Soren Kierkegaard's Fear And Trembling

How do individuals confirm that they are justified? In Soren Kierkegaard's "Fear and Trembling", Abraham was faced with this problem between two moral obligations. He has a moral duty to be faithful to God and his son Isaac. He believed that God was asked him to sacrifice Isaac. But Abraham strongly kept his faith and obeyed what He regarded as the will of God. Using Johannes de Scientio's view and his view, and the views of Johannes de Scientio, Kiakegaard will focus on the story of Abraham, and his audience must choose from the extremes.

My interpretation of the fear and tremor of Soren Kierkegaard is that this book is actually about three levels of perception of the realm of existence: aesthetic / sensual, moral, and spiritual. Most people take a three-step approach - aesthetic or perceptual experience leads to a moral understanding that leads to interaction with the spiritual world. But I think he truly said that the aesthetic / spirituality will bring people to the spiritual realm when he is doing well in the book. When we make a really beautiful art work, we will soon enter the ghost country.

Many of the philosophers who first read Kierkegaard, especially Johannes de Siledio's "Fear and tremor" often concluded that Kierkegaard supports sacred moral order. However, Soren Kierkegaard does not mean that morality was created by God (through his pseudonym Johannes de Silentio), but instead he will claim that God's command from God transcended morality. This difference means that God does not necessarily create human morality. Creating our own morals and values ​​is our personal. However, any religiousist must prepare for the sacred orders of God. It takes precedence over all moral and rational obligations. Kierkegaard called this case a suspension of moral teleportation. Abraham, the knight of faith chose to obey God unconditionally and received his son, the title of his faith and father of faith. Abraham transcended ethics and jumped on faith