Can Science Prove the Creation of the Universe?

If someone can tell you how all these things started, how is our world created? Modern science has made some impressive discoveries about our universe. George Smoot, who won the 2006 Nobel Prize for Physics Prize as a cosmologist at the University of California at Berkeley, said: It is very detailed to know how it works. Some people think that testing these theories is a test of faith, others know how the universe was made to some extent.

The science community sighed. Is faith true when science is over? What Hawking points out in this book is that "Because there is a law like gravity, the universe can create itself from nothing and can create it from now." Where physics ends In my opinion, metaphysics is a concept of becoming something, nothing exists. We have Greeks who are thinking from Socrates through Plato to Aristotle, long before the present era begins. An important work on this subject is Prague, the fourth and last dialogue of Plato, focusing on immortality of the soul.

That is the essence of creation. 1 Only in this statement can you see that creationism has big flaws. Although we can prove that science existed undoubtedly until the first 20 milliseconds, we can not prove it before. The above statements about creationism indicate that confusion alone is not the beginning. And this "creative hand" interprets the order of the universe from the confusion and applies the physical law to that confusion, so that it forms movement and order. However, prior to the confusion, creationism did not touch the foundation as a whole. Science recognizes that there is a period of application of different laws and orders, but creationism tries to deny this existence saying there is always something. Because, if there was a beginning and God was not before that, where did God come from? You can prove that there is a scientific beginning. We still do not know what it was before this start!