Everyone wants to know. This indicates that we are pleased with the sensation; in addition to being useful, they also love themselves; this is the basis of human knowledge, and Aristotle is a metaphysical It shows us in the book. What is the next question, how do I ask myself to ask myself. We are intrinsically interested in knowing and like our sense, but what is the relationship between the two and what can we call when perceptual perception arises .
Intelligence (knowledge) is the possibility, possibility, ability, strength, and feasibility of ability. There are two forms of intelligence described by Aristotle. The first form is passive and the second form is active. There is a permanent (eternal, immortal) idea, a so - called positive wisdom for human beings. This brings a deep understanding of Aristotle's view on humanity. A human being is a rational animal consisting of the possibility of knowledge and consciousness. The idea of Kiakegaard for humans is the opposite of Aristotle's idea. Existentialists do not like to divide themselves like Aristotle (heart, body, etc), they rely on experience. His philosophy comes from the combination of Plato (Justice) and Hegel (the principle of triple dialectic change). For Lutheran minister Kierkegaard who has a Christian faith, human being is a relationship ("between the two"). He saw that he knew his own self. Your current self is not the self you are trying to do
This is where Aristotle introduces a distinction between passive intelligence and active (or productive) intelligence. It represents a rapid breakthrough in similarity to recognition and thinking in the previous chapter (see 429 a 14 - 18). In fact, surprisingly there is no suggestion that there is a second intellectual, or at least two aspects of intelligence, so the idea of the third part is explained. As an example of this confusion, it is promised to have purely active intelligence (429 a 21) before it is said that intelligence is not natural but only potential capability. Stud metaphysics are linked). This new wrinkle is not compatible with most of III.4, so it can not simply be attached to III.4.
The power of universality proficiency traditionally stemmed from so-called "intelligent agents", that is intelligently active or productive. The concept of behavioral (or active) intelligence is one of the most complicated and controversial aspects of medieval epistemology. It resulted from several mysterious comments made by Aristotle (DA 430a 10-19), where he distinguished the two aspects of thought. There is a kind of way of thinking "what becomes all" (nousōōpantaginesthai), there is the idea of "making everything" (ho ... tōipantapoiein). Behind these explanations is the concept that the mind "becomes" the subject of that knowledge, which means that it can be used in an understandable form without the problems first revealed. Because passive thinking - thought to be all - is related to thought, all things are done in the same way and are related to pure substance, pure possibility, its forming principle