What is History? Essay
[2023-11-27 02:12:47]
The definition of history is a problem that has caused international discussions for centuries among writers, readers, and historical writers. In the words of famous historian Edward Gibbon, "History is really only a record of human sin, stupidity, and misfortune." Cicero had a more romantic view. He said: "History is a proof of the passage of time, it reveals reality, activates memory, provides guidance for daily life, and brings us ancient news: it is Historians have bothered that record ... this is the event that happened in the past ...
Of course, there is a view that even the evidence of main sources of information may be contaminated. Advertisements by rulers and governments are used as key tools to promote the spread of their citizens. For example, at the turn of the century in Russia, writers who criticized the government's internal affairs were condemned, persecuted, occasionally imprisoned or executed. From 1537 to 1574, a large review by Florence Cosimo I de 'Medici, the history of Florence has declined. The extreme wealth and power of the Medici family extends to the art of the Renaissance and its depiction is common among these artists' works as saints. The fear of persecution may unilaterally devise wise scholars. Even today, there are prejudices and prejudice in the explanation of everyday events in newspapers and television. The publicly released event is an event selected by the editor or director. For example, "Daily Telegraph" is widely considered to be the support of the Conservative Party. In the movie world, it is not written that "This is a real story", but it is "based on a true story." Pour romance using art licenses, or
Correspondingly, some historians go to the other extremes and believe that social history should be a social history: social history. The idea is political, economic, military, and certain other types of history, each studying only one side of society. If you want to understand the whole society, you must integrate these different types of history into one framework. This is an issue of social history. This view on social history has many difficulties. First of all, the overall method is based on the hypothesis of learning society. But when we use the word society, we usually do not refer to a unique social structure, but rather to a specific area of residents or to specific subjects of political authority. It has not yet been decided whether there is a unique social structure that affects the way people live.
Social history, also called new social history, is a field that includes the history of ordinary people and strategies and institutions to deal with their lives. In its "golden age" it was a major growth field among scholars of the 1960s and 1970s, and still well represented in the history department. In the 20 years from 1975 to 1995, the proportion of historical professors in American history in social history rose from 31% to 41%, but the proportion of political historians fell from 40% to 30%. In the history department of British College in 2007, 1,644 (29%) out of 5,723 faculty members recognized social history and the political history was 1,425 (25%). The "old" social history before the 1960s was a gathering without a central theme, which often included political movements such as "social" outside populism and elite institutions.
Although the history of political thought can be traced back to ancient times, the history of political history of the world and the history of human political thought spread between the Middle Ages and the Renaissance. In the age of enlightenment, the political entity expanded from the basic system of autonomy and monarchy to industrialization and modern complex democracy and communism system. At the same time, the political system expanded from the boundary of fuzzy definition to today's clear boundary. The history of political thought often overlaps the history of philosophy