The Case Against Science

Litigation against scientific science has become an unreliable epistemological document for several reasons. First, scientific assumptions are questionable. Second, the scientific method shows narrow limits to access to universal knowledge. Third, the conclusions of the scientific community as a whole are in doubt and inadequate. Fourth, scientific practices form a special perspective. In other words, its positioning in the knowledge world reduced all other knowledge channels and caused damage.

Litigation against science is straightforward: Probably half, many scientific literature may be just incorrect. Science went into the darkness due to the influence of small samples, small influences, invalid exploratory analysis, open conflicts of interest and attention to fashion trends pursuing suspicious importance. C. Glenn Begley and John Ioannidis - a courageous and keen researcher in clarifying systematic weaknesses in the biomedical sciences - the conclusion in an article in January 2015 states: Continued research investment is ongoing, and as a result, we can not confirm most of the results, which means that we can not tolerate the challenge of time. This is not playable. Science is not self-correcting but self-destructive.

Philippe Kecher, a philosopher of science, considers Karl Gustaf Hempel and Willard Van Oman Quinn in his 1982 book "Abuse of Science: The Case of Opposing Creationism". Popper's remarkable philosophical criticism advocates the problem of "counterfeit" and provides definitions of other theories. Not a set of forged statements. As Kitscher pointed out, Uranus observations when it was first discovered in 1781, if people adopt the strict pop-peran 's theory of "theory" "counterfeit Isaac Newton' s celestial mechanics "Will. Instead, it is thought that one planet has influenced the orbit of Uranus - and this prophecy is certainly confirmed. Kitcher agreed with Popper's opinion that "Science can only succeed if it fails," but I believe that scientific theories are composed of "a set of designed statements". And the other person - he says it "aids the hypothesis", that is