Evolutionary Ideas and the Biblical Concept of Creation

The idea of ​​evolution and the creative concept of the Bible are created and evolved from two different perspectives. The main difference here is that there is a god in the story of the beginning of creation and there is a random opportunity in the theory of evolution at the beginning. It is often referred to as "big debate" because everyone asks that the two sides are in conflict, "Why are we here, we are here?"

The theories and models of various creative disciplines are based on several presets, each one opposite the evolutionary assumption. The most fundamental thing is that the Bible's revelation is the key to understanding the world The Bible is a fundamental and irreplaceable source of information. Many Christians believe that if we consider creative days to be figurative, we can coordinate the Bible with the Big Bang and the very ancient Earth. However, this seems reasonable for those who do not pay enough attention to a series of events according to Genesis 1 or a series of events following evolution theory.

Some theologians are trying to harmonize the story created by the Bible with the evolutionary interpretation of the origin of life. However, to do this, we need to explain the creation time of Genesis 6 days indefinitely, not 24 hours text instead of 6 hours of text. This interpretation of the Bible can not be supported by the rational principles of Bible study. In many ways, evolution is incompatible with Christianity. There are several questions to consider. 1. Create a story. The story of the creationist in the first two books of Genesis, the first book of the Bible clearly shows that the work of creation was completed in six hours or 24 hours. Evolutionism contradicts this directly, denying God's creativity. As Christ instantly created a miracle on the ground, he created immediate creations during the creation cycle.

In Aristotle's metaphysics, he discussed the theory of his origin. Aristotle's theory must be distinguished from creationism. The word "creation" means the thought of the Bible. Because Aristotle is not familiar with the texts of the Bible, he does not understand the concept of "creation" in the sense of the Bible. Instead, he is more interested in the "origins" of the world. Aristotle believes that there are three kinds of substances before the concept of time, two of which are physical, one of which is immovable. It can be said that these three substances are "sensible eternal", the second substance is "sensitive and fragile", and the third substance is immovable. As the theory advances further, sensitive and perishable substances can be regarded as substances and eternal rational substances can be regarded as potential substances Animals can be regarded as metaphysical and belong to another science I will. According to Aristotle, animals are not gods.