Utopian creationism is virtually impossible to predict or create conditions that produce great literature, art, music. The introduction of your collection in the 16th century explains a wide range of topics such as humanism, nationalism, religious reform, which play an important role in stimulating rare literary works. It would be fun if the speculation of our century was a bit waste - to ask if a similar cultural earthquake is occurring, and that one day it would be a worthwhile consideration of the end of the 20th century .
Solarpunk is Hufflepuff's "bastard", a psychedelic speculative novel that focused on the future of environmentally friendly utopia. A view full of the basic hope of human influence on the world. Like the next girl, I like dark computer punk utopia, but the vision of sustainable city life like this EPCOT is optimistic and achievable. It has not become an annual award for socialist speculative novels yet. Even in a crowded literary honor landscape, I feel that there is such a space and necessity. Alternatively, hopepunk, or solarpunk, or "to promote social and economic justice on the theme of radical democracy, celebrate individual freedom, but also celebrate freedom of groups" (I will be celebrating Interzone's editorial There is. However, at this time, life is inherited and there are no solid plans.
To solve your other problem, I am not a technical utopia; it is neither a utopia nor a utopia. In my opinion, technical utopia greatly underestimates the hazards of hopeless voters who are fearing to accelerate technology unemployment, pick up instigators and throw permanent crimes. We expect that technical unemployment in the 1920s will cause great social dislocation. The entire work beginning with the driver and the retail clerk disappears within a few years. (If disappearance is postponed, it will be due to the "work creation" law, and these reduced "labor" will pay the minimum wage.) There is already an AI automated legal investigation called Ross. 20% Many other jobs are also automated, especially IBM Watson works with hundreds of startups. Each goal is now a series of jobs hiring millions of people.
My last blog comes from the Utopia perspective and discusses ways social media and the Internet allow people to shed their creativity through these platforms and share it. People can easily create websites and post videos to YouTube. I think they are important for others and new ideas. Some of them are even in lifestyle and occupation. I do not believe it, so I am not taking the side of dyspea or utopia. I understand Turkle's idea, "These young people live in a state waiting for contact" (Turkle 171). There are too many techniques. But I also understand people like silky. "People are not coach potatoes, we are coach potatoes because it is the only opportunity for us" (Shirky 4: 00). The gadget gives us the opportunity to do more. We need a balance between visual abnormalities and utopian views. So, in each of my blogs, I offered a debate over the argument.