Nietzsche, Marx, Kiakegaard and Zarastura are always the most popular, and the voice of God disappears throughout the mountains. Please reevaluate our idols and discover the relationship between the importance of their abolition and the complex network that we create for our lives. Zarathustra, his sacred character, opened up a new era, the last person was eradicated and the dirty pests were camouflaged as a promise of cheese. The world was filled with mouse traps and it was a crazy place full of faces they could not understand. This demolition of rationalist philosophers like Descartes is strongly influenced by Nietzsche, Marx, Kierkegaard, Foucault. After philosophical synthesis of these philosophers, the review of Descartes is surprising, and this work is considered glorious fame. Rene Descartes is thought to be the founder of analytical geometry, an important contributor to scientific methods, and finally a philosopher. But the philosophical review of the logicologist showed that his analysis lacked some legitimate content and tried to reach the truth but only attempted to realize the belief. This understanding and conclusion reveals the ambiguity of Descartes' philosophy and pleads to condemn him as a philosopher of glory (although he did not mention mathematicians). The term "existentialism" derives from the tradition of "existentialism" such as philosophers Blaise Pascal, Immanuel Kant, SørenKierkegaard, early in Karl Marx, Friedrich Nietzsche, Martin-Heidegger, Jean-Paul Sartre, Simone de Beauvoir It has a specific philosophical meaning. Maurice Merlot-Ponty and Albert Camus and writer Fyodor Dostoevsky and Franz Kafka SørenKierkegaard, Friedrich Nietzsche, Fyodor Dostoevsky are considered existentialists, but in fact were created by Jean-Paul Sartre. It is widely believed that Kierkegaard may be the first surviving philosopher, but he used the term "individualism" to refer to his philosophical thought. When reading a sentence, it is easy to understand why it is closely related to existentialism. Kierkegaard wrote to his book "Deadly Sick" as follows. Other losses can not occur so quietly; other losses - arms, legs, $ 5, wives etc - will definitely be noticed. "

Kierkegaard believes that the truth is only a subjective process. The truth exists only in the subjective existence of individuals and can not be seen in the complete system. Kierkegaard's objective truth is a simple idea created by the illusion of subjective existence and people can have complete and true objective knowledge of something existing in the world. "In an objective sense, thinking is understood as pure thinking, which corresponds to objects of the same abstract and objective meaning, so this subject is the thought itself, the truth is that of the corresponding thinking It becomes a relationship. The death of illness (Danish: SygdommentilDøden) is a book written in 1849 by the Danish philosopher Søren Kierkegaard in the pseudonym of Anti-Climacus. This book is a work of Christian existentialism, the concept of despair about Kierkegaard and is identified with the concept of sin in Christianity, especially primitive sin. Anti-climakus introduced this book with reference to John 11.4: "This disease is not death." This quote comes from the story of Lazarus. There, Jesus raised a man from death. However, the anti-climax casts doubt: even if Jesus did not restore Lazarus from death, is this sentence true? The concept of human death is over but the concept of Christian death is another waypoint that followed the path of eternal life. So, for Christians, death is fearless. On the contrary, I am worried that I can not die. Kierkegaard called it a desperate disease. According to Kierkegaard, if a person does not agree with God or God's self-plan, he will be "hopeless". In this way, he lost his self, and Kierkegaard defined it as "the relationship is related to itself in the relationship." Kierkegaard can define humanity as a tension between "restricted infinity" and "possible and necessary" and can be identified by a dialectical balance, or relationship, between these opposing features. Humans have natural introspection and self-awareness, but in order to become a true self, we must not be aware of ourselves, but also have to recognize our own source based on love, that is, the ability to create it It will not. People will despair when people deny themselves or create and maintain their own powers

From the late nineteenth century to the twentieth century, several philosophers discussed the differences in the theory of thinking, behavior, and human emotions in all philosophical thinking. The basic idea of ​​external philosophers is that they believe that the existence of human condition is the main problem of sharing a similar ontology. Soren Kierkegaard is considered a father of existentialism. He did not use the word "existentialism", but the original concept was that the main reason why individuals live with sincerity or enthusiasm is not society or religion. Soren Kierkegaard is a Danish philosopher, poet, theologian and critic. He was born in a wealthy family and went to the University of Copenhagen. Kierkegaard is considered a father of existentialism, but philosophy and existentialism as a series of ideas have not been defined either by him or in his life. He is a philosopher, but a devout believer. "The most important thing is that the truth is not just a matter of discovering objective facts, objective facts are important, but in reality there are ways to relate themselves to facts From a moral point of view, Human behavior is more important than any fact, the truth is subjectivity rather than objectivity. " Existentialism is said to begin with the Christian existentialist Soren Kierkegaard. For Kierkegaard, humans are outside all systems and can not be simplified. He is a Christian 's existentialist. Because he insists that building a personal relationship with God is the best achievement of human existence. As an existentialist, he opposes what he is called "Christian." It is a primarily organized religion, where individuals lose themselves in the group spirit. Religion is a personal activity of Kierkegaard, it is not a public activity. The existentialism of Christianity depends on understanding Christianity of Kiakegaard Presence therapy is developed by the philosophy of Friedrich Nietzsche and Soren Kierkegaard. As one of the earliest existentialist philosophers, Kirkegaard believed that human dissatisfaction could be overcome only by inner wisdom. Later Nietzsche further developed the existentialist theory by introducing the concept of free will and personal responsibility. In the early 20th century, philosophers such as Martin Heidegger and Jean-Paul Sartre began exploring the role of investigation and interpretation in the healing process. In the coming decades, people of the same generation came to recognize the importance of experience and understanding. It is a way to achieve mental health and balance.

Kierkegaard believes that true faith can only be achieved by abandoning the dual movement of reason or logic, and people believe that it can be logically understood. In "Fear and Trembling", Kierkegaard associates the knights that infinitely gave true faith and the knights of faith; in this article we will study this proposition and explain why Kierkegaard's analogy is why A wonderful metaphor for double movements that is necessary to try to gain faith. Kierkegaard's beliefs represent infinite resignation knights and knights. The belief in fear and tremor, Kierkegaard 's opinion, examined the order of Abraham by being believed to be the only child of God. Abraham spent many years trying to become pregnant with his wife Sara, eventually succeeding in finding a boy named Isaac. It was the ultimate sacrificed trial of God, manifested in the burning bush, brought his only son to the mountain to Abraham and asked him to kill him with a knife. The question most people ask is why God orders Abraham is neither a tragic hero nor a knight who will not resign as long as he is a knight of faith outside the realm of morality. The fear and tremor of Kiakeegor solved the contradictory movement of faith. SørenKierkegaard examines personal struggle and commitment to God and discovers that these maximize people For me, the deepest analysis of the character of Abraham comes from Kia Keegor's early fear and tremor, an article on the list of conditions I have to read. In his magnificent essay, Kiakegaard has focused on later events. But the conclusion is the same - in order to carry out this spiritually challenging and uncertain effort, people need a huge belief base. As defined by Kierkegaard, faith is an intimate and incomprehensible belief about what a person is doing and is not influenced by external recognition or post-mortem reputation. This is also anxiety about my beliefs, honesty of doubt, doubt. In fear and tremor, Soren Kierkegaard provided an obscure explanation of the faith beliefs of Johannes de Silentio. Essentially, Kierkegaard proposes "a leapful leap" in religious life, but it is inherently contradictory because it depends entirely on absurd power. But we can not achieve this state of absolute faith unless we experience various prerequisites and the movement of faith is the greatest sport people can do. Kierkegaard explains how individuals become knights or knights who resigned, using the story of Abraham and Isaac. The Knight of the Faith is the hardest to achieve, so it is the most difficult to master. "Faith begins with thinking stopping" (82)

Moment and mind I. Introduction In the concept of anxiety, S renkierkegaard deals with human anxiety about the possibilities of freedom. Because it is related to sin and spiritual progress. This article shows that Kierkegaard 's current concept and prescription for its essence are interrelated in a spiritual context. What is important is that the mind depends on the moment of change and possibility, and this change does not make it in time. From a time point of view, this change seems to be sudden. The first work of Soren Kierkegaard (1813 - 1855) was the "irony concept", Socrates, and finally continued to refer to the world of Christians. Ironic is the root of Dostoevsky and Kierkegaard, both of which play perfectly Devil's supporters. The last work is one of several that attacks the Christian world just like a big judge. In Ivan 's poetry, the evil judge showed both sides of the Christian world, but Dostoevsky' s sympathy was consistent with Ariza 's view. "But ridiculous!" Ariosha suddenly shouted, and he kept listening to confusion and excitement, but he was silent deeply. "Your poetry is praise and not condemnation to Christ, who will believe you when you talk about freedom So our Christians must understand it, it is unfair ), But the worst Roman Catholics, judges and Jesuits, you have been revealed! Soren Kierkegaard is a Danish philosopher, poet, theologian and critic. He was born in a wealthy family and went to the University of Copenhagen. Kierkegaard is considered a father of existentialism, but philosophy and existentialism as a series of ideas have not been defined either by him or in his life. He is a philosopher, but a devout believer. "The most important thing is that the truth is not just a matter of discovering objective facts, objective facts are important, but in reality there are ways to relate themselves to facts From a moral point of view, Human behavior is more important than any fact, the truth is subjectivity rather than objectivity. " However, with Buber's implementation concept, Soren Kierkegaard's existential philosophy may have the strongest influence. In the early work of Kierkegaard, he discovered Buber 's most important early thinking and some slow thinking: a direct relationship between individuals and God. Anxiety and exposure, the concept of "Knight of Faith" can not be avoided on a global scale, but it is always a matter of specificity of a new situation, the necessity of becoming a real human before getting out of a relationship, and the importance of human faith Sex is in our life. These similarities, together with the handling of Buber's Kierkegaard in his mature work, clearly shows one of the most important influences of Kierkegaard on Buber's idea.

In the book of fear and tremor, the constant use of "me", "me", "me", and "you" is how Nothomb opposes their argument as a collective society To the reader. Through the tone, Nothomb reveals Japanese hypocrisy through expression and shows that individualism exists in every society. Three important Japanese characters encountered by Amelie will help you prove (find better words). Fubuki's selfish shade There is a remarkable shame in women like mai in Japanese collective society. Fear and tremor (formerly Danish title: Frygtog Bæven) is a powerful philosophical work by SørenKierkegaard, published in 1843 as a pseudonym John the Silent. When God asked him to sacrifice his son, Kierkegaard wanted to understand the anxiety that Abraham must have. In 1994 Steve Reich issued the opera "The Cave". The title points to the patriarch's cave. The story of the opera is based on the story of Abraham and its immediate families. It is explained in various religious texts and personal understanding from various cultures and religious traditions. Abraham is neither a tragic hero nor a knight who will not resign as long as he is a knight of faith outside the realm of morality. The fear and tremor of Kiakeegor solved the contradictory movement of faith. SørenKierkegaard examines personal struggle and commitment to God and discovers that these maximize people On 16th October 1843, Kiakegaard published three more books on love, faith and more words. Fear and Trembling is published under the pseudonym Johannes de Silentio. Repetition is about the youth who has anxiety and depression (SørenKierkegaard), because he feels that his love to God must be sacrificed to a woman (Regine Olsen). He tried to see if the new science of psychology could help him understand himself. Constantin Constantius, a pseudonym for this book, is a psychologist. At the same time, he published "The Three Rebuild Discourses of 1843" with his own name. And it specifically explains how to use love to hide things about yourself. These three books were published on the same day and are an example of how to indirectly communicate with Kiakegaard.

Kiakegaard: "Love your neighbor like yourself" as a moral foundation You must do everything and you must love the Lord your God with all your heart. In these two commandments, you must hang all the law and the prophets. "[Matthew 22: 37-40, AV] The first man you meet when you go out when you pray and close the door is the one you love. Perhaps we may think of a religious aspect - "loving your neighbor seems to be yourself" is not halfway after all - but you will also become a disease of a non-condensing woman for many people I guess. The best exception here may be Buddhism, it generally provides countless answers to love, including the problem of "self". (Not because nothing is true, but because everything is one, but some of us are not ready yet.) But this comment is for those who do not know me Whenever you say that you are beautiful, they say that they love themselves. They are happy. But I did not say that they care about me, I did not say that my life experience is so important or I am very important for them. " Freud thinks that the commandments "to love your neighbor like yourself" are impossible. Basically morality is useless. The whole society seems to accept these statements from Freud. Today's morality is not that important, but personal superman seems to be based on the principle of happiness such as materialism and identity. Therefore, the cause of sexual harassment and many other sexual behaviors lies in a close relationship between identity, self and superego. Today, I think that the three parts of Freud's theory have a similar agenda, not the balance it should have. The command of the universalist "Loving your neighbor seems to be yourself" refers to the people surrounding him, and he should unilaterally love him if necessary. This command uses reciprocal logic and implies the foundation of Aristotle, but you should love yourself in an inappropriate way: especially if you love yourself in inappropriate and perverted ways, he is confused To do. as a result! Philosophers can discuss Aristotle's idea that this is the essence of this implicit "self-love" - ​​self love is all kinds of love of interpersonal relationship, criticism of egoism and examples of poverty of pride and pride - . Based on the love of one person to another. Saint Augustine gave up the argument - he insisted that the man does not need to master his own order (De bono viduitatis, xxi). Still, this order requires equal love - so Christian code "loves your enemies" (Matthew 5: 44 - 45)

Abraham is the father of Christianity, Judaism, and Islam, and is considered a perfect example of the fear of Kiakegaard and trembling beliefs. The most powerful example of Kiakegaard's writings is Abraham's indifferent behavior, promising to follow his call and sacrifice his one son and inherit his kingdom Isaac. Abraham followed the command of God faithfully, without regret, doubt, sorrow, anger. Just before Isaac's murder and sacrifice, God entered him and replaced him with a ram. Existentialism is said to begin with the Christian existentialist Soren Kierkegaard. For Kierkegaard, humans are outside all systems and can not be simplified. He is a Christian 's existentialist. Because he insists that building a personal relationship with God is the best accomplishment of human existence. As an existentialist, he opposes what he is called "Christian." An organized religion that personally persons lose themselves in the spirit of the group. Religion is a personal activity of Kierkegaard, it is not a public activity. The existentialism of Christianity depends on understanding Christianity of Kiakegaard Paul Tillich is an important existential theologist after Kierkegaard and Karbat and it helps to apply existentialism concepts to Christian theology and introduce existential theology to the public. His breakthrough work "Brave Courage" follows Kierkegaard's anxiety and absurd life analysis, but raises the allegation that modern people must achieve themselves through God's stupid living I will. Rudolf Bartmann used the existential philosophy of Kiakegaard and Heidegger to make Christian mythical by interpreting the concept of Christian myth as a concept of existentialism. Boer read Sorren Kerkegaard, an existentialist philosopher of Danish Christian in the 19th century. Richard Rhodes has said that Bohr passed through the heading under the influence of Kiagegor in "Manufacture of the atomic bomb". In 1909, Bohr sent the way of life of his older brother Kiakegaard as a birthday gift. In the attached letter, Mr. Boer wrote as follows. "This is the only thing I sent home, but I think that finding better ones is not easy, one of the things I read," Bol likes Kierkegaard's language and literary style Although it states that there is a disagreement about Kirkegaard's philosophy. Some of Bohr 's biographers believe that Bohr is an atheist but this discrepancy comes from the defense of Christianity of Kiakegaard.

Many theologians, scientists and philosophers discuss the role of faith. Throughout history many things have been discussed and explained about whether religion is logical or completely absurd. In this article, I will focus on the role of faith through Christian philosophers Sorean Kierkegaard and Paul Tillich 's lens. Faith plays an important role in the theology of Kiagogo and Tirich; I will examine the explanation of their faith and compare and contrast those clauses. The best examples of religious existentialism are the philosophy of St. Augustine, Blythe Pascal, Paul Tillich, Soren Kierkegaard. Religious existentialism thinks that the reality, essence of the two levels is the basis of existence. Religion is the greatest concern in this view. Paul Tillich is an important existential theologist after Kierkegaard and Karbat and it helps to apply existentialism concepts to Christian theology and introduce existential theology to the public. His breakthrough work "Brave Courage" follows Kierkegaard's anxiety and absurd life analysis, but raises the allegation that modern people must achieve themselves through God's stupid living I will. Rudolf Bartmann used the existential philosophy of Kiakegaard and Heidegger to make Christian mythical by interpreting the concept of Christian myth as a concept of existentialism. Review religious beliefs and incredible problems, paying particular attention to the existentialist challenge to religion. Readers were religious critics and advocates: Camus, Buber, Kierkegaard, Teilhard de Chardin, Sartre, Nietzsche, Tillich and Bonhoffer. How do modern Western theology understand faith in God? What is the meaning of the word "god" - or what do you mean? How do you believe evil reality? The answer to these questions will be the main focus of our work after reading the works of representative Jews, Christians, and heretical religious thinkers since the Second World War. Examples will come from liberalism, processes, feminism, extreme perspectives, and so on. Paul Johanisti (1886-1965) is a theologian and Christian's existentialist philosopher. Together with contemporary Carl Bath, Tillich is one of the most influential Protestant theologians of the 20th century. The attitude of Tiruh against Protestant theology is very systematic. He tried to connect culture to faith so that "faith does not have to be unacceptable to modern culture, contemporary culture is not necessarily unacceptable to faith". Therefore, the position of Tillich is apologetic and trying to come up with a specific theological answer that applies to everyday life. Tillich tried to balance revelation and reason with protecting revelation without violating rationality (by confirming that Thomas Aquinas says that faith is very reasonable)

Please relax a little over time. Enjoy paper lightness or surprisingly heavy feeling, ink refreshing, and type regularity. There are over 4 pages on this stack, there are answers to some questions and personal themes. Every philosophy is personal, but some philosophers deny it. Discussed here are philosophers who are not so stupid. The two primitive persistentists, Søren Kierkegaard and Friedrich Nietzsche, are dedicated human observers, but their conclusions are different and seem contradictory. The first two philosophers considered the basis of existentialist movement are Søren Kierkegaard and Friedrich Nietzsche and it was not clear whether to support the existentialism of the 20th century. They focus on subjective human experience, not mathematical and scientific objective truth. Like Pascal, they are interested in using forwarding to apparently eliminate meaningless life and boring quiet struggle for people. Unlike Pascal, Kierkegaard and Nietzsche also consider the role of free choice, especially with regard to basic values ​​and beliefs, and how these choices change the nature and identity of the selector. Knight of Kierkegaard and Übermensch of Nietzsche define the essence of existence, so it is representative of people who show freedom. Article: Post-Kant philosophers reached a definite conclusion about the meaning of human existence in the 19th century. Discussion between Friedrich Nietzsche and Soren Kierkegaard reveals disagreement. Nietzsche believes that in order to live a meaningful life in a world filled with change and confusion, people must force the reality to follow their own creativity. On the other hand, I believe that Kierkegaard can only make a meaningful life only after becoming a "knight of faith". Being alone while keeping your subjective values. With one god In his view, Nietzsche denied the world of modern Christians. When people compare and oppose cultural Christianity and Biblical beliefs, it can be seen in Nietzsche that many people agree to the "collapse" of the Christian world. His contrast with Kirkegaard is evident at this point as Nietzsche did not continue to reintroduce Christianity into the Christian world like the Danish people. Like other existentialists, he cherishes freedom, abandons integration, and insists on self discipline. The power of the country depends on the ability to provide space and benefits to those who do not meet the requirements. There must be freedom to question the recognized value of Superman who succeeded only in self-discipline

In the fear and tremor of Soren Kierkegaard, he believes in "the three major behaviors of faith". For the Kierkegaard, any form of faith entails a paradox. The path of faith, suggested by this paradox, and Kierkegaard, is indicated by the epoch-making wave, Beth and Jane's protagonists. Kierkegaard explained that people can follow the steps that can turn to faith; however, they are extremely difficult, he says that only one person, the "knight of faith" I believe it was completed. There is also an article by Soren Aabye Kierkegaard about the analysis of 400 years ago and what "meaning" the father of our faith "means. Or as he said, "Knight of Faith". The basic premise of Kierkegaard's claim is that Abraham's faith was tried by God asking Abraham to sacrifice his beloved Isaac and Abraham's obedience. Kierkegaard continues to explain what the Abraham belief is and how the Order will exercise the dual movement of faith. Kierkegaard could not understand Abraham but concluded that he must be highly appreciated for his actions. For the Danish philosopher Soren Kierkegaard, the religious beliefs of Abraham are inconsistent and can not be reconciled. How does this belief drive someone to kill his only child? What is faith? Kierkegaard Abraham considers him to be a knight of true faith. Heroes who have undergone unfamiliar conflict and torture can only be examined with holy reverence and fear. When he enriched Noah's personality, it seems that Aronofsky read a page from Kierkegaard's book. The story of the Bible itself still has many drawbacks. What we really know about this person is that he is righteousness in God's eyes and (as not to forget) he began to curse one of his sons drunk after the flood . So what is justice? The basis of Aronofs talked about this in an interview and pointed out that justice is "a balance between justice and compassion." Justice and compassion ... The two features of God in the Old Testament seem to be contradictory but reveal many difficult clauses in the Old Testament. Here we can think of Kierkegaard's religious philosophy. As an enthusiastic Christian, Kierkegaard emphasizes personal beliefs and encounters with individuals. It is not purely a social belief. Through his criticism of the Christian world - Christianity is predominant, political reality that claims to be Christians but each does not have true Christianity - through the "father of existentialism" I gained it. Nickname For Kierkegaard, it is not enough to rely solely on the profession of faith, but in the "crowds" of the modern Christian world this is all necessary. For Kierkegaard, the church is a barrier to true faith.

In the "fear of fear" of Kiakegaard, the concept of the knight of faith is a unique title given to those who devote God far beyond the understanding of ordinary people with a high-level concept, aesthetic or moral life . Expected person Kiakegaard seems to be the only solution to the problem in the case of his resignation, puts his faith in something that seems to be ridiculous, and makes the solution he desires I believe in God. Many philosophers who first read Kierkegaard, in particular Kierkegaard (written in the pseudonym of Johannes de Siletti), have often concluded that Kierkegaard supports it. It is sacred moral ordering law. The sacred command theory is Yuanlun's theory, and it claims that moral value is commanded by God or God. But Kierkegaard argues that morality is not created by God, but that God's command from God transcends morality. This difference means that God does not necessarily create human morality. However, any religiousist must prepare for the sacred orders of God. It takes precedence over all moral and rational obligations. Kierkegaard called this case a suspension of moral teleportation. Abraham transcended ethics and jumped on faith Abraham is neither a tragic hero nor a knight who will not resign as long as he is a knight of faith outside the realm of morality. The fear and tremor of Kiakeegor solved the contradictory movement of faith. SørenKierkegaard examines personal struggle and commitment to God and discovers that these maximize people For me, the deepest analysis of the character of Abraham comes from Kia Keegor's early fear and tremor, an article on the list of conditions I have to read. In his magnificent essay, Kiakegaard focused on later events, and Abraham was asked to sacrifice his only son, Isaac. But the conclusion is the same - in order to carry out this spiritually challenging and uncertain effort, people need a huge belief base. As defined by Kierkegaard, faith is an intimate and incomprehensible belief about what a person is doing and is not influenced by external recognition or post-mortem reputation. This is also anxiety about my beliefs, honesty of doubt, doubt.

Kierkegaards 'view of Kierkegaards' idea was a Danish philosopher in the mid-nineteenth century. As everyone knows, he is a father of existentialism at least 70 years ago in his era. At that time, Kierkegaard attacked Kant's rational morality and attacked Christianity. He asked us a question about how we understand faith. He said that faith is absurd. "Fear and tremor" shows an example of foolish faith, using the story of Abraham and his son Isaac. God asked Abraham to sacrifice his son Isaac's story and showed the theoretical confusion of morality and religion. Comparing Kierkegaard's view with Kant's view and knowledge method also helps to better understand the views of philosophers. For Kierkegaard it is not the reason of Kant to lead to faith, not to God. People can not make reasonable decisions about facts, evidence, and lack of conviction. Morality flourishes to the certainty of truth through reason. Religion can not have such luxury. This is not a rational decision but a belief. Kierkegaard refers to the transition from morality to the third stage, that is, "leap of faith". This paradox is an obvious and true discourse, but it leads to contradiction and intuition violation. It can be resolved only when inconsistencies are obvious. The story of Abraham of Kiakegaard is such a paradox. (Kerkegaard) For the Danish philosopher Soren Kierkegaard, the religious beliefs of Abraham are inconsistent and can not be reconciled. How does this belief drive someone to kill his only child? What is faith? Kierkegaard Abraham considers him to be a knight of true faith. Heroes who have undergone unfamiliar conflict and torture can only be examined with holy reverence and fear. When he enriched Noah's personality, it seems that Aronofsky read a page from Kierkegaard's book. The story of the Bible itself still has many drawbacks. What we really know about this person is that he is righteousness in God's eyes and (as not to forget) he began to curse one of his sons drunk after the flood . So what is justice? The basis of Aronofs talked about this in an interview and pointed out that justice is "a balance between justice and compassion." Justice and compassion ... The two features of God in the Old Testament seem to be contradictory but reveal many difficult clauses in the Old Testament. SørenKierkegaard is undoubtedly a profound religious thinker to be a father of existentialism. Like Tertullian's strong incompatibility, he proposed a clear belief and a reasonable perspective. If Kant claims religion only within reason, Kierkegaard will only require reasoning by religious restrictions. Faith requires a leap. Risk is necessary. All reasons come from proveing ​​that God's claim is actually a vicious circle. Hegel tried to argue that faith could be enhanced to objective certainty. In addition, Kierkegaard is seeking such a trap: it is extreme trust that is needed. The fundamental trust in faith is the highest level people can reach.

Kierkegaard's fear and trembling are what people are. How do humans connect with God? Who am I? Why do I exist? I. The famous theologian of the 19th century Soeren Kierkegaard wrote "Fear and Trembling" in 1843 in response to Hegellism. Kierkegaard took over the pseudonym of Jonannes de Silentio and told the contemporary attitude towards doubt and belief. He believes that humans are deeply rooted in reason and doubt, but they are different from French mathematicians, scientists and philosophers Descartes. 087393 KIERKEGAARD: Fear and confusion Evans, C Stephen and Sylvia Walsh, editor. Kierkegaard's new translation of German universalist and idealists' challenge was discussed through exploring the story of Abraham and Isaac. Considering the many questions raised by stories about beliefs, moral obligations and sins, Kierkegaard concluded that belief is contradictory and irrational, 038480 philosophical fragment / Johannes Clarks , HOWARD V. and EDNAH. Oh, EDS. And TRANS. Kierkegaard, Soren Kierkegaard, written in a pseudonym of Johannes · climakas, compares the Christian paradox with Greek and modern philosophical thinking and is exploring the meaning of adventure beyond the understanding of Socrates' truth. 371 pgs. • 1985 Many of the philosophers who first read Kierkegaard, especially Johannes de Siledio's "Fear and tremor" often concluded that Kierkegaard supports sacred moral order. However, Soren Kierkegaard does not mean that morality was created by God (through his pseudonym Johannes de Silentio), but instead he will claim that God's command from God transcended morality. This difference means that God does not necessarily create human morality. However, any religiousist must prepare for the sacred orders of God. It takes precedence over all moral and rational obligations. Kierkegaard called this case a suspension of moral teleportation. Abraham, the knight of faith chose to obey God unconditionally and received his son, the title of his faith and father of faith. Abraham transcended ethics and jumped on faith

Possible explanations for Kierkegaard's reasoning Some philosophers may know only what you know through experience. Perceived is the same as what is known. Since we understand things through sensation, what we understand must also be expressed through our senses. Express knowledge in words. Language is a means to convert our experience into concrete form sentences, so that sensitivity can be expressed in mind. I might use the word "slimy" to explain the snake (which is a linguistic expression of my experiences), so I distinguish one sentiment from another feeling. In the 19th century, the Danish philosopher Søren Kierkegaard confirmed the three stages that people can experience in their life, the aesthetic stage, the ethical stage, and the religious stage. Most people only go through the first step, in most cases they go through the second step (not even many people do it). I spent a lot of time at this stage - trying to gather all the excitement and magnificence. I get up late, irir responsibility and live fast. My thought process is completely focused on the present and is completely focused on myself. However, I am not focused on focusing (that is, making me better). I am focusing on personal interests. This is two different things For Kierkegaard, the highest stage of life that humans can expect is his so-called 'religious' stage. Now, Kierkegaard is a Christian - this is not a secret. However, the "religious" phase basically does not include a specific divine system or religious system. This is not one. Instead, it is about the first two stages of the past life, and deeply pulsating things. The transition from the aesthetic stage to the moral stage shifts from certain things (property, experience, people) to common ones (principle, duty, order, and progress). But after a while, this can start to feel regular. It can be felt that there is no higher purpose other than doing the right thing - fulfilling duty. Kierkegaard: Author of Exposition and Critique Daphne Hampson is not a fan of Kierkegaard's idea. But probably for this reason she is a more reliable guide. She is a professor at Oxford University of St. Andrews University and an associate professor of theology and religious faculties at Oxford University. She got two doctorates from Oxford University and Harvard Theological Seminary and first met with Kia Keegor in her twenties. An independent study with theological professor Richard Reinhold Niebuhr (nephew of American theologian Reinhold Niebuhr). Hampton spent most of his time at S.K. As an imaginary friend, her book is not just a viewing work, it is not a counted work. Its structure is simple: Each chapter gives a careful reconfiguration before looking at critiques, speaking one of Kierkegaard's main tasks.

How do individuals confirm that they are justified? In Soren Kierkegaard's "Fear and Trembling", Abraham was faced with this problem between two moral obligations. He has a moral duty to be faithful to God and his son Isaac. He believed that God was asked him to sacrifice Isaac. But Abraham strongly kept his faith and obeyed what He regarded as the will of God. Using Johannes de Scientio's view and his view, and the views of Johannes de Scientio, Kiakegaard will focus on the story of Abraham, and his audience must choose from the extremes. My interpretation of the fear and tremor of Soren Kierkegaard is that this book is actually about three levels of perception of the realm of existence: aesthetic / sensual, moral, and spiritual. Most people take a three-step approach - aesthetic or perceptual experience leads to a moral understanding that leads to interaction with the spiritual world. But I think he truly said that the aesthetic / spirituality will bring people to the spiritual realm when he is doing well in the book. When we make a really beautiful art work, we will soon enter the ghost country. Many of the philosophers who first read Kierkegaard, especially Johannes de Siledio's "Fear and tremor" often concluded that Kierkegaard supports sacred moral order. However, Soren Kierkegaard does not mean that morality was created by God (through his pseudonym Johannes de Silentio), but instead he will claim that God's command from God transcended morality. This difference means that God does not necessarily create human morality. Creating our own morals and values ​​is our personal. However, any religiousist must prepare for the sacred orders of God. It takes precedence over all moral and rational obligations. Kierkegaard called this case a suspension of moral teleportation. Abraham, the knight of faith chose to obey God unconditionally and received his son, the title of his faith and father of faith. Abraham transcended ethics and jumped on faith

I do not agree with Frankl on the driving force of the Kierkegaardian buildings for humans. I do not think that the main driving force of people is to pursue meaning. I also do not admit that his critics proposed alternative "motives" such as power and happiness. I believe that people are not the only one, but have the ability to be moved by many motivating factors. Furthermore, I think these motivations are expressed in a predictable, patterned way. In the three books I read this summer, it is possible to track the evolution of the hero's motive and the state of philosophical consciousness that follows. For the purpose of discussion, now I am working with me to develop the dynamic life I have developed in this chapter, to at least give me the comprehensibility of self-commitment self-commitment or the concept of ability of Kierkegaardian Either / Or I would like to discuss Model 2. The theory based on the biology of the practical institution presented in Chapter 3 and the incompatible synthetic possibilities I proposed in Chapter 4 provide a complete explanation and metaphysical basis for the truth of deep freedom, self-commitment To do. The reality or the ability of Kierkegaardian Either / Or is included in the institution's broader metaphysical framework - the ability to constitute principle credibility Reasonable human condition 3, deep freedom and real people: metaphysical research, Section 5.0 - Introduction, and Section 5.1 - Essential structure of deep freedom My idea is described in detail in chapters 2 to 5 below, together with this metaphysical interpretation of Kierkegaard 's concept and contemporary Kant' s anti - mechanism, free will, and practical institutional concepts. I make what I call a profound will. Otherwise, if I am free, I will be the ultimate source of all my choices and intentional actions. If one of the things I select and do is ultimately caused by a big bang or a partial regional environmental process or the state of the physical world, I become a far-end or near-end decision not free I will. This is also a local incompatibility, it is a combination with a clear image. Again, this is nonlocal compatibility and has been incorporated into scientific images Reasonable human condition 3, deep freedom and reality people: metaphysical studies, Section 1 2. Freedom of depth and authenticity of principle The ability to self-commit the choice of life, or true causality of Kierkegaardian Either / Or, and true psychological freedom, spontaneity and ownership is a necessary and sufficient condition for deep freedom. In other words, being deeply free is a necessary condition for the principle of authenticity, but that is not enough condition. It combines deep freedom and creates deep (non) moral responsibility. (Please explain the reason in this chapter as a prerequisite.) Therefore, natural liberalism is only a three part discussion. (I) freedom in life, (ii) incompatible incompatibility is reality, (iii) freely rational human thought Animal organizers essentially include deep freedom of abilities and credibility of principle together and are profound Non) moral responsibility, and natural liberalism is a reality. (Summary, From 1-5 above) Reasonable human condition 3. Deeply free and reality people: Metaphysical research, Section 1.3 - Center proposition and prediction

There are three fields of aesthetics, morality, religion. The moral field is merely a transitional field, and its best expression is a confession as a negative act. The scope of aesthetics is a range of immediacy, ethics is a range of requirements (this requirement is infinite, it is always bankrupt), religion is a range of realization, for example, that when a person satisfies a charity organization it is not satisfied Please be careful. A box or gold bag, a confession produced infinite space, and the result is a religious contradiction: it appears in 70,000 liters of water, but it is happy again. Reasonable human condition 5, Kant, Agnosticism and anarchism: Theology - Political Expo - Part 1, radical agnosticism, Section 1.1, Introduction This work is a sequel to Either / Or released by Kierkegaard two years ago. There, an aesthetic and ethical stage was raised, but Kierkegaard did not address religious areas except appendix. Here, he returned to the first two stages, then proceeded to a religious stage which occupies about two thirds of the book. In short, at the lifestyle stage, we treat each of the three stages of beauty, morality, religion, etc. continuously, "the place of existence" of life. He previously agreed with the word "stage" in his writings, but I do not think that they should be in the age of life, but as a paradigm of existence, not in turn. Indeed, the term sphere presence occurs more frequently than term term. In his own journal Kierkegaard noticed the difference between Stages On Life's Way and its predecessor. Frater Taciturnus reminds the reader many times that his name is not religious, but it is not so. As the entire work still works based on pseudonyms, the reader needs to remember that in the entire work, Kiakegaard approached a religious stage in an aesthetic way. Many of Quidam's diary entries start with "Today's Today". Therefore, his work is a memory. Memories are clearly a feature of the aesthetic stage. This is a retroactive behavior. Commitment to loved ones is an example of positive morality. Kierkegaard is anxious about his positive passion for the ideal (God). This is a religious stage

This article details the situation where the action responds appropriately to the action being performed. I understand Pojman's view and agree with the view that "every action in the universe has appropriate response" (Pojman, 1999, p. 96). I also agree that "evil behavior must obey the evil consequences of good deeds and good deeds" (Pojman, 1999, p. 96). For example, if you commit a murder, I think you should be executed. Yes, I know that some people may argue about this fact, but as long as they think about the sad family of those who are not alive, they feel pain, and the murderer They suffer when they are still alive. In the first part of my paper I will explain Pojman's view on Kierkegaard and explain the definition of Pojman's will. I will explain why he analyzed Kierkegaard and consider the power of his position. Later in this article, I will explain the range Evans responded successfully to Pojman. Evans solves its own position advantage. I will provide an alternative to Evans' criticism. As this article relates to the discussion contained in Pojman's book, consider the analysis of Pojman's Kierkegaard's view, as explained in religious beliefs and will, Evans's thesis. In support of their various positions, the authors rely mainly on conclusions on Philosophical Fragments 7 and The Philosophical Frags of anonymous writer Johannes Climacus. These are Kierkegaardian works I mention. The relationship between Kierkegaard 's view and the view attributed to the view of pseudonyms is not discussed here. In answering the discussion about "Kerkegaard" we call the author Kierkegaard. In answering the discussion about "Climacus" and analyzing my own The Fragments and The Postscript, I like quoting the author by pseudonym.

Explain the higher immediacy by comparing it with morality and aesthetics. Higher immediacy or religious belief is the most important accomplishment that people have accomplished, because only faith can give individuals the opportunity to become "true self". The ego is to be done throughout the lifetime, and God believes this is infinite. Therefore, human choice bears great responsibility because the choice of life's decision constitutes eternal redemption or curse. Because of religious beliefs, its formation requires morality and aesthetics, that is why they can not be the same. The choice between morality and aesthetics is a choice between good and evil, not a choice between good and evil. As Kierkegaard stated, the core of the aesthetic lifestyle is to try to lose self in the immediacy of existing experiences. The aesthetic expression paradigm is a romantic lover immersed in his passion. In contrast, the moral paradigm is the state of marriage, covenant and duty, and its condition is bound now by the past and the future. These two lifestyles have different concepts, incompatible attitudes, and premise of competitors. In the first part, Kierkegaard tells the artist (music, drama, etc.) and estheticians (the sensory experience is the best experience form, those who think that the ultimate goal of life) to find the most beautiful aesthetic experience in love I'm painting. . . In the second part, Kierkegaard believes that aesthetic life is not enough, and commitment to moral life is necessary for further development of human life. However, there is no strong contrast between aesthetics and moral life. On the contrary, Kierkegaard believes that efforts to moral life do not necessarily preclude aesthetic experiences. Errors in moral aesthetics (addendum 'aesthetic' or 'aesthetic') come from generalization from ideal ethics to all ethics. The aesthetic judgment paradigm dominates morality. Truth = Beautiful. Not all ethical merchandise and order are focused on what is right like Richard Rotie, but it is relatively transformed into aesthetic preferences, emphasizing human "creativity". Morality is more than a moral responsibility to worry about whether you are doing the right thing and the wrong thing. Because you can not "impose" moral preferences on others, the power of moral obligation is lost. Without the moral principles of morality, moral ethics theory becomes impossible. Only results are counted, absolutely not

Leap of Trust In his book "The Foreword of Nonscientific Conclusions", Soren Kierkegaard talks about the difference between subjective truth and objective truth. When talking about subjective truth, he compares it with "leap of faith". This means that you believe something anyway, no evidence to support it is necessary. He later linked 'leap of faith' to religion. "By leap of faith" One of them can affirm the proposition that God exists and can enter "God's relationship" to obtain "eternal happiness" (Schacht, 308). The final stage includes more: a leap of faith. For Kierkegaard, this means achieving a leap of confidence in God. However, the character of leaping (and I) should also be extended to other things. Leap of faith involves a belief in something that you may not be able to prove to others. It includes that belief from inner passion and excitement or confidence (using fewer terms). It is this belief that touches you because it is totally personal and unique. Kierkegaard said this feeling appeared at the same time in the water of 70,000 miles, but was also happy. It is united with wonderful fear and excitement. There is a person called this door, this process, a leap of faith. In the leap of faith, people jump into unknown things and someone can not be sure about something, someone will catch you. With the leap of faith, people have to give up all the tools they can find their place in the world. The person who created the word was SørenKierkegaard. Partly because of him, I dare to admire my friends' atheistic movement as a deep form of Christian liberation. Kierkegaard made it very clear that the only way to reach a higher form of existence is not by raising the ladder of moral behavior in the known world structure. This self improvement often leads to moral arrogance. It is the opposite of the morals people are going to achieve in their lives in many ways. Kierkegaard pointed out that we abandoned ourselves, our paradigm, and the moral moment of decision in order to abandon the leap of faith One of the famous views of Kierkegaard is what people call "leap of faith". The leap of faith is his concept of how people believe in God or how people behave in love. Faith is not a decision based on evidence. For example, some belief about God is genuine, or someone deserves love. There is not enough evidence to actually prove the true promise of true religious beliefs or romantic love. Anyway faith must make a promise. As Kierkegaard wrote, doubt is conquered by faith as faith has brought doubt to the world. "Complete nonsense. We can get a lot of practical evidence about a person's right love. We talk to them and understand their behavior. I can not see something like God. In the world of probabilistic knowledge, doubt is real emotion. Faith is an unrealistic and irrational reaction to this possibility.

Understanding Humanity: Summary of Philosophy and Art Examples: Our philosophers are not the first people to use art as an example to explain their argument. One example is Kierkegaard who turned his attention to Mozart's opera and tried to reveal the so-called aesthetic area of ​​his so-called existence. If Kierkegaard lives today, I think that he thinks that hero of Nikita Mikhalov's Dark Eyes (1987) is the prototype of the method of aesthetic existence. To support my thesis, I first discussed the theory of Kierkegaard in three existence fields. Aristotle said to the priest, "Art is an imitation of nature." As the model models the understanding of molecular structure and mathematical habits to simulate the economy, William Wallace believes that art is a model of mankind in his masterpiece "Natural modeling: Science philosophy and Nature philosophy" I will explain how to understand. . "At first glance, imitation seems to be a stylization of reality.In this reality, the common features of our world are introduced with a focus on somewhat exaggeration.The relation between imitation and imitation is dance and walking The imitation involves choosing something from ongoing experience to always place restrictions on what does not really begin or end. " Understanding Humanity: Summary of Philosophy and Art Examples: Our philosophers are not the first people to use art as an example to explain their argument. One example is Kierkegaard who turned his attention to Mozart's opera and tried to reveal the so-called aesthetic area of ​​his so-called existence. If Kierkegaard lives today, I think that he thinks that hero of Nikita Mikhalov's Dark Eyes (1987) is the prototype of the method of aesthetic existence. - Between Prince Machiavelli and Locke's second government paper, the concept of the government changed dramatically. Several philosophers advocated their ideas and laid the foundations for our government today. Niccolo Machiavelli, an Italian philosopher known for his government concepts and concepts that lived between 1469 and 1527. In the 18th century, "anthropology" was a field of philosophy to explain human nature. At that time, almost all of the field of system knowledge was understood as a field of philosophy. For example, physics is still known as 'natural philosophy', economic studies have developed into a part of 'moral philosophy'. At the same time, anthropology is not the main task of philosophy. As part of philosophy, it serves as a review of the philosophical doctrine's influence on human nature, and it may include massive empirical material currently considered psychology. Since the research field is part of philosophy, it is not necessary to explain it explicitly.

The first question, "Is there a pause in the theoretical objective?" The first question is to declare that morality is the universe applied to all people. But our aim in the universe is to act ethically. "As long as you want to stick to yourself and directly oppose the universe, he will sin, only by recognizing that he can reconcile with the universe again" (Kierkegaard, 1985, Page 83). As long as we do not admit our mistakes, we think that this argument makes sense because we can not move forward in our lives. The title of this section comes from the concept of Kierkegaard. The story of Abraham and Isaac's Bible tells us when God ordered Abraham to order Abraham to follow his son Abraham. Instead of faith, "Follow orders". Faith, everything will be abandoned - but my son, conscience, hope for the future - but all will be restored. His son is killed but still alive; the future of the elector is killed at birth, but it will still prosper. Anyway, this is what Kierkegaard said. For our purposes, it is important for Abraham's faith to make people understand the moral grace. Morality can only condemn Abraham, but we can understand what he is doing is not immoral. There are other meanings. Meaning and value which can not be understood by human size and normal size of achievement SørenKierkegaard proposed one of the first statements explaining the temporary suspension of personal ethics. In his long and beautiful essay on Abraham, Kierkegaard explained that Abraham almost killed his son and was eventually worshiped as a knight. Kierkegaard believes that all our actions and ideas fall into one of three categories. Everything we get for ourselves is aesthetics. All morals we do are religion (please be aware that religion has nothing to do with our God or religion perception). According to him, even though it is contrary to aesthetics, we will keep the rules and keep morality - this is the belief that we believe that we will abandon our natural personal desire to obey social norms is. He does this through dual movement - infinite resignation movement and faith movement.

The first question, "Is there a pause in the theoretical objective?" The first question is to declare that morality is the universe applied to all people. But our aim in the universe is to act ethically. "As long as you want to stick to yourself and directly oppose the universe, he will sin, only by recognizing that he can reconcile with the universe again" (Kierkegaard, 1985, Page 83). As long as we do not admit our mistakes, we think that this argument makes sense because we can not move forward in our lives. The title of this section comes from the concept of Kierkegaard. The story of Abraham and Isaac's Bible tells us when God ordered Abraham to order Abraham to follow his son Abraham. Instead of faith, "Follow orders". Faith, everything will be abandoned - but my son, conscience, hope for the future - but all will be restored. His son is killed but still alive; the future of the elector is killed at birth, but it will still prosper. Anyway, this is what Kierkegaard said. For our purposes, it is important for Abraham's faith to make people understand the moral grace. Morality can only condemn Abraham, but we can understand what he is doing is not immoral. There are other meanings. Meaning and value which can not be understood by human size and normal size of achievement SørenKierkegaard proposed one of the first statements explaining the temporary suspension of personal ethics. In his long and beautiful essay on Abraham, Kierkegaard explained that Abraham almost killed his son and was eventually worshiped as a knight. Kierkegaard believes that all our actions and ideas fall into one of three categories. Everything we get for ourselves is aesthetics. All morals we do are religion (please be aware that religion has nothing to do with our God or religion perception). According to him, even though it is contrary to aesthetics, we will keep the rules and keep morality - this is the belief that we believe that we will abandon our natural personal desire to obey social norms is. He does this through dual movement - infinite resignation movement and faith movement.

Leap of faith Since the 1960s, Northern Ireland has been shaken by "troubles." Atrocities such as constant explosion and killing have influenced the lives of most Protestant and Catholic families. Now they want only prayer and peace. They want to get the opportunity to end the violence and to live peacefully with the people of the "other" community. For some parents in Northern Ireland, education seems to be a hope for a peaceful life. Since education is responsible for shaping a child's perspective, Northern Ireland parents proposed comprehensive school concepts. To say that atheism is a leap of faith is the same as saying that the place called Modo is a leap of faith. What evidence do we have for Christian God, except for scribbling records about him in a relatively old book? Do not you think that there is a huge red dog called Clifford? I do not believe in 12 Greek gods This is a leap of faith? It is certain that this article is not the beginning to claim that atheism is equivalent to faith, but this is a recent example. It is easy to understand how people who believe in the basis that religion is deeply rooted in many cultures are easy to understand, but the reason why religion is deeply rooted in many cultures has higher powers It does not relate to some unique knowledge. Answer 3 Yes. Faith has dramatic progress. However, it is certainly advisable to achieve a leap of faith in the direction of the evidence. Consider a religious organization known as the gate of heaven. He told him that there is a spaceship behind the comet and they need to commit suicide when they get on the spaceship. Of course, the leap of this faith is stupid, as these doctrines actually do not have justifiable reasons. Well, he is not stupid, for example if there is a good reason to think that the universe points to the existence of God, that the resurrection of Jesus's body occurs, and that he claims to be God. The final stage includes more: a leap of faith. For Kierkegaard, this means achieving a leap of confidence in God. However, the character of leaping (and I) should also be extended to other things. Leap of faith involves a belief in something that you may not be able to prove to others. It includes that belief from inner passion and excitement or confidence (using fewer terms). It is this belief that touches you because it is totally personal and unique. Kierkegaard said this feeling appeared at the same time in the water of 70,000 miles, but was also happy. It is united with wonderful fear and excitement.

The only similarity between Marx and Kiakegaard is that he thinks Hegel is indifferent except for the disagreement with Hegel. As Kierkegaard put together in Either / Or, as Marx embodies in many of his books, no one will act for greater benefit or take action regardless of the outcome. . They believe that Hegel promised to leave himself to the former. He succumbs to universal morality at the expense of individuals and at the expense of greater profits. Here, Kierkegaard and Marx are far from Hegel. Background information on Hegel and Feuerbach (Averneri, pp. 8-27) Marx felt Kant was "opposite" and "should" and he was interested in Hegel's philosophy. Hegel's philosophy provides a way to eliminate this dichotomy. By "to achieve idealism in reality". Marx later discovered that this dichotomy still exists in Hegel's philosophy and is hidden in the internal contradiction of his social and political institutional theory. Feuerbach provided Margel a methodological way of criticizing Hegel, a way of change. Hegel believes that thinking is the subject, and that existence is a predicate. But Feuerbach wants to study this subject in space and time to develop materialist philosophy. His method of change is based on people, subject, and thinking. Philosophy of the 1800s. Kant's philosophy stimulated various ideologies such as G. W. F. Hegel and Karl Marx in Germany during the 1800's. Hegel has developed a theory of historical change called the dialectic. There, the conflicting conflict led to the creation of a new unity, and it led to the opposite. Hegel 's theory was transformed into dialectical materialism by Marx. Marx believes that only material things are genuine. He said that all ideas are based on the economy. He believes that dialectics of conflict between capitalists and industrial workers will lead to the establishment of communism, he calls it social and political systems. Marx is a theorist who uses philosophy to achieve his political view. As a student in Berlin, he was influenced by Hegel's dialecticism (genius of the Berlin Philosophical Association who died in the last 1831). Hegel's theory is that under any circumstances, through the process of struggle progress will be made in the truth, the thesis will be opposed by the opposite, new development, integration will appear outside the conflict . But apart from what he read, Marx did not quite understand the industrial working class. In contrast, Engels has a strong interest in Hegel, but he also knows the factory life of modern fear. He is from a wealthy textile family in Germany. In 1842 he was sent to manage the Manchester Engels and Herman cotton factories. As a result of careful observation over two years and detailed research, the result of the affected sociological survey, 'Level of Britain' s working class' announced in Leipzig in 1845 was the result.

This unique, he said that he is particularly orderly, stubborn and embarrassed. This man calls them "garbage", so this man does not like human beings very much. From the above, I think Freud is an arrogant figure, but he primarily depends on the intellectuals he learned. One day he even admitted his wife that he abandoned his name for 17 years in writing, so he decided to leave his name in the world on that day. His future biographer is simple. Anthony Storr, an academic solitary and prominent psychiatrist, challenged the idea of ​​choosing individual lifestyles to make mistakes. Through studies on historical examples and various psychological theories, Stall discusses the ways in which attention should be paid to the advantages of lonely life and the great satisfaction that comes from it. Kierkegaard is my favorite philosopher since I was 17 years old, reading fear and tremor. At college, I fell in love with a person full of energy and intelligence. I broke up with him several times and said that I want to be alone. I chose Lonely Life for various reasons and used his love Regine Olsen as an example of quoting the situation of Kierkegaard to support my view. Psychiatrist Anthony Stall talks about the role of spiritual "hatching" in creativity in his book "Lonely" about the relationship between solitude and creativity. The brewing that occurs in our brain occurs not only consciously but also unconsciously. All authors of this series are talking about how long it takes to take the materials slowly after the report is completed. Mr. Stoll said that time is a necessary preposition of creative "lighting" - when people saw the moment that they did not suddenly become clear, when they were struck by that insight flush . I have prepared preparatory writing rituals and mental frameworks for myself to maximize the opportunity for insight to come to us so that our thinking can even unconsciously link unrelated points I am talking about what I am trying to create.

The role of science, ethics, and belief in modern philosophy: It is strange that agnosticists such as Stephen Hawking in the late 20th century often proposed the Creator and the Universe, compared to Einstein. The problem of meta science, science itself is that science itself can not be answered. Modern brain science like Roger Penrose 's shadow of the heart (1994) has just begun to explore the relationship between the brain and the mind - physiology and perception. God: Because both have a common author, no conflict - nature and way - Galileo believed in God 's two books. Science philosophy will study the elements of scientific exploration from a philosophical point of view. In this article I will explain the metaphysical, epistemological and ethical issues related to the practice and goals of modern science. For the handling of philosophical problems arising from specific scientific questions and concepts, please refer to biology, philosophy, physics, philosophy. The history of philosophy is intertwined with the history of natural science. For the first time in the 19th century when the word science came to be used in a modern sense, those who are now thought to be the hero in the history of Western philosophy are often used for contributions to "natural philosophy" It is done. The query is currently designated as science The role of science, ethics, and belief in modern philosophy: It is strange that agnosticists such as Stephen Hawking in the late 20th century often proposed the Creator and the Universe, compared to Einstein. The problem of meta science, science itself is that science itself can not be answered. Modern brain science like Roger Penrose 's shadow of the heart (1994) has just begun to explore the relationship between the brain and the mind - physiology and perception. - Understanding humanity: a summary of philosophy and examples of art: Our philosophers are not the first people to use art as an example to explain their argument. One example is Kierkegaard who turned his attention to Mozart's opera and tried to reveal the so-called aesthetic area of ​​his so-called existence. If Kierkegaard lives today, I think that he thinks that hero of Nikita Mikhalov's Dark Eyes (1987) is the prototype of the method of aesthetic existence.

Antigone tyrant and martyr "When the tyrant dies his rule ends and the martyr is dead, his rule begins." Seren Kierkegaard in a number of ways this sentence applies to Sophocles Play Antigone went. These two lines can be used to represent the opposition of the two protagonists Kryon and Antigone in the theater. One is not long in the power which is the new king to the throne, other martyrs, but after her death his belief will continue to exist. In the first line of his introduction, Kiekegaard said that the tyrann's control died with him. In order to have Sophocles plot "Antigone", he made Antigone a martyr, a masochism and was killed by a tyrant. This is Antigone who respects her brothers and hopes to bring death to themselves. Furthermore, if Sophocles does not depict Kryon as a tyrant, the mood of the play will be greatly influenced. Indeed, her solid belief paved the way for her. Antigone tyrant and martyr "When the tyrant dies his rule ends and the martyr is dead, his rule begins." Seren Kierkegaard in a number of ways this sentence applies to Sophocles Play Antigone went. These two lines can be used to represent the opposition of the two protagonists Kryon and Antigone in the theater. One is the new king of the throne, has no power for a long time and the other is a martyr, and a firm belief persists after death. In the first line of his introduction, Kiekegaard said that the tyrann's control died with him. Compared to Antigone, Kryon and Ismail believe that different things are wrong and wrong. In this quote, "Tyrant dies, his rule is over, the martyr is dead, his reign has begun" (Kierkegaard), it appears in Cleon and Islamic Maine and Antigone Tyrant is not a martyr ,similar. Tyrants do not leave a permanent impression of the consent of urban people. If you understand what people really want, the popularity of this person may decline. For martyrs, this person only maintains suffering, beliefs, beliefs, or principles. And due to the quality of their personality, his / her image never dies. All in all, Clement, Antigone and Ismene represent two aspects of quotation, "When the tyrant dies his rule ends, the martyrs died, his reign started," the whole written by Sophocles Drama Antigone, Sophocles drama "Antigone" talks about the story of Antigone and Kryon, and the ongoing conflict between mistakes. Antigone seemed to fulfill the role of a solitary martyr, eventually bringing unnecessary death and life could have been saved. The King of Thebes Kryon tried to correct the mistake, but Antigone became obstinate and proud of his mistake. I helped her because she tried to play the role of choice for people who tried to help her stubborn and blind, including life, Haemon, Eurydices, as well as others, Antigone was a solitary martyr, , I think that I can save my life Everyone will die for the ignorance of the next game

In Antigon of Sophocre, Antigon is both anarchist and martyr for various reasons. Firstly, there are many reasons for girls to look like anarchists. Anarchist is a person who does not want the government and does not have higher authority. So, there are many reasons to make a girl an anarchist. The most obvious reason is that she is in violation of the law, which is the law established by King Tevez. The law includes the fact that after being expelled from his hometown, the army is gathered and the Polynes that is a traitor of Tevez is not buried, and war has taken place in the town after attack. Antigone tyrant and martyr "When the tyrant dies his rule ends and the martyr is dead, his rule begins." Seren Kierkegaard in a number of ways this sentence applies to Sophocles Play Antigone went. These two lines can be used to represent the opposition of the two protagonists Kryon and Antigone in the theater. One is the new king of the throne, has no power for a long time and the other is a martyr, and a firm belief persists after death. In the first line of his introduction, Kiekegaard said that the tyrann's control died with him. Compared to Antigone, Kryon and Ismail believe that different things are wrong and wrong. In this quote, "Tyrant dies, his rule is over, the martyr is dead, his reign has begun" (Kierkegaard), it appears in Cleon and Islamic Maine and Antigone Tyrant is not a martyr ,similar. Tyrants do not leave a permanent impression of the consent of urban people. If you understand what people really want, the popularity of this person may decline. For martyrs, this person only maintains suffering, beliefs, beliefs, or principles. And due to the quality of their personality, his / her image never dies. All in all, Clement, Antigone and Ismene represent two aspects of quotation, "When the tyrant dies his rule ends, the martyrs died, his reign started," the whole written by Sophocles Drama Antigone, Sophocles drama "Antigone" talks about the story of Antigone and Kryon, and the ongoing conflict between mistakes. Antigone seemed to fulfill the role of a solitary martyr, eventually bringing unnecessary death and life could have been saved. The King of Thebes Kryon tried to correct the mistake, but Antigone became obstinate and proud of his mistake. I helped her because she tried to play the role of choice for people who tried to help her stubborn and blind, including life, Haemon, Eurydices, as well as others, Antigone was a solitary martyr, , I think that I can save my life Everyone will die for the ignorance of the next game

According to Sartre, individuals are released from the moment they were born and continue to exist throughout their lives to determine their personality. Since the character of the individual is what we are doing now that we have done in the past, our character has never been fully defined before we lose the ability to act immediately after death. After we finally finish, we are defined by others as our action, success and failure accumulation and consequences. Before the essence, we are created without the help of a higher life. The philosophical career of Jean Paul Sartre (1905-1980) focused on building the existential philosophy called the existentialism in its first stage. Early works of Sartre are characterized by the development of classical phenomenology, but his idea is different from Husserl's interest in methodology, self-concept, morality. These branch points are the cornerstone of Sartre's existential phenomenology and its aim is not to understand the world itself but to understand the existence of human beings. By adopting and adapting the phenomenological method, Sartre began to develop ontologies about what it is. The main feature of this ontology is fundamental freedom without evidence, which is a characteristic of human condition. These are in stark contrast to the fact that there is no problem in the world of things. Sartre's substantial literary work always creates unstable facts and dramatic expressions of freedom in an indifferent world. The theory of Jean-Paul Sartre considers that existentialism is a kind of humanism that exchanges consciousness and existential thinking, what it means, and the nature of ontology. Throughout his philosophy, Sartre said that it is self, "the existence of a person must precede its essence" (Sutter 318). Understanding what "yes" means to recognize a universal way of thinking in the existence of a single human being Existentialism was founded by Jean-Paul Sartre, in favor of Martin Heidegger's claim that mankind existed before nature. "Essence" is the cornerstone of all metaphysical philosophy and rationalism, but the statement of Sartre is the denial of his previous philosophical system (in particular the philosophical system of Husserl, Hegel and Heidegger). Rather than creating "reality" he believes that existence and reality are first and that essence is later. The most important thing for Kierkegaard is that the moral entity is an individual and the subjective aspect of human life is the most important, and for Kierkegaard all of them have a religious connotation .

The truth can be defined as obeying reality or reality, and in order to make something "reality" it must be open, eternal and independent. If "truth" does not meet these guidelines, it is not "real". Clearly, everything that violates the "truth" boundary is definitely wrong. Truth and error seem to be not a simple black and white situation in many cases, sometimes there may be no reason to decide what is true and what is false. All truth is a matter of opinion. Truth is related to culture, history, language and society. All the truth we know is a subjective truth (ie the truth that depends on the soul). For example, in physics, Newton's law of gravity can be determined to be nearly 100%, but it can not be said that this is absolutely correct. For example, if you put a pencil it will fall, but what happens will be what happens when released. So we can not really say this law. In order to make this law 100% sure, we need to know that it is impossible in the future. It can not be said that this is fake, but completely incorrect things will not automatically become wrong. I would like to explain this claim using another example in another knowledge field, art. Taking an illustration of Mona Lisa as an example, some people think that they are actually watching the audience, others think that they are not watching, others think that they are crying in the picture, and smiling Some people imagine. Therefore, all of these audiences are right, as Mona Lisa is not smiling, or Mona Lisa can not blame someone to say that they are crying, or doing nothing. This is actually dependent on the viewer's perception, emotion, and reasoning ability. If a happy audience may find her smile, a bad mood may find that she is crying. Therefore, it depends on the psychology of the person looking at the picture at that time. In this case, inference is mainly emotion Objectively speaking, there may be universal truths, perhaps subjectively, everyone has their own truth. Personal truth is neither right nor wrong for outsiders. To others, "No, believe this" is very arrogant and impolite. Open discussion is one thing, argument in the narrow sense is another matter I would like to say that the truth exists outside of us and can be seen by anyone. Unfortunately, the real conclusion against the truth is more complicated, as humans can be stubborn. There are two kinds of truth in society: subjective truth and objective truth. The subjective truth is given to us through our personal experience related to the people around us: in short, this is the truth we proposed. Objective facts are discovered through searching. This is essential to our experience until sufficient evidence is gathered. Subjective truth is not always opposite objective truth, but it is not from other people, it depends on the emphasis of the theme for their view of the world. In Kierkegaard, objective truth is characterized by extrinsicity and subjective truth is characterized by intrinsicity. Objective thinkers do not find eternal happiness in subjective truth, but they are not interested in subjective truth. Objective thinkers are interested in the definition of existence, but subjective thinkers are interested in the definition of existence. Consideration about the nature of existence may be objective or subjective. The truth can be reflected objectively or subjectively. Kierkegaard believes that an objective thinker discovers the truth by approximation and a subjective thinker uses it to discover the truth. Objective thinkers need to quantify certainty or probability, subjective thinkers finally have to accept uncertainty. According to Kierkegaard, it can not be achieved by estimating trust, or by trying to quantify the review more certainly.

Rationalization of Sartor and human sexuality: Like Sarutol and Plato, Sartre streamlines sexuality. Rationalization here refers to the way Sartre attempts to promote interpretation by changing the term of discussion from sexual to non - sexual concept. The most important thing as philosophy is to emphasize the characteristics of the existence of human beings that seems to be most resistant to interpretation. Existentialism was founded by Jean-Paul Sartre, in favor of Martin Heidegger's claim that mankind existed before nature. "Essence" is the cornerstone of all metaphysical philosophy and rationalism, but the statement of Sartre is the denial of his previous philosophical system (in particular the philosophical system of Husserl, Hegel and Heidegger). Rather than creating "reality" he believes that existence and reality are first and that essence is later. The most important thing for Kierkegaard is that the moral entity is an individual and the subjective aspect of human life is the most important, and for Kierkegaard all of them have a religious connotation . Like Kiakegaard, Sartre calls it a "malicious" form, thinking of a fundamentally irrational and arbitraristic reasoning problem - that is trying to impose a structure on the world of phenomena - the other. According to Sartre, rationality and malicious intent of other forms prevent people from discovering meaning freely. Mr. Sartre argues that in order to suppress anxiety and fear, people restrict themselves to their daily lives, abandon liberty and tolerate that it is in the form of "appearance" of "others" I will. Owner) Opinion of another person, or at least one other person) I will take the issue of free will. Jean-Paul Sartre's "Being and Nothingness" has a strange part where Sartre is discussing human freedom compared to skiing. Sartre is a fundamental concept of freedom, according to this concept human beings can form themselves in a virtual way, almost without being restricted to the world in a godlike way. In order to find this example, Sartre thought about skating but refused (the skater's way was too dependent on the hard resistance of the ice) and eventually hit a ski (snow is so soft that the back of the trace ) Sartre admits that a better metaphor will be some form of "water skiing" - more autonomy will increase if the rider's road disappears, apparently he seems not accustomed to surfing

The essence of romantic romanticism first appeared in Germany and the UK in the 1770s, which resulted from the entanglement of the 18th century ideas and concepts known as enlightenment. This movement hit Europe like a candle in a hay barn, and in the 1920s its widespread flames hit France and other Europeans followed it. Although the 18th century generally focused on reason and judgment, law and order, and social value, romanticists emphasized imagination, emotion, freedom, personal value, nature, distance, forgotten times. The general concept of essence is as follows. Essence is a definable property of what exists. At that time, the essence of things was its definition. So the current problem is how the essence of things is related to their existence. There exists essence in a limited entity, but it does not exist; this is a rough explanation of Thomas' most fundamental metaphysical doctrine: essence and existence are different in a limited entity. Therefore, considering the nature and existence of Thomas' metaphysical thinking, he will consider his basic doctrine, that is, essence and existence are completely different. Existentialism was founded by Jean-Paul Sartre, supporting Martin Heidegger's claim that mankind existed before nature. "Essence" is the cornerstone of all metaphysical philosophy and rationalism, but the statement of Sartre is the denial of his previous philosophical system (in particular the philosophical system of Husserl, Hegel and Heidegger). Rather than creating "reality" he believes that existence and reality are first and that essence is later. The most important thing for Kierkegaard is that the moral entity is an individual and the subjective aspect of human life is the most important, and for Kierkegaard all of them have a religious connotation . The assertion that existence precedes essence is that assertions do not have such predefined qualities in humans and the essence of individuals is defined by individuals through individuals creating and living their lives . As Sartre said, existentialism is a sort of humanitarianism: "People exist first, encounter, rapidly increase in the world, and later define themselves." Existentialism tends to focus on the issue of existence of human beings and the conditions of existence. Being a person means each person's specific life and the specific way they are in the world. The existence of this particular individual must be the main source of information in people's research, but certain conditions are often considered "local" to the existence of human beings.

Not for this I was born and raised. I do not understand this need. I once prayed to God, I am very loyal. I once had a soul to understand peace. - A woman who sold her body from a prostitute "Lower" of a Russian brothel song (Bernstein, 169) has been dissatisfied with most members of society for a long time. However, since the early days of Rahab, Jericho's niece of the Old Testament helped Joshua and his people regain the promised land, prostitutes as well as sinners who may be saved, as women who save humanity It was drawn. . understood. Notes from the ground (Fyodor Mikhailovich Dostoevsky) 129 "Journal Epoch, memo from the basement", by Donstoevsky Konstantin Mochulsky: Flying over his life and work (1967) (Ken Kesey) "Raymond's" Grail Knight " Arrival beyond the wasteland M. Alderman (1972) Strange case of Jekyll and Haid (Robert Louis Stevenson) "Mask in the mirror: 18th century and 90s", "Separated Self: Perspective" Victorian literature (1969) 141 In Existentialism from Dostoevsky to Sartre, Walter Kaufman wrote as follows. "I do not think there is a reason to call Dostoevsky as an existentialist, but the underground memo tells us," I will not mention Dostoevsky's "underground note" in this article, but on the movement of the ensemble and the way it is released I will explore. Existential tone note - the subject of existence in Dostoyevsky's "Karamazov brothers". Mainly through Ivan Karamazov. I am primarily based on the French philosopher Jean-Paul Sartre, but pay attention first to the basic idea and spirit of the existentialist thinker Soren Kelkegaard. I made readers understand the origin of existentialism and did this to compare Sartre's atheistic existentialism with the theological existentialism of Kierkegaard. Under Fyodor Dostoevsky's "Underground Notes", a man under the ground insisted he was not active. This is what I call "doing nothing, I think it is very interesting, when I read that Jean - Paul Sartre is simple, I remembered the people in the basement." Existentialism is a kind of humanitarianism . "Underground people are fully aware that only you are choosing or lacking in choice and he suffers from his choice before making a decision.This is nothing for him In terms of articles, people are subconscious, existentialists.

Theoretical Overview Fritz Perls, MD, Ph.D., the founder and developer of Gestalt Treatment, was born in 1893 as a Jewish family and died in 1970. After experiencing dealing with a soldier in World War I, Perls was urged to complete Gestalt treatment. It depends on the influence of bulging. With the help of his wife, Dr. Laura Posner Pelus, he created the foundation for solid format tower therapy. They are not part of a discrete function but want a cure that emphasizes the global importance of mankind (Corey, 2013, p. 193). Gestalt therapy is another humanitarian approach. Gestalt therapy developed by Frederick Perls focuses on customer's current experience. The general technique of gestalt therapy is role-playing, and the therapist shows various roles to the client and instructs "owning" or accepting emotions previously felt unpleasant. Presence therapy encourages customers to take responsibility for their lives and problems. This is accomplished by allowing customers to understand freedom and select different courses to have greater meaning. Existential handling is rooted in Søren Kierkegaard and Friedrich Nietzsche's existential philosophy (existentialism). Gestalt Therapy The dream of Gestalt therapy is different from psychoanalysis and Jung analysis. Gestalt therapist believes that dreams are a message we are sending to ourselves. Please proactively investigate this information and incorporate the contents of your dream into the real life of the person. One of the main techniques used in Gestalt analysis is the "participate" technique. In the process, the therapist asks you to write down everything that person dreams of. Then people are asked to express each "part" of a dream and create a dialogue between the parts. For example, if one dreams of a person wearing a hat in the garden, the therapist may tell him to ask a number. I answered "What am I doing in your garden"? I answer "I am here to protect the people you love" and I will fulfill part of that role. A feeling Frederick Perls (1893-1970) is the founder of Gestalt Therapy. Gestalt therapy is designed to fill your emotional gap so that you can become a unified whole. I believe that Perls contains part of self that is unacceptable in dreams, unwelcome. Each personality in the dream and all things represents one aspect of self. You are a hurricane, you are an attacker, you are a broken car, you are a bridge, you are a dusty book. Perl refused to accept the idea that dreams are part of a universal symbolic language. He believes that all dreams are unique to those who dream of it.

Existentialism can be defined as a philosophical theory that focuses on individuals as free and responsible persons and determines his own development through actions of will. Existentialism is a thesis that has been discussed by some of the greatest philosophical ideas. Thinkers like Kierkegaard and Nietzsche have their own views on what existentialism is and the serious impact on the development of this paper. Each of these philosophies has had a tremendous influence on the wonderful idea of ​​the late history. Studies of "self" in philosophy tend to focus on the concept of existence. Understanding the meaning of "yes" means achieving a universal way of thinking in their lifetime. Jean-Paul Sartre elaborates his views mainly through phenomenology and the concept of free will. He insists that human beings will be described as "an existence preceding its essence" (Sartre 318). In this article we analyze human consciousness and existence, discuss Sartre's existentialist theory by becoming the meaning and existence of existence and self-existence theory. Among all the philosophers who studied in the forum, I found that I was most interested in Jean Paul Sauter's point of view. Jean Paul Sartre recognizes the premise that "existence precedes essence". Sartre believes that human beings will happen someday, will happen or will arrive at the scene, or in his words, humans will believe "sometime being released from the hole", and after this abnormal event, Life has meaning. In contrast to widely accepted ideas, Sartre is boldly suggesting this concept. It is widely believed that the meaning of life is far beyond our short and meaningless life. It does not matter if we can accept our life. Life will survive regardless of whether you understand life to some extent or not. Sartre believes that the reverse is true. He believes that life does not make sense unless we give it meaning. Everyone would think seriously about this concept. How life can have me! Simone De Beauvoir is a French writer, intelligent, political activist, feminist. According to Stanford University Philosophy Encyclopedia, she has maintained a lifelong open relationship with Jean Paul Sartre. De Beauvoir's biggest idea is that women are the same as men in all respects - especially romantic relationships. Prime Minister Stanford insisted that "women and men treat each other equally, equality is not synonymous with identity." Rather than play a role of sex in a richer, romantic relationship. What is the best way to not be a victim of gender assumptions? I refuse to associate your behavior (and happiness) automatically with typical male and female roles and ideals

For Hamlet's revenge, there is an old proverb that "My father's sin has visited my son". When my son is Hamlet, Rerete, Fortin Bra - the main figure of Shakespeare's "Hamlet" - people may wonder how their male fathers affect their special nature - their special crimes not. Hamlet can be thought of as Cain and Abel 's story, a foolish person who killed his brother, but this is a speculation that Claudius himself did when he prayed during the climax of the drama - "O. Asking for revenge on the revenge of Hamlet led to the collapse of many people. The nature of its consumption leads people to behave unscrupulously through anger rather than reason. Through Hamlet, revenge is a major event that leads to a tragic event. The characters in the play, Hamlet, Ruthes, Fortin Bra, tried to get revenge on his father's death. William Shakespeare play 'Hamlet' is mainly a tragedy of revenge because many characters are calling for revenge and confusion. Hamlet's revenge Hamlet is one of the best literary works with natural ability to transcend time and human condition. William · Shakespeare is investigating the themes of revenge, morality, sexuality, and family complexity. Hamlet's Shakespeare story gave us one of the earliest tragic heroes in the history of contemporary literature. In the process of revenge on his father's death, we also saw a systematic decline and a crazy mistake. And it reflects the famous 'Whether it becomes' or not (Hamlet 3.1.56). The previous sentence was written by Danish philosopher and poet Søren Kierkegaard. SørenKierkegaard born in 1813 is quite familiar with Shakespeare's sentences and is often mentioned in his writing.

In the Mood for Love (2000) released in 2000 and known as "Time Out New York" is one of the most popular and underestimated foreign movies. From old-fashioned descriptions of the 1960's to artistically attractive film pictures, this film is a major element of the fast-tempo, fast-paced film industry. Therefore, after seeing it I have been crazy for a couple days, dreaming of characters and making their destiny, this movie can not leave me. I will not let you go. 038892 Love is working at Kierkegaard, an analysis of Soren's moving form and source of love. The feelings and feelings of love are different from love work, love love, love love, love love as a royal law, love love as a triangle of love, and love of self love. 561 pgs. • 1998 087149 Alec's actual logic Fisher logic This extended version describes a unique approach to analysis and evaluation. It is designed to help students critically think about ongoing theoretical discussions often encountered in research, including discussions on nature, society, policies, philosophy, using various examples. 236 pgs. • 2004 Dawn's love poem covers a wide range of emotions from extreme physical passion to spiritual love, expressing a wide range of emotions from cynical despotic feelings to beliefs and accepted emotions. Therefore, it is difficult to classify them accurately. Dawn 's love poetry has a broader emotion than any other poet, and it is not a book, but a personal experience rooted in him. As he has a wide and diverse experience in love, you will find all kinds of emotions in his poem. He is famous for loving many women. Some of his lover 's events have lasted almost permanently for a long time, others were short - lived. For many people depression is a normal response to the ability of people they love to death and do everyday activities. However, if there are no signs of depression and depression is low over a long period of time, the greatest benefit is to talk to the primary care provider to determine if it is due to clinical depression. (Veterans Office in 2002) The three main types of depression are major depression, mood disorder, bipolar disorder. In addition to the three types of depression listed there are many other types of depression, but the difference is more than the degree rather than nature. For all practical purposes, the three main types of depression include the full range. The first type, the main type of depression actually invalidates one person in every aspect of his or her life. Trivial work such as meals and sleeping is affected by difficult tasks such as cognitive functions such as social interaction and severe depression.

The existential meaning of existence can be said that one of the most frequently considered philosophical thinking is "What is the meaning of life?" Manipulate the environment they live in greatly. After all, people have to wonder what their purpose is and define their meaning for themselves. Assuming that there are various people in the outside world, there is no doubt that opinions on the ultimate purpose of existence are different. Existentialism is a philosophical movement developed in the 19th and 20th centuries. In the basic existentialist belief, humans are the only animals that define themselves throughout life. It is meaningless without life. Existentialists believe in life and fight for it. When fighting for life, everyone has to face important and difficult decisions with limited knowledge and time to make these decisions. John Stuart Mill is one of the most important liberalists of the 19th century and supports Utilitarianism in ethics, that is, each one of us should act to acquire the largest number of people Happy viewpoint. He teaches that we can restrict that person's behavior only if it harms others, regardless of whether it harms the agent itself. Christian's existential philosopher Soren Kierkegaard believes that life is given to individuals, not society and religion, and lives with reality and passion. In our era of personality and mass customization, Kirkega's emotions reflect the spirit of our time. The meaning shapes and leads our life. But there is no quick answer to the ultimate problem of life. On the contrary, in today's world, the answer must be adjusted to the heart of the questioner. That is why I asked my students to think and express their own beliefs at the end of my religious course. I really enjoyed Maarten's position. Most of the "meaning of life" articles I encountered today end in one of two ways. Both of them suggest the concept of existentialism. Life has no meaning, it is up to us to create meaning. Or: The meaning of life is to be as viable as possible, to be yourself in sincere or passionate. Alternatively, some variations of these two concepts. Neither makes me uncomfortable. The first hypothesis is that we can not find meaning after the death of God, which proves to be meaningless. I do not buy this; we do not know very little about the universe (black hole, dark matter, wormhole, unknown size, space distance, string theory, quantum entanglement etc), and our own understanding almost Absent)? We are looking at the relationship between ourselves and our own ideas or making changes, not relationships.

The use of contrast helps characterize the concept of morality and revenge in the Hamlet of William Shakespeare. Foil between the characters further develops the concept and function and provides an additional meaning layer behind the game. Between Hamlet and Claudius, contrast is seen between Hamlet and Fortin Bra. The contrasting role mentioned is an important part of developing themes through the play, ie moral corruption. Moral corruption may be seen throughout Denmark, or simply by family units contacted by Hamlet. In Shakespeare's 'Hamlet Hamlet' revenge, Shakespeare revenged as the theme of all the works. Vengeance plays an important role in the development of Fortinbras, Prince of Norway, Hamlet, the Prince of Denmark, and the son of Polonius Laertes. All three asked for revenge for their father's murder. In Hamlet, revenge can be interpreted as another character. Everyone seeking revenge will overcome it. - Ophelia of William · Shakespeare's "Hamlet" "Look good to her, follow her, I pray to you" (IV.5.73) On the surface, Shakespeare's "Hamlet" is dramatic, mysterious It is an incredibly incredible drama figure. His motives, madness, contradictory morality, and existentialism struggle can be at least embarrassed. In analyzing his role, Laertes and Fortinbras are quoted often as examples of less extreme roles that are similar but handle a more specific dilemma. Hamlet's revenge Hamlet is one of the best literary works with natural ability to transcend time and human condition. William · Shakespeare is investigating the themes of revenge, morality, sexuality, and family complexity. Hamlet's Shakespeare story gave us one of the earliest tragic heroes in the history of contemporary literature. In the process of revenge on his father's death, we also saw a systematic decline and a crazy mistake. And it reflects the famous 'Whether it becomes' or not (Hamlet 3.1.56). The previous sentence was written by Danish philosopher and poet Søren Kierkegaard. SørenKierkegaard born in 1813 is quite familiar with Shakespeare's sentences and is often mentioned in his writing.

A coronation's violent theme 'Stranger (outsider)' Albert Gay's stranger is an absurd novel surrounding the hero Melso. One of the main themes of the novel is violence. There are various places where violence directly related to the subject of the book occurs and leads to serious violence. The main violent act of killing Arabs committed by Meursault lead to his character being completely abnormal, he noticed the absurdity of life. Crowning of optimism in "strangers" (outsiders) Albert Camus's novel "stranger" can be seen from several different perspectives. Some people think this book is "slap" or insult. However, some think that the view expressed in this novel is satisfying and optimistic. As there are various people in the world, there are various interpretations and opinions about this novel. - Voltaire is the author of the novel Candide, also known as "optimism". The novel "Voltaire" represents a concept of illogical and absurd optimism. In Candide, Voltaire respected the idea of ​​optimism. It was widely used by philosophers during enlightenment. In this story, Candid is a young man experienced a series of career and adventure experiencing adversity and adversity worldwide. "The Stranger" by Albert Camus is a novel about Mersau, a novel about how he became a "stranger" of society. The public already knew that he was a murderer, in which case he murdered the Arabs. However, even though he should not be part of the incident, Meursault did not mourn the casket of his dead mother. Society does not understand his existential beliefs. His extant belief allowed him to believe his life was meaningless. Meursault's common sense is that everyone will eventually die and their lives will not be a problem in the end. Meursault is a "stranger", it is ridiculous for society to show no emotions, but life has no meaning in life. Albert Camus wrote about the idea of ​​becoming a stranger in the world, but it reversed the meaning of Kierkegaard. A crowned stranger is a person living in the world, even if he does not want to become a Christian, he is forced to exist as a Christian. But Kiakegaard is talking about the desire to be a Christian living in a Christian who has abandoned the Christian world. The coronation ceremony and Kiakegaard share the same aversion of Christian democracy. Everyone is forced to actively participate in Christianity. Kiakegaard opposed Christian's vote, and for him Christ was the only authority. Camu called it "philosophical suicide of existential attitude". This is how he is putting it in myths of Sisyphus and other works.

Dostoyevsky's pathology The leading view of Dostoevsky is violent and his personality is being tortured; it is natural that many people think his work is a prophecy of the 20th century. However, Dostoevsky gave some of his best arguments to the devil in a firm explanation about the fall of this devil, but the Gospel often wins. Ivan Karamazov offered at least the possibility of repentance when he was kissed by his sacred brother, Aliosha. Raskolnikov, a nihilic anti-protagonist of sin and punishment, was finally redeemed by the love of a pure niece Sonja. The former novelist introduced the alienated hero in modern times of the time. Among them are the main characters of Kafka, those in the basement of Dostoevsky, and Sartre's disgusting rockin. However, in the case of Kafka and Dostoevsky, social factors rather than ontological factors are grounds for alienation, and in the case of Sartre's hero, it is not objective but strong recognition of the author has a remarkable character's performance , And finally there is a treatment solution and autobiographical overtone discomfort In Existentialism from Dostoevsky to Sartre, Walter Kaufman wrote as follows. "I do not think there is a reason to call Dostoevsky as an existentialist, but the underground memo tells us," I will not mention Dostoevsky's "underground note" in this article, but on the movement of the ensemble and the way it is released I will explore. Existential tone note - the subject of existence in Dostoyevsky's "Karamazov brothers". Mainly through Ivan Karamazov. I am primarily based on the French philosopher Jean-Paul Sartre, but pay attention first to the basic idea and spirit of the existentialist thinker Soren Kelkegaard. I made readers understand the origin of existentialism and did this to compare Sartre's atheistic existentialism with the theological existentialism of Kierkegaard. Under Fyodor Dostoevsky's "Underground Notes", a man under the ground insisted he was not active. This is what I call "doing nothing, I think it is very interesting, when I read that Jean - Paul Sartre is simple, I remembered the people in the basement." Existentialism is a kind of humanitarianism . "Underground people are fully aware that only you are choosing or lacking in choice and he suffers from his choice before making a decision.This is nothing for him In terms of articles, people are subconscious, existentialists.

The theology of death of God is a theological movement dating back to the radical theologian of the 1960s like Thomas Altitzer and William Hamilton and continues to appear in more diverse forms such as Slavojžižek and John Caputo. To that person. Movement can be traced back to the work of G. W. F. Thomas Altizers says "Psychological phenomenology is the first philosophical rule of God's death" (Altizer) and poets such as Nietzsche, Lacan, Heidegger, Thinkers like Kierkegaard and Derrida, and Hegel like William Blake . According to the mainstream Christian theology, before the second coming after the death, he saved his life in the middle of God, but after the second coming he was a physical resurrection of the deceased and material enthusiasm of the new earth I experienced. The questions and answers to the doctrine of the Catholic Church say: "Although death separates the soul from the body, in the resurrection God brings immortal life to our body and changes by reuniting with our soul, as Christ revives and lives forever "The new territory light is that the plan of God is not to give up the world, but instead to give it back, bringing life to the body of a new life, this is the promise of the gospel of Christians." By "death" God does not mean physical death that we may think. Instead, God refers to what happens forever after our body dies. The Bible calls this incident a "second death". The second death is different. It also needs to be separated, but it is to separate groups of people from different groups: on the one hand justice and forgiveness, and on the other hand evil and repentance. Both teams will review separately When it comes to the death of God and Jesus, the second important moment of sacrifice is the Day of Atonement. As for the death of God and Jesus, the word "redemption" is very important. This word means "to compensate for mistakes" or "to supplement". People do this when people are preparing for their mistakes. Other understanding of the terms focus more on solidarity or settlement. In this case, the atonement is any ransom that redempts or reintegrates to people. When the Bible talks about redemption in many cases, it means "to cover". Death is a time of trial to allow humans to repent and serve God - Autumn brings time and spiritual death to all humanity - redemption comes from repentance - God personally commits the world sin - Mercy is for repentants - all others are governed by the righteousness of God - mercy is coming from the redemption - only true confessioners can be saved. About 74 BC, my son, I would like to explain this to you. After God took us out of Eden until we were taken our first parents, he took the man and put it in the east end of the Garden of Eden, ccherubim. Let's become a sword of fire in various ways to protect the tree of life -

In this article, we will explore all aspects of the literary movement first appeared in the 19th century, the existentialism. It will discuss different climates that existed during the literary movement, including society, politics and economics. Combining the basic dictionary definition and the numerous interpretations that the author derived from existentialism, the information provided will deepen the understanding of the origin, popularity and breadth of the subject matter. In this article I will explore the work of famous existent writers, including Jean-Paul Sartre, Franz Kafka, Luigi Pirandello, Albert Camus, covering the whole period of existentialism. In this article, we briefly outline the history of existentialist thinkers, then discuss how empathicistic challenges place emphasis on freedom of choice in the world, and finally in response to my reaction We must take responsibility. It exists. How these dilemmas lead to loss of anxiety, guilt, inertia, motivation, responsibility for "interests" and existing choice are ontological anxiety, natural reaction to real life, Choosing to live in nature or return to a lonely world as you avoid resolving conflicts with the dilemma. Existential pathology will contrast with this Existential notes 4 Historical existentialism belongs to the 19th century to the 20th century as a unique philosophical and literary movement, but elements of existentialism are found in Socrates's thought (and life), the Bible, and research You can do. Many philosophers and writers before the modern era. Pascal's first major problem in predicting modern existentialism was Bryce Pascal, a French philosopher of the 17th century. Pascal refused the strict rationality of his contemporary traitor, Descartes, and was interrupted at his "Pensees" (1670), aborting the system philosophy that assumed the interpretation of God and humanity was pride. Like the later existent writer, he sees human life in the form of public opinion: the combination of man and self is itself a paradox and contradiction. In history, many thinkers have embodied the existentialist tradition. In that there is Augustine, believing that "the truth is in the hearts of people." In opposition to the reasonable nature of Thomas Aquinas Duns Scotus insisted that in his famous statement "There is a reason not to know the inside", the human will must be the basis of every statement . Kierkegaard, Nietzsche, and those who chased it opposed the delusive reality that we could foresee the difference between the truth and the reality in Western culture and understand it in an abstract and transcendental way. They protest strongly to dry intellectuals, but they are neither simple activists nor anti-rational. Other campaigns that subvert antinomicism and thought to emotions should not be confused with existentialism.

Changes in existing existential literary literature tend to focus on individual trips of existentialism. A common theme in existentialists' work, such as confrontation with alienation and death, often leads "anti hero" to the best choice and defines whether they achieved true understanding. The theme of existential literature is reflected in the whole world, and the work itself is a metaphor for a more spectacular transformation of Western philosophy. After the war, European intellectuals had their existentialist understanding. It is the same as the experience of their literary figures. Existential psychology can be seen as true interdisciplinary, but the main contribution and basic philosophy of these associations link these specific practitioners. The rise of existential psychology began in the 1950s and 1960s and prospered. 2. Freedom - lack of external structure, fear of individuals, beliefs to your own world, design of life, choice and behavior bring ultimate freedom. Responsibility In expecting to lay the foundation in the world that does not provide anything, responsibility shifts from software or hard determinism to self-generated "presence anxiety". Tanatos - Eros, existence: psychoanalysis - connection of existentialism Ryan D. Miller University of Nebraska Omaha We will explore the contribution of existentialism to the field of clinical psychology. The core of existentialism is the concept of seeking freedom, responsibility, anxiety, pain, and meaning. These and other extant concepts will be explored through careful study of writers' works such as Kierkegaard, Kafka, Tolstoy, Nietzsche, Frankel, Yalom and May. This course will provide general and specific guidance on ethical behavior in the practice of science and psychology using case study methods. It will cover a variety of issues including professional competence, confidentiality, client rights, animal and human research, informed consent, integrity and respect, and other topics. The main purpose of the course is to provide students with the knowledge and skills necessary for ethical decision making and ethical behavior.

Everyone wants to know. This indicates that we are pleased with the sensation; in addition to being useful, they also love themselves; this is the basis of human knowledge, and Aristotle is a metaphysical It shows us in the book. What is the next question, how do I ask myself to ask myself. We are intrinsically interested in knowing and like our sense, but what is the relationship between the two and what can we call when perceptual perception arises . Intelligence (knowledge) is the possibility, possibility, ability, strength, and feasibility of ability. There are two forms of intelligence described by Aristotle. The first form is passive and the second form is active. There is a permanent (eternal, immortal) idea, a so - called positive wisdom for human beings. This brings a deep understanding of Aristotle's view on humanity. A human being is a rational animal consisting of the possibility of knowledge and consciousness. The idea of ​​Kiakegaard for humans is the opposite of Aristotle's idea. Existentialists do not like to divide themselves like Aristotle (heart, body, etc), they rely on experience. His philosophy comes from the combination of Plato (Justice) and Hegel (the principle of triple dialectic change). For Lutheran minister Kierkegaard who has a Christian faith, human being is a relationship ("between the two"). He saw that he knew his own self. Your current self is not the self you are trying to do This is where Aristotle introduces a distinction between passive intelligence and active (or productive) intelligence. It represents a rapid breakthrough in similarity to recognition and thinking in the previous chapter (see 429 a 14 - 18). In fact, surprisingly there is no suggestion that there is a second intellectual, or at least two aspects of intelligence, so the idea of ​​the third part is explained. As an example of this confusion, it is promised to have purely active intelligence (429 a 21) before it is said that intelligence is not natural but only potential capability. Stud metaphysics are linked). This new wrinkle is not compatible with most of III.4, so it can not simply be attached to III.4. The power of universality proficiency traditionally stemmed from so-called "intelligent agents", that is intelligently active or productive. The concept of behavioral (or active) intelligence is one of the most complicated and controversial aspects of medieval epistemology. It resulted from several mysterious comments made by Aristotle (DA 430a 10-19), where he distinguished the two aspects of thought. There is a kind of way of thinking "what becomes all" (nousōōpantaginesthai), there is the idea of ​​"making everything" (ho ... tōipantapoiein). Behind these explanations is the concept that the mind "becomes" the subject of that knowledge, which means that it can be used in an understandable form without the problems first revealed. Because passive thinking - thought to be all - is related to thought, all things are done in the same way and are related to pure substance, pure possibility, its forming principle

Comparing strangers with living existents of hatred change means that they can not be rationalized because they can not account for human fear, pain, and suffering. After all, because we can not find anything, rationalization is ridiculous. Life is absurd. This led to the word "sky". Therefore, we can not find the meaning of life, we can not find what we want to make, so we will suffer. Camus and Sartre, who lived in the same era, helped to form an existential school. Of course there are other: Kierkegaard, Heidegger, etc. Existential judgment, discomfort in trial, and feeling aversion to Webster's dictionary are based on existentialism as "philosophical doctrine of faith, people have absolute freedom of choice, people have absurdity in the universe, anxiety and alienation We emphasize ". In the 1940s the existentialism became a philosophical world, the group of existential philosophers became famous celebrities in the United States. - Ethernet and ATM: Which has precedence. Abstract There are many problems in effectively sending data on the Internet. The two main technologies being used, Ethernet and asynchronous transfer mode (ATM) have done a great job of porting data, voice, and video from one point to another. However, they are not satisfactory in a variety of areas and can not propose a "complete" solution or become the only leader in the Internet market. Because of this, my body is not a stranger to that unbearable nausea, and most of us examine before the college entrance examinations morning, or the most important job interview in their lives . As you have ghostly nausea, breakfast looks like a threat. Without stopping breakfast, lunch and dinner. In fact, it quickly became part of me. My weight started falling out of my already slim body. At first, it starts digging around my eyes from 3 AM to 4 AM, then at 6 AM, and then at 6:30 to get ready for school. After that, it replaced my bumpy 'baby's belly' with a sharp waist bone and dropped the jeans. But I did not see it, I did not see it. They say love is blind, let me tell you this - the same can be said about fear For most people headaches are not strangers. Some are occasional, some are general, some are annoying and irritated, and some can cause debilitating pain and nausea. What do you do when you have a bad headache? Do you keep teeth biting? Lie down? Eating pills, do you want the pain to go away? There is a better choice. Most headaches are related to tension in the neck muscles. When the spine moves to a prescribed position due to developmental problems, trauma, repetitive stress, or other accidents, pressure is applied to the surrounding nerve. When the nerve is stressed or stimulated, information is sent to the back, neck and chin muscles and tightened.

The word Christian literally means small Christ and should clearly express their ultimate goal to each believer. Those who believe say that what they do and aim should be clearly aligned with the words, actions and goals of Jesus. To achieve this, two harmful aspects need to be considered. As mentioned in the Romans Chapter 12, personality and service are two important elements in the lives of the people living in Christ. There is a big difference between religious Christianity and genuine Christian life. Religion - any religion - the purpose is for individuals to be safe, feel good for themselves and their "opportunities" and to make individuals "negotiate" with their "gods". When I read Luke's Chapter 3 on John the Baptist, it is clear that he is not interested in promoting party religious lines. He only pays attention to our mental state and the place we need to guide energy. Of course he does not plan to make new friends! Please see how he solved the baptized crowd. "Are you a toxic snake, are you warning you to escape from anger coming?" Christian's existential philosopher Soren Kierkegaard believes that life is given to individuals, not society and religion, and lives with reality and passion. In our era of personality and mass customization, Kirkega's emotions reflect the spirit of our time. The meaning shapes and leads our life. But there is no quick answer to the ultimate problem of life. On the contrary, in today's world, the answer must be adjusted to the heart of the questioner. That is why I asked my students to think and express their own beliefs at the end of my religious course. The true Christian life is fundamentally different from the natural life of men and women. On the surface, it may be very similar, but in my mind the foundation of life is completely different. Christ is part of every healthy behavior, everyone who corrects every wrong action and idea, a happy donor, and an injured healer. In addition to being in danger of life anymore, Christ is all the center. Life surrounds him. As a result, life attracted appropriate attention. Despite a trial from the outside, deep peace has its inner strength, power will preserve foreign spirit, goodness and joy. This is really life!

For centuries the term "freedom" was a well thought out topic for many reasons. It got many different definitions, understandings and ideas about how it affects our daily lives. From the point of view of the philosopher, it presents two different and different perspectives. These views are what we are talking about: the existence of freedom and traditional freedom. There are good views and critical views of the two freedom arguments, but traditional freedom is more preferred in today's modern society as most people understand the terms related to law. Existential psychotherapy is an application of humanistic psychology, emphasizing that human beings have the freedom to understand their own lives using existential philosophy. They can freely define themselves and do whatever they want. This is a humanitarian therapy that forces customers to explore the meaning and purpose of their lives. There is conflict between having freedom and being limited. Examples of restrictions include genetics, culture, and many other factors. Presence therapy involves trying to resolve this conflict Presence therapy encourages customers to take responsibility for their lives and problems. This is accomplished by allowing customers to understand freedom and select different courses to have greater meaning. Existential therapy is rooted in the existential philosophy (existentialism) of characters such as SørenKierkegaard and Friedrich Nietzsche. Clinical Mental Health Consultation at Grace College Online M.A. prepares graduates to work in a consulting environment. This is a faith-based program that analyzes important mental health theory and strategy through Bible shots. For example, the "Theological Basis of Counseling" course tells students how to actually apply the Bible truth and principles. Existentialism - Existential psychology, like other existing psychology traditions, is deeply influenced by philosophy. Different existential traditions often reflect different philosophical influences. Existentialism - a phenomenological tradition, such as many from Heidegger, existentialism - but the humanist tradition is influenced by Nietzsche, Kierkegaard, Jasper, Bouver and Tillich. It does not deny Heidegger's existentialism - the influence on humanism's tradition, but its existence is not as dominant as existentialism - human approach, but it is well balanced from other perspectives.

When comparing residents in every corner of Dostoevsky with people in the basement, I am a sick person ... I am an angry person. I am not attractive. [...] I do not know my state, I do not know which part of me is affected. I respect medical and doctors very much, but I have neither treatment nor treatment. [...] No, I refused to take treatment. (Dostoevsky 1864: 17) Fyodor Dostoevsky wrote these words around 1864 and explained the mental state of a superconscious retired bureaucrat who was unable to analyze excessively and take him. It was separated from the mainstream of the community in which he lives. Under Fyodor Dostoevsky's "Underground Notes", a man under the ground insisted he was not active. This is what I call "doing nothing, I think it is very interesting, when I read that Jean - Paul Sartre is simple, I remembered the people in the basement." Existentialism is a kind of humanitarianism . "Underground people are fully aware that only you are choosing or lacking in choice, and he is suffering from his choice before making a decision. , People are subconscious, existentialists. In Existentialism from Dostoevsky to Sartre, Walter Kaufman wrote as follows. "I do not think there is a reason to call Dostoevsky as an existentialist, but the underground memo tells us," I will not mention Dostoevsky's "underground note" in this article, but on the movement of the ensemble and the way it is released I will explore. Existential tone note - the subject of existence in Dostoyevsky's "Karamazov brothers". Mainly through Ivan Karamazov. I am primarily based on the French philosopher Jean-Paul Sartre, but pay attention first to the basic idea and spirit of the existentialist thinker Soren Kelkegaard. I made readers understand the origin of existentialism and did this to compare Sartre's atheistic existentialism with the theological existentialism of Kierkegaard. Existence novel is an image of life mainly seen through keyhole. Sartre's "exit forbiddance" was done in a different room, the Beckett was waiting at the hillside where Gotto was deliberately not beaten, and from the underground hero's underground Dostoevsky Memorial in my heart It is personal and often fights itself with unlike larger political or social external enemies. This is correct. Existentialism is that our lives are basically small, that our greatest success lacks the import of the true universe, and that our name is no longer a short Jakku sandstorm I remind you. Discussions the existentialist artists used to make them - sarcasm, black humor, ferocity, absurdity - strengthened the darker view towards life. They will destroy, demolish, destroy false idols

I will take revenge. A malicious and violent way to make you feel sick about yourself. The tragedy of Hamlet's revenge is the theme that is repeatedly occurring in all roles. Whether this kind of revenge is physical or psychological, it is equally harmful. Mahatma Gandhi said, "I blind the whole world with one eye." This quote is very important throughout the Hamlet because it represents the story and conclusion almost exactly. The revenge theme of the Shakespeare play "Hamlet" is developed mainly on the necessity of permanent revenge, but these all begin with the murder of Hamlet's father. The type of justice that seems to be popular here is the spirituality of eyes and eyes, and you must kill the murderer. When people try to manipulate each other as a means to constantly achieve their goals, the plot twists and rotates. Unfortunately, for this complex revenge circle character, they get caught up in their plans and plans that ultimately lead to crash courses. Drama ends with the destruction of the entire Denmark royal family Hamlet's revenge Hamlet is one of the best literary works with natural ability to transcend time and human condition. William · Shakespeare is investigating the themes of revenge, morality, sexuality, and family complexity. Hamlet's Shakespeare story gave us one of the earliest tragic heroes in the history of contemporary literature. In the process of revenge on his father's death, we also saw a systematic decline and a crazy mistake. And it reflects the famous 'Whether it becomes' or not (Hamlet 3.1.56). The previous sentence was written by Danish philosopher and poet Søren Kierkegaard. SørenKierkegaard born in 1813 is quite familiar with Shakespeare's sentences and is often mentioned in his writing.

"If I want something, I do not want to gain wealth and power, but a latent sensation with enthusiasm, a viewpoint of possible eyes for young and enthusiastic eternity forever Sparks, very fragrant, fascinating possibilities! "- SørenKierkegaard. Kierkegaard is doing something. Anyone who is disappointed in Friday 's expectations on Friday morning can prove this; the promise of possibility often goes beyond the reality passed. Yesterday was almost perfect and basically perfect. By not seeing the perfect concept as a collection of objective reality and experience, I think it will be really perfect: the body, the mind and the spirit. . The perfect reality is not perfect, we can decide what it is At the end of the day it is important to realize that it is not absolutely necessary to make a perfect choice. In many cases, there is no perfect choice. Even if it exists, it may not be so important at the present time. Even after a while, perfect selection seems to remain the same as other options. A perfect day's exercise will help people decide on a perfect day's work. Individuals visualize their professional desires and perfect days from start to finish. Many people recognize their own failure, but ignore their success. The coach asked these people to list their biggest victory and what they still want to achieve. This makes it easier for individuals to understand during the session. Embedded beliefs can lead to bias and make change difficult. Prejudice interferes with belief system, self-confidence and working environment. When prejudice is discovered, that person demonstrates greater consciousness. Tribes need to be built around themes, not names. This can promote relationships with people's purposes and create groups. This is a great way to explore new opportunities

Individuals naturally contain a series of troublesome and painful emotions such as fear and pain. When human beings can experience inner fears, this is a stupid situation. Existentialism can be applied in the age of fear. Because it is a fear of people taking action. Existentialism is a philosophical theory governed by credibility, that is, the existence of a person is determined by their own will actions ("existentialism"). This existentialism emphasizes that individuals - their own thoughts and inner thinking about existence - encourage humans to explore "the roots of our own existence". For Kierkegaard, existentialist philosophers are not satisfied with writing papers alone at the university. In fact, they sit alone and write essays, but they sit down and write when first experiencing the world. They are people who make their ideas and lives reunite. "The central theme is the singles' unique experience, and the individual chooses to try before the most serious civilized problem." People should live The last conclusion of Samuel Becket emphasizes the concept of existential philosophy. Existential philosophy emphasizes the isolation of individual experiences in the uninteresting universe. It emphasizes the unexplainable and meaningless nature of human beings and emphasizes free choice. In Europe in the 1960s, the rise of absurd theaters brought a conspiracy of existentialism. The final stage mostly reflects all aspects of existentialism. In this play, Samuel Becket provides a clear and redundant expression of human emptiness. By understanding the pointlessness of individual existence, we firmly establish existential philosophy. Existentialists recognize the absurdity of their lives and take corresponding actions. Caulfield and Meursault show all aspects of existentialism by showing the fight against individualism in the universe, showing responsibility for behavior, rejecting all supreme concepts and living concepts. For existentialists, the meaning of man is more than becoming a merely perfectly rational individual. Human beings are also the existence of emotion and creativity. Therefore, for existentialists, feelings and emotions such as anxiety, absurdity, nausea, confidence, frustration, guilt feelings are not subjective emotions or reactions that can not be expressed by words. Instead, they are information on who we are, more generally about the disclosure of our relationship with other people and the world (beneficial). Discussion 1. Think about the next question in the group. In order to explain how emotions are disclosed, let's think about breaking the relationship (friends and boyfriend / with her). What do you think about this relationship (that is, what do you think, if you want to see it)? On the other hand, these emotions are your emotions, and nothing has any meaning. But, if we consider these emotions seriously, how can these emotions provide information on the quality of this relationship?

Vengeance of "Hamlet" Shakespeare 's "Hamlet" is mainly adjusted through connection, parallelism, and contrast between mixed families. In the play, we saw two families as victims of vengeance and perpetrators. The Polonius family is important in key scenarios and in the language used by families. The theme of revenge is the core of the drama, the four "cases" of revenge - three include the characters of "life": Fortinbras, Laertes, and Hamlet, and the greatest symbolic world of the Renaissance secular disaster, Troy The story destroyed due to the death of Father Ach and the revenge of Phyrrus In Shakespeare's 'Hamlet Hamlet' revenge, Shakespeare revenged as the theme of all the works. Vengeance plays an important role in the development of Fortinbras, Prince of Norway, Hamlet, the Prince of Denmark, and the son of Polonius Laertes. All three asked for revenge for their father's murder. In Hamlet, revenge can be interpreted as another character. Everyone seeking revenge will overcome it. - Ophelia of William · Shakespeare's "Hamlet" "Look good to her, follow her, I pray to you" (IV.5.73) On the surface, Shakespeare's "Hamlet" is dramatic, mysterious It is an incredibly incredible drama figure. His motives, madness, contradictory morality, and existentialism struggle can be at least embarrassed. In analyzing his role, Laertes and Fortinbras are quoted often as examples of less extreme roles that are similar but handle a more specific dilemma. Hamlet's revenge Hamlet is one of the best literary works with natural ability to transcend time and human condition. William · Shakespeare is investigating the themes of revenge, morality, sexuality, and family complexity. Hamlet's Shakespeare story gave us one of the earliest tragic heroes in the history of contemporary literature. In the process of revenge on his father's death, we also saw a systematic decline and a crazy mistake. And it reflects the famous 'Whether it becomes' or not (Hamlet 3.1.56). The previous sentence was written by Danish philosopher and poet Søren Kierkegaard. SørenKierkegaard born in 1813 is quite familiar with Shakespeare's sentences and is often mentioned in his writing. William · Shakespeare is a famous playwright in England. His play Hamlet develops around Hamlet's decision on how to retaliate for his father's death. But Hamlet can not be sure what he wants to take for retaliation. He discussed the idea of ​​suicide as a possible option within his own "unknown" monologue. In this monologue, Shakespeare uses metaphor, rhetorical question and repetition to express Hamlet 's hesitation about what he ought to do. - The purpose of Hamlet's Monologue (Soliloquy) monologue is to outline the ideas and emotions of specific characters in a particular role in the play. It is not direct but it is only the person who speaks to the audience and because there is the possibility that other people may hide their true viewpoint it will clarify that person's innermost belief and provide a fair perspective.

The tension between eudaimonist or other ethical ethics and divine orders can be traced back to Plato's Euthyphro that we ask that we are right. (Philosophers sometimes call it the Euthyphro dilemma). Sacred command theory has confirmed the former and appears in Oakham, Kierkegaard, Bart, as well as works by Locke and Berkeley [Honderich, 2005, "Holy Ordering Ethics"]. Still, even today, Christian scholars can prove the historical domination of Western natural ethics. The name "God Command Theory" can be used to refer to any of a variety of relevant ethical theories. What these theories hold in common is that they use God's will as the basis of morality. According to sacred command theory, things are morally good or bad, or moral obligations, simply because of God's will and command, are allowed or prohibited. If Theist gives the first answer to Euthyphro's dilemma, then it is God's will to assert morally good behavior and they are morally good so he faces independence. Will, they are morally good, then they must be morally good, irrelevant to the will of God. This is obviously incompatible with God's instruction theory; sacred command theorist must give Euthyphro's dilemma a second answer Sacred instruction theory is a moral theory that proclaims that God's will is the basis of morality. Based on sacred command theory, if God or God master it, things are morally right or wrong, mandatory, allowed or not allowed. In God's command theory, it is moral or immoral to do acts, divine orders or ban. In addition to God's command to do something, another aspect of divine command theory believes that behavior is moral, if God has motivation. Motivation of this sacred command theory can say that in addition to religious documents, some people can have the motivation to practice morality. We have examined the morality of the theory called God's command. This is a view that its behavior is correct only when God ordered it, that it is only a mistake if God forbade it. As a realistic architect, God can judge good and evil perfectly, but he faced the difficulty of struggling a system to distribute moral value far. Please imagine the god in its original position. He decides which actions are good behavior and which actions are bad behaviors. Under the sacred command theory, remember that God's command establishes correctness, and that his prohibition has established a mistake. Imagine now that God is thinking about three kinds of actions. Stolen, fraud, attack. We believe that there is a moral order in the choice of God if we believe that these acts have a moral status when God considered them.

Summary of responsibility to Jean-Paul Sartre and our teaching history: Historical research is one of the major concerns of Jean-Paul Sartre. Sartre's biography research and thinking is that history is not only a field where you collect facts, events and processes, but also a valuable challenge involving a grave personal responsibility, my responsibility for life before death is showing. Sartre's research shows that accepting this responsibility can be a source of wisdom. However, few historians believe that history transcends the orderly expression and interpretation of facts, events, processes. Jean-Paul Sartre is known for his responsible philosophy. He explains that people are suffering under the pressure of responsibility or actively avoiding responsibility. Sartre 's existentialism is often associated with atheism, but religious thought is often accompanied by responsibility. For example, Kierkegaard is a Christian philosopher of the 19th century and we believe that the confrontation responsibility is the result of a true human condition, that is, the positive contact with the reality. As Christianity requires superhuman effort and constant uncertainty, or fear and tremor, he provokes the church in a radical way. An example of the most important human suffering of Kiakegaard is Abraham's Old Testament. From the beginning of the 20th century to the latter half, the philosopher Jean-Paul Sartre became the main spiritualist of existentialism, attracted the biggest audience in all philosophical history. Sartre develops a series of philosophies and is responsible for human life. He said that everyone is responsible not only for themselves but also for the nature of man, ie, recognizing their own existence, who they are And to define ourselves as a way. From that point he believes that everyone can freely make a choice and everyone is responsible for understanding that each choice affects not only their future but also humanities. If these choices are made, he feels responsible for getting what they want, rather than waiting for it to happen. He feels that humans are overly dependent on God in terms of these lives. People can only rely on themselves Juan Paul Sartore, an existentialist philosopher of the 20th century, said that we are the choice. I do not agree with his atheism, but Sartre is basically right. Although we may be the product of our DNA and the environment, we still have a certain space for ourselves for each of us. Despite his political trend Martin Heidegger pointed out another important concept, authenticity. After the flock is not genuine. To be truly free, you must be yourself. In today's American society, commercial edification may be a big challenge for credibility. Honest introspection is becoming more important than ever. By reflecting the actual needs, you can minimize consumerism operations. Tyler Darden of the movie 'Beat Club' claims that consumerism leads to own own ownership, so people belong to them. This may be the main example of becoming a slave

Dostoyevsky's Underground Memo - The depth of invisible light that exposes the human heart is bright, but no one is at home. My elevator did not reach the summit. I will not play full deck. I lost the marbles. ... I am very angry. It is the same as you. - Crazy ladies. This is what Dostoevsky underground man is called to write his own memo - life paradox. Is he crazy? His rumor is just a crazy cry. A lot of people would like to think like this and our narrator may agree that this is normal. The "underground" of the mind is a dangerous terrain that Dostoevsky explores here, revealing its deepest fear and desire. This novel was first published in Russia in 1864. This wonderful version of CanongateCanons was evaluated by DBC Pierre and was rated by "Dostoye" clarified as "the size of this small book". The fact that Fusky gave up pills and things in the middle of the 19th century is still a topic: Existentialism. What makes a book classic? DBC Pierre explored ways to capture the "strange plot of the mind", and Dostoevsky (author of "synapse sensitive") is very different from Russian novelist who has been paying more attention to action so far I will. Before the existence of psychology was a psychologist, his observations were sharp and universal. The novel also resonated because the subject of the discussion was "Self-control of modern themes - industrialism, utopianism, Western market, science and technology to capture the truth" In "underground memo", Dostoevsky led the director's spiritual function. Weak psychiatric disorders cause obsessive questions, and may put emphasis on existentialism. Ironically, Dostoevsky 's bipolar disorder made him possible. In Existentialism from Dostoevsky to Sartre, Walter Kaufman wrote as follows. "I do not think there is a reason to call Dostoevsky as an existentialist, but the underground memo tells us," I will not mention Dostoevsky's "underground note" in this article, but on the movement of the ensemble and the way it is released I will explore. Existential tone note - the subject of existence in Dostoyevsky's "Karamazov brothers". Mainly through Ivan Karamazov. I am primarily based on the French philosopher Jean-Paul Sartre, but pay attention first to the basic idea and spirit of the existentialist thinker Soren Kelkegaard. I made readers understand the origin of existentialism and did this to compare Sartre's atheistic existentialism with the theological existentialism of Kierkegaard.

These statements are from external sources and may not be accurate. Bab.la is not responsible for its contents. Read more This personal account originally came from my Danish lifestyle blog Stayclassy.dk. And it first appeared in Denmark. I have a lot of positive feedback about the original article so I decided to translate it into English, and you can read it. This is a long reading of 5,000 words, but there is. Most of us have seen the movie "Unlimited and Bradley Cooper", but became miraculous children of irritated writers and chronic writers, wrote a book in 4 days, some books with some people I will learn books. The new language controls the stock market by applying advanced pattern recognition. Beautiful women were lined up to draw his attention, and a famous businessman suddenly wanted to work with him. Briefly, unlimited medicine - the official fictitious name NZT - 48 - brings a new and greatly improved life to Eddie Mora This article is a translation of the Danish press release "DSB vinder fjerde to Sverige" and I think it is translated by a professional translator (Schjoldager 2008: 29). Since Danish articles are translated into languages ​​other than English, this is translation between languages. As the reader's reader enters the DSB's English website, the translation is hidden, but the DSB is obviously a Danish company and its company's language is Danish, so the reader is reading translations I have to realize that. Open more than hiding (Schjoldager 2008: 31) Danish belongs to the northern part of German and is very similar to other Scandinavian languages. Famous writers in Denmark include Hans Christian Andersen whose fairy tale is translated into languages ​​other than biblical, a theologian who is a pioneer of contemporary existentialism, philosopher Soren Kierkegaard, and Karen. Blixen wrote "Out of Africa" ​​and "Babette's Feast". The position in Danish European history basically started in the Viking era around the year 800 AD. At that time, Danish people were notorious for plundering churches and monasteries. By 878 the Danish conquered the north and the east of England and in the eleventh century the King Canute (1014-35) was a vast kingdom including today's Denmark, England, Norway, Southern Sweden and a part of Finland We ruled. Christianity was introduced to Denmark in 826, and it was widely distributed under the control of Kanouté. After his death, the empire of Kanut collapsed

C. Steven Evans claims that he has a neutral position in religious philosophy. Evans rejects both faith and neutrality and believes that by trying "neutral, selfless attitude", "I can break the possibility that I do not even know what a religion is" (Evans, 1985) p. 115) Evans pointed out that some believe in the belief that faith and rational thinking is that "reasonable reflection" about religion is impossible. Johnson first followed the emergence of contemporary Christian psychology movement in the work of Christian philosopher Sorenkel Kegel, and later in C. Stephen Evans' work. Kierkegaard called some of his works "psychology." Part of Evans' inspiration is to challenge Christians in the field of psychology "develop my theories, research and practice, these theories, research and practice derive from Christian faith in mankind" Told. - At the same time, we will continue actively participate in a wider range of fields " During the last twentieth century, some defenders attempted to integrate Kirkegaard's subjective and existentialist ideas for most into traditional defense; it was noticed by Christian philosopher C It is deserves Stephen Evans. There are other advocates who clearly showed the usefulness of various apologies when meeting with people of various faiths and personality. A recent example of the latter is David K. Clark, his book "Dialogue-based apologetics" is different from what he considers as a competitive "content-oriented" approach, "human-oriented "Education approach is defended. Finally, the desire of Christian psychology for being an obvious Christian witness in a secular psychological environment is worthy of praise. C. Steven Evans is asking Christians to develop their own Christian psychological approach "while actively participating in a wider field", but that unbelievers are the Christian psychologist Christian gospel and the Bible Gospel means that it is affected by the truth 28:19) -20) Christian psychology has plenty of places to be admired, but it also has many weaknesses. Firstly, CP is based on the wrong view of the Bible. Christian psychology correctly pointed out the necessity of appropriate prerequisites, but it is far from the bibliographical doors. Christian psychologists have confirmed the authority, necessity, adequacy, and superiority of the Bible but have defined these characteristics of the Bible to actually destroy the Bible.

A speculation about whether Shakespeare 's play' Hamlet 'fulfills Elizabethan era revenge tragedy requirements is discussed in this article and there are quite a few commentary comments. Richard Lannam of "Super Drama" comments on the tragedy of small revenge in the tragedy of Hamlet's great revenge. As I tried, there is no doubt how to read Lertus' play. It is included in my summary - there is no solemnity. We must enjoy roar like roar. In Shakespeare's 'Hamlet Hamlet' revenge, Shakespeare revenged as the theme of all the works. Vengeance plays an important role in the development of Fortinbras, Prince of Norway, Hamlet, the Prince of Denmark, and the son of Polonius Laertes. All three asked for revenge for their father's murder. In Hamlet, revenge can be interpreted as another character. Everyone seeking revenge will overcome it. - Ophelia of William · Shakespeare's "Hamlet" "Look good to her, follow her, I pray to you" (IV.5.73) On the surface, Shakespeare's "Hamlet" is dramatic, mysterious It is an incredibly incredible drama figure. His motives, madness, contradictory morality, and existentialism struggle can be at least embarrassed. In analyzing his role, Laertes and Fortinbras are quoted often as examples of less extreme roles that are similar but handle a more specific dilemma. Hamlet's revenge Hamlet is one of the best literary works with natural ability to transcend time and human condition. William · Shakespeare is investigating the themes of revenge, morality, sexuality, and family complexity. Hamlet's Shakespeare story gave us one of the earliest tragic heroes in the history of contemporary literature. In the process of revenge on his father's death, we also saw a systematic decline and a crazy mistake. And it reflects the famous 'Whether it becomes' or not (Hamlet 3.1.56). The previous sentence was written by Danish philosopher and poet Søren Kierkegaard. SørenKierkegaard born in 1813 is quite familiar with Shakespeare's sentences and is often mentioned in his writing.

After faced with ghosts, Hamlet began fighting the essence of humanity and morality. The appearance of the ghost became the driving force of Hamlet's existential struggle. Shakespeare reveals the nature of humanity, the nature of Hamlet through construction. He emphasized that a strong sense of morality causes conflict in the decision to make noble choices. Hamlet's revenge Hamlet is one of the best literary works with natural ability to transcend time and human condition. William · Shakespeare is investigating the themes of revenge, morality, sexuality, and family complexity. Hamlet's Shakespeare story gave us one of the earliest tragic heroes in the history of contemporary literature. In the process of revenge on his father's death, we also saw a systematic decline and a crazy mistake. And it reflects the famous 'Whether it becomes' or not (Hamlet 3.1.56). The previous sentence was written by Danish philosopher and poet Søren Kierkegaard. SørenKierkegaard born in 1813 is quite familiar with Shakespeare's sentences and is often mentioned in his writing. Hamry is the beginning of the 17th century. The tragedy of Hamlet is one of William · Shakespeare's most famous plays. Because Shakespeare uses Hamlet to express the complexity of human thought, it is very popular. Shakespeare used monologue to clarify Hamlet 's inner idea. Through the monologue, the audience understands the fight against Hamlet's internal conflict and decides when to retaliate against his father and the disgusting feelings of his mother's desire for marriage. Also monologue Our personal response to William Shakespeare play 'Hamlet' (1603) is understood through our understanding of the context of the composer and the political environment. Britain is also penetrating the contemporary context. - One of the most obvious and important themes of William Shakespeare's Hamlet is the crazy theme. The theme of the entire script is clearly evident through Hamlet, Ophelia, Lertes' actions and ideas. Crazy is defined as the quality or state of mental illness or psychiatric disorder (mental disorder)

In Dostoevsky's "underground memo", people in the basement struggled between two opposing beliefs. The first time he acknowledged that his fictitious existence was determined in advance depends on his author's behavior. Underground people insist that the only possible world human beings can live in an uncertain world celebrating and positioning the free will of mankind. In an attempt to solve this problem, a man under the ground turned his attention to writing, tried to be honest with himself, explored why he did this and did not reject the facts that appeared. Notes from the ground (Fyodor Mikhailovich Dostoevsky) 129 "Journal Epoch, memo from the basement", by Donstoevsky Konstantin Mochulsky: Flying over his life and work (1967) (Ken Kesey) "Raymond's" Grail Knight " Arrival beyond the wasteland M. Alderman (1972) Strange case of Jekyll and Haid (Robert Louis Stevenson) "Mask in the mirror: 18th century and 90s", "Separated Self: Perspective" Victorian literature (1969) 141 In Existentialism from Dostoevsky to Sartre, Walter Kaufman wrote as follows. "I do not think there is a reason to call Dostoevsky as an existentialist, but the underground memo tells us," I will not mention Dostoevsky's "underground note" in this article, but on the movement of the ensemble and the way it is released I will explore. Existential tone note - the subject of existence in Dostoyevsky's "Karamazov brothers". Mainly through Ivan Karamazov. I am primarily based on the French philosopher Jean-Paul Sartre, but pay attention first to the basic idea and spirit of the existentialist thinker Soren Kelkegaard. I made readers understand the origin of existentialism and did this to compare Sartre's atheistic existentialism with the theological existentialism of Kierkegaard.

I just read Adam Gupnick's "American imprisonment" in "New Yorker". This is an article about tragic events around the USA. As everyone knows, there are more people locked in the United States than any other country. Blacks are imprisoned seven times as white as white. People who have money get slapped with good attorneys on their wrists and those who are not will be detained for many years. Like most of the broken ones in the United States, our politicians have economic incentives to maintain the status quo. Due to privatization of various departments, lobbyists spent millions of dollars to ensure that our prisons are vibrant If you do not realize that there is a fundamental mistake in the way we consider imprisoning, it is difficult to think about the current situation. William J. Stuntz accuses us not the principle of fairness and justice but the Bill of Rights, which emphasizes processes and procedures. Comment on Gopnik 's prison rape is very convincing. Prison rape is very popular and more than 70,000 prisoners are raped every year - this is considered a threat and is often part of the anticipated punishment. This theme is a standard feed for outdated suspects that are being threatened by comedy, raison in prison, and now it represents a normal clean policeman on TV every evening. The normalization of prison rape, like the struggle of the 18th century to see a man dying at the gallows, is certainly our future generation cruel and unintelligible to those who think they are civilized I will make you feel. For those who have not read, I encourage you to read the complete content. It's well written, thoughtful, worth reading Hello America! Can Adam Gopnik help me to read "American imprisonment?" What is a paper, I need to help writing. Adam Gopnik's "American imprisonment" Sharma in the Sydney 2012 Award, Part 2 "New Yorker" challenged this claim. New Yorkers: Gopnik and American imprisonment may help shape, and his disciple Madison is writing about us. I believe this paper. Impersonation of American papers into watcher movie plagiarism thesis, dissertation writing thesis, writing thesis writing. Anti - paper provides examples of papers to help students write papers. The following is an article on rhetorical analysis of imprisonment in the United States. Impersonation in the United States and the Criminal Justice: Why did you detain many people who became a major publicity in the United States at 9:24 pm on November 9, 2013? Author: Adam Gopnik.Caging of American Coffee will not help you write a good article's writing paper for paper Finn sjue writes about Kierkegaard 's beliefs and his own Vampire' s vampire paper collection and the drafted wolf essay on a drunken electric cage. Adam Gopnik, February 2, 2012 "American prison: Why do we detain so many people? In a recent discussion, American white supremacy is the true principle In this thesis writing ; Archive. March 2017; February 2017; January. Anti Essays provides some examples that students can use to write papers.The US states that prisoners were responsible for writing, And a large-scale shoot to inform the United States what the program on the theme of the US correctional company says despite critics, they shook their hands.The hands of January 25, 2012 US confinement

In Soren Kierkegaard's "Adjustment of Fear and Trembling", the author brought four wonderful changes to the temptation of God to Abraham in Genesis 22. Every time Abraham failed in some form to his trial, but Abraham had prepared for his son, but he missed the perfect movement of the philosophy and faith that Abraham had accomplished. It is closed by a short image of a child who is weaning. This may be a metaphor of past stories. Characterized by the non-normative style of Kierkegaard, we are told that these stories are the way someone is trying to understand Abraham; we are encouraged to contemplate these different stories, however It will not be forced. My wife shot 20 feet from the start of the shooting. She hid in a dark room and was worried about her life by the teacher of the first day, waiting for the door to open and finish. She called me with a shivering whisper. She later acknowledged that her hand trembled too much and could not hit the keyboard number. I can not pass through 911. I can not go through the police station. I left a voicemail at the police chief, he is a friend, a neighbor, and a daughter of a high school. Then I ran my car with my boots and headed to school as soon as possible. I stood beside the way and hoping for an answer and sent my text to my wife, or I learned that she was leaving the school. As reported by the press of the whole country, frightened residents of Whitefish gathered at the community gatherings, police chief Dir saw a 90-year-old Jewish couple tremble with fear. Some people set up an alarm system. Rabbi has a dark bald head in the woods, has night vision goggles and shooting weapons. The police increased their tour. Governor of Montana Governor Steve Block and representatives of anti - slander federation suddenly entered the town. The chairman of the World Jewish Council called on the authorities to stop the procession and call it "a dangerous life-threatening to endanger the entire US". Hysteric. "Nothing can stop us," he declared. Then there is an election. The first phone was around 9 PM. I was shocked. The following are trembling with fear and disgust. Your victory is as shocking as you are at you and it brings an exciting urge to your family, which means that it is worrying, sleep deprivation and damn mess . My son 's son started to go home regularly and talked about kompromat, pay, and golden shower (these are not necessarily related, but it may be when Muller is over). Everything except obvious is beyond me. I pointed out Nate Silver and Carlos Danger, and one hundred million voters who did not vote. Then Hilary himself: in 2008, another lover of a powerful political machine may lose a young progressive black man and then lose to a reacting old white man in 2016? That voice, that baggage, its right. Oi Company The best result I can think is "We will fully solve this problem, boys - panicked families will put Xanax together."

Impressions - Rhetorical Analysis in the United States Adam Gopnik explains the current state of prison framework in the US and the number of prisoners in New Yorker's article. Last Name 1: Name: Mentor: Course: Date: Not only did he state the reasons for mass detention, he also talked about the relationship between group imprisonment and fraudulent activity (Gopnik 75). Through the use of predictive and persuasive confirmation and ethical participation, Gopnik encourages individuals to understand that collective detention is a problem that should be inclined to corruption. As a senior writer, writer, analyst, Gopnik uses various resources such as pop culture, factual information, academic texts for articles as the final goal of supporting his idea in mind . By applying various evidence, he raised the terrible conditions of detention facilities in the United States. Initially, he said that day in Ivan Denisovich 's life to link the relationship between American prison and Soviet prison. In this case, he did a demonstration Hello America! Can Adam Gopnik help me to read "American imprisonment?" What is a paper, I need to help writing. Adam Gopnik's "American imprisonment" Sharma in the Sydney 2012 Award, Part 2 "New Yorker" challenged this claim. New Yorkers: Gopnik and American imprisonment may help shape, and his disciple Madison is writing about us. I believe this paper. Impersonation of American papers into watcher movie plagiarism thesis, dissertation writing thesis, writing thesis writing. Anti - paper provides examples of papers to help students write papers. The following is an article on rhetorical analysis of imprisonment in the United States. Impersonation in the United States and the Criminal Justice: Why did you detain many people who became a major publicity in the United States at 9:24 pm on November 9, 2013? Author: Adam Gopnik.Caging of American Coffee will not help you write a good article's writing paper for paper Finn sjue writes about Kierkegaard 's beliefs and his own Vampire' s vampire paper collection and the drafted wolf essay on a drunken electric cage. Adam Gopnik, February 2, 2012 "American prison: Why do we detain so many people? In a recent discussion, American white supremacy is the true principle In this thesis writing ; Archive. March 2017; February 2017; January. Anti Essays provides some examples that students can use to write papers.The US states that prisoners were responsible for writing, And a large-scale shoot to inform the United States what the program on the theme of the US correctional company says despite critics, they shook their hands.The hands of January 25, 2012 US confinement I just read Adam Gupnick's "American imprisonment" in "New Yorker". This is an article about tragic events around the USA. As everyone knows, there are more people locked in the United States than any other country. Blacks are imprisoned seven times as much as white people. People who have money get slapped with good attorneys on their wrists and those who are not will be detained for many years. Like most of the broken ones in the United States, our politicians have economic incentives to maintain the status quo. Due to privatization of various departments, lobbyists spent millions of dollars to ensure that our prisons are vibrant

The concept of "bad belief" in Sartre's philosophy shows that Paul Sartre is a French philosopher, a versatile thinker, and a writer. He is known today for his extraordinary research in the field of his two systems and philosophy. In addition to these two phenomena "existence and insignificance" and "dialectical criticism", Sartre developed several short philosophical versions, including several scripts, plays, novels, articles on art and literary criticism Did. Short story, autobiography, scores of news and political writing, and unique biographies of different writers. Jean-Paul Sartre is known for his responsible philosophy. He explains that people are suffering under the pressure of responsibility or actively avoiding responsibility. Sartre 's existentialism is often associated with atheism, but religious thought is often accompanied by responsibility. For example, Kierkegaard is a Christian philosopher of the 19th century and we believe that the confrontation responsibility is the result of a true human condition, that is, the positive contact with the reality. As Christianity requires superhuman effort and constant uncertainty, or fear and tremor, he provokes the church in a radical way. An example of the most important human suffering of Kiakegaard is Abraham's Old Testament. The concept of "bad belief" in Sartre's philosophy shows that Paul Sartre is a French philosopher, a versatile thinker, and a writer. He is known today for his extraordinary research in the field of his two systems and philosophy. - Friedrich Nietzsche is a German philosopher living between 1844 and 1900. His argument against eternal recurrence is one of his most controversial works. This concept, over time, shows that the world is always self-destructive and is self-creative afterwards. He made the eternal concept of Christianity fundamental, combined it with simple reasoning, and proposed innovative concepts. "Unfavorable belief" is, of course, a concept developed by Jean-Paul Sartre, but Midgley criticized even though Sartre claimed that it was totally free. Midley exaggerates Sartre's position, but this is also a myth. Sartre is very aware that the freedom of being "denied" is limited by what he calls "facts". The world is also a person's own composition; I might like to be an artist, but if I do not have artistic talent this fact will limit my freedom; constitution that is also malignant Example Throughout the description of "malicious" Sartre concluded that pointlessness is an important part of consciousness. Without it, it is impossible to be malicious. Sartre said that malice is the danger of essence of consciousness. Malicious acts prove that our aim is to avoid liability, but according to Sartre we are obliged to take responsibility. For Sartre absolute freedom means absolute responsibility. In his novel "disgusting" Sartre, the existence of a person is a mystery, a paradox, its nature and purpose can not be subtlely summarized in any expression. People are not alive like pure beings, but he may understand themselves with disgusting experiences. Roquentin found in nausea: "It is inevitable that it is a coincidence, by definition I mean that existence can not be thought of as necessary. With this garden, town and I myself. "

Everyone is connected and not everyone in God knows this. After death, humans will go to heaven or hell. "For everyone, death is either the door to the lives of God and his people, or the door to the withdrawal from what ultimately satisfies human needs" (Sire, 41). It depends on whether they believe in the teaching of God and live by them. If people do not recognize the religion itself, it is not important that they follow the same path. Christian's view of the world is a consistent view of life, quite different from naturalism, naturalism, materialism, existentialism, polytheism, paganism, mysticism, or decompositionism. This theological view provides direction and direction facing the plurististic approach to spirituality and secularism and truth and morality of the new era. Fear of the future, suffering, illness, and poverty, based on Christ's redemption work and God's great Christian worldview. In addition, the view of the world of Christians provides meaning and purpose to every aspect of life. Existentialism escapes from despair of nihilism. Existentialism basically has two forms, atheism and theology. Atheistic existentialism is a reexamination of naturalism. At least it escaped the suicidal tendency of nihilism. This world view again denies the existence of God. I oppose this. Because I feel that God is real and inner. However, it explains the world as a purpose. Because the world around us can understand through science and logic. I agree with the fact that we can understand the universe through observation and experiment. I think that science and logic can lead the most important people even to see God in the universe and become a creator of the universe. Existentialism can be atheistic, theological (or theological), or unknown. Some existentialists, such as Nietzsche, argue that "God is dead" and claim that the concept of God is outdated. Even if they feel that they can not prove it, others like Kierkegaard are very religious. An important element of existentialists is freedom of choice whether to believe or not. Existential themes appeared in early Buddhist and Christian writings (including Saint Augustine and St. Thomas Aquinas). In the 17th century, Bryce Pascal believed that Pascal would be meaningless, boring and miserable without God, as we thought of later existentialists, even if Pascal was different from them. . His contemporary John Rock claims individual autonomy and self-determination, but they actively pursue liberalism and individualism rather than reacting to existentialist experiences.

In the words of Soren Kierkegaard, "When a person turns the truth into his own, his personality will mature." There are various people all over the world. Everyone has different personality to make him / her unique. The tenth grade of the Presbyterian Christian School conducted academic ability tests and three personality tests to determine the possibilities of future careers. ACT Incorporated has developed a PLAN and displays our estimated ACT score and the best career we can. We also performed three personality tests to discover our true personality. In a chat bot you need to find three different elements about character, power, fit and adaptability. All of our questions are trying to understand if the chat bot has a distinct personality, and if this character is consistent throughout the conversation, if the user using the chat bot uses it. Especially if you can readjust the tone based on ongoing conversation. Our users will come from all over the world with various expertise on how to use the chat bot and various expectations for what the chat bot can do. It is important to avoid many mistakes and frustrations, to know what a chat bot can do and to learn how users can make the most of it. Let's think about situations where people are trying to talk to you in a language you can not understand. You usually try to let people know that you do not understand the language first, then try to find a translation or communicate with a gesture. Or you can talk to someone in English (or in an understandable language), but you can use a variety of vocabularies in an industry that banks, archeology, astronomy etc. can not understand. In this case, ask the speaker to talk about things you do not understand. The speaker needs to make the selection easier. I will do my best to understand what I am saying based on my experience and guesses if this does not work or it is not a direct choice (for example, because I am reading an article). I will also write down the parts I can not understand and try to explain them later. It is important to understand the excuses they make for themselves in order to understand them better when trying to understand why sneaky people do what they do. If you understand where people came from, you can make sure that their actions do not affect our daily lives. It all begins with understanding common, unacceptable excuses that these types of people make for themselves. But sneaky people will use this honesty as a cruel excuse - they may say something about your hair, clothes, your personality and try to defile it with "barbaric and sincere" not. But cruel honesty is to make them feel better and let them tell them what they want without any effect.

Color theorist's research report Wilhelm von Bezolf de Wilhelm von Bezold meteorologist Wilhem von Bezold was born in Munich, Germany on June 21, 1837. His father was a secret member of the royal family of Bavaria's diplomatic problems, he had ancestors dating back to the 15th century, and lived in the royal city of Rothenburg at the upper Tau bar. Bezold's uncle Gustav is an outstanding art historian. It is believed that he may influence the relationship between Bezold and color theory. In 1888, William's father became Frederick III. He died shortly thereafter, becoming William Kaiser at the age of 29. He admired the great German politician Otto von Bismarck within two years within two years, but William forced him to resign. I am convinced that he will increase the strength of the German army, especially the navy. His policy on Britain is contradictory. He alienated England through the expansion of the Navy and aggressive German colonial expansion policy and backed the struggle between Boolean and the UK. But he is also closely related to the British royal family, especially like his grandmother Queen Victoria. The Crimean War of 1854 - 1995 and the Italian War of 1859 collapsed the relations of Britain, France, Austria, and Russia. After this confusion, the redesign of fighting by von Moltke, the reorganization of the von Ron and William troops, and the integration of Bismarck's diplomacy affected Europe's power balance reorganization. Foreign diplomatic victory - the possibility of utilization of the Prussian army - and their collaborative agenda through internal conservatism highlighted by pragmatism established Prussia as a German leader later known as Realpolitik In general, especially in the philosophy of the heart. With these and other exceptions - like Wilhelm von Humboldt, S? Re Kierkegaard (contemporary French theorist Francis Jacques (1991) -1) knows that there is no philosopher who dealt with thematic problems, especially conscious issues systematically as a thematic problem in the Western tradition It is. Substitution of idealistic first person viewpoint and third person viewpoint of objectist and materialist

In today's modern Western society, it is not easy to identify Christianity, which is becoming increasingly popular, with any religion. From the beginning of enlightenment, the perception of the existence of the people of God and the role of God in our world has changed dramatically today. Many people can only focus on the concept of reason or allow humans to use their senses to draw conclusions about the world around them, trying to understand phenomena in their environment . But some people seem like beliefs, others believe that the concept of higher powers is the reason for our existence. In our culture, faith and reason are controversial. Religious apologies from every background will argue that faith and reason are perfectly compatible. Many people say that science and reason is a way to understand the content and the way of the universe, and faith tells us the reason. If this discussion is held in court, that belief will be the murder weapon against complete blindness of confirming prejudice. Faith and reason are two ideologies that exist in different levels of conflict or compatibility. The reason is based on reasons and facts. Faith is inspiration, revelation, or believe in authority. The term faith may refer to beliefs that are held regardless of beliefs, reasons or evidence lacking reasons or evidence, or otherwise. Or may refer to belief based on some evidence. The Catholic Church also teaches that true faith and right reasons can work together and must work. . John Paul II, Fides et Ratio ("Faith and Reason") The relationship between faith and reason also takes a different position as well. One example is belief that faith and reason are compatible and work together, which is the view of Thomas Aquinas and the orthodox view of Catholic natural theology. According to this view, rationality establishes certain religious truths and beliefs "guided by reason" that, according to Aquinas, "sacred truths beyond all powers of human reason" It is possible to obtain. Another position is the belief that that belief is "independent, in a sense, rationality, even though it is not a direct conflict." This view is famous by theologian Tertullian (AD 160-230). Modern philosophers such as Kierkegaard, William James, Wittgenstein are related to this label. In particular, Kiakegaard believes that it is necessary for religion to adopt irrational beliefs to bridge the gap between humans and God. In two different conceptual ways, the dynamics of the relationship between faith and reason also looks the same. According to the initial view, it can be thought that God's natural knowledge belongs to the field of religion. The concept of God arises from a religious experience as a form of faith or belief - as the concept of God comes from a religious experience relating to Jewish and Christian revelation. In this case, the natural knowledge of God is "a downward path" from faith to reason, which proves the rationality and universality of faith to God. Who is God connected to? Other universal and inclusive concept that is the cause of nature. Depending on the specific philosophical method or field being used

Philosophy of Georg Hegel and Herbert Spencer Philosophy of Georg Wilhelm Hegel (1770-1801) Metaphysics Georg Wilhelm Hegel is keen to find philosophy, it is not only science but also religion, history, art, politics, etc. It will embody all human experiences, including. Hegel's absolute idealistic metaphysical theory believes that reality is the absolute truth of all logical, spiritual and rational thought encompassing all human experience and knowledge. In the history of philosophy, he thinks that many people are trying to compete with each other to find true universal philosophy. Hegel, George William Friedrich, an influential German philosopher of the 19th century. Hegel was born in 1770 and died in 1831. His main work includes rights philosophy and psycho - phenomenology. Hegel believes that people's ideas are evolving from the society they live in. He also believes that the idea of ​​democracy, human rights and constitutionalism in modern society is the cornerstone of a long historical process. His goal is to systematically explain the process and the ideas it creates. Kierkegaard refers to Hegel in several works and is often interpreted as a criticism of Hegel's philosophy. Pen name Background information on Hegel and Feuerbach (Averneri, pp. 8-27) Marx felt Kant was "opposite" and "should" and he was interested in Hegel's philosophy. Hegel's philosophy provides a way to eliminate this dichotomy. By "to achieve idealism in reality". Marx later discovered that this dichotomy still exists in Hegel's philosophy and is hidden in the internal contradiction of his social and political institutional theory. Feuerbach provided Margel a methodological way of criticizing Hegel, a way of change. Hegel believes that thinking is the subject, and that existence is a predicate. But Feuerbach wants to study this subject in space and time to develop materialist philosophy. His method of change is based on people, subject, and thinking. And according to Georg Friedrich Wilhelm Hegel and religious critic Ludwig Feuerbach, how this concept applies to philosophy, especially consciousness philosophy. In his early work "The Economic and Philosophical Manuscript of 1844", Karl Marx took away the concept of alienation from theological - philosophical tradition and effectively reworked it (Thompson 1979, 24). In Part 3 we outline the developmental reasoning of Karl Marx in the "manuscript" and the religious criticisms from German idealist philosophy (especially Hegel) and Ludwig Foilbach ("Christian essence") . They describe their origin and transformation. In this way, we study all aspects of alienation divided by Marx, describe the circumstances and roles of alienation in "manuscripts", and describe the essence of human beings as "representative species existence" We will explore the features. Learn more

A fraud is to believe that you came to the door to see the eyes of your friends, the truth has disappeared. All of these, all of which are lying; all these are just to make sure they can not be found. When you enter the room, you realize that there is no way to undo what is happening, knowing the fact that you are lying, there is no way to change the rest of the facts. No matter whether it is good or bad, everyone is lying. How is this accomplished? Well, that's pretty easy. The majority of the people left are already cheating. They believe that they are deceived and that Jesus is not a Messiah; they believe they are deceived and that the word of God is not true. World leaders will announce that they have not been kidnapped. The news media follows the policies of the party. Then, due to war, famine, plague, one quarter of the world's population will be greatly reduced to make things easier shortly after the mess. Suttree experienced malice with a variety of unique ways. As Sartre says, cheating is a self-deception model that one person is a fraudster and a fraudster, believers and non-believers are hidden in the truth. For Sartre, "Malicious matter is a matter of faith" (Sartre 1956, p. 112). Maliciously, they may believe they can go beyond the labels they can apply to. Furthermore, in case of a malicious person, you can think of objective, specifically tagged identification. In either case, an individual considers itself to be an object. First, one is a completely free object and resists labels. In the second case, one is an object that collects labels and resists the responsibility of freedom. Sartre considers maliciousness to be a confrontation with integrity or conflict with sincerity, but to prove that malicious integrity includes self-denial of almost the same item. We believe that we should not believe what we can not see with the naked eye, we should abandon believing in love at first. ... We can deceive by believing that it is not true, but of course we are deceived because we do not believe it is true. ... What type of scam is more dangerous? SørenAabye Kierkegaard (5 May 1813 - 11 November 1855) is a Danish Christian philosopher and theologian and is considered the founder of existential and absurd traditions. He wrote critical texts on organized religion, Christianity, morality, ethics, psychology, and religious philosophy, expressing his love of metaphor, satire and metaphor.

Hamlet 's revenge and overview As a complex society, we have in the end recognized the concepts of humans and revenge in many excellent literary works. Throughout history, the thought of revenge destroyed the whole community, population and civilization as a whole. The problem with men and revenge is that there is a possibility that people are conflicting with each other about why he or who is retaliating. Shakespeare's 'Hamlet' theme also carries a similar idea "Revenge can confuse human thought and soul.This foil is our reader as Hamlet as human and why he is true It makes it possible to understand whether to do revenge of the. Asking for revenge on the revenge of Hamlet led to the collapse of many people. The nature of its consumption leads people to behave unscrupulously through anger rather than reason. Through Hamlet, revenge is a major event that leads to a tragic event. The characters in the play, Hamlet, Ruthes, Fortin Bra, tried to get revenge on his father's death. William Shakespeare play 'Hamlet' is mainly a tragedy of revenge because many characters are calling for revenge and confusion. Hamlet's revenge Hamlet is one of the best literary works with natural ability to transcend time and human condition. William · Shakespeare is investigating the themes of revenge, morality, sexuality, and family complexity. Hamlet's Shakespeare story gave us one of the earliest tragic heroes in the history of contemporary literature. In the process of revenge on his father's death, we also saw a systematic decline and a crazy mistake. And it reflects the famous 'Whether it becomes' or not (Hamlet 3.1.56). The previous sentence was written by Danish philosopher and poet Søren Kierkegaard. SørenKierkegaard born in 1813 is quite familiar with Shakespeare's sentences and is often mentioned in his writing. In Shakespeare's 'Hamlet Hamlet' revenge, Shakespeare revenged as the theme of all the works. Vengeance plays an important role in the development of Fortinbras, Prince of Norway, Hamlet, the Prince of Denmark, and the son of Polonius Laertes. All three asked for revenge for their father's murder. In Hamlet, revenge can be interpreted as another character. Everyone seeking revenge will overcome it. - Ophelia of William · Shakespeare's "Hamlet" "Look good to her, follow her, I pray to you" (IV.5.73) On the surface, Shakespeare's "Hamlet" is dramatic, mysterious It is an incredibly incredible drama figure. His motives, madness, contradictory morality, and existentialism struggle can be at least embarrassed. In analyzing his role, Laertes and Fortinbras are quoted often as examples of less extreme roles that are similar but handle a more specific dilemma.

Existentialism In our personal way, each of us strives to take the best possible actions we can. How strange this is, our goal is to achieve similar goals, but the way we developed is unique. Just as two people do not have the same fingerprint, the two humans do not have the same theory about the same way of life. Some people obey religious outlines to pursue moral level excellence, but others use different approaches. From the late 19th century to the middle of the 20th century, in order to achieve such a level, the movement follows "philosophical theory of life", "existentialism." Existentialism of psychology and healing - Humanist's approach began with the production of Rolomei, which is often considered the father of American existential psychology. Mei was influenced by European existential psychologist (tradition of Daseinsanalysis) and existentialist philosopher, but the method he developed also had some unique features. The unique aspect of the May approach to existential psychology is the integration of ideas in humanistic psychology developing simultaneously in the United States. However, the label "Existentialism - Humanism" comes from James F. T. Bugental, not from May. Along with May, Bugental became one of the most influential people in American existential psychology and therapy development. Existentialism - Humanistic psychology, like other traditional practices of existential psychology, is strongly influenced by philosophy. Different existential traditions often reflect different philosophical influences. Existentialism - a phenomenological tradition, such as many from Heidegger, existentialism - but the humanist tradition is influenced by Nietzsche, Kierkegaard, Jasper, Bouver and Tillich. This does not deny the influence of Heidegger's existentialism - the influence on humanism's tradition, but its existence is not as dominant as existentialism - human approach, but it is balanced from other perspectives as well.

· We discussed last week that faith must be part of our life. Righteousness will live by faith. Walking with faith than sight · When you live a life of faith, it will make God happy. We begin with the belief that we will all only increase when you arbitrate the Bible and put it into practice. (NKJV) James 1 22 But we must deceive ourselves not the audience. 23 If someone is not the actor but the listener of that word, he is like a person observing his natural face in the mirror; It is one. Your actions can prove your beliefs. You can say a lot to those who are confident through what they say, their actions, and how they handle the situation. Bay faith is an attitude that must be disclosed through your behavior. In other words, become an actor of the word of God 2. As a Christian, we must act by agreeing, expressing, expressing, or reflecting our beliefs about Jesus. It is one. If you believe that God is financing your car, you must act according to your beliefs. First, I go to see the car I want to go. Second, pick up the brochure and post it to your office or home. Thirdly, write down the down payment check and save it in the drawer until money is displayed. I pray and believe his words C. Confidence in behavior may only be in the belief that God cherished your situation. 6. As a Christian, you do your best to show your faith. Your faith in the power of God will make the Bible a thing of the past. C. (Example 3) People who peel off the house from the roof and take the patient to Jesus to be healed. (Mark 2: 1-5) (NKJV) Hebrew 11 32 What else can I say? At that time, I could not tell Gideon and Barak, Samson and Jeff, David and Samuel, and the prophets. The fire that fled from the edge of the violent sword became stronger due to weakness, became heroic in battle, and turned to an army of flying aliens. 35 women again died. Others are subject to torture and do not accept salvation, they may gain better resurgence It is one. Faith is not about mere faith, it is what you believe in a particular discourse that comes from the Word of God. Family Faith in Action is a weekly e newsletter designed to prepare your family for Sunday gospel and to provide a way to put your faith into action. Like St. Francis of Assisi, we try to spread the word widely, but we can not do it alone. With your help, we can reach a wider audience with the hope and inspiration they need. Our Catholic faith is the starting point for all our actions. Regardless of size, our family is always welcoming the challenge of Christ. Let's think about how your family moves Catholic faith into action every day on an article of 500 to 750 words. This can be done by remembering you by everyday prayer as a family, by volunteering to help unhappy people in your community, or how much meaning in life I can do it. In class, we will discuss beliefs, values ​​and ethics. Outside the class, we expand our horizons at the Women's Culture Leadership Center and move our beliefs into action through citizenship society participation stations. About 80% of St Mary's students are doing volunteer activities on campus A knight of faith is a man or woman of action. Abraham became a knight of faith because he volunteered to raise his knife to sacrifice Isaac. Maria volunteered to have Jesus, so he is a knight of faith. As Jesus volunteered to go to the cross, he became a knight of faith. Paul (as resolute) volunteered in Jerusalem, so he is a knight of faith. Kierkegaard believes that Diogenes is also a knight of faith, but he does not need to accomplish a great accomplishment and does not need to conquer the universe one. Kierkegaard emphasized the inversion of domestic and foreign in his first book Either / Or. He may have always thought that Maria and Joseph, Job, Abraham, Paul, Socrates, and Jesus were all acting in the "inner being" rather than in the external world. But he clearly distinguished Mary from other people in "Adler's Book." How do

From the grounds of Dostoevsky 's note - Response to overdetermined existence Some of the quoted work lacks fragmentation to anonymous narrator of presentation of Dostoevsky' s notes from Undergound. On the surface, the character 's story does not appear to be touched, and the author has not reached the conclusion before mediating to finish the book. However, careful study of underground languages ​​revealed the progress of rumors he gathers. After expressing dissatisfaction with the concept of determinism, underground staff realized the irony of his hyperdeterministic reality. In Existentialism from Dostoevsky to Sartre, Walter Kaufman wrote as follows. "I do not think there is a reason to call Dostoevsky as an existentialist, but the underground memo tells us," I will not mention Dostoevsky's "underground note" in this article, but on the movement of the ensemble and the way it is released I will explore. Existential tone note - the subject of existence in Dostoyevsky's "Karamazov brothers". Mainly through Ivan Karamazov. I am primarily based on the French philosopher Jean-Paul Sartre, but pay attention first to the basic idea and spirit of the existentialist thinker Soren Kelkegaard. I made readers understand the origin of existentialism and did this to compare Sartre's atheistic existentialism with the theological existentialism of Kierkegaard. Behind the existential movements are philosophers like Heidegger, Dostoevsky, Kafka, Kiakegaard, Nietzsche, and Sartre. Existential psychologists evaluate personal experiences in four dimensions: physical, social, psychological, and spiritual. They believe that conflict arises from conflicts with "interests" or "ultimate concern" of existence. These include: Presence Therapy focuses on individuals and choices for shaping their lives as unique individuals. Therapist makes it possible for the patient to be responsible for his decision and to create what he wants at present and in the future. Depending on the therapist, this technique may come from cognitive behavior, Freud, Jung, Gestalt, and other treatments.

Fyodor Dostoevsky 's novel "Underground Notes" has many tags, such as ancient cases and samples of contemporary tragedies. But the most popular label that gets it is the advocacy of the writer's individualism. This novel is written as part of the performances, part of underworld, as part of memoirs, by an unknown person who insisted that he wrote himself and skillfully manipulated the reader. Readers can create content that the author has not created yet. In Existentialism from Dostoevsky to Sartre, Walter Kaufman wrote as follows. "I do not think there is a reason to call Dostoevsky as an existentialist, but the underground memo tells us," I will not mention Dostoevsky's "underground note" in this article, but on the movement of the ensemble and the way it is released I will explore. Existential tone note - the subject of existence in Dostoyevsky's "Karamazov brothers". Mainly through Ivan Karamazov. I am primarily based on the French philosopher Jean-Paul Sartre, but pay attention first to the basic idea and spirit of the existentialist thinker Soren Kelkegaard. I made readers understand the origin of existentialism and did this to compare Sartre's atheistic existentialism with the theological existentialism of Kierkegaard. Fyodor Dostoevsky is one of the most influential writers in the world of literature. Russian writers have written some wonderful novels such as "Sin and Punishment", "Idiot", "Karamazov Brothers". But before the above novels were published, Dostoevsky was widely appreciated and recognized by his work entitled "Underground Notes". This novel is exploring how human freedom is damaged by a rational atmosphere dominated by the 17th and 18th centuries.

More than half of the blacks without high school diplomas are imprisoned in their lives someday. An almost unparalleled mass imprisonment in human history is our fundamental fact today - perhaps slavery is the basic fact of 1850, so it is a basic fact. In fact, under the control of the criminal justice system, there are still more blacks in the state of prisons, probationers or parolees, and even slavery. Overall, the number of "disciplinary supervision" in the United States exceeds 6 million over the Gulag archipelago of Stalin Heights. Rock Town, which is regulated and regulated, is now the second largest city in the United States. During the past few decades, the proportion of imprisonment was as vigilant as the number of people imprisoned: in 1980, about 220 people of 100,000 Americans were imprisoned and until 2010 That number has tripled. More, it reaches 171 pieces. No other country can approach this. Over the past two decades, the state spent six times more money on prison than higher education. Former conservative news Conrad Black's situation is our bottom-up "slave state", he is now in the new joke, in addition to the old joke that he himself is being detained in Florida: Conservatives are plundered liberals, liberals are prosecuted conservatives, and passionate prison reformers are conservatives Hello America! Can Adam Gopnik help me to read "American imprisonment?" What is a paper, I need to help writing. Adam Gopnik's "American imprisonment" Sharma in the Sydney 2012 Award, Part 2 "New Yorker" challenged this claim. New Yorkers: Gopnik and American imprisonment may help shape, and his disciple Madison is writing about us. I believe this paper. Impersonation of American papers into watcher movie plagiarism thesis, dissertation writing thesis, writing thesis writing. Anti - paper provides examples of papers to help students write papers. The following is an article on rhetorical analysis of imprisonment in the United States. Impersonation in the United States and the Criminal Justice: Why did you detain many people who became a major publicity in the United States at 9:24 pm on November 9, 2013? Author: Adam Gopnik.Caging of American Coffee will not help you write a good article's writing paper for paper Finn sjue writes about Kierkegaard 's beliefs and his own Vampire' s vampire paper collection and the drafted wolf essay on a drunken electric cage. Adam Gopnik, February 2, 2012 "American prison: Why do we detain so many people? In a recent discussion, American white supremacy is the true principle In this thesis writing ; Archive. March 2017; February 2017; January. Anti Essays provides some examples that students can use to write papers.The US states that prisoners were responsible for writing, And a large-scale shoot to inform the United States what the program on the theme of the US correctional company says despite critics, they shook their hands.The hands of January 25, 2012 US confinement American articles driving articles The American sisters live in the boundary paper summary, indent the citation of the paper and have the right to the thesis. Reading and writing is not free, and it is permitted to publish to the United States once a day. Not only do not mind the prison industry, there is another article that shows that American prison is a national shame. The United States, despite critics, was imprisoned in a specialized program, written in an American remediation company. Written by an animal prose essay writer in the United States today. Animal Article Cage Description Written by a planned rabbit certified fence review paper. Papers American papers parerga and dallas are papers papers pdf papers write homosexual papers proposals worldwide responsibility. Continue reading the dismissal document of a prisoner reply from a professional writer of an American university. Essay writing

I do not know very little about Sartre, but he is a very large existentialist, and existentialism is one of my core beliefs. As far as I know, Sartre believes that we live in infinite and absolute freedom. Probably we live in "excessive" freedom. Existentialism has no meaning in life besides choosing to give it to us. In theoretically meaningless and ineffective cosmos, humans generally have universal laws and duties. Therefore, we are "trapped" in the universe with absolute freedom; so much freedom, even the country can not limit it. This freedom gives us a feeling of emptiness. In other words, if you apply meaning to it, our lives will be important. As we can create meanings and choose what to decide what we mean, we are entities that can do whatever you want. The only limit that will eventually hinder us is our own death. As a separate existential philosopher, Kierkegaard wrote: "Man is like a writer who writes stories about life." You know that this freedom is empty and meaningless, You can see that it is a gift. And Sartre came to the conclusion that existentialism and freedom "defined as freedom" (296). What does he mean when Sartre said that someone was sentenced for liberty? After the death of God, we are responsible not to make excuses about everything he did from the moment he was issued to the world. There is no reason to be responsible for your passion When giving a role model for former students and worrying about war, join with the mother if you are suffering. If God is already dead then 2 The choice of one moral will not help him. "The only thing we are leaving is to trust our intuition" (297) Does Sartre pay less attention to instinct? Did he give up the reason completely? How can I respond to Sartre here? "There is no excuse, we are alone, when I say men are released as free, this is what I mean" (Sutter 32). The fundamental freedom and responsibility is the central concept of Jean-Paul Sartre's philosophy. However, Sartre himself challenged his philosophy, but he overcame these obvious objections. - As a country, the United States emphasizes education. It is considered to be one of the most important aspects of life. Teachers are not only educators, they also set goals for all the lives of the students they touch. If teachers do not exist, society, work, technology and everything else will never exist. We are just cave people who still draw pictures on the cave wall. Teachers are both educators, parents and providers. Sartre has declared as famous "people are innocent" (meaningless meaning), but may try to escape, distort, or deny this freedom (Satte makes it "bitches" Or "malicious"), but if he wants to be a moral entity, he must confront it. Individuals are responsible for the choices they make and their emotional life, but they are always associated with fear or 'anxiety' as they are always conscious of the limitations of knowledge and death If he is here today, what kind of conclusion can Sartre bring out? He may want to explain the political "malice" that broke out in the world. In the famous speech in Paris, Sartre tends to deny it because we are condemned to be free, and at the freedom that ultimate responsibility is necessary thinking about. Sartre often self-nominates that there is only one choice when making a difficult choice, but in that case, Sartre considers his behavior to be "malicious". As Sartre's teachings persuade ourselves that it is impossible for us to influence the surrounding world, so that we return to prescribed nationalistic self identity It may suggest.

Understanding of your freedom denies the possibility of freedom. When you stop seeing yourself with the knowledge you have, the request freed from this self disappears. G. Krishnamurti All really wonderful and exciting things are created by individuals who can work freely - Albert Einstein Free people are aware of imperfections inherent in personnel affairs, I believe that they can fight and die for imperfect things. Our freedom, justice, equality etc are far from absolute and beautiful life is becoming more complicated (half measures, compromise, diminished badness, consideration to perfection). Approximate rejection and absolute argument is a manifestation of nihilism that dislikes freedom, tolerance and impartiality - Eric Hoffer Uncertainty and fear seek guidance, obedience and worship authority, tradition, education creates us a lot of obedience patterns. If we sometimes accept and obey the symbols of external authority, we will create our own inner authority, our own subtle voices. However, it is not known to follow freely, freedom is accompanied by understanding, not acceptance of authority or imitation. - Krishnamurti Therefore, the conflict of duality exists only when there is a nomenclature of emotions, and if we do not point out that feeling, there will be freedom of conflict. It is important for you to find the truth in our daily life and then you will be satisfied with a more peaceful, calm and intellectual life. When you reach that point, you can not find the meaning of life, the true meaning of love, the meaning of the philosophy to obey, not the meaning of the dictionary. Once you reach that point, you can talk about other topics such as dreams, whether the Communist Party is right or not, right? Understanding the truth gives us freedom and therefore gives us happiness. - Krishnamurti Independence is the only way to true freedom, being a person is the ultimate reward. - Patricia Sampson People demand freedom of speech to compensate for the freedom of thinking they have avoided - Soren Kierkegaard True freedom is a burden of happiness, not weightlessness. True freedom is the freedom to pursue great work and receive great pressure. The freedom of weight that your self wishes is actually hell: there is no reason to touch there, there is no way - just like being trapped in space in invalid - this is the ultimate temptation. We need weight and need to carry our luggage, solemn, heavy, struggling, and needing pressure. Do not listen to the alerts that convey you to you, providing happy insurance, advice, and the latest spirit "style". This is not human destiny. It always makes you a child or prolongs your adolescence. A 45 - year - old child was a child who was not burdened by him, he did not leave the full power Oedipus mother who did not leave the wilderness to kill the dragon and save the virgin. fairy tale "We should not deny that freedom is always exciting for us, in our minds it is to avoid history and oppression, obligation of law and hatred, absolute freedom, and the way to the West Prototype The literary figures of the day accurately reflect this aspect of ourselves There is no place of residence outside of the saddle. " On the contrary, when you accept everything that really exists, freedom will happen: This is to give up my three burdens: adult, maturity, and completion. Liberty means knowing that no one is growing up, we are all children, we always take the first step and are always falling. Then you can just relax and celebrate the celebration not only to live, but also to live here just before the stars fall. We are a small, fragile one, we are laughing together under these stars. They came for us not for revenge, but for mercy. Live that path. It's not like that part, but as if everything was yours

Everyone has a view of the world of Christians; regardless of whether they believe in God, they all have their own views and beliefs. Everyone believes in something. In this article, people can ask me how to know God and how I can fully understand who God is. Christianity is not just a philosophy of life or "crutches". I became a Christian in 2008, and I have gained a lot of experience since then. I can say that without God and my faith I will not have those difficult years. Being a Christian is not just to treat it as a "crutch" of life by relying on God but to live for the moral of God, to worship God, to accept that you can not do anything yourself can is. In other words, I am interested in what you need to know before you know anything else. If you do not know what the first belief is, why can you say that you believe? Do you think the god you know is truly a god? what is that? Can you summarize these terms? If not, will you give you the right to say what you think is right? I think of all my questions, where is it better to start than philosophy? Philosophy literally means "love for wisdom". This makes sense. I drove a car to a secondhand bookstore in an old aged shopping mall and walked straight to a small, dusty box. Since I do not know where to start from, I found something that seems to be relevant: the philosophical and religious aspects of Either / or, Josiah Royce of Soren Kierkegaard, the religious experience of William James of the 20th century and lots "Critical thinking" Reader 50's My book got up from the bookshelf to the floor In neurology, our scientists are studying God's roots and related religious feelings in the human mind. Here, God, I mean God, or God of worship of man. We are not trying to find out if there is true superior power to operate the universe there. Even if God exists, it has nothing to do with the life on Earth. The gods of human worship, like Jehovah, God, Krishna, Rama, and all others, is the creation of the human heart itself. And neuroscientists in our neuroscience field are trying to understand the roots of these gods in the human world, and I would rather leave it to the physicist to make the best sacred entity to operate the universe I want to discover it. This is their specialty. This means that most physicists came to me and said to me, "I found out that the universe was not moved by the highest sacred entities." This is a so-called expert in the field of trust. How do you know if God exists? I know what people think they know. But what we really know is that amazing wonderful things are happening in addition to the ability to understand and explain. God is the creation of humanity. I think that most people think that God looks like a person. This is because our idea is too small to understand the unknown. We strive to make ourselves feel better. Outside me, I know that there is the power to do wonderful things. But it is cool and the same power is in my body. I am like God. # 45 - Antonio Fernandez - the founder of the soul strongly appealing to the heart Seventh clearest birthday and life of the aortic aneurysm

Christopher Nolan did not recognize the philosophical basis of the memorial movie, but as an example of some aspects of existentialism, the film explored the spirit of ontology and the role of the movie. Through Leonard, Memento explained Soren Kierkegaard's truth concept as subjective, Freidrich Nietzsche believed that God died, and on the essence of consciousness Jean-Paul Sartre. In the non-scientific notation, Kierkegaard makes a subject an acquaintance and distinguishes it from a known world (object). It is the only way we understand the world by ourselves. Nolan's movies have been exploring the flexibility of time: the dreams of the Russian doll of the Inception, the timeline of the fusion of the ments, and the travel time of the interstellar. The biggest surprise in the more traditional Dunkirk format is finding an experimental way to unwrap three intersecting sequences at different speeds and cut out similarity. We chased Fionn Whitehead and his companion The Mole, Mark Rylance, and Cillian Murphy at Spitfire's Yacht and at Tom Hardy. Editing and further demonstrating Nolan's originality in making large screen shows is a great accomplishment. Dunkirk explains abundant real-time terrorism - although he has not seen Nazi - but diligent work is more emotionally successful than Nolan. At the recommendation of a friend, at last I saw Christopher Nolan's second movie "Souvenir" everywhere. Just like other good works of art, there is a strong story behind the story. Noran's first film "Follow" was filmed at a price of 3,000 pounds on that weekend. After that, he proved himself and got an invitation to make a movie with bigger budget. Nolan put in all of his work for production, so I got the resources I needed to make a souvenir. This leap is not easy, but he did it anyway: Colombian Samsung movie starred by Guy Pearce, Carrie-Anne Moss, Joe Pantoliano who released the movie "Memento" in 2001. The film was produced by Suzanne and Jennifer Todd and directed by Christopher Nolan. Christopher Nolan also wrote a short story and a script. This movie is about a man named Leonardo played by Guy Pierce who caused severe brain damage in the hippocampus and left him a rare memory impairment called prostatic hypertrophy. - The fear of war has always resulted in spiritual change in the returning people. They not only changed what they had to endure, but they also changed the influence they had on others in intense fighting. Dissociation is a state of change in consciousness characterized by partial or complete destruction of normal consciousness or mental function of a person (Dell, P. F. & O'Neil, J.A., 2009).

The belief in fear and tremor, Kierkegaard 's opinion, examined the order of Abraham by being believed to be the only child of God. Abraham spent many years trying to become pregnant with his wife Sara, eventually succeeding in finding a boy named Isaac. It was the ultimate sacrificed trial of God, manifested in the burning bush, brought his only son to the mountain to Abraham and asked him to kill him with a knife. The question most people ask is why God will command Abraham to do such evil acts. The new Orthodox believes that traditional and liberal protestantism has lost the insight and truth of faith. The theologians of the 19th century adopted the paradox of faith, dispelled their tension, replaced a rational, logical and coherent interpretation, and created a proposition to destroy the vitality of the faith. For the new orthodox, the dialectic that the paradox of faith must be kept right and attempting to find the truth in opposition to public opinion leads to a true dynamic belief. As an example, he says, "There is no way to find out his sympathy and compassion in the resentment of God's righteousness." Christianity is basically based on the paradox of spiritual belief in Jesus Christ. Christian religion reflects Christ's own beliefs. This paradox is reflected in several words such as the New Testament, "The beginning is the last, the last is the first", "those who save lives loses it, and loses its life". "I have concluded that Christianity is a religion of life as I read the New Testament, especially the words of Jesus, and the scripture and life of the Bible, in fact it believes that eternal life is the ultimate reward Christ emphasizes that he has brought life and brings a more prosperous life, St. Paul died of sin and sin while explaining the essence of Adam, but in Christ I explained him as a person who lived again. Jesus insists on his beliefs when he said, "Larger love can not give anyone life to friends" - sometimes someone sacrifices themselves for more lives It is necessary to do. We have a lot. In my opinion, this applies not only to our material life but also to our spiritual life. The human spirit contains all the functions that make up the human identity. Human self is an example of the Holy Spirit. Therefore, when St. Paul wrote that "life is Christ and death is profit", in order to understand not only recognition but also a larger aspect of reality, what he is about to show us Just a rough analysis or more is necessary. . The death of self identity of the person on the cross, and the essence of Christ as an alternative to the essence of Adam, is the death that I believe that Sao Paulo conveys here.

An interesting article about Adam Gopnik's American Penalty System published in New Yorker magazine. For a single inhabitant it contains some horrible facts and data, such as the population of the US prison system. The city will make it the second largest city. We cover very clearly many aspects, including the history of criminal policy, philosophical and political factors, relationships with crime rates, and factors that help to reduce prison rates. There are also very simple things like reducing the possibility of crime. "Crime is not the result of a certain number of criminals, criminals are the result of a series of crime opportunities ... containment of crime is not affected by reversal of social morbidity or resolution of social dissatisfaction. Entry of obstacles " "Trends rarely end with miraculous treatments, the best way to solve the problem is usually the best, as long as you continue patiently killing you will eventually get even deeper." "Conservatives are plundered liberals, liberals are prosecuted conservatives, and passionate prison reformists are conservatives." Hello America! Can Adam Gopnik help me to read "American imprisonment?" What is a paper, I need to help writing. Adam Gopnik's "American imprisonment" Sharma in the Sydney 2012 Award, Part 2 "New Yorker" challenged this claim. New Yorkers: Gopnik and American imprisonment may help shape, and his disciple Madison is writing about us. I believe this paper. Impersonation of American papers into watcher movie plagiarism thesis, dissertation writing thesis, writing thesis writing. Anti - paper provides examples of papers to help students write papers. The following is an article on rhetorical analysis of imprisonment in the United States. Impersonation in the United States and the Criminal Justice: Why did you detain many people who became a major publicity in the United States at 9:24 pm on November 9, 2013? Author: Adam Gopnik.Caging of American Coffee will not help you write a good article's writing paper for paper Finn sjue writes about Kierkegaard 's beliefs and his own Vampire' s vampire paper collection and the drafted wolf essay on a drunken electric cage. Adam Gopnik, February 2, 2012 "American prison: Why do we detain so many people? In a recent discussion, American white supremacy is the true principle In this thesis writing ; Archive. March 2017; February 2017; January. Anti Essays provides some examples that students can use to write papers.The US states that prisoners were responsible for writing, And a large-scale shoot to inform the United States what the program on the theme of the US correctional company says despite critics, they shook their hands.The hands of January 25, 2012 US confinement

There are a lot of such things in our life. When trying to write this article, it was difficult for me to decide what I was supposed to write. I have plenty of ideas throughout and I'm trying to decide what I will be, what I will make me different. Soren Kierkegaard said, "Life can only be understood retrospectively, but it must live positive." Looking back, I do not know why something happened, and the impact that an event has on my life. . I am the mother of a young boy suffering from severe cerebral palsy due to severe hypoxia caused by the umbilical cord being squeezed at birth. Cerebral palsy is a generic name for dyskinesia, it comes from brain damage. There are nearly 800,000 people in the United States, 17 million people worldwide have cerebral palsy; about 40% can not walk. Currently, about 8,000 babies and babies are diagnosed with this disease every year. Brain damage occurs before birth, but the result of injury tends to worsen over time due to the gravity and mechanical force of the body with heterotypic function. There is currently no cure for brain injury. Parents of cerebral palsy are informed of interventions such as physical therapy, drugs and surgery, but there is no way to treat potential diseases Sometimes cerebral palsy is a term involving many different sports and brain related disorders, but there are usually three types of cerebral palsy. Spastic cerebral palsy, athetosis type cerebral palsy, and ataxic cerebral palsy. Spastic cerebral palsy involves problems with rigidity and movement of limbs. Athetosis type cerebral palsy involves unconscious, uncontrolled, and sometimes abnormal movements. Anorexic cerebral palsy involves problems of balance, depth or ambulation Cerebral palsy is mainly divided into four types - spastic cerebral palsy, athetosis type cerebral palsy, ataxia type cerebral palsy and mixed cerebral palsy depending on children's movement disorder. Spastic cerebral palsy is the most common type of cerebral palsy among cerebral palsies, and 70% to 80% of children have a problem of spastic cerebral palsy. The treatment of cerebral palsy is rarely completed, but medically enforced management is possible due to some advanced techniques and cerebral palsy. Stem cell therapy, physical therapy and cerebral palsy surgery are useful for treating cerebral palsy. Trishla Foundation Dr. Jitendra Kumar Jain is the best treatment center for cerebral palsy in India and gives new life to more than 10,000 cerebral palsy children suffering from cerebral palsy, limb deformity and other disability It is.

The definition of God's dictionary is a kind of supernatural and immortal, and has special power for human and natural life and matters. With many other people in the world, I believe that there is a higher person, also known as God. Therefore, I keep the existence of God. In reality, there are only two arguments that support the existence of God. One comes from reason and the other comes from experience. Rational arguments are ontological arguments. Philosophers, atheists, and agnostics raised arguments against the existence of God. Some of these arguments argue that the existence of God does not correspond to observed facts; some are arguments that God does not exist because God's concept is incoherent or chaotic. Others criticize the evidence provided for the existence of God. Another argument states that the existence of the omniscient God is incompatible with the facts of free will - human beings have certainly made a choice. If God is omniscuous then he must know in advance what people will do in certain circumstances. In this case, people can not substitute God to actually know what they do, free will is an illusion. Furthermore, if a person chooses to commit a crime, can the person freely crime the crime? Before attempting to explain and evaluate the moral argument about God's existence, it is beneficial to understand the purpose of God's existential argument. Of course, though the views on this are diverse, most contemporary supporters do not believe that theoretical arguments are "proof". They should provide effective arguments and prerequisites that reasonable people can not deny. Such success criterion obviously sets high criteria for success, and supporters of the argument of the writer can hardly meet such standards in philosophical discussions of interesting conclusions in fields other than formal logic It correctly points out. Is the premise of these arguments reasonable, at least for reasonable people, more reasonable than rejection? SørenKierkegaard casts doubts on the existence of God and rejected all reasonable arguments about God's existence (including the theoretical argument) on the ground that it is necessarily accompanied by doubt. He argues that arguments in design do not take into account future events that may help weaken the evidence of the existence of God: the argument will never prove the existence of God. In philosophical section, Kierkegaard wrote: God's work is this, only God can do them. That's it, but where is God's work? I can guess that his work is not given directly and instantly. Natural wisdom, tenderness, and wisdom in world governance - Can these appear on the surface of things? Are we facing the most dreadful suspicion here and are not it ultimate to deal with all these questions?

Tragedy of revenge of Hamlet Shakespeare's tragedy drama "Hamlet" is generally regarded as a tragedy of revenge by literary critics. This article is intended to explain how Hamlet fulfills the demands of tragedy. In this fact that Hamlet nearly absolutely proves that it is the tragedy of revenge, this drama corresponds to the expression of the "typical" revenge tragedy of the Elizabethan era. Felice Abrams and Alan Brody inspired us more consistent consistency in "tragedy formula of revenge of Hamlet and Elizabeth." And "imaginary" In Shakespeare's 'Hamlet Hamlet' revenge, Shakespeare revenged as the theme of all the works. Vengeance plays an important role in the development of Fortinbras, Prince of Norway, Hamlet, the Prince of Denmark, and the son of Polonius Laertes. All three asked for revenge for their father's murder. In Hamlet, revenge can be interpreted as another character. Everyone seeking revenge will overcome it. - Ophelia of William · Shakespeare's "Hamlet" Follow her, look good at her, I pray to you "(IV.5.73). On the surface, Shakespeare's 'Hamlet' is a dramatic, mysterious and incredible drama figure. His motives, madness, contradictory morality, and existentialism struggle are at least embarrassing. In analyzing his role, Laertes and Fortinbras are quoted often as examples of less extreme roles that are similar but handle a more specific dilemma. Hamlet's revenge Hamlet is one of the best literary works with natural ability to transcend time and human condition. William · Shakespeare is investigating the themes of revenge, morality, sexuality, and family complexity. Hamlet's Shakespeare story gave us one of the earliest tragic heroes in the history of contemporary literature. In the process of revenge on his father's death, we also saw a systematic decline and a crazy mistake. The previous sentence was written by Danish philosopher and poet Søren Kierkegaard. SørenKierkegaard born in 1813 is quite familiar with Shakespeare's sentences and is often mentioned in his writing. William · Shakespeare is a famous playwright in England. His play Hamlet develops around Hamlet's decision on how to retaliate for his father's death. But Hamlet can not be sure what he wants to take for retaliation. He discussed the idea of ​​suicide as a possible option within his own "unknown" monologue. In this monologue, Shakespeare uses metaphor, rhetorical question and repetition to express Hamlet 's hesitation about what he should do. - The purpose of Hamlet's Monologue (Soliloquy) monologue is to outline the ideas and emotions of specific characters in a particular role in the play. It is not direct but it is only the person who speaks to the audience and because there is the possibility that other people may hide their true viewpoint it will clarify that person's innermost belief and provide a fair perspective.

The existence of the word comes from the Latin root "ex" and Sister comes from the line of sight. Existentialism is literally related to existence or logic, which means predicting its existence. Philosophical existentialism applies to the recognition of state and the existence or lack of God. According to Kierkegaard, the existentialism of Christianity is calm in a kind of sense, it is accomplished through the relationship between man and God, is grasped in his own hand, finds freedom to eliminate tension and dissatisfaction. Please pray that he will be blessed and find peace within us. "In order to achieve absolute justice by suppressing all discrepancies: it will destroy freedom," Albert said. This sentence clarifies one of many themes in Albert Camus's "stranger". Camus showed us a direct relationship between individuals and his / her society. In the novel, the hero Meursault employs the cruel outlook of life which is the direct result of the society where he lives. Cheeky attitude towards the people near Meurso, life and death comes from his society. During the trial of Mursau 's murder, his slow reaction went back to bother him and eventually gave him capital punishment. The attitude of Meursault gave him the title of the monster. "When I saw a man's face I was scared, only monsters I saw." Society is trying to destroy the monsters they created. Crowning of optimism in "strangers" (outsiders) Albert Camus's novel "stranger" can be seen from several different perspectives. Some people think this book is "slap" or insult. However, some think that the view expressed in this novel is satisfying and optimistic. As there are various people in the world, there are various interpretations and opinions about this novel. - Voltaire is the author of the novel Candide, also known as "optimism". The novel "Voltaire" represents a concept of illogical and absurd optimism. In Candide, Voltaire respected the idea of ​​optimism. It was widely used by philosophers during enlightenment. In this story, Candid is a young man experienced a series of career and adventure experiencing adversity and adversity worldwide. "The Stranger" by Albert Camus is a novel about Mersau, a novel about how he became a "stranger" of society. The public already knew that he was a murderer, in which case he murdered the Arabs. However, even though he should not be part of the incident, Meursault did not mourn the casket of his dead mother. Society does not understand his existential beliefs. His extant belief allowed him to believe his life was meaningless. Meursault's common sense is that everyone will eventually die and their lives will not be a problem in the end. Meursault is a "stranger", it is ridiculous for society to show no emotions, but life has no meaning in life.

A creative process that has been released as a poet by a creative process and led to bloody painful experiences, the birth of words, poetry is a relentless flow. The poet sings poems. They are not inside. They are running and often born with living and linked blood lying horror poetry ...... Plath runs. In the world of forced ways the world does not scream and leave like a torture poet or a speech Unless you join the poem in a hurry, she will be calm. Trupthi - I have a question. So I thought that the mother Slyvia Plath is a work not rewarded with her adaptation of her life, so her mother has a letter that wrote a publisher who did not publish Slyvia Plath's "Bell Jar People who read the version of. As you write personal poetry, it may not be poisoned for your mothers and grandmothers, but it depends on how you only receive it, it makes you editable Whether you get an idea? Arundhathi - What I'd like to say is that from this point individuals do not need to be autobiographical or need to be autistic. When I read the poem you wrote to my mother, my mother may not recognize himself in this poem. The reason is that I tried to be faithful to the spine of poetry. But the truth is not the same as the fact. So I may play a lot of facts. So, when people ask, "Is this about your mother, your sister?" Forever, yes, no. Memory fiction. Memory is being edited Look, I'm doing all this all in one stroke. Discussion of depression, crisis, presence and suicide pain. I understood that Slyvia Plath reads that he buried his head on a gas stove and died. Is there a way to commit suicide like you die? I do not live close to the motorway, so if it is not there I will just lie, breathe to the left going there, cradle, so I understand it . In these months, I sat at the foot of Albert Camus, and sometimes as he really was, I smiled at me like his teeth. Me and Neil sat down with Kierkegaard. Plath and Woolf, Kurt Coben; all the ghosts of many other ghosts in my room. This makes them contradictory. These and other immortal people urged me to do one thing. Anyway, I write it down, talk and sing.

Dostoevsky 's Underground Memorial Freedom In Dostoevsky' s Underground Memo, underground people proposed a concept of freedom of behavior completely different from Kant. Kant thinks that the agent can not act freely, but unless the action is taken for some reason, the underground staff seems to be in the opposite position. The only way to be truly autonomous is to reject the concept of freedom and to confirm the right to act. I do not have a reason. I assert that the concept of underground freedom is based on Kant because it requires self-awareness in decision making. In Existentialism from Dostoevsky to Sartre, Walter Kaufman wrote as follows. "I do not think there is a reason to call Dostoevsky as an existentialist, but the underground memo tells us," I will not mention Dostoevsky's "underground note" in this article, but on the movement of the ensemble and the way it is released I will explore. Existential tone note - the subject of existence in Dostoyevsky's "Karamazov brothers". Mainly through Ivan Karamazov. I am primarily based on the French philosopher Jean-Paul Sartre, but pay attention first to the basic idea and spirit of the existentialist thinker Soren Kelkegaard. I made readers understand the origin of existentialism and did this to compare Sartre's atheistic existentialism with the theological existentialism of Kierkegaard. Notes from the ground (Fyodor Mikhailovich Dostoevsky) 129 "Journal Epoch, memo from the basement", by Donstoevsky Konstantin Mochulsky: Flying over his life and work (1967) (Ken Kesey) "Raymond's" Grail Knight " Arrival beyond the wasteland M. Alderman (1972) Strange case of Jekyll and Haid (Robert Louis Stevenson) "Mask in the mirror: 18th century and 90s", "Separated Self: Perspective" Victorian literature (1969) 141 In this course, I met "underground notes" of Fyodor Dostoevsky for the first time. After two visits to Western Europe, he wrote in 1864 (two years before huge crime and punishment) while Dostoyevski was shocked and fascinated by the state of Western civilization. Although the narrator ("underground man") from the underground memo is not a modernist (especially Dostoevsky), despite accepting his contemporary wisdom (philosophy, aesthetics) his position remains unchanged. (Morality and science) leads this wisdom to a logical conclusion and a glimpse of absurd reasons and absurd reasons for modern life and thinking. This principle can be summarized by the reasonable philosopher Gottfried Leibniz with the word "nothing known by unfounded law".

Unlike Sarty Snopes which burned a barn, The Unvanquished narrator breathed a bit. When quitting the father's abuse, Sati took an objective moral position. On the contrary, Bayard Sartoris faces "ambiguity and absurdity of human condition" and is looking for subjective truth (Kierkegaard). He acts for his family, but he may think he is doing something wrong. In addition, he believed the new information and asked him to accept a strange experience. Young protagonists through the experiences of Bayard Sartoris and Sarty Snopes, the temperament 'unmarried' and 'barn burning' in the southern part of Faulkner and the barn, the most important thing is the way they tell the story and the relevance About the masculinity of the southern part of the architectural advice class to offer. - Critical Analysis of William Faulkner's Burn on Barn 'The Tale of Barn Burns' was first published in Harper' s magazine in June 1939 and later received the O. Henry Memorial Prize in the best short story of that year did. Writer William Faulkner is "one of America's most innovative novelists." He describes the country's smell in the late 1800's and the way and method that makes you feel like you are with the characters of this story Did. BAYARD SARTORIS WILLIAM In the first interrelated story of FAULKNER, the boys "unwelcome" and "Ambuscade" grew from adolescence to adolescence. He is the son of Colonel John Saltris, and in many stories he is struggling with the civil war. When Bernard tried to retaliate against the death of Miss Rosa Milard and then refused to revenge her father's death, he completely ignored the vengeance code required by the traditional southern tradition, I did it. He has also become one of Faulkner 's sensitive men. (See "GAVIN STEVENS.") In "Smell of Verbena", Bayard refused attention of young widow DRUSILLA H AWKE. "BEAR, THE" William Faulkner (1942) Facts about companions of American short story document, 2nd edition (literary series companion)

Denmark's philosopher Søren Kierkegaard says, "I am trying to escape death owing to drunk, but what is a spirit? Under this situation I understand the collapse of King Arthur This story explains the disease self, the morbid spirit and the deadly sick people.The title provides a reasonable summary of the story: the theme is Arthur's cottage, and The situation of the house is degenerating. Dual meaning of the collapse of Edgar's House of Usher If there is something widely recognized by Edgar Allan Poe's "The Fall of the Usher House", that short story is one of the greatest in history. . The word Poe chooses and the way he puts them together is just a phenomenon. But this is about the same as people can agree. Actually, anyone who reads it thinks this story is wonderful, but there are various reasons. "House collapse", EDGAR ALLAN POE (1839) has been considered as a masterpiece of EDGAR A LLAN POE for a long time, and the "collapse of Usher's house" continues to attract new generation readers. Since being published in Burton's "Gentleman Magazine", scholars, critics, and general readers have continued their efforts to solve various possible causes of the influence of this story on human psychology . These explanations range from the land abandoned from Freudian, the former Kafka and the nihilist (see K AFKAESQUE and NIHILISM) to the biography and culture. In fact, Poe is tired of ALLEGORY, but some critics consider the house a fable of the human mind (Strandberg 705). Whatever the conclusion of the reader leads, no one can easily forget the story. The slope's story skills instantly introduced the story to us. In the midst of autumn fall (In autumn the word pun is implicitly included?) Whatever we mean sooner or later, the house Facts about companions of American short story document, 2nd edition (literary series companion) In the Autumn of House of Usher, Edgar Allan Poe jumps into the real darkness of a lonely life. In this story it seems the theme of darkness and death occur frequently. Death is defined as "termination or extinction of something" (American Heritage Dictionary). Edgar Allen Poe used this description in different ways in the fall of the house of Usher. When writing "The Collapse of The Usher House", Poe 's intention was not to show morals, lessons or truth of the reader, but only to try to give the reader a sense of fear.

Like you, I am a light worker looking for the truth. This is an unforgettable journey. Master, some religions, three husbands, two children, and three professions, I learned that I am true. I am synchronized with Universal Intelligence. Soren Kierkegaard said, "Life is understood as a recession, but it must move forward." We feel strongly the struggle for living in these human bodies. Because the sacred and constant sweet voice whisper the truth of our hearts. MH: I have always been interested in the brain rhythm before, during and after that. We started brain mapping to understand the effect of brain rhythm on the brain in real time. We hope to transform the brain of the electronic brain into a human body, turn it into sound and play in the form of my own brain wave. I rhythmically map my brain. Let's science together and see how rhythm affects the brain. My grandmother can not talk because she suffers from senile Alzheimer's disease. I played drums for her and when she played, she said my name. I noticed that the rhythm had medicinal effects. When your body is in rhythm, you will be healthy, and when the rhythm breaks, the body will break. I testified on rhythm and aging in front of the Senate in 1991. Brain mapping is the use of various technologies to study the brain, such as cell biology and imaging. This is a very difficult process and may take a long time to complete. Brain mapping maps areas of the brain to functions such as vision and creativity. It also shows how the brain changes the structure of the brain, such as how the brain changes due to learning and aging. We use brain maps to judge whether biphasic or other brain problems can be solved. Brain mapping is difficult Brain mapping Kateline Pollock brain mapping Brain mapping Thinking, moving, or causing action by someone. It is a very interesting topic to actually grasp how the brain works. One way is to use brain mapping. Brain mapping is the use of imaging to study the brain and they use these imaging machines to map neurons and synapses in our brain to find out why people do this It is. The history of brain mapping is important for understanding