From ancient times, the existence of God, or more accurately speaking, the existence of wisdom that defines power is a controversial discussion. Many people insist on divinity because in the process of creating the universe, the existence of this supreme existence doubts as to whether it has unique and terrible ability to design and create the universe. William Paley believes that there is a major supporter of God's presence and perfect order in the creation of the universe.
Does God really exist? This is probably one of the most popular answers and divides human nature into two separate ideologies of theology and atheism. To subscribe to either of these two doctrines, first of all, do you need to know who is God or what? The most traditional definition of God over most religions is that "God is the creator of the universe and everything in the universe". Therefore, people will insist that God wishes to do this He must be self-existential, knowledgeable, omnipotent, but also the "best existence form" Hmm. Such assertions and beliefs fundamentally caused deeply hostile hostility between atheists and theologians. Sometimes it feels a need for atheism according to the arguments presented by atheists, but the strongest belief in the existence of God may be achieved by theologians' support in the existence of God. It is not the opposite of an atheist. "Hanging"
Philosophers, atheists, and agnostics raised arguments against the existence of God. Some of these arguments argue that the existence of God does not correspond to observed facts; some are arguments that God does not exist because God's concept is incoherent or chaotic. Others criticize the evidence provided for the existence of God. Another argument states that the existence of the omniscient God is incompatible with the facts of free will - human beings have certainly made a choice. If God is omniscuous then he must know in advance what people will do in certain circumstances. In this case, people can not substitute God to actually know what they do, free will is an illusion. Furthermore, if a person chooses to commit a crime, can the person freely crime the crime?