Arguing Evolution

The controversy has evolved as a fact that there is an ambiguous boundary between providing best scientific support for the theory that strongly believes only incomplete evidence and writing persuasive research. In fact, there may not be any line after careful consideration, but for most scientists this is an unpleasant idea, they value the ability to write an objective report on the object and ultimately the best I get the answer. Because science has a positive answer and can prove that it is superior to other answers.

We first show the trends in personnel expenses per unit in Germany - initially, the unit labor cost trend in Germany, ie labor cost versus productivity is the same for production and manufacturing, labor cost and productivity I thought there was. Among the other economic sectors, they played an important role in favorable evolution, and other economic sectors played an important role in the advantageous evolution of Germany's tradeable manufacturing industry. Then we studied the German tradeable manufacturing mechanism. Next, we will investigate mechanisms that enable wage limits, a drastic decline in real real wages that allow wage limits, and a sharp decline in real wages at the lower limit of wage distribution and wage distribution.

A creationist wants to evolve because evolution is religion, not science "in order to weaken the argument of higher education advocated by biologists when discussing creationists, and to dispute science (evolution) I disagree. Religious redefinition (creationism) is between two equivalent religious beliefs. Even though I think that the theory of evolution is religious, intelligent design is not so. People who oppose evolution often call advocates of evolution the "evolutionist" or "Darwinist".

Since evolution and religion often have one or more things in common, evolution theory is argued as being religion as well. An example of the proposition proposed in these discussions is that the theory of evolution is based on the belief that advocates of evolution considers Darwin as a prophet and advocates of evolution refuse to accept different alternatives. In recent years these claims have become increasingly popular as new cultural movements are attempting to shorten the distance from religion and it is more common to use analogies that are deemed anti-religious It is justified.