Social Darwinism: An Ideology for Mass Murder

In 1859, Charles Darwin introduced a new philosophy of evolution to the world in his book "Origin of Species". In this work, Darwin supports human evolution through the process of natural selection rather than the influence of the Creator of God. Darwin's view on this evolutionistic struggle is simply expressed as "survival of the fittest." Although Darwin can not blame the Holocaust, there is still overwhelming evidence that social Darwinism is the main influence of Nazi leaders in the elimination of the Jewish people during the Second World War. It is origin.

The term "social Darwinism" was made by Thomas Henry Huxley in 1860's comment on Darwin's "Origin of Species". However, the modern concept of social Darwinism did not appear until the 1940s and 1950s, with the emergence of ideologies like fascism. . It is used to support the laissez - faireism and political conservatism and to oppose the rise of fascism. The main supporters of social Darwinism are Herbert Spencer, Thomas Malthus and William Graham Sumner. But they explicitly did not use the term "social Darwinism" to explain their work.

Social Darwinism is a loose ideology that emerged in the second half of the 19th century when Charles Darwin's natural selection evolutionary theory was used to prove specific political, social or economic views. Society Darwinists believe in "survival of the fittest." That is the idea that some people become stronger in society because they were born to get better. In various era of the past century and a half, social Darwinism was used to justify imperialism, racial discrimination, eugenics, social inequality. However, in order to convey his scientific idea to the British public, Darwin sought a popular concept from sociologist Herbert Spencer, such as "fighting for the survival of the fittest" and a struggle for economic Thomas Malthus survival Borrowed. He wrote an article about human society before. Evolution over time

Social Darwinism. Social Darwinism is an ideology that raises the paradox of naturalism to the principle of false science. When applying biological evolution to society, social inequality is considered natural, inevitable, and better thought that social success means survival of the fittest (Hawkins, 1997). Social Darwinism raises the hierarchy to a state that "inferior" race and cultural abuse is not only natural but also necessary - a way to improve humanity through natural selection. In this way, prejudice and discrimination are not only acceptable, it is also inevitable, necessary, natural and moral.

19th century philosopher Herbert Spencer advocated the idea of ​​social Darwinism. Social Darwinism is to apply natural selection theory to social, political and economic problems. In its simplest form, social Darwinism follows the slogan of "strong survival" including human problems. This theory is destined to rule them as it was being used to promote the idea that Caucasian European races are better than other races. When Spencer began to promote social Darwinism, the technology, economics and government of "White Europe" improved compared to other cultures. Looking at this obvious advantage, as well as economic and military structure, some people think that natural selection is functioning, and races more suited for survival prevail. We claim that social welfare programs that support the poor and disadvantaged people are contrary to nature itself and even extend this idea to microeconomic problems.