An Existentialist Meaning of Life

The existential meaning of existence can be said that one of the most frequently considered philosophical thinking is "What is the meaning of life?" Manipulate the environment they live in greatly. After all, people have to wonder what their purpose is and define their meaning for themselves. Assuming that there are various people in the outside world, there is no doubt that opinions on the ultimate purpose of existence are different.

Existentialism is a philosophical movement developed in the 19th and 20th centuries. In the basic existentialist belief, humans are the only animals that define themselves throughout life. It is meaningless without life. Existentialists believe in life and fight for it. When fighting for life, everyone has to face important and difficult decisions with limited knowledge and time to make these decisions. John Stuart Mill is one of the most important liberalists of the 19th century and supports Utilitarianism in ethics, that is, each one of us should act to acquire the largest number of people Happy viewpoint. He teaches that we can restrict that person's behavior only if it harms others, regardless of whether it harms the agent itself.

Christian's existential philosopher Soren Kierkegaard believes that life is given to individuals, not society and religion, and lives with reality and passion. In our era of personality and mass customization, Kirkega's emotions reflect the spirit of our time. The meaning shapes and leads our life. But there is no quick answer to the ultimate problem of life. On the contrary, in today's world, the answer must be adjusted to the heart of the questioner. That is why I asked my students to think and express their own beliefs at the end of my religious course.

I really enjoyed Maarten's position. Most of the "meaning of life" articles I encountered today end in one of two ways. Both of them suggest the concept of existentialism. Life has no meaning, it is up to us to create meaning. Or: The meaning of life is to be as viable as possible, to be yourself in sincere or passionate. Alternatively, some variations of these two concepts. Neither makes me uncomfortable. The first hypothesis is that we can not find meaning after the death of God, which proves to be meaningless. I do not buy this; we do not know very little about the universe (black hole, dark matter, wormhole, unknown size, space distance, string theory, quantum entanglement etc), and our own understanding almost Absent)? We are looking at the relationship between ourselves and our own ideas or making changes, not relationships.