Historic Model Of Science

Science's "heroic mode" is one of the most influential phenomena in history. The emergence of such worthwhile knowledge filled with realism, bold reasons, absolute truthfulness and overall objectivity has changed the way people think about the world and how they see the future It was. "Heroic mode" changed the rules and led the Western civilization into a new era full of shocking scientific surprises. The rebound from "Hero Mode" is so powerful that it will have a serious impact on other topics like history.

Today's science is divided into two categories: operational science and historical science. Operational science is genuine, concrete science. Science is observable, verifiable, reproducible, and tamperable. Historical science is also known as origin science. Both creationism and evolution fall into this category. It can not be observed, tested and repeated directly. You can not forge it. No one observes the obvious first cells formed by abiotic organisms. Therefore, we can not prove it; it means not a science but a perspective. The way to create an account is the same. But there is a witness to creation, that is the creator himself (obviously God can not be included in science)

Historically, a discussion on whether creationism is compatible with science dates back to 1874, when scientific historian John Wilhelm Draper published the history of conflict between religion and science. Among them, Draper painted the whole history of scientific development as a battle against religion. Progress in this history is further advertised by Andrew Dickson White's 2 volumes of scientific history and the believers of the Christian world science (1896). Their conclusion is controversial

In the 19th century I also saw the birth of "confrontation model" of science and religion. This is the view that history can be understood by the confrontation between the two eras in the evolution of human thought - theology and science. This explanation comes from the influential 'science and theological science war' in Andrew Dickson White's Christian world (1896), whose title is a good summary of the author's general theory. White's research established a discussion of conflict as the default way of thinking about the historical relationship between science and religion, as well as John William Draper's earlier "history of conflict between religion and science" (1874) . Both works are translated into multiple languages