Higher Immediacy Contrasted with Ethical and Aesthetic

Explain the higher immediacy by comparing it with morality and aesthetics. Higher immediacy or religious belief is the most important accomplishment that people have accomplished, because only faith can give individuals the opportunity to become "true self". The ego is to be done throughout the lifetime, and God believes this is infinite. Therefore, human choice bears great responsibility because the choice of life's decision constitutes eternal redemption or curse. Because of religious beliefs, its formation requires morality and aesthetics, that is why they can not be the same.

The choice between morality and aesthetics is a choice between good and evil, not a choice between good and evil. As Kierkegaard stated, the core of the aesthetic lifestyle is to try to lose self in the immediacy of existing experiences. The aesthetic expression paradigm is a romantic lover immersed in his passion. In contrast, the moral paradigm is the state of marriage, covenant and duty, and its condition is bound now by the past and the future. These two lifestyles have different concepts, incompatible attitudes, and premise of competitors.

In the first part, Kierkegaard tells the artist (music, drama, etc.) and estheticians (the sensory experience is the best experience form, those who think that the ultimate goal of life) to find the most beautiful aesthetic experience in love I'm painting. . . In the second part, Kierkegaard believes that aesthetic life is not enough, and commitment to moral life is necessary for further development of human life. However, there is no strong contrast between aesthetics and moral life. On the contrary, Kierkegaard believes that efforts to moral life do not necessarily preclude aesthetic experiences.

Errors in moral aesthetics (addendum 'aesthetic' or 'aesthetic') come from generalization from ideal ethics to all ethics. The aesthetic judgment paradigm dominates morality. Truth = Beautiful. Not all ethical merchandise and order are focused on what is right like Richard Rotie, but it is relatively transformed into aesthetic preferences, emphasizing human "creativity". Morality is more than a moral responsibility to worry about whether you are doing the right thing and the wrong thing. Because you can not "impose" moral preferences on others, the power of moral obligation is lost. Without the moral principles of morality, moral ethics theory becomes impossible. Only results are counted, absolutely not