What problem, essentially, is C. Stephen Evans attempting to resolve? Is his resolution effective? Why or why not?

C. Steven Evans claims that he has a neutral position in religious philosophy. Evans rejects both faith and neutrality and believes that by trying "neutral, selfless attitude", "I can break the possibility that I do not even know what a religion is" (Evans, 1985) p. 115) Evans pointed out that some believe in the belief that faith and rational thinking is that "reasonable reflection" about religion is impossible.

Johnson first followed the emergence of contemporary Christian psychology movement in the work of Christian philosopher Sorenkel Kegel, and later in C. Stephen Evans' work. Kierkegaard called some of his works "psychology." Part of Evans' inspiration is to challenge Christians in the field of psychology "develop my theories, research and practice, these theories, research and practice derive from Christian faith in mankind" Told. - At the same time, we will continue actively participate in a wider range of fields "

During the last twentieth century, some defenders attempted to integrate Kirkegaard's subjective and existentialist ideas for most into traditional defense; it was noticed by Christian philosopher C It is deserves Stephen Evans. There are other advocates who clearly showed the usefulness of various apologies when meeting with people of various faiths and personality. A recent example of the latter is David K. Clark, his book "Dialogue-based apologetics" is different from what he considers as a competitive "content-oriented" approach, "human-oriented "Education approach is defended.

Finally, the desire of Christian psychology for being an obvious Christian witness in a secular psychological environment is worthy of praise. C. Steven Evans is asking Christians to develop their own Christian psychological approach "while actively participating in a wider field", but that unbelievers are the Christian psychologist Christian gospel and the Bible Gospel means that it is affected by the truth 28:19) -20) Christian psychology has plenty of places to be admired, but it also has many weaknesses. Firstly, CP is based on the wrong view of the Bible. Christian psychology correctly pointed out the necessity of appropriate prerequisites, but it is far from the bibliographical doors. Christian psychologists have confirmed the authority, necessity, adequacy, and superiority of the Bible but have defined these characteristics of the Bible to actually destroy the Bible.