Contemporary atheism of contemporary atheism is a positive, new humanism, trying to rediscover and reconstruct the whole human thought and value. It shows the potential abuse of religion and the concept of God just kept in mind that it would see all of his incomplete means. Their evaluation of God can not do so. Atheists are to avoid responsibility. God knows that, so we have to talk about him. Everything you say about God is wrong and ineffective. The most important question is the question of the nature of God than his existence. Atheism was once truly a transformation social movement. In some democratic countries, it still exists. But I am not here. The social criticism of contemporary atheism has two aspects in which it is. First of all, we guarantee that scientific and rational construction is great to the world. Check out our wonders of technology, see our shiny building, and see lots of knowledge we have right now. We repeat the entire human genome, the telescope is helping us draw meaningless star patterns. People live long, eat well, more efficient fuck, far more confused than fear. Of course, things are not perfect yet - but we are working Modern atheism is a positive, new humanism, trying to rediscover and reconstruct human thoughts and values. It shows the potential abuse of religion and the concept of God just kept in mind that it would see all of his incomplete means. Their evaluation of God can not do so. Atheists are to avoid responsibility. God knows that, so we have to talk about him. Everything you say about God is wrong and ineffective. The most important question is the question of the nature of God than his existence. How can we know God? We have to believe in the preset irrational world we do not have. Modern atheism is a new anthropology. It instructs us to protect the more realistic view of mankind. A man is coincidental, historical, limited existence. Anthropology is the meaning of modern atheism. Modern atheists said that people live in a reasonable structure consciously conscious. I will not complete. Strong atheism is a philosophical position that God does not exist. It is a clear form of atheism, which means that it consciously rejects theology. Some powerful atheists also insist that the existence of any gods is logically impossible. It is also known as positive atheism, strong atheism, Gnostic atheism. It is worth noting that strong atheists also agree with the definition of weak atheists, but the converse is not always true. Atheists do not necessarily deny the possibility of the existence of God and God

Atheism In our society today, people with atheistic views, that is, people without God's faith are considered to be deviating since they are in violation of so-called social norms. Deviation is a mere idea. Society decides what is wrong with their idea of ​​what should be standard. Atheism is considered a negative deviation, or less than normal. They have places in society. This does not necessarily mean that they believe in evil, but this can be seen from people with a belief in a particular religion or society. Atheism has two forms called strong atheism and weak atheism (sometimes referred to as positive and negative atheism or Gnosticism and agnostic atheism). The former is defined as a positive belief that God does not exist and the latter is characterized by denying and supporting them as a positive proposition of God. Therefore, strong atheism is a stronger claim than weak atheism, requires positive evidence rather than weak atheism, and lacks evidence of theology. Weak atheism does not promise the existence of gods and gods, and that Gods and gods should not exist. It is also known as negative atheism or implicit atheism. Due to the absence or lack of evidence that justifies God or God's faith which defines atheism as a series of positions including unbelief, irrational beliefs, suspicion, weak definition of atheism usually gives a broad definition of atheism or Denying theology. Every object in the atomic universe consists of elements that are very small and not destroyed. (This is the case of Western atomism, Buddhists also have perfect atomic theory including instantaneous or eternal atoms. Atheism - refuses faith in the existence of God. In a narrow sense, atheism is a position without God. Most importantly, atheism is simply a belief that God does not exist. Atheism is in stark contrast to theology that, in its most common form, believes that there is at least one god. Angel • Ayabase • Biblical story • Biblical story • Cathedral • Christian sect • God • Devil • Indiget (God and Goddess of Rome) • Founder • Greek mythology • Hinduism • Jesus • Dramatic of Jesus Representations • people claim to be Jesus • language translation according to the Bible • monastery Henry VII disbanded in England • Mormonism • Patriarch of Antiochia without name • Pope • Pope • Sexually active pope • Holy • 613 Mitzvot • Israeli people

Atheists are people who believe that Gods or gods (or other supernatural creatures) are man-made structures, myths and legends, or these concepts are meaningless. Atheism has two forms called strong atheism and weak atheism (sometimes called positive and negative atheism or Gnosticism and agnostic atheism). The former is defined as a positive belief that God does not exist and the latter is characterized by denying or supporting them as a positive proposition of God. Therefore, strong atheism is a stronger claim than weak atheism. Because it is not weak atheism, positive evidence is necessary and evidence of theology is missing. Weak atheism does not promise the existence of gods and gods, and that Gods and gods should not exist. It is also known as negative atheism or implicit atheism. Atheism has proven that atheism is a series of positions including non-faith, unfair belief, doubt, or denial, and because of the lack or lack of evidence to prove faith to God or God, a wide range of atheism Give a definition. Every object in the atomic universe consists of elements that are very small and not destroyed. (This is the case of Western atomism, Buddhists also have perfect atomism including instantaneous or eternal atoms. Atheism - refuses faith in the existence of God. In a narrow sense, atheism is a position without God. Most importantly, atheism is simply a belief that God does not exist. Atheism is in stark contrast to theology which, in its most common form, believes that there is at least one god. Angel • Ayabase • Biblical story • Biblical story • Cathedral • Christian sect • God • Devil • Indiget (God and Goddess of Rome) • Founder • Greek mythology • Hinduism • Jesus • Dramatic of Jesus According to the Bible, the first year of language translation of Jesus • Monastery Henry VII disbanded in England • Book of Mormon • No Biblical name • Patriarch of Antioch • Pope • Pope • Sexually active pope • Saints • 613 Mitzvot • Israel

There is no controversy between the differences between religion and morality. How to interpret atheism as a moral choice Religion and ethics reflect various values, but it is very intertwined for most people. In many cases, moral principles of people are based on religious promises. In other cases, people find a source of morality other than religion, like all intrinsic values. My main point is that atheism is not a theological system based on theology but a moral basis. None of this will explain what I believe. Atheism does not force a specific moral structure. Atheism does not force rational, rational or evidence-based epistemology, but it simply rejects faith in God. Atheists may be completely irrational and superstitious, but still call themselves as atheists by rejecting their faith in God. Atheism does not constitute any other assertion about what constitutes a real nature or a fulfilling life. I am a Satanist because I believe in reason. I am a Satanic because I believe in justice. I believe that science is the best way to discover the truth and understand the reality, from small particles to cosmic filaments across the universe, so I am a Satanist. I am a Satanist because I am aware of the value and practicality of the religious framework that can serve humanity without supernaturalism and fear. Axiology or constructive atheism rejects the existence of God and supports "high absolute" like mankind. This form of atheism supports humans as a source of absolute morality and value, allowing individuals to solve moral issues without relying on God. Marx and Freud used this discussion to communicate the message of liberation, complete development, and free happiness. One of the most common criticisms of atheism is the opposite. To deny the existence of God is to lead moral relativism, to leave those without moral or moral basis, or make life meanless and miserable. Blaise Pascal wrote this in his Pensées

Atheism, the bias of hidden prejudice has plagued our society since its founding. In education, people ignore racial discrimination, hatred and prejudice have made great progress. Most people think that it is wrong to judge someone based on race, sexual orientation, and gender. You mention that people do not believe in God, you often find hatred staring, ignorant remarks or judgment. To better understand this, we will explain in the following article: part of the history of inference atheism, examples of religious freedom of America, examples of religious prejudice, and religious discrimination occurred. But is an atheist a suspicious class or a skeptical person? They are different ethnic groups as suffering from hostility and prejudice, their situation is not static, but many religious minorities. However, atheism was not a single identity, a set of ideologies and practices, but like this, it seemed rather simple, rather than Judaism, Buddhism and Christianity to say "religion" - Judaism, Buddhism, Mahayana, or Pentecostal reform, or more effectively a festival. "Atheism," philosopher John Gray, in his new book, "Seven kinds of atheism" (Farah, Strauss and Giro), is a more accurate concept, as above, and for the existence of God You can help them to Americans beyond the difficult fight to Victor J Stenger: New atheist theory: so-called new atheists do not damage their own butt, frequent disappointment more often than not infering their own way Best seller: firm footing (Paperback, 2009, Prometheus) scientific And through rational trivial problems. This looks better, but I am persuasive. Wen Jiaba Stevenson: We are fighting for now: Send a message from the forefront of climate justice (2015, Beacon Press): focusing on climate change, environmental issues, "New American activists" survey , They understand more about their human rights understand - how environmental degradation hurts people - more important than the conservative (and arrogance) concept of "save the earth".

In his essay "Evil and Almighty", McGee has built a view on the possibility of the existence of God with the characteristics of Lord religion, namely Christianity, Islam and Judaism. These features include that God is omnipotent, that you can stop evil with omnipotent tenderness, want to destroy evil, or be completely kind. Mackie systematically completed his logical response to the logical thinking process and to all possible types of criticism and alternative solutions. Summary: As you all know, J. L. Mackie is famous for having no objective value. I would like to investigate Mackie's explanation of what objective value really is, then consider his argument against those subjects and try to understand one of them. Specifically, I would like to see if his argument applies to Kant's objective value. Therefore, this conversation is both Kant's explanation and McKee's explanation (at least when I understood them). McKee believes that objective value (if any) has a strange causal relationship. Specifically, these entities have the ability to make them conscious of their motivation (whatever their meaning, they follow their recommendations). Does Kant believe that objectively valuable entities have such power? Is this power strange in metaphysics? J. L. Mackie defends moral skepticism in three specific arguments. His initial argument came from cultural relativism. McGee saw the problem that what we call objective moral belief seems not to form our culture. Rather, our culture seems to form our specific moral beliefs like monogamous. Therefore, moral subjectivity is the most rational explanation of moral beliefs to imitate our culture. His second argument against moral realism is that there is something strange or counterintuitive in the description of objective moral fields someone might give. There are three differences in this discussion. First, there are metaphysical questions, or questions based on odd states claimed by realists. For McGee, the wonder of this field is arguments against it. Secondly, there is a relationship problem as it is not clear how this field relates to natural objects and human behavior.

Many people understand the overall nature of the universe and the role human beings play in outer space (Taylor, 2003). For example, most of us do not know the answer to these questions, such as "Why are we here" and "What happens after dead?" Therefore, many people want to belong to religion. Because it gives them a sense of security in the universe. It can also provide guidance for their lives. Even if it is not so, I think it is easier to use some kind of explanation. "Atheism is neither a system of religion nor religion. Some religions are atheistic (such as certain sects of Buddhism), but this does not mean that atheism is religion.The two of unconscious atheism The general objections are: 1) if atheism is religion, bald is the color of hair, 2) if atheism is religion, then health is sick, then "if atheism is religion, abstinence is sexual It is the position. "- Atheists.org Is atheism "religion"? Is ultranism a kind of "cult"? People who think that atheism is "religious because it shows faith in God", the reasoning method used in atheism is the same as the reasoning method used in religion, or atheism is safe in causality I argue that it is not. Possibility of violence etc, real stake is an atheist 's claim to essential difference and superiority of religion, religious people try to refuse rather than advantage by denying the difference (!) Atheistic statistics are often difficult to accurately represent for a variety of reasons. Atheism is a position that is compatible with other forms of identity, including religion. Anthropologist Jack David Eller points out that "Atheism is a very common place in religion," and "I am surprisingly that atheism is not religious opposition or lack." In addition, he said that "Atheists call themselves" spirits "", but the widest sense of atheism does not exclude others. In many cultures, the concept or practice between "natural" phenomenon and "supernatural" phenomenon is very different, and the concept of "religion" and "non-religion" is not important. Regardless of how the faith is in God, people have a belief about other supernatural or spiritual matters, so settle the case.

Catch - 22 Theme and Atheism Joseph Heller 's novel Catch - 22 deals with a lot of human - readable problems. One of the problems raised was the subject of theology and atheism. This discussion is reflected in a two-page conversation between the hero Yossarian and Lieutenant Scheisskopf's wife. In this particular scenario, Yossarian and Lieutenant 's wife are discussing the existence of G - d, perhaps in the sense of Jews and Christians. Although the decline of discussion eventually proves to some extent, the scene begins with each letter introduced as an atheist. "Atheism" is usually defined by "theology." In other words, the theory is best understood as a proposition - true or false. It is usually defined as "believing in God", but "belief" here means "of faith". It refers not to the attitude of faith or the state of mind, but to the content of the proposition of faith. That is reasonable to say that the theory is true or false, and that is why it argues or opposes the argument. However, if "atheism" is defined by theology and theology is a proposition of the existence of God rather than believing that there is a psychological state of God, atheism is not a condition not to believe in the soul. God exists (more in detail below). "A-" of "atheism" is not "nothing" but "nothing", so it must be understood as negation, not absence. Weak atheism does not promise the existence of gods and gods, and that Gods and gods should not exist. It is also known as negative atheism or implicit atheism. Due to the absence or lack of evidence that justifies God or God's faith which defines atheism as a series of positions including unbelief, irrational beliefs, suspicion, weak definition of atheism usually gives a broad definition of atheism or Denying theology. Every object in the atomic universe consists of elements that are very small and not destroyed. (This is the case of Western atomism, Buddhists also have perfect atomic theory including instantaneous or eternal atoms.

Does God exist? This is a problem that many scholars, farmers, governments, and individuals have tried to move from the beginning of human civilization to the present and the future. From Taiwan to Jamaica, from the top of Russia to the bottom of Chile, every group of human history matches the shape of God. These religions define culture, tradition, lifestyle, and community, govern the country, define the state, and inspire the state and the control nation. Among the increasing number of philosophers, intellectuals and scholars, atheism is decreasing in the world. There are two reasons for this: (1) Atheism is losing the scientific foundation; (2) Atheism has created its own madness, fraud and psychosis as well as religion (Simon-Neto, 2005) . The reason for the former is that it continues to criticize the minor fact that the evolution theory which is repeatedly recorded in Defense Medicine Press writes that it is forced to accept the claim without adequate evidence to students and society. There are many paths to atheism. After the childhood of the church, many people came here early in their adulthood. Some people were brought up atheism by atheists' parents. Some people went to atheism after years of religious studies. I came to Christianity with many no Christians in an atheistic way through faith. When my mother explained the story of Easter to me, I was sitting in a yellow Easter dress with my frills and threw a black jellyfish in the garden and I was six years old. She explained that Jesus was crucified and revived as a child of God. When she told me that the story told me that it was the basis of most of her faith in her life, I saw her and said, 'I do not think this really happened.' Christian says that Christianity is not a system of religion but a depiction of reality. To be honest, I do not believe your religion is atheism. Atheism is your scientific materialistic religion's purpose. This is a belief system. You accept it as a way to explain the world around you and your place. What conflicts with the belief system of other people's gods or my soul can only show falsehood and delusion as considering these experiences in other situations threatens you. Honesty of faith. There is no difference in the likelihood that an angel Gabriel refuses to think when a Christian says the Quran with Muhammad. This is a simple prejudice that keeps the superiority of the imagination of your belief system.

"I do not know if there is a god, I do not know if the universe already exists forever." He believes that he can not know anything. If the assumption that "there is a beginning" is confirmed, the assertion that "things have not begun" is rebutted and the claim that "I do not know if it began" is proved wrong. Atheist atheism includes the philosophy of atheism and agnosticism. Because of the difference in definition, agnostic atheists do not believe in God or God and are established by extension: "God's existence and absence is now unknown, may not know absolutely" Or its knowledge is irrelevant or unimportant, or "abandonment of the existence and absence of God's knowledge is optimal." Strong atheism is a philosophical position that God does not exist. It is a clear form of atheism, which means that it consciously rejects theology. Some powerful atheists also insist that the existence of any gods is logically impossible. It is also known as positive atheism, strong atheism, Gnostic atheism Atheistic atheism is a philosophical position including atheism and agnosticism. Atheist atheists are atheists. Because they do not believe in the existence of God, they are agnostic. Because they insist that the existence of God is in principle unknown or actually unknown. If you can not find a reason to believe that a person is God, he should not believe that God is perfectly natural and reasonable; if so, he is an atheist. Evidence Based on Human Judgment If he finally concludes that he can progress further, investigate the essence and extent of human knowledge, and that God can not prove it, he will be sure that it is true He can not believe it because he can not know. It is also an atheist, an agnostic - an atheist - an atheist, because he is an agnostic. " Strong atheism is a logically defective position. Weak atheism, agnosticism and skepticism are theological positions "I do not know". Weak atheism agrees with the atheistic premise. Please check that theologians are the only ones claiming to know anything. What do they know? Finally, what you believe is not important. Important is the truth. You may not believe in gravity. But if you leave a skyscraper, you will work on the ground. Carefulness will allow us to do a thorough investigation of all available data before we take care of all our belief systems for our eternity. "How can I know that something is true?" "What is my source of information?" "Is my source absolutely reliable?" "What if I am wrong? Is it? "

A few years ago, atheism was introduced in the United States. Atheism, unlike Christianity, is to believe that there is no more force, interpretation of science as the planet of the earth, and our source as a society. Atheism has existed for hundreds of years. People who have religious beliefs may say that many atheists hate people who have religious beliefs soon. Atheists are a group of people who believe in themselves; they prefer living by mankind and their own beliefs rather than higher powers. The whole of atheism is included in this reply. Atheism is not a philosophy, it is not a world view, but simply refuses to deny obvious facts. Unfortunately, we live in a clearly ignored principle. Observe, review and debate. This is a grateful job. It involves pain and insensitive aura. In addition, this is a work which atheists do not want. It is worth noting that you do not need to consider yourself a non-astrologer or a non-alchemist. Therefore, there is no word for those who deny the validity of these pseudo fields. Likewise, "atheism" is a term that should not exist. Atheism is only a reasonable word made by people in front of religious doctrine. Weak atheism does not promise the existence of gods and gods, and that Gods and gods should not exist. It is also known as negative atheism or implicit atheism. Due to the lack or lack of evidence that justifies the faith of God or God that defines atheism as a series of positions including unbelief, irrational beliefs, doubts, weak atheists usually give a broad definition of atheism or theology Deny. Every object in the atomic universe consists of elements that are very small and not destroyed. (This is the case of Western atomism, Buddhists also have perfect atomic theory including instantaneous or eternal atoms.

Among the sacred reality, Hamza Andreas Tzortzis (modified in 6/2018) provided persuasive lawsuits for a reasonable and spiritual basis of Islam, but subtle and sympathetic I will dismantle atheistically. Join the trip of existentialism, spirituality, and reason, to clarify the powerful arguments to know the gods, the Qur'an, the prophets of Muhammad, and why God worships love. He talks about academic and mass objections and shows that modern atheism is based on erroneous assumptions about reality. If you want to know how Islamic intellectuals and spiritual traditions respond to these questions, this book is for you. Hamza Andreas Tzortzis 'new book provides a very comprehensive explanation of Islam' s theology, based on the ideas of the West and Muslim. Hamza Tzortzis is an international speaker, writer and lecturer. He has obtained PgCert and a master's degree in philosophy and currently continues his research at this graduate school in this field. Hamza studied Islamic thought and theology under qualified scholars. He provided seminars and courses on Islamic thought and philosophy. Hamza discussed well-known scholars and thinkers about Islam and atheism "Sacred reality is a resource that Muslims need to solve atheistic point of view of atheism, science, and the faith of modern God. From a long time ago, I was immersed in personal experiences and deliberations I heard the fact that sacred reality is not a dry philosophical reading, it is an interesting reading. "Moalmed ghilan, phd founder of neuroscience, Andalus Online "The sacred reality: God, Islam, and atheist illusion are not mere books on atheism, it is a book about universal and Islamic debate about God's existence, unity, worship, while fully solving infectious diseases This book is also the first book in English This book also provides a compelling case as a sacred revelation for the Qur'an and a compelling argument about why the Prophet Muhammad is the ultimate messenger of God A new book by Hamza Andreas Tzortzis is the first Islamic theology using Western thought and Islamic thought, and graduate education on philosophy and experience has been in over 10 years Comprehensive explanation Is there no hope of God, happiness and Is human value reasonable? If there is no god, is there a conscious and rational heart? Is it necessary for the existence of God? Scientific progress is about the divine denial Will it be? Among the sacred reality, Hamza Andreas Tzortzis (modified in 6/2018) provided persuasive lawsuits for a reasonable and spiritual basis of Islam, but subtle and sympathetic I will dismantle atheistically. Join the trip of existentialism, spirituality, and reason, in order to clarify the strong arguments to know God, the Qur'an, the Prophet of Muhammad, and why God worships love. He talks about academic and mass objections and shows that modern atheism is based on erroneous assumptions about reality.

Paul Tillich is famous for his own concept. However, this concept is as old as theology and words go back to Parmenides. After discovering the 19th century hundreds of years later, Tillich used it as his own and applied it to God, Christology and Trinity doctrine in his apology system theology. His theology responds to the questions raised by the philosophy arising from our universal ultimate concern - the finiteness of life in the shadow of eternal death, in particular existentialist existentialism. This answer is revealed to be ecstatic as YHWH. Only the infinite supernatural god such as infrastructure of existence and existence's power is truly "completely surrender, severe ... abandon our subjectivity ... endless passion and we will do it for us Whenever we are going to use it as a goal, we will use it for that purpose.Eternity God - the separation of men and the existence of God is conquered and the final eschatological change and eternal I made it possible for the history of life to be realized. Gaining atheism, the problem of the existence of God is also raised. Paul Tillich believes that God is an existence, and "presence" represents the ultimate reality of all beings, whether natural or supernatural. In fact, existence is not necessarily related to the individual god. Tillich wants to make it the ultimate concern for all in the broadest sense. In addition, attempts to define existence by giving the name of a particular god can not capture the real existence. Tillich considers all the specific concepts we know familiarly in the West to constitute idolatry. Giving religious symbols in an important sense too much, they fall into idolatry <http://philosopher.io/Atheism-Fundamentalism-Paul-Tillich-s-God-Part-1> Paul Tillich is famous for his own concept. However, this concept is as old as theology and words go back to Parmenides. After discovering the 19th century hundreds of years later, Tillich used it as his own and applied it to God, Christology and Trinity doctrine in his apology system theology. His theology responds to the questions raised by the philosophy arising from our universal ultimate concern - the finiteness of life in the shadow of eternal death, in particular existentialist existentialism. This answer is revealed to be ecstatic as YHWH. Prior to YHWH, transcend the existence, rationality and relationship between subject and subject, new atheistic scientific argument and failure of the god hypothesis

View on Christian Glossary atheist protest: evil myth denies God's existence Introduction Theology is a conscious introspective effort. Everyday we are thinking about the true, important, and real experience of the kindness of God. Since we humans are often social, we communicate our beliefs to verify ourselves. In addition, there are various forms of atheism, the three most popular atheistic beliefs include scientific atheism, human atheism, and the most popular atheists. Atheist atheism includes the philosophy of atheism and agnosticism. Because of the difference in definition, agnostic atheists do not believe in God or God and are established by extension: "God's existence and absence is now unknown, may not know absolutely" Or its knowledge is irrelevant or unimportant, or "abandonment of the existence and absence of God's knowledge is optimal." Strong atheism is a philosophical position that God does not exist. It is a clear form of atheism, which means that it consciously rejects theology. Several powerful atheists also insist that the existence of any gods is logically impossible. It is also known as positive atheism, strong atheism, Gnostic atheism Weak atheism does not promise the existence of gods and gods, and that Gods and gods should not exist. It is also known as negative atheism or implicit atheism. Due to the absence or lack of evidence that justifies God or God's faith which defines atheism as a series of positions including unbelief, irrational beliefs, suspicion, weak definition of atheism usually gives a broad definition of atheism or Denying theology. Every object in the atomic universe consists of elements that are very small and not destroyed. (This is the case of Western atomism, Buddhists also have perfect atomic theory including instantaneous or eternal atoms. There are two forms of atheism. The theoretical form tries to deny the existence of God based on reason. On the other hand, the actual shape denies God as effectively as life does not exist. As a result of a rational analysis based on empirical science, in a positive situation, theoretical atheism contradicts. Because God as a spiritual being is not the subject of experimental scientific knowledge. It is possible to deny the existence of God based on philosophical reasoning, but it is only when starting with preconceptions of realistic concepts like materialism and other ideologies. With the help of metaphysical realistic knowledge theory, this philosophical stance lacks a reasonable foundation and can always be expressed.

Most people object to the existence of God at some point in his or her life. This can happen for a variety of reasons. For example, when their belief is not enough to convince them, he or she may already be in a certain stage of their life. Humans have natural instincts to ascertain the cause of unknown events. For some people the existence of God may help to get the answers they are looking for. Philosophers spend a lot of time to prove or refute the existence of God. Philosophical theory believes that God exists (or must exist) and is independent of the teachings and revelations of a particular religion. Some philosophical experts convinced the existence of God through philosophical controversy others believed that they had religious beliefs that they could not need or be supported by rational arguments. Theological non-cognitiveism considers religious languages, in particular words like "god" (the capital), cognitively meaningless. It is cited as evidence that there is no such thing as "god", hence it is the basis of atheism. There are two main arguments: Kenilsson uses semantic verifiable theory to conclude that religious languages ​​are meaningless as it proves weak atheism because it can not be proved Weak atheism does not promise the existence of gods and gods, and that Gods and gods should not exist. It is also known as negative atheism or implicit atheism. Due to the lack or lack of evidence that justifies the faith of God or God that defines atheism as a series of positions including unbelief, irrational beliefs, doubts, weak atheists usually give a broad definition of atheism or theology Deny. Every object in the atomic universe consists of elements that are very small and not destroyed. (This is the case of Western atomism, Buddhists also have perfect atomic theory including instantaneous or eternal atoms.

This is because, the idea of ​​God, because Descartes It is believed that prove the existence of God, is that there are external exists is because when you try to prove that there is no room for doubt. He is looking for a definite certainty, the foundation on which he can base on all his beliefs and know that they are true. Descartes' overall project is to find a definite certainty that he can be based on all his knowledge and beliefs. Descartes used his doubt to attack the principles that support everything he believes. Philosophical theory believes that God exists (or must exist) and is independent of the teachings and revelations of a particular religion. Some philosophical controversy philosophical experts that the presence convinced of God through, not required by the reasonable claims, or those who believe that there is to be supported have a religious belief can not be there were. Theological non-recognition doctrine, words such as religious language, especially "God" (the capital) are considered to be cognitively meaningless. It is cited as evidence that there is no such thing as "god", hence it is the basis of atheism. There are two main arguments: Kenilsson uses semantic verifiable theory to conclude that religious languages ​​are meaningless as it proves weak atheism because it can not be proved Weak atheism does not promise the existence of gods and gods, and that Gods and gods should not exist. It is also known as negative atheism or implicit atheism. Due to the absence or lack of evidence that justifies God or God's faith which defines atheism as a series of positions including unbelief, irrational beliefs, suspicion, weak definition of atheism usually gives a broad definition of atheism or Denying theology. Every object in the atomic universe consists of elements that are very small and not destroyed. (This is the case of Western atomism, Buddhists also have perfect atomic theory including instantaneous or eternal atoms. I believe in monotheism, the existence of God, or the match of God. Therefore, the absence of God is different from polytheism, believing in the existence of many Gods, and atheism. Monotheism represents the tradition of Judaism, Christianity, and Islam, and the elements of faith are recognized in many other religions. From the 3rd century BC, the war Huns, which lasted along the north of the border was a group of nomads living in ancient northwest border of China. Forward, ultimately weakened the Han dynasty, collapsed in the third century AD. In the case of the Roman Empire, the invasion of various Germanic people (West Goat, East Goth, Bandar) and Huns from the 4th century AD destroyed the west half of the empire in the second half of the 5th century BC. In both cases, internal divisions and / or uprisings exacerbate external threats

In the article "as an atheist", H. J. McCloskey tries to prove that it is unreasonable to believe in God. McCloskey first tried to point out the flaws of theology by trying to counter the cosmology and the theoretical argument. After trying to show the flaws of the two arguments, he raised the problem of evil and tried to deal with theology as a self contradictory belief. At the end of his article, he tried to show his reader that atheism was satisfied, but God is not. When passing through McCloskey's argument, he shows numerous flaws in reasoning because he wants to prove that God is impossible. In an article by H. J. McCloskey titled "as an atheist" he starts with the argument of logic, common sense, and reasoning. He did not even read books of God, not to study, respectfully. I tried to prove where his argument lacks, and ultimately prove that atheism is true or that God does not exist. I think it interesting that he did not solve the ontological argument (God's view proves or proves the fact that he exists, and indeed, they are contesting them.) Atheism Something does not intend to make you an atheist In 1968, a famous philosopher H. J. McCloskey wrote a provocative article titled "as an atheist" in 1968. Macrosski believes that atheism is based on his favorable better belief system that argues against theological arguments. He tried to counter the cosmology and the theoretical argument for the existence of God; he also tried to destroy God based on the existence of evil. By doing so, he began to discuss the obvious comfort of free will and atheistic belief systems by expanding the discussion beyond the boundaries of God. But by carefully analyzing God's argument and gaining insight about the mysterious and free will that God has given mankind, we understand that theoretical beliefs are logically more healthy and more popular To do. McCloskey stated that evidence of God's claim does not clearly prove the reason for the existence of God. This article clarifies whether claims and evidence presented by McCloskey's article "About becoming an atheist" will provide enough ammunition to prevent people from maintaining faith in God I will try that. McCloskey 's intention was to systematically destroy God and to show that God' s life is not a good claim. Throughout this article, it will provide evidence that McCloskey is correct, atheism should be accepted, or "the time has come to seek the Lord." As McCloskey begins his argument and suggests that God is not proving a decisive case, such belief in God is worth giving up. My answer examined several points. The existence of God is the best explanation of the existence of the universe. Scientists believe that gravity explains some effects; gravity is an undeniable reality. Scientists have never seen gravity, but there are various physical "laws" that define their effects on the Earth and the Moon. These effects are the best explanation of the existence of God.

In the book "American Atheists" by David A. Williamson and George Yancey, they clarify what will be tested in each chapter of this book. These chapters are also divided into easy-to-read topics to better understand the book. They first give the reader an understanding of simple history and atheism and discuss who the atheists are. After several chapters they explored how atheists believe religion is foolish and how politics becomes an atheist principle. Today, in conservative America, those who do not believe in God of the Bible are called atheists. If you ask contemporary educated atheists about what he or her atheism means, they may tell you this is a simple denial of God's claim or existence. Today 's atheist thesis is mainly about monotheism - Christianity and Islam. They also refuse to accept God's claim in all other religions, but they are not their main purpose. Strong atheism is a philosophical position that God does not exist. It is a clear form of atheism, which means that it consciously rejects theology. Several powerful atheists also insist that the existence of any gods is logically impossible. It is also known as positive atheism, strong atheism, Gnostic atheism. It is worth noting that strong atheists also agree with the definition of weak atheists, but the converse is not always true. Atheists do not necessarily deny the possibility of the existence of God and God Positive atheism (also called "strong atheism" and "strong atheism") is an atheistic form that insists that God does not exist. Powerful atheists clearly claim that God does not exist. Some atheists further insist that the existence of God is logically impossible. Because this is incomprehensible or absurd, the existence of this god is a transcendental error. Metaphysical naturalism is a common worldview associated with strong atheism A strong atheist, also known as a clear atheist or a positive atheist, denies the existence of God or any other god. This person's view is entirely based on the actual situation that can be found using scientific methods. Since the existence of God can not be proved by science, a strong atheist concludes that God does not exist. The second atheist is also a recessive atheist, also known as a recessive atheist or a negative atheist. This person does not deny the existence of God, but declares religious relativism. In other words, she will claim that anyone's faith is faithful to that person, but she does not believe in God himself.

The pentagon feature for the nightcode typified by Gao Wen is perfect in five sense, never fails with five fingers, faithful to the five wounds that Christ received on the cross, five brotherly love With courtesy, godliness, purity, pleasure strengthens the Virgin Mary of Jesus. The concept of Gawain's representative effort is not appearing in the 21st century. Brotherly love does not appear in the 21st century as we are in war all over the world. In the 21st century, people are killing each other each day. The virginity of the 21st century was ruined by the lyrics of the rap song. According to their cultural ethics, many people do not accept the sexual behavior described in music. Dedication is often used to refer religious beliefs. In the 21st system, some people believe in atheism. Believing that atheism is a virtue contrary to the spirit of the knight. The spirit of the knight is an outdated virtue of the 21st century. People in the world today completely ignore the spirit of Knight. Brotherhood love, courage, and courage are not appearing in the 21st century as in the Middle Ages. Cavaliers' method described by Sir Gawain, Green Knight and Le Morte d'Arthur is the opposite of the code description of the 21st century. The Knight Code (a series of ideals or guidelines) was created by the Church to control the malicious behavior of Crusaders' knights. Cavaliers is expected to become a gentleman. Other features are loyalty, faith, strength and kindness. According to the lifetime law of King Arthur Knight, Greenweight accepted the challenge when he arrived in Camelot in New Year. Year of celebration. When Gawain missed his head and requested them to fight again within a year, his action was consistent with his code of conduct when the green knight did not die. The pentagon feature for the nightcode typified by Gao Wen is perfect in five sense, never fails with five fingers, faithful to the five wounds that Christ received on the cross, five brotherly love With courtesy, godliness, purity, pleasure strengthens the Virgin Mary of Jesus. The concept of Gawain's representative effort is not appearing in the 21st century. Brotherly love does not appear in the 21st century as we are in war all over the world. In the 21st century, people are killing each other each day. The virginity of the 21st century was ruined by the lyrics of the rap song. According to their cultural ethics, many people do not accept the sexual behavior described in music. Dedication is often used to refer religious beliefs. In the 21st system, some people believe in atheism. I believe that atheism is a virtue to the knight's spirit

HJ McCloskey skillfully sums up his thoughts and shares his beliefs in his article "Be Being a Athiest" and solves some important arguments discussed atheism and atheism from an atheistic point of view There are many. He did not apologize for raising a difficult topic and tried to convince him that he was persuasive. "I did not apologize even after doing this, because he needed to remember the reasons and merits of faith, he presented a good opinion (50)." You should be aware of whether it is a theologist or an atheist. What we believe, and why do you believe in faith? In 1968, a famous philosopher H. J. McCloskey wrote a provocative article titled "as an atheist" in 1968. Macrosski believes that atheism is based on his favorable better belief system that argues against theological arguments. He tried to counter the cosmology and the theoretical argument for the existence of God; he also tried to destroy God based on the existence of evil. By doing so, he began to discuss the obvious comfort of free will and atheistic belief systems by expanding the discussion beyond the boundaries of God. But by carefully analyzing God's argument and gaining insight about the mysterious and free will that God has given mankind, we understand that theoretical beliefs are logically more healthy and more popular To do. McCloskey stated that evidence of God's claim does not clearly prove the reason for the existence of God. This article clarifies whether claims and evidence presented by McCloskey's article "About becoming an atheist" will provide enough ammunition to prevent people from maintaining faith in God I will try that. McCloskey 's intention was to systematically destroy God and to show that God' s life is not a good claim. Throughout this article, it will provide evidence that McCloskey is correct, atheism should be accepted, or "the time has come to seek the Lord." As McCloskey begins his argument and suggests that God is not proving a decisive case, such belief in God is worth giving up. My answer examined several points. The existence of God is the best explanation of the existence of the universe. Scientists believe that gravity explains some effects; gravity is an undeniable reality. Scientists have never seen gravity, but there are various physical "laws" that define their effects on the Earth and the Moon. These effects are the best explanation of the existence of God.

1) Atheistic premise In my discussion at the beginning, I would like to prove that atheism / non-faith is reasonable. This is through argument called atheism premise. Atheism / agnosticism is perfectly rational, because the existence of God has no special claim, so the statement of the existence of God may be considered wrong. If that assertion is special, that assertion may be deemed false unless there is very strong evidence to support it. Plantinga believes that arguments about the impossibility of the existence of God will fail for similar reasons related to contradictions of theologians' beliefs: they believe there is the best world that is not entirely clear. Although it is logically impossible. Again, I think he is too fast to dismiss an atheist's claim here. Finally, he spent a period of talking about just evil pastoral or religious problems: the writer may find religious problems in evil. Right attitude In the face of great personal distress and misfortune, he may be tempted to rebel against God, shake his fist to the face of God, even abandon faith in God. But this is a different dimension problem. This type of problem is not for philosophical awareness but for pastoral care. They are logically contradictory or impossible to each other. It is now widely recognized that due to the work of Christian philosophers like Alvin Plantinga, the inner problem of suffering is failure as an argument of atheism. It is not possible to prove that (A) and (B) are logically incompatible or impossible. In the case of the existence of God there is no way to prove that there is some reason to represent painful cases of which God has observed to some extent impossibly or impossibly. This is a great encouragement, as it deals with the remaining problems that have not been agreed (and constitute a definitive objection to the attitude that philosophy never made progress).

In the article on "About Atheists", McCloskey believes that belief in atheism is a "more comfortable belief" by effectively using derogatory statements about theologians and their beliefs I will try talking to the reader. McCloskey deeply explored the cosmology and the theoretical argument and in the discussion against his comments and further theology theory also raised the question of why evil and evil can not exist Perfect God is the universe I am the creator of. In an article by H. J. McCloskey titled "as an atheist" he starts with the argument of logic, common sense, and reasoning. He did not even read books of God, not to study, respectfully. I tried to prove where his argument lacks, and ultimately prove that atheism is true or that God does not exist. I think it interesting that he did not solve the ontological argument (God's view proves or proves the fact that he exists, and indeed, they are contesting them.) Atheism Something does not intend to make you an atheist In 1968, a famous philosopher H. J. McCloskey wrote a provocative article titled "as an atheist" in 1968. Macrosski believes that atheism is based on his favorable better belief system that argues against theological arguments. He tried to counter the cosmology and the theoretical argument for the existence of God; he also tried to destroy God based on the existence of evil. By doing so, he began to discuss the obvious comfort of free will and atheistic belief systems by expanding the discussion beyond the boundaries of God. But by carefully analyzing God's argument and gaining insight about the mysterious and free will that God has given mankind, we understand that theoretical beliefs are logically more healthy and more popular To do. McCloskey stated that evidence of God's claim does not clearly prove the reason for the existence of God. This article clarifies whether claims and evidence presented by McCloskey's article "About becoming an atheist" will provide enough ammunition to prevent people from maintaining faith in God I will try that. McCloskey 's intention was to systematically destroy God and to show that God' s life is not a good claim. Throughout this article, it will provide evidence that McCloskey is correct, atheism should be accepted, or "the time has come to seek the Lord." As McCloskey begins his argument and suggests that God is not proving a decisive case, such belief in God is worth giving up. My answer examined several points. The existence of God is the best explanation of the existence of the universe. Scientists believe that gravity explains some effects; gravity is an undeniable reality. Scientists have never seen gravity, but there are various physical "laws" that define their effects on the Earth and the Moon. These effects are the best explanation of the existence of God.

A few years ago, a famous atheist H. J. McCloskey wrote an article entitled "As an Atheist." In that article, McCloskey tried to argue against some of the traditional views on the existence of God. Furthermore, in order to create a positive case of atheism, he posed a problem of evil and advocated atheistic comfort. McCloskey tried to destroy belief in theology of success. After considering his attacks it may still be an intellectually satisfying theorist. McCloskey did not provide a firm reason for the truth of atheism. However, we are not atheists, but they are not called atheists. Somehow, I think that what is recommended as an atheist is not a theologian at all. It shows that we believe that the world is fully mechanized, that the world is not mysterious, that we do not have the essence and vitality connecting all of us. So, you can think of yourself as an atheist, but you can think of the concept of "God" in many Oriental traditions, the essence of the universe, "meditation" or other transcendence, or the vitality that we experience As, or we have other existence and intimate relationships with the earth Most Christians I encounter belong to the "Gnutishan" category. I classify myself as "atheist of agnostic" and atheists like O'Connor and Dawkins. Christian Omamori Frank Turek can be classified as "Agnostic" and he is not convinced of God's existence, but chooses to be based on faith. But what is important here is that "theists" and "atheists" are the main descriptors, "north" and "agnostic" are modifiers. This is not one or two cases, and attribution to one category does not necessarily determine if it is due to another category. Agnosticism is a philosophical view, including theology and agnosticism. Agnosticists believe in the existence of God or God, but believe that the basis of this proposition is unknown or essentially unknown. Diagnosticians may argue that they do not know anything about the attributes of the gods they believe. Atheistic atheism is a philosophical position including atheism and agnosticism. Atheist atheists are atheists. Because they claim that the existence of divinity is in principle unknown or actually unknown.

The next five paragraphs of Hamlet and madness cover the following: What is atheism? Combination of Hamlet and Atheism What is the reason for atheism? When I am trying to overcome these problems to solve the real answer, if Hamlet is "crazy", you decide by thinking on your own. What is atheism? Webster's New World Dictionary - In the third edition of the university, it is defined as "psychosis or mental disorder, insanity, insanity, meaningless". My definition is not as cruel as the definition of a dictionary. Reasonable, insane, crazy? - "Hamlet" of William Shakespeare is "Hamlet" of Sone of William Shakespeare, the protagonist of the Danish prince, Hamlet, and has been interpreted in many ways. Throughout the script, Hamlet plays a different role, so it is difficult to define him as having only one role. When critics analyze Hamlet's character, they often question his reasons because he becomes obscure immediately after seeing his father's ghosts. What does it mean to be crazy? Definition of the word "crazy" One of the main arguments of Shakespeare 's famous drama "Hamlet" is mainly focusing on whether hero is actually crazy or simply pretending. Shakespeare did not directly explain Hamlet 's madness, but hinted at it through the play, so the reader was able to decide his own interpretation. Hamlet's madness can be seen in his reckless decisions, unusual mood swings, and his bold style of talk with the king. However, it can be judged that it is reasonable Crazy and crazy Shakespeare 's "Hamlet" in Shakespeare' s "Hamlet" is a master of fraud. Hamlet made Claudius decide to make him believe that he was crazy, but everyone except Claudius goes back. Ophelia is one of those who believe that Hamlet has lost his feelings, but she was very disappointed and committed suicide if he did not return to her love. At the end of the tragedy, Hamlet played a very good role, he was convinced that he was crazy. Clearly, Hamlet's "Tragedy of Hamlet", Prince of Denmark is one of the most famous literary works of William Shakespeare. Published at the beginning of the 16th century, the play is still the longest and most popular of all Shakespeare's works. Perhaps this masterpiece is very attractive, and the tragic story of King Hamlet's death was killed by Hamlet's uncle Claudius who married Queen Gertrude later to obtain the throne, and revenge against Prince Hamlet, Claudius. A wonderful journey Hamlet's Madness Effect in William Shakespeare's "Hamlet" One of the most common questions about Hamlet is whether he is really crazy or just acting. Hamlet said that Claudius will resent and retaliate after meeting his father's so-called ghost, so the problem is confusing. However, during the game, Hamlet did not seem to be able to run. However, according to the definition, it may be wise and crazy

Life that we experience will change from superficial disagreement to another without spending time to think about the meaning of life. It is not easy to solve such a problem, but by answering it, we stop our imagination and expand ourselves with knowledge of the outside world (Solomon 10). Unfortunately, anyone trying to answer this question will soon notice that this is not just an extensive question, but an extensive research slogan. Weak atheism does not promise the existence of gods and gods, and that Gods and gods should not exist. It is also known as negative atheism or implicit atheism. Due to the absence or lack of evidence that justifies God or God's faith which defines atheism as a series of positions including unbelief, irrational beliefs, suspicion, weak definition of atheism usually gives a broad definition of atheism or Denying theology. Every object in the atomic universe consists of elements that are very small and not destroyed. (This is the case of Western atomism, Buddhists also have perfect atomic theory including instantaneous or eternal atoms. I believe in monotheism, the existence of God, or the match of God. Therefore, the absence of God is different from polytheism, believing in the existence of many Gods, and atheism. Monotheism represents the tradition of Judaism, Christianity, and Islam, and the elements of faith are recognized in many other religions. From the 3rd century BC, the war Huns, which lasted along the north of the border was a group of nomads living in ancient northwest border of China. Forward, ultimately weakened the Han dynasty, collapsed in the third century AD. In the case of the Roman Empire, the invasion of various Germanic people (West Goat, East Goth, Bandar) and Huns from the 4th century AD destroyed the west half of the empire in the second half of the 5th century BC. In both cases, internal divisions and / or uprisings exacerbate external threats Traditionism believes that the existence of God is absent divinity The ultimate concept of the existence of God is the externalities that transcend the existence of any other form. , God's viewpoint. . In traditionalism, God has one of the main traits, transcendence. Atheism lacks faith in the existence of God (or divinity or other magical phenomena). This term is often used as a generic term for all non-theoretic belief systems, including atheism (weakness) and agnosticism, and Eastern religions such as Confucianism, Taoism and Zen.

I. Introduction Who am I? I am the world from which the world comes from. These questions about existence only remain in intellectual minds, and thinkers have the courage to seek answers that satisfy his miracles. But how does it exist? Then who gives the gift of existence. When people started asking questions, he just provided evidence as an ignorant statement. That person has the ability to explore. This article will attempt to discuss three philosophical standpoints of existence, that is, theology, agnosticism, atheism. Philosophical theory believes that God exists (or must exist) and is independent of the teachings and revelations of a particular religion. Some philosophical controversy philosophical experts that the presence convinced of God through, not required by the reasonable claims, or those who believe that there is to be supported have a religious belief can not be there were. Theological non-recognition doctrine, words such as religious language, especially "God" (the capital) are considered to be cognitively meaningless. It is cited as evidence that there is no such thing as "god", hence it is the basis of atheism. There are two main arguments: Kenilsson uses semantic verifiable theory to conclude that religious languages ​​are meaningless as it proves weak atheism because it can not be proved Strong atheism is a philosophical position that God does not exist. It is a clear form of atheism, which means that it consciously rejects theology. Some powerful atheists also insist that the existence of any gods is logically impossible. It is also known as positive atheism, strong atheism, Gnostic atheism. It is worth noting that strong atheists also agree with the definition of weak atheists, but the converse is not always true. Atheists do not necessarily deny the possibility of the existence of God and God Atheistic atheism is a philosophical view that includes atheism and agnosticism. Because of the difference in definition, agnostic atheists do not believe in God or God and are established by extension: "God's existence and absence is now unknown, may not know absolutely" Or its knowledge is irrelevant or unimportant, or "abandonment of the existence and absence of God's knowledge is optimal." Altruism believes that people have moral obligations or 'greater profits' to serve others; the terms created by Auguste Comte. Generally we oppose self-interests and self-interests. Anarchism in politics advocates eliminating either the rulers or many of the views and movements of the government. Except for opposition to the state, all anarchists do not clearly define the position. Comparative and comparative liberalism

Goodwill and evil religious beliefs are usually associated with God's thoughts. Evil is usually associated with devil's thought. Since childhood Christian has been taught as a general course for children's activities such as Sunday school and prayer club such as the concept of good and evil and the theme of God on the theme of God. Christian believes that God created the universe, and I believe this means that the world was created with the intent of good. "God placed them in the sky heaven, lighted them on the ground, dominated day and night, and separated light from the dark. Why or who is responsible for it in the world? How can we harmonize the good faith of God with the existence of evil? Even without theological grounds, even from a secular point of view, evil constitutes a problem of understandability of the world. In this course, ancient and medieval thinking provides a historical analysis of the various ways related to these problems and their solutions. We started the investigation from the Hebrew Biblical monism and then looked at the changes brought about by the Persian culture and the Helenaization of the Mediterranean basin after Alexander's process of conquering dualism. Dualism is a theoretical system or ideology system that recognizes two independent, mutually unintelligible principles, sometimes complementary and sometimes contradictory. At the same time, we believe that the rationalization of "we" is a matter of evil against "others" or religious intolerance. Christian religious dualism between good and evil is not perfect dualism. Because God (good) inevitably destroys Satan (evil). Early Christian dualism was primarily based on Plato's binaryism (see New Platonism and Christianity). Based on the concept of non-material Christian soul, there is a soul-physical distinction. Both atheism and dualism mean faith in two equally powerful gods with complementary or antisense properties, but atheism means harmony, but atheism is good and evil, brightness and darkness Such as competition and mean opposite. Or summer and winter. For example, the semiotropic system is a god of creativity and others are destructive (see theodicy). For example, in the original concept of Zoroastrianism, Ahura Mazda is the ultimate spirit and Ahriman (Angra Mainyu) is the ultimate evil spirit. Among the many themes that reflect evil through religion, evil is only good poverty, without evil there is no evil, evil is a necessary means to get evil, without evil it is a universe Evil in Better is better It is better and this evil is due to the free will of mankind and God sometimes like good things sometimes in bad things in their free choice to humans . Philosophers also explore the origin and essence of evil. The questions they are studying include when people can consciously and deliberately make evil, and when they can properly control individual responsibility for malicious acts. Many ancient philosophers speculated that evil is fantasy, alienation, alienation, or isolation from God.

Romanticism, slavery, and supernatural times throughout the 18th century dominated Western cultural thought. Romanticism is a huge art movement that influenced many of the famous artists we learned today. Percy Shelley is one of the artists. Sherry is famous for its anarchism, atheism, provocative egoism. However, Sherry seems to be a romantic philosopher poet with beautiful art work. Stansas writes frustration - in December 1818, in the vicinity of Shelley's poem Naples, he expressed his romantic work for his literary structure and nature-related style. Mary Sherry's Frankenstein is still one of the most important and greatest books of romanticism. Romanticism itself consists of a number of factors such as supernatural, emotional, imaginative, natural, social progress, infinite possibilities, and spiritual growth. - Romantic movement is a transition between art, writing and freedom to express other creativity and feelings. Romanticists regard nature as unchangeable. The era of romanticism and enlightenment basically reflects it. Since self-recognition is one of the characteristic elements of romanticism, Romantists realize their abilities. Romanticism, slavery, and supernatural times throughout the 18th century dominated Western cultural thought. Romanticism is a huge art movement that influenced many of the famous artists we learned today. Percy Shelley is one of the artists. Sherry is famous for its anarchism, atheism, provocative egoism. However, Sherry seems to be a romantic philosopher poet with beautiful art work. - Nature has performed so many festivals through art, photography, poetry and other literature, and many believe that nature and nature are standard. These artists use their talents to reveal interpersonal relationships with nature. In the late eighteenth century, romanticism appeared as an intellectual movement against the industrial revolution, the focus of the industrial revolution focused on natural scientific reasoning. After reviewing the romantic resource page, please list three features of romanticism. At the same time, identify three writers in a romantic era. Three features of romanticism are love for nature, interest in supernatural things, and passionate nationalism. The three authors are Edgar Allan Poe, Washington Irving and William Karen Bryant. Please list the three features of transcendence using pages of Transcendental Resources. The three features are that we believe that God is found in nature, individualism is worshiped, and excessive souls are worshiped.

The best way to understand why atheism is so important to me is to start with a little background. When I grow up I still live in Texas, and other Texas people often refer to it as a religious part of Texas. So my experience is also affected by my environment. I do not want to pay much attention to cultural beliefs, but I really want to point out. For example, people I know know rarely to accept evolutionism and big bangs, but scientific theories that are not creative are considered to be mainly the notorious "mere theory" theory. When I was studying at Columbia University, I continued my journey as an atheist, where I attended a speech by Salman Rushdie. I often feel uneasy when religious people cry out Mike on the subway and distribute brochures to change other people into their religious beliefs. It was only to fill out the form that made me so excited. My question and learning journey continued, and I became a religious "not a philosopher" person. The topic of religion is important to others, but it is not important to me. I have not dealt with religious problems by studying at university, living alone in New York, and building relationships with those who share similar ambitions, which is not a problem for me. As an atheist, I understand the journey and the way of atheists. I meant that being angry at Christianity and becoming homosexual did not believe in God. I was involved in Buddhism because I was a supercharged Flash programmer with overwork to understand and manage my stress. Although it is a sweet performance, the deadline is a blind man, but I learned how to meditate through Buddhism. Since I did not believe in God at that time, I refused more mysterious Buddhism. I am not interested in fairy tales. But I am interested in the therapeutic benefits of a quiet mind. For a long time, I could not find a philosophy that praises my atheistic life, lasts in the dark, holds the rails firmly, and hopes to find the truth. Without philosophy, atheists tend to be silent in my experience. Atheism is lonely. That is why it is hoped that so many new atheists will form communities and rekindle the magic of some religious communities. It never agrees. I decided to choose Asian philosophy because I can not resonate with my personal lifestyle, community, or ethics in Western philosophy. I have decided to study Buddhism.

Antony Flew: God's Presence and Belief Antony Flew first talked to the audience about the story of two explorers accidentally encountered the jungle garden. There are many beautiful flowers and weeds in this garden. The explorer said, "Several gardeners must be interested in this plan." The opponent objected to "no gardener". So the two explorers tried to find out who is right and what is wrong. They waited all night, but I had never seen a gardener. Then, "believer" said that there must be a gardener who is "an invisible gardener." Kant believes that moral argument is effective, but the last few centuries of philosophy saw a powerful question about the existence of God which is the theory of Immanuel Kant, David Hume and Anthonyfulle. The house made. As Alvin Plantinga states, the answer by this writer is whether faith is "the right foundation" or the evidence-based position is taken like Richard Swinburne. Some experts believe that only some discussion about the existence of God is persuasive, but believe that faith requires risk rather than product of reason. They say that there is no danger if the argument about the existence of God is as strong as the law of logic, they say that Pascal 's position is "reason why in mind". Philosophical theory believes that God exists (or must exist) and is independent of the teachings and revelations of a particular religion. Some philosophical experts convinced the existence of God through philosophical controversy others believed that they had religious beliefs that they could not need or be supported by rational arguments. Theological non-cognitiveism considers religious languages, in particular words like "god" (the capital), cognitively meaningless. It is cited as evidence that there is no such thing as "god", hence it is the basis of atheism. There are two main arguments: Kenilsson uses semantic verifiable theory to conclude that religious languages ​​are meaningless as it proves weak atheism because it can not be proved

There are many people with various opinions about God. Does he exist? Does not he exist? These questions can be discussed in myriad theories that there are reasons why he exists, methods that do not exist, or do not exist, and there is no way to do it. Theologians argue that God exists and there is a reason to believe that God exists. On the other hand, agnostics, atheists, and followers will think that there is no reason to believe that God exists. Let us consider two theories: theology (the existence of God) and atheism (God does not exist). Imagine that we live in a world where religious texts from different societies and the whole history are fully compatible - even though authors have no way of communicating, they all share the same story I will speak and give out a consistent doctrine. Text reasonably, everyone will think that this is the evidence that contributes to theology. Even under atheism, you can make some complicated explanations for broad consistency: perhaps passing a certain story to us through our evolutionary history is a universal dynamics is. However, we can not deny that theology provides a more direct explanation. God is spreading his word to many different people. (81 - 82) There is much debate about the existence of God about the existence of God. For a long time everyone wanted to prove the existence of God. Some people think that God exists and is proved by many philosophical or scientific foundations and religious reasons. On the other hand, others do not believe in the existence of God and their foundation is proved from many theoretical and scientific point of view. Many people try to prove the existence of God with reason. After Descartes proves its existence, he will think the truth about the essence of God, evidence of the existence of God, and the nature of material objects. The main task in Descartes' meditation is to design a system that allows him to understand the truth. He wants to lay the foundation of all further philosophy

This content is available through online browsing (free) program dependent on page scan. Screen readers can not currently scan, so please contact JSTOR user support for access. We will provide PDF copy of your screen reader Tattersall defends evidence-based arguments based on the possibility of unfounded malicious existence. This discussion contains the premise that obvious evil is theoretically incompatible with the God of Theists. However, this argument is obvious as it is unknown whether unpaid evil exists. Therefore, another premise of Tattersall 's claim is that there may be obvious evil. Objections against various arguments against this argument have been rebutted. In this article, Ryan Stringer criticized the reaction to evil atheism, known as "skepticism." He first developed a simple atheistic argument from evil and then simply proved its two premises. Then he defended the potential reaction to skeptics. First, he argues that skepticism is inherently unbelievable and brings about results and indirectly defends his view as an unfair correspondence. If skepticism is true, it seems to weaken the main argument of atheism, debate from evil. This is to provide reasons why doubt to theology doubts the important premise in the argument of evil, that is to say that at least some evil is an unpaid precondition in our world. If we can not judge whether there is reason to allow certain evil events for God, we can not judge whether evil in our world has not been paid. If we can not tell if the evil is free of charge in our world we can not rely on the existence of unjust evil to reach the conclusion that God does not exist. The remainder of this article explains skepticism in more detail, applies it to evil claims, and examines the reasons for opposition and opposition to skepticism

A skeptical god speaks of a very ambiguous picture of one of my casual Christians, Trisa, her mother, listening to my casual stepmother Thara, a sturdy night Sitting outside the back porch. The story, I noticed that I am always "atheist". But please understand that I mean "atheist" in a very positive and good way before you get the wrong impression. It seems that many people are linking atheism to negativity and sharpness, but we all should remember that atheists are only unbelievers. Science fiction known to humans: the Bible. It can not be denied that there is no "new" on atheism. No matter what kind of religion is formed, anytime, anywhere, quietly appearing question seems inevitable to continue. From ancient people such as Protagoras and Socrates to Friedrich · Nietzsche, Bertrand · Russell, Ian · Land, Karl, the history is rich and varied. · More contemporary thinkers such as Sagan. The public expression of God's suspicion in ancient times meant burns, but the suspicion of this new 20th century is more bold and more aggressive toward sacred things than that of the past. Gary Wolf's article "Unbelievers Church" posted on Connected Magazine in November 2006 states that today's atheists can not get out of the problem as we are not dogmatists. In addition to blaming them by believing in God, we respect our faith in God. Religion is not just wrong, it is not evil. " Especially when it is closely related to God and sacred, it should be accepted axioms. Since the Middle Ages, doubt about Jesus Christ (sacred human being) was questioned and clear evidence of God's origin and function was sought. Philosophy can not answer this question well because the concept of humanity and divinity does not logically match. Therefore, with the help of Christianity, several attempts have been made to solve the problem of imbalance. When Christ is questioned and suspected in the question, signs of great wisdom and miracles will appear, God's "voice" will be heard and declare his divinity. Likewise, the connection between Turner and the Holy Spirit made him a missionary The source of knowledge and authority of his prophecies is absolute, he said he is "doomed to have a big purpose" truly " I repeat. As a black leader, this is important, as he has to appeal to the then religious authorities, white priests.

Although God may not be able to prove through formulas or physical attributes, there is evidence in our time that we live in a smart designer. We just observe the end of the giant universe through the Hubble telescope and observe it. Look at the monitor of the electronic scanning microscope and dig a complex world of microscopic cells. In order to transform fertilized eggs into human beings please try to understand the huge number of complex information unique to digital codes. I will learn the principle of quantum mechanics and learn the world of super dimension. Please review your conscience, subconscious moral, moral standards, and the nature of religious thought. Then, try to harmonize all these reality with the basic theory of randomness. According to what we know today, atheism (not believing any kind of God) is a "faith leader" that is larger than God (believing that God is). I do not claim to prove the existence of God in 'scientific' certainty, but I can show you important and reliable evidence of the existence of God. The following is a summary of the main parameters. Order God gives you the best explanation about abstract concepts such as numbers, formulas, laws of nature, and attributes of mathematics. Causality God provides the best explanation about the existence of the universe and all its contents (the theory of replacement is a "no" explosion, leading us all). Design God provides the best explanation of complex order in cosmology, stars, planets, chemistry, and biological systems (alternate theory is a random opportunity to create everything we see) moral. God provides the best explanation about the existence of objective and unique moral / moral values ​​in the world. What do you think? - We all have sinned and should be judged by God. God the Father has sent his one son to satisfy the judgment for those who believe in him. Jesus, the creator of God and eternal child, dies us for sin, underwent punishment suitable for us, buried, and according to the Bible sent life innocent to be raised from death It was. If you really believe and believe in your heart, accept Jesus alone as your Savior and declare that "Jesus is the Lord". On the other hand, if I am neutral and do not do "a priori allegation" about a particular world view (whether it is naturalistic or not), the question "Does God really exist?" Has no meaning at all. Instead, it will be the first step towards an objective and meaningful search for the ultimate truth. We are willing to open our minds and ask questions, which is the basis of our ability to discover the truth behind our answers. First of all, before you ask a question, decide whether you really accept the answer. In the beginning was a god. What do you mean? What is God? Does God really exist? There are too many questions about God, and it is impossible to answer them. By definition, God transcends human understanding. Since God is far beyond human understanding, when we try to understand, we create a false image of God. An immeasurable thought is a waste of time, energy and energy. Trying to understand something you can not understand will be defeated before you begin. Before we start a short article about this God, we need to say these things. Does God really exist? This is probably one of the most popular answers, divide humanity into two separate ideologies, theology and atheism. In order to subscribe to either of these two doctrines, first of all, do you need to know who is God or what? The most traditional definition of God over most religions is that "God is the creator of the universe and everything in the universe". Therefore, people will insist that God wants to do all this, he must be self-existential, knowledgeable, omnipotent, but also the "best form of existence". This statement and belief basically evoked deep-seated hostility between atheists and theologians. Sometimes we feel the need for atheism according to the arguments presented by atheists, but

The Christian Existential Webster Dictionary focuses on existentialism as "an analysis of the existence of individuals in an unbelievable universe and the plight of individuals who must take ultimate responsibility for free will without knowing the right thing Philosophical Movement ". Wrong things are good or bad. "This seems to be exactly opposite to Christian doctrine because it insists human autonomy and independence rather than treat them as the subject of the highest existence but the existentialism and Christ You can coexist. Existentialists do not believe that God must be eliminated from existentialism like Karl Jasper. This existentialism is called Christian existentialism and Christian existentialists consider themselves to be "unique individuals" in front of existentialists. This philosopher of faith will focus on the relationship between myself and God. He would not deny or prove the existence of God, but he would argue that people could choose to believe in God. Existentialism: It is mainly the philosophy of the 20th century, focusing on the nature and perception of human existence. Existentialism has two main types. Atheism and Christianity. A believer in atheistic existentialism believes that individuals are lonely in the universe without God and that the basic condition of human beings is pain and loneliness. However, since there is no fixed value, individuals can create their own roles by exercising their free will. The pressure of atheism reached the climax and was closely related to the work of Jean-Paul Sartre. Christian existentialists, on the other hand, believe that in front of God people can find the pain of freedom from their lives. Existentialism stands out in works by writers such as Eugene Ionesco, Franz Kafka, Fyodor Dostoevsky, Simone de Beauvoir, Samuel Beckett, Albert Camus.

We welcome improvements to our articles. You can hope to review your contributions and make it more easily announced by recalling some points. Searching within the site will help you to check the scope of similar topics or related topics. Always list the source that supports your change at the end of the article. (Internet site is the best.) Your donation may be further edited by our staff, and that publication is subject to our final approval. Unfortunately our editing method may not be able to fulfill all contributions. Secularization is a historical process in which religion loses its social and cultural significance. For secularization, the role of religion in modern society is limited. In a secularized society, faith lacks cultural authority and religious organizations have little social power. Secularization has many meaning levels both theoretically and historically. Social theorists such as Karl Marx, Sigmund Freud, Max Weber, Émile Durkheim, etc. speculate that the modernization of society includes a decline in the level of religious beliefs. Research on this process aims at determining religious beliefs, practices, and methods and extent to which institutions lose social significance. The secularization of modern civilization is due to the failure to adapt to the broad ethical and spiritual needs of mankind and the rapid development of the physical science. Decomposing the concept of secular / secularism is useful before judging whether Nigeria is a secular country or a spiritual country. The terms secular and secularism have been rigorously reviewed by various scholars, institutions, or groups that conceptualize the differences and define the terms. Although scholars distinguish secularism from secularism, these concepts are often considered to be the same: political neutrality, freedom of religion, atheism, or non-religious Religion and the country of Nigeria: dealing effectively and legal countries - the front line of religious relations and its impact on national security In modern sociology, "secularism" refers to individuals and their social and psychological characteristics, "secularism" refers to the area of ​​social institutions. Secularity, including individual acts of individual actors, treats secular ideas and traditions as a pattern of consciousness. On the other hand, secularism includes organizational and legal structures reflecting the representation of secular institutions in secular politics and public life. Thus, secular continuity extends from liberal religiousism to mysticism, atheism, and secularism. That degree depends on secularism. Institutional expression level of secular feelings in the political and public domain of a country Religion and the country of Nigeria: dealing effectively and legal countries - the front line of religious relations and its impact on national security

In the first quarter of William Butler Yeats's "The Second Coming", the speaker drew a chaotic and terrible sight. The picture that we first read was spinning. "Turn and turn expanding circulation" (1), Mr. Tracy Coldwell said: A detailed explanation of his metaphysical and historical theory claims received from the spirit world "(2) The second line speaker says the order is loose," Falcon can not hear Eagle "(2). William Butler Yeat's "The Second Coming" verse "The Second Coming" was created by William Butler Yeats in 1919. Yeats is a versatile Irish poet known for his social and religious beliefs about poetry. In "Second coming" he developed his thought into three important metaphor. The first metaphor ties falcon and its eagle to the destruction of society. There are two possible explanations for this example. One way of thinking is that hawks represent society and eagles represent God and morality. William Butler Yeats left for the second Byzantine William Butler Yeats Shin died for the government William Ziinser Clutter William Zinsser College Pressures William Butler Yeats was born in Dublin, Ireland on 13th June 1865. He is the oldest of the four children of portrait painter John Butler Yeats. His father took part in William's regular school education at home, which gave him a permanent hobby of the classics. John Yeats has a strong personality. His personal philosophy incorporates aesthetics (belief that art and beauty are important to all) and atheism (belief without God). William felt its impact long after. Because it appeared in his interest to Magic and occultusum (supernatural). William Butler Yeats is a poet and playwright (playwright) in Ireland. Some people think he is the greatest poet in the 20th century. He received the Nobel Prize in literature in 1923. The work of William Butler Yeats has a clear bridge between the romantic poetry of the 19th century and the language of contemporary poetry. William Butler Yeats was born in Dublin, Ireland on 13th June 1865. He is the oldest of the four children of portrait painter John Butler Yeats. His father took part in William's regular school education at home, which gave him a permanent hobby of the classics. John Yeats has a strong personality. His personal philosophy incorporates aesthetics (belief that art and beauty are important to all) and atheism (belief without God). William felt its impact long after. Because it appeared in his interest to Magic and occultusum (supernatural).

The article by H. J. McCloskey "As an atheist" provides insight into the atheist view. It provides a comparison of anti - theological views related to the existence of God. It shows the reasons and advantages behind atheistic beliefs to prove its superiority as a source of strength. In this article, McCloskey refers to arguments such as cosmological argument, objective argument, design theory discussion as evidence. He argues that because there is no evidence that these arguments are true, it is not so, therefore our idea should be released from the existence of God. In this article, Ryan Stringer criticizes the reaction to evil atheism, known as "skepticism". He first developed a simple atheistic argument from evil and then simply proved its two premises. Then he defended the potential reaction to skeptics. First, he argues that skepticism is inherently unbelievable, brings the result, it makes it unreasonable correspondence and indirectly defends his view. Secondly, he directly defended his argument by proposing arguments that support his second premise. Stringer concluded that skeptical theology would not destroy his argument. Last week I officially landed on the Internet and became one out of 8% of Americans. In my post, he was called an "atheist or agnostic" hard "to be an atheist." My friend had an unexpected and effective response. Some of them have not spoken to me for years. It is powerful and moving, I notice that we have quietly lived together, and imagine that we are alone in the formation of this doubt and doubt. When we explore the commonalities we experience, we are shocked that other people are already feeling our pain, and I think that why "after-Christian atheism" is secular I am wondering whether it will not be discussed in culture. If I can get guidance on tentative Christian beliefs: "What do you expect when you go backwards" or some useful tutorial, it will be of great help to me. I noticed that the general nature of the atheist 's reaction to this article is a regrettable misunderstanding for my purpose. Most people seem to think of a comprehensive Christian who apologizes for atheism, or at least think about the unbearable evidence of Christianity. This is not a vision. For the sake of clarity, this article aims to clarify why the following atheists (or rather arguing) could not achieve their goals when discussing with Christians. There are many arguments against Christianity, but this article is about the most popular discussion, not about the most popular discussion. Many Christians are unaware of this, and many atheists do not say that it is very difficult to become an atheist by forsaking away your faith and it is terribly time consuming. Become an atheist (or agnostic, polytheist, etc.), rip off the structure of your personal identity and tore up all the psychological, emotional and logical assurance that you trust earlier, and your support Destroy the network and the community. As a former Christian, I understand this directly. Unfortunately, there is no discussion between Christians and atheists on this subject. So I am here and talking about it on the internet.

In order to get answers to their questions, they must personally arrange to talk to Jesus. They must know the fact that Philip has a Greek name (John is quite clear about this point, because he reminds the reader of this idea). Because of the names of these Gentiles, we can think that Galilee is a rich region of Gentiles at this time. Obviously, this method does not have much logic, but it always happens. If you were born Christian, raised a Christian, and only Christian understand Christian alone, the Christian faith system will be comforting for you. Humans love comfort. Humans want to be convinced that they are right. They got this guarantee from attending the church. Please look at the second one. Is there an absolute truth? Many people think that the afterlife is different for everyone, so everyone is right. Can you imagine this? So, does this mean that we can believe in the future life that I want? I am excluding this possibility, but this is just a "simple solution", there is only one alternative, only one absolute truth. In this case, this needs to mean that someone is right. Wait, no, no! Religion may be "right", but it is not necessarily the case. Perhaps no one will stumble upon the truth ... this is the possibility Christian says that Christianity is not a system of religion but a depiction of reality. To be honest, I do not believe your religion is atheism. Atheism is your scientific materialistic religion's purpose. This is a belief system. You accept it as a way to explain the world around you and your place. What conflicts with the belief system of other people's gods or my soul can only show falsehood and delusion as considering these experiences in other situations threatens you. Honesty of faith. There is no difference in the likelihood that an angel Gabriel refuses to think when a Christian says the Quran with Muhammad. This is a simple prejudice that keeps the superiority of the imagination of your belief system.

From ancient times, the existence of God, or more accurately speaking, the existence of wisdom that defines power is a controversial discussion. Many people insist on divinity because in the process of creating the universe, the existence of this supreme existence doubts as to whether it has unique and terrible ability to design and create the universe. William Paley believes that there is a major supporter of God's presence and perfect order in the creation of the universe. Does God really exist? This is probably one of the most popular answers and divides human nature into two separate ideologies of theology and atheism. To subscribe to either of these two doctrines, first of all, do you need to know who is God or what? The most traditional definition of God over most religions is that "God is the creator of the universe and everything in the universe". Therefore, people will insist that God wishes to do this He must be self-existential, knowledgeable, omnipotent, but also the "best existence form" Hmm. Such assertions and beliefs fundamentally caused deeply hostile hostility between atheists and theologians. Sometimes it feels a need for atheism according to the arguments presented by atheists, but the strongest belief in the existence of God may be achieved by theologians' support in the existence of God. It is not the opposite of an atheist. "Hanging" Philosophers, atheists, and agnostics raised arguments against the existence of God. Some of these arguments argue that the existence of God does not correspond to observed facts; some are arguments that God does not exist because God's concept is incoherent or chaotic. Others criticize the evidence provided for the existence of God. Another argument states that the existence of the omniscient God is incompatible with the facts of free will - human beings have certainly made a choice. If God is omniscuous then he must know in advance what people will do in certain circumstances. In this case, people can not substitute God to actually know what they do, free will is an illusion. Furthermore, if a person chooses to commit a crime, can the person freely crime the crime?

For more than a century, the concept of secularism and its boundaries has been widely controversial by secularists and non-secularists. The English dictionary defines secularism as separation of church and state, or separation between religion and politics. True secularist Michael Wolzer believes that this separation is an important democratic value and ultimately promotes tolerance for multiple religions (Walzer, p. 620). He defines secularism as "a doctrine of how society should be designed" - religion and politics should be separated to ensure politics of freedom of religion and freedom of religion . It is useful to elucidate the concept of secular / secularism before judging whether Nigeria is a secular country or a spiritual country. The terms secular and secularism have been rigorously reviewed by various scholars, institutions, or groups that conceptualize the differences and define the terms. Although scholars have distinguished secularism from secularism, these concepts are often considered to be the same: political neutrality, freedom of religion, atheistic or non-religious Religion and the country of Nigeria: dealing with de facto countries and legal countries - the forefront of religious relations and its impact on national security This book explores the concepts, practices, and political forms of secularism, explores the concepts, practices, and political forms of secularism, and the major historical changes in the formation of secular feelings and attitudes in the modern Western world I emphasize. It is the Middle East. Talal Asad continues to disassemble general assumptions that are considered secular and topographically covered. He has identified himself as anthropologist studying "unfamiliar things in the world other than Europe" and studying as an irrational dimension of social life (myths, taboos, religion, etc.) Some people think the concept of secularism is often misunderstood. Jack Berliner, director of the Georgetown University Jewish Civilization Program, wrote: In the July 2012 issue of Huffington Post entitled "Secularism is not atheism", he stated as follows. Misunderstanding "" The left often avoids it with Stalinism, Nazism, socialism and so on. In the United States, another wrong equation has recently appeared. This will be a groundless connection between secularism and atheism. Religious rights show this misunderstanding beneficially. At least since the 1970s. "

Ar, gu · men · ta · tive · ly, adverbar · gu · men · ta · tive · ness, noun · ar · gu · men · ta · tive, adjective · ar · gu · men · ta · tive · ly, It is a verb, a verb, er, er, er, er, er, er, er, er, er, er. Advertisement Advertisement Advertisement Advertisement Advertisement Advertisement advertisement advertisement advertisement advertisement advertisement advertisement advertisement advertisement advertisement advertisement advertisement advertisement advertisement advertisement advertisement advertisement advertisement created. Therefore, the response to the discussion here is the design of cosmological argument, objective argument, and creationism. First of all, we answer the claim as evidence. In his article McCloskey claims that theological argument is simply evidence that there is no supernatural existence in the universe. He encouraged atheists to believe the assertions and evidences claimed to their atheists so that they believed it was not enough to convince them to exert their persuasive power. Therefore, it is important to give up these discussions. He considers design interpretation to be the most valuable and valuable argument. He used evolution theory to support atheism ... another part of McCloskey called these arguments "evidence" and often that they could not explicitly prove God's case It means. McCloskey thinks that argument is proof Drange defends two arguments against atheism, including evil claims. As Drange pointed out, his argument itself is a deductive or logical argument from evil, ignoring the support of its premise. However, support for the forum of discussion is general or evidence. Therefore, he explained that his argument from evil is a debate of evidence rather than a conclusion. Is that chilling pain evidence against the existence of omnipotent omniscient infinitely benevolent god? Mark Vuletic considers the main problem of discussion between the defender and God's good doubt in this colorful hypothesis dialogue (based on actual dialogue in philosophical literature).

As of today, the two largest religions in the world, Christianity and Muslim, have a total of 6 billion members, accounting for more than half of the world's population. On the surface, they seem to have little in common, but when a person transcends the surface and looks at other factors such as rituals, beliefs, morals, founder, beliefs, the two religions There are many similarities. However, in order to truly understand and understand these similarities and differences, it is necessary to go back to the rise and birth of Christianity and Islam. For me, any objective analysis will conclude that Muslims are "bad" than modern Christianity (seen in the "atheist" eyes). In western countries, the political influence of Christianity is small or not at all. Muslims are increasing, and clearly intertwined with politics, especially through identity politics on the left. The result of the long-term collapse of Christianity by atheists is to create political and cultural vacuums in Islam. It can not be denied that the religious abuse Muslims committed is even more serious than what the most extreme Christians committed. Atheism actually increases the influence of religion on society through an alliance with Islam or at least a useful idiot. Therefore, contemporary atheism is actually completely against the definition of its own textbook. There are hundreds of religions in this world. Two of them are most famous. Islam and Christianity. On average, 750 million people practice Muslims and 1 billion people practice Christianity. The origin of Muslim is actually originated in Christianity, a historical book shows on the night of 610 that the first of many revelations came from God to Muhammad through the angel Gabriel (Christianity So this is the same as bringing the news.) The birth of an angel Jesus, of course Jesus is the founder of Christianity. Messages received by Muhammad tell him that there are not so many Gods that most Arabs think, but only one God (same as the beginning of the Ten Commandments). This god is the creator of the world (in Christianity God has written in heaven and earth, Genesis 1: 1), and someday he will judge humanity (Christianity But this is the truth: "Hebrews 10: 30"

Do philosophers of eastern religion have answers about what our aim is? Is there life after death? What must be achieved when you are still alive What is genuine or moral? Is there a god? These are the main philosophical problems people have tried to answer. Religion is a philosophy of interpretation, whether it is sacred or practical, it is a way of life. It is not surprising to see some people in the eastern world religion stand out as an important intellectual. Philosophical theory believes that God exists (or must exist) and is independent of the teachings and revelations of a particular religion. Some philosophical experts convinced the existence of God through philosophical controversy others believed that they had religious beliefs that they could not need or be supported by rational arguments. Theological non-cognitiveism considers religious languages, in particular words like "god" (the capital), cognitively meaningless. It is cited as evidence that there is no such thing as "god", hence it is the basis of atheism. There are two main arguments: Kenilsson uses semantic verifiable theory to conclude that religious languages ​​are meaningless as it proves weak atheism because it can not be proved Religious philosophy is a philosophical study on the meaning and nature of religion. It includes analysis of religious concepts, beliefs, jargon, discussion and religious beliefs practice. Much of the work being done in religious philosophy is confined to various theological religions. Recent studies usually incorporate a broader and more global approach, taking into account both theological and non-theological religious traditions. The range of analyzes and those engaged in the field of religious philosophy, including philosophers from continental traditions, Oriental and Western thinkers, religious followers and agnostics, skeptics and atheists are wide and diverse. Religious philosophy captures all major fields of philosophy and other related fields such as theology, history, sociology, psychology, natural science etc. The Western religious philosophy as a basic ancestor of contemporary religious studies is usually distinguished from the viewpoint of a third party from theology and many Oriental philosophical traditions. Scholars are not necessarily believers. In general, scholars rely on logic and the Bible as evidence, so theology is in stark contrast to the philosophy of religious and religious studies. Theology based on this understanding is consistent with understanding of the definition of Anselm in Canterbury in the eleventh century, seeking understanding of faith or belief (literally meaning "I understand"). Then the work of the theologian is to make a religious promise to agree that he or she is easy to understand or clarify. Scholars of religious studies do not have such loyalties

McCloskey supports atheism in "being an atheist" and attempts not to trust theology. He used many intelligent ways to argue about theological theory like a controversy over God because they did not prove the case for God. McCloskey pays attention to the discussion of cosmology, argues that everything we see is present and asserts that there is no reason to make God exist or to need it. He also pointed out that cosmological arguments give us us as human beings and give us without the necessary existence and the right to undertake the existence of God. This article clarifies whether claims and evidence presented by McCloskey's article "About becoming an atheist" will provide enough ammunition to prevent people from maintaining faith in God I will try that. McCloskey 's intention was to systematically destroy God and to show that God' s life is not a good claim. Throughout this article, it will provide evidence that McCloskey is correct, atheism should be accepted, or "the time has come to seek the Lord." As McCloskey begins his argument and suggests that God is not proving a decisive case, such belief in God is worth giving up. My answer examined several points. The existence of God is the best explanation of the existence of the universe. Scientists believe that gravity explains some effects; gravity is an undeniable reality. Scientists have never seen gravity, but there are various physical "laws" that define their effects on the Earth and the Moon. These effects are the best explanation of the existence of God. In 1968, a famous philosopher H. J. McCloskey wrote a provocative article titled "as an atheist" in 1968. Macrosski believes that atheism is based on his favorable better belief system that argues against theological arguments. He tried to counter the cosmology and the theoretical argument for the existence of God; he also tried to destroy God based on the existence of evil. By doing so, he began to discuss the obvious comfort of free will and atheistic belief systems by expanding the discussion beyond the boundaries of God. But by carefully analyzing God's argument and gaining insight about the mysterious and free will that God has given mankind, we understand that theoretical beliefs are logically more healthy and more popular To do. McCloskey stated that evidence of God's claim does not clearly prove the reason for the existence of God. There are many ways to refute the purpose of the theology of McCrosskey, but true theologians must be careful not to restrict the power of God. McCloskey may soon prosecute against simple objections. But when discussing God, especially when McCrosskey talks about what God is thinking, they can argue that they did not completely understand God. For a true theologian, we can not destroy or restrict the power of God. McCloskey asks "free will" assertion that "God may not be able to easily adjust this world, men are biased to freedom to choose the right things all the time" (McLorski). In opposition to this, theologians argue that the secondary evil which is the ongoing evil created by creation is to choose a foolish abuse of the full will God gives them free will Well (Evans, 164).

"Non-worldly" vacation: How unbelievers approached the holiday Alain de Botton discovered various attributes of religion with his TED talk "atheism 0". Among these attributes, all religions are emphasized as nearly general rules, and each religion has a believer 's calendar. These calendars are often marked in days or even weeks and have some importance and importance to those who believe in a particular religion and remind people of the values ​​that these religions represent. Christmas is also a holiday and holy day. This is an important religious day for Christians, one of the six sacred festivals celebrated in America. It is recognized as an important holiday for public organizations in the United States (including governments and schools) - and even many companies are offering a day off during the Christmas season. Christmas was always my favorite vacation. Not only my favorite vacation, be careful, but during my favorite year, for a while. This is not necessarily due to gifts. I like to buy gifts, but receiving is not a bad thing. I am not a religious believer either. This season, that time, and make Christmas my favorite atmosphere "Unsecretary" Vacation: How the Unbeliever approached the Holy Day Alan de Botton discovered various attributes of religion in his TED Talk "atheism 2.0". Among these attributes, all religions are emphasized as nearly general rules, and each religion has a believer 's calendar. - At "A & P", John Updike told the three young women who were swimwearing at the beach when they entered the grocery store. The woman visited the shop and started looking for Kingfish Fancy Herring Snacks for Queene's mother. Manager Lengel noticed girls' clothes. Because they went to the cashier for payment of snacks and did not face them properly.

Footnotes of Jewish philosophers on reasons and revelations are erroneous summaries. Reason and revelation are sources of different truth. They are inconsistent or complementary. This article attempts to answer these ancient questions from the perspective of the Jewish pluralism. I think that the two most important representatives of the Jewish main thought school, the rationalist Maimonides, Moses Mendelsohn and Hermann Cohen, and the fundamental view of anti-rationalist Judah Hallevi and Solomon Levi Steinheim I will mention. Philosophy - tradition includes a method of religion or ultimate reality, unrelated to the events of the Bible but unrelated to events, rather than the basis of a revelation-based approach, rather than the Bible, rather than the Bible Yes. World and experience, Augustine, Aquinas, Anselm, Kant, Heart Shawn, Alfred North Whitehead - History, but not cross section. Theology of the Old Testament was discovered in the confession of the Old Testament God's activity in history is the most legitimate form of the Old Testament theological discourse and therefore God, Psalm, and JEDP theology. There is no need to summarize. It only understands the process. Apocalypse The Apocalypse is the only book that is difficult to explain in the New Testament. There are several reasons. First, there is a very different interpretation of the overall timing of the book. Some people think that most people are pure history. Some people think much of the future. Second, the Apocalypse has many hints on the Old Testament. Implication is a phrase and reference in the Old Testament, and no one clearly states that he quoted the Old Testament. So, when John refers to the Old Testament, he is not usually saying that you are doing this. Third, the use of symbolic words in the Apocalypse is more than in other parts of the Bible. Apocalypse is a literary form known as the end of the world Philosophical theory believes that God exists (or must exist) and is independent of the teachings and revelations of a particular religion. Some philosophical experts convinced the existence of God through philosophical controversy others believed that they had religious beliefs that they could not need or be supported by rational arguments. Theological non-cognitiveism considers religious languages, in particular words like "god" (the capital), cognitively meaningless. It is cited as evidence that there is no such thing as "god", hence it is the basis of atheism. There are two main arguments: Kenilsson uses semantic verifiable theory to conclude that religious languages ​​are meaningless as it proves weak atheism because it can not be proved

For thousands of years, philosophers and theologians have opposed the existence of God. From my point of view, atheists are attacking the theologians and they desire to challenge the existence of God so that they can find some comfort in the dark outlook of human existence It seems. Frankly atheist Mikhovsky wrote an article titled "as an atheist" and he tried to argue and argue three discussions that he believes will convince many believers who believe in the existence of God There. In this article, Ryan Stringer criticizes the reaction to evil atheism, known as "skepticism". He first developed a simple atheistic argument from evil and then simply proved its two premises. Then he defended the potential reaction to skeptics. First, he argues that skepticism is inherently unbelievable, brings the result, it makes it unreasonable correspondence and indirectly defends his view. Secondly, he directly defended his argument by proposing arguments that support his second premise. Stringer concluded that skeptical theology would not destroy his argument. Last week I officially landed on the Internet and became one out of 8% of Americans. In my post, he was called an "atheist or agnostic" hard "to be an atheist." My friend had an unexpected and effective response. Some of them did not tell me for years. It is powerful and moving, I notice that we have quietly lived together, and imagine that we are alone in the formation of this doubt and doubt. When we explore the commonalities we experience, we are shocked that other people are already feeling our pain, and I think that why "after-Christian atheism" is secular I am wondering whether it will not be discussed in culture. If I can get guidance on tentative Christian beliefs: "What do you expect when you go backwards" or some useful tutorial, it will be of great help to me. I noticed that the general nature of the atheist 's reaction to this article is a regrettable misunderstanding for my purpose. Most people seem to think of a comprehensive Christian who apologizes for atheism, or at least think about the unbearable evidence of Christianity. This is not a vision. For the sake of clarity, this article aims to clarify why the following atheists (or rather arguing) could not achieve their goals when discussing with Christians. There are many arguments against Christianity, but this article is about the most popular discussion, not about the most popular discussion.

Answer to McCloskey Introduction Australian philosopher McCloskey is seriously thinking about his opposition to the existence of God in his article "About Atheists." He proposed many reasons to show my position, including the problem of evil. Macrosski believes that atheism is a more comfortable and easy-to-understand idea, rather than allowing God to suffer the innocent people to remove the glory from life and gain the final benefit. In an article by H. J. McCloskey titled "as an atheist" he starts with the argument of logic, common sense, and reasoning. He did not even read books of God, not to study, respectfully. I tried to prove where his argument lacks, and ultimately prove that atheism is true or that God does not exist. I think it interesting that he did not solve the ontological argument (God's view proves or proves the fact that he exists, and indeed, they are contesting them.) Atheism Something does not intend to make you an atheist In 1968, a famous philosopher H. J. McCloskey wrote a provocative article titled "as an atheist" in 1968. Macrosski believes that atheism is based on his favorable better belief system that argues against theological arguments. He tried to counter the cosmology and the theoretical argument for the existence of God; he also tried to destroy God based on the existence of evil. By doing so, he began to discuss the obvious comfort of free will and atheistic belief systems by expanding the discussion beyond the boundaries of God. But by carefully analyzing God's argument and gaining insight about the mysterious and free will that God has given mankind, we understand that theoretical beliefs are logically more healthy and more popular To do. McCloskey stated that evidence of God's claim does not clearly prove the reason for the existence of God. This article clarifies whether claims and evidence presented by McCloskey's article "About becoming an atheist" will provide enough ammunition to prevent people from maintaining faith in God I will try that. McCloskey 's intention was to systematically destroy God and to show that God' s life is not a good claim. Throughout this article, it will provide evidence that McCloskey is correct, atheism should be accepted, or "the time has come to seek the Lord." As McCloskey begins his argument and suggests that God is not proving a decisive case, such belief in God is worth giving up. My answer examined several points. The existence of God is the best explanation of the existence of the universe. Scientists believe that gravity explains some effects; gravity is an undeniable reality. Scientists have never seen gravity, but there are various physical "laws" that define their effects on the Earth and the Moon. These effects are the best explanation of the existence of God.

Many economists use statistical data to understand how the market works. Even without prior mathematical knowledge, Anthony Davis introduced several methods and ways economists use for their work. George Smith is an independent scholar at Cato Institute Libertarianism.org, a weekly columnist. He is atheism: lawsuit against God (1974), atheism, Ian Land and other heretics (1991), why is the author of atheism (2000). He is also the author of "Great Political Thinker", "The Constitution of the Constitution", and "Free Thoughts" audio series. He posted articles and reviews on the New York Times, news day, reasons, and freely. , Liberal Study Journal, Free Exploration and Humanists. He also wrote two major papers on the discussion of free events in his book "Freedom System" (September 2013) and "Herbert Spencer's National Sociology" (November 2014). Although the viewpoint of radical liberalism (liberal) of class analysis depends on national institutional analysis, except with one exception, I have noticed that early liberalists did not attempt to do this analysis in detail know. Herbert Spencer is an exception, especially with his sociological research on the rapid development of modern state bureaucracy. As pointed out in a paper published by Spencer for Libertarianism.org, Spencer points out attention to the development of deep-rooted bureaucracy that has their lives, is politically autonomous, and dominates the majority It is. Social and economic activity field " Our last stop in your information path is related to the "administrative collection" in Libertarianism.org "Privacy, Regulation and Internet" video. "Government assistance" will remove privacy when government organizations gather data on medical, financial, employment and family relationships designed to support citizens. In the 21st century, this is a problem because the government can record, save and distribute this information. Another place where law enforcement agencies collect your information is the cloud. "By 2016, 36 percent of US consumer content will be stored in the cloud," Gartner said.

In his article "as an atheist", McCloskey made some arguments in favor of God's absence and atheism. He used several incidents that theologians performed at a general level and focused more on Christian gods. These cases were divided into several parts, then he challenged the argument. In his speech he briefly reviewed the arguments presented by the doctrine, suggesting that they were "confirmed" and that there is not enough evidence to accept the existence of God. In an article by H. J. McCloskey titled "as an atheist" he starts with the argument of logic, common sense, and reasoning. He did not even read books of God, not to study, respectfully. I tried to prove where his argument lacks, and ultimately prove that atheism is true or that God does not exist. I think it interesting that he did not solve the ontological argument (God's view proves or proves the fact that he exists, and indeed, they are contesting them.) Atheism Something does not intend to make you an atheist In 1968, a famous philosopher H. J. McCloskey wrote a provocative article titled "as an atheist" in 1968. Macrosski believes that atheism is based on his favorable better belief system that argues against theological arguments. He tried to counter the cosmology and the theoretical argument for the existence of God; he also tried to destroy God based on the existence of evil. By doing so, he began to discuss the obvious comfort of free will and atheistic belief systems by expanding the discussion beyond the boundaries of God. But by carefully analyzing God's argument and gaining insight about the mysterious and free will that God has given mankind, we understand that theoretical beliefs are logically more healthy and more popular To do. McCloskey stated that evidence of God's claim does not clearly prove the reason for the existence of God. This article clarifies whether claims and evidence presented by McCloskey's article "About becoming an atheist" will provide enough ammunition to prevent people from maintaining faith in God I will try that. McCloskey 's intention was to systematically destroy God and to show that God' s life is not a good claim. Throughout this article, it will provide evidence that McCloskey is correct, atheism should be accepted, or "the time has come to seek the Lord." As McCloskey begins his argument and suggests that God is not proving a decisive case, such belief in God is worth giving up. My answer examined several points. The existence of God is the best explanation of the existence of the universe. Scientists believe that gravity explains some effects; gravity is an undeniable reality. Scientists have never seen gravity, but there are various physical "laws" that define their effects on the Earth and the Moon. These effects are the best explanation of the existence of God.

He became more controversial in the debate. He talks too much and can not become part of a project essential for team work. These examples are automatically selected from various online news sources to reflect the current usage of the term "discussion". The views shown in the examples do not represent the views of Merriam-Webster or its editors. Please send feedback created. Therefore, the response to the discussion here is the design of cosmological argument, objective argument, and creationism. First of all, we answer the claim as evidence. In his article McCloskey claims that theological argument is simply evidence that there is no supernatural existence in the universe. He encouraged atheists to believe the assertions and evidences claimed to their atheists so that they believed it was not enough to convince them to exert their persuasive power. Therefore, it is important to give up these discussions. He considers design interpretation to be the most valuable and valuable argument. He used evolution theory to support atheism ... another part of McCloskey called these arguments "evidence" and often that they could not explicitly prove God's case It means. McCloskey thinks that argument is proof Drange defends two arguments against atheism, including evil claims. As Drange pointed out, his argument itself is a deductive or logical argument from evil, ignoring the support of its premise. However, support for the forum of discussion is general or evidence. Therefore, he explained that his argument from evil is a debate of evidence rather than a conclusion. Is that chilling pain evidence against the existence of omnipotent omniscient infinitely benevolent god? Mark Vuletic considers the main problem of discussion between the defender and God's good doubt in this colorful hypothesis dialogue (based on actual dialogue in philosophical literature). Sadra advocated a new argument called Seddiqin argument or justice argument. This argument prove the existence of God through reality of existence and try to conclude with the necessity of eternal God. In this discussion, one thing itself proves that the path is the same as the goal itself. In other arguments, the truth is derived from an external source such as from possible to necessary, from source to eternal origin, or from exercise to immobile motive. There is no intermediate language other than the truth in the claim of the right person. A version of his ontological argument can be summarized as follows.

According to statistics of the Ministry of Information and Broadcasting in India, the third largest Muslim population in the world is India. The main religion in India is Hinduism, Islam is still second in its second religion, but it is still the world's largest Muslim minority (directory of ethnic minorities in the world - Muslim in India). India is the home of religious beliefs, but this statistically clearly represents the success of establishing and expanding early Muslims in India. Indian Muslim Spread Another myth of Indian society includes how Muslims spread in India. A popular concept is that Islam is a violent religion, spreading by force. This is historically incorrect. In fact, in India, only one king in history has expanded his management of religious communication. After the Kalinga war, Emperor Ashok accepted Buddhism and sent most of his officials to disseminate Buddhist messages 5. However, Islam has spread through India in many mechanisms, most of the change (more than 90%) is due to Su fi. Saint's human influence 6 I am vulo Delhi's smooth transition of Sultan's rule. Another example of overlap between Islam and Hinduism is Sikh. Sikhism is a religious order established in the 15th century and it is an important period of the spread of Islam in India. Sikhism is focused on the doctrine of God's love and contains the faith of Islam and Hinduism. Delhi's Sultan and Sikhism Sikhs are the common grounds in the middle to prove the relationship between Muslim and Hindus at the time. second Muslim came to India in the early 7th century with the emergence of Arab merchants on the Malabar coast of Kerala, which began to become a major religion during Muslim rule in the Indian subcontinent. The spread of Islam in India occurred mainly thanks to the mysterious Sufi tradition between Delhi's Sultanate (1206 - 1526) and Mughal Empire (1526 - 1858). Hinduism is an ancient religion (Hinduism is diverse but has divine, theology, polytheism, atheism, pantheism, monism, atheism, agnosticism and Gnosticism), India is also the largest religious group. As of 2011, there are about 966 million followers, accounting for 79.8% of the population. Hindi was originally derived from Sanskrit Sindhu (Indus' historical area), geographical explanation, pointing to a person from Sindhu River.

My view arises from the broad belief system in my family. My father is a godly evangelical Christian who places his life savings on the foundation of Christian school. My mother was also a devout Christian who works at the above Christian school and she dedicated her life to being humble, a god-fearing woman. My older sister is a Christian who fears God with respect and is a socially conservative full-time mother. My younger sister is a believer of God who is socially liberal and politically motivated. As an outsider who cares about the atheist community, I can not help but realize that this is a community that has experienced painful growth. Last week, we were opposed to atheists opposed to Richard Dawkins' comments, many people criticized those who criticized Dawkins, many people questioning the behavior of Dawkins and many people asked him did. It was all pretty confusing. I thanked my friend for giving me a shared link yesterday and sent a tweet to me, "I answered:" Atheism has experienced an interesting process of forming sects. "This is somewhat frustrating Although it is a commentary, I have been reflective already, but I think there are some truths in this. In my doctor thesis, I went to the area: I participated in observations with the college atheist community, interviewed the twenty most active members, and the atheists I met in Ottawa near It compared with the answer of. They are not interested in joining the atheist community. I expect that people in the atheist club feel that they are being discriminated against more religious growth (clubs replace the church) or because of their atheism. Some people have done such experiences, but I feel the reputation of atheists is very bad (colleagues say "You are not an atheist, you are very good" It is. In religious societies in Canada, the religious background of most people is fairly average (secularly or when children go to church every week). So the background is consistent with the background of the atheist I interviewed. It is not part of the atheist community. The last point is very interesting

Atheism is definitely one of the opponents of theology. However, atheism offers an important role to theology by acting as "advocate of the devil", which in turn will ultimately strengthen theology. In the book "On Atheists" by H. J. McCloskey, McCloskey criticizes the classical argument of the existence of God and regards the problem of evil as the reason why people should not believe in God. In his view, McCloskey studied the weakest argument of the theory, such as cosmological argument, distance learning argument, and evil discussion. However, we are not atheists, but they are not called atheists. Somehow, I think that what is recommended as an atheist is not a theologian at all. It shows that we believe that the world is fully mechanized, that the world is not mysterious, that we do not have the essence and vitality connecting all of us. So, you can think of yourself as an atheist, but you can think of the concept of "God" in many Oriental traditions, the essence of the universe, "meditation" or other transcendence, or the vitality that we experience As, or we have other existence and intimate relationships with the earth Most Christians I encounter belong to the "Gnutishan" category. I classify myself as "atheist of agnostic" and atheists like O'Connor and Dawkins. Christian Omamori Frank Turek can be classified as "Agnostic" and he is not convinced of God's existence, but chooses to be based on faith. But what is important here is that "theists" and "atheists" are the main descriptors, "north" and "agnostic" are modifiers. This is not one or two cases, and attribution to one category does not necessarily determine if it is due to another category.

I did not see the proof that I accepted the existence of God, so I have no reason to believe in God. Atheism is not a religion. There is no common religion or sacred ceremony. In this article, I will explain what I like most about the typical days, the difficulties I encountered, the ways others treat me, and atheists. For me, a typical day is to awake, to shout out horrible words to people, to burn some homes and steal other people's food. And if I have time, I will run some kittens. The universality of folk beliefs is the cultural universality of anthropology. Natural world animation and soul beliefs, and practices of ancestral worship are universally found in world culture, and in order to preserve saints, fairies or aliens, monotheism or substance society's superstition to believe the devil It will appear as. . The existence of perfect polytheistic religion, as well as ceremonial worship by priest classes, require higher level organizations and are not present in all cultures. In Eurasia, a mustard is one of the few examples of surviving polytheism. In addition, although modern Hinduism includes numerous polytheistic folk traditions, Hinduism is dominated by monism or monotheistic theology in dogmatism (Bhakti, Advaita). Historic Vedic polytheism ritual is called Hindu Shruta. Cultural diversity Today's society has many aspects about culture and diversity. Many of us think that culture is a belief, tradition, thought, and action that has been handed down from generation to generation of different communities. However, cultural diversity basically involves a radical change of ancient culture and a changing change over time. Changes in recent decades have been experienced in many areas including education and work

Leap of faith Since the 1960s, Northern Ireland has been shaken by "troubles." Atrocities such as constant explosion and killing have influenced the lives of most Protestant and Catholic families. Now they want only prayer and peace. They want to get the opportunity to end the violence and to live peacefully with the people of the "other" community. For some parents in Northern Ireland, education seems to be a hope for a peaceful life. Since education is responsible for shaping a child's perspective, Northern Ireland parents proposed comprehensive school concepts. To say that atheism is a leap of faith is the same as saying that the place called Modo is a leap of faith. What evidence do we have for Christian God, except for scribbling records about him in a relatively old book? Do not you think that there is a huge red dog called Clifford? I do not believe in 12 Greek gods This is a leap of faith? It is certain that this article is not the beginning to claim that atheism is equivalent to faith, but this is a recent example. It is easy to understand how people who believe in the basis that religion is deeply rooted in many cultures are easy to understand, but the reason why religion is deeply rooted in many cultures has higher powers It does not relate to some unique knowledge. Answer 3 Yes. Faith has dramatic progress. However, it is certainly advisable to achieve a leap of faith in the direction of the evidence. Consider a religious organization known as the gate of heaven. He told him that there is a spaceship behind the comet and they need to commit suicide when they get on the spaceship. Of course, the leap of this faith is stupid, as these doctrines actually do not have justifiable reasons. Well, he is not stupid, for example if there is a good reason to think that the universe points to the existence of God, that the resurrection of Jesus's body occurs, and that he claims to be God. The final stage includes more: a leap of faith. For Kierkegaard, this means achieving a leap of confidence in God. However, the character of leaping (and I) should also be extended to other things. Leap of faith involves a belief in something that you may not be able to prove to others. It includes that belief from inner passion and excitement or confidence (using fewer terms). It is this belief that touches you because it is totally personal and unique. Kierkegaard said this feeling appeared at the same time in the water of 70,000 miles, but was also happy. It is united with wonderful fear and excitement.

Sigmund Scholmo Freud was born on Freiburg in Moravia on May 6, 1865. Freud was born in a Jew, but turned to atheism, and later his Jew will come back to "disturb him". An interesting (but alarming) fact is that Freud's mother (also the second wife of his father) is just a few years older than his two brothers and sisters. Because Freud has a psychological problem, many people think that Freud believes psychological problems are related to sexual problems in childhood (Isbister, p. 9) . Siegmund Freud. Who is Sigmund Freud? Siegmund is an Australian neurologist, also known as the founder of psychoanalysis. After that I got a doctorate in medicine from the University of Vienna. Freud is developing therapeutic techniques such as using free associations or discovering changes. His theory is unconscious and the subject of the state of ideology. He assumed that he had a sexual desire. - Founder's father is a revolutionary group with different personality and ideology, but has a common goal of American freedom. They understand that citizens should have a say in the government, and the government can gain power only if the citizen agrees. Revolutionary leaders compromised their beliefs to avoid endless discussion of issues that needed urgent solutions. Sigmund Freud recently announced the Sigmund Freud collection of Congress libraries. Freud's quest for loss of consciousness and creation of psychoanalysis has deeply influenced the history of contemporary culture and thought, and as Princess Mary Bonaparte once wrote analysts and mentors, his work in the history of human thought We have established a position. This series which could only be used in Washington until now can enter the world in an unprecedented way. An online collection funded by generous grants from the Polonsky Foundation

Some of our team's managers, educators, and medical professionals recommend a strange book that teaches skepticism, atheism, and philosophy of a new era. Because this report is persuasive, even if these concepts and their reasoning code words appear in your area, you will not be ignorant. This may change a very exciting and magical life. But this is a new kind of Oriental mysticism. Our team has priests and medical professionals claiming that these books change people's lives. When I experienced severe depression last year, I read all possible articles on brain science and psychology. Not only that, I have read "A road less travel" by practicing psychotherapist M. Scott Peck and "The Brain - The Story of the Story". I also took a very interesting psychology course at Yale University. I may appreciate it later, but I can not confirm that it will be a good reading when I write. In fact, I can never release it. That is why my brain wants to avoid it. Just like anything else you need to do a lot of work before getting important results I have read this reminder, and I do not complain about road uncertainty. No one can complain - the boss does not confirm your work. Confirmation must be done from an internal information source. The way you have to walk must be defined by yourself This is the most important thing. "There is a chance to hesitate and retreat before a person promises, there is a basic fact about all the initiatives (and creation) that ignorance kills countless ideas and excellent plans. A series of events of encourage unexpected events, we can not do anything we can and we can not dream of what we can do, meetings and physical aid, let's be bold with talent, strength and magic. Let's get started right now. "

William Butler Yeats: Modernist William Butler Yeats is an Irish poet of the 19th century. William Butler Yeats was born in Dublin, Ireland in 1865. He was educated in Dublin and London and in 1877 wrote his first passage (nobelprize.org). He wrote many poems in his life and was considered to be the most influential poet of his time. He is very influential in the modernist era. William Butler Yeats is one of the most famous poets of the 19th century. - The paragraphs described are on pages 222 - 266 of M. T. "Life without a surprising Octavian". Anderson It explains the scientific papers by Gitney and Sharpe and the letter from Dr. Trefusis, a document about the death of Cassiopeia, a memoir written by Octavia (a poem written by Theoginis). These pages start with Smallpox disease of Smallpox, Octavian 29-year-old mother, Cassiopeia William Butler Yeats was born in Dublin, Ireland on 13th June 1865. He is the oldest of the four children of portrait painter John Butler Yeats. His father took part in William's regular school education at home. John Yeats has a strong personality. His personal philosophy incorporates aesthetics (belief that art and beauty are important to all) and atheism (a belief that God does not exist). William felt its effect was slow as it appeared in his interest in magic and occultism (supernatural).

The belief I have and the one that gives me strength are combined with what I am teaching and what I am studying. Over this article there are five questions to explain not only about life but also about the people I became. All three philosophers I chose are different and have something in common. They all share in common that they all support what they believe. The three people I chose were Aristotle, because I like happiness, and he believes this is the key to life. Philosophical theory believes that God exists (or must exist) and is independent of the teachings and revelations of a particular religion. Some philosophical controversy philosophical experts that the presence convinced of God through, not required by the reasonable claims, or those who believe that there is to be supported have a religious belief can not be there were. Theological non-recognition doctrine, words such as religious language, especially "God" (the capital) are considered to be cognitively meaningless. It is cited as evidence that there is no such thing as "god", hence it is the basis of atheism. There are two main arguments: Kenilsson uses semantic verifiable theory to conclude that religious languages ​​are meaningless as it proves weak atheism because it can not be proved In many cases, the word "belief" means that the speaker believes that religious beliefs are correct, even though there is no firm evidence. For example, God created the universe, or God sent a message to the Bible prophet Isaiah. Some religious believers believe that there is evidence that this belief is true, but that belief has not been agreed to anyone in any religion, they are certainly approved by people other than their religion Logicologists and scientists who have not been refused to be evidence. This applies to the belief that it is impossible for a philosopher to prove that "the difference between faith and knowledge is forced". Since knowledge is a rational and true belief, this has led philosophers to discover that knowledge differs from beliefs. (This is overly simplified, see the article on epistemology and Gettyr.) Agnosticism is defined here as a philosophical belief that the existence of God can not be proved or forged according to what we currently have. In other words, because neither can justify scientifically, it is a belief that you must see this view at least partly from a faithful point of view from the point of belief. Recognizing that this belief is not based on knowledge but based on faith, ignorance advances one step further and believes in the existence of God. Agnostic Christianity usually develops around the belief that we can know that the God of Christians is a true god, but among them the most specific teachings are sometimes discussed.

Some atheists strongly oppose creating creationism and intelligent design at American schools as an alternative to biological evolution. After the Kansas State Board of Education decided to allow intelligent design to replace evolutionary education, in 2005, Italian church monster flight was created by the team. A flying spaghetti monster is an ironic theory, where herds think that it has as much scientific support as intellectual design theory. In the first letter to the Kansas Board of Education, Henderson showed that the correlation does not mean that the increase in global warming does not mean a reduction in the population of the pirates. In this example, praise is not for God, so we ridicule some of the religious groups' belief that the world is experiencing difficulties like war and famine. This adds a strong sense of boundary between the atheist's church and the state and separates the sacred nation from religious interference. But this confidence in the boundary between the church and the state is not limited to atheists and pastors. Many people do not believe that organized religion is good for society. Not only is it not taxed, I am amazed at what I can see as a known incorrect repeat statement of children's brainwashing, children's vulnerable over the years. Some people think that at least these Bible will be seen critically if these children are not misunderstood. Many situations in which historically organized religious organizations acted not only brought about the deaths of millions of people, but in many cases prevented the abandonment of human rights. Atheism is often misunderstood as a belief that God does not exist, but it is not; it can be an atheist or an agnostic. These two terms answer different questions. Atheism answers the question you believe, ie the lack of faith in God. Agnosticism answers to what you know, how confident you have in your beliefs. According to this definition, a person can be an agnostic - an atheist or an unconscious - an atheist. We can also explain people as Agnostic - Christian, or Clues - Christian. Agnosticians admit that their faith is not a guarantee of truth, and Gnostic is a person who claims to be positive about their beliefs, or who lacks faith. What does it mean to be a human being? This question was answered in anthropological research. Anthropology is a study of various human cultures in the world in history. According to the University of Hawaii at Hilo, anthropology "emphasizes the comparison of human groups to understand the scope of human behavior and biology, so think about what human beings are." Anthropology, We focus on common aspects of mankind, such as language, cultural ties, economics, and curiosity to find common grounds. Anthropology is a scientific study on the cultural, social, biological and environmental aspects of humanity, its past and present lives. Cultural anthropology is one of four research fields in a wider area of ​​anthropology (archeology, physics or biological anthropology, and three other linguistics). Cultural anthropologists specialize in cultures and people's beliefs, practices, and cognitive social organizations of human society. Cultural anthropologists study how people who share a common cultural system organize and form the surrounding material and social world and form these ideas, behaviors, and physical environments . Social and cultural anthropology is one of the four major areas of anthropology. Social and cultural anthropologists focus on social and cultural studies and are often interested in cultural diversity and universalism. In addition, social and cultural anthropology is usually divided into social anthropology and cultural anthropology. The method of social and cultural anthropology is mainly ethnography based on qualitative data. This contrasts with quantitative data commonly used in other anthropological fields such as archeology and physical anthropology. Ethnography is a comprehensive study of culture,

This place is absolutely forever. If you want to burn the Alexandria library again and leave only these texts, then all other lost books have the basis to be reworked. Interpretation of Krishna's own essence, listening to the full sentence, Arjuna always evokes primitive Epiphany as if wisdom contained in Sanskrit is congenital, but what it feels is that I have not noticed mind and courage We care about ourselves and this behavior obscures our wisdom. Gita removes these veils and you will notice that these veils have been removed for the soul who understands themselves intuitively. However, for those whose experiences and attention are limited to current events, they will see another "superstitious sky god book". Krishna is simple and does not use symbols or metaphor, or metaphors like Muhammad or Jesus, but not everyone can understand or use Sanskrit. But you always feel that something about the world has been around since you were a child, you are confused by this contemporary world of atheism and manpower and are postponed from the spirituality of "new era" of atheism and corruption If it is, guitar is your priority Eknath Easwaran's translation is a top priority and Amazon is usually under $ 8. Unlike most translations, Easwaran truly obeys this principle. His translation is not mere academic research, it is his spiritual responsibility for gifts from the West. Before each chapter there is a chapter summary that explains what will happen. This is very useful. Gita itself is not a long and difficult reading. Once picked up, it is difficult to put it in practice. I absolutely recommend it to those who seriously consider the spiritual way. Some people think "Bhagavad - gita" is originally independent text, except "Bhagavad - gita" did not develop Mahabharata 's behavior, except for the first chapter. In addition, the general style and content of Bhagavad Gita and Mahabharata are contradictory. When Gita is over, the story of Mahabharata starts again. "Vatican" was written in the era of major social change in India, with the development of Jainism and Buddhism, the Kingdom became bigger, the degree of urbanization became higher, the trade activity increased, and A social confrontation occurred. more and more. This ancient Indian text is about how to integrate the calm, calm and eternal life, and spiritual value in daily life in a rapidly changing world. Sanskrit is one of Oriental philosophy's most influential papers. Bhagavad-gita is the eternal message of spiritual wisdom of ancient India. The word Gita means songs and words. "Bhagawan" refers to God, usually "Bhagavad · Gita" is called "God's Song." For thousands of years, it formed tradition and made great people. Gri talked to Krishna's disciple Arjuna on the battlefield of Cruzerate and answered the main problems of our lives and beings. Krishna also calls Rila Avatar one of those extraordinary characters whose stories of life are enough to help us gain enlightenment. Bhagvad Gita is a thought process behind a very normal life, singing, dancing, and peaceful in a great fight. Bhagavad Gita, also called The Gita, is a philosophical poem focusing on the dialogue between Prince Pandava Arjuna and the beloved Sir Krishna. Fighting the turmoil of war, Arjuna sought the advice of Sir Krishna. In Bhagavad-gita, Krishna gave Arjuna wisdom, devotion and self-realization. They talk about various theological and philosophical issues. According to Gita, the only way to end this cycle is to use Dharma to eliminate your life as much as possible. Therefore, I believe that the essence of Bhagavad Gita is a contrast between Karma and Dharma.

Summary of responsibility to Jean-Paul Sartre and our teaching history: Historical research is one of the major concerns of Jean-Paul Sartre. Sartre's biography research and thinking is that history is not only a field where you collect facts, events and processes, but also a valuable challenge involving a grave personal responsibility, my responsibility for life before death is showing. Sartre's research shows that accepting this responsibility can be a source of wisdom. However, few historians believe that history transcends the orderly expression and interpretation of facts, events, processes. Jean-Paul Sartre is known for his responsible philosophy. He explains that people are suffering under the pressure of responsibility or actively avoiding responsibility. Sartre 's existentialism is often associated with atheism, but religious thought is often accompanied by responsibility. For example, Kierkegaard is a Christian philosopher of the 19th century and we believe that the confrontation responsibility is the result of a true human condition, that is, the positive contact with the reality. As Christianity requires superhuman effort and constant uncertainty, or fear and tremor, he provokes the church in a radical way. An example of the most important human suffering of Kiakegaard is Abraham's Old Testament. From the beginning of the 20th century to the latter half, the philosopher Jean-Paul Sartre became the main spiritualist of existentialism, attracted the biggest audience in all philosophical history. Sartre develops a series of philosophies and is responsible for human life. He said that everyone is responsible not only for themselves but also for the nature of man, ie, recognizing their own existence, who they are And to define ourselves as a way. From that point he believes that everyone can freely make a choice and everyone is responsible for understanding that each choice affects not only their future but also humanities. If these choices are made, he feels responsible for getting what they want, rather than waiting for it to happen. He feels that humans are overly dependent on God in terms of these lives. People can only rely on themselves Juan Paul Sartore, an existentialist philosopher of the 20th century, said that we are the choice. I do not agree with his atheism, but Sartre is basically right. Although we may be the product of our DNA and the environment, we still have a certain space for ourselves for each of us. Despite his political trend Martin Heidegger pointed out another important concept, authenticity. After the flock is not genuine. To be truly free, you must be yourself. In today's American society, commercial edification may be a big challenge for credibility. Honest introspection is becoming more important than ever. By reflecting the actual needs, you can minimize consumerism operations. Tyler Darden of the movie 'Beat Club' claims that consumerism leads to own own ownership, so people belong to them. This may be the main example of becoming a slave

Religion and existence of God are topics that have been questioned, challenged, reprimanded, ridiculed, and studied for many years. That is the only thing that caused a certain ban at school, even the physical abuse of those who dare to talk about it. With such a topic, people are eager to know whether God exists or not. For those who say he does not, they want to gain facts and evidence to support them. For those who believe, the facts are explained by the Bible, nature itself, and of course man. Religion and the existence of God From the beginning, the existence of God has been questioned. Religion thrives when the universe answers questions that can not be answered, and people can find comfort in their answer. As science develops and responds to these questions in a natural way rather than a supernatural answer, many people are no longer seeking the cause of things from God or religion, and they are beginning to pay attention to science. Many scientists believe that God is dead ... the existence of God is always controversial. This is the last theme of the discussion as everyone seems to have an opinion on it. I look at the traditional discussion of the existence of God, discussions to endure the test of time, and see each discussion in turn, and finally by looking for truly useful discussion logic behind each discussion I will analyze. Response to criticism and criticism. The first argument about the existence of God, I Richard Swinburn was one of the most important religious philosophers of the time and advocated a debate which can be called a hypothesis in his "Being of Being" (2004). His monotheistic existence should be treated first. Just like a "hypothesis", then he tests or verifies by observing the world he believes created. According to Swinburne, using the scientific and empirical data validation process for the world will make it more than to make assumptions about the existence of God impossible. He is a supporter of Skopostheorie, but using his hypothetical method makes it easier for people, including atheists, to accept. Atheists believe that God's argument is inadequate, wrong or trade-off compared to arguments, but some religions such as Buddhism do not care about the existence of God at all, Other religions such as Jainism reject this possibility. God of creators. The position on the existence of God can be divided along many axes and creates various orthogonal classifications. Theology and atheism are positions of faith (or lack of faith), Gnosticism and agnosticism are the position of knowledge (or lack of knowledge). Ignorance includes a belief in the consistency of the concept of God. Atheism includes faith in the practical importance of the existence of God

Comparing T. S. Eliot's "The Waste Land" and "WWIII WILLIAM Butler Yeats" World War II, the perception of the people in Europe has changed fundamentally. Prior to the war, they believed that humans were born to be kind. People are no longer fantasizing about this human concept. Both Thomas Sterns Eliot and William Butler Yeats are strongly aware of this disillusionment and have shown it in their poems. In addition to the war, Elliott and Yeats also became disillusioned in Europe, such as the Russian Revolution and the Irish rebellion, confirmed their fear of humanity, enlarged "wasteland" and "rebirth". "The poets just share an incredibly large amount William Butler Yeat's "The Second Coming" verse "The Second Coming" was created by William Butler Yeats in 1919. Yeats is a versatile Irish poet known for his social and religious beliefs about poetry. In "Second coming" he developed his thought into three important metaphor. The first metaphor ties falcon and its eagle to the destruction of society. There are two possible explanations for this example. One way of thinking is that hawks represent society and eagles represent God and morality. William Butler Yeats left for the second Byzantine William Butler Yeats Shin died for the government William Ziinser Clutter William Zinsser College Pressures William Butler Yeats was born in Dublin, Ireland on 13th June 1865. He is the oldest of the four children of portrait painter John Butler Yeats. His father took part in William's regular school education at home, which gave him a permanent hobby of the classics. John Yeats has a strong personality. His personal philosophy incorporates aesthetics (belief that art and beauty are important to all) and atheism (belief without God). William felt its impact long after. Because it appeared in his interest to Magic and occultusum (supernatural). William Butler Yeats is a poet and playwright (playwright) in Ireland. Some people think he is the greatest poet in the 20th century. He received the Nobel Prize in literature in 1923. The work of William Butler Yeats has a clear bridge between the romantic poetry of the 19th century and the language of contemporary poetry. William Butler Yeats was born in Dublin, Ireland on 13th June 1865. He is the oldest of the four children of portrait painter John Butler Yeats. His father took part in William's regular school education at home, which gave him a permanent hobby of the classics. John Yeats has a strong personality. His personal philosophy incorporates aesthetics (belief that art and beauty are important to all) and atheism (belief without God). William felt its impact long after. Because it appeared in his interest to Magic and occultusum (supernatural).

Religion is a phenomenon, especially faith and worship of individual God or God's rule. Religion is a part of mankind from the beginning, people believe in Almighty God or other gods. Since most religions have particularly high powers, it raises the question of whether God really exists. Everyone in the world can answer that particular question based on their religious beliefs. Some people say that God exists and they will give evidence of God's existence, but others believe that there is no such thing as God does not exist and there is no such thing as God. At first it was a god. What do you mean? What is God? Does God really exist? There are too many questions about God, and it is impossible to answer them. By definition, God transcends human understanding. Because God is far beyond human understanding, when we try to understand, we create a false image of God. An immeasurable thinking is waste of time, energy and energy. Trying to understand something you can not understand will be defeated before starting. We need to say these things before we start a short article about this God. Does God really exist? This is probably one of the most popular answers and divides human nature into two separate ideologies of theology and atheism. To subscribe to either of these two doctrines, first of all, do you need to know who is God or what? The most traditional definition of God across most religions is that "God is the creator of the universe and everything in the universe". Therefore people will insist that God wishes to do this. Such assertions and beliefs basically caused deep-rooted hostility between atheists and theologians. Sometimes there is a feeling of atheism according to the arguments presented by atheists but the strongest belief in God's existence may be achieved through theologians' support in the existence of God In the opposite of atheists There is none. "Hanging" Philosophers, atheists, and agnostics raised arguments against the existence of God. Some of these arguments argue that the existence of God is not consistent with the observed facts, others argue that God does not exist because God's concept is incoherent or chaotic. Others criticize the evidence provided for the existence of God. Another argument states that the existence of the omniscient God is incompatible with the facts of free will - human beings have certainly made a choice. If God is omniscuous then he must know in advance what people will do in certain circumstances. In this case, a person can not substitute for God to actually know what he or she does, free will is an illusion. Furthermore, if a person chooses to commit a crime, can the person freely crime the crime?

Paul Tillich criticizes God as a way of existence or existence. He feels that if God is present, God can not be properly called a source of all beings (which in turn will create God's problem). As an alternative, he suggested that God is understood as "the foundation of existence itself" Because people can not deny existence (we and our world exist), he feels that there is power of existence. God sees God as the basis for the existence of all things. Therefore, God is before "existence", and God appears in the structure of all existence. Tillich believes that the symbol is the only way to imagine God-like meaning and abstraction. He regards God as a symbol and highly appreciates the image of the individual gods as a way for people to connect and respond to the place of existence. Likewise, he believes that the theme of Christian images may still be meaningful by rethinking the literally accepted story. Tillich believes that the root of atheism is to reject traditional images (existence / existence of God), he thinks that another symbolic image may be considered acceptable To Tillich, God itself exists, not exist. In order to explain the relationship between the existence itself and the finite existence, Tillich accepted the word "ground". For Tillich, God is the foundation of existence, the foundation of existence structure. God itself is the basis of existential theory of existence. In other words, every ontology has its own power to participate in the essence of existence. All the explanation of God is expressed through what we understand. Can we know God? For Tillich, the answer is obvious. Using analogy theory (analogy exists), ie "everything is included in infinite existence itself" (239), analogy theory explains the possibility of knowing God and speaking. But for Tillich, this analogy proves that we can say the way about God only in the fact that "God must be understood as myself" (240). Paul Tillich criticizes God as a way of existence or existence. He feels that if God is present, God can not be properly called a source of all beings (which in turn will create God's problem). As an alternative, he suggested that God is understood as "the foundation of existence itself". Tillich believes that the symbol is the only way to imagine God-like meaning and abstraction. He regards God as a symbol and highly appreciates the image of the individual gods as a way for people to connect and respond to the place of existence. Likewise, he believes that the theme of Christian images may still be meaningful by rethinking the literally accepted story. <http://philosopher.io/Atheism-Fundamentalism-Paul-Tillich-s-God-Part-1> Paul Tillich is famous for his own concept. However, this concept is as old as theology and words go back to Parmenides. After discovering the 19th century hundreds of years later, Tillich used it as his own and applied it to God, Christology and Trinity doctrine in his apology system theology. His theology responds to the questions raised by the philosophy arising from our universal ultimate concern - the finiteness of life in the shadow of eternal death, in particular existentialist existentialism. This answer is revealed to be ecstatic as YHWH. Prior to YHWH, transcend the existence, rationality and relationship between subject and subject, new atheistic scientific argument and failure of the god hypothesis

Greek gods and myths Andromeda is a pillar of the goddess St. George broke the dragon = infidels were replaced by Christian Perseus and he joined the marriage of Hippodamia who used Gorgon Axis Mundi (always narrow passage) Opposite towards towards (Athena transformer) And turning dinner guests into stones (medicinal columns) He changed the overall nature of Minos' traditional Mycenae to the Zeus era, then the meaning of mycene was transformed into a sister. Ultimate hero nominated advanced another story of Perseus to Zeus character (backward version) --------- ----------------- ----------------------- Greek gods welcome reading my report on Greek gods and myths. You will learn about what they do with the gods. It is also a myth and legend about Greece. The Greek gods of Greek gods are the same as many other gods. They are drawn like men and women. The Greeks did not worship animals. The gods are blessed with many weaknesses like human beings. The gods may be embarrassing, embarrassing, malicious, and trivial. The gods are considered immortal, but they have a beginning ... - Theology: Believe in God. (58) - Atheism: I refuse to believe in God. (56) - ignorance: a decision between the two about the existence of God. (54) - Indifference: Do not mind whether God exists or not. (53) - comparison between freedom and commitment: ironically, freedom takes time and effort to find alternatives, and if you make a decision, you must promise to do so Hmm. (1) - God's question: This is a question about whether God exists. Please answer One of the most fundamental but important elements of the Greek myth is probably Greek gods and goddesses. The ancient Greeks created a story about the life and travel of the Greek gods known as myths and revealed all the phenomena difficult to interpret merely by using nature and modern science and logic. These myths about God were disseminated to explorers all over the world by explorers and narratives of the story, later fused with the Greek religion. - I only want to know why the world is addicted to ancient Greek myths, only thousands of years ago. If you look at today's Greek-themed books and movies, you will find that the world is confused by Greek myths. People are seeing something related to Greek myth every day, they have not even noticed. These ancient myths give us a deeper understanding of how Greek lives of that era and their ideas work. An ancient Greek narrator tells the story of ancient Greek gods from one village to another. These stories are called myths (myth abbreviations, or stories about God). Each story teller has changed myths to fit their audience and their own imagination, but anyone speaking the story is consistent in strength and personality. For example, Zeus is always the king of God, and only Zeus can throw a lightning bolt. This is the story of ancient Greek myths by Storyteller Lin Donn.

I am not a very devout person. I have not taken part in religious ceremonies. I do not plan to pray before going to bed. Also, I do not regularly read parts of the Bible. To insist that it is closest to my personal belief is to call himself a Taoist of an armchair. But I made my mind deeply distrustful for those who believed in my own beliefs. . . Jim Buckers, Osama bin Ladens, Paul Shan Leez. They look like a special kind of scum in the human whirlpool. Even religion is a drawback. Honesty and religious distortion in the fighting service within the tribe are the main contents of our era: everyone who receives the compensation will receive a reward. "Does the evangelical team endorse a greedy pagan?" Pain makes it possible for those same evangelists to drive from the temple as money changers. In his work, however, Frederick Douglas easily recognizes the religious doctrine that supports the purpose of the earth and opposes the so-called religious slave owner In 1852, he came from the speaker's podium I mocked. Words, I say, welcome disbelief! We welcome atheism! Anything is welcomed! Give priority over the gospel, as the priests claim! They translate religious names into tyranny 's engines. " Some religious people do terrible things under the name of God, but usually these do not represent the mainstream doctrinal of religion, but most of this religion is a misdirected representation of their faith It seems to be. Although human beings are engaged in wars for various reasons, some degree of war has been promoted to some extent by religion, but Karen Armstrong, bestseller, says "fundamentalism is often a kind of nationalism in religious disguise "I pointed out. In this case, it is difficult to know the end of religion and the beginning of politics. Clearly, without religion, mankind will not cause war. Pastor and superstition in ancient Egyptian religion: After the empire was established, ancient Egyptian religion experienced various forms of degeneration through organized priests and unfounded superstition. The average Egyptian religious believers are operated by talented priests for the pursuit of true immortality. A simpler and immortal form was adopted so that the dead appear before Osiris to judge their behavior sober. The soul of righteousness who passed the test is considered to have entered the field of everlasting happiness. Burns mentioned the wealth and wealth in righteous people: "They will find a lily Yuri where they can sail, a spark pool where they swim, and a dubious grove that sing birds and various gentle creatures. American Social Management Science Journal ISSN Printing: 2156-1540, ISSN Online: 2151-1559, doi: 10.5251 / ajsms.2012.3.3.93.98

After reading Phillip Jenkins' Next World of Christians, this book reminds me of an unforgettable passage of the movie 'Apollo XIII'. Politicians warned in advance that the previous tragedy would be a misery moment. Space program's mission control flight director Jean Kranz mistakenly heard the conversation and solved the problem. "Nevertheless, I believe that gentlemen, this is our best moment." This book shows that the obvious demise of the Western Church (the arrival of the era) is a reflection of secularism and postmodern opponents It is because it predicts destiny. Today, Westerners who used to be global Christian base camps are gradually becoming (and rapidly) post Christians. In the coming era there are many important blessings and hope for progress, but in general the church which was once the center of the Western society is around (In the economy of God this is very for the Western church It might be a good thing). ) But the decline of Western Christianity does not mean the global decline of the gospel. Jesus builds his own church. Jesus never forgets to tell a lie. During the past 50 years, Christianity has developed vigorously in Africa, Latin America, Asia - in what many people call "Global South", this development creates amazing historical global development It was. These figures can be misleading as they can only report self-reported Christians, but even if significant inflation is granted, the general trend is amazing. Free Christianity was always an ally of atheists in the war of creation and evolution. Evolutionism is an important ideological ground for atheism. Due to the explosive growth of Christians and conservative Christians worldwide, the birthrate is higher, and the success rate of the gospel is higher, the number and impact of liberal Christianity is expected to continue to decline. - The US federal government funds evolutionary false science and Greece's serious financial problems. Their useless teaching is that the United States can not continue to operate with a huge deficit without a result. There is no doubt that the funds for fake science of evolution will be reduced, this is already happening. This course takes Christianity as a prism and uses this prism to examine the origin and development of world religion. Since the creation of the ancient Mediterranean world of the first century, Christianity has tried to acquire a global position. Based on the decision of Paul's evangelization, Christianity has been trying to build a network of believers in the world for a long time. And now it accounts for about 20% of the world population. This course will focus on the Christian tradition, the Catholic Church and the Pentagon as an example of deliberate and successful globalization, studying the globalization of Christianity from the twentieth century to the 21st century. We ask if modern values, pluralism and relativism are beneficial to people of religion and religion. What is the prospect of a purely humanitarian approach to a common problem in the globalized world where religion is no longer a powerful cultural force anymore?

Friedrich Nietzsche (1844-1900) Perhaps best known is "God is dead, God is still dead, we killed him." (Nietzsche, The Gay Science 388). In the 1960's, a thinker on the death of divine theology in the United States, for example Thomas · Artises, "must understand that death of God is a historical event, God is in our era and I It is in the history of ours "Death" (Christian Atheism 61).) Although the concepts about the death of these two gods are different, there are several things in common: they face the opposite, religion is a human being I believe that it is a product of necessities, express the kind of humanity in India, recognizing the importance of coexistence, doctrine and interest. "God is dead" (German: "Gott ist tot", also called Death of God) is widely quoted by German philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche. Nietzsche used this expression in a metaphorical meaning to express the possibility that the Illuminati "believed" the belief in God or any god that had existed so far. Others such as the most powerful god supporters of theology of the gods used this expression literally. And it means that the god of Christians that once existed no longer exists. A great atheist in the 19th century, Friedrich Nietzsche, declared death of God and understood that the death of God means destruction of every meaning and value in life. I think that Friedrich Nietzsche is correct. But here we need to pay close attention. The problem here is not that "Do we need to believe that God can live a moral life?" I did not claim to have to do this. The problem is not that "Can we admit objective moral values ​​without trusting God?" On the contrary, the problem is "If God does not exist, there is objective moral value?" Since Nietzsche declared "the death of God", the problem of the possibility that there is no morality for God is outdated - death of objectivity as new semi-gods have created. Probably the result is postmodern era. Apart from Nietzsche, there are moral philosophers who have established moral systems, such as utilitarianism, pragmatism, hedonism, rational self-interest, without relying on the concept of God. Nietzsche grew up in God's belly and Christian morality. His father, like his grandfather 's grandfather, was also a Lutheran pastor and Nietzsche himself went to university to study theology. Theological research may never have such a spectacular shedding - and then later ridicule Luther as "truth value" and declare himself to be a person of "antichristian" did. A year later the young Nietzsche turned to a classical philosophy at the university - text and culture studies of the ancient Greek and Roman world - even before he completed his doctoral dissertation, in 1869 Basel I was good at appointment of the university. He soon met with the composer Richard Wagner, became an apprentice for a while and imagined Wagner's concert to save European culture from the harmful influence of Christian morality.

Today, I would like to answer the article "as an atheist" by H. J. McCloskey. In his article McCloskey advocated some of his atheistic views and criticized the theological position. As a self-expert, McCloskey's view shocked me. I think it is difficult to believe that someone can deny the existence and love of God with all my heart and soul. I know their atheists who repented, they are already deeply saying, they know that their views are wrong. This may be McCloskey. This article clarifies whether claims and evidence presented by McCloskey's article "About becoming an atheist" will provide enough ammunition to prevent people from maintaining faith in God I will try that. McCloskey 's intention was to systematically destroy God and to show that God' s life is not a good claim. Throughout this article, it will provide evidence that McCloskey is correct, atheism should be accepted, or "the time has come to seek the Lord." As McCloskey begins his argument and suggests that God is not proving a decisive case, such belief in God is worth giving up. My answer examined several points. The existence of God is the best explanation of the existence of the universe. Scientists believe that gravity explains some effects; gravity is an undeniable reality. Scientists have never seen gravity, but there are various physical "laws" that define their effects on the Earth and the Moon. These effects are the best explanation of the existence of God. To be honest, I am not the happiest person. My distrust of God fits well with the lyrics written by Andy Partridge 's XTC song "Dear God" which was published in 1986. But I think that I am spiritual and more open. However, I have not found a way to explain the open ideas of religion and spirit that I have. I feel it is not worth jumping into any of this. So, to say that you are making yourself most free is to come out of my mouth. McCloskey has many different kinds of arguments about the existence of God. Every discussion has a concept about God. Each discussion takes a different approach. I will focus on cosmology and objective arguments. As we all know, the scopostauri is derived from a sacred argument from order in the universe to the existence of God (1). In the order of the universe created by wise existence, they think it is ... the claim of existence of God is truth, and reason is true. In philosophical discussion, any description is less important or controversial. But this is the position I proposed in this article. A reasonable and true equation is the core of the discussion I am studying here, which is an ontological argument against the existence of God. There are several versions of ontological arguments about the existence of God.

Historical transformation of Western thought Most philosophers are aware of linguistic transformations in the second half of the 19th century. If anything, few people have noticed a historical turning point in the late 17th and early 18th centuries. In order to live in times of anxiety, the universe and life present problems that need to be resolved The question of this article can be said: why history is very important until recently and the story is now very important . I studied the emergence of irrationalism to provide an explanation for the replacement of historical stories. DB: First of all, this division arises from various ideas in the history of Asia and the West. In the Western world, thinking is suitable for science and technology. Several historians like Joseph Needham asked why the Chinese did not develop the technology despite their civilization was higher than medieval European civilization. He gave a few explanations - we do not need to introduce them in detail here. But for a variety of reasons Western ideas can probably be traced back to ancient Greece and their early emphasis on the concept of measures that can be traced back to the beginning towards the development of technology and industry It was. In contrast, partly because of the philosophy that is common in the East, immeasurable in the first place, and when dealing with measurable fields, the East's idea is more static It is that. I like things Change in consciousness: Exploring hidden causes of the social, political and environmental crisis the world faces The history of atheist philosophy has spanned for thousands of years. The atheist school was discovered in early Indian thought and existed in the religious era of the historical Veda. It is in Greek philosophy before Socrates that underlies Western atheism, but it was not until the enlightenment of later years that it began to become a unique world view. There is a difference in the basis for how atheists and religious demographics change. Evaluating questions other than faith may suggest that you deny a universal belief, not an active atheist claim. Furthermore, self-identification is inconsistent with the lack of people's automatic faith. For example, for some reason, just because you do not believe in God does not necessarily mean people recognize themselves as "atheists." According to the 2012 WIN / Gallup International Survey, the number of atheists has increased worldwide and religious beliefs are generally decreasing. Postmodernism and post-structuralism have questioned the reason why Western culture is based on "truth": absolute knowledge and meaning, author's "distribution", accumulation of positive knowledge, historical progress, and humanism Ideal and practice. The demolition of Revelation Jack Derrida is probably most often referred to as nihilism, and he himself does not act as a nihilism alleged by others. Derridan interpretive believes that this approach can free text, individuals, or organizations from restricted truth, but decomposition opens up the possibility of other forms of existence. For example, Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak uses disintegration to create ethics to open Western scholarships to subordinate voices and philosophies outside Western text norms. Derrida himself established a philosophy based on "responsibility to the other side"

I noticed you are looking for another potential Oscar winner character. With the huge success you achieved with the movie "Inheritance" nominated for Oscar in 1988, I found it best to find the same type of character. That said, I have asked Paramount Pictures to fax their next project's role, Henrik Ibsen's play into a movie, and enemies of people. Paramount's actor manager believes that you will fit perfectly the main role of the doctor "Inheritance Wind" in which Kirk Douglas and Jason Robards produced by David Papazian directed by David Greene appeared was arranged by Jerome Lawrence and Robert E. Lee. The drama "inherited wind" was inspired by the "Monkey Judgment" in 1925, where a teacher was arrested and tried to teach a course of evolution. But the movie "inheritance" should not be regarded as a documentary, should not be regarded as a true record of the experiment, but rather it should be regarded as a dramatic movie that shapes it by raising it to convey a strong message to the audience . "Inheritance Wind" is a well-made movie with high-quality performance, photographs of films, and funny and interesting stories. However, inheritance winds are not departing from the historical facts of the "monkey trial" in order to show prejudice to the audience, they should practice what they preach. Still, the inheritance wind is still worth recommending, but it is for those who have strong concern and are interested in the dramatic conflict of opinions and beliefs. From open credit to the very end, inheritance winds celebrate human thought and claim to be the greatest gift for all, as they claim it is the key to our existence. Everyone should make their own judgment and choices according to their free will and no one has the right to control other people's thoughts and beliefs. However, when communicating information to the audience, the succession wind itself strongly manipulates the viewer's thoughts and emotions, and shakes their beliefs in particular in the direction of atheism. An atheist who inherits the wind is said to be a tolerant and forgiving intellectual who suffers from ignorant, narrow Christian paranoia 's hands. This depiction attempts to abandon their religious beliefs and influence viewers to support their ideas. "Darwin took us to the top of the mountain and we could look back from there and see what we came from - Drummond

Romantic Natural Environment When I opened my eyes I saw that he was lying there, still sleeping and exploring his deepest thought. Like the sun rising and crossing the mountains, the violent air in the morning broke my nose and warmed up. I started out and awoke to his lips gently kissing me. He slowly opened his eyes and smiled. When he gently touched the side of my face with my hand, I felt that this chocolate-colored skin melted me. After lying completely there to keep each other, we decided to go dressing in the morning wearing clothes. Blank poetry, rhythmical sorrow - a visit to a common romantic theme - the impact of nature on imagination, the relationship between children and the natural world, the liberation of the national environment and the contract of the city, and the relationship between adults and childhoods It is linked together in the memory of. Corbridge does not have childhood like Wordsworth, but his memories are urban and I can not see the love of the sky, but I will tell it to the children. He was short, eccentric, he was bullied when he was a child because he was not skilled in sports and fighting. He saw the tyranny of school masters and classmates expressing the general inhumanity behavior of mankind against mankind, and devoted his life to the war against injustice and repression . Thomas Hogg worked with him to write "the necessity of atheism" at Oxford University, and he refused to deny the document and was deported. This created his father and his waist B / W Romanticists are looking at this theme from various angles. Romanticism supports individual freedom through the relationship between man and nature and therefore opposes neoclassical compliance with order and class. Romanticists believe nature is an essential owner of abstract quality such as truth, beauty, independence, democracy. Essentially, people can be recycled, or at least their roots can be approximated - whether they are individuals or countries. The image of the American as a garden can be applied to the romantic view of nature, but the grid of civilizations must be removed from the landscape. The primitive American wilderness - and the undeveloped country - gave the United States an effective claim that is currently considered desirable in European thinking. Therefore, wild nature became a source of national pride and became the root of the character of its own national identity.

Throughout history, art has constantly changed. I think that there are four major eras of great progress in the evolution of art. First of all, I will talk about Baroque. This is dark and emotional and certainly reflects the political tension of that period. Next, I will talk about romanticism based on nature and the outdoors. This period also showed a brighter, happier, imaginative art work than before. Let's show how simple and easy the Impressionist's art works. In historical context creationism and evolution are always controversial subjects and are one of Darwin's major breakthroughs in disseminating his theory of evolution. When Darwin published his evolution theory in 1859, his book was thought of as a major technological advancement at the time. Since the existence of evolution compensates society, "evidence" like the existence of God creates a catalyst that does not exist, and creationism is almost replaced by atheism. Some of the theories of social evolution make technological innovation the most important determinant of social change. Technological advances such as smelting of iron, introduction of plows in agriculture, invention of steam engine, and computer development brought about long-term social impact. Changes in technology are often considered together with economic processes. These include the formation and expansion of markets, modification of property relations (change from relationship of feudal lord and farmer to relationship of contract owner and tenant, etc.), change of labor organization (change from independent craftworker to factory etc) included. The historical materialism proposed by Marx and Engels is one of the most prominent theories that dominates the economic process, but that is not the only theory. In fact, materialistic is opposite to Marxism. Not a sudden breakthrough but the idea of ​​changing the world tends to develop slowly. A good example is Darwin's natural selection theory. His notes show that he developed something close to evolution before reading his study on population growth in Malthus, before experiencing his epiphane. This made his theory mature. Carbon is fundamentally the foundation of all life on Earth, because it is excellent for binding with other atoms. This connection function may make the structure more complicated. Likewise, human innovation works better when something supports the formation of more complex ideas. This is why the network is the basis for exchanging information and ideas. Without contact, the high-level ideas will disappear with the person who owns it. However, building a connection with others can spread good ideas. That's why good ideas are added to the audience.

Olivia thinks that she does not have to do rehabilitation and that she needs to prepare for the university at school. Every Olivia is just a delusion. She is obsessed with herself, her friend, her situation, her family, and her obsessive obstacles did not help her. The main event that showed her that she was much more delusive throughout the book was at the end of a bout that caused so much anxiety and tension over time. Nobody really knows Olivia. She moved her room like stroking for hours, moved everything to the left for one second, then moved a bit to the right and annoyed. Reading Amy Reid's short story "Cleaning" has deepened the understanding of the cause of drug abuse and its causes. In her novel "Reed" she shows how medicine and alcohol can be a factor in normal teenager life after describing ordinary teenagers. At the beginning of the story, we gave five completely different teenagers they arranged to live, but they still went to the drug rehabilitation center yet before they could be 18 years old . According to the histogram below, most users are somewhere in between. Then we inform us that drug abuse is not going to start with people, but there are some decisions Amy Lead is still the truth. No matter how incomplete it is, the miracles and sanctity of our daily life are reality. Amy lived a passionate and accomplished life. She is beautiful and strong in many ways. Her courage and her absolute ability to influence people and move around people is the power of magical nature. In fact, I know that she refused passive, prefabricated, universal beliefs. However, as an adult, she also actively refuses nihilism and atheism as a child, youth, and youth who removes temptation. And her death itself changed and wiped out the death - for the others. All of these are verifiable facts. I recently had an opportunity to interview Amy Eret, the founder of Madison Reed, and a foresighted person like Arianna Huffington who waved up in the anti-cultural world of the company. Amy believes that it gives employees the ability to call a team member who regards Mentor as a coach, not a typical "boss" model. Her passion for self-development and self-recognition is carried out through her philosophy at work. She opens a new way to hair dyeing industry and is looking for ways to help women feel beautiful without compromising health. Madison Lead is all about interpersonal relationship, especially with each client. She offered a powerful example for her beautiful daughter, Madison, named the daughter. As Amy told you, when she entered the door at night, she asked, "She is asked to take responsibility for her little daughter," Mom, what will you do today? "Welcome , Amy!

Likewise, in a letter to his son's tutor, the King Henry IV of France regularly asked to whip his young son. According to his own experience, he insists that "there is nothing in the world that is superior to myself" (Reference 8). Indeed, as Navarre Henry himself was hit with a whip like a child, he had a good reason to ask his son to succeed to the throne and continue his career. These harsh treatments do not represent an overall care shortage for children in Europe. Children; and children think they are passive victims of "ons" or "bombing" of commercial media and advertisements. For example, the Children's Association report admits that most children have never lived this way - they have more wealth, better houses and more holidays. However, the explanation on the role of the media and the business world is mainly due to concerns about "materialism", aggression, and the adverse effects on physical and mental health. In today's society, researchers and educators have different views on the role of developmental psychology and its application in elementary school classrooms. It is widely believed in the education sector that children must experience the process of learning, thinking and thinking. Therefore, teachers who can integrate Piaget and Vygotsky's theory into their educational strategy will be able to improve their academic performance better. Developmental psychology studies changes in behaviors with aging and studies psychological processes of development. That is, it represents a series of biological, cognitive and social emotional changes that humans experience with age. It represents human growth, including physical, emotional, intellectual, social, cognitive, and development of personality from birth to death. The influence of the macro system comes from the cultural point of view of society. Role view (eg, gender role) has a series of related behaviors expected in an individual. The boy must be a powerful health care provider and do not cry. Or girls should be carers. Domestication is an example of the role of these genres in society. Various values ​​and lifestyles have great influence on children. I believe they have a large house and have the need for expensive cars and adults who need to marry a white fence and 2.5 children. Morality and values ​​come from family beliefs and religious laws, but in some cases religious laws are consistent with the federal. Religions such as Catholicism, Lutheran, Buddhism, Hinduism and Atheism are greatly different from each other, and if the belief system is different, these systems have various values ​​that influence individuals.

Evidence of city plan exists from ancient times. In ancient Greece, the first settlement grew to the city, mainly in addition to their regime, without special urban planning. However, the excessive increase in the population of these cities leads to a wave of colonization in the Mediterranean, a so-called classical ancient era. The colony was founded in a cautiously selected location in the metropolitan area and provided natural resources (mineral, fertile land, water) and trade routes. The history of urban planning can trace back to the earliest known cities, especially in Indus and Central America civilizations. They built cities through the grid and clearly different regions according to purpose. The layout of the planned community is usually completely designed before construction, taking into account the linkage of physical, economic and cultural systems, and clear insight into the impact of the plan is made everywhere in the world today It is in. Urban society is usually stratified. In terms of space, cities are officially or informally isolated from the perspective of race, economy, and ethnicity. People who live together can live in various places, work, play, interact with a variety of people, and make races and lifestyle competitors. Or in poor areas, slums Rodriguez Garcia, J. A.: Urbanism confesses religion. Madrid: Ed. Monte Carbo, 2003. An unpublished book on the relationship between urban planning and different religious factions. First, let's see the approximation of the history of urban planning law in Spain and the current urban planning law. Then it studied the principles of secularism and cooperation with religious denominations in the Spanish city planning law. onFray, M. Tractat d'ateologia Barcelona: Description of 1984, 2005. From a philosophical point of view Onfray analyzes and protects the validity of atheism by detailed analysis of how monotheist religion works, sacred text, and involvement in daily life. history I would recommend this book to those interested in history, sociology, archeology, urban planning and cultural research. This book is based on substantial analysis of materials and historical literature and provides excellent explanatory materials for each chapter. A comparative analysis of unique historical development concepts and contemporary urban planning and culture refers to Lilley, K. D. Medieval urban life: 1000-1450 (European culture and society). 2002 Palgrave Macmillan

In the meantime, see the Sam patch and 1800-1837; the industrial revolution is happening. A large factory is being produced in coastal big cities. Production and demand for new and old products are increasing. People work in factories living on different days everyday but I hope they can afford to finally produce the products they produce. But it is clear that people with these growing, elusive companies earn money and power there. Today, Sam has a unique place in neuroscience (doctorate degree at the University of California Los Angeles), morality, spirituality, atheism, and sharp geopolitical arguments. In this scorpion, he starred the most viral video clip. It stands out from the Birmacher show (high score). . Due to the explosive popularity of his podcast (his name is shared with his name Waking Up), Sam 's influence and range of attention has soared over the past year. As he pointed out in our interview, even his most successful writing will take many years to reach hundreds of thousands - and his podcast series will cost 2 million It will be over. Connect with the audience By the first big jump of Sam Patch at Paterson of the Passage Falls, the town could talk for the first time in the newspaper. Sampatch jumped off these waterfalls and showed that everyone can do wonderful things. Timothy Crane is attracting a large number of people to move the bridge, and Sam Patch hopes to utilize this group of people by keeping their attention away from Crane. The famous motto of the same patch is "some can be the same as others". Sam wants people to know that only the people of the upper class can not do a fantastic achievement. (P.66) In the meantime, see the Sam patch and 1800-1837; the industrial revolution is happening. A large factory is being produced in coastal big cities. Production and demand for new and old products are increasing. People work in factories living on different days everyday but I hope they can afford to finally produce the products they produce. But it is clear that people with these growing, elusive companies earn money and power there.

Brady and Drummond are two former partners who have started a legitimate life. Now, everyone is superior, we are trying to become mutually confident with our own way and beliefs. Despite having a common goal, the two gradually became very different, as shown in the drama and the movie "Inheritance Wind". Over the years, everyone struggled with the incident, established their own names and gained popularity (or fame), and they paid close attention to the other side. Knowing the victory of other people makes them more difficult, more decisive in their way, believing their heterogeneous beliefs are correct, and if these beliefs are the focus of their exi "Inheritance Wind" in which Kirk Douglas and Jason Robards produced by David Papazian directed by David Greene appeared was arranged by Jerome Lawrence and Robert E. Lee. The drama "inherited wind" was inspired by the "Monkey Judgment" in 1925, where a teacher was arrested and tried to teach a course of evolution. But the movie "inheritance" should not be regarded as a documentary, should not be regarded as a true record of the experiment, but rather it should be regarded as a dramatic movie that shapes it by raising it to convey a strong message to the audience . "Inheritance Wind" is a well-made movie with high-quality performance, photographs of films, and funny and interesting stories. However, inheritance winds are not departing from the historical facts of the "monkey trial" in order to show prejudice to the audience, they should practice what they preach. Still, the inheritance wind is still worth recommending, but it is for those who have strong concern and are interested in the dramatic conflict of opinions and beliefs. From open credit to the very end, inheritance winds celebrate human thought and claim to be the greatest gift for all, as they claim it is the key to our existence. Everyone should make their own judgment and choices according to their free will and no one has the right to control other people's thoughts and beliefs. However, when communicating information to the audience, the succession wind itself strongly manipulates the viewer's thoughts and emotions, and shakes their beliefs in particular in the direction of atheism. An atheist who inherits the wind is said to be a tolerant and forgiving intellectual who suffers from ignorant, narrow Christian paranoia 's hands. This depiction attempts to abandon their religious beliefs and influence viewers to support their ideas. "Darwin took us to the top of the mountain and we could look back from there and see what we came from - Drummond

William Butler Yeats - an Irish poet, a play writer, a prose author - known for his work of intellectuals and regular works - is known as "one of the greatest British poets of the 20th century" - even the most impressive fact that won the Nobel Prize for literature in 1923 was known for award-winning lyric poetry - the Yeats war was born in Dublin in 1865. Yeats' childhood has been widespread in education and personal experiences. William Butler Yeats: Modernist William Butler Yeats is an Irish poet of the 19th century. William Butler Yeats was born in Dublin, Ireland in 1865. He was educated in Dublin and London and in 1877 wrote his first passage (nobelprize.org). He wrote many poems in his life, thought to be the most influential poet of his time. He is very influential in the modernist era. William Butler Yeats is one of the most famous poets of the 19th century. - The detailed paragraph is not Octavian of Octavian 's surprising life Nothing. It is on pages 222-236. Anderson It describes a scientific paper by Gitney and Sharpe and a letter from Dr. Trefusis, a document about the death of Cassiopeia, a memoir written by Octavian (a poem written by Theoginis). These pages start with Smallpox, Octavian 29-year-old mother, Cassiopeia's smallpox disease William Butler Yeats' poem William Butler Yeats is an Irish poet, playwright, and essayist - one of the greatest British poets of the 20th century. (Ye Zhi 1) His early poetry and theater got ideas from Irish fables and esoteric studies. (Ellman 1) When Ye Zhi wrote about his country he used nationalism to avoid themes of oppression, social division and solidarity. - William Wordsworth can better understand his view on the destruction of nature in his poem "A line written in early spring." Through anthropomorphization, he shows nature life-like and entertains life. However, human beings are still destroying what they call "the sacred plan of nature" (8). The whole poem is about the interaction between nature and man. Wordsworth is obviously not satisfied with human beings making it to the world. William Butler Yeats was born in Dublin, Ireland on 13th June 1865. He is the oldest of the four children of portrait painter John Butler Yeats. His father took part in William's regular school education at home, which gave him a permanent hobby of the classics. John Yeats has a strong personality. His personal philosophy incorporates aesthetics (belief that art and beauty are important to all) and atheism (belief without God). William felt its impact long after. Because it appeared in his interest to Magic and occultusum (supernatural).

Looking outside seems to be unimportant, it is an internal importance, but our society lacks understanding today. Today the difference is different The different people are discriminated, contemptuous, and often selected. People with disabilities are treated as different creatures by most people, and people with disabilities choose their way, but our society still alienates them. There are various kinds of disorders, specific types of disorders, mental disorders, disability, learning disabilities and social disorders. Disabled discrimination is defined as discrimination against people with disabilities. Atheism means discriminatory behavior based on the physical abilities of the body, especially for people with disabilities without obstacles (definition of disability). In an competent society, we established people with disabilities as standards of "ordinary life" and to provide public places, private places and services, education and social work to standard people. . Not everyone is protected by law. In order to be protected, the person must be qualified for that occupation and have a legally defined obstacle. The Disability Discrimination Act stipulates that disabled persons are those who are physically or mentally disabled and who have considerable long-term adverse effects on the ability to carry out normal daily activities. In 1992, the Disability Discrimination Act (Federation) prohibits discrimination against people with disabilities in all situations. It is illegal to treat people with disabilities in employment, education, public places, offering goods and services, accommodation facilities, clubs and associations, or to make reasonable adjustments to persons with disabilities There is stipulation. Complaints submitted based on the context DDA were submitted to the Australian Human Rights Commission. Discrimination against people with disabilities will benefit those without disabilities as a disability or disability. Disabled discrimination treats people without disabilities as criteria of "normal life" and leads to the elimination of persons with disabilities targeting the "standard" population in public and private places and services, education and social welfare . According to research, it is indicated that employment not only needs to provide living but also maintenance of mental health and well-being. Work satisfies some of the basic needs of individuals, such as group goals, social connections, status, activities. People with disabilities are often socially isolated, and work is a way to reduce isolation.

Each government of the United States government has different views on the role that the leaders and citizens should play in their own countries. Various kinds of governments include oligarchies, governments are managed by supreme leaders, tyranny and they believe that powerful people should fully manage their personnel. In the United States, we believe in democracy and are dominated by majority. The main problem for our government is to keep it. Our government and citizens ignore their roles and responsibilities in the government. The US constitutes the system of the US government. Three different government departments that enact legislation, enforce the law, and in certain cases judge the law. This framework provides the US government with the necessary force to gain basic rights to life, freedom, and the pursuit of happiness. The United States is a country based on the universal principle. It calls for higher standards than all governments receive their legitimate rights from the consent of control. All countries are responsible for this principle, and it is this principle that makes the United States truly legitimate. As far as our history is concerned, the basic principles of the American government and American lifestyle are systematically attacked, but the philosophy of this system is opposite to our own philosophy. Our US government is built on the concept of personality and dignity. The basis of this concept is that it is important to believe in people. Because he gives him a certain nontransferable right created by God and not deprived of citizen authority. Therefore, including God in our oath will further recognize that our people and our government rely on the moral teaching of the Creator. At the same time, it will help deny the concept of atheism and materialism in Communism followed by obedience to individuals. The American government is the product of many enlightenment thinkers who flourished from the second half of the 17th century to the early 18th century. Among them is British philosopher Thomas Hobbes. Hobbes' view is contrary to the American government's management principles - his beliefs on the absolute power of the government 's subject - such as many, perfectly complying with the views stated in the country' s founding documents There. Many of his views on social contracts, equality, and freedom of nature have inspired the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution, but prior to the end of the civil war, other people are actually integrated into the philosophy of the US government There was not.

Rent from the world's largest e-book store and save it. Read notes on the Web, tablet and on the phone and highlight it and take notes Yeats 'expanded rotation' may not be a reference to Falcon, or at least it may not be a reference to Falcon. According to John Unterecker's "Guide to William Butler to the Reader", the poet believes that the melody is the opposite cone against power like harmony and discordance. In this case, Yeats's "enlarged environment" means a miserable acquisition. Unterecker suggested the possibility that gyre might have a dual meaning in the poem: "The pattern of circulations of double scattered was carefully designed to include even a pair of hovering birds. Angry desert birds We are surrounded by clumsy Sphinx. " William Butler Yeats: Modernist William Butler Yeats is an Irish poet of the 19th century. William Butler Yeats was born in Dublin, Ireland in 1865. He was educated in Dublin and London and in 1877 wrote his first passage (nobelprize.org). He wrote many poems in his life and was considered to be the most influential poet of his time. He is very influential in the modernist era. William Butler Yeats is one of the most famous poets of the 19th century. - The paragraphs described are on pages 222 - 266 of M. T. "Life without a surprising Octavian". Anderson It explains the scientific papers by Gitney and Sharpe and the letter from Dr. Trefusis, a document about the death of Cassiopeia, a memoir written by Octavia (a poem written by Theoginis). These pages start with Smallpox disease of Smallpox, Octavian 29-year-old mother, Cassiopeia William Butler Yeats was born in Dublin, Ireland on 13th June 1865. He is the oldest of the four children of portrait painter John Butler Yeats. His father took part in William's regular school education at home. John Yeats has a strong personality. His personal philosophy incorporates aesthetics (belief that art and beauty are important to all) and atheism (a belief that God does not exist). William felt its effect was slow as it appeared in his interest in magic and occultism (supernatural).

The books on the shelf are made up of various colors, different ages and various writers. These bindings are leather and paper, as well as cotton fabric materials, letters engraved on them are gold and silver, sometimes ordinary inks. Writers who died faithfully year after year sit at the legitimate place of each place. The writers of Defoe and Hawthorne are sitting side by side, but other writers such as Whitman and Thoreau are surrounded by them. Like many people in my generation, I am fascinated by the magic of video games and television books. 2001-2002, Harry Potter's magic brought me serious reading. I grew up in a conservative conservative society, I attributed some of my political and ideological trends to JK Rowling. I can not imagine how to publish a book. The wonderful wisdom of Dumbledore is still born from a book that wishes to influence our real life. This so-called atheistic Bible does not change me to atheism .... Since I was 11 years old, I was an atheist's atheist. But this book gives me confidence to protect from reasons of stupidity - it also affects my interest in religion, culture, civilization and the way they interact. This book also gave me a lot of discussion and discussion that I did during the past few years. If you think that the hardcover book has lost its charm in this rapidly evolving digital age, you are surprised here. My friend, you may not understand the magic of a book on a book. There are many readers in the book community who prefer to read books yourself rather than actually reading iPhone / iPad / iPod or Amazon books. People who love books still rely on hard-cover paper books, so they can feel the charming and amazing fragrance of ink and paper. So, please take this opportunity to attract readers by providing space for your favorite books in the Amazon store. So take care of this book, please make your store yours only. Please check the title of their best writers, genres, bookstores. This will definitely bring more buyers to your store. Believe me, books are the most popular item on Amazon. Thank you for loving the book.

If you want to learn more about Ragnar Lothbrok, Sagas of Ragnar Lodbrok translated by Ben Wagoner consists of three different texts on legendary Dane (legend of Ragnar Lodbrok, story of Ragnar's son, Icelandic text) I will. A story about the King of Denmark and Sweden, and extensive comments and memorandum to supplement them The most famous and main source of Laghar's life and heroic acts is the legendary Laguna Lesbourg's legend of the 13th century (Old Norwegian: Ragnarssagaloðbrókar). It is part of the fornaldarsögur type - the legendary story happened before the Icelandic colonization from the 870 AD - and adapted to the legendary wave of Iceland that cleverly wiped out the entire island. These types of heroic legends tend to return to the myths of Scandinavian family history and often end with the death of their champion. The legend of Ragnar Lothbrok shows that Ragnar is the ancestor of the Icelandic family. You can find the conceptual basis shared with Ragnar Redbeard, Friedrich Nietzsche, H. L. Mencken, Ayn Rand, Jack London and H. P. Lovecraft, everyone is thought to influence Satanism. Dr. LaVey's vision is to integrate schools of various ideas using unique ideas and symbols, develop into a completely unique and powerful philosophy and continue to stimulate and develop even after more than 50 years since its establishment It is a belief. The devil church keeps all the membership information secret, but based on my own online and online interaction, I observed similar demographics and general atheism. I have personally met many Satan women over this age, but most Satanists seem to be men between 20 and 45 years old. The identity of Ragnar Redbeard is unknown. The theory of general promotion is weak. When I first published this book, I thought that London was a teenager and that he was ridiculous to think about Jack London. Those familiar with Friedrich Nietzsche believe that he is highly likely to be a candidate.

The work of El Salvador Dalí The creativity of Salvador Dali, like today's American culture, made it possible for him to become a person who wants to be free. Dali's excellent performance in drawing, ease of access to unconscious images, and mastery of self-propagation brought unimaginable fame. Dali was born in Figueras of Catalonia in northern Spain in May 1904. Dali was a middle-class family and started his life. He participated in the Surrealism movement in the summer of 1929, but due to his relationship with the Communist Party there are many reservations besides the political and religious backgrounds related to atheism and Marxist politics. A surreal work by Salvador Dalí is derived from the smallest scientific element of Einstein's work. Dali is very interested in quantum mechanics and nuclear physics. These atomic particles are the basis of "permanent memory" of his painting, which I think several people represent time bending. Using these simple thinking experiments, Einstein understands that both time and space are shaped by matter - this is the basis of general relativity. Surprisingly, this thought experiment changed what we think about the universe. Newton's view of the universe is one-dimensional, but Einstein suggested that our universe is four-dimensional. There, stars, planets, and celestial bodies form "fabrics" that are dynamically influenced by the bending and bending of gravity. El Salvador Dali was born on May 11, 1904 to parents, famous notary salutary Salvador Dali Cousy and a calm mother Felipe Domenech Ferres. Strange behavior of youth in El Salvador. Philippa is a devout Catholic, the old El Salvador is an atheist, a combination that has a serious impact on their son's worldview. Dali's artistic talent was apparent from a very young age and his parents backed it - well-known that his relationship with his disciplined father is nervous. After all, Dali's original creativity and provocative attitude keep him away from his father, but it also serves as the cornerstone of his imaginative artistic accomplishments.

Buddhism and Sexuality are the most forgiving religion in the world and constitute a doctrine that can coexist with most other religions. Buddhism started in Siddhartha Gautama in northern India in the 6th or 5th century BC. Religion has two forms of guidelines, Buddhists need to follow these guidelines. These are four sacred eight times. Buddha teaches that a person is his slave, the cause of suffering is desire, basically the way to stop pain is to overcome desire. Buddhism thinks that singleism is the ideal of a monastery. For those who think that they can not live alone, please do not commit adultery with other people's wives. Fucking other sex with a wife, a married girl, or a girl protected by her relatives (fathers or brothers), or sex with a marriage with a prostitute, eventually leads to sufferings and self It leads to. You should avoid writing normative texts of Buddhism. Buddhist papal text tells the story of Buddha's explanation on adultery karma. For example, nationwide Robert Goldman, one of the stories is Sera Soreyya For sex, Christianity as a religion denying the world certainly has problems. Other releases, such as atheism and Hinduism, Jainism, Buddhism, also value monism, but sex itself is not necessarily considered sinful. The difference is that Judaism is already evident: in most ancient religions: sex is as contaminated as blood. Sin is polluted, but the reverse is not necessarily the case. Pollution is not always sinful. If there is confusion about this, I can understand this. However, if you cut yourself, bleed, or even a woman comes to menstruation, it is not sinful in itself. However, the situation of thinking will not experience menarche in the classic novels and the movie "Carrie". Since Christianity does not have rules on pollution, it protects the sense of pollution by folding sin and confession.

"Room" by Jean-Paul Sutter takes us to a journey of confrontation between humans and the world. Eve chose to take care of her husband Pierre suffering from a mental disorder at the expense of her identity. At the beginning of the book "Wall and other stories", Sartre encouraged us to interpret that text from the standpoint of existentialism. So we have to understand the philosophical significance of Sartre for life. "What is the meaning of life?" Jean-Paul Sautter accepts our own drawbacks and benefits first, then defines life as understanding the existence of the world regardless of our behavior . When we are responsible, we can honestly experience our lives. Jean-Paul Sartre proposed a philosophy of existentialism. According to this philosophy, individuals are responsible for their existence and the quality / quality of the lives in which he lives. Sartre's personality view is fair. An example of Sartre's animals and plants is the most wonderful one. He distinguishes them from humans by saying that animals and plants are operated unconsciously and mechanically. We support atheism. Despite obstacles to life, this philosophy proves that humans are responsible for their behavior. I will take the issue of free will. Jean-Paul Sartre's "Being and Nothingness" has a strange part where Sartre is discussing human freedom compared to skiing. Sartre is a fundamental concept of freedom, according to this concept human beings can form themselves in a virtual way, almost without being restricted to the world in a godlike way. In order to find this example, Sartre thought about skating but refused (the skater's way was too dependent on the hard resistance of the ice) and eventually hit a ski (snow is so soft that the back of the trace ) Sartre admits that a better metaphor will be some form of "water skiing" - more autonomy will increase if the rider's road disappears, apparently he seems not accustomed to surfing

Hardy spent most of his life in the 19th century. In this era, the development of Darwin's species theory rocked a lot of Christian faith and faith in God. As a result, new materialism and atheism were developed to support the denial of the Darwinian God role in the creative process. Indeed, the publication of the origins of Darwin's species hit the UK, flooded, refused traditionalism, opened the way for many liberal thinkers who supported materialism. An analysis of the fictional county called Wessex, Thomas Hardy 's "Tess of the Durbarville" in the late 1880' s is a story of Tess de Nothfield, an innocent 16 - year - old girl is due to her fate It has grown to become a complicated woman. The theme of the whole novel is how Tes, how the accident determines the fate of the character. - The story about Thomas L. Friedman's "untouchable" world is mediocrity, which is "an amazing rise of the middle class worldwide" (p.323). He explained about American society. How to become global This globalization that occurs in today's society leads American children to have a competitive way of thinking about Chinese culture. We need to start thinking wisely and know what kind of lifestyle it needs to succeed. Analysis of Test of D'Urber family of Thomas Hardy The depth of artistic unity seen in Tess of D'Urbervil of Thomas Hardy extends through all the chapters of the novel. No chapter is more important than other chapters. Because each chapter is essential for telling the tragic story of Tess Debeifeld. There was no example showing frills or excess in the prose of Hardy. - The Blue Eye: The structural element in the blue eyes, Toni Morrison uses the structure as a help to convey her story. For this purpose, she uses at least three unique structural devices. First, Morrison started a novel in three paragraphs. And prepared a reader to speak shocking stories. Secondly, the novel is divided into four main parts, each season has a season name

It also shows that not believing in the existence of the Creator does not mean that all evil and hedonism are accepted. As a human being, it is noteworthy that we are proud of the ability to manipulate the environment and give meaning to life. The irony of the center is that we are the source of actual change, management of our lifestyle, the development of our own laws, and the establishment of a system of law and order. A moral and immoral system. Dostoevsky once wrote that "If God does not exist, everything is allowed"; and for existentialism this is the starting point. Everything is forgiven if God does not exist, and people are so lonely because he can not find anything dependent on himself. He quickly found out that there were no excuses. He is free in all respects, freely accepted like freely, foolish and machine, freely rejected, freely imitate, marry, get married, give up the game, and within a few years the power of this death Tie him. He can do whatever he likes, there is no right to anyone to advise him unless he is thinking that they exist, otherwise there is neither good nor evil. If God did not exist, Dostoevsky's Ivan Karamazov said "Everything is forgiven." Our social progress shows that he is right. Over the past thirty years, we became more secular and forbade God from accepting public education and idea markets. Is this a mere coincidence of historical coincidence, or is there a deep relationship between morality and God's faith? Pantheism believes that everything is an intrinsic god, or the universe, or nature is equal to God. A more detailed definition is that the laws of nature, the existence, and / or the universe (which will be all in use, existing, or total) will be expressed or personified by God's theological principle There is a tendency to emphasize the concept. Transcendental existence unrelated to nature is denied. According to how to understand this viewpoint, this view is considered equivalent to atheism, mysticism or theology

In Act 2 Act 2, when Lear metaphorizes with his own name, the audience can think only about the loss of reliable power and the loss of his daughter from his kingdom. Of course, if Shakespeare uses a certain number of men, we can show concrete examples to reduce the power of the sad old man. This scene is almost always done, draws a poor rear, is betrayed by his daughter, loses the kingdom, and demands it from his hundred soldiers - this is his last possession and the age of the king It is the only symptom. Atheism - Because God is the principal author of the Bible, you can argue that it contains nothing that is inconsistent with the mistakes, contradictions, and the truths of science and history (if the original author makes a historical or scientific truth When you want to draw). Minor inconsistency is caused by a copy error of a manuscript or translation. Catholics believe that the Bible is a message of God in the people's words. This is always the fact that it means imperfection. Catholic interpretation strongly supported the principle, but did not deal with spelling mistakes. According to Pope John Paul II, "From the beginning of the Old Testament, God used all the possibilities of human language while accepting his language subject to the limits of this language for men and women . Initially, God's love always enters the heart and body of mankind, bringing the country without any conflict, contradiction, or struggle. But human beings are separated from God, building a self-centered relationship of false love, which brings about struggle and contradiction between the body and the mind. Therefore, there was a history that body - centered love betrayed the origin of God 's love, ideals, and eternal life centered on mind. Therefore, we have to remove this external love, Satan's love, and instead, inherit the original inner love, the love of God, and establish a match between the body and the mind. Since then, unity has begun. (97 - 179)

Dostoyevsky 's Theme Dostoevsky was born in 1821 and will be one of the greatest writers of Russian literary history. Fyodor received engineering education in St. Petersburg, but decided to follow literary career. He wrote down his feelings about a specific topic and believes that everyone should understand the government. Dostoevsky participated in the underground organization Petrashevsky and revealed the publicly prohibited truth among these books. Through these themes, Dostoevsky wrote many themes. The theme of relief of Dostoevsky embodies the traditional religious desire. In the prison, Raskolnikov has been reborn. His prisoner is a criminal, but he wants to kill him for "distrust" (Dostoevsky 625). They can feel his atheism, but they like gentle and devout Sogna. Raskolnikov is confused by the love of life he is seeing everywhere. I wondered why he hampered him from committing suicide. He began to appreciate the simplicity of his life, and Dostoevsky buried the page with a description of the beauty of spring. The time and place of catharsis of Rascuronikov is symbolically very important. With the depth of the disease, he entered a cold and desolate Siberian Iceland hospital. While lending, he noticed the mistake he made during the resurrection of Jesus Christ (Dostoevsky 626). As nature is regenerating itself, his health recovers. Raskolnikov went to Sony to confess. Humble behavior,! Dostoevsky grew up in a middle - class family in Moscow. His father, a doctor was his tyrant and his mother was a gentle, devout woman who died before Dostoevsky's 16th birthday. The sky escaped the suppressed atmosphere of his father 's family, and the boy got the love of reading, especially Gogol, E.T.A.Hoffman, and Balzac. Under the father 's argument, Dostoyevsky was trained by engineers in St. Petersburg. When a young man attended school, his father was killed by his serf in a small country mansion. Dostoevsky rarely mentioned about the murder of his father, but the theme of the edepus complex is frequent in his work, and Freud believes the expression of guilt of his father's novelist believes that the desire of death

The essence of God is Philippians 2: 1-11. Paul and Timothy said, "Every time I remember you, I thank my God.4 For all of you in all my prayers." For guidelines and relationships (which conform to the definition of "personal"). · Is God intrinsic or transcendental? Paul and Timothy said, "God can prove my wish to you all through the emotions of Christ Jesus." (And therefore satisfies the agreed "essential" definition). From the beginning, people were thinking about the existence of God, the essence of God, and the relationship between God and nature. In "Rethinking the essence of God", editors of the best-selling books "Hand of God" and "Heart of God" have thoroughly studied the mystery of the universe. This time he explored these questions: What is the essence of God? How is this property expressed? Does God continue to play an active role in our destiny, or is it the creation of the universe? Pantheism believes that everything is an intrinsic god, or that the universe, or nature is equal to God. A more detailed definition is that the laws of nature, the existence, and / or the universe (which will be all in use, existing, or total) will be expressed or personified by God's theological principle There is a tendency to emphasize the concept. Transcendental existence unrelated to nature is denied. According to how to understand this viewpoint, this view is considered equivalent to atheism, mysticism or theology God made nature. God has established the laws of nature. God created mankind. God gave man a reason to understand the law of nature. God also provides revelation about God's will and desire. There are clauses on humanity in sentences, which are interpreted as guiding moral life. Therefore, in addition to the physical universe provided for human research, there is also the word of God. Question: The religious scriptures of the world need to be interpreted as their meaning and application. Not everyone agrees with the best explanation. Consider the following example. It is very important for many people. The degree of understanding a passage of a certain Bible has a serious influence on many who are not homosexuals and those who do sexual acts other than childbirth.

Neurosurgeons and brain-injured patients are unexpectedly complex complications. The brain can be at risk due to accidents, stroke, alcohol or drug abuse, tumors, poisoning, infectious diseases and diseases, bleeding, drowning, AIDS, and other factors such as Parkinson's disease, multiple sclerosis and Alzheimer's disease There is sex. Disease The human brain is one of the most important and complex organs of the human body. Here we preserve our ideas, emotions, and all learning behavior. Neurons // Alexa Canady Medical Doctor is an African-American woman who will become the first neurosurgeon in the United States. Her "approach to patient care" approach and her ability to reassure the patient greatly helped her become a pediatric neurosurgeon and broke the boundaries of black women in this area. She spent an operation history at a childhood hospital in Michigan, where her neurosurgical program was recognized by the pediatric top country nationwide through her efforts. She later became the head of the neurosurgical project at the age of 36. Canady also participated in research to advance the neurosurgical technique, invented a programmable anti-siphon shunt to treat hydrocephalus, fluid accumulation abnormality in the brain, and shared patents with two neurosurgeons . It is tragic for thousands of patients whose life has changed forever for the medical treatment of Dr. Canadi. Early diagnosis and treatment may become standard if each specialist is responsible for identifying patients lacking B12. Michael Egnor is a neurosurgeon at the State University of New York at Stony Brook. For his patient, he must hope that he better understands the brain's anatomy than his origin. In this website article "Neurosurgeon, not Darwinist," he claims that evolution is fake. After studying Darwinism, Egnor apparently discovered that "the evolutionary biologist 's claim far exceeds the evidence." Egnor concludes that "Darwinism itself is a religious belief imitated by science" - "myth of creation of atheism".

Plato 's apology came about when Socrates was tried in front of the Athenian leaders. It is here that Plato tells us that Socrates protects himself. Socrates clarified as much as possible that he was not afraid of giving a death sentence. His speech does not show signs of obvious fear or anxiety, which creates a very bold and courageous front line. Socrates wants to make himself not cause unnecessary suffering, even if he is not afraid of death. Plato's apology is an explanation of the Socrates trial. Socrates is Plato's teacher, and the dialogue is written in honor. It is doubtful whether the remark of the apology was actually submitted in the courts of Greece; the speech may have been made by Plato's ideal thought on the position of his leader in the trial. Socrates firmly believes in his beliefs. He has the notion that if they need it they should prepare for their faith. He also proposed proprietary ways of clarifying by revealing the weaknesses of the assertion statement. His "Socratic Method" examined the definition of "simple", which seemed more difficult. Basically, this method raises questions about this question. To define terms, you need to take positions to avoid confusion. In his Euthyphro conversation, Socrates asked Euthyphro about the essence of religion. Euthyphro replied: "How much reverence for God?" (Tredennick, pp Plato's apology said that Socrates is questioning the allegation of defamation of his plaintiff Meletus. Meretas blamed Socrates for the sun and the moon are not gods but only a large number of stones. Socrates 'correspondence was not to clearly deny the assertion of atheism, but to attack Meretus' contradiction. If Plato's story is accurate, the jury can see Socrates offer smoke screen instead of obeying sacred allegations.

God exists. At least it can be said that this view is still controversial, but Dostoevsky needs to prove that he thinks this is the absolute fact. Dostoevsky changed from atheism before writing "crime and punishment". His previous research showed that Dostoyevsky at the time was a believer in the new philosophy, but "crime and punishment" had various religious influences and opposed these philosophies like nihilism. These religious influences often manifest themselves in crime and punishment in the form of mysterious events that stand out from the reality of books. First of all, we need to spread the word. As the New York Times pointed out, despite these shocking figures, we tend to forget or reject research. Spread this gap and do what you can to help build a collective awareness problem. It is time to caution and the time has come to understand that there are still many things to do. We are having problems because government policy does not contribute to the group of African-American and other color people to encourage the construction of white Americans wealth. In order to solve this problem, we need policies to help narrow the gap. RZW noted that a single initiative can not be executed. It is necessary to widely disseminate correspondence such as racial discrimination audit, data collection improvement, tax reform. This survey describes many of the specific policies that we can develop and their personal impact. We will not make policies as individuals, but we will be elected by lawmakers. Please use Opiria CEO Dr.-Ing. In words. Christian Lange: "Personal data is oil in the 21st century." Restart Energy is designed to help spread this newly discovered source of wealth to energy users. I will receive energy. A partnership that is proud of fair partnership and we will announce. Opiria and PDATA democratize personal data brokers in a secure, legal, fair and transparent way, using block chain technology and selection principles. Company support for the Opiria platform

The best way to understand why atheism is so important to me is to start with a little background. I grew up in Texas and the majority of my life is often referred to as the religious part of Texas in other Texas states in Texas. I do not want to pay much attention to cultural beliefs, but I really want to point out. For example, a person I know is rarely accepting evolution theory or the big bang, but scientific theories that are not creative are considered mainly nonsense, and are argued by a notoriously discussed "mere theory" argument. * Disclaimer: The purpose of this article is to share my personal journey with religion / spirituality. I am not trying to convince or persuade a belief or doctrine, nor to discuss religious issues. I only share my personal story. Please share your personal experience / travel in the comments section. But I will not participate in the discussion. It is my lack of religious belief that I want to open more. This is usually what I keep myself, but I noticed that I am very sorry about the fact that I am an atheist. As I live in the south, most people around me are Christians, regarded as non-traditionalists. By insisting that you are one of these identities, you will want to discuss your personal choices with them. Several Backgrounds: I am traveling an exceptional religion. My journey never existed, so maybe a non-traditional or even a correct word. My brain tells me that God is impossible; my research, science and facts are the best. It is easy to define myself as an atheist This is the term I used to explain my beliefs over and over. Maybe I have to believe it. As a person dealing with unimaginable losses, sometimes he continues to struggle with the feelings of weakness - I think I should have had a few things, and I changed peace them I kept worrying about not being there. It's like a weight I can not hold, lifting it off my shoulder. I blindly told the pressure, pressure, and responsibility to the universe. Of course I can handle it.

Society's religion, Miriam, Deborah, Halda are the names of the prophets in the Bible, and they are also women. In the Bible there are two books about Esther and Ruth women. Psalm 68:11 writes like this. "The Lord is commanded and a woman who declares good news is a good master." With the support of these women, why are they considered as inferior sexual acts in the church? "Women and gender; reading the Bible through the eyes of women" states that women have the same opportunities and freedom of speech as men, so the entire community can benefit from their contributions . Female participation This article explains the importance of religion in society. We will explain why society has religion and how their belief system works for them. Also ask if these features are out of date or whether religion has a meaningful function in today's world or whether glass windows have been impregnated in past times. "Religion" can be defined by two main groups. - Religion is a very difficult subject. Discussing religion is passing through the mine. Everyone has the right to have their own opinions and beliefs. In modern America, it is currently very popular, it will migrate from existing religions or not at all. By secularizing our society it is not difficult to believe how science and technology play an important role in contemporary American religion. Religious sociology focuses on dialectical relations between religion and society, religious practice in society, historical background, development, universal theme and role. Particular emphasis is placed on the role of religion throughout all societies and recorded history. The difference between religious sociology and religious philosophy is that we are not beginning to evaluate the validity of religious beliefs. However, the process of comparing several contradictory doctrines requires the inherent "methodological atheism" mentioned by Peter Berg. Although religious sociology is very different from theology in supernatural invalid assumptions, theorists tend to recognize the socio-cultural realization of religious practice.

Huck Finn Paper is a phenomenon to be thought. HuckFinn should remain or continue. Huck Finn has clear clues about a very demanding and racist language. Because of the extremely serious discrimination against different skin colors in past world history, the term "niger" will always and always be considered as negative. With "obscene, atheism, grammar, vulgarity, humble moral tone, and anti-terror", this controversial novel appeared in many new versions. Huck Finn is a wonderful novel for two reasons. It is a very stressful adventure, depending on the intention of Jim and Huck being captured and the unique and clever insightful story of Huck. He is carrying out his worldview challenge and hopes to achieve this with new facts. But even people who like Huck Finn have agreed with Jim and the way he handles the page and a huge number of flaws in the text making the novel a problematic favorite. Huck Finn Paper is a phenomenon to be thought. HuckFinn should remain or continue. Huck Finn has clear clues about a very demanding and racist language. Because of the extremely serious discrimination against different skin colors in past world history, the term "niger" will always and always be considered as negative. - Huck Finn's racial children reach out to them in such a way that they almost eliminate the enthusiasm that students may bring to them, or they prepare for them. There are few high school young people who are ready for Huckleberry Finn adventure My college student adjusted Huck more frequently. His loneliness is theirs, they are keen to write names. In the least encouraged case, you can produce articles on Hacken and video games, Huck Finn and the Hunger Games, Hackford and Teen Smoking, Hackford and Social Media, Hackford and ADHD. Educating students is trained to teach young adults' novels and avoid classics, but instead if you distort the lens, you can feel the classic feel like today's young adult novel I will find it. They thought Tom and Hack were not two children with fishing pole, but rather a manifestation of common axioms in childhood research, "young people create their own history". , Cultural rescue artists, the story of their own controller

I support Sartre's view that humans are totally free. I think that the action we have chosen is responsible for our humanity and purpose. I am born for the first time, then they agree to choose their own ideas. Everyone must be born, but once you are born, you think that you can freely become the person you chose. There is always a way different from choice in life; this is just a matter of choosing people. I do not think everyone in the universe has a common human race. Juan Paul Sartore, an existentialist philosopher of the 20th century, said that we are the choice. I do not agree with his atheism, but Sartre is basically right. Although we may be the product of our DNA and the environment, we still have a certain space for ourselves for each of us. Despite his political trend Martin Heidegger pointed out another important concept, authenticity. After the flock is not genuine. To be truly free, you must be yourself. In today's American society, commercial edification may be a big challenge for credibility. Honest introspection is becoming more important than ever. By reflecting the actual needs, you can minimize consumerism operations. Tyler Darden of the movie 'Beat Club' claims that consumerism leads to own own ownership, so people belong to them. This may be the main example of becoming a slave Existentialist Jean-Paul Sartre wrote as a university professor in 1938. A novel influenced by Kafka infuriates the ability of inanimate objects and circumstances to define themselves, frustrated researchers in the city who are convinced that intellectual and spiritual freedom will evoke the aversion of heroes I will involve. Thirty years ago, Antoine Roquentin settled in Bouville, a port town in France, and completed his research on the lives of politicians of the 18th century. But in the winter of 1932, "sweet sickness" he said that nausea more and more influenced everything he does or what he likes - his research project, the "self-study" company all the books in the library I am reading The owner of the cafe named Francoise, the memories of Anny, the physical relationship with British girls he used to love, and even his own hands and even nature are beautiful

Essentially, the religion of Hyrule is the perfect combination of all religions, that players of all faiths and players without any believer at all can enjoy the game at all. Among the many matches of the Zelda series are Christianity, Muslims, atheism, and even the main religious beliefs of the Japanese Shintoism. These traces seem to match the central idea of ​​Triforce which is the legendary symbol of Goddess Hyrule. Triforce consists of three different parts, each representing a different virtue. For more than 20 years, there is no action role playing game like "The Legend of Zelda the World". The original remastered Super Nintendo's classic "The Legend of Zelda: The Links of the Past" is currently one of the most fun and attractive adventures on any game platform. Combine the old perfection degree with what is superior to the sum of that part. The sequel is not necessarily a bad thing. Look at the building of Luigi: Dark moon. This is a sequel to the sequel to GameCube in 2001. This is because Mario 's narrow brother sucks the ghost with an enhanced vacuum cleaner. Besides that, this is a new installment, we successfully added a multiplayer game and a new mechanism - it's like dim! - A way to not destroy already fun experiences Zelda Sayre was born in the early 20th century in 1900 and was named after the heroine of the gypsy hero of Robert Edward Francis' short story "The Wealth of Zelda". Inspiration, the latter named it the princess of the same name behind her. When Zelda met Scott Fitzgerald, a visiting soldier in Montgomery, his hometown of Alabama, she was the infamous and the most daring and rebellious girl. The 19-year old Zelda is a ballerina, and her high school graduation ceremony summarizes her lifestyle at the time. "At the same time, 23-year-old Scott is extremely worried about his future career as a writer and is already working on the autobiographical first novel" This Side of Heaven ". In their courtship process, Scott began forming a female character of the main character of the book after Zelda.

The social and political philosophy of Stoke and Yeats' work is at the turn of the century and in Europe, especially in Ireland there is extensive concern about the influence of the ethnic mix being done and the lower class control of nobility. In Ireland, the Protestant who dominated the country began to worry about the emergence of Catholics, which threatened their land and political power. Two Irish authors Bram Stoker and William Butler Yeats in this period published their views on this "problem" in their novels. William Butler Yeats, born in 1865, died in 1939. Yeats is one of the most famous poets in the 20th century. Yeats, also a philosopher, has developed his own philosophy. "Yezhi has developed a philosophy linking history, art, personality, and interest in society, for example in the history civilization develops, eventually the opposite civilization is born as it dies. William Butler Yeats is a poet and playwright (playwright) in Ireland. Some people think he is the greatest poet in the 20th century. He received the Nobel Prize in literature in 1923. The work of William Butler Yeats has a clear bridge between the romantic poetry of the 19th century and the language of contemporary poetry. William Butler Yeats was born in Dublin, Ireland on 13th June 1865. He is the oldest of the four children of portrait painter John Butler Yeats. His father took part in William's regular school education at home, which gave him a permanent hobby of the classics. John Yeats has a strong personality. His personal philosophy incorporates aesthetics (belief that art and beauty are important to all) and atheism (belief without God). William felt its impact long after. Because it appeared in his interest to Magic and occultusum (supernatural).

Every day, books are prohibited and challenged by school and parent organization. These organizations and schools deprive children of intellectual freedom. The American Library Association defines intellectual freedom as "everyone has the right to ask and receive information without restriction from all perspectives" (Ross, Caplan 1). When the school restricts students' censorship freedom, the ALA considers "to suppress ideas and information that some people, individuals, groups, or government officials consider as unpleasant or dangerous" (1 ). President Bill Donnoho of the Catholic Federation condemns Golden Compass as a "harmful" effort to put children into an anti-Christian belief, creates a 23-page booklet called "Golden Compass: Uncovering" and saves it with Pullman I insisted. "Atheist" of a child to "sell". "On October 9, 2007, I talked to Mr. Donowe why Christians should not leave the movie to the interviewer John Gibson. I am worried that meaningless Christian parents would like to take the children to the movie, but it was held on December 7th, which is troublesome It is not that I buy a book, so this movie is an anti-Catholic diet and also sells books on atheism. Answer: How should Christians deal with the film "golden compass" based on Philippe Pullman's book? Given the anti-religious tendencies of the book and its writers, people questioned the content of the movie. The book series "his dark material" on which Golden Compass is based is antichristian. Christians have good reasons to avoid supporting this series through film tickets and book sales. Protests and public boycotts will be counterproductive, as advertising a studio selling movies is free. At the same time, Christian families must take the golden compass seriously. Because the source material is obviously opposed to Christianity and is targeted at children. Christian parents and children should be prepared to answer some erroneous statements in this series.

Discussion of Column Cosmology in the Establishment of Successful Existence of God Column The argument of cosmology thinks this is effective from the existence of the world or from the existence of the universe - due to the existence of God. The only proper explanation shown is that it was created by God. It means that whatever it exists is from its existence and that the universe has its beginning, so that is the reason for existence, that is, God, that is, God must exist. Kalām's cosmological argument is a contemporary expression of the cosmological argument about the existence of God, named after Warrior Lane Craig in his "Calm Cosmology" by Karam (medieval Islamic academic philosophy) It was done. (TheKalāmCosmologicalArgument, 1979) promoted. This argument is a variant of Aristotle's indifferent promoter, which was named after the medieval Islamic academic philosophy and because of the possibility of Craig's opposition to the actual infinite existence Craig became a philosophy of the 11th century Go back. Home Argalari Like most arguments about the existence of God, cosmological arguments exist in many forms; here two are discussed: cosmological arguments of time, Kalam (ie the first argument), and division Discussion of style. The main difference between these two arguments is that they avoid the first opposition to the argument and cast the question "is there a reason for that existence in God?" Then suppose that God exists to explain the existence of the universe and we will not take us anywhere. Without God, we have an entity that we can not explain, there is a universe; there is an entity with God, we can not explain, that is God. It is based on the first premise of Kalam's cosmological argument (whatever the beginning of existence), it is a positive argument of atheism, which is a divine hypothesis about God's only stage Trying to handle. Presence may be decisively confirmed or refuted: phases of philosophy. God protected by Christianists is a transcendental, eternal, spiritual being. He is the creator of every physical reality and exists before all time, space, matter, and energy. As "outside" of the natural world, God can neither discover nor refute with science alone. So, the pros and cons of the existence of God must ultimately be philosophical.

Poems of poetry meditation in 1928 collected by the tower among school-aged children of William Butler Yeats first published in 1927 William Butler Yeats's "school-aged children" , Written in eight 8-line poems. . In addition to a simple title, I built a direct background, but this is intentionally easy to understand words. The speaker is visiting the classroom, "his guide of the day, or the teacher 's uncle in the classroom soon answers his fact - the way of the truth. William Butler Yeats was born in Dublin, Ireland on 13th June 1865. He is the oldest of the four children of portrait painter John Butler Yeats. His father took part in William's regular school education at home, which gave him a permanent hobby of the classics. John Yeats has a strong personality. His personal philosophy incorporates aesthetics (belief that art and beauty are important to all) and atheism (belief without God). William felt its impact long after. Because it appeared in his interest to Magic and occultusum (supernatural). William Butler Yeats: Modernist William Butler Yeats is an Irish poet of the 19th century. William Butler Yeats was born in Dublin, Ireland in 1865. He was educated in Dublin and London and in 1877 wrote his first passage (nobelprize.org). He wrote many poems in his life, thought to be the most influential poet of his time. He is very influential in the modernist era. William Butler Yeats is one of the most famous poets of the 19th century. - The detailed paragraph is not Octavian of Octavian 's surprising life Nothing. It is on pages 222-236. Anderson It describes a scientific paper by Gitney and Sharpe and a letter from Dr. Trefusis, a document about the death of Cassiopeia, a memoir written by Octavian (a poem written by Theoginis). These pages start with Smallpox, Octavian 29-year-old mother, Cassiopeia's smallpox disease

The Greeks think that these first gods will be justified. When we see it today, the confusion is the Milky Way. Both are necessary and deserves to "love" God. The Greeks are very close to the discovery that scientists discovered today think only in terms of thinking about God in a scientific way that the Big Bang theory is like the birth of chaos. There are many similarities and differences between the contents of the Genises account and the contents of the Greek account flood. In the story of the Greek language, Zues is angry about the world for human sin and wants to destroy it. When he decided to flood the flood, he intended to destroy the world with lightning, otherwise heaven would ignite. As he tried to drown the earth, God made Noah an ark and told all living creatures (male or female) to be placed on the ark. However, in the Greek story, Zues never warned of human floods, but simply caused Posiden to drown it, Hades caused an earthquake. They evacuated to the mountain they did not arrive. These are just a few examples of distortion between Greek myths and Genises accounts. Greek gods welcome reading my report on Greek gods and myths. You will learn about what they do with the gods. It is also a myth and legend about Greece. The Greek gods of Greek gods are the same as many other gods. They are drawn like men and women. The Greeks did not worship animals. The gods are blessed with many weaknesses like human beings. The gods may be embarrassing, embarrassing, malicious, and trivial. The gods are considered immortal, but they have a beginning ... - Theology: Believe in God. (58) - Atheism: I refuse to believe in God. (56) - ignorance: a decision between the two about the existence of God. (54) - Indifference: Do not mind whether God exists or not. (53) - comparison between freedom and commitment: ironically, freedom takes time and effort to find alternatives. (1) - God's question: This is a question about whether God exists. Please answer

"Ecrasons l'infame" which is interpreted as "We must crush this bad thing". This is what Voltaire used to express his feelings about organized religion. As soon as many monsters followed his way, Voltaire expressed his hatred of culture and religion and chose the universal god of nature. In the coming century, Darwin will announce Voltaire's scientific theory to support the desire for atheism. But without other theories, the French wise men of the 18th century were obliged to use creationism to explain the beauty and organization of the world. (The hypocrisy of religious attacks on religion, especially the hypocrisy of the Roman Catholic Church, is a thematic iteration theme in Candide, but other religions - Protestantism, Judaism, Islam - are also plagued by Voltaire's testimony. Outrage to various forms of fanaticism and intolerance and he cruelly exposed the cruelty made under the name of God Other people recognized Voltaire as a legitimate religion itself I believe that it will reveal the abuse of religion without denying sex. Voltaire's novel Candide contains a lot of things. This includes ridiculeing the beliefs of philosophers who conflict during enlightenment. But perhaps the most powerful satiric work in his novel is religion. Voltaire believed in God, but strong opposition to religion. He does not say how to believe God through religious officials, but I believe that everyone should serve God in their own way. The first example where Voltaire removes religion is after Candid leaves the castle. One of Candide 's main dilemmas is an optimistic and pessimistic worldview. The optimistic view towards the world is related to Voltaire's criticism of Christianity throughout the story. Voltaire bore religion through a series of corrupt, hypocritical religious leaders, but he does not condemn daily religious believers. Candide grew up under the guidance of Pangloss, I thought this was the best world and I thought things were due to natural reasons. This Pangloss 's view is an optimistic view on the Christian - based world, the problem of the late Candid' s story, to Pangloss, "Things can not be realized because everything is the best" (Voltaire, 35). However, as Candid experienced many horrible events such as whiplash, rape, robbery, unjust enforcement, illness, earthquake, betrayal, he questioned the belief in optimism.

The UK experienced a dramatic change in the 19th century. The British culture, socio-economic structure, and politics are greatly influenced by scientific principles. Due to these changes, many social expressions have been done. Changes in the classification of this period can be seen in social institutions; for example, the transition from popular evangelism to atheism, the emergence of feminism, and the creation of new political ideologies (liberalism, conservatism, and radicalism) . These are just a few of the changes that have occurred. Social Darwinism is a loose ideology that emerged in the second half of the 19th century when Charles Darwin's natural selection evolutionary theory was used to prove specific political, social or economic views. Society Darwinists believe in "survival of the fittest." This is the idea that some people become stronger in society because they were born to be better. In various era of the past century and a half, social Darwinism was used to justify imperialism, racial discrimination, eugenics, social inequality. However, in order to convey his scientific idea to the British public, Darwin sought a popular concept from sociologist Herbert Spencer, such as "fighting for the survival of the fittest" and a struggle for economic Thomas Malthus survival Borrowed. He wrote an article about human society before. Evolution over time Charles Darwin thought about the theory of social Darwinism. Social Darwinism is a view of Darwin's law that people follow the natural choices of plants and animals. Darwin did not develop his theory from understanding the fact. He understands well about natural selection and is writing a book on concepts. Therefore, his theory finally appeared to many people, once defended imperialism, racial discrimination, political conservatism. Darwin understood the concept and concept of natural selection and was recognized in his development theory. Therefore, it is more important to understand these ideas and concepts simply because understanding the facts can not make us succeed.

As a deformed Christian, soldier, writer, or speaker, Lewis inspired a lot of people throughout his life. The test he encountered in his life made him a more exciting and respectable writer and character. Narnia is one of his most popular works, and we can express morality in an imaginable way in fictitious figures and scenes (Gilbert 14). Young Life Clive Staples Lewis was born in Belfast, Northern Ireland on 29th November 1898, was born in Albert J. Lewis and Florence Hamilton Lewis (Gormley 2). Clive Tap Lewis has many things: a British novelist, a professor of Oxford and Cambridge, a poet and apology of Christianity. He is not a philosopher, but he is, of course, a great thinker: Lewis is the idea to do its best in considering contradiction to improve faith. He applied this strict attitude to love and wrote The Four Loves, a dissertation about the love that humans need to survive. Lewis identified four different kinds of love: emotion, friendship, desire and unconditional. According to this summary, emotion is "to enjoy someone's love or someone's love." Clive staples Lewis, more commonly known as C. S Lewis, was born in Belfast, Ireland on November 29, 1898. As a child, Lewis likes the author of Beatrix Potter's book, "The Story of Peter Rabbit". Lewis likes how to talk animals and is fascinated by the anthropomorphic idea. And he invented the world of animal domination of Boxen. At the age of 32, Lewis became a reborn Christian and joined the English church. This movement had a major impact on his work, especially his "Chronicles of Narnia" series. And it tells a group of children who stumbled upon the mysterious will. This is the novelist and birthday of Christian's apologist C. S. Lewis (author of the author), born in Clive Stablebo Lewis (1898) in Belfast, Ireland. He grew up in a big house in the country. He said: "I am a long corridor, a sunny room in the sky, silence in the room on the upper floor, a loft exploring solitude, distant noises in the pool and pipe, and winds under the tiles, and the book Infinite. "Epic of Nordic mythology and ancient Scandinavian is particularly attractive. Lewis became an atheist after her mother's death and atheism has deepened after fighting in front of France during the First World War. He studied at Oxford University and later became a professor there. After taught for about a year, he went to the Oxford University Teachers' Meeting and met a young Anglo-Saxon professor named JR. Turkien Clive Staples Lewis (1898 - 1963) is one of the knowledge giants of the 20th century and can be said to be one of the most influential writers of his era. He was a researcher and leader of English literature at Oxford University until 1954, who was unanimously elected to the presidents of the medieval and Renaissance literature at Cambridge University, but this position continued until retirement. Lewis allowed him to reach a large audience, wrote over thirty books, and his work attracts thousands of new readers each year. C. S. Lewis's most outstanding and most popular achievements include Christianity only from a planet of silence, great divorce, pen and pencil letters, and a reputed classic in Narnia narrative. To date, Narnia 's book sold over 100 million copies and was converted into three major movies.

If William Butler Yeats and William Blake did not study William Blake, William Butler Yeats's research will be incomplete as Yeats's research helped Blake's research. The two poets were ruthlessly tied. Helping Black's research, Yeats was able to find a clearer poetic voice. Yeatsu respect and understand that blacks do not have parallel works in the Yeats era. Yeats read Black for the first time when he was 15 or 16 years old. At that time, my father handed the book to Black. Yeats writes in his article "William Black and Imagination" as follows. "When people read black, it is like an inexhaustible fountain studded in our face." Yeats, prose xxx) " William Butler Yeats: Modernist William Butler Yeats is an Irish poet of the 19th century. William Butler Yeats was born in Dublin, Ireland in 1865. He was educated in Dublin and London and in 1877 wrote his first passage (nobelprize.org). He wrote many poems in his life, thought to be the most influential poet of his time. He is very influential in the modernist era. William Butler Yeats is one of the most famous poets of the 19th century. - The detailed paragraph is not Octavian of Octavian 's surprising life Nothing. It is on pages 222-236. Anderson It describes a scientific paper by Gitney and Sharpe and a letter from Dr. Trefusis, a document about the death of Cassiopeia, a memoir written by Octavian (a poem written by Theoginis). These pages start with Smallpox, Octavian 29-year-old mother, Cassiopeia's smallpox disease If William Butler Yeats and William Blake did not study William Blake, William Butler Yeats's research will be incomplete as Yeats's research helped Blake's research. The two poets were ruthlessly tied. Helping Black's research, Yeats was able to find a clearer poetic voice. Yeatsu respect and understand that blacks do not have parallel works in the Yeats era. Yeats read Black for the first time when he was 15 or 16 years old. At that time, my father handed the book to Black. Yeats writes in his article "William Black and Imagination" as follows. "When people read black, it is like an inexhaustible fountain studded in our face." Yeats, prose xxx) " William Butler Yeats was born in Dublin, Ireland on 13th June 1865. He is the oldest of the four children of portrait painter John Butler Yeats. His father took part in William's regular school education at home, which gave him a permanent hobby of the classics. John Yeats has a strong personality. His personal philosophy incorporates aesthetics (belief that art and beauty are important to all) and atheism (belief without God). William felt its impact long after. Because it appeared in his interest to Magic and occultusum (supernatural).

In the analysis of God, the creator and maintainer of Western philosophy, in general, we acknowledge that if God is the Creator, he must be attributed in part to other attributes by definition. This article assumes that God exists. Otherwise it is not an analysis of the attributes discussed, but a return to provide evidence of the existence of God, which is the purpose of discussion like an ontological argument. Using evidence and justification, this article looks at whether creativity and sustainability can be assigned to God, and whether they are necessary for the existence of God. God is considered to be personal or non-personal. In theology, God is the creator and maintainer of the universe, and in deity the God is not the lasting but the creator of the universe. In panthesism, God is the universe itself. Do not believe in the existence of God in atheism. In agnosticism, the existence of God is regarded as unknown or unknown. God is also the source of all moral obligations and is considered to be "a desire to exist". Many famous philosophers have expressed opposition to the existence of God and to its existence. The theologist can easily argue that the theologian is the creator and maintainer of the whole universe. The omnipotent omnipotent god has the power to rule everything. So, as God creates space, time, inflation and big bangs, we decided to create many universes, not creation of the universe. According to Theism, once you have all the space and time, a source of transcendental matter and energy, God can freely create any type of physical reality he wishes. Therefore, unlike theology, science needs evidence, so theology may conform to this concept rather than science. The aim of the scientific efforts of theology is God. But for Torrance (Munchin 2011a: 8), God is the Creator, Savior, and Person of the Universe (Nature). To Torrance, the universe is difficult to understand without God. Therefore, the object is not only God but also the creator of nature, establishing a connection between theology as human science and natural science. In this way, theology helps to understand the natural world. As mentioned earlier, this is also a discussion that McGrath uses to express the correlation between natural science and theology. The main creator of Maya theology is Jade God, which often appears in Maya's art in his work. He has a symbiotic relationship with humans. When man worships him, he lasts and then he maintains humanity. In this Mayan theology, the gods exist in a very interactive way in Maya's life. This interaction sanctifies everyday behavior. Therefore, the act of harvesting corn and eating is the sacrifice of the corn of God for his people. Of course, the God of the corn participated in the work drawn on the wall of the temple. But, in addition to that, there is another important person. Jun Ajaw (Hoon-Ah-HOW). Jun Ajaw is one of the heroic twins of the above Mayan theology text Popol Vuh. He and his brother Yax Balam (Yahsh Ba-LAM) held power as he overtook death - he joined the Xibalba (She-bal-BA) trio and returned to the world. Jun Ajaw is a symbolic form of God of corn

The concept of biological evolution has been thought of as a long persuasive theory to explain how life begins and how organisms are widely differentiated throughout the life cycle of the planet. However, careful analysis and criticism of the various assumptions of this concept suggests that the theory of evolution is an illogical notion based on theoretical preconditions which can never be verified. Meanwhile, the creation represents another aspect of the coin, so far there is a great interest in biologists on the face of creation and evolution controversy, atheists and believers. The motivation for most biologists to accept the concept of evolution comes from their argument that their atheism and creation can not prove experiments at all, and the same criticism points out their assumption about the fundamental aspects of evolution doing. Through analysis, criticism and reassessment of several related genetic factors, these factors have long been considered to support the observation of evolutionary concepts. Genetic adaptation to stress and evolution, comparative genomics, and selection of nature and targets Function and behavior of direct controversial creatures Natural selection may be observed in nature, but it is not observed in life. The concept of biological evolution is an illogical and agnostic hypothesis as it directly contradicts our current knowledge of the behavior of the human genome and human proteome and the structural and functional properties. Also, almost all basic premises of this concept can not be tested Both can be used to mimic experiments, which are prerequisites for accepting and validating scientific hypotheses. Biological evolution is caused by the time course of the genetic makeup of species. Genetic changes are usually (but not always) leading to major changes in the appearance and behavior of organisms. Evolution requires the occurrence of mutations and several variants to replace other variants. Genetic variation is produced by two processes, mutation and recombination. Mutations occur when DNA is incompletely replicated during replication, producing a difference between the parent gene and its progeny. Some mutations affect only one position in DNA; others produce rearrangements of large parts of DNA Biological evolution is defined as any genetic change in a population under several generations of heredity. These changes, whether small or large, may be obvious, or less obvious. In order for an event to be regarded as a case of evolution, it must change at the genetic level of the group and move from one generation to the next. This means that the genes in the population, and more specifically the alleles, change and are contagious. Be aware of these changes in the phenotype of the group (the physical characteristics of the expression that can be seen) Cultural evolution is a change in the frequency of cultural variation if biological evolution is a change in the frequency of genetic variation over time in a population. Through culture, we mean the characteristics conveyed to society, not genetics. The color of natural hair is derived from heredity, hair dyeing is cultural. Boundaries are not necessarily clear - biology and culture interact and co-evolve in an attractive way. For example, like language, Gait is a complex product of cultural and biological constraints. Lactose tolerance is a well-known situation in the interaction between biological evolution and cultural evolution in eating habits and livestock industry. As biological evolution shapes us to adapt to our environment, cultural evolution also shapes our languages ​​to suit us.

At the end of the thirteenth year, "Dedicating something (especially life) to God as an act of punishment or respect"; in the middle of the 14th century, "the sacrifice of sacrifice" (12c) from the ancient French sacrifice (12c) From the ceremony, at the expense of "sacrificial monks or sacrifices" from the sacrificial "sacred ceremonies" (the correct neutral "sacred" holy one; see the holy ones) + facere root "do, do "(Look at artificiality) The Latin sacrifice is covered with ancient English ansegdniss. The feeling of "giving up on something to other things, things that gave up on other things" was recorded for the first time in the 1590s. Baseball emotions were first proved in 1880 "Unfortunately these young people do not understand, but in many cases, sacrificing life is the easiest sacrifice of all sacrifices: the ability to serve the truth and their ability to grow Before it is the purpose of the cause brought up - the sacrifice is completely beyond the power of many people.The idea of ​​this century is separated from the political language.You listen to "socialism" When you think about social democracy, communism Russia, Bernie Sanders, or something else. This word itself may be an emotional trigger in the continuation of hundreds of political conversations in the past 10 years. There is no Babel built by God: Dostoyevsky's atheism, socialism and the ethical foundation of civil society Because it comes from Sanskrit, this "sacrifice" is not necessary even if it is not the true meaning of the word, nor is it hated. The sacrifice is exalted and exhilarating, more consistent with the concept of "worship", leading to the well-being of those involved. Our society urgently needs a primitive and sacred intention to sacrifice culture. It is a basic social and spiritual value across cultural and religious boundaries. The true meaning of the highest sacrifice can be seen from the inside. Sacrifice so that you can express something. Well, the sacrifice given outside represents the spiritual sacrifice of the mind, and the soul dedicates itself to God. As it is the beginning of creation and ends with beautification, the soul is dedicated to God once again. Therefore, we should also sacrifice to him only, because only God should pay spiritual sacrifice 607 607 ST II - II. 85.2, corpus. Matthew Levering saw that Abraham almost sacrificed Isaac to clarify the essence of sacrifice.

A big lie I went to church since I was 3 years old. I have been to Sunday school since I was 3 years old. Since then, I have been recognized as a member of the church and have actively participated in the high school youth program of our church. Over the years, I think "growing to God", at least this is what my pastor said. I am thinking myself now, at the age of 17, I have not "grown to God" yet. There are many reasons for choosing atheism. I'm sorry, I should explain "big big lie". There are several, but in this case, the concrete example of our "big lie" is about criticism. Over and over again, I listen to people who are not satisfied, we need "better" criticism. We need not deep rational criticism, not anger and anger, not quantity and irony, not personal or advertisement. It should focus on people, not people Hitler made the word "big lie". It is a propaganda technique, the use of lies is very outrageous, and no one believes that such a huge story is made, so it must be true. The trump card's lies are so cruel that you can not lie to anyone and normal people can not become cruel enough to think about themselves, so there must be some truth there. A big lie is effective Evolution is a lie. Estimating the age of the universe is a lie. Chemistry is a lie. The Big Bang is a lie. This is not just science. Spirituality is a lie. Meditation opens your thoughts on the possession of the devil. Buddha is a false prophet. In the presence of it, it still invites Satan to live in me. This is the first time I met David R. Hawkins. This fundamentally changed my life. Jehovah's Witness's faith was measured objectively and began to notice that it could be identified as a lie. I have a rich story about how Jehovah's Witnesses were chosen and the stories of the world that hate them for the truth to begin to be interpreted. I began to see progress, I realized that with courage and effort I can change my life and my life. I began to feel strong and capable. I started having hope I think that everyone needs to tell lies. I guess this is not a big deal; unless you tell a lie and say you are doing illegal things. My parents tell lies to children about Santa Claus and tooth fairies. Teenagers lie to their parents about their achievements and relationships. An older woman is lying to his age. There are many friends who do not know the whereabouts of their parents. Many people are doing this. Lying is almost normal. Some people tell lies very much. For example, if someone asks you for how they look like you will lie and say yes, so their emotions will not be hurt. Truth hurts honey

The ancient Greeks believed in a series of myths that explained nature, established moral principles for people, and was just a folk legend. In this article we will discuss the beginning of mythology, the Greek gods themselves, and some myths about ancient morals, nature, and ancient legends. Because the myths and details about God are communicated in the word of mouth, there are things that are exchanged or different by myths and gods. Greek myths derive from folklore until they come to explain nature, and the narrator incorporated moral principles into myths. Greek gods welcome reading my report on Greek gods and myths. You will learn about what they do with the gods. It is also a myth and legend about Greece. The Greek gods of Greek gods are the same as many other gods. They are drawn like men and women. The Greeks did not worship animals. The gods are blessed with many weaknesses like human beings. The gods may be embarrassing, embarrassing, malicious, and trivial. The gods are considered immortal, but they have a beginning ... - Theology: Believe in God. (58) - Atheism: I refuse to believe in God. (56) - ignorance: a decision between the two about the existence of God. (54) - Indifference: Do not mind whether God exists or not. (53) - comparison between freedom and commitment: ironically, freedom takes time and effort to find alternatives, and if you make a decision, you must promise to do so Hmm. (1) - God's question: This is a question about whether God exists. Please answer Faith in God has always existed in the history of mankind. Whether it is Greek gods: Apollo, Zeus, or the Jewish - Christian God, is believed by Christians in modern society. Faith in God has always existed in humans, but assuming that God does not exist, this explains this false belief, the cultural evolution of religion. - The main character of Zoni Neil Helston's "The eyes are seeing God", Janie Crawford is trying to find his voice in the novel. Succeeded. Her husbands have various influences on the ability to find this sound. As you can see, Greek gods have significant significance and influence on Greek culture. I talked about some of the more popular letters in Greek and Roman myths. There are various cultures and traditions, many of which are various heroes and heroines, but Greek and Roman myths highlight the gods and heroes they believe in, so I draw attention to my attention.

Over time, the United States has developed rapidly in terms of religious, cultural and ethnic diversity. Religion is a part of many living things; Nonetheless, for Christians, Jews, Catholics, Muslims and many other religious organizations, not to mention non-religious people, the country is neutral and We must accept citizens by maintaining secular life. For years, citizens sometimes forgot the meaning of freedom. Especially when it applies to religion without government invasion. In the early 20th century, the Third Republic promoted formal separation of church and state law. Since 1880, public education has been controlled by ordinary citizens and remained neutral with respect to religious affairs. For families practicing religion only through customs and customs, it is easy to separate family members. At least two groups must be distinguished between Catholics. The group is cold and ruthless. : We will accept external customs and traditions, but that belief is questionable. Their baptism, marriage, and funeral are religious, and at least they have a certain moral attitude from religion. Most of this group consists of this group. Farmers and most high and low bourgeoisie Since the beginning of the nineteenth century, the separation of church and state has become part of the national legal and cultural naming. Even judges, politicians, educators, even religious leaders believe that the separation of church and state is the center of church and state relations, the cornerstone of American democracy. In 1879, the Supreme Court initially used the term "separation of church and state" as an abbreviation for the meaning of the first revised religious provision, "almost accepted as a formal description of the scope and effectiveness of modification" Stated. Most Americans support the separation principle of church and state as one of the characteristics of the US government. There is no such word in the Constitution, but there is no organization theory that influences the American concept of intersection of religion, culture, and politics rather than the principle of separation of church and state. American atheist, Inc. The first amendment to the Constitution of the United States is a non-profit, non-political educational institution that accepts the explanation of Thomas Jefferson that it aims to separate "walls" and specializes in the complete and absolute separation of the state and the church. And, considering donating many YouTube atheist accounts of Patreon, they spend time on fighting religious doctrines and promoting atheism. Matt Dillahunty, which separates creative and religious views, is another YouTube atheist who became famous for Atheist Experience's public cable TV program and now specializes in criticizing long-term detailed religious views I am running a YouTube channel. As everyone knows, Messiah madmen also promise to unravel the nonsense of religious controversy.

Faiz Ahmed Faiz was born in Sialkot in 1911 and studied English literature and philosophy in Lahore. As a poet, Faiz began writing the traditional theme of passion and beauty, but soon these traditional themes were overwhelmed by the bigger social and political events of the time. Traditional love 's sorrow is tied to the suffering of suffering human beings Phais uses his poem to support the cause of socialist humanism. Therefore, the image of the familiar love poet brings new meaning to the hands of the f ... "Faiz Ahmad Faiz (Punjab, Urdu: 13th February 1931, born November 13, 1984), MBE, NI, Lenin Peace Prize is also an influential leftist intellectual revolution poet Urdu It is believed to be four times the Nobel Prize for literature. Phais is writing poetry in Punjabi As a prominent member of the progressive writer movement (PWM), Faiz is a famous Marxist and in 1962 Lenin and the Soviet Union Political and military agencies in Pakistan repeatedly condemned atheism in his work His work still influences Pakistani literature and art.In the highest civil rights Faiz literary works are awarded after death In 1990, Nishan-e-Imtiaz received the award. The majority of Faiz Ahmad Faiz 's life has been used to resist and criticize the established tyranny, and even in his death his poems are the material of many revolutionaries. So when Piyush Mishra and many other protesters gathered at the Indian Film and Television Academy (FTII) it was not surprising that he chose to read the poem by Faiz. But Mishra himself was also a poet and decided to read his own reaction to that poem. Resistance is not only a sign of Faiz 's poem but also a symbol of resistance. This festival seems to be fascinated by a well-organized "Corporate Culture Festival" developed around Faiz's iconic resistance image. This is a strange contrast: the moment the resistance to poetry was discussed in Aldamra's small Adabi Baithak, a larger hall was reserved for TV and movie artists. In any case, argument about resistance literature is very enthusiastic. Almost all three panelists believe that the "golden age" of literature that resists has passed along the era when the ideological gap between the right wing and the left wing reached the peak. In the post-ideological era, there was only sporadic resistance. However, this topic should be discussed from a broader perspective. Poetry is the art and occupation of Pakistan. It started from the Persian Empire. Poems after independence are written in Urdu and regional languages. Faiz ahmad is considered to be the biggest poet in Pakistan. Pakistan is known as the hometown of poet Most Pakistani are writing several poems. In addition, there are many famous folk singers in Pakistan, such as the late late Aram Lohar, also famous for Indian punjab. As a refugee in Afghanistan arrived in the western province, the music of Pashto and Persia reignited and Peshawar was established as the center of Afghan musicians and foreign Afghan music distribution centers.

Comparison of literary styles of Dickens and Hardy To compare the literary styles of Dickens and Hardy, we use "signalman" of Charles Dickens and "boiling arms" of Thomas Hardy. "Signal man" features a signalman of a lonely train working in the signal box of railway disconnection. A "ghost" appeared before a fatal accident. Thomas Hardy's long-standing literary career has witnessed and covered the most important artistic and literary revolution of the present age. Hardy was born in 1840 near Dorchester in England. Before 87 years before he died in 1928, the genre of this Victorian novel faded The former avant - garde movement is called modernism and dominates the English literary circle. Hardy seems to be a unique Victorian novelist with gorgeous and distinctive style and sensitivity to classroom problems. But his work has increasingly revealed perceptual and moral norms that abandon the strict Victorian society and sexual desire and appear to abandon atheism and subjective morality rather than absolute Christianity . His philosophy was outdated in the Victorian Britain, telling the turbulence of social and cultural modernism. Comparison of literary styles of Dickens and Hardy To compare the literary styles of Dickens and Hardy, we use "signalman" of Charles Dickens and "boiling arms" of Thomas Hardy. "Signal man" features a signalman of a lonely train working in the signal box of railway disconnection. - Comparison between Henry Miller and Jack Keroroac I. Introduction It was not unusual for a person to return to nature to "find yourself." Books, essays, seminars, retreats are dedicated to helping people understand the way to find enlightenment and healing through connections with nature. Thomas Hardy and Charles Dickens' work has a typical destiny theme. The roles of the two creators are essentially the same, they talk about the concept of depression. Dickens is different from Hardy. Dickens chose the role of the character through the choice of the overall population, but the solid chooses the fate of his role in the natural environment of nature. Firstly, the roles of Thomas Hardy and Charles Dickens encounter loneliness. This frustration is used to depict their destiny. One example of it is Hardy 's poem, when he said, "I saw my glasses," Hardy examined the glass and conveyed the fate of the irritated character. At the beginning of the document I wrote that "I look at my cup and look at my wasted skin, 'God makes me thinner to thin my heart.'

Respect, compulsion, and religious beliefs In this article it is stated that the support of liberal democratic citizens should not support mandatory policy arguments, based on the reasons that other citizens know to reasonably refuse We discussed and valued important discussions in detail. My conclusion is that this argument failed. In particular, I believe that religious believers who support mandatory public policy based on religious beliefs do not look down on citizens reasonably believe that such religious beliefs are wrong. Many of you are interested in the evolution of China's religious policy over the past 50 years. There is definitely evolution in this respect. However, the two important policies have not changed - we respect the freedom of religion and the freedom to work independent religious issues. Does the ruling party Communist Party, which is a party claiming atheism, really respect the freedom of religion? Is it necessary for China to continue to independently carry out religious problems even when the whole country is open to the outside world? To answer these questions, we have to spend talking about 50 years ago in the past 50 years. It may be a historical background or the preparation stage of the latter. In this regard, assessing the strengths and weaknesses of China's religious policy will be more fair and more objective. Respect, compulsion, and religious beliefs In this article it is stated that the support of liberal democratic citizens should not support mandatory policy arguments, based on the reasons that other citizens know to reasonably refuse We discussed and valued important discussions in detail. My conclusion is that this argument failed. - When I recently visited Europe, I gained the privilege to participate in expedition trips focusing on adolescent sexuality, school sex education, media influences, parentage and child communication. In the US statistics on adolescent sexual activity, pregnancy rate, HIV and sexually transmitted diseases are very high, the Netherlands, Germany and France maintain healthier standards Various studies at the Pew Research Center have documented many articles on the decline of American religious beliefs in the 21st century. Americans without religious beliefs and / or religious beliefs rose from 2% in the 1950s to 22.8% in 2014. Religious writers condemn the decline of ordinary suspects (such as social collapse, the collapse of traditional values), but atheists and humanitarians released their hopes and cheers. And rise of enlightenment. Given the increase in supernatural phenomena in the US, it may be the opposite. Definitely, some things will fill the gap

God is the Creator Christianity is a religion that reflects the Christianity of Jesus. Christ is completely holy and deadly. He is a god. He fulfilled the Messiah prophet that came in the Old Testament, so he is truly unique. The above prophecies are clearly conveyed through the Bible, a guide for Christians. Specifically, the Old Testament is the foundation of many religions (ie Judaism, Muslim, and Christianity). The Bible (the Bible) is made up of several books, each book is considered a source of history and fable. The core idea of ​​Judaism is the Jewish single, almighty, invisible commitment to God, he is the creator and ruler of the universe and the source of human moral law . God's idea as a creator of the universe has opened the Bible story Bereshit ("Initial") in Genesis. This declaration of faith appears in the Jewish original text, including important prayers called Shima. Quoting Deuteronomy 6: 4-9, Cima is the central feature of all synagogue service. It is recorded even in important situations such as when getting up every day or death etc. Shema (name means "listen / listen"): God is considered to be personal or non-personal. In theology, God is the creator and maintainer of the universe, and in deity the God is not the lasting but the creator of the universe. In panthesism, God is the universe itself. Do not believe in the existence of God in atheism. In agnosticism, the existence of God is regarded as unknown or unknown. God is also the source of all moral obligations and is considered to be "a desire to exist". Many famous philosophers have expressed opposition to the existence of God and to its existence. The theologist can easily argue that the theologian is the creator and maintainer of the whole universe. The omnipotent omnipotent god has the power to rule everything. So, as God creates space, time, inflation and big bangs, we decided to create many universes, not creation of the universe. According to Theism, once you have all the space and time, a source of transcendental matter and energy, God can freely create any type of physical reality he wishes. Therefore, unlike theology, science needs evidence, so theology may conform to this concept rather than science.

"West Wind" was written just before Percy Bysshe Shelley died in 1822. Shelly spent most of his time living in England, where he was born into a high society family. He took part in Eton's primary education and Oxford University until he was dismissed by announcing "necessity of atheism". Shortly married a civilian named Harriet · Westbrook shortly after being exiled. It was disturbed by the family because of his low social status. Marriage is short-lived, Shelly soon fell in love with Mary Godwin. The image of Niranjan Dutt in Shelley's "Westerly Carroll" is a poem by Percy Bische Sherry and shows the correspondence between the poet's inner world. This is one of his famous poems. The theme of this poem is that the poet is intended to be a force that can bring change and resurrection into human life. Through the natural renaissance of Westerly as an agent, this theme is metaphorically expressed. It is explained by his excellent usage ... "Night" is a poem that Keats uses detailed explanation to compare natural beauty with reality, life and death. In the beginning poetry, the writer was fascinated by the song of Peace of Nightingale. Through this process, this song became a powerful spell that exceeds the world of Keats. In the whole poem intertwining with the view of his death Shelley symbolizes the power of nature and the inspiration of nature using the westerly wind. However, unlike Mont Blanc, West Wind is aggressive and lively in poetry like "West Wind Acura". Mont Blanc has not moved, but the westerly wind is the driver of change. Even if it is destroyed, the wind will promote new lives on the planet and human social progress. In Shelley 's work, the statues of Ancient Egyptian Pharaoh Ramesses II or Oz - man Diaz symbolized political tyranny. In "Ozymandias" (1817), the statues were subdivided, left behind in the open desert, tyranny was temporary, and any political leader, in particular irregular political leaders, was hoped to last long There is no power or real influence. A broken monument also represents the decline of civilization and culture: after all, the statue is a human building, a work of art created by the creator, now it is - and its creator - all creatures It was eventually destroyed and destroyed

The idea of ​​Al Ain Rand about communism of autobiography Kira, we live in a major role, Al Ain Land said: "Kira's life is not my specific event, Her thought, her faith (xvii) Therefore, by considering Kira's view from various perspectives, we can conclude that Rand is most likely to share the same view. If someone If you read the life of Rand, the view of communism in Rand is very obvious. She is rightly opposed to that and its core values. Communism is based on these core values ​​based on these principles. The best for the country is the best for the individual, the state is the most important, and the state meets all the needs. W. Bohrer English 11 Horn 12/17/13 Ayn Rand Biography: On February 2, 1905, Ayn Rand was born in St. Petersburg, Russia, only three weeks after the bloody revolution in 1905 (Heller 2) . Her name is Alisa Rosenbaum. Until I arrived in America, she did not change my name to Ayn ​​Rand. Arisa was born in a Jewish family living in an anti-Jewish country and sometimes makes people live - it is a struggle. Her parents' name was Zelman Wolf Zakharovich Rosenbaum - better known as "Zinovy" - and Khana Berknovana Kaplan - better as "Anna" - married nine months ago when born. Ian Rand (1905-1982) is a philosopher and novelist of Russian-American. If you have never heard of her, this is a very easy insight: If you do not like Marx, you may like Land. If you like Marx, Land is basically Marx's Antichrist. Land is the creator of objectiveism. It is a philosophical school that teaches the importance of individualism and the importance of inductive analysis of reality. Because it exists independently of human perception. Rand believes that social freedom is being threatened by altruism (concern for the welfare of others) and collectivism. Mr. Rand believes that society does not completely eliminate the "tribal" mentality of collectivist ethics, and this idea, particularly in Europe, refuses to recognize the individual rights of each individual, It is argued that it promotes. Mr. Land thinks that capitalism is the only "moral" system that exists because it is necessary to protect the rights of all individuals. Russian-American Ain Land refused to support free-market capitalism's communism, but kept atheism. Skeptic magazine Michael Shermer expresses Rand's objectiveism as "the most impossible cult in history". Despite Xieer Mo's emphasis on the rejected individualism and collectivism, Barbara Brandon quoted the writer Writer and Land's quarrel but Land is what music believers and her tastes take "I think that it is a person who does not agree morally, it should be condemned psychologically."

Ivan Fyodorovich Karamazov's devil hero Fyodor Mikhailovich Dostoevsky is considered by many to be the top of the great Russian writer of the 19th century. Gogol, Tolstoy, Lermontov, Pushkin, Chekhov: As well as many great people around the world, these writers pay attention not only to their art but also to society. He became infatuated when he made his masterpiece "Death · Soul", he wanted to bring his nation's resurrection through his story. Alexei Fyodorovich Karamazov (also known as Alyosha, Alyoshka, Alyoshenka, Alyoshechka, Alexeichik, Lyosha, Lyoshenka) was the youngest of the Karamazov brothers at the age of 20, the second wife of Karamazov, the youngest of the Ivan brothers It was. The child talker sees him as the protagonist of the novel of the opening chapter as well as the writer of the prologue. He is said to be very cute. At the beginning of the event, Alyosha was a newcomer at the local Russian Orthodox Abbey. His faith is in stark contrast to his brother Ivan's atheism. His elder, Father Zoshima, sent him to the world, where he was involved in the dirty details of his family. In a secondary episode, Alyosha became friends with a group of boys, and their fate added a message of hope to the conclusion of the novel. Ivan Fyodorovich Karamazov's devil hero Fyodor Mikhailovich Dostoevsky is considered by many to be the top of the great Russian writer of the 19th century. Gogol, Tolstoy, Lermontov, Pushkin, Chekhov: As well as many great people around the world, these writers pay attention not only to their art but also to society. He became infatuated when he made his masterpiece "Death · Soul", he wanted to bring his nation's resurrection through his story. ALexei Fyodorovich Karamazov is the third son of Fyodor Pavlovich Karamazov who became a celebrity (and has been remembered) for the tragic and strange ending that he encountered 13 years ago. It will be a correct explanation of the location. At the moment I am just saying this "landlord" (they have little time to spend him in his land, but he said here) he belongs to a strange but ubiquitous human being And I think you are. It is miserable and corrupted as well as chaotic - a chaotic way to allow him to complete various dark little financial transactions, not others

Many Greek gods publicly indicate that the importance of God in Greek society comes from the fact that they are often used to explain phenomena that people can not understand. Entities involved in it. Even a simple everyday life such as sexuality and deadly conflict will be affected by godly work. Unlike contemporary religions such as Catholic, Buddhism, Hinduism, etc., where Almighty power can dominate the function of the world, in ancient Greece the hierarchical nature of God was a characteristic of religion. Greek gods welcome reading my report on Greek gods and myths. You will learn about what they do with the gods. It is also a myth and legend about Greece. The Greek gods of Greek gods are the same as many other gods. They are drawn like men and women. The Greeks did not worship animals. The gods are blessed with many weaknesses like human beings. The gods may be embarrassing, embarrassing, malicious, and trivial. The gods are considered immortal, but they have a beginning ... - Theology: Believe in God. (58) - Atheism: I refuse to believe in God. (56) - ignorance: a decision between the two about the existence of God. (54) - Indifference: Do not mind whether God exists or not. (53) - comparison between freedom and commitment: ironically, freedom takes time and effort to find alternatives, and if you make a decision, you must promise to do so Hmm. (1) - God's question: This is a question about whether God exists. Please answer Faith in God has always existed in the history of mankind. Whether it is Greek gods: Apollo, Zeus, or the Jewish - Christian God, is believed by Christians in modern society. Faith in God has always existed in humans, but assuming that God does not exist, this explains this false belief, the cultural evolution of religion. - The main character of Zoni Neil Helston's "The eyes are seeing God", Janie Crawford is trying to find his voice in the novel. Succeeded. Her husbands have various influences on the ability to find this sound. Greek gods are the foundation of Greek culture and religion, the center of Greek superstition and worship. These are related to the origin of God and its behavior in myths. Because God can show blasphemy, courage, or kindness to humans and other gods, the Greeks will mark God according to their quality. In most cases, the Greeks can only decide whether to worship or despise God through them or the content they control. - Polytheism and polytheism itself includes not worshiping a single god but many sacred religions. The basic principle of this polytheistic definition has been achieved by many polytheistic religions in history and has had a great influence on worship and religion. The oldest four polytheisms are Greek, Egyptian, Canaan, Mesopotamian.

Marx could not predict the future but useful insights Marxism was first created by Karl Marx (1818-1883) and Frederick Engels (1820-1895). It has not only theories and practices based on scientific thinking but also historical dialect materialist theory. That is, there is no clear answer to the problem, but the theory is based on a certain number of variables and these variables are always limited. Most of them are limited. Through this historical materialism, Marx and other Marxists learned the development of social organization and ideology through time and learned how each other succeeded and promoted in history. Of course Marxism has been associated with atheism for a long time. Karl Marx believed that history had evolved through various stages - capitalism developed for socialism, then communism could develop - this is where Marx states his theory as science So it is prediction, not prophecy. In a sense it is scientific - as evidenced by history - failure of his thoughts provides forgeability of science. Marx, Vladimir Lenin and Joseph Stalin's idols reminded communist believers of Utopia's dream - to copy the Trinity. Kim Jong Il is the North Korean cult - even the mysteries that his son has been trying to accomplish since his father died - even Kim Jong Il to explain to God A good subtitle of Karl Marx's biography is "failed research". Marx insists that the philosophical point of view is not only to understand the world, but also to improve the world. But his philosophy drastically changed the worst: for the most part of the 20th century, 40% of people living under the Marxist regime suffered from famine, Gulag and political party dictatorship. Marx believes that his new dialectical science will allow him to predict the future and understand the present. But he failed to foresee the two greatest developments of the 20th century - the rise of fascism and the welfare state - and he falsely believed that communism would take root in the most advanced economy. Today the only successful self-style Marxist regime is an avid practitioner of capitalism (or "socialism with Chinese character"). Third, Marx can predict the future of capitalism through his view on historical materialism. David Caute (1967, p. 12) argues that Marx 's philosophy provides a general analysis of past, present and future. To be respectful, Marx seeks modern society through his historical past and attempts to predict his future through current social trends. As explained in the first half of this article, Marx believes that human history is a process of class conflict, social change is a form of class struggle. In the face of modern society, Marx pointed out that society can be divided into two categories - bourgeoisie and proletariat. It is optimistic that Marx believes that this communist society establishes more advanced production, no longer uses it, and no longer alienates (Fulcher and Scott, 2007, p. 31).

To be God's nature is considered a friend, parent, guardian, and leader. The first volume of William Wordsworth's "Overture" does not refer directly to God, but Wordsworth talks about nature. Nature is around him, and his past and present are very important. Wordsworth is so obsessed with nature that it is clear that nature is a religion for him. Parents often make others feel safe and protected, and God often fulfills the role of parents. Wordsworth shows that he is "home" no matter where he is. From the beginning, people were thinking about the existence of God, the essence of God, and the relationship between God and nature. In "Rethinking the essence of God", editors of the best-selling books "Hand of God" and "Heart of God" have thoroughly studied the mystery of the universe. This time he explored these questions: What is the essence of God? How is this property expressed? Does God continue to play an active role in our destiny, or is it the creation of the universe? Pantheism believes that everything is an intrinsic god, or the universe, or nature is equal to God. A more detailed definition is that the laws of nature, the existence, and / or the universe (which will be all in use, existing, or total) will be expressed or personified by God's theological principle There is a tendency to emphasize the concept. Transcendental existence unrelated to nature is denied. According to how to understand this viewpoint, this view is considered equivalent to atheism, mysticism or theology In pantisism, God and the universe are considered to be the same thing. In this view, the natural science basically studies the essence of God. This definition of God creates a philosophical problem that the universe of God is the same as the universe without God except for the words used to explain it. Deity and populism insist that there is a god that is different from the universe, or that transcends the universe (beyond space). These positions deny that God is involved in the operation of the universe, including personal communication with humans. If it is never possible for God to intervene in the universe, communicate with the universe, or evolve into the notion of the universe, it is difficult to distinguish the universe from God.

Disability makes daily activities more difficult. They may limit what you can physically or mentally, or they may affect your senses. A disorder does not mean there is nothing to do and it is not sick. Most people with disabilities can live a fulfilling and healthy life, enjoy it, learn it, and enjoy it. With mobile auxiliary equipment and auxiliary equipment, everyday work becomes easy In the United States, one in five people has disabilities. Some people were born alone. Other people suffer from these diseases due to illness or injury. Some people grow with age. Almost all of us suffer from obstacles at some point in our lives. To summarize as atheism, preferably suppression of disability, we believe that disability is always a negative state of existence. Living with disabilities is synonymous with discontinuities. People with disabilities need to be healed or repaired. The value of life for people with disabilities is lower, not worth the fair opportunity, equal opportunity, and the right to happiness. But for many people with disabilities they tend to be called "people with disabilities" - the obstacles are an essential part of their identity, which is a typical of our ubiquitous nerves It is a challenge of a healthy (NT, AB) ruling story. For example, many people hesitate when some people in the autism spectrum say that they prefer the first language of identity, meaning they are called autism. Why are you sure that you are invalid? Whether NT or AB community like it or not, obstacles are not just identities, but also culture and community. I think that supporters of disabled people will also remain Remembering people without obstacles, the term "physically fit people" may also be the wrong way to talk about people without obstacles. Disabilities such as Autism Spectrum Disorder are not related to the human body. It is appropriate to say that a person is "physically healthy", but it is also necessary to consider that this term does not necessarily correspond to everyone under the umbrella of people with disabilities. For more general terms, please try using words such as "Do not disable". There are still many people who have not identified disabilities. These people may say that they are not physically handicapped, but they may not think they are not aware that they have disabilities. This is something I often encounter at the university campus. Students do not even feel that their state is "invalid enough" or "invalid", but it is clear that they can benefit from the service.

February 12, 1809 - Charles Robert Darwin was born in Shrewsbury Hills. 1818 - Darwin enters Schoolbury school. From 18th October to 27th - 22nd, Darwin was hospitalized at the University of Edinburgh who studied medicine, but surgery (without anesthesia) and blood test started him from that profession. From 1827 until 15th October 1957, Darwin was allowed to prepare for the occupation of the church at the Christian College of the University of Cambridge. He accepted the conditions of faith. Summer of 1829 - Darwin and F. travel to Entomology in North Wales Charles Darwin's formal evolution theory is about the same as gravity theory or relativity theory. Unlike physics theory, biological theory, especially evolution theory, is considered long and difficult in social and political fields. Even today, elementary school does not evolve often. But evolution is the binding force of all biological research. This is the theme of unity. In paleontology, evolution organizes relics of past life and provides workers with effective ways to better understand the history of life. The history of common evolutionary thinking and paleontologic contributions is often beneficial for today's workers. Like other iterative processes, science derives a lot of resources from its history. In historical context, creationism and evolution are always controversial subjects and are one of Darwin's major breakthroughs in spreading his evolution theory. When Darwin published his evolution theory in 1859, his book was thought of as a major technological advancement at the time. As the existence of evolution theory offsets society, there is nothing to prove the existence of God, create a catalyst, creationism is almost replaced by atheism. Since the publication of Charles Darwin 's Origins of Origin, people have discussed creationism and evolution. By supporting facts and assertions, evolution is defended as more than just a theory, which shows that it is a fact. - Because he is made in the final state, a person can not evolve to another state. He is made according to the image and image of his father, so you do not need to evolve; therefore there is no sign of evolution from the beginning. Since sin entered the world, people have been fooled to believe that there is evolution Since the discovery of evolution, human creation has changed rapidly. Nevertheless, the world does not understand the theory and theory of evolution of Lord Charles Darwin for a while for a while. Prior to evolution, I believed that the upper class was called "sacred creature" by being influenced by the religious ideology of how human beings were created. However, the introduction of evolution theory used this theory as the foundation of biology and changed my mind.

Sixty years ago, London's publisher Geoffrey Bles released for the first time a revised edition of four radio lectures published by Oxford writers. This book is called "Just" It does not have it. This book is not mentioned at all from C. S. Lewis' view of a wide range of theological, philosophical and ethical issues, it is the most important and effective defense of the Christian religion of this century. Since it has entered the seventh year since the publication succeeded (hereinafter referred to as "MC"), there is no other apology yet, so the possibility of its success will be low. The first reason MC does not work is very basic. It does not provide what the title promises. It did not even even the classic Christian of John Stout did - that at least outlined the basis of evangelical understanding of the gospel. Puritan's pastor Richard Baxter believes that he will definitely get a positive from this word, considering Lewis's intention to offer the title's own devotion and "pure Christianity", it is much lower than this. In addition, the MC provides more than just "MC": Lewis's own view on family relations, marriage and sex; he pays special attention to God and time's stingy issues (in my opinion , The problem has been that people who have not read many Plato have effectively continued Christian Platonism and its "Eternal God." The dangers present here are also related to CIs to famous references to the Bible It also exists in the mention of Scofield era (I understand that this may be the first time someone insisted on this In 2006, since 1945 Christianity has ranked third among the most influential Christian books today. The title influenced Touchstone magazine: "Christian Magazine" and William Dembski's "Mere Creation". As Francis Collins, Jonathan Aitken, Josh Cutler and Philosopher C. E. M. Joad, Charles Colson converted to Christianity as he read a book. Articles in the book also influenced the name of pop / rock band Sixpence None the Richer. And it was nominated by contemporary Christian Texas Grammy. Christian's metal band, Living Sacrifice, uses the phrase "hammering process" as the name of their album The Hammering Process. The metal core band Norma Jean has won the title "There is no passenger: no parasite" in the book "There are no passengers and parasites" in a perfect Christian society. British Department of Defense Lewis in the UK wants to explain what is common to Christians. In pure Christianity, his aim is to avoid controversy explaining the fundamental doctrine of Christianity, for essentially educated people and their intellectual generation, formal Christian theological terminology He did not retain their original meaning. Lewis puts most of his Christian religious advocacy in moral argument, leading from atheism to Christianity. His lawsuit is based on "principle of right and wrong" that everyone knows by quoting the moral law, an example of Nazism; Christians and atheists believe that Hitler's actions are morally wrong . At a more general level, it is widely believed that theft violates this moral law. Lewis thinks that moral law is like the law of nature because it is not designed by humans.

Wise Blood shows the organized religious flaws seen by the author Flannery O'Connor through anti-religious hero and social representative Hazel Motes and the way to his salvation. The author makes sharp comments on the concept of atheism by suggesting that Christ is the view of life and death. This novel is used as an analysis of the faith declaration and American society. The novel reflects the religious and non-religious society of the era in which it was placed; this reflection allows O'Connor to emphasize herself and her belief about the world after World War II I made it. Flannery O'Connor's "good guys are hard to find" predicts the Flannery O'Connor of the George Dynasty, one of the most prolific writers of the 20th century. As a strict Catholic, O'Connor often shows spiritual corruption in most of her stories. One famous story of O'Connor, "good people are hard to find", reveals the image of mental deficiency inherent in personality. Grandma conveyed a misfit warning, but her activity itself is an impending end sign. At the age of 22, the famous 20th century Southern writer Mary Flanner O'Connor began his career in 1947 and created his own unique way of writing. . During the short years of O'Connor she completed 31 short stories and 2 novels. In the Romanian roots, Roman Catholics set all the stories from "intense comedy" to "serious tragedy", using her religious background and environment. As a "humorous and grotesque genius" O'Connor distorted her work and made it unique. Flannery O'Connor used her work "Good Country People", "Revelation", "Sisterhood", "Social Structure" and "Setting" to solve "Old Country", "Revelation", "Parker's Back" I used various kinds of humor from "Parker's Back". The author Flannery O1 Connor was born in Savannah, Georgia on March 25, 1925. The fact that she was born and became a Catholic, proved her personal beliefs and helped her self-reliance and the formation of satire to her life. According to our textbook, "O1 Conner novel is closely related to the worldly spiritual life" (318). Her novels and stories include religious themes and spiritual problems. Indeed, in many of her story, the hero doubt her own beliefs or experienced big apocalyptic change. This article starts with a question. Did the hero of O1 Connor's short story "Revelation" experience real revelation? And answering this question is loudly "no".

Poetic analysis of William Butler, when you are older, there are Innisfree Lake, Coole's wild swan, second arrival, Byzantine sailing, short story, theater, television program, novels and so on. All work has important ideas. One of the main reasons for doing this is that they have a strong belief in their thinking or somehow related to an important part of their whole life. For example, author Thomas Hardy prefers to treat lost ideas in various ways in poetry. William Butler Yeats: Modernist William Butler Yeats is an Irish poet of the 19th century. William Butler Yeats was born in Dublin, Ireland in 1865. He was educated in Dublin and London and in 1877 wrote his first passage (nobelprize.org). He wrote many poems in his life, thought to be the most influential poet of his time. He is very influential in the modernist era. William Butler Yeats is one of the most famous poets of the 19th century. William Butler Yeats wrote the Victorian and Modernist literature, but still had a major impact on modernism style. William Butler Yeats' poem William Butler Yeats is an Irish poet, playwright, and essayist - one of the greatest British poets of the 20th century. (Ye Zhi 1) His early poetry and theater got ideas from Irish fables and esoteric studies. (Ellman 1) When Ye Zhi wrote about his country he used nationalism to avoid themes of oppression, social division and solidarity. The Irish nationalist Yeats uses the three poems "The Coming Soon", "September 1913", "Europe 1916", through the theme, emotion and figurative words to express feelings about the Irish independence war I expressed it. William Butler Yeats is a poet and playwright (playwright) in Ireland. Some people think he is the greatest poet in the 20th century. He received the Nobel Prize in literature in 1923. The work of William Butler Yeats has a clear bridge between the romantic poetry of the 19th century and the language of contemporary poetry. William Butler Yeats was born in Dublin, Ireland on 13th June 1865. He is the oldest of the four children of portrait painter John Butler Yeats. His father took part in William's regular school education at home, which gave him a permanent hobby of the classics. John Yeats has a strong personality. His personal philosophy incorporates aesthetics (belief that art and beauty are important to all) and atheism (belief without God). William felt its impact long after. Because it appeared in his interest to Magic and occultusum (supernatural).

Most people think that evolution is a viable explanation of what life is like today. The theory of evolution is the theory that all creatures are descendants of other living creatures living in the early days, and this difference is due to genetic change in many generations. We must recognize that evolution is a theory and can not be regarded as a fact. Its roots came from Greek anatomists, but evolution was revealed when Charles Darwin published his book "The Origin of Natural Selected Species" in 1859. This research paper is not intended to convince you of your beliefs, but it is a bunch of knowledge that you can better educate both. Creationism and evolutionary controversy represent a conflict between the two world-related approaches (scientific / nonscientific). The basic idea of ​​biological evolution (science) is that as you and your cousin share a common grandmother, every life on the planet has a common ancestor. Creationism (non-science) is a person who believes in God, he is an absolute creator of the kingdom of heaven, he was born out of nothing, that is an act of free will. Free Christianity was always an ally of atheists in the war of creation and evolution. Evolutionism is an important ideological ground for atheism. Due to the explosive growth of Christians and conservative Christians worldwide, the birthrate is higher, and the success rate of the gospel is higher, the number and impact of liberal Christianity is expected to continue to decline. - The US federal government funds evolutionary false science and Greece's serious financial problems. Their useless teaching is that the United States can not continue to operate with a huge deficit without a result. There is no doubt that the funds for fake science of evolution will be reduced, this is already happening. Theology means to believe that God uses the evolutionary process of nature to create species. The mainstream Catholic and Protestant theology accepts compatibility between evolution and creationism. When thinking about how to understand creationism theory theorist thinks seriously about making science mainstream 66 Under the broad definition of creationism theoretical evolution supports faith in creationism It is creationism as it contains. But if we adopt a narrow definition that Genesis needs to believe in the mysterious activities of God in natural history and criticism of evolution theory, then most of the variants of theological evolution are not creationism.

There is no religion with the same belief as other religions. Even a certain religion can have a sect or a denomination of a different core belief. In any case, in many different religions, you can find some common theme or thought genre that might be surprising. For example, Sikhs and Zoroastrians do not believe that people have similar histories and doctrines. But these two religions are awakening in the founder's religion, faith is only one god, religious faiths are more similar than ceremonies, the difference is the birth story of the founder, the acceptability of their information , And in life after death. What do you mean. Faith in the posthumous world is the basic principle of most religions, including Hinduism, Buddhism, Jainism, Sikhism, Christianity, worship of fire, Islam, Judaism, and Baha'i faith, but the concept of immortal soul That is not the case. "Soul" itself has a different meaning, and it is not used in the same way in different religions and denominations of different denominations. For example, in various areas of Christianity, there are various views on the relationship between the immortality of the soul and the body. Immortality is a state of life that allows people to avoid death and maintain conscious thinking. It may mean that a person exists indefinitely from a physical source other than an organic life like a computer. India is a country with many religions. Here are all the major religions of the world. Hinduism, Buddhism, Jainism, Christianity, Muslim, Sikhism, Zoroastrianism and the like. People of various religions live here in quite a few numbers. All of these religions have different denominations and small sects, and they grow freely. India is unique in a sense in a hometown of the four major religions in the world of Hinduism, Jainism, Buddhism, and Sikhism. Hinduism as the majority of religions has various fields such as Saivism, Vaishnavism, Shaktism, Tantricism, Sun-cult, Ganapatya-cult. Buddhism and Mahayana Buddism, Theravada Buddism, Vajrayana and Kalhakakrayana sect, Jainism and Svetambar and Digambar sect, Islam and Shiites, Sueni, Shafi and Hannah, Catholic and Protestant Christian lives in this country. Primitive tribes of this country also have their own cult. Sikh, Zoroastrianism, Baha'i, spiritualism are increasing more and more. People are looking for true beliefs that are not ruled by greed and hypocrisy. So far the territory of the remote region of the world is running. Sherman and medical men are practicing on isolated islands in Africa, Australia and New Zealand. Atheism is a concept, all religious beliefs are collections of bundles, and are supported by the whole world. - France is in Western Europe and is the third largest country in Europe. It border with Switzerland, Belgium, Germany, Luxembourg, Monaco, Italy, Andorra, Spain. French Guiana is adjacent to Surinam and Brazil and is an important part of France. France has various landscapes. Coastal plains north and west of France, and mountains to the south.

The role of religion in society The role of religion in society is definitely a dynamic role. The relationship between religion and society is constantly changing. Religion affects various societies in various ways in various ways and brings about a change in social form based on the change of religion. Religion can be a driving force of society, but it is rather reactive rather than a radical one. Functionalist functionalist thinks that religion maintains social solidarity, emphasizes consensus among social population, and it helps to maintain social well-being. Religious sociology includes practice, historical background, development, universal theme, and role of religion in society. Particular emphasis is placed on the role of religion throughout all societies and recorded history. The difference between religious sociology and religious philosophy is that sociologists are not starting to evaluate the validity of religious truths, but rather Peter L. Berger states "methodology atheism". Formal discipline of contemporary sociology began with a religious analysis of the 1897 study on the Durkem's suicide rate between the papacy and the Protestant. Modern discussions tend to focus on topics such as secularization, civil religion, intersection of religion and economy, and the role of religion in the context of globalization and multiculturalism. Secularization is a historical process in which religion loses its social and cultural significance. For secularization, the role of religion in modern society is limited. In a secularized society, faith lacks cultural authority and religious organizations have little social power. Secularization has many levels of meaning both theoretically and historically. Social theorists such as Karl Marx, Sigmund Freud, Max Weber, Emile Durkheim, etc. speculate that the modernization of society includes a decline in the level of religious beliefs. Research on this process is aimed at determining the way and extent to which religious beliefs, practices, and institutions lose social significance. The secularization of modern civilization is due to the inability to adapt to the wide range of ethical and spiritual needs of mankind, and the rapid development of the physical science. The United States needs a major national debate about the real role of religion in a free and pluralistic society. For decades the former famous religious position in society has been eroded. The religious leaders who are to be at the forefront of the moral and spiritual Renaissance are strangely cowardly. Americans who believe in religious beliefs should not be convinced that religion must remain unrestricted in all issues related to public interest. Freedom of religion prescribed in the Constitution does not mean that the Constitution prohibits religion from entering public places.

When humans try to distinguish themselves from other animal kingdoms, the foundation of morality is one of the most important arguments. Perhaps secondly, to infer as a characteristic feature, the ability to show ethical behavior gives a sense of natural natural order inherent to humans. But if we understand that humanity centricism is abandoned and there is no great difference from other animals, our unique moral behavior will lead to explanation. What force most people to act on morals. Traditionally, moral values ​​are the reason for censorship. This concept was derived from ancient Rome, "The government appointed staff to oversee public morals." However, censorship based on ethics is very controversial. Some people believe that the government should not force moral or religious beliefs because their beliefs are "evil, evil or wrong". 11 This is a decision to enjoy certain materials Most believers believe that the morality derived from their religion is superior to other religions and a very general argument that supports religious beliefs is moral behavior without it It is that there is no basis for it. (Please note that this is not a discussion to support the religious truth, but only to support its usefulness.) However, does morality come from religion? More specifically, if we know in a way what God did, and did not want to do, would it be enough to tell us the difference between right and wrong? This is very interesting. One of the most common prejudice against atheism is that it does not provide a basis for morality. It is widely believed that there is no religious belief, no moral doctrine about religious tradition, no need to worry about eternal punishment or desire for eternal reward. People will be completely selfish and considerate. Atheists are often accused of moral relativism. There is no fundamental moral principle, all morals can adapt to the needs of the present time. To try to discover a deductive theory of axioms, to decide the basic principles of moral justification based on a direct moral intuition, or to determine reasonable grounds of logical positivism or existentialism. Moral principles are reduced to social decisions or emotional and other irrational reasons. Since Darwin announced through the theory of natural selection evolution, philosophers and scientists have tried to find reasons for moral behavior in the course of evolution.

"Inheritance Wind" tells a 24-year-old Bertram T. Cates, a teacher arrested for teaching evolution of Darwin to junior high school. Several of the news allegations that have received the attention of the town of Hillsborough and the people of Cates were arrested by teaching evolution in a strict Christian town. A famous lawyer named Henry Drummond defended him, and fundamentalist politician Matthew Harrison Brady sued. The story takes place in a small town in Hillsboro, Tennessee. Katz tried to teach his classes that the importance of life was not simply the teaching of the Bible. "Inheritance Wind" in which Kirk Douglas and Jason Robards produced by David Papazian directed by David Greene appeared was arranged by Jerome Lawrence and Robert E. Lee. The drama "inherited wind" was inspired by the "Monkey Judgment" in 1925, where a teacher was arrested and tried to teach a course of evolution. But the movie "inheritance" should not be regarded as a documentary, should not be regarded as a true record of the experiment, but rather it should be regarded as a dramatic movie that shapes it by raising it to convey a strong message to the audience . "Inheritance Wind" is a well-made movie with high-quality performance, photographs of films, and funny and interesting stories. However, inheritance winds are not departing from the historical facts of the "monkey trial" in order to show prejudice to the audience, they should practice what they preach. Still, the inheritance wind is still worth recommending, but it is for those who have strong concern and are interested in the dramatic conflict of opinions and beliefs. From open credit to the very end, inheritance winds celebrate human thought and claim to be the greatest gift for all, as they claim it is the key to our existence. Everyone should make their own judgment and choices according to their free will and no one has the right to control other people's thoughts and beliefs. However, when communicating information to the audience, the succession wind itself strongly manipulates the viewer's thoughts and emotions, and shakes their beliefs in particular in the direction of atheism. An atheist who inherits the wind is said to be a tolerant and forgiving intellectual who suffers from ignorant, narrow Christian paranoia 's hands. This depiction attempts to abandon their religious beliefs and influence viewers to support their ideas. "Darwin took us to the top of the mountain and we could look back from there and see what we came from - Drummond Do you still need to inherit the wind? Most mainstream religious groups, including many Protestant churches, Catholic churches, and orthodox Jewish rabbits, claim that there is no contradiction between Darwin's theory and faith in God (according to these views, They elected to evolve as a way to fill the earth). For strict fundamentalists, only games can not change their ideas. But another reason to buy a ticket is the simple fun of this famous game. Calling them Brian or Brady, Darrow or Drummond, it is a pleasure to see these huge characters at work. Perhaps, perhaps the true winner of this competition is freedom of thinking.

Neitzche once wrote that "People separated from tradition were a victim of extraordinary people." This can be said to be his own idea. Obviously it is true romance, nature and his love for humanity, and even his pure hatred for Christianity. All his papers and his work represent his strong emotions about romanticism. Frederich Niitzche is known for his observations on humans and their nature. It is worthy of him that he has passion for his philosophy and his former Socratic thought. In the second half of that day I met Val, but there are no other little wrinkles in the plan. But are bad experiences often changed to good stories? Frederich Neitzche believes that experiencing good things requires a bad experience; with us they become stronger. He may be right ... Because travel can spend my time According to Neitzche, suffering is a means to endure it and to overcome it, so we will better prepare for stronger and greater suffering. In fact, Neitzche strongly insists on actively pursuing pain and reasonably proves that pursuing this superhuman (or euber men 's) pursuit is the most logical purpose of life I will. In Maula Jatt, Noori Natt embodies Neitzsche's idea. He is looking for someone suffering from prison to jail who is disappointed at him. We saw that a prisoner of war fought for it when he heard that he was coming. He became too strong, becoming a superman too, he felt the emptiness of my life. If someone has the courage to stand up, he will be very happy because he is enthusiastic about being stronger and bigger. When Neitzche says to have a stage when all their passions are just devastating, as they drag their victims with silly weights, this idea is morality as an anti-natural open line and It is very compatible. 1). Socrates and Neitzche reached an agreement in this regard, but they opposed Neitzche's view that God should be ignored. In the defense of Neitzche, Aristotle believed that Socrates incited faith in God and that his excessive blind belief in man was kind. It is no wonder why religious norms focus so much on coordination of happiness and passion, and today as an acting of Scott Adam, God can become accustomed to the public toward totalitarian direction. The real individual is "Christiana". Friedrich Nietzsche - Atheist. Neitzche's philosophy comes from the will of life. Since "God is dead", religious ideals can not be tolerated. God's death creates superman not bound by ordinary moral law to create his own value. He said that atheism is the only substitute for God's death. EDMUND HUSSERL - Father of phenomenology. Three steps of the phenomenological approach: transcendent reduction of Epetche's Eidetic Reduction Eidos is the center of all

In 'One hour story', Kate Chopin said that in some cases, the death of a loved one might be a blessing. As the story suggests, this may include abusive relations and misfortune marriages. In Chopin's story, ironically it is relaxing when she heard the news, although the situation may convince the reader that Lewis husband's death will bring her big pain I will. This suggests that death does not necessarily lead to sorrow. Execution was a former standard; in fact, they were a happy holiday. Death is very common, it may be a celebration, a laughing child, game and execution. There may be a sniper of death. Please think about the trauma that people need in order to make such a person according to our standards. But everyone is like this! That is amazing. I saw people like this. When I live in Africa, I know how locals should endure. Even if they do not know the spoken words they know that "shit has happened". They know death. They are practicing death. This is not just death. They also work hard and know how to manage difficult times. They complained loudly. Cameroon villagers shared with me in my own way for two years, but they are very tolerant. Because they have to do so. it can not be helped. I would like to know if this is a light reflection of our recent ancestors. As a young single woman, I think that childbirth is natural, safe and happy. I can not let you prepare for the death of Yabara, a 27 - year - old pregnant woman in my village. Like many Mary country girls, she got married in her early teens. She has six children at home when she passed away as a seventh child for childbirth. Complications can be easily treated by caesarean section, but in this village without surgery, still - exists - is a sentenced death Death itself is not that bad. Okay, it may be, but this is the point. Because we can not truly know what it is, the explanation of death is terrible or happy. That is purely the result of the attributes we have imposed on it at some point. The idea of ​​our death is almost always normative and not descriptive. I think that this is the source of the phrase "All religions are authentic". Since all religions are equally false, all religions are reality. Probably a better sentence is "All religions are genuine." Every religious doctrine (including atheism) means to greatly influence the way we perceive the world and to define the meaning of death of each particular person.

To do this, we examine how the discussion over the comprehensive language adapts to the broader discussion between the egalitarian and the supplement, and the significance of its use or nonuse in theology, translation As mentioned above, the discussion on gender-neutral languages ​​is divided into two distinct problems: the use of femininity in the form of women and the use of "general he, he, male and female" or "father, son Both the ritual and the Bible text that focus on the replacement of male formats such as 'Brothers' and 'Brethren' has a gender neutral form. The Bible has been translated into many languages ​​by the Hebrew, Aramaic and Greek Bible languages. As of October 2017, the complete Bible has been translated into 670 languages, but in the New Testament there are only 1,521 languages, the Bible parts and stories are translated into 1,121 other languages. Therefore, at least some of the Bible has been translated into 3,312 languages. The Hebrew Bible is written mainly in the Hebrew Scriptures, and there are several parts of the Bible Aramaic language (especially Daniel and Ezra). From the 6th to the 10th century, Jewish scholars today called Masoretes compare the texts of all known Biblical manuscripts to create unified standardized text. After all, a very similar set of texts appeared, none of them was called Masoretic Texts (MT). Since the original text contains only consonants, Masoretes also added vowel points (called niqqud) to the text. These translated verses are correctly referred to in the Bible as inspirational scriptures and God's Word. They are authoritative when they accurately convey the meaning of the original text. Only the original works of the original language can be regarded absolutely reliable and free of errors. However, it is done when a poem that is strongly appealing to the heart translates by text that appeals strongly to another heart. If some people definitely do not have a perfect original, I doubt why it is important to protect them. Atheism and error are doctrines derived from facts based on God's inspiration. This does not require errors in the original work, and they are perfect. They condemn the writer by telling them what they would like to say to them, so they are words of God. Therefore, the intention of these inspirations is Canon. Everything else has to be tested by them. Any Bible we have today is translated from documents written in these ancient languages, which means there is no correct English translation. Vocabulary is very poetic but we will not say that anymore. Needless to say, our understanding of these ancient languages ​​improved over time and we helped translate the Bible. That's why I am looking for a Bible that we can understand. The formal equivalent translation is basically verbatim. In these Bibles, the focus of the translation team is to maintain the syntactic structure of the original language as much as possible. The idea is to translate Hebrew or Greek words into English, including equivalent ones. They focus less on text, so they are less concerned with making descriptive decisions. Instead, by translation, the reader can make these decisions.

Atheistism - People are extremely self-denying themselves by fasting, whipping and self-injurious actions (Columbia Encyclopedia) in order to gain pleasure and spiritual understanding of fasting, flogging and self-injurious behavior. This practice of self-humiliation is called asceticism. Since religious records began, people knew that there was asceticism. This fanatical religious activity is related to many religions, including Buddhism, Hinduism, Islam, Judaism, and Christianity (Columbia Encyclopedia). In many religious traditions, asceticism including Buddhism, Jainism, Hinduism, Christianity, and Judaism has existed in history. Modern mainstream Muslims practice asceticism in the form of fasts during Ramadan, giving up all sensory pleasures, including food and water from sunrise to sunset. The observation of fasting between Ramadan is purely for God and adds a spiritual connection to God; it is one of the five pillars of Islam so all Muslims must fast It will not. The tradition of Sophie includes strict asceticism throughout history. The practitioners of these religions abandoned the enjoyment of the senses and led a generous way of life in redemption, redemption, or pursuit of spirituality. Atheism is regarded as a spiritual transformation trip in ancient theology, simplicity is sufficient, happiness, and thrifty is sufficient. Historical evidence suggests that the tradition of monks in Taoism practices asceticism The most common aspiration behaviors are fasting, complete abstinence, self poverty, sleep deprivation, and a desert into the wilderness Including including. More extreme and unnatural abstinent Taoist customs include public self-dehydration and self-cremation. As with other religions, the purpose of these practices is to achieve sacredness and transcend immortal bodies. According to Stephen Eskilson, asceticism is still part of modern Taoism Sexual abstinence like a Christian sect is only a part of abstinence, both natural abstinence and non-natural abstinence are part of Christian abstinence. Natural ascetic habits include simple life, begging, fasting, and moral customs such as humility, compassion, perseverance, and prayer. Evidence of extreme unnatural asceticism in Christianity appeared in the texts of the second century, then in the tradition of Orthodox Christianity and Western sisters, for example, tying the body to the rock, just grazing, Praying in the pillar of elements such as monk Simeon Stylites for many decades, confined in solitary confinement, adopting beast lifestyle, giving up personal hygiene, self pain and spontaneous suffering. This act of asceticism is related to the concept of Christian sin and redemption.

Introduction of political thought Philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche was born in a small village in Prussia at Röckenbei Lützen in Germany on October 15, 1844. His father, Carl Ludwig Nietzsche, was a Lutheran missionary. He died when Nietzsche became four years old. After attending a private preparatory school in Naumburg, Nietzsche received classical education at the famous Schulpforta school. During the next 10 years Nietzsche lived secretly. But for him as a philosopher and writer, this is also an efficient time. Friedrich Nietzsche - a provocative, debating and powerful 19th century philosopher and philosopher - wrote in his view of power (what he calls "the most personal" book "gays science"). "). Nietzsche of the time (and in touch with many of his work) was able to get such a strong reaction. Because his view was equally bold, passionate, anti-cultural and anti-established. But Nietzsche's philosophical journey has many aspects to consider, evaluate, absorb and respect. Nonetheless, it is difficult to dispute and ignore his unprecedented style and unparalleled influence on Western thought. In the late nineteenth century, German philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche had many things to tell about love. Please think society as a nihilism, meaning no meaning, morality, value. Nietzsche believes that romantic love is frivolous and friendship is the foundation of a stronger interpersonal relationship. If you do not have dating apps or websites, more choices, more relationships, and more social activities will open up new opportunities. In the 2012 survey, using the Internet makes it easier for users to find partners, especially middle-aged people who are active in homosexuals or "weak markets". Just a thought # 3: 1882 - just 135 years ago - philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche declared that "God is dead" in the famous. Since Nietzsche is an atheist, he did not claim to have genuine articles there. God died later. According to Scotty Hendricks of Bigthink.com, Nietzsche's "God is dead" means that Europe no longer needs God as a source of every morality, value or order in the universe; philosophy and science We will do this for us. This secularized secularization has made philosophers recognize that not only God died, but also they killed him in a way that they crave better to understand our world. German philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche probably introduced the concept of death of God in 1889, but Corson observed that Nietzsche's point of view is not about God's existence but the relevance of God. Corson said that God was declared dead. "Because we live, play, give birth, rule, do not die, as if he does not exist." The "God's dead" movement in the 1960s quickly disappeared. . Still, the atheist philosophy has entered America 's politics. From the mid-1960s to today, atheism has become more aggressive and political. Corson said to insist that it now believes. It insists on imposing ideas and trying to ban a competitive vision

It is agnostic that you find a happy place, but you are considering atheism. Ignorous people like the idea of ​​God; yet they feel that they can not prove it, the atheists do not believe it. I grew up to be a Jew, but despite my parents being forced to let me go to the Hebrew school and go to the temple, I was never religious. Over the years, I have learned the Hebrew language and have read the Old Testament story, but gradually I realized that this is a story. Today there are at least 4,200 religions in the world, countless religions are lost in history. Of all the religions that still exist, most people in the world belong to about 10 religions. The probability that all 4,200 religions (including major religions) are true gods is 0%. Some people speculate that each religion has at least a little sacred inspiration and gathers the pieces of the puzzle that God left us. But the only way to draw this conclusion is to ignore the doctrines of many religions. After all, they are not compatible. If any religion is true, then there is only one religion. The most interesting thing is that the debate in the world is religion. In the world, you will find many religions, some stand out more than others, and some are extreme than others. Religion is the foundation of many places and cultures of today's world. Religion helps people understand the meaning of life and identify the origin of life. Numerous people around the world have dedicated their lives to their beliefs and religions. It is not an exaggeration to say that religion has an influence on the world today. In the field of comparative religion, the common geographical classification of the world's major religions includes religion in the Middle East (including Iranian religion), Indian religion, East Asian religion, African religion, American religion, Marine Religion, and classical Greek religion. A comparative study of religion is a field developed in Christian theological school, which tends to force a variety of phenomena as a constraint of Christianity. The problem is not that the other 'religion' talks very little about the very important issues for Christianity, but to regard himself as a religion just as Christianity regards itself as a religion Even you can not. Christianity is one of the world's major religions. It is a global religion, and most countries in the world are participating. Christian believes that God is the best and creator of the world. They also believe in his son Jesus Christ, believing that he died to save his sins, he calls him Messiah and the world Messiah and Messiah. Christianity is different from other religions in the world in that there are more believers than other religions.

Socrates and apologies Several of the best sources of information on the philosophical views of Socrates are the initial dialogue of his student Plato who tried to provide faithful master methods and photographs of doctrine. Apologies are one of many recorded conversations about Socrates. This is about how Socrates has arrested and corrupted a depraved youth, believing that God (atheism) does not exist and becoming a boss. He took part in his trial and presented a good debate. I think that Socrates is misdemagnosed and should not be sentenced to death. In Plato 's apology and criticism, Plato made a clear and accurate discussion against Socrates. Socrates is a wise man who views different things about life, which brings many contradictions to us. Socrates is an expressive person, but he never recorded a job. Although he is ignorant, he was incorrectly convicted of who is going to fight against his unfair enforcement. Behind these hardships is an objection that is often explored. Socrates is the most patriotic philosopher working dedicatedly to his country. - Socrates' defense began with Socrates, he said he did not know whether his jury in Athens is convinced by his accusers. This is an important statement as Socrates explains how many of his mistakes made by whistleblowers, especially if it proved to be untrue. His criminals warned that Socrates is a "smart" speaker, and if a "smart speaker" is the one who speaks the truth, he declared that he would recognize himself as a speaker . 1 The first whistle was a person who had been spreading rumors about Socrates for a long time. According to the rumor, there is "Socrates, wise man, expert thinker, a person investigating all of the ground, and a person who makes stronger weaker statements" (18b6-c1). They are different from official whistleblowers, but Socrates thinks they are worse than official whistleblowers (18b1-c1). The first whistleblower is explained in detail in Chapter 5. 2 If necessary, Socrates can order the clerk to read the formal indictment. Burnett, p. 3, Diogenes Laertius, the life and outlook of the famous philosopher 2. 40.4 Xenophon confirmed the faithfulness of this expression. In Memorabilia (1.1.1), he quotes exactly the same indictment except that only one word has been changed (from Î1 / 4 °). I do not think that this is literally.

Directions: "Use FACTS to discuss them - do research and MLA format articles, quote works that support your position A) Textbooks, take side aspects: moral issues // S. Satris, ed. , McGraw Hill, 9th Edition. , 2003 // ISBN 0072845112, at least two quotes support your idea (you can use other sources - if you think it is more appropriate - and, 4) Let's start with the summary: list the topics in the text box in front of the text, then two main support for topic thinking. Later, enrich the paper in the form of a typical paper. Do you need a professional writer to process this paper and give you the original thesis? Click here to read this article Discussions, including normative theorem proving, ie moral or ethical claims, provide unique aspects for philosophical analysis and pose their own problems. In general, the difference between logical argument and moral argument is that certain premises and conclusions in moral argument (except definition and fact) represent normative claims. The definition is used to determine the usage of a term or phrase and the factual premise represents a descriptive empirical claim describing some actual situations, but the normative argument represents a normative moral judgment , That is, such assertions are considered to apply in some cases. It's not. Normative claims include "spousal abuse is immorality", "should be trusted", "do not tell a lie". Normative ethical subjectivity is a moral stance trying to identify whether actions are morally right or wrong by trying to prove the four different claims of this claim. Normative ethical subjectiveism claims that behavior is morally correct only if a person who judges the action is approved. From this ethical perspective, a normative ethical theory was formed. Moral theory is the theory of right and wrong. This position on morality is contrary to another moral position of antirealism called aesthetics. Ethical anti-realityism is focused on this point of view. Because there is no correct action or wrong action, only personal preferences are not moral. It also pointed out that morality is only personal preference. Normative moral subjectivity insists on its argument with four different arguments, democracy, tolerance, disagreement and atheism. Molyneux distinguishes "value theory" related to morality and aesthetics from "real theoretical proof" related to reality. As has been widely reviewed, as has been said that his past "Universal Priorities" (2007) still shows his own view on the correct moral and aesthetic reasoning methods, and now I am now I will talk about truth debate. Discussions will occur whenever you try to convince others about your whereabouts or preferences without using threats or power. Discussions exist in the language in each negotiation. Whenever we accept reasonable opposition without relying on direct or indirect punishment, the discussion will revive.

Each government of the United States government has different views on the role that the leaders and citizens should play in their own countries. Various kinds of governments include oligarchies, governments are managed by supreme leaders, tyranny and they believe that powerful people should fully manage their personnel. In the United States, we believe in democracy and are dominated by majority. The main problem for our government is to keep it. Our government and citizens ignore their roles and responsibilities in the government. The US constitutes the system of the US government. Three different government departments that enact legislation, enforce the law, and in certain cases judge the law. This framework provides the US government with the necessary force to gain basic rights to life, freedom, and the pursuit of happiness. The United States is a country based on the universal principle. It calls for higher standards than all governments receive their legitimate rights from the consent of control. All countries are responsible for this principle, and it is this principle that makes the United States truly legitimate. As far as our history is concerned, the basic principles of the American government and American lifestyle are systematically attacked, but the philosophy of this system is opposite to our own philosophy. Our US government is built on the concept of personality and dignity. The basis of this concept is that it is important to believe in people. Because he gives him a certain nontransferable right created by God and not deprived of citizen authority. Therefore, including God in our oath will further recognize that our people and our government rely on the moral teaching of the Creator. At the same time, it will help deny the concept of atheism and materialism in Communism followed by obedience to individuals. The American government is the product of many enlightenment thinkers who flourished from the second half of the 17th century to the early 18th century. Among them is British philosopher Thomas Hobbes. Hobbes' view is contrary to the American government's management principles - his beliefs on the absolute power of the government 's subject - such as many, perfectly complying with the views stated in the country' s founding documents There. Many of his views on social contracts, equality, and freedom of nature have inspired the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution, but prior to the end of the civil war, other people are actually integrated into the philosophy of the US government There was not.

Critical examination of human sexual life of Siegmund Freud 0 Introduction This is a word of Bell that penetrates all cultures and overwhelms all humanity. This means a lot to many people; for some people this is sacred and should be respected. For others, this is fun and should be seduced by not repressing; the expression of it is "human sexuality." Dietrich's writer reaffirmed the central nature of sexual life in human life. Gender is in stark contrast to other areas of physical experience. Sigmund Freud destroyed intellectual society by working under the premise of sex, instinct, and personality. The relationship between literary criticism and psychoanalysis is mainly related to gender and its language expression. It focuses on three main phases of pursuing literary criticism including writers (his or her subjectivity), sentences, and readers. Psychoanalysis theory treats texts of literature as "symptoms of artists". There, both authors and text establish relationships that are synonymous with relationships between dreams and dreamers. Later, Floyd psychoanalysts recreated a method called "reader reaction criticism". The new approach explains the psychological experience of the reader's text. We fully predict the reader's subjectivity to the text. Freud (1900) argues that Sigmund Freud's dream study is a worthy field of value to explore. This is not to explain the use of sexual meaning in a dream, but to explain the symbol of a dream from a broader perspective. The use of sexual implications in the interpretation of dreams is one of the main teachings of Sigmund Freud. Sigmund Freud said dreams are an exact way to express individual's unconscious desire. In addition, Freud explained that people and things in dreams are always expressed in symbolic form. Freud called this aspect a way to unconscious. Grosskurth (1991) further explained that Freud's view of psychoanalysis and dreams is well-known. This is because using his analytical method for treatment plays an important role in deepening the understanding of the term mind. "Man is a wolf for people." When Freud first opened mankind, these words surprised millions of people (Floyd). Sigmund Freud was born in 1856 and died in 1939. He is known as the father of psychoanalysis (Jones). Throughout his life, he has struggled to unravel mankind in an unconscious state, to live his life and to get into the confusion between humans and humans (Chiriac). - Sigmund Scholmo Freud was born on Freiburg in Moravia on May 6, 1865. Freud was born in a Jew, but turned to atheism, and later his Jew will come back to "disturb him". An interesting (but alarming) fact is that Freud's mother is also the second wife of his father and only a few years older than his two brothers.

God has plans for all children to be involved in grace. Grace is forgiveness, the only true grace comes from God. God's grace is offered to everyone, whatever his or her religious beliefs are or is missing. When he is ready and shows it in a different way. The real obstacle is whether the provided grace is realized and accepted. At Flannery O'Connor 's "The River", Harry, a helpless child, fell in a favorable position. He does not know what is going on, but he knows he is not satisfied with his present life. In Christianity, grace is not detained by God and is unpopular. Christians believe that God gave unjust tenderness and eternal salvation (secular reward in some traditions, because God is unconditional love). No one can receive this kind of grace. This is all that God did. Talk about attractive grace at some branches of Christianity: for God's chosen people this grace will overcome that person's resistance, bringing them twice. For grace 's gift, some Christians choose to live in a way to express their gratitude. Most people understand that they can not make more money for their good behavior and can not purchase more elegance. They choose to express the gifts of the grace of God by ordering their lives. This obviously can include philanthropy ("good") philanthropy to avoid bad habits and bad behavior, physical humiliation and extreme behavior, no longer need to explain here What is the philosophy of grace? Grace is a concept of Christianity, but among all religious traditions, Buddhism, Islam and Hinduism, as well as atheism have been answered. It begins with unconditional love and compassion. But unconditional love and compassion begin with their own. This is usually the most difficult step in an elite competition society leaving many people without dignity. "At the same time, the grace is adequately educated, reminds people, rich is self-righteous, not very hostile towards those values ​​of others.The fight against other forms of racial discrimination and prejudice is essential There is no doubt that there are various ways you can go even though ignorance should not be regarded as an irrevocable crime, but many liberal factions are wealthy People who have undergone college education often reduce faith in a considerable part of the population of evil and delusions confusion.

Question: Please state your understanding of F. Nietzsche's philosophy. He said "God is dead". Nietzsche's philosophy is an extreme view as it requires a thorough reassessment of morality in contemporary society and a blatant attack on the Jewish - Christian tradition. He believes that people should dare to be themselves. In order to maximize the potential of a person as a person, the ethical system of social administration must change. In this article, in order to make the new issue more clear, we first explain the philosophy of Nietzsche "God is dead". After that, I will explain his moral theory of "master-slave" and his "will to power". Before I summarize his overman concept, I will discuss his view on Western ethics. Nietzsche believes philosophers should pay attention to human problems and eliminate the main value of his culture like experimenters. Obviously, he is a nihilist. What is produced is his reflection on the death of God. He imagines a new day, the Christian "rejection of life" morality can be replaced by the philosophy of life affirmation German philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche probably introduced the concept of death of God in 1889, but Corson observed that Nietzsche's point of view is not about God's existence but the relevance of God. Corson said that God was declared dead. "We live, play, give birth, rule and do not die, as if he does not exist." Still, the atheist philosophy has entered America 's politics. From the mid-1960s to today, atheism has become more aggressive and political. Corson said to insist that it now believes. It insists on imposing ideas and trying to ban a competitive vision When Friedrich Nietzsche said "God is dead", he meant that the traditional structure of God was dead in modern society. Although the view of the world of materialism was an ideology for a history of more than a hundred years, this is somewhat prolific, after Nietzsche's statement, the mainstream religion is still a major part of Western culture. "This is a confusion, in order, in confusion, in higher orders.The most reliable order is the most immutable order, this is not necessarily the most visible order.The observer seems to be invisible from the tree This tree can make him ignore the forest. "- Jordan Peterson

Scream stopped returning to the room as the wall prevented the fierce battle between the two. A young boy sat in the corner and did not know what to do, and he did not know where he went when he was fighting. Suddenly a loud noise suddenly filled the house and a little boy noticed that his father went again when a little boy saw only his imagination about the last memory and ended . As many parents insisted on violence, the same tragedy happened to many Christian families all over the world. Abstract: Although a reasonable position of a person is divorced in common with the reason, philosophers are slowly analyzing what the agent needs because it is not affected by rational criticism. In this article we propose a theory aimed to tell us what we need. First of all, I disagree with the very general view that what is the view of substantive reasons. According to this view, the substantive reason has nothing to do with procedural rationality. This common view thinks that the substantive reason is simply a set of reasons you have. Therefore, if you do not act according to substantial rationality, you are not necessarily criticized. The substantive reason should be considered to be related to procedural rationality. In the second half of the paper, I discussed the greatest rationality and the most irrational theory with the aim of analyzing the category of criticism. Let's take a look at Lindy's "rationality" view. The concept of "rationality" and "rationality" exists in the concept of ancient ideas, mainly prevention and sophistication, but the concept of modern "rational" and "rational decision" is based on Max Weber results I was born. We work with psychologists, philosophers, and psychoanalysts. Classical sophrosyne is prevention, self-management and moderation, integration. It was replaced by something different. "Rationality" was formed in the post-enlightenment era when we thought that we understand the world in the next corner. It does not assume randomness or simplifies the random structure of our world. Of course, there is no interaction with the world. Morality and physics shocked atheists and confirmed the rationality of Christianity. A reasonable person proves everything God and religion need. . . Through the traces that God has left in this world, prepare for reason and observation. Only a fool tripped over the bottom of a pit or mysterious fool. . . . Good morals and small ordinary beliefs will save Christians from distrust and lead to eternal reward. {39} This attitude formed the idea of ​​several generations of apologies. Perhaps they avoided atheism for a while. Turner told us, "These believers ... accepted the modern times and changed their faith in sailing with their water.The belief in God for most inexplicability and mystery. Is more firmly established in morality and reason. In the above, that is, in concrete human experience and provable human knowledge

The article I chose today to show the evil of the world depicting the evil of the world relates to a person named Abner Louima. The man was arrested in 1997 and appealed in New York as accused as being beaten at the station's toilet. When he was in a cell, a 19 - year - old witness, Conelle Lugg, heard a cry and beat the walls of the bathroom. Then the policeman pushed Louima into his pants and saw blood come out of him. I will wind up. One of the most interesting questions in Phil 300's world is "If God exists, why is the world bad?" "If God created the universe and us, it should not be asked, and the problem of the devil is thought to be the cause of atheism, but the problem of evil is not considered to be a correct argument ... If there is evil in nature (that is, evil is not due to the human abuse of free will), one of the core arguments of the Jewish Christian tradition is that of Almighty Almighty God There is evidence: From common sense, we can deduce from this observation that there is no God imagined from this tradition - if he exists, he will stop evil There is evil in this world. I thought the evil man won a long time on the hill of Jerusalem. An evil man thought that it won this year in my life. But evil was not only defeated, it was crushed. And 'suffering and testing may last for a while, a happy sunrise will bring happiness. The only way I want is whether Jesus is the truth and whether he is risen from the death or not. You may think that I am absorbed in believing such a thing. Even my wife thinks I am crazy from time to time (but I've been needing her more than ever in the last five years). But unless you have suffered never, you can not understand the need for infinite hope. Without hope it makes no sense. Because of our freedom of freedom, we argue that we have evil in this world and do not fully answer the concept of "evil problem". To say that there is evil in this world is the same as saying making a wrong decision in this world. Decisions as bad as evil have no form. God can not do bad things because all decisions God makes are good decisions. Human beings started evil. - The problem of evil The basis of the Jewish / Christian tradition is to believe that there is a supernatural individual, that he is the ultimate creator, and that all others exist due to their existence. The three main features of this existence (God?) Are perfectly good (full strength), completely strong (full strength) and all knowledge (omniscience).

The main theme of evolution has changed in the world around us. This simple fact is everywhere in our view. Ogawa cleans dirt and stones from high to low. The unmanned garden is full of weeds. The other changes are more gradual, but it is more dramatic if you look at it for a long time. As our sun made five billion years ago, a powerful telescope reveals a combination of new star and dust of the Milky Way. Shortly thereafter the Earth itself was formed, at that time the rocks, dust, gas surrounding the sun condensed on our solar system planet. In historical context, creationism and evolution are always controversial subjects and are one of Darwin's major breakthroughs in spreading his evolution theory. When Darwin published his evolution theory in 1859, his book was thought of as a major technological advancement at the time. As the existence of evolution theory offsets society, there is nothing to prove the existence of God, create a catalyst, creationism is almost replaced by atheism. Since the discovery of evolution, human creation has changed rapidly. Nevertheless, the world does not understand the theory and theory of evolution of Lord Charles Darwin for a while for a while. Prior to evolution, I believed that the upper class was called "sacred creature" by being influenced by the religious ideology of how human beings were created. However, the introduction of evolution theory used this theory as the foundation of biology and changed my mind. British naturalist Charles Darwin revolutionized biology through his evolution process and natural selection process. Herbert Spencer is the main philosopher of biological and social evolution. The research of Spencer in the 19th century had a great influence on the development of biology, psychology, sociology and anthropology. Although Darwin influences the field of natural history and geology, his evolution theory has caused a big controversy. - Some of Herbert Scott's poems are about the food industry. At The Boss, he commented on the fact that all types of people will buy groceries, "rich, ugly, beautiful, sweet. He comes from a traditional school, and he The words used indicate that he is in the working class, he believed that when he came from an old school, he must live there to succeed in business "

When I started this course to rethink the world view, I thought that my world view was a Christian theologian. I am not irritated by this discovery, but I am surprised. Then I realized that I was not educated and did not know God as I thought. In fact, my faith seems to be affected by society more than the divinity of God. Fortunately, this is a learning experience designed to bring me closer to the truth of Christians and to understand others' beliefs. Like Christians, atheists have a conscious and unconscious worldview. Christian and other theologians, have for thousands of years, view of the world that can be massage is carefully adjusted so as to correspond to the needs of the subconscious to human endogenous (or rather a series of world view) . If you plug it in and pass it through the edge system, you can create a functional emotion support system. An atheist does not have it. Often some philosophies can hardly be understood, they deal with the same needs, but there is little support for them, and the leader does not. The 'New Atheist' movement brought cultural support to atheism, but its content was very disadvantageous. When I started this course to rethink the world view, I thought that my world view was a Christian theologian. I am not irritated by this discovery, but I am surprised. Then I realized that I was not educated and did not know God as I thought. In fact, my faith seems to be affected by society more than the divinity of God. - Human experience is a connection between people and people. Our experience defines who we are and who we are. It also defines how we interact with others. To my surprise, the events that bring joy, comfort and happiness are related not only to us but also to events that lead to anxiety, fear and despair. This reveals the fact that God uses all the benefits of those who love him in his sovereigns in some way. The purpose of ICW is to introduce the concept of world view, to define the line of Christian world view, and to investigate preliminary criticism about non-Christian world view. My first criticism was that the author 's account of Christian' s worldview was shaped by occasional baptismal assumptions of their conservative evangelism - even sometimes distorted. In other words, they occasionally confuse the details of their iconic Christian worldview with the simplicity of the Christian world view, or C. S. Lewis calls it "pure Christianity".

What do you think about yourself? How other people are looking at you. Do you really care? The answer to all these questions depends on the culture you have cultivated. In most cases scientists believe that culture plays a very important role in human development. A woman raised in India may grow into a traditional woman married to young people, working part-time and devoting much of their time to her family. If the same person grew up in a more Western country, she can go to university and pursue career until she is 30 years old. Please see the religious research paper collection. These sample articles are intended to make it easy to understand how to write such written tasks. Religion is a given act and practice, world view, text, sanctification, moral or organizational culture system that ties humans to supernatural or transcendental ones. However, there is no academic consensus on what constitutes religion. Different religions include various elements including sacred, sacred, belief, supernatural existence or supernatural existence, or "certain ultimate polarity and transcendental given to the rest of life" It may or may not be included. Norms and strength "Religious activities include rituals, sermons, memorials or worship (God), sacrifices, festivals, festivals, profanity, enlightenment, funeral services, marriage services, meditation, prayer, music, arts, dance, public services, or Other aspects of human culture are included. Unfortunately, as we accidently believe that cultural practices mistakenly believe that they are directed to particular gods, or because they mistakenly believe that it is a supernatural existence, most people are concerned about religion I have a distorted view. This is obvious when people try to solve this problem. If you desire, you can call distorted views a religion, but this is distortion or misrepresentation of religion. The Bible contains a true religion as a place to visit mothers and orphans in a miserable state. When religion wants to support their view that it is a good work, or is in a negative situation, it is usually a background when it is a sign of religious spirit to do something repeatedly. "Religion" is not one thing. Religion is not a set of ideas, and most people in the world have a lot of opinions. Almost all opinions that can be held are held by a particular religion. Because there are many religions that do not contain the concept of God, this includes even atheism. The world can not be divided into "religious people" and "non religious people". Whether or not there are religious believers, it is divided into people with some opinion and those with other opinions. Often "religious" views are blamed for differences when secular differences lead to more conflicts, wars, killings, repression, and other distinct evils in the FAR FAR.

This online exhibition provides insights on how the state-created documents are formed and the role that imagination and vision plays in creating autonomous nation-state creative behavior I will. As part of the political party formation in the 1790s, it included a speech by Alexander Hamilton by George Washington. This exhibition builds an American colony, shapes the early American life and politics, and explores the role of religion in forming the United States. The chapter entitled "Religion and Federal Government" includes a wide aspect of speech and speech by Alexander Hamilton's Washington's parting. In a farewell speech, Washington advised his compatriots that "religion and morality" is the "pillar of human happiness and the most decisive pillars of human and citizen's responsibility". He added that "national morality" can not exclude religious principles. " "Ethics or morals", he concludes that the product of religion is "Spring required for the government of the people". President Eisenhower's 50th anniversary speech will soon begin. Eisenhower's speech on 17th January 1961 - following George Washington's farewell speech, perhaps the most important farewell speech in the presidential history - the most memorable is that his military - industrial complex It is a warning. That concern is still unresolved as well as the defense budget. The biggest concern during President Eisenhower's speech and during office as president is how his beloved country can protect his specialty, freedom and authority while protecting himself from new enemies did. His account of Communist enemies is ruthless: "We are confronted with hostile ideologies - global, atheism, ruthless, and latent." Advice to Booker T. Washington's US citizen is the same as that of George Washington. In his farewell speech, George Washington's first order is "the most important purpose to promote the universal penetration of knowledge, according to public opinion given to public opinion by public opinion, public opinion Whether elected or not, the greatest politicians are people who understand this important connection between our government's form and education. Personally, there are few people who are strong or enthusiastic as Booker T. Washington lives this truth. For this purpose, he is the best process to acquire the house, company and wealth undertaken by a firm level of education (most importantly, including moral qualities) is the best and indeed I am convinced that it is the only way to establish racial communism. First of all, it is important to mention that George Washington's parting speech was made in September 1796 and announced in the media on September 19, 1796. According to Kaufman, the US daily advertiser, first published on David Claypoole on September 19, 1796, entitled "US Washington State Addresses Rejecting US President's Term" saw. It was reprinted everywhere in the newspaper and was later reprinted in the form of a brochure (Kaufman, 1969). In this way, George Washington can say that he decided to present his farewell speech to the country. Meanwhile, there are no constitutional provisions restricting the president's term of office, and Washington will be the head of the US government for many years.

The video shows the most amazing and famous Temple of Latter-day Saints in the world (LDS / Mormonism temple). I like to see temples are the videos I showed in lecture of elementary school lessons. Please tell us in the comments below (Late Saints) LDS Temple Collection is your favorite? The picture is from http://www.ldschurchtemples.com/temples/. Music from http://ow.ly/k9CI. For details of the Latter-day Saint and its temple, please visit http://lds.org. Los Angeles California Temple is the second largest temple operated by the Latter-day Saints Jesus Christ Church in Santa Monica Boulevard near Westwood in Los Angeles. It is the first LDS temple built in 1956 and built in California, the world's largest temple. Due to the multiethnic population of Los Angeles various beliefs including Buddhism, Hinduism, Islam, worship of fire, Sikhism, Bahai, various Orthodox churches, and Sufism have been carried out. For example, immigrants from Asia formed many important Buddhist congregations and made the city home to the most diverse Buddhist in the world. The first Buddhist temple was founded in the city in 1875. Atheism and other secular beliefs are also common as it is the largest city in the western United States. In 2011, the Canadian LDS Church claimed to have about 200,000 members; the Canadian National Household Survey of 2011 calculated about 100,000 people. It has a congregation in all the provinces and territories of Canada and has at least one temple in 6 of the 10 provinces, including the oldest LDS temples outside the United States. Alberta Province boasts the largest number of LDS churches in Canada, accounting for about 40% of the total membership in LDS church in Canada and 2% of the total population of Jeonju (According to a national household survey, More than 50% of the population). 1.6% of Mormons and the state's population, followed by Ontario and British Columbia I visited Buddhist temples in this region many times. If you want to see Korea, it is like visiting a Buddhist temple. I visited the cathedral of another country many times. If you want to see the country of Europe, it is like visiting the cathedral. It means history and culture. From the beginning, we walked with religion from art, architecture, music and so on. But religion from our thoughts and thoughts becomes too strong. For what? for whom? In order to gain power, they use religion. Then, powerful people use religion more effectively as a tool. When someone talks about religious matters it is difficult to say no. History proved this. Think of the war we experienced. When I saw the world map, the boundary line of Africa made me feel pain. It is like someone is carving with a ruler. Just like using a pencil and ruler to make squares and triangles. How can we shape the boundary line? Is this the character of mankind?

Polytheism, 7910 Woodmont Avenue, Suite 450, Bethesda, 20814, German philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche, issued by the World Future Association at the end of the 19th century, wrote a fictional account of a madman. For the town, I declared that "God is dead". Nietzsche's story shows the atheistic wave spread by European intellectuals from the late nineteenth century to the early twentieth century, but this atheism is never popular as a whole society. Nietzsche developed his aesthetic critique of Christianity (and Judaism) by celebrating the polytheistic superiority to monotheism. Against monotheism, while all people have "general type and ideal", polytheism is a phenomenon that individuals "build their own ideals and bring out their own laws, joy and rights" It makes it possible. It is first respected that an individual is allowed to be "the first and" individual rights "for the first time. Only polytheism is able to observe the power of the world through a multifaceted perspective which is the ability to distinguish between humans and other animals. "In polytheistic, free spirits and multiparticians got the first early form - to create our own new eye for ourselves - to become our own new eyes again : Therefore, all animal men have no eternal vision and prospect - (GS 143) https://the-eye.eu/public/concen.org/UChicagoPress.Ebook.Pack-2016-PHC/9780226259819.UChicago%20Press.Nietzsche%27s%20Enlightenment_%20The% 20Free-Spirit%20Free-Spirit%20Trilogy% 20of% 20the% 20Middle% 20Period.Paul% 20Franco.Oct% 2C2011.pdf Detailed research on the energy elements of Levantine onomastica in the 1st century BC has revealed that there is no opposition between monotheism and polytheism, but rather there are different types of polytheism. The Hebrew, Ammonic, and Moab language names have a limited number of gods and sacred nicknames that look like developing polytheism, but the Aramis and Phoenician names contain quite a number It is. They represent obviously developed polytheism. Due to the beliefs of individual family religions, it seems that this difference should be done less often - they are very similar through Levante - the stage of social development of the problem and the international business And more about the scope to be integrated into political relations. People with worry: Revaluation of culture / Authorization of Hezekiah's prayer (2 Kings 37: 14 - 19 / Isaiah 37: 14 - 20) While accepting the existence of other gods, devotion to God. Created by Max Muller, it is said to be "in principle monotheism, in fact polytheism." The term change is a comprehensive monotheism and monotheismatic polytheism, and it is designed to distinguish between different forms of phenomena. Philosophical theory believes that God exists (or must exist) and is independent of the teachings and revelations of a particular religion. Some philosophical experts persuaded the existence of God through philosophical controversy others believe that there are religious beliefs that can not be needed or supported by rational arguments.

Matthew Harrison inherited the style of Brady: Jerome Lawrence and Robert E. Lee no one deceived. He may initially look strong, but he has no real. Such erroneous fronts can be compared with the water behind the Earth Dam. It may temporarily hold water, but when water finds weak points, the entire structure collapses with all the water behind it. In Brady, water represents the inside of the stickiness of his personality. When he becomes uneasy in front of the audience he once adored, all his liquidity will collapse. "Inheritance Wind" in which Kirk Douglas and Jason Robards produced by David Papazian directed by David Greene appeared was arranged by Jerome Lawrence and Robert E. Lee. The drama "inherited wind" was inspired by the "Monkey Judgment" in 1925, where a teacher was arrested and tried to teach a course of evolution. But the movie "inheritance" should not be regarded as a documentary, should not be regarded as a true record of the experiment, but rather it should be regarded as a dramatic movie that shapes it by raising it to convey a strong message to the audience . "Inheritance Wind" is a well-made movie with high-quality performance, photographs of films, and funny and interesting stories. However, inheritance winds are not departing from the historical facts of the "monkey trial" in order to show prejudice to the audience, they should practice what they preach. Still, the inheritance wind is still worth recommending, but it is for those who have strong concern and are interested in the dramatic conflict of opinions and beliefs. From open credit to the very end, inheritance winds celebrate human thought and claim to be the greatest gift for all, as they claim it is the key to our existence. Everyone should make their own judgment and choices according to their free will and no one has the right to control other people's thoughts and beliefs. However, when communicating information to the audience, the succession wind itself strongly manipulates the viewer's thoughts and emotions, and shakes their beliefs in particular in the direction of atheism. An atheist who inherits the wind is said to be a tolerant and forgiving intellectual who suffers from ignorant, narrow Christian paranoia 's hands. This depiction attempts to abandon their religious beliefs and influence viewers to support their ideas. "Darwin took us to the top of the mountain and we could look back from there and see what we came from - Drummond

Percy Bysshe Shelley (1792-1822) is a sad genius trying to lead a happy life. He is fascinated by history, language and philosophy and is very happy with the children He trying to improve the situation in our world seriously becomes a religious student. He mastered Latin and Greek, thought about the great philosopher, and suddenly was born - he became a mix of Lucretius, Prini, Hume, Rock, Dolbach, Bacon, Voltaire, Spinoza, Franklin, Pain and the Master It was. The idea of ​​the body and other giants is integrated in his shimmering heart. August 4, 1792 - Year of fear of France - Percy Bysshe Shelley (his grandfather's "Bysshe", a member of the same field) is the son of Timothy and Elizabeth Shelley. As brothers, John and the four sisters Elizabeth, Mary, Margaret, and Helen's eldest son, Percy, not only inherited the great estate of his grandfather, but lined up to sit on Congress one day. As the oldest boy, a young Persie is their love and longing for his sister, his parents, even his early dominant servants, and a family house near Horsham in Sussex. Young lord of the field. He was full of fun and imagination, designed a game to play with the sisters, and told the ghost stories to joy and joyful crowds. Percy Bysshe Shelley was born on Field Place on August 4, 1792. His ancestors began to be Sussex aristocrats from the beginning of the 17th century. His grandfather, Sir Byshe Shelly, made himself the most rich man in Horsham, and his father, Timothy Sherry, was a calm traditional parliamentarian. Percy Bysshe Shelly was sent to Eton for education and continued his studies at Oxford. At that time he released two spy stories and poems. In Oxford in autumn of 1810, Shelley and his best friend, Thomas Jefferson Hogg, created a booklet on the necessity of atheism and claimed that the existence of God can not prove to be the reason for experience. Sherry refused to reject the file, so Sherry and T. J. Hogg were rejected. The incident opened a violation between Sherry and his father, and his father interrupted all his relations with his son. He went to London Mary Sherry, born in London in 1797, was the daughter of famous radical artists William Godwin and Mary Worth Craft. In 1814, as soon as she met, she fell in love with Percy Bysshe Shelly who was not known at the time. In December 1816 when Shelly 's first wife committed suicide, Mary married Percy. Since she lived in Italy from 1818 to 1822 when she drowned, Mary returned to London as a professional novel, story, and essayist and died in 1851. Charlotte Gordon's previous publications include romantic Water Margin: Mary's extraordinary life Wollstonecraft and her daughter Mary Shelley (2015), B actress Bradstreet: First American Poet's Unknown Story (2005). A woman named God: Abraham's dilemma and the birth of three faiths (2009). The romantic Water Margin received the 2016 National Book Critics Biography Award. Currently she is an excellent humanistic professor at Endicott College.

The world will be like theology, the intention is "its appearance absolutely. That is certainly the case ..." Bradley "And see everyone - they are all over them." [ And from this standpoint, Schopenhauer can only see "atheists" from a narrow perspective. There is another option for atheism and West / Middle East monotheism (Judaism, Christianity), Islam. Theologians think a lot. They think about the relationship between God, the world, and God and the world. They call it theology. Our theologian changed the theology of this word to a verb: "Theology" or "Theology." This is because theology is an activity. It is an act of shaping imagination about how the world relates to God and what it means to man. Theology and philosophy, music and art, about how we imagine and materialize time and space Theology has two forms, philosophy and religion. Philosophical theology ("natural theology") is a subdivision of philosophy. It uses natural human reasons to explore the most important of all problems, questions about God. Religious theology (or "eschatological theology") is a reasonable exploration of the meaning and consequences of faith in revealing religion - in our case the Catholic Church's "faith deposit" or "sacred tradition "Comes from Christ and his apostles Written Scripture When thinking about theology of Christianity, people think that it is only related to religion and God. Theology is a study of religion and the relationship between God and the world. Theology is based on the Old Testament and the New Testament of the Bible, and the historical tradition practiced by Christians. It has been practiced for thousands of years. People always try to justify, review, clarify, defend or promote Christian reasons. When it comes to all work of Christ in Christianity, misfit seems to understand most aspects of Christianity. How he sees Christian faith depends entirely on how he lives his / her life. "Our sacred concept tells us more about life than it can be done by most people - Are you thinking carefully or ignoring the results of the hypothesis Is it there? - It leads our life. " CHSOC 473 / World emerging theology Christianity (3) presents representative examples of many new theologians Christian churches are prospering all over the world. Participants explored ways to clarify certain themes of traditional Christianity in one theology using interesting demonstration articles (most of which are collected in the editor's "readers"). Please sign the instructor necessary for registration. Same: RLSOC 788. CHSOC 476 / American Spanish culture and religion (3) introduce the history, culture, economy and politics of American Hispanic. In addition to lectures, this course uses feature films, novels and short stories to promote reflection, discussion and research on subjects in the American Spanish and Latin OS. I emphasize religious aspects of the experience of Latin America in the United States. Same as RLSOC 722

Concept of the author's human nature Through all of the Western world and our written history, philosophers, politicians, and writers have discovered the importance of understanding the nature of human beings. Human beings are responsible for our definition of abstraction with amazing universality across Western countries such as justice, fairness and law. Mankind must also be carefully studied to understand, acquire or maintain the power of society. Finally, the essence of human beings must be carefully understood to protect the essence of human being from the operation and understanding of its place in society. In this article I think that we may not need much knowledge about human nature as there is moral concern to change it by biotechnology. We do not need the concept of nature or the concept of humanity - or it may be fundamentalist and static. There is not necessarily a need to identify the meaning of human beings in order to link the moral meaning to the situation of mankind and cautious about its technical operation. In order to have moral concern about changing it we do not need to have a complete theory of humanity. Concept of the author's human nature Through all of the Western world and our written history, philosophers, politicians, and writers have discovered the importance of understanding the nature of human beings. Human beings are responsible for our definition of abstraction with amazing universality across Western countries such as justice, fairness and law. Mankind must also be carefully studied to understand, acquire or maintain the power of society. Finally, the essence of human beings must be carefully understood to protect the essence of human being from the operation and understanding of its place in society. Naturally it works hierarchically. Western philosophers have used this concept to prove the existence of a hierarchical system in human society. It exists in nature (and always exists). Still, despite lowering the natural level to this level, I can not draw a complete picture. As usual, the West provides rational and systematic theory, while the East provides nuances and reflections. Let's take a closer look. The concept of spirituality has been linked to higher powers over the years. The atheism of the mass has returned all religions to slavery of certain image of God. This is an easy way to prove the superiority of childishness and arrogance. When humans try to remove their religious beliefs, they admit that they are very powerful. As individuals, they began to think that they were the center of the universe.

Statement of diversity - I am hoping that Hubert Harrison was born in St. Croix in the Virgin Islands in 1883 and became the most famous atheism in America in the 1920s. One of them. Harrison was a controversial man since childhood. He came to New York at the age of 17 and used foreign language knowledge to find postal work. This allows him to pursue his passion for learning and writing. However, when he wrote an article criticizing Booker T, the pursuit of the latter soon put him and his boss into the water. In 1917, "Hurlem's extremist father" Hubert Harrison founded the Freedom League and voice, the first organization of the "New Black Movement" and the first newspaper. Harrison's organization and newspaper are political, but also emphasize art (his newspaper has a book review "Poems for people"). In 1927, Harrison challenged the concept of Renaissance with the Pittsburgh Messenger team. He believed that the concept of the "black Renaissance" ignored "the flow of literary works flowing from black writers from 1850 to the present", he said that the so-called "Renaissance" is primarily a white invention. Hubert Harrison (left, 1883 - 1927) is a name you might not be accustomed to. He is a Western Indian American writer, a political activist who worked at Harlem and influenced the radical knowledge of A. Phillip Randolph and Marcus Garvey directly due to the new black movement. With numerous molecules, he claims class consciousness, secular humanism, and social progressiveism - he is also a socialist. For several years, he and the American Socialist Party (1912-1914) were deeply involved in the organizational level and then turned to other things. So I started writing this article with Hubert Harrison's work. Before explaining why discussions on economic justice are whitewashed, we must understand socialism. After leaving the American Socialist Party, Harrison will continue to be an editor of the Black World, Marcus Garvey's United Nations Black Association (UNIA) newspaper, which has 500,000 subscribers. As a result, Garvey affected Malcolm X and Martin Luther King Jr. Apparently, Dani Harrison followed the footsteps of his father. However, rather than mimicking what George Harrison does, Dani Harrison walks his way and incorporates his point of view in lawsuits. That's why I think his debut is the beginning of a solid and successful personal career.

The concept of "bad belief" in Sartre's philosophy shows that Paul Sartre is a French philosopher, a versatile thinker, and a writer. He is known today for his extraordinary research in the field of his two systems and philosophy. In addition to these two phenomena "existence and insignificance" and "dialectical criticism", Sartre developed several short philosophical versions, including several scripts, plays, novels, articles on art and literary criticism Did. Short story, autobiography, scores of news and political writing, and unique biographies of different writers. Jean-Paul Sartre is known for his responsible philosophy. He explains that people are suffering under the pressure of responsibility or actively avoiding responsibility. Sartre 's existentialism is often associated with atheism, but religious thought is often accompanied by responsibility. For example, Kierkegaard is a Christian philosopher of the 19th century and we believe that the confrontation responsibility is the result of a true human condition, that is, the positive contact with the reality. As Christianity requires superhuman effort and constant uncertainty, or fear and tremor, he provokes the church in a radical way. An example of the most important human suffering of Kiakegaard is Abraham's Old Testament. The concept of "bad belief" in Sartre's philosophy shows that Paul Sartre is a French philosopher, a versatile thinker, and a writer. He is known today for his extraordinary research in the field of his two systems and philosophy. - Friedrich Nietzsche is a German philosopher living between 1844 and 1900. His argument against eternal recurrence is one of his most controversial works. This concept, over time, shows that the world is always self-destructive and is self-creative afterwards. He made the eternal concept of Christianity fundamental, combined it with simple reasoning, and proposed innovative concepts. "Unfavorable belief" is, of course, a concept developed by Jean-Paul Sartre, but Midgley criticized even though Sartre claimed that it was totally free. Midley exaggerates Sartre's position, but this is also a myth. Sartre is very aware that the freedom of being "denied" is limited by what he calls "facts". The world is also a person's own composition; I might like to be an artist, but if I do not have artistic talent this fact will limit my freedom; constitution that is also malignant Example Throughout the description of "malicious" Sartre concluded that pointlessness is an important part of consciousness. Without it, it is impossible to be malicious. Sartre said that malice is the danger of essence of consciousness. Malicious acts prove that our aim is to avoid liability, but according to Sartre we are obliged to take responsibility. For Sartre absolute freedom means absolute responsibility. In his novel "disgusting" Sartre, the existence of a person is a mystery, a paradox, its nature and purpose can not be subtlely summarized in any expression. People are not alive like pure beings, but he may understand themselves with disgusting experiences. Roquentin found in nausea: "It is inevitable that it is a coincidence, by definition I mean that existence can not be thought of as necessary. With this garden, town and I myself. "

My history is a special topic for my father. His story is the major source, politics and events of the world that I changed from 1911 to 1986. He was born in 1911 with one brother who served in World War I and another brother who served in World War II. In my opinion, history will be a kind of storytelling, but once the reality comes up, I will soon be disappointed. The textbook lacks the qualities of a thick, dry, genuine, concrete, and my father's story than any book I have ever seen. A classic anecdote is a pleasant surprise and my heart and mind always have history classes (I currently teach skills). I can not necessarily agree with his view of history, but interesting is part of history. You do not have to agree to someone's perspective to enjoy it. Everyone who follows the page on Facebook I know that Taleb and I can not agree very well in other areas than history and politics. Professor Taleb did not agree with Richard Dawkins' evolution theory (although I agree with Talibu's extreme atheism to Dawkins), he agreed with Stephen Pink's view on the global trend of global violence reduction There was not. And against those who like to use biotechnology for breeding crops Without learning the humanities science, we can build a framework of discussion without history, how we can succeed or lead the results of technology and science to lead Homo sapiens without humanities, Please tell me how to properly discuss technology costs. The way to build a more just society using male and female compatriots, technology and science is ultimately the most influential and most influential ownership and our most awesome cruelty It will be. History shows that the transition of mankind from one world order to another world order always accompanies accumulation of new production technology; in principle, this transformation is inspired by war and revolution. Critical mass of new technology that accumulated the breakthrough of the next civilization. However, the cycle of the new war and revolution can be fatal for individuals as well as for the entire human race. Therefore, breaking the circle of the world history is very important for entering a new level of world civilization development without waiting for other world class catastrophes.

Sikh, Zoroastrianism, Baha'i, spiritualism are increasing more and more. People are looking for true beliefs that are not ruled by greed and hypocrisy. So far the territory of the remote region of the world is running. Sherman and medical men are practicing on isolated islands in Africa, Australia and New Zealand. Atheism is a concept, all religious beliefs are collections of bundles, and are supported by the whole world. There are thousands of religious activities and beliefs all over the world. A major problem in our society is that many people are not intelligent to accept religion but have no smart attitude of finding an acceptable alternative, and as many people have strong will, organizations I do not want to become. People, but they can not surpass the protest. These situations create a sense of "between the two stool", which lacks a real motive; it creates a sense of tension that may find its way in violent or systematic antisocial behavior Why are there so many religions? Can you have so many gods? There may be people who think that there is neither truth nor religion. It is thought that each of us should find the truth of the religion that we are seeking for ourselves. There are many religious doctrines claiming to be the only truth. However, in order not to harm anyone, society avoids publicly showing religious beliefs. As a result, seemingly heartless, transparent society, seemingly indifferent and lonely world filled with people who crave the truth. Most people do not seek religious enlightenment for themselves, but obediently blindly consider them to be enlightened leaders or enlightened poetry. Organized religion can be very helpful by fostering community awareness among believers. Unfortunately, it may also cause conflicts between different groups of believers. We are human beings and the religion to follow is human beings. If the religion is immortal, no other religion is necessary. Religion is enough. The fact that there are so many religions conveys to us that all religions established by prophets are deadly religions through God's revelation. After a while, consumption has ended, the religion has ended. In the days when they wanted to extract oil from almonds and olives, they placed a round pot with a stick and tied it to the bull; the bull crushed it around the circle. Bull does not reach anywhere, it will be several tens of thousands of laps. Likewise, we obey our religion, but they will not take us anywhere because they are not traveling. Expired

They had been dating for a while, but then Percy was angry with her. Now, his interest is that the teacher invented his first major poem called Queen Mab named Elizabeth Hitchchener. In the second half of 1812, he met a radical political philosopher named his hero, William Godwin. Harriet and Percy had problems with the whole relationship, but there were still two children. The first child was a girl born in June, 1813. Before Harriette gave birth to a second child, Percy left and immediately got interested in another young woman. She is the daughter of William Godwin. Frank Wolf wrote Percy Bachel Shelley's lifetime in 1927, "Several stories have to be reconsidered by each generation, not that we have something new to add to them. It also makes them a story of not only Sherry but also our own story: "The life of a great man and woman has become this for centuries, for Virginia Woolf himself this is true. This is truth for everyone.In the beginning of her comprehensive Wolf's new biography, British scholar Hermione Lee raises several other sentences from other Wolf's biographies: "Virginia Wolf Is Miss Steven. "Virginia Woolf is the subject Sexually abused children: She is an incest survivor Virginia Woo lf is "crazy"? "Is Virginia Woolf crazy?" "1 Etcetera, please wait." It seems that it is no longer possible, Lee wrote. That is the beginning: 'Adeline Virginia Stephen was born on January 25, 1882. "" August 4, 1792 - Year of fear of France - Percy Bysshe Shelley (his grandfather's "Bysshe", a member of the same field) is the son of Timothy and Elizabeth Shelley. As brothers, John and the four sisters Elizabeth, Mary, Margaret, and Helen's eldest son, Percy, not only inherited the great estate of his grandfather, but lined up to sit on Congress one day. As the oldest boy, a young Persie is their love and longing for his sister, his parents, even his early dominant servants, and a family house near Horsham in Sussex. Young lord of the field. He was full of fun and imagination, designed a game to play with the sisters, and told the ghost stories to joy and joyful crowds. Percy Bysshe Shelley was born on Field Place on August 4, 1792. His ancestors began to be Sussex aristocrats from the beginning of the 17th century. His grandfather, Sir Byshe Shelly, made himself the most rich man in Horsham, and his father, Timothy Sherry, was a calm traditional parliamentarian. Percy Bysshe Shelley was sent to Eton for education and continued studying at Oxford. At that time he released two spy stories and poems. In Oxford in autumn of 1810, Shelley and his best friend, Thomas Jefferson Hogg, created a booklet on the necessity of atheism and claimed that the existence of God can not prove to be the reason for experience. Sherry refused to reject the file, so Sherry and T. J. Hogg were rejected. The incident opened a violation between Sherry and his father, and his father interrupted all his relations with his son. He went to London

In the drama "inheritance wind" by Jerome Lawrence and Robert Lee, there are many social injustices in the controversy, which is why they did not have the opportunity to win the case. An example of prejudice in town is town love for Matthew Harrison Brady. The second example is the extreme obedience and pious attitude of the people of the town. The last example is a narrow way of thinking by judges and jurors, leading to an unfair trial. In a nutshell, defense has encountered many unfair circumstances in the 'inherited wind' of the TV series. The first example of town prejudice was the overall feeling of attorney lawyer Brady. "Inheritance Wind" in which Kirk Douglas and Jason Robards produced by David Papazian directed by David Greene appeared was arranged by Jerome Lawrence and Robert E. Lee. The drama "inherited wind" was inspired by the "Monkey Judgment" in 1925, where a teacher was arrested and tried to teach a course of evolution. But the movie "inheritance" should not be regarded as a documentary, should not be regarded as a true record of the experiment, but rather it should be regarded as a dramatic movie that shapes it by raising it to convey a strong message to the audience . "Inheritance Wind" is a well-made movie with high-quality performance, photographs of films, and funny and interesting stories. However, inheritance winds are not departing from the historical facts of the "monkey trial" in order to show prejudice to the audience, they should practice what they preach. Still, the inheritance wind is still worth recommending, but it is for those who have strong concern and are interested in the dramatic conflict of opinions and beliefs. From open credit to the very end, inheritance winds celebrate human thought and claim to be the greatest gift for all, as they claim it is the key to our existence. Everyone should make their own judgment and choices according to their free will and no one has the right to control other people's thoughts and beliefs. However, when communicating information to the audience, the succession wind itself strongly manipulates the viewer's thoughts and emotions, and shakes their beliefs in particular in the direction of atheism. An atheist who inherits the wind is said to be a tolerant and forgiving intellectual who suffers from ignorant, narrow Christian paranoia 's hands. This depiction attempts to abandon their religious beliefs and influence viewers to support their ideas. "Darwin took us to the top of the mountain and we could look back from there and see what we came from - Drummond

This verse, sacrifice and novel, Chapter 8 of Pi of Life tells about the scene of sacrifice. Both articles use some common features to arouse reader's fear and shock. They all explain the entire scene as completely disgusting and frightening. There are many similarities in the way text uses literary features. And there are many differences. These two texts use images of the same meaning to indicate how bad the scene is. When Pi felt his "mother's hand" in his "bouncing heart", when the goat said that the hand of "four hands" imprisoned my cramped feet, "they all I showed a touch image. The character in the title of Yann Martel's novel "Pi of Life" explains his feelings about religion in Chapter 7. In this chapter, Pi explains the dialogue with one of his teachers, atheist, Satish Kumar. He has been to Pi's father's zoo. Mr. Kumar told peel that the zoo is like a temple for him. Pi answered with the word "religion rescues us". Pi tells the majority of the story, and then says religion is always in his mind. He is also a young man who likes to learn and respect authority. When Mr. Kumar said that religion is dark, Pi feels that his world is shocked. He praised and respected Mr. Kumar, but he learned that Mr. Kumar did not recognize what he cherook. When revealing that he suffered from polio as a child, when he shouted "Where is God?" Pi worried that Kumar's atheism might destroy what Pi liked. The writer is in his novel "The Skin of Life". Martel uses highly descriptive images such as lifeboats, landscapes of the same kind of food on an island landscape, Pi's house through novels drawn by novels, oranges, even Pi's names, fears, anthropomorphism, Support special topics such as pain Symbolic meaning Survival, hope and vulnerability. Yan Martel supports hyena as a symbol of evil and violence, supporting the theme of fear and survival. Pi expresses hyena as "ugliness of transcendental relief" I was explored in Yann Martel, a novel written by Life of Pi. Pi 's life is a story about a young boy in India called Piscine or Pi, trapped in a life - sized boat in the Pacific after a shipwreck. Since he was able to survive unnaturally in the unnatural power of nature and the solitude he felt, Pi experienced growth from a child to a young adult. In addition to exploring the true nature of mankind, the primary role of Pi in life exploration and self-defense is instinctive instinct, often caused by painful pain. In Pi's novel Life, Yann Martel exemplifies the concept of survival, as wrecked inhabitants experienced painful hardships and sufferings. Through the behavior of different characters to predict the concept of will, they show their ambition to life. Attempt of their brave or stupid self contradiction

This verse, sacrifice and novel, Chapter 8 of Pi of Life tells about the scene of sacrifice. Both articles use some common features to arouse reader's fear and shock. They all explain the entire scene as completely disgusting and frightening. There are many similarities in the way text uses literary features. And there are many differences. These two texts use images of the same meaning to indicate how bad the scene is. When Pi felt his "mother's hand" in his "bouncing heart", when the goat said that the hand of "four hands" imprisoned my cramped feet, "they all I showed a touch image. The character in the title of Yann Martel's novel "Pi of Life" explains his feelings about religion in Chapter 7. In this chapter, Pi explains the dialogue with one of his teachers, atheist, Satish Kumar. He has been to Pi's father's zoo. Mr. Kumar told peel that the zoo is like a temple for him. Pi answered with the word "religion rescues us". Pi tells the majority of the story, and then says religion is always in his mind. He is also a young man who likes to learn and respect authority. When Mr. Kumar said that religion is dark, Pi feels that his world is shocked. He praised and respected Mr. Kumar, but he learned that Mr. Kumar did not recognize what he cherook. When revealing that he suffered from polio as a child, when he shouted "Where is God?" Pi worried that Kumar's atheism might destroy what Pi liked. The writer is in his novel "The Skin of Life". Martel uses highly descriptive images such as lifeboats, landscapes of the same kind of food on an island landscape, Pi's house through novels drawn by novels, oranges, even Pi's names, fears, anthropomorphism, Support special topics such as pain Symbolic meaning Survival, hope and vulnerability. Yan Martel supports hyena as a symbol of evil and violence, supporting the theme of fear and survival. Pi expresses hyena as "ugliness of transcendental relief" I was explored in Yann Martel, a novel written by Life of Pi. Pi 's life is a story about a young boy in India called Piscine or Pi, trapped in a life - sized boat in the Pacific after a shipwreck. Since he was able to survive unnaturally in the unnatural power of nature and the solitude he felt, Pi experienced growth from a child to a young adult. In addition to exploring the true nature of mankind, the primary role of Pi in life exploration and self-defense is instinctive instinct, often caused by painful pain. In Pi's novel Life, Yann Martel exemplifies the concept of survival, as wrecked inhabitants experienced painful hardships and sufferings. Through the behavior of different characters to predict the concept of will, they show their ambition to life. Attempt of their brave or stupid self contradiction

William Butler Yeats: Modernist William Butler Yeats is an Irish poet of the 19th century. William Butler Yeats was born in Dublin, Ireland in 1865. He was educated in Dublin and London and in 1877 wrote his first passage (nobelprize.org). He wrote many poems in his life, thought to be the most influential poet of his time. He is very influential in the modernist era. William Butler Yeats is one of the most famous poets of the 19th century. William Butler Yeats wrote the Victorian and Modernist literature, but still had a major impact on modernism style. William Butler Yeats is a poet and playwright (playwright) in Ireland. Some people think he is the greatest poet in the 20th century. He received the Nobel Prize in literature in 1923. The work of William Butler Yeats has a clear bridge between the romantic poetry of the 19th century and the word of modern poetry. William Butler Yeats was born in Dublin, Ireland on 13th June 1865. He is the oldest of the four children of portrait painter John Butler Yeats. His father took part in William's regular school education at home, which gave him a permanent hobby of the classics. John Yeats has a strong personality. His personal philosophy incorporates aesthetics (belief that art and beauty are important to all) and atheism (belief without God). William felt its impact long after. Because it appeared in his interest to Magic and occultusum (supernatural). William Butler Yeats: Modernist William Butler Yeats is an Irish poet of the 19th century. William Butler Yeats was born in Dublin, Ireland in 1865. He was educated in Dublin and London and in 1877 wrote his first passage (nobelprize.org). He wrote many poems in his life, thought to be the most influential poet of his time. He is very influential in the modernist era. William Butler Yeats is one of the most famous poets of the 19th century. - The detailed paragraph is not Octavian of Octavian 's surprising life Nothing. It is on pages 222-236. Anderson It describes a scientific paper by Gitney and Sharpe and a letter from Dr. Trefusis, a document about the death of Cassiopeia, a memoir written by Octavian (a poem written by Theoginis). These pages start with Smallpox, Octavian 29-year-old mother, Cassiopeia's smallpox disease William Butler Yeats' poem William Butler Yeats is an Irish poet, playwright, and essayist - one of the greatest British poets of the 20th century. (Ye Zhi 1) His early poetry and theater got ideas from Irish fables and esoteric studies. (Ellman 1) When Ye Zhi wrote about his country he used nationalism to avoid themes of oppression, social division and solidarity. - William Wordsworth can better understand his view on the destruction of nature in his poem "A line written in early spring." Through anthropomorphization, he shows nature life-like and entertains life. However, human beings are still destroying what they call "the sacred plan of nature" (8). The whole poem is about the interaction between nature and man. Wordsworth is obviously not satisfied with human beings making it to the world.

In the formal religion of today, the essence of God can not be found. In the novel 'The Wind Looking People', the writer W.O. Mitchell essentially wants to believe and convey this message. He said that the grassland is composed of the simplest natural form, complete nature, and the religious structure of today's "god" consists only of people to alleviate their suffering and fear. As a human being, we do not actually know where we are going, or where we are coming from in this regard. The problem of religion has penetrated Pete Houtman's "Atheist" (2004), the national award winner. Hautman's novels focus on Jason Block, an atheistic teenager who began his religion after bullying failures. Although Jason's plan seemed easy at the beginning, different interpretations of 'belief' could cause trouble as his new faith gained believers including bullying. Godless is a thoughtful investigation of religious thought of young people, suggesting that they are religious, but suggests the importance of faith in society, which usually looks very secular - every belief Participants oppose religious problems. Some people believe that the decline of religion in society is a social evil. For some people it is inherently bad things they think about atheism in modern society. Other participants believe that the decline of religion is not good for this instrument and condemn the decline in value mentioned in the first half of this article. As told, there is a kind of "lonely God and absolute life" - no one will be responsible for your actions and ultimately will not decide your actions. Another person agrees that the decline of religion has resulted in "individualism, self-centeredism, loss of value, respect for human life" In the 1950s, most people practiced religion. But in the past 50 years, if you measure some of the population engaged in religious activities, America's religious beliefs will suddenly decline. The proportion of Americans not engaged in religious activities increased from 2% in 1965 to 17% in 2015. According to the forecast by Pew Research Center, the decline of religion will continue for the next 50 years. Therefore, in the United States my question seems to be a big answer. However, from the viewpoint of global trends, various situations are emerging. An estimated 1.1 billion people worldwide are irrelevant to religion. According to the Pew Research Center, by 2050 the population of the group is estimated to increase by 100 million people, the actual human proportion in this group will drop from 16.4% to 13.2%.

Obviously, the world needs more wisdom and humility. But how do we develop this virtue? Why are so many people so arrogant? Will our own prejudice prevent us from becoming wise and discreet? And are there prejudices that makes it easier to actually make us discreet? Which cognitive-oriented and personality traits bring superiority in knowledge humility - is stable from birth, learning habits, or some aspect between them? Do contemporary studies on emotions tell us what promotes wisdom and humility of ourselves and other people? Psychology, philosophy, and education experts are doing exciting new research on these issues, and the results have important practical applications. In the face of difficult problems, people tend to ignore objections and ignore it. Political and moral differences are very polar and sometimes even dangerous. Whether it is Christian fundamentalism, Islamic extremism or extreme atheism, religious dialogue is still dyed by arrogance, doctrine and ignorance. The world is more sensitive to the reasons to support and oppose that belief and needs more people who think they are willing to consider the possibility of their political, religious and moral beliefs being misunderstood. The world needs more wisdom and humility. In this course we will consider the following main questions regarding science of humility. Can human perception recognize to us what is intellectual humility? How does arrogance evolve and how will we become more open? How does emotion affect our ability to become mentally humble? All lectures taught by leading experts organized around some interesting reading and practical tasks you will help solve problems related to humility in your daily life Yes. This course can be used as part of a series of articles exploring theories of the humility, science, and applications. In the theoretical course behind wisdom and humility, we thought about how to define the humility of intellectuals, the essence of intellectuals, and how we know modest people with knowledge. If you are interested, please complete all three courses to better understand this attractive theme. Looking for: Wisdom and humility: Theory - https://www.coursera.org/learn/intellectual-humility-theory Wisdom and humility: Practice - https://www.coursera.org/learn/intellectual- humility-practice Dr Church, Visiting Assistant Professor at Hillsdale University and Chief Researcher at the University of Edinburgh Intellectual Property Program, says: "Absolutely, the humility of wisdom is the virtue of accurately tracking the quality of knowledge and the evidence of your beliefs." It is humble. For the church, this means that modesty of knowledge is not necessarily compatible with serious intellectual beliefs. "If our beliefs do not interfere with evidence and reason, we will be arrogantly intelligent if we do not amend or abandon this belief based on opposing new evidence." If we know that we are right about something, the willingness to modify or abandon our beliefs may seem to be intellectually meaningful or deceivable. " Modesty relates to integrity, honesty, and selfless mind, but the intellectuals are open-minded and open minded, commensurate with their beliefs and evidence. Intellectually discreet people strongly believe in a certain topic but I am aware that they are aware of their limits and that I am willing to be wrong by others. Philosophers and psychologists who have been studying intellectual humility - for example director of Prosperity Center for Human Development - Justin Barrett - says it is a very valuable feature in the workplace and in life. Barrett is part of a project focusing on the meaning of knowledge and how to encourage it. Dr. Ian Church and Dr. Peter Samuelson are chief researchers

Marquis de Sade's attitude towards women Marquis de Sade was a French writer in the late eighteenth century. His work was notorious for their times, made Sade a reputation as a traitor, a corrupt man, and a sodomite. A more general misstatement about Saad is his attitude towards women. His attitude is reflected in his lifestyle and his two literary figures, Justine and Julliette. Marquis de Sade was considered the first and only evil philosopher for his atheism and sadism. People of the Saad family alternated the use of the title of the Marquis and Ear. His grandfather, GaspardFrançoisde Sade was the first person to use the Marquis; occasionally he was a Marquis de Sade, but in the document it was confirmed as Marquis de Mazan. It is usually necessary to assume the aristocratic title without the funds of the king, as the Saad family was the noble epape, then Frank claimed to be the nobility's nobility the nobility. Another heading usage shows that the nominal hierarchy (under the duc et pair) is nominal; theoretically, the title of Marquis is given to the aristocrat in a few counts, but the suspicious people Use leads to their fame. Priorities are not qualifications in the court, they are the benefits of the throne, not titles. There is communication between the father and the son, and the father calls his son a marquis. Marquis de Sade's attitude towards women Marquis de Sade was a French writer in the late eighteenth century. His work was notorious for their times, made Sade a reputation as a traitor, a corrupt man, and a sodomite. A more general misstatement about Saad is his attitude towards women. His attitude is reflected in his lifestyle and his two literary figures, Justine and Julliette. - Gender discrimination in the dark heart of Joseph Conrad This article discusses Conrad's novel "The Heart of Darkness" in a theme and form according to the values ​​that can be called gender discrimination. "Sex discrimination" is a cultural premise that regards women as unfair, in a different way from men. Social, intellectual, moral One Marquis de Sado born in Paris, France on June 2, 1740, or Cont. Donatien Alfons-François de Sade. He died on December 2, 1814. When Bastille was imprisoned, he wrote philosophy in the bedroom and made public. His work, Sodom, which existed over 120 years ago was lost (Carefully hidden scroll of 45 feet actually survived, but it was not discovered until 1904. Bastille's On influence, he began studying an improved and more comprehensive version of Justine, Juliette followed it, was published in 10 volumes in 1797, and was published anonymously (see Deese, P 1999-2004). The Marquis de Sade: Biography, bibliography, movies and links. Independent reference material. Biography project. Www.PopSubCulture.com)

Personal story - atheist I did not ask the pastor to come. I would rather go to see the TV during the day alone. Yes, I began to feel a little isolated, but some nasty saint I barely know will not make me feel better. But when one person is hospitalized and praying for the request and all these things, the church will be informed of the standard policy. That face helped me to a certain extent. 4 The literal definition of "atheism" is "a person who does not believe in the existence of God or God", but those who claim to be atheists say they believe in God or 8% universal spirit. In fact, 2% of people say that they absolutely confirmed the existence or universal spirit of God. Alternatively, many people conform to the definition of the "atheist" dictionary, but they are not called atheists. Because they say they are atheists (3%) about 3 times that of Americans say they do not believe in God or the general spirit (3%) By definition, an atheist is a person who does not believe in the existence of God or God, an unbeliever. But based on the above two examples and many of my conversations with atheists and families, atheists choose to believe in God enough to condemn the evil of the world. Every time I hear the question "Do you have a God?", The most common reaction is usually "There is war, starvation, famine, disease and it is impossible to exist". Very real! There is war. I feel hungry. I have famine and illness. My problem is war, famine and disease, proof of God that does not exist, selfish, inhuman, greedy, incomplete human byproduct. My first question for atheists is "What is the definition of God?" For anyone who says there is no god, he ought to know what God means. I have a book and say to a partner "This is not a pen" and saying "It is not a pen", he should know what the pen definition is. . For him, this is not a pen. Likewise, in order for an atheist to "have no god", at least know the concept of God. His concept of God will come from the environment he lives in. Many people worship the quality of God - so he does not believe such a god. Likewise, Muslims should not believe such false gods and do not believe. A strong atheist, also known as a clear atheist or a positive atheist, denies the existence of God or any other god. This person's view is entirely based on the actual situation that can be found using scientific methods. Since the existence of God can not be proved by science, a strong atheist concludes that God does not exist. The second atheist is also a recessive atheist, also known as a recessive atheist or a negative atheist. This person does not deny the existence of God, but declares religious relativism. In other words, she will claim that anyone's faith is faithful to that person, but she does not believe in God himself.

How do people's lives change into poetry? I can think that poetry is only a cause of despair. William Butler's poem says no. Yeats focused his long-term focus on the background to enter the poem. From the time as a little boy, seeing his family's different religious views prompted him to be better as a poet to enter into manhood. Due to William Butler Yeats' plays, famous poetry, and artistic changes, he was recognized as one of the best British poets in the 20th century and he succeeded. William Butler Yeats: Modernist William Butler Yeats is an Irish poet of the 19th century. William Butler Yeats was born in Dublin, Ireland in 1865. He was educated in Dublin and London and in 1877 wrote his first passage (nobelprize.org). He wrote many poems in his life, thought to be the most influential poet of his time. He is very influential in the modernist era. William Butler Yeats is one of the most famous poets of the 19th century. William Butler Yeats wrote the Victorian and Modernist literature, but still had a major impact on modernism style. William Butler Yeats is a poet and playwright (playwright) in Ireland. Some people think he is the greatest poet in the 20th century. He received the Nobel Prize in literature in 1923. The work of William Butler Yeats has a clear bridge between the romantic poetry of the 19th century and the language of contemporary poetry. William Butler Yeats was born in Dublin, Ireland on 13th June 1865. He is the oldest of the four children of portrait painter John Butler Yeats. His father took part in William's regular school education at home, which gave him a permanent hobby of the classics. John Yeats has a strong personality. His personal philosophy incorporates aesthetics (belief that art and beauty are important to all) and atheism (belief without God). William felt its impact long after. Because it appeared in his interest to Magic and occultusum (supernatural). William Butler Yeats, born in 1865, died in 1939. Yeats is one of the most famous poets in the 20th century. Yeats, also a philosopher, has developed his own philosophy. "Yezhi has developed a philosophy linking history, art, personality, and interest in society, for example in the history civilization develops, eventually the opposite civilization is born as it dies.

China's "China Book since 1945" by Stewart Ross since 1945, written by author Stewart Ross, was held in the explanation of the 1900 Chinese empire. It depicts the land landscape of China and it completely shows the fact that the Great Wall was blocked from barbarians in 221 BC. The author seems to use the tone of the Chinese empire to appreciate it very much, thinking it is one of the few empires of the few. Indeed, Mr. Rozman says "... the cultural and scientific achievements of China, including paper, printing, invention of explosives, creation of the finest paintings, and most" empire critics "are very big. China William Stewart (1844-1906) wrote in the name of Saladin. He is involved in the Victorian free thinker and the secular alliance of the UK. He compiled secular commentary from 1882; it was renamed Agnostic Journal and Eclectic Review and closed in 1907. Ross supports agnosticism and opposes Charles Bradley's atheism as an open spiritual quest. As a philosopher, if we talk to a purely philosophical audience, I should say that I should explain that I am an agnostic. Because I think there is no firm debate to prove that God does not exist. On the other hand, if you want to convey the correct impression to ordinary people on the street, I think that you should say that I am an atheist. Because I can not say the same thing even if I say that I can not prove that there is no god. God of horse The book "Chinese books since 1945" written by writer Stewart Ross in 1945 explains the Chinese empire of the 1900s. It depicts the land landscape of China and it completely shows the fact that the Great Wall was blocked from barbarians in 221 BC. The author seems to use the tone of the Chinese empire to appreciate it very much, thinking it is one of the few empires of the few. Indeed, Rozman said, "China's cultural and scientific achievements include paper, print, invention of gunpowder, creation of the finest paintings, and one of them, including most" imperial critics " One. Flag of the People 's Republic of China representing China' s nationalist - especially the supporters of the Nationalist Party opposing Communism and the flag of the People 's Republic of China that supports the People' s Republic of China -. China's nationalism comes from a very diverse source of ideology, including traditional Chinese thought, American progressiveism, Marxism, and ethnologic thinking of Russia. Ideology also presents many different, often contradictory forms of expression including super imperialism. These performances include the Three People's Principles, the Chinese Communist Party, the anti-governmental view on Tiananmen protests in 1989, the fascist blues, and the cooperation of the Japanese king Jingwei.

During Genesis 6-9, all human beings felt God's anger through the divine floods and the purification of the earth. Only Noah in the eyes of God is the righteous who should be saved. Through Noah, God saw the Savior he created. As the human beings expand and become larger, he begins to see the evil of mankind spreading out, and because of this evil he is wrong or evil, or trying the earth of everyone trying It is necessary to wash away. Through this part of Genesis, God is seen to have retaliatory and destructive nature regardless of how correct that act is. From the beginning, people were thinking about the existence of God, the essence of God, and the relationship between God and nature. In "Rethinking the essence of God", editors of the best-selling books "Hand of God" and "Heart of God" have thoroughly studied the mystery of the universe. This time he explored these questions: What is the essence of God? How is this property expressed? Does God continue to play an active role in our destiny, or is it the creation of the universe? 1 John 4: 8-16 - "God is love" "God is very light", "God is spirit", "God is love", Spirit and light are representations of the essence of God. Love is the expression of his personality, which corresponds to his personality. Love is the essence of God. He always lives in the atmosphere of love. Even though it is impossible, it is difficult to define and explain the love to God. From some poems (1 John 3:16; John 3:16) It is of the nature that God's love keeps its interest in the physical and mental well-being of his existence You can see that. Please lead him to sacrifice. Human concept reveals love Pantheism believes that everything is an intrinsic god, or the universe, or nature is equal to God. A more detailed definition is that the laws of nature, the existence, and / or the universe (which will be all in use, existing, or total) will be expressed or personified by God's theological principle There is a tendency to emphasize the concept. Transcendental existence unrelated to nature is denied. According to how to understand this viewpoint, this view is considered equivalent to atheism, mysticism or theology

Everyone is connected and not everyone in God knows this. After death, humans will go to heaven or hell. "For everyone, death is either the door to the lives of God and his people, or the door to the withdrawal from what ultimately satisfies human needs" (Sire, 41). It depends on whether they believe in the teaching of God and live by them. If people do not recognize the religion itself, it is not important that they follow the same path. Christian's view of the world is a consistent view of life, quite different from naturalism, naturalism, materialism, existentialism, polytheism, paganism, mysticism, or decompositionism. This theological view provides direction and direction facing the plurististic approach to spirituality and secularism and truth and morality of the new era. Fear of the future, suffering, illness, and poverty, based on Christ's redemption work and God's great Christian worldview. In addition, the view of the world of Christians provides meaning and purpose to every aspect of life. Existentialism escapes from despair of nihilism. Existentialism basically has two forms, atheism and theology. Atheistic existentialism is a reexamination of naturalism. At least it escaped the suicidal tendency of nihilism. This world view again denies the existence of God. I oppose this. Because I feel that God is real and inner. However, it explains the world as a purpose. Because the world around us can understand through science and logic. I agree with the fact that we can understand the universe through observation and experiment. I think that science and logic can lead the most important people even to see God in the universe and become a creator of the universe. Existentialism can be atheistic, theological (or theological), or unknown. Some existentialists, such as Nietzsche, argue that "God is dead" and claim that the concept of God is outdated. Even if they feel that they can not prove it, others like Kierkegaard are very religious. An important element of existentialists is freedom of choice whether to believe or not. Existential themes appeared in early Buddhist and Christian writings (including Saint Augustine and St. Thomas Aquinas). In the 17th century, Bryce Pascal believed that Pascal would be meaningless, boring and miserable without God, as we thought of later existentialists, even if Pascal was different from them. . His contemporary John Rock claims individual autonomy and self-determination, but they actively pursue liberalism and individualism rather than reacting to existentialist experiences.

Some atheists strongly oppose creating creationism and intelligent design at American schools as an alternative to biological evolution. After the Kansas State Board of Education decided to allow intelligent design to replace evolutionary education, in 2005, Italian church monster flight was created by the team. A flying spaghetti monster is an ironic theory, where herds think that it has as much scientific support as intellectual design theory. In the first letter to the Kansas Board of Education, Henderson showed that the correlation does not mean that the increase in global warming does not mean a reduction in the population of the pirates. In this example, praise is not for God, so we ridicule some of the religious groups' belief that the world is experiencing difficulties like war and famine. This adds a strong sense of boundary between the atheist's church and the state and separates the sacred nation from religious interference. But this confidence in the boundary between the church and the state is not limited to atheists and pastors. Many people do not believe that organized religion is good for society. Not only is it not taxed, I am amazed at what I can see as a known incorrect repeat statement of children's brainwashing, children's vulnerable over the years. Some people think that at least these Bible will be seen critically if these children are not misunderstood. Many situations in which historically organized religious organizations acted not only brought about the deaths of millions of people, but in many cases prevented the abandonment of human rights. Atheism is often misunderstood as a belief that God does not exist, but it is not; it can be an atheist or an agnostic. These two terms answer different questions. Atheism answers the question you believe, ie the lack of faith in God. Agnosticism answers to what you know, how confident you have in your beliefs. According to this definition, a person can be an agnostic - an atheist or an unconscious - an atheist. We can also explain people as Agnostic - Christian, or Clues - Christian. Agnosticians admit that their faith is not a guarantee of truth, and Gnostic is a person who claims to be positive about their beliefs, or who lacks faith. What does it mean to be a human being? This question was answered in anthropological research. Anthropology is a study of various human cultures in the world in history. According to the University of Hawaii at Hilo, anthropology "emphasizes the comparison of human groups to understand the scope of human behavior and biology, so think about what human beings are." Anthropology, We focus on common aspects of mankind, such as language, cultural ties, economics, and curiosity to find common grounds. Anthropology is a scientific study on the cultural, social, biological and environmental aspects of humanity, its past and present lives. Cultural anthropology is one of four research fields in a wider area of ​​anthropology (archeology, physics or biological anthropology, and three other linguistics). Cultural anthropologists specialize in cultures and people's beliefs, practices, and cognitive social organizations of human society. Cultural anthropologists study how people who share a common cultural system organize and form the surrounding material and social world and form these ideas, behaviors, and physical environments . Social and cultural anthropology is one of the four major areas of anthropology. Social and cultural anthropologists focus on social and cultural studies and are often interested in cultural diversity and universalism. In addition, social and cultural anthropology is usually divided into social anthropology and cultural anthropology. The method of social and cultural anthropology is mainly ethnography based on qualitative data. This contrasts with quantitative data commonly used in other anthropological fields such as archeology and physical anthropology. Ethnography is a comprehensive study of culture,

One thing to think from a romantic point of view is to think away from the vast majority of perspectives and from a positive perspective. Percy Bysshe Shelley has many romantic themes in his play. After receiving education at Eaton University, he continued his trip to Oxford University and was dismissed one year after publishing inappropriate verses. He then worked full time, traveled to Italy just before his death, causing a rowing accident on the Livorno coast. He wrote many pieces of work, and his work contains many topics. August 4, 1792 - Year of fear of France - Percy Bysshe Shelley (his grandfather's "Bysshe", a member of the same field) is the son of Timothy and Elizabeth Shelley. As brothers, John and the four sisters Elizabeth, Mary, Margaret, and Helen's eldest son, Percy, not only inherited the great estate of his grandfather, but lined up to sit on Congress one day. As the oldest boy, a young Persie is their love and longing for his sister, his parents, even his early dominant servants, and a family house near Horsham in Sussex. Young lord of the field. He was full of fun and imagination, designed a game to play with the sisters, and told the ghost stories to joy and joyful crowds. Percy Bysshe Shelley was born on Field Place on August 4, 1792. His ancestors began to be Sussex aristocrats from the beginning of the 17th century. His grandfather, Sir Byshe Shelly, made himself the most rich man in Horsham, and his father, Timothy Sherry, was a calm traditional parliamentarian. Percy Bysshe Shelley was sent to Eton for education and continued studying at Oxford. At that time he released two spy stories and poems. In Oxford in autumn of 1810, Shelley and his best friend, Thomas Jefferson Hogg, created a booklet on the necessity of atheism and claimed that the existence of God can not prove to be the reason for experience. Sherry refused to reject the file, so Sherry and T. J. Hogg were rejected. The incident opened a violation between Sherry and his father, and his father interrupted all his relations with his son. He went to London Mary Sherry, born in London in 1797, was the daughter of famous radical artists William Godwin and Mary Worth Craft. In 1814, as soon as she met, she fell in love with Percy Bysshe Shelly who was not known at the time. In December 1816 when Shelly 's first wife committed suicide, Mary married Percy. Since she lived in Italy from 1818 to 1822 when she drowned, Mary returned to London as a professional novel, story, and essayist and died in 1851. Charlotte Gordon's previous publications include romantic Water Margin: Mary's extraordinary life Wollstonecraft and her daughter Mary Shelley (2015), B actress Bradstreet: First American Poet's Unknown Story (2005). A woman named God: Abraham's dilemma and the birth of three faiths (2009). The romantic Water Margin received the 2016 National Book Critics Biography Award. Currently she is an excellent humanistic professor at Endicott College.

Jean-Paul Sartre: The opposite side of modern pessimism and the unrealistic and trivial era of despair, Jean-Paul Sartre clearly stands out in the masses, the main intellectual and hope of the 20th century It became a fortress. In the face of pain and despair, absurd and freedom, nihilism and transcendence, "Sutter summarized the 20th century ... In a sense, he has the theory of every major event he experienced Arthur C As Danto commented, "Answered" (Marowski and Matuz 371). Jean-Paul Sartre, born in Paris on June 21, 1905, is the only child of the French naval officers Jean-Baptiste Sartre and Anne-Marie (Schweitzer). His mother is the Alsatian, the first representative of the Nobel Prize winner Albert Schweitzer, his father Louis Théophile is Ammely's father's brother. When Sartre was two years old, his father died of illness, he was most likely to be infected with Indochina. Anne Marie returned to the house of his parents at Meudon where he taught Sartre's mathematics and brought up Sutter with the help of his father Charles Schweitzer who led him to classics from a young age. Literature When he was twelve years old, Sartre's mother remarried, the family moved to La Rochelle and was bullied there. Jean-Paul Sartre: The opposite side of modern pessimism and the unrealistic and trivial era of despair, Jean-Paul Sartre clearly stands out in the masses, the main intellectual and hope of the 20th century It became a fortress. - Battle for Equality Throughout history women have received cruel and unfair treatment in an unequal society designed to suppress women who are harmful to health. Male superior strength often deprives women of their ability to maximize their abilities and maximize their abilities. The power of men is not enough to suppress powerful voices and women's wisdom Juan Paul Sartore, an existentialist philosopher of the 20th century, said that we are the choice. I do not agree with his atheism, but Sartre is basically right. Although we may be the product of our DNA and the environment, we still have a certain space for ourselves for each of us. Despite his political trend Martin Heidegger pointed out another important concept, authenticity. After the flock is not genuine. To be truly free, you must be yourself. In today's American society, commercial edification may be a big challenge for credibility. Honest introspection is becoming more important than ever. By reflecting the actual needs, you can minimize consumerism operations. Tyler Darden of the movie 'Beat Club' claims that consumerism leads to own own ownership, so people belong to them. This may be the main example of becoming a slave

- Oz really likes the irony of poetry. Because it quotes an ounce in such a way as to indicate his immortality. Compliments will take you anywhere. We seem to be the top of today's greatness, but if that is the fact, without understanding that our proud self-esteemed thinking will soon become a memory to fade away. Today's greatness, sorrow broke the statue in the history of 2000. What do you think will remain in New York after 4,000 years? Percy Bysshe Shelley (1792-1822) is often a rebel and considered a revolutionary. Therefore, "Ozymandias", one of his most famous poems, is a warning against the arrogance of the great leader. This poem is believed to be inspired by the monumental Ramses II statue purchased by the Italian explorer Giovanni Belzoni for the British Museum. It was written at the end of 1817 as part of the competition between Sherry and his friend Horace Smith and was published in The Examiner in January 1818. August 4, 1792 - Year of fear of France - Percy Bysshe Shelley (his grandfather's "Bysshe", a member of the same field) is the son of Timothy and Elizabeth Shelley. As brothers, John and the four sisters Elizabeth, Mary, Margaret, and Helen's eldest son, Percy, not only inherited the great estate of his grandfather, but lined up to sit on Congress one day. As the oldest boy, a young Persie is their love and longing for his sister, his parents, even his early dominant servants, and a family house near Horsham in Sussex. Young lord of the field. He was full of fun and imagination, designed a game to play with the sisters, and told the ghost stories to joy and joyful crowds. Percy Bysshe Shelley was born on Field Place on August 4, 1792. His ancestors began to be Sussex aristocrats from the beginning of the 17th century. His grandfather, Sir Byshe Shelly, made himself the most rich man in Horsham, and his father, Timothy Sherry, was a calm traditional parliamentarian. Percy Bysshe Shelly was sent to Eton for education and continued his studies at Oxford. At that time he released two spy stories and poems. In Oxford in autumn of 1810, Shelley and his best friend, Thomas Jefferson Hogg, created a booklet on the necessity of atheism and claimed that the existence of God can not prove to be the reason for experience. Sherry refused to reject the file, so Sherry and T. J. Hogg were rejected. The incident opened a violation between Sherry and his father, and his father interrupted all his relations with his son. He went to London

When religion is considered to be the creation of a superhuman institution or institution, including a series of beliefs about the cause, nature and purpose of the universe, in particular the memorial of spirituality and ritual, and usually involves the management of humanitarian matters A set of beliefs ". "(Religion) .The oldest religion still present today is called Hinduism.The people who follow Indian religion pursue knowledge of truth, reality and moral order throughout their life. Hinduism is one of the oldest religions in the world. That is the third largest religion. Hinduism includes many subjects such as Hindu religious structure, art, artifacts, various eras. Hindus practice strict religious beliefs and customs. Hinduism consists of 1,000 religious groups that have developed in India since 1500 AD. Hindu believers are known as Hindus. Hindu people live their lives according to the religious instruction of the Vedic scriptures. Hinduism contains various ideas about spirituality and tradition, but there is no church order, no doubt religious authority, governance body, prophet, or a binding Bible. , Monism, agnosticism, atheism or humanitarianism. Because the term Hinduism covers a wide range of traditions and ideas, it is difficult to derive a comprehensive definition. Religion "violates our desire to define and classify it." Hinduism is defined differently from religion, religious tradition, a series of religious beliefs, and "way of life". From the perspective of Western vocabulary, Hinduism like other beliefs is called correctly religion. In India, the word dharma is preferred over western religion and is more extensive. Hinduism is a series of religious beliefs that have developed slowly over time. Some aspects of religion can be traced back to ancient times. For example, in today's Hindu marriage, the bride and groom married like a holy fire centuries ago. Believers recite Veda everyday. From time to time, scholars try to organize many popular cults, gods and traditions into magnificent belief systems. However, unlike religion such as Buddhism, Christianity, Muslim, Hinduism can not trace back to the originator who has only one set of ideas. In Hinduism, Vedas are first known as the oldest religious classics in Hindu exercises. I am too old, so I do not know much about the authors of these texts. Vedas are defined as judgment, knowledge or observation. The composition of the text of Veda seems to be a ladder. Each step has its own set of Bibles. The text of Veda explains goals and the steps to accomplish them. The Vedas Scriptures fall into four categories: rigs (ceremonies, spells, prayers), Yajours (ceremonies, how to perform rituals), summers (singing, how to execute spells, rules of songs) and Atharba (priest). Veda talked about some nature-related gods (fire, wind, and storms). In addition, there are many creative stories in Hindu religious scriptures.

Salman Rushdie's sarcastic novel "The Moor's Last Sigh" is a planned way with great care, diving into Indian families with great care and laughing out of evil with laughing mischiefs in the world It was. Rushdie's elaborate story is described as a story about homicide and suicide, atheism and abstinence, emotions and adultery and is described as "a fall from a high fertility hybrid", our mentor, Moraes Zogoiby. "Moor" In the center of this strange and fascinating story is the follower of the Moorish family. A complicated network including ridiculous political activists, clans, homosexual husbands, artists, Jewish underworld gangs and others. I worked on Salman and two books, The Moor's Last Sigh and the Story Set East, West. The last sigh of the Moor was his first adult novel after Satan's poem, so it is important that Salman and the book should be able to advertise. I have never been to New Scotland yard for discussion before or after publication. When we proposed the possibility of reading at the National Theater, the first response was a mixture of agility and doubt. But this stage has passed and we will be lucky soon to make the Scottish yard increasingly creative as to how we manage books. Unless I misunderstood, these ideas include a magical mystery journey that collects our audience from South Bank and sends it to a secret destination. Jeffrey Robertson QC defends Salman Rashdie in a blasphemy case On January 2, 1492 Boasdor, the last king of Nasri, left the Alhambra and led his family through a path known as the Moorish sigh. Christian's world is very happy. In London he ordered Henry VIII to commend the hymns of Saint Paul. In Rome, Cardinal Spaniard, Rodrigo Borgia (father of notorious Cesare and Lucrezia), organized the bullfighting and parade. Eight months later, Borgia became Pope Alexander VI, and put the Spaniards in the Vatican. A century ago the Spanish Jewish community (the world's largest community) was intensely planned by Spanish compatriots. Many people are forced to convert to Christianity, and these "new Christians" - pigs known as Maranos or "old Christians" - are the targets of racially inspired hatred A master of experienced devil hunter and mysterious John Constantine (Matt Ryan, "Criminal Psychology") based on the DC comic popular comic series "Hellblazer" is a dark art and vicious naughty furious wit I have knowledge. He fought aggressively - or at least he fought. As his soul was designated as hell, he decided to give up on the exercise against evil until a series of events returned him to fight, and he makes every effort to defend the innocence. In the balance of good and evil, Konstantin travels with his skills, finds supernatural fear threatening our world, and sends back to where they belong. Then, who knows ... After all, maybe he and his soul have hope

The theme of inheriting the wind that inherits the winds of Jerome Lawrence and Robert Lee is occupied. The play began in Hillsboro, Tennessee, when a man named Bertram Kate violated the law by teaching the banned Darwinian theory. The most famous speakers at the time, Matthew Harrison Brady and Henry Drummond came to this small religious town in Hillsboro. Brady sued Kratz and Drummond kept him. After a battle of a few days, the verdict finally decided that Bertram Cates was convicted. "Inheritance Wind" in which Kirk Douglas and Jason Robards produced by David Papazian directed by David Greene appeared was arranged by Jerome Lawrence and Robert E. Lee. The drama "inherited wind" was inspired by the "Monkey Judgment" in 1925, where a teacher was arrested and tried to teach a course of evolution. But the movie "inheritance" should not be regarded as a documentary, should not be regarded as a true record of the experiment, but rather it should be regarded as a dramatic movie that shapes it by raising it to convey a strong message to the audience . "Inheritance Wind" is a well-made movie with high-quality performance, photographs of films, and funny and interesting stories. However, inheritance winds are not departing from the historical facts of the "monkey trial" in order to show prejudice to the audience, they should practice what they preach. Still, the inheritance wind is still worth recommending, but it is for those who have strong concern and are interested in the dramatic conflict of opinions and beliefs. From open credit to the very end, inheritance winds celebrate human thought and claim to be the greatest gift for all, as they claim it is the key to our existence. Everyone should make their own judgment and choices according to their free will and no one has the right to control other people's thoughts and beliefs. However, when communicating information to the audience, the succession wind itself strongly manipulates the viewer's thoughts and emotions, and shakes their beliefs in particular in the direction of atheism. An atheist who inherits the wind is said to be a tolerant and forgiving intellectual who suffers from ignorant, narrow Christian paranoia 's hands. This depiction attempts to abandon their religious beliefs and influence viewers to support their ideas. "Darwin took us to the top of the mountain and we could look back from there and see what we came from - Drummond

When you got older, William Butler Yeats, William Butler Yeats and the older female author remembered her youth. When she completed the photo album, her past lover whispered to her. Basically, Yeats shows that as a woman grows older, Yeats does not need to be alone. She always remembers her companion. "When you are older, gray, sleeping and nodding with fire" (l. 1 - 2) represents a woman of this age that needs to fight more frequently. William Butler Yeats: Modernist William Butler Yeats is an Irish poet of the 19th century. William Butler Yeats was born in Dublin, Ireland in 1865. He was educated in Dublin and London and in 1877 wrote his first passage (nobelprize.org). He wrote many poems in his life, thought to be the most influential poet of his time. He is very influential in the modernist era. William Butler Yeats is one of the most famous poets of the 19th century. William Butler Yeats wrote the Victorian and Modernist literature, but still had a major impact on modernism style. William Butler Yeats is a poet and playwright (playwright) in Ireland. Some people think he is the greatest poet in the 20th century. He received the Nobel Prize in literature in 1923. The work of William Butler Yeats has a clear bridge between the romantic poetry of the 19th century and the language of contemporary poetry. William Butler Yeats was born in Dublin, Ireland on 13th June 1865. He is the oldest of the four children of portrait painter John Butler Yeats. His father took part in William's regular school education at home, which gave him a permanent hobby of the classics. John Yeats has a strong personality. His personal philosophy incorporates aesthetics (belief that art and beauty are important to all) and atheism (belief without God). William felt its impact long after. Because it appeared in his interest to Magic and occultusum (supernatural). William Butler Yeats. William Butler Yeats was the protagonist of the cultural revolution developed by a strong nationalist movement in the second half of the 19th century. He dominated a generation of work. He established the forms and themes that were considered norms of his generation's writers. Yeats is a confession poet - he writes direct poems based on his own experience. He is a deliberate idealist. This is to create his own people - the art for Irish people.

Dr. Faust Elizabeth of Dr. Christopher Marlow arrived in the British throne in the era of religious confusion and political uncertainty. At the end of her reign, England became the first official Protestant country in Europe, but the tension between Protestant and oppressed Catholics continued to plague the country. Most of the literature created during her reignation reflects the sensitivity to religion and the resulting political conspiracy. In the drama of Dr. Faustus, Christopher Marlowe put the role of title in the power struggle resembling the conflict of life in the Elizabethan era. Dr. Faustus was written by Shakespeare's competitor Christopher Marlowe. Marlow retained the moral character of his play, but the beginning of the Renaissance also affected it. Neo Platonic Magic and Free Thought Atheism are features of Dr. Faustas published in 1604. The main character (Faustus and Everyman) in the play pretends to be an ordinary person and their name can be made "anyone". Both stories have an image of Messenger To Faustus doctor Mephistopheles magically returns to Faustus to return to his soul. In Everyman, death, "a powerful messenger" tells Everyman that he should die. Then the hero began his journey and had to fight difficulties, but eventually they could not escape fate. "We are pilgrims on earth - the concept of medieval life, this is the central topic of morality. This paper is a study by Dr. Faustus of Christopher Marlowe. This drama represents the curse of the human soul that is contrary to God's law. The main character in the play is different from other main character of Marlow, so the author chose Dr. Faustas of Marlow. Most of Marlow's hero is sympathetic, Faust is far from compassion. Faust rebelled against human restrictions on knowledge and power. He wants to acquire the power and knowledge of God. This article aims to analyze the process leading to the curse of the hero. Here, the study of the curse which was made clear by the hero becomes the main problem of analysis. In discussing this topic, the author analyzes the hero's conflict in chapter 3 and then analyzes how Fostus' pride and despair led to the curse of the next part of this chapter. In addition, his despair is a barrier to his return to God's grace. Dr. Faustus of Christopher Marlowe is a psychological study of internal struggle. One of the most prominent themes of Dr. Foster is the conflict between good and evil in the human soul. Marlow's theater led the religious work of morality and suffering. The focus of the play is in Dr. Faustas, a title figure, led to an easily agnostic tendency drawn by Marlow as a contradictory figure. Dr. Foster is two people. His quirk character leads to duality and inconsistency.

The relative age of the earth is not usually considered a controversial topic. The majority of scientific data published in school textbooks and taught to students shows that they are about billions of years ago. Radiometric measurements and geological rock research have been used as evidence to support such a large era. However, a small but decided minority, consisting mainly of fundamental Christians, was a strong challenge to this age. These so-called "creative scientists" oppose the evidence supporting young planets. Old Earth creationists generally agree with the mainstream scientific estimation of the age of the universe, humans, and the Earth itself, but deny the theorists of contemporary evolution theory on biological evolution theory. The argument between the views of the two creationists depends on the meaning of the Hebrew word yom which means "day." Young Earth creationists insist that in the context of Genesis 1-2, Yeom is 24 hours. Old Earth creationists opposed and I thought that the term 'yom' would be used for a longer term. Old Earth creationists used many Bible arguments to keep their views. Old Earth Creationism is a transformation of the origins of the universe and the creative view of Earth's life. As a theory of origin, it is more consistent with the mainstream scientific ideas of the geology, the cosmology and the Earth's era and the younger earth creationism. Young Earth Creationism is a sort of religious belief that heavenly, earth and earthly life was created by God's direct actions from 6000 to 10,000 years ago. That believer is a Christian, a Jew, and a Muslim who believes that God created the earth in six hours and recorded the Hebrew Genesis as a written record. Today, contrary to Gosset, the creationists of the young earth believe that not only the earth is young, but scientific data supports this view. However, the concept of obvious age is still being used in young earth creation literature. Some young Earth creationists believe that Adam does not have a belly button. The young creationists of the earth strongly adhere to the concept of the unquestionable Bible, the Bible is the inspiration of God, absolutely correct in all matters to deal with them, without any errors, science, and history and I believe it is completely authoritative. And morality and theology. Young Earth creationists also believe that advocates of modern scientific understanding they do not agree are mainly driven by atheism.

But when society is considered, it usually concerns the government, population, school, and people living there. Religion is not usually what people will pay attention first in society but how society will be affected by the religion worshiped by the state. Studies have shown that countries with more populous atheists than secular countries or religious nations are more peaceful countries. However, in religious countries it is said that the murder rate, teen pregnancy rate, abortion rate, sexual disorder, war rate are high. The loss of religious influence on society has brought about a change in the relationship between religion and politics. However, the influence of religion on society has not completely disappeared (Berger 1999: 3). Recently, religion has become a growing phenomenon in the private sector (Luckmann 1967) or a vulnerable group. The impact of secularization on religion can not be denied, but there are still examples of growth and new influences on politics (Moyser 1991: 16). Religious orientation may be linked to political ideology (ie nationalism, fundamentalism, liberation theology) (Moyser 1991: 8). Religious sociology focuses on dialectical relations between religion and society, religious practice in society, historical background, development, universal theme and role. Particular emphasis is placed on the role of religion throughout all societies and recorded history. The difference between religious sociology and religious philosophy is that we are not beginning to evaluate the validity of religious beliefs. However, the process of comparing several contradictory doctrines requires the inherent "methodological atheism" mentioned by Peter Berg. Although religious sociology is very different from theology in supernatural invalid assumptions, theorists tend to recognize the socio-cultural realization of religious practice. General religious beliefs are caused by social situations of dysfunction. This is the conclusion of Gregory Paul's latest sociological research (pdf). As the "socio-economic hypothesis of ethical creator" shows, popular religion is a psychological mechanism for dealing with high levels of stress and anxiety - or he suggests. Many believers believe that there is no doubt - even if there is no religion there is no morality. They quoted George Washington's view and he believed that neither religious principles nor Dostoevsky's famous claim (in fact, his fictitious person, Ivan Karamazov's word), the people's morals would win can not. Then there are Americans who keep the very popular religious beliefs of their country and claim that faith-based charities are better than the general government.

Fyodor Dostoevsky is a model of realism literature, delicately exposing nihilism in the novel "Sin and Punishment" published in 1866. That hero, Rodion Raskolnikov, is blaming and painful, accusing his moral and social relations. He embodies the qualities of nihilism and abandonment of all emotional and moral issues. This philosophical doctrine, in particular the "nihilism movement", one of the great reforms of the Russian empire, and the expansion of apostasy and atheism of postmodernism are everywhere in history, these two examples emphasize virtue appropriately Have personal and social abandonment. According to Raskornikov's theory of "crime and punishment" by Fyodor Dostoevsky, there are two kinds of people coexisting in the world: "extraordinary" and "ordinary". Ordinary people can define (248) that "men must live obediently and they are normal and there is no right to violate the law because they are normal." On the other hand, "special" people are "those who have the right to commit any crime and violate the law just because they are extraordinary" (248). The theory of Dostoyevsky is reflected in the character of his novel. Being human is full of contradictions. In Fyodor Dostoevsky's novel "Sin and Punishment", the relationship between the killing of a young man and his friends and family is being investigated. Characters created by Dostoevsky are full of beautiful contradictions and they become more humanistic. The main character Raskolnikov is focused on Dostoevsky to explore the character's duality. "Raskol" in Russian means "split" or "split". This name has an internal view of Raskolnikov. He struggled between a conscience that urged him to do good and a cruel and reasonable aspect that urged him to do evil. His conscience urged him to be generous and kind to those who were not luckier than him. Once, Raskolnikov saw a young girl get drunk on the street. There was a senile old man behind her. Raskolnikov finds a nearby police officer and takes him to the scene

The fact proved that struggle for social justice and joint interest often brings enormous cost to the relevant personnel. Dr. Martin Luther King 's "Birmingham Prison Letter" and Sophocles' "Antigone", Dr Colbourn' s lecture "The History and Better Life Facing the World: Life After Rosewood". Lecture, freedom, and lectures that describe ordinary everyday life are the price of fighting for social justice and common interests. First, Dr. Martin Luther King and many other African Americans paid an enormous price to African Americans to fight for equality, social justice and better living. First, Martin Luther King (Jr.) Is a leading black leader in the social justice struggle and advocates equality, civil rights, tolerance, justice and representation in black society. A highly respected and influential "borrowed my dream speech" borrowed from Muffy evokes a more acceptable, tolerant and enthusiastic image tomorrow, and this racial discrimination is no longer an individual, It is not for agencies, institutions. And culture has an adverse effect. In other words, Caucasi admit their privileges, redistribute their powers, dismantle the patriarchy, and promote capitalism (or at least against our relationship with money, poverty and marginalization) To cast). Martin Luther King (Jr.) Talks about fraud, prejudice, violence that black people are experiencing everyday. The inevitable repression of dominant white patriarchal culture in the United States arises from the history of terrible racial conquest and systemic violence. Happy World Bipolar Day! Attachment: Atheism and racism are not the same things, you are a privileged white man Martin Luther King is the great-grandson of his son, grandson and pastor. His voice is intertwined and leads our struggle against social justice and civil rights. He is optimistic even knowing that his life is the life he told and believed. He is a thoughtful teacher, philosopher and strategic thinker. For scientists, this seems to be a strange topic, but like all the other people, when we deeply dig into work, feeling safe, intensive and creative, our work is the best . Sometimes, when we are "too embarrassed", we forget the history, in this case the power gained from understanding our common history. Let's learn about our history and where we are now

Eric Blair is known for his English pseudonym George Orwell (1903-1950), a person familiar with the role of the government. He worked at the British government in Myanmar at the Indian Imperial Police. Returning to his European roots, Orwell also backed the Spanish government as he fought against the royalists in the civil war. Until his professional writing as a political writer, the Orwell government's idea was fully expressed. Orwell is very contradictory in his political writings. First of all, I am a democratic socialist. Attempts to create socialist utopia beyond democracy will fail because the will of the people must be the highest; the basis of socialist philosophy is that every human being is born equally, everyone is It has the right to life and freedom. Beyond the scope of democratic control these fundamental rights will inevitably be compromised. An unforgettable way of saying is that power is corrupt, absolute power is absolutely corrupt. For socialists like me, there is a fixed idea in every idea, including those who believe that I have to agree on certain matters such as atheism and support options. The extraordinary Utopia literature of "1984" is the mirror of life. To reflect their views on social issues, many new authors, including Utopia Sir Thomas Moore and "One hundred and eight" George Orwell, took the place of character, environment, government and society Use. That work is tied to real work. It is the world. A character is an attachment to a literary work, unless there is a smooth character, the novel is incomplete. - George Orwell has created two protagonists with inconsistent personality who believe in the concept of love in the forbidden world. Both are secret insurgents of the party and share the same hatred towards the party's totalitarian powers, but there is considerable disagreement between Julia and Winston. The difference between them includes their morality, motivation for their rebellion, and their character.

Representing your own proper English prose is essential for success in English culture. The terrible reality of this statement shows a deep insight into the cultural identity of English; the English community strictly tells individuals within that community based on the educational background of each person written in the standard English field I will judge. In Tense Present, David Foster Wallace made some inexplicable views about "the dark lower abdomen of American calligraphy" and some thoughtful insight into his own misunderstanding. "The world suffers from intolerance and prejudice, and even in the case of erroneous information strong actions are respectable; and in our very complex modern society, calm attention is always to be prepared The doctrine set the most diverse view of the problem and the mind freely and fairly. " As the belief moves towards faith and doctrine, the problem expands and becomes more evident. We see this in religious and political ideology, especially those involving war, intolerance, slavery, superstition (Bible, declaration). We saw this with religious research, "sacred" war and slavery. During the Black Death, millions of people died of ignorance of this disease due to their faith in God or Satan. At the same time, their religious leaders did not do anything to encourage experimental science In the 1930s and 1940s, the world saw Communists' fanatical idealism. Atheism is involved as they have destroyed the lives of millions of people). We saw how Christianized Germans made Nazism and Holocaust to defend the Jews (Hitler 's faith) in order to win the Lord. If there is no religious belief in the afterlife, the tragedy of the 9/11 case can not happen. Mental vegetarianism and vegetarianism are filled with homosexuals, racists, and intolerant people who have created a new political brand, Diet Nazism. Surprisingly, the mixed presence of religion and eating habits created an avid male trying to purge the world as soon as possible from all impurities. It is dangerous. All the people you love, you assassinated the fact that chicks were caught by Burrito, they are eating your troubling stories. You fight more harm than good by fighting them more hard by giving their shame, guilt, regret, fear, anxiety, making people more sick "My son's fanatic" is a warm, shocking and exciting story, to some extent a strange story that opens up the issue of generation and culture gap. It allows viewers to think about differences, intolerance and religious violence. I would recommend this to those who are interested in European filming technicians or Islamic (fanatical) fundamentalism issues.

It is unpopular to see things that are different from traditional ones. In a romantic era, the writer removes normal sentences at the time. In the Renaissance era, the church has had a big impact on everyone, but if there are people who "fall apart" like that, the church will guarantee that they will be punished. To oppose them is considered an infringement of God. A man named William Butler Yeats created his own philosophical system based on his insights and the thought of many thinkers. William Butler Yeats, born in 1865, died in 1939. Yeats is one of the most famous poets in the 20th century. Yeats, also a philosopher, has developed his own philosophy. "Yezhi has developed a philosophy linking history, art, personality, and interest in society, for example in the history civilization develops, eventually the opposite civilization is born as it dies. William Butler Yeats' poem William Butler Yeats is an Irish poet, playwright, and essayist - one of the greatest British poets of the 20th century. (Ye Zhi 1) His early poetry and theater got ideas from Irish fables and esoteric studies. (Ellman 1) When Ye Zhi wrote about his country he used nationalism to avoid themes of oppression, social division and solidarity. The Irish nationalist Yeats uses the three poems "The Coming Soon", "September 1913", "Europe 1916", through the theme, emotion and figurative words to express feelings about the Irish independence war I expressed it. William Butler Yeats is a poet and playwright (playwright) in Ireland. Some people think he is the greatest poet in the 20th century. He received the Nobel Prize in literature in 1923. The work of William Butler Yeats has a clear bridge between the romantic poetry of the 19th century and the language of contemporary poetry. William Butler Yeats was born in Dublin, Ireland on 13th June 1865. He is the oldest of the four children of portrait painter John Butler Yeats. His father took part in William's regular school education at home, which gave him a permanent hobby of the classics. John Yeats has a strong personality. His personal philosophy incorporates aesthetics (belief that art and beauty are important to all) and atheism (belief without God). William felt its impact long after. Because it appeared in his interest to Magic and occultusum (supernatural). William Butler Yeats: Modernist William Butler Yeats is an Irish poet of the 19th century. William Butler Yeats was born in Dublin, Ireland in 1865. He was educated in Dublin and London and in 1877 wrote his first passage (nobelprize.org). He wrote many poems in his life, thought to be the most influential poet of his time. He is very influential in the modernist era. William Butler Yeats is one of the most famous poets of the 19th century. William Butler Yeats wrote the Victorian and Modernist literature, but still had a major impact on modernism style.

B. Deng Xiaoping (1982-1987): Acceptance of freedom of religion in the context of modernization After the death of Mao Zedong, Deng Xiaoping finished class struggle and popular movement, but practical to achieve modernization and economic development We adopted governance. He acknowledged that China eroded the poor society and the economy was stagnant, "How can we survive in countries like our great powers and poor countries if we do not try to increase production? When there are so many difficulties in the lives of the people? "In the face of the urgent need to restore public confidence eroded, Deng Xiaoping adopted a more free and delicate religious freedom policy to unite citizens did. Although China is an official atheist country, the Constitution of the People's Republic of China always guarantees freedom of religion. Despite this freedom, only five religions were officially accepted. These are Protestant, Catholic, Buddhism, Taoism, Islam. Everything is strictly controlled by the government. Since the reform in 1978 the Chinese government is more tolerant of the revival of religion and believes it will promote greater social unity. A religious group that is not tolerant is Falun Gong. The government observed and supervised the movement at an early stage, but the Chinese Communist Party announced in October 1999 that it became a cult organization as it became more common. The Communist Party of China thinks that it is a well-organized political organization and opposes it. Central government Since the radical movement of the Cultural Revolution, the Chinese government has become more tolerant of the practice of traditional beliefs. In 1978, the "Constitution of the People's Republic of China" guaranteed "religious freedom" and made some restrictions. It can establish or rebuild a spiritual and philosophical system unless it is regarded as a threat to the power of the Chinese Communist Party. In addition, these organizations are closely monitored. The influence of the past is still deeply rooted in Chinese culture. The People's Republic of China is a socialist country under the guidance of the Communist Party of China. The Constitution guarantees religious freedom, but the Chinese government is still promoting atheism. China practices various religions, but the three major religions are Buddhism, Taoism or Taoism, and Confucianism. There are a few Christian, Islam and some others. China is the world's most populous country with a population of about 3 billion. The majority of the population is Han Chinese. However, since the couple is limited primarily to one child by law, the growth rate has slowed to less than 1% a year. To limit population growth, couples can only have one child. The second child is possible, but the penalty is very high

Adam Smith was born in Calcuti, Scotland on July 5, 1723. Steve entered the University of Glasgow at the age of 14, where he learned Francis Hutchinson 's moral philosophy. Here, Smith developed his strong passion for freedom, reason and freedom of speech. In 1740 he received the Snell Exhibition and entered the Ballet College of Oxford. In 1746 Smith left Oxford University. In 1748, Smith started a public lecture at Edinburgh under the auspices of the main case. In 1751 Smith was appointed Chairman of Glasgow Logic University and the following year he was appointed the position of Francis Hutchinson, president of ethics philosophy, his old teacher. Nicholas Phillips' new biography, "Adams Miss: Enlightened Life" (Ale; $ 32.50), which was very successful in putting together the two Smiths, shows how this feeling will become a financial god Let's see. . Historian Philipson of Edinburgh University pursued Rothschild and revealed that Smith is more like a moral person than a marketer. He discovered a deeper emotional vein and rarely made Smith Lord Byron, but he used events and plans to promote his life. One is his intimate friendship with philosopher David Hume, his nearest colleague, and his greatest influence, and his less direct embrace to Hume's notorious atheism. I realized that the real problem of Smith is not an issue of economists. How should a philosopher's question live? This is a modern question, Darwin's question: How do you find and unify the order in a world without God? Adam Smith: writer, philosopher, and pioneer of the economy. But why did Adam Smith make him so important? Adam Smith was born on June 16, 1723 and is known for writing books called country wealth. Among his books, Smith discusses the generally accepted paradox of economic philosophy and also proposes a better, more correct ideology. Before Smith wrote his theory about the wealth of the people, individuals only considered national economics as the term "import and export". Many people believe that the situation of imported goods is very bad as currencies leave the country. Of course this means export is good as money has entered the country. This ideology has brought many countries to manufacture it to limit imports. Several strategies include taxing imports and protecting livestock industry.

Greek gods existed mostly from the beginning of humanity as mankind has what they worship, for example the sun, the moon and many others. For me, the Greeks have the most unique gods. They have various things such as love, war etc. The gods seem almost like humans, they cherish and cherish in the lives of the people they see and their people. As everyone knows, the gods and humans mix together, with a certain force, half human beings and half immortal people have been created. Greek gods welcome reading my report on Greek gods and myths. You will learn about what they do with the gods. It is also a myth and legend about Greece. The Greek gods of Greek gods are the same as many other gods. They are drawn like men and women. The Greeks did not worship animals. The gods are blessed with many weaknesses like human beings. The gods may be embarrassing, embarrassing, malicious, and trivial. The gods are considered immortal, but they have a beginning ... - Theology: Believe in God. (58) - Atheism: I refuse to believe in God. (56) - ignorance: a decision between the two about the existence of God. (54) - Indifference: Do not mind whether God exists or not. (53) - comparison between freedom and commitment: ironically, freedom takes time and effort to find alternatives, and if you make a decision, you must promise to do so Hmm. (1) - God's question: This is a question about whether God exists. Please answer Faith in God has always existed in the history of mankind. Whether it is Greek gods: Apollo, Zeus, or the Jewish - Christian God, is believed by Christians in modern society. Faith in God has always existed in humans, but assuming that God does not exist, this explains this false belief, the cultural evolution of religion. - The main character of Zoni Neil Helston's "The eyes are seeing God", Janie Crawford is trying to find his voice in the novel. Succeeded. Her husbands have various influences on the ability to find this sound. Greek gods are the foundation of Greek culture and religion, the center of Greek superstition and worship. These are related to the origin of God and its behavior in myths. Because God can show blasphemy, courage, or kindness to humans and other gods, the Greeks will mark God according to their quality. In most cases, the Greeks can only decide whether to worship or despise God through them or the content they control. - Polytheism and polytheism itself includes not worshiping a single god but many sacred religions. The basic principle of this polytheistic definition has been achieved by many polytheistic religions in history and has had a great influence on worship and religion. The oldest four polytheisms are Greek, Egyptian, Canaan, Mesopotamian.

He gave us the purpose of life. That is to glorify him according to him, in everything we do (Kelsey, 2012). When we die, we will be judged by God. It is up to you to decide this if you believe that Jesus dies for our sins and stands up again and we can build a relationship with God through Christ (Kelsey, 2012). I will ask why I believe in Christ and I know that everything in the Bible is genuine. First of all, believe in believing what God is, believing in the absence of God, and believing in one thing that is common to many Gods. faith. Pantheism believes that everything is an intrinsic god, or that the universe, or nature is equal to God. A more detailed definition is that the laws of nature, the existence, and / or the universe (which will be all in use, existing, or total) will be expressed or personified by God's theological principle There is a tendency to emphasize the concept. Transcendental existence unrelated to nature is denied. According to how to understand this viewpoint, this view is considered equivalent to atheism, mysticism or theology In pantisism, God and the universe are considered to be the same thing. In this view, the natural science basically studies the essence of God. This definition of God creates a philosophical problem that the universe of God is the same as the universe without God except for the words used to explain it. Deity and populism insist that there is a god that is different from the universe, or that transcends the universe (beyond space). These positions deny that God is involved in the operation of the universe, including personal communication with humans. If it is never possible for God to intervene in the universe, communicate with the universe, or evolve into the notion of the universe, it is difficult to distinguish the universe from God. Almighty is God's inner-sided position in the universe, but it also transcends it. It is different from pantisism which God thinks is synonymous with the physical world. In equalityism God is regarded as the creator and motive behind the universe, and the source of universal morals. This term is closely related to Greek philosophy in Heraclitus' work. Heraclitus is seen throughout the universe, and everything is made by the universe.

In this course, we will introduce Christian teachings as Christian subjects in great detail about various expressions and backgrounds. Contemporary nursing background (postmodern and new atheism) has also been carefully considered Discussion about various defense methods continues, but the number of people claiming that the era of education has ended is increasing more and more. Those thinkers believe that apology theory assumes ideal of reasonable knowledge. It is the foundation of contrary to modern rationalism Christianity. With the emergence of virtual death of modern rationalism and the emergence of postmoderns, the teachings of antichristian rationalism and Christian rationalism are considered to be outdated. On the other hand, other Christian thinkers believe that the situation in modern times is more complicated. They believe they did not give rationalist ideals because postmodernism qualified it. They concluded that the place is still nursing instruction, but it must take into account the latest developments in post modern thinking. The Christian apology theory tries to build a bridge between disbelievers by proposing that Christianity is true, rational, and suitable for reason and evidence. Christian's apologyist Francis A. Schaefer in the second half of the 20th century saw Christian's apology as "evangelism". It is a way to prepare the heart and soul for the Christian message (the gospel). Oxford University theologian Alistar E. McGrath best summarized the relationship between apology and evangelism. "... Christian apocalypse represents a serious and continuous approach to the" ultimate problem "caused by culture, people, individuals. Is participation aimed to show how Christian faith can give meaningful answers to these questions? As John the Baptist prepared the way of the arrival of Jesus of Nazareth, the teaching of nursing is opening a way to evangelism ... evangelism ... Please send me a personal invitation letter. The apology or defense of Christian religion dates back to the 1st century, but the formal science of apology is a more recent development. In this chapter, we will explore the history of nursing education in three stages. First, we discuss the teaching in detail in the New Testament itself. Secondly, we pay close attention to the main advocates before reform, especially Augustine, Anselm, Thomas Aquinas. Third, we will take a more general overview of apologetic teachings from religious reform to the present In the next chapter, we consider the defense philosophy of some contemporary Christian thought in more detail I will do.

Life and work of William Butler Yeats William Butler Yeats was born in Dublin in 1865 and will continue to be recognized by his companion as the greatest British poet of the century. Perhaps his earliest work "The Tower" (Fraser, 207) is as early as 1828, just ten years before his death. One time lawyer, later famous painter John Butler Yeats, WB. Son Yeats was born near Dublin and is part of the Cornwall and Gaelic language grew up between England and Ireland. William Butler Yeats: Modernist William Butler Yeats is an Irish poet of the 19th century. William Butler Yeats was born in Dublin, Ireland in 1865. He was educated in Dublin and London and in 1877 wrote his first passage (nobelprize.org). He wrote many poems in his life, thought to be the most influential poet of his time. He is very influential in the modernist era. William Butler Yeats is one of the most famous poets of the 19th century. - The detailed paragraph is not Octavian of Octavian 's surprising life Nothing. It is on pages 222-236. Anderson It describes a scientific paper by Gitney and Sharpe and a letter from Dr. Trefusis, a document about the death of Cassiopeia, a memoir written by Octavian (a poem written by Theoginis). These pages start with Smallpox, Octavian 29-year-old mother, Cassiopeia's smallpox disease Life and work of William Butler Yeats William Butler Yeats was born in Dublin in 1865 and will continue to be recognized by his companion as the greatest British poet of the century. Perhaps his earliest work "The Tower" (Fraser, 207) is as early as 1828, just ten years before his death. Later famous painter John Butler Yeats, WB. William Butler Yeats is a poet and playwright (playwright) in Ireland. Some people think he is the greatest poet in the 20th century. He received the Nobel Prize in literature in 1923. The work of William Butler Yeats has a clear bridge between the romantic poetry of the 19th century and the word of modern poetry. William Butler Yeats was born in Dublin, Ireland on 13th June 1865. He is the oldest of the four children of portrait painter John Butler Yeats. His father took part in William's regular school education at home, which gave him a permanent hobby of the classics. John Yeats has a strong personality. His personal philosophy incorporates aesthetics (belief that art and beauty are important to all) and atheism (belief without God). William felt its impact long after. Because it appeared in his interest to Magic and occultusum (supernatural).

Personal peace means that someone is happy with themselves and they are not worried about someone else. Wealth includes obsession with acquisition of important things. According to Schaeffer (2005), these are dangerous life ideologies, as they may result in "meaning of life and pessimism to fixed values" (p. 206). This kind of pessimism abandons Christian values ​​and enables individuals to more strictly control the concept of peace and prosperity. Francis Schaeffer is a Christian philosopher, writer and theologian who can incorporate the meaning, morality, and values ​​that philosophy deals with. He is also a famous missionary and often speaks with universities and seminar audiences nationwide. Schaefer believes that "Christians are responsible for bravely confronting the increasingly hostile society that declines and becomes more hostile." Thereby turning a human being into a machine. He kept saying that if a person is a non-personal person plus the product of time and opportunity, the person has no intrinsic value and his freedom is nothing but illusion. He believes that when we understand that people are created in God's statues, we have true intrinsic value, personality and freedom. The answer to Essay.com / Francis Schaeffer's book "Return to Freedom and Dignity" F. Discussing Schaefer's view on Christianity about Skinner Reply to Francis Schaefer's book "Return to Freedom and Dignity" in this book This article discusses views of Schaefer's view of B. F. Skinner by Christian. Francis Schaefer was one of the greatest Christian thinkers of the 20th century. When I was young, he grew up in a liberal church, moving in the direction of agnosticism or atheism. But then when he discovered the Word of God and read the Bible, he compares the answers I found there and the questions I read in philosophy. He became a Christian and after years he wrote a book entitled "He is there, he is not silent." In that book, he said: There is no other philosophical answer. You can search through university philosophy, underground philosophy, petrol station philosophy - it is not important - there is no other philosophical answer that exists. Eastern, Western, ancient, modern, old and new, regardless of old and new, it satisfies the needs of every idea of ​​the world, there is only one kind of philosophy, only one kind of religion.

We take ourselves from the center of the universe (at least that Ptolemy version), place us on a planet orbiting planet, and the other planets do the same. We start seeing ourselves and our world from a truly scientific point of view. Modern medicine, biology, chemistry, astronomy and many other fields became more autonomous and began to ask the right questions. We began seeing the relationship with God with more critical eyes. During this period, religious diversity, agnosticism and atheism in a modern sense certainly derive from this. The concept of modern human rights began in this era. This eventually developed into the decline of the monarchy as a major form of governance, and legal and judicial system based on statutory law. Renaissance is the age of discovery, the most important of which is how ordinary we are in many ways, but we are making it unique in all other respects How will the renaissance change people's perceptions of people? - How did Renaissance change the introduction of a man's paper? The Renaissance changed people's perception of people through philosophical, religious, artistic, and scientific perspectives. The philosophy developed will challenge the way the ruler dominates the monarch's mind and people. There are many pre-thought church teachings that have been challenged by the great scientists of those days. On the religious side, a new culture that challenges the beliefs of the Catholic Church is formed. Artists beat church and religious ideals and pursued a more humanistic approach. Philosophy also has a big influence on the views of people who change people. Philosophers share a satirical and critical style, a commitment to openly exploring the mind, and a hostility toward established political and religious authority, although the degree is different. Voltaire wants all religious and religious freedom to enjoy the right of equality. These new ideas will add a new way of seeing yourself. During the Renaissance, human perception of people changed. This view has changed from a more religious viewpoint that the Renaissance view is more concentrated on this person. It shows the possibilities and achievements of mankind. This is revealed through art, the inner nature of human beings, the position of humans in the universe, and the human body. One way the Renaissance changed people's perception of people was through art. In the Middle Ages, art had different purposes. Artists expressed more religious beliefs and their human beings are less realistic. This is because art is getting better with time and can capture more realistic images. For example, Leonardo da Vinci's "Mona Lisa" is a picture showing this beautiful woman, the famous work of the Renaissance. Thanks to such work, artists can not only express their religious beliefs in art but also express the beauty of people.

Lessing's "Nathan the Wise" means the universal concept of rational religion, which is typical of enlightenment. Lessing did not abandon the existing religion in his work, but I think his humanitarian religion contradicts the definition of human beings. Therefore, understanding of religion by Lessing is impossible to realize because it ignores the foundation of religion. First, I will explain that this play reproduces the intention of manhood and humanity. Many religions imply this in the notion of heaven, hell and purgatory. To be "a place" means that they must be outside our universe. In other words, they must be in different universes. Or they are their own universe. The universe can parallel and be one aspect of our universe. The objection to this is that they exist in dimensions that we can not understand or undiscovered in our universe. If you think of planets and galaxies as approximate reasoning of the universe, this means nearly a myriad of universe. When calculating something with this ratio, the count is usually 1, 2, 3 ... infinity. Therefore, referring to the planetary concept above, we believed only what we saw in the solar system. Scientists now know that there are at least 2 trillion galaxies in the universe. It is a wonderful place quite different from the concept of the universe we have when it was established among the world's major religions. So, have astronomical discoveries in the past few centuries affected religion? In the past few decades there was a new way to discuss atheism. Religious philosophers such as Michael Martin and Nicholas Everett asked us to think about the universe we expect Christian God to create and compare it with the universe we live in It was. I think they have a mismatch. Everitt is focusing on the size of the universe and I believe this will give us reasons to believe that there is no classical Christian god. Clearly, we are expecting a difference between the type of the universe created by the human-centered God and the universe we live in. How do you explain it? The simplest explanation is, of course, that God does not exist. The dimension of the space and time of the universe gives us reasons to be atheist

"But due to the nature of the translation, what is insanity at the bottom of the absence of the external and internal?" - In his 1901 article entitled "Antonin Alto" entitled "Magic", the Irish poet William Butler · Yeats (William · Butler · Yeats) is proposed Concept of aesthetic work directly rooted in the ancient work of magician and pastor. His basic belief is a form that can summarize his entire life and belief literary career as follows: (1) the boundaries of our minds are constantly changing and the thinking of many people As it was, flow to each other, and can be created or revealed single thought, single energy. William Butler Yeats: Modernist William Butler Yeats is an Irish poet of the 19th century. William Butler Yeats was born in Dublin, Ireland in 1865. He worked in Dublin and was educated in London, writing his first poem (nobelprize.org) in 1877. He wrote many poems in life and was considered to be the most influential poet of his time. He is very influential in the modernist era. William Butler Yeats is one of the most famous poets of the 19th century. But William Butler Yeats wrote of the Victorian and contemporary literature, but he still had a major impact on modernist style. William Butler Yeats is a poet and playwright (playwright) in Ireland. Some people think he is the greatest poet in the 20th century. He received the Nobel Prize in literature in 1923. Works by William Butler Yeats constitute a clear language in romantic poetry and contemporary poetry bridge of the 19th century. William Butler Yeats was born in Dublin, Ireland on 13th June 1865. He is the oldest of the four children of portrait painter John Butler Yeats. His father participated in regular school education at William's family and sustained the charm of the classics. John Yeats has a strong personality. His personal philosophy combined aroma (art and beauty is important for all beliefs) and atheism (a kind of faith in God). William, which appears within his magical interest and occult (supernatural), felt long after that effect William Butler Yeats is a man famous for his famous works of the 19th century and is considered one of Britain's greatest poets. Yeats is a knowledgeable poet born before him. In his poetry and literary work, he combines techniques and styles to express meaningful ideas. Yeats became a pioneering poet of revolutionary style and content for all works. In these analyzed verses, Yeats shows him a truly unique way through the innovative use of style and content.

There is a difference between Darwinism and creationism. One is based on data and the other is based on belief. Darwinism regards itself as science and scientific methodology explains this. Biological evolution is accompanied by changes in living things in life history on the earth. It explains that living things share a common ancestor, and over time the evolutionary change creates new species. On the other hand, the idea of ​​creating science comes from the belief of most Abrahamic religions - including humans and other creatures - that God created the universe. They want to argue that the problem of evolution (or what they call "evolution theory" or "Darwinism") and science is not religion but religion and religion (science). "The example comes from the lie of Ken Ham: evolution, but it is called" the cause, principle or system of faith related to enthusiasm and belief "(from Webster Quoted) as well as a deep misunderstanding evolution of two religions) dictionary. Humm's ridiculous argument differs from "contradiction-free biblical evidence", in the past can only study them and can not access directly, so deriving scientific conclusions from fossils and evidence is That means you can not. Written in the era of Kenam In historical context, creationism and evolution are always controversial subjects and are one of Darwin's major breakthroughs in spreading his evolution theory. When Darwin published his evolution theory in 1859, his book was thought of as a major technological advancement at the time. Since the existence of evolution compensates society, "evidence" like the existence of God creates a catalyst that does not exist, and creationism is almost replaced by atheism. Since the publication of Charles Darwin 's Origins of Origin, people have discussed creationism and evolution. By supporting facts and assertions, evolution is defended as more than just a theory, which proves to be a fact. - Because he is made in the final state, a person can not evolve to another state. He is made according to the image and image of his father, so you do not need to evolve; therefore there is no sign of evolution from the beginning. Since sin entered the world, people have been fooled to believe that there is evolution

Imagine driving in Marin County, you missed your turn, suddenly surrounded by a 40 - 50 shaved head, wearing a blue bib overalls, an axle handle, a stick, a baseball bat I shouted with. "Kill them, let's come over them!" It sounds like a horror movie. The term "cult" from Latin Cultus means religious worship and dedication to a specific image or object (Oxford English Dictionary). Dr. Robert J. Lifton, a professor of psychology and psychiatry at John Jay College and a graduate student at the City University of New York, defines the characteristics of cults as follows. 1) Charismatic leader increasingly becoming a subject of worship. McLoone's 2010 - 2011 participation plan was based on a rehabilitation model called Synanon, invented by Charles "Chuck" Dederich of Santa Monica in 1958. The rehabilitation center is spin-off of alcohol based on special self-help - Dederich who participated in this event in 1956 - developed into a true social movement. Initially, Synanon was a blueprint for a clean life. But within 10 years, the seaside Utopia designed by Dederich became a fierce cult. In the 1970s Synanon became a fixed factor in the treatment of addiction in the United States in its strict attitude despite its being published as a "racquet of this century" including child abuse, illegal imprisonment, beatings, and misappropriation of funds It was. McLoone and other experts told me this is a dirty secret of rehabs By the end of the 70's, the union's California state roots were popular psychological fruits. Chavez was often taken away by Cinanon, a rehabilitation center that changed her lifestyle, originally in Santa Monica. The advantageous work of Synanon is developed mainly on activities called "games". In this activity, members of the community attack each other through real or creative arguments. Even therapeutic work and even enlightenment - Synannon has declared itself as a religion - progressing through hot potatoes that are responsible to others. Chavez likes this game and I'd like to start practicing with La Paz. The union's problem is that the Labor Relations Act is to deprive its enemy - producers - he said nothing can be hammered, he said. If La Paz can become a model community like Cinanon, it can be bigger than a simple administrative agency. Mr. Chavez said, "If this alliance is not a sport, I do not want a part of it." Personality worship lacking supernatural elements is often described as secular religion. For example, see objectiveism. Synanon is a dictatorial medicine treatment center, secular movement, recognizing the status as de facto religion, tried to legally reorganize the Synanon church in the mid-1970s. There are various kinds of non-religious Judaism. The extent of faith usually adheres to the law, faithfully defends the people born or involved only in the Jewish god and Jewish cultural elements, making it more like a country than religious identity. This is often referred to as "secular Judaism", "cultural Judaism" or "Jewish atheism".

In C. S. Lewis' s book "Pure Christianity", "stubborn toy soldiers" is an advantageous chapter. Lewis walked this chapter with his readers. In the first paragraph, he talked about how humans are living here and now, people really do not think about what will happen if a man never falls. The second paragraph is about how natural and spiritual life is opposite, not separate. Lewis said that this is because people were born in a certain way and God wants another way. When these two aspects are combined with natural life and spiritual life, the way people usually do things will be destroyed in the process. Lewis used the metaphor of toy soldiers to explain how Christians became the style of Jesus. Our natural life is our self-centered life. Meanwhile, Lewis is very serious about the analogy of tin soldiers. He said that we might not like it if we want to be the Christ. This will make us indignation of him, and perhaps we will pull us away from him. We are human beings and God is God. This is what it should be. We need to earn spiritual life by ourselves and the humanity of God. Lewis believes that this is the way we get spiritual life. Lewis of the British National Church intends to explain the common points of Christians. In pure Christianity, his aim was to avoid controversy explaining the basic doctrine of Christianity For the essentially educated people and their intellectual generation, the official Christian theological terminology He did not retain their original meaning. Lewis puts much of his Christian religious advocacy in moral argument, and this argument persuaded him from atheism to Christianity. He quoted an example of Nazism and settled his case based on the moral law, everyone knew, "rules of right and wrong"; Christian and atheist, Hitler's actions are morally wrong I believe there is. . At a more general level, it is widely believed that theft violates this moral law. Lewis thinks that moral law is like the law of nature because it is not designed by humans.

The Spanish Civil War from 1936 to 1939 was a big conflict in the Spanish history. The war was initiated by the general Francisco Franco in a military uprising dated July 17, 1936, and ended on April 1, 1939 with Franco's victory. This victory led to the replacement of the second Spanish republic by Franco's conservative dictatorship. This conflict caused conflict in various cultures and ideologies in Spain. Important examples of ideological conflict are communism and fascism. Spanish fascism led by general Franco and nationalists is another story. It is rooted in the fear of civil war, communism and anarchism. Franco and nationalists claim to be defenders of Christian civilization against communists and anarchists who tried to destroy Spain. German fascism comes from anger. After the punishment and impossibility of the Palace of Versailles, compensation for the Germans still exists. It is the anti-communist racism, which is attracting the national identity of Germany, which we believe is now the hegemony of the Aryans. The attempted extinction of all the Jews attracted the most attention, but Nazi indiscriminately tried to eliminate homosexuals, gypsies and all other unpleasant elements to make pure Germany. During the Spanish Civil War, the left-wing Republicans opposed the right-wing nationalists to participate in the surrogate war between communism and fascism and Dali backed the victorious nationalists led by Francisco Franco. Later, he praised Franco and lived happily under the general 's regime. He also accepted flabbergast left in other ways. To commemorate the 20th anniversary of Israeli founding, he accepted a committee to produce a series of Zionist paintings. Dali spent most of the United States in the 1940s and 1950s. He also gave up on his youthful atheism and even though he always aimed for a new way he started to accept religious themes, making his odd Freud symbol unsolicited for familiar Christians It was. In 1951 he painted the cross of St. John · Christ and showed a crucifixion from the top. The audience saw the top of Christ, but there was no face. Currently located in the main museum in Glasgow, it is probably the most popular picture in Scotland.

Eric Blair is known for his English pseudonym George Orwell (1903-1950), a person familiar with the role of the government. He worked at the British government in Myanmar at the Indian Imperial Police. Returning to his European roots, Orwell also backed the Spanish government as he fought against the royalists in the civil war. Until his professional writing as a political writer, the Orwell government's idea was fully expressed. Orwell is very contradictory in his political writings. First of all, I am a democratic socialist. Attempts to create socialist utopia beyond democracy will fail because the will of the people must be the highest; the basis of socialist philosophy is that every human being is born equally, everyone is It has the right to life and freedom. Beyond the scope of democratic control these fundamental rights will inevitably be compromised. An unforgettable way of saying is that power is corrupt, absolute power is absolutely corrupt. For socialists like me, there is a fixed idea in every idea, including those who believe that I have to agree on certain matters such as atheism and support options. The extraordinary Utopia literature of "1984" is the mirror of life. To reflect their views on social issues, many new authors, including Utopia Sir Thomas Moore and "One hundred and eight" George Orwell, took the place of character, environment, government and society Use. That work is tied to real work. It is the world. A character is an attachment to a literary work, unless there is a smooth character, the novel is incomplete. - George Orwell has created two protagonists with inconsistent personality who believe in the concept of love in the forbidden world. Both are secret insurgents of the party and share the same hatred towards the party's totalitarian powers, but there is considerable disagreement between Julia and Winston. The difference between them includes their morality, motivation for their rebellion, and their character.

Mr. Plato's apology was entitled "Mr. Plato's colleague resumed the trial" and "Sorry", Mr. Socrates insisted that he wanted to do good only for defense. I believe that Socrates is not guilty of his claim, but he despised the court and showed his thought that led to his death. In his defense, Socrates claims that he is innocent, again and again, not wise "I know because it is small or big, I do not have wisdom ... .... "In his other speech in the middle, he seemed to be doing the opposite as if he was better than anyone, later he even said" If the world decided Socrates, Plato 's apology is a description of Socrates' trial. Socrates is a teacher of Plato, and the dialogue is written in a tributary form. An ideal speech is doubtful whether the apology actually made remarks in the Greek court, thinking of his leadership position on the trial problem, which constitutes the possibility caused by Plato. Socrates firmly believes in his beliefs. He has the idea that if necessary it should be prepared for their faith. He also proposed a unique discussion method by revealing the weaknesses of the statement of debate. His "Socrates method" saw the definition of "simple", which seemed even more difficult. Basically, this method raises questions about this problem. To define a term, you need to take a position to avoid confusion. In his Euthyphro conversation, Socrates asked Euthyphro the essence of godliness. Euthyphro replied: "How much pious is to God" (Tredennick, pp Plato 's apology apology is that Socrates preserved his life and vision in the same jury. They condemned his death and distorted young people in Athens for "atheism". Saying, I advise anyone who encounters my attitude and I will not stop teaching practice and philosophy "persuading him: Socrates' correspondence My friends, why you are great and powerful Very concerned about money and honor and reputation in citizens of Athens? Do you not notice whether you are considering this about the wisest city, the greatest improvement of wisdom and truth and soul? Are not you ashamed of this? " Plato 's apology for Socrates includes a violent statement about the relationship between Socrates and Athens citizens and citizens. It was surprising that Socrates did not keep the essence and method of his teaching, as it was being tried for rotting youth. Instead, he just denied that he was a teacher. Many scholars believe that Plato distinguished him from sophisticated people primarily when Socrates denied that he was a teacher. In this article, I think, from the perspective of the historical life of educational change Socrates and Plato, Socrates refuses the difference between Socrates and sophistry more than what was shown much more complicated. As an orator, sophist, natural philosopher, Socrates, probably philosopher: Socrates has Athenian there are various kinds. I believed that I failed to recognize the new Athens in the 5th century education. Why did Socrates deny that he was a teacher? Positioning of Socrates in traditional education of new educators and apologetics of Plato's Socrates

Key features of an ontological argument about the existence of God An ontological argument about God's existence was originally proposed by Sts Anselm of Proslogian in the 11th century. Anselm is a monk of Archbishop of Canterbury, one of medieval theologians. It has been endorsed and criticized by many philosophers. This argument attracts those who believed in the existence of God, not atheism. This argument is totally transcendental, trying to prove that God exists only based on this concept, and that it exists as a characteristic / feature of God, and that it is omnipotent. Ontological argument about God's existence The ontological argument is a transcendental argument. These arguments try to prove the existence of God from the meaning of the word God. Anselm of Canterbury introduced an ontological argument to his work 'Proslogion'. The classic argument of Anselm is based on two principles, the most important of which are St. Anselm and Rene de Carte of the above Canterbury. - Cosmological argument tries to prove the existence of God by showing that there are no myriad reasons for the existence of objects. It states that everything must have the last unresolved cause. The reason for this unknown reason is declared to be God. Such discussion is believed to be the reason for understanding us and the existence of the universe. There are several forms of cosmological argument, but basically it is as follows. Like the ontological argument, the cosmological argument, also known as the first factor theory, is a classical argument against the existence of God. However, unlike ontological arguments, we conclude that God exists in the posterior premise (with evidence), as it is based on what is visible in the world and the universe. It shows the first reason behind the existence of the universe. Cosmological arguments are based on chance (depending on other things) and point out that things exist as something caused them to happen. Discussion also points out that things exist, but they do not exist and there are many reasons that can go back in time. Time begins with the birth of the universe formed about 15 billion years ago. Ontological discussion is a philosophical argument on the existence of God using ontology. Many discussions are categorized into ontology categories and they tend to include discussion about the state or existence of the existence. More specifically, ontological discussions tend to begin with the a priori theory of cosmic organizations. If the organizational structure is true, that argument will provide reasons why God must exist. The first ontological argument in the West Christian tradition was proposed by Canterbury's national anthem in his 1078 Proslogion. Anselm defines God as "there is nothing more to think" and believes that this existence must exist in the mind even in the minds of those who deny the existence of God. He suggested that if there is the greatest possible presence in the heart, it must also exist in reality. If it exists only in the mind, a larger presence must be possible - the existence that exists in the thought and the reality

Evangelical Book 12: 13. The statement here corresponds to the beginning of the conclusion of evangelism chapter 12: 8. Everything on the earth is expressed as vanity there. "The conclusion of the discourse, the whole, please let us know." In addition to the books "Yu Shu" and "Chronicles" asylum author, in fact, using the word "rew" as Hebrew There is none. Beyond the next 20:16, that did not happen. It happens frequently in the Chaldea region of Daniel. It means "whole", not "total". At the same time, when it is clearly stated as the end, only the perfectly important idea at the end is considered; then we clearly tell them that the last is also the sum. In this book you are definitely a specific word in front of us. We can also treat life repeated as often jealousy, often repeated recommendations. It is understood by the last sermon "Fear of God". All complaints are atheism Many scholars are aware of the influence on evangelists. Sidhuri 's speech in ancient Babylonian epics is very similar to evangelistic book 9: 7 - 10 and may have a direct influence. For example, it contains a statement about the strength of three ropes that can only be found in Gilgamesh Epic and Ecclesiastes (4: 12). Many scholars are drawing attention to various themes, dramas, and bibles, and these themes, dramas, and the Bible all show the influence of Girgamesh epic on Homer's epic. These effects are explained by Martin Lichfield West on the east side of Helicon. Greek poetry and mythological elements of West Asia There is a sense that the mission book following the book of rumors is actually an introduction to another book. The annoying experience of the Minister set him to "many proverbs" (evangelism chapter 12: 9). In these words, we have a sacred reason for the rumors. God will be saved by all the people who realize that it is recorded. And those experiences and meaningless wandering of people who chose to write are recorded there. "Proverbs represent the best wisdom literature of Solomon, a proverb is the principle of life that is reduced to a statement.This book is based on the principle that Solomon dominated his kingdom and his influence Solomon's proverb is divided into five different subgroups This book probably should be regarded as a collection of five books written separately Produce together

Nature and civilization always have strong ties; from the whole history, when human interaction challenges this tie, there will be a tension between nature and humans. One of the work of the poet is to reveal this tension through his or her poem and calm the quarrel. Percy Shelly is such a poet and believes that society is separated from nature In his poems people can find benefits of this example and society and the world. August 4, 1792 - Year of fear of France - Percy Bysshe Shelley (his grandfather's "Bysshe", a member of the same field) is the son of Timothy and Elizabeth Shelley. As brothers, John and the four sisters Elizabeth, Mary, Margaret, and Helen's eldest son, Percy, not only inherited the great estate of his grandfather, but lined up to sit on Congress one day. As the oldest boy, a young Persie is their love and longing for his sister, his parents, even his early dominant servants, and a family house near Horsham in Sussex. Young lord of the field. He was full of fun and imagination, designed a game to play with the sisters, and told the ghost stories to joy and joyful crowds. Percy Bysshe Shelley was born on Field Place on August 4, 1792. His ancestors began to be Sussex aristocrats from the beginning of the 17th century. His grandfather, Sir Byshe Shelly, made himself the most rich man in Horsham, and his father, Timothy Sherry, was a calm traditional parliamentarian. Percy Bysshe Shelley was sent to Eton for education and continued studying at Oxford. At that time he released two spy stories and poems. In Oxford in autumn of 1810, Shelley and his best friend, Thomas Jefferson Hogg, created a booklet on the necessity of atheism and claimed that the existence of God can not prove to be the reason for experience. Sherry refused to reject the file, so Sherry and T. J. Hogg were rejected. The incident opened a violation between Sherry and his father, and his father interrupted all his relations with his son. He went to London

Many poets, writers, and writers use anthropomorphism to draw attention to the audience through comparison. This technique of giving objects that are specific to human features allows the reader to better identify the content drawn on the page. Second-generation poets, including romantic poets, especially Lord Byron, Percy Sherry, John Keats, will use personalization to draw attention to the reader and return to nature if possible. To its beauty. Percy Bysshe Shelley is the definition of a romantic poet. His philosophical philosophy emphasizes the importance of aesthetics and his poem clearly represents the beauty and majesty of nature. Like many of his romantic colleagues Shelly's own life is short, tragic and suffering. Drowning in a rowing accident before age 30, one of his wishes is that his words will influence and stimulate until he has a long time to become a reality. Shelly proved the power of nature in his poem "Westerly Winds" using symbols, metaphor, instrument, image, and many other devices. And I will tell you that this power is part of his mission. Plugin There are many similarities between Victor and Mary's husband Percy Shelly. Victor is a pseudonym of Percy Shelley, like his collection of poems written by his sister Elizabeth, Victor and Kazaa. One of Mary Shelley 's models of Victor Frankenstein is presumed to be full of Oxford' s room at Eaton in 'Percy' which has tested many chemical reactions with electricity, magnetism and gunpowder '. Scientific equipment Percy Shelley was formerly a student at Oxford University. Participation in the class at Shelley 's college brought a controversy, but he certainly was very productive and presented his first novel and several verses. But Shelley had some problems, and his 1811 brochure "the need for atheism" let him be exiled from the university. The booklet is opposed to the existence of God, but it also helps to support and support the atheist's identity and beliefs. When a person investigates religious subjects in Frankenstein, this background on Shelly belief should be kept in mind, at least since Shelly helps Mary edit the novel, and of course its form and theme debate It is part of.

Outline of Jewish faith to the quality of God In this article I will discuss Jewish beliefs against Hashim and what Jews think about his qualities. To prove my answer I will use the example of a famous religious scholar named Maimonides and reference to Tora. The Jews believe that God is omnipotent, that is, has infinite power and authority. Among the 13 principles of Maimonides, the Jews believed that Point 7 showed God's infinite power over humanity and the universe. There is a variety of definitions of the concept of "God". Even if we have the capital 'G', we do not have exactly the same meaning when using the word 'god'. Although Jews and Christians have some similarities in the faith of God, it is very important to draw a unique understanding of Jewish gods in order to correctly understand Judaism and to avoid simplified explanation . In the universe, God knows the character of all creatures and their heart. The very important 12th century Jewish philosopher Moses Maimonides is "in the confusion guidance" human words are not enough to explain God, human efforts to explain the positive attributes of God Even God will affect the absolute match. There are various kinds of non-religious Judaism. The extent of faith usually adheres to the law, faithfully defends the people born or involved only in the Jewish god and Jewish cultural elements, making it more like a country than religious identity. This is often referred to as "secular Judaism", "cultural Judaism" or "Jewish atheism". Comparison: Zender, Tom (2010). God goes to work: a new idea for prosperity and profit. Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons. Page 17 - 18. ISBN 9780470617700. https://books.google.com/books?id=n3r2XzmMuhgC. It was acquired in 2018-07-27. "Some people say that today's people are working in church rather than in church.This religious company never worried about the major countries of the United States and other worlds once they were worried about. An example of how to fail

In his short life, Georges Pierre Suura was an innovator in the era of the art world innovators. A French painter was a leader called the New Impressionist movement in the late 19th century. Unlike a wide range of Impressionist brushstrokes, Shura developed a technique called stippling or splitting. In this way, he uses contrasting points and strokes to create subtle changes in the picture. Seurat is an art scientist as he spends most of his life looking for various colors and linear effects to change the appearance and texture of the canvas. French Impressionist painter Georges Pierre Suura has been told that "I attacked each canvas with a golden part." In these examples, the field of vision lies only in the golden part of the painting's height. . The golden ratio of Georges Seurat and artwork provides more detailed analysis and commentary, and many other examples. Below, Edward Burne Jones created a "golden staircase" (click here to enlarge) and carefully crafted the details of the gold section. A golden part appears on the stairs, and the ring of horn is carried to the fourth woman from the top. The robe from the waistband to the hem under the chest has reached the phy point of the knee. The width of the interior door behind the stairs is the gold part of the width above the entrance of the skylight. How much can you find? Paul Valery, George Santayana, Richard Rotey, Ronald Dokin, Georges Pierre Soula, Constantin Block, Robert Rauschenberg, Andréjid, Philippe Ross, Rudolf Lavin, Melse Cunningham, Wales, Wallace Elizabeth Bishop of the Atheist and Elizabeth Bishop of Czezosomi and Liner Maria Rilke, EO Wilson and Sam Harris of Chiesessomios explored how atheism evolved, deepened and matured, and trying to regain it. God of art, philosophy, and knowledge of the rich detail of this life and science with warmth is integrated into rational and secular morality. In the 1880's, after the Impressionists, the French artist Georges Pierre Seurat contributed to French paintings by introducing more systematic and scientific techniques called dot picture or division. Small dots are grouped together to create a feeling of vitality that interacts and blends into the eyes of the viewer. Some people wonder if Shura's great work should be considered an inevitable result of the Impressionist, or should be regarded as an intentional anti-Impressionist, but that the answer includes both elements there is. In pursuit of color analysis, Sura continues in a more systematic way what Monet and Pizarro have done.

William Butler Yeats, a woman in a poem, has a long history with women. He is strongly influenced by all sorts of women from the love of Olivia · Shakespeare · Asia Pacific, her adopted daughter Ystar, partnership and friendly relations with Mrs. Gregory and friendship, and George · Hide Leeds marriage. And the birth of his own daughter Anne Yeats. These relationships are reflected in his poetry and there are various levels. In his work he stated that women give the reader some historical content and show the development of her women's concept. William Butler Yeats' poem William Butler Yeats is an Irish poet, playwright, and essayist - one of the greatest British poets of the 20th century. (Ye Zhi 1) His early poetry and theater got ideas from Irish fables and esoteric studies. (Ellman 1) When Ye Zhi wrote about his country he used nationalism to avoid themes of oppression, social division and solidarity. The Irish nationalist Yeats uses the three poems "The Coming Soon", "September 1913", "Europe 1916", through the theme, emotion and figurative words to express feelings about the Irish independence war I expressed it. William Butler Yeats, a woman in a poem, has a long history with women. He is strongly influenced by all sorts of women from the love of Olivia · Shakespeare · Asia Pacific, her adopted daughter Ystar, partnership and friendly relations with Mrs. Gregory and friendship, and George · Hide Leeds marriage. And the birth of his own daughter Anne Yeats. These relationships are reflected in his poetry and there are various levels. In his work he stated that women give the reader some historical content and show the development of her women's concept. William Butler Yeats is a poet and playwright (playwright) in Ireland. Some people think he is the greatest poet in the 20th century. He received the Nobel Prize in literature in 1923. The work of William Butler Yeats has a clear bridge between the romantic poetry of the 19th century and the language of contemporary poetry. William Butler Yeats was born in Dublin, Ireland on 13th June 1865. He is the oldest of the four children of portrait painter John Butler Yeats. His father took part in William's regular school education at home, which gave him a permanent hobby of the classics. John Yeats has a strong personality. His personal philosophy incorporates aesthetics (belief that art and beauty are important to all) and atheism (belief without God). William felt its impact long after. Because it appeared in his interest to Magic and occultusum (supernatural).

Kant's "critique of pure reason" indicates that there are multiple categories, and he uses logic to derive these conclusions. "It is also possible to intuitively synthesize only the unity of expressions that differ intuitively by the same function with different representation unity.This is often called purely understanding concept.Therefore, The logical form brings about the same behavior of the concept and also brings transcendental content to that expression through integration of diversity in a general intuition. My own opinion is that the criticism of Kant of philosophical multiculturalism based on advertising is also caused by the old and deep tendency of the 19th century, the 20th century, the 21st century, that is anti - Cantanism, or simply anti - Canti is. I mean Kant and Kant's philosophy, and even prejudice against fear. Furthermore, in the American McCarthyism from the end of the Second World War and from the late 1940s to the 1950s, the mainstream British and American academic philosophy almost all German philosophy (except for early analysis philosophers like Eph) . Just as most of Europe's philosophy influenced by Marxist is a moral aura, members and colleagues of reggae, Wittgenstein, Carnap, and other Vienna circles are moral by Nazi style fascism aura Contaminated with related pollution, Russia, Stalinist communism Since the 20th century, critics tended to think that Kant had a tense relationship with religion, which is not a general view of the 19th century. The letter from Karl Leonhardt's Line Hold made Kant the first known. She wrote: "I believe that I can deduce religion without reservation, in particular Christian interests are in full compliance with reasonable criticism, one of Kant's first comments, John Schulz, "Is this system itself fully integrated with Christian faith, the latter's deity and good deed are more obvious?" As Friedrich Nietzsche said this view through the 19th century , He said, "Kant's success is only the theologian's success." Spinosimism is widely believed to be the cause of the pantiesism controversy. Even atheism is a complicated pantheism This article examines the latest trends in Kant scholarship on religious philosophy and these trends are in a general view of Kant as a philosopher who decisively holds metaphysical things, especially metaphysical metaphysics I claim to challenge. This view is often used to justify the anti-metaphysical grounds of most modern theology and religious philosophy; a discreet picture that Kant is now appearing is causing problems for this attraction.

Percy Bysshe Shelley is a highly influential romantic poet and is one of the second generation of romantic poets, the "Young Devil". He was tamed with Lord Byron and John Keats who were also important poets in their era. Like the other two comrades, Sherry died when he was young as they lived so fast. When he was 29 years old, he was killed in a rowing accident. Shelly has famous poetry such as Ozymandias, Westwind Carols, Skylarks. As a romantic poet Shelley often uses the relationship between nature and spirit and uses personal examples in his poems "West Wind" and "Lark". August 4, 1792 - Year of fear of France - Percy Bysshe Shelley (his grandfather's "Bysshe", a member of the same field) is the son of Timothy and Elizabeth Shelley. As brothers, John and the four sisters Elizabeth, Mary, Margaret, and Helen's eldest son, Percy, not only inherited the great estate of his grandfather, but lined up to sit on Congress one day. As the oldest boy, a young Persie is their love and longing for his sister, his parents, even his early dominant servants, and a family house near Horsham in Sussex. Young lord of the field. He was full of fun and imagination, designed a game to play with the sisters, and told the ghost stories to joy and joyful crowds. Percy Bysshe Shelley was born on Field Place on August 4, 1792. His ancestors began to be Sussex aristocrats from the beginning of the 17th century. His grandfather, Sir Byshe Shelly, made himself the most rich man in Horsham, and his father, Timothy Sherry, was a calm traditional parliamentarian. Percy Bysshe Shelley was sent to Eton for education and continued studying at Oxford. At that time he released two spy stories and poems. In Oxford in autumn of 1810, Shelley and his best friend, Thomas Jefferson Hogg, created a booklet on the necessity of atheism and claimed that the existence of God can not prove to be the reason for experience. Sherry refused to reject the file, so Sherry and T. J. Hogg were rejected. The incident opened a violation between Sherry and his father, and his father interrupted all his relations with his son. He went to London

Many people are interested in distinguishing words from agnosticism and atheism. The reason is simple, an atheist is a person who does not believe in the existence of God and other gods. It may be difficult to remember this difference, but checking the origin of these two words may be useful This agnostic person appeared in 1869 (probably created by British biologist Thomas Henry Huxley) and consisted of Greek agnōstos (meaning "unknown, unknown"). Atheists got English from French athletes. Although the two words share a prefix (which can cause many confusion), the body of each word is completely different. Agnostic shares a part of its history with words related to knowledge and knowledge such as prophecy and prognosis. Atheists share words related to God, usually like theology or theology. Atheists lack faith in any God, accounting for about 3% of the world's population. Atheists in some countries, such as Japan (65%) and Sweden (85%), have a large population. Often atheists are considered "strong atheists" or "weak atheists" depending on the background and certainty of that belief, or lack of faith. Some atheists strongly oppose creating creationism and intelligent design at American schools as an alternative to biological evolution. After the Kansas State Board of Education decided to allow intelligent design to replace evolutionary education, in 2005, Italian church monster flight was created by the team. A flying spaghetti monster is a satire theory that believes that the priests have as much scientific basis as intellectual design theory. A powerful atheist, also known as a clear atheist or a positive atheist, denies the existence of God or any other god. This person's view is entirely based on the real circumstances that can be found using scientific methods. Since the existence of God can not be proved by science, a strong atheist concludes that God does not exist. The second type of atheist is also known as a recessive atheist or aka atheist. This person does not deny the existence of God, but declares Religious Relativism. In other words, she will claim that anyone's faith is faithful to that person, but she does not believe in God himself.

Pat Tillman has a brilliant life. His everyday driving and manners are particularly certain, making him a higher score than our others. His motives made him succeed. He is a football player in high school and personal statistics are impressive as a team. His manners respect him. He received a football scholarship and went to college and got 84 GPA to avoid the 'Joc' stereotype. After all it becomes a star NFL defense guard, it is his sense of responsibility to lead him from the goal line of the football stadium to the forefront of the battlefield. Tillman's Army Ranger Rory Fanning based in Fort Lewis, Washington, in September 2008, traveled throughout the United States, including his "Walk for Pat", raised funds and raised the awareness of the Pat Tillman Foundation . The prescribed funding target was $ 3.6 million, and when he decided to join the army, the value of the Tillman contract was rejected. After that, Larvie Ralph Causewalich of the Salerno executive officer died at the forefront battle base in Horst in Afghanistan, and in the commentary of the truth ESPN who conducted a second investigation in search of Tillman's family based on Tillman's atheism, Mr. Causewritz said, "These people are difficult to relinquish, this may be due to their religious beliefs" and "I believe they sent a better life when you died." Pat Tillman did not talk much about it recently, so it is worth repeating his story. In 2004, George W Bush White House did its best to speak Tillman's story as widely as possible: the American hero Pat Tillman was a Star College Rugby and NFL player, and he gave up a favorable deal It was. I joined the army. Terrorist attack on September 11 is a model of war with terrorism. He served in Iraq and Afghanistan, was violently killed by the enemies of Afghanistan, and received the Purple Heart Award and the Silver Star Award.

In the world of scientific exploration, atheism, and assassination of God revealing the weak ontology theory of Canterbury St. Anselm, we often miss the existence of our glorious God. Due to new theories of neuropsychology, quantum physics, gene therapy, evolution and psychobiology, we are constantly forced to eliminate God from our lives and replace it with cold empty scientific ideas . With the virtue theory, genetic susceptibility, evolution from development, dark matter, superstring theory, multilevel universe, and the neurological cause behind consciousness, we become increasingly far from being God's reality It is. Ontological arguments are transcendental arguments. These arguments try to prove the existence of God from the meaning of the word God. Anselm of Canterbury introduced an ontological argument to his work 'Proslogion'. The classic argument of Anselm is based on two principles, the most important of which are St. Anselm and Rene de Carte of the above Canterbury. If he does not exist, you can still think of a bigger existence (it is like you said that God does not exist besides this existence). Presence must be one of the attributes of God. Because by removing it it is still possible for you to understand the bigger god (the god that exists). The most common problem with this discussion is that it only seems to enumerate the existence of God's attributes and does not seem to indicate it. This argument seems to indicate that any fact you can imagine should be true. Originally developed by St. Anselm (1033-1109) of Canterbury, the ontological argument takes various forms. Since they are transcendental arguments because they are based on prerequisites that can be said to be independent of world experience, they are unique in the traditional theory of God's existence. All of these begin with the concept of God and lead to the conclusion that God must exist. If it succeeds, the ontology prove that the absence of God is impossible. Anselm believes that God is not a bigger existence, but existence. What is in thinking (in understanding) is another problem outside of understanding (out of your mind, actually). Then he asks which is big: is it in thinking or in reality? His argument led to the conclusion in this way.

One of the reasons I participated in this semester religious program was to get back to my god again. Christianity seemed to be the only accepted religion after the bishops' family had grown up. My parents, family, and society prayed to me, attended Sunday schools and church services, and encouraged me to join youth organizations in my church. To some extent, religion has become a boring incident for me, and I have slowly lost interest in the whole church and Christianity. My own experience of NKT began at the age of 17. I first learned Buddhism in the social studies of freshmen, but my curiosity has increased in my older years. The central principle of the four noble truths attracted me; direct discussion of pain seems to be a refreshing rhythm change from other religions The last prophet since then. Who am I? Finally, the most important thing in spirituality is to find a purpose and explain our pain; everything else is like a metaphysical tentacle. The most important thing that Buddhism teaches me is the importance of religion. It firmly reminds me of how stupid and unfounded the anti-authoristic position is. Buddhism tells me that faith is a valor more valor than ridicule. It tells me that many religious people should be respected, and each religion has their own unique truth and prospects for life. Through my exploration of Buddhism and Taoism, I have recognized that modern atheism preserves that religion has no place in the modern world, unfounded and unfounded. Religious churches, if any, provide a systematic guide to living in a fascinating world today filled with isolation. As the number of today's world increases, more and more isolated religious and spiritual practices provide a means to connect with groups of people with diverse backgrounds. Religion is still connected with modern people and it may be more important than ever.

In the face of difficult problems, people tend to ignore objections and ignore it. Political and moral differences are very polar and sometimes even dangerous. Whether it is Christian fundamentalism, Islamic extremism or extreme atheism, religious dialogue is still dyed by arrogance, doctrine and ignorance. The world is more sensitive to the reasons to support and oppose that belief and needs more people who think they are willing to consider the possibility of their political, religious and moral beliefs being misunderstood. The world needs more wisdom and humility. But anyway, what is the humility of wisdom? Why do people seem to be so absorbed in the arrogance of intellectuals? Psychologists, philosophers, theologians, and educators now came up with several answers. In this course, we define general humility and wisdom and ask how to know who is modest. All lectures taught by leading experts organized around some interesting reading and practical tasks you will help solve problems related to humility in your daily life Yes. This course is part of a series of articles exploring theoretical, scientific and applied problems surrounding the humility of knowledge (the latter two will be published in June and November 2017). After completing all three courses, you can better understand this attractive theme. Looking for: Wisdom and humility: Science - https://www.coursera.org/learn/intellectual-humility-science Knowledge humility: Practice - https://www.coursera.org/learn/intellectual- humility-practice Follow us on Twitter. @EdiPhilOnline and #IHMOOC Once you purchase a certificate, you can access all course materials, including score assignment. Once the course is completed, e-Cert will be added to the results page. From there, you can print the certificate or add it to your LinkedIn profile. If you want to read the contents of the course and only want to see it, you can check the course for free. Dr Church, Visiting Assistant Professor at Hillsdale University and Chief Researcher at the University of Edinburgh Intellectual Property Program, says: "Absolutely, the humility of wisdom is the virtue of accurately tracking the quality of knowledge and the evidence of your beliefs." It is humble. For the church, this means that modesty of knowledge is not necessarily compatible with serious intellectual beliefs. "If our beliefs do not interfere with evidence and reason, we will be arrogantly intelligent if we do not amend or abandon this belief based on opposing new evidence." If we know that we are right about something, the willingness to modify or abandon our beliefs may seem to be intellectually meaningful or deceivable. " Modesty relates to integrity, honesty, and selfless mind, but the intellectuals are open-minded and open minded, commensurate with their beliefs and evidence. Though intellectually discreet people strongly believe in a topic, they are aware of their limits and hope that they are wrong by others. Philosophers and psychologists who have been studying intellectual humility - for example director of prosperity center for human development, Justin Barrett - says it is a very valuable feature in the workplace and life. Barrett is part of a project focusing on the meaning of knowledge and how to encourage it. Dr. Ian Church and Dr. Peter Samuelson are chief researchers The humility of intellectuals' ethical knowledge includes recognition of the limitations of your knowledge and distorted effects of your view. It results in not claiming to be more realistic than you really know. The humility of wisdom indicates the lack of self-declared intellectuals. Intellectual courage represents your motivation to change your faith. It involves recognizing negative prejudices and opinions. It allows you to accept ideas and concepts that are fairly judged in advance. It involves asking social norms to develop their own views

A simple definition of sacrifice is to give up something for something else whether it is for other people's life, for thought, or for belief is. "She is 17. He stood in front of her and looked at her weapons." Do you believe in God? She paused. This is a matter of life and death. "Yes, I believe in God." "Why did she ask the executor, but he did not give her the opportunity to reply, this teenage girl is already dead. "(DC Talk 17) An example of this sacrifice was actually done at Columbine High School in Littleton, Colorado on April 20, 1999. In the story of Iphigenia and today's society, support for the sacrifice of life was found Reasons of life, people in other countries, countries, people with religious beliefs First of all, you can understand the importance of sacrificing life to save more lives. In the story of Greece, Iphigenia was forced to sacrifice her life by her father and many Greek soldiers to appease the gods that rule the wind. Her inner struggle involves a desire for a lifetime Bible. If she does not die, her family will be executed with her. Iphigenia needs to decide which is more important in macro planning. Her death decision was only because I was my beloved person and I realized what my family had sacrificed. This dedication to her relatives is the reason why she is willing to give her her life. When Achilles told Iphigenia about her decision, he noticed the nobility and courage that she did to make such a huge sacrifice. This courage is more like the courage given at the expense of life for the rest of today. People are aware of the work of firefighters and police when looking for people who show courage and dignity like Iphigenia in today's society. Whenever a professional leaves his radio rather than a phone, they may sacrifice their lives for others' lives. Many of these workers may have in the field might put them in a safe and dubious situation. It is understood that this worker has to sacrifice his life for those who need help. "Unfortunately these young people do not understand, but in many cases, sacrificing life is the easiest sacrifice of all sacrifices, for example, young people who are sacrificed for five to six years The sacrifice is completely beyond the power of many people - the power to serve the truth and the purpose of the cause they are raising before they grow and become a goal - the idea of ​​this century is political When you hear 'socialism' you may think about social democracy, communist Russia, Bernie Sanders, or something else. This word itself may be an emotional trigger in the continuation of hundreds of political conversations in the past 10 years. There is no Babel built by God: Dostoyevsky's atheism, socialism and the ethical foundation of civil society It is natural to think about what you have to give as soon as you hear the word "sacrificial". I have heard that people are sacrificing in their lives, such as increasing leisure time, earning more money, paying rent at the expense of weekend holidays. Learning how to use sacrifice correctly shows that there are many things you can get. In a sense, sacrifice always provides life itself in some way. Sacrifice is a festival of life, the grace of its sacred and immortal nature. In the sacrifice, the prayer life of prayer is released to the power of God and establishes the connection between the victim and the power of God. By sacrificing, life returns to a sacred source, regaining the power and life of life; life is supported by life. Therefore, the words of Rome's victims against his god say, "You will increase through this offering (Macte)." However, this is an increase in the power of God that will ultimately benefit the victims. In a sense, sacrifice is the promotion and assurance of the vitality of God's vitality between its source and its results.

It calls for the elimination of the "gray zone" which is the intellectual space where Muslims who do not confront religious extremists live. Jihadists believe that you are against us or you are with us. "My life is gray," said Moradian-based American writer Leila Laram. "My friends are from different religions or have no faith at all, so our lives are gray in a sense." Laramie said that it is far from being alone in having complex racial, ethnic, linguistic and multinational identities. Mr. Raja Mimi said, "In a view like an Islamic state, your identity as a Muslim and a heathen is a single identity." We are all confused. " Laramie is a creative professor at the University of California Riverside. Recently she was the author of The Moor's Account, a novel based on the story of the first black explorer in America. According to Laramie, the US presidential candidate is increasingly adopting the ISIS binary language. "They can not truly distinguish Islam from the Muslim nation, they can not distinguish Muslims from terrorists," she said. "As long as these differences are ambiguous, this will create an atmosphere that makes Muslims very unpopular in the West, that Islamic states depend on." "Now they are people who are condemned and confused by our political leaders," she said. She said that this led Western countries to become the largest natural ally against Muslims in the Islamic state and to the West. Next, the fundamentalists and their enemies retreat to what she calls "black and white areas". Afghanistan is one of the most challenging women in the world. However, there is still hope for women there. They endure war, intimidation and abuse. Their emotional story about the edge of social change - in this week's PRI world "Unknown Afghanistan" Immediately following the terrorist attack in Paris on 13 November 2015, an article by Morocco-born writer Laila Lalami was posted in the New York Times magazine. "I am in a Muslim life in a gray region of the West", Laramie, his Ph.D. He is a linguist who regularly comments on various topics on culture and human rights, criticizes, discusses and discusses some of the challenges that faced as a Muslim immigrant to the United States over the past quarter century. My latest novel in Scottsdale, Arizona. In the following discussion, a woman asked me to talk about my growing experience in Morocco. I will tell myself that the reader is interested in the writers they are listening to is natural. Even if the conversation is transferred to Islam and then transferred to the Islamic state, I will continue to talk about myself. Finally another woman raised her hand and said that the only Muslim she saw when he turned on the TV was militant. Kacem El Ghazzali is a high school student in Morocco who anonymously writes blog about secularism. When his identity was revealed, the teacher accused him as "rocking faith" and the student threw a stone at him and the village's Imam condemned him from the podium did. He hid and eventually evacuated to Switzerland like Saber. The story of converting Husseini to atheism is typical in many ways. He grew up in Palestine and he called ordinary Muslim families, but in junior high he began asking questions - "Do we have the freedom to choose other problems?" Although he was unaware at the time, he encountered a discussion on free will and reservation (al-qada wal-qadr in Arabic), which has been used by theologians for centuries. If God is omniscient, he can certainly foresee the behavior of evil; if he is omnipotent, he must be able to stop them; he is good Then why will he forgive evil and then punish them?

The "Times" blogger on philosophy believes that being an atheist does not mean "everything happens" - in reality it is reversed. What do you think? Is morality independent of God? Are those people who do not believe in God as good as those still? What determines your decision to act ethically, and how to do it yourself? I think many people think that atheism means nihilism - rejecting God means rejecting morality. They deduce that people who deny God must be indifferent at least in consideration of right and wrong, even though they are not aggressive evil. Only morality is independent of God, and we can get a sense of morality from religious worship. Only morality is independent from God and anyone can have a moral foundation that supports God's order. Let's explain why. First of all, let's quietly look at the influence of having morally minded on the existence of God. Please consider the following moral decisions - in my opinion, the judgment is clearly correct. These specific moral decisions are not true unless morality rests on the existence of God, that is, God does not exist. In my opinion, this is a special proposition. If God does not exist - then does slavery become an Englishman? Is there any problem with torture? What does the pain of others say? Now think about our personal relationship - how do we love our parents, children, our life partner, our friends. The moral values ​​of these people depend on the existence of God, meaning that these people themselves are worthless. Their boat or their car. In other words, the historical connection we cherish, the character and personality character we love is that it is useless on its own. Student: Please read Anthony's post and tell me what you think about this complex topic. Where does morality come from? What leads you to think about actions? Do you choose ethical behavior? Mainly due to the commitment of rewards or the threat of punishment - from God or other authorities? If you are an atheist, if you do something that you can express morally, God can oppose you as opposed to thinking that living your life in a moral way is more important You can forgive, this is the only value in your life. What is your choice? Please give the following comments to the students aged 13 and older. Please use only your name. For reasons of privacy policy, students' comments will not be posted using the last name. One day I realized that Freethinkers used a new slogan to print a poster. Of course, not all atheists are liars, thieves, murderers. On the contrary, many people are very happy people. But at a deeper level, the slogan destroyed itself. So I went to the table and began discussing this with Freethinkers. I claimed that it is impossible to do good without God. When you believe in God, you also believe that God is good. This is the start of discussion. God is just kind and can only decide what is good. Julia Carter, professor of philosophy at Dartmouth College, said in her book "Ethics", "The central idea behind the theory of God's will as a moral foundation is this is God's will Only if God orders it, "You must accept God, when you do this, he will guide you through the Holy Spirit just to do the right thing But what will happen if it does not work? Simplicity: We have not obeyed God's instructions and orders, God leads us to choose good things, but also gives us the ability to make choices This explains why we sometimes make the wrong choice, but we can not blame God with the wrong choice.This is our responsibility, so we are You must approach the God for gas. Well, good morals come from him Plato raised the following dilemma in his dialogue Euthyphro. "Is God so advantageous as it is a good thing or a good thing, is there a benefit that God ordered?" (4) If it is the beginning, since morality is not objective in God Dr. Craig is denied. Arguments or second, morality depends on God, ie subjective morality. In any case, this dilemma at least reasonably do

A story is a storytelling text. The story is realistic, imaginary, or both. The purpose of the story is to tie the reader to the sentences and characters and events that appear in the story. The story should start with a title. The title can be made creative, but it must be associated with a story in some way. The story text has a flexible structure. However, it is important to protect the story throughout the text so that the reader can understand what is going on. The story needs to have a beginning, middle and end The text of the story begins with direction and detail. I will introduce stories, characters, scenes This series of events occupies most of the story. This tells the reader what happened and what happened. Among the series of events is the complexity (contradiction or problem) that creates obstacles that the main role must overcome. The climax of the story is a turning point. This can happen at any point in a series of events. The end of the story is called a conclusion. Conflict includes solutions to complications or inconsistencies Creating your own story can be fun. In order not to confuse the reader, it is important to follow the basic structure of the first, middle, and last. Introducing your character at the beginning of the story, the theme of the scene and the story is also important When writing a story, you can become very creative about certain parts of the story. Narratives are usually moved by roles and diagrams (series of events). Do not forget to write clearly, but do not forget to include some creativity. Dialogue is also a good way to help promote stories events. In the text, information and literary text are mixed. Each unit has various information and literary anchor texts. As other supplemental texts are included, the types and text types required by the standard are widely distributed. Literary works include fiction, romance, epic, epic fantasy, poetry, drama, songs, short stories. Information texts include Christian history, interviews, nonfiction, speech, sermons, political theory, founding documents, prose. The format of the reading refers to how the text is composed, ie continuous text or noncontiguous text. The content of the reading refers to the type of information to be conveyed, ie literary text or informational text. Therefore, combining two formats and two types of content will result in four pairs. However, given the practical characteristics of reading material and the reading method of junior high school students, literary texts are almost continuous. Therefore, this study used three reading situations. The influence of socioeconomic status, parentage and learning motivation on reading ability But as you know what non-literary text is, the question is: How do you read non-literary text? Reading literary texts includes searching topics, figurative, and symbols, but reading and analysis of non-literary texts are entirely different. Analysis of texts other than literature requires identification of facts, access to knowledge, development of skills, and execution of tasks. One way is to see the author. Texts other than literature are usually written by experts in that field so you can check the author's experience and education to see if that person becomes a trusted source. You can also examine the type of data provided in non-literary text in detail. What kind of samples are there in them? How is research done? How was it analyzed and who analyzed it? 3/5 - From the beginning of the thesis, it is not clear how the thesis will evolve. "Memoirs" is a literary sentence type, is there a main focus of the article? Is the paper on atheism the main information of the author? This article returns to the point of the problem, but it lacks consistency. This sample shows how to look up graphic novels on Paper 2. A review of the author's ability to juxtapose black-and-white and black and white images. Unfortunately, the level of analysis ends with that, it i

Karl-Anthony Towns has surpassed his 21 years and is a student studying history both inside and outside the basketball court. Two weeks ago, when he saw images and videos from the white supremacist meeting in Charlottesville, Virginia, he understood the background. "Let's start with the facts," Downs said in a "Friday" announced "Players' Tribune" article, "Not only is it that it is still an indication that racism is still alive, It shows that it is missing. " And respect it. Minnesota · Timberwolf Center said that he talks with "strangers about Charlottesville" including a black taxi driver raised in Louisiana in the 1960s. The town explains, "By seeing what we have learned in the fifth grade elementary school history class, we understand how important and appropriate emotions are in our history." Personally, I was very disappointed. I have no sorrow, but I am very disappointed. I got even a little ... I was defeated. There is no despair - I have hope. But I got tired. If you are a minority in the United States, just watching the news will be exhausted. Usually, I am optimistic. What you see is something you get. But I think these feelings will spread to you. Then the town talked about the police shooting Philando Castile near Minneapolis. And that has had a big impact on his team and teammates. Perhaps this is the reason he said Charlottesville told him "did not shock", which is different from President Trump's response: I think it is something like this: President's reaction in basketball terms ... you probably know that I know a bit about sports ... just to catch a ball during a short break Field - stumble on the feet of the paint when the ball jumps out of the boundary But Downs has finished his article on Hope. The title is "people who want to promote social wedges through hatred, not" racial discrimination ", but" we have more things "about people who want to unite, learn and grow. Read the full article here Karl-Anthony Towns - Karl-Anthony Towns, which is the subject of various cult and Messianic groups, brings forth the fifth everlasting human life. In his talent for mold breaking compared to his multifaceted basketball excellence and his size, he represents a compilation of ancient struggles in harmony with the ancient chaos. You may wish to eat him to become the fifth ion himself. Or you may wish to eat him to prevent the fifth ion and leave humanity forever in the fourth atheism. Either way, you must take responsibility a lot. "There are chaotic tanks." Anthony Davis, Draymond Green, Carl Anthony Downs are well-known names for NBA today. Everyone is a unique player, but they share many attributes that makes Garnett such a wonderful player. To those who are watching today's game, modern big things are normal, but they are not always. The modern giant was born on a summer day in Toronto, Canada. When a tall, thin child from Chicago was born, the modern giant was born in the fifth pick of the 1995 draft. Taken of 76 birds, Timberwolves can suck my cock. Not in design, incompetent, they acquired the first draft pick of the cereal, the latter became Andrew Wiggins and Karl-Anthony Towns, this is the informal and most exciting young player of the NBA this season. Because Joel Embiid looks as much as Downs, T-Wolves tends to actually fall, and Wiggins does not seem to be a superstar as much as I thought during the first year of Kansas. But even so. The Jahlil Okafor effect casts a shadow over everything related to the draft, 76ers would be amazing if they have both a town and Embiid.

I believe that we are traveling through our lives. There is a possibility that our spiritual evolution will occur by the greatest lesson in life, no two roads are the same. I am using the term loose spirit, because I think that it does not belong to a particular religious belief or brand. For me, the spirit is to find peace within your own internal, the affection that you love, the joy, the feeling of happiness and perfection Through my journey of life, I believe I will maintain an open mind. Sometimes, the most important lesson is taught by people, you do not expect the most places. Everyone has the right to his beliefs as long as they do not interfere with the rights of others. Whether your faith is Christianity, Judaism, Hinduism, Buddhism, Islam, Atheism, Agnosticism, Evolutionism, or any of the above, will prevent your faith in anyone that you interfere with your case I have the right to practice, you are a judge, I made a mistake Many people with faith and religion as tools to guide them through the journey of life. This tool can be used comfortably to feel sense of belonging or to help decision of good and bad as a moral compass. But conscience and religion should not be used as weapons against others. They should not be used for harm, judgment or persecution Individuals or groups have different perspectives I believe that we should open our hearts and that we should not emphasize our own belief that we do not want others to differ. As each of us is becoming our own identity. Through our experience, as long as we open their hearts, listen and be pleased to learn, we can teach countless possibilities for everyone in our life . With the ability to learn and educate, we can open up our thoughts and new ideas proposed by others. Adaptability is an important skill to the master I have not always been a standardized way of life. In 1998, I graduated from high school, a student with almost "C". Then I got a job at the restaurant business and I was promoted to management in a few years. I will pay my yield and value not consistent with long hours labor. After I leave school for 8 years, I did not have happiness or satisfaction in the field of my choice, I struggled with the idea of ​​the university. When I was in high school, after all, I was not the best student, but I always thought that it was between 18 and 22 years of age when normal college road began. After that, I have encountered so far that I started thinking about the people around who. When I followed my dreams, I thought of regret about whether I would change the life I spoke. I also decided what I did not need. The only obstacle in your life is that you are set for yourself. In order to receive a bachelor 's degree program, sometimes my master' s degree continues, I am ready to graduate with excellent grades now and I got a bachelor 's degree in business administration. The reason I believe that life is a journey is part here. More from us, from well-known examples, we can accept new ideas and look forward to accepting each other's difference, our journey will be better Life is a journey, or we have been told. But I do not believe that life is a journey. In other words, I need to check my dictionary to learn English itinerary defined, very simple. Journey of action journey from one place to another. Mediation; I doubt the use of this popular definition of life ignoring the very important part of life. Do not worry if you spend your life. Tasting center. Please miss the final and do not worry too much about your future. I once wrote about both sides of the coin and I will try to realize how this adventure is better than the side of that coin. I thought that I got better understanding because I am on the other side, but in hindsight, I noticed that I got on the "middle" just! But coins have mediation When I started my journey of self-education, I changed a lot of my thoughts. I do not believe that the only way to succeed in life is to go to college

Karl Emil Maximilian "Max" Weber is a founding thinker of sociology and died at the age of 56. His life is short-lived, but his influence is long, he is still prospering today. His various works have been quoted over 171,000 times To commemorate his life, we appreciate his permanent importance to his work and sociology. Please click on the link below and find everything about Max Weber. In his life, Weber wrote many papers and books. Through these contributions, he was considered with Karl Marx, Emile Durchem, and WE B. Du Bois and Harriet Martinoau, one of the founders of sociology Given the amount of his writing, the various translations of his work, and the number of other people writing about Weber and his theory, giants closer to this subject may be distracted. This article explains what he considers as the most important theoretical contribution, details of the connection between culture and the economy, how people and institutions have authority, how to maintain authority And how does it shape our lives? Max Weber was born in Prussia (now Germany) in Erfurt, Saxony in 1864 and later became one of the most important sociologists in history. In this article, I will learn about his early education at Heidelberg and getting a doctorate. In Berlin, and how his studies intersect with political activities in his life Social class is a very important concept and phenomenon in sociology. Today, sociologists are asking Max Weber to point out that the status of one person in society to another is not just that person's status. He thinks that in addition to wealth, the level of fame related to that person's education and career, and the political association of that person constitute the people's hierarchy in society. Continuing reading to learn about Weber's ideas on power and social stratification, he shared this idea with a book titled "Economy and Society" that led to a complex expression of socioeconomic status and social class . The spirit of Protestant ethics and capitalism was published in German in 1905. Since the American sociologist Talcott Parsons first translated it into English in 1930, it was the backbone of sociological research. This article explains how Webber ties economics sociology and sociology of his religion and how to study and interact with theoretical values ​​and cultural and socioeconomic belief systems is known. In the article, Weber believes that capitalism has evolved into the advanced stage of its existence in the West, as Protestantism encourages work as a call from God. Money This is combined with the value of asceticism - to lead a simple secular life without expensive fun - to encourage a tireless spirit. Later, with the decline of religious culture, Weber believed that capitalism removed the Protestant moral limit and expanded to an economic acquisition system. Worried about the eternal curse of the doctor, the Internet corner soon began to question the legacy as the founder of the life effect work and humanitarian surgeon and Magdi Yacoub Heart Foundation and Hope Chain Charity . It is a country. It is concern with these people that Jacob and many other Egyptians have been removed from the "religious" label and driven to choose something between spirituality and atheism. His life, work, and heritage are casting some basic questions about our lives, work and human relations of today. What is our true intention? Do we feel like changing ourselves? Do we unexpectedly love humanity selfishly? After we left, would someone care about what we created? Before the bomb finished their lives in the summer of 1980, Walter Rodney created a strong legacy. This important work, "How does Europe not develop in Africa" ​​brought a new perspective to Africa's underdeveloped development. His Marxist analysis is far beyond the way that has been accepted in the underdeveloped research in the Third World. For students who want to better understand the dynamics of contemporary r

Our children live in spiritually dangerous culture. False doctrine of atheism, agnosticism, and various other philosophies leads our children to make mistakes and distrust and as moral corruption rampant, they are forced to succumb to criminal acts. A great many people oppose them, and they need the influence of a godly father who loves the Lord and knows his way. When the Israelites are about to enter the Promised Land, they are in immoral and immoral culture. God taught his commandments to their children and entrusted his father to show them his way. By being fully established in the facts, these loyal fathers quickly protect their children from fraud and temptation surrounding them. In a sense, the cultural hazards that our children face is even more dangerous than the dangers encountered by Israelis. Hebrews lived as independent people. God did not intend to confuse them with the heathen countries they robbed. But today, Christians live in culture. Many of our children publicly promote an unfair philosophy at public schools and universities. Even some seminary schools destroyed their position against the Bible truth to guide the students to the world. The wrong doctrinal path is full of signs that clearly indicate that we have proceeded in the wrong direction. Split: When a family accepts the wrong belief, it causes conflict and causes separation at home. Disillusionment: When the selfish motivation of the leaders is discovered, believers of false teachers will eventually be disappointed Danger: The teaching that promotes moral tolerance attracts people who wish to do what they want. But the impact of unethical lifestyle compromises the future of all our children Our cultural problems are overwhelming and beyond the therapeutic capacity. But you can follow the example of the apostle Paul. He was a Jew, and he told the message of Christ to the infidels who were infidels. He has the courage to tell them the truths of the gospel, doing whatever is necessary for his colleagues. Today, we live in the most threatening generation in the world, but by using modern communication technology we also have a maximum to reach out to everyone with the message of Jesus Christ It has the potential of. In the face of a universal misunderstanding, we can take personal measures to protect ourselves and our family from erroneous viewpoints. This article is based on the lecture notes of Dr. Stanley's speech "False Dogma" broadcast on TV this weekend. Answer: Doctrine is "a series of ideas or beliefs that can be taught or thought to be true." The doctrine of the Bible refers to the doctrine that is consistent with the revealed Bible and the Bible. Incorrect doctrine is to add, eliminate, refute, or abolish the doctrine given in the word of God. For example, any teaching about Jesus' denying a virgin is incorrect doctrine, as it contradicts the explicit teaching of the Bible. (Matthew 1: 18) As early as the first century of the Christian era, the wrong teachings penetrated the church, and many of the letters of the New Testament were written to solve these mistakes (Galatians 1: 6-9 ; Colossians 2: 20-23. Titus 1: 10) - 11) Roman Catholic church has been a fake church ever and ever. The doctrine of the Bible, which is believed to believe, is distorted based on traditional doctrine contradictory to the biblical discourse, God's indiscriminate discourse. Errors will never be fraudulent than using real masks. The leaders of the Catholic Church will always follow the explanations of false teachers warned from God These teachers will come to the scene at the end of the day and deceive many people with counterfeiting words - Peter 2: 1-3, As explained in 18. 19 years

Naturalism in philosophy is a natural theory that confirms the relationship between scientific methods and philosophy by confirming that all creatures and events of the universe are independent of their inherent characteristics. Therefore, all knowledge on the universe lies in the paleness of scientific research. Naturalism denies the existence of true supernatural reality, but it can do supernatural as long as it can indirectly produce that knowledge. In other words, natural objects are affected in a way that can be detected by so-called supernatural entities. Naturalism assumes that nature can be learned in principle. In essence, regularity, uniformity, integrity means objective law Without these laws, the pursuit of scientific knowledge is absurd. The specific evidence that humans are seeing his beliefs endlessly is seen as confirmation of naturalistic methodology. Naturalists point out that human beings do not crave nature's despair nor deny the "natural law" when seeking the truth, even though scientific theories are abandoned and biased towards other scientific theories To do. The theory has changed, but the methodology has not changed Naturalism is often equated with materialism, but its scope is wider. Materialism is indeed naturalistic, but the converse is not necessarily the case. Strictly speaking, naturalism has no ontological preference; that is, there is no prejudice against any particular kind of reality: dualism and monism, atheism and theology, and idealism and materialism are It itself is compatible. As long as all reality is natural, no other restrictions are imposed. Indeed, naturalists have expressed a variety of views, even to develop theological naturalistic views. Naturalists rarely pay attention to metaphysics (they ridicule them), and they are not doing a philosophical attempt to establish their position. Naturalists only argue that nature is reality and whole. Nothing, no "other", no "other world" The biggest epidemic of naturalism occurred mainly in the United States during the 1930s and 1940s, for example F. J. E. Woodbridge, Morris R. Cohen, John Dewey, Ernest Nagel, Sydney Hook Realism about natural seeds believes that there is a kind of nature in substance. Naturalism on the classification of natural categories is a matter of distinction between natural groups and objects, but there is no ontological commitment and realism is an ontological commitment. Since "(weak) realism" may be used to represent naturalism, the term strong realism can be used to distinguish stronger ontologies. In short, the difference between silver and gold is not only the difference between the two natural groups, but also the difference between two different entities, silver and gold. Natural realism can be understood as an analogy of universal realism. Another problem is whether they are a simple similar or virtually related position. Perhaps the natural species is universal or only due to universality. In realism, this simplistic view can be contrasted with naturalism fundamentalism that believes that not only natural species (as an entity) but also natural species also finds a basic and distinctive place in our ontology it can. . We detailed the three positions of natural species in naturalism: (i) naturalistic (strong) realism, simplified realism, fundamentalistic realism The definition of naturalism is very similar to the definition of literary realism, in fact, naturalism is considered to be a division of literary realism. Both focus lies in showing trustworthy events and personality without hiding the real difficulties of human life. However, naturalism is strongly influenced by Darwin, and naturalistic literary works often do not end in a better character at the first stage. Naturalism tries to explain the reality honestly, but there is also a hypothesis that we can not overcome the 'real' people. Realism does not necessarily have the same certainty and pessimism. In fact, while realism claim

If you want to have a public office in Texas, you must believe in God. You can not serve as a dog catcher - if it is the elected office, you must believe in God It seems unbelievable to think about the long history of fraudster, fraudster, white-collar criminal, national criminal. Article 4 of the State Bill of Rights in the Texas State states that in order to preserve the position elected in Texas state "superiority must be recognized". There is no need to honor specific religions. No one says anyone must be a Baptist, a Catholic, or a Mormon, but it is clear that "there is no need to apply atheism". This may also exclude agnosticism as they are eternal skeptics and they can not be confidently believed that they believe in supreme existence. This is only one of the rare aspects of the Texas Constitution, and few people know it. Texas also protects the obligor of the bankruptcy case - especially if you have something that is really worth the failure If your house is paid - even if it is worth two million dollars - you can keep it. If your house is located on 200 acres of land throughout the country you can stay as such. If you pay big, bad, well-equipped, and payment, you can keep it Finally, you need to hold two guns. I do not know why. I would like to help you to protect your property from invoices collector's nuisances. Most Texas people seem to think that Texas has a constitutional right to leave the United States. But Texas has the right to split itself into two, three, four or five states. The only benefit is to give us 10 senators instead of the two senators. I do not know what that advantage is because eight senators are as useful as a bucket filled with water for those who are drowning. According to the Texas Handbook, the plan is to separate the province from the Colorado River, and new areas in the South and the West are called Lincoln, and the North and the East are called Texas. Another plan proposes to divide us into three states. These will be called Jefferson, Texas and Matagorda None of these plans stand out from the committee. I think that lawmakers know that if an excellent man in Texas receives the wind, they will get a long Texas rope and raise it from the oak. W. F. Strong is a Fulbright scholarship student and cultural communication professor in Rio Grande Valley, Texas. Harryingen Texas Public Radio 88 FM, Texas Literature, Texas legend, Blue Bell Ice Cream, Whataburger (with cheese), Mesquite's Smoke Breast Resident Expert Kerman teaches comparative literature at the University of Texas at San Antonio. He is a very devoted voter: he quotes the anecdote you know, if he ingested statistical information, like him, the vote is the government's computer and taken in Benjamin Franklin You can offlele say you were asked if it is a constitutional monarchy or a Republic conference when it was formed. Research shows that many Texans are unlikely to vote based on their living environment and their identity. Texas is younger than most other states, poor, educational standards are Latin, there are legal barriers such as laws on the status of voters. Centuries ago, inherent in 1827 was the first year of the Texas Constitution. The first Constitution of Texas State was called Core Willa and Tejas Constitution. The population of Texas is currently about 4,000. Prior to announcing independence from Mexico, Texas worked under the Mexican Constitution with two parliament buildings. The House consists of two years' representatives. In the House, the Senate has a term of four years and is elected by the Legislature. The collapse between Texas and Mexico was mainly a constitutional crisis, eventually leading to separation. Since Texas citizens were dissatisfied with the arrangement under Mexico regime, a political tournament was held. The Mexican government did not make any claims to citizens and asked Texas to set up another state. The 1836 treaty drafted a constitution for t

Bhagat Singh, (born September 27, 1907, India, Lyallpur in Punjab province [current Pakistan] - March 23, 1931, Lahore [current Pakistan]), the revolutionary hero of Indian independence movement Bhagat Singh participated in Dayanand Anglo Vedic High School of Arya Samaj (Modern Hindu Reform) and National College (Both Lahore). He was a young man who immediately fought for national independence as he began protesting the British rule in India. He also served as writer and editor of Punjabi and Urdu newspapers in Amritsar, supporting Marxist theory. He is admired for the advertisement of the popular language "Inquilab zindabad" ("Long live the revolution"). In 1928, Bhagat Singh and colleagues planned to kill police chiefs who were responsible for the death of Indian writer and politician Lala Lajpat Rai (one of the founders of National Academy) during a silent march to the Simon Committee did. On the contrary, in the case of a wrong identity, Junior Officer JP Sanders was killed and Bhagat Singh had to escape from Lahore in order to escape the death penalty. In 1929 he and the assistant threw a bomb at the Central Legislative Assembly in Delhi, protested the implementation of the "Indian Defense Law", and then surrendered. He was hanged at the age of 24 because he killed Sanders. On 8th April 1929, Bagattoshin threw a bomb at the central assembly and later arrested him. Bhagat Singh, Sukh Dev, Raj Guru received a death sentence from the court with a destructive act. They were hanged on March 23, 1931. Bagattoshin is still seen as an example of many young people in India. His sacrifice, patriotism, and courage are respected and respected for generations. He published and edited Amritsar's Urdu and Punjabi newspapers and contributed to the low-cost brochure published by Naujawan Bharat Sabha who accused the UK. He also briefly introduced Veer Arjun 's newspaper published in Delhi and the magazines of Kirti, Kirti Kisan Party ("Labor and Peasant Party"). He often uses pseudonyms including names such as Balwant, Ranjit, Vidhrohi. In the prison in 1930 - 31, Bagattoshin was approached by fellow prisoners Randy Rusin and the seek leader. And then Akhand Kirtani Jatha was found. According to Shiga Verma, an intimate partner of Bagat Singh who edited and edited his work later, Randhill Singh convinced that God existed in Bagat Singh and he did not condemn him I tried to do. The standing self is like a black curtain between you and God. In response, Bhagat Singh wrote an article titled "Why is I being an atheist" to solve whether his atheism is a matter of vanity? In this article, he defended his beliefs, he was an omnipotent follower, and I could not be sure that others stuck to myths and beliefs in their minds. He acknowledges that religion makes death easier, but an unproven philosophy is also a sign of human weakness. In this respect, he pointed out: Bhagat singh article of Punjabi language news and news, latest information, and tips from Caterina articles. Name * Email * Bhagat singh essay of the Punjabi dictionary, December. Original picture of Bagat Singh. More Chandra Bose wears a Japanese model's uniform. His men serve Nazi Germany and the empire. He devoted his life to serve the people of the country. His birthday was July 15th, which recognized the self-cultivation service in the field of youth education in Tamil Nadu province and was regarded as 'growth on education day'. The British government shouted ruthlessly in the peaceful gathering of Jallianwala Bagh in Amritsar, killed nearly 1,000 people and injured many people. The young Kamaraj was just 16 years old, and he finished level 6 and was helping his uncle at his textile store. The incident appealed to him, and he quit his job and joined the national free movement. His family had to fight poverty and eradicate discrimination

Best answer: "Hoplite culture" is a system in which each city state sends heavy infantry. It peaked in 400 BC "Darian Union" is a naval alliance led by Athena, corresponding to the invasion of King Persian Xerxes. In the decades, the power of Athens has changed from a voluntary alliance to a nearly involuntary empire. (2nd) "Peloponnesus War" was held between the Athens Empire and Sparta, and its allies between 431 BC and 404 BC. After all, Sparta won with the help of Persia. "Pythagoras" is a philosopher and mathematician of ancient Greece. "Sophist" is not a quest for truth but a rhetoricist who uses philosophy as a means of persuasion (Socrates condemns them as liars). "Socrates" was a philosopher of Athens in the 5th century BC and used his keen questions (we now call "social method") to criticize his society. After refusing to be exiled for atheism and corrupt youth, he was ordered to commit suicide by the state in 399 BC. The paradox of the Roman Republic was that a powerful anti-monarchy government system was established for the city state, created a military machine to conquer big cities, and the imperial city national political system was not suitable for business. Due to the Punjab War, Rome came to dominate the Great Empire in the West Mediterranean, many other provinces than Italy. Wealth and land that entered the Republic created a large number of slave farms (latifundiae) and weakened the economic viability of small citizens - peasants (pillars of the traditional Roman corps). The powerful Senate family became very wealthy, and their members dominated the magistrate and state governors of the city (local corruption made these families more affluent). As the Roman corps have to recruit enough soldiers from poor, landless urban families, corps depend increasingly on their Senate generals to provide their wages and retirement pensions (land) It came to be like. Dependence on this soldier depends more and more on Senate clients, not states, and is promoting improvements in the BCE civil war of the last century. As a student of a lifelong history focusing on the history of Europe, my research almost always ends with a line. Typical Western civilization courses range from ancient Greece to Rome, feudal feudal feudalism, Italian Renaissance, Spanish empire, Atlantic empire, Napoleon, colonialism, and two world wars. Students know little about the East Hapsburg dynasty, the crusade of Lithuania, and the formation of Moscow. But these are compelling and moving clauses to greatly help us understand the more humanistic nature of European history and stories. Below is an article I wrote. In this article I explained in detail the importance of incorporating Eastern Europe into a larger framework of European history class. Next year I will become a high school teacher of the Western civilization, AP Europe and other European history research course and I think that I have to face the fundamental purpose of history education. To the university, even to the graduate school, my own curriculum seems to be designed to allow the students to repeat the information that the teacher thinks important after temporarily digesting it. In high school, the focus is mainly the royal and military highlights of ancient Greece, Rome, France, UK, Spain, Italy. However, no matter how many facts are achieved in the academic year, this is not the ultimate goal of the history class. If you truly understand the comprehensive knowledge of the mainland's history for 250 years, all students will generally fail. Have you participated in the AP World History this year? Or are you considering taking it somewhere in high school? Then you need to read this AP World History Study Guide. You can learn the main idea and prepare for the exam by not learning the AP World History examination learning method without mind all name, date and place. It also introduces some important strategies that will help you prepare effectively. The AP commu

A typical memoir of the UK generation in the First World War was one of the most painful autobiography in history. Robert Graves despised his class, his country, his military boss, and civilians who blindly brought the Holocaust into home security. His stupid and cruel portrait popular at England's elite school is as tough as the explanation of his fight. There is nothing like a horrible and meaningless death of Graves, a terrible encounter with a terrible corrupting body, and a ruthless and terrible confrontation with the army 's command. But this annoying book was always fascinating. Graves is an excellent storyteller, and obviously it can burn all his bridges at the age of 34 (his age was first announced in 1929). He expresses beautiful words in extremely clear words and tells the reader about this excitement. As a poet, historical novelist, and critic, Graves resembles British Hemingway in this work. Minimize his essay and avoid all editors. Level of war - a trafficker he despised. - Wendy Smith Robert Graves' autobiography, telling farewell to everyone, 1929 when the writer is 34 years old. "This is my bitter holiday for England," he wrote in the preamble of the second edition of Revision 1957. The title also included the passage of old orders after the disaster of the First World War, the lack of so-called patriotism, atheism, feminism, socialism, interest in pacifism, traditional marriage changes, especially the expression of new literature It may point. They appeared, they live directly in the grave so they are treated in the workplace In his autobiography, Robert Graves explained the dramatic and somewhat eerie memory of his time in the First World War, and bid farewell to everyone. If you do not participate in war, it is difficult to understand the terrible and dramatic event that happened. As with other stories, it is easy to imagine and understand what happens when there is evidence to support the story. By including letters, articles, newspaper clippings, Graves can give the reader a better understanding of his war experiences. Your book is likened to Douthat's privilege, education and ruling class of Harvard, and the closure of Bloom's American heart, but it reminds me of Robert Graves's bitter autobiographical title, good-bye. Like Graves, if you like your historical comedy, you will get angry - your version of Graves' traumatic war is the day of admission to Yale University - and you will appear The whole old order. However, rather than being expelled to Majorca, it mimics the institution participating in the exile evangelistic trip of the country you are participating in. This is not only "political progress" but also a dramatic story that is too nervous, also anti-capitalism. . I pray for good luck; you have done a lot of fair criticism, I hope people listen to the good part Like Nabokov, Robert Graves wrote his memoir as "young man" to say "say goodbye to everyone" and rewrote it in the past 30 years. Many British authors finished autobiography when they were relatively young. The extreme example was Henry Green, who believes he might have died in battle at the age of 33, and he began autobiography in the late 1950s when he wrote Pack My Bag (although he died at the age of 62) . I completed the first volume of "Little Learning" and explained his 21-year-old life.

The biography of Adam Smith Smith is one of 18th century Scottish moral philosophers who led to impulse modern theory and his work marked a groundbreaking and progressive method, this method gradually Replace fixed Aristotle's view on invisible hands: - § "Everyone, to make the community's annual income the same size as he is not generally intended to promote public interest We must make an effort, he just did not know to what extent it would be desirable to get to promote their own interests, and as well as many other situations, he is visible Not promoting his intention not purpose at hand. Nicholas Philipson's new biography, "Adam Smith: Enlightenment Life" (Ale; US $ 32.50) 2 · We have been very successful in trying to put Smith, let us look at this person, Pull it together How to be a little financial god feelings. Historian of the University of Edinburgh Phillipson, following Rothschild, revealed that Smith is more like a moral person than a marketer. He discovered a deeper emotional vein, but he used events and plots to activate his life, despite changing Smith to Lord mainly Byron. One is his close friendship with philosopher David Hume (his closest colleague and his greatest influence) and a less simple embrace of Hume's notorious atheism. It turned out that the real problem of Smith is not a matter of economists. How can we become more prosperous and poor people? Even if it is a question of a philosopher, what should I do? This is a modern question. Darwin's question: How do you find and unify the order of the world without God? Philosopher David Hume is an important early role in Scotland's Enlightenment Movement with Adam Smith in 1750. Hume has a major impact on the theoretical and Smith economies. Hume does not believe in causality - at least he can "see" the micro skepticism you cause - Smith also said that he is "an invisible economic mystery, invisible "I am looking forward to dinner instead of the butcher, winemaker, bakery's kindness, but I am interested in their interests," Mr. Smith said. writing. "We will not solve ourselves to their self-love, to their own human nature, our own necessities, but we will not tell them the benefits to them." It is very difficult, very Scotland, and Instead of the diameter of Calvinism. As we know today, it is not entirely a "free market economy". Myth is still unknown The 18th century economist Adam Smith's free market theory suggests that there is always a power supply to appease the demand, there is no invisible hand that can guarantee that no government does not exist . "We are not from the kindness to look forward to the butcher of the dinner, the baker's and the winemaker, but for their own benefit. Respectfully" Other promises of all other countries and countries and military alliances The best way to get rid of exotic countries to avoid open isolation policy. Historically, the feeling of the United States was strong. President Woodrow Wilson won the second paragraph in 1916 and is particularly prominent in international partnerships that will participate in the newly formed US, outside (outside) the United States (erroneously) outside World War I I promised. Prior to pilot Charles Lindberg at American First Committee, popular with outstanding performance, World War II, the committee attempted to stop US participation in the war

Religion is dying. We live in a world where society has changed. Women can marry women, men can marry men, men can become women, women can become men. It is wonderful to see how we grow. But sometimes, it is a bit scary as we now brand people with faith. At first it was a person who believed in the brand, but now people who have never reached that position several years ago established a brand. Interestingly, we insist that our millennium generation is freedom of speech, free love, and generation, but we realized that we are responding to this claim. We show people with religious beliefs, Muslims, Catholics, Jews, scientists and so on. We judge them in some way: Muslims are terrorists, Jews are jealous, Catholics are homosexuals and so on. Millennial generation is now avoiding religion. This is something I can not understand. All religions are the foundation of morality and faith, which shapes us and helps us to determine the right things and bad things we see. I am a Catholic. Even if you do not agree, I will be respected and will respect the belief of everyone. I feel that the Millennial generation grew and decided to move away from religion. People of any faith build a brand for those who are not suitable for their mold. But if we teach the next generation of religious mistakes, the religion itself will die. We lose beauty, lose stories and lose something of value to everyone - faith. Religion builds community. It will unite people together. Yes, religion can divide us and tear us apart, but only if we choose to ignore others' opinions. When I was young, I was eagerly listening to the story that was said by the pastor in the crowd, and I will link it with what is happening in my life. In many ways, these stories will suggest me in such a way that I do not think others can do. I do not want to imagine a world without religion. If our millennium continues to overthrow our religion, we will choose to not listen so it will be a hypocrite. We do not accept the religion we are from but we are locking them out as we are trying to include "open mind". We can be an open mind generation. We can have everything. As long as we choose to accept and accept others' opinions, we can continue to be Christians, Jews, etc and can include everyone. Religion is beautiful. That's why we are wrong and correct. They built a community, built a city, raised controversy, and tied people together. We see religious death because the people who choose to close our generation will be hypocritical. "Ethical issues" is a well-known problem for religious people and their atheists. In the discussion on the importance of religion in society it is usually a question of "getting you": "Without faith, how can you become moral without religion?" Atheism The name of the person tried to explain this, and I always left with frustration. They dismissed the problem awkwardly and continued to talk about hard science. That is the right way: as long as we continue to dismiss this question it will continue to emerge and religious people will keep thinking this is a reliable score. It's not. (Actually, outside of our belief system, many religious people can not understand their good intentions and I am a bit more nervous.) This article is concerned with why morality is related to any form of faith It is my attempt to explain what is not. Religion is always an important element in society. In early society, religion brought a unified bond. The importance of religion has weakened in modern society, but it continues to shape our beliefs and way of living. In each family, some or other religious activities can be seen at some time. The child saw parents go to the temple and do religious ceremonies. He listens to religious sermons, which may determine his lifestyle and shape his thoughts. Not all religions have the same faith, but in one form, religion exists in all known human societies. Even the earliest society of history shows evident rel

Are there books that contain sexual or violent content, slanderious, racially abused, or religious or political information that should not be provided at your school? One way to draw attention from Americans is to investigate the book they have read in detail. More persuasive, they refused In 2002, the fear of mysticism and Satanism contributed to dissatisfaction about the Harry Potter series. In 2015, due to the curse and atheism, the Florida school thought about "a mysterious event of the night dog" about the age of autistic boys. This week is a ban on book weeks, and the American Library Association emphasizes its top ten list of the most challenging top ten books of the year: it is actually a snapshot of the American way of thinking. Since 1990, hundreds of parents, educators, and citizens of every year have complained about the association's online reporting system. There are 323 issues in books published in 2016. The details are secret. The association is more interested in people's perceptions of specific books and reviews than those who seek to ban the publication. "We are like fire watchmen - we are looking for signs of smoke," said James Laruy, director of the organization's intellectual free office. "What is America concerned now?" - Are you familiar with books prohibited by the American Library Association or challenging books? Have you seen it? If so, which one? - Are there other books prohibited by your school library? From other libraries? If so, why? Otherwise, why? Learn more about the week that dates back to 1990, which is banned every September and the list of the most challenging top ten books of the American Library Association. Or use our ideas to gather teachings and learning about banned books. Students aged 13 and over welcome comments. All comments are hosted by the learning network staff, but please note that once your comment is accepted it will be published Administrators should not have the right to ban school library books. If you ban a library book, students will not be able to explore new ideas. Administrators should provide other options so that students can still explore new literature. - Because the content is clear, it is common to review books at school. Parents are complaining about the school about the book considered to be a must-read because they are disapproved of the idea presented in the book. If the book contains unpleasant or sexually explicit content, parents will challenge them so they can not read. Books should not be banned. Should children not read books? Yes. But these books should not be banned. Parents are responsible for reading children and should not leave their responsibility to schools and public libraries. You should be able to decide which book to read by yourself. I think adults should not teach other adults what they should read. It is okay if they do not want to read a book, but it is ok for those who want to read it. The National Library Association is against the prohibition of books, but in the United States schools and public libraries prohibit the use of books. This is usually the result of parents dissatisfaction and they find specific books that are not suitable for children (eg books on sexual orientation like Tango Makes Three). In many libraries, including the British Library and the Library of Congress, pornographic books are organized in separate collections that restrict access to the reading room. Some libraries may need special applications to read certain books. The library sometimes avoids buying controversial books, and the personal opinion of librarians may affect the choice of books.

Take a glass of water. Add some salt - it will dissolve in water and you will not be able to see it or get rid of it. Now taste the water, you will taste salt with all the drops of water In this example, water represents the world, salt represents Brahman, but invisible Brahman is everywhere. After the body dies, the soul reaches Moksha or is reborn as a different body. There are ten incarnations (avatars) visited by Vishnu to save the earth at a dangerous moment. While Hindus looked forward to it, nine avatars were on the earth. Maha Yogi said that Shiva is sitting next to Trident. There was a cobra in the neck, a waistband of a tiger print, and a constant river across his hair. This story tells us that when the Ganges River reaches the Earth it destroys the Earth if it does not fly through Shiva's hair. 2. Nataraj is the king of dance, dancing on a dwarf that represents ignorance. This is Shiba's dance, it is said that it is turning the world into a turning point. Lingham is a symbol of penis that represents reproductive ability and sacrifices milk. Krishna is the manifestation of Vishnu that saved the world by drinking poison (which made him blue). Krishna is known as a candle-like person. I steal butter, hide the clothes of the cowgirl (Gopis) swimming in the river, and climb the trees looking at them. He is a lucky and obstacle remover, so he often prays in Mandir in front of other gods Her car is a lotus with a lotus and a coin in hand. Lakshmi is worshiped at Hindu 's New Year Diwali Festival, and Hindus hope Lakshmi wish them good luck next year. God made nature. God has established the laws of nature. God created mankind. God gave man a reason to understand their natural laws. God also provides revelation about God's will and desire. There are clauses on humanity in sentences, which are interpreted as guiding moral life. Therefore, in addition to the physical universe provided for human research, there is also the word of God. Question: The religious scriptures of the world need to be interpreted as their meaning and application. Not everyone agrees with the best explanation. The following example is very important for many people. The degree of understanding of a passage of a certain Bible has a serious influence on many people who do not have heterosexuals and sexual acts other than childbirth. From the beginning, people were thinking about the existence of God, the essence of God, and the relationship between God and nature. In "Rethinking the essence of God", editors of the best-selling books "God's Hand" and "God's Heart" have thoroughly studied the mystery of the universe. This time he explored these questions: What is the essence of God? How does this property appear? Does God continue to play an active role in our destiny, or is it the creation of the universe? Pantheism believes that everything is an intrinsic god, or that the universe, or nature is equal to God. A more detailed definition says that the laws of nature, the existence and / or the universe (in which everything is gathered or gathered) is expressed in God's theological principle or is personified There is a tendency to emphasize the concept. Transcendental existence unrelated to nature is denied. According to how to understand this viewpoint, this view is considered equivalent to atheism, faith, or theology In pantisism, God and the universe are considered to be the same thing. In this view, the natural science basically studies the essence of God. This divine definition creates philosophical problems. In other words, in addition to the words used to explain it, the universe of God is the same as the universe without God. Deity and populism argue that there is a god that is different from the universe, or that transcends the universe (beyond the space). These positions deny that God is involved in the operation of the universe, including personal communication with humans. If it is never possible for

Percy Bysshe Shelley was born in Horsham, Sussex, England in 1792. He entered Oxford University in 1804, where he was exploring the subject of atheism by developing his idealistic and controversial philosophy. He was banished from school by expressing these ideas and was avoided by his father. Sherry continued writing verses, continued to participate in various political reforms, and met Mary Godwin, the daughter of his deceased friend. They got married in 1816, moved to Italy in 1818 and lived with their children. "When I got to the pussy, I pulled the wet red curl lightly, I stroked with a finger and a feminine scent.With rubbing my finger, I opened a bright and moist pink lips. It is delicious, creamy, pale, creamy skin ... her heart is very hot and tight, and whenever she has a spasm it touches the sugar wall and reacts her tongue with everyday I spread out her thigh, I rubbed the rounded tip of the brush handle between her separate labia, pressed it against her clitoris, and put it inside her, one at a time I put it. It's not too big, but it opened her well and I can say that when she starts hanging back, it will make her feel better and go deeper. " I resist this urge, but I do not do much. My lips are stuck to her. She trembled under my warm breath when I sucked her ass bones. My lips kissed the area I just kidnapped and just apologized. I always find that women are very beautiful, elegant and gorgeous creatures. She looks very innocent now. This reminds me that we were young and infiltrated the toilet when we were disappointed with each other. The cold steel of the clover clip will reach my feel. It has two clips and a chain that connects to either. Bite the clip on sensitive skin on the left nipple. She released it from then. I am pulling the chain, and her movement is still there. By contrast, a wooden clothes pin was placed on her right nipple. It is more gentle and does not sink deep into the skin He groaned on me. I have no choice but to smile in my mouth. It is wonderful to taste the water mixed in the skin. Please hurry it to my lips when I completely swallowed his penis in my throat. I carefully breathed my nose so that I could avoid suffocation when I participated in a devout mission. My eyes are closed when tremors pass through my body. Finally, at this moment, or at least the worst moment has passed. I may be disappointed, trembling, having a shallow breathing, and ignoring my itchy as much as possible. I smell of copper beneath my tongue. I handed a paper towel and pressed it against my lips. I would like to tell my mother that we are discussing this and that it is possible enough for me to be more than just a cushion of this chair, but I know it is futile . I know that she is right. What made me painful was that my elderly mother and my daughter, nearly 8 years old, had to bear my slack off. This is not fair

Why does our society need religion? Is religion really important in our society? For the world we live today, these are some of the questions we ask ourselves. It is characterized by violence at all levels. People fight based on tribal grounds. Peace is not at all, but since we love ourselves, the Bible commands us to love our neighbors. The poor people are always oppressed, but we should help each other We do not need religion, otherwise we lose all morality. Prostitution has become an order of the day from girls' school students. This is only for greed. Because we are breaking them every day, people can say that they have forgotten God's commandments. So what is the importance of religion in society? When you belong to a specific religion, you must have the best thing. For example, Christians believe in God, and our faith believes in him. When we pray, we believe that he is listening and will give us our wish. Through this belief, we believe this is a way to achieve perfect welfare. Religion is not limited to mosques, churches, temples and synagogues, this is our way of life. Morals, values, principles, and desires can also be defined as religion. Religion has two things that help to influence human health This is prayer and meditation. When you pray meditate, you activate your brain and stimulate clarity as you think. Religion helps people because it allows her to remember things. The religion in our life clears our mind and has the effect of promoting our happiness. Religion helps us define our lives, so we can say that it gives meaning to our lives. Religion will help us deal with the most stressful moments in our lives, as it gives us hope for progress. It helps you avoid depression and make your life smoother and healthier. "Ethical issues" is a well-known problem for religious people and their atheists. In the discussion on the importance of religion in society it is usually a question of "getting you": "Without faith, how can you become moral without religion?" Atheism The name of the person tried to explain this, and I always left with frustration. They dismissed the problem awkwardly and continued to talk about hard science. That is the right way: as long as we continue to dismiss this question it will continue to emerge and religious people will keep thinking this is a reliable score. It's not. (Actually, outside of our belief system, many religious people can not understand their good intentions and I am a bit more nervous.) This article is concerned with why morality is related to any form of faith It is my attempt to explain what is not. Religion is always an important element in society. In early society, religion brought a unified bond. The importance of religion has weakened in modern society, but it continues to shape our beliefs and way of living. In each family, some or other religious activities can be seen at some time. The child saw parents go to the temple and do religious ceremonies. He listens to religious sermons, which may determine his lifestyle and shape his thoughts. Not all religions have the same faith, but in one form, religion exists in all known human societies. Even the earliest society of history shows evident religious symbols and ritual traces. Throughout history, religion is always a central part of social and human experiences, and has formed responses to individual living environments. Because religion is an important part of society around the world, sociologists are very interested in studying religion.

Plato introduces the concept of eidos, the invariant ideal form of all phenomena in the world, and shows that the change is an ideal and incomplete manifestation of God's inspiration. Therefore, Plato excluded evolutionistic thinking. Aristotle doubted Plato's philosophy - it shows a gradual change in the natural world from simple to complex. He proposed a concept of Scala Natura (a wonderful chain of existence) that seeds are fixed and do not evolve in the ladder of life. Two thousand years. Aristotle's world view was accepted into the Western philosophy. But in the context of Darwin's natural seed selection and contemporary evolution theory "evolution is a fact" prevents the comprehensive view of hundreds of subordinate theories found in major theoretical and evolutionary studies It might be. (Lewis, 1980). In order to consider this possible failure, the meaning of the theory must be considered. This term is often misused to represent concepts, reasoning, single ideas or assumptions, or that the author is uncertain It is. Futuyma quotes the theoretical definition in the Oxford English dictionary. "General statements, principles, or statements of causes of what is known or observed" (Futuyma, 1979). This theory is sufficient as the theory must include a description of its basic premise. If we can not state the basic premise (hypothesis) of the theory being discussed, people have not even begun to understand that theory. In historical context, creationism and evolution are always controversial subjects and are one of Darwin's major breakthroughs in spreading his evolution theory. When Darwin published his evolution theory in 1859, his book was thought of as a major technological advancement at the time. As the existence of evolution theory offsets society, there is nothing to prove the existence of God, create a catalyst, creationism is almost replaced by atheism. Darwin wrote 19 papers on evolution. Darwin is said to be the greatest scientific contributor to his evolution theory. If Darwin did not propose this theory, do people believe in today's evolution? Darwin got a lot of opportunities to inform her name. He is against the teaching of the Bible. Evolution of Darwin and Christianity There is some argument that the theory of evolution proposed by Charles Darwin does not oppose religion. Others do not believe in the theory of evolution, but they still contribute to education and redistribution. If they truly understand the theory, this will not happen. This is due to the impossibility to understand the doctrine of Darwinism and includes the most dangerous views of these theories that are penetrating society.

Godel's proof is revolutionary in metallographic histology, but their impact on logic "objectivity" is less important. Godel shows that in a logical system that can axiomize arithmetic operations, certain statements are "undecidable". In other words, we can not prove whether they are true or false (we can not prove Φ or prove - Φ). He extended this to prove that the logical system based on the architecture can not prove its own consistency - ie it can not show that all true statements are not contradictory. However, the incompleteness theorem actually applies only to a specific subset of logic (a system with recursive axioms such as Peano 's atheism and theoretical foundation of mathematics). So what they are saying is that we can not be sure that our mathematical theorem is not contradictory. But mathematicians do not care about it, do not worry so much. We can not prove that these systems are complete and consistent, but it is impossible or impossible to generate a theorem that is inconsistent with normal pan and butter theory. But since we can not decide, we never know So what Godel did was to put mathematical consistency uncertain. Probably each theorem is consistent with axioms. It may not be the case. I can not prove that this is the fact By the way, pure classical propositional logic (there is no logic of quantifiers) is complete and consistent. But without quantifiers you can not base on mathematics, so unquantified logic is not that powerful. Even if you can prove that the system in question is complete and consistent, it does not mean that few axioms you choose based on agreement. This only shows that we chose some good axioms. In "Logic philosophy" of Frege, logic consists of logical entities. Logical functions, range of values, and truth - true and false - are considered to be objectively real entities that exist outside the physical and psychological world. (As shown below, Frege is also committed to other logical entities like senses and thoughts.) Logical axioms are real. Therefore, Frege denies the general view that logic has no content or metaphysical commitment. Frege is also a strict criticism of psychology in logic. Logical truth is the truth about psychology. Frege believes that logic may determine how people should think about the law, but logic is not a science of how people think. Even if no one believes them or uses them for inference, the logical truth is still true. Whether true or false, ineffective and effective is not dependent on someone's psychology or someone's beliefs. Before Hegel, this theme (essential doctrine) was not considered to be part of logic at all. Today, it is often covered by historical and scientific philosophy or research methods. It is called objective logic because it explains the process of unknowingly executing knowledge, as determined by objective laws. In contrast, subjective logic begins with an abstract concept whose central creative concepts are developed and become increasingly more specific theoretical practices such as the history of scientific development; for example, in the Periodic Table of the Elements Chemical science after discovering concept

William Butler "Adam's Curse" poem "Adam's Curse" of Yeats (William Butler Yeats, contemporary of Richard Elman and Robert Special Olympics Claire Norton of poetry, reproduced in the anthology of the second edition. [WW Norton & Company Co., Ltd. 1988] 147 -148) The curse theme in the whole poem is related to the experience in the text. (As a woman with "painful and hard work", then, firstly, break the poetry of "painful and hard work" (Footnote 6 P 147): contact with the core and "curse of Adam" three different verses of poetry , They are as follows: P 147) Finally, the pain and hardships that work the love are working (p 147). William Butler Yeats: Modernist William Butler Yeats is an Irish poet of the 19th century. William Butler Yeats was born in Dublin, Ireland in 1865. He worked in Dublin and was educated in London, writing his first poem (nobelprize.org) in 1877. He wrote many poems in life and was considered to be the most influential poet of his time. He is very influential in the modernist era. William Butler Yeats is one of the most famous poets of the 19th century. But William Butler Yeats wrote of the Victorian and contemporary literature, but he still had a major impact on modernist style. William Butler Yeats is a poet and playwright (playwright) in Ireland. Some people think he is the greatest poet in the 20th century. He received the Nobel Prize in literature in 1923. Works by William Butler Yeats constitute a clear language in romantic poetry and contemporary poetry bridge of the 19th century. William Butler Yeats was born in Dublin, Ireland on 13th June 1865. He is the oldest of the four children of portrait painter John Butler Yeats. His father participated in regular school education at William's family and sustained the charm of the classics. John Yeats has a strong personality. His personal philosophy combined aroma (art and beauty is important for all beliefs) and atheism (a kind of faith in God). William, which appears within his magical interest and occult (supernatural), felt long after that effect William Butler Yeats was born in 1865 and died in 1939. Yeats is one of the most famous poets of the 20th century. Also, philosopher Yates developed its own philosophy, which is the philosophy that Yates is linked to history, art, personality and interest in local community ". Having a basic view of him is all these, the field strength of the conflict is working. For example, in history, the development of civilization and the eventual demise, the inverse civilization was born with it.

The answer is as follows. Human beings are divided into various countries, such as various countries, religion, family, language, culture, caste, sex, economy, age. They are constantly fighting themselves "All the kingdoms that divide with myself will be destroyed and all cities and families that divide with them will not be able to endure" (Matthew 12:25) However, since politicians and rulers never unite people, it is unlikely that such split will happen. They know that the easiest and best policy for dominating citizens is to divide and conquer. As long as we can not see through their game plan and we can unite everyone, humans will continue to be their biggest enemies. I would like to improve my opinion by quoting the beautiful words of this Hindi song in the movie "Dhool Ka Phool". Critic Connolly, a critic and writer in the 1950s, said that the biggest enemy of creativity is the stroller in the hall, but I think this is totally wrong. This is the particular lifestyle enemy he wants, a person sending a letter, but for real novelists, the hall's stroller is the biggest friend - it will make you enthusiastic, what you are reality You will understand. . My child is a big inspiration for me. It is a very rich experience to see three young people create their independent world. A completely innocent person sacrifices himself for the benefit of others including his enemies, and becomes a ransom of the world. This is a perfect move. He is not a great warrior, a scientist, a king, a prophet, or a philosopher. A person who changes the world with pure will. He knows that the world is full of pain and resentment, and hatred and egoism only divide the world. He was hated by a few people in his country, and one of his people was killed. But in the next century, when people are more interrelated in terms of economics, culture, intelligence, people will understand that he is a pioneer in winning people and enemies. Tribute to the best people ever Anacalcis Crots called the Satanists themselves "human epics" and self-termed as "personal enemies of Jesus Christ" in the Illuminati. Like all "light", Croz is a supporter of the world, and he imagines the systems of countries all over the world along the way established by the French Revolution. The idea was to first perform atheism and communism in France. Satanism has completed sexual joy in the streets, Christians massacred in public places, killed pastors, cemeteries, even even similar foods. The prostitute became infatuated with the altar of the church, and the goddess called it "emotion" with "a reasonable festival" - imitating the Adam West hope plan to respect devil's "goddess of love" To do. Lighting people from all over Europe participated in this fun - join the carnival and witness the bloodshed

The religion of Babylon and Assyria is the backbone of all cultural societies. Pastor E. O. James put together a lot of research on the religion of Babylonia and Assyria. E. O. James chose a broad perspective of their ancient culture through their temples architecture, rituals, myths, daily life, and the government's world. Anyone studying the religion of Babylonia and Assyria will feel that it is somewhat similar to the earlier Western civilization. In the early Western civilization, the king and the priest were the best rulers compared to Babylon and Assyria. Polytheism: There is more than one God's belief in comparison with monotheism (God) and atheism (God and God). Examples are the Greek, Roman, and Northern European myths, ancient Egypt, Babylonian, and Assyrian religions, and some new pagan, magical, and new age beliefs. Several forms of Hinduism combine deity and deityism (both are gods). The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints teaches a kind of Christian polytheism as the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit are three gods and believe that human beings can be promoted to the Holy Spirit. Anyone studying the religion of Babylonia and Assyria will feel that it is somewhat similar to the earlier Western civilization. In the early Western civilization, the king and the priest were the best rulers compared to Babylon and Assyria. It is difficult to imagine that hidden scripts and words of the great civilization of Tigris-Euphrad Valley were not known at all more than a century ago. People reading this book will be fascinated by the process which will be revealed after the wonderful treasures of the Babylonian and Assyrian civilizations that have been forgotten for centuries. Since the flood story has been translated and released to the world, most of it has been completed, and the Hebrew flood story surprisingly resembles previous Babylonian predecessors. A student of anthropology, human science begins to recognize that the myth of Babylon may be worth learning Here is the myth of Assyrian and Babylonian religion to explain this book and why it is impossible to prevent Assyria's religion with another cure. Broadly speaking, the Babylonian religion based on the Sumerian foundation is a mysterious religious system based on fear of evil spirits and other immeasurable elements of the social environment. The author also noted that (a) an important difference between the Assyrian civilization and the Babylonian civilization despite the fact that the early Sumerian culture is the basis of the national civilization and (b) the Assyrians and the Babylonians are flash It is very closely related to Mitt's shares that point out that there is a Jewish association, and (c) most Assyrians borrowed from Babylonians, especially in law and religion.

Pablo Picasso was born in Malaga, Spain on October 25, 1881, and died in Mougins in France on April 8, 1973. Picasso is a painter, sculptor, printmaker, ceramist, and stage designer. Pablo Picasso and Georges Barque co-founded Cubism. Two famous paintings by Picasso are Guernica and Le Domoiselle Davignon. He is even considered to be one of the largest and most influential artists of the 20th century. ("Pablo Picasso." 2011.Biography.com. May 30, 2011, 06: 10 http://www.biography.com/articles/Pablo-Picasso- 9440021.) Gertrude Stein in Pennsylvania in February Was born. Allegheny Let's think of the Romantic school which originally theory of nationalism (primitive). It is an enthusiasm of blood and the earth in the beginning of the 20th century. They are somewhat skeptical of Enlightenmentism and are being claimed by the Enlightenment era, like the theory of social contracts and the fact that people are basically psychologically similar anytime, anywhere. Tendency to adopt enlightenment - belief. The style of faith and politics therefore their political criticism is concentrated in the country itself. What it is, and its role in people's lives. The difference between an absoluteist and an enlightened absoluteist is an extensive analysis of how much they accept the age of enlightenment. For example, Queen Catherine II of Russia completely refused to accept the concept of social contract, but she accepted many ideas of enlightenment and became one of the great patrons of Empire Russian art . Oh, her Nakaz aimed to modify Russian law. You may think that all thinkers of enlightenment are atheists, but they are not. In fact, most of them are not. To some extent, enlightenment inspired atheism, but more generally, it brought about a mixture of Christianity and scientific rationality. The natural movements of Europe and the United States in the latter half of the 18th century represent this point best. So what is God? Simply put, God believes in the existence of God, but chooses to make the universe act according to the laws of nature. Demician denies the supernatural phenomenon and claims that God is wise through reason and nature rather than God's revelation. The deity is usually conceptualized by comparison with a watch manufacturer. In the opinion of Deist, God is a great "watchmaker" who created the world (like a clock) and then allowed to "run" according to the activities of nature (without supernatural intervention). Everyone, some of the founder of America is a natural person, the most famous of which is Thomas Jefferson.

I thought we had a perfect life; mother, father, two children on the way, and another pleasure. I also have a dog called Missy. Our children are more than we need and we have more time to grow than I can remember. You will think that this is enough. Obviously in their eyes, this alone is not enough. In January, my six - year - old Heather returned from school and asked for a hamster. My husband and I think that this may teach her some responsibility after all the endless feeding, watering and promises of cleaning. Anarchist's anthropologist David Grave wrote: "In the 21st century, we all feel a sense of shame." "This feeling is a deep disappointment of the world in which we live, a broken commitment - a strict commitment, We are thinking that the adult world should be something. "Paradoxically, when the capitalist system is facing the greatest threat In the early 1950's Cold War era, Joseph McCarthy Senator urged Americans to choose both in "Common Battle between Communist Atheism and Christianity." Intergovernmental war between the two worlds - and a series of technological advances that change daily life - After decades of unsuccessful policies and broken promises, the brilliant future promised by neoliberalism will face serious danger. As we can not understand or reconcile, the oppressed working-class voters are finally tired of neo-liberal commitments to the bright future of wealthy and powerful people. For many people, Hilary Rodham Clinton represents at least a bit more painful smile, a shameless bribe, and the best hope for a shameless exploitation of the working class. However, after Mrs. Clinton's great failure by Bernie Madoff's business-familiar bankruptcy predator, only one woman united neo-liberals all over the world, and a financially strict, deregulated condition Glory that I was able to return to. A broken commitment is not to maintain a person's verbal commitment or commitment. When a person who broke the promise is not about to start a conversation, breaking the promise may be particularly devastating. The blogger wrote: I told the girl, I know that I could not go, even though I knew that I would go out with her. I do not want to hurt her, but I do not know what else to do. What my friends do not understand is that if you lie to a girl and break an appointment it will double damage and cause damage that might be avoided. By breaking his promise, he brought about great harm to her hope. There is no doubt that she is very excited to participate in the competition with him. If my promise is broken my life may break

Karl Marx published his very controversial "Communist Party Declaration" in 1848. It is still one of the most influential political manuscripts. This book has been taught and analyzed in university classrooms around the world from a historical and philosophical point of view. Between 1922 and 1991, the Soviet Union was the closest country to implement and realize Marxist ideals. Marxism has limited enforcement in the past, but it could be the main ideology of the 21st century. Marx also returned to the right wing as a monster which is mostly a conservative party on Twitter. Among many conservatives, Marxism is now the entire phrase "we dislike". Democratic Raoulkari is often referred to as a Marxist, as is President Obama. To conservatives, Marx is a living threat due to the past crime, atheism, national debt, and oddities of the Communist regime from the Soviet Union to Cambodia due to the super capitalists George Soros Liberal Marxism emphasizes the anti-dictatorship aspect of Marxism and refers to a broad range of economic and political philosophies. Early liberal Marxist trends that left Communism opposed Marxism - Leninism and its derivatives, such as Stalinism, Chaosim, and Maoism. Liberal Marxism also often criticizes the position of reformers as held by social democrats. The tendency of the liberal Marxist is based on the late works of Marx and Engel, in particular the French Grandis and the Civil War, to the ability of the working classes to establish their own fate without the need for a revolutionary party or state He emphasizes Marxist beliefs. Please help mediate or release. Together with anarchism, liberal Marxism is one of the mainstream of liberal socialism. Mao Zedong thought is Marxism as a successor of Marxism - Leninism, "applied" because there is no better word in modern times. First of all, in order to understand Maoism, we have to understand Marxism - Leninism, and why are both out of date? Now, this is not whether Marxism and Leninism 's revolution is impossible or impossible, or that Marxism and Leninism have nothing to do with the world today. Road At this stage, Marxism - Leninism is a doctrinal revisionist ideology, as well as so-called Marxism - Leninism - Stalin - Hashist ideology. Ignoring the further development of science, sticking to the religious understanding of Marx, Lenin and Stalin and the more general, this will be wrong and in the revolution - anti-revolution

This 1960 film is based on the same name drama by Jerome Lawrence and Robert Lee. The story is based on facts, but the author argues that it is not history to inherit the wind. Only a few phrases could be obtained from proof of actual examination of the trial. Quoting the author 's words: "So the inheritance wind does not pretend to be a news - it is a drama - it is not 1925. Since the trial of the name historical facts have been recorded in many works It was. "Inheritance Wind" in which Kirk Douglas and Jason Robards produced by David Papazian directed by David Greene appeared was arranged by Jerome Lawrence and Robert E. Lee. The drama "inherited wind" was inspired by the "Monkey Judgment" in 1925, where a teacher was arrested and tried to teach a course of evolution. But the movie "inheritance" should not be regarded as a documentary, should not be regarded as a true record of the experiment, but rather it should be regarded as a dramatic movie that shapes it by raising it to convey a strong message to the audience . "Inheritance Wind" is a well-made movie with high-quality performance, photographs of films, and funny and interesting stories. However, inheritance winds are not departing from the historical facts of the "monkey trial" in order to show prejudice to the audience, they should practice what they preach. Still, the inheritance wind is still worth recommending, but it is for those who have strong concern and are interested in the dramatic conflict of opinions and beliefs. From open credit to the very end, inheritance winds celebrate human thought and claim to be the greatest gift for all, as they claim it is the key to our existence. Everyone should make their own judgment and choices according to their free will and no one has the right to control other people's thoughts and beliefs. However, when communicating information to the audience, the succession wind itself strongly manipulates the viewer's thoughts and emotions, and shakes their beliefs in particular in the direction of atheism. An atheist who inherits the wind is said to be a tolerant and forgiving intellectual who suffers from ignorant, narrow Christian paranoia 's hands. This depiction attempts to abandon their religious beliefs and influence viewers to support their ideas. "Darwin took us to the top of the mountain and we could look back from there and see what we came from - Drummond

Introduction: As a Christian we read, we talk and understand the attributes and nature of God in Christian life. I am talking about the uniqueity and individuality of our daily life, or the relationship with him. Throughout history, God has left his hidden jewels in the Bible. On the one hand, the Bible lists some of the attributes of who he is, but as usual it is incomplete and we have to search for his attributes essentially. Sovereignty: This word means the best power and authority for all. 1 John 4: 8-16 - "God is love" "God is very light", "God is spirit", "God is love", Spirit and light are representations of the essence of God. Love is the expression of his personality, which corresponds to his personality. Love is the essence of God. He always lives in the atmosphere of love. Even though it is impossible, it is difficult to define and explain the love to God. From some poems (1 John 3:16; John 3:16) It is of the nature that God's love keeps its interest in the physical and mental well-being of his existence You can see that. Please lead him to sacrifice. Human concept reveals love From the beginning, people were thinking about the existence of God, the essence of God, and the relationship between God and nature. In "Rethinking the essence of God", editors of the best-selling books "Hand of God" and "Heart of God" have thoroughly studied the mystery of the universe. This time he explored these questions: What is the essence of God? How is this property expressed? Does God continue to play an active role in our destiny, or is it the creation of the universe? Pantheism believes that everything is an intrinsic god, or the universe, or nature is equal to God. A more detailed definition is that the laws of nature, the existence, and / or the universe (which will be all in use, existing, or total) will be expressed or personified by God's theological principle There is a tendency to emphasize the concept. Transcendental existence unrelated to nature is denied. According to how to understand this viewpoint, this view is considered equivalent to atheism, mysticism or theology Natural law is extremely important for Christianity, but Christianity is not important to natural law. Natural law is not for God's revelation but with God's will. The nature of man and the world reflects the will of God. Even though sacred believers believe that conditions and frameworks are created by God, people do not have to be Christians to understand the existence and framework of human existence and social life. In the process of creating each existence, God planted the laws of nature among them. According to the instructions of God, the laws of nature are better than all other laws. We believe that the laws of nature are to believe in the existence of ethical standards beyond specific community customs, practices, and laws. The empirical method can be regarded as a rule system created by humans when trying to execute the law of nature.

Have you thought about removing the fears and troubles of the modern society and running away to a magical place? Clive Staples Lewis (C. S. Lewis) made such a place in his very popular kids series, The Chronicles of Narnia, as he is well known. Among these books, Lewis has a potential message about Christianity. He represents four important aspects of the Christianity of this series: Christ and God, evil and faith in the world. "The Chronicles of Narnia", C. S. Lewis introduced us to a powerful Lion named Aslan. The story is a writer including C. S. Lewis, his friend, a professor of Oxford literature, a Christian 's apology, and a child' s "Nania" fantasy known as "Jack". In 1951, he met an American woman named Joy Gresham, who corresponded to him. She has a history of Jews and is a poet who has changed from atheism and the history of communism to Christianity. She also married very happily (later divorced) and tried to raise a ten-year-old son Douglas (he liked Narnia's books). Initially, the relationship between Jack and Joey was a knowledgeable duel, and it was increasingly respected and loved. The word "fight for the sake of Narnia" has been taken from the last volume of C. S. Lewis's "The Narnia National Story". In the last fight Jill and Eustace were sent to the magical country of Narnia and the King helped save the country in the last fight. When they realize that they are definitely killed, Jill is not rather that she becomes an old man rather foolish at home, probably walking in the bathroom and eventually dying in the same place, not for the sake of Narnia He was commented that he was killed. See, for example, .1. CS Lewis, Perelandra (New York: Macmillan, 1965), located in Perelandra Lewis, is trying to describe a world where people are tempted but not degraded. A man, in this case, a woman, a woman on the earth was tempted by the devil through Weston, but Weston did not defeat Weston by moral resistance, but paid a ransom to kill his ransom . "The story of Narnia" is a series of seven fantasy novels by C. S. Lewis. It is regarded as a classic of children's literature, and is the author's most famous work which sells over 100 million copies in 47 languages. "The Chronicles of Narnia", written by Pauline Baynes published in London from 1950 to 1956, has adapted several times to radio or television, theater, movies or several times. This series depicts the fantasy world full of fantasy worlds of Narnia, magic, animals talking with mythical beasts. And he talks about the adventures of various children playing the central role of the world's continuous history. In addition to "Horses and his boys", the heroes are kids of the real world, carried magically to Narnia, where they are summoned by Lion Aslan to protect Narnia from evil. Restore the throne to the correct route

Cap and Bell William Butler Yeats' folk song "William Butler Yeats" "Cap and Bell" depicts the act of love through the explanation of clowns and Queen's behavior. By using many symbolic references, dramatic characters accurately reflect lover's behavior. Many of his works ("court", "fool of the roadside", "two fool's songs", "hourglass" etc.), people like clowns are mentioned, Yeats has always repeated ridiculous behavior many times I'm painting. William Butler Yeats: Modernist William Butler Yeats is an Irish poet of the 19th century. William Butler Yeats was born in Dublin, Ireland in 1865. He was educated in Dublin and London and in 1877 wrote his first passage (nobelprize.org). He wrote many poems in his life, thought to be the most influential poet of his time. He is very influential in the modernist era. William Butler Yeats is one of the most famous poets of the 19th century. - The detailed paragraph is not Octavian of Octavian 's surprising life Nothing. It is on pages 222-236. Anderson It describes a scientific paper by Gitney and Sharpe and a letter from Dr. Trefusis, a document about the death of Cassiopeia, a memoir written by Octavian (a poem written by Theoginis). These pages start with Smallpox, Octavian 29-year-old mother, Cassiopeia's smallpox disease Cap and Bell William Butler Yeats' folk song "William Butler Yeats" "Cap and Bell" depicts the act of love through the explanation of clowns and Queen's behavior. By using many symbolic references, dramatic characters accurately reflect lover's behavior. Many of his works ("court", "stupid street fool", "two songs of fools", "hourglass" etc.), men like clowns are mentioned - a girl she made Her thoughts about the resolution and the result, but she did what she thought was correct for the Earth to regain its life Pacey announced the utopia of Matapoiset in light of feminism. Women's stereotypes no longer exist, women are equal. "She was born in colorful, painless like a puppy without shame of race and sex and hates them for the future of the mediocre monster" (p 106, Piercy) William Butler Yeats was born in Dublin, Ireland on 13th June 1865. He is the oldest of the four children of portrait painter John Butler Yeats. His father took part in William's regular school education at home, which gave him a permanent hobby of the classics. John Yeats has a strong personality. His personal philosophy incorporates aesthetics (belief that art and beauty are important to all) and atheism (belief without God). William felt its impact long after. Because it appeared in his interest to Magic and occultusum (supernatural).

This website uses cookies for analysis, personalization and advertisement. Please click here to change detailed information and cookie settings. Continue browsing, you agree to use our cookie. Update and Reform Williams 1993 History Supplement Earth Belich 2009 History Recovery of Spain Monarchy 1665-1700 Storrs 2006 History Recovery Hatton 1993 Historical Recovery, Reform and Reform, 1660 - 1828 Gregory 2000 History Recollection Catholic Reform British Forest The history of 2000 The resurrection of The Armadas Wernham to 1994 History Owen Uprising Glyn DÅr Davies 1995 Historical Revolution and the Environment of the South France McPhee 1999 Historical Revolution and the Republic Jennings 2011 Historical Revolution and Upper Violence, Riot in the Krikler 1993 History Stewart 1996 Historical European Revolution, 1848 - 1849 Evans, Pogge von Strandmann 2002 History - Romans never died 'Goldwin, Hancock 1993 History Richard II Fletcher 2008 History France's 3rd Republic to Vichy Pasmore's Rights 2012 Historical rights Tucker of war and peace 2001 Historical riots Meeting Randall 20 06 History Happy England's soaring and fall Autumn Helton 1994 History American The rising of the can wig party and autumn hall The rise of historical and historical economics and social reform in 2003, Germany 1864-1894 Grimmer · Solm 2003 The rise of Perth University in 1991, the rise of bourgeoisie in the history of the empire, Europe The rise of the financial history of the financial situation cé 200-1815 Bonney 1999 History of historical asylum Historical divorce of 2009 1990 History of Romanians, 1774 - 1866 Hitchens Historic route of 1996 and the history of the field Antrim 2012 British Navy and German threat, 1901-1914 Seligman 2012's historic rules Crisis 1923 - 1924 Historical rulers of Fischer 2003, residents of the town, bazaars 2012 historic rural settlements and Anglo-Saxons in England History of society 2012 years Russian original Oriental Tolz 2011 history Russia America Vinkovetsky 2011 history The aristocracy in the revolutionary era and its enemies Doyle 2009 History of each aristocratic hairdresser 1994 Aristocratic government of the era of historical reform Mandler 1990 Nobility mood star of historical Greek civilization 1992 Historic Victorian British aristocratic woman And Political Society Reynolds Historic Army of 1998 Cromwell England, 1649-1660 Reece 2013 Historical Army, Empire and Cold War France 2012 History Asante and the Netherlands 1744 - 1873 Yarak 1990 History Fragment enters the Mid stage 2013 History AÅ> oka and Mauryas Thapar 2012 historical assimilation from reform to atheism enlightenment and decline of empire history Historic Atiya journey of Hunter, Uhton 1992 Lambert - Hurley, Sharma The historical Atlantic Ocean of 2010 Family Pearsall 2008 History Australian Empire Schroder, Word History of 2010 History of Augustine to Gregory 2008 Historical Power and Ascetic Great · Year 2 000 History Support Hitler / Jerrey History of 2001 Balkan · Biondić 2011 History Barbed wire diplomacy Wilee 2010 History dislikes Gerber 2012 History battle Castle Olzov 2009 History battle Hetch Hetchy Righter 2005 History of African American Become a person Sidbury 2007 History will be Silverman in Austria 2012 Doumanis 2012 History 2009 Major Mask History Mukhhopadhyay 2006 History will become Protestant to Reformers Ryrie 2013 History is Soviet and the UK Marshall 2002 Death in the 2002 History Reform Benjamin Collins and Regional Newspaper Trades 18th Century Ferdinand 1997 History Benjamin Franklin Gauss' Tae 2006 History Bensam, Byron and Greece Rosen 1992 History

There was a boy named Karl Marx that would grow to become a communist father when he was on a piece of land not far away. It seems like a bad passion, but his idea is certainly goodwill, coming from comments about the daily life around him. After careful consideration, Marx helped to find a theory called socialism, "Transition between capitalism and communism that is distinguished by wages made by unequal distribution of goods and work" ( Maryam - Webster Online) opened the way to communism. . First of all, I am a democratic socialist. Attempts to create socialist utopia beyond democracy will fail because the will of the people must be the highest; the basis of socialist philosophy is that every human being is born equally, everyone is It has the right to life and freedom. Beyond the scope of democratic control these fundamental rights will inevitably be compromised. An unforgettable way of saying is that power is corrupt, absolute power is absolutely corrupt. For socialists like me, there is a fixed idea in every idea, including those who believe that I have to agree on certain matters such as atheism and support options. There are many attempts to create a utopian society through the history of utopia, but it has always failed. Utopia has to create a perfect world for everyone, and many also believe that the utopia is equal to the equality of people and rights. A common attempt at Utopia is to get rid of the power of others, which is a form of utopian communism, Thomas Moore also pointed out that crime does not occur in utopian society. It is easy to make utopia - to equalize everyone, to receive education without greed and crime, to keep peace and harmony .... Utopia is just a dream, there is no utopia from humanity, greed, personal thought. Throughout history, various leaders, civilians, terrorists are trying to create such a perfect utopia world. I also propose articles about utopia readers / utopia readers of goods. A utopian reader on utopian literature. Utopia Reader is built around the single volume anthology of writing the full range of Utopia. "Utopia Reader" The book provides an overall sketch of the utopia's history by the quality of the rich text for the reader. In addition, the reader has utopia, a brilliant utopia thought and history about convincing articles. Utopia Reader highlights the whole book with photos and illustrations. Utopia on paper provided by a skilled writer on our website. If you like the style of my writing, you can further order Utopia of the topic of the article. Utopia is seeking papers on Sir Thomas for his book published in 1516 on utopia

Romanticism and Percy The romantic era of Bysshe Shelley covers the period between the French Revolution in 1789 and the coronation ceremony of Queen Victoria in 1837. In the meantime, there were unexpectedly rich writers, artists, and composers in Europe such as Goethe, Rousseau, Pushkin, Hugo, Beethoven, Schubert and so on. Romanticism has certain characteristics such as emotions, imagination, introspect, our response to nature, and childhood insights that are distinguished from the age of enlightenment emphasizing objectivity and rationality. Percy Bysshe Shelley's life and work reflects the extreme joy of ecstasy and despair to meditation. Shelley's dramatic short lives and his work, mysterious, exciting and lasting themes: stimulation and contemplation, rebellion against authority, communication with nature, fantasy imagination and power of poetry, pursuit of ideal love , And exploring free wild spirit - all of these Shelleys exemplify his life and life in the many work he died after he died at the age of 20. Nine. Shelley shared many basic themes and symbols with his great contemporaries, but he left his special mark on romanticism: he is a vision of his ideal of ideals In pursuit of Ming Dynasty created a strong symbol and received simultaneously Deep doubts August 4, 1792 - Year of fear of France - Percy Bysshe Shelley (his grandfather's "Bysshe", a member of the same field) is the son of Timothy and Elizabeth Shelley. As brothers, John and the four sisters Elizabeth, Mary, Margaret, and Helen's eldest son, Percy, not only inherited the great estate of his grandfather, but lined up to sit on Congress one day. As the oldest boy, a young Persie is their love and longing for his sister, his parents, even his early dominant servants, and a family house near Horsham in Sussex. Young lord of the field. He was full of fun and imagination, designed a game to play with the sisters, and told the ghost stories to joy and joyful crowds. Percy Bysshe Shelley was born on Field Place on August 4, 1792. His ancestors began to be Sussex aristocrats from the beginning of the 17th century. His grandfather, Sir Byshe Shelly, made himself the most rich man in Horsham, and his father, Timothy Sherry, was a calm traditional parliamentarian. Percy Bysshe Shelly was sent to Eton for education and continued his studies at Oxford. At that time he released two spy stories and poems. In Oxford in autumn of 1810, Shelley and his best friend, Thomas Jefferson Hogg, created a booklet on the necessity of atheism and claimed that the existence of God can not prove to be the reason for experience. Sherry refused to reject the file, so Sherry and T. J. Hogg were rejected. The incident opened a violation between Sherry and his father, and his father interrupted all his relations with his son. He went to London

The Federal Government should limit abortion as abortion deprives the rights to the lives of American children, threatens the lives of women, and allows Americans to have a means to abandon the results of their actions . The fertile age of a woman is 20 years old to 24 years old. A young woman is said to be highly likely to become pregnant. Planning whether to lay a baby or have a family or not is one of the women's biggest decisions in her life. There is no great opportunity to build a family. Pro Life and Pro Choice is often a complicated and difficult to understand choice. People who oppose abortion often believe life begins with concepts and is based on the Bible point of view. People who support that choice believe that women have the right to end their pregnancy regardless of the reason. In the United States, the idea of ​​supporting selection is considered to support abortion and the position to support life is considered anti - abortion. - The theme of abortion is always the subject of controversy and discrepancy. Basically we have two aspects. One is to support life, and the other is to support selection. Judith Jarvis Thompson obviously adopted a position to support the choice and made a unique discussion on the problem of abortion. Meanwhile, Don Makis supports pro-lifestyles with the theme of abortion. The argument of supporting life and choosing choices is one of these manifestations. Proponents believe that life begins with a concept, the baby is separated from her mother, and has the right to life. Even so, mothers have the right to end their children 's life, as they depend on their bodies. There is no reconciliation when one party considers that abortion is actually a murder and the other party thinks this is a matter of free choice. Selection of pro-life and career, as long as you listen to these words you will think about big discussions such as nature and child rearing, atheism and theology, and Splendor and sugar. My personal persuasion is a professional choice. I believe that if the discussion occurs, relying on facts and formal logic, the only option is to see that choice is the right choice. In this era, science and technology dominates our lives. We can do whatever we want with our own body. There is a possibility to be asked

Therefore, the teachings of Galileo were banned by the church and Galileo himself was imprisoned. However, in 1992, the Vatican City, led by Pope John Paul II, had a ritual declaring Galileo correct in Copernicus's investigation and support. (Abstract) This shows that today's church does not believe science is a threat or interference to its doctrine. The current church actually supports the evolution of science and natural selection. However, many popes and Catholics generally accept evolution, but there are still many things. Evolution of Darwin and Christianity There is some argument that the theory of evolution proposed by Charles Darwin does not oppose religion. Others do not believe in the theory of evolution, but they still contribute to education and redistribution. If they truly understand the theory, this will not happen. This is due to the impossibility to understand the doctrine of Darwinism and includes the most dangerous views of these theories that are penetrating society. Since the publication of Charles Darwin 's Origins of Origin, people have discussed creationism and evolution. By supporting facts and assertions, evolution is defended as more than just a theory, which proves to be a fact. - Because he is made in the final state, a person can not evolve to another state. He is made according to the image and image of his father, so you do not need to evolve; therefore there is no sign of evolution from the beginning. Since sin entered the world, people have been fooled to believe that there is evolution In historical context, creationism and evolution are always controversial subjects and are one of Darwin's major breakthroughs in spreading his evolution theory. When Darwin published his evolution theory in 1859, his book was thought of as a major technological advancement at the time. As the existence of evolution theory offsets society, there is nothing to prove the existence of God, create a catalyst, creationism is almost replaced by atheism. Since the discovery of evolution, human creation has changed rapidly. Nevertheless, the world does not understand the theory and theory of evolution of Lord Charles Darwin for a while for a while. Prior to evolution, I believed that the upper class was called "sacred creature" by being influenced by the religious ideology of how human beings were created. However, the introduction of evolution theory used this theory as the foundation of biology and changed my mind.

In the intense drama "inheritance" by Jerome Lawrence and Robert E. Lee, three strong men expressed a strong view: Bertram Cates, Henry Drummond and Matthew Harrison Brady. First, defendant Bert Cates was responsible for teaching "Darwinism" in his second year. Second, Katz's counsel, Henry Drummond, showed his belief in the right to think. Third, Matthew Harrison Brady is a "giant" prosecutor who explains his prejudice against creationism. Overall, these three basic characters are fighting for their own personal beliefs. "Inheritance Wind" in which Kirk Douglas and Jason Robards produced by David Papazian directed by David Greene appeared was arranged by Jerome Lawrence and Robert E. Lee. The drama "inherited wind" was inspired by the "Monkey Judgment" in 1925, where a teacher was arrested and tried to teach a course of evolution. But the movie "inheritance" should not be regarded as a documentary, should not be regarded as a true record of the experiment, but rather it should be regarded as a dramatic movie that shapes it by raising it to convey a strong message to the audience . "Inheritance Wind" is a well-made movie with high-quality performance, photographs of films, and funny and interesting stories. However, inheritance winds are not departing from the historical facts of the "monkey trial" in order to show prejudice to the audience, they should practice what they preach. Still, the inheritance wind is still worth recommending, but it is for those who have strong concern and are interested in the dramatic conflict of opinions and beliefs. From open credit to the very end, inheritance winds celebrate human thought and claim to be the greatest gift for all, as they claim it is the key to our existence. Everyone should make their own judgment and choices according to their free will and no one has the right to control other people's thoughts and beliefs. However, when communicating information to the audience, the succession wind itself strongly manipulates the viewer's thoughts and emotions, and shakes their beliefs in particular in the direction of atheism. An atheist who inherits the wind is said to be a tolerant and forgiving intellectual who suffers from ignorant, narrow Christian paranoia 's hands. This depiction attempts to abandon their religious beliefs and influence viewers to support their ideas. "Darwin took us to the top of the mountain and we could look back from there and see what we came from - Drummond

For thousands of years, people have tried many times to incorporate monotheism into culture, but (obviously) others are more successful than others. But polytheisticism will continue to exist elsewhere. The first attempt to introduce monotheism we know is due to Faroa Amenhotep IV (about 3 350 years ago). He tried to turn Egypt from an existing polytheism into a religion of the sun god Aten. To illustrate this, he changed his name to Akhenaten. It did not last long: the Egyptians returned to their former polytheism after his death. Culture was unrealistic in the Middle East from approximately 2500 to 3,000 years ago - all the local tribes and cities worship their own local gods, while other tribes worshiping their own gods and We also accepted cities. Every God is strongest in his territory, and it gets weaker as it enters other areas. Early Judaism was developing during this period, and early Jews invade Toruah (later became part of the Christian Old Testament) for Jewish lands / cities for their own place There was evidence that you could beat the tribe and city you did. God YHWH is stronger in his land than God that supports the invaders. Instead, the Jews lost some fights because the local gods of the city they tried to invade were stronger than their own local god YHWH, the influence of YHWH was that of the Jewish house It reflects the fact that it exceeded far. Later, when the Jews were arrested about 2,600 years ago and expelled to Babylon, they paid more attention to their religious beliefs to emphasize and strengthen the identity in this foreign city. After this the Jewish work began to emphasize that YHWH is the only true god and not the god among the gods. However, even though the Jews are developing monotheism, most other cultures of the world have been happily preserved for centuries and even polytheisms over thousands of years: Greeks, Romans, Indian, Chinese, Azet Kirks, Egyptians, etc. In most cases (Jews are a notable exception), there is no transition from polytheism to monotheism. Normally it happens that invaders and existing rulers introduced monotheism (for example Constantine ceased persecution of Christians in the Roman Empire and opened the doors to Christian recognition). Religion that existed before. This is not a transition from believing many gods to believing in only one god: it is a transformation from one religion to another, and the old religion is overturned by a new religion. There are few people whose locals decide to stop worshiping their gods. While accepting the existence of other gods, devotion to God. Max Muller created "monotheism, in reality polytheism" in principle. The term change is a comprehensive monotheism and monotheismatic polytheism, and it is designed to distinguish different forms of phenomena. Philosophical theory believes that God exists (or must exist) and is independent of the teachings and revelations of a particular religion. Some believe that God exists through philosophical controversy others believe that there are religious beliefs that are not needed or supported by rational arguments. Monotheism, believing in the existence of God, or believing in the unity of God. Therefore, the absence of God is different from polytheism, believing in the existence of many Gods, and atheism. Monotheism represents the tradition of Judaism, Christianity, and Islam, and the elements of faith are recognized in many other religions. Monotheism and polytheism are generally considered fairly simple terms - for example comparisons of more than one number. However, the history of religion suggests that many phenomena and concepts should warn that this problem should not be overly simplified. For example, monotheism is not legitimate to think that it is not a polytheism, but a late development of religious history.

I attended a school filled with excellent teachers, so it is very difficult to answer. My favorite is Deacon William Hynes, also known as Deacs. He teaches junior religion, basically a class of philosophy. He moved with us to the upper grades. It is the same class, but at a deeper level, there is more world theology Let's talk about special teaching methods. This is a school of a man, so the story and joke are not exactly PG and the student is not a serious elderly. But no one respects Deacs This guy is always been, each theme has a story. From hiking to Israeli war zone in Sri Lanka, I accidentally spent one week in Vietnam seeking bribes to the Congolese police. He did it all Obviously, he is also a religious religion. We were reading the Psalms every day, so we finished reading the book by the end of the year. And he repeated the psalm for ten minutes with interesting facts. However, contrary to the rest of the school (which is operated by a brother company), he did not force you to kill your throat. Frankly, I am an agnostic, and he and I will tease each other in class. When he found me knowing Arabic terminology, he always let me read about ridiculous paragraphs about atheism and about any articles about Islam. This guy has developed a passion for lifelong learning among all the students He can teach at any university course, but here he is in my high school. Really people We will still send you an e-mail. We have just discussed my research on Latin and my summer vacation in the Midwest. My best teacher ever was Mr. Jack Herr, my 8th grade science teacher, Mr. Jack Herr. He is the most interesting person in my life, and all classes are so funny I actually learned science. He is a man who really understands me and has dramatically changed my life. He is always doing interesting things to make me laugh, and he is a surfer, so he is cool and he is a very good painter. But this year is over and his year is finally at my school soon he moved to Switzerland The last thing I got from him was the CD he made for me. He is the best man I know and the best teacher ever. Please think about the best teacher you ever had. What do you learn from that person more than a syllabus? Probably. Or perhaps the best teacher in your life is your neighbors, parents, friends, or other people you call the teacher. What if everyone in our community thinks they are teachers? If we all put our young people's education on not only our own children's education but also the most important question? I am not saying that you need a village here, but I think that we are all products of the community. This of course also leads to interview questions about what you are the best teacher, who your favorite teacher is and why. This question is not just the occupation that you have chosen, but it is a place of study, but since the teacher is basically the first manager or manager of your work, you explain how you work as an employer To do. Does she respect your teacher because she is patient and tolerant, or is she spending time helping you? Interviewers are interested in explaining the features that teachers like because teachers can gain insight as to which management method they prefer and which methods can be used to succeed.

About China's facts, 21% of the population of China lives in urban areas, and 79% of the population live in rural areas. The national anthem of China is "Oriental Red". The capital city of China is Beijing and Beijing. The Chinese currency name is original. The average life expectancy of Chinese men is 65.5 years, and the average life expectancy of women is 69.5 years. China's literacy rate is 80%, the main religions in China are atheism, Buddhism, Taoism. In the 5th century AD, the Chinese calculated the value of Pi to exceed 10 decimal places. Do not forget some important facts about China. There are no immigrants in China. In fact, no foreigner receives a green card. China can buy real estate in western European countries and purchase real estate entering western European countries. The reverse is not the same. This imbalance and the difference between China and Western governance makes it difficult to smoothly adjust the current construction boom. Things will work, then they will not. In a nutshell, the market will collapse as far as possible, unless there is buffering of burden of responsibility. Patience This is a great advantage that China effectively de facts. We regard China's position in the modern world as a developing country where West authorities are enthusiastically compensating for the centuries of retreat and introversion, Chinese scholars regard the Chinese as scholars as inevitable return and return home to China I regard it as the nature of the "Middle East". The situation Kingdom "They believe that the election cycle of Western countries may accurately reflect the current national sentiment, but we believe that the progress of progress more accurately reflects the interests of the state" If you want to see the country become the driving force of the modern world, please go to China. If you want young people trying to adjust their desire for consumption and want to see freely about the fact that this newly discovered wealth is sent on a bloody red plate, please come to China. Before going to China you would like to see the new and magnificent industry and infrastructure achievements wrapping the glory of the ancient world. A pleasant stereotype for travelers such as me will fix staying time in China to a series of stereotypes. Invisible Government Although they vote to communicate via established phones, but the ability to access articles is lacking, this article will be shared 6 - Important economic factors in China. There are four facts that China has no room for doubt. First, they are populous (the world's largest population). Second, the area of ​​their land is large (fourth largest). Third, they have invested heavily in infrastructure over the past two decades. They have many new ways and even new ways. Fourth, they built the majority of their economy at the large manufacturing center in the city. Automatic driving cars of all accounts are suitable for them. It creates efficiency for a large number of people. This allows them to better utilize their human resources (their biggest economic strength). It allows them to better distribute these human resources to their country (and prosper the economy as well as the eastern city). Their infrastructure investment will have a fruitful result in the operation of these cars.

Modern moments are characterized by an unprecedented "belief" in the law (Comaroff 2009). The purpose of this interdisciplinary project is to deepen our new and critical understanding of the dilemma related to the protection and implementation of "religious freedom". What is often overlooked with the current call to this famous idea (l) is that you must first have "religion" in order to enforce the law that guarantees the freedom of religion (Sullivan 2005). However, it is very difficult to define "religion" (Asad 1993; Keane 2007). It is the use of power around what is regarded as "religion" without a doubt, it shapes, coordinates and positions the subject and the citizen in the government (Asad 2006). This is a serious dilemma of legislative religious freedom. Discussions about 'Freedom of religion and freedom of religion' are often frustrating, abstract and tightly regulated. This project will transcend familiar freedom of religion as a representation of freedom and tolerance through "freedom of religion" created and negotiated in the contact between citizens and the legal system. This comparison project on the intersection of law and religion consists of three case studies. Each case study aims to treat "freedom of religion" in various aspects of country-specific business as a concept and practice. France, Indonesia, Sri Lanka. These countries were chosen because the national police were "religious" and "secular" and revealed various ways to adapt to religious pluralism. By focusing on "friction" (Tsing 2005) that occurs when people meet the concept of globalization (religious freedom), this project studies religious globalization and legalization of religion, broader discussion on international law I will help you. Gender and citizenship In his provocative exploration entitled "Beyond Freedom of Freedom", hard explored the influence of secularism and religious freedom on the world stage. She said that the logic of political secularism and subsequent religious freedom is long in the center of the United States, the United Nations and many individual countries. In her opinion, the scope of religion is clumsy, and the double culture of religion and secularism is obscuring more than it clarifies. She thinks it is impossible to distinguish elements of religious society from elements of non religious society. "To rely on the category of religious actors according to political objectives" means "We assume that some form of behaviorism is not driven by religion, neither consistency nor sociologically legitimate intellectual behavior" I think. Since everyone has the right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion, freedom of religion can not be regulated from different perspectives in terms of the freedom of an individual who is convicted. This level of religion is interpreted as a set of beliefs based on a religious position (traditional or contemporary) or religious facts. This means that it contains the typical beliefs of any religion, including positive and negative beliefs, ie atheism, agnosticism or indifference to religion.

The word that God does not exist is meaningless as the triangle of a rectangle. Against ontological arguments Nothing, nothing. The universe can not appear suddenly. For the first reason reason The universe is necessary for human beings to prosper. Christianity can explain this, but you can not atheism. The opposite of design theory Morality consists of a collection of prestigious orders. Only God can make such orders. I disagree with moral argument For those who can not deal with the reality of life without God, is religious belief a mere emotional crutch? Do we have to renounce the absolute truth proposition of Christianity to accept other faith claims? The medieval society believed that humans existed because God wants them to exist. Descartes does not doubt the existence of God, I doubt that the existence of man is God's desire. He has a problem because he used a series of theorems to prove the existence of God. He proved that thought is the essence of thinking. At that time the revolution supported a new idea of ​​"I think it was the case." It led to the era of enlightenment by giving independent thinking and free will to the human institution. For Descartes, thought proves that our existence is a conscious entity. Due to the solution of the problem, the thinkers of the 18th and 19th centuries formed identities based on mathematics and science. Equivalent thoughts and consciousness do not satisfy thinking thoughts. After the era of reason, we continue to doubt our existence Questions about the existence of God. In the times of Christianity, Judaism, and Muslim, the existence of God has never been questioned. The problem of existence of God comes from our new way of thinking after these religions. Science makes us think about how things work in our world and casts doubt on the existence of God. In the times of Jesus, scientific research has not proved that God exists. Where do the people of history get the concept of God? Many philosophers There is much debate about the existence of God about the existence of God. For a long time everyone wanted to prove the existence of God. Some people think God exists and is proved by many philosophical or scientific foundations and religious reasons. On the other hand, others do not believe in the existence of God and their foundation is proved from many theoretical and scientific point of view. Many people try to prove the existence of God with reason. After Descartes proves his existence, people will consider the truth about the nature of God, the proof of the existence of God, and the nature of matter. The main task in Descartes' meditation is to design a system that will allow him to understand the truth. He wants to further lay the foundation of all philosophy

Rationality of Existence In order to reject abstract thinking and the absolute essence of reason, existentialism was born in the age of reason. Existentialists have assertions and evidence to support their ideas. They try to find the absolute truth without absolute thinking. In this article I will point out the existentialist's assertion in denying absolute reasons. First, reason is the best creation of the soul and people have the ability to think about what they want. Also, what is needed is said to constitute the reason for its existence itself. It is said that it itself exists. Therefore, it is not necessary to further explain the reason why there is a necessary purpose called "atheism". However, Aseity has a unique connection with God. Thus, if an abstract object exists, then God is not unique, exists with that abstract object, and exists as many other objects that exist within its own nature. This problem is specified as a unique problem The reason for the existence of the universe is not the cause of the existence of the universe itself. The same can be said to us. The reason that we exist is not responsible for our existence. Whatever its reason, we are all present now. Whatever the reason, they do not exist. The reason for us to exist is not the reason for us to exist. The reason is obvious. Reproduction is the reason for our survival. Sex is a mammal that is our way. This is a division of a unicellular organism. However, unlike the full attribute of reason, the reason is likely to be affected by previous behavior, and this is also the reason. A series of causal relationships is formed, where events can be responsible for more than one thing, if it is not another event, it is the influence of other events. With the ability to locate the cause and patience. Before mammalian DNA evolved, DNA itself was formed even before rolling. How far can you see it? If the universe does not need to exist but still exists, the reason for its existence will have the same nature. Whether the universe is present or not, the reason why the universe exists is not affected, regardless of cause or absence. Whatever the universe is in, the cause of the existence of the universe remains intact. The reason is due to the existence state of the universe. The reason for the existence of the universe is not the cause of the existence of the universe itself. The same can be said to us. The reason that we exist is not responsible for our existence. Whatever its reason, we are all present now. Whatever the reason, they do not exist. The reason for which we exist is not the reason for us to exist

Karl-Anthony Towns has surpassed his 21 years and is a student studying history both inside and outside the basketball court. Two weeks ago, when he saw images and videos from the white supremacist meeting in Charlottesville, Virginia, he understood the background. "Let's start with the facts," Downs said in a "Friday" announced "Players' Tribune" article, "Not only is it that it is still an indication that racism is still alive, It shows that it is missing. " And respect it. Minnesota · Timberwolf Center said that he talks with "strangers about Charlottesville" including a black taxi driver raised in Louisiana in the 1960s. The town explains, "By seeing what we have learned in the fifth grade elementary school history class, we understand how important and appropriate emotions are in our history." Personally, I was very disappointed. I have no sorrow, but I am very disappointed. I got even a little ... I was defeated. There is no despair - I have hope. But I got tired. If you are a minority in the United States, just watching the news will be exhausted. Usually, I am optimistic. What you see is something you get. But I think these feelings will spread to you. Then the town talked about the police shooting Philando Castile near Minneapolis. And that has had a big impact on his team and teammates. Perhaps this is the reason he said Charlottesville told him "did not shock", which is different from President Trump's response: I think it is something like this: President's reaction in basketball terms ... you probably know that I know a bit about sports ... just to catch a ball during a short break Field - stumble on the feet of the paint when the ball jumps out of the boundary But Downs has finished his article on Hope. The title is "people who want to promote social wedges through hatred, not" racial discrimination ", but" we have more things "about people who want to unite, learn and grow. Read the full article here Karl-Anthony Towns - Karl-Anthony Towns, which is the subject of various cult and Messianic groups, brings forth the fifth everlasting human life. In his talent for mold breaking compared to his multifaceted basketball excellence and his size, he represents a compilation of ancient struggles in harmony with the ancient chaos. You may wish to eat him to become the fifth ion himself. Or you may wish to eat him to prevent the fifth ion and leave humanity forever in the fourth atheism. Either way, you must take responsibility a lot. "There are chaotic tanks." Anthony Davis, Draymond Green, Carl Anthony Downs are well-known names for NBA today. Everyone is a unique player, but they share many attributes that makes Garnett such a wonderful player. To those who are watching today's game, modern big things are normal, but they are not always. The modern giant was born on a summer day in Toronto, Canada. When a tall, thin child from Chicago was born, the modern giant was born in the fifth pick of the 1995 draft. Taken of 76 birds, Timberwolves can suck my cock. Not in design, incompetent, they acquired the first draft pick of the cereal, the latter became Andrew Wiggins and Karl-Anthony Towns, this is the informal and most exciting young player of the NBA this season. Because Joel Embiid looks as much as Downs, T-Wolves tends to actually fall, and Wiggins does not seem to be a superstar as much as I thought during the first year of Kansas. But even so. The Jahlil Okafor effect casts a shadow over everything related to the draft, 76ers would be amazing if they have both a town and Embiid.

Moral obligations may be blinded by religious views. For some people, religious self-respect is stronger than moral belief. Initially, Hillsboro citizens of Jerome Lawrence and Robert Lee's novel "inheritance wind" recognized that religion is worth more than moral truth. As the novel continued, the prosecutor Matthew Harrison Brady entered the scene which revealed the court's prejudice against Beltram Cates' case. As Brady accepts the challenge from a medical point of view, the proud and proud exposure to recent incidents can be seen as a dramatic personality disorder. Inheritance Wind - Scene Analysis We will introduce to the wind Matthew Harrison Brady (Dir.Stanley Kramer, With Spencer Tracy, Gene Kelly.MGM.1960), using the dialogue, composition, camera work, music production and inheriting the scene of the audience. Matthew Brady. Kramer reveals important information about movie plot in this scene. This scene opens a bird's eye view of the hill town, focusing on the movement of the lower parade. - In this modern era, people seeking clean energy are pursuing much needed. Current technologies include solar thermal power plants, damn windmills. These are all sheep 's energy, but the yield is low. We need to find a viable way to generate more energy and make it cheaper using the basic energy of wind, hydraulic and solar energy. Measures are taken to make more effective use of hydraulic power by using wave and current turbine "Inheritance Wind" in which Kirk Douglas and Jason Robards produced by David Papazian directed by David Greene appeared was arranged by Jerome Lawrence and Robert E. Lee. The drama "inherited wind" was inspired by the "Monkey Judgment" in 1925, where a teacher was arrested and tried to teach a course of evolution. But the movie "inheritance" should not be regarded as a documentary, should not be regarded as a true record of the experiment, but rather it should be regarded as a dramatic movie that shapes it by raising it to convey a strong message to the audience . "Inheritance Wind" is a well-made movie with high-quality performance, photographs of films, and funny and interesting stories. However, inheritance winds are not departing from the historical facts of the "monkey trial" in order to show prejudice to the audience, they should practice what they preach. Still, the inheritance wind is still worth recommending, but it is for those who have strong concern and are interested in the dramatic conflict of opinions and beliefs. From open credit to the very end, inheritance winds celebrate human thought and claim to be the greatest gift for all, as they claim it is the key to our existence. Everyone should make their own judgment and choices according to their free will and no one has the right to control other people's thoughts and beliefs. However, when communicating information to the audience, the succession wind itself strongly manipulates the viewer's thoughts and emotions, and shakes their beliefs in particular in the direction of atheism. An atheist who inherits the wind is said to be a tolerant and forgiving intellectual who suffers from ignorant, narrow Christian paranoia 's hands. This depiction attempts to abandon their religious beliefs and influence viewers to support their ideas. "Darwin took us to the top of the mountain and we can look back from there to see what we are doing from there - Drummond

If you are young you have plenty of time to enjoy life. If you feel that you are not enjoying as much as you can, you can try several ways to improve your life. For example, you can learn how to deal with trouble, how to make new friends, and how to laugh more. 1 Find what you are worried about. Most people sometimes worry or worry. But as you grow up you can learn to deal with your concerns. You may still be worried, but it does not affect your life or your mood. The first step is to identify what you are concerned about. [1] For example, maybe you are worried about your grades, family or friendship. Perhaps you are concerned about future exams and exams. On the other hand, perhaps you were watching the news, you are afraid of where the world is. Write down what you are afraid of in journals and notes. [2] 4 Please take a deep breath. If you feel uneasy about yourself, please stop breathing for a while. Deep breathing helps relieve stress. [6] All these things mean that you close your eyes and concentrate on deep breathing. While breathing in through your nose, try to count the four heads. Breathe through your mouth and count 4 of your hearts. Please continue breathing until it calms down. 6 is good for your body. Anxiety increases when you are not healthy. You can eat fruits and vegetables to relieve stress. Let's exercise everyday with a lot of water. [8] If you are 13 years of age or older, you should drink at least 8 glasses of water a day. [9] Try to drink all day with you to make sure you drink enough. If you do not like fresh water, add some lemon or orange to add flavor. Some of the exercises you can try include swimming, kicking, label playing, skipping, swinging or running in the backyard. Please go out and act every day. If the weather is cold ask the parents to ask whether they can get local YMCA membership or try out video games to get up and move. If you want to say this, you will say it more often. This is not easy to enjoy - it is definitely the day after tomorrow's taste. It hurts to say that when you are young. As you grow older, you can taste it. Please enjoy it. Remember, honesty is better than an expert who pretends not to. Please tell it with clear eyes. Please do not look away. There is nothing to be embarrassed about. Ignorance is truly happy when you are aware of your limits. Others here are strange but realistic. In everyday battles of adult life, there is really no such thing as atheism. There is nothing to worship. Everyone worships. Our only choice is to worship. And regardless of whether it is JC or Allah, YHWH or Wiccan Mother Goddess, four Holy Ghosts or some inseparable moral principles - Choose something or spiritual type of God for worship There is a persuasive reason. Everything you worship will keep alive you Enjoying being a childhood, enjoying being a young teenager, becoming a college student, hippie, dropping out of school. Please enjoy young adults, genuine adults, or elderly people. It lasts only for a moment so enjoy it all, there is no rewind button or repeat button. I hope that you get tremendous pain in the process of growth, and that growth will make you the happiest adult ever.

This statement is part of His great argument that the existence of God and belief in God are beneficial and necessary for civil society functions. A big background of his participation in the debate of the time showed that he did not intend to use this sentence as an ironic irony and basically it is fictitious as it is basically used commonly today I assert there is. In fact, that statement was part of an article where he wrote criticism and refutation of articles of atheists called "Three Scammers". Voltaire is also an unforgettable saying such as "Si Dieu n'existait pas, il faudrait l'inventer" ("If God does not exist, it is necessary to invent him") included in the poem It is in the middle of being known. In 1768, he made a speech on anonymous writer, "Three Scammers", of controversial works. However, although this is not sarcastic remark often taken by people, it is an objection to De Holbach's atheist group, Grimm brothers, others. The first section seems to refute the assertion that the world's evil and suffering should be regarded as evidence for the existence of God. The third section is a section containing frequently quoted rows. In this larger context, it is clear that his intention is to support the assertion of believing in God. He does not seem to say here whether God thinks it exists, but I believe that faith in God is good, atheism is not good for society. His remaining poems continue this argument, then continue with some nice enlightenment stories and insulting comedy. "If God does not exist, it is necessary to devise it," Voltaire said that a person exists and needs to be present above him. In my opinion, what I'd like to say is that people are dangerous animals. He needs something that he believes, the wall it depends on. This is the argument that most atheists use to claim that they believe that God is human creation. However, if one saw a religious belief, the conclusion of this aspect of human subconsciousness would mean that it is a feature God plants. In the erroneous version of the Thanksgiving Manifesto using a part of it, the suggestion that "If God does not exist, we need to invent him" to the famous statements of Voltar in Washington has been omitted. In the case of these "citations", there are people who think that it is necessary to devise them if there are no remarks appropriate for the sectarian interests. "First President of the United States" in "Freedom and Government" announced by W. M. in the Christian Science Journal. XX, No 8 (November 1902) Mary Baker Eddie, p. 465; did not quote the initial or initial source of this statement; later cited "Cry for justice: collection of social protest literature" (1915), by Upton Sinclair, p. 305, from which a broader reference is made, and Frank J. Wilstach, A Diquiry of Similes, 2d ed. , P. 526 (1924) Although they are often cited from the background, Voltaire is known for its many memorable maxims. "If God does not exist, he must be invented." As already mentioned, there is still intense debate about its meaning and intent. Starting with his novel "Candide", "All in the world is the best", in fact Leibniz and bad imitation of religious optimism. Voltaire quotations, which are best cited, are actually completely fake in fact. "I do not agree with what you said, but defend your rights and claim that right" is actually Evelyn Beatrice. Although S. Hall caught the attitude of Voltaire, it wrote in 1906 Voltaire et al biography.

The word monotheism comes from the Greek "things" and means "god". Therefore monotheism is a belief in the existence of a single God. While atheism is a lack of faith in God, monotheism is often contrasted with polytheism, which is the belief of many gods. Because monotheism is based solely on the idea of ​​a god, believers frequently think that this god creates all reality independently from any other being and is completely self-sufficient. Moses and monotheism Moses and monotheism are the last books written by Sigmund Freud. In 1939, when Sigmund Freud died in London, this book was published. London is a place to live with his family, so that Nazi's escape from harassment against the Austrian Jews; this is where Freud feels safe. Siegmund Freud is a Jew, he is opposed to anti-Semitism. Freud was denied promotion for his entire trip. The god whom he talked asked me to leave my land and relatives so that Moses would go to the promised land that Moses had never seen or heard. Abraham's faith is always tested, as God promised Abraham plenty of incredible or impossible things without God's intervention. Abraham knew that heirs were absent from his legacy. In the last book of 1939, "Moses and Monotheism", Sigmund Freud assumed that Moses is an Egyptian aristocrat claiming Achinaton's monotheism. According to the theory proposed by contemporary Bible critics, Freud believes that Moses was murdered in the wilderness, which has always created a collective sense of self-esteem, the core of Judaism. He wrote: "Judaism is the father's religion and Christianity becomes the son's religion." Possibility of Moses' Egyptian family and his message gained a lot of attention from academia. Those who disagree with this view seems to differ from Athenism in all respects except Tora's religion is dedicated to the central character of one God. Similarity with 104 Freud's historical interpretation of Moses was not widely accepted by historians and was regarded as a false history by many people. Moses is an Egyptian, Moses has faith in monotheism in Egypt, converts Jews to it, Moses is harassed, Moses' tradition of killing continues to feel guilty of Jews unconsciously . The first three statements have been debated for centuries and many scholars and theorists have reached the same conclusion. Since Akhenaten considers himself to be the sacred son of Arden, the idea of ​​Moses' monotheism from Akhenaten is problematic as religion is not purely monotheism as Freed thinks. And since the date of withdrawal in Egypt is controversial, it is unlikely near Akhenaten for the first or second century. He did not want to admit it, but religion may still be indirect, but it is only indirect.

Introduction to the religious history of Communist Cuba: After the uprising of Castro in 1959, religious evolution of Cuba included suppression of the declared atheistic communist government. There are several reasons for this suppression to happen, but the recent trend of resurgence (which began in the late 1980s), and more importantly, the increase in the Christian population in Cuban society. This spiritual rise may be due to many aspects of Cuban economy and society. Yemaya is a goddess of the Santería religion which prospered in Cuba and the Caribbean, after being taken to Africans enslaved in the 16th century. Even though Cuba was colonized by Spanish Catholics, it is not entirely acceptable, but the existence of Santeria in the community was shocking. Especially under the ancient religious communist regime, until recently, this counterattack against "ancient religion" was spreading in Cuba, until recently Santria was able to succeed in the public place. Like religious or spiritual customs that must be secretly afraid of retaliation, much of Santería's tradition must be sublimed or incorporated into Catholic rituals. Cuba is a multiethnic society with a population mainly from Spain and Africa. The largest organized religion is 85% of Roman Catholics and 15% of sun terrier, combined with native religions of Protestant, Jewish, Santi, and Africa. Roman Catholicism is the most widely used religion in Cuba. Formally speaking, the cuba was an atheist country for most of the Castro era. However, due to the Constitutional amendment adopted on July 12, 1992, the nature of the Cuban nation changed from atheism to secular, allowing religious believers to join the Cuban Communist Party (PCC). The Cuban Communist Party, the Cuban Communist Party (PCC), the Cuban Communist Party, organized by Fidel Castro et al in 1965, but its history goes back to communism activities that started in Cuba in 1923. According to the Constitution of 1976, it became the only political party allowed the activity. In Cuba, in the revised constitution of 1992, it was defined as "organized avant-garde of the people of Cuba". Participating Comunista Cubano was established in 1925 by a member of Third International (Communist International) trained by Moscow. For thirty years, it adhered to the Stalinist policy, but in the 1940s and early 1950s opportunism cooperated with the Fulgencio Batista regime and its members even received motives of government and labor. However, from 1954 to 1959 the communists became the target of government oppression.

Creatio ex Capacitas and Creatio Continua: When God creates heaven and earth when the force is insufficient, the Earth is an invisible cavity, the darkness is hidden in the depth. . . God said, "Let me light you" and there is light. ~ (Genesis 1: 1-2a; 3NRSV). The Biblical poetry above is not only for God's creation of it, but also for what he created. It is always subject to controversy. There are two main camps in this discussion, those who are sure to be creative and those who affirm atheism. These two activities are inseparable in reality, but ubiquitous creation emphasizes sacred transcendence and God can distinguish logically in order to create a sacred expression from the "completely opposite side" of creation I will. The constant presence of God in internal creation, the continued will of God to creation, and the continued governance of God of creation are all conveyed by the concept of creation continuity. The relationship between these two creative concepts is shown in the study of St. Augustine (Hippo St. Augustine) (354-430). Augustine argues that creation is a momentary act. At the moment when God is said to have the universe, all materials, processes, abilities, roads will appear (creation in the sense of instant creation). But over time, creation is sacred "Let there ..." The creation of nihilism in the law seems to contradict Aristotle's eternal understanding of the universe, since nothing has been created. How can the universe be created from scratch if all the important things must precede the potential things? Maimonides specifically used the entire guide to explain that it is a misleading question based on a false epistemological hypothesis. This "main premise: categories applicable to natural processes also apply to creation" (Seeskin 94) is an epistemological mistake that Maimonides tried to reveal. His argument to this hypothesis is part of the effort to prove the possibility of no creation and Torah's Creatio ex nihilo account is threatened by this controversy and needs to be proved. (Seeskin 94) However, with respect to recent circumstances, it seems that the issue of reproductive genetics is in an intermediate position. Many people have a creative perspective, "continuous creation". That is, the universe creation of God, all involved in it is ongoing work. Next, human beings become "co-creator" and continue his work for him on Earth. Philip · Hefner is defined as follows. Humans are co-creators created by God, whose purpose is to act as an agent, act freely, and create the most healthy future in the nature that we create. It is the nature of nature, our own genetic heritage, the whole human society, and the evolutionary ecological reality we belong to. It is said that the exercise of this institution is a god's desire for humanity. "

The Roman Empire was unparalleled in the ancient world. With its powerful military, technical development and extensive infrastructure, Rome can become an unmistakable power of the Mediterranean. Placing under this greatness is a deadly secret that led to the ultimate collapse of the empire. As Francis Schaefer said in "How to live", the secret of eroding Rome is God's understanding in civilization. The first understanding of Roman God has laid the foundation for the collapse of civilization. The center of religion in Rome is God. For us, this is one of the most difficult things to understand in an ancient Roman religion. After all, few people believe in Roman gods. We live in a society where Biblical monotheism or atheism is the most common sacred understanding. But for the Romans there are many gods and some dogma. The state of Rome is focused on important gods like Jupiter, Juno, Mars, and Apollo, but the myriad possibilities for exotic gods like Serapis and Isis, and individuals like Matuta There is home like god like Sylvanus. The Orthodox of the Bible and the Church does not allow the Romans to think about whether these gods have some flexibility The ancient Greeks and the ancient Romans shared many of their gods and goddesses, but the ancient Romans did not believe that all the gods appeared in human form on them. On the contrary, the gods of ancient Rome are considered to be spiritual. In order to help people communicate effectively and worship God's soul, ancient Rome has hired a pastor to lead people to deal with religious problems. The ancient Romans also believed that their emperor would become a god after death (ancient Rome) Religion plays a very important role in the daily life of ancient Romans and Romans. Roman religion is centered on God, interpretation of events usually involves the gods in some way. The Romans believed that God dominated their lives and that as a result they spent a lot of time to admire them. After the reign of Augustus emperor (27 BC to 14 CE), the emperor was also regarded as a god and was worshiped on a special day. Every God has a special holiday, usually a public holiday. This holiday gives people the opportunity to visit the temple, regardless of which god is celebrated. In this temple the priests sacrifice animals and dedicate them to God.