Exposing the Weakness of Saint Anselm of Canterbury’s Ontological Argument

In the world of scientific exploration, atheism, and assassination of God revealing the weak ontology theory of Canterbury St. Anselm, we often miss the existence of our glorious God. Due to new theories of neuropsychology, quantum physics, gene therapy, evolution and psychobiology, we are constantly forced to eliminate God from our lives and replace it with cold empty scientific ideas . With the virtue theory, genetic susceptibility, evolution from development, dark matter, superstring theory, multilevel universe, and the neurological cause behind consciousness, we become increasingly far from being God's reality It is.

Ontological arguments are transcendental arguments. These arguments try to prove the existence of God from the meaning of the word God. Anselm of Canterbury introduced an ontological argument to his work 'Proslogion'. The classic argument of Anselm is based on two principles, the most important of which are St. Anselm and Rene de Carte of the above Canterbury. If he does not exist, you can still think of a bigger existence (it is like you said that God does not exist besides this existence). Presence must be one of the attributes of God. Because by removing it it is still possible for you to understand the bigger god (the god that exists). The most common problem with this discussion is that it only seems to enumerate the existence of God's attributes and does not seem to indicate it. This argument seems to indicate that any fact you can imagine should be true.

Originally developed by St. Anselm (1033-1109) of Canterbury, the ontological argument takes various forms. Since they are transcendental arguments because they are based on prerequisites that can be said to be independent of world experience, they are unique in the traditional theory of God's existence. All of these begin with the concept of God and lead to the conclusion that God must exist. If it succeeds, the ontology prove that the absence of God is impossible. Anselm believes that God is not a bigger existence, but existence. What is in thinking (in understanding) is another problem outside of understanding (out of your mind, actually). Then he asks which is big: is it in thinking or in reality? His argument led to the conclusion in this way.