From market globalism to imperial globalism: Ideology and american power after 9/11

As capitalist liberalism has completely transformed in the past two decades, it depends mainly on the views of free market philosophers of the 19th century. British and American globalism creators have a calm mind when trying to attract people all over the world trying to capture globalization as an unavoidable giant in a leaderless world. It is persuasive.

However, within the extreme political situation after the 9/11 attack, many markets Global list is the best way to maintain the viability of their projects to the new conservatives of the American benign empire It is to strengthen adaptation. Doctrine. It is supported by overwhelming military strength. As a result, the globalism of the market evolved into the empire's globalism, but we did not dispute at neoliberal camps.

The transition from soft power to hard power of the Bush administration was documented and analyzed at the policy level in today's intense debate on whether the United States really constitutes the "empire" since 9/11. However, few people have noticed the corresponding ideology. This story changed from a "soft" story centered on "leading market" to a more rigorous imperialism word in the United States.

In order to find the main ideological differences between the market globalism of the 1990s and the empire globalism of the 2000s, this thesis is a representative discourse and influence of influential global listists around 9/11 I analyzed some. As shown in this paper, the transition of discourse from market globalism to Imperial globalism shows a central role played by ideology in the dynamic growth of global interdependence.

The myth of globally scattered ideological block chains became formal at the end of World War II and was coded after 11th September Source code is a condition of American hegemony being a condition of survival and global stability Prove that. This new block chain decentralized node and miners will ultimately achieve a global block chain through economic, political and military cooperation and enforcement. We can not deny the fear of the two world wars mankind. These atrocities weaken the mirror of civilization and humans are fighting to reassemble these mirrors to create meaning from this horrible atrocity. Later individuals, intergenerational, intergenerational, and collective trauma created the conditions necessary for the development of global block chains.

In order to find the main ideological differences between the market globalism of the 1990s and the empire globalism of the 2000s, this thesis is a representative discourse and influence of influential global listists around 9/11 I analyzed some. As shown in this paper, the transition of discourse from market globalism to Imperial globalism shows a central role played by ideology in the dynamic growth of global interdependence.

In my opinion, we must introduce a new classification system that divides the ideological landscape into three areas. In the center we will find two major variants of the ideological family of globalism, namely the market globalism before 9-11 and imperial globalism after 9-11. The political contradictory ideological family will occupy the remaining two conceptual areas. Challengers of rights by globalism may include nationalism, new localism, and various religious fundamentals with a strong political tendency. The opposite ideology on the left may include a series of ideas related to global feminism, international populism, and "global social justice" movements. Of course, further research is still needed as to whether these ideologies constitute a complete ideology or just an increase in "modules".