Division of ‘Art’ and ‘Science’: Comparison of Popper and Woolf’s Theories

The question of how to divide scientific boundaries and where to divide is still a controversial issue. Since the emergence of modern science from the 16th century to the 17th century, many philosophers and thinkers have tried to establish clear boundaries and criteria to separate them from other forms of knowledge. However, so far no consensus has been reached on specific issues. This issue was called "demarcation problem" in philosophy and was always a serious problem for science itself, as it raised many other questions about the universal status of contemporary social science.

Most of the earlier studies in Popper's scientific philosophy focused on what he was calling a boundary, or a distinction between scientific (or empirical) theory and unscientific theory. In particular, Popper sees capturing logical or methodological differences between scientific fields (physics etc.) and non-scientific fields (myth production, philosophical metaphysics, Freud's psychoanalysis, Marxist social criticism, etc.) It is aiming. Popper demarcation proposals can be seen effectively as a response to boundary verifiability criteria proposed by logical experts such as Carnap and Schlick. According to this standard, statements are cognitively meaningful only if they can be verified in principle. In particular, this standard aims to show that empirical scientific assertions have meaning and that traditional philosophical metaphysical assertions are meaningless.

In the article "Science: Conjecture and Refutation", Karl Popper is about to explain standards that must be met in order for the theory to be regarded as scientific. He called this problem a boundary problem. "The standard of the theoretical scientific status is its forgery, or blame or testability", he summarized his argument. Non Scientific Consensus He insists that the way to use his conclusion is different from Popper. If you want to find the boundary between science and science Kuhn should not look for 'sharp or decisive' boundaries because science is not objective, as Popper convinces us. Stated. Subjectivity

Science philosopher Karl R. Popper uses the concept of tampering to distinguish between science and fake science. The verifiable theory is scientific, but it is not verifiable. Mr. Popper pointed out that "Darwinism is not a verifiable scientific theory, but a possible framework to validate metaphysical research plans and scientific theories," Popper said in an "unfinished mission". It is "scientific". People who oppose evolution argue against Pover's theory of evolution and claim that creationism is equally an effective metaphysical research program. For example, Duane Gish, the main supporter of Genesis, wrote in Discovery Magazine (July 1981): "Steven Jay Gould is a creationist whose creationism is science theory We insist that wrong accusation