the most contradictory belief has nothing to do with whether the theory of evolution is an effective theory or not. For me, I believe that discussion is not between evolution and creation, but between my own scientific and spiritual aspects, and that many people have such conflicts. Evolution theory and evolution theory explain the fact. Creationism is a myth that explains the facts. Evolutionism is proved by facts, creationism is a story about facts. It is always interesting to learn about science and religion, but it is interesting to understand that science produces facts and that all creationists (religions) can be discussed through evolution theory. Therefore evolutionists provided evidence and creationists tried many other thinkers who used scientific theories empirically inferred to challenge Galileo, Copernicus, Bacon, Descartes, and the Biblical hypothesis I will try to. . The Catholic Church called this ideology of creationism as heresy and thus has a bad habit of suppressing complete disarray of the Bible to some extent. For centuries the scientific research has evolved into the theory of big bang and evolution, although it is mainly such a place. Evolutionism and creative evolution theory are based on science and more detailed evidence, creationism is a belief based theory. It is by no means convincing, it is a factor influencing ideas and theory supported by scientists. Therefore, you can not truly compare one; you need to choose what you think you are the truth at the same time. There has been a confusing problem since the beginning of human life ... an explosion can not produce life. I believe that anyone who has seen pictures of Hiroshima and Nagasaki immediately after the other two very explosions will support me there. Through research of scientific evidence we can decide that Genesis is the only possible and provable explanation for the existence of the world and life.

- BC In 1990, Abraham exiled in 1990 BC - an exiled monarchy in 1450 BC, 1450 BC. - 1045 BC, unified monarchy 1045 BC. - BC 930, Israel 930 - 725 BC 725 BC 590 B. Jews 590 BC - 440 BC - Babylon - 440 BC - Exile as of 440 BC. - 6-4 BC It is because it is the time since the birth of Jesus Christ (Congelliere). According to the theory of evolution, the schedule is formed as a single cell of 8 billion years (prokaryote), 1 billion multicellular organism, 500 million fish and wild amphibian, 360 million amphibious, 200 million years etc. It has been. This year's mammals, non-birds since 65 million years In modern public places, the most prominent interaction between science and religion includes evolution and creation / intellectual design. The lobbying for a legitimate struggle (eg Kitzillaire and Dover's trial in 2005) and evolutionary and creative education centered on American schools suggests a contradiction between religion and science. But even if we focus on the acceptance of evolution the relationship between religion and science is complicated. For example, in the UK, scientists, clergy and popular writers tried to harmonize science and religion from the 19th century to the early 20th century, whereas the United States against the emergence of evolutionary thought like the 1925 scope test I saw fundamentalism (Bowler 2001, 2009). ) Evolution theory and evolution theory explain the fact. Creationism is a myth that explains the facts. Evolutionism is proved by facts, creationism is a story about facts. It is always interesting to learn about science and religion, but it is interesting to understand that science produces facts and that all creationists (religions) can be discussed through evolution theory. Therefore evolutionists provided evidence and creationists tried many other thinkers who used scientific theories empirically inferred to challenge Galileo, Copernicus, Bacon, Descartes, and the Biblical hypothesis I will try to. . The Catholic Church called this ideology of creationism as heresy and thus has a bad habit of suppressing complete disarray of the Bible to some extent. For centuries the scientific research has evolved into the theory of big bang and evolution, although it is mainly such a place. A comprehensive approach to discussion on evolution and creationism requires that I explain the positive explanation provided by creationists. If you want to compare evolution to creationism, you can not focus on the difficulties you may encounter with evolutionary thinking. You also have to study options carefully. Doing so will bring a lot of difficulties to Genesis. The reason is that the creationists silence the details of the explanation they want to protect, or create a detailed story that can not be scientifically reviewed. For example, as I mentioned, the "creationists of the young earth" believe that there is only a thousand years history on Earth. This argument conflicts with various highly scientific findings such as geology and physics, which are highly reliable. If you buy this version of Genesis you must refuse evolution, not the majority of other science.

Genesis is a theory originally created by people, the earth, and other parts of the universe, not from the random random explosion to the existence of opportunities. We are on the surface of a small, elaborate, self-tuning spacecraft. Along with survival, conquest and death, we have witnessed beauty, aroma, love, and music. Please think about this. Mathematics, philosophy, spring, degeneracy, agriculture, courtship, quasars, and iphone; everything comes from noon? By chance The controversy between evolutionism and creative evolution and creationism dates back to the publication of the origin of Darwinian origin in 1859, which laid the foundation for life evolution. Scientists continue to find more evidence to support Darwin's conclusion; organisms are produced by a common ancestor modified by the natural selection mechanism, leading to species evolution into the environment. The following is the main geological topic Creation and Evolution Since the announcement of the origin of Darwinian origin in 1859, the United States has discussed evolution and creation. Recently, discussions on whether to incorporate creativity in the public school curriculum as a theoretical alternative or combined with evolutionary intensification have intensified this argument in the United States. When such unstable problems are discussed, other problems are raised ... denying this fact, the world will not develop. Evolution theory can be verified compared to creationism. Because of the theory, evidence, and increased acceptance in today's society. In order to discuss the absolute nature of evolution, we must fully understand the history of this groundbreaking knowledge. Evolution is often described as a long-term change. Scientists generally believe that the evolution of the world has led to several theories. Creationism and evolution This article focuses on the big controversy between creationism and evolution. I am going to take two opposite views on this subject. First, the discussion focused on the reasons many believe that God created the universe and all living things. On the other hand, scientific information will be provided to confirm the evidence for the existence of God. This kind of evolutionistic creation argument has its roots ... evolution! Each organism comes from the theory of a smaller organism. A theory that claims that humans are from monkeys. This "theory" is what we teach children at school. When a child asks teachers about creationism, they will definitely get answers such as "I can not answer this question". Because schools are not allowed to teach religious subjects. I think the school thinks that evolution is the second best solution. I believe

Most people think that evolution is a viable explanation of what life is like today. The theory of evolution is the theory that all creatures are descendants of other living creatures living in the early days, and this difference is due to genetic change in many generations. We must recognize that evolution is a theory and can not be regarded as a fact. Its roots came from Greek anatomists, but evolution was revealed when Charles Darwin published his book "The Origin of Natural Selected Species" in 1859. This research paper is not intended to convince you of your beliefs, but it is a bunch of knowledge that you can better educate both. Creationism and evolutionary controversy represent a conflict between the two world-related approaches (scientific / nonscientific). The basic idea of ​​biological evolution (science) is that as you and your cousin share a common grandmother, every life on the planet has a common ancestor. Creationism (non-science) is a person who believes in God, he is an absolute creator of the kingdom of heaven, he was born out of nothing, that is an act of free will. Free Christianity was always an ally of atheists in the war of creation and evolution. Evolutionism is an important ideological ground for atheism. Due to the explosive growth of Christians and conservative Christians worldwide, the birthrate is higher, and the success rate of the gospel is higher, the number and impact of liberal Christianity is expected to continue to decline. - The US federal government funds evolutionary false science and Greece's serious financial problems. Their useless teaching is that the United States can not continue to operate with a huge deficit without a result. There is no doubt that the funds for fake science of evolution will be reduced, this is already happening. Theology means to believe that God uses the evolutionary process of nature to create species. The mainstream Catholic and Protestant theology accepts compatibility between evolution and creationism. When thinking about how to understand creationism theory theorist thinks seriously about making science mainstream 66 Under the broad definition of creationism theoretical evolution supports faith in creationism It is creationism as it contains. But if we adopt a narrow definition that Genesis needs to believe in the mysterious activities of God in natural history and criticism of evolution theory, then most of the variants of theological evolution are not creationism.

Creationism and evolution This article focuses on the big controversy between creationism and evolution. I am going to take two opposite views on this subject. Initially, the discussion focused on why many people believe that God created the universe and all living creatures. On the other hand, scientific information will be provided to confirm the evidence for the existence of God. The fundamental cause of this creationist argument theory called evolution theory is modern understanding of the progressive process of natural evolution. The controversy between evolutionism and creative evolution and creationism dates back to the publication of the origin of Darwinian origin in 1859, which laid the foundation for life evolution. Scientists continue to find more evidence to support Darwin's conclusion; organisms are produced by a common ancestor modified by the natural selection mechanism, leading to species evolution into the environment. The following is the main geological topic Creation and Evolution Since the announcement of the origin of Darwinian origin in 1859, the United States has discussed evolution and creation. Recently, discussions on whether to incorporate creativity in the public school curriculum as a theoretical alternative or combined with evolutionary intensification have intensified this argument in the United States. When such unstable problems are discussed, other problems are raised ... denying this fact, the world will not develop. Evolution theory can be verified compared to creationism. Because of the theory, evidence, and increased acceptance in today's society. In order to discuss the absolute nature of evolution, we must fully understand the history of this groundbreaking knowledge. Evolution is often described as a long-term change. Scientists generally believe that the evolution of the world has led to several theories. Creationism and evolution This article focuses on the big controversy between creationism and evolution. I am going to take two opposite views on this subject. Initially, the discussion focused on why many people believe that God created the universe and all living creatures. On the other hand, scientific information will be provided to confirm the evidence for the existence of God. This kind of evolutionistic creation argument has its roots ... evolution! Each organism comes from the theory of a smaller organism. A theory that claims that humans are from monkeys. This "theory" is what we teach children at school. When a child asks teachers about creationism, they will definitely get answers such as "I can not answer this question". Because schools are not allowed to teach religious subjects. I think the school thinks that evolution is the second best solution. I believe

Charles Darwin's epoch-making work "The seed of origin" has been a century and a half after numerous tests and demonstrations based on the theory of evolution of nature selection. It is the cornerstone of modern biology. As evolutionary biologist Theodosius Dobzhansky observed, "All of biology has no meaning other than from an evolutionary perspective." However, those discussions can not be reviewed. Furthermore, the teaching of evolution is protected by the Constitution of the United States. But American science teachers are still faced with considerable pressure to compromise statements on this basic concept. What is the best way to combat the threat of scientific thinking that gave hints from religion? Probably not surprisingly, this is also a matter of discussion. The controversy between the theory of evolution and creative theory of evolution and creation dates back to 1859 when the origin of Darwin's species was published, which laid the foundation for life evolution. Scientists continue to find more evidence to support the conclusion of Darwin; organisms are descendants of common ancestry altered by the natural selection mechanism and evolve species into the environment. The following is the main geological topic Creation and Evolution Since the announcement of the origin of Darwinian origin in 1859, the United States has discussed the evolution and creation. Recently, discussions on whether or not to incorporate creationism into the public school curriculum, regardless of whether it is combined with evolution theory or a theoretical substitute in the United States, have intensified this argument. When such an unstable problem is debated, other problems are raised ... even if denying this fact the world will not develop. Because of theory, evidence, and increased acceptance in today's society, evolution is verifiable compared to science. In order to discuss the absolute nature of evolution, we must be able to fully understand the history of this epoch-making knowledge. Evolution is often described as a long-term change. Scientists generally say that the evolution of the world has led to several theories.

Absurdity of Scientific Creationism We humans have always believed that we are unique, whether through sacred sanctions or self-sustaining superiority. For some people this understanding has been closely related to the traditional principles that have long been regarded as facts and this principle has just recently been challenged. For modern Christians, the literal interpretation of the Biblical creation account has been attacked and widely accepted by Darwin's theory of evolution. For some people, the credibility of the destruction of the Bible's creation directly leads to questions about the authority of the Bible against its moral doctrine. The creation of science or the creation of science is a field of Genesis, scientifically supporting the creation of stories in Genesis, refuting or reinterpreting geology, cosmology, biological evolution, archeology, history I insist. And scientific scientific facts, theories and scientific paradigms. Linguistics Search Noah's Ark - According to the flood of Genesis, it is trying to find a burial ground of Noah's Ark, somewhere in the so-called "Ararat Mountain Range". There were many explorations, but some of them were false successes; this practice is widely regarded as fake science, more specifically fake archeology. Absurdity of Scientific Creationism We humans have always believed that we are unique, whether through sacred sanctions or self-sustaining superiority. For some people this understanding has been closely related to the traditional principles that have long been regarded as facts and this principle has just recently been challenged. For contemporary Christians, the literal interpretation of the Biblical account of creation is under the influence of Darwin's evolution theory development and widely accepted influence. Creationism and evolution How did it actually happen? Since 1859 Charles Darwin has announced the origin of the species the first time he announced his observation on how life on Earth has caused a lot of controversy. . Both creationists and evolutionists believe in the "big bang" theory of life creation, but the mechanism of new life development brings conflicts. Evolutionists believe that life on Earth is a coincidence. Old Earth Creationism is a transformation of the origins of the universe and the creative view of Earth's life. As a theory of origin, it is more consistent with the mainstream scientific ideas of the geology, the cosmology and the Earth's era and the younger earth creationism. Young Earth Creationism is a sort of religious belief that heavenly, earth and earthly life was created by God's direct actions from 6000 to 10,000 years ago. That believer is a Christian, a Jew, and a Muslim who believes that God created the earth in six hours and recorded the Hebrew Genesis as a written record.

Evolution and Creation in Education In the 20th century, we see ecalation of creation. This is a recent discussion by the Supreme Court's evolutionary debate on the famous trial court by the Kansas Board of Education and the decision on the evolutionary education of public schools. Due to the drastic problem of evolutionary education in this highly controversial American classroom, individuals of Christian beliefs may find it difficult to form another belief beyond the creationism and the extremes of evolution Hmm. In the United States, Genesis is the center of political discussion about the creation and evolution of public education, and whether educational creationism in science classroom contradicts the separation of church and state. Currently, the form of controversy is whether or not supporters of the intelligent design movement wish to "teach arguments" in science classes, regardless of whether they confuse science and religion. In November and December 1999, people on American roads conducted 1,500 North American investigations on evolution and creationism. They discovered that most North Americans are unfamiliar with Genesis. Most North Americans have heard about evolution, but many do not fully understand the rationale. The main findings are as follows. Evolution and Creation in Education In the 20th century, we see ecalation of creation. This is a recent discussion by the Supreme Court's evolutionary debate on the famous trial court by the Kansas Board of Education and the decision on the evolutionary education of public schools. Due to the unstable educational problems of this extremely controversial American classroom, it may be difficult for some Christian believers to form a different belief other than extreme. An overview of the creation and evolution of school professors: evolutionary and creative education in the public school system is controversial. Charles Darwin announced his evolutionary conclusion in 1859. This dramatically changed the science of education in public school systems (Armenta, 1). Several lawsuits have been filed for evolutionary education. - Discussion between evolutionism and creative evolutionism and creationism has been on for a long time. When Charles Darwin proposed the origin of species in 1859, this was when the discussion began completely. The first discussion on evolution and creation in litigation took place in a 1925 trial. Evolution has been removed from textbooks and courses. Evolution began to infiltrate textbooks in 1987

Since the beginning of humanity there was a question about the origin of mankind and how all living things acquire those characteristics. The two main theories that emerged over time were Genesis and evolution, both of which provided a very clear answer to this question. The foundation of creationism is the answer to the idea of ​​creating supernatural forces, the whole universe, humans, and many other organisms where they live. However, Evolution believes that all living things change over time and are more likely to evolve to something different from the new one. In other words, one theory considers that all creatures on humans and the earth are the result of God's design. Since the beginning of humanity there was a question about the origin of mankind and how all living things acquire those characteristics. The two main theories that emerged over time were Genesis and evolution, both of which provided a very clear answer to this question. The foundation of creationism is the answer to the idea of ​​creating supernatural forces, the whole universe, humans, and many other organisms where they live. However, Evolution believes that all living things change over time and are more likely to evolve to something different from the new one. In other words, one theory thinks that all creatures on humans and the earth are the result of God's design, and the other theories show that they are only the result of adaptation and growth of the environment. But since both theories are perfect, only prudent research can get a true understanding of human origin. For centuries people have been convinced that creationism, the earth, their inhabitants, and everything in the universe are created and dominated by supernatural powers. According to Cohen and Scott, the greatest influence on this concept is the Bible, more specifically Genesis, which proposes "creation from the Nothing" ("Creation of Nothing"), to the Earth A relatively near world flood began [27]. Of course, Cohen and Scott refer to the creation stories of the Jewish - Christian Bible, Adam and Eve, the Garden. Creationism and Evolution This article focuses on major controversies between creationism and evolution. I am going to take two opposite views on this subject. First, the discussion focuses on why many people believe that God created the universe and all living creatures. On the other hand, scientific information will be provided to confirm the evidence for the existence of God. This creationist's counterargument called evolution theory has its roots ... evolution theory! Each organism comes from the theory of smaller organisms. The theory which claims that humans are from monkeys. This "theory" is what we teach children at school. When a child asks teachers about creationism, they will definitely get answers such as "I can not answer this question". Because the school is not allowed to teach religious subjects. I think the school thinks evolution is the next best policy. I believe The controversy between the theory of evolution and creative evolution and creation dates back to the publication of the origin of Darwin's species in 1859, which laid the foundation for life evolution. Scientists continue to find more evidence to support the conclusion of Darwin; organisms are descendants of a common ancestor modified by the natural selection mechanism, leading to the evolution of species into the environment. The following is the main geological topic Creation and Evolution Since the announcement of the origin of Darwinian origin in 1859, the United States has discussed the evolution and creation. Recently, discussions on whether or not to incorporate creationism into the public school curriculum, regardless of whether it is combined with evolution theory or a theoretical substitute in the United States, have intensified this argument. When such an unstable problem is debated, other problems are raised ... even if denying this fact the world will not develop. Becau

Introduction Christians and non-Christians are talking about themes of creativity and humanity. Modern scientists can argue that the universe has reached billions of years and support their claim through an unproven date system. The Bible says that God is the Creator and that man is shaped by him. As a Christian, the Bible must be analyzed to examine the truth behind creation. Creationism: creation 64 days The creation of the universe refers to the universe including Adam and Eve, literally made in 24 hours, consistent with the Bible. People who claim creationism believe that God created the world represented by the Bible Genesis. Creationism firmly believes that the earth is less than 10,000 years old. Modern creative scientists can be divided into various groups by the interpretation of Hebrew "yom" (day). They are convinced that the creation story of Genesis is accurate and that the whole universe and all forms of life are created by God. It continues to be the most widely accepted theory of the public Creationism believes that the universe and all forms of life are created by God (innocence and innocence). It is an objection to contemporary evolution theory which explains the emergence and diversity of life without relying on the teachings of God and the power of other gods. Mainstream scientists often reject creationism. The Bible creationists believe that the creation of all six things of God in Genesis is literally true. Others like old creationists believe that the Creator created everything that exists, but you may not think that the story of Genesis is the history of this creation history. However, neither type of creationist is accompanied by a downward change such as a change in the living being such as a change within the species (usually understood as the "species" mentioned in Genesis 1: 24) or a negative variation I believe. But they do not believe any of these changes. Changes can lead to evolution from lower or simpler species to higher or more complex species

Or linguistically, the first part of the evolution directly involves defining all the "aging of the organism" directly, while the second part deals with how these changes occur ( Shermer 11). Of course this means that the main function of evolution is not only to "survive the fittest" but also to explain how organisms change over time. The changing creatures go through a process called natural selection. This means that it is difficult for living things to survive and propagate, resulting in the spread of genes to the next generation (Shermer 11). The controversy between evolutionism and creative evolution and creationism dates back to the publication of the origin of Darwinian origin in 1859, which laid the foundation for life evolution. Scientists continue to find more evidence to support Darwin's conclusion; organisms are produced by a common ancestor modified by the natural selection mechanism, leading to species evolution into the environment. The following is the main geological topic Creation and Evolution Since the announcement of the origin of Darwinian origin in 1859, the United States has discussed evolution and creation. Recently, discussions on whether to incorporate creativity in the public school curriculum as a theoretical alternative or combined with evolutionary intensification have intensified this argument in the United States. When such unstable problems are discussed, other problems are raised ... denying this fact, the world will not develop. Evolution theory can be verified compared to creationism. Because of the theory, evidence, and increased acceptance in today's society. In order to discuss the absolute nature of evolution, we must fully understand the history of this groundbreaking knowledge. Evolution is often described as a long-term change. Scientists generally believe that the evolution of the world has led to several theories. In the history of science and religion, there is no intense debate besides evolution and creation. Since most evidence supports evolution, this problem has caused intense debate, but due to longstanding religious beliefs, creation of ideas will never prove to be wrong. Human creation can be divided into three simple beliefs: creationism, natural evolution theology, and theological evolution. The complexity of the three aspects makes it possible for the theory to support a common national, religious or non-religious dilemma Mass media frequently express science with the science of creation and evolution, religion, creation and religion, and evolution as science. Unfortunately, if you do not agree with this tag, you can also tag it. If you do not agree with the stereotype, whether you are a creationist or an evolutionist, you will be accused and "exposed" as a religious fanatic. To redeem absurd and unscientific religious worldview. Indeed, neither of the two origin models goes beyond reasonable doubt (otherwise evolution is not called the "theory of evolution"). Whether we think to admit it or not, our people who agree with evolution do this by faith. The understanding of design in biology may have a theological significance, but it is not based on religious premises - it is based on empirical observation and logic

Evolution of natural selection is the result of evolution, organisms can adapt to the current population, but not to perfect organisms (Smock 2014). For the past 200 years, guppies of men have shown more or less colorful patterns to decorate their bodies. In hostile waters, research has shown that the body of male guppy becomes more colorful in predators and areas without more conservative color schemes (Futuyuma 2009). In the 1980 study, once the Guppy was moved to a safer marine area, it was shown that more male male guppies appeared in the next generation (Futuyuma 2009). Evolution theory and evolution theory explain the fact. Creationism is a myth that explains the facts. Evolutionism is proved by facts, creationism is a story about facts. It is always interesting to learn about science and religion, but it is interesting to understand that science produces facts and that all creationists (religions) can be discussed through evolution theory. Therefore evolutionists provided evidence and creationists tried many other thinkers who used scientific theories empirically inferred to challenge Galileo, Copernicus, Bacon, Descartes, and the Biblical hypothesis I will try to. . The Catholic Church called this ideology of creationism as heresy and thus has a bad habit of suppressing complete disarray of the Bible to some extent. For centuries the scientific research has evolved into the theory of big bang and evolution, although it is mainly such a place. They want to argue that the problem of evolution (or what they call "evolution theory" or "Darwinism") and science is not religion but religion and religion (science). "The example comes from the lie of Ken Ham: evolution, but it is called" the cause, principle or system of faith related to enthusiasm and belief "(from Webster Quoted) as well as a deep misunderstanding evolution of two religions) dictionary. Humm's ridiculous argument differs from "contradiction-free biblical evidence", in the past can only study them and can not access directly, so deriving scientific conclusions from fossils and evidence is That means you can not. Written in the era of Kenam

Rocks containing red iron are not dissolved in the first amount of oxygen immediately into the atmosphere of the earth, but "soluble iron ions (iron) combine with iron to form insoluble iron ions" dissolved in the ocean (Triebes, 190). In addition, the geological record shows that a red iron band does not appear on rocks about 2 billion years ago "Earth rocks are almost fixed to all oxygen they can absorb" (Triebes, 190). At the moment, we can listen to the question of creation of human beings very precisely, both the concept of creation and the theory of evolution. However, such a statement seems to be incorrect. Because many contemporary scholars point out that the idea of ​​creating a creator, humanity, does not deny scientific theory. The world of religion is not contradictory to science.This can be proved by the fact that many well-known world scientists are religious people: Copernicus, Isaac Newton, Mikhail Lomonosov, Bayu Albert Einstein In other words, science does not deny the idea that God created humanity. Historical Question: How did Albert Einstein influence the creation and evolution of the Manhattan Project? Why did Einstein's participation in and participation in the Manhattan plan changed during the Second World War? Albert Einstein is definitely one of 20th century geniuses. His work in gravity, relativity, light, and space helped tell the golden age of scientific research, and scientists are still being studied with surprises. Also, he is well-known Is it creation or evolution? This problem is more popular than ever. There are various theories about the creation of the earth and human development. The biggest problem is which one really applies. Scientists will tell you that the theory of evolution is how humans are created. Creationists and Christians will tell you that creationism is the way people create. Which group of people are correct? The Texas State Assembly has a bill to present a new set of guidelines for biological education ... research on creationism and evolution theory has been controversial argument for decades One side or the opposite side. Creationism believes that faith precedes science and should establish faith in the book, guidance of the Bible. God created everything on the earth and above, and it took six days. Evolutionists believe that the earth is much older than the Bible and plants, animals, and humans are the result of natural evolution called evolution.

Our hometown is an old problem like human beings. There are countless religions, each with its own distortion of the origin of the earth and mankind, but one of the most obvious controversies is creationism and evolution. Depending on where your faith lies, the earth was somewhere between 6000 and 5 billion years ago. People tend to think that this big time difference makes it impossible to get two widely accepted "theories". The controversy between evolutionism and creative evolution and creationism dates back to the publication of the origin of Darwinian origin in 1859, which laid the foundation for life evolution. Scientists continue to find more evidence to support Darwin's conclusion; organisms are produced by a common ancestor modified by the natural selection mechanism, leading to species evolution into the environment. The following is the main geological topic Creation and Evolution Since the announcement of the origin of Darwinian origin in 1859, the United States has discussed evolution and creation. Recently, discussions on whether to incorporate creativity in the public school curriculum as a theoretical alternative or combined with evolutionary intensification have intensified this argument in the United States. When such unstable problems are discussed, other problems are raised ... denying this fact, the world will not develop. Evolution theory can be verified compared to creationism. Because of the theory, evidence, and increased acceptance in today's society. In order to discuss the absolute nature of evolution, we must fully understand the history of this groundbreaking knowledge. Evolution is often described as a long-term change. Scientists generally believe that the evolution of the world has led to several theories. Creationism and evolution This article focuses on the big controversy between creationism and evolution. I am going to take two opposite views on this subject. Initially, the discussion focused on why many people believe that God created the universe and all living creatures. On the other hand, scientific information will be provided to confirm the evidence for the existence of God. This kind of evolutionistic creation argument has its roots ... evolution! Each organism comes from the theory of a smaller organism. A theory that claims that humans are from monkeys. This "theory" is what we teach children at school. When a child asks teachers about creationism, they will definitely get answers such as "I can not answer this question". Because schools are not allowed to teach religious subjects. I think the school thinks that evolution is the second best solution. I believe

Introduction of creationism and evolution 1. Definition 5. Variation of creationism 7. Evolutionary research Historical conflict 2. Controversy 5. Conclusion Appendix Work quotation Introduction Creation and evolution seen from historical significance Continuous conflict among people There is, it leads people to discuss and ban people. In many religious cultures and schools evolutionary theories are influenced by this anti-cultural way, creationism seems to be in various forms. Evolution theory and evolution theory explain the fact. Creationism is a myth that explains the facts. Evolutionism is proved by facts, creationism is a story about facts. It is always interesting to learn about science and religion, but it is interesting to understand that science produces facts and that all creationists (religions) can be discussed through evolution theory. Therefore evolutionists provided evidence and creationists tried many other thinkers who used scientific theories empirically inferred to challenge Galileo, Copernicus, Bacon, Descartes, and the Biblical hypothesis I will try to. . The Catholic Church called this ideology of creationism as heresy and thus has a bad habit of suppressing complete disarray of the Bible to some extent. For centuries the scientific research has evolved into the theory of big bang and evolution, although it is mainly such a place. Since the publication of Charles Darwin 's Origins of Origin, people have discussed creationism and evolution. By supporting facts and assertions, evolution is defended as more than just a theory, which proves to be a fact. - Because he is made in the final state, a person can not evolve to another state. He is made according to the image and image of his father, so you do not need to evolve; therefore there is no sign of evolution from the beginning. Since sin entered the world, people have been fooled to believe that there is evolution Evolutionism and creative evolution theory are based on science and more detailed evidence, creationism is a belief based theory. It is by no means convincing, it is a factor influencing ideas and theory supported by scientists. Therefore, you can not truly compare one; you need to choose what you think you are the truth at the same time. There has been a confusing problem since the beginning of human life ... an explosion can not produce life. I believe that anyone who has seen pictures of Hiroshima and Nagasaki immediately after the other two very explosions will support me there. Through research of scientific evidence we can decide that Genesis is the only possible and provable explanation for the existence of the world and life.

Two well-known scientific advocates exchanged views on how scientists approached religion and their believers John Rennie, Michael Shermer, Steve Mirsky saw Ben Stein 's new protest movie. This is their view on design flaws. In this episode, Steven Asuma at Columbia University in Chicago will explain his new book on Peter's Birth, the protest creation museum in Kentucky, as well as his book on monuments and natural history museums, including myths and malformations. In addition, I will test your knowledge about recent science in the news. The website mentioned in this episode includes www.skeptic.com, www.stephenasma.com. The consortium of scientific society hopes the scientific community will be deeply involved in science education including evolution. Steve Mirsky's Report At the World Evolution Forum in the Galapagos Islands, the history and tradition of science and data, as well as controversy and arguments are revealed. Has humanity invented good and evil, or are these emotions part of the legacy of our primate's ancestor? The new movie "Deported" stated that smart design is a good science and has been reviewed by evolutionary believers, this is exactly the Darwinian doctrine. John Rennie, Editor in Scientific America, and Steve Mirsky, a podcast host, discussed this movie. Eugenie Scott, director of the National Science Education Center, talked about film interviews and her organization's efforts to provide correct information on eviction. In addition, I will test your knowledge about recent science in the news. For more information on SciAm's Expelled, please visit www.sciam.com / expelled. The website mentioned in this episode includes www.expelledthemovie.com; www.expelledexposed.com; www.natcenscied.org. Progress in science rather than the decline of religion will most resist the influence of creationism. The controversy between the theory of evolution and creative evolution and creation dates back to the publication of the origin of Darwin's species in 1859, which laid the foundation for life evolution. Scientists continue to find more evidence to support the conclusion of Darwin; organisms are descendants of a common ancestor modified by the natural selection mechanism, leading to the evolution of species into the environment. The following is the main geological topic Creation and Evolution Since the announcement of the origin of Darwinian origin in 1859, the United States has discussed the evolution and creation. Recently, discussions on whether or not to incorporate creationism into the public school curriculum, regardless of whether it is combined with evolution theory or a theoretical substitute in the United States, have intensified this argument. When such an unstable problem is debated, other problems are raised ... even if denying this fact the world will not develop. Because of theory, evidence, and increased acceptance in today's society, evolution is verifiable compared to science. In order to discuss the absolute nature of evolution, we must be able to fully understand the history of this epoch-making knowledge. Evolution is often described as a long-term change. Scientists generally say that the evolution of the world has led to several theories.

Introduction to scientific creationism In 1859, Charles Darwin published the origin of the species, and he proposed evolution for the first time. Since this radical theory was first proposed, its relevance and its subsequent theological significance have been debated. To understand why the Darwinian theory caused so much controversy in the past century it is first necessary to examine evolution and the theory of the origin of Darwin's species. Strictly speaking, evolution only changes over time. The creation of science or the creation of science is a field of Genesis, scientifically supporting the creation of stories in Genesis, refuting or reinterpreting geology, cosmology, biological evolution, archeology, history I insist. And scientific scientific facts, theories and scientific paradigms. Linguistics Search Noah's Ark - According to the flood of Genesis, it is trying to find a burial ground of Noah's Ark, somewhere in the so-called "Ararat Mountain Range". There were many explorations, but some of them were false successes; this practice is widely regarded as fake science, more specifically fake archeology. Henry Morris' influential scientific creationism (1974) also uses the "dual mode" approach to repackaging creationism into science. Scientific creationism is a handbook for biological teachers and that "basic scientific creation models" can be taught without reference to Genesis or other religious literature or religious teaching thinking about. The version is for public schools (not mentioning the Bible) and for Christian school (including the chapter "Creating based on the Bible") Science creationism edited by Henry Morris is often sold to Christian secondary schools. This book gives only the creative aspect of the problem. Christian schools are encouraged to use them as a central science textbook complemented only with general scientific materials, not complemented by opposing opinion books. At "Christian Heritage Courier" published in September 1979, Dr. Morris criticized John Dewey's progressive education. Teaching applies to facts of constantly changing existence. "He pointed out that this concept of education is not necessarily part of American education." There was a time when finding the truth could bring the truth! In addition to this ready answer, they also have ready-made textbooks. Perhaps the most famous is Dr. Morris' scientific creationism, which was initiated by His Institute of Creation. Introduction, "Scientific creationism (public school version) ..." deals with all important aspects of creative / evolutionary problems from a strict scientific point of view, without reference to the Bible or other religious literature We are trying to evaluate the physical evidence of related science fields. "

Evolution theory and evolution theory explain the fact. Creationism is a myth that explains the facts. Evolutionism is proved by facts, creationism is a story about facts. It is always interesting to learn about science and religion, but it is interesting to understand that science produces facts and that all creationists (religions) can be discussed through evolution theory. Therefore, evolutionists can infer that creationists are providing evidence that evolutionists are trying to prove that they are wrong. They want to argue that the problem of evolution (or what they call "evolution theory" or "Darwinism") and science is not religion but religion and religion (science). "The example comes from the lie of Ken Ham: evolution, but it is called" the cause, principle or system of faith related to enthusiasm and belief "(from Webster Quoted) as well as a deep misunderstanding evolution of two religions) dictionary. Humm's ridiculous argument differs from "contradiction-free biblical evidence", in the past can only study them and can not access directly, so deriving scientific conclusions from fossils and evidence is That means you can not. Written in the era of Kenam Evolution theory and evolution theory explain the fact. Creationism is a myth that explains the facts. Evolutionism is proved by facts, creationism is a story about facts. It is always interesting to learn about science and religion, but it is interesting to understand that science produces facts and that all creationists (religions) can be discussed through evolution theory. Therefore evolutionists provided evidence and creationists tried many other thinkers who used scientific theories empirically inferred to challenge Galileo, Copernicus, Bacon, Descartes, and the Biblical hypothesis I will try to. . The Catholic Church called this ideology of creationism as heresy and thus has a bad habit of suppressing complete disarray of the Bible to some extent. For centuries the scientific research has evolved into the theory of big bang and evolution, although it is mainly such a place.

"Life makes no sense, Jesus gives us the meaning of life, we have to accept that he gives meaning to our life.When you are the answer, about the meaning of life To ask is a waste. "Research is a controversial discussion and constantly makes many people unilateral. Creationism believes that faith precedes science and should establish faith in the book, guidance of the Bible. God created everything on the earth and above, and it took six days. The controversy between evolutionism and creative evolution and creationism dates back to the publication of the origin of Darwinian origin in 1859, which laid the foundation for life evolution. Scientists continue to find more evidence to support Darwin's conclusion; organisms are produced by a common ancestor modified by the natural selection mechanism, leading to species evolution into the environment. The following is the main geological topic Creation and Evolution Since the announcement of the origin of Darwinian origin in 1859, the United States has discussed evolution and creation. Recently, discussions on whether to incorporate creativity in the public school curriculum as a theoretical alternative or combined with evolutionary intensification have intensified this argument in the United States. When such unstable problems are discussed, other problems are raised ... denying this fact, the world will not develop. Evolution theory can be verified compared to creationism. Because of the theory, evidence, and increased acceptance in today's society. In order to discuss the absolute nature of evolution, we must fully understand the history of this groundbreaking knowledge. Evolution is often described as a long-term change. Scientists generally believe that the evolution of the world has led to several theories.

There is a difference between Darwinism and creationism. One is based on data and the other is based on belief. Darwinism regards itself as science and scientific methodology explains this. Biological evolution is accompanied by changes in living things in life history on the earth. It explains that living things share a common ancestor, and over time the evolutionary change creates new species. On the other hand, the idea of ​​creating science comes from the belief of most Abrahamic religions - including humans and other creatures - that God created the universe. They want to argue that the problem of evolution (or what they call "evolution theory" or "Darwinism") and science is not religion but religion and religion (science). "The example comes from the lie of Ken Ham: evolution, but it is called" the cause, principle or system of faith related to enthusiasm and belief "(from Webster Quoted) as well as a deep misunderstanding evolution of two religions) dictionary. Humm's ridiculous argument differs from "contradiction-free biblical evidence", in the past can only study them and can not access directly, so deriving scientific conclusions from fossils and evidence is That means you can not. Written in the era of Kenam In historical context, creationism and evolution are always controversial subjects and are one of Darwin's major breakthroughs in spreading his evolution theory. When Darwin published his evolution theory in 1859, his book was thought of as a major technological advancement at the time. Since the existence of evolution compensates society, "evidence" like the existence of God creates a catalyst that does not exist, and creationism is almost replaced by atheism. Since the publication of Charles Darwin 's Origins of Origin, people have discussed creationism and evolution. By supporting facts and assertions, evolution is defended as more than just a theory, which proves to be a fact. - Because he is made in the final state, a person can not evolve to another state. He is made according to the image and image of his father, so you do not need to evolve; therefore there is no sign of evolution from the beginning. Since sin entered the world, people have been fooled to believe that there is evolution

My research on Darwin's theory of evolution has convinced me that there is not much room for spirituality of any kind in the truly rigorous scientific theory about the origin of life. At least this is a nuisance. Clearly, we are above strict creative lenses, but religion is completely outdated. Do spirituality have reality in the scientific principles of evolution theory, or is it just a crutch that we rely on? Can God and Darwin coexist? Evidence that continues to evolve by natural selection is almost imperative. To some extent, the term "survival of fittest" first proposed in Darwin's natural selection theory is a brief description of eugenics. Darwin and Alfred Wallace submitted a paper on the concept of natural selection in 1858. This concept has become the backbone of modern biology. Later Darwin published an influential book in 1859. "Origin of species by natural selection, or protection of dominant race in life struggle". Eugenics (/ juːdʒɛnɪks /; derived from Greek), "Born from Europe", "Good, Good", "Ethnicity, Stocks, Relatives" is a series of beliefs aimed at improving the genetic quality of the population and It is a custom. Broadly speaking, there are two types of eugenics: positive (encouraging breeding) and negative (encouraging discussion). It is not suitable for breeding) This article explains Darwin's theory of natural selection. At the same time, this paper fully explains the natural selection of "modern evolution synthesis" in the 20th century. This paper also gives application of the principle of natural selection to explain current antibiotic resistance in bacteria. Finally, this paper summarizes the theory of evolutionary science in Darwin and then discovers natural selection. As we all know, Charles Darwin is the father of evolution and inheritance and advocates the principle of controlling heredity. One of his outstanding principles is that natural selection will be decided when the theory of natural selection becomes the driving force if the theory of evolution becomes clear as a car. This theory clearly states that the nature of control and selection of organisms contributes to survival while in the same eradication of lower species (Fairfield, 2000). Charles Darwin strongly believes in the theory of evolution and is the founder of the natural selection theory. Natural selection is the theory of competing - survival, spouse, universe, food, shelter etc - that tend to naturally preserve valuable organisms and tend to keep evolving undesirable organisms evolving. Evolution can roughly be divided into two types: macroscopic evolution and microscopic evolution. Macro evolution deals with changes above the seed level, but micro evolution is a change in gene frequency within a population, which may lead to the formation of new species. Darwin thinks that natural selection will take place in nature, it is necessary to select and cultivate the best and most suitable resource. The concept of genetics and genetics did not appear until the introduction of Gregor Mendel and the evolutionary study followed the evolution of DNA discovered by Watson and Click in 1953.

In more state and public schools, for example "movement between Tennessee parliamentarians is to seek more discussion or space for smart design at public schools across the country .In January, the Indiana State Assembly is in charge of school districts Proposed a bill to allow you to decide whether to combine creationism and evolutionary teaching methods in science courses (Huffington Post). The theory of Genesis related to Protestant Protestant Christianity in the United States supports the original Bible (Tattersall 21) about the creation of God's humans and other parts of the universe. Today, as a part of America 's populist revival, Genesis is emerging again. - The development of humanoid bipedalism was about 4 million years ago, and there was a wonderful evolution in Africa. Early human race, human ancestry began a big leap in its evolution. These primitive people moved out of the forest and started walking upright on the plain (Fagan, 98). This change from four-leggedism is the most important adaptation of these early primitive humans. It causes many changes and makes humans today. Creation is the most natural experience in our universe. Creation in space is necessary and constant, which is happening everywhere everyday. The universe is inherently creative. As interrelated participants in the natural world, all living things, all species of the universe have local creativity based on their own characteristics, respectively. Seeds on earth, wise men on the planet will develop almost unlimited power. In many ways this species is smarter and more fully equipped than all the other species on the planet and you can enjoy the fruits of existence; As humans gradually understand the universe, we find that we are not special again and again. In 1543, Copernicus began to prove that the earth is not the center of the universe, so it began. Over and over, my understanding of the world became confused (sometimes completely dismantled) and humans rushed to the edge. The Earth is not the center of the solar system, the solar system is not the center of the Milky Way, and the Milky Way is just one of the hundreds of billions of galaxies - not the center of the universe, perhaps even the only universe. So, think about it, we are arrogantly the only ideological life in the universe is obviously arrogant

Perhaps the fight in creation and evolutionary war is not as famous as the monkey trial range. In 1925, the teacher of Tennessee John Scopes taught the evolution in the classroom, deliberately challenging the state law, banning educational evolution. The trial is aimed at generating propaganda, its role is like charm. Actors are studded with stars: famous lawyer Clarence Darrow preserves scope, while three populist presidential candidate Williams Jennings Brian sue. Americans heard litigation through the radio Finally, Scopes was found guilty and was fined $ 100. The Supreme Court of Tennessee later reversed the technical judgment, but insisted on a law that prevented evolution theory from being taught. [7 Theory on the Origin of Life] After the trial, other states enacted their own anti-evolution law. But gradually the anti-evolutionary movement lost momentum and went back to the textbook. The controversy between the theory of evolution and creative evolution and creation dates back to the publication of the origin of Darwin's species in 1859, which laid the foundation for life evolution. Scientists continue to find more evidence to support the conclusion of Darwin; organisms are descendants of a common ancestor modified by the natural selection mechanism, leading to the evolution of species into the environment. The following is the main geological topic Creation and Evolution Since the announcement of the origin of Darwinian origin in 1859, the United States has discussed the evolution and creation. Recently, discussions on whether or not to incorporate creationism into the public school curriculum, regardless of whether it is combined with evolution theory or a theoretical substitute in the United States, have intensified this argument. When such an unstable problem is debated, other problems are raised ... even if denying this fact the world will not develop. Because of theory, evidence, and increased acceptance in today's society, evolution is verifiable compared to science. In order to discuss the absolute nature of evolution, we must be able to fully understand the history of this epoch-making knowledge. Evolution is often described as a long-term change. Scientists generally say that the evolution of the world has led to several theories.

Several philosophies that have emerged recently are most likely to break the conviction that we are definitely creative. Since my adolescence, I have witnessed witnessing that most people are generally converted to "humanitarian propositions" (HP) and the attraction to "creative hypothesis" (CH) is declining It was. I form my attitude and opinion based on observation and collective research. I call it "the ultimate collapse of creative perspectives". Hollywood, coupled with the proliferation of non-believers in our society - (USA), suffers from practical ideas that create shapes and shapes to some extent. People who push "scientific evidence" to the limit are often opponents of them. It is to assert absolute certainty, divine revelation, unshakable faith. Science is not that kind of thing. It is the creation of mankind. As with all human creations, it is full of uncertainty through our own values, politics, and assumptions. so. "Science is beyond culture, science has no value, if science says that science will give us a fair truth, they may not even know how wrong they are not. They may have attended too many math classes, but they do not have scientific history or philosophy. So now it seems like computer programmers who do their job and do not need to understand physics. However, like the physical constraint code, culture, value, and politics also restrict science. The whole Qur'an has hundreds of poems that describe creation and nature's miracles and call upon humans to regard them as a sign of God. Mankind has been explained and managed as an administrator on the planet (as in the case of the Jews and Christian Bibles). There are also many ban on koran and prophecy to not hurt useless, excessive, and other forms of creation. A prophecy says that it is forbidden to waste water even if it is immersed in a river. A balanced life and a gentle lifestyle are important Muslim principles that are proposed by most Muslim scholars, applicable to all aspects of life, including the care of the earth and any creation.

People always insist on which theory is true, evolution or creation. Evolution is related to natural selection. Natural selection means that individuals with the best characteristics survive and inherit their superior characteristics to descendants. Those offspring will produce more individuals with these strong features, and eventually all species have these strong features. This means that if this cycle takes a long enough time it will eventually lead to a change in the population that will bring new species. Darwin believes that all forms of life are descendants of ancient generic species. Creationism believes that all creatures and life forms are created in their present state. Creationists believe in God ... more He observed the animal from various places and observed the evolution of the seed in front of him. When he proposed his evolution theory scientists thought he was crazy but soon got some supporters, and now his evolution theory is the most stable in science. This sentence of Darwin's text explains natural selection. Natural selection is one of the main ideas of evolution. Adaptation is another great idea in evolution. When there are more descendants than you can survive, a natural choice will occur, only strongers can survive. Those strong individuals pass strong alleles to their descendants. Soon this will lead to a gradual evolution of the population. These living things will survive better in certain circumstances. Adaptation is the change of species by its environment. According to the theory of evolution, we believe the earth has a history of about 5 million years. Creationism says there is only about 6000 years history on Earth. Scientists have shown that the age of the earth far exceeds 6,000 years. They take rocks and the earth and decide the age of the earth using machines equipped with special crystals. Scientists' fossils have gradually discovered species changes over the years. Creationism says that all species come to the earth as it is today, but there is evidence that seeds evolved into today's species. Scientists observed a gradual change in species, In the online dictionary, evolution is defined as "the theory that different kinds of animals and plants are derived from other existing types, and the distinct differences are due to future generation changes". It comes from simpler things, and because of natural choices it becomes more complex over time. Macroscopic evolution will be the focus of the following discussion and biblical creationism and it will be diminished. The controversy between the theory of evolution and creative evolution and creation dates back to the publication of the origin of Darwin's species in 1859, which laid the foundation for life evolution. Scientists continue to find more evidence to support the conclusion of Darwin; organisms are descendants of a common ancestor modified by the natural selection mechanism, leading to the evolution of species into the environment. The following is the main geological topic Creation and Evolution Since the announcement of the origin of Darwinian origin in 1859, the United States has discussed the evolution and creation. Recently, discussions on whether or not to incorporate creationism into the public school curriculum, regardless of whether it is combined with evolution theory or a theoretical substitute in the United States, have intensified this argument. When such an unstable problem is debated, other problems are raised ... even if denying this fact the world will not develop. Because of theory, evidence, and increased acceptance in today's society, evolution is verifiable compared to science. In order to discuss the absolute nature of evolution, we must be able to fully understand the history of this epoch-making knowledge. Evolution is often described as a long-term change. Scientists generally say that the evolution of the world has led to several theories.

The problem of teaching creation at public schools Introduction The problem of teaching creation at public schools has long been controversial. Various discussions have been proposed over the years. First, creationists try to make the teachings of evolution illegal. This problem was submitted to the Supreme Court in 1968. In the case of Epson v. Arkansas, the High Court opposed the ban on evolutionary teaching. Shortly after this decision, creationists began seeking equal treatment between 'equal time', creationism and evolution. Religious groups, science teachers, highly educated parents, etc. have significant differences in this problem. The issue of educational creation in public schools is a controversial issue in the United States and federal, state and local authorities need to deal with this issue more fully. Otherwise, it will affect the quality of education, especially science education, and will further reduce the scientific skills of American students compared to students from industrialized countries and Japan and Korea. For a long time, people have discussed issues of creative education in public schools. Various discussions have been made over the years. The first creationists tried to make the teachings of evolution illegal. This problem was submitted to the Supreme Court in 1968. In the case of Epperson v. Arkansas, the High Court opposed the teaching of evolution. Shortly after this decision, creationists began seeking equal treatment between 'equal time', creationism and evolution. If this attempt fails, the creationist turns into "to create science" (Grunes 465). The main argument today about teaching creation at public schools is that creation is a scientific theory and therefore should be taught with evolution. Soldiers who oppose creationism at public schools are those who believe creative science is a bad science and those who believe that it infringes upon the separation of church and state. Creation in the creation of public schools The question of whether to teach creation in public schools is a very emotional and complex problem. It can be seen from several different perspectives, its effect is one of them. Despite the lack of evidence to support the fundamental idea of ​​Genesis, this alone is not enough to exclude them from the public school curriculum of the United States. The problem goes beyond survival far beyond other activities. In 1859, Charles Darwin announced the origin of the species and since that time people have discussed between creationism and evolution theory. Evolution is supported only by various religious works, especially the Bible. Creationists believe in the Holy Creator, God. Creationism has a wide range of beliefs, including relying on the magical work of God to explain the universe, life, and various kinds of origins.

Evolution and creation in the American school system "God, God, God!" My ear sounded my father's latest speech. Attendance to his church was not very consistent, so I mainly learned about Christianity through his own teachings. This lesson is related to our creation. He explained how God formed the first man Adam from dust and formed the first female Eve from Adam's ribs after 6 days of creation and carnival. In the early days of my life my father's faith was myself. He became a good Catholic child for me, and because there are no other options, I became a good Catholic child. An overview of the creation and evolution of school professors: evolutionary and creative education in the public school system is controversial. Charles Darwin announced his evolutionary conclusion in 1859. This dramatically changed the science of education in public school systems (Armenta, 1). Several lawsuits have been filed for evolutionary education. - Discussion between evolutionism and creative evolutionism and creationism has been on for a long time. When Charles Darwin proposed the origin of species in 1859, this was when the discussion began completely. The first discussion on evolution and creation in litigation took place in a 1925 trial. Evolution has been removed from textbooks and courses. Evolution began to infiltrate textbooks in 1987 Evolutionism is considerably younger than religious beliefs of creation and creation. Prior to Charles Darwin, evolution was a devout idea, and God as a creator was believed to be widely accepted. However, since Darwin introduced his evolution theory a century and a half ago, discussion about theory and creation always existed. - It is a modest expression that claims almost no conflict in the realm of faith and reason. From the earliest stage of scientific exploration, these two areas of thought fell into a vicious circle and gave up as the religion gradually modernized to adapt to the new understanding of the universe. Evolution theory and evolution theory explain the fact. Creationism is a myth that explains the facts. Evolutionism is proved by facts, creationism is a story about facts. It is always interesting to learn about science and religion, but it is interesting to understand that science produces facts and that all creationists (religions) can be discussed through evolution theory. Therefore, while evolutionists provide evidence, creationists try Galileo, Copernicus, Bacon, Descartes, and thinkers who challenge biblical hypotheses using empirically deduced scientific theory. . The Catholic Church called this ideology of creationism as heresy and thus has a bad habit of suppressing complete disarray of the Bible to some extent. For centuries the scientific research has evolved into the theory of big bang and evolution, although it is mainly such a place.

Evolution and creation in today's school One of the biggest controversies in today's school is the debate between evolution and creationism, which should be taught in American science classes. Many Christians believe that creationism should be given equal time at school, but other Christians believe that the teaching of creationism is to teach religion. Those who strive for equal time say that creationism can be taught without all religious terms. There are still many people who believe that evolution is a belief system like creationism (creation versus creation Evolution theory and evolution theory explain the fact. Creationism is a myth that explains the facts. Evolutionism is proved by facts, creationism is a story about facts. It is always interesting to learn about science and religion, but it is interesting to understand that science produces facts and that all creationists (religions) can be discussed through evolution theory. Therefore evolutionists provided evidence and creationists tried many other thinkers who used scientific theories empirically inferred to challenge Galileo, Copernicus, Bacon, Descartes, and the Biblical hypothesis I will try to. . The Catholic Church called this ideology of creationism as heresy and thus has a bad habit of suppressing complete disarray of the Bible to some extent. For centuries the scientific research has evolved into the theory of big bang and evolution, although it is mainly such a place. Theology means to believe that God uses the evolutionary process of nature to create species. The mainstream Catholic and Protestant theology accepts compatibility between evolution and creationism. When thinking about how to understand creationism theory theorist thinks seriously about making science mainstream 66 Under the broad definition of creationism theoretical evolution supports faith in creationism It is creationism as it contains. But if we adopt a narrow definition that Genesis needs to believe in the mysterious activities of God in natural history and criticism of evolution theory, then most of the variants of theological evolution are not creationism. Creationism is not the same classroom, but has a place in the classroom and evolution. Creationism belongs to theological or religious history. Because sacredness believes in the creation of the world by the Bible. The Bible means that the Bible is confined to groups of religion. The so-called "creative science" is not science at all. Recently it is more like a political movement than the scientific movement. Of course, creationists may have institutions like "creation laboratory" (a church without any scientific research) or "creative research society" (another church without scientific research) , After all it is not truncated in creation. Broken schedule Recently, many science teachers at public schools tried to educate evolution by teaching so-called "smart design theory" (Washington State).

As long as history is the focus of discussion, creation is not science, but the origin of school life. The ancient Egyptians believed that the god Ra of the sun made land from the depth of water and took another form of building everything, including God and humans. Iroquois is a native American tribe and tells the story of the God of the human family line This story leads the twins, one is evil and the other is good. Excellent twins create a perfect world. What happens when science and religion encounter? Well - for beginners, you will get a scientist named Abhijit Naskar who is me. But jokingly said - as science and religion encounter, we will gain a field of human understanding belonging to the field of science, as it belongs to the field of religion. This field is called "neurology" - this is a fusion of science and religion. It is the only scientific field related to religion and related to science. but why? Why do you need neurology? As it is the only area of ​​rational thinking, we try to understand religion, religion, and the roots of God without requiring neurology and a big impulse to refute and destroy religion. We are based on empiricism, not just optimism, even though optimism is around us. As long as history is the focus of discussion, creation is not science, but the origin of school life. The ancient Egyptians believed that the god Ra of the sun made land from the depth of water and took another form of building everything, including God and humans. Iroquois is a native American tribe and tells the story of the God of the human family line This story leads the twins, one is evil and the other is good. Excellent twins produce the perfect picture taught by the school to evolve and families or other educators are invited to their children and students about Genesis or other types of creative myths or legends You should let me know. In fact, the transparent interpretation of this principle has emerged effectively: since there are two or more "aspects" of the discussion, it is not the Chinese "yin and yang" principle or Greek philosopher's view Everyone on this planet is coming Gould 's argument is that evolution should be taught at public schools, not creation. Evolution is a public school curriculum because he believes that evolution is science and creation is religion. In addition to giving a view and understanding about his own evolution and creation, Gould also exemplified other important person's views on this argument. His article includes John Whitcomb and Henry Morris who wrote articles about The Genesis Flood. The idea was that a large amount of water vapor covered the earth, but they could not explain how the cover reached it. Whitcomb and Morris believe that rising water from the ground, coupled with the sky rain, will produce enough water to account for Noah's global flood. They decided that he would release it as God initially placed water there.

The creation of children on the Internet The way this old evolutionary and creative problem can make other friends and colleagues oppose each other. Most of them are about discussing this issue with us and about relationships with children. The majority of the controversy caused by this problem seems to be centered on how children see Darwin's "social doctrine" or social Darwinism. Studying evolution has the potential to hurt the morals of school-age children. I began to study the following: Please make sure that children based on website based materials can learn the latest materials from scientific and biblical standpoint. I think the network is a good example. Five years ago, when I started creating web pages for the first time, the web browser built a web editor, and all edits were visual and there was no need to write code. Of course, since then the way you work on the web has changed a lot, but the basic principles for displaying web pages are still basically the same. But somehow, every attempt to create a tool on the site failed (Microsoft's infamous FrontPage editor comes to mind). In order to display the page as designed in Photoshop, you need to manually create HTML and CSS programming. To display a web page on the World Wide Web, you usually start by entering the URL of the page in a web browser or by following a hyperlink to a page or resource. After that, the Web browser starts a series of background communication messages and retrieves and displays the requested page. In the 1990 's, browsing, web surfing (after surfing the channel), or' Web surfing 'that displays a web page using a browser or moves between web pages using a hyperlink Browsing "called. In an early study on this new behavior, we used a web browser to investigate the user model. For example, in one survey, five user patterns were found: Exploratory Surfing, Window Surfing, Evolutionary Surfing, Bounded Navigation, Target Navigation. Do you think that is only for experimental purposes? Yes, it will be a public place only when the visual media (web browser) intervenes. The World Wide Web has acquired a standard for creating HTML (invention of CERN) functioning as a platform for researchers to cooperate with. At that time, the page was only text and tables. Soon, the first graphic browser Mosaic announced the ability to format text and fonts. Images on web pages are also possible. This revolutionized the way of Web presentation. Furthermore, as the cascading style sheet evolves, you can organize the content to convert the web design to art form. Shortly thereafter, Flash enabled streaming video over the network.

Creationism and evolution It really happened. Since 1859 Charles Darwin has announced the origin of the species the first time he announced his observation on how life on Earth has caused a lot of controversy. . Both creationists and evolutionists believe in the "big bang" theory of life creation, but the mechanism of new life development brings conflicts. Evolutionists believe life on earth is a coincidence, and random atomic collisions (abiotic substances) are called biogenesis 2. I raised the question of what is the argument between creationism and evolution theory and thought it was "God made it" rather than "the process of nature did it" (Scott, 2004). Science can not absolutely prove or refute creation and evolution. However, scientists and other people in society use creationism and evolution theory to prove our existence. Creationists believe in the explanation of the origins of Christians in Genesis. Creationism is a belief in statements such as "beginning". Creationism and evolution: How did it actually happen? Since 1859 Charles Darwin has announced the origin of the species the first time he announced his observation on how life on Earth has caused a lot of controversy. . Both creationists and evolutionists believe in the "big bang" theory of life creation, but the mechanism of new life development brings conflicts. Evolutionists believe that the cause of life on the planet is coincidental ... creationism - the theory of evolution is not the logic of Genesis 1: 1. "In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth." Faith: Religious Jews and Christians follow. These two religions believe that human beings, the rest of the earth, and the universe were originally created by creation, not evolution. This view on the origin of the earth is unique. Because it is the first faith to practice monotheism (believing in God)

Several philosophies that have emerged recently are most likely to break the conviction that we are definitely creative. Since my adolescence, I have witnessed witnessing that most people are generally converted to "humanitarian propositions" (HP) and the attraction to "creative hypothesis" (CH) is declining It was. I form my attitude and opinion based on observation and collective research. I call it "the ultimate collapse of creative perspectives". Hollywood, coupled with the proliferation of non-believers in our society - (USA), suffers from practical ideas that create shapes and shapes to some extent. People who push "scientific evidence" to the limit are often opponents of them. It is to assert absolute certainty, divine revelation, unshakable faith. Science is not that kind of thing. It is the creation of mankind. As with all human creations, it is full of uncertainty through our own values, politics, and assumptions. so. "Science is beyond culture, science has no value, if science says that science will give us a fair truth, they may not even know how wrong they are not. They may have attended too many math classes, but they do not have scientific history or philosophy. So now it seems like computer programmers who do their job and do not need to understand physics. However, like the physical constraint code, culture, value, and politics also restrict science. The whole Qur'an has hundreds of poems that describe creation and nature's miracles and call upon humans to regard them as a sign of God. Mankind has been explained and managed as an administrator on the planet (as in the case of the Jews and Christian Bibles). There are also many ban on koran and prophecy to not hurt useless, excessive, and other forms of creation. A prophecy says that it is forbidden to waste water even if it is immersed in a river. A balanced life and a gentle lifestyle are important Muslim principles that are proposed by most Muslim scholars, applicable to all aspects of life, including the care of the earth and any creation.

Since curiosity and exploration began, we have attributed all of our progress to a supernatural existence called "God". As science evolves, evidence suggests that the need for such existence is getting smaller and smaller, but religion still strives to keep the Bible in science. Due to their misunderstandings of science treating their beliefs in making stories as "real science" has bothed many people and stopped scientific exploration. Clearly, some people think creationism is a viable scientific model, but that does not meet the scientific requirements of the standard. Every culture creates a story of creation, in each case they not only help to define the sources of people - they help us reach our position as a society. The foundation of American creative stories is the pursuit of freedom, equality, and happiness. Like most ingenious stories, this story is authentic and part of myth. Because it is a month of black history, there are five truths here and too many people are hiding today. The first slave arrived here in 1619. Between 1619 and 1865, Virginia passed over 130 slavery laws to regulate black ownership. In the law of 1662, children of slave mothers are stipulated to be all slaves, regardless of their father's race and status, so you can not make free children with the rape of a white slave owner . According to the law of 1667, the slave who had converted to Christianity was still determined to be a slave. The law of 1669 allowed the slave to be killed to resist authority Two separate stories are the foundation of how the world was created. The first theory is evolution. Evolutionism says that we evolve over time and eventually become human beings. Creation says that God created us and everything is instantly created. Accept the evolution and creation of controversy that can end the world. Evolution is the first of two theories. Evolution is summarized as doctrinal of change. It is derived from Latin and means expansion. Evolutionism explains the belief that all living things come from early biological evolution. Evolution is in our side in many ways. Charles Darwin summarized the theory of evolution, but the theory of evolution has been on for a long time. (Patent, 16-19) Charles Darwin proposed evolution. According to Darwin's thesis, "The material world, the life of animals, even human beings are the product of progressive development, certain creations are denied at least implicitly" (Encarta's "Creation "). . The problem that "stubborn" Christians take most of the time to defend is the discussion of "World and watch". (Encarta "creation") According to science, the world began with a big explosion about 1.5 billion years ago, the planet and the sun began about 4600 years ago. Christians say that there is no way to figure out the length of the day. In Chapter 5 of Genesis, Adam was said to have a son of 187 years old and died when he was about 969 years old. The theory behind this is that God created the world in six long periods called "times". Each of these "times" has been going on for millions of years.

Creationism - the theory of evolution is not the logic of Genesis 1: 1. These two religions believe that human beings, the rest of the earth, and the universe were originally created by creation, not evolution. This view on the origin of the earth is unique as it is the first religion to practice monotheism (believing in God), and God created the universe alone. Evolutionism is considerably younger than religious beliefs of creation and creation. Prior to Charles Darwin, evolution was a devout idea, and God as a creator was believed to be widely accepted. However, since Darwin introduced his evolution theory a century and a half ago, discussion about theory and creation always existed. - It is a modest expression that claims almost no conflict in the realm of faith and reason. From the earliest stage of scientific exploration, these two areas of thought fell into a vicious circle and gave up as the religion gradually modernized to adapt to the new understanding of the universe. Creationism - the theory of evolution is not the logic of Genesis 1: 1. "In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth" These two religions believe that the human beings, the rest of the earth, and the universe were originally created by creation rather than evolution. This view on the origin of the earth is that it is the first religion to practice Monotheism (believing in God), ... in that the theory of evolutionary and creative evolution is a theory based on science and more detailed evidence It is unique. And creationism is a belief based theory. It is by no means a belief, it is a factor that influences ideas and theory supported by scientists. Therefore, you can not truly compare one; you need to choose what you think you are the truth at the same time. Since the beginning of human life there was always a confusion problem. Since the discovery of evolution, human creation has changed rapidly. Nevertheless, the world does not understand the theory and theory of evolution of Lord Charles Darwin for a while for a while. Prior to evolution, I believed that the upper class was called "sacred creature" by being influenced by the religious ideology of how human beings were created. However, the introduction of evolution theory used this theory as the foundation of biology and changed my mind.

Christians must choose between evolution and creationism. Discussions on evolution and creation have spread from the beginning. In fact, it is not as simple as these two opposite views. Everyone seems to be forming their own theory. When trying to find a match among these unique theories, this is a complicated and laborious job. However, many Christians think we need to find alternatives to the extremistic evolutionistic and creative view. In modern history, evolution was the focus of discussion between Christianity and science. Christian who accepted the literal interpretation of the scripture of creation by the Bible found that evolution of Darwin is incompatible with their interpretation of Christian faith. The creation of science or scientific creation is a division of Genesis and attempts to provide scientific support for the creation of Genesis Genesis and is a commonly accepted of the universe of the Earth's geological history, cosmology Try to refute scientific facts, theory and scientific paradigm. so. Early universe, chemical origin of life and evolution of life. It began as scientific evidence for the American fundamentalist Christian to prove the absolute nature and forgery of the Bible in the 1960 's. Since then, it has developed quite a religious follower in the United States, Genesis Science Division is branching all over the world. Does Christians have to choose between evolution and creationism? Discussions on evolution and creation have spread from the beginning. In fact, it is not as simple as these two opposite views. Everyone seems to be forming their own theory. When trying to find a match among these unique theories, this is a complicated and laborious job. But many believe that Christians need to discover another option ... the argument between evolution and creative evolution and creationism is the 1859 Darwinian seeds that lay the foundation for life evolution It dates back to the announcement of the origin of. Understanding scientists continue to find more evidence to support Darwin's conclusion; organisms are produced by a common ancestor modified by the natural selection mechanism, leading to the evolution of the species into the environment.

Science magazine records evolutionary creation controversy since publication in 1880. The reference number per year indicates the severity of the public debate. Peaks occurred in the Scopes test (1925) and California states (1979-1981), Arkansas state (1981), and Louisiana (1982-1987) tests. Evolutionists directly win the latest three, public opinion mainly supports science with a scope trial, but in a recent case the disagreement of the opinion of the Supreme Court promoted a new creative activity - the intelligent design movement It seems. In the last century and a quarter of a century the argument changed slightly. The fundamentalism of teaching evolution is still very strong. Scientists have always proposed better education as a means of solving conflict, but so far the evidence does not support this position. The difference between science and fundamentalism seems to be conflicting, and hot arguments have no obvious end. In the early 1980s, the Louisiana Legislature passed a law called "Balanced Cure Treatment - Science and Evolution - Science Act". This law calls for not teaching evolution theory or creationism but also teaching creationism when teaching evolution theory. Creationists actively encouraged the law and believed that the act was about the academic freedom of faculty and the argument that the state supported the bill. The lower court ruled that the actual purpose of the country is to promote the creation of scientific religious teachings, but the state appealed to the Supreme Court. Does legislation in Louisiana state take a balanced approach to creating science and evolutionary science in violation of the founding provision of the first amendment? Louisiana State Council founded Louisiana State Balance Treatment Creation for Public School Education Act - Science and Evolution - Science. This law prohibits education of evolution theory and "creative science" theory in public elementary and junior high schools unless accompanied by other theoretical guidance. building Evolution theory and evolution theory are facts explaining theory. Creationism is a myth that explains facts. Evolutionism is proved by facts, creationism is a story about facts. While there has always been discussion between science and religion, it is interesting to understand that science creates the fact that all creationists (religions) can do to demonstrate the theory of evolution theory. Therefore evolutionists provide evidence and creationists try to try other thinkers who challenge the Bible's hypothesis using Galileo, Copernicus, Bacon, Descartes, and empirically inferred scientific theory . The Catholic Church persecutes this ideology of creationism, calls it the heresy, and therefore has a troubling habit of suppressing the complete confusion of the Bible to some extent. For the next century, scientific research has evolved into the theory of big bang and evolution, although it is mainly such a place.

"In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth." It is the beginning of the Bible and the world to write in Genesis 1: 1. There is always a discussion on where we are, where we are in the future and in the future. According to Merriam - Webster 's online dictionary, evolution is defined as "the theory that different kinds of animals and plants are derived from other existing types, distinct differences are due to consecutive generation changes" . Everything comes from simple things and becomes more complicated as time goes by for natural choices. The theory of aging tends to adapt to the theory of macroscopic evolution of biology that is incompatible with the biblical and intentional creation - the creation of all living organisms by the direct institution of sovereignty. Macro evolution theory teaches that all life evolves from a single primitive cell. It happens in an accidental clash of atoms, a smart planner or creators do not coordinate the emergence of these species. People who like age theory are often linked to a position giving the basic premise of biological evolution such as the evolution of theology, but it is said that God leads the process of evolution rather than coincidence. Evolution is divided into micro evolution and macro evolution. The evolution type recorded above is microscopic evolution. The bigger change, such as when a new species is formed, is called macroscopic evolution. Some biologists think that the mechanism of macro evolution is different from the mechanism of change of micro evolution. Others believe that the difference between them is arbitrary - macroscopic evolution is cumulative microscopic evolution. The word evolution has many meanings. The fact that all living things are connected to common ancestry through lineage is often called evolution theory. The theory of how the first batch of organisms appeared was often called evolution theory. This should be called angiogenesis. People often use the term "evolution" to express natural choices - this is one of many mechanisms of evolution. Several Bible questions seem inherently scientific. The problem of creation and evolution is basically a scientific problem. maybe. Perhaps the Bible says to mention floods, and the sun still raises scientific problems. In fact, these are reliability issues. The real question is that the author of Genesis (an anonymous collector of any Hebrew folk tales) has good authority to create the earth in seven days, or he is just a common day of the day Do you repeat the fable? This enhances reliability rather than scientific problems. Does the gospel tell the true story? Did God really carve the Ten Commandments on Moses' stone? If so, that is God. One day, it was said that God is "to become light".

Religious discussions are often directed to the subject of origin in many cases. There are two reasons for this. First of all, some people literally or semi-literally interpreted the Bible (or other related Bible), and they still believe the world looked almost like the past. . Obviously, this problem must be solved before the existence and nature of God begins to be discussed. Second, even those with a more general and nonverbal interpretation of the story often use invalid arguments and insist on directly interfering with God in one or more points of the past. Biblical Creationism: Genesis is a religious belief that the universe and life are "derived from the specific behavior of God's creation". For young Earth creationists, this includes the Biblical interpretation of the stories of Genesis and the refusal of scientific evolution. A state or fact that racist tribalism is organized in tribe or tribe. Strongly faithful behavior and attitude towards your tribe and social group: Prejudice, discrimination, or conflict against various races based on the belief that your race is excellent. Whether the unique features and abilities of the race are superior to or superior to other races and other races in particular All thoughts on the origin, assumption and theory of humanity have rights to life and have their supporters. However, regardless of the scientific point of view, the Bible creates the world, and humans are the most important to people. God's idea of ​​creating human beings is the foundation of religion and religion of millions of people, the basis of their ideology, and their perception of the existence of all humans. In Aristotle's metaphysics, he discussed the theory of his origin. Aristotle's theory must be distinguished from creationism. The word "creation" means the thought of the Bible. Because Aristotle is not familiar with the texts of the Bible, he does not understand the concept of "creation" in the sense of the Bible. Instead, he is more interested in the "origins" of the world. Aristotle believes that there are three kinds of substances before the concept of time, two of which are physical, one of which is immovable. It can be said that these three substances are "sensible eternal", the second substance is "sensitive and fragile", and the third substance is immovable. As the theory advances further, sensitive and perishable substances can be regarded as substances and eternal rational substances can be regarded as potential substances Animals can be regarded as metaphysical and belong to another science I will. According to Aristotle, animals are not gods.

Ineffectiveness of Genesis I was interested in science, especially natural science, for children. They are always very fond of me. That's why I am a curious child, so I have read a lot of books on paleontology, archeology, geology. In the meantime, parents were deeply involved in the church. They are just graduating from the seminary and they are considering starting their own ministry. Of course this caused my confrontation. & Lt; Tab / & gt; The original theory of Genesis evolved into a variety of creationisms. These theories are divided into four less specific theoretical categories in the article of the University of Wisconsin at Milwaukee. Gap theory "In the first theory, the text of the Bible literally means that the earth was created within 6 days, this theory is also known as the young earth creation theory. How is the Earth formed? This is a problem that has plagued human beings for many years. There are two main theories that explain how the Earth is formed. These are the theory of evolution, creationism, religion theory. Creationism can be divided into various groups. The most accepted creationism is one of the Bible creationists. The creation and evolution of the Bible are very different, there is an indication of its authenticity. In the theory of evolution, life is thought to be produced only by the process of nature. This theory suggests that in the past there was an extended stability period that ended with mass extinction, and new species suddenly appeared. This process occurs without supernatural forces or spiritual intervention. Almost all contemporary scientists who are not evangelical Christians believe in evolution theory Evolution and Creativity: Theoretical Evolution - This theory is mainly for countering supernatural creationism. As its name suggests, the theory of evolution is "early stage development" (Corey 2). It is "a process that causes genetic change of a group beyond generations" (Corey 2). The scientific community thinks that "biological evolution is a change in the nature of an organism beyond the life of an individual" (Corey 3)

A long list of arguments by Ernst Meyer - the challenge of creationism and evolution The socially accepted order always brings waves of criticism and contempt. In Ernst-Meyer's "long list of arguments," he is concerned with the forefront of the argument that aggressively argued that his predecessors have been hotly discussing over the years that humans are not created by the creation of God Looking at the discussion, but animals in a state that is constantly changing. A better way, the name of the biologist Ernst Mayer (Ernst Mayer), seeking Darwin's attempt to understand the process of human evolution, not only explores Darwin's theory but also explains to some extent by humans Not only beliefs that higher organisms make up. d Plato was called biologist Ernst-Meyer "Great anti-hero of evolution" because he also insists on belief in essentialism, which is known in the form of a theory. This theory holds that observing objects of any natural type in the world is incomplete in ideal form or "seed" representation that defines this type. So, for example, in his Timaeu ​​seconds, Plato, because of the character ...... jealousy, he is expecting ", Demiourgos created within, the universe, all because it is good You are talking as well as yourself everything they may be. It must be included Because they are not included, the universe becomes incomplete without them ... ... "So the creator has created all the possible forms of life" All potential life forms are essential to create perfect ideas - all kinds of animals, it is "this In order to enrich the principle of '' if it is complete it has greatly influenced Christian thought A long list of arguments by Ernst Meyer - the challenge of creationism and evolution The socially accepted order always brings waves of criticism and contempt. In Ernst-Meyer's "long list of arguments," he is concerned with the forefront of the argument that aggressively argued that his predecessors have been hotly discussing over the years that humans are not created by the creation of God Looking at the discussion, but animals in a state that is constantly changing. A better way, the name of the biologist Ernst Mayer (Ernst Mayer), seeking Darwin's attempt to understand the process of human evolution, not only explores Darwin's theory but also explains to some extent by humans Not only beliefs that higher organisms make up. d Evolutionary biologist Ernst-Meyer, influenced by German biologist Bern Hard-Lensch work, shows the influence of local environmental factors of species closely related to the geographical distribution of the subspecies. Meyer worked, follow-up "The origin of taxonomy and species" Dobzhansky-made book was published in 1942 and the book emphasizes the importance of alien species in the formation of new species formation. This form of speciation occurs after the development of the reproductive isolation mechanism has occurred following the geographical isolation of the subpopulation. Meyer also developed the concept of species and defined species as a hybrid or potential hybrid population isolated from all other populations.

Creationism does not exist in public schools. The ongoing conflict is about the technology that public children 's children create for humanity. Many religious leaders and believers want to teach children the creationism of the Bible, not scientific evolution. This idea violates the first amendment, is nearly impossible to do, and will hinder further expansion of children's thinking. Creation in the creation of public schools The question of whether to teach creation in public schools is a very emotional and complex problem. It can be seen from several different perspectives, its effect is one of them. Despite the lack of evidence to support the fundamental idea of ​​Genesis, this alone is not enough to exclude them from the public school curriculum of the United States. The problem goes beyond survival far beyond other activities. In 1859, Charles Darwin announced the origin of the species and since that time people have discussed between creationism and evolution theory. Evolution is supported only by various religious works, especially the Bible. Creationists believe in the Holy Creator, God. Creationism has a wide range of beliefs, including relying on the magical work of God to explain the universe, life, and various kinds of origins. Creationism does not exist in public schools. The ongoing conflict is about the technology that public children 's children create for humanity. Many religious leaders and believers want to teach children the creationism of the Bible, not scientific evolution. This idea violates the first fix, it is almost impossible to do, it will prevent further expansion.

Introduction to the creation and evolution of school professors: Evolutionary and creative education in public school systems is controversial. Charles Darwin announced his evolutionary conclusion in 1859. This dramatically changed the professor's science in the public school system (Armenta, 1). Several cases were brought up for evolutionary guidance. The ban on religious conservative legislators is placed in equal treatment of evolutionary theory with evolutionary professors with creationism and intelligent design (Anmenta, 1). Individuals believe in creation, some believe in evolution, others are uncertain (Morris Henry). Some people argue whether it is necessary to teach evolution and creation at school. Others feel that creation is not a sufficiently effective idea, but they actually teach to young people. Regarding this issue, there have been many discussions and controversies over the years. This is because people have a strong emotion about this topic and their beliefs. According to abundant sources such as surveys, articles and case studies, many people around the world are trying to explain the origins of the universe and hope to teach evolution and creation. Introduction to the creation and evolution of school professors: Evolutionary and creative education in public school systems is controversial. Charles Darwin announced his evolutionary conclusion in 1859. This dramatically changed the professor's science in the public school system (Armenta, 1). Several cases were brought up for evolutionary guidance. The ban on religious conservative legislators is placed in equal treatment of evolutionary theory with evolutionary professors with creationism and intelligent design (Anmenta, 1). Creationsim vs. Evolution For a long time school administrators, teachers, parents and even students have opposed the creation and evolution of professors. Many public schools have inherited evolution because scientific methods and support are scientific theories as human beings. Many religions present different views on how human beings we know are created. We believe that these people can inherit the winds of Jerome Lawrence and Robert Lee. Trial, controversy creation and evolutionary argument. There are many characters with brilliant and powerful personality. This includes Matthew Harrison Brady and Henry Drummond. All of these influential people are strong, but not everyone has the same power for themselves, not just for others. Matthew Harrison Brady is a very strongly respected person

School evolution, intelligent design, and creative human nature are intrinsically intriguing. Science proves this unique characteristic that most people feel at least to some extent. Science is an art asking the reason. Why does the moon look like a perfect circle, semicircle, or disappearing together? Why do they fall on the ground when they fall? Why can a chair support human resistance to pulling human strength. Why the chair keeps its shape, water represents the shape of its container, but keeps the same amount, and perfume seems to fill the whole room. Intelligent Design vs. Evolution is a new high risk game. Intelligent design is a theological answer to mainstream science, Darwin's evolution is an atheistic creation story. Intelligent design allows meaning and purpose, but evolution is a story that achieves everything through a step-wise and unguided process of random change and adaptation. Almost every article or television program that covers every aspect of nature, from chimpanzee diet to human dream today, must mention "our evolutionary heritage". More importantly, these phenomena have adversely affected Darwin's health condition. Homosexuality and altruism are increasingly retroactive to some evolutionary advantages. As a researcher, writer, or philosopher, he has to pay homage to Darwin, no matter how fragile he is with Darwin. High school teachers are struggling to teach evolution. Sometimes they are obliged to teach the creation of "science", "intelligent design theory" and "evidence for evolution", and sometimes they are being pressured to forget the evolution of the professor. What should the teacher do? Legally speaking, what does teacher do and can not do? The part of "should" is easy. Both teachers and scientists say "teach evolution". (See the NAS website "Teach about the essence of evolution and science" or the National Biology Teachers Association and the National Science Teachers Association.) As a famous geneticist, Theodosius Dobshanski once said: Because it is a proven theory evolution should be taught in school. Evidence is included in lawsuits on public school evolution and creationism. A creationist or a person who believes in intelligent design, "All evidence that tends to ruin evolution is proof of intelligent design ... proof of design" (Evolution, Creationism ...) intelligent design People who advocate can not provide facts and evidence, but simply try to fix evolution. If the teacher no longer tells the theory of evolution, biology will cease to exist. It is impossible to get rid of the theory of evolution because "Revolution is focused on the core theory of biology" (evolution theory, creationism ...). Evolutionism explains the origins of fossils and life. God believes in higher existence or evolution, but the belief that all things are created should be personal beliefs.

Creation stories of Genesis deal with similar topics, but they have different perspectives and focus on the basic principles of creative process. The first story is focused on the creation of God throughout the universe. Essentially, he imposes order in disarray: "There is neither a shape nor a hole in the earth; the darkness is deep" (Genesis 1: 2, King James). From this primitive state, he draws various aspects of the universe from midday to night, men and women. Since the early twentieth century, creationists and evolution theorists have discussed the legal status of creation and evolution doctrine in public school science classes. Creation - evolution is a controversy in the court system about the origins of the earth, humans, life, the universe. Both views contradict and are causing deadlock in chess judicial games. Advocates of creative science are working to teach the creation of the Bible versions as a science with evolutionary theory at US public schools and they cast doubt on this. Arkansas passed a law requiring professors to be creative at public schools. In 1981, the law was ruled as unconstitutional by federal judges who declared creationism inherently religious. A similar Louisiana law was knocked down in 1982. In their defense, creationists argue that evolution is not a fact, it is just a theory. On the other hand, some scientists such as Carl Sagan argue that evolution is fact, not theory. Stephen Jay Gould claims that evolution is a fact and a theory. It is true that this evolution happens; the mechanism by which it occurs is theoretical. Creationism and classroom American classrooms have big flaws. Science curriculum supports evolution without other theories about how the universe exists. This narrow approach is preventing many young people from seeing vast pictures of the world. As it is important for the progress of modern science, scientific creationism should be incorporated into the curriculum of our public schools. Duane Gish has a doctorate. In biochemistry

The 1920 Scope Trial is also known as a "monkey trial", a legal conflict between Tennessee and Scope, a very popular legal controversy between evolutionism and creationism, the 1920s Played a role in the formation of. Important role. If it does not exceed the actual outcome of the dispute, it is a similar interpretation of the case. This case has attracted worldwide attention and media coverage is producing various opinions around the world. One of the main factors that widespread attention in such noncritical towns has been the beginning of the testing phase. Range Monkey Trials One of the most famous attempts in our history is John Scopes. Scopes was a high school teacher at Dayton, Tennessee and was arrested for teaching evolution in high school biology lessons. In the 1920s, in Tennessee province, except for creationism written in the Bible, all breaches of law were the same. These laws are the result of a strong fundamentalist movement in the United States. - ... With scientific rationality we can establish a scientific way to investigate the surrounding world. The world and the universe where we live are far beyond the complexity of the creation of our world through the creation of God. Dr. Kenneth Miller is a scientist who also believes in God and in an interview with NOVA discusses why evolution is a more reliable explanation for creating our world than creationism. Advocates of creative science are working to teach the creation of the Bible versions as a science with evolutionary theory at US public schools and they cast doubt on this. Arkansas passed a law requiring professors to be creative at public schools. In 1981 the law was ruled unconstitutional by federal judges who declared creationism essentially religious. A similar Louisiana law was knocked down in 1982. In their defense, creationists argue that evolution is not a fact, it is just a theory. On the other hand, some scientists such as Carl Sagan argue that evolution is fact, not theory. Stephen Jay Gould claims that evolution is a fact and a theory. It is true that this evolution happens; the mechanism by which it occurs is theoretical.

Table of Contents III Introduction 1 Historical Evolution 1 Theoretical Evolution 1 Old Earth Creation Theory 1 Young Earth Creation Theory 2 COPERNICAN Principle 2 Evolution 2 Discussion of the Young Earth and Earth Creation Theory 3 Personal Perspective 4 Conclusion 4 References 5 Introduction Evolution theory It has existed. There are many creationisms of old and young Earth. In this article I will explain these theories and arguments. Atheistic Evolution Atheistic evolution can be defined as a belief that everything is created without a supernatural phenomenon (God). The first scientific and earth historical view we discuss is a recent or literal view. This position is often called scientific creationism, creative science, or young earth creationism. Young Earth creationists believe that the Earth and the Universe are just tens of thousands of years old, and Genesis gives us a brief explanation of God's creative activities. The second position, progressive creationism or old creationism thinks that the earth and the universe have billions of years of history. Progressive creationists, however, believe that God created certain (innocent) innocence in the history of the earth for billions of years. They do not believe that the era of Genesis is pointing to 24 hours, but a long-term indefinite day. As a ministry, GotQuestions.org officially adheres to the young Earth creationism. We truly and completely believe that the creationism of the young earth fits best to the Biblical account of creation. However, we recognize that the former Earth creation is an effective view that Christians can hold. In any way, it should not be regarded as a heresy of the earth creationism of the past, in any way, an old earth creationist is not a brother and sister of Christ. Our view is always suited to the challenge and it inspires us to find more Bible to confirm that our faith is consistent with the Bible.

One of the most common problems in anthropology is "Where does man come from?" But the two main theories are literary creationism and theological evolution. Literary creation is the concept of creation in literature 24 hours, 6 days. Theoretical evolution means that God creates a basic framework for the existence of humans and living things, and then the process of evolution takes over to form life. Theological evolution theory, theological evolution theory, the evolutionistic creationism theory, or the evolutionary theory driven by God all considers God's religious teachings to be compatible with the scientific understanding of modern biological evolution. The evolution of theology itself is not a scientific theory, it is a series of ideas on how general evolutionary science relates to religious beliefs, and it is in stark contrast to special creative ideas. Advocates of theological evolution theory usually make evolutionist ideas consistent with belief in God and reject contradictory arguments about religious-science relations. Theory of Evolution Theory (TE), also known as evolutionary creationism - The idea of ​​God's creation is to skillfully design the universe where everything evolves naturally. Normally, "evolution" in "theoretical evolution" means evolution by complete evolution - astronomical evolution (forming the galaxy, the solar system, etc.) and geological evolution (forming the geology of the earth) and chemical evolution ) Biological evolution (for the development of life) - but it can only refer to biological evolution To explain how the world is formed, three major theories are proposed. They are creationism, theological evolution and naturalistic (biological) evolution. The evolution of creationism and naturalism provides a diametrically opposite view and the evolution of theology attempts to blend the two. People who claim creationism believe that God created the world represented by the Bible Genesis. Creationism firmly believes that the earth is less than 10,000 years old. Modern creative scientists can be divided into various groups by the interpretation of Hebrew "yom" (day). They are convinced that the creation story of Genesis is accurate and that the whole universe and all forms of life are created by God. It continues to be the most widely accepted theory of the public There are many kinds of creationism. It ranges from the most severe Biblical textualism, the history of the earth, of only a few thousand years, to the priesthoodism of the Catholic Church. The doctrine accepts the evidence that the earth has existed for millions of years, and this evolution can explain much of its history, not the creation of a human soul. Between these extremes are young Earths and old Earth creationists who differ in details on the age of the earth and how God created life.

Advocates of intelligent design also use it to point out the gap of evolution. They believe that evolution does not introduce intelligent designers by themselves, so they can not do the truth. In other words, intelligent design is a religious-centered theory. If intelligent design is inherently unscientific and devout, if you want to teach this theological idea in science courses, give all other theological ideas. Most intelligent design supporters suggest that there is only one author or smart designer. In other words, it is monotheistic creator. High school teachers are struggling to teach evolution. Sometimes they are obliged to teach the creation of "science", "intelligent design theory" and "evidence for evolution", and sometimes they are being pressured to forget the evolution of the professor. What should the teacher do? Legally speaking, what does teacher do and can not do? The part of "should" is easy. Both teachers and scientists say "teach evolution". (See the NAS website "Teach about the essence of evolution and science" or the National Biology Teachers Association and the National Science Teachers Association.) As a famous geneticist, Theodosius Dobshanski once said: An overview of the creation and evolution of school professors: evolutionary and creative education in the public school system is controversial. Charles Darwin announced his evolutionary conclusion in 1859. This dramatically changed the science of education in public school systems (Armenta, 1). Several lawsuits have been filed for evolutionary education. - Discussion between evolutionism and creative evolutionism and creationism has been on for a long time. When Charles Darwin proposed the origin of species in 1859, this was when the discussion began completely. The first discussion on evolution and creation in litigation took place in a 1925 trial. Evolution has been removed from textbooks and courses. Evolution began to infiltrate textbooks in 1987 The idea of ​​the evolution of school system education has caused widespread discussion. Liberals tend to teach evolution theory. This is about human development and Darwinism. Because they support public schools, because these schools do not teach God and its creation through Adam and Eve. Their goal is to concentrate on science. I support both sides' ideas, but if I choose I will conservatively say. This is because I think that people should not choose a particular school district. If the student is classified as a non credit school or does not provide the necessary course, the student must not settle on this. If families do not agree with the teaching of creation, they do not need to attend private Christian schools or private schools. All families need access to vouchers, but there is a limit to getting the best education.

There are a lot of controversies in the courtroom and over the years as to whether smart design should be taught in the evolution of public schools. Intelligent design is a concept of change of nature, not a random process, but guides need to lead to reasons that nature is like today. In most cases, the concrete guidance is God. God created a deliberate world. Creationism and intellectual design are the same idea, I believe that nature is created by the existence of God, God. Because it is a proven theory evolution should be taught in school. Evidence is included in lawsuits on public school evolution and creationism. A creationist or a person who believes in intelligent design, "All evidence that tends to ruin evolution is proof of intelligent design ... proof of design" (Evolution, Creationism ...) intelligent design People who advocate can not provide facts and evidence, but simply try to fix evolution. If the teacher no longer tells the theory of evolution, biology will cease to exist. It is impossible to get rid of the theory of evolution because "Revolution is focused on the core theory of biology" (evolution theory, creationism ...). Evolutionism explains the origins of fossils and life. God believes in higher existence or evolution, but the belief that all things are created should be personal beliefs. The main argument today about teaching creation at public schools is that Genesis is a scientific theory to be taught with evolution theory. Public schools teach combatants who oppose creationism and it is a bad science to create science and people believe that it is a violation of the separation between church and state. Advocates of creative science are organizations known collectively as new Christian rights, such as Creative Research Institute. On the other hand, people opposed to the creation of science are usually freedom of scientists, educators and citizens (Grunes 466). An overview of the creation and evolution of school professors: evolutionary and creative education in the public school system is controversial. Charles Darwin announced his evolutionary conclusion in 1859. This dramatically changed the science of education in public school systems (Armenta, 1). Several lawsuits have been filed for evolutionary education. - Discussion between evolutionism and creative evolutionism and creationism has been on for a long time. When Charles Darwin proposed the origin of species in 1859, this was when the discussion began completely. The first discussion on evolution and creation in litigation took place in a 1925 trial. Evolution has been removed from textbooks and courses. Evolution began to infiltrate textbooks in 1987

Today's literary works have played a new role in the relationship between literature and religion. And that's pretty fashionable. As the two philosophies collided, rotated and evolved, the reader was treated as a book by Genetics Francis Collins' The Word of God. " An objection from Dawkins. "But there was no one who disagreed with Coty like Ahamed VP In his similar study of these worlds, Couty is the evidence of religious problems often overlooked by Christians, Muslims and Jews showed that. So then, what are the four models of his science and religion interaction? The first model is the conflict which is the most common model in the media. The conflict model assumes science and religion, claiming that a priori, science or religion is genuine, others are fake. In the field of evolution and creationism, this model is adopted in the field of evolution and creationism as creationists believe that science must be wrong in order not to comply with the reading of the Bible. The science of evolution is real, so it must be wrong. Everyone knows how I feel about this model, but like most people, let's say this war has quite a lot of incidental damage. Bad religion and bad science are there, and they are often expressed in discussions of "science and religion". But let's suppose the rest of this article is discussing true religion and true science. In this case, there is no incompatibility. So what do I mean when I say people are expecting too much science or too little religion? Science is very good at helping us discover how things in nature function. But there are some very important and very important issues that science can not answer. What is the purpose of my life? What happens when I die (if any)? Why is the world bad? Where did the concepts of good and evil, justice, compassion, love, and beauty come from? Of course, the most important things in raising a controversy are as follows. Why is there something rather than what is there?

The single sex school is worried about changing the classroom into a single sex classroom. This topic is important as it involves the development of national and educational systems. There are various arguments about single - sex schools that either support it or oppose the separation of two men and women. The single sex school will attract attention and will not achieve the same academic achievement and will not affect social life. First of all, supporters of a single sex school think that it will provide a better educational environment. Should a single sex school be banned? Do you want your child to study at a single sex school? Single sex school is a school for all students of same sex. There are many famous single sex schools in America such as Wellesley College, Smith College, Holyoke College. There are various problems in a society that likes a single sex school (sax, creationism does not hold for public schools) because many think that many people can receive better education than a coeducational environment. Fierce controversy. Ongoing conflict relates to providing technology for human creation to children in public schools. Many religious leaders and followers hope to teach the children the creationism of the Bible, not the evolution of science. This idea violates the first fix, it is almost impossible to do, it will prevent further expansion. The main purpose of this study was to investigate public opinion on single-sex education. Through cautious literature analysis, it is judged whether schools by gender are making a profitable contribution. Among concrete measures, the number of schools by gender is increasing, which corresponds to a limited number of studies on this subject at public elementary schools, indicating the need for further research Bednall, 1995). In particular, single sex education is on the rise after the abolition of controversial laws, which prohibit public schools funded by federal government from discriminating against children based on gender. The law emphasizes the need for investigations to inform stakeholders about the benefits of single-sex education compared to the educational system. Existing literature shows that there are many advantages for unisex education

Evolutionists and creationists can agree that the universe seems to be an attractive and surprising place of residence, although there are various perspectives on the origin of life. The argument that many people ask their own questions has already been raised, "Where did I come from?" The two ideas created by such questions come from evolution and creation. The creation of the Bible is against the evolutionist. In Genesis 1: 1, this verse says, "In the beginning God created heaven and earth". The origin of the earth, together with the birth of mankind, is one of the biggest and controversial issues between creationists and evolutionists. According to scientific theory, it is said that the universe is eternal and the Bible has a beginning. The official beginning has been proved; the problem is that when an accurate beginning begins, there is no time, space or problem. Christianity uses the Old Testament to describe the beginning of life. In 6 days, God created heaven, earth, sun, moon, water, animals, and finished at the end of mankind. Other major events such as Noah's flood happen in the life cycle of the earth, which explains the fossil distribution and the formation of the Earth's layer. St. Augustine of the hippopotamus (a Christian, later a member of Manichaea) regarded the Old Testament as nonsense There are two major groups of people trying to explain the creation of the earth, creationists and evolutionists. The first creationist in these groups believed in God, the Creator of God. The explanation of creationists is entirely based on the magical work of God. According to this view, spiritual existence is responsible for making everything exist. The theory of creationism is supported only through various religious works, especially the Bible. Whether figuratively, literally, the Bible is definitely an important literary work, but the age of the earth is only 10,000 years old and is considered not to support the validity of the theory of creationism.

Between 2000 and the past 2000, the Bible was at the heart of many controversial issues. People who are neither believers nor believers have argued whether this is a true god or a collection of stories and myths. At the forefront of this discussion is the occurrence of the problem. Many Christians believe that God literally created this world within four hours. Using this theory, they will say that the earth has a history of about 6000 years, but there are also a few people who believe in the old Earth. Faith in the creation of the universe proposed in Genesis. Creationism described in Genesis is a scientific story, and some creationists believe that Big Bang theory and evolution theory are wrong 1. Advocates of creative science are working to teach the creation of the Bible versions as a science with evolutionary theory at US public schools and they cast doubt on this. Arkansas passed a law requiring professors to be creative at public schools. In 1981 the law was ruled unconstitutional by federal judges who declared creationism essentially religious. A similar Louisiana law was knocked down in 1982 In Gould's paper, the validity of scientific theory, that is evolution, has been questioned by its disbelievers. On the contrary, creationist believes that scientific theory, evolution theory does not convey a clear explanation and is incomplete. "... theory" usually means "incomplete fact" - from fact to theory, hypothesis (Gould, 1 page) Creationists furthermore can not prove scientific theory, evolution is like an experiment It is argued that it can not be. Since scientific theory has been tested this way, evolution is not a fact. "If evolution is not the case, scientists can not even make a decision about this theory. Essay.com/Jacob Brosovsky's "Imaginative Tentacle" and Stephen Jay Gould's "Facts and Theory as Derivatives" Jacob Bronowski's "Imaginative Tentacle" and Stephen Jay Gould's "Facts and Derivatives as Theory"

The scientific concept of creation and the common problem of people in the Big Bang is the reason why things are like them. How is our world created? There are many different theories from various viewpoints. In this article, I will discuss the scientific outlook of creationism. The theory I will discuss is the Big Bang theory, which is the creation theory that is now accepted by most scientists, as an explanation of the origin of the universe. Big Bang's theory claims that the universe was once very compact, precise and hot. Faith in the creation of the universe proposed in Genesis. Creationism described in Genesis is a scientific story, and some creationists believe that Big Bang theory and evolution theory are wrong 1. Advocates of creative science are working to teach the creation of the Bible versions as a science with evolutionary theory at US public schools and they cast doubt on this. Arkansas passed a law requiring professors to be creative at public schools. In 1981 the law was ruled unconstitutional by federal judges who declared creationism essentially religious. A similar Louisiana law was knocked down in 1982 Genesis science is used by several creationists to express their belief that Genesis is a scientific description of the origin of the universe. Reading the Bible is like scientific text contradictory to Big Bang theory and evolution theory. "Creating scientists" says these theories are wrong, and the scientists claiming this theory do not know anything about the origin of the universe and the truth of life on Earth. One of the major leaders in the creation of science was the establishment of the Institute's Duane T. Gish. Gish is the realization of Evolution (San Diego, Calif.: Creation-Life Publishers, 1985) and Evolution which is a challenge to fossil record, Creation-Life Publishers, CA, 1978, San Diego, California. Another leader in this movement is Walter Brown at the Science Creation Center. Gish and Brown do not seem to understand the difference between fact and theory.

In cases related to constitutionality, separation of church and state frequently occurs. This intense fight since the establishment of the country touched the hearts of American citizens and faced the influence of the two most important public opinion of the country. Several teaching materials including religious content entered many public schools in the country but their comprehensiveness arises from their background and historical importance and is strongly supported by important evidence and literature It is. On December 20, 2005, Pennsylvania District Judge John E. Jones III issued a 130-page ruling (Kitzmiller v. Dover Regional School District), stating: Religious views are simply remarking of creationism, not scientific theory ... peer reviewed studies, data, publications do not support identity. "Science and creationism was prepared by a NAS committee to comply with the regulations passed by the Arkansas State Council and shortly thereafter Louisiana asked for teaching" creative science "along with the development of public schools. Decision of the Kitzmiller v.Dover Regional School District in December 2005 believes that advocates of controversy are promoting intelligent design and trying to weaken the teachings of evolution while promoting the American public while public Educational policy of schools that introduced creationism into school science curriculum Kitzmiller v. In the Dover Regional School District, ACLU represents a group of parents who challenge the teacher's request of a public school district and proposes a so-called "smart design" as an alternative to the development of the high school biology curriculum. In a nationally recognized decision, the district judge has decided that "intelligent design" is not science and education, but violates the "establishment provision" of the first revision. Donald Trump scares me everyday, so if he scares you, I have two demands. The first is to access the ACLU website and become a monthly donor. American Civil Liberties Union is an experienced, experienced and experienced organization. I can not imagine a better way to invest in the protection of our constitutional rights, even if a trump is not elected, so I still encourage you to support this organization. Kitzmiller v. The Dover Regional School District is the first direct challenge of the US Federal Court against the public school district and requires intelligent design as an alternative to evolution. Plaintiffs succeeded in thinking that Smart Design is a kind of creationism, so the Board of Education policy violated the enactment of the first revision of the US Constitution. Parents of eleven students in Dover, Pennsylvania claimed that the Board of Education needed to read aloud in a science class of ninth grade as the professor evolved, sued the Dover Regional School District. Plaintiffs were represented by the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), American Independent Church and State (AU), and Pepper Hamilton LLP. The National Science Education Center serves as a plaintiff consultant. Defendant represented by Thomas Moore Law Center

The purpose of this paper is not to prove the evolution of "Darwinism". Because the author is not to carry out the accomplishments already done by others, but to study some kind of thought trajectory among supporters of creation. In particular, they focused on some of the impossibilities of the 'design' ability of evolution. I refrain from defining individual concepts. Because they were explained before and far beyond my administration. Creation and Evolution Since the announcement of the origin of Darwinian origin in 1859, the United States has discussed evolution and creation. Recently, discussions on whether to incorporate creativity in the public school curriculum as a theoretical alternative or combined with evolutionary intensification have intensified this argument in the United States. When such unstable problems are discussed, other problems are raised ... denying this fact, the world will not develop. Evolution theory can be verified compared to creationism. Because of the theory, evidence, and increased acceptance in today's society. In order to discuss the absolute nature of evolution, we must fully understand the history of this groundbreaking knowledge. Evolution is often described as a long-term change. Scientists generally believe that the evolution of the world has led to several theories. Creationism and evolution This article focuses on the big controversy between creationism and evolution. I am going to take two opposite views on this subject. First, the discussion focused on the reasons many believe that God created the universe and all living things. On the other hand, scientific information will be provided to confirm the evidence for the existence of God. This kind of evolutionistic creation argument has its roots ... evolution! Each organism comes from the theory of a smaller organism. A theory that claims that humans are from monkeys. This "theory" is what we teach children at school. When a child asks teachers about creationism, they will definitely get answers such as "I can not answer this question". Because schools are not allowed to teach religious subjects. I think the school thinks that evolution is the second best solution. I believe

Create or evolve. How the earth was formed. This is a problem that has plagued human beings for many years. There are two main theories that explain how the Earth is formed. These are the theory of evolution and creationism. Creationism can be divided into various groups. The most accepted creationism is one of the Bible creationists. The creation and evolution of the Bible are very different, there is an indication of its authenticity. In the theory of evolution, life is thought to be produced only by the process of nature. Creationism and evolution This article focuses on the big controversy between creationism and evolution. I am going to take two opposite views on this subject. Initially, the discussion focused on why many people believe that God created the universe and all living creatures. On the other hand, scientific information will be provided to confirm the evidence for the existence of God. This kind of evolutionistic creation argument has its roots ... evolution! Each organism comes from the theory of a smaller organism. A theory that claims that humans are from monkeys. This "theory" is what we teach children at school. When a child asks teachers about creationism, they will definitely get answers such as "I can not answer this question". Because schools are not allowed to teach religious subjects. I think the school thinks that evolution is the second best solution. I believe Evolutionism is considerably younger than religious beliefs of creation and creation. Prior to Charles Darwin, evolution was a devout idea, and God as a creator was believed to be widely accepted. However, since Darwin introduced his evolution theory a century and a half ago, discussion about theory and creation always existed. - It is a modest expression that claims almost no conflict in the realm of faith and reason. From the earliest stage of scientific exploration, these two areas of thought fell into a vicious circle and gave up as the religion gradually modernized to adapt to the new understanding of the universe.

Genesis, the Gospel, and Evolution Theory Introduction Human beings have questioned about the origin and purpose on the earth. The Bible tells mankind that God created them and explained their purpose. But since the Renaissance, humanism has responded to questions about origin by naturalistic means and redefined science in the process. Most higher education institutions and many individuals explain the origin of human beings using natural evolution without considering the influence on beliefs. Theological evolution theory, theological evolution theory, the evolutionistic creationism theory, or the evolutionary theory driven by God all considers God's religious teachings to be compatible with the scientific understanding of modern biological evolution. The evolution of theology itself is not a scientific theory, it is a series of ideas on how general evolutionary science relates to religious beliefs, and it is in stark contrast to special creative ideas. Advocates of theological evolution theory usually make evolutionist ideas consistent with belief in God and reject contradictory arguments about religious-science relations. Evolutionary creation is a term that is rarely used in the development of theology and in general some or all of the classical religious teachings on God and creation are part of modern scientific understanding of biological evolution It is considered to be compatible with all. Evolution of theology is not a theory in the scientific sense but a special view on how evolutionary science relates to a specific religious interpretation. Gap creationism is also known as a specific set of Christian beliefs about restoration creationism or destruction and reconstruction, the creation of the universe and the origin of mankind. It is widely believed that the concept of gap theory was enacted in the early 19th century by William Buckland and Thomas Chalmer, but some believers can go back to the Bible days. It became very popular when it was advertised by the Scofield Reference Bible in 1909. Recently, due to the acceptance of several major evangelical pastors and theologians, the evolution of theology has become increasingly common. They argued that Genesis 1 did not mention the six normal creation days and that the floods recorded in Genesis 6 - 8 were local events rather than global events Let's see. In addition, they will say that God used evolution to create everything that once lived on the earth. An important aspect of theological evolution is to insist that they have human or human creatures on Earth, as well as Adam, Eve, Cain, Abel. One of their observations on Genesis 4 was another existence when Cain killed Abel. They say that these people are witnesses of Cain and other people who evolved with Abel.

Discussions on creation and evolution about how to create a planet has been a constant battle for many years. I really know who has the really universe, or whether it is the final result of a single atomic big bang. According to Webster's 9th New University Dictionary definition, creation is "an act of making the world an orderly existence" (Webster, 304). This seems to mean immediate action, the world just appeared, and it suddenly existed. One argument against creationism is evolution, which is defined as the theory that different types of plants and animals arise from other existing types and differences. Creationism and evolution This article focuses on the big controversy between creationism and evolution. I am going to take two opposite views on this subject. Initially, the discussion focused on why many people believe that God created the universe and all living creatures. On the other hand, scientific information will be provided to confirm the evidence for the existence of God. This kind of evolutionistic creation argument has its roots ... evolution! Each organism comes from the theory of a smaller organism. A theory that claims that humans are from monkeys. This "theory" is what we teach children at school. When a child asks teachers about creationism, they will definitely get answers such as "I can not answer this question". Because schools are not allowed to teach religious subjects. I think the school thinks that evolution is the second best solution. I believe Creation and Evolution Since the announcement of the origin of Darwinian origin in 1859, the United States has discussed evolution and creation. Recently, discussions on whether to incorporate creativity in the public school curriculum as a theoretical alternative or combined with evolutionary intensification have intensified this argument in the United States. When such unstable problems are discussed, other problems are raised ... denying this fact, the world will not develop. Evolution theory can be verified compared to creationism. Because of the theory, evidence, and increased acceptance in today's society. In order to discuss the absolute nature of evolution, we must fully understand the history of this groundbreaking knowledge. Evolution is often described as a long-term change. Scientists generally believe that the evolution of the world has led to several theories.

Evolution and creativity create a way to create planets. There are several different answers to this question. One is from a religious point of view, comes from the Bible. The other comes from the scientific world and is based on evidence which came into the last century. Evolutionism is directly contradictory to another theory that existed for thousands of years, creationism. Evolution argues that humans have evolved from monkeys for thousands of years. The Midwest Center of the Innovation Center conducted a random phone survey asking "At public school, we just evolve, create, develop, create, evolve or just create"? . It means evolution only, 18.9% are created only, 64% are created and evolved, and 11% are not created. Bliss (1978) concluded, "Although these data are limited, they provide a fair and appropriate view of adults at public schools." Weinberg (1978) states as follows. The survey reflects the reality - as I believe - and those results are a tribute to the poor work we did in teaching evolution. " An overview of the creation and evolution of school professors: evolutionary and creative education in the public school system is controversial. Charles Darwin announced his evolutionary conclusion in 1859. This dramatically changed the science of education in public school systems (Armenta, 1). Several lawsuits have been filed for evolutionary education. - Discussion between evolutionism and creative evolutionism and creationism has been on for a long time. When Charles Darwin proposed the origin of species in 1859, this was when the discussion began completely. The first discussion on evolution and creation in litigation took place in a 1925 trial. Evolution has been removed from textbooks and courses. Evolution began to infiltrate textbooks in 1987

In this philosophical scientific research paper, I proceed as follows. First, I will explain the pros and cons of creation and evolution. Next, according to Saint Augustine and Charles Darwin, we will analyze the philosophical scientific reasons for this problem. Finally, I guess my results and give scientific advice. Many people have asked this question. Where are you from. According to the higher powers of creationists, or "God" created the universe. Some people think that "God" starts from space and shapes it. Creation and evolution There has been discussion between science and religion since the publication of the origin of Charles Darwin's species. Although scientists have proposed many theories about human origin and the creation of the earth, religious organizations have a major creationism based on the story of the Bible "Genesis". However, these theories are not the cause of the discussion. Because different theories are mere words of myth. I am going to take two opposite views on this subject. Initially, the discussion focused on why many people believe that God created the universe and all living creatures. On the other hand, scientific information will be provided to confirm the evidence for the existence of God. The objection to this type of evolutionary creationism has its roots Evolutionism is considerably younger than religious beliefs of creation and creation. Prior to Charles Darwin, evolution was a devout idea, and God as a creator was believed to be widely accepted. However, since Darwin introduced his evolution theory a century and a half ago, discussion about theory and creation always existed. - It is a modest expression that claims almost no conflict in the realm of faith and reason. From the earliest stage of scientific exploration, these two areas of thought fell into a vicious circle and gave up as the religion gradually modernized to adapt to the new understanding of the universe.

Most people are responsible for protecting the planet they live in. Everyone is aware that the earth is changing. Some people think that this is an immediate problem, others think that it is a cycle of life. Who is right? Biodiversity is diminished by human beings, or there is no problem with our planet. Biodiversity, a widespread ecosystem, is gradually being destroyed by humans; it is possible to solve this problem when humans maintain their lifestyle. Biodiversity is the biodiversity of the life on earth. Every life on earth has certain similarities. Every life on Earth requires water. It is the foundation of our biochemistry. Life on Earth uses carbon chemistry, also known as organic chemistry or biochemistry. Life is based on DNA and is an independent entity characterized by behavior, consumption, growth, response to stimuli, reproduction, death, and evolution (Serri, 2006). These listed attributes can be described as "Earth and Earth" as "Earth, etc." describes all lives on the earth. Old Earth Creationism is a transformation of the origins of the universe and the creative view of Earth's life. As a theory of origin, it is more consistent with the mainstream scientific ideas of the geology, the cosmology and the Earth's era and the younger earth creationism. Young Earth Creationism is a sort of religious belief that heavenly, earth and earthly life was created by God's direct actions from 6000 to 10,000 years ago. That believer is a Christian, a Jew, and a Muslim who believes that God created the earth in six hours and recorded the Hebrew Genesis as a written record. Young Earth Creation Theory (YEC) is creationism and the belief that the universe, the earth, and the earth's life are created by God's direct action 10,000 years ago. Its main believer is a Christian who consents to the literal interpretation of the creation of the story in the Bible's Genesis and believes that God created the earth within 60 hours. Compared with YEC, Old Earth Creation believes in the metaphorical interpretation of Genesis and the scientifically determined age of the Earth and the universe.

Evolution or creation In a coherent world like us people question their religion and they do not know whether to believe in God's creation or evolution. Through my research, I have found four possible answers to this question to combine the two theories. There is no proof or belief in it at the same time. One way is to believe that when God made the tree in 4004 BC, he will form a complete ring. The same is true for other plants, animals and minerals. Creationism and evolution This article focuses on the big controversy between creationism and evolution. I am going to take two opposite views on this subject. First, the discussion focused on the reasons many believe that God created the universe and all living things. On the other hand, scientific information will be provided to confirm the evidence for the existence of God. This kind of evolutionistic creation argument has its roots ... evolution! Each organism comes from the theory of a smaller organism. A theory that claims that humans are from monkeys. This "theory" is what we teach children at school. When a child asks teachers about creationism, they will definitely get answers such as "I can not answer this question". Because schools are not allowed to teach religious subjects. I think the school thinks that evolution is the second best solution. I believe Evolutionism is considerably younger than religious beliefs of creation and creation. Prior to Charles Darwin, evolution was a devout idea, and God as a creator was believed to be widely accepted. However, since Darwin introduced his evolution theory a century and a half ago, discussion about theory and creation always existed. - It is a modest expression that claims almost no conflict in the realm of faith and reason. From the earliest stage of scientific exploration, these two areas of thought fell into a vicious circle and gave up as the religion gradually modernized to adapt to the new understanding of the universe.

The Creation of the Universe and the Origin of Humans and New Species The Big Bang is the theory that the universe was created in a large explosion containing three gases. My first point is to ask where these three gases are. They are not only from their hometown. They need to have an origin, otherwise this theory is impossible. Another theory related to the Big Bang is Edwin Hubble 's theory that the universe is expanding and redshifted. Old Earth Creationism is a transformation of the origins of the universe and the creative view of Earth's life. As a theory of origin, it is more consistent with the mainstream scientific ideas of the geology, the cosmology and the Earth's era and the younger earth creationism. Young Earth Creationism is a sort of religious belief that heavenly, earth and earthly life was created by God's direct actions from 6000 to 10,000 years ago. That believer is a Christian, a Jew, and a Muslim who believes that God created the earth in six hours and recorded the Hebrew Genesis as a written record. There are some ideas, but society mainly discusses two of them. The first thought is that people were created by God when they created the universe. This is the concept of creationism. It is endorsed by many religious people. Creationism is supported by religion. The second way human beings can produce is through a process called evolution. Evolution is the theory advocated by scientists to explain the origin of all species. Both explanations are theoretical, so we can not prove them. When discussing creationism and evolution theory, this is a metaphor for eternal discussion about the origin of mankind. The question of how humans are present is one of the big controversies of this century. There is not enough evidence to support creationism, but there is little support for evolution. The controversy about the origin of life is still controversial. The origin of life can be thought of from the theory of evolution or creation. The argument is that teaching Genesis at a public school is wrong. Because people have many beliefs about how the earth is created. On this particular topic, many science teachers have different views. Some people think that they should teach their time at home, at church, or elsewhere instead of teaching at public schools. Other science teachers believe that students should learn all reliable theories of evolution and creation. Some science teachers encounter legal problems in order not to obey other teachers.

Creating Questions In most cases, poetry written by the same author shows similar themes. Authors usually focus on specific topics and ideas and are clearly stated in his work. Sometimes poets use every aspect of their lives as the basis of poetry. In William Blake's "The Lamb" and "The Tyger", the authors used similar themes in both. Black poetry often contains religious topics. "He is a liberal addict to God ... a Christian who hates the church." (Kazin, p. 3) In Black's "Lamb" he discusses many ideas that questioned creativity and religion. . And how do all creatures get their own characteristics? The two main theories that emerged over time were creationism and evolution, both of which provided a very clear answer to this problem. The foundation of creationism is the supernatural power, the creation of the whole universe, human thought, and the answer to many other creatures in which they live. However, Evolution thinks that every living thing changes over time and is likely to gradually become different from the new one. So Is it creation or evolution? This problem is more popular than ever. There are various theories about the creation of the earth and human development. The biggest problem is which one really applies. Scientists will tell you that the theory of evolution is how humans are created. Creationists and Christians will tell you that creationism is the way people create. Which group of people are correct? The Texas State Assembly has a bill to present a new set of guidelines for biological education ... research on creationism and evolution theory has been controversial argument for decades One side or the opposite side. Creationism believes that faith precedes science and should establish faith in the book, guidance of the Bible. God created everything on the earth and above, and it took six days. Evolutionists believe that the earth is much older than the Bible and plants, animals, and humans are the result of natural evolution called evolution. How will evolution and creation create the earth? There are several different answers to this question. One is from a religious point of view, comes from the Bible. The other comes from the scientific world and is based on evidence which came into the last century. Evolutionism is directly contradictory to another theory that existed for thousands of years, creationism. According to the theory of evolution, humans have evolved from monkeys for thousands of years.

Viewpoint of Creationists In all Western cultures, the term "creationism" or "creation" is automatically associated with Christianity and the Bible. In particular, it is related to the origin of the book, "Book of Genesis", which tells stories of creation. But this generalization does not evolve from their own point of view but ignores other believers who believe in the firmness of creation and as one of the Bible's "Genesis", less than 10,000 years ago I believe that we have created the universe in time shows the literal interpretation of the book. Old Earth Creationism is a transformation of the origins of the universe and the creative view of Earth's life. As a theory of origin, it is more consistent with the mainstream scientific ideas of the geology, the cosmology and the Earth's era and the younger earth creationism. Young Earth Creationism is a sort of religious belief that heavenly, earth and earthly life was created by God's direct actions from 6000 to 10,000 years ago. That believer is a Christian, a Jew, and a Muslim who believes that God created the earth in six hours and recorded the Hebrew Genesis as a written record. There are two major groups of people trying to explain the creation of the earth, creationists and evolutionists. The first creationist in these groups believed in God, the Creator of God. The explanation of creationists is entirely based on the magical work of God. According to this view, spiritual existence is responsible for making everything exist. The theory of creationism is supported only through various religious works, especially the Bible. Whether figuratively, literally, the Bible is definitely an important literary work, but the age of the earth is only 10,000 years old and is considered not to support the validity of the theory of creationism.

Throughout history, art has constantly changed. I think that there are four major eras of great progress in the evolution of art. First of all, I will talk about Baroque. This is dark and emotional and certainly reflects the political tension of that period. Next, I will talk about romanticism based on nature and the outdoors. This period also showed a brighter, happier, imaginative art work than before. Let's show how simple and easy the Impressionist's art works. In historical context creationism and evolution are always controversial subjects and are one of Darwin's major breakthroughs in disseminating his theory of evolution. When Darwin published his evolution theory in 1859, his book was thought of as a major technological advancement at the time. Since the existence of evolution compensates society, "evidence" like the existence of God creates a catalyst that does not exist, and creationism is almost replaced by atheism. Some of the theories of social evolution make technological innovation the most important determinant of social change. Technological advances such as smelting of iron, introduction of plows in agriculture, invention of steam engine, and computer development brought about long-term social impact. Changes in technology are often considered together with economic processes. These include the formation and expansion of markets, modification of property relations (change from relationship of feudal lord and farmer to relationship of contract owner and tenant, etc.), change of labor organization (change from independent craftworker to factory etc) included. The historical materialism proposed by Marx and Engels is one of the most prominent theories that dominates the economic process, but that is not the only theory. In fact, materialistic is opposite to Marxism. Not a sudden breakthrough but the idea of ​​changing the world tends to develop slowly. A good example is Darwin's natural selection theory. His notes show that he developed something close to evolution before reading his study on population growth in Malthus, before experiencing his epiphane. This made his theory mature. Carbon is fundamentally the foundation of all life on Earth, because it is excellent for binding with other atoms. This connection function may make the structure more complicated. Likewise, human innovation works better when something supports the formation of more complex ideas. This is why the network is the basis for exchanging information and ideas. Without contact, the high-level ideas will disappear with the person who owns it. However, building a connection with others can spread good ideas. That's why good ideas are added to the audience.

Implementation of counterfeit science, inexpensive science, and anomalous science varies. Over time, humans have seen the rise and fall of various scientific research fields. However, no one seems to have completely disappeared. Even today, the human view of the planet Earth, astrology, crop circle, ancient astronauts, and eternal movements are still supported. These are convincing examples of how humans can survive in all forms of reasoning without using subordinate evidence. Many evidence points out the simple fact that a single human brain itself can not design more intelligence than itself. This is a purely empirical statement: billions of people came and no one did this. Clearly, one human's wisdom can not design intelligence in his lifetime. However, these billions of brains who have accumulated knowledge for thousands of years and have developed external intelligence processes have performed system - civilization. The whole civilization is neither you, me nor an individual, it will produce superhuman AI. The process involving countless people is beyond the time scale we do not fully understand Although not through design, the level of human intelligence is obviously achievable. Indeed, direct design has proved to be an unlikely way to design very complex systems like our brains and future AIs. If appropriate, you can create an appropriate environment in the virtual world of the simulation and evolve AI independently. However, it avoids wasting resources and time at a much faster rate than biological evolution and some high level supervision. If you think that the human brain is merely organized, there is no obvious reason not to acquire intelligence by replicating such structures or systems to silicon or other artificial hosts. It also reduces the likelihood of getting close to a smart peak. As seen by special individuals in history, our cognitive aspects may develop in a very excellent way compared to normal humans. No Intelligent design theory empirically verifies whether most biologists "true design" is a true design (product of intelligence) or a product of an undirected process such as mere natural selection behavior It is an effort to do. Random change creation theory focuses on keeping the literal reading of Genesis, including the Earth created by the Bible God, usually thousands of years ago. Unlike creationism, the scientific theory of intelligent design is unknown to the source of design and there is no promise to protect Genesis, the Bible, and other scriptures. Honest intelligent design critics are aware of the difference between intelligent design and creationism. According to a doctor

School reforms are not new concepts and trends, and they continue to evolve since the establishment of our national education system. School reform aims to make the education system better; in fact, we will make our children more available to compete on a global scale. School reform that I decided to study was school education by gender. This is the idea that students' performance will improve if there are only students of the same sex in the classroom. I have only one (experimental) course: my 6th grade science class. A single sex school single sex school is hated by many people because they believe that when students graduate from a cooperative educational university or college they can not have opposite sex. This belief often also affects the idea of ​​separating by gender-specific schools, and many believe that these types of schools will promote separation of men and women. - Recent discussions focused on whether high school students' strategies should be adopted to achieve a successful educational system, they focus more on their research and are appropriate to eliminate every aspect We urge you to provide educational environment. It is an interruption. Implementing these strategies improves the quality of high school education and broadens the range of high scores Should a single sex school be banned? Do you want your child to study at a single sex school? Single sex school is a school for all students of same sex. There are many famous single sex schools in America such as Wellesley College, Smith College, Holyoke College. There are various problems in a society that likes a single sex school (sax, creationism does not hold for public schools) because many think that many people can receive better education than a coeducational environment. Fierce controversy. Ongoing conflict relates to providing technology for human creation to children in public schools. Many religious leaders and followers hope to teach the children the creationism of the Bible, not the evolution of science. This idea violates the first fix, it is almost impossible to do, it will prevent further expansion. There has been considerable anger in both the public and educational sectors in the past decade in both existing and proposed single sex schools, but there is little controversy in the single sex course of Mixed Sex School. One of the reasons is that in single elementary school, junior high school, junior high school, especially public school today, single sex course is somewhat rare. However, for a variety of reasons, some schools are considering or testing single sex courses.

Life - God or Evolution design. Life is truly designed, but someone or what is the center of controversy. Creationists think that it is a wise designer, God; evolutionists consider it a natural driving force, natural choice. When an organism has favorable survival characteristics, natural selection works for a time sufficient to breed, so it passes these characteristics to the next generation. Living organisms with weak traits will die from breeding and will disappear from the gene pool. Dawkins is opposed to the creativeistic interpretation of life in his previous work on evolution theory. The theme of The Blind Watchmaker, published in 1986, is that evolution can explain clear designs in nature. In "God's delusion" he focuses directly on the broader discussion used to support and oppose the existence of God (or God). Dawkins had long hoped to write a book that publicly criticizes religion, but his publisher suggested not to do so. By 2006, his publisher was warm with the idea. Dawkins attributed the change in this idea to the "four-year Bush" (he said "God ordered him to invade Iraq"). By that time, some writers, including Sam Harris and Christopher Hitchens, were writing "Book of Evil Trinity" by Robert Weitzel with Dawkins and publicly attacking religious books. Theory of Evolution Theory (TE), also known as evolutionary creationism - The idea of ​​God's creation is to skillfully design the universe where everything evolves naturally. Normally, "evolution" in "theoretical evolution" means evolution by complete evolution - astronomical evolution (forming the galaxy, the solar system, etc.) and geological evolution (forming the geology of the earth) and chemical evolution ) Biological evolution (for the development of life) - but it can only refer to biological evolution Theological evolution theory, theological evolution theory, the evolutionistic creationism theory, or the evolutionary theory driven by God all considers God's religious teachings to be compatible with the scientific understanding of modern biological evolution. The evolution of theology itself is not a scientific theory, it is a series of ideas on how general evolutionary science relates to religious beliefs, and it is in stark contrast to special creative ideas. Advocates of theological evolution theory usually make evolutionist ideas consistent with belief in God and reject contradictory arguments about religious-science relations.

Who or what made the universe? How did you start? As we have seen, did the universe always exist or did it suddenly start in some form? During the past century people have discovered that the universe is expanding and people want to know the reason. These are the questions Big Bang theory is trying to answer. Not everyone is completely convinced of all the details, but the Big Bang is the most widely accepted theory about the origin of our universe. According to Big Bang theory, the universe is said to begin with infinite small volume expansion of extremely high density and temperature. The Big Bang model is the best scientific model currently described about the origin of the universe. Please be aware that you are using the word "origin of the universe", not the word "creation of the universe". I believe in God, but the word creation has a theological significance. In a scientific context, I prefer to say "the origin of the universe". From a scientific point of view, the Big Bang is our best explanation so far. From a theological point of view, we have a religious outlook on the origin of the universe. We say that there is an ongoing process of creation as God maintains the universe with his will. From the Big Bang model, we can say that there is a beginning ... we have the age of the universe (about 14 billion years). This is pointing to the universe in the beginning. Therefore there is no contradiction between science and theology, which is considered to point to the universe. Old Earth Creationism is a transformation of the origins of the universe and the creative view of Earth's life. As a theory of origin, it is more consistent with the mainstream scientific ideas of the geology, the cosmology and the Earth's era and the younger earth creationism. Young Earth Creationism is a sort of religious belief that heavenly, earth and earthly life was created by God's direct actions from 6000 to 10,000 years ago. That believer is a Christian, a Jew, and a Muslim who believes that God created the earth in six hours and recorded the Hebrew Genesis as a written record. Religious cosmology is a way to explain the origins of the universe and to manage the principle or "order" of reality. In its simplest form, cosmology can be a story of origin, interpretation of history, the present situation, the future of a possible world, and the origins, spirit, divinity and power of people. The story of the origin of the ancient Greeks began with the creation of confusion. It was the first thing that existed. The dark god Erebus and the nightly representative Nixus were born in a mess. Nyx bore Aether (light) and Hemera (daytime). Hemera and Nyx caused alternate day and night phenomena to withdraw from the dark. Aether and Hemera then made Gaia, the mother of all lives, and created the gods of the sky, the mountains, the sea and ultimately the Pantheon. One of God, Prometheus formed men with mud and gave them gifts of fire. This origin story reflects many important cultural concepts.

The jury of Range Monkey Trial, held in a small court in Dayton, Tennessee, prepared for the "monkey" trial to return the case of the most controversial case of the 1920s. So far, the trial itself has become a sight of the media, lawyers, witnesses and even defendants are symbol of the commercial media of the 1920s. The trial itself was set as a media demonstration to challenge the constitutionality of the stewardship. This act prohibits the teaching of "any theory that denies the creation story of God taught by the Bible", in particular the theory of evolution. Civil liberties in the United States Scope test summary: On July 10, 1925 a range test (usually called a range evolution test or a range monkey test) was started. Defendant, John Thomas Scopes, a high school coach and a substitute teacher were accused of breaching the Butler law by teaching evolution in his class. The Butler's Law prohibits any professor denying the theory of the creation of the Bible. By teaching humans to be apes, descendants of evolution, the scope is condemned to break the law Range Monkey Trials One of the most famous attempts in our history is John Scopes. Scopes was a high school teacher at Dayton, Tennessee and was arrested for teaching evolution in high school biology lessons. In the 1920s, in Tennessee province, except for creationism written in the Bible, all breaches of law were the same. These laws are the result of a strong fundamentalist movement in the United States. - ... With scientific rationality we can establish a scientific way to investigate the surrounding world. The world and the universe where we live are far beyond the complexity of the creation of our world through the creation of God. Dr. Kenneth Miller is a scientist who also believes in God and in an interview with NOVA discusses why evolution is a more reliable explanation for creating our world than creationism. In 1925, a few months after Carrie's first trial, when the Tennessee teacher, John Scopes tried to evolve education in 1960, the country was fascinated by the famous "monkey" trial. This year's movie drama (based on the 1955 drama) has inherited the wind. What he remembers now is that the heroic struggle of science for superstition is also a discussion about biology textbooks defining eugenics. The range uses George Hunter's A Civic Biology including these paragraphs to promote eugenics:

February 12, 1809 - Charles Robert Darwin was born in Shrewsbury Hills. 1818 - Darwin enters Schoolbury school. From 18th October to 27th - 22nd, Darwin was hospitalized at the University of Edinburgh who studied medicine, but surgery (without anesthesia) and blood test started him from that profession. From 1827 until 15th October 1957, Darwin was allowed to prepare for the occupation of the church at the Christian College of the University of Cambridge. He accepted the conditions of faith. Summer of 1829 - Darwin and F. travel to Entomology in North Wales Charles Darwin's formal evolution theory is about the same as gravity theory or relativity theory. Unlike physics theory, biological theory, especially evolution theory, is considered long and difficult in social and political fields. Even today, elementary school does not evolve often. But evolution is the binding force of all biological research. This is the theme of unity. In paleontology, evolution organizes relics of past life and provides workers with effective ways to better understand the history of life. The history of common evolutionary thinking and paleontologic contributions is often beneficial for today's workers. Like other iterative processes, science derives a lot of resources from its history. In historical context, creationism and evolution are always controversial subjects and are one of Darwin's major breakthroughs in spreading his evolution theory. When Darwin published his evolution theory in 1859, his book was thought of as a major technological advancement at the time. As the existence of evolution theory offsets society, there is nothing to prove the existence of God, create a catalyst, creationism is almost replaced by atheism. Since the publication of Charles Darwin 's Origins of Origin, people have discussed creationism and evolution. By supporting facts and assertions, evolution is defended as more than just a theory, which shows that it is a fact. - Because he is made in the final state, a person can not evolve to another state. He is made according to the image and image of his father, so you do not need to evolve; therefore there is no sign of evolution from the beginning. Since sin entered the world, people have been fooled to believe that there is evolution Since the discovery of evolution, human creation has changed rapidly. Nevertheless, the world does not understand the theory and theory of evolution of Lord Charles Darwin for a while for a while. Prior to evolution, I believed that the upper class was called "sacred creature" by being influenced by the religious ideology of how human beings were created. However, the introduction of evolution theory used this theory as the foundation of biology and changed my mind.

Scope test, officially known as Tennessee and Scope, but given the nickname "Monkey trial" was considered a popular legal controversy between evolution and creationism in court, and in the 20th century The impact is immeasurable. The interpretation of the case is as popular as the actual outcome of the case, and even more. The worldwide attention and coverage received in this case led to a number of opinions. The viewpoint of the scholars includes explaining that this case is irrelevant and explaining it as "basin in American religious history" (Ronald L.). As the result of the "range monkey trial" was found to be only a victory of religious dogmatism, the only way for fundamentalists to stop progress in science is to hinder the progress of education. Therefore, to do this, they have joined forces with conservatives to promote a conservative agenda for the American education system, and some of the conservative agenda, as well as religious fundamentalism It is the doctrine. Many educational boards across the country have been captured by a conspiracy of Christian fundamentalism firmly organized to control nationwide education system. From the early 1980s to the present, the Board of Education became a board of education to become a religious fundamentalist conservative, promoting the agenda of mandatory neglect of scientific facts and scientific investigation methods. Scope test summary: On July 10, 1925 a range test (usually called a range evolution test or a range monkey test) was started. Defendant, John Thomas Scopes, a high school coach and a substitute teacher were accused of breaching the Butler law by teaching evolution in his class. The Butler's Law prohibits any professor denying the theory of the creation of the Bible. By teaching humans to be apes, descendants of evolution, the scope is condemned to break the law Range Monkey Trials One of the most famous attempts in our history is John Scopes. Scopes was a high school teacher at Dayton, Tennessee and was arrested for teaching evolution in high school biology lessons. In the 1920s, in Tennessee province, except for creationism written in the Bible, all breaches of law were the same. These laws are the result of a strong fundamentalist movement in the United States. - ... With scientific rationality we can establish a scientific way to investigate the surrounding world. The world and the universe where we live are far beyond the complexity of the creation of our world through the creation of God. Dr. Kenneth Miller is a scientist who also believes in God and in an interview with NOVA discusses why evolution is a more reliable explanation for creating our world than creationism.

The argument that human evolution is fact or fiction has existed for hundreds of years. Evidence of human origin has been found in many parts of the world, and these fossils have been proved to be human beings. Eurasia and Africa are included in the world. Even though fossils were discovered in Eurasia, the ancestor of Huminoidia of human beings dates back to the Miocene era 23 to 5 million years ago. Hominoidea is a superfamily that includes many species today, including jibbons, orangutans, gorillas, chimpanzees, humans. Evolution theory and evolution theory explain the fact. Creationism is a myth that explains the facts. Evolutionism is proved by facts, creationism is a story about facts. It is always interesting to learn about science and religion, but it is interesting to understand that science produces facts and that all creationists (religions) can be discussed through evolution theory. Therefore evolutionists provided evidence and creationists tried many other thinkers who used scientific theories empirically inferred to challenge Galileo, Copernicus, Bacon, Descartes, and the Biblical hypothesis I will try to. . The Catholic Church called this ideology of creationism as heresy and thus has a bad habit of suppressing complete disarray of the Bible to some extent. For centuries the scientific research has evolved into the theory of big bang and evolution, although it is mainly such a place. Summary: # 2 The evolution of mankind is always a myth for most people. However, researchers studying human evolution tried to find evidence explaining human evolution. Researchers Christophe Boesch and Hedwige Boesch-Achermann are observing a group of local chimpanzees since 1979 in the tropical rain forest of Cote d'Ivoire. The chimpanzee needs to be equipped according to the wild environment.

Experts came up with a variety of theories, such as life began with the sea, life started on land, and perhaps life did not start on the earth. In this article I will explain three more general theories. The first theory to be discussed is sperm motility theory. Panspermia's theory believes that life starts from the rest of the universe, not from the earth. This idea was first proposed by Fed Hoyle and Chandra Wickranasinghe in the 18th century. This theory seems reasonable to account for the occurrence of sudden life in such a short period of time. Old Earth Creationism is a transformation of the origins of the universe and the creative view of Earth's life. As a theory of origin, it is more consistent with the mainstream scientific ideas of the geology, the cosmology and the Earth's era and the younger earth creationism. Young Earth Creationism is a sort of religious belief that heavenly, earth and earthly life was created by God's direct actions from 6000 to 10,000 years ago. That believer is a Christian, a Jew, and a Muslim who believes that God created the earth in six hours and recorded the Hebrew Genesis as a written record. Is the most popular book wrong? Many people who read the Bible believe that they can only live on the ground by the power of God. I do not believe in the theory of evolution, but there are many people who believe in the power of God's creation. Creationism is a belief that God or God created all life and wisdom on the universe and the earth. According to the Bible, "God created heaven and earth in the beginning" (1: 1). Creationists think that God is the only person ... The problem raised is what is the controversy between creationism and evolution theory. 2004) may be displayed in some cases. Science can not absolutely prove or refute creation and evolution. However, scientists and other people in society use creationism and evolution theory to prove our existence. Creationists believe in the explanation of the origins of Christians in Genesis If we claim that life on the earth arises from the theory of the earth and it is formed quite early after it is formed, this origin (with a planet which is "physically entertain") is not an unlikely event maybe. Accepting evolution usually means that people take it as a matter of course that simple life can be complicated or at least not likely to be complicated at least. The rare earth hypothesis claims that complicated life actually developed on the earth requires "astrophysics and an impossible combination of geological events and the environment".

In the creation and evolutionary society, there are various problems that led to intense debate. There was always conflict between the scientific community and religious society. This theme happens to be creationism rather than evolution theory. Of course, the scientific community supports the theory of evolution, religious organizations strongly support creationism. This will be a continuing struggle between church and science, because neither party has solid evidence to support their view. Creation and Evolution "Creation and Evolution" Please read this question a couple of times to see what's wrong with this title. We have all heard of this argument. The idea of ​​Genesis, the idea that God created all the seeds emerging today, and the evolutionary theory, the evolution of all life from simple bacteria to all species emerging today, is a well-known argument. Since first announcing "evolution" with his 1859 controversial book "Origin", he published his book "The Origin of Natural Selection Seed" and proposed evolution. This book and other books have begun discussion for many years between evolutionist and creationist. Were we created by supernatural supernatural existence, or did our creation happen accidentally? Let's start with two inconsistent theories. The general usage of the word "evolution" is that our world creatures exist through a natural process without guides. Evolution theory and evolution theory explain the fact. Creationism is a myth that explains the facts. Evolutionism is proved by facts, creationism is a story about facts. It is always interesting to learn about science and religion, but it is interesting to understand that science produces facts and that all creationists (religions) can be discussed through evolution theory. Therefore, while evolutionists provide evidence, creationists try Galileo, Copernicus, Bacon, Descartes, and thinkers who challenge biblical hypotheses using empirically deduced scientific theory. . The Catholic Church called this ideology of creationism as heresy and thus has a bad habit of suppressing complete disarray of the Bible to some extent. For centuries the scientific research has evolved into the theory of big bang and evolution, although it is mainly such a place.

To complete the masterpiece of Life Stardust God, the Bible records that God created plants and living creatures, birds, fish, livestock, creatures moving on the ground, wildlife, and humans according to that species . Biblical authors are not experienced biologists or geneticists who do not clearly understand microorganisms, amino acids, proteins, elements, atoms, molecules, cells, chromosomes, genes, DNA, RNA. They explained the origin of life with meaningful words at the time for them. In Aristotle's metaphysics, he discussed the theory of his origin. Aristotle's theory must be distinguished from creationism. The word "creation" means the thought of the Bible. Because Aristotle is not familiar with the texts of the Bible, he does not understand the concept of "creation" in the sense of the Bible. Instead, he is more interested in the "origins" of the world. Aristotle believes that there are three kinds of substances before the concept of time, two of which are physical, one of which is immovable. It can be said that these three substances are "sensible eternal", the second substance is "sensitive and fragile", and the third substance is immovable. As the theory advances further, sensitive and perishable substances can be regarded as substances and eternal rational substances can be regarded as potential substances Animals can be regarded as metaphysical and belong to another science I will. According to Aristotle, animals are not gods. The creation of the Bible is supernatural, not a long-standing naturalistic process. Creator does not need substance, much time, energy, or anything else. Creation of the Bible is important as it identifies God, man and is the basis of the gospel. It explains death, pain, and tells Christ and that atonement! The theories and models of various creative disciplines are based on several presets, each one opposite the evolutionary assumption. The most fundamental thing is that the Bible's revelation is the key to understanding the world The Bible is a fundamental and irreplaceable source of information. I think that creationism is a category mistake in a sense, as the Bible is a theory like other theories. Whatever the Bible explains creation, it is not theory and theory. This is not a Genesis writer and someone else can often sit and explain it ... "In the beginning God created heaven and earth ..." Kitz Miller v. For Dover USA 2005) The most important question is whether smart design is science or not. It is impossible to teach the separation of religion and nation according to the constitution of a public school in the United States because it becomes a religious theory such as creationism if it is not science. Judge John E. Jones III judged that identification is not science

Innovators changed our world dramatically. Their research promoted specific areas of research and helped many people around the world. The quality of our lives comes from innovators. To be honest, innovators seem to have many similarities. Some of the most admired creationists, Alexander Fleming, Steve Jobs, and some of Rachel Carson have countless similarities. These three creationists made a great contribution to their respective fields. There are many other meaningful comparisons in them, but there are also very deep differences. With the important conditions to be noted below, creationists oppose strongly against the world created by evolution, in particular the world mentioned as the origin of his species by Charles Darwin. Creationists (and of course traditional creationists) oppose evolutionary facts (patterns). In other words, all the organisms of biology and death are the final products of the natural growth process, eventually from inorganic matter. ") Usually this is called" macro evolution "rather than" micro evolution ". Old Earth Creationism is a transformation of the origins of the universe and the creative view of Earth's life. As a theory of origin, it is more consistent with the mainstream scientific ideas of the geology, the cosmology and the Earth's era and the younger earth creationism. Young Earth Creationism is a sort of religious belief that heavenly, earth and earthly life was created by God's direct actions from 6000 to 10,000 years ago. That believer is a Christian, a Jew, and a Muslim who believes that God created the earth in six hours and recorded the Hebrew Genesis as a written record. There are two major groups of people trying to explain the creation of the earth, creationists and evolutionists. The first creationist in these groups believed in God, the Creator of God. The explanation of creationists is entirely based on the magical work of God. According to this view, spiritual existence is responsible for making everything exist. The theory of creationism is supported only through various religious works, especially the Bible. Whether figuratively, literally, the Bible is definitely an important literary work, but the age of the earth is only 10,000 years old and is considered not to support the validity of the theory of creationism.

"If you want to understand the importance of a trial, ignorance and prejudice that Darrow and his colleagues suffered are too realistic, there is too much armor in the public opinion, and it is unlikely that a dispute in Dayton's court Even with the most humorous moments, fortunately there are not many such moments, and pastoral elements have never existed, the concerned beliefs are deep-rooted and passionate.Seth Holderman - Julius USA, leading to the rural fundamentalists in the United States, seeking stability of faith. John T. Scope's public trial (known as "Monkey Trial"), a high school teacher in Dayton, Tennessee, Scope trial (July 10-21, 1925, Dayton, Tennessee, USA) infringed the province Professor Charles Darwin's Declaration as Depressed as Professor Charles Darwin In March 1925, the Tennessee State Assembly declared that any doctrine denied denying God's creation doctrine taught by the Bible. The world's attention is focused on the trial process which promises a confrontation between fundamentalist faith and biblical liberal interpretation. William Jennings Brian led the prosecution, Clarence Darrow served. The judge eliminated the test of the constitutional or theoretical validity of the law and limited the experiment to John T. Scopes whether it taught a single evolution theory, he acknowledged. He was convicted and fined $ 100. The law was abolished in 1967 In 1925, a few months after Carrie's first trial, when the Tennessee teacher, John Scopes tried to evolve education in 1960, the country was fascinated by the famous "monkey" trial. This year's movie drama (based on the 1955 drama) has inherited the wind. What he remembers now is that the heroic struggle of science for superstition is also a discussion about biology textbooks defining eugenics. The range uses George Hunter's A Civic Biology including these paragraphs to promote eugenics: Range Monkey Trials One of the most famous attempts in our history is John Scopes. Scopes was a high school teacher at Dayton, Tennessee and was arrested for teaching evolution in high school biology lessons. In the 1920s, in Tennessee province, except for creationism written in the Bible, all breaches of law were the same. These laws are the result of a strong fundamentalist movement in the United States. - ... With scientific rationality we can establish a scientific way to investigate the surrounding world. The world and the universe where we live are far beyond the complexity of the creation of our world through the creation of God. Dr. Kenneth Miller is a scientist who also believes in God and in an interview with NOVA discusses why evolution is a more reliable explanation for creating our world than creationism.

Benjamin R. Barber, the most selling jihad organization and author of McWorld, said the public school is "the foundation of our democratic civic culture ... we understand the meaning of the public of that system, We began moving towards road citizenship of common nations and countries. "Identity: They are forgery of our citizenship and are the cornerstone of our democracy. "(Today's American Journal). School education has changed over the years between students and teacher's demands. The learning method of the day is to remember the students and motivate them to be exposed to the threat of severe discipline. An overview of the creation and evolution of school professors: evolutionary and creative education in the public school system is controversial. Charles Darwin announced his evolutionary conclusion in 1859. This dramatically changed the science of education in public school systems (Armenta, 1). Several lawsuits have been filed for evolutionary education. This is because the ban on religious conservative legislators is placed on equal treatment of evolutionary evolution and creationism or evolution by intellectual design (Armenta, 1). Creationism and Evolution For a long time, school administrators, teachers, parents, and even students have opposed creation and evolution of education. Since scientific methods and support have become our scientific theory as human beings, many public schools have inherited evolution. Those people think that students should be able to inherit the winds of Jerome Lawrence and Robert Lee. Trial, controversial creation and evolution controversy. There are many characters with a gorgeous and strong individuality. These include: Matthew Harrison Brady and Henry Drummond. All these influential people are strong, but not all people have the same power. Not only for other people but also for themselves. Matthew Harrison Brady is a very strong and respected person

For the scope trial, I think that there will be many people from three presidential candidates, William Jennings Bryan, the best lawyer Clarence Darrow in the US, and H. L. Mencken, his most popular journalist. This is an attempt of thinking, a struggle between traditionalism, our father's faith, and modernism, we use our wisdom to measure our faith. It has the most memorable event in the history of the Anglo - Saxon Court called the New York Times: Dalo was called Prosecutor William Jennings Bryan and examined his interpretation of the Bible. The jury of Range Monkey Trial, held at a small court in Dayton, Tennessee, is preparing to return the ruling of the most controversial case of the 1920s at the "monkey" trial. So far, the trial itself has become a sight of the media, lawyers, witnesses and even defendants are symbol of the commercial media of the 1920s. The trial itself was set as a media demonstration to challenge the constitutionality of the stewardship. This act prohibits the teaching of "any theory that denies the creation story of God taught by the Bible", in particular the theory of evolution. Civil liberties in the United States Range Monkey Trials One of the most famous attempts in our history is John Scopes. Scopes was a high school teacher at Dayton, Tennessee and was arrested for teaching evolution in high school biology lessons. In the 1920s, in Tennessee province, except for creationism written in the Bible, all breaches of law were the same. These laws are the result of a strong fundamentalist movement in the United States. - ... With scientific rationality we can establish a scientific way to investigate the surrounding world. The world and the universe where we live are far beyond the complexity of the creation of our world through the creation of God. Dr. Kenneth Miller is a scientist who also believes in God and in an interview with NOVA discusses why evolution is a more reliable explanation for creating our world than creationism. Range Trial, also known as Range Monkey Trial, was a lawsuit filed in 1925 by John Scotts, a science teacher developed from the Tennessee Public School that was illegal in recent bills. This trial was based on the two most famous lecturers at the time, William Jennings Bryan and Clarence Darrow. The trial was seen as challenging the constitutionality of the bill while publicly advocating the validity of Darwin's theory of evolution and the opportunity to advertise the image of the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU).

"In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth" (Genesis 1: 1). For thousands of years, naturalists, materialists, and humanists have questioned such remarks - and lately, litigation, intense debate, and unresolved arguments are taking place recently. The main argument to be discussed in this article is whether evolution should be taught in the classroom. And if you want to teach it, should it be taught as fact or theory? It is also intended to provide sufficient evidence to completely deny the theory of evolution, making it much lower than the theory, but that in fact is not a futile opinion of those who elect to not accept the truth . Show more The creatures that appear on the planet are fully developed or not. Otherwise, they must evolve from existing species through some form of modification. If they manifest themselves fully developed, they must actually be created by some omnipotent intelligence "(qish of Gish). In addition, if the theory of evolution is true, "There will be countless transient fossils ... millions of fossils are gradually changing to different stages of various creatures and" missing links "(Parker, et al, 367). Charles Darwin also recognizes this problem: "The number of intermediate varieties that existed before must be truly enormous, since not all strata and all strata are full of such intermediate links Or elaborate graduated organic chain; this may be the most obvious and serious objection to the theory "(Parker, et al, 367). However, Darwin's question is not limited to just that: "I assume that eyes ... may be formed by natural selection, I think it is free to admit that it is ridiculous as much as possible" ( Parker et al., 381). Furthermore, regarding the fact that the animals must be alive and functional between transient forms and any changes, he said, "If we can prove that complex organs exist Creation and Evolution Since the announcement of the origin of Darwinian origin in 1859, the United States has discussed the evolution and creation. Recently, discussions on whether or not to incorporate creationism into the public school curriculum, regardless of whether it is combined with evolution theory or a theoretical substitute in the United States, have intensified this argument. When such an unstable problem is debated, other problems are raised ... even if denying this fact the world will not develop. Because of theory, evidence, and increased acceptance in today's society, evolution is verifiable compared to science. In order to discuss the absolute nature of evolution, we must be able to fully understand the history of this epoch-making knowledge. Evolution is often described as a long-term change. Scientists generally say that the evolution of the world has led to several theories. Creationism and Evolution This article focuses on major controversies between creationism and evolution. I am going to take two opposite views on this subject. First, the discussion focuses on why many people believe that God created the universe and all living creatures. On the other hand, scientific information will be provided to confirm the evidence for the existence of God. This creationist's counterargument called evolution theory has its roots ... evolution theory! Each organism comes from the theory of smaller organisms. The theory which claims that humans are from monkeys. This "theory" is what we teach children at school. When a child asks teachers about creationism, they will definitely get answers such as "I can not answer this question". Because the school is not allowed to teach religious subjects. I think the school thinks evolution is the next best policy. I believe

I do not want to change someone's perception of creation or evolution, but please write it for those who are told to me that I am wrong unless I fully believe what I am doing. This article is short, incomplete, and not detailed. If you think that you can not accept this article, I am willing to provide more information and I'm willing to listen to your discussion about the story. I do not think that the creation and evolution of the Bible contradict each other. I believe that God has given the world not only the moral laws that are given to us, but also the unchanging and invariable complete law that is still present. Theological evolution theory, theological evolution theory, the evolutionistic creationism theory, or the evolutionary theory driven by God all considers God's religious teachings to be compatible with the scientific understanding of modern biological evolution. The evolution of theology itself is not a scientific theory, it is a series of ideas on how general evolutionary science relates to religious beliefs, and it is in stark contrast to special creative ideas. Advocates of theological evolution theory usually make evolutionist ideas consistent with belief in God and reject contradictory arguments about religious-science relations. Theory of Evolution Theory (TE), also known as evolutionary creationism - The idea of ​​God's creation is to skillfully design the universe where everything evolves naturally. Normally, "evolution" in "theoretical evolution" means complete evolution - astronomical evolution (forming the galaxy, the solar system, etc.) and geological evolution (forming the geology of the earth) and chemical evolution Forming the first life) Biological evolution (for the development of life) - but it can only refer to biological evolution Evolutionary creation is a term that is rarely used in the development of theology and in general some or all of the classical religious teachings on God and creation are part of modern scientific understanding of biological evolution It is considered to be compatible with all. Evolution of theology is not a theory in the scientific sense but a special view on how evolutionary science relates to a specific religious interpretation. Gap creationism is also known as a specific set of Christian beliefs about restoration creationism or destruction and reconstruction, the creation of the universe and the origin of mankind. It is widely believed that the concept of gap theory was enacted in the early 19th century by William Buckland and Thomas Chalmer, but some believers can go back to the Bible days. It became very popular when it was advertised by the Scofield Reference Bible in 1909.

Islamic views on evolution and creation Since the 1800's, the evolutionary impact far exceeds the limits of biology. In fact, this effect is increasing, and today evolution has become an important intellectual in the west. Science and religion shaped the values ​​and thoughts of Western society, everyone played a very important role and gave a profound impression to society. Most authors today think that science and religion are very contrasting with companies and basically do not have anything in common. Evolution theory and evolution theory explain the fact. Creationism is a myth that explains the facts. Evolutionism is proved by facts, creationism is a story about facts. It is always interesting to learn about science and religion, but it is interesting to understand that science produces facts and that all creationists (religions) can be discussed through evolution theory. Therefore evolutionists provided evidence and creationists tried many other thinkers who used scientific theories empirically inferred to challenge Galileo, Copernicus, Bacon, Descartes, and the Biblical hypothesis I will try to. . The Catholic Church called this ideology of creationism as heresy and thus has a bad habit of suppressing complete disarray of the Bible to some extent. For centuries the scientific research has evolved into the theory of big bang and evolution, although it is mainly such a place. Creation and Evolution "Creation and Evolution" Please read this question a couple of times to see what's wrong with this title. We have all heard of this argument. The idea of ​​Genesis, the idea that God created all the seeds emerging today, and the evolutionary theory, the evolution of all life from simple bacteria to all species emerging today, is a well-known argument. Since Darwin first published "evolution" with his 1859 controversial book "Origin", he published his book "The Origin of Natural Selection Seed" and proposed evolution. This book and other books have begun discussion for many years between evolutionist and creationist. Are we created by supernatural supernatural existence, or is coincidence that our creation is occurring? Let's start with two inconsistent theories. The general usage of the word "evolution" is that our world creatures exist through a natural process without guides.

In today's society, many topics have caused very controversy among different groups of people. From abortion to medical system reform, there is no room for discussion. The topic with a major and sustainable controversy in religious society is Big Bang theory and creation. The controversial aspect is mainly the scientific community, and on the other it is clearly a religious world. Genesis 1: 1-2 says: "First of all, God created the heavens and the earth - everything you see, something you can not see. Faith in the creation of the universe proposed in Genesis. Creationism described in Genesis is a scientific story, and some creationists believe that Big Bang theory and evolution theory are wrong 1. Advocates of creative science are working to teach the creation of the Bible versions as a science with evolutionary theory at US public schools and they cast doubt on this. Arkansas passed a law requiring professors to be creative at public schools. In 1981, the law was ruled as unconstitutional by federal judges who declared creationism inherently religious. A similar Louisiana law was knocked down in 1982 Pope Pius XII declared that the Big Bang theory would not conflict with the concept of Catholic creation at the first meeting of the Papacy Academy on 22nd November 1951. Some conservative Christian factions also welcome Big Bang theory to support the historical interpretation of creationism, but a supporter of the young earth creationism that supports the very literal translation of Genesis I refuse to accept this theory. Bahá'í'í founder Bahá'u'lláh teaches that the universe is neither a beginning nor an end. In the book of wisdom ("Lawh-i-Hikmat", written in 1873-1874). Bahá'u'llá said: "There are things that existed before, but that is not what you see today: the world of existence is created by the heat generated by the interaction between the mainstay and its recipients.

One of the biggest problems facing Christianity in the field of apology is scientific debate about creationism. This is a very interesting argument. Because they are not trying to prove different points such as "Big Bang Theory" or evolution theory, but accept all other assumptions as scientific facts and start with the assumption that Biblical science will be impossible. The following are some of the problems related to creationism summarized from the profound thinking website (Pettit): I. The problem of creationism is a logical dilemma A. The evidence for creating science The source is based entirely on the fact that the Bible is complete and inaccurate Creation - evolutionary controversy (also called creationism and evolution, also called origin theory) contains continually repeated cultural, political and theological issues about the origins of the earth, humans and other lives. In the Christian world, creationism was widely regarded as truth, but since the mid-nineteenth century evolution of natural selection has been established as an empirical scientific fact. Discussion is not scientific but philosophical. Evolution is considered a fact in the scientific world, and efforts to maintain traditional views are almost universally regarded as fake science. The controversy has a long history but today it has retired to constitute a good science education Creationist politics is mainly focused on the creation of education in public education. New creationism is a pseudo-scientific movement aimed at reaffirming creationism and is likely to be welcomed by the general public, policy makers, educators, and the scientific community. Its purpose is to rebuild the argument about the origin of life in a non-religious way, not relying on the Bible. This is an objection to the ruling of the US Supreme Court in Edwards versus Aguilard in 1987 and is an inherent religious concept that is claimed in the public school course to be correct or accurate. Establishment of the first revision The creation of science or the creation of science is a field of Genesis, scientifically supporting the creation of stories in Genesis, refuting or reinterpreting geology, cosmology, biological evolution, archeology, history I insist. And scientific scientific facts, theories and scientific paradigms. Linguistics Search Noah's Ark - According to the flood of Genesis, it is trying to find a burial ground of Noah's Ark, somewhere in the so-called "Ararat Mountain Range". There were many explorations, but some of them were false successes; this practice is widely regarded as fake science, more specifically fake archeology.

Link to Missing Origins Many people in the world claim to find these missing connections between animals and people. These findings are said to support evolution, but what they do in turn is to abandon evolution. Some examples of missing links are Piltdown men, Neanderthal men, Australopithecus and Homo Erectus. All these missing links are mischievous and mischievous. Create a point. Scientists who are decreasing the sun have noticed our sun today. It seems the sun is shrinking. Creation and Evolution Since the announcement of the origin of Darwinian origin in 1859, the United States has discussed evolution and creation. Recently, discussions on whether to incorporate creativity in the public school curriculum as a theoretical alternative or combined with evolutionary intensification have intensified this argument in the United States. When such unstable problems are discussed, other problems are raised ... denying this fact, the world will not develop. Evolution theory can be verified compared to creationism. Because of the theory, evidence, and increased acceptance in today's society. In order to discuss the absolute nature of evolution, we must fully understand the history of this groundbreaking knowledge. Evolution is often described as a long-term change. Scientists generally believe that the evolution of the world has led to several theories. Creationism and evolution This article focuses on the big controversy between creationism and evolution. I am going to take two opposite views on this subject. Initially, the discussion focused on why many people believe that God created the universe and all living creatures. On the other hand, scientific information will be provided to confirm the evidence for the existence of God. This kind of evolutionistic creation argument has its roots ... evolution! Each organism comes from the theory of a smaller organism. A theory that claims that humans are from monkeys. This "theory" is what we teach children at school. When a child asks teachers about creationism, they will definitely get answers such as "I can not answer this question". Because schools are not allowed to teach religious subjects. I think the school thinks that evolution is the second best solution. I believe

Without the Bible, mankind would not be able to draw a different creative theory. Many people do not consider the Old Testament and the New Testament, but everyone knows. Theories that influence different religions are creation, evolution, and myth. There are 6,775,235,700 people walking on the earth, and everyone has personal opinions of his / her world. In Genesis, Christian scholars are talking about the work of the 7 days God who has built the world. Water, land, light, people, etc. How is the Earth formed? This is a problem that has plagued human beings for many years. There are two main theories that explain how the Earth is formed. These are the theory of evolution, creationism, religion theory. Creationism can be divided into various groups. The most accepted creationism is one of the Bible creationists. The creation and evolution of the Bible are very different, there is an indication of its authenticity. In the theory of evolution, life is thought to be produced only by the process of nature. This theory suggests that in the past there was an extended stability period that ended with mass extinction, and new species suddenly appeared. This process occurs without supernatural forces or spiritual intervention. Almost all contemporary scientists who are not evangelical Christians believe in evolution theory Evolution has emerged since the publication of the origin of Charles Darwin's species and people are discussing the merit of creationism and evolution. This theory is reinforced by the use of DNA, genetics, and its mutation research, the early species changes encountered and the distribution of related animal species over a wide range of geographical areas. - The individual believes in creation, some believe in evolution, and some are uncertain (Morris Henry). Some people insist on whether it is necessary to teach evolution and creation in school. Others feel that creation is not a sufficiently effective idea, but in fact we are teaching to young people of our generation. Over the years there have been many discussions and controversies on this subject. People have strong feelings about this topic and their beliefs.

Following the evolutionistic Hindu creation myth and the Earth era, I discovered the Hindu creation myth. Just as Brahma's meditation creatures were born from his heart. He thought of a body composed of darkness, his rectum appeared in the wind, and the devil was born. Then Brahma abandoned the dark body and the body was at night. Then he thought of himself as a gentle and bright new body. A shining god or god appeared from his mouth. Then he pulled out the white one now. Christian creation myth seems to be a combination of Muslim and Hindu myths. According to the Bible, "God created the heavens and the earth at the beginning" (Genesis 1-1.2), "Eternal God shapes the dust of the earth, inhale the breath of life into his nostrils, and It has become a living soul. " 7). This human depiction is made from dust, and the life God breathes in humans resembles the creative depiction of Islam. The Bible also stated that God had said: "Make the water bring flocks of living things, make birds fly across the ground and cross the sky" (Genesis 20 - 1.30). This description is similar to the description of Hindu creation. There, God created other creations with other creations. According to the creation of Hindus, all species on the planet, including humans, are "decentralized" or come from a state of pure consciousness. Hindu creationists argue that animal and plant species are material forms of pure consciousness and live in an infinite cycle of birth and renewal. Ronald Dodge said, "Indian creatives strongly insist on ancient human beings, I think these people seem to have been formed perfectly for a long time like tens of thousands of years ago" It was. Hindu creationism is a kind of old Earth creationism. It may exceed billions of years. These views are based on Vedas. The Vedic creation myth depicts the extreme ancient era of the universe and the history of the earth.

Create and evolve the two main aspects of our reasons for this very complex universe. No one knows which theory is right. Over the years, every human race has become a mystery. I know who has solved that strange problem indefinitely. Your point of view may be different from many other points around you. This is my view. Creation focuses on one point, God. The Bible and the Quran are the best sources of information on this topic. For Christianity creation ------------------ For Christianity, the story of creation can be found in the first two chapters of the Bible Genesis. Creationism and evolution This article focuses on the big controversy between creationism and evolution. I am going to take two opposite views on this subject. Initially, the discussion focused on why many people believe that God created the universe and all living creatures. On the other hand, scientific information will be provided to confirm the evidence for the existence of God. This kind of evolutionistic creation argument has its roots ... evolution! Each organism comes from the theory of a smaller organism. A theory that claims that humans are from monkeys. This "theory" is what we teach children at school. When a child asks teachers about creationism, they will definitely get answers such as "I can not answer this question". Because schools are not allowed to teach religious subjects. I think the school thinks that evolution is the second best solution. I believe An overview of the creation and evolution of school professors: evolutionary and creative education in the public school system is controversial. Charles Darwin announced his evolutionary conclusion in 1859. This dramatically changed the science of education in public school systems (Armenta, 1). Several lawsuits have been filed for evolutionary education. - Discussion between evolutionism and creative evolutionism and creationism has been on for a long time. When Charles Darwin proposed the origin of species in 1859, this was when the discussion began completely. The first discussion on evolution and creation in litigation took place in a 1925 trial. Evolution has been removed from textbooks and courses. Evolution began to infiltrate textbooks in 1987 Evolutionism is considerably younger than religious beliefs of creation and creation. Prior to Charles Darwin, evolution was a devout idea, and God as a creator was believed to be widely accepted. However, since Darwin introduced his evolution theory a century and a half ago, discussion about theory and creation always existed. - It is a modest expression that claims almost no conflict in the realm of faith and reason. From the earliest stage of scientific exploration, these two areas of thought fell into a vicious circle and gave up as the religion gradually modernized to adapt to the new understanding of the universe.

Range Monkey Trials One of the most famous attempts in our history is John Scopes. Scopes was a high school teacher at Dayton, Tennessee and was arrested for teaching evolution in high school biology lessons. In the 1920s, in Tennessee province, except for creationism written in the Bible, all breaches of law were the same. These laws are the result of a strong fundamentalist movement in the United States. In 1925, the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) volunteered to defend all those teachers who were willing to challenge these teachings to the teachings of evolution. The jury of Range Monkey Trial, held in a small court in Dayton, Tennessee, prepared for the "monkey" trial to return the case of the most controversial case of the 1920s. So far, the trial itself has become a sight of the media, lawyers, witnesses and even defendants are symbol of the commercial media of the 1920s. The trial itself was set as a media demonstration to challenge the constitutionality of the stewardship. This act prohibits the teaching of "any theory that denies the creation story of God taught by the Bible", in particular the theory of evolution. Civil liberties in the United States Range Monkey Trials One of the most famous attempts in our history is John Scopes. Scopes was a high school teacher at Dayton, Tennessee and was arrested for teaching evolution in high school biology lessons. In the 1920s, in Tennessee province, except for creationism written in the Bible, all breaches of law were the same. These laws are the result of a strong fundamentalist movement in the United States. - ... With scientific rationality we can establish a scientific way to investigate the surrounding world. The world and the universe where we live are far beyond the complexity of the creation of our world through the creation of God. Dr. Kenneth Miller is a scientist who also believes in God and in an interview with NOVA discusses why evolution is a more reliable explanation for creating our world than creationism.

A prominent scholar, Dr. Edward Moore wrote a paper on Dante's Creation Theory (posted on his fourth "Dante Study" series) for his role as Dunted. It was named after fame. All serious students will consult. Working on topics outside his broad academic range, this article contains many serious mistakes on medieval theology and philosophy. Actually, Dr. Moore's conclusion is not quite accurate. Therefore, I suggest that Ding refers to the main problem posed by creationism of this thesis and urges the necessary modifications to Dr. Moore 's theory. It depends on Paradiso's well-known paragraph (vii.121 n °). Dr. Moore said that he discovered a clear distinction between Dante's two creations: an angel, a celestial body, a human soul, and an angel such as a primitive creature, as in the case of elements, plants and animals I insisted. If so, this discovery will be important to determine Dante's philosophy and philosophy. Professor Giuseppe Mazota: I will see XXVII, XXVIII, XXIX in heaven today, but I think Dante really made three together, but Dante suggested that creationism and cosmology are not exactly the same Did. . Beatrice's theory explains the shape of the universe, and these three cant are very difficult. This looks like creation and physical depiction of the universe, we call this the cosmology.The Dante deals with the two forms of the universe. It is physical. Well, when we see three cants, we will show them all. I want to say that they are not exactly the same, but they are not. Dividing the two is a very boring line A prominent scholar, Dr. Edward Moore wrote a paper on Dante's Creation Theory (posted on his fourth "Dante Study" series) for his role as Dunted. It was named after fame. All serious students will consult. Working on topics outside his broad academic range, this article contains many serious mistakes on medieval theology and philosophy. Actually, Dr. Moore's conclusion is not quite accurate. Therefore, I suggest that Ding refers to the main problem posed by creationism of this thesis and urges the necessary modifications to Dr. Moore 's theory. I think this is the text behind Dante's physical interpretation of the physical universe, but it is also not physical at the same time. It is also creationism, and its creationism holds the unpredictable possibilities. This will tell you what you can update. If you stay within the limits - you will see how he criticizes the physical concept of the world. If you stay within these limits, you can not count on anything other than what you already have. You can not expect worse or bad things than you have already experienced. The only idea human beings can think of is a way to update, can think of change or freedom, or only in the context of creation

Is there a conspiracy to suppress "creating science"? Two studies cited in the Genesis literature often insist that there are numerous scientific evidences to support creationism, but secular mainstream scientists suppress publication to peer-reviewed journals It is. They insist that they did not bring fair shakes to the author scientists; they are censored. In fact, creative scientists have not even provided a scientific theory about creation and publication. No doubt, mainstream scientists can not review unsubmitted content. By studying the content of publications submitted by scientists, we can start studying this problem. "Science without religion is insufficient, religions without science are blind," says Albert Einstein. This article focuses on evolution, religion, and creationism. In the first stage, these were defined and later discussed their relationships and controversies. The definitive statement is over. The evolution theory of natural selection was originally proposed by Charles Darwin in 1859 in his book "Origins of Species". In 1930, Darwin 's natural selection and Mendel' s inheritance of freedom formed a contemporary evolutionary comprehension. Its persuasive, this theory provides a unified answer to the diversity of the life on the planet. Evolution is a change in the genetic character of a population inherited from generation to generation. These features are coded as genes that are replicated during reproduction and are transmitted to offspring. Gene mutations and other random changes can create new or altered traits that lead to differences between organisms. Evolution theory and evolution theory explain the fact. Creationism is a myth that explains the facts. Evolutionism is proved by facts, creationism is a story about facts. It is always interesting to learn about science and religion, but it is interesting to understand that science produces facts and that all creationists (religions) can be discussed through evolution theory. Therefore while evolutionists provide evidence, creationists try to try thinkers who challenge the Bible's hypothesis using Galileo, Copernicus, Bacon, Descartes, and empirically inferred scientific theory. . The Catholic Church called this ideology of creationism as heresy and thus has a bad habit of suppressing complete disarray of the Bible to some extent. For centuries the scientific research has evolved into the theory of big bang and evolution, although it is mainly such a place. "The fact of evolution is the backbone of biology and biology is the science's special position based on improved theory, is science or belief?" Charles Darwin Intelligent reason William Dembski said that the origin of life Questions about the origin of the universe says that it must penetrate human thought ... Although for centuries from the future scientific research is mainly to accept this progress, the question of the Big Bang and evolution It has evolved into theory. Tennessee was not the place of 1925. In Dayton, Tennessee, it turned out that the high school biology teacher violated the recently passed law - Butler law -. Because he taught evolution in the classroom.

I can not speak to him for a long time that this is correct. The age of the earth is unobservable and we can only go back to the book that the history book tells us to live in that era. On the other hand, you have creationism. It is an intellectual design. If there is a designer, he declared that he / she has not yet reached the earth and declared "I created the earth". This is also the theory usually used by Christians, Muslims, and Jews. Does Christians have to choose between evolution and creationism? Discussions on evolution and creation have spread from the beginning. In fact, it is not as simple as these two opposite views. Everyone seems to be forming their own theory. When trying to find a match among these unique theories, this is a complicated and laborious job. But many believe that Christians need to discover another option ... the argument between evolution and creative evolution and creationism is the 1859 Darwinian seeds that lay the foundation for life evolution It dates back to the announcement of the origin of. Understanding scientists continue to find more evidence to support Darwin's conclusion; organisms are produced by a common ancestor modified by the natural selection mechanism, leading to the evolution of the species into the environment. Evolutionism is considerably younger than religious beliefs of creation and creation. Prior to Charles Darwin, evolution was a devout idea, and God as a creator was believed to be widely accepted. However, since Darwin introduced his evolution theory a century and a half ago, discussion about theory and creation always existed. - It is a modest expression that claims almost no conflict in the realm of faith and reason. From the earliest stage of scientific exploration, these two areas of thought fell into a vicious circle and gave up as the religion gradually modernized to adapt to the new understanding of the universe. Theory of Evolution Theory (TE), also known as evolutionary creationism - The idea of ​​God's creation is to skillfully design the universe where everything evolves naturally. Normally, "evolution" in "theoretical evolution" means complete evolution - astronomical evolution (forming the galaxy, the solar system, etc.) and geological evolution (forming the geology of the earth) and chemical evolution Forming the first life) Biological evolution (for the development of life) - but it can only refer to biological evolution

Analysis of justification of creation - science can be traced back from the end of the 18th century to the beginning of the 19th century There is always conflict between creationism and evolution, one trying to invalidate the other (4). David Cowdell, author of "Law and View of the World: Problems in Creation - Scientific Controversy", expressed his view in the case of McLean and the Arkansas Board of Education (1). Like many others, this lawsuit is trying to restore "equal time" statutes so that "public school science teachers present creation and evolution theory in the classroom" (1). Strictly based on science, evolution theory follows the theory of naturalism. Naturalist theory is based on the universalization of American creationism and theoretical evolution due to religious problems, legitimacy of fossils, and the simple fact that human evolution happened during periods when human invasion is impossible I am getting behind. (Steen, 2001) According to Gallup, 99% of scientists believe in naturalist theory, but only 10% of the US population believes in this theory. The increasingly popular theory is a combination of creationism and naturalism theory. A historian and a religious professor Eugene M. Klaaren believes that "the belief in the creation of God" is at the heart of the rise of British science in the 17th century. Philosopher Michael Foster has released an analytical philosophy that links Christian creationism with empiricism. Historian William B. Ashworth opposes the notion of history, a distinctive way of thinking, and the concept of Catholicism and Protestant science. Historians James R. Jacob and Margaret C. C. Jacob claim the transformation of the knowledge of the 17th century British Church with the British influential scientists (like Robert). · Boyle and Isaac Newton are linked. John Dillenberger and Christopher B. Kaiser wrote a theological study covering other interactions that occurred in the 18th, 19th and 20th centuries.

If someone can tell you how all these things started, how is our world created? Modern science has made some impressive discoveries about our universe. George Smoot, who won the 2006 Nobel Prize for Physics Prize as a cosmologist at the University of California at Berkeley, said: It is very detailed to know how it works. Some people think that testing these theories is a test of faith, others know how the universe was made to some extent. The science community sighed. Is faith true when science is over? What Hawking points out in this book is that "Because there is a law like gravity, the universe can create itself from nothing and can create it from now." Where physics ends In my opinion, metaphysics is a concept of becoming something, nothing exists. We have Greeks who are thinking from Socrates through Plato to Aristotle, long before the present era begins. An important work on this subject is Prague, the fourth and last dialogue of Plato, focusing on immortality of the soul. That is the essence of creation. 1 Only in this statement can you see that creationism has big flaws. Although we can prove that science existed undoubtedly until the first 20 milliseconds, we can not prove it before. The above statements about creationism indicate that confusion alone is not the beginning. And this "creative hand" interprets the order of the universe from the confusion and applies the physical law to that confusion, so that it forms movement and order. However, prior to the confusion, creationism did not touch the foundation as a whole. Science recognizes that there is a period of application of different laws and orders, but creationism tries to deny this existence saying there is always something. Because, if there was a beginning and God was not before that, where did God come from? You can prove that there is a scientific beginning. We still do not know what it was before this start!

The creation of the universe, the earth, and mankind was only dark at the beginning. This darkness has existed for millions of years. There is neither a star, neither the sun nor the earth. But one day, something special happened. The darkness produced light. This is a very small amount of light, but that's enough. Light became a dark husband. For a long time both brightness and darkness became boring. Light began to insult the darkness, light was also insulted violently as well. Old Earth Creationism is a transformation of the origins of the universe and the creative view of Earth's life. As a theory of origin, it is more consistent with the mainstream scientific ideas of the geology, the cosmology and the Earth's era and the younger earth creationism. Young Earth Creationism is a sort of religious belief that heavenly, earth and earthly life was created by God's direct actions from 6000 to 10,000 years ago. That believer is a Christian, a Jew, and a Muslim who believes that God created the earth in six hours and recorded the Hebrew Genesis as a written record. Young Earth Creation Theory (YEC) is creationism and the belief that the universe, the earth, and the earth's life are created by God's direct action 10,000 years ago. Its main believer is a Christian who consents to the literal interpretation of the creation of the story in the Bible's Genesis and believes that God created the earth within 60 hours. Compared with YEC, Old Earth Creation believes in the metaphorical interpretation of Genesis and the scientifically determined age of the Earth and the universe. The creation of the times is an effort to harmonize the literal meaning of Genesis with the modern scientific theory on the universe, the earth, life, and human age. I believe the 6-day creation referred to in Genesis is not a normal 24-hour work day but a longer period (a thousand years or a few million years). Genesis is interpreted as a description of the evolution process of the universe and provides a broad base for building any number of theories and interpretations. Advocates of age theory can be found in theologians evolutionists and progressive creationists.

"What is the most serious problem human beings can ask themselves: where are we from, of course, this leads to the following, where are all lives come from?" Many different views on the origin of mankind are controversial and there are still problems today. (Edey, p.1) The viewpoint is called "creation - science". It is generally thought to be based on extreme literal interpretation of the Bible, movement of Christian fundamentalists. Mass media frequently express science with the science of creation and evolution, religion, creation and religion, and evolution as science. Unfortunately, if you do not agree with this tag, you can also tag it. If you do not agree with the stereotype, whether you are a creationist or an evolutionist, you will be accused and "exposed" as a religious fanatic. To redeem absurd and unscientific religious worldview. Indeed, neither of the two origin models goes beyond reasonable doubt (otherwise evolution is not called the "theory of evolution"). Whether we think to admit it or not, our people who agree with evolution do this by faith. The understanding of design in biology may have a theological significance, but it is not based on religious premises - it is based on empirical observation and logic In the history of science and religion, there is no intense debate besides evolution and creation. Since most evidence supports evolution, this problem has caused intense debate, but due to longstanding religious beliefs, creation of ideas will never prove to be wrong. Human creation can be divided into three simple beliefs: creationism, natural evolution theology, and theological evolution. The complexity of the three aspects makes it possible for the theory to support a common national, religious or non-religious dilemma Creation and evolution There has been discussion between science and religion since the publication of the origin of Charles Darwin's species. Although scientists have proposed many theories about human origin and the creation of the earth, religious organizations have a major creationism based on the story of the Bible "Genesis". However, these theories are not the cause of the discussion. Because different theories are mere words of myth. Creationism and Evolutionism This article focuses on a major controversy between creationism and evolution. I am going to take two opposite views on this subject. Initially, the discussion focused on why many people believe that God created the universe and all living creatures. On the other hand, scientific information will be provided to confirm the evidence for the existence of God. The objection to this type of evolutionary creationism has its roots

There are still a lot of efforts to continue creativity in American classrooms. One strategy is to argue that evolution is religion, so it should not be taught in the classroom, or evolution is religion, of course you can teach creation in the classroom. [1] In the 1980s, Philip Johnson began reading the scientific literature on evolution. Science was defined by finding a natural interpretation, but this means that Darwin writes in court, examines the evidence of evolution from a religious point of view and challenges the sole rational interpretation of the origin of the species lead. For Fen In April 2010, American Religious College issued a guide to the religious education of the US K-12 public school, including guidance on innovative science and intelligent design that should not be taught in science courses. The world view is defined (and limited to it) as a method of exploration based on observable and measurable evidence gathering specific inference principles. But these view of the world and other "guesses focusing on the origin of life" are another important and relevant form of human quest to be studied appropriately in literature and social science courses It shows. However, such research must include a variety of religious and philosophical views that represent the diversity of the world view, and avoiding making a view more legitimate than other views. " The creation of science and intelligent design is an example of a negative baking idea that has not reached the hypothetical level because they are tampered with most physics, chemistry, and all biology. Denial of business science and economics of "voodoo" have many well-known negative ideas. As I mentioned earlier, these terms are not used consistently. The Riemann hypothesis in mathematics is a speculation I defined. Fermat's last theorem has been guessed for centuries before being proved Together with Shimura's guess, it is now Taniyama Shimura's theorem. However, as Fermat claims to have evidence that he is not writing down, it is politely called the theorem By the mid-1990s, intelligent design became a separate sport. Because most of the advocates of the creative movement accept the Bible as a literally undisputed historical story, whose main objective is to verify the Bible's record through the Bible, creation of the scientific movement is an intelligent design movement It is different from neo-creativeism. In contrast, in principle, New Creationism completely avoided mentioning the Bible in the discussion and described the objective (see Wedge Strategy). By doing so, advocates of intelligent design will try to succeed in creating scenes where science can not ensure success in public school science courses. Smart design supporters carefully avoid mentioning smart designers as public identities as public identity while trying to reintroduce creationism into the science classroom while avoiding the first amendment to prohibit religious infringement I will.

Theory of Origin in Aristotle 's Metaphysics In Aristotle' s metaphysics, he discussed the theory of his origin. Aristotle's theory must be distinguished from creationism. The word "creation" means the thought of the Bible. Because Aristotle is not familiar with the texts of the Bible, he does not understand the concept of "creation" in the sense of the Bible. Instead, he is more interested in the "origins" of the world. Aristotle believes that there are three kinds of substances before the concept of time, two of which are physical, one of which is immovable. The metaphysics that we know are Aristotle's "first philosophy". Metaphysics includes the study of the universal principle of existence and its abstract nature. Probably the starting point for Aristotle's metaphysics is that he dismisses Plato's formal theory. In Plato's theory, the physical objects themselves are variable rather than actual, instead they correspond to an ideal, eternal, invariant form through a common name that can only be perceived by intelligence I will. Therefore, what is considered beautiful in this world is actually an incomplete appearance of the shape of beauty. Aristotle's arguments against this theory are many. After all, he refused to regard Plato's point of view as a poetic but empty language, and as a scientist and an experientist he strongly wanted to pay attention to the reality of the material world. Theory of Origin in Aristotle 's Metaphysics In Aristotle' s metaphysics, he discussed the theory of his origin. Aristotle's theory must be distinguished from creationism. The word "creation" means the thought of the Bible. Because Aristotle is not familiar with the texts of the Bible, he does not understand the concept of "creation" in the sense of the Bible. Instead, he is more interested in the "origins" of the world. - For thousands of years, human beings have been thinking about supremacy. Part of the origin of this omnipotent desire for these sacred entities derives partly from our desire to seize the truth of the universe in which we live. We partly come back from that part of the universe physically surrounds us and consumes us perfectly at the end of our lives It is an orderly structure, the universe, and even the invention of the Creator can be expressed. "(P.xvii) Metaphysics is an important philosophical study of Aristotle and includes ontology. The term" metaphysics "is defined because its research is right behind" physics " . It is accepted because the purpose of metaphysics is to transcend physics and to discover the ultimate essence and the cause of existence. Basic Element: A substance is a reality of an individual thing, a substance is not a matter of substance (not necessarily) by accident (not necessary), that is, a special property of an object is a substance not belonging to other individuals, and It is the general principle of individual things. Alternatively, the element is a substance belonging to many individual ones.

In Aristotle's metaphysics, he discussed the theory of his origin. Aristotle's theory must be distinguished from creationism. The word "creation" means the idea of ​​the Bible. Since Aristotle is not familiar with the texts of the Bible, he does not understand the concept of "creation" in the Bible sense. Instead, he is more interested in the "origins" of the world. Aristotle believes that there are three kinds of substances before the concept of time. Two of them are physical and one is immovable. You can explain that these three substances are "smart eternal", the second is "sensitive and fragile", and the third is immovable. In order to further promote this theory, sensitive destruction can be thought of as material, and sensible eternity can be seen as being potential, things that can not move are metaphysical and belong to other science It can be seen. According to Aristotle, real estate is God. It does not move, transforms delicate perishable goods into movement, thereby changing the possibilities to reality. This theory is Aristotle's creed, and it is impossible to create anything from anything. Aristotle said: "If there is no real existence reason, how can you exercise? ... the seed needs to act on the semen of the earth and menstrual blood," he said The thing is that something must be started by another thing. There is always a reason for this. One depends on the other. So, before the origin is "real estate", that is, God must exist. Aristotle believes there are four changes: what, place, quality and quantity. For example, a pen is by definition an object, has a position, and takes a space. It exists for a while, has shape and size. These external functions are subject to change. According to Aristotle, everything is changing. Therefore, the pen may move and the color and size may change. When it changes from a perceptual state (also called latent state) to a possible state, it reaches a realistic state. According to Aristotle, this theory can be applied to the origin of the world. Once the world stands up and runs it can change, so it is possible. Aristotle said the change is eternal. Because the world is constantly changing, it is eternal. That is, there is a beginning but not an end. Aristotle supports a theory that further promotes teleology, or tele (meaning it progresses over time). Aristotle said, "Shape is not real and does not exist" (Devolutionary Volume 7, p.290). This means that the object is in its progress. A tree is a chair. Acorn means oak. Something is not its essence, it is determined by its possibilities. How is this related to hot dogs and sandwiches? The world we see and the world around us are based on our sense and perception. The way in which sensory information is translated in our brain is divided into categories and subcategories. The information of some people is obviously divided more than the others. Languages ​​are related to each other based on definition and quality. Example: A star is related to the universe in our brain, the bright, the night, and the words of the universe. Origin theory in Aristotle 's metaphysics In Aristotle' s metaphysics, he discussed his theory of origin. Aristotle's theory must be distinguished from creationism. The word "creation" means the idea of ​​the Bible. Since Aristotle is not familiar with the texts of the Bible, he does not understand the concept of "creation" in the Bible sense. Instead, he is more interested in the "origins" of the world. - For thousands of years, human beings have been thinking about supremacy. Part of the origin of this hunger to mankind in these sacred entities is partly derived from our desire to seize the truth of the universe in which we live. A part of this universe physically surrounds us and consumes us perfectly at the end of our lives, so we will return from there

Today, schools throughout the country teach evolution, but when the teacher John Thomas Scopes teaches high school students in Tennessee it is not so. In March 1925, the state passed the law prohibiting teaching of evolution as it clashed with the Bible's creative story. The scope of this lawsuit is 90 years ago on Friday, July 10, known as "Scope Monkey Trial", one of the most famous trials in American history. Three presidential candidates, William Jennings Brian, defended the prosecution and tried to prove that the scope violates the law. As the times reported, Brian who died shortly after the trial planned to use the end of the trial as a "best speech." There was no actual speech during the trial due to the lawful operation of defense, but he then handed it to the public later. It includes such a paragraph: It is difficult to add that this law does not come from prejudice. Most people do not try to establish or teach religion - it tries to protect themselves from arrogant minority efforts to teach scorpion science to force children to religious beliefs. Due to technical problems the verdict was later overturned but its scope eventually failed and a fine of 100 dollars was imposed. But the real star of the trial is Faner's skilled lawyer Clarence Darrow. He raises a number of loopholes in Brian's claim and fundamentalism theory. This case shows the turning point of the way evolution is taught at school and more widely recognized in the United States. Scientists and teachers shook their heads. Mr. Brian is dead, at least when refusing to criticize as a group, some of them do not trial in Athens' court rather than in Pilate's court, others who personally compare the scope of the trial There. A teacher who was condemned (like Mr. Scopes) declined young people by teaching to violate the law, did not respect God and denied his behavior once (like Mr. Funst) I refused. To protect it, in his opinion this is the most respected form and was convicted (like Mr. Scopes). Mr. Scopes was fined $ 100 and Mr. Socrates received Hemlock. Please read TIME 1925 full autopsy report in the TIME file for free. Dixit A few months after the first trial by Carrie in 1925, when the teacher John Scopes of Tennessee tried to evolve education in 1960, the country was fascinated by the famous "monkey" trial. The drama of that year (based on the 1955 drama) inherited the wind. What he remembers now is that the heroic struggle of science for superstition is also a debate for clear eugenic biology textbooks. The range uses George Hunter's A Civic Biology, which includes a passage to promote eugenics. Scope test summary: On 10th July 1925 range test (usually called range evolution test or range monkey test) was started. Defendants, John Thomas Scopes, high school coaches and substitute teachers were accused of breaching the deeds law by teaching evolution in his class. The Butler's Law prohibits the teaching of any theory that denies the creation of the Biblical story. By teaching humans to be apes, descendants of evolution, the scope is condemned to break the law Range Monkey trial Perhaps one of the most famous trials in our history is John Scope. Scopes was a high school teacher in Dayton, Tennessee and was arrested for teaching evolution in high school biology lessons. In the 1920s, Tennessee State Act violated creationism written in the Bible. These laws are the result of a powerful fundamentalist campaign spread throughout the United States. - ... Scientific rationality allows us to establish a scientific method to investigate the surrounding world. The world and the universe where we live are far more complicated and complicated than the creation of our world by God's creation. Dr. Kenneth Miller is a scientist who also believes in God and discusses why the theory of evolution is a more reliable explanation for creating our world than creationism.

In this dictionary myth is "a traditional story about old stories, heroes and supernatural creatures, often to explain the origins of natural phenomena and aspects of human behavior". However, as this definition is very logical and like steel, we can not include a small portion of what we have for those who created it. When the early people begin looking for answers to everyday events, they usually find them. Creative myth, also known as the cosmic myth, is a philosophical and theological detailed explanation of the first creation myth within the religious community. The term myths here refers to imaginative expressions in the narrative form of experiences and understandings as basic reality (see also myths). The word "creation" refers to the beginning of things from an ultimate source of information, or in other ways, from the intention and behavior of transcendental existence. The creation myth is a symbolic story of the origin of the world, as understood by a particular community. Later creationism was based on the subsequent history and community needs. Thus, for example, all theology and speculation about the Christian community is based on the Bible Genesis and creation myths created by Jesus Christ. Creative myth (or creative story) is a cultural, traditional or religious myth that explains the earliest beginning of the world today. Creative myth is the most common form of myth, usually developed first through oral tradition and human culture. Creation myths are often not historical or literal, but are often thought of as those who convey deep truth. Though not always, they are often considered to be cosmic myths - they represent the order of the universe from a disordered state or disordered state.

The question of how to divide scientific boundaries and where to divide is still a controversial issue. Since the emergence of modern science from the 16th century to the 17th century, many philosophers and thinkers have tried to establish clear boundaries and criteria to separate them from other forms of knowledge. However, so far no consensus has been reached on specific issues. This issue was called "demarcation problem" in philosophy and was always a serious problem for science itself, as it raised many other questions about the universal status of contemporary social science. Most of the earlier studies in Popper's scientific philosophy focused on what he was calling a boundary, or a distinction between scientific (or empirical) theory and unscientific theory. In particular, Popper sees capturing logical or methodological differences between scientific fields (physics etc.) and non-scientific fields (myth production, philosophical metaphysics, Freud's psychoanalysis, Marxist social criticism, etc.) It is aiming. Popper demarcation proposals can be seen effectively as a response to boundary verifiability criteria proposed by logical experts such as Carnap and Schlick. According to this standard, statements are cognitively meaningful only if they can be verified in principle. In particular, this standard aims to show that empirical scientific assertions have meaning and that traditional philosophical metaphysical assertions are meaningless. In the article "Science: Conjecture and Refutation", Karl Popper is about to explain standards that must be met in order for the theory to be regarded as scientific. He called this problem a boundary problem. "The standard of the theoretical scientific status is its forgery, or blame or testability", he summarized his argument. Non Scientific Consensus He insists that the way to use his conclusion is different from Popper. If you want to find the boundary between science and science Kuhn should not look for 'sharp or decisive' boundaries because science is not objective, as Popper convinces us. Stated. Subjectivity Science philosopher Karl R. Popper uses the concept of tampering to distinguish between science and fake science. The verifiable theory is scientific, but it is not verifiable. Mr. Popper pointed out that "Darwinism is not a verifiable scientific theory, but a possible framework to validate metaphysical research plans and scientific theories," Popper said in an "unfinished mission". It is "scientific". People who oppose evolution argue against Pover's theory of evolution and claim that creationism is equally an effective metaphysical research program. For example, Duane Gish, the main supporter of Genesis, wrote in Discovery Magazine (July 1981): "Steven Jay Gould is a creationist whose creationism is science theory We insist that wrong accusation

The main theme of evolution has changed in the world around us. This simple fact is everywhere in our view. Ogawa cleans dirt and stones from high to low. The unmanned garden is full of weeds. The other changes are more gradual, but it is more dramatic if you look at it for a long time. As our sun made five billion years ago, a powerful telescope reveals a combination of new star and dust of the Milky Way. Shortly thereafter the Earth itself was formed, at that time the rocks, dust, gas surrounding the sun condensed on our solar system planet. In historical context, creationism and evolution are always controversial subjects and are one of Darwin's major breakthroughs in spreading his evolution theory. When Darwin published his evolution theory in 1859, his book was thought of as a major technological advancement at the time. As the existence of evolution theory offsets society, there is nothing to prove the existence of God, create a catalyst, creationism is almost replaced by atheism. Since the discovery of evolution, human creation has changed rapidly. Nevertheless, the world does not understand the theory and theory of evolution of Lord Charles Darwin for a while for a while. Prior to evolution, I believed that the upper class was called "sacred creature" by being influenced by the religious ideology of how human beings were created. However, the introduction of evolution theory used this theory as the foundation of biology and changed my mind. British naturalist Charles Darwin revolutionized biology through his evolution process and natural selection process. Herbert Spencer is the main philosopher of biological and social evolution. The research of Spencer in the 19th century had a great influence on the development of biology, psychology, sociology and anthropology. Although Darwin influences the field of natural history and geology, his evolution theory has caused a big controversy. - Some of Herbert Scott's poems are about the food industry. At The Boss, he commented on the fact that all types of people will buy groceries, "rich, ugly, beautiful, sweet. He comes from a traditional school, and he The words used indicate that he is in the working class, he believed that when he came from an old school, he must live there to succeed in business "

School reforms are not new concepts and trends, and they continue to evolve since the establishment of our national education system. School reform aims to make the education system better; in fact, we will make our children more available to compete on a global scale. School reform that I decided to study was school education by gender. This is the idea that students' performance will improve if there are only students of the same sex in the classroom. I have only one (experimental) course: my 6th grade science class. A single sex school single sex school is hated by many people because they believe that when students graduate from a cooperative educational university or college they can not have opposite sex. This belief often also affects the idea of ​​separating by gender-specific schools, and many believe that these types of schools will promote separation of men and women. - Recent discussions focused on whether high school students' strategies should be adopted to achieve a successful educational system, they focus more on their research and are appropriate to eliminate every aspect We urge you to provide educational environment. It is an interruption. Implementing these strategies improves the quality of high school education and broadens the range of high scores Should a single sex school be banned? Do you want your child to study at a single sex school? Single sex school is a school for all students of same sex. There are many famous single sex schools in America such as Wellesley College, Smith College, Holyoke College. There are various problems in a society that likes a single sex school (sax, creationism does not hold for public schools) because many think that many people can receive better education than a coeducational environment. Fierce controversy. Ongoing conflict relates to providing technology for human creation to children in public schools. Many religious leaders and followers hope to teach the children the creationism of the Bible, not the evolution of science. This idea violates the first fix, it is almost impossible to do, it will prevent further expansion. There has been considerable anger in both the public and educational sectors in the past decade in both existing and proposed single sex schools, but there is little controversy in the single sex course of Mixed Sex School. One of the reasons is that in single elementary school, junior high school, junior high school, especially public school today, single sex course is somewhat rare. However, for a variety of reasons, some schools are considering or testing single sex courses.

The 1920s was an era of change. New ideas are easier to experiment and accepted by the vast majority of people. Some of them include a fight between jazz music and alcohol ban. However, the fundamental way of thinking focused on this article is Evolution. This theory had existed for more than half a century ago before the 20th century, but recently it became common in the United States. It contradicts Christian's sacred creationism in the Bible. In July 1925, 80 years ago, fire was fired with religion, science and public schools mixed in Dayton, Tennessee. Scope trial, or "monkey trial" is called national headline. The trial lasted only a week, but the questions raised by it are the same as their differences at that time. 1914 - Citizenship of George William Hunt, and later used in the biology course of Dayton, Tennessee. Civil biology explains evolution theory that "simple life forms on earth slowly and gradually create more complex life forms and ultimately form the most complex life forms." The Range Monkey Trial religious science stage is in Dayton, Tennessee. The main character of the show is a 25-year-old science teacher named John T. Scope. The range is in the direction to advance the United States. The poster read Scopes "Monkey" Trial. In 1925, John T. Scope was advised to challenge Butler's law. The law was passed by a small town in Dayton, Tennessee, and it is forbidden to teach the Bible people. Through the evolution of text education, Scope violated the law and attracted domestic media attention. Concentration of media in the scope experiment effectively presents contrasting ideas of religious town and religious town. As science began to explain before it could not be explained, it caused a conflict with religion. The "monkey" trial in Dayton, Tennessee was one of the most noteworthy trials in history, as it was one of the first and most public times of the conflict. The trial revealed a division between faithful fundamentalists and newly formed evolutionists. - Range Monkey Trials Perhaps one of the most famous attempts in our history is John Scopes. Scopes was a high school teacher at Dayton, Tennessee and was arrested for teaching evolution in high school biology lessons. In the 1920s, in Tennessee province, except for creationism written in the Bible, all breaches of law were the same. These laws are the result of a strong fundamentalist movement in the United States.

When considering the origin of life, there are two main points to reach: intelligent design or natural process (Ken Ham, 2008). "According to the former, supernatural interventions are essential to life, according to the latter organisms may form naturally, for example from the Nile (Encyclopedia of Philosophy, 2006) Creation is the universe by God It can be defined as the creation of "creation", nd). Intelligent design can be defined as "some functions" (Ken Ham, 2008). How do you believe in the creation of the earth? There are two theories that are believed to be based on the creation, evolution and creation of the earth. Evolution is a process in which various kinds of organisms are made and distinguished from their structure in the historical context of the earth. Genesis is a belief that life and the universe are created by the existence of heaven, a transcendental and kind God. - ... The phrase "molecular clock scale" is used to define this modification frequency. Increasing the speed of molecular clocks is the most likely cause of human creation. Mutations contributing to the survival and breeding of organisms are likely to be handed down to our descendants. Human Acceleration Zone 1 (HAR1) is a rapidly changing DNA sequence that contributes to the healthy formation of the cerebral cortex in the brain. Creationism and evolution This article focuses on the big controversy between creationism and evolution. I am going to take two opposite views on this subject. Initially, the discussion focused on why many people believe that God created the universe and all living creatures. On the other hand, scientific information will be provided to confirm the evidence for the existence of God. This kind of evolutionistic creation argument has its roots ... evolution! Each organism comes from the theory of a smaller organism. A theory that claims that humans are from monkeys. This "theory" is what we teach children at school. When a child asks teachers about creationism, they will definitely get answers such as "I can not answer this question". Because schools are not allowed to teach religious subjects. I think the school thinks that evolution is the second best solution. I believe Individuals believe in creation, some believe in evolution, and some are uncertain (Morris Henry). Some people insist on whether it is necessary to teach evolution and creation in school. Others feel that creation is not a sufficiently effective idea, but in fact we are teaching to young people of our generation. Over the years there have been many discussions and controversies on this subject. People have strong feelings about this topic and their beliefs. Surveys, articles, case studies and other rich sources of information indicate that many people in the world want to teach evolution and creation in school.

It is absolutely necessary for God to show ourselves to the world through Jesus Christ and to save us from corruption. This corruption includes sin and death, and worshiping other gods. The form of expression is necessary for human form, otherwise people who need to believe will doubt. This is not a simple way to salvation for Jesus, but all of this is necessary to complete the plan of God and to give us the hope of eternal life in the kingdom of heaven. Even today, Jesus still plays a proactive role still in our life. "In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth." This Biblical citation has caused Christian's big controversy and many years of evolution. I have heard it many times, "I believe that evolution makes you a person who does not believe in God." Something. Our society believed that these scriptures were more than 2000 years, so we developed it Creationism - the theory of evolution is not the logic of Genesis 1: 1. "In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth" These two religions believe that the human beings, the rest of the earth, and the universe were originally created by creation rather than evolution. This view on the origin of the earth is that it is the first religion to practice Monotheism (believing in God), ... in that the theory of evolutionary and creative evolution is a theory based on science and more detailed evidence It is unique. And creationism is a belief based theory. It is by no means convincing, it is a factor influencing ideas and theory supported by scientists. Therefore, you can not truly compare one; you need to choose what you think you are the truth at the same time. Since the beginning of human life there was always a confusion problem. Over time, many theories have been used to explain the origin of things. The classic is Charles Darwin's theory of evolution and creationism, God created all things in the first place. However, the modern world provides a new theory to explain the universe. The latest theory is what is called silly design theory. This might seem interesting, but in fact this theory is mainly an answer, or perhaps a discussion of other arguments against other theories which are now called intelligent design theory.

Creation and evolution "Creation and evolution" What is wrong with this title? Please read this several times and answer this question. We have all heard of this argument. The idea of ​​Genesis, the idea that God created all the seeds emerging today, and the evolutionary theory, the evolution of all life from simple bacteria to all species emerging today, is a well-known argument. Since the first publication of "evolution" in Darwin's controversial book "Origin of Species" published in 1859, discussion between religion and science existed. They want to argue that the problem of evolution (or what they call "evolution theory" or "Darwinism") and science is not religion but religion and religion (science). "The example comes from the lie of Ken Ham: evolution, but it is called" the cause, principle or system of faith related to enthusiasm and belief "(from Webster Quoted) as well as a deep misunderstanding evolution of two religions) dictionary. Humm's ridiculous argument differs from "contradiction-free biblical evidence", in the past can only study them and can not access directly, so deriving scientific conclusions from fossils and evidence is That means you can not. Written in the era of Kenam Creation and Evolution "Creation and Evolution" Please read this question a couple of times to see what's wrong with this title. We have all heard of this argument. The idea of ​​Genesis, the idea that God created all the seeds emerging today, and the evolutionary theory, the evolution of all life from simple bacteria to all species emerging today, is a well-known argument. Since Darwin first published "evolution" with his 1859 controversial book "Origin", he published his book "The Origin of Natural Selection Seed" and proposed evolution. This book and other books have begun discussion for many years between evolutionist and creationist. Are we created by supernatural supernatural existence, or is coincidence that our creation is occurring? Let's start with two inconsistent theories. The general usage of the word "evolution" is that our world creatures exist through a natural process without guides. Evolution theory and evolution theory explain the fact. Creationism is a myth that explains the facts. Evolutionism is proved by facts, creationism is a story about facts. It is always interesting to learn about science and religion, but it is interesting to understand that science produces facts and that all creationists (religions) can be discussed through evolution theory. Therefore evolutionists provided evidence and creationists tried many other thinkers who used scientific theories empirically inferred to challenge Galileo, Copernicus, Bacon, Descartes, and the Biblical hypothesis I will try to. . The Catholic Church called this ideology of creationism as heresy and thus has a bad habit of suppressing complete disarray of the Bible to some extent. For centuries the scientific research has evolved into the theory of big bang and evolution, although it is mainly such a place.

Plot A The main idea of ​​this story is that the settlers who landed on the new earth leave the land of the Earth's city (the extraterrestrial life living on this planet). A very important event in the story is what the colonists thought interesting for a couple of days in the dessert. The best way for them to run out of water is to keep track of their tracer to the nearest waters. The dungeon is the closest place to the water. How is the Earth formed? This is a problem that has plagued human beings for many years. There are two main theories that explain how the Earth is formed. These are the theory of evolution, creationism, religion theory. Creationism can be divided into various groups. The most accepted creationism is one of the Bible creationists. The creation and evolution of the Bible are very different, there is an indication of its authenticity. In the theory of evolution, life is thought to be produced only by the process of nature. This theory suggests that in the past there was an extended stability period that ended with mass extinction, and new species suddenly appeared. This process occurs without supernatural forces or spiritual intervention. Almost all contemporary scientists who are not evangelical Christians believe in evolution theory Extinction is a part of the constant evolution of life and only 2-4% of the species that once lived on the earth is thought to be alive. However, the fossil record shows that in the majority of the Earth's 3.5 billion years history, the loss rate of species is thought to be one of one million species annually. Since scientists "describe" about 2 m out of estimated 50 thousand to 30 thousand species and only 3% of them are estimated, only 869 species extinctions were officially recorded since 1500. The loss rate between known species is inferred. In this way, IUCN calculated that the loss rate in 2004 will rise to 100 to 1, 000 species per million annually. This is comparable to the last five "mass extinction". About 65 million years ago Scientists estimate that there are now seven million species on the planet. About 2 million people are registered in the catalog. This requires the work of many generations of explorers and biologists to find and record them, but this is where we are now. This work is infinite. The fossil record we know is derived from the evidence of sedimentary rocks almost completely found near the surface of the Earth. During the billions of years of massive geological era, most of the sediments that once existed were classified deeper in the earth through plate tectonics, volcanism and asteroid influences. We will probably never let the paleontologist team search for fossils 20 miles below the surface.

As science began to explain before it could not be explained, it caused a conflict with religion. The "monkey" trial in Dayton, Tennessee was one of the most noteworthy trials in history, as it was one of the first and most public times of the conflict. The trial revealed a division between faithful fundamentalists and newly formed evolutionists. Even if the jury reminds the jury that it only has to judge whether the scope violates the law, the verdict is more than that. The jury of Range Monkey Trial, held in a small court in Dayton, Tennessee, prepared for the "monkey" trial to return the case of the most controversial case of the 1920s. So far, the trial itself has become a sight of the media, lawyers, witnesses and even defendants are symbol of the commercial media of the 1920s. The trial itself was set as a media demonstration to challenge the constitutionality of the stewardship. This act prohibits the teaching of "any theory that denies the creation story of God taught by the Bible", in particular the theory of evolution. Civil liberties in the United States Scope test summary: On July 10, 1925 a range test (usually called a range evolution test or a range monkey test) was started. Defendant, John Thomas Scopes, a high school coach and a substitute teacher were accused of breaching the Butler law by teaching evolution in his class. The Butler's Law prohibits any professor denying the theory of the creation of the Bible. By teaching humans to be apes, descendants of evolution, the scope is condemned to break the law Range Monkey Trials One of the most famous attempts in our history is John Scopes. Scopes was a high school teacher at Dayton, Tennessee and was arrested for teaching evolution in high school biology lessons. In the 1920s, in Tennessee province, except for creationism written in the Bible, all breaches of law were the same. These laws are the result of a strong fundamentalist movement in the United States. - ... With scientific rationality we can establish a scientific way to investigate the surrounding world. The world and the universe where we live are far beyond the complexity of the creation of our world through the creation of God. Dr. Kenneth Miller is a scientist who also believes in God and in an interview with NOVA discusses why evolution is a more reliable explanation for creating our world than creationism.

The relative age of the earth is not usually considered a controversial topic. The majority of scientific data published in school textbooks and taught to students shows that they are about billions of years ago. Radiometric measurements and geological rock research have been used as evidence to support such a large era. However, a small but decided minority, consisting mainly of fundamental Christians, was a strong challenge to this age. These so-called "creative scientists" oppose the evidence supporting young planets. Old Earth creationists generally agree with the mainstream scientific estimation of the age of the universe, humans, and the Earth itself, but deny the theorists of contemporary evolution theory on biological evolution theory. The argument between the views of the two creationists depends on the meaning of the Hebrew word yom which means "day." Young Earth creationists insist that in the context of Genesis 1-2, Yeom is 24 hours. Old Earth creationists opposed and I thought that the term 'yom' would be used for a longer term. Old Earth creationists used many Bible arguments to keep their views. Old Earth Creationism is a transformation of the origins of the universe and the creative view of Earth's life. As a theory of origin, it is more consistent with the mainstream scientific ideas of the geology, the cosmology and the Earth's era and the younger earth creationism. Young Earth Creationism is a sort of religious belief that heavenly, earth and earthly life was created by God's direct actions from 6000 to 10,000 years ago. That believer is a Christian, a Jew, and a Muslim who believes that God created the earth in six hours and recorded the Hebrew Genesis as a written record. Today, contrary to Gosset, the creationists of the young earth believe that not only the earth is young, but scientific data supports this view. However, the concept of obvious age is still being used in young earth creation literature. Some young Earth creationists believe that Adam does not have a belly button. The young creationists of the earth strongly adhere to the concept of the unquestionable Bible, the Bible is the inspiration of God, absolutely correct in all matters to deal with them, without any errors, science, and history and I believe it is completely authoritative. And morality and theology. Young Earth creationists also believe that advocates of modern scientific understanding they do not agree are mainly driven by atheism.

Harry Emerson Fosdick was born in Buffalo, New York on May 28, 1878. Fosdick married Florence Allen Whitney in 1904, and in the same year served as a pastor at the First Baptist Church in Montclair, New Jersey. Their daughters' names are Eleanor and Dorothy. He taught at the United Seminar in New York from 1908 to 1946. Fosdick wrote a popular magazine like Harper's, Atlantic Monthly, Ladies' Home Journal, but he covers twice. He became a weekly missionary of the Presbyterian church in New York for six years (Christian). Evolution was not the subject of major religious debates in the United States by 1910, but in the 1920s the theological debate of fundamentalism and modernism was based on the teachings of evolution and Christianity on the origin of modern creationism Brought the foundation of. When evolution was reintroduced into the curriculum, there was a series of lawsuits that tried to teach creationism along with the evolution of science courses. A young Earth creationist (YEC) promotes the creation of science as "another scientific interpretation of the world we live in". This often quotes design arguments to explain the complexity in nature to prove the existence of God. Most of the creative scientific supporters hold Christian faith in the Bible or Christian Biblical or Evangelical rather than higher criticism that liberal Christian belief in fundamentalism - contemporaryism debate. But there is also an example of scientific creation of Islam and Jews that is consistent with the story of the creation recorded in their religious teachings. The Adventist Church on the seventh day has a history of creating science. This can be traced back to the active 7th day Adventist church, George McLeadie Price, which developed the views of flood geology and formed the foundation of creative science. This study was continued by the Earth Science Institute, the official institution of the Adventist Church on Day 7 on the campus of the University of Loma Linda in California.

In 1859, Charles Darwin introduced theories of evolution, or the development and diversity of all creatures, including humans, from other living things and species through the natural selection of publications of species origin. Based on strong evidence, Darwin caused a scientific revolution that changed the world's perception and understanding of modern science. He also caused intense controversy in the Christian dominated society. The conflict between science (the theory of evolution of Darwin) and religion (sentences of the Bible) is widely spread throughout the country as a teaching of evolution, and is preferably reflected in the range trial. The jury of Range Monkey Trial, held in a small court in Dayton, Tennessee, prepared for the "monkey" trial to return the case of the most controversial case of the 1920s. So far, the trial itself has become a sight of the media, lawyers, witnesses and even defendants are symbol of the commercial media of the 1920s. The trial itself was set as a media demonstration to challenge the constitutionality of the stewardship. This act prohibits the teaching of "any theory that denies the creation story of God taught by the Bible", in particular the theory of evolution. Civil liberties in the United States Range Monkey Trials One of the most famous attempts in our history is John Scopes. Scopes was a high school teacher at Dayton, Tennessee and was arrested for teaching evolution in high school biology lessons. In the 1920s, in Tennessee province, except for creationism written in the Bible, all breaches of law were the same. These laws are the result of a strong fundamentalist movement in the United States. - ... With scientific rationality we can establish a scientific way to investigate the surrounding world. The world and the universe where we live are far beyond the complexity of the creation of our world through the creation of God. Dr. Kenneth Miller is a scientist who also believes in God and in an interview with NOVA discusses why evolution is a more reliable explanation for creating our world than creationism.

Theme and Symbol: Inheritance winds may be the best court drama of the 20th century, and inheritance wind is based on the famous range of monkey trials. That play was printed 30 years later and depends on changing the reality elements of the trial case. The central confrontation of play is based on the scope of the monkey trial itself. For example, when Brady discussed religious values, Drummond asserted natural values ​​and freedom of thought. The theme of handling the wind is not only strongly conveyed through a dramatic and interesting plot but also through dramatic and persuasive performance. Brady and Drummond showed outstanding performances, Brady played a passionate role and gained everything, but after losing the wind they lost everything. In contrast, Drummond played a dry humanized atheist until the end. These characters are fully presented by talented actors who play them. Jerome Lawrence and Robert Lee wrote the drama "Inheritance Wind". It is based on the exam of the 1925 range (monkey). Henry Drummond is a counsel of Bertram Cates. Matthew Harrison Brady is a prosecutor. Katz is on trial because his second grade course teaches evolution rather than most of his choice of creation. In a conversation with Brady, Drummond said: "The idea is a bigger monument than the cathedral." This is the best way to show the theme of a drama by showing the importance of thought and progress. In the intense drama "inheritance" by Jerome Lawrence and Robert E. Lee, three strong men expressed a strong view: Bertram Cates, Henry Drummond and Matthew Harrison Brady. First, defendant Bert Cates was responsible for teaching "Darwinism" in his second year. Second, Katz's counsel, Henry Drummond, showed his belief in the right to think. Third, Matthew Harrison Brady is a "giant" prosecutor who explains his prejudice against creationism. Overall, these three basic characters are fighting for their personal beliefs. In the drama "inheritance wind" by Jerome Lawrence and Robert E. Lee, Drummond and Brady have different views on how human beings reach the earth. Drummond supports the theory of evolution, but Brady is creationism. This book is a play of the Broadway theater based on the experiments of the Tennessee Mountains and John Thomas in 1925. The trial itself has a series of conflicts centered on evolution and religion but there is a series of tensions throughout the trial including collective and personal rights as well as academic and parental interests. In addition, the contradictory idea of ​​creation and evolution brings the various aspects of discussion and the right to freedom of speech.

Adam Clayton Powell Jr. once said that "There is no future for those who deny the past" (Applewhite, Evans, III, Frothingham 474). Over the centuries these words apply to the world and most people can not understand the concept of the way human beings come from scientific nature. Denying this fact, the world will not be able to develop. Evolution theory can be verified compared to creationism. Because of the theory, evidence, and increased acceptance in today's society. Mass media frequently express science with the science of creation and evolution, religion, creation and religion, and evolution as science. Unfortunately, if you do not agree with this tag, you can also tag it. If you do not agree with the stereotype, whether you are a creationist or an evolutionist, you will be accused and "exposed" as a religious fanatic. To redeem absurd and unscientific religious worldview. Indeed, neither of the two origin models goes beyond reasonable doubt (otherwise evolution is not called the "theory of evolution"). Whether we think to admit it or not, our people who agree with evolution do this by faith. The understanding of design in biology may have a theological significance, but it is not based on religious premises - it is based on empirical observation and logic In the history of science and religion, there is no intense debate besides evolution and creation. Since most evidence supports evolution, this problem has caused intense debate, but due to longstanding religious beliefs, creation of ideas will never prove to be wrong. Human creation can be divided into three simple beliefs: creationism, natural evolution theology, and theological evolution. The complexity of the three aspects makes it possible for the theory to support a common national, religious or non-religious dilemma

Creation and Evolution: Many words about the origin of educational perspectives have been written. Many ancient people believed that there were some powerful gods responsible for producing humans (Warburton 12). Another theory is parallel evolution, where humans evolve simultaneously in several parts of the world (Allman, 54). The metaphysical assumptions and the moral meaning of evolution have been causing conflict for more than a hundred years. Biologists before "Darwin" are based on their theological assumptions of their science. An overview of the creation and evolution of school professors: evolutionary and creative education in the public school system is controversial. Charles Darwin announced his evolutionary conclusion in 1859. This dramatically changed the science of education in public school systems (Armenta, 1). Several lawsuits have been filed for evolutionary education. - Discussion between evolutionism and creative evolutionism and creationism has been on for a long time. When Charles Darwin proposed the origin of species in 1859, this was when the discussion began completely. The first discussion on evolution and creation in litigation took place in a 1925 trial. Evolution has been removed from textbooks and courses. Evolution began to infiltrate textbooks in 1987 Evolutionism is considerably younger than religious beliefs of creation and creation. Prior to Charles Darwin, evolution was a devout idea, and God as a creator was believed to be widely accepted. However, since Darwin introduced his evolution theory a century and a half ago, discussion about theory and creation always existed. - It is a modest expression that claims almost no conflict in the realm of faith and reason. From the earliest stage of scientific exploration, these two areas of thought fell into a vicious circle and gave up as the religion gradually modernized to adapt to the new understanding of the universe. Theological evolution theory, theological evolution theory, the evolutionistic creationism theory, or the evolutionary theory driven by God all considers God's religious teachings to be compatible with the scientific understanding of modern biological evolution. The evolution of theology itself is not a scientific theory, it is a series of ideas on how general evolutionary science relates to religious beliefs, and it is in stark contrast to special creative ideas. Advocates of theological evolution theory usually make evolutionist ideas consistent with belief in God and reject contradictory arguments about religious-science relations.

Plato introduces the concept of eidos, the invariant ideal form of all phenomena in the world, and shows that the change is an ideal and incomplete manifestation of God's inspiration. Therefore, Plato excluded evolutionistic thinking. Aristotle doubted Plato's philosophy - it shows a gradual change in the natural world from simple to complex. He proposed a concept of Scala Natura (a wonderful chain of existence) that seeds are fixed and do not evolve in the ladder of life. Two thousand years. Aristotle's world view was accepted into the Western philosophy. But in the context of Darwin's natural seed selection and contemporary evolution theory "evolution is a fact" prevents the comprehensive view of hundreds of subordinate theories found in major theoretical and evolutionary studies It might be. (Lewis, 1980). In order to consider this possible failure, the meaning of the theory must be considered. This term is often misused to represent concepts, reasoning, single ideas or assumptions, or that the author is uncertain It is. Futuyma quotes the theoretical definition in the Oxford English dictionary. "General statements, principles, or statements of causes of what is known or observed" (Futuyma, 1979). This theory is sufficient as the theory must include a description of its basic premise. If we can not state the basic premise (hypothesis) of the theory being discussed, people have not even begun to understand that theory. In historical context, creationism and evolution are always controversial subjects and are one of Darwin's major breakthroughs in spreading his evolution theory. When Darwin published his evolution theory in 1859, his book was thought of as a major technological advancement at the time. As the existence of evolution theory offsets society, there is nothing to prove the existence of God, create a catalyst, creationism is almost replaced by atheism. Darwin wrote 19 papers on evolution. Darwin is said to be the greatest scientific contributor to his evolution theory. If Darwin did not propose this theory, do people believe in today's evolution? Darwin got a lot of opportunities to inform her name. He is against the teaching of the Bible. Evolution of Darwin and Christianity There is some argument that the theory of evolution proposed by Charles Darwin does not oppose religion. Others do not believe in the theory of evolution, but they still contribute to education and redistribution. If they truly understand the theory, this will not happen. This is due to the impossibility to understand the doctrine of Darwinism and includes the most dangerous views of these theories that are penetrating society.

One of the first arguments advocated by Pandas and People is that the early Earth's experimental model at the beginning of life did not use oxygen. They believe that oxygen is necessary to interpret the oxides. Without oxygen, there is no ozone layer to protect our lives from destructive ultraviolet rays that could destroy life. (2) Therefore, actual experiments simulating the early environment of the earth require a large amount of oxygen. Errors used in these discussions miss some important evidence that oxygen is excluded from the equation. Evolution has emerged since the publication of the origin of Charles Darwin's species and people are discussing the merit of creationism and evolution. This theory is reinforced by the use of DNA, genetics, and its mutation research, the early species changes encountered and the distribution of related animal species over a wide range of geographical areas. - The individual believes in creation, some believe in evolution, and some are uncertain (Morris Henry). Some people insist on whether it is necessary to teach evolution and creation in school. Others feel that creation is not a sufficiently effective idea, but in fact we are teaching to young people of our generation. Over the years there have been many discussions and controversies on this subject. People have strong feelings about this topic and their beliefs. Since the publication of Charles Darwin 's Origins of Origin, people have discussed creationism and evolution. By supporting facts and assertions, evolution is defended as more than just a theory, which proves to be a fact. - Because he is made in the final state, a person can not evolve to another state. He is made according to the image and image of his father, so you do not need to evolve; therefore there is no sign of evolution from the beginning. Since sin entered the world, people have been fooled to believe that there is evolution Charles, Darwin. Origin of species and foundation of the origin of species. The full text of Darwin's first unpublished thesis explains evolution theory and the first edition of its presentation to the world. Florida St. Petersburg: Red and Black Press, 2009. ISBN 9781934941454. Writers and editors of the New World Encyclopedia rewrote and completed Wikipedia articles according to the standards of the New World Encyclopedia. This document conforms to the terms of the Creative Commons CC-by-sa 3.0 license (CC-by-sa) and can be disseminated using appropriate attribution. Under the terms of this license you can refer to the Contributors of the New World Encyclopedia and the contributors of the Spontaneous Volunteers of the Wikimedia Foundation. Please refer to this article for a list of acceptable reference formats. Researchers have access to the history of early contributions by Wikipedians.

Evolution of American Education System In July 1925, Tennessee's high school teacher John Skodes sat in the court to teach violations of state law by teaching evolution. In other words, humans and monkeys have similar ancestors. This was not an ordinary trial but a "trial of the century" and gathered attention of the media widely This is the battle between the two best lawyers in the country and evolution and creation, We are asking the question. The theory that God was put on the earth. The basic theme of this paper is the need to teach biological evolution in the discussion about creation and development of public education in the United States. The fact that evolution happens explains the interrelationship of various facts in biology and makes biology meaningful. This concept is a unified concept in biology education. In addition to "theory of evolution", the phrase "biological is meaningless" has been widely used by people who oppose deformation called creationism and its intelligent design. Although this article claims that Christianity and evolutionary biology are compatible (after De Chardin), this position is explained as evolutionistic creationism or theological evolution, but this term refers to creatures It is thought that anthropology is also included in academics. And those who think that it is creator. There is no need like Richard Dawkins who published The Selfish Gene three years later I think that American liberal arts education is a small evolution of European education in the 18th century. The world needs more things. Non-technical undergraduate education requires a new system to teach students how to learn and judge the scientific process of scientific, social and business related issues. Jane Austen and Shakespeare may be important, but in an increasingly complex, diversified and vibrant world, wisely, constantly learning citizens, and many others related to more adaptive human creation It is much less than that of. . If the rate of change is high, education needs to shift from knowledge to learning. This is the same as how the US educational system works. Regional control of education means that state students learn to evolve while other schools do not learn to develop or school boards control the curriculum rather than states. It is determined by people in other states. More patchwork, more confusion, more confusing. In addition to waving the flag of regional control, DeVos is a supporter of a charter school that deprives students and funds from private schools and public schools. She is promoting the practice of family education based on the skills and supervision of home schooling and the way they educate children.

Creating the Cosmic Controversy First, the universe was created among the Big Bang, or the patient God. In other words, the universe is created by God or scientific events. God's theory of creating the universe is a cosmological argument, which is also called the first element. It goes back as it is based on what the world and the universe can see. This means that there is some evidence and evidence. It does not rely on experience or reason, it does not rely on emotions, so it is not like the "ontology argument" preori. Evolutionism and creationism are often called "major debates". This is an emotional 'ingenious' problem. Science in the 20th century, to some extent, made a convincing discovery that the universe began. Both sides of the big argument believe that the universe is not always there. Unfortunately it is the place where the contract ends. For "why" and "how" of "original event", division and discussion begin here. There are two theories in this big argument. The first one is a historical default - origin creation model. I think this theory shows designers a complex design that collects everything. The second theory is a recent atheistic interpretation, an evolutionary origin model. This theory assumes that the complicated design of charging for all is a product of a coincidence chance and a lot of time. Old Earth Creationism is a transformation of the origins of the universe and the creative view of Earth's life. As a theory of origin, it is more consistent with the mainstream scientific ideas of the geology, the cosmology and the Earth's era and the younger earth creationism. Young Earth Creationism is a sort of religious belief that heavenly, earth and earthly life was created by God's direct actions from 6000 to 10,000 years ago. That believer is a Christian, a Jew, and a Muslim who believes that God created the earth in six hours and recorded the Hebrew Genesis as a written record. To the best of my knowledge, "the truth of the creation of the Bible" is the first book on the creation of the theology of theology and interprets the story of the creation of the Bible in such a way that it does not give arguments about the Earth era and the universe . Obviously, the age of the earth or the universe is not a question of the Bible. There are no places in the Bible that mention the times of the heavens and the earth. Therefore, we have no choice but to think about how to present discussions on the age of the universe among intellectuals without prioritization of the Bible. The theory of Genesis related to Protestant Protestant Christianity in the United States supports the original Bible (Tattersall 21) about the creation of God's humans and other parts of the universe. Today, as a part of America 's populist revival, Genesis is emerging again. - The development of humanoid bipedalism was about 4 million years ago, and there was a wonderful evolution in Africa. Early human race, human ancestry began a big leap in its evolution. These primitive people moved out of the forest and started walking upright on the plain (Fagan, 98). This change from four-leggedism is the most important adaptation of these early primitive humans. It causes many changes and makes humans today.

Therefore, the teachings of Galileo were banned by the church and Galileo himself was imprisoned. However, in 1992, the Vatican City, led by Pope John Paul II, had a ritual declaring Galileo correct in Copernicus's investigation and support. (Abstract) This shows that today's church does not believe science is a threat or interference to its doctrine. The current church actually supports the evolution of science and natural selection. However, many popes and Catholics generally accept evolution, but there are still many things. Evolution of Darwin and Christianity There is some argument that the theory of evolution proposed by Charles Darwin does not oppose religion. Others do not believe in the theory of evolution, but they still contribute to education and redistribution. If they truly understand the theory, this will not happen. This is due to the impossibility to understand the doctrine of Darwinism and includes the most dangerous views of these theories that are penetrating society. Since the publication of Charles Darwin 's Origins of Origin, people have discussed creationism and evolution. By supporting facts and assertions, evolution is defended as more than just a theory, which proves to be a fact. - Because he is made in the final state, a person can not evolve to another state. He is made according to the image and image of his father, so you do not need to evolve; therefore there is no sign of evolution from the beginning. Since sin entered the world, people have been fooled to believe that there is evolution In historical context, creationism and evolution are always controversial subjects and are one of Darwin's major breakthroughs in spreading his evolution theory. When Darwin published his evolution theory in 1859, his book was thought of as a major technological advancement at the time. As the existence of evolution theory offsets society, there is nothing to prove the existence of God, create a catalyst, creationism is almost replaced by atheism. Since the discovery of evolution, human creation has changed rapidly. Nevertheless, the world does not understand the theory and theory of evolution of Lord Charles Darwin for a while for a while. Prior to evolution, I believed that the upper class was called "sacred creature" by being influenced by the religious ideology of how human beings were created. However, the introduction of evolution theory used this theory as the foundation of biology and changed my mind.

Science's "heroic mode" is one of the most influential phenomena in history. The emergence of such worthwhile knowledge filled with realism, bold reasons, absolute truthfulness and overall objectivity has changed the way people think about the world and how they see the future It was. "Heroic mode" changed the rules and led the Western civilization into a new era full of shocking scientific surprises. The rebound from "Hero Mode" is so powerful that it will have a serious impact on other topics like history. Today's science is divided into two categories: operational science and historical science. Operational science is genuine, concrete science. Science is observable, verifiable, reproducible, and tamperable. Historical science is also known as origin science. Both creationism and evolution fall into this category. It can not be observed, tested and repeated directly. You can not forge it. No one observes the obvious first cells formed by abiotic organisms. Therefore, we can not prove it; it means not a science but a perspective. The way to create an account is the same. But there is a witness to creation, that is the creator himself (obviously God can not be included in science) Historically, a discussion on whether creationism is compatible with science dates back to 1874, when scientific historian John Wilhelm Draper published the history of conflict between religion and science. Among them, Draper painted the whole history of scientific development as a battle against religion. Progress in this history is further advertised by Andrew Dickson White's 2 volumes of scientific history and the believers of the Christian world science (1896). Their conclusion is controversial In the 19th century I also saw the birth of "confrontation model" of science and religion. This is the view that history can be understood by the confrontation between the two eras in the evolution of human thought - theology and science. This explanation comes from the influential 'science and theological science war' in Andrew Dickson White's Christian world (1896), whose title is a good summary of the author's general theory. White's research established a discussion of conflict as the default way of thinking about the historical relationship between science and religion, as well as John William Draper's earlier "history of conflict between religion and science" (1874) . Both works are translated into multiple languages

When contemporary people think about human formation, our idea is automatically directed to Adam and Eve Adam and Eve are the first men and women created by God according to Genesis. Prior to the advent of Eve and Adam, various cultures proposed myths about human construction. These myths include: "The Song of Creation" from Rig Veda, African creation stories from Popol Vuh, and Creative Stories of Native Americans "How People Created". . I'm human. Creative myth (or creative story) is a cultural, traditional or religious myth that explains the earliest beginning of the world today. Creative myth is the most common form of myth, usually developed first through oral tradition and human culture. Creation myths are often not historical or literal, but are often thought of as those who convey deep truth. Though not always, they are often considered to be cosmic myths - they represent the order of the universe from a disordered state or disordered state. Creative myth, also known as the cosmic myth, is a philosophical and theological detailed explanation of the first creation myth within the religious community. The term myths here refers to imaginative expressions in the narrative form of experiences and understandings as basic reality (see also myths). The word "creation" refers to the beginning of things from an ultimate source of information, or in other ways, from the intention and behavior of transcendental existence. The creation myth is a symbolic story of the origin of the world, as understood by a particular community. Later creationism was based on the subsequent history and community needs. Thus, for example, all theology and speculation about the Christian community is based on the Bible Genesis and creation myths created by Jesus Christ.

Human origin I have found scientific remarks that claim that the pyramid was built in 10, 500 BC. It is hard to believe. He insisted that they were built long ago, but he and the other people thought that the first civilization did not show up to 3,500 BC. I have studied and discovered reliable and continuous chronological events over the 7000 time difference. All things in the Bible have been proven in archeology and chronological order, so I chose it as my source. The creation model and the evolution model give various predictions about the origin of life, human, and the universe. Evolutionary models explain the origins of life, humans, and the universe using natural laws and processes. The creative model is mainly based on the Bible. Surprisingly, more religions are focused on evolution than creation. Religion based on evolution theory includes Buddhism, Hinduism, spiritualism, and humanism. Creatorism is mainly based on three religions: Judaism, Christianity and Muslim. God originally created a common origin of harmony with mankind. Throughout the process of evolution, this common origin can be divided into humans and ambiguous ones. Over the years, people have evolved into his present form. This evolution is the result of human natural selection or adaptation to a changing environment, and the adoption of specific functions to effectively compete. Creationism has evolved from the creation of God to evolution. The main basis of the creative story is the Bible, which is the only foundation for Christians to deny evolution theory. Christians argues that evolution contradicts what the Bible says, but they are wrong. If you carefully study the Bible, you will find that there is nothing directly contradicting the concept of evolution in it. Catholics seem to have wrong assumptions about this topic.

Case 2: Creationism In this case, the biological teacher was told that he should teach creationism rather than evolution theory. Teacher Sandra Maxwell was very upset and I did not want to tell her students her work. Insertion in a new textbook states that evolution is 'controversial' and accepted by 'some scientists'. I think this is not an injury. Teaching students different theories about how the earth and living things are formed will not cause any harm. She is biased towards creation. Richard Dawkins publicly opposed fundamentalist religion because he actively destroyed education including science-related activities and science. According to Dawkins, religion "destroys science and weakens intelligence." When a science teacher tries to explain the theory of evolution, parents become hostile as parents think they contradict their religious beliefs, and even in some textbooks, "evolution theory" is systematically deleted think. He has promised to show a negative influence that religion believes exerts on science education. In collaboration with science educator Anna Thanukos and scientific philosopher Michael Weisberg, I examined this issue in a paper published in Evolution: Education & Outreach in 2008. We have dozens of students completing the survey to evaluate their views on science and evolution. Our goal is to find out if someone understands the relationship with the nature of science, such as scientific theory and how to develop science, and whether we accept evolution as a human or other species explanation . Science education defines the principle (property) of the nature of science understood by students and important to all citizens. William McComas and Joanne Olson analyzed the latest science education curriculum documents around the world and confirmed 14 general statements on the essence of science on most courses. This is probably the most widely recognized principle of scientific essence. These principles are considered suitable for elementary and junior high school because they do not need to provide a more accurate view of scientific career and to effectively understand scientific expertise. Each principle is explained in principle of the essence of science Correction: For decades, scientific education standards and reform documents have clearly stated that the guidance on the nature of science and process is an important part of science education for children and adolescents. For example, see the Science and Technology Exercise section of the National Academy of Sciences K - 12 Science Education Framework. Correction: The nature and process of science are knowledge that can be taught and evaluated. In fact, concepts related to the nature of science and processes are increasingly appearing in standardized tests. Furthermore, what we teach should not be determined by test alone, but should be determined by what is beneficial for the student. Students can use scientific nature and process concepts to decide whether to accept scientific ideas (evolution, climate change, etc.), whether to pursue science, and other important political, personal, social Determine the problem.

We studied the empirical evidence of religious socialism, assuming that religion promotes expensive behavior that would benefit others. Although the sociological survey reveals the relationship between religious beliefs and social and self-declaration, experiments measuring religious beliefs and actual sociocal behavior show that such relationships are mostly reputable It is suggested that the problem will occur in a situation where it is strengthened. Experimentally induced religious thinking reduced the rate of fraud and increased the altruistic behavior of anonymous strangers. Experiments prove the relationship between an obvious profession of religious devotion and greater trust. Cross-cultural evidence suggests that there is a correlation between the cultural existence of ethical concerns and the number of large groups. We will synthesize evidence from every field for religious parent society, solve their specific boundary conditions and point out unresolved issues and new forecasts. Investigation of Religious Behavior from a Cross-Cultural Perspective This approach has a wide range of comparisons and important anthropological implications, including the origin and evolution theory of religious systems and the functions of religious behavior and institutions throughout the culture . Case studies are primarily from text society, but some relate to large-scale organized religious systems in complex hierarchical societies. African archeology has renewed global debate about the origins of agriculture and civilization. This course examines the prehistoric economic foundation of a complex society in Africa: intensive hunting and gatherings, early grazing and domestication of plants. Detailed case studies of ancient civilizations (Egypt, Aksum, Jenny, Swahili, Da Zimbabwe) reveal various processes of pre-historical social change in various parts of Africa The second part details the history of creationism / evolution theory. Publications from ancient times to the origin of the species briefly explain its history. After that discussions will continue on scientific and religious correspondence to the origins of Europe and America. What followed was the rise of fundamentalism in the early 20th century and the absorption of creationism. Scott briefly and clearly explained the origin and demise of various young earth creationists throughout the heyday of Edwards versus Aguilard. Mostly reworked chapters describe the emergence of neo-creativeism, from the now-forgotten creationist attorney Windel Bird's "sudden emergence" strategy to more famous IDC The concept of life evolution was a positive source of academic discussion centered on the philosophical, social and religious implications of evolution . Today, modern evolutionary synthesis is accepted by most scientists. However, for some experts evolution is still a controversial concept. While various religions and sects harmonize their beliefs and evolution through concepts such as the evolution of theology, some creationists contradict evolution with creation myths found in religion and raised various objections to evolution I believe it.

Memphis' attraction Memphis is considered to be the base of blues music, but the reputation of the city also includes a mansion where Elvis Presley lives. There are lots of wonderful attractions in the city, but these are the most memorable spots in Memphis. Memphis is the largest city in Tennessee, with a population of over 670,000. In addition to being the home of Blues, this town is also famous for its famous Elvis Presley home. Because of its size, Memphis has to be made and makes the choices to be seen, so if you want to experience that taste, consider a few days' stay. Memphis is the most violent place in Tennessee province and is one of the most violent places in the country. In 2016, the city reported 1,830 violent crimes per 100,000 inhabitants. There are 633 violent crimes per 100,000 people in 2016 in Tennessee as a whole. This is the highest percentage of violent crimes in the state. Harlingen's unemployment rate is 6.1%, much higher than the state's 4.6% unemployment rate. Like many cities in this list, the population of Harlingen is decreasing. Over the past five years, the population of the city has increased by 3.7%, but the population of the city has decreased by 0.9%. Located in the southeast corner of Tennessee, Memphis is the largest city in the state and has a population of about 650,000. In the hearts of many people, about 61% of African Americans in Memphis, and 34% of whites in the last census are always in black and white cities, the civil rights movement website, and King Martin Luther It is Dr.'s lifetime. Fatal Attacks However, the dramatic growth of Latin immigrants to Memphis is expected to greatly change the ethnic composition of this big city. From 1990 to 2000, the population of Latin Memphis increased by more than 600%. 104 Memphis' attraction Memphis is considered to be the base of blues music, but the reputation of the city also includes a mansion where Elvis Presley lives. There are lots of wonderful attractions in the city, but these are the most memorable spots in Memphis. Memphis is the largest city in Tennessee, with a population of over 670,000. In addition to being the home of Blues, this town is also famous for its famous Elvis Presley home. - Teaching students' evolutionary theory was in the classroom for about 100 years. The war between evolutionism and creationism lasted long (Bailey 63)

Most people in the world believe that the spirit exists on the earth. In fact, "Most religions and cultures believe that the universe was created by" creative hands ". As a test, think which one wins, creates or evolves. It was the most controversial argument in history, but creation is more logical than evolution. First of all, in order to understand the contents of creation, it is necessary to know what creation is. The Bible defines creation as an action that makes God realize the universe and all its contents. What is evolution, evolution? Evolution is the process of adapting different forms of living things from their initial form. Because biology is a study of life and evolution is how organism adapts to the environment, evolution is closely related to biology. "Evolution is a process that diversifies from the earliest forms of the history of the earth with the development of various kinds of organisms." Evolution occurs within species, not within individuals. Some people believe that evolution is a myth that lacks scientific evidence, others believe there is evidence to support it. Evolution of living things is thought to have been going on for the past three billion years. Intelligent design has scientific basis. However, given the fact that it seems to be fashionable and complicated now, it seems to believe in evolution theory. Even those who do not know the topic have never considered evolutionary evidence. The belief in the theory of evolution is an amazing phenomenon. There is no observable evidence of macroscopic evolution (ie evolution from different organisms to another), but it is still enthusiastically defended by scientific institutions. This strange situation is easily documented here, acknowledging that they lack evidence, quoting a recent statement by a leading evolutionist. These statements misrepresent that no significant scale evolution has occurred at this time, never occurred in the past and can not occur at all. Since the publication of Charles Darwin 's Origins of Origin, people have discussed creationism and evolution. By supporting facts and assertions, evolution is defended as more than just a theory, which proves to be a fact. - Because he is made in the final state, a person can not evolve to another state. He is made according to the image and image of his father, so you do not need to evolve; therefore there is no sign of evolution from the beginning. Since sin entered the world, people have been fooled to believe that there is evolution

The choice of class teacher's skills and teaching method plays an important role in raising students' interest in biology. The purpose of this study was to study the most successful teaching methods in the biology curriculum and the views of junior high school students and biologist teachers about viable options to make the biology class more interesting. In this survey, students voting from several schools, two Jelgava secondary schools, two from Riga, one from Vecumnieki were voted. According to the findings, 58% of students think the biology course is very interesting. We stated that the ability of 56% of the students to concentrate on biology lessons depends on my subjects. Most importantly, they look at teacher 's speech, listen to teachers about real topics, and like to do laboratory work and group work. While many students prefer to participate in the discussion, very few students will do various exercises, individual work, fill out worksheets, or complete the project. The smallest student among all the students wants to use textbooks. The most commonly used methods by teachers are as follows. Lecture, explanation, presentation, discussion. Teachers believe that their students like working in the laboratory, discussions, listening to teacher opinions, and watching demos and movies. They also show that the theory must be linked to practice and involve information technology. While teaching their subject biology teacher, try to establish a relationship between theory and real life to cultivate student's interest in natural processes. In most of the first half of the 20th century, the evolutionary guidance of the American high school biology course was not common. Due to the 1925 Scope trial decision, this issue was very rare in American middle school biology textbooks but gradually reintroduced and legally protected by Epperson v. Arkansas in 1968. Since then, in various decisions of the 1970s and 1980s, creative religious beliefs for creationism were legally prohibited in the junior high school curriculum, but in 2005 2005, as a intelligent design (ID) pseudo-science It was returned in the form of. Kitzmiller v.Dover of that year was also excluded. District school district affair In order to become a secondary school teacher, you need to obtain a bachelor's degree in secondary education or a subject such as biology. In order to teach at a public school it is necessary to obtain a state educational license or certificate. Secondary school teachers at private schools generally do not need to hold proofs, but this is becoming increasingly popular in private school systems. The most common step to becoming a high school teacher is to get accredited with the particular subject you want to teach in order to qualify. Many four-year colleges need to wait for a second grader or a second grader before applying for a teacher's program. These courses include student guidance internships while the students have the opportunity to work under the guidance of experienced educators and teachers.

(Background of the Victorian era, class notes: 102 pages) This era influences tennison and its mental state and mediates the deepest concern of Victorian era religious doubts such as death, creation, evolution. Memoriam has many intellectual problems involved, and the poet seeks the meaning of life and death when it tries to reach an agreement with his sense of loss. (Victorian context, class notes: 110 pages) mourn the fight to harmonize traditional religious beliefs and beliefs. Tennyson's Memoriam and Arnold's To Marguerite Nature Picture - continued and Dover Beach The two poets who used rich natural paintings during the Victorian era were Alfred, Lord Tennyson and Matthew Arnold. In Tennyson's "mourning" he uses various aspects of nature as a metaphor to explain the feelings of close friends after death. Arnold's verse uses various kinds of water as a metaphor of To Marguerite - Continued and Dover Beach. At the beginning of Tennyson's poem, he explained about the ancient yew tree. Perhaps his greatest poem was "In Memoriam" which was published in 1850, which was written in the past 17 years. After his death of his close friend Arthur Haarlem, he began writing. His death questioned Tennyson about the purpose of life and the importance of death. As all events relate to Haarlem and death, "taking in mourning" is like a poetic diary. They said that the uncertainty of this poem makes it very beautiful. T. S. Eliot, a poet of the 20th century, said, "This is a very bad thing, but that doubt is a very intense experience." Strength, doubt, beauty: typical Tennyson Tennyson was only 24 years old when his best friend Arthur Henry Haarlem died suddenly. Tennyson will write a poem devoted to Haarlem in the next decade and publish it as "Mourning" (SparkNote 1) in 1850. Haarlem's death will seriously hurt Tennyson's religious beliefs and encourage him to solve these questions through exploration of death, especially Harlan's long mourning to his long poem. He sometimes asks religion, but he also holds doubts about science. However, Tennyson believes that evolution is progressing, I am concerned about the conflict with this biblical creationism and believe that despite scientific discoveries it is necessary to maintain faith in God It is. (Spark note 1)

The idea of ​​evolution and the creative concept of the Bible are created and evolved from two different perspectives. The main difference here is that there is a god in the story of the beginning of creation and there is a random opportunity in the theory of evolution at the beginning. It is often referred to as "big debate" because everyone asks that the two sides are in conflict, "Why are we here, we are here?" The theories and models of various creative disciplines are based on several presets, each one opposite the evolutionary assumption. The most fundamental thing is that the Bible's revelation is the key to understanding the world The Bible is a fundamental and irreplaceable source of information. Many Christians believe that if we consider creative days to be figurative, we can coordinate the Bible with the Big Bang and the very ancient Earth. However, this seems reasonable for those who do not pay enough attention to a series of events according to Genesis 1 or a series of events following evolution theory. Some theologians are trying to harmonize the story created by the Bible with the evolutionary interpretation of the origin of life. However, to do this, we need to explain the creation time of Genesis 6 days indefinitely, not 24 hours text instead of 6 hours of text. This interpretation of the Bible can not be supported by the rational principles of Bible study. In many ways, evolution is incompatible with Christianity. There are several questions to consider. 1. Create a story. The story of the creationist in the first two books of Genesis, the first book of the Bible clearly shows that the work of creation was completed in six hours or 24 hours. Evolutionism contradicts this directly, denying God's creativity. As Christ instantly created a miracle on the ground, he created immediate creations during the creation cycle. In Aristotle's metaphysics, he discussed the theory of his origin. Aristotle's theory must be distinguished from creationism. The word "creation" means the thought of the Bible. Because Aristotle is not familiar with the texts of the Bible, he does not understand the concept of "creation" in the sense of the Bible. Instead, he is more interested in the "origins" of the world. Aristotle believes that there are three kinds of substances before the concept of time, two of which are physical, one of which is immovable. It can be said that these three substances are "sensible eternal", the second substance is "sensitive and fragile", and the third substance is immovable. As the theory advances further, sensitive and perishable substances can be regarded as substances and eternal rational substances can be regarded as potential substances Animals can be regarded as metaphysical and belong to another science I will. According to Aristotle, animals are not gods.

Evolution is a topic that is always controversial and is very important in defining the origin of human beings. Genesis is still a common belief in contemporary society and is maintained by virtual truth in a sense and this belief has been widespread for many years prior to the concept of evolution but it is a major opposition to evolution It is a person. Alan Rogers, author of Evidence Evolution, provides a comprehensive discussion on creationism, from molecular data to morphological data. He believes that many creationists are using "arguments from personal doubts," which means that the lack of detailed explanation of the problem is evidence of the answer. Combining "evidence of evidence" with textbooks on NOS (eg Espinoza 2012) to fully exploit the important contributions of Rogers is likely to achieve the author's worthy goals: evolutionary science Understanding, acceptance, and thanks. The fact, logic, simplicity is unlikely to affect the recognition of the evolutionary rationality of most people. Biology courses and textbooks focus on the evolutionary mechanism and sacrifice evidence of evolution, although most people are unknown, but unless you believe in evolution, you are exposed to massive evidence. They change their beliefs. Since the evolution theory of textbooks is becoming increasingly sophisticated, it is unknown whether most biologists agree with the initial premise. Indeed, after reviewing some of the best-selling elementary level biology books (Nehm et al. 2009), I know that many of the topics discussed by Rogers are actually included in these texts . I also suspect that science educators agree with the second premise: empirical research shows that more understanding of evolution often can not contribute to meaningful belief changes . Intelligent design has scientific basis. However, given the fact that it seems to be fashionable and complicated now, it seems to believe in evolution theory. Even those who do not know the topic have never considered evolutionary evidence. In the 1980's, Philip Johnson began reading the scientific literature on evolution. Science was defined by finding a natural interpretation, but this means that Darwin writes in court, examines the evidence of evolution from a religious point of view and challenges the sole rational interpretation of the origin of the species lead. Because of the phenomenon. His efforts to raise the credibility of this book and the subsequent creative list and to adjust it is the beginning of the "Smart Design" movement. Intelligent design assertions have evidence that life was created by "smart designers" (primarily because the physical properties of objects are very complex and must be "designed"). Supporters argue that IDs take into account not only the facts gained through naturalism but "all the facts available"

Dr. Morrow's Evolution Theory, God and Society In his book "The Island of Morrow Dr." written by H. G. Wells, you can see a microcosm that evolves and expresses God and society as strange things. First of all, Dr. Morrow fulfills the role of God. Dr. Morrow is an educated person who attempts to prove that animals change into human form, so animals become more and more humans, forgetting all of their animal instincts. After Morrow produced these beasts, he ruled them through fear. Theological evolution theory, theological evolution theory, the evolutionistic creationism theory, or the evolutionary theory driven by God all considers God's religious teachings to be compatible with the scientific understanding of modern biological evolution. The evolution of theology itself is not a scientific theory, it is a series of ideas on how general evolutionary science relates to religious beliefs, and it is in stark contrast to special creative ideas. Advocates of theological evolution theory usually make evolutionist ideas consistent with belief in God and reject contradictory arguments about religious-science relations. Francis Collins says, "Evolution is a reality, but it is started by God," and if you acknowledge that "evolution will explain it, but to a biologist who explains it under the guidance of God" Describe. Eugenie Scott, secretary general of the National Science Education Center of the United States of America, uses this term to refer to a part of the range of all beliefs about creation and evolution, including the theological view God created through evolution. It covers a wide range of beliefs about the scope of divine intervention. Some of them are close to the concept that naturalism rejects continuous intervention. Genesis stated that "God created mankind in his own image." If God is speech, God created mankind with his own image, words and languages ​​are sacred sparks that divide humans from animals, and refuted Darwin 's theory of evolution. Darwin and his supporters did not try to explain how speech and language were born and evolved. In 1872, the London Language Institute ceased accepting papers on this issue until the 1950s when attractive young linguists named Noam Chomsky adopted linguistics as topics. Scientists abandoned. Chomsky writes over 150 books, but I can not count how many articles, but I have never responded to criticism about the origin of language in Darwin. In 2014, eight famous scientists, including Noam Chomsky, published a paper titled "Mystery of Language Evolution." Golden lie: how sex and deception promote human evolution, civilization and 2016 presidential election

Due to the evolution of the symbol two billion years ago, the first multicellular organism was formed by collision of two prokaryotes. About 65 million years ago, asteroids hit the earth, dinosaurs died out. Three days ago, in your note, you painted a bunch of troubling songs, you represent the first in 1948 paintings of Jackson Pollock. You wrote the word entropy in the upper left corner of the page. At the bottom right of your writing, creativity is based on randomness and chance. The DNA and evolution of all creatures in the universe are ubiquitous. Why does the creator create the "story" of the universe at the beginning of the "third act"? Why create - to deeply and aggressively integrate evolution - can we use this ability from the beginning? According to Christian theory, after 1000 years, no matter how much deformation the Earth and all seeds experience, believers willfully ignore the entire 1000-year scientific history to maintain their argument There is no doubt. Theory of Evolution Theory (TE), also known as evolutionary creationism - The idea of ​​God's creation is to skillfully design the universe where everything evolves naturally. Normally, "evolution" in "theoretical evolution" means complete evolution - astronomical evolution (forming the galaxy, the solar system, etc.) and geological evolution (forming the geology of the earth) and chemical evolution Forming the first life) Biological evolution (for the development of life) - but it can only refer to biological evolution The purpose of biology is the product of evolution. Therefore, in order for life to have a biological purpose, it must be a product of evolution. But life is not a product of evolution. For evolution to happen, life must appear on the scene. Because evolution foretails life, life has no biological significance. Other purposes are useful. When we say that the purpose of the hammer is to strike a nail into the nail, we are talking about the purpose of their tool. This purpose comes from the intention of the creator of things. The purpose of the hammer is to hit a nail, for this is the idea of ​​the hammer creator when designing it. Evolution occurs at the population level. Natural selection is a mechanism of evolution. This is the process of adapting organisms to their environment by genetic traits. Darwin's bird is known as a symbol of evolution. Finch is a sparrow eye bird. Today there are about 14 kinds of finches known, but most of them are found in the Galapagos Islands. Specifically, there are only 13 species in the Galapagos Islands and 1 species in Cocos Island. These species are similar in most respects except shape and size, with one feature.

The theory of evolution is the story of Meyer and his naturalist - an evolutionist that contains natural choices in their interpretation and constitutes the majority of today's evolutionary sounds - and now enters evolutionary stagnation. Not yet. For example, consider the fact that Meyer's speciation center theory applies to creative species such as humans. The cultural and creative aspects of what we call "high level" species can confound the evolution of new species of taxa and how they can evolve from Homo sapiens. Restriction, social culture What is evolution, evolution? Evolution is the process of adapting different forms of living things from their initial form. Because biology is a study of life and evolution is how organism adapts to the environment, evolution is closely related to biology. "Evolution is a process that diversifies from the earliest forms of the history of the earth with the development of various kinds of organisms." Evolution occurs within species, not within individuals. Some people believe that evolution is a myth that lacks scientific evidence, others believe there is evidence to support it. Evolution of living things is thought to have been going on for the past three billion years. Intelligent design has scientific basis. However, given the fact that it seems to be fashionable and complicated now, it seems to believe in evolution theory. Even those who do not know the topic have never considered evolutionary evidence. The belief in the theory of evolution is an amazing phenomenon. There is no observable evidence of macroscopic evolution (ie evolution from different organisms to another), but it is still enthusiastically defended by scientific institutions. This strange situation is easily documented here, acknowledging that they lack evidence, quoting a recent statement by a leading evolutionist. These statements misrepresent that no significant scale evolution has occurred at this time, never occurred in the past and can not occur at all. Since the publication of Charles Darwin 's Origins of Origin, people have discussed creationism and evolution. By supporting facts and assertions, evolution is defended as more than just a theory, which proves to be a fact. - Because he is made in the final state, a person can not evolve to another state. He is made according to the image and image of his father, so you do not need to evolve; therefore there is no sign of evolution from the beginning. Since sin entered the world, people have been fooled to believe that there is evolution

In his article "Global warming erodes glacier ice", Revkin believes that global warming continually changes the world we live today. He confirmed his position by including examples such as the disappearance of the North Pole Crown, melting of glaciers, erosion of glaciers. He also includes some facts and some notes on expert testimony to further confirm his position. Throughout this article, Revkin repeatedly quotes Dr. Lonnie G. Thompson. Dr. Thompson is a professor at the Ohio State University Earth Sciences Division and a researcher at Ohio State University Bird Polar Research Center. I became a science journalist in 1990. I am the editor in chief of Discover. Andy Revkin is currently working on senior editor ProPublica. Just before I started, he just wrote a cover story about global warming. I think this is the first cover story about global warming. Revkin wrote an article on NASA's climate scientist Jim Hansen and his testimony on the climate model. And it showed that human carbon emission increased the temperature. I wrote a lot of articles about evolution at the time, and I was attacked by creationists. Evolution was a political football since the Scope's Monkey experiment. I have the first row of seats where I can see the art of attacking science. Creationists use misunderstandings about balance to demand equal time in creationism. They gave God the creation of other names. They chose my article to convey the opposite of what I wrote. They personally attacked biologists as liberated elites who hate good people. In his article "Global warming erodes glacier ice", Revkin believes that global warming continually changes the world we live today. He confirmed his position by including examples such as the disappearance of the North Pole Crown, melting of glaciers, erosion of glaciers. He also includes some facts and some notes on expert testimony to further confirm his position. Throughout this article, Revkin repeatedly quotes Dr. Lonnie G. Thompson. - Some people do not know about good and evil, but in the southern part of the 1930s nobody supports this guy besides Atticus, so you can see that black men are charged with rape charges. · Finch, this is the right man. In order to kill the Mockingbird, Harper Lee uses the role of Atticus Finch to prove that it is important for people to stand up and do the right thing.

The drama "The Wind of Succession" was written by Jerome Lawrence and Robert Lee to inform the reader about the corruption of the law restricting the freedom of the general public. The play was based on the actual occurrence of personal John Scope in Dayton, Tennessee in the 1920s. This famous "Monkey trial" not only allows people to accept new theories about the origin of mankind but also shows that they do not need to limit themselves to other aspects of life. At the beginning of the script, the author tried to lead us to the topic of Darwinism and creationism. Robert Lee and Jerome Lawrence who inherit the wind are famous dramas based on range trials. This scope trial was a lawsuit in 1925 at Dayton, Tennessee. In this case, John Scopes, a local alternative teacher accused of teaching evolution, was involved. There is the Butler law in Tennessee State, it is illegal for a state-funded school to teach evolution. Therefore the range was tried to break the law. Lee and Lawrence wrote "inheritance wind" to prove that the Butler law is unconstitutional and eliminated freedom of speech. However, the author changed many experimental events to persuade people to stand on the side of evolution and freedom of expression. When Li and Lawrence wrote their famous drama "Inheritance Wind", it was a bit reasonable to distort the facts and personality around the trial. It is based on the famous "Range Monkey Trial" in the town of Dayton, Tennessee. Inheritance styles were written by Jerome Lawrence and Robert Lee. The play was not intended to describe the actual history and litigation in scope tests but was used as a tool to explore social anxiety and anti-intellectualism that existed in the United States in the 1950s. Lawrence and Lee wrote the plays in response to the threat of intellectual freedom caused by anti-communist hysteria of McCarthy era. The main themes described in "Inheritance Wind" are curiosity of intellectuals, narrow or limited recognition, the importance of religion, and relationships of recognition.

Memphis' attraction Memphis is considered to be the base of blues music, but the reputation of the city also includes a mansion where Elvis Presley lives. There are lots of wonderful attractions in the city, but these are the most memorable spots in Memphis. Memphis is the largest city in Tennessee, with a population of over 670,000. In addition to being the home of Blues, this town is also famous for its famous Elvis Presley home. Because of its size, Memphis has to be made and makes the choices to be seen, so if you want to experience that taste, consider a few days' stay. Memphis is the most violent place in Tennessee province and is one of the most violent places in the country. In 2016, the city reported 1,830 violent crimes per 100,000 inhabitants. There are 633 violent crimes per 100,000 people in 2016 in Tennessee as a whole. This is the highest percentage of violent crimes in the state. Harlingen's unemployment rate is 6.1%, much higher than the state's 4.6% unemployment rate. Like many cities in this list, the population of Harlingen is decreasing. Over the past five years, the population of the city has increased by 3.7%, but the population of the city has decreased by 0.9%. Located in the southeast corner of Tennessee, Memphis is the largest city in the state and has a population of about 650,000. In the hearts of many people, about 61% of African Americans in Memphis, and 34% of whites in the last census are always in black and white cities, the civil rights movement website, and King Martin Luther It is Dr.'s lifetime. Fatal Attacks However, the dramatic growth of Latin immigrants to Memphis is expected to greatly change the ethnic composition of this big city. From 1990 to 2000, the population of Latin Memphis increased by more than 600%. 104 Memphis' attraction Memphis is considered to be the base of blues music, but the reputation of the city also includes a mansion where Elvis Presley lives. There are lots of wonderful attractions in the city, but these are the most memorable spots in Memphis. Memphis is the largest city in Tennessee, with a population of over 670,000. In addition to being the home of Blues, this town is also famous for its famous Elvis Presley home. - Teaching students' evolutionary theory was in the classroom for about 100 years. The war between evolutionism and creationism lasted long (Bailey 63)

First, God created the heavens and the earth. Or say that. Then, this magical existence, this clever designer, will follow. He made the sun and the moon, the sea and the land, and all the beasts on the earth. Then he became a man. All these works were completed in just 6 days. Everything we know, everything we have should come from this short-lived and large-scale design. But this information is exactly opposite to what modern science tells us. And itself is the essence of national debate. They want to argue that the problem of evolution (or what they call "evolution theory" or "Darwinism") and science is not religion but religion and religion (science). "The example comes from the lie of Ken Ham: evolution, but it is called" the cause, principle or system of faith related to enthusiasm and belief "(from Webster Quoted) as well as a deep misunderstanding evolution of two religions) dictionary. Humm's ridiculous argument differs from "contradiction-free biblical evidence", in the past can only study them and can not access directly, so deriving scientific conclusions from fossils and evidence is That means you can not. Written in the era of Kenam As we all know, the story ends. Everyone accepts evolution and no longer discusses this issue. Assuming that it is not so, the argument that evolution and creationism will become mutually attracting each other for centuries is controversial, but how does this dialogue fit this dialogue? Next week we will post latter part of this topic and see how biologists, writers, and philosophers place emphasis on today's generality. As an idea closely related to science fiction, the amazing thing is how deep is the similarity of evolution, religion, and other places. For decades scientists and biologists have discussed arguments between nature and cultivation. This discussion is about how much our environment and genetics influence our behavior and developmental stages. According to this argument, nature can explain that human behavior occurs due to its genetic makeup. Because human behavior is due to its genetic structure, it should also affect the lifelong development and development of (natural) people. - A famous psychologist Jerome Kagan once said "Genes and families may decide the foundation of the house but time and place determine its form" (Moore 165). Discussion about nature and cultivation has been a mystery for many years and always appeals doubts about whether human behavior, thinking and feelings were born over time. Natural or genetic influences are formed before birth and fine tuned through initial experience

Believing in the theory of evolution, "Darwin did two things; he showed evolution is a fact contradictory to the literal interpretation of the creation of the Bible, for its reason, natural choice is not guidance or design of God "Britannica Encyclopedia) The traditional Christian view created by the world is that God created many things through planning, design and design in just six days. The creation and purpose of human creation in God bring personal meaning and value to Christian life. One of the major elements of biology is evolution. This does not mean that biochemists have to believe in evolution theory, meaning that biochemists who do not believe in evolution theory will misunderstand the main structural parts contributing to the establishment of research fields and their specialized and practical applications To do. But more importantly, biochemists who do not believe in the theory of evolution are likely to make erroneous conclusions about biochemical problems, since the basic understanding of the subject is partial and fragmentary. For example, you can teach "the story of two cities". I can even recite it without doubt. But if I believe it was written by Stephen King, I will reach the wrong conclusion about the content of this book sooner or later. Another example: You can learn how to build a house: places to buy materials, pour cement, hammer nails, walls and so on. Scientists will convince people that evolution is the only rational explanation for the universe. Scientists such as Stephen Hawking argue that evolution proved to be the correct answer to the origin of life and the origin of the universe, evolution is still a theory. This problem occurs because evolution is not the only answer. In fact, creationism provides more viable answers to the origin of the universe than to evolution. Create very special Bible support Science is always ongoing work. There is no one who believes in evolution, relativity, thermodynamics, as someone believes in God, angels, or the Bible. Instead, we accept evolution (etc) as the best explanation available today, the best reasoning work and the evidence that works best for us. Science is not a matter of faith. Of course, science is embedded in society and it may be distorted by desire, pride, and simple incompetence as well as human efforts under the influence of culture. Scientists may be corrupt and scientific organizations may be dominated by special interest groups and experimental results may be forged, research structures may be poor .

Just as Huck finds trapped in Dracula's castle, the author unexpectedly clarifies what is happening and leaves the situation at the most exciting and stressful moment. "Castle is a real prison, I am a prisoner!" Therefore, Byron claims that immediacy is related to fear, but suspense has the same purpose, because it makes the reader's fear It is because it evokes. Another feature that was very popular in the 18th century is the story of a letter like Pamela and Clarissa's Samuel Richardson. In 1859, Charles Darwin published a book titled "On the Origins of Species". This book is inserted into people's thoughts evolved from Victorian people, ie cockroaches. Therefore, we often refer to Mr. Hyde's animal characteristics in this book. The author thinks that Mr. Hyde is not a completely evolved person, rather than a human being, rather than a human being, and he depicts this through Mr. Hyde's animal image. When Mr. Uterson faced him for the first time at the entrance to Dr. Jekyll's laboratory, he was told that she was inhaling with a "squeaky" sound just like a snake had to go . Dr. Jackel's steward, Poole explained his crying like "mouse" and his movement like "monkey" and explained that his scream was "just fear of animals" Charles Darwin says to the agnostist Thomas Huxley in an introduction to the origin of the species as follows: It has been formed and placed on the surface of the earth for a long time ... Since this assumption is opposed to general analogy of nature it is worth remembering that it is not supported by tradition and revelation. Obviously his real opponent is a progressive creationist and claims that God has created all creations on the earth at different times and places. When he arranged various kinds of evidence, his repeated iteration was as follows. "We must admit that these facts are not explained by creationism"

The myth of Maori relates to the story of Polynesia on the creation of the universe, according to Rosenberg, it starts with nothing and is "not thinking about thinking about the creation of the universe and human" in other creation myths Varies. Process progress (351) It may be wrong, but it changes from "not present" to "thought" rather than nothing, so it is from words and actions, but with other creative myths and more Have similarities. It represents a natural event or aspects of nature and humanity. Creative myth (or creative story) is a cultural, traditional or religious myth that explains the earliest beginning of the world today. Creative myth is the most common form of myth, usually developed first through oral tradition and human culture. Creation myths are often not historical or literal, but are often thought of as those who convey deep truth. Though not always, they are often considered to be cosmic myths - they represent the order of the universe from a disordered state or disordered state. The myth of Maori relates to the story of Polynesia on the creation of the universe, according to Rosenberg, it starts with nothing and is "not thinking about thinking about the creation of the universe and human" in other creation myths Varies. Process progress (351) - Indian creative myth There are many explanations in Indian creative myth. They are all representatives of the main principles of Brahmin and are expressed as "ubiquitous, ubiquitous, ubiquitous". (Creating Myth Dictionary, p. 139, David Liming and Margaret Liming) Brahmin, or Brahma created an idea from God's behavior, he is a representative of Brahmin as a person. Creative myth, also known as the cosmic myth, is a philosophical and theological detailed explanation of the first creation myth within the religious community. The term myths here refers to imaginative expressions in the narrative form of experiences and understandings as basic reality (see also myths). The word "creation" refers to the beginning of things from an ultimate source of information, or in other ways, from the intention and behavior of transcendental existence. The creation myth is a symbolic story of the origin of the world, as understood by a particular community. Later creationism was based on the subsequent history and community needs. Thus, for example, all theology and speculation about the Christian community is based on the Bible Genesis and creation myths created by Jesus Christ.

What is our objective? How did it become? Many people ask these questions at some point in their lives. The answer is very controversial. Some say that higher powers produce the universe and everything in it. The goal of our life is to provide power. Others are giving us a scientific reason for being like a big bang, and the purpose of our life is to survive. The first theory above is called creationism. Another thing is that most schools encourage the evolution of evolution. Regarding titles, there are two ways of thinking. The first is that titles are reserved for certain relationships, such as slave owners, boys' fathers, son's jazz, etc. The title that they respect is among those in the relationship. I believe that it is appropriate for some of the communities to impose these self-stated personal titles on unrelated persons. The term of the leather community refers to how you wear certain clothes. Generally, the garments that are worn on the left side of the human body give the impression that a dominant, invasive or active person is dominant in human relationships or scenes. If you are wearing on the right side of the body, it is subjective, under or passive in a human relationship or scene. For multipurpose people, they tend to mark left and right. The title page is not used in papers written in MLA style. Instead, type your name, teacher's name, course name, and date in the upper left corner of the paper. Each item should be placed on a different line, each line must be placed in double space. Next, double the space to the title and center of the paper. Double the space twice and start the text. Research papers written in APA style usually require a summary or abstract of the paper. If an abstract is needed, it is in front of the text of the text. The title "summary" is central and the first page of this article. Then the text follows the next page number Research papers follow the standard composition (paper) format. It has titles, referrals, texts and conclusions. Some people prefer to start research papers with titles and introductions, others wait until the body of the paper begins before creating titles and introductory texts. For details on writing presentations and conclusions, please see this link. The last (but not important) step is to fix it. When changing, check the paper and change it with a weak part. The various fields for finding errors are as follows. Content - too much details or too few details, composition / structure (this is the order to write information about the subject), grammar, punctuation marks, capital letters, word selection,

Evolution is a topic that is always controversial and is very important in defining the origin of human beings. Genesis is still a common belief in contemporary society and is maintained by virtual truth in a sense and this belief has been widespread for many years prior to the concept of evolution but it is a major opposition to evolution It is a person. Alan Rogers, author of Evidence Evolution, provides a comprehensive discussion on creationism, from molecular data to morphological data. He believes that many creationists are using "arguments from personal doubts," which means that the lack of detailed explanation of the problem is evidence of the answer. Combining "evidence of evidence" with textbooks on NOS (eg Espinoza 2012) to fully exploit the important contributions of Rogers is likely to achieve the author's worthy goals: evolutionary science Understanding, acceptance, and thanks. The fact, logic, simplicity is unlikely to affect the recognition of the evolutionary rationality of most people. Biology courses and textbooks focus on the evolutionary mechanism and sacrifice evidence of evolution, although most people are unknown, but unless you believe in evolution, you are exposed to massive evidence. They change their beliefs. Since the evolution theory of textbooks is becoming increasingly sophisticated, it is unknown whether most biologists agree with the initial premise. Indeed, after reviewing some of the best-selling elementary level biology books (Nehm et al. 2009), I know that many of the topics discussed by Rogers are actually included in these texts . I also suspect that science educators agree with the second premise: empirical research shows that more understanding of evolution often can not contribute to meaningful belief changes . Intelligent design has scientific basis. However, given the fact that it seems to be fashionable and complicated now, it seems to believe in evolution theory. Even those who do not know the topic have never considered evolutionary evidence. In the 1980's, Philip Johnson began reading the scientific literature on evolution. Science was defined by finding a natural interpretation, but this means that Darwin writes in court, examines the evidence of evolution from a religious point of view and challenges the sole rational interpretation of the origin of the species lead. Because of the phenomenon. His efforts to raise the credibility of this book and the subsequent creative list and to adjust it is the beginning of the "Smart Design" movement. Intelligent design assertions have evidence that life was created by "smart designers" (primarily because the physical properties of objects are very complex and must be "designed"). Supporters argue that IDs take into account not only the facts gained through naturalism but "all the facts available"

The fundamental influence on the development of children is the religion that children develop. Since its founding religion has always been embedded in American culture. However, in modern America, religion is declining and this atheistic fear of the United States has encouraged hoping to teach religion in public education. "No matter how good or bad, religious belief plays a central role in the formation of events in the United States and the world" (Haines, 9). Success, but the belief that church and state are separated is an effective argument. Unfortunately, there is no consensus on best practices for teaching religion in public schools. For the most part American schools have long built chaotic relationships with religion. This is mainly due to school prayers, and these schools are changing all the time. There is only one school system in Modesto, California, and a religious course of the world is necessary to graduate. In Wichita, Minniha is heading in a different direction, and about 1,200 private and public schools use core knowledge, but it is widely known but not widely adopted. Public schools should ban religion. There is no reason to allow religious exhibitions to weaken the public education system. Participation of religion in public schools is distracting and unnecessary. In addition to educational purposes, eliminating religion is important to provide a stable and effective learning environment for each student. Without religious beliefs, students can succeed in the classroom. - The first amendment is usually equivalent to freedom of expression and provides five types of protection: establishing articles, free exercise of religion, freedom of speech, freedom of press and freedom of peaceful assembly. Public universities and college students (and student groups) enjoy complete protection of the first amendment, but this right depends greatly on the background of student freedom of speech. Public schools can teach religion, but religion can not be taught. Public schools can teach students to understand religion in a fair and objective way, such as discussing the influence of religion on history, art, music, literature, or teaching comparative religion courses. However, they may not teach courses based on religion. Public schools teach sound science and history. Public schools will not teach religious doctrines in science classes such as creationism and intelligent design, nor will they compromise evidenced proof scientific theory. In addition, public schools can not teach incorrect American history based on religious teachings.

The first amendment first amendment states: "Congress has enacted any law, respects religious beliefs, prohibits the use of free religion, is dissatisfied (North America Residents of colonial residents have no legal right to express an opinion against the administration of the British government against them). Several judicial decisions exclude problems related to the task of teaching "creation of science" when teaching evolutionary education and evolution theory. Article 1 of the Constitutional Amendment requires that public institutions such as schools continue to be religiously neutral. Public schools can not promote it because "creative science" claims certain sectarian religious views. The law was heard in the United States District Court when Arkansas passed a law requiring that "creation of science" and "equal time" develop. Opponents of the bill include Unified Methodist Church, British Catholic, Bishop of African Methodist, Presbyterian and Religious Leader of Southern Baptist Church, and several educational institutions. After a full-blown trial, the judge judged that "creative science" is not eligible for scientific theory (McLean v. Arkansas Board of Education, 529 F. Supp. 1255). Legal decisions on creationism and evolution were dependent on the first revision of the US Constitution. "Congress should not establish laws relating to the establishment or prohibition of religious freedom" to some extent. The provisions of enactment and free exercise require religious neutrality to public authorities. Therefore, it must be a corrupt context, but it is perfectly legal for a teacher to teach religion. People can explain religious or religious views, but it is not constitutional to say "Buddha is correct". Similarly, people can talk about religious controversy, but it is not appropriate to stand on one side (eg, "Pitifers are right because witches are evil, it is right to burn a witch "). What to do Every student in a public school in the US has a constitutional right to hear the whole story as the story evolves. It is known as the first revision of the Bill of Rights. American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), according to the authority of civil rights, each student has the right to take fair education (ACLU ...). Supreme court decision Edwards v. In Aguillard, 482 US 578 (1987), the court ruled by omitting evolution and creation from the science curriculum to compromise "to provide comprehensive science education". At the moment the law is very clear and the Supreme Court has stepped in - the first amendment prohibits modifying the state curriculum solely to preserve religious beliefs. This is the establishment of religion, it is unconstitutional. (Edwards) So it is not just illegal to evolve from the classroom.

Evolution: facts or fiction. One of the biggest problems in history is "Where are we from?" One of the most common answers to this question is creationism. Everything is created by higher existence there. Another idea is evolution, the idea that all living things are derived from organisms that are not so complex. In the last century, the theory of evolution has a new way of thinking and widely accepted by the scientific community. Still, I think that there is no fact that many people support it for evolution, there are some reasons why evolution can not happen. Evolution is the fact of life. There are many controversies about whether evolution is fact or fiction. The interpretation of the novel about how the world has reached the present begins with the creation of all human beings in the statue of God. The first two people he created were men and women: Adam and Eve. I found out that this theory is wrong. Humans experienced a time series of complete change after the first mutation, standing 2 feet, not 4 feet, like their nearest people. Three facts evidence supporting the evolutionary record in the course of the times - fossil records, biochemical similarities and degenerative organs The argument that human evolution is fact or fiction has existed for hundreds of years. Evidence of human origin has been found in many parts of the world, and these fossils have been proved to be human beings. Eurasia and Africa are included in the world. Even though fossils were discovered in Eurasia, the ancestor of Huminoidia of human beings dates back to the Miocene era 23 to 5 million years ago. Hominoidea is a superfamily that includes many species that exist today. In recent history, both creationists and evolutionists have discussed whether evolution theory should be part of public education in the United States. Evolution is a scientific fact or science fiction novel. There are many concepts in science and mathematics, but evolution is science based on several disadvantages. It is a scientifically proven science and the process of learning and evolution is an integral part of the overall development of student education, as excluding it will revoke the rights of certain students. Evolution This is fact or fiction. Darwin's theory has had a great impact on today's world. It caused a lot of discussion between religious authority and the people of the scientific community. This theory urged individuals to think about the origin of the life of the universe. - Summary of primate evolution I. Primate type A. New world monkey 1. Example: Spider monkey, Golden lion T monkey, squirrel monkey. Diets usually consist of fruits, insects and other small animals 3. Very diverse and ecological 4. Use the tail as the fifth limb to help climb 5. Evolution of the first modern ape 6 Cross over the Atlantic Ocean 1. When the sea level is low, float on floating island or cross the bridge B. Old world monkey 1

There are many beliefs about how we will be. There is a religious belief, "Big Bang" theory, and we believe that we have evolved from a lower form of life. It is difficult to say exactly how life is made and who has the right answer. A person can take one of two perspectives on the origin of life. They either believe the creator (the creator) or believe in evolutionists, but through in-depth research on scientific evidence, we must believe that evolution is the basis of our existence . The Midwest Center of the Innovation Center conducted a random phone survey asking "At public school, we just evolve, create, develop, create, evolve or just create"? . It means evolution only, 18.9% are created only, 64% are created and evolved, and 11% are not created. Bliss (1978) concluded, "Although these data are limited, they provide a fair and appropriate view of adults at public schools." Weinberg (1978) states as follows. The survey reflects the reality - as I believe - and those results are a tribute to the poor work we did in teaching evolution. " Creationism and Evolution For a long time, school administrators, teachers, parents, and even students have opposed creation and evolution of education. Since scientific methods and support have become our scientific theory as human beings, many public schools have inherited evolution. Those people think that students should be able to inherit the winds of Jerome Lawrence and Robert Lee. Trial, controversial creation and evolution controversy. There are many characters with a gorgeous and strong individuality. These include: Matthew Harrison Brady and Henry Drummond. All these influential people are strong, but not everyone has the same power. It is not only for other people but also for themselves. Matthew Harrison Brady is a very strong and respected person Evolutionism is considerably younger than religious beliefs of creation and creation. Prior to Charles Darwin, evolution was a devout idea, and God as a creator was believed to be widely accepted. However, since Darwin introduced his evolution theory a century and a half ago, discussion about theory and creation always existed. - It is a modest expression that claims almost no conflict in the realm of faith and reason. From the earliest stage of scientific exploration, these two areas of thought fell into a vicious circle and gave up as the religion gradually modernized to adapt to the new understanding of the universe.

Many Native Americans are talking about the creation of the Earth, which explains how the Europeans formed before they entered North America. Creation myths vary from culture to culture, but there is something in common between heaven and the earth. One of the most popular creation myths is Iroquo creation myth. Iroquois or Haudenosaunee means "Iroquois Indian Museum" (nd) consisting of six Indian countries including Mohawk, Oneida, Onondaga, Cayuga, Seneca, and Tuscarora tribes. Iroquois's creation myth may be slightly different, according to the person who said it, because the six countries that make up Iroquo covers a considerable amount of land and has a considerable history. Iroquoir's creation myths provide Iroquois a guide to their priorities, and their happiness and nature's well-being are well-balanced in the front. This idea is still related to Iroquois ceremonies today, at least in a traditional sense, indicating that the global creation myth has been done with Iroquois. Genesis and Iroquois's various mythical creations each have their own creative stories, most of which have elements of how a certain high power, power creates the world and creates humanity It contains. Christian faith in the story of Genesis has these important elements like Iroquoir's creation myth, the world behind the turtle. The two creative stories have similarities, but they also have some remarkable contrast. These comparisons include two cultures ... how evolution and creativity will produce the earth. There are several different answers to this question. One is from a religious point of view, comes from the Bible. The other comes from the scientific world and is based on evidence which came into the last century. Evolutionism is directly contradictory to another theory that existed for thousands of years, creationism. According to the theory of evolution, humans have evolved from monkeys for thousands of years. In these two myths, animals play an important role. Without them, creation myth will lack major elements; land creation of Iroquois myth and painful creation of Bushman myths. Their roles represent that animals are necessary in the lives of these people. In Greek mythology, when Pandora was taken to Epimetheus, she was given a box and ordered Zeus not to open. In addition to giving her a box, Zeus gave her curiosity as a temptation to her crime. In order to overcome the curiosity to nature, Pandora took place in the box and all the problems of the earth jumped out of the box. Because of her sin, the whole human race has to suffer. This is the result of human being forced to face Prometheus' fire.

Who chose our hero? Who will see our hero. Who is watching the security guards? In the process of history, many public figures have been censored about what they believe to be controversial heroic acts. Charles Darwin dismantled the theory of creationism with his discovery in evolutionary biology. President Harry S. Truman approved a nuclear explosion in Hiroshima and Nagasaki in Japan, ended the Second World War, and killed thousands of civilians. Amnesty International John Dillinger stole from banks nationwide Just select a classic cartoon star of a militia, Allen Moore and Dave Gibbons, security guards. But from a purely symbolic point of view, it must be Rorschach. Who is the first photo of Zack Snyder's Watchmen movie? Rorschach Who will dominate the online actor debate? Like Rorschach Punisher, Rorschach is easily regarded as a fascist, an absolute belief in morality - not gray shade, black and white, only good and evil -. However, in the hands of Moore, freckle ginger Walter Kovacs is a tense, tormented, complex creator and the most memorable series of watchers (prison riot, 1 person) As a center, you may eventually become the most graphic novel Pure role, only role - fool warning - not interested in sacrificing your own interests for greater profit Watcher is a limited edition series of 12 manga books by Alan Moore, Dave Gibbons and John Higgins published by DC Comics in 1986 and 1987. The observer focused on the six main characters of the comedian, Manhattan doctor, staying up late, Ozymandias, Rorschach, Silk Ghost. These characters were originally based on a powerful crusade and then redesigned with a proactive proposal in order to accommodate the super hero attribute that DC acquired from the Charlton cartoon in the early 1980s. Series writer Alan Moore presented six "completely opposite methods" to perceive the world and created a hero who gives the privilege to determine the morally most understandable thing to the reader of the story. When I read the Brian Doherty column about Reason Online, "Rorschach was not shrugging his shoulders, a hero of a watcher as an objectiveist," with sighs and laughter mixed. The whole premise of Doherty's article is to describe Rorschach as "moral core". "A watcher of Alan Moore and Dave Gibbons, an example of osteopathy and murder-friendly law and order-keeping therapy depict him as a respected person rather than being a poor person, being afraid of him.

The "Conference" journal contains papers read at the meeting of members of the American Philosophical Association in April and November. Papers are sometimes used as part of a workshop. In addition, posts posted by external authors were published, reviewed by qualified scholars in a specific research field, and published by the publication committee. Conference papers, exceptions, are usually under 30 pages. The "conference" journal also includes memoirs of resumes of deceased members of the association. "Mobile Wall" represents the period between the latest issue available in JSTOR and the latest journal. The moving wall is usually expressed in terms of age. In rare cases, since the issuer selected the "zero" mobile wall, the current problem will be made public on JSTOR as soon as it is issued. For example, if the current year is 2008 and the journal has a 5 year moving frame, you can get the 2002 article. Creation and Evolution Since the announcement of the origin of Darwinian origin in 1859, the United States has discussed the evolution and creation. Recently, discussions on whether or not to incorporate creationism into the public school curriculum, regardless of whether it is combined with evolution theory or a theoretical substitute in the United States, have intensified this argument. When such unstable problems are discussed, other problems are raised ... even if we deny this fact the world will not develop. Because of theory, evidence, and increased acceptance in today's society, evolution is verifiable compared to science. In order to discuss the absolute nature of evolution, we must be able to fully understand the history of this epoch-making knowledge. Evolution is often described as a long-term change. Scientists generally say that the evolution of the world has led to several theories. Evolution of theology, theology of evolution, evolution theory of creation, or evolution theory guided by theology agrees that religious doctrine is consistent with the scientific understanding and biological evolution of modern God. The evolution of theology itself is not a scientific theory, it is a series of ideas on how general evolutionary science relates to religious beliefs, in contrast to specific creative views. Advocates of theological evolution theory often match evolutionist ideas with God's beliefs and refuse contradictory arguments about religious-science relations - they contradict each other's scientific theories of religious doctrine of creation and evolution theory I do not need it. Evolution is very young compared to religious beliefs of creation and creation. Prior to Charles Darwin, evolution was an evil idea and belief in God's Creator was widely accepted. However, since Darwin introduced his theory of evolution one and a half and a half ago, discussion about theory and creation always existed. - It is a modest expression that claims almost no conflict in the realm of faith and reason. From the beginning of the scientific exploration, these two thought fields faced a struggle and gave up as the religion slowly modernized to adapt to the new understanding of the universe.

Science has changed our world, but we are not always right for the first time. Please click the image below to learn more about the four theories published. It is a bit familiar. Such Trojans are disguised as "science", and I long believed that women and men are essentially different. However, scientific reasons why women are smart and suitable for care as Angela Saini's hot new book "Inferiority: Science Writing New Studies with Women's Negligence and Rewriting" are boring. The title of this book has at least scientific myth that has existed since 1881. That year, a woman's reader asked Charles Darwin whether women are equal to men. Mr. Darwin said, "In my opinion, it is very difficult for human law to become intellectual for human beings (if you understand these laws are correct)." Charles Darwin Darwin developed the theory of evolution and species as science was a respected field. Darwin belongs to a philosopher belonging to the category of science philosophy. Science philosophy depends on the boundary of metaphysics and ethics and focuses on realism and idealism to explain the world. As a scientist, Darwin has been exposed to various species all over the world, but it caused many problems in his mind. - Recent studies by tree ancestors have proved support for the hypothesis that one of the signs of human evolution is bipedalism, an ancestor from trees' ancestry. As implied, the ancestors of tree life benefit from bipedal walking through supported movement throughout the tree network (Thorpe et al., 2007). In addition, using the upper body with trees ancestry is helpful for foraging (Stanford 2006) I wrote a lot of articles about evolution at the time, and I was attacked by creationists. Since the Scope's Monkey trial, evolution was political football. I have the first row of seats where I can see the art of attacking science. Creationists use misunderstandings about balance to demand equal time in creationism. They gave God the creation of other names. They chose my article to convey the opposite of what I wrote. They personally attacked biologists, they hate good guys and get rid of the elite.

Whether evolution is inconsistent with Christianity. Dawkins argues that the form of God is not necessary if evolution is true, as "God" does not control anything (2). Religion was always a subtle theme. There is no doubt that Christian faith is prejudice. Since the publication of his book "Origin of Species" by Charles Darwin, the embarrassment between creationists and evolutionists has been very rampant. Most people believe that the theory of evolution never coexists with creationism, but this speculation is far from legitimacy. Which television network is "sold" now? Casual sex, affair, homosexuality, violence, abortion, allergy, evolution, drugs and alcohol. Anti - Christian, humanitarian philosophy throughout the media - the philosophy of considering Christianity and Christians as past stupid relics, and these relics should be abolished. Why should we television our television, even though it only provides a steady flow of values ​​that are not open Christian? When will Christians take action? Antichrist: In Christian literature, Antichrist is a villain and deceives people to think of him as holy. At the end of the day, according to the tradition of Christianity, Jesus will come back to defeat the Antichrist (Smith and Greene 1995: 53). In the eschatological eschatology, there is also a statue of Antichrist drawn in Hadith as a monster from the east. Anti-legalism: 1) I believe that certain religious loyalties are exempt from secular laws. 2) I believe that the secular law is evil and should be observed (Smith 1995: 53). 3) Theological position that the subjective elements of Christianity, such as moral law, are emphasized as an objective element of Christianity Many people think "Antichrist" refers only to certain individuals who believe that Christians will appear in the last moment. This man is called Antichrist. This is not a fact. In the Bible, Antichrist is only a heresy against spreading Jesus and his teachings and / or the message of the Gospel. A popular image of a smooth and attractive leader who deceives people to worship her. He makes a good movie as a god. In reality, there are always many anti Christians. But people do not want to consider this problem. This eventually made them tolerate being persuaded by Antichrist.

Discussion on the relationship between birds and dinosaurs We live in a world where there must be answers to every question. If there is no answer to this question, someone will decide what the answer is. One problem is that birds have evolved from dinosaurs. Many scientists have theory. There is no clear answer. But I will give you information on some theories the scientists have and information on new discoveries that certainly may be what the scientists around the world are constantly looking for. According to the Phalanx number (the number of fingers in the finger), the hands of the dinosaurs and the birds are essentially different. The result may challenge the consensus that birds are descendants of dinosaurs, so this is an important and highly controversial field of research. Embryologists and some paleontologists who oppose bird dinosaurs have counted the number of birds for a long time based on many studies on the development of eggs II - III - IV. This is based on the fact that, in most amniotic fluid animals, the number first formed in the hand of five fingers is the number IV, which forms the long axis. Therefore, embryologists determined the long axis of birds as IV and the number of survivors as II - III - IV. The advanced Tetanurae hand fossil seems to have the number I-II-III (some of the genus Abeleroida also has a reduced number IV) Archeoptery was the first fossil discovered the relationship between dinosaur and bird. It is considered a transient fossil because it shows the characteristics of both groups. Only two years after the birth of Darwin 's revolutionary species, its discovery stimulated a new argument between evolutionary biology and supporters of creationism. This early rising bird is like a dinosaur and there is no clear wing impression on the surrounding rocks At least one specimen is mistaken for Compsognathus. Since the 1990s, more feather dinosaurs have been discovered and provide stronger evidence for a close relationship between dinosaurs and modern birds. Most of the specimens were excavated at the lagerstätte of the Yixian layer of Liaoning Province in northeastern China which is part of the Cretaceous continent.

Evolution is a very hot topic and has caused a lot of controversy over the past 200 years. As time goes on, organisms change and adapt to their own environment, the earth has a history of more than 6,000 years. It shows something millions of years ago using radiological dating to indicate that it is genuine. Another theory that is contributing to some of these is theoretical theory. It shows the rock formations over 6000 years built on top of each other, showing the time axis of the rock. Charles Robert Darwin, born February 12, 1809, is a naturalist in Britain and the scientific theory of its natural selection evolution became the main foundation of modern evolutionary research. Darwin 's biological theory attracts the attention of many professional scientists, and evolution has influenced many scientific fields and other aspects of life by the time he died. - ... With scientific rationality we can establish a scientific way to investigate the surrounding world. The world and the universe where we live are far beyond the complexity of the creation of our world through the creation of God. Dr. Kenneth Miller is a scientist who also believes in God and in an interview with NOVA discusses why evolution is a more reliable explanation for creating our world than creationism. In the 19th century, Charles Darwin formed the theory of evolution through natural selection. The fact that seeds change (evolve) over time, as has been widely accepted by Darwin's scientific contemporaries, is not new. But what Darwin is offering is a new rational explanation of how this evolutionary process is done. Descendants inherit their characteristics from their parents, but they have small (and nearly random) variations. However, most organisms have far more offspring, resulting in competition between resources and healthy spouses among species and individuals within species. This in turn creates a natural selection process and, on average, individuals having favorable changes (to ensure surviving and healthy spouses) will have more offspring than others I will.

Marilyn Robinson 's steward - beyond reason, Marilyn Robinson exceeds the boundary of her novel "Butler" reason and sends out a voice of consciousness. It is melancholic but may be hidden in a soft and orderly condition, constantly redefining boundary review and perception boundaries and reevaluating. As a narrator, Ruth leads the reader through sad events and secular details of her childhood and adolescence. She is trying to adjust her experience, fragmentation and unity, past, present and future for a shorter understanding and confirmation with her aunt Silvie. In order to find the root of knowledge of this transformation, we need articles from Marilyn Robinson, one of America's greatest writers in 1998. Robinson is also a writer of Darwinism and a provocative article that constitutes the essay episode "Death of Adam" in 1998. "Rubber stone" Robinson is not a creationist. In fact, she writes that creationism is "religious cartoon" which is "the best thing that Darwinism can do", because "Darwinism prove that it despises all religions". So, she is evolving. What is the objection? What? Like authors Jeffrey Eugenides and Curtis Sittenfeld, Marilyn Robinson's collection is rare. But each one is a jewel. Secondly, Housekeeping and Gilead were nominated for Pulitzer Prize, Gilead won. The novel Orange Award came back. (This award went to Zadismith in another year). Robinson manages boldness with a small and extensive pace. We study while reading the children, but we also know the power of temptation of the modern world that Robinson calls "Gobble". This way of thinking, we rarely admit it to ourselves, but we keep on feeling uncomfortable for us. I hope this reading will be what we need for this dialogue. History and family stories are also good choices. The Out Stealing Horses of PerPetterson and The Assault of Harry Mulisch deal with the complex family dynamics of the Second World War. More modern options include Marilyn Robinson's Housekeeping Service, Catherine Chung's Forgotten Country, Family Secrets, North Korea and Immigration Experiences; Chimepot's name is a personal desire and a community It is Usher Lef's relationship with expectation. Duncan Macmillan's play "People, Places and Things" - The story that I mentioned most in recent months is a repetitive record of an actress's rehabilitation attempt. The road of Cormac McCarthy is desolate and fainting; in that universe, the most important love is the relationship between my father and my son.

Creator myths I studied are similar in many ways. They are also different, showing an essentially different way of thinking about the world. Everyone has Creator - God to make the world the present world. In their world there is a confrontation that changed the expression of the world. God may be involved in these conflicts with God or God. Their bloody fight will prove who is stronger and bring about changes in world control. Others are selfish and use only people as tools, but some people have good things for others. Compared to Christian 's creative myth, the Navajo creation myth is a bit complicated. Navajo's creative story begins with a dark world of land surrounded by water. Each side represents direction and color, white is East, blue is South, Yellow is West, Black is North. That is an insect in this land. There is no real "god" at the moment, but someone or something must be with insects. Unlike the creation myths of Christianity, God and Creator are not visible at the beginning of Navajo creation myth. Creative myth (or creative story) is a cultural, traditional or religious myth that explains the earliest beginning of the world today. Creative myth is the most common form of myth, usually developed first through oral tradition and human culture. Creation myths are often not historical or literal, but are often thought of as those who convey deep truth. Though not always, they are often considered to be cosmic myths - they represent the order of the universe from a disordered state or disordered state. The philosophical and theological details of the original creation myth in the religious community, also known as creation myth, cosmic mythology The term myth here is a story-type imagination of the basic reality experience and understanding It refers to rich expressions (see also myths). The word "creation" refers to the beginning of things from an ultimate source of information, or in other ways, from the intention and behavior of transcendental existence. The creation myth is a symbolic story of the origin of the world as understood by a particular community. Later creationism was based on the subsequent history and community needs. Thus, for example, all theology and speculation about the Christian community is based on the Bible Genesis and creation myths created by Jesus Christ.

Faith system religion is usually defined as a set of supernatural, sacred or sacred beliefs, and ethical principles, practices, values, institutions, and rituals related to such beliefs (Wikipedia, 2006) . Most major religions have evolved to today's things for centuries. In many cultures and eras, religion is always the foundation of life and has penetrated all aspects of human existence (Fisher, 2002). Religion has been handed down generously. My religious beliefs were uploaded by relatives around her mother. My faith establishes the commandments of my life. I am part of the religious belief system of the Roman Catholic community. Because I am an active member of the church, my behavior is consistent with my religious precepts. Nice creed (confession of the 4th century faith) is used in every group. Nice beliefs summarize the faith of the Catholic Church and my personal beliefs. "We believe in invisible invisible gods, fathers, almighty, heaven and earth creator Son, the father is born forever, God comes from God, comes from the light of light, Come from the true God, born, not accomplished, with the father, everything is accomplished through him.The salvation, he got out of heaven; by the power of the Holy Spirit he was born in the Virgin Mary, For us who became a human, he was nailed under the control of Pontius Pilate, who suffered, died, and was buried. I was raised in a Catholic church when I was young. The religious creationism theory described in "The Creation of Adam" embodies Christian belief that God created a person in his statue. Religious education plant my personal character and ethics, but I often challenge what I teach. And my curiosity will eventually lead me from structured religion. I became interested in art, then became the basis of my pursuit of industrial design. Christian religious education helped me develop Christian knowledge and understanding, especially Catholic teachings. Christian religious education, especially Catholic teaching, taught me some religious norms. Indeed, those who can not pass St. Francis High School (Pleasant County, Maryland) are considered to be unable to complete or pass other subjects. As a result, Christian religious education made it possible to understand my identity more deeply, so that I could understand my position in the world through Christian religious and moral teachings.

Birthmark, they are signs of imperfection. They are cursed or special. When this story was written as a birth point in the 1840's, social beliefs were deeply influenced by the Puritan religion. Religion is thought to be the answer to all questions, but there is no room for science. Another Puritan belief is that in Biblical Creationism, basically God created the Earth. Birth mark - Many people are born with a birthmark. According to the baby center, over 80% of babies have specific birth marks at birth or shortly thereafter. They are brown, yellowish brown, blue, pink or red and can appear anywhere in the body. The exact cause of the birthmark is unknown. Especially when color, shape, size change, be sure to periodically check your bruises. If bleeding, bleeding, or itching begins, please consult your doctor. Since the birthmark may change to cancer, do not let the sun shine Birthmark is a skin abnormality that occurs when a baby is born. There are two kinds of birth marks. Angiogenesis marks consist of blood vessels that are not properly formed. They are usually red. Two types of angiogenic plaques are stain of hemangioma and wine. Colored birthmark consists of a group of pigment cells that causes skin color. There are various colors from yellowish brown to brown, gray to black, even blue. You can become a birthmark. I do not know who caused the various kinds of birthmarks, but there are some birthmarks in my family. Your baby's doctor will check your birth place to see if any treatment is needed or if you need to observe. In addition to sputum, colored birth marks are not usually handled. Treatment of vascularization traces including laser surgery Dermatologists divide the birthmark into two types. Pigment spots caused by excess skin pigment cells include sputum, brown spots, and Mongolian spots. Vascular spots, also known as red spots, are caused by an increase in blood vessels such as staining of the macula (salmon spot), hemangioma, wine stains. At least one baby aged 10 years or older has a birth point of a blood vessel. Several types of birth marks are part of skin lesion tissue called sputum or sputum, which means "born birth mark" in Latin.

The Range Monkey Trial religious science stage is in Dayton, Tennessee. The main character of the show is a 25-year-old science teacher named John T. Scope. The range is in the direction to advance the United States. The poster read Scopes "Monkey" Trial. In 1925, John T. Scope was advised to challenge Butler's law. The law was passed by a small town in Dayton, Tennessee, and it is forbidden to teach the Bible people. Through the evolution of text education, Scope violated the law and attracted domestic media attention. Concentration of media in the scope experiment effectively presents contrasting ideas of religious town and religious town. In July 1925, 80 years ago, fire was fired with religion, science and public schools mixed in Dayton, Tennessee. Scope trial, or "monkey trial" is called national headline. The trial lasted only a week, but the questions raised by it are the same as their differences at that time. 1914 - Citizenship of George William Hunt, and later used in the biology course of Dayton, Tennessee. Civil biology explains evolution theory that "simple life forms on earth slowly and gradually create more complex life forms and ultimately form the most complex life forms." The Range Monkey Trial religious science stage is in Dayton, Tennessee. The main character of the show is a 25-year-old science teacher named John T. Scope. The range is in the direction to advance the United States. The poster read Scopes "Monkey" Trial. In 1925, John T. Scope was advised to challenge Butler's law. The law was passed by a small town in Dayton, Tennessee, and it is forbidden to teach the Bible people. Through the evolution of text education, Scope violated the law and attracted domestic media attention. Concentration of media in the scope experiment effectively presents contrasting ideas of religious town and religious town. As science began to explain before it could not be explained, it caused a conflict with religion. The "monkey" trial in Dayton, Tennessee was one of the most noteworthy trials in history, as it was one of the first and most public times of the conflict. The trial revealed a division between faithful fundamentalists and newly formed evolutionists. - Range Monkey Trials Perhaps one of the most famous attempts in our history is John Scopes. Scopes was a high school teacher at Dayton, Tennessee and was arrested for teaching evolution in high school biology lessons. In the 1920s, in Tennessee province, except for creationism written in the Bible, all breaches of law were the same. These laws are the result of a strong fundamentalist movement in the United States.

Exploring the validity of natural theology The basic thinking process of creationism and evolution is definitely very different. The former ideologicalism fundamentalists adhered to the principles of the Bible that God's creation was the cause of diversity of the environment within 6 days and evolutionists believed that the universe created billions of years ago It has been said repeatedly that it is constantly in an unstable state. At first glance, the description of life on these planet seems to be contradictory. Scientists ask questions first and make systems, but creationists build beliefs based on faith completely and explain the environment. Let's go back to work. Theology has two forms, philosophy and religion. Philosophical theology ("natural theology") is a subdivision of philosophy. It uses natural human reasons to explore the most important of all problems, questions about God. Religious theology (or "eschatological theology") is a reasonable exploration of the meaning and consequences of faith in revealing religion - in our case the Catholic Church's "faith deposit" or "sacred tradition "Comes from Christ and his apostles Written Scripture Catholic Theology Catholic theologians are always interested in natural law and are always interested in the interrelationship between reason and faith and we are convinced that God works in history through the nature of things, especially human nature I will. His wisdom and will can build natural theology and moral philosophy effectively and complemented by supernatural theology and moral theology. Based on this judgment he found out the integration and malformation associated with it without hesitating to study the essential order of human nature. Unfortunately, the main obstacle to the acceptance of modern natural law is the misunderstanding that the law belongs to the Catholic Church, not to others. Traditionally, natural theology is a term used to observe nature and to prove the existence of God and the sacred purpose with human reason. From a more positive perspective, natural theology is part of theology, not relying on revelation. To some extent "to reveal God" is based on the premise that the purpose of God and God is not open to human understanding, it is completely related to natural theology, the probability of the theology and rationality revealed It is to solve the problem. From the 17th century to the 18th century, attempts were made to establish a "natural religion" that people might agree with, thereby improving the harsh accusations and actions of skeptics who revealed religion. A classic piece for reasonable derivation of sacred purpose is William Paley's natural theology (1802), but as dates back to Plato's work, rationality about the existence of God's rationality in the work world You can find a good discussion. - 347)

This is true .. Employers are interested in your accomplishments, you! Everything for you. From skills and abilities to internships, extracurricular activities, and overall passion, occupations in a particular field do not necessarily require you to choose a profession There are several carriers that need to consider the main choices. These include, but are not limited to, accounting, computer programming, engineering, and finance. Students usually get the best results on their favorite course, then why not choose your major major students? The purpose of your profession is not to prepare for a specific job, especially at liberal arts college like Wake Forest. Your profession is to train you as a whole. Think of all the possibilities and passions you can pursue! There are four main ways to explore the interests of your favorite career by talking to people you know through reading, through reading and through reading. Use the link below to start exploring key related occupations through "browsing". For hints on all four major discovery strategies, click the "Look for career interests" link. Many of our graduates continue to acquire a bachelor's degree directly. We signed a transfer agreement with many famous universities and universities. Students interested in becoming social workers will cooperate with UNH Durham and Plymouth State University on our two plus two courses. They got a bachelor's degree and joined the BSW program as a junior. Bachelor's of Science in Psychology and Human Services and other bachelor's degrees have the same type of form. Southern NH University, Springfield College, Keene State University, and UNH Manchester are just a few of them. UNH Manchester is some examples Students explore key issues including at least one topic explored through class discussion. Several examples are included: whether Genesis is a public school, exploring the evolution of American creationism movement, or discussing how science public perceptions changed since the formal introduction of evolution To do. In this senior undergraduate course, we will look at major topics from early cultural formation to the 18th century world history. Since this is not a research course, I will explore the main patterns in history. Historical events, trends and developments have not only influenced a large number of residents on the planet but also contributed to the complex and interdependent world we are seeing today. In this course we will also examine the problems faced by most students and educators in the world history, especially the definition, conceptualization, methods of teaching the history of the world, especially the problems of 6th and 7th graders.

Litigation against scientific science has become an unreliable epistemological document for several reasons. First, scientific assumptions are questionable. Second, the scientific method shows narrow limits to access to universal knowledge. Third, the conclusions of the scientific community as a whole are in doubt and inadequate. Fourth, scientific practices form a special perspective. In other words, its positioning in the knowledge world reduced all other knowledge channels and caused damage. Litigation against science is straightforward: Probably half, many scientific literature may be just incorrect. Science went into the darkness due to the influence of small samples, small influences, invalid exploratory analysis, open conflicts of interest and attention to fashion trends pursuing suspicious importance. C. Glenn Begley and John Ioannidis - a courageous and keen researcher in clarifying systematic weaknesses in the biomedical sciences - the conclusion in an article in January 2015 states: Continued research investment is ongoing, and as a result, we can not confirm most of the results, which means that we can not tolerate the challenge of time. This is not playable. Science is not self-correcting but self-destructive. Philippe Kecher, a philosopher of science, considers Karl Gustaf Hempel and Willard Van Oman Quinn in his 1982 book "Abuse of Science: The Case of Opposing Creationism". Popper's remarkable philosophical criticism advocates the problem of "counterfeit" and provides definitions of other theories. Not a set of forged statements. As Kitscher pointed out, Uranus observations when it was first discovered in 1781, if people adopt the strict pop-peran 's theory of "theory" "counterfeit Isaac Newton' s celestial mechanics "Will. Instead, it is thought that one planet has influenced the orbit of Uranus - and this prophecy is certainly confirmed. Kitcher agreed with Popper's opinion that "Science can only succeed if it fails," but I believe that scientific theories are composed of "a set of designed statements". And the other person - he says it "aids the hypothesis", that is

The theory of natural selection of Darwin provides us with explanations about the process of species change over a long period of time. His theory is based on five main assumptions. Change: Individuals in species are different from each other in physical characteristics and behavior. Heredity: Some mutations between species members are hereditary, meaning that descendants are more like parents than others. But what about evolution? Domingos depicted John Holland's early life. The Netherlands is inspired by Ronald Fischer's classic "genetic theory of natural selection", the most important of which is Darwin's theory of evolution. Then he decided to turn Darwin's theory into an algorithm. As a pioneer in a new field he proposed a model theorem in the Netherlands. It makes it possible to predict the quality of the next generation. Therefore, he is the father of genetic algorithm, probably one day, Robot Park (fictitious futuristic park, robots fight hard, losers are destroyed, winner software copied to his descendants such as DNA To Charles Robert Darwin, born February 12, 1809, is a naturalist in Britain and the scientific theory of its natural selection evolution became the main basis of modern evolutionary research. Darwin 's biological theory attracts the attention of many professional scientists, and evolution has influenced many scientific fields and other aspects of life by the time he died. - ... With scientific rationality we can establish a scientific way to investigate the surrounding world. The world and the universe where we live are far beyond the complexity of the creation of our world through the creation of God. Dr. Kenneth Miller is a scientist who also believes in God and in an interview with NOVA discusses why evolution is a more reliable explanation for creating our world than creationism.

Creative science - an attempt to discover scientific evidence that the story created by the Bible is true. Some of the people who created scientific movements known as "young earth creationists" rejected evolution but also rejected the idea of ​​the universe and the earth for billions of years. Social Darwinism - I believe Darwin's theory of evolution can be applied to human society, and like the wildlife the crowd is affected by survival of the fittest. This concept of distrust influences many social theories and exercise now. From the late 19th century to the beginning of the 20th century, from free abandonment capitalism to various eugenics movements All thoughts about the origin, assumption and theory of human beings exist and have the right to have their supporters. But regardless of the scientific point of view, the Bible creates the world and humans are the most important to people. God's idea of ​​creation is the foundation of the religion and religion of millions of people, the basis of their ideology, and their perception of the existence of all human beings. In Aristotle's metaphysics, he discussed the theory of his origin. Aristotle's theory must be distinguished from creationism. The word "creation" means the idea of ​​the Bible. Since Aristotle is not familiar with the texts of the Bible, he does not understand the concept of "creation" in the Bible sense. Instead, he is more interested in the "origins" of the world. Aristotle believes that there are three kinds of substances before the concept of time. Two of them are physical and one is immovable. You can explain that these three substances are "smart eternal", the second is "sensitive and fragile", and the third is immovable. In order to further promote this theory, sensitive destruction can be thought of as material, and sensible eternity can be seen as being potential, things that can not move are metaphysical and belong to other science It can be seen. According to Aristotle, real estate is God.

Evolution theory should present a theory to reproductive books. How is the astrology legend in Akira Fair? It is impossible to consider these absurd concepts. That is why ideas of creation should not be seen as an answer to the beginning of life. Instead, evolution accounts for the creation of life. Charles Darwin was praised for the creation of evolution. Evolution theory assumes that all natural forms derive from their ancestors and adapt to their environment over time. The Midwest Center of the Innovation Center conducted a random phone survey asking "At public school, we just evolve, create, develop, create, evolve or just create"? . It means evolution only, 18.9% are created only, 64% are created and evolved, and 11% are not created. Bliss (1978) concluded, "Although these data are limited, they provide a fair and appropriate view of adults at public schools." Weinberg (1978) states as follows. The survey reflects the reality - as I believe - and those results are a tribute to the poor work we did in teaching evolution. " An overview of the creation and evolution of school professors: evolutionary and creative education in the public school system is controversial. Charles Darwin announced his evolutionary conclusion in 1859. This dramatically changed the science of education in public school systems (Armenta, 1). Several lawsuits have been filed for evolutionary education. - Discussion between evolutionism and creative evolutionism and creationism has been on for a long time. When Charles Darwin proposed the origin of species in 1859, this was when the discussion began completely. The first discussion on evolution and creation in litigation took place in a 1925 trial. Evolution has been removed from textbooks and courses. Evolution began to infiltrate textbooks in 1987

Heritage: Religion and Science Stanley Kramer's film 'Legacy Wind' is investigating a trial based on range tests conducted in Dayton, Tennessee in 1925. A range trial, often referred to as a "century trial" (scope trial page), clarifies the dispute between Christian creationism and more scientific evolution theory. John Scotts, a high school biology teacher, was arrested for teaching evolution illegally. "The significance of a trial arises because it is regarded as a contradiction between social value and intellectual value" (Scope trial page). This is a way to explore the main theme of conflict between intellectuals and believers, thinkers and narrow thinking, and the relationship between others' perception and self-worth. Finally, inheritance promotes freedom of thinking and freedom of thinking. When attacking the value of free national ideas and speech in this country, can not you get anything as Brady attacked your house and inherited the wind? No Inheritance wind recreates this legendary experience. In dramas and movies, Brian accuses evolution theory with the concept of narrow text and accuses all scientific theories as "not erroneous evolutionary science" but "not the world" 17. In the interpretation of Genesis, Brian, who inherited the wind, insisted on so-called biblical authority and God created the universe scorpion at 9 am, 6 days starting October 23 BC! 18 At the end of his phased testimony, Brian was completely confused. "Mother," he begged a wife. "They are laughing at me, mum!" 19 Discussions on religion and science are often unilateral and Rovigli is no exception. I recall that this scientific account is particularly arrogant, that is to accept as uncertainty and assertion of religion. In fact, the differences seem not to be so obvious. Scientists often insist on absolute posting. Sometimes this is the theory of the theory, sometimes it is just as powerful, the absolute principle of the way. Religion is often the driving force of faith and doubt, sometimes it accepts mystery. Extensive stroke does not bring justice to either side

For a long time, mankind has left tough capsules evolved from monkeys, but with all the technological progress and all biological progress, great scientists have used evolutionary theory and science . Even if they solved the problem of the origin of life, this field was a strong challenge to the problem. Due to the large amount of information such as complicated systems that can not be simplified scientists need to find answers to important questions of life, many scientists have reached the same conclusion and results, evolution is to all questions I did not answer. The question is, what is it? Science is a very effective ideology. Did science find evidence of the existence of God? It is clearly different. Because their theory is not science, the best thing that creationists and intellectual design theorists can do is to tell us that we live in a universe that is not created. But if God exists as the creator of all things, he must exist and be separated from everything. We, humans, and everything we perceive are all part of everything. Whatever you see, God can not distinguish it scientifically. Since the latter half of the 20th century, many creationists have come up with a concept called intelligent design. The claim that it comes from modern science is a contemporary interpretation of design theory presented by William Paley (1743-1805) for the existence of God. But since most of its supporters do not identify with the Hebrew Bible or the God of the New Testament, but the identity and essence of the "smart designer" of the universe, all creationists accept intelligent design not. Today, most American creationists agree to eliminate evolutionary theory from the public school curriculum, or at least to assimilate creationism and evolution theory equally equally with rational scientific theory.

Ar, gu · men · ta · tive · ly, adverbar · gu · men · ta · tive · ness, noun · ar · gu · men · ta · tive, adjective · ar · gu · men · ta · tive · ly, It is a verb, a verb, er, er, er, er, er, er, er, er, er, er. Advertisement Advertisement Advertisement Advertisement Advertisement Advertisement advertisement advertisement advertisement advertisement advertisement advertisement advertisement advertisement advertisement advertisement advertisement advertisement advertisement advertisement advertisement advertisement advertisement created. Therefore, the response to the discussion here is the design of cosmological argument, objective argument, and creationism. First of all, we answer the claim as evidence. In his article McCloskey claims that theological argument is simply evidence that there is no supernatural existence in the universe. He encouraged atheists to believe the assertions and evidences claimed to their atheists so that they believed it was not enough to convince them to exert their persuasive power. Therefore, it is important to give up these discussions. He considers design interpretation to be the most valuable and valuable argument. He used evolution theory to support atheism ... another part of McCloskey called these arguments "evidence" and often that they could not explicitly prove God's case It means. McCloskey thinks that argument is proof Drange defends two arguments against atheism, including evil claims. As Drange pointed out, his argument itself is a deductive or logical argument from evil, ignoring the support of its premise. However, support for the forum of discussion is general or evidence. Therefore, he explained that his argument from evil is a debate of evidence rather than a conclusion. Is that chilling pain evidence against the existence of omnipotent omniscient infinitely benevolent god? Mark Vuletic considers the main problem of discussion between the defender and God's good doubt in this colorful hypothesis dialogue (based on actual dialogue in philosophical literature).

This discussion has been going on for many years. Whether the school should be allowed to teach evolution without teaching creation. The court ruled that the answer is "no" and creationism can not be included in the academic curriculum of public schools. According to the judgment of the court, it is clearly stated that our public school has no place based on belief theory. What happens if there is another way to exclude God from the equation? Public high schools can include intelligent design courses as a way of teaching evolution and creativity without violating the separation of church and state. Intelligent design: The theory that the universe and individual organisms is too complicated than the result of chance or random choice points to "smart designers". Critics criticize that advocates of smart design support "pseudo science" and are trying to make the feelings of creationists more scientific (Prothero 2008: 214). Interactive Ritual Chain Theory: Interactive Ritual Chain Theory (IRC) is a perspective focused on interaction and personal emotional input and feedback in these interactions. The IRC developed by Randall Collins (2004) insists that interactions generate or consume participants' "emotional energy" based on key factors. These factors include coexistence of interacting entities, group exclusivity, mutual attention and emotion, and physical synchronization. Importantly, the IRC theory also puts religious subjects in social space and outlines the connection between rituals, emotions and beliefs. In order to better understand silly design theory, we must first understand intelligent design theory. It is quite the opposite of the argued theory. Intelligent design theory argues that the best interpretation of certain features of space and biology is not the assumption that things and the universe are their way but the existence of a smart designer who creates everything. For example, as an intelligent design theory. This is a modified belief theory that there is a strong presence to create everything that is considered Christ in Christianity on the earth. In response to this theory, a materialist theory called foolish design theory was invented.

Pope also said scientific discourse of the origin of the universe confirms the existence of God. At the Vatican Academy 's meeting, he said evolution is consistent with God' s plan. He said that the first book of the Bible, Genesis, may suggest that God is "a magician who does something with a cane", but that is not the case. Instead, God argues that "God has allowed us to evolve them according to the domestic laws he gave to everyone so that they can create human beings and accomplish their accomplishments." "Evolution requires the creation of evolution, so the concept of nature's evolution and creation is not inconsistent." Big Bang theory believes that the universe began with small bubbles of 13.7 billion years ago. Scientists believed that a massive thermal explosion occurred at that time, causing the universe to expand at a very fast rate. It traditionally conflicted with religious organizations. Because they believe that creation is "before freedom of speech" or nothing. Evolution is controversial because it means that the world is shaped by random changes rather than the wise design of God. Nonetheless, the Catholic Church proclaimed that the Big Bang and evolutionary theory were consistent with their creative concepts in 1951. Like the current pope, former Benedict XVI also considers the conflict between creationism and evolutionary beliefs to be irrational. He wrote like this in 2007. "I saw it in Germany, but intense discussions between so-called creationism and evolution seems to be mutually exclusive choices in the United States." The difference between religious learning and scientific learning can be traced back to Galileo Galilei, who believes the Earth is orbiting the sun and forced to deny faith. A group like the creationist of the young earth rejects evolution and Big Bang theory and believes that the earth will be completed within six 24-hour working days. Giulio Giorello, a professor of philosophy at the University of Milan University of Delli Study, said the latest remark of the Pope is very important as it shows an attempt to challenge the disagreement of the opinion on the science of the Church Told. Pope Francis pays tribute to his predecessor, Benedict XVI, as he revealed his new sculpture as "Great Pope" in the same incident on Monday. In the autumn of that year, Pope Francisco showed progress with some scientific problems. He told members of the Papacy Academy that he supported Big Bang theory and evolution. According to the "independence" report, Pope Francis said: "Today we believe that the world-origin Big Bang does not contradict the sacred Creator intervention, but we need it. Through 2014 and 2015 , Pope Francisco has been deeply involved in political and environmental conflicts all over the world and he opposed global misconduct and abuse of political and economic power and 43 students in Mexico Suspected of disappearance and killing, the dangers and losses of life caused by immigration, poor fiscal management within the church, and sexual abuse. Many scholars have seen the past unity of the cosmological model as confirmation of God's claim to create the universe. This list of supporters of "Big Bang Theology" includes Pope Pius XII, Francis Collins (dean of the National Institutes of Health) and defender William Ryan Craig and Hughes. In fact, the Big Bang cosmology theory provided early support for theology. After all, Big Bang cosmology says the age of the universe is limited, and (traditional) experts say that God created the universe from nothing. Can not you see the traditional theory of Big Bang cosmology? There are several reasons to be cautious about this sentence.

The importance of the last line of the Lord's Prayer The last line of the Lord's prayer is "under the name of the Father, the Son, the Holy Spirit". This is the point of Christianity. This aim is to thank Jesus Christ for reminding us where we are from and giving life to mankind's crimes. In the Bible there are many important points that will tell us how it will become. Many people have a story about the origin of the earth, with a focus on beliefs on creationism. Personal prayer plays an important role in Orthodox Christian life. For many Orthodox Christians, the important form of prayer is Jesus' prayer. This is a sentence that is repeated over and over, for example, "The Lord Jesus Christ, the Son of God, is merciful to me and a sinner." The purpose of this iteration is to allow people to concentrate on God. For monks and nuns their spiritual life should follow the same way of life that all Christians must achieve by following God's commandments. There is no objection to marriage, but it is widely believed that the single principle of the church can deepen the understanding of the lives of Christians and keep them away from secular things. All beliefs have important beliefs and prayers. One such example in Christian denominations is "Lord's prayer", which many members have already remembered very young. An important prayer for Roman Catholic church is Ave Maria or 'Hale, Mary'. This is best known for Marianne's prayers. Ave Maria is also used in Greek Orthodox Church and Lutheran Church. Therefore it is safe to say that it has been recognized throughout the Christian world. The text was divided into two parts in history, and the third part was added later. The first part is based on Luke 1: 28, which tells the greetings of the angel Gabriel to the Virgin Mary on the day of annunciation. This is an angel telling Mary that he is beaten by the Holy Spirit and giving birth to his son. The middle part is based on Luke 1: 40-42, Gospel, and he describes St. Elizabeth's greetings to Maria. Currently pregnant Mary intends to visit her pregnant relative, Elizabeth.

As many people remember, all public schools teach evolution. The process of evolution is not the only theory, but the school has taught it as if it were the truth. However, there are many other ideas, all students are theoretical and hypothetical, so you should tell it. Since evolutionary teachings have not been proved and confirmed by all scientists, it should not be taught at school, but should be left to the students to think and discover. Because students need to understand the facts, evolution should be taught at school. Evolution is the foundation of biology and students can not completely understand science without evolution. Some say that future opportunities for Kansas students will be rejected because they do not know what evolution will have on someone in the future. For example, if a student is not taught to evolve and does not go on to a city in the city, he will be late when the university studies evolution. This evolution should be taught at school Creationism and Evolution For a long time, school administrators, teachers, parents, and even students have opposed creation and evolution of education. Since scientific methods and support have become our scientific theory as human beings, many public schools have inherited evolution. Those people think that students should be able to inherit the winds of Jerome Lawrence and Robert Lee. Trial, controversial creation and evolution controversy. There are many characters with a gorgeous and strong individuality. These include: Matthew Harrison Brady and Henry Drummond. All these influential people are strong, but not all people have the same power. Not only for other people but also for themselves. Matthew Harrison Brady is a very strong and respected person

Inheritance Wind - The role of film development in Matthew and Sarah Brady usually has a powerful legal theme that represents a very dry, professional role and occasionally emerging character development moments. The prosecutor 's chief lawyer, Matthew Harrison Brady, first appeared as a vibrant people in the movie "wind of succession". He and his wife, Sarah, seem to be the perfect couple under American political spotlight. Both of them have a wide smile and they are proud of walking, but they are wearing sporty and stylish clothes. In the inheritance, Jerome Lawrence and Robert Lee made a large trial in a small town and discussed controversial "creation and evolution". There are many characters with a gorgeous and strong individuality. These include: Matthew Harrison Brady and Henry Drummond. All these influential people are strong, but not everyone has the same power. It is not only for other people but also for themselves. Matthew Harrison Brady is a very strong and respected person In the intense drama "inheritance" by Jerome Lawrence and Robert E. Lee, three strong men expressed a strong view: Bertram Cates, Henry Drummond and Matthew Harrison Brady. First, defendant Bert Cates was responsible for teaching "Darwinism" in his second year. Second, Katz's counsel, Henry Drummond, showed his belief in the right to think. Third, Matthew Harrison Brady is a "giant" prosecutor who explains his prejudice against creationism. Overall, these three basic characters are fighting for their personal beliefs. Change is an important element of life, drama "Inheritance Wind" is a book of change. The greatest change will be one of two protagonists, Matthew Harrison Brady and Henry Drummond, a lawyer who balances the relationship of faith and science. There are many similarities between the two. They are very kind and mutually respectful with each other. There are many differences. All lawyers accepted this case for my own reasons.

Several factors contributed to the change of American society in the 1920s. After the First World War, many Americans were tired of President Wilson and his liberal policy. It is irritated as the people voted for Republicans in the first election of the 1920s. The President brought a new conservative quarter and Republicans won power after electing President Harding. However, President Harding died before welcoming President in 1923, Vice President Calvin Coolidge took office as president. Racial discrimination lasts through America's history, but religious heritage in American society is so. Although the religion of the 1920s still played an important role in American society, rapid change, decline of morality and decline of traditional beliefs resulted in a declining influence (Hoover City School). Still, where religion is strong, people challenge Modernism and are shocked by the despicableness of American lifestyle. These people expressed intolerance to science and Darwin's theory of evolution and kept boasting about the creation of the human god (Miller 229). When the high school biology teacher John Scopes challenged creationism in 1927 and taught his students evolutionary theory, the American educational system was not even more forgiving. This test proves that the state does not tolerate the combination of the society that creates God and the evolution in the evolution of that human being (WWW-VL History Center Roster) The 1920s was an important period in American history. Time is called the transition period during the world war, but as we know today, its cultural pace forms an American society. The 1920s is an era of major social change and this country is one of the most powerful industrial economies and urban economies in the world. "Prohibition of alcohol", introduction of jazz music, the position of women in society, immigrants are all useful to shape the lives of Americans. These events also brought more cultural diversity and freedom to the United States.

Young Earth Creation Science experts have made the Grand Canyon the center of its global flood model. The reason why they attract so much attention is because of its obvious meaning. If it was formed in millions of years, the earth must be ancient. Articles introduced here fall into two categories. Some are counterarguments to the creation of scientific theory by the young Earth, and some are original articles. I eventually collected them here to do a comprehensive study of the cany, as they ultimately beat the young earth and created scientific models. The core of this section is the review of the main work of creation of the monument to the disaster: the scientist, the Grand Canyon issued by the Institute of Creation. Grand Canyon: Catastrophe Memorial - Book Review. This young Earth book is the cornerstone of the Grand Canyon's young Earth theory, but it is full of mistakes. Coconino sandstone - It is said that the rock formations of this Grand Canyon area were formed by Noah flood. However, the author missed some important contradictions Desert Problem - What is needed is only the desert desert in the geological record to counter the young Earth model Stratigraphy- Or, can Noah's worldwide flood create all the rock formations found in the Grand Canyon? Canyon fraud - Can modern Canyon formed within 6 days prove that the flood can produce the Grand Canyon? Do you know that you can become a Christian, and do you believe the earth is billions years old? I can even believe in evolution and become a Christian. There is no contradiction between science and the Bible ... All science needs to understand correctly how it fuses with the Bible. In order to learn more about the creationism of the old Earth, please refer to the faith of the old Earth or investigate the article "Can you become a Christian and believe the old Earth?" Please check this website. Our goal is to respect God by refuting the bad science behind the creationism of the young Earth and correctly presenting his creations. The Grand Canyon is a magical natural creation. About 5 million people are watching Grand Canyon every year. Some people may not understand all the geological events that happened in the Grand Canyon, but everyone can understand their beauty and surprise. That's why it is properly classified as one of the seven natural wonders of the planet. The Grand Canyon will be the national park to provide the best protection. The goal of the National Park Service is to protect the park and all its functions (including protection), to leave it natural for future generations When asked to imagine the biggest, deepest and longest canyon that people can imagine, the image of the Grand Canyon often appears in the minds of men. The Grand Canyon is an incredibly wonderful place to awaken the viewer of it. But recently the canyon has also caused controversy, especially on its origins. The scientific community generally believes that the Grand Canyon was formed by the slow erosion of the Colorado River for millions of years. However, Dr. Steve Austin published a completely different theory about the age and formation of the canyon and wrote the book which explained his theory as "Grand Canyon: a monument of disaster". Dr Austin believes that the formation of a canyon is very rapid immediately after Noah globally spread in the Bible Genesis worldwide. Dr. Austin suggested that the canyons are thousands of years, not millions of years. Some scientists believe that the ancient river carved most of the Grand Canyon in front of the Colorado River. The two ancient canyons of 70 million years ago may be part of the modern Grand Canyon. Not all scientists agree with this, but that is not a problem. Question and discovery is the reason science is very cool! The Grand Canyon is a large and deep river valley in northeastern Arizona. The main cause of the erosion of the Grand Canyon is water; most scientists believe that the Colorado River for

Controversy over Family Education In today's society, controversy over family education is a related issue. Family education is usually referred to as guidance of a student in an educational program outside established schools under the guidance of a guardian or a guardian. There are several arguments about this current topic. Some people have reasonable grounds to support family education, others do not agree with the process and the motives behind them. There is an effective point to consider both arguments. Abstract: Family education is a controversial topic among educators. When a child receives education at home, children's interest in education and social life as a whole increases. Children do not have a social environment to learn to acquire basic social skills; while most parenting educational environment teaches parents provided information provided, one child, perhaps brothers and sisters . - Family Education: Effective educational methods for home education have grown steadily over the past few decades (lines in 2000), under the supervision of parents, not education of school teachers. Parents are increasingly involved in children's education and are actively involved. For some people, home education means copying schools at home, including textbooks, transcripts, and standardized tests. Schools and teachers teach students in a myriad of ways from talking in classes to practical activities and online research Textbooks are still the basic means to learn both inside and outside the school. Disputes concerning the content and distribution of textbooks in public schools are historical and contemporary; the state board of education has reviewed and selected books well, but depending on the area, schools and guardians are using textbook viewpoints, words , I oppose academics. In recent years, the Texas State Committee has proposed a science textbook to teach evolution and creationism, and chose a historical book doubting the separation of church and state and incorrect reference to the existence of American communism. The book was finally established, but the case proved the degree of controversy in education.

"In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth." This Biblical citation has caused Christian's big controversy and many years of evolution. I have heard that "I believe that evolution makes you a god of distrust" many times. Something. Our society has sincerely believed these verses over more than 2,000 years. Therefore, it is not acceptable to explain the evolutionary evolution through gradual changes of extreme and inconsistent natural selections. Theological evolution theory, theological evolution theory, the evolutionistic creationism theory, or the evolutionary theory driven by God all considers God's religious teachings to be compatible with the scientific understanding of modern biological evolution. The evolution of theology itself is not a scientific theory, it is a series of ideas on how general evolutionary science relates to religious beliefs, and it is in stark contrast to special creative ideas. Advocates of theological evolution theory usually make evolutionist ideas consistent with belief in God and reject contradictory arguments about religious-science relations. Those who are not so religious and do not have confidence in God believe in the theory of evolution. In my opinion, people who claim to support beliefs in evolutionary theory think that they know enough about science and biology, and the complexity of all of the cells and humans, and those who actually created it forget. In the Bible, the Quran and most ... more ... This is genetically forbidden because all information on the development of the organism is encoded in its parent's DNA. Changes of living things must stay within their basic type ... evolutionists try to explain that natural selection occurs with mutations in the genetic code. But this will not lead to evolution. This is because mutations do not create new genetic possibilities. They just change existing ones. Today, genetic changes and mutations occur in animals such as pigs and mice, and we are trying to produce human DNA in cells.

Of course, all courses require education to provide the most accurate interpretation of reality for future generations. The controversy between supporters of evolutionism and advocates supporting intelligent design as part of creationism already taught which models should be taught at nationwide schools. There are countless sources and the evaluation of evidence, together with the available organisms being described, suggests that evolution is best suited to provide an accurate description of how biodiversity occurs It suggests. Authors Mooney and Nisbet reviewed a report on the evolution of school education in 2005 and the discussion on intelligent design. When science enters the political and legal realm, news coverage is often misunderstood, "It is not covered by situation science journalists, but it is being repelled by political pages, opinion pages, TV news" In the process, they believe that science is distorted. Because non-science journalists "do not emphasize powerful scientific cases that support evolution, but I believe that evolutionary science is increasingly" controversial "." Evolution and intelligent design taught in public schools is an increasingly hot discussion. Both supporters and enhancers are at different angles and intelligent design should replace evolution as part of science curriculum. This controversy led to a number of litigation and religious controversy. The main problem in teaching this scientific concept at our school is the idea to obey ideas without definitive evidence. - The theory of criminal seems to be the decline of two major faction schools. The classical criminal school with criminals as being reasonable, and the positivistic criminal school on sociological prospects that affect personal living, and affect them in a positive or negative way.

Parents should let their children go to public schools and do not be afraid that they are forced to be preached or prayed according to other people's traditions. Students can make true voluntary prayers, read the Bible without interruption, and form religious clubs to meet after school, which must be their choice. They can also talk about their religion to their classmates unless they are harassing. But public schools should not force students to participate in prayers and other religious activities. Public schools can teach religion, but religion can not be taught. Public schools can teach students to understand religion in a fair and objective way, such as discussing the influence of religion on history, art, music, literature, or teaching comparative religious courses . However, they can not teach courses based on religion. Public schools teach sound science and history. Public schools will not teach religious doctrines in science classes such as creationism and intelligent design, nor will they compromise evidenced proof scientific theory. In addition, public schools can not teach incorrect American history based on religious teachings. Students feel that they are a member of the school community. Whether they have different religious beliefs - they are not picked out or excluded. For example, religious content and religious school gatherings held in changing rooms will keep ethnic religions and non-professional students away, preventing many students from participating fully in school life. School officials can not punish students for refusing to participate in these religious activities. Your Taxpayers Fund will provide funds for secular education, not religious education. No one should be forced to fund religious education, regardless of whether they dispute or agree on what they teach. Here is why public schools should not promote religion, and why taxpayers' money should not pay tuition at private religious schools. The issue of public school religion, including public schools and religion, has become a subject of intense debate. It is difficult for the government to clarify the appropriate boundaries of religion in public schools. It is true that teaching religion is allowed in the public education system, but the real problem is that there should be room between teaching religion and simply teaching religion. It is almost impossible to teach American history Public schools can teach religion, but religion can not be taught. Public schools can teach students to understand religion in a fair and objective way, such as discussing the influence of religion on history, art, music, literature, or teaching comparative religious courses . However, they can not teach courses based on religion. Public schools teach sound science and history. Public schools will not teach religious doctrines in science classes such as creationism and intelligent design, nor will they compromise evidenced proof scientific theory. In addition, public schools can not teach incorrect American history based on religious teachings. Public schools should ban religion. There is no reason to allow religious exhibitions to weaken the public education system. Participation of religion in public schools is distracting and unnecessary. In addition to educational purposes, abolition of religion is important to provide a stable and effective learning environment for each student. Without religious beliefs, students are more likely to succeed in the classroom. - First amendment is usually equivalent to freedom of speech and provides five types of protection: establishing articles, freedom of exercise of religion, freedom of speech, freedom of press, freedom of peaceful assembly. Public universities and university students (and student groups) enjoy complete protection of the first amendment, but this right depends greatly on the background of the freedom of expression of the students. Religion of public schools For centuries religious practi

I recently completed this book, "Walking Whales" by Hans Thewissen - a researcher (pun), a giant in the field of whale evolution. Among them, he detailed the majority of his work and their important fossil stories, for example, fossils bridged the gap between the land and the aquatic whale's ancestors. Prior to Thewissen, there was no crocodile intermediate showing that a whale gradually shifted from land to water. More importantly, before this, the lack of whale fossils during transition was the core point of creationism, whales were always aquatic organisms. Ambulocetus (meaning "walking whale") is the earliest whale species from Pakistan. That name is because it has short legs and big feet for swimming. Together with the other members of Ambulocetidae, it is a transient fossil that shows how whales evolved from terrestrial mammals. The name comes from the historical assumption that you can walk on land, but recent research has shown that it is completely aquatic life like modern whale. Ambulocetus is as completely aquatic as the modern whale and has a similar chest shape. Chemical analysis of teeth indicates that it can move between salt and freshwater. There is no outer ear. Its skull has a long nose (facing sideways) headed sideways at the height of the skull like a modern hippopotamus.

"Creating" means to create a world known as the universe's world or the origin of the universe. Cosmology generally includes explanations of its physical characteristics, such as whether there is light or darkness in the universe, which part is formed, as well as a description of the origin of the world. Likewise, Theogonie, which explains the origin of God, is not limited to explaining its existence, but decides on their number and explains their nature. It is weak. In many ancient cultures and religions, there is a story of creation myth. These myths usually tell you how God created the world and human beings. There are some general stories about war with old gods, and perhaps the most interesting story, the story of the great flood of human survivors, how God was born. The most famous flood story is in the Bible (Genesis), but also in Mesopotamia, Greece, Scandinavia, India, and China. Each culture has its own flood version. We made several Greek versions of the world, including the story of the flood. The most authoritative Boeotian poet Hesiod in the 7th century BC. Hesiod is Boeotian's poet and many people believe it will flourish after Homer. Hesiod wrote Theogony and two poems, works, and days. Throughout this article I rely mainly on Theogony, but these two works can actually be combined to form a complete creation myth. "The story of Genesis is different from the story of Genesis, which represents a single god, with the power of his words, he shapes the world from the original water-like chaos." The life of the universe. "(Harris and Platzner, Classical Mythology: Image and Insight, page 65), then there are other different cosmological views related to the eggs of the universe Egg of the universe is not only Greek mythology but also other cultures And civilization is also a universal and universal theme in creative myth Another tradition of the creation of the egg of the universe comes from the so-called Orpheus Mystery Religious Organization poem "There are a variety of Greek and Romans, There are many different religious groups that do not conform to the ordinary public religion of the gods and goddesses, their rituals and sometimes their teachings are secret, only religious groups can understand. A creative myth (or a creative story) is a cultural, traditional or religious myth that explains the earliest beginning of the world today. Creative myth is the most common form of myth, usually developed first in oral tradition and through human culture. The myth of creation is often historical or literal, but it is often thought of as a person who conveys a deep truth. Though not always, they are often considered to be cosmic myths - they represent the order of the universe from a disordered state or a disordered state. In creation myth, philosophical and theologically well-known as the cosmic myth, we detail in detail the first creation myth in the religious community. The term myth refers to an imaginative expression in the form of a story in the form of a basic reality experience or understanding (see also myths). The word "creation" refers to the beginning of things from an ultimate source of information, or in other ways, from the intention and behavior of transcendental existence. The creation myth is a symbolic story of the origin of the world, as understood by a particular community. Later creationism is the interpretation of this myth based on the later history and community needs. Thus, for example, all theology and speculation concerning the Christian community is based on the creation myths of the Bible Genesis and the new creation of Jesus Christ.

Surprisingly, even though I read the same book over and over again, we did not think they were bored. Like the first time - the same excitement and interest. But the speech is different, people want innovation and creativity A persuasive speech or assertion to the audience. This is an art that clearly and logically expresses opinions. Speech is very important in persuasion, but the magic of convincing speech can only be experienced most effectively if the subject is interested and attracts the attention of each member of the audience. This is also the most important This is where the subject of convincing speech becomes important. We have heard too many speech about smoking and drinking. There is a list of topics of persuasive and persuasive speech to help keep the audience of you carefully and focused here. Plastic surgery for cosmetic reasons (cosmetic surgery). Is it beyond a reasonable level? Use surveillance cameras in public places such as parking lots. Good idea or invasion of privacy? As a part of drug war, the right to search private items of students such as lockers and backpacks Food stores' shelves are full of food made from genetically modified materials. There is no genetic recombination label. Genetically modified labels are essential for making decisions. Do family education miss children to miss the social interactions and growth necessary for that age group? We incorporate digital information into physical space. The ability to reach the computer and manipulate the digital object The possibility to share data with cars and other cars to avoid accidents. Does this violate privacy? Nonprofit organizations reward them with less expenditure rather than the work they do. Even though it means greater expenditure, we should begin to reward the charity's goals and achievements. Stem cells help to develop personalized procedures by creating human biology / physiology models in the laboratory The ideas of the past and the future give us discomfort. Restoring the mind to the present will be a positive feeling Intelligent design or creationism About 55% of Americans believe that God created people, not evolved. Should this be taught at school? We believe that the topics covered here can be transformed into an interesting compelling presentation for various viewers, but since they are aimed at providing you with ideas, what to present to the target audience It is necessary to make the best judgment about. Choosing a good topic for a convincing speech is not easy. Therefore, many students ask us for help on our custom writing service and ask "Please write my thesis" or "Please help us to provide a persuasive speech topic". Although it is not a problem, there is no problem even if you try to find a topic yourself. Therefore, if you select the second option, you need to remember this. Are you struggling to find persuasive speech topics? It is difficult to find topics of interest to you and your audience, but this guide has done a lot of work and created a compelling list of 105 persuasive ideas of speech. They are divided into 10 categories covering various topics, so you are sure to find topics of interest to you. The most important factor in choosing and creating persuasive speech is to select topics you care about and care about. You need to do a lot of research on this topic. If you want to learn it is to make the process easier and more enjoyable. It can also help you stay passionate and informative when you speak, and these two important factors can provide excellent persuasive power. Choosing the topic of persuasive speech is not enough. It is important for the target audience to open your mouth and listen to the speaker's voice. But choosing an interesting and persuasive paper theme is the first step to providing information to an attractive performance. This is an opportunity for each student to improve the overall performance and the final course performance, wh

Symbiotic relations means "co-action" of two different species, each of which benefits from this relationship. Examples of symbiotic relationships are Oxpecker (bird) and rhinoceros or zebras. Oxpecker discovers rhinoceros and cockroaches and eats cockroaches and other parasites. Oxpecker receives food and the beast receives pest control. Also, when exposed to risk, Oxpecker shouts out a warning to help symbiosis (the name of another partner in the relationship) Common development of symbiotic living creatures. Since everyone is part of their environment, they "use each other" in such a way as to benefit both when they adapt to their environment. 1. Bees and flowers Bees fly from flowers to flowers and collect honey and use it as food for bees. When they fall on the flowers, they get some pollen on their furry body When they fall to the next flower, a part of the pollen of the first flower is wiped out and the plants are pollinated. This is good for plants. With this symbiotic relationship, honey bees can eat, flowering plants can breed Spider crab and algae crabs inhabit in shallow areas of the ocean floor, and crabs live greenish brown algae on their backs, so crabs are integrated with the environment. Algae is a suitable place to live and crabs can be camouflaged. ** Bacteria and humans Some bacteria live in human intestines and many other animals. Human beings can not digest all the food they eat. Bacteria allow humans to eat foods that can not be digested and partially digest foods, and to work by humans. Bacteria benefit from eating and digesting food to digest human benefits * Pollination refers to flower pollen entering another flower, allowing plants to breed ** Symbiosis symbiosis within or among them is sometimes called a theme when one of symbiosis exists on other symbiotic symbols. However, this term is often used to describe parasitic relationships, not symbiotic relationships. What is evolution, evolution? Evolution is the process by which various kinds of organisms change from the initial form and adapt. Because biology is a study of life and evolution is how biology adapts to the environment, evolution is closely related to biology. "Evolution is a process that diversifies from the earliest forms of the history of the earth with the development of various kinds of organisms." Evolution occurs within species, not within individuals. Some people think that evolution is a myth that lacks scientific evidence, others believe there is evidence to support it. It is believed that the evolution of living things has been going on for the past 3 billion years. Evolution is one of the greatest scientific discoveries ever. Understanding the interrelationships of all life on the planet, biologists made amazing discoveries. There is much evidence to support evolution, and opposing it seems to deny the moon in the sky. But people are actively denying that evolution is still occurring. Morphology, the formation of new species from ancestral species takes a long time, but there are observable evolutionary steps. There are 8 examples including action evolution. Discussions between the theory of evolution and the theory of creation of evolution and creationism have been on for a long time. When Charles Darwin proposed the origin of species in 1859, this was when the discussion began completely. The first discussion on evolution and creation in litigation took place in a 1925 trial. Evolution has been removed from textbooks and courses. Evolution began to infiltrate textbooks in 1987. - Darwin's theory of evolution is the theory of biological evolution and points out that all species are produced and developed by natural selection of small genetic variations that enhance individual competitiveness, viability, and fertility. This theory was solved by a geologist Charles Darwin, a naturalist, known for his evolution theory. Darwin's theory of evolution has existed since the 19th century (Darwin C 1859 Dema

Karachi (Urdu: کراچی) is the largest city in Pakistan, the capital of Sind Province. Until 1958 it was the capital of Pakistan. The capital moved to Rawalpindi. In 2017, about 17.63 million people lived in Karachi. [2] It is the largest city in the Muslim world. [2] There are "Mai Kolachi Jo Goth" and "Karatishi" in the name of the old city. The Karachi are Karachi. The father of Quaid-e-Azam (Muhammad Ali Jinnah) was born and buried in Karachi. It has two important regional ports. Karachi occupies the largest share of GDP and national income in Pakistan Karachi has five districts: South, East, West, Central and Distrct Malir. The city is the financial and commercial center of Pakistan There are 26 universities including Karachi University in Karachi. It is home to the National Stadium and several other sports facilities hosting many cricket matches. There are several long sand beaches in this city such as Clifton / Kemari Beach and Sandspit Beach. Clifton Beach suffered an oil spill, but the beach was cleaned up. Karachi owned KANUP, the first nuclear power plant in Pakistan, Canada in 1952. Karachi hosted the first night hockey game of India and Pakistan at Pakistan Stadium Hockey Club in 1986. Karachi has various shopping areas such as Sadar district of downtown Karachi, large and small. There are many large modern shopping malls in Karachi. The city has a modern international airport called Jinna International Airport, and there are two large ports in Karachi port and Kasim port. Karachi is connected by rail to other parts of Pakistan Free encyclopedia, Tituba of Wikipedia. "Tituba was also called Tituba Indian and was one of the first three people charged with magic in Salem Witch's trial ... She was the first man in Salem The village acknowledged magic Although I denied that it had something to do with magic at the beginning, I had to admit to speak with the devil at once. The 1692 Salem Witch Trial - The witch house of Salem, Salem Washington, Massachusetts, 30th anniversary of Salem Witch trial Introduction of the memorial photograph.This website also explains the term "witch" to understand the trial of Salem Witch and it is necessary to understand the definition of magic in the 17th century. Salem Witch trial. A comprehensive article from the free encyclopedia, Wikipedia. Background: Political, regional, economic, religious and social background. Activities include: initial outbreaks, allegations and inspections before the local magistrates, official charges: Oyer Court and Terminer in 1693, the High Court, the legal process used. Spectral evidence, witchcake, touch test, contemporary commentary rehabilitation and closure, reversal of comfort and comfort of survivors and their families, memorial of descendants, trials of Salem's female literary work, media and popular culture, press reports on suffering Medical theory Evolution of cited pages, Free encyclopedia of Wikipedia searched on April 15, 2007, April 14, 2007: Genesis, Wikipedia, Free encyclopedia, found on April 15, 2007, April 14, 2007: Scientists say that religion and religion can coexist with religion and science, Wikipedia Free Encyclopedia, evolution and religion, taken out from Lovgren Stefan on April 12, 2007 National Geographic News, October 18, 2004, April 15, 2007, Author: Creation - Evolution Controversy, Wikipedia Free Encyclopedia, 13 April 2007, Search from 15th April 2007: Evolution and Creationism, 2007 From the search on April 16:

A monk is a person who gives religion some or all of his life. The word comes from ancient Greek and can be translated as loneliness. In Greek, this term can be used for both men and women, but in English, the same woman is called a nun. The monk practices asceticism. They live alone or live with other monks who share the same ideals. Monks can be found in various religions, the most common are Buddhism, Christianity, Hinduism, Jainism and Taoism. A monk living alone is often called a hermit, and sometimes lives with other priests. A nun who lives together will do this at a monastery Chastity: Buddhists can not have sexual relationships or sexual relations, can not start family or get married. Static: The monk can not move far away except where necessary. Sometimes this means that the monks must be hidden, which means that they must not leave the monaster (especially during the Walta period). Sometimes they can be allowed to leave, but they can not go so far Responsibility: The monk must do something everyday. For example, a monk must pray or meditate and have to do some work. Free encyclopedia, Tituba of Wikipedia. "Tituba was also called Tituba Indian and was one of the first three people charged with magic in Salem Witch's trial ... She was the first man in Salem The village acknowledged magic Although I denied that it had something to do with magic at the beginning, I had to admit to speak with the devil at once. The 1692 Salem Witch Trial - The witch house of Salem, Salem Washington, Massachusetts, 30th anniversary of Salem Witch trial Introduction of memorial photos. This website also explains the term "witch" to understand the trial of Salem witches. We need to understand the definition of magic in the 17th century. Salem Witch trial. A comprehensive article from the free encyclopedia, Wikipedia. Background: Political, regional, economic, religious and social background. Activities include: initial outbreaks, allegations and inspections before the local magistrates, official charges: Oyer Court and Terminer in 1693, the High Court, the legal process used. Spectral evidence, witchcake, touch test, contemporary commentary rehabilitation and closure, reversal of comfort and comfort of survivors and their families, memorial of descendants, trials of Salem's female literary work, media and popular culture, press reports on suffering Medical theory Evolution of cited pages, Free encyclopedia of Wikipedia searched on April 15, 2007, April 14, 2007: Genesis, Wikipedia, Free encyclopedia, found on April 15, 2007, April 14, 2007: Scientists say that religion and religion can coexist with religion and science, Wikipedia Free Encyclopedia, evolution and religion, taken out from Lovgren Stefan on April 12, 2007 National Geographic News, October 18, 2004, April 15, 2007, Author: Creation - Evolution Controversy, Wikipedia Free Encyclopedia, 13 April 2007, Search from 15th April 2007: Evolution and Creationism, 2007 From the search on April 16: Wikipedia Battenberg Princess Viking Eugnie of Battenberg Victoria Victoria Eugenia Spain October 24, 1889 April 1889 1969 Granddaughter O ... Pater La Bourgeoisie or Pater Le or Les Bourgeois is a French phrase is a French cry. Advantages of University Education Thesis Wikipedia ... Essential success of education Future articles Key points to lower college tuition Key points Frankenstein article on les aiguilles et al opium Critique essay 5 Element description Industrial revolutionary art paper Paper prose Feminist criticism against

I would like to write a place that inspired me. The most wonderful place I have been to is the unforgettable adventure in my USA. I noticed that I saw one of the dreams of Las Vegas. I stayed there for three days. This is a unique place with buildings illuminated everywhere in the night. An interesting fact is that Las Vegas is one of the brightest places in the world, as seen from outer space. The climate is very dry. The weather is really hot during the day, absolutely impossible to go for a walk. Therefore, the streets are busy and crowded at night. Night life is very busy The ground floor of all hotels is decorated in various styles. There are beautiful gardens, riverside, genuine sky-like ceilings, good-looking actors such as historical heroes, and some of the hotel's top floors have wonderful panoramic views. One of the biggest hotels at the MGM Grand is the real Lion Zoo where there is a lion in the glass cage. In front of the hotel there is a dance fountain not only impressing their own dance but also the size and height. These are just a few of my memories that remained in my heart. Someday we strongly recommend you to see this wonderful city. There are many harsh reality living here, there is no mistake. But San Francisco is also a beautiful city! It is full of diversity, triple-legged dogs (and four-legged dogs), lively plants, wonderful people, and unforgettable places that are neither Pier 39 nor Alcatraz. But when people around you are as short as you, it is difficult to find all the advantages of San Francisco. If you work for a technology company this is one of the many drawbacks of living in the "high-tech bubble". So what is this "internspace"? This is contrary to traditional categories, so let's start with something that is not so. As an intern, you have lots of ways to spend your time. There are network and career development team, internship provided by a specific company, and counseling supplies like lean circle. San Francisco has coffee lovers, dog lovers, Frisbee players, and cyclists gatherings. The most memorable places I visited in the United States are Yosemite National Park and Death Valley, to name a few. Of course New York, San Francisco, and North Carolina coast, especially Outer Banks. Certainly Washington, DC. In this beautiful city you can quickly feel the power of the world capital. Summer, DC It offers many cultural events, music such as museums and jazz. Guests can enjoy jazz, drinks and picnics at the sculpture garden at Hirshhorn Museum for free. Memphis's charm Memphis is thought to be the base of blues music, but the reputation of the city also includes a mansion where Elvis Presley lives. There are lots of wonderful attractions in the city, but these are the most memorable places in Memphis. Memphis is the largest city in Tennessee, with a population exceeding 670,000. In addition to being the home of Blues, this town is also famous for its famous Elvis Presley home. - The evolution of student education was in the classroom for about 100 years. The war between evolutionism and creationism lasted long (Bailey 63)

Science is a word with many meanings, knowledge, truth, inspection process. However, difficulty arises when setting clear definitions of terms. Of course, physics is science, theology is not so. However, many academic disciplines are not intuitively divided into two categories such as psychology, history, ethics, etc. Are these sciences? It seemed to be dictionary editing only at the beginning, and although philosophers are a trivial problem, in fact, although the distinction between science and nonscience is important for society - teaching since the formation of the public school curriculum In distinguishing between science and religion that must be done In McLean and Arkansas, Judge William Overton proposed five criteria when studying the validity of "creating science" as scientific theory. Two of these characteristics are the temporal nature of the testability of the empirical world and the theoretical conclusion. Overton explains why these criteria are important and why creative science thinks they can not satisfy them. Overton believes that the measurability of the world of experience is the basic principle of modern science. According to Overton's measurability or forgeryability, it is the scientific nature of the theory. Overton believes that creative science does not meet this standard. The creativeist faith shows that you do not know how God created it and what process it used. They believe that they can not find information about the creative process God used through scientific research. McLean vs. Arkansas case ruling, judge William Oberton decided to use disproof as resolving "To create science" One scientific standard (such as a religious professor) Professor of a public school in Arkansas State It must not be. In his testimony, philosopher Michael Ruth (Michael Ruth) scientific letters will be defined and constructed as follows (Pennock 2000, see page 5 and Ruth 2010): Daubert In the case of the majority opinion, the so-called proposed counterprobability possibility including Daubert factor defines the scientific way the court is accepted. These original Daubert factors are Kumho Tire Co. v. Carmichael case and US case PRIME (US v. Prime 2002 case) are cited. In the case of Daubert, the majority opinion of the US Supreme Court suggested that judge Harry-Blackman quoted Popper and other philosophers of science: In 1981 the judge ruled overtonton 'McLean and the Arkansas Education of the Education' that Creationism should not be required to do education as an evolutionary theory in schools and other scientific theories That's why. Currently, Mr. Jones refuses to teach creation in a scientific class, exercises constitutional rights, and when it is not a scientific theory, why do we have to teach it in science classes? This is religion also science We do not know how life started, but there is no way to prove religious beliefs, but they mean nothing to do with science, meaning wrong It is not something. Prior to that, I proposed an optional course or an extracurricular workshop to explain Genesis and other religious beliefs. If they are interested, this proposal makes it possible for students to understand religious views and they do not have to do it unless they share the beliefs behind creation. Finally, this church student analyzes and thinks

Fire 2 (amphibian), seawater crocodile (reptile), southern turkey (Aves), reed (mammal), ocean floor fish (Osteichthyes) Vertebrates are animals with a spinal cord surrounded by cartilage or bone. The words come from the vertebrae that make up the bones of the spine. Invertebrates are called invertebrates. Vertebrates include birds, fish, amphibians, reptiles and mammals. The skeleton part of the vertebrate is as follows. Vertebra: A series of short, hard vertebrae are separated by joints. This internal skeleton protects the spinal cord. A joint between the vertebrae bends the spine Bow: The fish throat has a sacrum bow, and some amphibians support the scorpion. In most vertebrates, some arches have evolved into other organs such as the jawbone. Examples of vertebrates are mammals, birds and fish. Tens of thousands of species have been confirmed. The term "fish" is used to describe at least four different kinds of vertebrates Free encyclopedia, Tituba of Wikipedia. "Tituba was also called Tituba Indian and was one of the first three people charged with magic in Salem Witch's trial ... She was the first man in Salem The village acknowledged magic Although I denied that it had something to do with magic at the beginning, I had to admit to speak with the devil at once. The 1692 Salem Witch Trial - The witch house of Salem, Salem Washington, Massachusetts, 30th anniversary of Salem Witch trial Introduction of the memorial photograph.This website also explains the term "witch" to understand the trial of Salem Witch and it is necessary to understand the definition of magic in the 17th century. Salem Witch trial. A comprehensive article from the free encyclopedia, Wikipedia. Background: Political, regional, economic, religious and social background. Activities include: initial outbreaks, allegations and inspections before the local magistrates, official charges: Oyer Court and Terminer in 1693, the High Court, the legal process used. Spectral evidence, witchcake, touch test, contemporary commentary rehabilitation and closure, reversal of comfort and comfort of survivors and their families, memorial of descendants, trials of Salem's female literary work, media and popular culture, press reports on suffering Medical theory Evolution of cited pages, Free encyclopedia of Wikipedia searched on April 15, 2007, April 14, 2007: Genesis, Wikipedia, Free encyclopedia, found on April 15, 2007, April 14, 2007: Scientists say that religion and religion can coexist with religion and science, Wikipedia Free Encyclopedia, evolution and religion, taken out from Lovgren Stefan on April 12, 2007 National Geographic News, October 18, 2004, April 15, 2007, Author: Creation - Evolution Controversy, Wikipedia Free Encyclopedia, 13 April 2007, Search from 15th April 2007: Evolution and Creationism, 2007 From the search on April 16: Wikipedia Battenberg Princess Viking Eugnie of Battenberg Victoria Victoria Eugenia Spain October 24, 1889 April 1889 1969 Granddaughter O ... Pater La Bourgeoisie or Pater Le or Les Bourgeois is a French phrase is a French cry. Advantages of University Education Thesis Wikipedia ... Essential success of education Future articles Key points to lower college tuition Key points Frankenstein article on les aiguilles et al opium Critique essay 5 Element description Industrial revolutionary art paper Paper prose Feminist criticism against

Today, many students are not affected by evolution theory, one of the most important concepts of modern science. It provides a well structured framework for understanding and teaching evolution in an engaging and conversational style. This book is meant to explain how teachers, parents, local officials, scientists and educators reveal the vast diversity and similarity of Earth's evolution in evolution theory. Essence of Method In addition, this book provides answers to frequently asked questions to help the reader understand many problems and misunderstandings about evolution. The book contains sample activities for teaching evolution and the essence of science. For example, books include fossil footprints and activities to investigate population growth. And the science teacher can use it to introduce the evolutionary principle. Provide background information, materials, and step-by-step presentation of each event. Also, this volume: Explain how science differs from other human efforts and why evolution is one of the best ways to help students understand this difference. Education on evolution and the nature of science is based on the 1996 National Science Education Standards issued by the National Research Council - and provides detailed guidance on how to evaluate and select teaching materials to support the standard This book is comprehensive and practical, incorporating one of today's educational subjects into a balanced and rational argument. This will be particularly interesting for science teachers, school administrators, and community interested members. The importance of evolution is summarized as follows. Publication of the National Academy of Sciences "Teaching the Evolution and the Nature of Science": "There is no other idea that will greatly influence how we think about ourselves and how we relate to the world" (NAS In 1998, page 21. The Academy of Sciences in science, evolution, and creationism, "Creationist views reverses the scientific process, they do not want change - supernatural forces form a living or earth system To - explain basic requirements, hypotheses for rejecting science "These beliefs can not be tested, modified, or rejected by scientific means and therefore can not be part of a scientific process "(NAS 2008, p. 43) The evolution of theology is to regard God's religious teachings to be compatible with the understanding of modern scientific biological evolution. The evolution of theology itself is not a scientific theory, it is a series of ideas on how general evolutionary science relates to religious beliefs, in contrast to specific creative views. Advocates of theological evolution theory often match evolutionist ideas with God's beliefs and refuse contradictory arguments about religious-science relations - they contradict each other's scientific theories of religious doctrine of creation and evolution theory I do not need it. High school teachers are in the dilemma of teaching evolution. Sometimes they are obliged to teach the creation of "science", "intelligent design theory" and "evidence for evolution", and sometimes they are being pressured to forget the evolution of the professor. What should the teacher do? Legally speaking, what does teacher do and what can not be done? The part of "should" is easy. Both teachers and scientists say "Teach evolution." (See the NAS website "Teach us about the essence of evolution and science" or the National Biology Teachers Association and the National Science Teachers Association.) As a famous geneticist, Theodosius Dobshanski says:

First, God created the heavens and the earth. Or say that. Then, this magical existence, this clever designer, will follow. He made the sun and the moon, the sea and the land, and all the beasts on the earth. Then he became a man. All these works were completed in just 6 days. Everything we know, everything we have should come from this short-lived and large-scale design. But this information is exactly opposite to what modern science tells us. And itself is the essence of national debate. They want to argue that the problem of evolution (or what they call "evolution theory" or "Darwinism") and science is not religion but religion and religion (science). "The example comes from the lie of Ken Ham: evolution, but it is called" the cause, principle or system of faith related to enthusiasm and belief "(from Webster Quoted) as well as a deep misunderstanding evolution of two religions) dictionary. Humm's ridiculous argument differs from "contradiction-free biblical evidence", in the past can only study them and can not access directly, so deriving scientific conclusions from fossils and evidence is That means you can not. Written in the era of Kenam As we all know, the story ends. Everyone accepts evolution and no longer discusses this issue. Assuming that it is not so, the argument that evolution and creationism will become mutually attracting each other for centuries is controversial, but how does this dialogue fit this dialogue? Next week we will post latter part of this topic and see how biologists, writers, and philosophers place emphasis on today's generality. As an idea closely related to science fiction, the amazing thing is how deep is the similarity of evolution, religion, and other places. For decades scientists and biologists have discussed arguments between nature and cultivation. This discussion is about how much our environment and genetics influence our behavior and developmental stages. According to this argument, nature can explain that human behavior occurs due to its genetic makeup. Because human behavior is due to its genetic structure, it should also affect the lifelong development and development of (natural) people. - A famous psychologist Jerome Kagan once said "Genes and families may decide the foundation of the house but time and place determine its form" (Moore 165). Discussion about nature and cultivation has been a mystery for many years and always appeals doubts about whether human behavior, thinking and feelings were born over time. Natural or genetic influences are formed before birth and fine tuned through initial experience

Evolution theory: "Selfish Gene" is the relationship between science and religion (1), Dawkins introduced the concept of information unit, copy concept "meme." They are fairy tales, catchy songs Compete in our mind and heart to the theory in the form of replication in ethics and society. One of the most prolific struggles took place today between science and religious amazing dies. Although their relationship is complex, its historical orbit is a common evolutionary trajectory, but the gradual accumulation of adaptive responses are mapped to each other. In modern public places, the most prominent interaction between science and religion includes evolution and creation / intellectual design. The lobbying for a legitimate struggle (eg Kitzillaire and Dover's trial in 2005) and evolutionary and creative education centered on American schools suggests a contradiction between religion and science. But even if we focus on the acceptance of evolution the relationship between religion and science is complicated. For example, in the UK, scientists, clergy and popular writers tried to harmonize science and religion from the 19th century to the early 20th century, whereas the United States against the emergence of evolutionary thought like the 1925 scope test I saw fundamentalism (Bowler 2001, 2009). ) The real competition between religion and science began with the American Fundist movement at the beginning of the 20th century. At the same time, by the United States and the theory of evolution, the development of high criticism of the Bible and the arrival of modern liberal theology, fundamentalist Christian, as the age and the origin of human evolutionary biology and biblical competition observe the earth, Read the Bible using the strategy. Many conservative theologians take an impressive initiative that balances theology and scientific development, but this conflict continues today Advocates of theological evolution theory usually make evolutionist ideas consistent with belief in God and reject contradictory arguments about religious-science relations. Theory of Evolution Theory (TE), also known as evolutionary creationism - The idea of ​​God's creation is to skillfully design the universe where everything evolves naturally. Normally, "evolution" in "theoretical evolution" means evolution by complete evolution - astronomical evolution (forming the galaxy, the solar system, etc.) and geological evolution (forming the geology of the earth) and chemical evolution ) Biological evolution (for the development of life) - but it can only refer to biological evolution

Organizing complexity is a system of organization and complexity. In simple mode, an unorganized system is more likely than a complex organized system. The system can be structured simply as crystal, such as complicated as weather or confusion, and still can be caused by natural means. Even in these cases, they can also avoid the confusion of a simple system. In the weather the crystals obtained by the organization of their simple molecular forces, and the interaction of the complex, are continuously inflowing energy from the sun. If part of the organization or the complexity of the system is not the same, they may obviously occur naturally, but found in the same system, in the case of complexity, organization, can occur significantly The sex has been reduced, the system has become more and more. Such a system can not be generated immediately by statistical natural processes immediately Statistical thermodynamics, as compared with other systems, indicates that complex systems are relatively few, but they are organizing an equivalent position. This indicates that the number of comparable status complex organizing systems is much less than the total number of possible system states 10-100. Even when such a repetitive combination does not exist, such a system will occur once, sometimes even the probability of time, assuming that Big Bang, the universe did not have enough time and material. This system is considered statistically impossible. In fact, since the natural system is a combination with, no matter how long you can repeatedly permit the permitted substances, such a system is not impossible due to the occurrence of any natural process. When intelligent agents are intentionally created, they are only displayed. Life represents the most complex organizational system known to exist for reasons that the natural origin of life is impossible. So for many reasons, the evolutionist's invention is still to say that the law of physics is a staunchest which does not happen, they will explain in these stories, thinking what will happen You can not Evolution of cited pages, Free encyclopedia of Wikipedia searched on April 15, 2007, April 14, 2007: Genesis, Wikipedia, Free encyclopedia, found on April 15, 2007, April 14, 2007: Scientists say that religion and religion can coexist with religion and science, Wikipedia Free Encyclopedia, evolution and religion, taken out from Lovgren Stefan on April 12, 2007 National Geographic News, October 18, 2004, April 15, 2007, Author: Creation - Evolution Controversy, Wikipedia Free Encyclopedia, 13 April 2007, Search from 15th April 2007: Evolution and Creationism, 2007 From the search on April 16: Ruledo Carnap Charles Morris deputy editor in chief editor of unified scientific basis (Volume I - Volume II) Organizing Committee Rudolf Carnap CHARLES MORRIS Philippe Frank Otto · Neurath JOERGEN JOERGENSEN LOUIS ROUGE advisory committee Niels Bohr R. Mises Egon Branwig G. MANNOURY J. CLAY Ernest Nagel Dewe Arne Nesfederigo Enriquez Hans Reichenbag Herbert Fiegel ABEL REY Clark L. HULL Russell Wardermer Kaempfat L. Susan Steving VICTOR F. LENZEN ALFRED Tarski JAN LUKASIEWICZ Edward Thorman William M. MALISOFF JOSEPH H Chicago University of Chicago Press. WOODGER University of London, University of Chicago 60637 Twins Twins created in 1992 to create a Science Association conference (created by Science Association, Institute of Northeastern University and Sponsor of Century of Creator Center, 1992 Twins). This is a collection of 70 different articles about 'various science science' for people. I was in Texas, near the fossil ridge to buy "Creative Science Museum". The guy told me this is the most specialty they own. I do not even know how to refer to it - it's nothing but basically a bunch of copy of a spiral bound "publisher." In other articles, in order to make that quantum mechanics possible The article claimed is the Bible. Therefore, these people mind using computer technology from theor

Some atheists strongly oppose creating creationism and intelligent design at American schools as an alternative to biological evolution. After the Kansas State Board of Education decided to allow intelligent design to replace evolutionary education, in 2005, Italian church monster flight was created by the team. A flying spaghetti monster is an ironic theory, where herds think that it has as much scientific support as intellectual design theory. In the first letter to the Kansas Board of Education, Henderson showed that the correlation does not mean that the increase in global warming does not mean a reduction in the population of the pirates. In this example, praise is not for God, so we ridicule some of the religious groups' belief that the world is experiencing difficulties like war and famine. This adds a strong sense of boundary between the atheist's church and the state and separates the sacred nation from religious interference. But this confidence in the boundary between the church and the state is not limited to atheists and pastors. Many people do not believe that organized religion is good for society. Not only is it not taxed, I am amazed at what I can see as a known incorrect repeat statement of children's brainwashing, children's vulnerable over the years. Some people think that at least these Bible will be seen critically if these children are not misunderstood. Many situations in which historically organized religious organizations acted not only brought about the deaths of millions of people, but in many cases prevented the abandonment of human rights. Atheism is often misunderstood as a belief that God does not exist, but it is not; it can be an atheist or an agnostic. These two terms answer different questions. Atheism answers the question you believe, ie the lack of faith in God. Agnosticism answers to what you know, how confident you have in your beliefs. According to this definition, a person can be an agnostic - an atheist or an unconscious - an atheist. We can also explain people as Agnostic - Christian, or Clues - Christian. Agnosticians admit that their faith is not a guarantee of truth, and Gnostic is a person who claims to be positive about their beliefs, or who lacks faith. What does it mean to be a human being? This question was answered in anthropological research. Anthropology is a study of various human cultures in the world in history. According to the University of Hawaii at Hilo, anthropology "emphasizes the comparison of human groups to understand the scope of human behavior and biology, so think about what human beings are." Anthropology, We focus on common aspects of mankind, such as language, cultural ties, economics, and curiosity to find common grounds. Anthropology is a scientific study on the cultural, social, biological and environmental aspects of humanity, its past and present lives. Cultural anthropology is one of four research fields in a wider area of ​​anthropology (archeology, physics or biological anthropology, and three other linguistics). Cultural anthropologists specialize in cultures and people's beliefs, practices, and cognitive social organizations of human society. Cultural anthropologists study how people who share a common cultural system organize and form the surrounding material and social world and form these ideas, behaviors, and physical environments . Social and cultural anthropology is one of the four major areas of anthropology. Social and cultural anthropologists focus on social and cultural studies and are often interested in cultural diversity and universalism. In addition, social and cultural anthropology is usually divided into social anthropology and cultural anthropology. The method of social and cultural anthropology is mainly ethnography based on qualitative data. This contrasts with quantitative data commonly used in other anthropological fields such as archeology and physical anthropology. Ethnography is a comprehensive study of culture,

Every different culture has its own creative story. Most of them contain elements of a certain high power, how force creates the world and creates humanity. Christian beliefs in the stories of Genesis have these important elements, like the creation of Iroquois's myth "World Turtle." The two creative stories have similarities, but they also have some remarkable contrast. These comparisons show how the two cultures of Native American Iroquois and Christian are seeing life, good and evil, the perception of the nature and cultural impact of each culture, and ultimately Christianity God and Iroquoi are included ... are displayed as ... Show more content By contrast, in the story of Genesis, God gave the person the right to rule over all living things on the earth. (Genesis 1: 28) Until today, this man hunted various animals, did not respect nature, cleaned and polluted the forest. Finally, Christian and Iroquoi have different views in terms of standard human eyes. First of all, the God of Christianity is the only god. However, there are many gods in Iroquois culture, they become elements, and then Iroquoi admire these elements. (Iroquois 30) In Genesis, a person was created in the statue of God (Genesis 1:27), but in Iroquois myths were created by others. Creator God is thought to be closer to his father who loves his children, but when the children rebel against them, Iroquois god is respected and respected, and Iroquois myth does not mention punishment for humanity in Iroquois myths. . It is similar to believing in God, living in God, elsewhere in the world, Iroquois' sky world, or Genesis paradise. Overall, the two stories "world turtle" and "Genesis" are very similar, but their individual differences also truly distinguish the two cultures. Two cultural perspectives on life and good and evil. Each culture reflects the impact on nature and culture. Finally, how to depict God of Christianity and God of Iroquois Comparison and comparison of Genesis and Iroquois' s Creative Story When I was reading two stories, or Genesis and Iroquois. There are some similarities between the two. In Genesis I talk about heaven and the earth like the two worlds mentioned in Iroquo's story. (Iroko 's creative story 23 pages / Genesis 1 page). When we talked about the earth's underlying world that the earth does not look dark, God created the sun, the moon and the stars to adjust the sun, the night, the season, and the year. (Iroko's creative story 24 pages / Genesis 1 page). In either talk God puts animals on land, water, birds and trees in the air. (Iroko's creative story 24 pages / Genesis 1 page). In these two stories, God removes men and women from dust and uses his own image to suck their nostrils to give them life. (Iroko 's creative story 24 pages / Genesis 2 pages). I also noticed many differences between the story of Iroquois and Genesis. During ~ Creation of Genesis and Iroquois's various myths each have their own creative stories, most of which are elements of how a certain high power, power creates the world and creates humanity is included. Christian beliefs in the stories of Genesis have these important elements, like the creation of Iroquois's myth "World Turtle." The two creative stories have similarities, but they also have some remarkable contrast. These comparisons include two cultures ... how evolution and creativity will produce the earth. There are several different answers to this question. One is from a religious point of view and comes from the Bible. The other comes from the world of science and is based on the evidence that appeared in the last century. Evolutionism is directly contradictory to another theory that has existed for thousands of years, creationism. According to the theory of evolution, humans have evolved from monkeys for thousands of years.

Controversy over the origin of life is rising. Evidence is believed to be a necessary condition for faith decisions, and many people fear violations of God's Word and the nature of science. These people established their own "religion" or belief called intelligent design theory. The combination of scientific evidence and biblical ethics established the intellectual design theory to adapt to sacred Christ and evolutionary believers. This group believes that evolution is occurring, but God has created the beginnings of all the lives. A famous atheist, Richard Dawkin, explained the belief that God had an effect on evolution and tried to "smuggle God" through the back door. Ironically, young Earth creationists share the insults of Dow accepting the evolutionary destruction of the doctrinal writing of the Bible and treating the story as a fable. The introduction of Charles Darwin's theory of evolution produced a struggle between evolutionism and religion. Until today, people came to ask where they came from due to the influence of Darwinism. God, higher spirit, or evolutionary process is the two main choices. God has been the main answer for many years, but after the idea of ​​Darwin, scientists completed the task of returning to the beginning of existence and trying to make scientific explanations. Clearly, since no one knows exactly who is causing human creation, it is a personal basis and can only be determined through religious beliefs and evident guesses. Without the influence of Darwinism, there is definitely no controversy. However, there is no need to cause controversy. Human creation should be considered a combination of God and evolution Evolutionism is considerably younger than religious beliefs of creation and creation. Prior to Charles Darwin, evolution was a devout idea, and God as a creator was believed to be widely accepted. However, since Darwin introduced his evolution theory a century and a half ago, discussion about theory and creation always existed. - It is a modest expression that claims almost no conflict in the realm of faith and reason. From the earliest stage of scientific exploration, these two areas of thought fell into a vicious circle and gave up as the religion gradually modernized to adapt to the new understanding of the universe. Theological evolution theory, theological evolution theory, the evolutionistic creationism theory, or the evolutionary theory driven by God all considers God's religious teachings to be compatible with the scientific understanding of modern biological evolution. The evolution of theology itself is not a scientific theory, it is a series of ideas on how general evolutionary science relates to religious beliefs, and it is in stark contrast to special creative ideas. Advocates of theological evolution theory usually make evolutionist ideas consistent with belief in God and reject contradictory arguments about religious-science relations.

There was an island floating in the sky where the sky people lived long before the world going to the creation myth of Aboriginal in Australia was created. They live quietly and happily. No one has died, never been born nor experienced sorrow. But one day, I noticed that Sky women were supposed to lay twins. She told her husband, she was angrily said. In the middle of the island there are trees, as the sun has not been built yet, it provides light throughout the island. He tore the tree and opened a big hole in the middle of the island. Strange thing is that the woman looked into the hole. In the distance, she can see the water covering the earth. At that moment, her husband pressed her. She fell off the hole and rolled into the water below Under the floating island, two birds saw the fall of an empty woman. Just before she got into the water, they turned her back to her and took her to another animal. They decided to help the women, they jumped into the water and got the soil from the bottom of the ocean. Animals failed trying one after another. Finally, Ota tried it, and when his appearance his mouth was full of mud. The animal robbed it and spread it behind a big turtle. Mud begins to grow and grows until it becomes the size of North America. Then the woman took the land. She blown air and made a star. Then she made the moon and the sun An empty woman gave birth to her twin son. She named seedlings. He was kind and gentle. She named another Flint, his heart is as cold as his name. They grew rapidly and started to fill the earth with their creations. Saplings produce good ones. He made animals useful to humans. He made two rivers and put the fish in a place without bones. He made plants that people could easily eat. If he can do all the work for himself, there is no pain. Flint destroyed most of his works and produced all bad things. He flows the river only in one direction. He placed the bones on the fish and placed the fruit of thorns in the bushes. He built winter, but the seedlings gave it life so that it can give way in the spring. He made a monster that his brother was driving under the earth. After all, Sapling and Flint decided to fight until one conquered the other. Although not winning, Flint lost in the end. Since Flint is a god who can not die, he was forced to live behind a big turtle. Occasionally his anger will appear in the form of a volcano. Iroquoi respects all animals. This is reflected in the creation myth through the roles that animals play. Without the help of animals, an empty woman may sink to the bottom of the sea or it may not create the earth. Iroquois creation myths may be slightly different, according to the person who said it, because the six countries that make up Iroquo covers a considerable amount of land and has a considerable history. Iroquois creative myths provide Iroquois a guide to their priorities and their happiness and nature's happiness are balanced in the front. This idea still relates to Iroquois ceremonies today, at least in a traditional sense, indicating that the global creation myths have been done with Iroquois. Creation of Genesis and Iroquois's various myths each have their own creative stories, most of which are elements of how a certain high power, power creates the world and creates humanity is included. Christian beliefs in the stories of Genesis have these important elements, like the creation of Iroquois's myth "World Turtle." The two creative stories have similarities, but they also have some remarkable contrast. These comparisons include two cultures ... how evolution and creativity will produce the earth. There are several different answers to this question. One is from a religious point of view and comes from the Bible. The other comes from the world of science and is based on the evidence that appeared in the last century. Evolutionism is directly contradictory to another theory that has existed for thousands of years, creationism. Acco

Something on the universe and the earth refers to intelligent design, God is a smart designer. Animals, plants, and humans have many unique items. These items happen only by being too unique and complex. The intelligent design of these projects refers not only to opportunities but also to smart designers. Intelligent design is a study of nature, animals and human patterns, and the best explanation is the result of intelligence. (Dembski.2010) Intelligent design studies the influence of intelligence, not designers. Therefore, intelligent design directly challenges Darwinism, evolution and other naturalistic methods to solve the origin of life. (Dembski ...... Display contents The outer layer of the crucible is not a solid structure. It consists of a multilayered, compact hexagonal plate overlapping the roof tile. The interior is made of completely different things. It consists of a lightweight, rigid foam made up of trabeculae and film.です is also some empty spot. John Eliot stated that the Toucan's beak was skillfully designed to be strong and light. Dictionary means clever meaning, creative skills and imagination. As evolution did not design anything, it just happened that the designer could not explain the unique creative design of the toy. (Butt. 2006) The third animal is a platypus. Evolutionists were shocked by the various structures in the mouth of Duckville. That bondage means a close relationship with a duck; its tail may put it on a beaver; its hair resembles a bear's hair; its claudication means it becomes an otter That claw crawls. The image evolution of animals does not explain the various structures found in platypus. There is a dragonfly that looks like a platypus. The tail of platypus is like a beaver. Unlike Beaver, the platypus tail is very furry. Platypus has 5 toes on the foot, toe is like a hill, but like a reptile there is a nail. The platypus fur is very similar No Intelligent design theory is an effort to empirically verify whether most biologists "apparent design" is a true design (a product of intelligence) or a product of a simple undirected process. Selection affects random changes. Genesis usually starts with religious text and tries to see how scientific findings are being adjusted. Intelligent design begins with natural empirical evidence and attempts to determine inferences derived from evidence. Unlike creationism, the scientific theory of intelligent design does not claim that modern biology can discriminate whether the intellectual cause detected by science is supernatural or not. Intelligent design refers to scientific research programs and communities of scientists, philosophers, and other scholars seeking evidence of natural design. Intelligent design theory believes that certain features of the universe and biology are best explained by intelligent reasons, not undirected processes like natural selection. Through research and analysis of system components, design theorists can decide whether various nature structures are the products of opportunity, natural law, intelligent design, or a combination of them. This type of research is done by observing the type of information generated by the intellectual agent's behavior. Then scientists look for objects with the same type of information characteristics, we usually know that these objects come from intelligence In the past few decades, the interpretation of evolutionary theory by Charles Darwin's natural selection has been challenged by another theory called intelligent design. Science teachers and board of education are increasingly working hard to introduce facts to the students. Despite discussions there is controversy. How should students understand the life history of this planet? Is Christianity and other major religions incompatible with the evolution of Darwin? Is there evidence to support the new theory of intelligent design? Can ID and Darwin find a common position?

It is not surprising to say that there are thousands to millions of stories on the planet (or at some point in time). Our innocent young people are influenced in elementary school more than we are admitting, depending on how we view ourselves and the people around us. The story that our parents read late at night is that we use the words of cats and cows in our hat to jump over the moon and close our eyes to get to sleep and to our stories in our dreams I'll arrive. It left 2 traces of scent on the morning. Please tell me what "Darwin's theory" is. As we already know the evolution of Darwin, evolution itself is not Darwin. Darwin tried to explain how evolution happened and failed altogether. His theory is that numerous, continuous, small and random changes he called the "choice" of death filters are the cause of evolution. Every life is intelligent, and evolution is caused by intellectual reaction of cells to the needs of the environment. Cells acquire input of environmental requirements through known biochemical pathways and coordinate their genomes accordingly. Evolution is more like Neoramarquian than Neo-Darwin. Inheritance of acquired functions is fully accepted and proved by science. Since the discovery of evolution, human creation has changed rapidly. Nevertheless, the world does not understand the theory and theory of evolution of Lord Charles Darwin for a while for a while. Prior to evolution, I believed that the upper class was called "sacred creature" by being influenced by the religious ideology of how human beings were created. However, the introduction of evolution theory used this theory as the foundation of biology and changed my mind. Evolution of Darwin and Christianity There is some argument that the theory of evolution proposed by Charles Darwin does not oppose religion. Others do not believe in the theory of evolution, but they still contribute to education and redistribution. If they truly understand the theory, this will not happen. This is due to the impossibility to understand the doctrine of Darwinism and includes the most dangerous views of these theories that are penetrating society. Charles Robert Darwin, born February 12, 1809, is a naturalist in Britain and the scientific theory of its natural selection evolution became the main foundation of modern evolutionary research. Darwin 's biological theory attracts the attention of many professional scientists, and evolution has influenced many scientific fields and other aspects of life by the time he died. - ... With scientific rationality we can establish a scientific way to investigate the surrounding world. The world and the universe where we live are far beyond the complexity of the creation of our world through the creation of God. Dr. Kenneth Miller is a scientist who also believes in God and in an interview with NOVA discusses why evolution is a more reliable explanation for creating our world than creationism.

A creative myth (or a creative story) is a cultural, traditional or religious myth that explains the earliest beginning of the world today. Creative myth is the most common form of myth, usually developed first in oral tradition and through human culture. The myth of creation is often historical or literal, but it is often thought of as a person who conveys a deep truth. Though not always, they are often considered to be cosmic myths - they represent the order of the universe from a disordered state or a disordered state. In myths, humanitarian myths are created by prose authors and other novels. This type of writer incorporates traditional mythological themes and prototypes into the novel. Some people have creative myths. Liming, David Adams; Leeming, Margaret Adams (1994). Encyclopedia of Creative myth (2nd edition). ABC-CLIO ISBN 978-0 - 87436 - 739 - 3 Liming, David Adams, Leeming, Margaret Adams (2009). Creative myth dictionary (Oxford reference online editor). Oxford University Press. ISBN 0-19-510275-4 We listed the mysterious creation myths of the ancient Egyptians in their initial list including their god Atum (or mythical Ra). In mythology, the universe began as a black, original chaotic soup, but eggs were formed from nothing. From this egg, Atom god is poured. Obviously when Atomia felt Atum's first thing was Masturbation, and there was a race from his semen that helped him create and dominate the gods of the universe. The idea that ejaculation is the driving force of creation is very important to the ancient Egyptian society and they tied the squirting and flow of the Nile to even the godly behavior of Atum. A creative myth (or a creative story) is a cultural, traditional or religious myth that explains the earliest beginning of the world today. Creative myth is the most common form of myth, usually developed first in oral tradition and through human culture. The myth of creation is often historical or literal, but it is often thought of as a person who conveys a deep truth. Though not always, they are often considered to be cosmic myths - they represent the order of the universe from a disordered state or a disordered state. In creation myth, philosophical and theologically well-known as the cosmic myth, we detail in detail the first creation myth in the religious community. The term myth refers to an imaginative expression in the form of a story in the form of a basic reality experience or understanding (see also myths). The word "creation" refers to the beginning of things from an ultimate source of information, or in other ways, from the intention and behavior of transcendental existence. The creation myth is a symbolic story of the origin of the world, as understood by a particular community. Later creationism is the interpretation of this myth based on the later history and community needs. Thus, for example, all theology and speculation concerning the Christian community is based on the creation myths of the Bible Genesis and the new creation of Jesus Christ.

The foundation of science is believed to be observation and experience, and humans have observed nature phenomena for centuries and have experienced various types. However, religion is thought to be older than science, and is thought. Does God create a person or do we have to create him? A deeper belief is to think and unify how human beings created art, sentences and religion. God has various forms and names in various languages ​​and dialects There are various customs and religions all over the world in all religions, all races and countries, Biblical texts and books have knowledge from p Share. Discussions between science and religion are often wrong. There is no need for contradictions, but remember that they are focusing on different goals, goals, and experiences. It is dangerous to put prescription labels on science, especially religion. Religion means various things for various people. In the United States, Buddhist monks can not be mixed like evangelical Christians. Both science and religion can play a role in human life. Science looks; religious feelings. Science tells religion: what I see is to give you what I see. Religion tells science: I just want to tell you my feelings. The benefits of science are first recognized in the world of psychology and then recognized in the physical world. The benefits of religion are first recognized in the world of psychology and then recognized in the material world. In the ongoing debate between science and religion, I find myself attracted to the former. As a US citizen, I gradually noticed the incredible freedom we have, freedom of religion, freedom of press, freedom of speech (citing a few names). However, as an individual I am worried that we are losing all the greatest freedom and thought power. Science is an ability to accept advances and failures of new thinking, but also relentlessly retries. Religion is a hollow substitute for scientific reasoning. It is necessary to understand that "X 'is comfortable" does not mean "X is true" (Dawkins, 20). As long as humans have the curiosity of curiosity and the courage of pioneers and develop new and improved theories, scientific theories proved to be wrong are not wasted. This article aims to promote science as a higher interest by accessing and refuting many discussions about the existence of God. Since the publication of the origin of the species by Charles Darwin, discussion has continued between science and religion. Although scientists have proposed many theories about human origin and the creation of the earth, religious organizations have a major creationism based on the story of the Bible "Genesis". However, these theories are not the cause of the discussion. Because different theories are just an explanation of an unknown myth. Discussion is caused by different belief systems. The main difference between creationists and scientists is the way they face this argument. Creationists have developed their own science: to create science. Creative scientists want to prove that creation is right, science is wrong, and selective interpretation of fossil records is provided. However, their explanation is exaggerated and ridiculous. Creationists choose the scientific theory and do everything possible to point out the shortcomings.

"Ecrasons l'infame" which is interpreted as "We must crush this bad thing". This is what Voltaire used to express his feelings about organized religion. As soon as many monsters followed his way, Voltaire expressed his hatred of culture and religion and chose the universal god of nature. In the coming century, Darwin will announce Voltaire's scientific theory to support the desire for atheism. But without other theories, the French wise men of the 18th century were obliged to use creationism to explain the beauty and organization of the world. (The hypocrisy of religious attacks on religion, especially the hypocrisy of the Roman Catholic Church, is a thematic iteration theme in Candide, but other religions - Protestantism, Judaism, Islam - are also plagued by Voltaire's testimony. Outrage to various forms of fanaticism and intolerance and he cruelly exposed the cruelty made under the name of God Other people recognized Voltaire as a legitimate religion itself I believe that it will reveal the abuse of religion without denying sex. Voltaire's novel Candide contains a lot of things. This includes ridiculeing the beliefs of philosophers who conflict during enlightenment. But perhaps the most powerful satiric work in his novel is religion. Voltaire believed in God, but strong opposition to religion. He does not say how to believe God through religious officials, but I believe that everyone should serve God in their own way. The first example where Voltaire removes religion is after Candid leaves the castle. One of Candide 's main dilemmas is an optimistic and pessimistic worldview. The optimistic view towards the world is related to Voltaire's criticism of Christianity throughout the story. Voltaire bore religion through a series of corrupt, hypocritical religious leaders, but he does not condemn daily religious believers. Candide grew up under the guidance of Pangloss, I thought this was the best world and I thought things were due to natural reasons. This Pangloss 's view is an optimistic view on the Christian - based world, the problem of the late Candid' s story, to Pangloss, "Things can not be realized because everything is the best" (Voltaire, 35). However, as Candid experienced many horrible events such as whiplash, rape, robbery, unjust enforcement, illness, earthquake, betrayal, he questioned the belief in optimism.

Evolution and Darwin adaptation and evolution are the key to success in society based on survival of the fittest. If there is a barrier that species can not conquer, even if it means change, we will do everything possible to overcome it. Over time, evolution helped us succeed in the most challenging times. Human species are at the highest level of their class and are knocked down by other species, but what happens when seeds begin to encounter obstacles in their own society? Can mankind overturn himself and become a new human being? Please tell me what "Darwin's theory" is. As we already know the evolution of Darwin, evolution itself is not Darwin. Darwin tried to explain how evolution happened and failed altogether. His theory is that numerous, continuous, small and random changes he called the "choice" of death filters are the cause of evolution. Every life is intelligent, and evolution is caused by intellectual reaction of cells to the needs of the environment. Cells acquire input of environmental requirements through known biochemical pathways and coordinate their genomes accordingly. Evolution is more like Neoramarquian than Neo-Darwin. Inheritance of acquired functions is fully accepted and proved by science. Evolution of Darwin and Christianity There is some argument that the theory of evolution proposed by Charles Darwin does not oppose religion. Others do not believe in the theory of evolution, but they still contribute to education and redistribution. If they truly understand the theory, this will not happen. This is due to the impossibility to understand the doctrine of Darwinism and includes the most dangerous views of these theories that are penetrating society. Charles Robert Darwin, born February 12, 1809, is a naturalist in Britain and the scientific theory of its natural selection evolution became the main foundation of modern evolutionary research. Darwin 's biological theory attracts the attention of many professional scientists, and evolution has influenced many scientific fields and other aspects of life by the time he died. - ... With scientific rationality we can establish a scientific way to investigate the surrounding world. The world and the universe where we live are far beyond the complexity of the creation of our world through the creation of God. Dr. Kenneth Miller is a scientist who also believes in God and in an interview with NOVA discusses why evolution is a more reliable explanation for creating our world than creationism.

Longroyd Kindergarten - My story I understand that I went to Longroyd Nursery for the first time when I was 3 years old. It is said that this is because my mother made a mistake at my age. She later told them that my yellow fever caused a panic. Huang Wei is her true meaning. I obviously remember jaundice, because during the day I was allowed to lie on my grandmother's bed in the front room, and I set the fire on fire. This luxury is unheard of. I gave you a medicine, and I had to drink it with a straw to make it not touch my teeth. 1922 - Abigail Adams Elliott, with the help of Mrs. Henry Greenleaf Pearson, founded Ruggles Street kindergarten in Rocksbury, Massachusetts, one of the earliest educational kindergartens in the United States. It became Elliott - Pearson Children's School and is now part of Child Development Department at Elliott - Pearson Tufts University. 1925 - Tennessee State and John Scopes ("Monkey Judgment") attract the public's attention because John Scopes, a high school biology teacher, was accused of a ten-year crime of evolutionary theory which violated Butler law . The trial ends with the confidence of the scope. Discussion on the theory of evolution and creationism continues today Kindergartens play an important tool role in the future of children, because they are considered to be a foothold for shaping the overall character of a child. Registering the name of the ward in the nursery school is a moment of affection and pride for any parent. Through the nursery school, the child got the necessary outside world and has been running him until now. With the help of kindergarten, the child has taken the first step in formal education system. Therefore, selecting a good and reliable one for your child from the list of nursery in Dubai can be a difficult task, but it does not look like this. All children, especially those whose parents do not speak English or French, strongly encourage kindergartens. After studying at a nursery school for several years, children are integrated into the local community and are ready for elementary school completely (especially when there is neither English nor French at home). Parents can also become friends of the community through pre-school contacts. The child has to start school after the 5th birthday of September 1st. The first few years of compulsory education in Canada was called elementary school or elementary school. Elementary schools are usually mixed, and when you go to junior high school it is usually until the age of 11 (from 1st to 6th graders). In some areas, students go to elementary school until the age of 13 (until elementary school eighth grade).

The controversy has evolved as a fact that there is an ambiguous boundary between providing best scientific support for the theory that strongly believes only incomplete evidence and writing persuasive research. In fact, there may not be any line after careful consideration, but for most scientists this is an unpleasant idea, they value the ability to write an objective report on the object and ultimately the best I get the answer. Because science has a positive answer and can prove that it is superior to other answers. We first show the trends in personnel expenses per unit in Germany - initially, the unit labor cost trend in Germany, ie labor cost versus productivity is the same for production and manufacturing, labor cost and productivity I thought there was. Among the other economic sectors, they played an important role in favorable evolution, and other economic sectors played an important role in the advantageous evolution of Germany's tradeable manufacturing industry. Then we studied the German tradeable manufacturing mechanism. Next, we will investigate mechanisms that enable wage limits, a drastic decline in real real wages that allow wage limits, and a sharp decline in real wages at the lower limit of wage distribution and wage distribution. A creationist wants to evolve because evolution is religion, not science "in order to weaken the argument of higher education advocated by biologists when discussing creationists, and to dispute science (evolution) I disagree. Religious redefinition (creationism) is between two equivalent religious beliefs. Even though I think that the theory of evolution is religious, intelligent design is not so. People who oppose evolution often call advocates of evolution the "evolutionist" or "Darwinist". Since evolution and religion often have one or more things in common, evolution theory is argued as being religion as well. An example of the proposition proposed in these discussions is that the theory of evolution is based on the belief that advocates of evolution considers Darwin as a prophet and advocates of evolution refuse to accept different alternatives. In recent years these claims have become increasingly popular as new cultural movements are attempting to shorten the distance from religion and it is more common to use analogies that are deemed anti-religious It is justified.

According to documentary theory, the Torah is composed or edited by several different documents, or a tradition written by several different writers. These original documents are written by various authors because they are thought to support various styles and names of God. One document may endorse "Elohim" and another document may endorse "YHWH". These sources are generally considered sources J, E, P and D. However, Genesis shows only traces of J, E and P. There were also subdivisions of the four main sources of information. Advances in science raise questions about the concept of Bible creation. Many scientists are now questioning the credibility of long-standing beliefs about creation. According to Mark 10: 6, "Jesus said, but since the beginning of creation God formed them into men and women." In addition, John 1: 1-3 says, "In the beginning language is words, words are words, God and word are Gods." According to the Bible, Adam was made 6000 years ago if the dates are summed. Therefore, the earth was made about 6,000 years ago. It is an introduction to the basic story of the Bible and theology. In thinking about the Bible story, the authors emphasize the whole agreement and regard the Bible as a drama in six actions - creation, sin, Israel, Christ, church, and new creation. Two common themes are tying the Bible stories - Old Testament contracts and the Kingdom of the New Testament. Through the story, the author believes that God reveals through stories and calls us to participate in his drama. I chose the theme of "space war" in the Bible only to solve this more holy creation idea. It's not just an angle, it's just an angle. In the coming weeks and months we will explore various perspectives. But for the moment, we continue to pay attention to the Old Testament 's space war, and today we will begin Egyptian studies. We saw the theme of creation in Exodus 1: 6. The Israelites came to Egypt, "They are rich, multiplied, and very many" (1: 7). That is language creation (Genesis 1: 28). We also see that the people of God "grows" all the time in Genesis (eg: 8: 17; 17: 2; 26: 4; 28: 14). It was increased by the order of God at the time of creation, it is done by the people of God - even Egypt Literary creationism believes that the earth and all animal species miraculously created a history of six to ten thousand years. This view is based on the literal historical interpretation of a passage of the Bible understood as the word of God concerning history and the interpretation of scientific evidence designed to harmonize this literary perspective and science. Therefore, science is believed to support the beliefs of the young Earth, the reality of the global flood of the Noah era, the possibility of star light spreading from the distant star to the earth during the creation cycle, and so on. These theories call for modifying the mainstream scientific physics, astronomy, geology, biology, and history extensively. These views are not very inspiring in the scientific community, as creationist views on the literal understanding of the Bible as a leadership framework of natural science are not widely shared.

Summary of Aristotle and Heidegger's theory and practice: In recent years, Heidegger's discussion on Aristotle's "destructive resilience" in Heidegger's publication was strengthened. Heidegger's clear comment on Aristotle in these courses will allow people to use "Nicago's Ethics and Metaphysics" to read the existence and read the existence and time. My thesis focuses on the relationship between theory and practice and analyzes the network of differences between the two thinkers. At the very young age, Heidegger was influenced by Aristotle through Catholic theology, medieval philosophy, and Franz Brentano. Aristotle's ethical, logical and metaphysical work is important for his intellectual development in the critical period of the 1920s. He later reduced Aristotle's work, but Heidegger suggested postponing Nietzsche's reading and "to study Aristotle first for 10 to 15 years". When reading Aristotle, Heidegger raised more and more doubts on the traditional Latin translation and the academic interpretation of his ideas. What is particularly important is Aristotle's interpretation, or is it the resurrection of New Aristotle's "practical philosophy", the influence on others, he is all about Aristotle. The ethics of Marathiist in Volume 6 and reinterpretation of some "metaphysical" works. Both speak of arguments about existence and time Summary of Aristotle and Heidegger's theory and practice: In recent years, Heidegger's discussion on Aristotle's "destructive resilience" in Heidegger's publication was strengthened. Heidegger's clear comment on Aristotle in these courses will allow people to use "Nicago's Ethics and Metaphysics" to read the existence and read the existence and time. - Metaphysics: Because physics actually means the physical world, meta includes non-material worlds such as spiritual and spiritual profiles. According to Encarta Encyclopedia, "metaphysics" is a division of philosophy bringing "the essence of ultimate reality" (1 page) by Hummingbird N's "metaphysics", a dictionary is a "spiritual philosophy Please know the nature and cause you define as "(1 page) Theory of Origin in Aristotle 's Metaphysics In Aristotle' s metaphysics, he discussed the theory of his origin. Aristotle's theory must be distinguished from creationism. The word "creation" means the thought of the Bible. Because Aristotle is not familiar with the texts of the Bible, he does not understand the concept of "creation" in the sense of the Bible. Instead, he is more interested in the "origins" of the world. - For thousands of years, human beings have been thinking about supremacy. Part of the origin of this omnipotent desire for these sacred entities derives partly from our desire to seize the truth of the universe in which we live. We partly come back from that part of the universe physically surrounds us and consumes us perfectly at the end of our lives

Utopian creationism is virtually impossible to predict or create conditions that produce great literature, art, music. The introduction of your collection in the 16th century explains a wide range of topics such as humanism, nationalism, religious reform, which play an important role in stimulating rare literary works. It would be fun if the speculation of our century was a bit waste - to ask if a similar cultural earthquake is occurring, and that one day it would be a worthwhile consideration of the end of the 20th century . Solarpunk is Hufflepuff's "bastard", a psychedelic speculative novel that focused on the future of environmentally friendly utopia. A view full of the basic hope of human influence on the world. Like the next girl, I like dark computer punk utopia, but the vision of sustainable city life like this EPCOT is optimistic and achievable. It has not become an annual award for socialist speculative novels yet. Even in a crowded literary honor landscape, I feel that there is such a space and necessity. Alternatively, hopepunk, or solarpunk, or "to promote social and economic justice on the theme of radical democracy, celebrate individual freedom, but also celebrate freedom of groups" (I will be celebrating Interzone's editorial There is. However, at this time, life is inherited and there are no solid plans. To solve your other problem, I am not a technical utopia; it is neither a utopia nor a utopia. In my opinion, technical utopia greatly underestimates the hazards of hopeless voters who are fearing to accelerate technology unemployment, pick up instigators and throw permanent crimes. We expect that technical unemployment in the 1920s will cause great social dislocation. The entire work beginning with the driver and the retail clerk disappears within a few years. (If disappearance is postponed, it will be due to the "work creation" law, and these reduced "labor" will pay the minimum wage.) There is already an AI automated legal investigation called Ross. 20% Many other jobs are also automated, especially IBM Watson works with hundreds of startups. Each goal is now a series of jobs hiring millions of people. My last blog comes from the Utopia perspective and discusses ways social media and the Internet allow people to shed their creativity through these platforms and share it. People can easily create websites and post videos to YouTube. I think they are important for others and new ideas. Some of them are even in lifestyle and occupation. I do not believe it, so I am not taking the side of dyspea or utopia. I understand Turkle's idea, "These young people live in a state waiting for contact" (Turkle 171). There are too many techniques. But I also understand people like silky. "People are not coach potatoes, we are coach potatoes because it is the only opportunity for us" (Shirky 4: 00). The gadget gives us the opportunity to do more. We need a balance between visual abnormalities and utopian views. So, in each of my blogs, I offered a debate over the argument.

The question of whether theoretical science science is theoretical is often a fierce argument. This argument revealed a problem called division. The problem is how to distinguish between science and nonscience. This is a very important issue, especially when studying church and state separation. The boundary problem is obvious when the school is not sure whether they should use creationism as a possible scientific theory. School teaches science, but how to distinguish the difference between scientific theory and theological theory? I understood the difference between English theory and scientific theory, so let's explain the difference between scientific theory and science law. As mentioned earlier, scientific theory is sufficient evidence of certain aspects of nature. Scientific law is only an observation of the phenomenon the theory is about to explain. For example, suppose you were lying under an apple tree and observed that an apple fell from the branch to the ground. The observation of this phenomenon can be called the law of universal gravity. The law of gravity shows that it falls to the ground every time an apple is dropped. Gravity theory explains why apples fall on the ground. The law is observation. Theory is an explanation Evolution, like gravity theory, is scarcely accepted in the scientific community. The word theory in the scientific world is "not just a theory". Scientific theory is an explanation of sufficient evidence of certain aspects of nature obtained by scientific methods and repeatedly tested and confirmed by observations and experiments. The way Ashaari and Maturidi learn Aqidah is the answer to aqidah's general threat to the Muslim philosophy of the 3rd century. When I was young I handed Ashaari's text (and I do not want to ignore the importance of studying these texts), and today most students are very troublesome in this extensive study of this philosophy I think that it is. They are irrelevant to these texts Scientists use scientific methods to find interpretations of various phenomena. Scientific methods of science proposed scientific law and scientific theory. Scientific theory is interpretation of phenomena obtained through reasoning, observation, and experiments. An example of scientific theory is Darwin's theory of evolution. On the other hand, the laws of science try to describe phenomena occurring in nature. An example of scientific law is E = mc 2, which represents the speed of light in vacuum. In most cases, scientists do not have the technology to study this phenomenon. But through research and research, they can lead conclusions and develop scientific methods.

Marilyn Robinson's steward William H. Bourke's transcendental suggests that transitivity of Marilyn Robinson's housekeeping is a pilgrimage mental adjustment necessary to gain the value of the transition Full of complete view of the world Loss and division "(717). The real world of housekeeping is "a window like a fragmented isolated isolated random night view" (Robinson 50). In order to find the root of knowledge of this transformation, we need articles from Marilyn Robinson, one of America's greatest writers in 1998. Robinson is also a writer of Darwinism and a provocative article that constitutes the essay episode "Death of Adam" in 1998. "Rubber stone" Robinson is not a creationist. In fact, she writes that creationism is "religious cartoon" which is "the best thing that Darwinism can do", because "Darwinism prove that it despises all religions". So, she is evolving. What is the objection? What? Like authors Jeffrey Eugenides and Curtis Sittenfeld, Marilyn Robinson's collection is rare. But each one is a jewel. Secondly, Housekeeping and Gilead were nominated for Pulitzer Prize, Gilead won. The novel Orange Award came back. (This award went to Zadismith in another year). Robinson manages boldness with a small and extensive pace. We study while reading the children, but we also know the power of temptation of the modern world that Robinson calls "Gobble". This way of thinking, we rarely admit it to ourselves, but we keep on feeling uncomfortable for us. I hope this reading will be what we need for this dialogue. History and family stories are also good choices. The Out Stealing Horses of PerPetterson and The Assault of Harry Mulisch deal with the complex family dynamics of the Second World War. More modern options include Marilyn Robinson's Housekeeping Service, Catherine Chung's Forgotten Country, Family Secrets, North Korea and Immigration Experiences; Chimepot's name is a personal desire and a community It is Usher Lef's relationship with expectation. Duncan Macmillan's play "People, Places and Things" - The story that I mentioned most in recent months is a repetitive record of an actress's rehabilitation attempt. The road of Cormac McCarthy is desolate and fainting; in that universe, the most important love is the relationship between my father and my son.

Evolution of School System Discussion about the evolutionary education of schools is a problem. It first attracted public attention, and in 1925 the legendary scope of the lawsuit against Tennessee State, which was also known as the scope of monkey trials. Meanwhile, the provincial constitutional rules only taught creation, so young scientific teachers in Tennessee province have been tried. After much discussion and deliberation, the US Supreme Court ruled in favor of John Scopes and gave freedom to teach teachers throughout the state public teaching classes of evolution (Farris 163). The development of the American school system is slow. However, providing top-class public education to all children in the country is a difficult task. Today, 50 million American students attend approximately 100,000 schools and are receiving education from over 3 million teachers. Even the size alone is overwhelming. The goal of school education is equally ambitious as well. Educators do not just design gadgets or build websites. On this amazing scale, they will try to collect people - a very difficult job, a quick solution, a simple solution, no "hacking". An overview of the creation and evolution of school professors: evolutionary and creative education in the public school system is controversial. Charles Darwin announced his evolutionary conclusion in 1859. This dramatically changed the science of education in public school systems (Armenta, 1). Several lawsuits have been filed for evolutionary education. - Discussion between evolutionism and creative evolutionism and creationism has been on for a long time. When Charles Darwin proposed the origin of species in 1859, this was when the discussion began completely. The first discussion on evolution and creation in litigation took place in a 1925 trial. Evolution has been removed from textbooks and courses. Evolution began to infiltrate textbooks in 1987 Evolution of Darwin and Christianity There is some argument that the theory of evolution proposed by Charles Darwin does not oppose religion. Others do not believe in the theory of evolution, but they still contribute to education and redistribution. If they truly understand the theory, this will not happen. This is due to the impossibility to understand the doctrine of Darwinism and includes the most dangerous views of these theories that are penetrating society.

There are many ideas about evolution. Some people take our existence as a matter of course and some like to use the Bible and the existence of God to explain all the evolution. However, some people studied evolutionary subjects and provided an explanation of where the species came from, and how they evolved in their way. This type of science has been studied for a long time and one of the most famous ideas in the field of evolution is the person named Charles Darwin. Charles Robert Darwin, born February 12, 1809, is a naturalist in Britain and the scientific theory of its natural selection evolution became the main basis of modern evolutionary research. Darwin 's biological theory attracts the attention of many professional scientists, and evolution has influenced many scientific fields and other aspects of life by the time he died. - ... With scientific rationality we can establish a scientific way to investigate the surrounding world. The world and the universe where we live are far beyond the complexity of the creation of our world through the creation of God. Dr. Kenneth Miller is a scientist who also believes in God and in an interview with NOVA discusses why evolution is a more reliable explanation for creating our world than creationism. Jean-Baptiste de Lamarck introduced the word "evolution" in the scientific dictionary in 1809. Fifty years later Charles Darwin used a science model of natural selection as the driving force of evolution. (Alfred Russell Wallace is considered to be a co-discoverer of this concept as it helped to study and experiment with the concept of evolution.) Evolution explains the tremendous change of life discovered on the earth now It is used to do. It describes the history of species evolution - the characteristics of the various species to which it belongs - and its relationship with other species known as that lineage. Extensive biological methods produce information about phylogeny. These include comparisons of DNA sequences, products of molecular biology (more specifically genomics), and comparisons of fossils or other records of paleontology, relics of paleontology Biology became scientific when Charles Darwin announced "About the Origins of Species". But the theory of evolution is not new to Darwin. Lamarck announced the theory of evolution in 1809. According to Lamarck, seeds are constantly produced from non-biological resources. These species were originally very primitive, but due to certain inherent trends, the complexity increased over time. This evolution is called direct generation. Lamarck suggested that adaptation of living things to the environment can be handed down to their descendants. For example, he believes that the original giraffe stretches his neck to reach the higher branches. This makes their descendants have long necks when they were born. This proposed evolutionary mechanism is called inheritance of acquired features. Lamarck also believes that seeds will never be extinct, but there is a possibility of a newer form. All these three ideas are known to be wrong.

I always regard the theory of natural selection as survival of the fittest and naturally assumes that nature excludes those who are neither smart nor powerful enough to drive humans to the top of evolution ladders. After participating in this course, the concept of my ladder has changed. I think now that it is not vertical, I treat it as a horizontal where I think everything that exists on the earth today will not challenge. I have a deeper and more subtle understanding of the concept of natural selection and I understand how it works with other natural processes that affect evolution. What is evolution, evolution? Evolution is the process of adapting different forms of living things from their initial form. Because biology is a study of life and evolution is how organism adapts to the environment, evolution is closely related to biology. "Evolution is a process that diversifies from the earliest forms of the history of the earth with the development of various kinds of organisms." Evolution occurs within species, not within individuals. Some people believe that evolution is a myth that lacks scientific evidence, others believe there is evidence to support it. Evolution of living things is thought to have been going on for the past three billion years. Intelligent design has scientific basis. However, given the fact that it seems to be fashionable and complicated now, it seems to believe in evolution theory. Even those who do not know the topic have never considered evolutionary evidence. The belief in the theory of evolution is an amazing phenomenon. There is no observable evidence of macroscopic evolution (ie evolution from different organisms to another), but it is still enthusiastically defended by scientific institutions. This strange situation is easily documented here, acknowledging that they lack evidence, quoting a recent statement by a leading evolutionist. These statements misrepresent that no significant scale evolution has occurred at this time, never occurred in the past and can not occur at all. Since the publication of Charles Darwin 's Origins of Origin, people have discussed creationism and evolution. By supporting facts and assertions, evolution is defended as more than just a theory, which shows that it is a fact. - Because he is made in the final state, a person can not evolve to another state. He is made according to the image and image of his father, so you do not need to evolve; therefore there is no sign of evolution from the beginning. Since sin entered the world, people have been fooled to believe that there is evolution

Does the teacher have a way to incorporate religion into the curriculum? If so, do you have a way to include religion without harming anyone? America is working hard to solve religious concepts. This struggle deserves attention both politically and educatively. We should allow discussion on whether schools believe they have existed for many years. This discussion has been discussed many times in the court, but now some Americans insist that they should allow religion to return to school. Perhaps religious people should be cautious about "teaching religion" at public schools. Atheists and free thinkers are generally better at educating religion and Bible than general believers. A few years ago the Pew Religion and Public Life Forum announced a study that atheists and agnostics gained higher scores than those who believe religious knowledge. Members of the Free Religion Foundation often tell us that they were rejected by religion after reading the Bible. Contrary to the devout memories of the more delicious Scriptures of the Bible and the Parrot Parliament, understanding that the religious assertiveness of calm and academic research is almost inevitably one thousand of religions claiming to be one Religious truth beliefs Not all of them are right ... maybe they are all wrong! Public schools can teach religion, but religion can not be taught. Public schools can teach students to understand religion in a fair and objective way, such as discussing the influence of religion on history, art, music, literature, or teaching comparative religion courses. However, they may not teach courses based on religion. Public schools teach sound science and history. Public schools will not teach religious doctrines in science classes such as creationism and intelligent design, nor will they compromise evidenced proof scientific theory. In addition, public schools can not teach incorrect American history based on religious teachings. Unfortunately, there is no consensus on best practices for teaching religion in public schools. For the most part American schools have long built chaotic relationships with religion. This is mainly due to school prayers, and these schools are changing all the time. There is only one school system in Modesto, California, and a religious course of the world is necessary to graduate. In Wichita, Minniha is heading in a different direction, and about 1,200 private and public schools use core knowledge, but it is widely known but not widely adopted.

Religious right of public school "Jesus in the classroom" Do you still feel uncomfortable? Religion in the public school system is one of the most controversial subjects in American society. Other religious and politically entangled themes. If you are like most Americans, this topic makes you feel depressed, nervous, or at least a bit uneasy. The proper role of religion in public schools continues to be a controversial subject until the first amendment clause until today, and certainly appears in the future of our country. The problem of public school religion, including public schools and religion, has become a subject of intense debate. It is difficult for the government to clarify the appropriate boundaries of religion in public schools. Certainly, teaching religion is permitted in the public education system, but the real problem is that there should be a margin between teaching religion and simply teaching religion. It is almost impossible to teach American history Public schools can teach religion, but religion can not be taught. Public schools can teach students to understand religion in a fair and objective way, such as discussing the influence of religion on history, art, music, literature, or teaching comparative religion courses. However, they may not teach courses based on religion. Public schools teach sound science and history. Public schools will not teach religious doctrines in science classes such as creationism and intelligent design, nor will they compromise evidenced proof scientific theory. In addition, public schools can not teach incorrect American history based on religious teachings. Public schools should ban religion. There is no reason to allow religious exhibitions to weaken the public education system. Participation of religion in public schools is distracting and unnecessary. In addition to educational purposes, eliminating religion is important to provide a stable and effective learning environment for each student. Without religious beliefs, students can succeed in the classroom. - The first amendment is usually equivalent to freedom of expression and provides five types of protection: establishing articles, free exercise of religion, freedom of speech, freedom of press and freedom of peaceful assembly. Public universities and college students (and student groups) enjoy complete protection of the first amendment, but this right depends greatly on the background of student freedom of speech.

Lawyers ("defense counsel", "lawyers", "lawyers", "lawyers", "lawyers", "consultants" or "lawyers") are those who work in law. Lawyers have a license to acquire a degree in law and practice in a specific field. If you have questions about the law, please consult a lawyer. Legal problems are called incidents. A person can hire a lawyer to bring up a lawsuit against others or to help them sue them. If the case is raised in the court, a lawyer will appear on behalf of his client. Lawyers use their legal knowledge to convince the court that the client is on the right side of the discussion. Lawyers also will support the people who are "out of court settlement." This means that both sides of the discussion agree on penalties in advance, so you do not need to go to a trial. When a person is charged with sin, he has a counsel who is trying to prove that they have not committed a crime. The lawyers insisted that they were called prosecutors that they committed a crime. Lawyers also prepare legal documents for their customers. Example: buying and selling property, testicles (will). Some lawyers (called "pledgers" in the UK) can take legally binding witness statements that can be submitted to the court Lawyers work in various environments. Some people work on their own, others work at law firms. Some lawyers work in hospitals and private companies. Lawyers working for private companies are often referred to as internal lawyers Lawyers usually charge fees for the work they do, but sometimes they provide advice called "for free public service" that is freely called "free service". In many countries, if a person is accused of charges and can not pay lawyers, the government will pay lawyers to use tax on behalf of their lawyers. Elizabeth I of England of Wikipedia, a free encyclopedia. "Elizabeth I (September 7, 1533 to March 24, 1603) became the ruler of the Queen of England on November 17, 1558. Sometimes the Queen of Virgin, Gloriana, Queen Beth and She was born as a daughter of Henry VIII as a princess but her mother Ann Borin was executed two and half years later and was announced that Elizabeth is born from marriage. Wikipedia Battenberg Princess Viking Eugnie of Battenberg Victoria Victoria Eugenia Spain October 24, 1889 April 1889 1969 Granddaughter O ... Pater La Bourgeoisie or Pater Le or Les Bourgeois is a French phrase is a French cry. Advantages of University Education Thesis Wikipedia ... Essential success of education Future articles Key points to lower college tuition Key points Frankenstein article on les aiguilles et al opium Critique essay 5 Element description Industrial revolutionary art paper Paper prose Feminist criticism against Evolution of cited pages, Free encyclopedia of Wikipedia searched on April 15, 2007, April 14, 2007: Genesis, Wikipedia, Free encyclopedia, found on April 15, 2007, April 14, 2007: Scientists say that religion and religion can coexist with religion and science, Wikipedia Free Encyclopedia, evolution and religion, taken out from Lovgren Stefan on April 12, 2007 National Geographic News, October 18, 2004, April 15, 2007, Author: Creation - Evolution Controversy, Wikipedia Free Encyclopedia, 13 April 2007, Search from 15th April 2007: Evolution and Creationism, 2007 From the search on April 16:

In Frankenstein, Mary Sherry challenged her motives for scientific development and moral uncertainty of that era. This criticism is becoming increasingly important as modern scientists attempt to enter nature that could not have been imagined so far by using cloning and genetic engineering. Through careful analysis, you can see how this novel explains the potential dangers of these uses and the irony of conflict between science and creationism. Prior to the birth of the story, Mary Shelly began to understand the progress and speculation of the scientific community in the early 19th century; in the introduction of Frankenstein, edited M Mary Sherry 's Frankenstein is a 19th - century literary work that delved into the scientific world and deliberately deduced the rational results of morally insensitive technical research. Although the novel leads to several questions about knowledge and lofty nature, the novels mainly explore the psychological and physiological journey of two complex characters. Each character has some interesting features, from passive and meditative things to rashes and impulsive things, but their most attractive qualities are their strangeness. Mary Shelley's Frankenstein considers the pursuit of knowledge in the context of the industrial era and is focusing on the ethical, moral and religious influence of science. The tragic example of Victor Frankenstein emphasizes the humble desire of human beings for knowledge, which is science without morality in general, but a detailed discussion of the text of this novel is subtle to this interpretation We will reveal contradictions. The creation of Frankenstein 's monster was shown as an unparalleled achievement of scientific discovery, but it brought sadness, fear and destruction to his maker. In a sense, the creation of a monster is punishment for Frankenstein's pursuit of unmistakable knowledge. This reflects the theme suggested by Dr. Marusle's Faustus that Faurus was sentenced to hell for his excessive ambition. In Frankenstein's novel "Frankenstein", Mary Shelly depicts a monster. The point of view of the monster is terrible. At first it was childish, kind and helpful, but as he gained knowledge he became miserable. Mary Shelley wrote an article about monsters to express her view on knowledge and the changes it brings. In the 19th century of the industrial revolution, there was a negative effect. At that time, there was a lot of development of science and technology that led people ... Has the strong influence of Victor Frankenstein due to the pursuit of knowledge bring a fatal result? In most cases, when there is a strong desire, results are rarely taken into account. In Frankenstein's novel, Victor Frankenstein pursued knowledge in a compulsive way and did not inform him of possible effects. Victor Frankenstein was the main reason for his biological loneliness. In fact, Victor Frankenstein made a mistake because of this isolated creature.

There are many beliefs about how we will be. There is a religious belief, "Big Bang" theory, and we believe that we have evolved from a lower form of life. It is difficult to say exactly how life is made and who has the right answer. A person can take one of two perspectives on the origin of life. They either believe the creator (the creator) or believe in evolutionists, but through in-depth research on scientific evidence, we must believe that evolution is the basis of our existence . The Midwest Center of the Innovation Center conducted a random phone survey asking "At public school, we just evolve, create, develop, create, evolve or just create"? . It means evolution only, 18.9% are created only, 64% are created and evolved, and 11% are not created. Bliss (1978) concluded, "Although these data are limited, they provide a fair and appropriate view of adults at public schools." Weinberg (1978) states as follows. The survey reflects the reality - as I believe - and those results are a tribute to the poor work we did in teaching evolution. " Creationism and Evolution For a long time, school administrators, teachers, parents, and even students have opposed creation and evolution of education. Since scientific methods and support have become our scientific theory as human beings, many public schools have inherited evolution. Those people think that students should be able to inherit the winds of Jerome Lawrence and Robert Lee. Trial, controversial creation and evolution controversy. There are many characters with a gorgeous and strong individuality. These include: Matthew Harrison Brady and Henry Drummond. All these influential people are strong, but not everyone has the same power. It is not only for other people but also for themselves. Matthew Harrison Brady is a very strong and respected person Evolutionism is considerably younger than religious beliefs of creation and creation. Prior to Charles Darwin, evolution was a devout idea, and God as a creator was believed to be widely accepted. However, since Darwin introduced his evolution theory a century and a half ago, discussion about theory and creation always existed. - It is a modest expression that claims almost no conflict in the realm of faith and reason. From the earliest stage of scientific exploration, these two areas of thought fell into a vicious circle and gave up as the religion gradually modernized to adapt to the new understanding of the universe.

Discovery of Toumai - Introduction to the primitive of the ancient: The present evolution of human thought is about to change dramatically. Primitive human skull, jaw fragments, primitive teeth were found in the Djurab desert. People believe that these fossils are between 6 and 7 million. Chad's nickname "Toumai" means "Walton" in the Quran language. Where did you find it? These fossils were found in the Durobe Desert in northern Chad, Central Africa. As Toumai was discovered in Chad and far from the legendary story of Olduvai Gorge, Laetoli, Middle Awash, it suggests that all chapters of human evolution may not have been found yet. Most of the research was focused there as most of the primitives were traditionally found to have been done in the Great Rift Valley on the East - South axis of Africa. The discovery of Chad may be an indicator of our earliest broad relatives and its contemporaries in the continent of Africa. Both Milford Wolpov, Martin Pickford and Brigget Senut believe that Tumai is a monk, not an ancestor. The discovery of Tumai is only a small part of the discovery that caused the controversy of the early 21st century. Discovery of Toumai - Introduction to the primitive of the ancient: The present evolution of human thought is about to change dramatically. Primitive human skull, jaw fragments, primitive teeth were found in the Djurab desert. People believe that these fossils are between 6 and 7 million. Chad's nickname "Toumai" means "Walton" in the Quran language. Where did you find it? - Wikipedia.com says that creationism is life, the earth and the universe are creations of supernatural existence. The theory of Genesis related to Protestant Protestant Christianity in the United States supports the original Bible (Tattersall 21) about the creation of God's humans and other parts of the universe. Today, as a part of America 's populist revival, Genesis is emerging again. In July 2002, the international team led by French paleontologist Michel Brunette announced the discovery of the human skull. An unknown species called Sahelanthropus tchadensis was found in Chad in Central Africa. A very complete skull is called "tomai" which means "hope for life in Goran". The human face and teeth of the skull are surprising since researchers are coming from an era when believing that human ancestry began to evolve. It is not clear whether Toumai is bipedalism. Brunette etc. It is irrational reasoning that it is a habitual bipedal walking as it shares common features with other primitive people known as bipedalism. The skull is said to be a male skull, due to the wonderful combination of original function and advanced function.

He became more controversial in the debate. He talks too much and can not become part of a project essential for team work. These examples are automatically selected from various online news sources to reflect the current usage of the term "discussion". The views shown in the examples do not represent the views of Merriam-Webster or its editors. Please send feedback created. Therefore, the response to the discussion here is the design of cosmological argument, objective argument, and creationism. First of all, we answer the claim as evidence. In his article McCloskey claims that theological argument is simply evidence that there is no supernatural existence in the universe. He encouraged atheists to believe the assertions and evidences claimed to their atheists so that they believed it was not enough to convince them to exert their persuasive power. Therefore, it is important to give up these discussions. He considers design interpretation to be the most valuable and valuable argument. He used evolution theory to support atheism ... another part of McCloskey called these arguments "evidence" and often that they could not explicitly prove God's case It means. McCloskey thinks that argument is proof Drange defends two arguments against atheism, including evil claims. As Drange pointed out, his argument itself is a deductive or logical argument from evil, ignoring the support of its premise. However, support for the forum of discussion is general or evidence. Therefore, he explained that his argument from evil is a debate of evidence rather than a conclusion. Is that chilling pain evidence against the existence of omnipotent omniscient infinitely benevolent god? Mark Vuletic considers the main problem of discussion between the defender and God's good doubt in this colorful hypothesis dialogue (based on actual dialogue in philosophical literature). Sadra advocated a new argument called Seddiqin argument or justice argument. This argument prove the existence of God through reality of existence and try to conclude with the necessity of eternal God. In this discussion, one thing itself proves that the path is the same as the goal itself. In other arguments, the truth is derived from an external source such as from possible to necessary, from source to eternal origin, or from exercise to immobile motive. There is no intermediate language other than the truth in the claim of the right person. A version of his ontological argument can be summarized as follows.

The idea that the world has made progress or development of science has never existed. In fact, the period of enlightenment in 1700 and scientists such as Isaac Newton, Benjamin Franklin, with the power of dangerous men and first toy, to prevent rabies invention, gravity, people, chemist Louis · Pasteur vaccine, discovering evolutionary Charles Darwin's father Not only possibility but also more exciting scientists are changing the world of "progress" in the beginning. In recent history, both creationists and evolutionists have discussed whether evolution theory should be part of public education in the United States. Evolution is a scientific fact or science fiction novel. There are many concepts in science and mathematics, but evolution is science based on several disadvantages. It is a scientifically proven science and the process of learning and evolution is an integral part of the overall development of student education, as excluding it will revoke the rights of certain students. So, what about forecasts of evolution and creation? The evolutionary record is very irritated. Let's learn how evolution deals damage to science. Meanwhile, to create a commentator, it depends on past modern scientific achievements - to see what importance science is about evolution? And the contribution of creative scientists. Based on a clear example degree of modern scientific forecast of creationism model, cross reference over Neptune: Voyager II supports creation. However, it has turned out that the dominant theory of evolution, many of which are not compatible with observations on "prediction" and evolution theory. If evolution is true, for example, there is a deep lack of will of millions of missing links (whether there are any missing links?). Fossils The record of this model and it must be the opposite of the concept of evolution - for example see the link was lost. Evolutionist Gould wrote this puzzle in detail Science, especially geology and biology, clearly plays a very important role in evolutionary philosophy. Geology is a field of science that is important for verifying evolution. This science essentially provides a timeline of evolution that millions of organisms can adapt and evolve. Before Sir Charles Lyel proved to be 4 billion years from the earth, most people believed that most people are from 5000 to 7 years old. Of course, support time frame like the evolution process known today is too short, very important for the evolution of geology, philosophical reasons (Appleman 9). Biology gives some other basic evidence of evolution. As you can see from Mendelian geneticists and other works, all living things have similar structures and necessary natural processes. Without them, Darwin could not prove his theory of evolution, so both evolutionary scientific theory, to provide much of the evidence, (Eiseley 94-96)

Evolutionism and Christian faith 1. The emergence of the theory of evolution The root of historical evolution theory seems to have a doctrinal belief trying to deny creation. Most heathenian philosophers of ancient Greece defended the concept of evolution. By looking at the history of philosophy it turns out that the concept of evolution has continued many pagan philosophies. However, this ancient pagan philosophy is not involved in the birth and development of modern science, but is a belief in God. Some believe that it is not against biological evolution depending on faith and some or all of the classical religious teachings on Christian gods and creations are part of modern scientific theories including concrete evolution Or all of them. "In evolution theory and creationism, Eugenie Scott and Niles Eldredge say that it is actually an evolution theory because God is the first cause of the universe and is also an essential maintainer / supporter, It is accepted by people who are atheistic rather than righteous The evolution of theology can be combined with the interpretation of the creation of age in the stories of Genesis, but most believers say that the first chapter of Genesis is " Text "should not be interpreted as an explanation, but should be interpreted as a literary framework. Or a fable. Evolutionism and Christian faith 1. The emergence of the theory of evolution The root of historical evolution theory seems to have a doctrinal belief trying to deny creation. Most heathenian philosophers of ancient Greece defended the concept of evolution. By looking at the history of philosophy it turns out that the concept of evolution has continued many pagan philosophies. - As the German philosopher Georg Hegel thinks, human history is characterized by greater freedom, reason and understanding. Belief for humanity is the idea that mankind has the positive possibility to develop and develop into a more open, caring, peaceful and educated society. However, there is a growing trend of challenging this idea and controlling social media and everyday conversation. Darwin's theory of evolution is straightforward and should be taught as a theory of human development and creation. In the case of religion, this may be a controversy, but not everyone is a Christian faith. It is a widely accepted theory and it is a possible explanation for human development, so it should be taught in school. Most schools are schools because they do not teach evolution. Although I am a Christian, I still think that learning Darwin's theory of evolution is beneficial.

Young people or adolescents are people from 13 to 19 years old. Teenagers are another word for teenagers. When a teenager reaches 20 years old, they are not already developed, so they are no longer teenagers. Ordinary people use different things, and they vary in different societies. Most societies traditionally have a formal ceremony to commemorate the change from childhood to adulthood - just like American sweet 16. In puberty, rapid mental and physical development will occur. Adolescence is the name of the transition period from childhood to adulthood. In the United States, children aged between 11 and 14 and young people attend secondary school, youths aged 14 to 18 usually go to secondary school. In the UK, teenagers and children are mixed in high school. Young people who attend secondary schools (high schools in the United States) usually graduate at age 16 or 19. The sexual appeal to adolescent youth is often referred to as hemophilia though this often confuses British pedophiles or pedophiles. [1] Girls begin to adolescence at 10-11 years old; boys 11-12 years old. [2] [3] Girls usually complete adolescence before 15 to 17 years of age, [3] [4] [5] and boys usually complete adolescence before 16-17 years old. [3] [4] The main point of adolescence in women is the onset of menstruation, menstruation, occurring on average between 12 and 13 years; [6] [7] [8] men, this is the first ejaculation In the age of 15 in the 21st century when the average occurs [9], the average age of children, especially girls, until adolescence is lower than the 19th century, the girls are 15 years old, the boys are 16 years old. [10] This is thought to be due to rapid body growth, weight gain, improvement of nutrients leading to fat accumulation [11], or eating meat of an animal ingesting estrogen. [12] [13] Elizabeth I of England of Wikipedia, a free encyclopedia. "Elizabeth I (September 7, 1533 to March 24, 1603) became a ruler of the Queen of England on November 17, 1558. She is the daughter of Henry VIII as a princess Although born, her mother Ann Bolin was executed two and half years after being born, announced that Elizabeth is born from marriage. Wikipedia Battenberg Princess Viking Eugnie of Battenberg Victoria Victoria Eugenia Spain October 24, 1889 April 1889 1969 Granddaughter O ... Pater La Bourgeoisie or Pater Le or Les Bourgeois is a French phrase is a French cry. Advantages of University Education Thesis Wikipedia ... Essential success of education Future articles Key points to lower college tuition Key points Frankenstein article on les aiguilles et al opium Critique essay 5 Element description Industrial revolutionary art paper Paper prose Feminist criticism against Evolution of cited pages, Free encyclopedia of Wikipedia searched on April 15, 2007, April 14, 2007: Genesis, Wikipedia, Free encyclopedia, found on April 15, 2007, April 14, 2007: Scientists say that religion and religion can coexist with religion and science, Wikipedia Free Encyclopedia, evolution and religion, taken out from Lovgren Stefan on April 12, 2007 National Geographic News, October 18, 2004, April 15, 2007, Author: Creation - Evolution Controversy, Wikipedia Free Encyclopedia, 13 April 2007, Search from 15th April 2007: Evolution and Creationism, 2007 From the search on April 16:

The American Civil Liberties Union recognizes that this legislation is likely to be a law because it was a landslide in the Tennessee Legislature's House of Representatives (January 1925). After several mistakes began ACLU sent press releases to several newspapers in Tennessee State like the Chattanooga Daily Times and announced that they would provide legitimate aid to the teachers in the state of Tennessee state . The teaching has evolved in public schools so that test cases can be used to challenge the bill's constitutional validity. 1925 - Tennessee State and John Scopes ("Monkey Judgment") attract the public's attention because John Scopes, a high school biology teacher, was accused of a ten-year crime of evolutionary theory which violated Butler law . The trial ends with the confidence of the scope. Discussion on the theory of evolution and creationism continues today. 1938 - After failing to regulate child labor earlier, the Fair Labor Standards Law was signed by President Franklin Roosevelt. In many of its provisions, such as setting the minimum wage to 25 cents per hour, the law sets the minimum age of non-agricultural labor and limits the number of hours worked and the type of employment for older children. Scope trial formally known as Tennessee v. John Thomas Range formally known as Range Monkey Trial is a US lawsuit in July 1925, where an alternate high school teacher, John T. Scope, is in Ben Tennessee Bert He was accused of breaching. This law stipulates that the evolution of mankind is illegal in state-funded schools. This trial was deliberately done to attract publicity in the town of Dayton, Tennessee. The scope is uncertain, he actually taught the theory of evolution, but he deliberately condemns himself and allows the incident to have a defendant Range Trial, also known as Range Monkey Trial, was a lawsuit filed in 1925 by John Scotts, a science teacher developed from the Tennessee Public School that was illegal in recent bills. This trial was based on the two most famous lecturers at the time, William Jennings Bryan and Clarence Darrow. The trial was seen as challenging the constitutionality of the bill while publicly advocating the validity of Darwin's theory of evolution and the opportunity to advertise the image of the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU).

Ayasha Husseini Mrs Johnson AC ELA 8th grade prayed at a public school on May 7, 2014. "I do not think any type of religion should be introduced to public schools in the United States." - Thomas Edison. Religion and prayer of public schools is a big controversy for American schools. School officials can not support religion because they violate the first revision that "Congress should not enact laws relating to religious beliefs or ban on free movement". Public schools must remain neutral because establishing a particular religion at public schools violates the first amendment The problem of public school religion, including public schools and religion, has become a subject of intense debate. It is difficult for the government to clarify the appropriate boundaries of religion in public schools. It is true that teaching religion is allowed in the public education system, but the real problem should be that there is a margin between teaching religion and simply teaching religion. It is almost impossible to teach American history Public schools can teach religion, but religion can not be taught. Public schools can teach students to understand religion in a fair and objective way, such as discussing the influence of religion on history, art, music, literature, or teaching comparative religion courses. However, they may not teach courses based on religion. Public schools teach sound science and history. Public schools will not teach religious doctrines in science classes such as creationism and intelligent design, nor will they compromise evidenced proof scientific theory. In addition, public schools can not teach incorrect American history based on religious teachings. Public schools should ban religion. There is no reason to allow religious exhibitions to weaken the public education system. Participation of religion in public schools is distracting and unnecessary. In addition to educational purposes, eliminating religion is important to provide a stable and effective learning environment for each student. Without religious beliefs, students can succeed in the classroom. - The first amendment is usually equivalent to freedom of expression and provides five types of protection: establishing articles, free exercise of religion, freedom of speech, freedom of press and freedom of peaceful assembly. Public universities and university students (and student groups) enjoy complete protection of the first amendment, but this right will be greatly influenced by the background of the student's freedom of speech.

In his article "Global warming erodes glacier ice", Revkin believes that global warming continually changes the world we live today. He confirmed his position by including examples such as the disappearance of the North Pole Crown, melting of glaciers, erosion of glaciers. He also includes some facts and some notes on expert testimony to further confirm his position. Throughout this article, Revkin repeatedly quotes Dr. Lonnie G. Thompson. Dr. Thompson is a professor at the Ohio State University Earth Sciences Division and a researcher at Ohio State University Bird Polar Research Center. I became a science journalist in 1990. I am the editor in chief of Discover. Andy Revkin is currently working on senior editor ProPublica. Just before I started, he just wrote a cover story about global warming. I think this is the first cover story about global warming. Revkin wrote an article on NASA's climate scientist Jim Hansen and his testimony on the climate model. And it showed that human carbon emission increased the temperature. I wrote a lot of articles about evolution at the time, and I was attacked by creationists. Evolution was a political football since the Scope's Monkey experiment. I have the first row of seats where I can see the art of attacking science. Creationists use misunderstandings about balance to demand equal time in creationism. They gave God the creation of other names. They chose my article to convey the opposite of what I wrote. They personally attacked biologists as liberated elites who hate good people. In his article "Global warming erodes glacier ice", Revkin believes that global warming continually changes the world we live today. He confirmed his position by including examples such as the disappearance of the North Pole Crown, melting of glaciers, erosion of glaciers. He also includes some facts and some notes on expert testimony to further confirm his position. Throughout this article, Revkin repeatedly quotes Dr. Lonnie G. Thompson. - Some people do not know about good and evil, but in the southern part of the 1930s nobody supports this guy besides Atticus, so you can see that black men are charged with rape charges. · Finch, this is the right man. In order to kill the Mockingbird, Harper Lee uses the role of Atticus Finch to prove that it is important for people to stand up and do the right thing.

Many people are interested in distinguishing words from agnosticism and atheism. The reason is simple, an atheist is a person who does not believe in the existence of God and other gods. It may be difficult to remember this difference, but checking the origin of these two words may be useful This agnostic person appeared in 1869 (probably created by British biologist Thomas Henry Huxley) and consisted of Greek agnōstos (meaning "unknown, unknown"). Atheists got English from French athletes. Although the two words share a prefix (which can cause many confusion), the body of each word is completely different. Agnostic shares a part of its history with words related to knowledge and knowledge such as prophecy and prognosis. Atheists share words related to God, usually like theology or theology. Atheists lack faith in any God, accounting for about 3% of the world's population. Atheists in some countries, such as Japan (65%) and Sweden (85%), have a large population. Often atheists are considered "strong atheists" or "weak atheists" depending on the background and certainty of that belief, or lack of faith. Some atheists strongly oppose creating creationism and intelligent design at American schools as an alternative to biological evolution. After the Kansas State Board of Education decided to allow intelligent design to replace evolutionary education, in 2005, Italian church monster flight was created by the team. A flying spaghetti monster is a satire theory that believes that the priests have as much scientific basis as intellectual design theory. A powerful atheist, also known as a clear atheist or a positive atheist, denies the existence of God or any other god. This person's view is entirely based on the real circumstances that can be found using scientific methods. Since the existence of God can not be proved by science, a strong atheist concludes that God does not exist. The second type of atheist is also known as a recessive atheist or aka atheist. This person does not deny the existence of God, but declares Religious Relativism. In other words, she will claim that anyone's faith is faithful to that person, but she does not believe in God himself.

Evolution of our country Although the United States is considered one of the greatest countries in the world, it is not that easy. Our ancestors have experienced many trials and hardships in our history and we have to learn a lot of lessons to find out where we are today. Events like the Great Depression taught us a lot. In addition, new inventions, expansion to the West, and Roosevelt New Deal had a positive impact on our country. In 1866, with the new memory of the American Civil War, workers wanted to adopt a simpler lifestyle after the American culture had completely changed. This list presents the 10 most innovative, historic and influential events in the development of the United States. Lister tried to include five good and five bad events, but the bad won the number game. Readers of other countries are encouraged to submit a list of the most important events in their country. From a later point of view it seems this is the only way to end the worst moment in the United States. After about 600,000 American men died of injuries and serious unsanitary medical practices, Lincoln called the famous "All Charity" one month before his death on March 4, 1865 I announced my second inaugural speech. Speech There was a picture of his speech, including that the John Wilkes booth is standing behind the balcony. Lincoln ended his speech in this sentence: "It is not evil for everyone, it provides charity for everyone ....... I try hard to get the job done by us. Shaw, those who fight the battle, his legacy, and orphans. " Creation and Evolution Since the announcement of the origin of Darwinian origin in 1859, the United States has discussed evolution and creation. Recently, discussions on whether to incorporate creativity in the public school curriculum as a theoretical alternative or combined with evolutionary intensification have intensified this argument in the United States. When such an unstable problem is discussed, other problems are raised ... denying this fact, the world does not develop. Evolution theory can be verified compared to creationism. Because of the theory, evidence, and increased acceptance in today's society. In order to discuss the absolute nature of evolution, we must fully understand the history of this groundbreaking knowledge. Evolution is often described as a long-term change. Scientists generally believe that the evolution of the world has led to several theories.

In the black community, non-uniformism has been taking place over the years. It introduced himself to slaves and kept showing themselves to blacks in the 21st century. The black community has a great presence, and taxonomism is causing divisions in the black community. In the era of slavery, the black family considered himself better than the black world. Today, middle class black people think that they are higher than the underlying black people. The black family and the middle-class black family tried to withdraw from the low-ranking people. Shortly thereafter, the split of the new Kuhn would be subject to a similar strong opposition. Creationism (or intelligent design), ecology, physiology (or evolutionary psychology), feminism, post colonialism, and computationalism (or virtualization, complexity theory) are different from contemporary science-oriented social cognitive movements. Different degrees are different and criticize the structure of the university's discipline to avoid the "final concern" problem that comes from a clear perception that all sorts of people and things exist in common reality . All exercise is expected to be a source of new unity. Table 2.1 summarizes the differences between unified science images and heterogeneity science images as a prelude to the systematic misunderstanding of today's separatist against rejuvenation. Working people evacuating around the world are tying their needs to contradictions. A common adverb is "I want to return to our country". Wherever you go, the biggest enemies are international organizations, open trade, and (infrequently) inflow of brown skin migrants. Trump slogans are "first in the US" (and are often accused of racial discrimination and prejudice against Mexicans and Muslims.) It is not a coincidence that the murderer opposed the British Brex Counciler Joe Cox There. It was shot again and again by the British Brexit vote and "put Britain first" (apparently white supremacist literary purchaser) A gradual shift to the rise of the madhouse and its modern psychiatric hospital, and finally to a modern psychiatric hospital, explains the emergence of an organized institutional psychiatrist. Initial institution was "crazy" but institutionalization is part of the social process seeking solutions for external family and communities in the 19th century, for people considered "crazy" It is a correct solution. . In England in the early nineteenth century, thousands of "crazy" could have been placed in various institutions, but by the beginning of the 20th century this number has increased to about 100,000. This growth occurs concurrently with the development of infidels (now known as psychiatry) as medical professionals.

In Thayer's article, he is trying to incorporate Darwin's theory of evolution into international security research. This paper answers the core question of how the theory of evolution theory has on realistic international security theory and how peace can be achieved if war is part of human nature I try to do. The paper states that the theory of evolution provides a scientific theoretical basis for the assumption that realism, the ultimate cause of war and ethnic conflict, and the origin of war inherent in human nature as part of its evolutionary history I agree with Thayer. But what about evolution? Domingos depicted John Holland's early life. The Netherlands is inspired by Ronald Fischer's classic "genetic theory of natural selection", the most important of which is Darwin's theory of evolution. Then he decided to turn Darwin's theory into an algorithm. As a pioneer in a new field he proposed a model theorem in the Netherlands. It makes it possible to predict the quality of the next generation. Therefore, he is the father of genetic algorithm, probably one day, Robot Park (fictitious futuristic park, robots fight hard, losers are destroyed, winner software copied to his descendants such as DNA To Charles Darwin's theory of evolution was proposed in the book "Origin of Species" published in 1859, but this research does not basically mention Darwin's application theory to humans explicitly. This application of Darwin was not published until 1871, and he published his second wonderful work on evolution, human decline and sex selection. A book published by Darwin is that all races came from a common ancestor and interdisciplinary supporters believe that race was made separately, among the distinctive supporters It was held with intense debate. Family Darwin, a strongly abolished relationship, suffered from slavery and suffered when traveling beagle many years ago. Shortly after Charles Darwin's origins were announced in 1859, Agassi became one of Darwin's most critical critics. In an article, he believes that Agassi refuses the theory of evolution because it has an atheistic and speculative nature and that this theory is not fully supported by geological records. The advantage of Agassi helped to stop accepting the evolution of America. However, this theory is supported by scientists. Despite the separation of knowledge, Agassis insisted on creationism on the last day. In order to find evidence against Darwin's theory, he even reviewed the route to Darwin's Vietnam, including the famous Galapagos Islands.

Some atheists strongly oppose creating creationism and intelligent design at American schools as an alternative to biological evolution. After the Kansas State Board of Education decided to allow intelligent design to replace evolutionary education, in 2005, Italian church monster flight was created by the team. A flying spaghetti monster is an ironic theory, where herds think that it has as much scientific support as intellectual design theory. In the first letter to the Kansas Board of Education, Henderson showed that the correlation does not mean that the increase in global warming does not mean a reduction in the population of the pirates. In this example, praise is not for God, so we ridicule some of the religious groups' belief that the world is experiencing difficulties like war and famine. This adds a strong sense of boundary between the atheist's church and the state and separates the sacred nation from religious interference. But this confidence in the boundary between the church and the state is not limited to atheists and pastors. Many people do not believe that organized religion is good for society. Not only is it not taxed, I am amazed at what I can see as a known incorrect repeat statement of children's brainwashing, children's vulnerable over the years. Some people think that at least these Bible will be seen critically if these children are not misunderstood. Many situations in which historically organized religious organizations acted not only brought about the deaths of millions of people, but in many cases prevented the abandonment of human rights. Atheism is often misunderstood as a belief that God does not exist, but it is not; it can be an atheist or an agnostic. These two terms answer different questions. Atheism answers the question you believe, ie the lack of faith in God. Agnosticism answers to what you know, how confident you have in your beliefs. According to this definition, a person can be an agnostic - an atheist or an unconscious - an atheist. We can also explain people as Agnostic - Christian, or Clues - Christian. Agnosticians admit that their faith is not a guarantee of truth, and Gnostic is a person who claims to be positive about their beliefs, or who lacks faith. What does it mean to be a human being? This question was answered in anthropological research. Anthropology is a study of various human cultures in the world in history. According to the University of Hawaii at Hilo, anthropology "emphasizes the comparison of human groups to understand the scope of human behavior and biology, so think about what human beings are." Anthropology, We focus on common aspects of mankind, such as language, cultural ties, economics, and curiosity to find common grounds. Anthropology is a scientific study on the cultural, social, biological and environmental aspects of humanity, its past and present lives. Cultural anthropology is one of four research fields in a wider area of ​​anthropology (archeology, physics or biological anthropology, and three other linguistics). Cultural anthropologists specialize in cultures and people's beliefs, practices, and cognitive social organizations of human society. Cultural anthropologists study how people who share a common cultural system organize and form the surrounding material and social world and form these ideas, behaviors, and physical environments . Social and cultural anthropology is one of the four major areas of anthropology. Social and cultural anthropologists focus on social and cultural studies and are often interested in cultural diversity and universalism. In addition, social and cultural anthropology is usually divided into social anthropology and cultural anthropology. The method of social and cultural anthropology is mainly ethnography based on qualitative data. This contrasts with quantitative data commonly used in other anthropological fields such as archeology and physical anthropology. Ethnography is a comprehensive study of culture,

Everything means that all symbolism can express and represent various ideas, moments, memories of all people's lives. F. In Scott Fitzgerald's novel "The Great Gatsby", colors, names, and objects symbolize different personality and character ideas. Some symbols are more obvious and more acceptable than others. People say money brings our world to success. This famous quotation applies to Fitzgerald's literary works in many ways. Representing this desire, there seems to be many colors necessary for the character. Pantheism considers everything to be part of a wonderful "integration". It comes from two Greek words, bread means "everything", and Teos means "god". Because Pantheism says that everything is a god, we are one with the universe and we are God. We are a part of the inhuman divinity that constitutes the universe. When answering this question, what is there, why is not there? Pantheism says that everything has a non-personal beginning. The universe itself has wisdom to live. Existing "things" are how energy expresses itself. If you have seen the movie "Star Wars," you will have seen the concept of pantyhism, "primitive power" drawn in the scenes of human energyless energy. Since the origin of the universe has a non-personal origin, the problem of "why" has been avoided. As with naturalism, pantyhism basically says, "There is no good answer to this question, so we do not consider it." Everything has a beginning. There is no middle, end, no existence without starting. There are two possible beginnings in our universe. This does not mean that there are two intermediates, two ends, or two independent. That means there is a contradiction that only one is true. The first is Big Bang theory. This is a scientific view of how we spread out of the electronic explosion. The electronic explosion eventually fuses with the nucleus. This is said to take over 15 billion years. Another general view is that God created the universe and everything in it. It only takes 6 days and should rest on the 7th day. If this is the case, we are currently only four seconds on the sixth day. In scientific creationism everything is described as if people on Earth are looking backwards from now to the beginning of the universe. "Time and space" is like a series of blankets Essay.com/ This article follows the process of evolution from the comparison of the Big Bang and the Bible's beliefs and all aspects of human reproduction. This article explores the evolution of life in a variety of ways by comparing the Big Bang and Bible beliefs to human fertility. To live in a double universe like ours, consisting of dual energy, ie having two polarities means that everything has a starting point and an end point. There are ways to expand the purpose, deceive them, or deceive themselves to not see, but in the end death is not a fuss because it begins, it just happens. In my TV series "The Twilight Saga" my family died, I do not notice it, I do not accept it, I move around, I sleep in the room, I remember the chapter that I ate with my family. They were afraid and worried, so he tried to explain that he was dead because he was dead. He has not heard. So he collapses everyday, not only because of a stench but also because of the terrible scenes he presents, no one can be with him. Until one day he ate the soup, his nose fell to the soup, then suddenly he felt that the reality crushed him, and that he needed to continue his way I understood.

(I) In the first creative story, humans were finally created, and the second person was created in front of the Garden of Eden. (Ii) God rested after working on the seventh day of the account originally made, but did not mention it in the second account. (Iii) In the first explanation the earth is invisible quality, but in the second explanation the land is naked and dry (Iv) God was created by the word of God's command in the first description, but in the second, God shapes men from dust and is explained as imitators (V) It was created at the stage of the first account (days), but did not follow the stage of the second account and the period was not specified (Vi) In the first story, human beings are the creative climax, but in the second world, people are the center of God's creation. (Vii) Men and women are created in the first account at the same time, but in the second account God created men and finally women were created (Viii) In the first explanation, human beings were made as children, but in the second explanation they were made to live together in the marriage system. (Ix) In the first explanation, humans want to eat plants and feed seeds, but in the second case they do not eat goods and evil tree nuts. What is the role of elderly people in promoting harmonization and responsibility sharing in African traditional communities? (Resolved) Explain the role of elderly people in promoting harmony and sharing responsibilities in African traditional communities Answer: In Genesis 1: 1, "In the beginning God created heaven and earth" is written. In later Genesis 2: 4, it seems that the second different creative story began. Two different ideas for creating an account are a common misconception about these two paragraphs. They are neither contrary to the order in which things are created and do not contradict them. Genesis 1 explains "Sixth day of creation" (and the seventh day of rest), and Genesis 2 covers only the first day (day 6) of the creation week and there is no contradiction. First let's see the obvious differences between the two created accounts. Then, rather than to impose a contemporary idea on this ancient text, rather than impose a contemporary idea on this ancient text, Genesis 1 (technically Genesis 1: 1 - 2: 3) and Genesis 2 (2: We start with 4) to suggest a way to understand the relationship. My aim is to make Christian read these chapters. Because we seek our theological and ethical requirements when seeking loyalty to God in the modern world. First, in the description of Genesis 1 and 2 creationism, the name of God was always different. The first account uses the generic term 'elohîm (Hebrew is' God ') until Gen 2: 3, so the second account is a compound name YHWH' starting with Gen 2: 4, We will use elohím (this will continue until Gen 3). This is the official end of the story of the garden on the origin and evil of human creation. ) Two accounts to create a beginning. The first statement in Genesis 1 is that the transcendent God, the universe, and the "place there" created everything from nothing. In the second record of Genesis 2, we imagined and personalized the inner god on the earth, and made things from the earth. It represents the inside of God that exists here. "You can eat nuts in the garden, but do not eat nuts in the middle of the garden, please do not touch, you will die." But snake said to the lady, "- You will never die.When you eat it, your eyes are opened and you know God knows good and evil like God Because there is. "{{Genesis 3.1-5} Navigation link directory. . . Contextual content. . Your copy. . Frequently Asked Questions. . shell

Today, many students are not affected by evolution theory, one of the most important concepts of modern science. It provides a well structured framework for understanding and teaching evolution in an engaging and conversational style. This book is meant to explain how teachers, parents, local officials, scientists and educators reveal the vast diversity and similarity of Earth's evolution in evolution theory. Essence of Method In addition, this book provides answers to frequently asked questions to help the reader understand many problems and misunderstandings about evolution. The book contains sample activities for teaching evolution and the essence of science. For example, books include fossil footprints and activities to investigate population growth. And the science teacher can use it to introduce the evolutionary principle. Provide background information, materials, and step-by-step presentation of each event. Also, this volume: Explain how science differs from other human efforts and why evolution is one of the best ways to help students understand this difference. Education on evolution and the nature of science is based on the 1996 National Science Education Standards issued by the National Research Council - and provides detailed guidance on how to evaluate and select teaching materials to support the standard This book is comprehensive and practical, incorporating one of today's educational subjects into a balanced and rational argument. This will be particularly interesting for science teachers, school administrators, and community interested members. The importance of evolution is summarized as follows. Publication of the National Academy of Sciences "Teaching the Evolution and the Nature of Science": "There is no other idea that will greatly influence how we think about ourselves and how we relate to the world" (NAS In 1998, page 21. The Academy of Sciences in science, evolution, and creationism, "Creationist views reverses the scientific process, they do not want change - supernatural forces form a living or earth system To - explain basic requirements, hypotheses for rejecting science "These beliefs can not be tested, modified, or rejected by scientific means and therefore can not be part of a scientific process "(NAS 2008, p. 43) The evolution of theology is to regard God's religious teachings to be compatible with the understanding of modern scientific biological evolution. The evolution of theology itself is not a scientific theory, it is a series of ideas on how general evolutionary science relates to religious beliefs, in contrast to specific creative views. Advocates of theological evolution theory often match evolutionist ideas with God's beliefs and refuse contradictory arguments about religious-science relations - they contradict each other's scientific theories of religious doctrine of creation and evolution theory I do not need it. High school teachers are in the dilemma of teaching evolution. Sometimes they are obliged to teach the creation of "science", "intelligent design theory" and "evidence for evolution", and sometimes they are being pressured to forget the evolution of the professor. What should the teacher do? Legally speaking, what does teacher do and what can not be done? The part of "should" is easy. Both teachers and scientists say "Teach evolution." (See the NAS website "Teach us about the essence of evolution and science" or the National Biology Teachers Association and the National Science Teachers Association.) As a famous geneticist, Theodosius Dobshanski says: While the evolutionary theory of science teachers in public schools in the United States is no longer illegal, religious groups have tried to strengthen the teachings of "alternative" while evolving for decades. These include the creation of the Bible, scientific creation, and intellectual design - they all teach the life of the earth to varying extent not only through evolution. Some people lobbied

Introduction In the Wizard of Oz (1939), Dorothy and her friends went to Emerald City to find Oz - a wonderful and powerful wizard. At the end of his arrival, Dorothy's dog opened the curtain and revealed that the wizard was just a normal person. In many ways, this story is similar to the creation and interpretation of religion by individuals in society. I will discuss this metaphor, Rudolf Ott and his religious creationism, Peter L, on the next few pages. Discussion that evolution as religion is usually analogy: Some people argue that evolution is religion, because evolution and religion have something in common. One example of assertions in these claims is a remark based on evolutionistic beliefs and proponents of evolution theory assertively refuse to accept different alternatives. These arguments are becoming increasingly common in recent years, as neo-creative movements are trying to preserve distance from religion. Evolution is promoted to be more than just science by its practitioners. Evolution has been advertised as a complete alternative to Christianity with ideology, secular religion, meaning and morality. . . . Evolution is religion. This is the evolution of the early days, and today's evolution is so. Another way of saying "religion" is "the world view", the whole reality. The evolutionary world view applies not only to the evolution of life but also to the evolution of the entire universe. In the field of space evolution, our natural scientists are far away from the experiment science of life scientists, and from mysterious mathematics and metaphysical speculation, we are creating a variety of evolutionary cosmology. Socialist Jeremy Rifkin commented on this special game In the book "Sapiens", the evolution of religion is being compared. According to almost all religions, humans are a symbol of creation and are quite different and superior to animals. But according to evolution theory, like our species, we have traveled every aspect of the planet long before human evolution. Among them are Neanderthalensis people living in Europe and Asia, Denisova's people, and so on. When Homo sapiens encounters other colleagues they may intersect them and the same may happen in different parts of the world. Time may be the reason for the rise of various races around the world. This theory brings many political tensions, alleging that different racial races have different genetics and therefore may lead to war between ethnic groups. Therefore, due to political pressure and lack of evidence this theory may not be endorsed by many people.

The evolution of thinking is based on a wide variety of plants, singing birds in the bushes, various insects flying between, worms crawling through the wet soil, and tangled banks reflecting these carefully constructed shapes of each other Thinking to be interesting All that is interdependent so that it is so complicated and different differently is created by the law surrounding us. - Before the first week of the Charles Course in Darwin, the origin of the species, I had little knowledge of evolution, phylogeny, biodiversity and I was of little interest. At the moment, I did not notice that I started the journey of remaking and personal evolution at first. After another series of evolution, things seem to have stabilized at last. My journey began several years ago, when I broke up with my wife, I completely invented myself, learned how to rent in about twenty years, and learn to live alone It did not become. I know who I am. It takes years to understand, but most of it is a good father. This quickly disappears This is a long preface and I have heard most of my students in junior high school and high school biology classes. However, I thought that it deserves a well-thought answer, "Do you believe in evolution theory?" Recently, "Yes, you may read Jerry Coyne's" Evolution is Real "to save time". Because Cambrian rabbits and similar off-site fossils are soon detected, the reality of evolution is that scientific evidence is beyond reasonable doubt, so anthropologists no longer need to summarize scientific methods It is. Unfortunately, in the United States the evolution theory still seems to be a political problem, and in some cases it may be in the political realm (for example, by the Board of Education) there may be differences in political issues I do not. One concern of fundamentalists is the evolutionary teaching of schools. They believe that evolution, especially human evolution, is a false belief that harms the Christian civilization. As a result, bills supporting fundamentalists, which prohibit teaching evolutionism through the 1920s, were submitted to legislatures of several states. The initiative in Kentucky was initiated by Nebraska politician William Jennings Bryan (1860-1925) and worked to ban human evolution at all publicly funded schools, including universities. Teach. Although this measure has been canceled, dead supporters are still fighting the law. Discussion about creationism as an alternative to evolution theory has recently revived with the educational system in the UK and the United States. According to George Coyne SJ, evolution is not an atheistic worldview people often think. In fact, looking back on our role in the evolutionary world helps deepen our faith. Based on scientific knowledge, the nature of God, and the nature of mankind, I would like to discuss how I believe scientists like me are looking at them. This knowledge is the basis of discussion of all beliefs and I hope that it complements the knowledge created by philosophy and theology. There are several criteria for judging the accuracy of scientific theory such as predictability, reproducibility of experiment, simplicity, economy of interpretation.

Tennyson's Memory Memory is a symbol of Tennyson's friend Arthur Haarlem, a symbolic feature of science and religious controversy in the mid-19th century. Reflexion, Haarlem's tragic death caused Tennison to participate in more ambitious poetry projects than traditional Milton Dirge, including meditation on the most serious problems human beings face It turned out to be a kind of incident. Advances in science, especially in the fields of geology and biology, challenge the beliefs that make up the foundation of Christianity. Belief to charity God, responsible for creation and subsequent supervision and faith Tennyson's Memoriam and Arnold's To Marguerite Nature Picture - continued and Dover Beach The two poets who used rich natural paintings during the Victorian era were Alfred, Lord Tennyson and Matthew Arnold. In Tennyson's "mourning" he uses various aspects of nature as a metaphor to explain the feelings of close friends after death. Arnold's verse uses various kinds of water as a metaphor of To Marguerite - Continued and Dover Beach. Robert Frost 's natural image and lifecycle in the wind and rain In his poem "Wind and Rain" Robert Frost has developed a central theme that reflects the reflection of people about his life. As men grew, he realized that he did not live a fulfilling life, but spent most of his life worrying about his inevitable death. The man expressed his wish to sacrifice his life to cheer up his life; he would rather die rather than spend the rest of his life to die. Tennyson was only 24 years old when his best friend Arthur Henry Haarlem died suddenly. Tennyson will write a poem devoted to Haarlem in the next decade and publish it as "Mourning" (SparkNote 1) in 1850. Haarlem's death will seriously hurt Tennyson's religious beliefs and encourage him to solve these questions through exploration of death, especially Harlan's long mourning to his long poem. He sometimes asks religion, but he also holds doubts about science. However, Tennyson believes that evolution is progressing, I am concerned about the conflict with this biblical creationism and believe that despite scientific discoveries it is necessary to maintain faith in God It is. (Spark note 1) Another writer who portrays the religion in Victorian literature was "In Memoriam A. H. H" of Sir Infredin Dinson. Written specially for his best friend Arthur Henry Harlem, he said very beautifully, "Love you, never lose / never love you" (27 lines 15 - 16). This is grief. Poetry; But it reflects not only religion but also science We told that we can not prove existence: "Believe in places we can not prove" (line 4 of the preface) Tennyson dealt with sorrow , I am trying to protect it correctly. New scientific knowledge brings confidence in the era of God's existence

In the intense drama "inheritance" by Jerome Lawrence and Robert E. Lee, three strong men expressed a strong view: Bertram Cates, Henry Drummond and Matthew Harrison Brady. First, defendant Bert Cates was responsible for teaching "Darwinism" in his second year. Second, Katz's counsel, Henry Drummond, showed his belief in the right to think. Third, Matthew Harrison Brady is a "giant" prosecutor who explains his prejudice against creationism. Overall, these three basic characters are fighting for their own personal beliefs. "Inheritance Wind" in which Kirk Douglas and Jason Robards produced by David Papazian directed by David Greene appeared was arranged by Jerome Lawrence and Robert E. Lee. The drama "inherited wind" was inspired by the "Monkey Judgment" in 1925, where a teacher was arrested and tried to teach a course of evolution. But the movie "inheritance" should not be regarded as a documentary, should not be regarded as a true record of the experiment, but rather it should be regarded as a dramatic movie that shapes it by raising it to convey a strong message to the audience . "Inheritance Wind" is a well-made movie with high-quality performance, photographs of films, and funny and interesting stories. However, inheritance winds are not departing from the historical facts of the "monkey trial" in order to show prejudice to the audience, they should practice what they preach. Still, the inheritance wind is still worth recommending, but it is for those who have strong concern and are interested in the dramatic conflict of opinions and beliefs. From open credit to the very end, inheritance winds celebrate human thought and claim to be the greatest gift for all, as they claim it is the key to our existence. Everyone should make their own judgment and choices according to their free will and no one has the right to control other people's thoughts and beliefs. However, when communicating information to the audience, the succession wind itself strongly manipulates the viewer's thoughts and emotions, and shakes their beliefs in particular in the direction of atheism. An atheist who inherits the wind is said to be a tolerant and forgiving intellectual who suffers from ignorant, narrow Christian paranoia 's hands. This depiction attempts to abandon their religious beliefs and influence viewers to support their ideas. "Darwin took us to the top of the mountain and we could look back from there and see what we came from - Drummond

Evolution has emerged since the publication of the origin of Charles Darwin's species and people are discussing the merit of creationism and evolution. This theory is reinforced by the use of DNA, genetics, and its mutation research, the early species changes encountered and the distribution of related animal species over a wide range of geographical areas. To fully understand what a fossil is and to see how they are made. Ian Land expressed doubts about the validity of evolution. I think that she is uncomfortable, according to evolution theory, there is no substantial difference between humans and animals, or it may dilute or dilute individual responsibility (criticism against other theories of evolution Made to remember). However, Land refuses to make final judgment based on the lack of education on this issue, and objectiveist politics and economics have the same problem when dealing with the externalities of other free market ideologies Said. Theists must deny or dilute the externalities of the environment. In the world of objectivists, pollution is not a big problem, but if that becomes a problem, we can simply privatize everything and let the market play its magical role. In Gould's paper, the validity of scientific theory, that is evolution, has been questioned by its disbelievers. On the contrary, creationist believes that scientific theory, evolution theory does not convey a clear explanation and is incomplete. "... theory" usually means "incomplete fact" - from fact to theory, hypothesis (Gould, 1 page) Creationists furthermore can not prove scientific theory, evolution is like an experiment It is argued that it can not be. Since scientific theory has been tested this way, evolution is not a fact. "If evolution is not the case, scientists can not even make a decision about this theory. Essay.com/Jacob Brosovsky's "Imaginative Tentacle" and Stephen Jay Gould's "Facts and Theory as Derivatives" Jacob Bronowski's "Imaginative Tentacle" and Stephen Jay Gould's "Facts and Derivatives as Theory" You've heard about our biggest scientific theory, evolution theory, Big Bang theory, gravity theory. You also heard about the concept of evidence and insist that certain evidence proves the validity of these theories. Fossils, genetic inheritance and DNA prove evolution. Hubble expansion of the universe, the star, the galaxy, the evolution of the heavy element, and the presence of the cosmic microwave background proves the Big Bang theory. Falling objects, GPS clocks, planetary motion and starlight polarization prove gravity theory