Computational complexity and philosophical dualism Abstract: I have studied several recent controversies, including the possibility of mathematical intuitive mechanical simulation. Part 1 addresses the presentation of Lucas-Penrose's position and outlines some basic logical conceptual mechanisms (Godel's proof, Hilbert's tenth question, and Turing's stopping problem). In Part 2 I will explain the main outline of the complexity theory and the concept of Bremerman's transformation and basic limitation. In addition to the dualism that has been discussed (especially Christian and Descartes models), there is a new theory to protect dualism. Dualism of naturalism derives from Australian philosopher David Chalmers (born 1966) I believe there is an explanatory gap between objective experience and subjective experience. It has nothing to do with the physical properties it depends on. According to Chalmers, the naturalistic description of the dualism of nature requires a new basic kind of nature described by the new supernormal rule; before the Maxwell equations, the materialistic mechanical and Newton models are electric I understand the challenge. Resembles Attribute dualism is a philosophical view that two attributes are associated with a substance. According to it, psychological attributes such as desire exist in specific substances such as neurons. This particular doctrine tells us that the world consists of one substance, substance, but there are two different attributes: physics and metaphysics. Therefore, attribute dualism is arguing that the difference in ontology lies in the difference in the nature of the mind and the substance, consciousness being intangible in neurobiology. Essentially, this theory argues that psychological attributes inevitably appear when the problem is organized in an appropriate way. Between 1000 and 600 years, the French philosopher René Descartes laid the foundation for the origin of Descartes' binaryism. In contrast, British philosopher Thomas Hobbes opposed dualism, which supports materialism. Recently, Descartes' dualism and dualism generally lost support. Materialism is a more rational and interpretive theory of the relationship between body and mind. - Both John Rock and Thomas Hobbes believe that men are essentially equal, but their personal view on equality suggests a fundamentally different approach to proper citizenship I guided you to do. Locke believes that the correct form of civilian government should pay attention to the common interests of people and protect citizens' rights to life, health, freedom, and personal property.

Descartes' physical material dualism Through the history of humans, philosophers try to explain where our thoughts and consciousness came from and how we can have our own unimportant characteristics did. We want our physiological brain to automatically give us non-inductive features such as feelings, thoughts, desires, etc., or thinking, interaction with the body, let us feel and think Whether there is a desire. In addition, the mind is the only nonphysical existence in our universe, or another existence that exists like a ghost or a soul. In this paper, we explain Descartes' interactive material dualism and analyze and evaluate it in this paper. In this paper, although this discussion on Descartes' interactive material dualism is effectively effective, it points out that there is no echo because its second premise is incorrect. Although this discussion has a logical framework and deductive validity, we argued, but due to its second premise, it is inevitably wrong. By demonstrating the uniqueness of psychological and physical attributes and states, this paper proposes the existence of several arguments and secondary qualities that support material dualism. This paper also studies the main criticism of interactive material dualism and the problem of physical and mental interaction. If this article is totally effective, the second assumption that you can agree with Descartes' discussion is a mistake as a reader. The first premise of the present discussion is the reconfirmation of Descartes' interactive substance dualism theory that non-critical items can affect physical entities. "Dualism of matter is a spiritual substance that includes psychological features that generally considers the body as a physical object with physical characteristics and the mind can not reduce the body." (Moreland & Craig, 2003) Self or mind Specific electrical and chemical stimuli (physical properties) that cause consciously to experience perceptual quality and consciousness to pain (mental nature). In material dualism, Descartes believes that thoughts and brains interact closely with each other, even if they are different substances with different characteristics. This is considered to be the key point of Descartes in dualism of interactive material.

This article defines Descartes dualism and explains the reaction to Girbert Lyle 's Cartesian dualism against Descartes dualism, critically evaluates and supports Lyle' s assertion on Descartes' material dualism. Descartes dualism is a psychological dualism developed by the infamous René Descartes (1596-1650). Descartes dualism is about entities: he says there are two different entities, body and thought (1). All objects that may exist or may exist are in one of these categories. Oxford philosopher Gilbert Lyle (1900-1976) had another way to explain Plato and Descartes' thought. Lyle expressed Descartes dualism as "category error". As its name implies, category errors include placing something in the wrong logical category. In the case of Lyle, Oxford visitors walked around universities, libraries, laboratories, and teachers' rooms and asked, "Can I see the university?" She saw the university Critique of Descartes' Dualism of Gilbert Lyle. Lile refused to accept the view that the body is only a "machine" operated by an independent "ghost" of human thought, but I thought the two are basically related to one another . In the following decades, this sentence became widely known as philosophy, in particular in 1967 when a book of the same name was published by Arthur Koestler, and finally penetrated mass culture and language. I imagined that the phrase of Lyle can transplant the future of Japanese "ghost" to the "shell" of bio robot and influenced Shirow Masamune's "Ghost Shell" (SF comics and animation) It was. "Shell's ghost problem is what happens to humans when the physical difference between humans and machines is gone.

Over the years, many philosophers have tried to answer elusive physical and mental problems. There are many ways to understand this problem, but probably not as famous as Descartes dualism. The theory advocated by Reina descartes in the early 17th century is at the center of modern metaphysical discourse. He was respected and censored through the teachings of meditation, and still endured many attempts by others to refute them. One of his greatest critics of the 20th century was Gilbert Lyle. Oxford philosopher Gilbert Lyle (1900-1976) had another way to explain Plato and Descartes' thought. Lyle expressed Descartes dualism as "category error". As its name implies, category errors include placing something in the wrong logical category. In the case of Lyle, Oxford visitors walked around universities, libraries, laboratories, and teachers' rooms and asked, "Can I see the university?" She saw the university Critique of Descartes' Dualism of Gilbert Lyle. Lile refused to accept the view that the body is only a "machine" operated by an independent "ghost" of human thought, but I thought the two are basically related to one another . In the following decades, this sentence became widely known as philosophy, in particular in 1967 when a book of the same name was published by Arthur Koestler, and finally penetrated mass culture and language. I imagined that the phrase of Lyle can transplant the future of Japanese "ghost" to the "shell" of bio robot and influenced Shirow Masamune's "Ghost Shell" (SF comics and animation) It was. "Shell's ghost problem is what happens to humans when the physical difference between humans and machines is gone. Gilbert Lyle has created a famous metaphor called "a ghost in a machine" in order to oppose a "strange" view of the human brain and its accompanying intellectual energy. He considers Descartes' heart and body dualism to be a simple category error - it ignores the basis of mental and psychological behavior in the physical movement of the brain. Since writing of Lyle, neural network has become a backbone of machine learning, and has demonstrated a great power in complicated tasks ranging from image recognition to video game. However, as to all the advances, there remains the question of whether the neural network repeats human brain motion sufficiently accurately, often as implied or claimed with the emergence of "implicitly ghost" (ie, mind) . Is recent argument against the progress of artificial general intelligence reasonable?

Discussion on Dualism Introduction Discussions on the true nature of man, the existence of free will and the validity of science are focused on two philosophical theories of dualism and materialism. In support of dualism, supporters believe that there are two types of substances, human beings, substances and non-material substances. Meanwhile, since materialism proposes that people and things are the same, there is no other non-material existence. These arguments provide a good basis for philosophers to believe substantive dualism. But there are also serious objections. The first major discussion on dualism is simplicity. The material list says that it is more reasonable to subscribe to them because their opinions are simpler (they only believe in physical things). The materialistic view is easy to prove, as it is no doubt that there are material substances and substances that are not material are current hypotheses. This argument is very irrational to me. You should choose a philosophical point of view, as one person makes more sense to you. Because one person is not because your idea is small. One argument against dualism is about causality. If consciousness (thought) can exist independently of physical reality (brain), we must explain how to create physical memory of consciousness. Therefore, dualism must explain how consciousness affects physical reality. One of the major objections to dual interactivity is the lack of explanation of how materials and non-materials interact. Various non-material thought factors of dualism influence substance bodies, and vice versa, especially in the 20th century are attacked strongly by various aspects. Dualist critics often ask how completely irrelevant things completely affect substances - this is a fundamental problem of causality This paper shows Descartes' interactive material dualism, which we analyze and evaluate with this paper. This paper points out that this discussion on Descartes' interactive material dualism is unhealthy, although its second premise is wrong, it is inherently effective, but it is unhealthy. Despite the logical framework and deductive validity, we discussed this argument, but it is inevitably wrong due to the second premise. In this paper, by presenting the uniqueness of psychological and physical attributes and states, we propose some arguments and secondary qualities that support material duality. In this paper, we also consider the main criticism of interactive material dualism and the problem of physical and mental interaction. If this article is totally effective, the second premise that you can agree with Descartes' discussion as a reader is false.

Dualism of the mind and the body is often regarded as a central problem of the philosophy of the heart. The problem of mind and body dualism is that it is not clear whether Descartes is really an independent existence in the discussion or whether the mind is the brain itself. Descartes believes that people have two main elements, physical and non-material, called heart and soul. As a scientist, Descartes believes in the mechanics theory of matter, but he is also very religious and I do not believe people are simply mechanical creatures like watches. Therefore, Descartes believes the mind will lead the mind. First, there are two types of artificial intelligence. It is a computer that can have artificial intelligence and human ability. This is in contrast to artificial narrow intelligence that artificial intelligence computers can do what humans can do, but only within narrow limits. - Ben Thompson, Strategic Finance Minister, Steven Mnuchin recently laughed a lot of Twitter posts as lack of understanding about AI was lacking. He said that he is not interested in automating artificial intelligence, but autonomous vehicles say they plan to shuttle from the coast to the coast in the near future. We have not yet implemented "strong" artificial intelligence (also called artificial intelligence) that can achieve all intellectual tasks human beings can achieve. However, significant advances in artificial intelligence over the past few years have shown that strong artificial intelligence can be achieved in the near future. Artificial intelligence requires appropriate machine learning algorithms, data and computational power. Many of today's most promising artificial intelligence techniques use neural networks. Neural networks can be small, simple, or large and powerful. The larger the neural network, the stronger it is. To achieve the limits of neural networks as well as today's artificial intelligence capabilities, a powerful computer chip

In my opinion, thinking - when thinking about brain problems, dualism is a more attractive point of view. The idea that the mind is an independent entity and independent of the body is the central point of dualism. One of the reasons that fascinated me was due to my Catholic religious belief. Interior view is another reason why dualism is more logical to me than materialism. I will logically explain why thinking and brain are separate. Furthermore, discussion of separability creates several advantages that make dualism more attractive to my eyes. Another argument of dualism is that dualism is necessary for free will. If dualism is wrong it may be materialism and the assertion that mankind is a completely material life is true. (We do not think idealism - just discuss ideas and ideas.) If materialism is true, every movement of the body should be determined by the laws of physics that determine all behavior and reactions of the universe. However, being strong free will assume not only acting exactly as we wanted, but also being free. Natural law can not solve why this is necessary for us. According to a dualist, heart is not important, so you do not need to think that it is bound by the physical law governing the body. Therefore, a strong free will is compatible with dualism, but it is incompatible with materialism. (See Taylor, 1983, p 11; Rey, 1997, pp. 52-53) One type of dualism argument consists of standard opposition to physicalism. The main example is based on the existence of qualia, the most important being the so-called "discussion of knowledge". Since this parameter has its own entry (see entry qualia: see knowledge parameter), it is handled relatively easily here. But all discussions on physi- calism are also irreducible and non-critical arguments of the mind, and considering the existence of the material world, do not forget that it is a dualist argument. Philosophers and scientists such as Victor Reppert, William Hasker and Alvin Plantinga have proposed dualism arguments called "rational arguments". They believe in C. S. Lewis and first argue in his "miracle" book; Lewis calls it "difficulty of naturalist", this is the title of the third chapter of the miracle. The argument assumes that there is no reason to believe that if all our thoughts are affected by physical reasons, it is the result of a reasonable basis, as naturalism requires. However, inference from the ground to the result can understand the knowledge. So if naturalism is the truth, there is no way to know it other than luck.

Dualism assertion Dualism is the theory that mind and matter are two different things. The main argument of dualism is that the facts about the objective external world of particles and force fields revealed by the modern physics science are not about the fact that things appear from a specific point of view but the facts of subjective experience is that things are It is about how it is from individual consciousness. From the subject point of view. They must be described in first person and third person. A series of dualism arguments consists of standard opposition to physicalism. The main example is based on the existence of qualia, the most important of which is the so-called "knowledge theory". Since this parameter has its own entry (see entry qualia: knowledge parameter), it is handled relatively easily here. But all discussions on physi- calism are arguments that are irreducible and meaningless minds, and remember that considering the existence of the material world, it is a dualistic debate. Philosophers and scientists such as Victor Reppert, William Hasker, Alvin Plantinga proposed a dualism argument called "rational argument". They believe in CS Lewis in the book of his "miracle" to discuss first; Lewis called it the "difficulty of cardinal cardinalism", this is the title of the third chapter of the miracle is. Discussion assumes that there is no reason to believe that they are the result of a reasonable basis if all our thoughts are affected by physical reasons, as naturalism requires. However, reasoning reasoning can understand knowledge. So, if naturalism is the truth, there is no way to know it other than luck. So far, all arguments in this section are simply arguments of attribute dualism, or neutrality between attributes and material dualism. In this section and section 4.5, we consider several arguments that promote material dualism. The discussion in this section can be used as a preparation for 4.5, which concentrates on dissatisfaction of dualism of nature in the form of Humean. Berkeley found a theory that resembled the theory in the text of Hume's "Hum" in his "Philosophical Review" (Note A, pages 577-81), but later rejected it. concept. John Foster expresses Berkeley's view in a more contemporary language

During this period of 30 years of political rights destroyed the word, F. Scott Fitzgerald seems to be hard to believe that he was fairly fashionable once he was a socialist. A few years ago, he thought that he was a Catholic was not so prevalent. It is difficult to connect the characteristic background of Fitzgerald's novel with the kingdom of the magical world where he chose to have a spirit of proletariat solidarity or pastor's devotion, but the discussion of this paper is left and religious view It is between. Tension forms the core of vision. Great Gatsby "Great Gatsby" is one of the best literary works of the 20th century. It explores the essence of Westerners in difficulties and other social problems. The great Gatsby is not just a historical novel in the 1920s. Fitzgerald uses the letters and symbols in this book to conduct a detailed analysis of the lives of ordinary people. - Great Gatsby, for example, is symbolic and colorful. Throughout the book, authors use them to represent different themes in the novel. Some of these colors are white, yellow, gray, green, pink, red, and blue. However, I think that these colors have special meanings to other colors, so I chose white and green as comments. White is mainly used to explain innocence, hypocrisy, personality corruption. Green represents hope, ambition, and dreams of Gatsby The importance of the color of "Great Gatsby Fitzgerald" lies in literature, which is often intended to select different letter colors to express the character's personality. Designed by The Great Gatsby's F. Scott Fitzgerald, the colors are green, yellow / gold, gray and are used to represent attributes of colored people and places. Clearly, green is the most prominent color in the novel. - "The most lonely moment in my life is when they see the whole world collapse.The only they can do is to look at the blank sheet." - F. Scott Fitzgerald, "Great Gatsby" The American dream, a longtime ideal embodies the hope that people can accomplish economic success, political power, and eternal love by dedication and effort. During the roar of the 1920 's, Americans made a facade to cover their real identity.

Regarding the spirit and brains of dualism and materialism, I am facing the philosophical task of keeping dualism or materialism, depending on which is the most attractive to me. Therefore, I support dualism, that is, believe in a material and spiritual state, or I believe in materialism, that is to say that everything that believes in existence is material or material. I think that materialism is easier to prove, but dualism is more attractive. At first, philosophers thought thought and brain were separate. It is called dualism. The theory of dualism thinks thinking and brain are composed of different substances. The brain is material, the brain is not important, or it is irrelevant to the physical world. However, when scientists began studying the brain in the early 19th century, there was a monism. This theory thinks thought and brain are one thing. In the past, philosophers knew little about how the brain works, or its behavior. However, some early scientists began to make important discoveries about monism. Their experiments show that the physical process is very important for understanding behavior. Renedecart proposed dualism to solve the relationship between the brain and the mind. After recording the brain mechanism involved in the circulation of cerebrospinal fluid, he suggested that the pineal gland is the place where the heart interacts with the body. This dualism may provide a driving force for later anatomists to further explore the relationship between the anatomical and functional aspects of the brain's anatomy. Thomas Willis is considered to be the second pioneer in the research of neuroscience and brain science. In 1664, Cerebri Anatome (Latin: Anatomy of the brain) followed the pathology of the brain in 1667. Among these, he explained the structure of cerebellum, ventricle, cerebral hemisphere, brain stem and cranial nerve, studied its blood supply, and proposed functions related to different regions of the brain. Willis' circle is the name that first used the term 'neurology' as a result of investigating the blood supply to the brain.

In this article, I will explain the theme of the philosophy of the heart (POM) which is divided into four fields of dualism, materialism, idealism, and neutral monism. However, due to the depth of these four areas, this article discusses dualism and neutral monism more deeply. Philosophy of the mind studies the relationship between the mind and the body. Dualism is the field of POM, and we believe that the reality consists of spiritual things and material things. Monism is neutral one-sidedism. The conclusion of neutral monism is that neither spiritual attributes nor physical attributes are caused by reality, but rather substances called neutral (philosophy encyclopedia). Traditional materialism in monism suggests that everything is part of body and mind, body and mind (Encyclopedia Philosophy Lily). This means that the human mind acts with your body through a simultaneous connection. Dualists oppose the existence of one-sidedism. Dualists believe that there is a basic form of existence, but there are two forms of existence, the body and the mind. Dualists believe that both our body and mind exist, but the body and mind are different and separate (Xrefer - Dualism). The main problem of dualism is the problem of two different independent entities. Dualism and monism are famous philosophical topics from ancient times to the present. The term "binaryism" means that our body and mind are independent. And our body and mind can not be the same. This is because the mind and body are two different substances. In contract, "universalism" means that both body and mind are combined into one. Our body and mind are indivisible and everyone is influenced by other people. Monism and dualism each have its own strengths and weaknesses. Physical and mental problems can be divided into various problems. Can we think about our mind or ask ourselves? What is your body? Are they coexisting, or are there hearts only in the body? Or does the body exist only in the mind? Otherwise, we will also think that there may be many kinds of relationships if both mind and body exist. Perhaps the mind will influence our body There is a philosophy school called advaita in Indian philosophy. There are systems such as monism and dualism. However, advaita is a non-binary theory that is not a monism (it is a monism theoretically opposite to binaryism). A negative prefix 'a' is added to dvaita (non-duality) to give more rich meaning. This means more than the opposite of dualism. Heidegger uses a hidden prefix, but this is not a hidden antonym but a combination of what was hidden and revealed. In many cases, a negative prefix will say that it is not the original meaning, but leaves many other possibilities and gives richer meaning than positive terms. (I am not saying that all denials produce such a taste)

In those times when tremendous growth in both the population and the region, people who need to express their own national identity in order to connect the widely diverse and rapidly growing population to the American republican ideals It is not. Not to mention this vision, of course, when Europeans "discover" the United States, we ignore the fact that it became the home of hundreds of different Native American tribes. And the important role that women play. To build a country This entry deals with dualism in the philosophy of the heart. The word "binaryism" has many uses in the history of thought. In general, the idea is that there are two basic types or categories of principles or principles in a particular field. For example, in theology, "binaryists" refers to those who believe good and evil, or God and devil, are about the same in the world. Dualism is a fundamental type, that is, a monism that is a category of things or principles, and more rarely diversification, which is a category of multiple types or views. In philosophy of the mind, dualism is completely different in terms of spiritual and physical or physical, spiritual and physical, and brain. Diversification in the field of spiritual philosophy distinguishes it from belief that there are multiple substances in the world ultimately rather than monism or dualism. (See also cosmology). Polyroism believes that people related to a group or another group have different ideas. Polytheistic beliefs or worship of multiple gods (usually gathered in the Pantheon) and related myths and ceremonies. The philosophical position of positivism thinks that the only true knowledge is scientific knowledge. This is the science philosophy method that comes from enlighten thinkers like Pierre - Simon Laplace (and many others). See also logical positivism. There is a philosophy school called advaita in Indian philosophy. There are systems such as monism and dualism. However, advaita is a non-binary theory that is not a monism (it is a monism theoretically opposite to binaryism). A negative prefix 'a' is added to dvaita (non-duality) to give more rich meaning. This means more than the opposite of dualism. Heidegger uses a hidden prefix, but this is not a hidden antonym but a combination of what was hidden and revealed. In many cases, a negative prefix will say that it is not the original meaning, but leaves many other possibilities and gives richer meaning than positive terms. (I am not saying that all denials produce such a taste)

Novel "Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde's strange incident" centered on the concept of humanity, but until the last chapter, when the complete story of Jekyll and Hyde's relationship became clear, the theme was completely I did not show up. . Therefore, for the first time after witnessing all the events of the novel including Hyde's sin and his ultimate eclipse, we can clearly face the prospect of dual humanity. This text not only considers the duality of mankind as its central theme but also thinks about the characteristics of this duality and forces us to consider plots of each novel. There are many types of duality designed to best deal with various aspects of puzzles. For example, it is thought that Descartes dualism is one of the oldest forms of material dualism, that both substances and non-material substances exist and consciousness exists in non-material substances. Another theory, attribute dualism, considers consciousness to be an unimportant attribute resulting from the same thing as creating physical attributes. Attribute dualists believe that neural activity has both physical and nonphysical properties. Physical properties include substances such as electromagnetic potential and nonphysical properties include substances such as consciousness It is widely regarded as two pioneers of contemporary dualism, material dualism and material dualism. Material dualism thinks that mind and soul are different nonphysical entities from human forms, whereas material dualism thinks that there is no difference between soul and body. ) Material dualism leaves some room in the position that the soul may exist separately from the body before and after the death. It allows the causal relationship psychological and physical relationships to work together, but property dualism does not allow this concept. The cause of the event can be described as a physical event in the brain and as other events as desire, emotion or thought. However, material dualism has been increasingly ignored in most modern discussions.

The main character of William Faulkner, the trajectory of Joe Christmas and immoral decisions became a siren song, which gave him the life at the stern of the stern. Christmas way changed, twisting, foolish person carried to the world was created. Then he saw his past without mercy in order to make a decision for his future. Bright August is similar to Robert Frost's "Untaken Road", but when Joe decides that he reaches the bifurcation point of the road and that he has to plan the type of life that he wishes to lead, the inconsistent elements It mixes with his role. August Joe 's Christmas study in the light Joe' s Christmas eating disorder in the light of August and dislikes of women 's sexual desire (or female) also trace back to the original scene of the dietitian chamber I can do it. However, the original scene is not the last piece of the puzzle. The original scene is used as a work condition for further analysis of Joe's psychology. In the rest of the novel, the reader is encouraged to associate that scene with Joe 's behavior first. However, between Freud's theory and the original scene and Joe's symptomatic behavior, I will draw a one-to-one relationship. Mechanical connection of points does not solve the problem Joe named Christmas as he was abandoned at a 5 year old orphanage at Christmas Eve. After not entering the orphanage he was hired by the McEachern family, a husband without children and a wife. Her husband forced him to abide by his rigid and unfaithful cold British parliamentary doctrine and tried to defeat his religion to Joe. When McEachern tracked Joe at midnight school dance, Joe 's night escape, Joe probably beat him to die. When he needed her most, Joe lost his prostitute girlfriend Bobby Allen and was beaten badly that night. He started on the street, running whiskey, sex, and violence for 15 years.

Interpretation of Heidegger 's Descartes dualism: The problem of traditional epistemology is the relationship between the subject and the outside world The difference between the subject and the object makes it possible to distinguish between those who have knowledge and those who know it. Starting with Descartes, the subject is something unexpanded, and this object is an extension of what he does not think. Heidegger dismisses this distinction between the subject and the object and thinks that the subject does not differ from the outside world because it is essentially in the world. Material dualism is an ontological dualism protected by Descartes, which claims to have two basic substances, spirits and substances. The spirit does not spread to the universe, and the problem can not be considered. It believes that the immortal soul occupies the area of ​​independent existence and obviously the body will die. This view contradicts physicalism. Dynamic space framework developed by Gottfried Leibniz (1646-1716). The idea behind the dynamics in metaphysical cosmology is that the material world can be explained by the movement of the distance, not by the expansion but by the positive, point-like force. Dynamically describe simple elements, Leibniz, Monas, and those that exist as a group of elements with only strong essence. It developed as a response to the passive material view of the philosophical mechanism. Material dualism (or Descartes dualism) believes that the mind is an independent matter - the mind does not spread out into space and matter can not be thought. This is the most famous type of dualism of Descartes, it is compatible with most theologians who claim that the immortal soul occupies an independent "existence region" different from the material world. Attribute dualism (also called token physics) argues that thought is a series of independent attributes that emerge from the brain, but that is not a unique substance. Thus, if the substance is organized in an appropriate way (ie in the form of a living human tissue), psychological features will appear.

Critical criticism of Ann Conway 's Descartes Dualism: Explain and analyze criticism of Anne Conway' s descartes dualism. After a brief biography of Conway, I portrayed some of the influence on her philosophy. Then I mentioned non-importance from her non-Cartesian point of view. According to Conway, there is only one substance in the reality of creation. This substance includes substance and spirit. She believes that pure substances and spiritual substances are impossible. Next, I will discuss several discussions of Conway on Descartes dualism. Conway criticized Descartes' dualism with a total of six arguments, but the latter is better known for the convertibility of matter and spirit. According to Conway, things and spirits are not two completely opposite entities; they are only substances that can be exchanged. Changes in material survival and spiritual survival, and vice versa. Since dualism denies the possibility of conversion, these modules of thinking and spirit not only give her theory, but also oppose the concept of dualism. Since the discussion of Conway is widely complicated, we explain only the argument contrasting with the concept of dualism. Material dualism (or Descartes dualism) believes that the mind is an independent matter - the mind does not spread out into space and matter can not be thought. This is the most famous type of dualism of Descartes, it is compatible with most theologians who claim that the immortal soul occupies an independent "existence region" different from the material world. Attribute dualism (also called token physics) argues that thought is a series of independent attributes that emerge from the brain, but that is not a unique substance. Thus, if the substance is organized in an appropriate way (ie in the form of a living human tissue), psychological features will appear.

My research theme is the scroll of the Dead Sea, determinism and free will, or coexistence of moral evil with nature's evil and dualism text. I am very interested in this issue as I am very interested in discussions between scholars and scientists. When applied to religious background, it seems to be a particularly complicated problem, which can not be resolved rationally or scientifically. When deciding to know what surprised the ancients, this topic was close to the center of my personal interest. Dualism: Understanding of reality exists at two extremes. Metaphysical dualism thinks that the universe exists in two opposite (and sometimes inconsistent) reality - heart and material, or spirit and substance, or yin and yang. Moral dualism assumes a conflict between universal benefits and universal evil and hostile evils (eg believing that God and Satan are equal and opposed). Eadie, Betty: A writer of a new-era of bestsellers, accepted by the light and the heart of awakening. As an active member of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, Edie claims that he died, went to heaven, and returned to her body (see experience of near death). Her book contains a combination of a new era and Mormonistic faith. Dualism is always a characteristic of many religions and philosophies. Recognizing that the universe has both spiritual and physical aspects, dualism usually regards the spiritual world as good and the material world as evil. But since the Hebrew Scriptures did material creation very well (Genesis 1: 31) and believed that there was evil spirit (1st Sam 16: 14), those who supported dualism gave the Old Testament I could not refuse. However, since the work of the New Testament is based on the same principle, only distortion can be used to support dualism. Dualism is defined as a two-part state. It usually refers to people who have two views on nature: material (physical) and spiritual (soul). Dualism thinks the problem is evil, only spirit or soul is good. I will look at how the different parts of the Bible show the separation of the soul and the body. It exists in many ways, including sexual, political and social aspects. The most common message is that the soul is the most important part of man. It is also clear that both Christians and the author of the Bible believe that the soul is an independent spirit and is only contained within the body. To be philosophical dualism means that there are two different entities or substances in the universe - material, mental, physical, and spiritual. The great difference between the ancient Greeks and the soul is in adage. "The body is a grave." Therefore evil is a result confined to a limited body by an infinite soul. For example, Plato is a strong dualism because it expresses the idea that the soul is independent of the physical existence. A reasonable soul, like a tank or a tank, is a spiritual substance different from the body in which it lives. Dualism played a major role in the European Renaissance when Descartes fully described this idea as substance entity and material expanding substance. This dualism makes it possible to realize all the mathematical science of physics and all the facts of the material world are explained based on measurements.

The character of Psycho (1960) of Alfred Hitchcock has a double nature and is delicately delineated through the appearance of characters and the use of mirrors throughout the film. The first shot of Psycho is to zoom in from the open area of ​​the city on a sunny day. When the lens further zoomed in, it entered a dark room, indicating that Marion Crane (Janet Leigh) and Sam Loomis (John Gavin) infected an undisclosed hotel. This is a binary image that is just one example of the placement of Hitchcock in this movie. Psychology of Alfred Hitchcock Alfred Hitchcock's "Psychology" - a world famous movie - was premiered in New York's hometown on June 16, 1960. This movie tells of the life and conflict of a young and beautiful woman, Mary Enclave, which was operated by the police after Janet steals 40,000 dollars. - Psychology of Alfred Hitchcock Alfred Hitchcock's "psychology" is his best-known, widely recognized, his best film. It took three weeks in 1960, and today even today, according to today's film technology standards it was considered one of the greatest horror movies ever to date and surprised the audience for more than four decades. Alfred Hitchcock and Psycho created masterpieces and cooperated to bring horror movies in the era of modern terrorism. Psycho tells virtually two stories Alfred Hitchcock 's psycho - psychology is a horror movie directed and produced by Alfred Hitchcock. This film was filmed in the late 1950s and was released in 1960. There are few horror movies of the 1960 's that are considered to be epoch - making movies. This film is black and white, so it's very dark and dark, so it's best for taking horror movies. Alfred Hitchcock's movie "Psycho Psycho" was shot by Alfred Hitchcock and it was shocking. In the 1960s, when movie censorship was very close to today's standards, Hitchcock promoted the limits of spiritual things never been done. The image of the movie art, symbolism, subconscious in this movie was wonderful then, and that is still the case. - Alfred Hitchcock's movie psychology movie "Psychology" was produced by Alfred Hitchcock (1899-1980), a British born American film director. He is known for his technological innovation and psychologically complex thriller. The movie "Psycho" was produced in 1960 and screened in New York. Because the first year of "psychology" earns 15 million dollars, this is a breakthrough movie - more than 15 times the cost of making a movie. Alfred Hitchcock's movie psychology Alfred Hitchcock's movie "Psychology" was released in 1960. The movie is played by two main characters - Janet Legge as Anthony Perkins as Norman Bates and Marion Klein. The movie Psycho was a thriller, won numerous awards and was a great success. Psycho is in Arizona, mainly located in Bates Motel. With the production of the sequel, this movie was a great success. But they are not as big as the original Psycho. - Alfred Hitchcock in the rear window of the rear window of Alfred Hitchcock, L. Jeffries played by Jimmy Stewart was completely set to spending all of the time he was watching the neighbor from the wheelchair. He used a camera to improve his vision, thereby enhancing his role as a bystander and a voyeur. This will help you to create a movie that is playing outside the Jeffries window. In this "movie in the movie", the life of his neighbors became the theme of conspiracy.

Combination of Descartes Dualism and Mind and Body Abstract: Cartesian dualism and combination of thought and body are often understood as contradictory concepts. In the temporal interpretation, Descartes was believed to be the first dualist (in meditation) and later developed his position for body and mind (passion). Some authors did not find a solution to this problem. Nevertheless, over the past 20 years several explanations have been developed to actively solve the difficult relationship between Descartes dualism and the thought and body combination. Descartes' debate about the appearance raises one of the most mysterious questions in his dualistic philosophy: What is the union between the heart and the human body? Thus, Descartes 'dualism established an agenda for philosophical discussion of mind - and - body problems for many years after Descartes' death. Descartes is also a rationalist who believes in the power of natural thinking. Descartes shows the theory of congenital knowledge, and all humans are born through the higher power of God. It was this congenital knowledge theory that later philosopher John Rock (1632-1704) led the opposition to empiricism theory, arguing that all knowledge was obtained through experience. What is so dangerous? In order to find the answer, we need to look back over the "Father of modern philosophy" René Descartes during the 4th century. Together with him, we have created our modern concept of mind and body dualism (later called "Descartes dualism"), whose mind and body are seen as two different substances - spirit and matter - It was. Before Descartes, of course, this idea was supported by churches and other philosophers, but his role was to incorporate it into a prosperous scientific worldview. Regarding Descartes dualism, there are two other ways of viewing, but we believe that we are all natural today. The first is free will. Descartes wrote in his "passion of soul": "Will is inherently free and never limited," he said of all our decisions, our character and our behavior I believe that it comes from our hearts. From our soul. Therefore, we will ultimately bear ethical and other responsibilities for ourselves and our actions.

Laura Esquivel's Like Water for Chocolate is a dreamlike romantic depiction of Mexican girl Tita, but according to Mexican tradition it can not get married. Because she is the youngest girl in this family. His corrupted situation was only exacerbated by her castrated mother Mamaelena. When burning Pedro Masquez asked for marriage, Tita was the only one who was able to escape from her boring life. When Tita knew that Titata selfishly denied her Pedro, Titus felt discouraged, but this did not stop the passion shared by Tita and Pedro. Symbol of threat and instability in the life of Antoine Kosovo - fire is uncontrollable, all consumption and destructive danger. In the novel "The Great Sea of ​​Sargasso" written by Jean Rhys, fire is a popular symbol in the whole novel, in connection with the burning and burning life of Antoinette. Tovarnet is still extinguished and must fire. At the beginning of the novel, Krivri 's fire required Antwanet' s fear and instability. The relationship between Antoinette and Mr. Rochester motivated her to be further at risk and live her life. Finally, after finally feeling a sense of stability in her life, Antoinette made a fire that reconnected her to a previously defined symbol of her excitement and life threatening risk. Every scholar acknowledges the symbol of fire in the story, but I think there is little connection between fire and Antoinette's race and opposition. On the contrary, the fire symbolizes the lack of stability and the high risk of Antoinette's life. Mary Lou Emery, a literary researcher, discussed the instability of Antoinette and the dangers of her life, but she did not fully develop the subject and the relationship with the fire. By emphasizing the fire that happens in the large waters of Sargasso, you can see that the fire is related to dangerous and unstable events in the life of Antoinette. Fire at the beginning of the story killed Antoinette brothers, frenzied their mothers and fear that Antoinette is afraid of black and Jamaican people who hated her and her family. Through the rest of the story, Antoinette faces contradictions, dangers and volatility in his relationship with Mr. Rochester.

To fully understand the purpose of cold blood, when writing such a story you need to explore the strategy of Kapote. In his "cold blood", Capote proposed a possibility of reasonable order without fully recognizing it. And often revealed that random and accidental events formed the history of crime. As a result, we can not ascertain the exact cause of the event in the clutter house that followed the fate of the night, and empathize with two conflicting figures in the story, Perry Smith and Alvin Dewey I was forced to do it. In the cold blood of Capote, Truman Capote's "cold blood" is the story of Perry and Dick and the night of November 15, 1959. This investigative, fast-paced, direct documentary provides a commentary on the essence of violence in the United States and examines the details. Investigation that led to murder and killing of murderers, the trial and executions of four members of the clutter family. When I read Truman Capote 's novel "Cold Blood", I spent more of the "cold blood" of Truman Capote and offered a just reason for justice related to death. In this book, two criminals, Dick and Perry, killed the confusion. They were caught and tried, but the biggest punishment in Kansas is life imprisonment, most prisoners were paroleed 20 years later. He was sentenced to 20 years imprisonment for cruelly killing the four most influential families in the area and brought a huge hysteria to Holcomb and others. We remember that the cause of the death of the Chloet family due to the explosion of the shotgun is largely unrelated to the particular situation of the crime and has little to do with the result. Truman Capotte got off in the town and shed cold blood. Well, this is a book of fatal flaws. It will in turn inspire Capote and the adventures of Harper Lee, a popular praised movie, Capote. This weekend 's broadcast on Sundance TV. In a two - part documentary "cold blood: murderous family murder case", Joe Berliner and his brother - in - law, Bruce Sinofsky, co - supervised the case on homicide and paradise. Three young teenagers charged with murder charges and convicted focus on the Crout family and their terrible endings. A member of the Lauter family

knowledge. What is the reality? These are philosophical concepts that many famous philosophers have been paying attention for centuries. One of the philosophers who paid particular attention to this problem is Plato. To answer these questions, he writes the allegory of the allegory and "allegory of the cave" and compares the reality with the actual enlightenment. Plato uses ignorant darkness and accent lights to describe the real knowledge as a picture of a personal imagination that understands the real world. The fable of the cave is one of the most famous sentences in the history of Western philosophy. This is an excerpt from the beginning of Volume 7 of the "Republic" book. Plato tells the parable in the context of education, which concerns the nature of philosophy education that ultimately provides insight about the prospects of Plato's education. Socrates is the protagonist of the Republic and conveys the allegory of the cave to the Glaucon. Glaucon is one of Plato 's brothers. In the seventh book of the Republic, Socrates told Glaucon, imagining a group of prisoners who were detained together because they were children of the underground cave, and said he was his opponent. Their hands, feet and neck are tight enough to move. You can see the back wall of the cave in front of their eyes. Socrates said: Analyzing and summarizing Plato's "Fable of the Cave" - ​​Plato's "Fable of the Cave" represents an expanded metaphor, which is in sharp contrast to the way you perceive and believe the reality. The argument behind his allegory is the basic view we perceive and is an imperfect "view" of the final form that represents truth and reality. In his story, Plato built a cave in which the prisoner was bound and forced to see the front wall of the cave. In Rhetorical analysis: The fable of the cave I used to analyze rhetoric is Plato's "Fable of the Cave". In this article, Plato conveys a fable to us and explains his view on the state of human knowledge. In his allegory, Plato said several prisoners are sitting in a small walled cave facing a large wall. The only thing they can do is to see the walls in front of them, they can not move the neck or the conclusion about the cave fables. However, this movie has a relationship with Plato 's ontology and phenomenon so it is difficult to distinguish between understandable areas and easy to understand areas. Plato's beliefs are interpreted and modernized in the film, proving that Plato's four truths are embodied in the conclusion of his cave fables. Pleasantville helps viewers understand Plato's conclusion from cave fables

Oscar Wilde's novel "Portrait of Durian Gray" depicts the dual life dichotomy led by Durian Gray, the contrast between portrait and Dorian is a general struggle between sin and morale Embodies and the social moral compass 2 Dorian 's contrasting lifestyle development inevitably affects the fatal worsening of his soul and soul 4 Oscar Wilde is one of Dorian Gray' s two in his novel We exaggerated the influence of heavy life. The result of dual living is consistent with the result of social oppression. Dorian Gray's picture finally conveys the decline caused by the limits of the soul and turns people into d In Dorian Gray's conscience, Oscar Wilde's "portrait of Dorian Gray", many of the criticisms of Oscar Wilde's "Portrait of Dorian Gray" are Dorian Gray and his own portrait Including relationship (Rabbies 392). Some people may think that portraits represent the characteristics of Dorian Gray, but this is only a superficial analysis of the role of the novel and Dorian. Oscar Wilde's novel "Portrait of Durian Gray" depicts the dual life dichotomy led by Durian Gray, the contrast between portrait and Dorian is a general struggle between sin and morale Embodies and the social moral compass 2 Dorian 's contrasting lifestyle development inevitably affects the fatal worsening of his soul and soul 4 Oscar Wilde is one of Dorian Gray' s two in his novel We exaggerated the influence of heavy life. The result of dual living is consistent with the result of social oppression. Dorian Gray's picture finally conveys the decline caused by the limits of the soul and turns people into d Oscar Wilde's novel "Portrait of Durian Gray" depicts the dual life dichotomy led by Durian Gray, the contrast between portrait and Dorian is a general struggle between sin and morale Embodies and the social moral compass 2 Dorian 's contrasting lifestyle development inevitably affects the fatal worsening of his soul and soul 4 Oscar Wilde is one of Dorian Gray' s two in his novel We exaggerated the influence of heavy life. The result of dual living is consistent with the result of social oppression. Dorian Gray's picture finally conveys the decline caused by the limits of the soul and turns people into d Oscar Wilde's novel "Portrait of Durian Gray" depicts the dual life dichotomy led by Durian Gray, the contrast between portrait and Dorian is a general struggle between sin and morale Embodies and the social moral compass 2 Dorian 's contrasting lifestyle development inevitably affects the fatal worsening of his soul and soul 4 Oscar Wilde is one of Dorian Gray' s two in his novel We exaggerated the influence of heavy life. The result of dual living is consistent with the result of social oppression. Dorian Gray's picture finally conveys the decline caused by the limits of the soul and turns people into d

"He turned around and we, the two strangers on the ship are facing each other with the same attitude." (9) The secret shares of Joseph Conrad's story in his new ship Captain, narrator and hero I feel isolated solitude with the crew. He had a wonderful visitor and found that he was a fugitive of the Leggett's Sefra ship. Leggett and the captain immediately kept in touch from the first meeting on the ship. As the captain felt that he had the same human experience as the reggette, he signed an alliance with the legget. Joseph Conrad's "secret co-owner" "To live and understand what is going around, people have to understand and understand what is happening inside." Captain I discovered that I did not understand myself as I thought. Until the discarded legat arrived, the captain finally reached the level of self-understanding and completion. Leggatt has played the praise of the captain, and his actions and ideas ultimately help the captain understand himself and create stronger characters. The secret sharers of Joseph Conrad raised many themes in the thought detailed through their complex stories and novels. Among all the presented themes, one theme was thoroughly endorsed by Conrad's secret sharer. The theme of support is that we can change our moral and moral beliefs because of lack of experience or confidence as a leader. Initially, the captain was an upright compliant person, but thanks to the dialogue between the murderer and Legtagt, there were many people who were safe and easy to extend, and we were able to make a very illogical decision. In Joseph Conrad 's short story "Shared Secret", the ship' s captain became a secret. At night, a murderer called Legtagt slid down the ship and the captain decided to hide him in his cabin without knowing the reason. In order to save the man and protect his deceit, the captain almost landed, as he brought the captain close to the coast and infiltrated the water to let the murderer escape. "I want to know how faithful to the ideal concept that everyone creates their own personality for their own secrets." But he seems to happen to awaken individual demons It seems. I got hurt. "That night, I seemed to be facing my idea in the depths of a dark and huge mirror."

Since humans invented the gift of gratitude, we have tried to discover who we are. After all, this is one of the crucial functions that makes us humans. When an animal looks inside the mirror, it looks as a separate member of that kind, rather than as an individual. We are different, we see ourselves in the mirror and have all our faults, anxiety, doubts. Nevertheless, we have achieved and succeeded, as humans mean we have infinite creativity. Charles Taylor, "Self Source: Formation of Contemporary Identity" (Cambridge, Massachusetts State, 1989), 187-188 argues that natural science can not resolve the "unavoidable framework". Taylor believes that the most radical dualism is good / evil and the emergence of humans needs to form identity. Taylor moved the dualism of subjectivity and purpose to modernization, but he also seems to incorporate his metaphysics into the historical assumption about the identity and the childhood born from this dualism. Historical relationships between Taylor's liberal ideal as a transcendental and the contemporary childhood born or agreed at Holly Brewer: Children, Law and the British and American Power Revolution (Chapel Hill, 2005) Charles Taylor Charles Edward Taylor, his full name was born in 1868, located in Decatur, Illinois. About 1892 Charles met a woman named Henrietta (Eta) Webert. In Henrietta there is an uncle called Charles Webbart who owns the building and later the Wright brothers will rent home from Henrietta's house. At this point, Charles Taylor began researching farm machinery, small engines, bicycles. All of these small details in Charles' life will make him the first AMT. Jewel - Howard Taylor is a former wife of former General Liberian Charles Ghankay Taylor. After his disqualification, Mr. Taylor agreed with his supporters: "God does it, I will return." Is this the moment Charles Taylor speaks? Has his ex-wife Jewel never lose his surname, will he hold the power behind the victory of George Wear to protect him? Who will judge Mrs. Taylor's intentions? But sane liberians are afraid and want to know Wear, and his vice president has also chosen a plan.

Knowing the spirit of others will know what is going on in the hearts of others. I am not going to say that it is possible to know what others' ideas are, but I say you can get a good idea of ​​their ideas. I do not think anyone can know what other people's idea is, and they are in love with some sort of electronic device that can output what that person is doing in their heart Do not allow to fall into. So, this is the only way that I think is the only way that others can tell others what they are thinking. Author Nicholas Epley explains our ability to distinguish what other people think about us in his work Mindwise as follows. "Not only to read and guess, but to ask and to hear" Instead of drawing inaccurate pictures in our head, other senses to learn more about other people. Author Michael Gazzaniga explains how to build identity in "Who's Supervisor - free will and brain science". A story to explain your behavior. As it can contain, it negates or streamlines the rest. " To counter the dualism, we use how we can understand other ideas. If the mind can not be observed publicly, then the existence of our own external thinking must be inferred from the behavior of other people or organisms. However, the reliability of this inference is very suspicious. Because we only know that a particular mental state leads to our own distinctive behavior. From inferring a single example and deducing the whole population, our own situation is to promote the weakest introduction. Therefore, if dualism is true, we can not know that other people have any ideas at all. But common sense tells us that other people have ideas. Since common sense can be trusted, dualism is wrong This ability that is attracted to others' ideas is also widely available in the form of people we love and friends. But we often think of people closest to us. There is a tendency to think that we know about all of them, and our curiosity is usually left to strangers and gossip. But when we are truly interested in our relationship, we find that we touch the surface with the many people we care. I found this to be a regular pattern with my many friends. Just by presenting the questions at the right time, interesting stories and opinions that had been hidden from me before come out.

Goodwill and evil religious beliefs are usually associated with God's thoughts. Evil is usually associated with devil's thought. Since childhood Christian has been taught as a general course for children's activities such as Sunday school and prayer club such as the concept of good and evil and the theme of God on the theme of God. Christian believes that God created the universe, and I believe this means that the world was created with the intent of good. "God placed them in the sky heaven, lighted them on the ground, dominated day and night, and separated light from the dark. Why or who is responsible for it in the world? How can we harmonize the good faith of God with the existence of evil? Even without theological grounds, even from a secular point of view, evil constitutes a problem of understandability of the world. In this course, ancient and medieval thinking provides a historical analysis of the various ways related to these problems and their solutions. We started the investigation from the Hebrew Biblical monism and then looked at the changes brought about by the Persian culture and the Helenaization of the Mediterranean basin after Alexander's process of conquering dualism. Dualism is a theoretical system or ideology system that recognizes two independent, mutually unintelligible principles, sometimes complementary and sometimes contradictory. At the same time, we believe that the rationalization of "we" is a matter of evil against "others" or religious intolerance. Christian religious dualism between good and evil is not perfect dualism. Because God (good) inevitably destroys Satan (evil). Early Christian dualism was primarily based on Plato's binaryism (see New Platonism and Christianity). Based on the concept of non-material Christian soul, there is a soul-physical distinction. Both atheism and dualism mean faith in two equally powerful gods with complementary or antisense properties, but atheism means harmony, but atheism is good and evil, brightness and darkness Such as competition and mean opposite. Or summer and winter. For example, the semiotropic system is a god of creativity and others are destructive (see theodicy). For example, in the original concept of Zoroastrianism, Ahura Mazda is the ultimate spirit and Ahriman (Angra Mainyu) is the ultimate evil spirit. Among the many themes that reflect evil through religion, evil is only good poverty, without evil there is no evil, evil is a necessary means to get evil, without evil it is a universe Evil in Better is better It is better and this evil is due to the free will of mankind and God sometimes like good things sometimes in bad things in their free choice to humans . Philosophers also explore the origin and essence of evil. The questions they are studying include when people can consciously and deliberately make evil, and when they can properly control individual responsibility for malicious acts. Many ancient philosophers speculated that evil is fantasy, alienation, alienation, or isolation from God.

Descartes 'discussion on separable works quotes the missing traitor, Descartes' argument about dualism, that his contemplation of the first philosophy summarizes his ideological theory and its theory, the history of Western thought Pioneering work at the world Relationship with other regions The main argument through meditation raised his universal doubt method through his famous Cogito, and dualism, evidence of God and the world about it. Descartes dualism is one of the most influential thoughts born from work; however, the style of meditation is a personal reflection that allows Descartes to follow the flow of consciousness and discuss slight tangents. Descartes skepticism - Descartes skepticism - Descartes skepticism - Descartes skepticism - Descartes skepticism - Descartes skepticism - Descartes skepticism - Descartes skeptical argument - Descartes skeptical argument - Descartes Skeptical argument - Descartes skeptical argument - Descartes skeptical argument - Descartes skeptical argument In this article, I will study René Descartes' suspicion and reaction to Britain. Bouwsma and Norman Malcolm Bouwsma and Malcolm argued against criticism of certain parts of Descartes' claim, but I will prove that this is not enough to refute the whole. In order to understand Descartes' argument and sometimes radical view, we need at least a general understanding of the motivation for discussion. The 17th century was an era of advancement of science, the prosperous scientific community was interested in establishing consistent standards to define what science is. Their science is based on a combination of experience and experience, and ideally there is no prejudice to contaminate the results. However, Descartes believes that the sensation is unreliable and science based only on sensory information is uncertain.

The method used in this paper is dualism. In theory, in my opinion, dualism seems to work at cognitive level. It includes the value orientation of human subjective world and therefore world orientation. In order to define the position and personal relationships and desires of things in the world, we have to rely on dualism to study the world. Coming to literature, I will explain the (historical) facts and fictional binomial terms. Here we are trying to analyze the direction of binary values ​​by applying binary method in Arundhati Roy novel The God of Little Things. I am not a very fast reader. In the last year of high school I spent about a month to complete God's trivial thing. While I was actually completing the book, I had to repeat these chapters frequently. I am very busy, but it is important to read back the lines I have already read. The novel that won the Booker Prize is actually a victory for writing. Small things - big things - devil unrealistic things, genuine things. Writing is unrealistic, its role is not true. However, real life depends greatly on these novels. Not all emotions lead to good reading, not all emotions are connected. As good readings come out, we tend to rely on them freely. My husband had a very old book called "Little Things God" during his college days. I tried to read it once, but it was late, and not my type; but the title of the book was with me for many years. I think that he will show his grace through small things if there is a god. To forget the miracle is like waiting for a lover you have never seen before, and it has hundreds of roses on your birthday. If you have a god, even in the darkest time of day you will see his presence many times during the day. Again, I am not a religion. This is comprehensive. There is absolutely nothing in heaven to do contrary to his will, so everything in your life is important to him. Even trivial things often happen to forget to think about the will of God - it is too small to ask God for help as soon as possible. We need to realize that God may have a desire for all these things. When I asked God for something, I remember being so rebellious. I thought that I am too selfish and even thought that God does not care about it, but the truth is that he did it! He care about every part of your life, from small to big. He wants to know because he made you, he loves you! For a while, I was trying to pray for interpersonal relationship. As a strong, independent single woman, I think that weakness in praying for this field in my life is a weakness. My opinion is that the relationship of pray shows that I am not satisfied with my bachelor. In fact, this is just a pride. I think that I am strong if I can prove to myself that I can hard work my life without thinking about being with someone. But the truth is that God considers God to wish for marriage in my heart. He wants me to be open to it and be vulnerable to him. In order to do this, I need to make spiritual pride

Further research on the perception of pain related to psychosomatic problems supports the idea that people can control pain. What is not fully studied is the concept that pain is mediated by the brain, the mind, or both. We all know that pain is an instinctive "feel" if you want, and it is necessary for the survival of all creatures. Without pain, it will not be recognized and will not deteriorate to the extent of death. Pain is a necessary protection mechanism for survival. Physical and mental problems in philosophy are studies on how the human mind and the human body are related. There are two general strategies to explain their relationship. First of all, the dualism of the mind and the body thinks that humans have both a spirit of consciousness - a mind and an unconscious body. Secondly, physical and material materialism considers human conscious thinking is a product of brain activity, not more than that. First, I think about the mind and body dualism. When a woman named Rebecca was injured in a car accident and a nursing staff boarded an ambulance, she had near death experience. As she reported later, she felt her conscious thought leaving her body and then slowly rising. From that place, she can look down at her body and caregiver move her to the stretcher. Then her idea began to rise increasingly and moved toward a bright light. The experience of Rebecca's death is a vivid way to express dualism of the mind and body. In our normal life, our body and mind are interrelated and coordinated. After death, the two parted. Our bodies died and our spiritual thoughts moved to another area. As I saw earlier, one of the important assets of dualism is that it can explain the afterlife. As a human being, we will unite our body and our mind. When our heart leaves work, our bodies can not work. When our body is not allowed to allow the conditions necessary for natural behavior, we can not resolve the issue properly and participate in economic creation. Therefore we can only succeed if we are allowed to work as a perfect human being. To be disharmed means to throw away the body for the mind and body, but in any case, when this discordance arises, obvious problems are caused by mind, body, or body and body health happen. Tell us the deeper level of our existence: soul and spirit. More importantly, if the entire species is in discordance, the result can be catastrophic. For this reason, this book explores in detail the nature of this discrepancy and how it can be used to achieve harmonization and recovery of harmony between mankind and the world. Otherwise, each one of us can be freed from authoritarian socialist oligopoly and other master and slave models.

Exploring the various theories concerning mind and body problems I will try to do this by first judging what kind of ideas and bodies are talking about physical and mental problems. Third, we explain the existing method of discussing the problem, and finally the advantages and disadvantages of that method. The body is the body we think that we are related to sensation. It usually includes arms, feet and head. Thoughts are responsible for their thoughts and emotions, and there is reasonable ability. However, if we say that the mind and body are two different, independent ones, we are not superior to machines and robots. The idea of ​​Cartesian theory forms a physical and mental problem. So what is the physical and mental problem? The problem is how the body and the mind are related to each other. According to Descartes' philosophy, the mind is a kind of thought and the body is an extension. These two are somewhat correlated. In order to answer this question, Descartes formed a philosophical theory called dualism. According to the dualism of Descartes, the body and the mind are interdependent. The body needs a mind to respond to them and tell them what to do, the mind needs a body as a purpose to express our thoughts. But, if we say that we are connected to each other, where is the connection between the mind and the body? There must be some relationship between the mind and the body. I think that certain things affect our body and vice versa. In the dualism philosophy of the mind and body, the mind and body are theories of all kinds of matter and nature. This position means that thinking and body have different meanings, but also different types of entities. Therefore, binaryists identify the brain and oppose the theory considered as a physical mechanism. The contemporary problem of the relationship between the mind and the body comes from the philosopher and mathematician René Descartes' thought of the 17th century and gives a classic expression of dualism. Starting with the sum of his famous Cogito, ergo (Latin: "I think so, so I am"), Descartes developed the mind theory as a non-material, nonexpandable substance. Activities such as rational thought, imagination, emotion, motivation

The theme of the mind and how to know it is from the beginning. This is one of the questions that is likely to be unanswered. I learn it every day because the heart itself is so confused. One question raised by Descartes was "How do we know"? We are thinking about this problem today as well. We will ask it almost everyday, probably not in that way, but in some form. To be honest, how do you know? When Descartes began studying his idea, he would condemn all his earlier ideas and start something new. The dualism of Descartes' mind and matter means the concept of humanity. According to Descartes, humans are a complex existence of thought and body. Descartes prioritizes the mind and thinks that the mind can exist without the body but the body can not exist without the mind. In meditation, Descartes believes that although the mind is a substance, the body consists only of "accidents". However, he believes that the mind and body are closely related. Nature tells me through pain, hunger, thirst, etc. Together, I will form a unit with the body. I will not feel pain even if my body is hurt, but I will only be perceived by intelligence just as a crew sees something broken on his ship. Dualism is closely related to the idea of ​​René Descartes (1641) who believes that thought is not important, it is not spatial. Descartes clearly distinguishes consciousness and self-recognition and distinguishes it from the brain as intelligence. Therefore, he was the first person who developed physical and mental problems in the form of today's existence. Dualism is totally in contrast to various one-sidedism. Material dualism is in contrast to all forms of materialism, but material dualism can in some sense be regarded as a form of emerging materialistic or non-reducing physicalism. Rene de Carte is one of the modern philosophers who have dealt dualism widely. For Descartes, the body and the mind are different substances, and the non-physical mind has something to do with the body. Material dualism dominates Descartes' dualism. He says, "The dualism of matter is accompanied by the idea that a person's identity is formed over time by the identity of a substance, and in a version that supports the doctrine of life after death, it is this substance. Survival is often It is called "soul" and may involve a specific memory and psychological continuity that constitutes the existence of human beings. Thoughts and bodies are unique substances closely related to living people. In a nutshell, it is beyond time and space.

Other thoughts Bertrand Russell expressed a belief in understanding other ideas in an article centered on the concept analogous to "analog", "analog". His idea is that "We believe that other people's thoughts and emotions are similar to the quality of ourselves.We know only the time and space structure of friends' minds or their abilities "Russell 89" Russell talked about inner consciousness, such as being able to observe memory from our own thought, feeling happiness, feeling pain, and so on. We often considers other ideas as objective in the world, but other ideas also exist in our own mind. We often create mental models of others' personality, thoughts, and emotions. When you are certain that your spouse prefers Christmas gifts, you may consider how their image responds to each gift, thinking about their spiritual image. The important thing is that even though it does not exist, you can simulate others' thoughts. You can stay in the restaurant, and - with your mind to perceive - your long-term dissolution with your ex boyfriend definitely knows it dislikes it. You can also simulate the soul you passed away, especially if your heart leaves a very clear impression on your own mind. To counter the dualism, we use how we can understand other ideas. If the mind can not be observed publicly, then the existence of our own external thinking must be inferred from the behavior of other people or organisms. However, the reliability of this inference is very suspicious. Because we only know that a particular mental state leads to our own distinctive behavior. From inferring a single example and deducing the whole population, our own situation is to promote the weakest introduction. Therefore, if dualism is true, we can not know that other people have any ideas at all. But common sense tells us that other people have ideas. Since common sense can be trusted, dualism is wrong Author Nicholas Epley explains, in his work Mindwise, our ability to distinguish what other people think about us as follows. Instead of drawing inaccurate pictures in our head, other senses to learn more about other people. Author Michael Gazzaniga explains how to build identity in "Who's Supervisor - free will and brain science". A story to explain your behavior. As it can contain, it negates or streamlines the rest. "

Descartes' view on the subject of spiritual philosophy Descartes made some remarkable contributions to the philosophy of the mind. The purpose of this article is to discuss these contributions. Descartes is known for its fanatical dualism. This is an opinion that the mind and body are independent of each other, and it is understood that to some extent it is a causal relationship. Descartes is no exception, I believe that the body and spirit are two completely different substances. An important development of Cogito is the foundation of branch of philosophy, philosophy of mind. Cogito places Descartes in a position of dualism of mind and body. Descartes has drawn a simple entity consisting of two worlds, although the body can be understood, but the mind does not understand. Things that contain things and substances are space and time, and some ideas are pure thoughts rather than material. Composition This position affects Gilbert Ryle and P. F. Stephen opposed this view in the 20th century What is so dangerous? In order to find the answer, we need to look back over the "Father of modern philosophy" René Descartes during the 4th century. Together with him, we have created our modern concept of mind and body dualism (later called "Descartes dualism"), whose mind and body are seen as two different substances - spirit and matter - It was. Before Descartes, of course, this idea was supported by churches and other philosophers, but his role was to incorporate it into a prosperous scientific worldview. Regarding Descartes dualism, there are two other ways of viewing, but we believe that we are all natural today. The first is free will. Descartes wrote in his "passion of soul": "Will is inherently free and never limited," he said of all our decisions, our character and our behavior I believe that it comes from our hearts. From our soul. Therefore, we will ultimately bear ethical and other responsibilities for ourselves and our actions. Even in studies of mind philosophy, cognitive science, neuroscience, etc., we use Descartes' heart and body dualism as a foil. This usage is rooted in the criticism advocated by Princess Bohemian Elizabeth (1618 - 1680). She believes that when Descartes considers the real distinction between physique and body, they believe that causal interaction is impossible. After all, causal interaction can be achieved through contact; things like the body touch each other through their surface. But unless they spread, the heart can not have a surface, so the body can not touch the heart, and vice versa.

In his short story "Me and my chimney", Herman Melville tried to keep his old chimney, and he admitted that it was a chimney. He considers "this chimney is a magnificent VIP" (Melville), but since I was thinking that it was a burden and constantly complaining about excluding it as much as possible, I will keep it In particular we objected. I can see that the narrator has spent a lot of time trying to explain the importance of the chimney for him and his wife's plan to drive away the chimney. With respect to the Christian world view, discussion of dualism is excellent in many respects. For beginners, we believe that the belief that God exists and interacts with our world is consistent with double arguments in material and spiritual areas. Materialism does not allow this belief. Dualism also provides a space for the concept of life after death. The interaction between material and spiritual areas in dualism means that your part can survive your physical death and collapse (Cowan 156). There is also biblical evidence of dualism. In the book of Matthew Christ, warn his disciples not to be afraid of those who can kill our bodies, but to destroy our physical and spiritual people. Dualism thinks that human beings are composed of substance or substance (body) and spiritual substance (soul). But where is the soul of the field of dualism? The soul in the body, or the body in the soul? How do two different substances relate and interact with each other? Materialism believes that only matter exists - it is not important. Thus, if non-physical or mental thinking can not affect the body (because the body has no mind), the mental entity or God does not affect the material world. There is no way to explain how the physical world and the world are like gods, or whether they are gods with spiritual beings or entities. Traditional Descartes dualists believe that the world divides the world into two categories: substances and non-substances. These materials include everything we encounter and interact day by day, including our body, and non-materials include all our thoughts, emotions, what we call ourselves included. In a nutshell, the mind comes from the complex biological and physical characteristics we make. But from this point of view, we need to be cautious about the labels of the mind. Non-reducing physicists avoid using the term urgent as they may be confused with ways to assert that the term urgent is urgent

"Mind - body difference" We usually consider the brain and body to be physical. When thinking, it may be better to understand and understand the mind. When thinking, the mind is purely composed of thinking and the body is expansion. The mind tells the body what to do. The mind is a psychological entity, the brain itself is the body. I can not imagine the brain, but the difference between the brain and the brain is which is spiritual and the other is physical. Both the body and mind are like foundations. Dualism assumes that there are two ontological different entities, the mind and the body. This distinction may come from the fact that the body and the mind are composed of different substances (substance duality) or the same substance, but the function is different (functional duality). The double concept can be traced back to Zoroastrianism around 1000 BC, which is also a great part of Buddhist philosophy as well as modern religious beliefs. Mind and body dualism represents a metaphysical position that the mind and body are two different substances and each has a different nature. The famous version of an ancient origin, dualism comes from René Descartes of the 17th century. According to him, humans are made up of two completely different substances that can not be unified. The mind is not taken into consideration, it is a material that is not material but is a thought substance and the body is an expanded material but unthinkable substance. The body is bound by mechanical law, but the mind is not (Descartes, 1952). Therefore, as Lyle (1949) states, "One person ... live through two mortgages, one happens inside the body and the other happens in my mind. Things ... the events of the first history are events of the material world and the second events are the events of the psychological world "(p 11 - 12) The problem of mind and body is a philosophical question about the relationship between thinking and consciousness in human thinking and the relationship of the brain as part of the body. This problem is based on an interactiveist on the relationship between the mind and the body, so it is different from the psychological and physical effects of the body in chemistry and physiology. Based on the assumption that the mind and body are fundamentally different fundamentally, this problem occurs when the mind and body are considered different.

The first premise to deal with this type of brain search is to determine what, if any, differences exist in a well-behaved individual's brain. The actual classification of "double-occupied" seemed to be completely eliminated, and the interpretation of the term "dominant hand" became increasingly confusing. In addition to superstition and mysticism, in their earliest history personal preferences of the left hand or right hand proved clinicians using this chiral clue primarily as an indicator of the brain's lateralization (2) . Different networks deal with ideas and brains, as different networks handle vision and sound of the same object. In both cases, the difference is that there is a direct difference in psychological reality, not a difference that essentially reflects the necessary distinction. Just like thoughts and brains, visual experience and sound experience are fundamentally different. And since it is an unintelligible fantasy, understanding it does not change the way they experience so far. The last sentence may wonder if you read nothing about the mental illusion. Do not be afraid! It is very important to know that our dualism is just an illusion. The laboratory of Thomas Mussweiler recently conducted a study to show that those who strongly believe dualism are not healthy. why? Dualists believe that their body is just a shell that is far more important than the heart. At first, philosophers thought thought and brain were separate. It is called dualism. The theory of dualism thinks thinking and brain are composed of different substances. The brain is material, the brain is not important, or it is irrelevant to the physical world. However, when scientists started studying the brain in the early 19th century, there was a monism. This theory thinks thought and brain are one thing. In the past, philosophers knew little about how the brain works, or its behavior. However, some early scientists began to make important discoveries about monism. Their experiments show that the physical process is very important for understanding behavior.

The philosophical theory of dualism thinks thinking and body are two separate entities. Dualism assumes that two "substances" interact, but that contrasts with physicalism by rejecting the correlation between body and mind as proof of identity. Comparing these two theories, the perfect evidence of dualism about the existence of qualia escaped the claim of physicalism. The common theory of non-physical attributes defined in Jackson's knowledge theory is aimed at imperfections of phenomenology, but this description is not fatal to dualisticism because it can not comply with philosophy including the theory of causality . I imagined. zombie This thought experiment was proposed to explain the difference between "physical knowledge" and "non-physical knowledge" originally obtained by research by Mary in the 1982 paper "Epiphenomenal Qualia" by philosopher Frank Jackson It was. She gets it when she goes out. Therefore, the discussion is usually this, neuroscientific description of the brain is an inappropriate description of consciousness. There are many objections. Laurence Nemirow argues that after seeing the color, he gained practical knowledge on how to imagine the color. Neuroscientist Rama Chadlin thinks that Mary is trapped in a gray room and will not be able to see the color when going out but it will be a blind body. Since it is impossible to remove colors from the laboratory, others such as Evan Thompson have questioned the validity of the experiment. Whether it is of physical nature depends on the definition of the term "physical". In cases where physical function causes disease but does not affect function, in that case quality is "physical" in the sense of a physical event, but it is non-physical in the sense that it is isolated from other physical events Can be considered. Philosophically, they violate the principle of termination of causality. However, based on discussions such as methodological naturalism, there is another definition of physicalism that all things that can be studied using natural scientific methods are physical (see Stoljar 2001). Therefore, the qualifications of vassals may not be materialistic, but they may be covered by physiism; they are, as events related to material events, they are the functions to which they are given Waiting for how to be guided from.

Knowing the spirit of others will know what is going on in the hearts of others. I am not going to say that it is possible to know what others' ideas are, but I say you can get a good idea of ​​their ideas. I do not think anyone can know what other people's idea is, and they are in love with some sort of electronic device that can output what that person is doing in their heart Do not allow to fall into. So, this is the only way that I think is the only way that others can tell others what they are thinking. Author Nicholas Epley explains our ability to distinguish what other people think about us in his work Mindwise as follows. "Not only to read and guess, but to ask and to hear" Instead of drawing inaccurate pictures in our head, other senses to learn more about other people. Author Michael Gazzaniga explains how to build identity in "Who's Supervisor - free will and brain science". A story to explain your behavior. As it can contain, it negates or streamlines the rest. " To counter the dualism, we use how we can understand other ideas. If the mind can not be observed publicly, then the existence of our own external thinking must be inferred from the behavior of other people or organisms. However, the reliability of this inference is very suspicious. Because we only know that a particular mental state leads to our own distinctive behavior. From inferring a single example and deducing the whole population, our own situation is to promote the weakest introduction. Therefore, if dualism is true, we can not know that other people have any ideas at all. But common sense tells us that other people have ideas. Since common sense can be trusted, dualism is wrong This ability that is attracted to others' ideas is also widely available in the form of people we love and friends. But we often think of people closest to us. There is a tendency to think that we know about all of them, and our curiosity is usually left to strangers and gossip. But when we are truly interested in our relationship, we find that we touch the surface with the many people we care. I found this to be a regular pattern with my many friends. Just by presenting the questions at the right time, interesting stories and opinions that had been hidden from me before come out.

The pain corresponding to Mind Brain identity theory is, for example, the release of c-fibers in the central nervous system, or perhaps fibers; I think that broccoli merely kills you to make a human B (bk) - fiber Black well companion to philosophy, such as photography that believes: Chapter 5 William G. Lycan's "psychology of mind" As its name implies, the theory or doctrine of mind and brain identity is the idea and the brain Consciousness and problem) of dualism. material Psychological identity theory thinks that the state and process of the mind is the same as the state and process of the brain. Strictly speaking, you do not have to think that your heart is exactly the same as your brain. In idioms we used exchangeable words "she has a good heart" and "she has a good brain", but 'her weight is 50 ounces' I can not say. Here we recognize thinking and the process of recognition of the brain, and the state of the mind and brain. Let's think about the painful experience of watching something or having a psychological image. Psychological identity theory thinks that these experiences are only brain processes, not just brain processes. Mind knows where the mind is, and in addition to the brain it has its own unique identity. The brain is a material habitat of the mind, but the idea of ​​living and living in the house is not important. If we can compare the brain with the computer, the brain can be regarded as its operator. A clever idea is born when the heart manipulates the computer's brain. Even though the brains of the two substances are 100%, the ideas generated by them are not the same if different ideas act on them. Most dualists believe that the soul is the same as the mind, but it differs from the brain and its function. In dualismists, we believe that the brain is a new attribute of the brain: it depends on the brain, but it is not the same as the brain and its process. This position is often referred to as "property dualism", but here we are interested in material dualism, that is, the theory that the mind is an independent matter (not just another property), so it is physically There may be death (Swinburn, 1997)

Physical and psychological problems are philosophical questions about thought and consciousness in human thinking and the relationship with the brain as part of the body. It is very different from how the body and the body work in chemistry and physiology, as this problem is based on interactionist on the body and mind. This problem occurs when the mind and body are regarded as unique, based on the assumption that the mind and body are fundamentally different fundamentally. Understanding the relationship between the brain and thinking - thought - the physical problem is one of the central problems in the history of philosophy - is a challenging issue in both philosophy and science. There are three major philosophical schools of thinking about answers: dualism, materialism, and idealism. Dualism thinks that the mind is independent of the existence of the brain, materialism thinks psychological phenomena are consistent with neuro phenomena, idealism thinks that only psychological phenomena exist At first, philosophers thought thought and brain were separate. It is called dualism. The theory of dualism thinks thinking and brain are composed of different substances. The brain is material, the brain is not important, or it is irrelevant to the physical world. However, when scientists started studying the brain in the early 19th century, there was a monism. This theory thinks thinking and brain are one thing. In the past, philosophers knew little about how the brain works, or its behavior. However, some early scientists began to make important discoveries about monism. Their experiments show that the physical process is very important for understanding behavior.

INTRODUCTION Descartes' first philosophy's contemplation is aimed at establishing absolute certainty and "something in a stable, perhaps sustainable science" (meditation I.18). Descartes tried to destroy all his old beliefs and to restructure his foundation from the beginning. He used a series of exaggerated doubts and returned to establish the certainty of all his clear and unique thoughts after denying all the preconceptions he considered ordinary. At first glance, Descartes' philosophical debate seems to be very logical and reliable. The inherent periodicity of Cartesian reasoning is revealed by Arnauld whose objection is called the Cartesian circle. Descartes believes Descartes is based on the fact that Descartes has a clear and definite view of God, but the credibility of the Descartes' clear and unique view is that the fact that God exists rather than a cheater Guaranteed by. Therefore, in order to show the existence of God, Descartes must assume that God exists. Descartes' overall goal is to help humans master and possess nature. He provided an understanding of the tree of the world knowledge trees, flexor optics, meteorology and geometry and established its metaphysical basis in meditation. Then he spent the rest of his life in the field of mechanics, medicine and ethics. Dynamics is the foundation of his physiology and medicine, and this is the basis of his moral psychology. We can track the great importance and influence of Descartes on the development of mind and body dualism and modern skepticism, but he provides many other species for discussion. Descartes, the discussion of wax, the idea of ​​Descartes, the theory of body and perception are important arguments. But he proved that the evidence of the existence of God is not ingenious and not so successful. Descartes is an attractive research topic because you can see the view of the modern world born from his writings. Abstract: Cartesian dualism and combination of thinking and body are often understood as contradictory concepts. In the temporal interpretation, Descartes was believed to be the first dualist (in meditation) and later developed his position for body and mind (passion). Some authors did not find a solution to this problem. Nevertheless, over the past 20 years several explanations have been developed to actively solve the difficult relationship between Descartes dualism and the thought and body combination. The problem I found in most of these problems is to inconsistently describe his concepts of Descartes dualism and union and interaction, by them "weakening" or by "more flexibly" dualism It is trying to do. I developed a synchronous interpretation based on textual evidence to show that dualism and trade unions appear simultaneously in Descartes' work.

Philosophy of the heart can dissect the brain and try to elucidate what is going on inside. That is what Philopher is about to do today. Why do I have to dissect the brain? This question is based on the simple fact that Philophers wants to know why what happens in the human brain. You can return to knowing and believe something. We also learn emotions by expression of facial expressions. Reading your face is a difficult task. Philosophy of the heart is a field of philosophy to study the essence of the mind. Although other problems such as difficulty of consciousness and the nature of a particular state of mind are solved, the problem of mind and body is a paradigm in the philosophy of the mind. The spiritual aspects of this research include psychological events, psychological functions, psychological attributes, consciousness, the existence theory of mind, the essence of thinking, the relationship between the mind and the body. Dualism and monism are two central ideas about mind and body, and although there are minor differences, they are not perfectly suited to either one. Dualism is present in both the East and the West tradition (Hindu philosophy and Plato's Sankhya and yoga school), but its entry into the Western philosophy is due to the 17th century René Descartes I believe dualism of interactionism or interactionism is a theory in the philosophy of the mind and that matter and mind are two different independent substances that produce causal effects on each other. It is dualistic and traditionally material dualism, but sometimes it sometimes is it property dualism. Interactionism was proposed by French rationalism philosopher Rene Descartes (1596-1650) and continues to be associated with him. Descartes believes that the body is material and characterized by a spatial extent rather than thought and emotion. However, he insists that the two interact, suggesting that this interaction occurs in the pineal gland of the brain.

Nicholas Malebranche Nicholas Malebranche is a theologian and philosopher of the 17th century. He is very influential on the two aspects of the philosophical history. The first is that we see everything through God. The second one is his accident. His concern is how our thinking gets a perceptual image of external objects. His final answer is that God includes all external targets, as God has planted these ideas into our thoughts and at the right time. Therefore, we see the external objects and images seen from God. In the history of philosophy there are at least two answers to this question. Nicholas Malebranche invented an unexpected situation, which is why God is alone in all events. Therefore, God 's involvement allows past events to cause future events. Therefore, past and future events are related as God makes it show this way. However, the unexpected situation has been criticized by the poor God's achievement and its power. In contrast, Gottfried Leibniz devised a pre-established harmony theory to explain the progress of events in the world. God is again the only reason for all events, but God has only one intervention to determine the course of all future events. The pre-established harmony theory is similar to the situation someone arranges thousands of Domino in some way. Coincidence is supported by Islamic philosophers such as Nicholas Marebrass and Abu Hamid Mohammed Ibn Mohamed Gazzari. The causal relationship between them is not a real causal relationship at all. Body and spirit are different substances, but God's intervention (for both mental and physical) through each particular opportunity is related to its effect. Attribute dualism thinks that the world is mere substance - substance type - and has two different attributes: physical and psychological. In other words, it believes that some sort of physical thing (at least the brain) has non-physical psychological attributes (beliefs, desires, emotions etc.). It is not necessarily a clear question how the mental and physical attributes of the causal relationship depend on the diversity of the dualism of the property being discussed The second version of interactive dualism is that God exchanges information between my physical brain and spiritual thinking and the French philosopher Nicholas Marebranche (1638-1715) makes this view Defended. Malebranche studied various interpretations of the brain and spiritual interactions and claimed that they all failed for a fundamental reason. The physical and mental areas are fundamentally different from each other, and there is no interactive neutral area. In my spirit, think about what is necessary to change the impulses of the 3D brain into non-3D perception. It is impossible to make something with air: there is no mechanism to do this. We need a miracle to complete this task. According to Malebranche, this is where God comes. I will return to the rattlesnake case. My eyes and ears receive sensory information about the snake, which causes a biochemical reaction in the brain of my body.

Many ancient philosophers including Plato explored reality related metaphysics before Descartes cast doubt on this question. However, Descartes' view of the mind and body dualism is quite different from Plato's viewpoint. As Marleen Rozemond (author of dualism of Descartes) pointed out, Plato believes that the body is only a container for the use of the soul, and Descartes provides the evidence that the body and soul are interrelated (172). Not only do one person use other people but they are separated, but the mind affects the body and the body affects the mind. "Matrix" is based on the philosophical problem advocated by French philosopher and mathematician René Descartes in the 17th century. One of the most important claims of Descartes is intellectual autonomy or the ability to think for himself. In the case of Descartes, this requires not only "good intentions" but also "good intentions". Descartes knows that his sensual experience is not necessarily consistent with the reality and uses wax arguments to prove how impaired the sensation is. However, as wax approaches the flame these functions change quickly. Descartes is often called "the father of modern philosophy" and suggests that he offered a new philosophical species that departed from the old philosophy in an important way. This "old" philosophy is Aristotle's philosophy. Because it was diverted and interpreted through the Middle Ages. Indeed, since Aristotleism is deeply rooted in the knowledge system of the Descartes era, critics believe that evidence of the truth is found in the Bible. Therefore, when someone tries to counter the Aristotle's main principle, he may be accused of being punished holding the opposite position of God's word. However, in the days of Descartes, many people opposed Scholastic Aristotle's paper or some other paper in some way. Thus, when Descartes discusses the implementation of his modern philosophical system, the destruction of academic tradition is not unprecedented.

In all human occupations, psychiatry is most concerned with the relationship between the mind and the brain. In many clinical interactions, psychiatrists need to consider objective aspects of subjective psychological experience and brain function. This paper attempts to summarize the main philosophical position of thinking problems in a philosophical and knowledgeable form of dialogue between psychiatrists and three residents. The positions to be considered include material dualism, property dualism, type discrimination, symbolic identity, functionalism, exclusion of materialism and explanatory dualism. In this article we will try to provide a short, user-friendly introduction from a psychiatric point of view and current thinking about physical and mental problems. Physical and psychological problems are philosophical questions about thought and consciousness in human thinking and the relationship with the brain as part of the body. It is very different from how the body and the body work in chemistry and physiology, as this problem is based on interactionist on the body and mind. This problem occurs when the mind and body are regarded as unique, based on the assumption that the mind and body are fundamentally different fundamentally. The philosophy of the heart is a field of philosophy to study the essence of mind, psychological events, psychological functions, psychological attributes, consciousness and relationships with the body. Physical and mental problems, the relationship between the mind and the body, there are other problems that are not related to the essence of the heart, but it is often seen as the central problem of the philosophy of the heart, It has nothing to do with the relationship. José Manuel Rodriguez Delgado wrote: "There is no clear distinction between the soul and the thought in the current general usage, there are still people who still consciously still think of the soul, perhaps the soul more or less consciously You can enter and leave the body as an independent presence. " For centuries the problem of mind and body was a central problem of spiritual philosophy, but other factors are related to the nature of consciousness, but these factors are related to the ontological relationship with the body It does not matter. In any case, philosophers try to determine whether thought - or even - how - can affect the body and affect the body. As stated in the Oxford Philosophy Guide, "The problem of mind and body is the question of how the relationship between the mind and the body, or the state and process of the mind relates to the state and process of the body" (Honderich 613) For thousands of years to find a solution to the problem of the mind and body, the distinction between mind and body was a philosophical material. In the simplest form, the mind and body questions will try to answer this question: What is the relationship between the mind and the body? Philosophers, psychologists, and neuroscientists all develop the theory to try to understand the thought, emotion, and place of self-understanding in nature. First investigation of psychological relationship

In interactiveism in Descartes philosophy and spiritual philosophy, the dualism theory that preserves this kind of thought and body is independent, but has a causal relationship. Interactivists insist that spiritual events like John Doe wanting to kick the brick walls may be the cause of the movement of the body, the cause of his legs and feet moving to the wall. On the contrary, the physical event that his foot touches the wall may be the cause of the psychological event that he felt heavy pain. In the 17th century, René Descartes used interaction as a classicistic expression. But in addition to speculating that it will occur in the pineal gland deep within the brain, he can not make a satisfactory explanation of how the interaction will occur. This problem led directly to the accidental nature of Nicolas Malebranche in France from the 17th century to the 18th century and various other explanations about the relationship between the body and the mind. These are the German philosophers from the 17th century to the 18th century - the mathematician Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz's theory, the pre-established harmony between the body and the mind in God's creation, and the 17th century Dutch Jewish Including rejection of dualism by the human rationalist Benedict de Spinoza. Support of monism of mind and body as basic material attributes The interactionist faces two difficulties: (1) Imagine how such two foreign objects interact with each other because the material, the quality of mind, and the quality of the body are fundamentally different It is difficult to do. (2) Physics seems to present a completely unavoidable structure from non-physical areas, as explained mechanically. See also dualism of mind and body. Let me give an example of the comparison mechanism and the interaction of mutual interaction interactions (the influence between people, situation, action). Let me give an example of a mechanical interaction: characteristics, situation, and relationship between context and characteristics. Do you support another viewpoint? Please explain the reason. Please post a response of 200 to 300 words below: Do you think this event changed personality? If it changes your character, how will your personality change? What if that event does not change your personality? Do you think your character depends on environmental impact and genetic influence? The dialogueist view recognizes that the influence of personality depends on the circumstances and the situation is affected by the personality of the existent person. Interactivity also recognizes that people often choose circumstances that reflect their personality. Allan R. Buss, one of many interactive researchers, introduced the idea that people and the situation interact in three different ways. A common example of the interaction between people and the situation is the Stanford Prison Experiment where university students participated. Study on simulation research In the prison environment, some students work as guards and other students work as prisoners. When the security guard became more insulting than expected, the study was over. Because interaction theory is used to study social interactions between different members, the interaction theory is linked to the family system. Based on the theory of interaction theory, families are simply units of personality interaction. Communication, personality, and role play an important role in the family of social systems. Communication plays an important role in the interaction between different members of the family. Since families tend to act based on the meaning of words used for communication, the way the family communicates determines the interaction between them.