How Voters Decide by Richard Lau and David Redlawsk
[2023-02-08 17:32:20]
I'm angry. Wait, anger may not be the correct word. Perhaps I should say my anger, but it really evokes a complete image of my current emotional state. I do not think so. I think of anger, excitement, resentment, but in the same way they can not express complex emotions when I feel deceived or stolen. To make this feeling even more frustrating is that those responsible for fraud and theft do not recognize what they are doing.
In addition to these innovative designs, there are experimental studies to investigate the type of information voters want to receive about candidates and the influence this information has on voting decisions. Richard Lau and David Redlawsk (1997) conducted a series of computer-based experiments in the mid-1990s to study these problems. They discovered that voters tend to prefer biographical information rather than difficult problem information and more information including emotional elements.
It shows itself in memory as a pattern that is a learned knowledge structure consisting of interrelated networks of beliefs, opinions, values (Fiske et al., 1990, Hamill et al., 1985, Judd & Krosnick, 1989, Lau & Redlawsk, 2001). 2003, Kinder 1998). However, there are differences in the number of dimensions used (or required) to organize the contents of the general civil rights ideology model. Review of this section summarizes the focus of this discussion.
Political ideology: its structure, function, and selective affinity John T. Jost, 1 Christopher M. Federico, 2
The main factor controlling the large scale acquisition of ideological content seems to be focusing on and understanding information from political elites (Bennett 2006; Converse 2000, 2006; Kuklinski et al. 2001 ; Lau & Redlawsk 2001; Lupia et al. 2000). Most likely to receive, process and use such information - highly involved political experts - those with relatively well established political schemas that can be used to absorb new information - (Eg Erikson & Tedin 2003, Fiske et al., 1990, Hamill et al., 1985, Lavine et al., 1997, Luskin, 1990, Zaller, 1992). In addition to cognitive abilities, there is evidence that motivation is important. Studies have shown that individuals with a high evaluation need, ie, individuals with a chronic tendency to form opinions and judge good and evil (Bizer et al. 2004), are also likely to master discourse ideologies and use them I will. Contents (Federico 2004, 2007; Federico & Schneider 2007)
Political ideology: its structure, function, and selective affinity John T. Jost, 1 Christopher M. Federico, 2