Gandhi's ideology in the Film

Mahatma Gandhi and Indian film Mahatma Gandhi is a multifaceted person covering every field under the sun such as agriculture, education, science, health, economy, literature, industry, women, children, health, planning. Birth, religion, and of course politics. Many people were surprised to realize his abundant work and I heard that history of his work may be more than anyone in history (his work has more than 100 books, hundreds of pages per book As well).

The mystery of ideology can be traced back to Gandhi in the history of India. From 1920 to around 1947, Gandhi dominated the political arena of India through the direction of the ideology he provided to Congress. Gandhi ideology should be very simple as it is only two simple principles of truth and nonviolence. But things are not that simple. In the era of Gandhi (even after his death), no one can claim to fully understand the ideology of Gandhi. Gandhi's followers declare an ideological understanding based on the years spent with Gandhi. Gandhi's ideology includes everything he said over the years. If speech or behavior has internal contradiction or inconsistency, Gandhi will not doubt it. What ordinary people can do is to fear everything about Gandhi. On the other hand, if someone else goes beyond the literal meaning of Gandhi, it will be condemned.

Ahimsa is a concept practiced by political and ideological leader Mohandas Gandhi and he used this concept to promote the use of passive resistance to Indian nonviolent means and colonial rule . Since Mohandas Gandhi used Ahimsa as a means to achieve the goal, in the end the Prince rejected Machiavelli's proposal that it is necessary to preserve the quality to retain his title. Machiavelli suggested that the leader had military experience, and "During peace he suggested that he must train himself not time.

Films by Gandhi's Richard Attenborough were screened in theaters all over the world for several weeks. That extraordinary popularity may be attributed to being posted in the "peace movement" journal that emerged in response to the increasing threat of nuclear war. However, this coincidence caused a strong reaction from those who dislike peace movement and show distrust. Among the critics at Attenborough not only attacked the movie but also attacked the heroes, a series of articles laughed and corrupted Mahatma Gandhi. Probably the most malicious attack would be by film critic Richard Grenier who commented on American magazines. In addition to criticizing the movie, Grenier also attacked Gandhi, Hinduism and India. All these raised people's interest in Gandhi, discussions are no longer confined to academia.