Creationism Isn't Science but Belongs in Schools

As long as history is the focus of discussion, creation is not science, but the origin of school life. The ancient Egyptians believed that the god Ra of the sun made land from the depth of water and took another form of building everything, including God and humans. Iroquois is a native American tribe and tells the story of the God of the human family line This story leads the twins, one is evil and the other is good. Excellent twins create a perfect world.

What happens when science and religion encounter? Well - for beginners, you will get a scientist named Abhijit Naskar who is me. But jokingly said - as science and religion encounter, we will gain a field of human understanding belonging to the field of science, as it belongs to the field of religion. This field is called "neurology" - this is a fusion of science and religion. It is the only scientific field related to religion and related to science. but why? Why do you need neurology? As it is the only area of ​​rational thinking, we try to understand religion, religion, and the roots of God without requiring neurology and a big impulse to refute and destroy religion. We are based on empiricism, not just optimism, even though optimism is around us.

As long as history is the focus of discussion, creation is not science, but the origin of school life. The ancient Egyptians believed that the god Ra of the sun made land from the depth of water and took another form of building everything, including God and humans. Iroquois is a native American tribe and tells the story of the God of the human family line This story leads the twins, one is evil and the other is good. Excellent twins produce the perfect picture taught by the school to evolve and families or other educators are invited to their children and students about Genesis or other types of creative myths or legends You should let me know. In fact, the transparent interpretation of this principle has emerged effectively: since there are two or more "aspects" of the discussion, it is not the Chinese "yin and yang" principle or Greek philosopher's view Everyone on this planet is coming

Gould 's argument is that evolution should be taught at public schools, not creation. Evolution is a public school curriculum because he believes that evolution is science and creation is religion. In addition to giving a view and understanding about his own evolution and creation, Gould also exemplified other important person's views on this argument. His article includes John Whitcomb and Henry Morris who wrote articles about The Genesis Flood. The idea was that a large amount of water vapor covered the earth, but they could not explain how the cover reached it. Whitcomb and Morris believe that rising water from the ground, coupled with the sky rain, will produce enough water to account for Noah's global flood. They decided that he would release it as God initially placed water there.