The Linguistic Revolution:The Relation Between Class, Language, and Ideology In 1984

Almost all the novels contain some political suggestions and suggestions, but few are as direct political novels as George Orwell in 1984. From the beginning to the end, this novel is a magnificent shocking piece, a powerful prevention against extreme totalitarian illness. Among them, Orwell depicts a frustrating future, and individualism is stopped. Citizens are placed in a strict class structure by the government and threatened by physical harm. By reducing the nuance, by meaning the shadow of the language.

In this paper, we discuss the relationship between the beliefs of deep-rooted languages ​​("language ideology") and the language system and consider how the contradiction between language proposition and procedural knowledge influences the language regulation method in society . It explores the epistemological basis to distinguish between language ideology and language systems and how the conflicting effects of both aspects of language behavior create a framework for language restriction in academic and institutional environments I will discuss. In this article, by using important insights brought by studies of language anthropology and combining them with philosophical thinking of language behavior, fundamental interdependence between the deep-root belief model and the nature of the language itself Is there a question as to whether there is.

Therefore, language ideology is best understood as a belief, emotion, and concept of socially shared languages, dialectically linking language and society. In other words, the purpose of language ideology is society, not language. Like other societies, the ideology of language is interesting and controversial in multiple. Considering that language ideology bridges between language and language