Analysis of Alan Roger´s Evidence of Evolution

Evolution is a topic that is always controversial and is very important in defining the origin of human beings. Genesis is still a common belief in contemporary society and is maintained by virtual truth in a sense and this belief has been widespread for many years prior to the concept of evolution but it is a major opposition to evolution It is a person. Alan Rogers, author of Evidence Evolution, provides a comprehensive discussion on creationism, from molecular data to morphological data. He believes that many creationists are using "arguments from personal doubts," which means that the lack of detailed explanation of the problem is evidence of the answer.

Combining "evidence of evidence" with textbooks on NOS (eg Espinoza 2012) to fully exploit the important contributions of Rogers is likely to achieve the author's worthy goals: evolutionary science Understanding, acceptance, and thanks. The fact, logic, simplicity is unlikely to affect the recognition of the evolutionary rationality of most people.

Biology courses and textbooks focus on the evolutionary mechanism and sacrifice evidence of evolution, although most people are unknown, but unless you believe in evolution, you are exposed to massive evidence. They change their beliefs. Since the evolution theory of textbooks is becoming increasingly sophisticated, it is unknown whether most biologists agree with the initial premise. Indeed, after reviewing some of the best-selling elementary level biology books (Nehm et al. 2009), I know that many of the topics discussed by Rogers are actually included in these texts . I also suspect that science educators agree with the second premise: empirical research shows that more understanding of evolution often can not contribute to meaningful belief changes .

Intelligent design has scientific basis. However, given the fact that it seems to be fashionable and complicated now, it seems to believe in evolution theory. Even those who do not know the topic have never considered evolutionary evidence.

In the 1980's, Philip Johnson began reading the scientific literature on evolution. Science was defined by finding a natural interpretation, but this means that Darwin writes in court, examines the evidence of evolution from a religious point of view and challenges the sole rational interpretation of the origin of the species lead. Because of the phenomenon. His efforts to raise the credibility of this book and the subsequent creative list and to adjust it is the beginning of the "Smart Design" movement. Intelligent design assertions have evidence that life was created by "smart designers" (primarily because the physical properties of objects are very complex and must be "designed"). Supporters argue that IDs take into account not only the facts gained through naturalism but "all the facts available"