The Debate Between Science and Religion

The foundation of science is believed to be observation and experience, and humans have observed nature phenomena for centuries and have experienced various types. However, religion is thought to be older than science, and is thought. Does God create a person or do we have to create him? A deeper belief is to think and unify how human beings created art, sentences and religion. God has various forms and names in various languages ​​and dialects There are various customs and religions all over the world in all religions, all races and countries, Biblical texts and books have knowledge from p Share.

Discussions between science and religion are often wrong. There is no need for contradictions, but remember that they are focusing on different goals, goals, and experiences. It is dangerous to put prescription labels on science, especially religion. Religion means various things for various people. In the United States, Buddhist monks can not be mixed like evangelical Christians. Both science and religion can play a role in human life. Science looks; religious feelings. Science tells religion: what I see is to give you what I see. Religion tells science: I just want to tell you my feelings. The benefits of science are first recognized in the world of psychology and then recognized in the physical world. The benefits of religion are first recognized in the world of psychology and then recognized in the material world.

In the ongoing debate between science and religion, I find myself attracted to the former. As a US citizen, I gradually noticed the incredible freedom we have, freedom of religion, freedom of press, freedom of speech (citing a few names). However, as an individual I am worried that we are losing all the greatest freedom and thought power. Science is an ability to accept advances and failures of new thinking, but also relentlessly retries. Religion is a hollow substitute for scientific reasoning. It is necessary to understand that "X 'is comfortable" does not mean "X is true" (Dawkins, 20). As long as humans have the curiosity of curiosity and the courage of pioneers and develop new and improved theories, scientific theories proved to be wrong are not wasted. This article aims to promote science as a higher interest by accessing and refuting many discussions about the existence of God.

Since the publication of the origin of the species by Charles Darwin, discussion has continued between science and religion. Although scientists have proposed many theories about human origin and the creation of the earth, religious organizations have a major creationism based on the story of the Bible "Genesis". However, these theories are not the cause of the discussion. Because different theories are just an explanation of an unknown myth. Discussion is caused by different belief systems. The main difference between creationists and scientists is the way they face this argument. Creationists have developed their own science: to create science. Creative scientists want to prove that creation is right, science is wrong, and selective interpretation of fossil records is provided. However, their explanation is exaggerated and ridiculous. Creationists choose the scientific theory and do everything possible to point out the shortcomings.