Chomsky is one of the most cunning, infamous criminal critics of guardians of the world order or liberal democracy advocated by Western countries. He criticized him especially for criticism of the United States and Britain who tried to establish democracy around the world to give some control over people for political or material reasons. Therefore, Chomsky believes that this movement established democracy as a repressive tool rather than a means of liberation. After the collapse of Communism in Eastern Europe and the Soviet Union, many people regard "Western liberal democracy" as the best form of the government, which is very suitable for the modern world. Some people even claim to be that ... show more content On the other hand, some may argue that only liberal democracy can guarantee the personal freedom of its citizens and hinder the development of dictatorship. In Western countries, the population of wealthy people is excessively large in the root cause of inequality such as administrative and legislative institutions, and "inheritance of assets, private interests of land and profit capital", which is due to "incomplete market" Thing. I am not an entrepreneur "skill. However, this incomplete democratic ideology, as Chomsky's criticism of the world's guards seems to have had many experiences in the Third World, so that the Western countries have poor countries with very democratic voices I do not want to spread it to use it. Therefore, they not only require a set of rules to manage political competition but also require greater social and economic equality. To provide inappropriate solutions In my article, I claim that liberal democracy can prosper in Russia. I think there is soil in Russia for both freedom, democracy, and disability. The first argument is a democratic experience. The second is the right to create opportunities for political parties and practice culture and religion. The third is freedom of speech and religion. Taking all the facts opposite to support into account, strong opposition, freedom of the media, the absence of silky in government agencies, the constitutional change, the legal aspects of absence or corruption, how Russian governance emphasizes The main criteria of liberal democracy such as protection of individual rights, improvement of civil liberties and civil society, social development pursuing their own interests against Russia, revitalize freedom and democracy You can. Liberalism is a crucial feature of contemporary democracy and is explained by the dissemination of the term "liberal democracy" as a way of explaining the country with free and fair elections, the rule of law and the protection of civil liberties It is. However, the liberalism being discussed in the field of international relations theory has evolved to its own one. Liberalism includes various concepts and discussions on how institutions, actions and economic links will embrace and mitigate national violence. Compared with realism, it adds many factors to our view - especially for citizens and international organizations. Most noteworthy is that liberalism is always a traditional realistic foil in international relations theory. Because it provides a more optimistic view of the world based on different historical readings of realistic scholarships. The main alternative to realism and institutionalism among international relations theorists is liberalism. As in domestic areas, the theory of free international relations is often said to be normative rather than positive 4 The most famous liberal theory in this field is Wilson's "liberal internationalism", generally a kind It is understood as that of. World democratic program However, as used here, liberalism represents a series of forward-looking theories on national behavior, not about how they should act.

Liberalism and liberalism liberalism are the forces that change from the birth of this country to today's politics. Prior to signing the Constitution, the principle of liberalism was the foundation of American political thought and behavior. Of course, to maintain legal power over the years, liberalism has to change. When considering this change, we may ask if the idea and goal of classical liberalism were lost when it turned into modern liberalism. Individual freedom is often seen as the core value of liberalism. However, freedom can be categorized into two categories: negative and positive. Negative freedom, traditionally associated with classical liberalism, promotes incoherent beliefs and lacks all external constraints on individuals. This means that individuals should be able to freely pursue their own interests without external restrictions or pressure. Nevertheless, negative freedom does not mean that an individual should have absolute and unlimited freedom. J. S. A classical liberal like Mill can bring the right to display more content, that is "permission", ie harm to others, or ... if freedom is infinite I believe Liberalists believe freedom is a fundamental value, but a fair country guarantees personal freedom. Liberal feminists agree with this view and claim women's freedom. Liberalism feminism takes several forms, as liberalism means a disagreement about freedom. This entry describes two basic liberal feminism. In the first part, I will explain what is often called "free feminism" in philosophical literature. Free feminism sees freedom as personal autonomy - living the life of choice - and political autonomy - is conditional coauthor. In the second part of the live we will explain what is called "classical - liberal feminism" or sometimes "liberal feminism" (these terms are used interchangeably here). Classical liberalism or liberal feminism regards freedom as freedom from mandatory interference In the category of Jaguar, liberal feminism is still a strong tendency of feminist political thought. After paying attention to liberalism and equality, the main focus of liberal feminism is to protect and strengthen women's personal and political autonomy, the first is to live freely throughout their lives, The second is helping to determine the direction of political society. It is free. . This approach became more active as a result of John Rawls's "Theory of Justice" (Rolls 1971) and subsequent political liberalism (Rolls 1993) issuance. Susan Moller Okin (Okin 1989, 1979; Okin et al. 1999) and Eva Kittay (Kittay 1999) productively expanded his theory using Rawls' research and focused on women's concerns.

Political liberalism Norman Davis states that liberalism is in line with two parallel paths of political development and economic development: political liberalism is to focus on the basic concept of the government By agreeing to most libertarians are the factors that are popular, limited, fair monarchs promote stability, people not only think about myself now, but also express the same idea I can do it. Freedom and Political Liberalism The relationship between freedom and political liberalism and political liberalism of William D. Towah is in his publication "Equality Trust", Goddard, J. (2013) Freedom defined by many people argues that the ability of a person to perform his / her will, without any positive obstruction or interference by anyone, is reduced and hence is defective . He proposed that freedom should be regarded as "no relation". Political liberalism Norman Davis states that liberalism is in line with two parallel paths of political development and economic development: political liberalism is to focus on the basic concept of the government By agreeing to most libertarians are the factors that are popular, limited, fair monarchs promote stability.People Liberalism is too complex as a political concept. It seems that there is liberalism as much as liberalism. Some examples include liberalism, classical liberalism, bloody liberalism, economic liberalism, political liberalism, political liberalism, social liberalism, politicalism, objectiveism, anarchic capitalism, and of course neo-liberalism . In international relations theory, you can find neoliberal institutionalism, liberal internationalism, or embedded liberalism. And there is no doubt that other liberalism can be found in other academic themes. Clearly, this is all equivalent to an inexplicable liberal turmoil that needs to be arranged. In the past decade, the relocation of phrase neoliberalism has not accompanied the revival of liberalism in the American political glossary. Liberal political magazine "American Prospect" began a coordinated movement to revive the term 10 years ago, but it almost failed. Especially when Mr. Barack Obama was elected in 2008, the resurrection was regularly predicted, but the President and other important leaders and the social movement did not claim the liberal tradition . There are no candidates for the Democratic Party this year. The famous Barney Sanders calls himself a "democratic socialist" and Hillary Clinton tends to express himself as "a progressive who makes things".

The modern Protestant movement highlights intellectual freedom and spiritual and moral content of Christianity. b: Economic theory emphasizes that individuals are not tied up and is usually based on free competition, self-regulated market and gold standard (see the meaning of the gold standard 1) c: Protection of political philosophy, especially political freedom and civil liberties, based on beliefs on progress, basic human goodness, and personal autonomy: This philosophy is important for the government to improve social inequality It is argued that it is a tool. (Eg social corruption including race, gender or class) Liberalism is a political philosophy or a worldview based on the concept of freedom and equality. Classical liberalism emphasizes the role of freedom and social liberalism emphasizes the importance of equality. Liberalists support various perspectives based on the understanding of these principles, but generally speaking freedom of speech, press freedom, freedom of religion, free market, civil rights, democratic society, secular government, We support gender and other ideas. Program Equality and International Cooperation Liberalism is a political philosophy held by people who believe in all people the principles of freedom and equality. Classical liberalism pays more attention to freedom and individual freedom, and social liberalism equally pay more attention. Some examples of the principles of liberalism supported by supporters include freedom of speech, freedom of religion, freedom of press, civil rights and gender equality. In order to explore this concept, please consider the definition of the following liberalism. People first began accepting the concept of liberalism in the age of enlightenment, and it became increasingly popular as it rejected social and political norms of time, including state religion and absolute monarchy did. British philosopher John Rock of the 17th century was admired as a "founder" of liberalism, and his work influenced American revolutionaries. Many enlightenment thinkers support liberal democracy, but an outstanding person is John Rock known as "father of liberalism" or "father of liberty and democracy". Locke is responsible for fully developing the notion of liberalism and liberal democracy and affecting the whole Western European countries including the United States. Therefore, the work of rock is the basis of all the democracy of today. 4,5 In addition to the revolutionary efforts, the acceptance of the liberalism of the Enlightenment has been condemned as suppressing individuals Brought extensive demands for Western governments' reforms. It is free. Discrimination (including direct and sarcastic) against problems such as discrimination (religious intolerance etc), censorship (such as political expression), arbitrary imprisonment and economic restraint

Liberalism is aimed at protecting and protecting personal, civil, social and economic rights and liberties of individuals. [1] Typically, it is classified according to the laissez-faire government style. [1] Liberalism has two different fields. Reform liberalism and classical liberalism. Classical liberalism: The main points of classical liberalism are private property, free competition, personal rights and freedom, self-interest, economic freedom and the rule of law. Please do not forget the acronym POISER. Liberal reform: Liberal reform is very similar to classical liberalism, both of which are beliefs on private property, open competition for a strong economy, personal rights and freedom, and the rule of law I am using it. Liberal reform deviated both from the concept of equal opportunity of classical liberalism (believing that everyone has the right to receive good education and medical care) and collective interest Classical liberalism began in the mid-1700s as a response to absolute monarchy, religious persecution, and feudal economic and social constraints. Reform liberalism began in the late 19th century. This is a reaction to the effects of unconstrained capitalism and socialist thinking. To some of the important thoughters of this ideology, J. S. Mill, J are included. Dewey, J. Keynes and J. Rawls Liberalism generally believes that human self-interest improves society. It also focuses on limited government, individual rights, free trade and equality. Both liberalization sectors idealize these values, but we have a different view on how to accomplish these values. As a means to encourage democracy, the ability to promote equal opportunities and reform the liberalism to enjoy the right (positive freedom). Government policies should be used to create equality. Classical liberalism does not promote government intervention but emphasizes free competition (negative freedom) Liberalism is one of the major schools of international relations theory. Liberalism comes from Latin liberalism, meaning "freedom", originally called free philosophy. That roots is in a wider liberal idea born from enlightenment. The core problem that it is trying to address is the problem of achieving sustained peace and cooperation in international relations and various approaches that may help to achieve them. Liberalism originally originated from deep academic and philosophical roots. The main principles of the theory are international cooperation and peace, and the initial influence is seen as a common goal among the larger religious practices. In the latter half of the 17th century and the 18th century, political liberalism started challenging aristocrats and forming shapes that inherit equality. In international relations, the Liberal International Economic Order (LIEO), also known as rule-based ordering or the US-led free international order, surrounds some guiding principles such as the market where modern international relations are held It is the idea that it is organized. , Multilateral institutions, liberal democracy, and the leadership of the United States of America and its allies. This order was enacted after the Second World War and is usually related to the American Peace Association. International organizations play a central role in free order. For example, the World Trade Organization has formulated and implemented free trade agreements, but the World Bank provides assistance to developing countries. The premise of order is that free trade and free markets promote world prosperity and peace. Critics believe that liberal order sometimes causes social problems such as inequality and environmental degradation.

Modern terms refer to liberalism as the leftist political scope, but there are many other kinds of liberalism. For example, Progressive liberalism: usually related to the Democratic Party. It is well-known for welfare programs, expansion of social freedom, and advocacy of citizenship. Also, the increase in taxes to pay for these welfare plans is also famous and insists on emphasizing too much political legitimacy. Co-operative rhythm: usually related to the Republican Party. Also called "conservatism", this means protecting the existing economy. It is believed to minimize taxation to companies and companies, increase economic freedom, and privatize government's current social welfare programs. Due to restricted social freedom, the minimum regulation of increased contamination rate and stock market volatility during management is also infamous. Classical liberalism: It is usually associated with the Liberal Party. It is known for its limited continental activity, it wants income taxes to be abolished with little social / economic restrictions. We are not notorious for choosing someone instead of a local office, so it's not infamous for anything. Tyrone D'amonte is progressive. He likes to play B ball with his brothers, throw paint and jump. When caught by the police, he insisted that he "did not do nuclear weapons" and accused them of racist. He spent his welfare examinations with smoke on behalf of his mother who had nine children and three children working at home. Cletus Crawford is an entrepreneur. He works at Kentucky Lumberyard Co. and works overtime 7 days a week. He does not like his homosexuals and raccoons all entering his neighbors and attracting his spasm. He drove a rusty 1992 Ford Ranger full of sky whiskey and cigars. He lives in a trailer far from Lexington. Steve Smith is classical music. At school he received acceptable scores and was hospitalized at ITT Birmingham after graduating from high school. After graduating from college, he began making digital images through CAD software. He can banner LGBT blueprints at their conference and help you freely to make a new civilian gun for Heckler & Koch. This is the case of expanding the country and using free rights languages ​​to destroy freedom. In other words, it is anti-liberal liberalism or technical authoritarian liberalism. The liberalized ideology was repackaged for the coordinated technocratic national service that appeared after the Second World War. Countries like the Soviet Union and its Western allies encourage such rights as a means of demonstrating technocratic national behavior. "Positive rights" of the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights is partly due to the lobbying of the Soviet Union as it perceives itself as a defender of these rights. This is another way of saying this is a random country, she is happy under the scope of liberalism and socialism language. Especially the concept of liberalism in the United States mainly focuses on nontransferable rights such as freedom in the American Bill of Rights. Among the books of H. W., a strange death of American liberalism, Brands said that American liberalism can only survive the war. When the war continues, the United States needs federal aid to return to liberalism. On the other hand, book, liberalism: genius Liberal factions support a broad perspective based on an understanding of the intended purpose of liberalism. Therefore, the meaning of "liberalism" differs in various parts of the world. In the United States, liberalism is related to the welfare state policy of the New Deal plan initiated by President Franklin Roosevelt, and the idea of ​​free-principle economics exists in the current American conservatism 3 In Europe, Principle is the most common. The government's responsibility relates to the commitment of social welfare, and in many countries after Latin America and Communism it is often related to socialism, often referred to as social liberalism 4. In China, libe

No one inferred the position of the oligarch. "All power and wealth of oligarchy regime" is their motto. People in low-poor people do not care about the upstream layer, exploitation of other social workers is their specialty area. We found a Conservative Party on the other side of the scale. Conservative traditional rules, team health instead of individuals. Somewhere in the middle, there is a liberal (there is not a lot of bleeding, some people) Reason, reason, logic, thinking is the rationale for liberal justification. They believe that logic and intelligence are absolute standards of behavior. Individualism is the foundation of culture. Personal self-interest is displayed ... ... Detailed content These projects are said to be designed to support economic development, but they are often linked to large-scale environmental damage and social dislocation. Once these countries have accumulated a large amount of external debt, they will be unable to obtain credit and cash in other countries, they will be forced to go to these agencies and accept all the conditions they need. The poorest countries in the world owe much money to these two agencies over other private or government agencies. Most of these loans are inadequate because the borrowing country has insufficient income to repay. Repayment of loans absorbs major resources from the poor country's budget and is in the state treasury of rich countries As liberalists believe that it is only necessary for poor people to fit their attitudes to the middle class ideas so that they can succeed, these institutions have the Western economic institutions and cultural advantages I believe that these poor countries can be rescued. The lender knows that repayment is impossible because the debt of these countries is so large. The only reliable result of their ongoing loans is their own interests. In their struggle to pay their debts the state is obliged to do what will lead to direct benefits. Unfortunately, this is usually clear, at the expense of long-term damage to the environment. Professor David Palumbo-Li of Stanford University pointed out in the Vox newspaper that "the opposition of liberals to progressiveists is nothing but betrayal of the true and complete value of liberalism." "By liberals like lira, we can reverse opportunities to compete for what we can call leaders of" not white people ", downgrade race, gender issues, and other minority problems It is a problem. Political distortion of Noah's position. Comedians think that depriving Africa's character of the French World Cup players means to separate them from their important part. Both of them think color vision abnormal liberalism is an important part of the importance of ethnic minority individuals. The main purpose of this paper is to study the difference between classical liberalism and modern liberalism. The first part provides a general definition of "liberalism" and focuses on the common elements of all forms of liberalism. In Part 2, we introduce the history of liberalism, from classical and modern liberalism to modern neoliberalism, and try to explain the relationship between their main doctrine and historical background. In the last part, we carefully study the differences between classical liberalism and modern liberalism and discuss the boundary between freedom and government intervention in modern society.

The revolution of 1848 was often called "Spring of the masses" and symbolized the era of political and social unrest spread throughout the European continent. During this period we considered the overthrow of the monarchy, the formation of a new state, and the "extreme ideology" of nationalism and liberalism as a belief in the middle class. The population of European countries is increasing at an unprecedented rate. The public began to feel uneasy about the monarchy of the governance system of the European government in the 19th century and hoped to achieve individual freedom and equality through the change. Nationalism also determines the political life of Europe in the 19th century. Where the country is part of the empire, the struggle for national liberation is also a struggle against the old dictatorial regime, and nationalism is tied to the free anti mona movement. As in Spain, the nation state is the integration of the old monarchy, nationalism itself is conservatism and monarchy. Most nationalist movements began to oppose the existing order, but by the 20th century some governments regarded themselves primarily as nationalism. Political nationalism is a complex and diverse phenomenon. Its main forms are liberalism nationalism, conservative nationalism, expansionism nationalism, anti-colonialism nationalism. Free nationalism gives the state a moral status similar to that of an individual. That means the state has rights, in particular self-determination power. Because liberalist nationalism thinks that all countries are equal, we insist that the ideals of the nation state are universally applicable. Conservative nationalism not only pay attention to the principles of self-determined nationalism, but also pay attention to social cohesion and public order promised by national patriotism. From this point of view patriotic loyalty and public awareness are rooted in the common past concepts and have transformed nationalism into advocacy of traditional values ​​and historical systems. In the political tradition of liberalism, people criticized "nationalism" as being generally a dangerous power and being the cause of conflict and war between states. Liberals generally do not question the existence of a nation state. Liberal criticism also emphasizes individual freedom, not collective national identity by definition (see collectivism). Criticism of pacifism's nationalism also focuses on nationalistic conflicts that gained hints on nationalist movement violence, related militarism, and chauvinism and chowningism. Especially in Germany, from the historical connection with the past war, the symbol of the country and patriotism lost credibility.

Classical liberalism is usually Jessian liberalism (free market + limited country or small country + Republic) and this idea will form a fair society. Reform liberalism or modern American liberalism subsequently insisted on the use of national behavior to rectify areas where classical liberalism failed to establish a legitimate society. FDR is an important figure inspired by early reform of Teddy Roosevelt (his protagonist) and Woodrow Wilson (his supporter). Ronald Reagan defines the modern American conservatism's response to contemporary liberalism failures (true or not) to establish contemporary socialism (after Goldwater). Conservatives have changed or restricted to various degrees, but never destroyed the modern American free state. American contemporary conservatives usually use some form of Jessen liberalism to add some form of social conservatism (some Judaism - imposing Christian values ​​to form a fair society or To promote). Needless to say, not everyone believes Conservatism is any political philosophy (principle of monarchy and aristocracy) that promotes tradition and order. It can usually be understood as the opposite philosophy of classical liberalism and social liberalism. There are several forms of classical conservatism (as opposed to classical liberalism), as follows. Authoritative forms (such as the former Absolute monarchy and "church state") religion, culture, or other forms related to beliefs and customs defined in the country (tradition, customs and / or laws and orders are individual or collective freedom When placed before. In the United States, it is difficult to find a real monarch. Modern liberalism and modern conservatism are extremely neutral ideologies. . These roots dates back to the 17th century and can last until the beginning of the 20th century. To fully understand the politics of the United States, it is important to understand the mainstream ideology. It is also important to analyze the differences and similarities between the two ideologies. In this article, I will first consider the ideology that both the origins of classical liberalism and tenants, both modern liberalism and modern conservatism are evolving. I will discuss it later ... See more Classical Liberalism and Classical Conservatism In today's society, most people can not explain the difference between the Democratic Party and the Republican Party. In fact, both ideologies seem to be very similar, so people tend to think that there is no big difference if Republican candidates and Democratic candidates run in the same office. - Democratic delegation shouted "right conspiracy", but radio discussions lamented the evil "liberal agenda". News broadcasting stations are called "conservative conservatives" by Hollywood authorities, or "freedom of freedom" of Christian radios. Everywhere people are shooting their opponents with a freely or conservative label gun, and many Americans are trying to understand the differences and differences between them.

The purpose of this paper is to look at liberalism and contemporary ideas that influence church culture. This article will give the definition of liberalism, culture, and church. While studying this topic in detail, this article will learn from the 1700s to the 21st century. Liberalism comes from latin 'liberalism' or freedom. Liberalism is a belief in the importance of freedom and equal rights. Liberalism supports a broad view according to the basic principles and principles of the Constitution, liberal democracy, human rights, capitalism, and the understanding of free trade. I understand the liberal impulse to respect multiculturalism, but is not human rights more important than culture? Humans have evolution and reform of rights, culture and culture. Free friends and allies are seeking that churches and pastors accept homosexual rights and women's rights. The demand for a few mosques and Muslim leaders is not a respect or even a racist. The purpose of this paper is to look at liberalism and contemporary ideas that influence church culture. This article will give the definition of liberalism, culture, and church. While studying this topic in detail, this article will learn from the 1700s to the 21st century. Liberalism comes from latin 'liberalism' or freedom. Liberalism is a belief in the importance of freedom and equal rights. Liberalism supports a broad view according to the basic principles and principles of the Constitution, liberal democracy, human rights, capitalism, and the understanding of free trade. When thinking about Western liberalism, you may think of many things: a thousand years, feminism, "cultural disposition". These views are technically liberal, but on the left they do not represent liberalism. Liberalism is a belief that, for example, everyone has individual rights and should do whatever they want, usually a belief or conservative who is related to Republicans. The truth is that liberalism is formed by Liberal Party, a party that is often forgotten. However, although liberalism comes from the Democratic Party and the Republican Party, it is usually implemented by the Republicans (but not perfect). In the days after World War I, liberalism was the fastest growing field in American churches. The momentum of the liberal school is rising, and a considerable number of seminary schools teach from a liberal point of view. During the post World War II era, this trend returned to the assembly of American seminary and conservative theological school. By 1850, Catholics became the country's largest single denomination. Between 1860 and 1890, the population of American Catholics has tripled; by the end of the decade it will reach 7 million people. These numerous immigrant Catholics come from Ireland, Quebec, South Germany, Italy, Poland, and Eastern Europe. This influx will ultimately bring more political power to the Catholic Church, and greater cultural presence will lead to heightened concern about the "threat" of the Catholic Church.

The realistic view of international political economics on May 2, 2001 can be seen in the international trade policy of the United States and China. As a mature world power country, the United States will further strengthen its international role through trade with other countries (ie China), reflecting the realist idea of ​​the country, which occupies the central position of the political situation of the world I am doing. The willingness of the United States to participate in the world market shows the concept of domestic interests, which reminds European countries of many of the policies according to the era of monarchy. It is very interesting for me to get out of this Yin and see the breathing - breathing process and what it is. It has many names, and I am convinced: passion and pragmatism, idealism and skepticism, innocence and realityism, openingness and closure, freedom and conservatism. I notice that I am confused with people who have found themselves dedicated to life - those are their lives, not my life. I think it is clear that my pendulum keeps swinging for the time being. I do not think that we can keep balance from the beginning. I think that it is necessary to witness these extreme situations and feel truly all kinds of experiences. In those days it was neither hot nor cold, I could not get any profit from the model. Instead, it makes sense to identify the mode in which you are, the advantages and disadvantages of that mode, and the ability to switch modes as needed. International relations are tricky at best, the worst thing is misery. Innocent mistakes caused by cultural differences can have unintended consequences. In the discussion between liberalism and realism, I sit on the left side. I think that people should be more important than money I think that America needs to be aware of the world society and be involved in it. I define myself as a liberal, but for me, generally I pay more attention to human rights, human potential, international cooperation, and fair society, not my economic interests about it. The government thinks that it is not an opponent nor an oppressor but a partner, but in reality it is necessary to provide services that citizens and the private sector can not provide themselves.

Utilitarianism is defined as the greatest benefit of the greatest number, including happiness pain, "to bring the greatest happiness to the most people." Utilitarian theory is based on the view that the higher the morality is, the greater the positive result of most people is. Hedonism argues that happiness is good for you and that pain is not so. Aggregation means that if the merit exceeds the negative factors of people, the result will be better. Resurrection is the highest moral obligation As Mill changed Utilitarianism, instead of measuring the result on a quantitative scale, we measure qualitatively the benefits of something. He explains that intellectual pleasure is more valuable than physical pleasure because intellectual pursuit ultimately helps to rebuild the whole society. Classical liberalism is based on individualist rationality and morality, with limited government, constitutionalism, rule of law, proper process and personal freedom (such as freedom of speech) It is dedicated to the ideals of. Reform of liberalism supports an equal opportunity and believes in the rationality of nature and human beings. Promotion to anyone needs to improve personal reasoning in order to promote the participation of the government to influence society in the long term and secure a good social environment such as education and distribution of wealth There is. People are not equal, but everyone should have the greatest possibilities Liberal reform: Liberal reform is very similar to classical liberalism, both of which are beliefs on private property, open competition for a strong economy, personal rights and freedom, and the rule of law I am using it. Liberal reform departed from the concept of classical liberal equal opportunities (believing that everyone has the right to receive good education and medical care) and collective benefits. Liberalism generally believes that human self-interest improves society. It also focuses on limited government, individual rights, free trade and equality. Both liberalization sectors idealize these values, but we have a different view on how to accomplish these values. As a means to encourage democracy, the ability to promote equal opportunities and reform the liberalism to enjoy the right (positive freedom). Government policies should be used to create equality. Classical liberalism does not promote government intervention but emphasizes free competition (negative freedom) Introduction Classical liberalism theory emphasizes the protection of individual freedom, primarily by limiting government power. Classical liberalism is a broad political, economic, and human social philosophy that maintains individual freedom and accepts universal human dignity. The most important feature of classical liberalism is that it consists of the following beliefs: Everyone has inherent dignity and value, and everyone has essential things

Liberalism strictly observes the equality of all individuals and recognizes their voices in society. The source said, "The principle of liberalism should be challenged whenever there is opportunity." The interpretation of the source will say that it is against liberalism and its principle. Information sources agree that economic equality, cooperation and collective interest are the principles to be found in society. Since liberalism supports individualism, sources will agree with the opposition of liberalism and collectivism. Since the birth of liberalism and conservatism, liberalism and conservatism have always been political ideas and thoughts. Over the years, the views on their views and the role of the government in democratic societies have changed, but the basic ideas and principles have not changed. Liberalism and conservatism have different levels. That is because anyone can label. Some are radical and extreme, others stand on a more neutral territory ... The 1848 revolution has entered an era of widespread political and social unrest throughout the European continent. During this period we considered the overthrow of the monarchy, the formation of a new state, and the "extreme ideology" of nationalism and liberalism as a belief in the middle class. The population of European countries is increasing at an unprecedented rate. The masses began to worry about the monarchy of the European government of the 19th century. However, it should be noted that the principle of liberalism is very common in many countries. "Legalist theorists insist that the government should play a minimal role in social life." Along with the evolution and development of liberalism, its supporters must face various accusations or condemnation, so the general public must understand "pity of destiny" and various situations. Perspectives As a result, there was a different tendency among liberal followers. "Classical liberal theorists insist that individual freedom should be encouraged in any country.The state should restrict its business and economic regulation and be delegated by the constitution.Personal property rights , Civil liberty protection and free market support is the success of free countries.

Realism and liberalism are two excellent international relations theory. These doctrines present sensible views on war, diplomacy, and family relations. The basic principles of the agreements we rely on are not always worried (Karle, Warren, 2003). By interpreting the data, people can understand these ideas. The evaluation of these departments has significant advantages in the concept of international issues. When analyzing these data, you will understand the diversity between realism and liberalism. Basically, one of the main differences between liberalism and realism is the interpretation of power politics and the relationship between power between states. Where realism is heavily dependent on military power and resources, liberalism recognizes the powerful power seen as a soft force, such as the use of diplomatic or economic sanctions. From the perspective of international security, liberalists lack the ability to adapt and diversify all means of energy use and take excessive attention to military strength without considering the usefulness of actions such as diplomatic arguments I think we need to pay. In addition, the realists certainly allow the supervision of institutions like the United Nations, a fundamental viable tool that the liberal factions believe to establish international safety through the use of soft power law. In the 1970s, the development of "new" or new liberalism and realism became a major change in international relations theory. Neo - liberalism is focused on the concept of conflict, while neo - liberalism is the advance of liberalism. For liberal and neoliberalists, they are more optimistic about peaceful relations, but compared to liberals, neo-liberals are very interested in the creation of institutions that dominate the international system. It was not until the 1980s that Marxism became the main substitute for mainstream realism and liberal tradition. In the context of realism and liberalism which seems to take nationalism as commonplace, Marxist principle provides a blueprint for fundamentally changing different interpretations of international conflicts and existing international order. Orthodox Marxist theory thinks capitalism is the central cause of international conflict. As they saw the seeds of their own destruction they fought for profit and fought against socialist countries so capitalist countries fought each other. In contrast, Neomarxist's "dependence" theory focuses on the relationship between developed capitalist and developing countries, and the former is used for the latter's use with the help of the evil alliance with the dominant developing countries I think that will be. It is wealthy. The solution is to overthurn these parasitic elites and build a revolutionary government dedicated to independent development.

Realism and liberalism are two excellent international relations theory. These doctrines present sensible views on war, diplomacy, and family relations. The basic principles of the agreements we rely on are not always worried (Karle, Warren, 2003). By interpreting the data, people can understand these ideas. The evaluation of these departments has significant advantages in the concept of international issues. When analyzing these data, you will understand the diversity between realism and liberalism. Basically, one of the main differences between liberalism and realism is the interpretation of power politics and the relationship between power between states. Where realism is heavily dependent on military power and resources, liberalism recognizes the powerful power seen as a soft force, such as the use of diplomatic or economic sanctions. From the perspective of international security, liberalists lack the ability to adapt and diversify all means of energy use and take excessive attention to military strength without considering the usefulness of actions such as diplomatic arguments I think we need to pay. In addition, the realists certainly allow the supervision of institutions like the United Nations, a fundamental viable tool that the liberal factions believe to establish international safety through the use of soft power law. In the 1970s, the development of "new" or new liberalism and realism became a major change in international relations theory. Neo - liberalism is focused on the concept of conflict, while neo - liberalism is the advance of liberalism. For liberal and neoliberalists, they are more optimistic about peaceful relations, but compared to liberals, neo-liberals are very interested in the creation of institutions that dominate the international system. It was not until the 1980s that Marxism became the main substitute for mainstream realism and liberal tradition. In the context of realism and liberalism which seems to take nationalism as commonplace, Marxist principle provides a blueprint for fundamentally changing different interpretations of international conflicts and existing international order. Orthodox Marxist theory thinks capitalism is the central cause of international conflict. As they saw the seeds of their own destruction they fought for profit and fought against socialist countries so capitalist countries fought each other. In contrast, Neomarxist's "dependence" theory focuses on the relationship between developed capitalist and developing countries, and the former is used for the latter's use with the help of the evil alliance with the dominant developing countries I think that will be. It is wealthy. The solution is to overthurn these parasitic elites and build a revolutionary government dedicated to independent development.

According to the famous sociologist Eduardo Bonilla-Silva, charges of four major racists were rejected today. One is called abstract liberalism. This idea is related to the other three and is the most important. Liberalism and conservatism are not liberalism. It uses equality ideas with liberal elites to justify the social consequences of racial discrimination. For example, people say that positive actions are not a good idea, since positive actions create an unequal footing that makes colored people unfair advantage. This view clearly ignores the history of the United States. In all aspects of American history, people of color have always been the subject of inequity in Caucasian life. The most obvious is Jim Crow, slavery. Today, we see housing discrimination, excessive imprisonment, occupational discrimination, school inequality discrimination, inequal wages, and only a small suppression system. The abstract liberal opinion needs to completely ignore American history in order to function. Instead, the white verdict on color suppression ends with a civil rights movement. This is certainly not the case. Racial discrimination changed to suit our era. It is clear that justice rather than equality needs to end racial discrimination. Abstract liberalism is "thought on political liberalism and economic liberalism" (28). Since abstract liberalism is being used for a wide range of problems, Bonilla-Silva shows several different examples of using this framework. When asking white students, "Whether to provide a unique opportunity for minorities to enter university," please use racial discrimination under the name of an equal opportunity (31). Bonilla-Silva insists that these Caucasians "ignore the impact of past and modern discrimination on the social, economic and educational circumstances of the minority" (31). Autonomous approach, "should not be forced": to maintain the true appearance of things, excuses for personal choice or racial injustice, and ethnic choice In the framework of abstract liberalism, using an idea often related to liberalism, such as "equal opportunity", "elite rule", "personal effort", in an abstract and contextual way I will explain inequality. For example, young white female college students are asked if they should offer their own opportunities for minorities to attend university. Student responses ignore social, economic and educational conditions of past and modern discrimination against minorities. Impact. Therefore, by saying that "they should have the same opportunity as others," students maintain racial inequality in education while maintaining her nonracist image. Summary Liberalism is attributed to all those who have political liberalism and economic liberalism. Having political liberalism means that everyone has equal opportunities. Even when the minority is considered to have superiority, no matter how small this superiority is regarded as unfair to other people. Because it is inevitable, naturalism is the spirit of racism or ethnic friction. To some extent, it allows white people to see racial friction as "a way to things". The structural problem arising from this idea is that it tends to favor its own ethnic group. Even if this is against the ideal of color vision abnormalities, people tend to regard "like us" as a natural tendency.

Classical liberalism is against government interventionism in every aspect of life. They believe that everyone should be treated equally regardless of income. This is different from reform liberalism in that they hope to secure equal opportunities through government intervention. This can be achieved through gradual income taxation, government regulation of large enterprises, and social welfare. In my opinion, classical liberalism is fair and easy to implement than reformer liberalism. Classical liberalism will oppose any economic regulation. They believe that those who can earn money based on the principle of supply and demand already are helping other people in the process. Classical libertarians take inequality as an inevitable consequence of free competition, thinking that reinvestment of capital is beneficial in the long term, creating new technologies, employment and opportunities . With heavy taxes on this money, many opportunities and employment will be lost, wealth inequality and poor opportunities will be further increased. The biggest difference between ideological sets is that reform liberalism takes account of equal opportunities and if one means increasing freedom of others, reducing freedom of one person It is moral. Classical liberalists believe that invisible hands regulate the economy and in the long term redistribution of wealth to the poor hurts them. They believe that everyone should have complete control over their destiny. I think classical liberalism sticks to a very simple principle and I think that it is an excellent theory because everyone is responsible for their actions. Dickerson, Mark, Thomas Flanagan, and O Neill Brenda. Government and Politics Introduction: Concept approach. Toronto: Nelson Education, 2010. 126-142. printing Liberal reform: Liberal reform is very similar to classical liberalism, both of which are beliefs on private property, open competition for a strong economy, personal rights and freedom, and the rule of law I am using it. Liberal reform departed from the concept of classical liberal equal opportunities (believing that everyone has the right to receive good education and medical care) and collective interests. Liberalism generally believes that human self-interest improves society. It also focuses on limited government, individual rights, free trade and equality. Both liberalization sectors idealize these values, but we have a different view on how to accomplish these values. As a means to encourage democracy, the ability to promote equal opportunities and reform the liberalism to enjoy the right (positive freedom). Government policies should be used to create equality. Classical liberalism does not promote government intervention but emphasizes free competition (negative freedom) Breeden Sander (UCID 10080322) October 14, 2011 Jay Makarenko POLI 201 Writing Issues Classical Liberalism V. S Liberalism Reform The problem of classical liberalism is against government interventionism in every aspect of life. They believe that everyone should be treated equally regardless of income. This is different from reform liberalism in that they hope to secure equal opportunities through government intervention. This is accomplished by progress ... John Rawls and political liberalism, in Rohr 's theoretical answer to the basic question of political liberalism, is the "overlapping agreement" and "the comprehensive doctrine" I will explain the idea in detail. Role: "Is there a possibility that a fair and stable free and equal civil society will exist for a long time, are they still deeply divided by rational religious, philosophical and moral doctrine?" (Rolls 4) . Specifically, how these concepts are useful for preservation Classical liberalism is shared by it and consists of many ideologies to reform liberalism. Because of the finite nature of classical liberal ideology, reform liberalism developed from classical liberalism. The essence of classical liberalism can be reg

Politics needs a lot of ideology. This means that different individuals can create multiple recognition based on the given theory. As a result, two kinds of people appeared. First of all, some people agree with the principle of a given theory. These people mostly believe in all prescriptions of this theory. These people find that these theories have great applicability in everyday life. Then there is another group of people composed of theoretical critics. In most cases people in this category tend to oppose theoretical propositions and they often present a theoretical alternative. In general, all theories have two weaknesses. "In most cases, the ideology of liberal classical theory is different from the ideology of modern scientific theory" (Barish, 17). However, the detailed analysis of the two proposed different ideologies often leads to the conclusion that liberal classics are predominant. Therefore, with its ongoing application of its principle, it is excellent. In the history of political science and other political philosophy, liberalism is highly appreciated. Therefore, classical liberalism Economic liberalism is the economic theory of classical liberalism developed during the Enlightenment Period, particularly Adam Smith who claimed minimal interventions to the government's economy. Liberalism, neoliberalism, and some conservative schools, especially liberal conservatism, are often called economic liberalism. Neo-liberalism refers to plans to mitigate trade barriers and restrictions on domestic markets, while forcing the opening of foreign markets using the power of the government. In a sense, this is a modern attempt, supported by conservatives like Ronald Reagan (1911-2004) and Margaret Thatcher (1925-2013), which have been restored since the 1970s. To more pure classical liberalism Alt - right is a collective term for various ideologies other than American mainstream conservatism and classical liberalism. It has a deep philosophical and intellectual background that can cover various economic theories ranging from socialism to liberalism and various ideas ranging from fascism to direct democracy. Alt-right has several basic positions. Mainly racial realism / human inequality is not equal for everyone. There are reasonable and insignificant differences in the physical and psychological aspects of race, and these differences have an important influence on society. Men and women are not the same except for obvious things. Finally, identity is important, society should accept this

Letters to yourself have to start at the age of 50. First of all, I want to be proud to be Nigeria's first female president to achieve your long-awaited goal. You promise to not escape to other countries. Also, please do not open this letter by 50 years old birthday. You must have grown up and it must be more mature. I already know that you already know the contents of this letter, but I will continue as I am convinced that your old memory requires some supplement. Nigeria is a multinational country with about 300 diverse cultural communities. In 1947, Nigeria was not a country. Nigeria is now a multinational society, and one of the social problems of building Nigeria as a country is multi-ethnic, along with friends such as multilingualism and ethnic honesty. There are various boundaries between the state and the predecessor of the modern Nigerian. Ethnographic journalists, on the other hand, estimate that over 250 ethnic groups formed Nigeria. A Nigerian or Nigerian is a Nigerian citizen or a descendant of a Nigerian. Nigeria is composed of multiethnicity and culture, and the term Nigeria refers to citizenship based on citizenship. Nigerians come from over 250 nationalities and languages. There are several ethnic groups in Nigeria, but due to economic factors there is a massive movement of Nigerians with multinational and religious backgrounds living in Nigeria. In the city of Nigeria. English is a common language of Nigerian people. About 50% of Nigerians are Muslims and 50% are Christians. As of 2009, according to the United Nations Statistics Department, Nigeria is the eighth most populous country in the world. There are 250 ethnic minorities in Nigeria, diversity is common. Each of these groups dates back thousands of years before the creation of Nigeria. Each ethnic group contains several language groups, and they use at least 450 languages ​​in Nigeria. Hausa-Fulani, Yoruba, and Igbo are the most populous ethnic minorities, respectively, and several groups including Ijaw (10%), Kanuri (4%), Ibibio (3.5%) and Tiv (2.5% high population. English is the official language of Nigeria, but promotes native language learning through K - 12 education. Junior high school students have to undergo Hausa, Yoruba, or wart test as part of the exit exam. Pidgin English is also a common language in urban and rural areas of Nigeria.

Rousseau has many thoughts on how society as a whole should function. His point is about those who demand freedom. With this freedom, we do not theoretically compare ourselves, or try to improve ourselves better than others. His other key ideas include the notion of general will and collective sovereignty. These show that society and the government should enjoy common wishes and work together as a coherent unit. Rousseau has several famous books, one of which is a social contract. From the 18th century to the 19th century, the most important elements of political idealism were the contract theory of John Rock and Jean-Jacques Rousseau, as well as the thinkers of Adam Smith, Jeremy Bentham, John Stuart Mill It appeared in liberalism philosophy. These thinkers have created idealists called political liberalism. Liberalism emphasizes that consensus is the basis for legitimate political authority and it is a limited constitutional government as the basis for human rights. As liberalism dominates contemporary political and economic theory, international relativists often define the idealistic tradition as liberalism. Liberalism has many forms and derivatives, but those core concepts meaningful to life can be traced back to three main points. Early thinkers such as John Locke, Jean-Jacques Rousseau, Adam Smith, etc. started with human beings in nature, found meanings of existence through labor and property, and used social contracts to create an environment supporting these efforts It was. Kantism is a philosophy based on Immanuel Kant's ethics, epistemology and metaphysical writings. Kant is known for his moral theory, and there is a moral obligation, a "classification order" arising from the concept of responsibility. Kantian believes that all actions are done in accordance with basic maxims and principles, and that they must be ethical and must abide by absolute orders. Jean-Jacques Rousseau was born in 1712 as the son of independent Calvinism city Geneve, Isaac Rousseau, Suzanne Bernard. Rousseau's mother died on 9th birthday, Rousseau grew up from his father and received education until he was ten years old. Isaac Rousseau is a minority ethnic group of residents of Geneva and enjoys the status of the citizen of Geneva which is the position of Jean-Jacques. According to the story after Rousseau, the random education he received from his father included planting the Republican patriotism and reading a classical writer like Pultak dealing with the Roman Republic. After his father exiled in the city to avoid arrest, Jean - Jacques was taken care of by a nearby Bossi pastor, followed by apprenticeship sculptures. Mme de Warens made Rousseau arrange a trip to Turin and convert it to Roman Catholic in April 1728.

Liberalism and social contract Charles Lamour talks about it because moral complexity exists in the sense of diversity. The concept of pluralism thinks that everyone has its own independent concept of good. It is almost impossible for me to ask the same entity the same concept of "good life" and its role in them. As each of us has these conflicting ideals our concept of goodness may be attacked by the concept of competition being held by others around us. Early conservatives, liberals, and various social contractor theorists were very different from ours. The difference lies in other contemporary phenomena, relativism. It is this postmodern phenomenon, or relativism, that Paul Johnson believed Einstein 's theory of relativity in 1919 as an experimental confirmation. In general thought, this confirmation will eliminate the possibility of ancient moral order. But for most people, the straight lines and right angles of Newtonian physics are perfectly understandable, the theory of relativity is not merely ambiguous anxiety. Source People are aware that absolute time and absolute length have been abandoned; that behavior is curvilinear. Suddenly, there seems to be no certainty in the movement of the ball. As Hamlet observed sadly, "This world has left the labor union." It seems as if the rotating Earth comes off its axis and floats in the universe that no longer meets the customary metrics. The world liberalism order began to decline in the 1970s and reached its peak. Since the early 1970s, the average income in the US continued to rise. Now is the time to draft an updated, more just social contract. Unfortunately, the reverse is true. To the economy the middle class is minority and we began hollowing out until young people have no real opportunity. The urgent need in the world today is that leaders and organizations are showing better direction. Who can provide better contracts, promises, goals, and ways to people? This really enriched their lives. A prosperous person. That's not it? They can download the listing ship

The political philosophy and theory of contemporary liberal Thomas Hobbes, John Rock and Jean Jacques Rousseau are different from each other, but these three philosophers will be the people before the formation of the state. This is a natural state. Their views on social contracts reflect their position on the political aspect. Three philosophers also studied the government's purpose and role for individuals in the country. Modern liberalism is a philosophical way of thinking about social progress and growth. Social liberalism (also called modern liberalism or equalistic liberalism) is a political ideology that supports the expansion of the market economy and civic and political rights and various liberalisms, and it is a solution to the legitimate role of the government We believe that measures are also included. Economic and social problems such as poverty, medical care, education. Under social liberalism, the interests of society are seen as harmony with freedom and individuals. Social liberalism policy is widely adopted in most capitalist worlds, especially after the Second World War. Social liberalism and political parties are often seen as centralists or middle-left. Social liberalists believe that they occupy a midway point between social democrats and classical liberals. The definition of classicism and modern liberalism is mutually antagonistic and the third use of this term relies on a fully defined political background. In various circumstances, a liberal in a country may feel that it opposes the liberalism of other countries from the viewpoint of principle and policy preference. For example, contemporary American liberal is not a quasi-Republican Iranian liberal, who would not consider changing their Islamic identity even if they do not mandate their principle strictly like conservatives, We support the secularism in the government. Words with different definitions like "liberalism" should be spread in political discourse because they lead to confusion. For example, given its various definitions, I can say that both the interventionist Democratic Party and the Republican Party claiming to be a free-founding principle are liberals. In my world 'liberal' is opposed to the present situation

Realism is an international theory that expresses interest in international politics. The fundamental reason for understanding realism is that many realists have retrospective exhibitions at civil war scholars. Realists are most interested in exploring and understanding more about realism. War problems In addition, realism leads the American leaders to think more about the benefits of achieving peace. Many facts of realists are to increase the interests of the state. I believe the state is the basic role of international politics. Mainstream international relations theories are "realism" and "freedom institutionism". Realists believe that the state is in a disorder of world politics and that each country pays attention to their national interests. The concept known as "security dilemma" arises from the view that all countries are potential enemies and strengthening the security of a country leads to a relative loss of security in all other countries I will. Realists measure power based on material capabilities such as military expenses and natural resources. Realism believes that peace can last only through equilibrium of power between several countries, not the world of bipolar hegemony. Kenneth Waltz best summarizes the basic elements of realism. Although the degree is varied, mainstream international relations theory including realism, liberalism, constructivism, has privileged hegemony and socialization in the construction of international order. The theory of non hegemian international order believes that the international order is not only a function of power and the preference of hegemon (or power). A non-hegemonic international order can be defined as a relatively stable model of interaction between groups of countries, without personal or collective hegemony of the great powers. "British school" of international relations, also known as international society, liberal realism, rationalism or UK institutionalists, still has a "domestic society" at the international level despite the "disorderly" situation (Literally) lack of ruler or the world of the world) As Martin White did in the lectures of the London School of Economics in the 1950s, the extensive research of the British School was a reflection of the past international theoretical tradition Includes consideration. Hobbes (after Thomas) Hobbes), 2) Rationalists (or after Grotten, Hugo Grotius) 3) Revolutionists (or Kant, after Emanuel Kant). Roughly speaking, the UK school itself supports rationalist or Groatian traditions and is seeking an intermediate route (or through the media) between realistic "power politics" and revolutionary "utopianism" I will.

Normally, liberalism can be divided into two different fields: classicalism and modernism (but some claim that the third article is called the field of neoliberalism), each field is Inevitably overlapping attitudes about the theory behind somewhat different ideology. How should it be implemented? Before studying how these are related to each other and before making comparisons, it is important to give as much definition as possible to define the concept of liberalism. The main purpose of this paper is to study the difference between classical liberalism and modern liberalism. The first part provides a general definition of "liberalism" and focuses on the common elements of all forms of liberalism. In Part 2, we introduce the history of liberalism, from classical and modern liberalism to modern neoliberalism, and try to explain the relationship between their main doctrine and historical background. In the last part, carefully study the differences between classical liberalism and contemporary liberalism and discuss the boundary between freedom and government intervention in modern society. However, there is a big difference between classical liberalism and modern liberalism. Classical liberalism is characterized by faith in the "smallest" state whose function is limited to maintaining domestic order and personal safety. Classical libertarians emphasize that humans are basically selfish and basically self-sufficient; people should be responsible for their lives and the environment as much as possible. As economic theory, classical liberalism praises the advantages of self-regulated markets where government intervention is regarded as unnecessary and destructive. Classical liberalism is expressed in specific natural rights theory and Utilitarianism, and it provides one of the cornerstones of liberalism. Modern liberalism (sometimes also called social or welfare liberalism) arises from the belief that unregulated capitalism can only create new forms of injustice and is more sympathetic to the state It shows attitude.

Liberalism, citizenship reformism, democracy This paper argues that liberalism provides democracy with the experience of citizen reformism. Without it, democracy will lose association with arguments and practices to develop public policy and to provide resources for the realization of democratic citizens. The reason for the liberalism lies in the demonstration of the rise of the world economic order, and more specifically the reconstruction of the role played by the creation of a welfare state after the Second World War. Perhaps the most important difference between the two models is that democracy and democracy start with democracy and ensure that all people promote product diversification for all. In liberal democracy, this is confusing, as multiculturalism is difficult to cultivate and there are few meaningful methods for citizen participation. Therefore, support of a single culture, such as bipartite system, big company hegemony (facebook, Amazon, Google, Monsanto etc.), rapid evolution of the appearance, ideology trends applying practice. Liberalism, citizenship reformism, democracy This paper argues that liberalism provides democracy with the experience of citizen reformism. Without it, democracy will lose association with arguments and practices to develop public policy and to provide resources for the realization of democratic citizens. The reason for liberalism lies in the demonstration of the reconstruction of the role played by the rise of the world economic order, and more specifically, in the study of liberalism and its important values, research on democracy and social justice Is often done. . The world is believed to provide ideology and political philosophy to ensure peace among believers. "Democratic peace" was formulated to illustrate the world where democracy does not participate in war, because democratic compatriots coexist with stable, historically unique forms of government. We can explain liberal democracy more accurately. This political order relies on the principle of republicanism, adopts the form of the Constitution, and incorporates the principles of pluralism of citizen 's equality and democracy. At the same time, it accepts and executes the principle of liberalism, ie the legal scope of public power is limited, it requires some restrictions or differences in most decisions. The Liberal Democratic Party order can limit the authority of majority vote by using means such as absolute majority vote or unified rule or dispatch it to the Constitutional Court without imposing direct pressure. go

Lyndon Johnson and American liberalism, a short biography of Lyndon Johnson, talked about his life in the Texas countryside and followed the ups and downs of his political career. It discusses his liberalism, the "positive government" spirit, and its impact on domestic and foreign issues. Johnson is a person who knows how to obviously accomplish the work, but in my opinion, Shurman did a fairly forward explanation of LBJ, but his "approach under the table" approach was questioned in this book I will. Tatiana Ortega Era: 4th Lyndon Johnson Linden Johnson, our 36th president is a well-known "sociable great". Johnson is extremely thoughtful when it comes to American compatriots and African Americans. President Lyndon Johnson is a wonderful source of inspiration for African Americans. President Johnson was the most important person in securing the rights of African Americans during the term of office in the 1960s. President Johnson impressed him in his first few years. Lyndon Johnson and American liberalism, a short biography of Lyndon Johnson, talked about his life in the Texas countryside and followed the ups and downs of his political career. It discusses his liberalism, the "positive government" spirit, and its impact on domestic and foreign issues. - In order for countries to consistently overcome international obstacles, it is necessary to establish a framework of ideal political standards. The two frameworks that are constantly being discussed in international relations are theories of neo-realism and liberalism, and the two theories are about how politicians should manage the state and how to treat others I have my own view. The Vietnam War, which is managed by Liberty Johnson of Liberty President, is a new left special goal of the new world. Johnson and his high officials are not popular on the US campus. The anti - war movement warmed the rhetoric by violent incidents in both sides. The climax came from the 1968 Democratic National Convention. The new left wing also adapted to the reproduction of feminism. Because the new left former leader is primarily Caucasian, women react to the lack of progressive gender politics in their social intelligence movement. The New Left is also characterized by the invention of contemporary environmental protection movement. It contradicts ignorance to the environment of the former left, and promotes conflict between labor of union workers. Environmentalism also brought about various other social justice movements, such as the environmental justice movement, aimed at preventing minorities and the weak people's environmental factors.

Tolerance, Liberalism, and Community Digest: The principle of tolerance and tolerance limits the use of power by following the opposite religious and moral values ​​of lifestyle that is as tolerant as possible. Socialism insight, that is, moral thinking is always rooted in the concept of social self-goodness, but I think that this does not impair freedom and tolerance. There is no lifestyle built into our self-concepts that is so heavy that a free and neutral is hindered at the level of reflection and a meticulous attention is paid. It is now widely accepted that the principle of forgiveness and the principle of tolerance require a dialogue between liberal and non-free communities to solve conflicts. But for two reasons, dialogue is an inappropriate solution. The first is that it raises the question of the right to participate in the dialogue. Secondly, if the community infringes seriously the rights of its member states, free nations should enforce these rights. The value of anti-imperialists can not be promoted rationally to protect tyranny. Most liberalists place importance on individual autonomy and cultural pluralism. However, individuals may choose a culture that is not free. A liberal state can intervene in a non-free community to maintain peace among different community concepts, for individual rights, or to tolerate partial non-free pluralism. To promote the development of freedom, liberal also promotes concepts like pluralism and tolerance. Through pluralism, liberal refers to the spread of opinions and beliefs characterized by a stable social order. Unlike many competitors and predecessors, liberal does not seek consistency and homogeneity in people's way of thinking. In fact, their efforts were to coordinate and minimize conflicting views, yet to establish a regulatory framework that allows them to exist and prosper. Due to the liberal philosophy, pluralism can easily be tolerated. Liberals think that individuals have different opinions, so they should respect and respect each other 's disagreement. From a liberal point of view, tolerance was originally related to religious tolerance and Barus Spinoza condemned "stupidity of religious persecution and ideological warfare". We often hear sarcastic phrases like "free tolerance", which indicates that liberal is not really tolerant. But this refutation does not explain what liberals should accept or how to practice acceptance. People using this expression already remember certain details such as "liberals can not tolerate my recognition of sexual orientation." If sentences are spoken, this is simply omitted. What happens next is a grammatical trick. They rely on infinite meaning to drown the true meaning of their sentences in overly generalized word games, and "liberalists" are everything, including intolerance of race and sexual orientation It seemed to imply that it should be tolerated. When Infography insisted that Popper's solution was a paradox, it showed that the words "tolerance" and "intolerance" are used indefinitely. However, we have never used tolerance in an infinite sense.

A way for liberalism and realism to confront liberals. In order to define a viewpoint in international relations, we must understand its origin and major authors, including the context they write. Because liberalism has many writers in history, it is one of the more loosely defined views. Liberalism depends mainly on good aspects of human nature. One of the most famous liberal writers is Kant. He often writes about the disorderly nature of international relations - calling it "lawless barbarian". He also wrote the three main ways of achieving peace in this system, a way to deal with every aspect of human life using human beings. Mainstream international relations theories are "realism" and "freedom institutionism". Realists believe that the state is in a disorder of world politics and that each country pays attention to their national interests. The concept known as "security dilemma" arises from the view that all countries are potential enemies and strengthening the security of a country leads to a relative loss of security in all other countries I will. Realists measure power based on material capabilities such as military expenses and natural resources. Realism believes that peace can last only through equilibrium of power between several countries, not the world of bipolar hegemony. Kenneth Waltz best summarizes the basic elements of realism. "British school" of international relations, also known as international society, liberal realism, rationalism or UK institutionalists, still has a "domestic society" at the international level despite the "disorderly" situation (Literally) lack of ruler or the world of the world) As Martin White did in the lectures of the London School of Economics in the 1950s, the extensive research of the British School was a reflection of the past international theoretical tradition Includes consideration. Hobbes (after Thomas) Hobbes), 2) Rationalists (or after Grotten, Hugo Grotius) 3) Revolutionists (or Kant, after Emanuel Kant). Roughly speaking, the UK school itself supports rationalist or Groatian traditions and is seeking an intermediate route (or through the media) between realistic "power politics" and revolutionary "utopianism" I will. "British school" of international relations, also known as international society, liberal realism, rationalism or British institutionalists, lacks "national society", ie control, at the international level, despite "disorder" I believe. Or the country of the world. Despite being called a British school, many scholars of this school are neither British nor British. Broadly speaking, the UK school itself supports rationalism and the tradition of Groathia, seeking an intermediate route (or through the media) between realistic power politics and the revolutionary "utopianism" . The English school refused to accept the behaviorist approach of international relations theory. International relations theory is a typical study of the basic insight of international relations and its origins.

Rousseau has many thoughts on how society as a whole should function. His point is about those who demand freedom. With this freedom, we do not theoretically compare ourselves, or try to improve ourselves better than others. His other key ideas include the notion of general will and collective sovereignty. These show that society and the government should enjoy common wishes and work together as a coherent unit. Rousseau has several famous books, one of which is a social contract. From the 18th century to the 19th century, the most important elements of political idealism were the contract theory of John Rock and Jean-Jacques Rousseau, as well as the thinkers of Adam Smith, Jeremy Bentham, John Stuart Mill It appeared in liberalism philosophy. These thinkers have created idealists called political liberalism. Liberalism emphasizes that consensus is the basis for legitimate political authority and it is a limited constitutional government as the basis for human rights. As liberalism dominates contemporary political and economic theory, international relativists often define the idealistic tradition as liberalism. Liberalism has many forms and derivatives, but those core concepts meaningful to life can be traced back to three main points. Early thinkers such as John Locke, Jean-Jacques Rousseau, Adam Smith, etc. started with human beings in nature, found meanings of existence through labor and property, and used social contracts to create an environment supporting these efforts It was. Kantism is a philosophy based on Immanuel Kant's ethics, epistemology and metaphysical writings. Kant is known for his moral theory, and there is a moral obligation, a "classification order" arising from the concept of responsibility. Kantian believes that all actions are done in accordance with basic maxims and principles, and that they must be ethical and must abide by absolute orders. Jean-Jacques Rousseau was born in 1712 as the son of independent Calvinism city Geneve, Isaac Rousseau, Suzanne Bernard. Rousseau's mother died on 9th birthday, Rousseau grew up from his father and received education until he was ten years old. Isaac Rousseau is a minority ethnic group of residents of Geneva and enjoys the status of the citizen of Geneva which is the position of Jean-Jacques. According to the story after Rousseau, the random education he received from his father included planting the Republican patriotism and reading a classical writer like Pultak dealing with the Roman Republic. After his father exiled in the city to avoid arrest, Jean - Jacques was taken care of by a nearby Bossi pastor, followed by apprenticeship sculptures. Mme de Warens made Rousseau arrange a trip to Turin and convert it to Roman Catholic in April 1728.

Introduction Thomas Hobbes is often considered a pioneer of modern liberalism. It is easy to understand why many contemporary liberals agree with Hobbes' political philosophy because of his belief in individualism and his consent and acceptance of intellectual and moral autonomy. But Thomas Hobbes did not support the concept of a democratic government, but upheld the concept of absoluteism government until his death. It is necessary to pay special attention to Hobbes' denial that autonomy can be regarded as an autonomous form or can be seen. Can Thomas Hobbes be called the founder of modern liberalism? The answer to this question is firm "No". Hobbes has a radical political and moral philosophy, but they are absolutely inaccessible to the radical political and moral philosophy of modern liberalism. Hobbes is closer to the opposition 's argument and is often regarded as a supporter of authoritarianism. To understand why we need to discuss the philosophy of contemporary liberalism, including the prevention of the big government, and the opposition to Hobbes' philosophy, including human needs for the big government. Introduction Thomas Hobbes is often considered a pioneer of modern liberalism. It is easy to understand why many contemporary liberals agree with Hobbes' political philosophy because of his belief in individualism and his consent and acceptance of intellectual and moral autonomy. But Thomas Hobbes did not support the concept of a democratic government, but upheld the concept of absoluteism government until his death. Hobbes needs to pay special attention The political philosophy and theory of contemporary liberal Thomas Hobbes, John Rock and Jean Jacques Rousseau are different from each other, but these three philosophers will be the people before the formation of the state. This is a natural state. Their views on social contracts reflect their position on the political aspect. Three philosophers also studied the purpose of the government and the role of the country against individuals. In Thomas Hobbes (/ hɒbz /; April 5, 1588 - December 4, 1679), in some previous text Malmesbury's Thomas Hobbs was a British philosopher and thought it was contemporary politics It is one of the founders of philosophy. Hobbes is known as Leviathan explaining the influential expression of social contract theory in his 1651 work. In addition to political philosophy, Hobbes has contributed to various other fields including history, law, geometry, gas physics, theology, ethics, and general philosophy.

Today 's world politics is greatly affected by globalization. Most countries integrated this phenomenon and created social and cultural interactions and economic incentives to promote national growth and development. Therefore, many policies of a country are consistent with current country's preferences and dependence on other countries. Despite the power of China's rise and its expanding goal, terrorism can cause all countries irrespective of its power, so the emergence of power emerging to fight common dangers like terrorism It must be connected with the forces of. Liberals predominantly follow Robert Keohane's institutional approach, claiming China should be integrated into the international system and comply with international rules and norms. Wang Yizhou's work (Wang, 2003) and Su Changhe's article (Su, 2002) represents China's liberal system approach. There are three arguments. First, cooperation reduces the possibility of increasing violence and international organizations provide effective means of international cooperation. Because in the globalized world we can not develop the economy without cooperation with other economies and international economic systems. Secondly, international organizations are binding on the actions of Member States. Participation and integration in international organizations is the key to policy recommendations made by Chinese liberalists to better realize the nation's most important benefits better and more reasonably. In the face of China's reality and under the influence of Neoliberal institutionalism around 2000, Chinese liberal scholars began introducing and advocating institutional methods (Wang, 1995; Liu, 1997; Qo , 1998; Guo, 1999; 1999; Su, 2000, 2002). Their argument focuses on several aspects related to the development of international organizations and China. First of all, China should join international organizations, and so only then can China achieve its national and international goals in the most cost-effective way. International organizations and organizations can provide China with the best opportunity to significantly lower opportunity costs in China by utilizing globalization and opening to the outside world. Last week, China 's President Xi Jinping lifted the Chinese term limit, raised the question that China' s financial liberalization and the opening of international systems will cause democratic pressure and forced political liberalization. The attitude that "the West has made China wrong" has emerged. How is the Western side wrong China? China's central planning era before 1979 (precisely) was regarded as a disaster by the West, characterized by dictatorship, famine, serious resource disagreement. In addition, along with China's market-oriented initiative and income growth people are expected to demand greater voice on policies - given the greater economic power they want to gain greater political power I will. This represents the concept of a standardized ideology that unifies the mainstream of Western Europe more or less closely, that is, capitalism and political democracy are closely related. Because each is an economic and political organization of "right" form.

A way for liberalism and realism to confront liberals. In order to define a viewpoint in international relations, we must understand its origin and major authors, including the context they write. Because liberalism has many writers in history, it is one of the more loosely defined views. Liberalism depends mainly on good aspects of human nature. One of the most famous liberal writers is Kant. He often writes about the disorderly nature of international relations - calling it "lawless barbarian". He also wrote the three main ways of achieving peace in this system, a way to deal with every aspect of human life using human beings. Mainstream international relations theories are "realism" and "freedom institutionism". Realists believe that the state is in a disorder of world politics and that each country pays attention to their national interests. The concept known as "security dilemma" arises from the view that all countries are potential enemies and strengthening the security of a country leads to a relative loss of security in all other countries I will. Realists measure power based on material capabilities such as military expenses and natural resources. Realism believes that peace can last only through equilibrium of power between several countries, not the world of bipolar hegemony. Kenneth Waltz best summarizes the basic elements of realism. "British school" of international relations, also known as international society, liberal realism, rationalism or UK institutionalists, still has a "domestic society" at the international level despite the "disorderly" situation (Literally) lack of ruler or the world of the world) As Martin White did in the lectures of the London School of Economics in the 1950s, the extensive research of the British School was a reflection of the past international theoretical tradition Includes consideration. Hobbes (after Thomas) Hobbes), 2) Rationalists (or after Grotten, Hugo Grotius) 3) Revolutionists (or Kant, after Emanuel Kant). Roughly speaking, the UK school itself supports rationalist or Groatian traditions and is seeking an intermediate route (or through the media) between realistic "power politics" and revolutionary "utopianism" I will. "British school" of international relations, also known as international society, liberal realism, rationalism or British institutionalists, lacks "national society", ie control, at the international level, despite "disorder" I believe. Or the country of the world. Despite being called a British school, many scholars of this school are neither British nor British. Broadly speaking, the UK school itself supports rationalism and the tradition of Groathia, seeking an intermediate route (or through the media) between realistic power politics and the revolutionary "utopianism" . The English school refused to accept the behaviorist approach of international relations theory. International relations theory is a typical study of the basic insight of international relations and its origins.

Liberalism and social contract Charles Lamour talks about it because moral complexity exists in the sense of diversity. The concept of pluralism thinks that everyone has its own independent concept of good. It is almost impossible for me to ask the same entity the same concept of "good life" and its role in them. As each of us has these conflicting ideals our concept of goodness may be attacked by the concept of competition being held by others around us. Early conservatives, liberals, and various social contractor theorists were very different from ours. The difference lies in other contemporary phenomena, relativism. It is this postmodern phenomenon, or relativism, that Paul Johnson believed Einstein 's theory of relativity in 1919 as an experimental confirmation. In general thought, this confirmation will eliminate the possibility of ancient moral order. But for most people, the straight lines and right angles of Newtonian physics are perfectly understandable, the theory of relativity is not merely ambiguous anxiety. Source People are aware that absolute time and absolute length have been abandoned; that behavior is curvilinear. Suddenly, there seems to be no certainty in the movement of the ball. As Hamlet observed sadly, "This world has left the labor union." It seems as if the rotating Earth comes off its axis and floats in the universe that no longer meets the customary metrics. The world liberalism order began to decline in the 1970s and reached its peak. Since the early 1970s, the average income in the US continued to rise. Now is the time to draft an updated, more just social contract. Unfortunately, the reverse is true. To the economy the middle class is minority and we began hollowing out until young people have no real opportunity. The urgent need in the world today is that leaders and organizations are showing better direction. Who can provide better contracts, promises, goals, and ways to people? This really enriched their lives. A prosperous person. That's not it? They can download the listing ship

INTRODUCTION Central America trade relations are of great interest as they show economic interactions between the world's largest economy and the second largest economy. After China joined the World Trade Organization (WTO) in 2001, its economic performance dramatically improved. Therefore, the trade relations of Central America from 2001 to 2011 will be explained in the following section. In general, Central America relations are peaceful from the perspective of interdependent liberalism. As far as Marxism is concerned, it is an asymmetrical relationship. To explore interdependencies, you need to understand what is necessary for good interdependence. According to Stephen Covey, if success of interdependence is considered to be the productivity that we desire, productivity can be divided into three key elements, individual investment, interaction, and deposit to an emotional bank account Can be divided. In terms of interaction, it is necessary for us to openly communicate with each other. Also, we will keep active exchanges with each other. For example, doing something you like and doing whatever you want is the best way to build a positive dialogue. This helps to build relationships in a smooth and natural way. Trade relations from 2001 to 2011 will be discussed in the next section. In general, Central America relations are peaceful from the perspective of interdependent liberalism. As far as Marxism is concerned, it is an asymmetrical relationship. Interdependence in Central America Trade Relations Liberalism Interdependence Liberalism Karrbo and Ray (2010) emphasizes liberalism as "a theoretical viewpoint that emphasizes the interdependence between the state and local governments, an important feature of the international system" . Liberals derive several unique power concepts that are quite different from the concept of realism. For liberals, one form of international influence arises from the interdependence (power and interdependence) between Keohane and Nye's preferences called "asymmetric interdependence". The more similar everything else, the stronger the taste in the country with the higher degree of interdependence. If a given person can have more power over the given result, the country's desire will be less, the country will be less interested in it, fewer preferences, other people have The force will be weakened. Asymmetric interdependence, the preference for a country's consensus, is stronger than that of any other country and has the ability to negotiate. For example, in trade negotiations small, poorer countries tend to rely on trade, therefore they tend to derive more benefits from free trade, so they are in a weaker position in the negotiation process and make more concessions There is a tendency.

When we investigated how far the modern liberalism deviated from classical liberal liberalism until the early 19th century it was politically faithful and was first used in Spain in 1812. The first true liberal government in Britain was the Gladstone government in 1868. Liberalism is due to the collapse of European feudalism and its growth that replaces market and capitalist society. Initially, even innovative ones were seeking fundamental reforms, so liberal ideas were radical. When we investigated how far the modern liberalism deviated from classical liberal liberalism until the early 19th century it was politically faithful and was first used in Spain in 1812. The first true liberal government in Britain was the Gladstone government in 1868. Liberalism is due to the collapse of European feudalism and its growth that replaces market and capitalist society. - The premise of metaphysics and the type of liberal ideology: Liberalism and liberalism as a way of demeaning Abstract: The problem of choosing a way for our country makes it possible to discuss liberalism inevitably I will. At first glance, this should not be a problem. The principle of liberalism is the foundation of Western society and the foundation of the modern world order. But not all Russian intellectuals agree with this view. The main purpose of this paper is to study the difference between classical liberalism and modern liberalism. The first part provides a general definition of "liberalism" and focuses on the common elements of all forms of liberalism. In Part 2, we introduce the history of liberalism, from classical and modern liberalism to modern neoliberalism, and try to explain the relationship between their main doctrine and historical background. In the last part, carefully study the differences between classical liberalism and contemporary liberalism and discuss the boundary between freedom and government intervention in modern society. However, there is a big difference between classical liberalism and modern liberalism. Classical liberalism is characterized by faith in the "smallest" state whose function is limited to maintaining domestic order and personal safety. Classical libertarians emphasize that humans are basically selfish and basically self-sufficient; people should be responsible for their lives and the environment as much as possible. As economic theory, classical liberalism praises the advantages of self-regulated markets where government intervention is regarded as unnecessary and destructive. Classical liberalism is expressed in specific natural rights theory and Utilitarianism, and it provides one of the cornerstones of liberalism. Modern liberalism (sometimes also called social or welfare liberalism) arises from the belief that unregulated capitalism can only create new forms of injustice and is more sympathetic to the state It shows attitude.

In its history of over a hundred years, political science has paid attention to many theories of international politics. The three major political theories that are usually discussed are liberalism, realism, and Marxism. But the background that many political scientists did not think about is the paradox which is related to frequently changing voters and usually voters. In the last few decades, the ideological preference of the elector has changed from a conservative president like President George W in particular. In Europe, conservative liberalism should be confused with liberal conservatism, which is a kind of conservatives including economic, social and moral issues combining conservative ideas and liberal policies There is none. The roots of conservative liberalism can be found at the beginning of liberal history. Prior to the two world wars, in most countries of Europe the political class consisted of conservative liberals from Germany to Italy. Since 1917 events like World War I have occurred and more fundamental classical liberalism has been brought to more conservative (ie more calm) liberalism. The conservative Liberal Party tends to develop in European countries that do not have a strong secular conservative party and the separation of church and state is not a problem. In a country with conservative Christian democracy, this conservative liberal brand has developed. Since "conservatism" and "liberalism" have different meanings depending on different times and countries, the usage of the term "liberal conservatism" is totally different. It rejects the principle of equality as being incompatible with the nature of human beings, but it is often in contrast to aristocracy, which emphasizes the concept of natural inequality. Since the conservatives of democracy have accepted typical liberal system such as rule of law, private property, market economy, constitutional representative government etc, the liberalism factor of liberal conservatism is conservative The agreement is obtained between. In countries such as the United Kingdom and the United States, the term "liberal conservatism" is understood as simply "conservatism" in popular culture. Instead of

In the Communist Declaration, what is Communism is argued; this article attempts to inspire the world about what Communist ideals are. The Communist Party supports proletariat and in their view they desire the best of the working class. "The basic condition of the existence and control of the bourgeois class is the accumulation of wealth and the formation of capital by private hands The basic condition of capital is wage - labor" (Marx, p. 135). Marx and Engels think that the reason for the existence of bourgeoisie is in the labor of proletariat; without capital created by proletariat, bourgeoisie will not succeed as much as they do. Another important element of classical liberalism is economic liberalism. This principle is provided primarily by Adam Smith of "Wealth of the Country". Overall, classical liberalists insist on laissez-faire and believe in market self-regulation and minimal government intervention to ensure personal freedom and market prosperity (Heywood 47). Utilitarianism complements the philosophical defense of classical liberalism. This was proposed by Jeremy Bentham, James Mill, and J S. Grinding They believe that the purpose of society is to "maximize maximum happiness". In order to achieve this goal, there must be a representative government to support freedom. (Gingell, Little, Winch 225-228) At the heart of classical liberalism is the concept of laissez-faireism. But for the majority of American classical liberals, freedom of laisseism does not mean there is no government intervention at all. Instead, they prefer to see government tariffs, railway subsidies, and internal improvements, and they all benefit producers. They accused the intervention on behalf of consumers. The conservative economic philosophy of the United States tends to be more free and enables more economic freedom. Economic liberalism can far exceed the financial conservation concerns of fiscal conservatism and the beliefs or principles of government intervention in the market. It sometimes extends to a wider "small government" philosophy. Economic liberalism is related to free market or free-laundry economics American classical liberalism (also known as free-laisseism liberalism) claims that the free market economy is the most productive. A statement by Henry David Thoreau may mean "the government is the best government and the government is the least regulated." Classical liberalism is the philosophy of individualism and self-responsibility. The classic liberalist in the United States believes that if the economy leaves the supply and demand of nature without government intervention, the result is the most satisfying human beings require. Modern classical liberalists are against the concept of social democracy and welfare state

Classical liberalism is the dominant ideological capitalism during the 18th century. That view is widely endorsed. This stated that the government should sit down and observe the business, so they should not cheat the government to force the contract. There are many classic creeds, but they are psychology, economics and politics. Each view has its own point of view. In this article, I will discuss these ideas and you will see that Donald Trump was a classic liberalism. Based on the four assumptions of human nature, psychological doctrine of classical liberalism. Let's start with the sender of the letter. If you support Donald Trump, it is neither conservative nor disagreed, so this letter can be for you. This includes them middle, liberal, liberal (classical liberalism etc.), moderate, or simply tired of the old politics of diseases and people. I heard the theme with liberal regulars and moderate supporters, which are periodic frustrations because of the political correctness of the cards. I have heard that Donald Trump is politically incorrect again and again that he can stop the fort of political correctness beforehand. I agree that political correctness and freedom of speech must be opposed to not being the essence of policing. I also agree that this day and age, politically incorrect. However, politically incorrect Donald Trump is not meant to serve to prevent political correctness Before the presidential election of Donald Trump, we sometimes forget that he is preparing Donald Trump for the possibility of becoming the foremost president of the world. For the liberal faction, the number of "Russian intervention" environmental racism accumulated by the fact that the trump president's secret and facts are blurred in the group of pathology. Although some of the racial discrimination has its advantages, in the overall diagram of the liberal line the factor is not contributing to the election of cards can trace directly to US policy and political economy There are, in particular, their political and economic policies Donald Trump's election victory almost certainly serves against anti PC, clearly we are showing what we need to heal political culture in dysfunction. The step necessary to achieve this treatment is to restore the freedom of classical liberalism, thought and speech specification. This does not preclude denial real prejudice and hatred, but there is no need to respect political correctness. In fact, the opposite political correctness and respect Donald Trump The first Obama has entered the president's politics and was born in a mainstream Kenyan racist conspiracy theory. By pointing out Obama 's race (and not to mention), playing cards and tea parties tried to rob the President' s legitimacy, he denied the legitimacy of the election crime based on the race. During the primary election, the cards occupied white nationalism and conquered the Republican base. White supremacists and white nationalists are defined as those who claim to have racial superiority of origin, the biological evidence of white body and identity of civilization is first I have formed a supporter of the core trump. Select Breitbart News In Steve Vannon, we took over the cards and invited the right Alt key to direct his campaign

Imagine Clemens, the son of Recandes, a famous Athenian Empire general who interprets Merian's dialogue through realism, liberalism, and constructivism, and a wasteful dialogue where three delegates are waiting from May returns. I have done it. Since views and opinions in political science are fluid, they will inevitably change and will undergo a variety of reactions. Because the body of his delegation contains realists, liberals and constitutiveists. Political realism is often in contrast to IR researchers with idealism and liberalism, and from a theoretical point of view, international norms, interdependence among countries and international cooperation are emphasized. It suggests a classical discussion between idealism and realism: whether international politics can be based on the moral order derived from the principle of justice. Is it that or is it always the stage of national interests and power conflicts? IR critics are always juxtaposing classicalistic realism and idealism and liberalism. In other words, liberalists and idealists see the world by emphasizing international standards, interdependence relations between countries, and international and economic cooperation. Thucydides' Melian dialogue caused the first discussion between school of thought of idealism and realism. The three major theories used in international political economics are constitutionism, realism, and liberalism. Scholars often use these theories to explain economic events in the international political economy. Liberalists focus on personal interests, but constructivists are extremely concerned about how international relations are built through ideas in the system. In this paper, we will explain the relationship between state actors and non-state actors in international systems, using realism theory. - Since the feminist generation of the 20th century, women have been affected by men. Women do not know what is happening around them, the life they want or even their body. Many women have already expressed protests against this repression, but sometimes it involves great personal risks. This is Marie Gouze (1748-93) of France and has written "Declaration of women's rights and civil rights" under the name Olympe de Gouges.

The reason for trying to integrate the public and private is because Plato tries to answer the question "Why is it for one person?" And Christianity claims that complete self-fulfillment can be achieved by serving others. This metaphysical or theological approach combines pursuit of perfection and community awareness and requires us to recognize common humanity. They demand that we believe that what is most important for each and every one of us is in common with others - the same can be said about the unity of personal realization and human solidarity. The introduction of Aristotle's natural person theory and Hobbes natural person theory is placed in the novel's characters. Aristotle advocated two important ideas in his "humanity" theory. The first idea is the human character of a person, including the characteristics of the mind and the body, which is the development of the excellence of meditation. The second part of this theory is Aristotle's view that meditative life is the foundation of a truly beautiful life. This includes his views on humans. Natural law theorists have at least three answers for their use. The first answer is Hobbesian and it is based on the subjective theory of good. With respect to the theory of subjective goodness, making things better is because it is the purpose of human beings, or to some extent, the positive attitude of a person, or the purpose of a positive attitude of a person. Condition Considering tremendous changes in human desire, you may think that the theory of confirming subjective goodness is to dismiss the theory of natural law. But that is not the case. Because people sometimes think about the common nature of human beings, their similar physical organization has a common desire for them, and these desires are extremely important for human purposes and purpose. . By their side. This is actually what Hobbs said.

Realism is an international theory that expresses interest in international politics. The fundamental reason for understanding realism is that many realists have retrospective exhibitions at civil war scholars. Realists are most interested in exploring and understanding more about realism. War problems In addition, realism leads the American leaders to think more about the benefits of achieving peace. Many facts of realists are to increase the interests of the state. I believe the state is the basic role of international politics. Mainstream international relations theories are "realism" and "freedom institutionism". Realists believe that the state is in a disorder of world politics and that each country pays attention to their national interests. The concept known as "security dilemma" arises from the view that all countries are potential enemies and strengthening the security of a country leads to a relative loss of security in all other countries I will. Realists measure power based on material capabilities such as military expenses and natural resources. Realism believes that peace can last only through equilibrium of power between several countries, not the world of bipolar hegemony. Kenneth Waltz best summarizes the basic elements of realism. Although the degree is varied, mainstream international relations theory including realism, liberalism, constructivism, has privileged hegemony and socialization in the construction of international order. The theory of non hegemian international order believes that the international order is not only a function of power and the preference of hegemon (or power). A non-hegemonic international order can be defined as a relatively stable model of interaction between groups of countries, without personal or collective hegemony of the great powers. "British school" of international relations, also known as international society, liberal realism, rationalism or UK institutionalists, still has a "domestic society" at the international level despite the "disorderly" situation (Literally) lack of ruler or the world of the world) As Martin White did in the lectures of the London School of Economics in the 1950s, the extensive research of the British School was a reflection of the past international theoretical tradition Includes consideration. Hobbes (after Thomas) Hobbes), 2) Rationalists (or after Grotten, Hugo Grotius) 3) Revolutionists (or Kant, after Emanuel Kant). Roughly speaking, the UK school itself supports rationalist or Groatian traditions and is seeking an intermediate route (or through the media) between realistic "power politics" and revolutionary "utopianism" I will.

In order for countries to consistently overcome international obstacles, it is necessary to establish a framework of ideal political standards. The two frameworks that are constantly being discussed in international relations are theories of neo-realism and liberalism, and the two theories are about how politicians should manage the state and how to treat others I have my own view. Neo-realism is at a structural level and emphasizes that the balance of anarchism and power is a major element for maintaining the level of international affairs. In most areas of international relations, the two main ideas dominated the theoretical space. Realism and liberalism, especially its descendants, neo-realism and neoliberal theory have been the mainstream theory used to explain international phenomena since the mid-1980s, in which "new" is more scientific (Positive) Their way (Lami 2011: 116). The position of the new positivist theorizes the relationship between the causal variable (the third analysis image of Waltz) in the international system and the influence on the national behavior as the major player in the international system. Prior to the collapse of the Soviet Union, arguments between neo - realism and neo - liberalism dominated the field of international relations; materialism was the cornerstone of mainstream international theory. For new realists, the main determinant of national behavior is the distribution of military forces between countries, so anarchist and relative power distribution will promote much of what happens in world politics. (Copeland 2000: 187). Neo-liberalists also think that national interests are fundamentally an important benefit, even though the importance of international systems is regarded as an intervention variable. (Rues-Smit 2001: 224). Therefore, social analysis in social analysis of international relations studies has been left behind. Neoliberalism. New realism. Two concepts that led to academic discussion on international relations. After the collapse of World War II, the main concern of the day was to try to understand how to avoid such conflict in the future. This leads to mutual dependence of the research countries and whether countries can cooperate if cooperated. We believe that cooperation is an essential element in promoting peace and stability as neoliberalism creates complex interdependence and leads to war. This stability also reduces military expenditure. This will help promote economic development as seen in both Japan and the United States. However, as Gryko was explained by prisoners' dilemma in 1988, cooperation is not necessarily viable.

Importance of neoliberalism on the general election of the Liberal Party In the next article I will talk about the importance of neo-liberalism in the 1906 general election against the Liberal Party. Other factors will also be discussed. The Liberal Party may win the election. I will talk about Conservative mistakes and whether it played an important role in the Liberal Party 's victory in the 1906 election, not' neo - liberal 'itself. At the beginning of the 21st century, the party lost a lot of support for the interests of Conservatives and New Democrats. In the federal elections of 2011, the liberal party made the worst result ever, won 19% of the national referendum and 34 seats. In the 2015 federal election, Justin Trudeau's Liberal Party regained its best record since the election in 2000 and has won a majority in the House of Representatives, as he won 39.5% of the popularity vote and 184 seats. New England state and civil elected officials have recently come mainly from the Democratic Party. This area is often regarded as the most vacant area in the United States, New England people are more liberal than Americans in other areas. In 2010, four of the six New England states were investigated as the most free state in the United States. While New England states outside of New Hampshire were elected in the 2000 presidential election, six states in New England were elected in the 1992, 1996, 2004, 2008, 2016 and 2016 elections by Democratic president I voted for the candidate. Zhongdu voted for Gore. In the 113th Congress, the House from all six New England states is a Democrat. In New England there are two independent individuals now serving in the Senate: Burnie Sanders representing the self-proclaimed democratic socialist in Vermont province and Angus representing the independent state of Maine . ·gold Colombia In 2006, the LDP and Social Democratic Party elected Horacio · Serpa as a candidate for the LDP and Carlos · Gabylia as a candidate for the Democratic Party and made a primary election. For the 2010 presidential election, the quartet held a primary election: former LDP electoral minister Rafael Pardo was a candidate, Democratic Party elected Senator Gustavo Petro, Conservative electoral ambassador Noemi · Sanin, Green Party Choose Bagota Mayor Antasas Mox

At the end of the reform, Alan Brinkley made it very clear that there are two types of liberalism. The first type comes from protectionism that can be called today's liberalism. This form of early liberalism is the result of a new agreement. The idea of ​​this new agreement is clearly stated to help American people get rid of the economic depression. Essentially, the goal behind it is to keep people alive. Due to the damage of the Great Depression it is rare to find someone who can support his or her family. In 1982, Allan Brinkley's protest voice: Hugh Long, Father Coffin, Great Depression was a wonderful overview of the long-standing tradition of American political protest action. Brinkley skillfully explained this tradition, the Father Hugh Long and the adult of Coflin during the Great Depression. The topic seems familiar, but Brinkley's relaxed and fascinating style is interesting to the reader. This book should be interested in scholars who are interested in protesting historians and casual readers who are interested in Hugh Long and Cohrin 's father. At the end of the reform, Alan Brinkley made it very clear that there are two types of liberalism. The first type comes from protectionism that can be called today's liberalism. This form of early liberalism is the result of a new agreement. The idea of ​​this new agreement is clearly stated to help American people get rid of the economic depression. Essentially, the goal behind it is to keep people alive. - There are three major nationalities in the United States, conservatism, liberalism, and liberalism. The only position that lay the foundation for progress is a liberalistic position. The next article will briefly explain some aspects of conservatism and liberalism, will advance this view, and America must advance with a more liberal attitude. In short, this article demonstrates that a powerful government is essential to drive the country forward. Allen: Hello. I am a non-violent criminal. There is a record. Unfortunately, I can not regain my rights. When Charlie Crist served as Governor, I applied. He is a reformist Liberal-based Republican governor, who gave the rights to people. However, when Rickscott came in, I was still applying. Allen: Uh, I have to wait five years. Ironically, I am white. I know that 60% to 70% of people are there, you know that the criminal is a derivative of Latin America or African American. The reality is that there is a high possibility that these people will vote for the Democratic Party. There are a lot of Florida elections you know, which is less than 6 to 8 points, so there must be a political aspect.

Anarchism is the only 19th century liberalism that approaches the limits of logic to believe in individual supremacy, freedom (freedom of freedom), democracy, free market. Individualist anarchism can be said to be the logical extreme of classical liberalism. Individualist anarchism: - Free market. - Very unique personality. - Optimistic perspective on the essence of human beings - a stateless society. - emphasize comparison between freedom between individualist anarchism and liberalism and civil liberty (and emphasis on equality): humanity / personality: - egoism which both believe in the superiority of individuals - meaning of egoism Anarchism is an integral part of liberalism and is considered to emphasize the importance of human equality and individual rights. However, as liberalism does not require the abolition of a hierarchy or the introduction of a stateless society, as the liberalism considers it necessary for maintaining order and equality no matter how small it is, authoritative governments It comes from arbitrary agreement and can be regulated conservatively. Therefore, anarchism itself is an ideology. Chomsky believes that anarchism is a direct descendant of liberalism and it will complete individual freedom and minimal enlightened government ideals. He believes that liberal socialism is a logical conclusion of liberalism, spreading democratic ideals to the economy and making anarchism a unique socialist philosophy. Of course, the position we can take is that we do not care about the problems people face today and want to consider the possibilities of tomorrow. Okay, but do not pretend to be interested in humans and their destiny, and stay with other people with other privileges in the seminar room and knowledge cafe. Or people can take a more humanitarian position. Today I will work and I want to build a better society for tomorrow. The first political philosopher who called himself anarchist was Pierre-Joseph Prudon, who showed official anarchism in the mid-19th century. Beginning in France in the 1890s, the term "liberalism" is often used as a synonym for anarchism, its use as a synonym is still common outside the United States. On the other hand, some people refer to free-market philosophy of individualism with liberalism and call free market anarchism as liberal anarchism.

At the end of the reform, Alan Brinkley made it very clear that there are two types of liberalism. The first type comes from protectionism that can be called today's liberalism. This form of early liberalism is the result of a new agreement. The idea of ​​this new agreement is clearly stated to help American people get rid of the economic depression. Essentially, the goal behind it is to keep people alive. Due to the damage of the Great Depression it is rare to find someone who can support his or her family. In 1982, Allan Brinkley's protest voice: Hugh Long, Father Coffin, Great Depression was a wonderful overview of the long-standing tradition of American political protest action. Brinkley skillfully explained this tradition, the Father Hugh Long and the adult of Coflin during the Great Depression. The topic seems familiar, but Brinkley's relaxed and fascinating style is interesting to the reader. This book should be interested in scholars who are interested in protesting historians and casual readers who are interested in Hugh Long and Cohrin 's father. At the end of the reform, Alan Brinkley made it very clear that there are two types of liberalism. The first type comes from protectionism that can be called today's liberalism. This form of early liberalism is the result of a new agreement. The idea of ​​this new agreement is clearly stated to help American people get rid of the economic depression. Essentially, the goal behind it is to keep people alive. - There are three major nationalities in the United States, conservatism, liberalism, and liberalism. The only position that lay the foundation for progress is a liberalistic position. The next article will briefly explain some aspects of conservatism and liberalism, will advance this view, and America must advance with a more liberal attitude. In short, this article demonstrates that a powerful government is essential to drive the country forward. Allen: Hello. I am a non-violent criminal. There is a record. Unfortunately, I can not regain my rights. When Charlie Crist served as Governor, I applied. He is a reformist Liberal-based Republican governor, who gave the rights to people. However, when Rickscott came in, I was still applying. Allen: Uh, I have to wait five years. Ironically, I am white. I know that 60% to 70% of people are there, you know that the criminal is a derivative of Latin America or African American. The reality is that there is a high possibility that these people will vote for the Democratic Party. There are a lot of Florida elections you know, which is less than 6 to 8 points, so there must be a political aspect.

In his book "Racial Discrimination Without Racial Discrimination", Eduardo Bonilla-Silva talks about four different frameworks to prove color blind racial discrimination. The first of these abstract liberalisms is by far the most ambiguous, so avoiding it is most difficult for me. However, some concepts sound familiar. That is because it is reminiscent of the concept of liberal hippies with stereotypes, ie individualism, personal freedom, equal opportunities. Many happy buzzwords, many do not use free hippies Since the focus of this book is primarily to try to prove that people trying to prove their innocence are actually misusing racial loopholes, this special framework Many things appeared when discussing positive actions. The focus of the discussion is definitely not racist, I think that everyone should have an equal opportunity (focusing on individual efforts), so anyone should receive special handling is not. Abstract liberalism will emerge when saying "it should be personal" or "everyone should have an equal opportunity". Assuming that everyone can judge alone without any problems, they sound absolutely fair, equally and beautifully until you think they are eliminating years of history and oppression Like all the frames in the book, this is what ethnically conscious people have always watched. Especially in aggressive actions and similar programs, it can not be counted that Caucasian actions are a little hesitant to support it. They think it should be inclusive, and no one should be "special handling". A kind, sincere intention, but it is an incredible problem because it ignores the whole-body problem bothering people of color. Abstract liberalism can succeed only in fake lands, not only in racial discrimination but also in lack of discrimination Eduardo Bonilla-Silva believes color blind discrimination arises from "abstract liberalism, cultural biochemistry, naturalization of racial issues, and minimization of racial discrimination". The practice of color vision abnormality is "subtle, institutional, and clearly non-racial". Because races are clearly ignored in decision making. For example, if a race is ignored by a group of white people, whites become a normative criterion, people with color are affected and racial discrimination experienced by these people is minimized , Will be eliminated. At the individual level, people with "color blindness" reject racist ideology, but refuse systematic policies aimed at coping with institutional racial discrimination. Bonilla-Silva (2) said color-blind socialism is "an ideology that gained unity and control in the late 1960s and interpreted contemporary racial inequality as a result of non-racial mechanics" . In order to analyze the color blind racial discrimination, Bonilla-Silva responded "Involving interview data mainly" (11) to the survey of university students' social attitudes in 1997 and the Detroit Area Study (DAS) in 1998 (12) )passed it. Bonilla-Silva decomposes the analysis of color blind discrimination into four central themes, expressing how Caucasi interpret the world without racial issues. According to an interview analysis of university students and respondents of DAS, color blind racist discrimination has four central frameworks, most white respondents use these frameworks. The four frameworks are abstract liberalism, naturalization, cultural racial discrimination and racial discrimination. Among the four frameworks, abstract liberalism is the most important because it forms the basis of a new racial ideology. This is also the most difficult to understand (what is competition or positive action against the bus, does it obviously interfere with our American individualism?) Therefore, in this chapter, Explain the space and how it works with color blinds.

President Obama outlined "an important step in advancing a positive, constructive and comprehensive relationship between the two countries" in a speech in the US-China strategic economic dialogue. In the President 's 2011 state speech, in addition to some emergency domestic and international policies, he also provided four important steps to achieve economic recovery. What these speeches have in common is the logic behind the liberal international relations tradition. Political rhetoric: Barack Obama's inaugural speech address Mr. Barack Obama's inaugural speech was announced to the American people to express the president's next term of office. President Obama is now the second year since he took office as president, so this speech will be the second time for President Obama. The purpose of this speech is to share his vision for his next semester, his future ideas, and the rights of Americans with the public. - Slavery exists throughout history and now exists in various forms. Slavery is imprisonment for others' individuals. Herbert Spencer proposed the idea that survival of the fittest survive in human society. In today's age, slavery has socially strong people using weak people and weak people. The first speech I would like to see is Barack Obama 's speech at the 2004 Democratic National Convention. John Kelly was a presidential candidate for the Democratic Party and Mr. Obama made a keynote speech at the meeting. This story is rarely introduced, I think this is the most effective of all Mr. Obama's speech. Why is it the best? This made him a political celebrity in politics from a person with great potential. In a speech from 0 to 60. A wonderful speech brings three aspects - the correct speaker, the correct message, at the right time. Sometimes you may or may not be the wrong speaker, sometimes information is incorrect, and does not have a completely sometimes speech of the time (that is, when you give it to the place of delivery time). An excellent writer of speech convinced the audience that all three aspects are perfectly consistent, like the events of a rare planet.

Introduction | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | || | | | | | | | | Source restriction ... ... | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Why and why the war in Afghanistan happened and why? ....................................................... .... 17 What is the true purpose of invasion of Iraq? ....................................... twenty one Personal reflection ... ... | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | ||| || || || || | | â € | â € | â € | â € | â € | â € | â € | â € | â € | â | | ‰ |. 28 Summary | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Overview | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 33 | | | | | | | | | 33 Reference destination | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | || | | | | | | | | | | | | | The definition of neoliberalism points out that neo-liberalism is primarily political theory first and foremost. Neoliberalism - its history, geographical location, trends of crisis and its trajectory - After the resident 9/11 incident, the ecological correspondence of Americans to plaintiff was weak, but it passed away. Power of the East and the United States. This led us to the next US war on terrorism. The company is undisclosed and said, "This is extremely important for Iraq's economic recovery." Klein Failure of liberalism. Smith, despite terrible incidents, tortures, killings, Iraq The ambiguity of this behavior is that it has nothing to do with actual protection. Finally, neo - liberalism is related to specific cultures (especially American culture) and specific languages ​​(English). This is not surprising: British and American liberalism has the greatest impact on neo-liberalism. Neo-liberalism as an ideology does not depend on any culture or language. Indeed, a single global language will promote free trade - but this may be Esperanto or English. Actually, the advertisement in English, the neoliberal policy and the foreign American foreign policy are usually the same. Especially in Central Europe and Eastern Europe. Neo-liberalism is a political and economic framework that has experienced many forms. The word "neoliberalism" was first used in the 1930s. The first supporter of this idea was Walter Lipman, a legendary American journalist who published his book "Exploring Good Socialism" published in 1937. Lipman does not use this term in his book, but the second year was created at the event by Alexander Rustow titled "Walter Lippmann Colloquium". Words - but he still details the neoliberal knowledge base of these pages. Naturally, Lippman 's liberal view refused the central plan of socialist economics. We also reject capitalism full of laissez-faire and we believe that the state can play an active role in managing certain aspects of the economy.

In the 20th century, liberal philosophers created countless philosophical theories that many people are practicing today. In these false ideologies, existentialism, secularism, pragmatism, and Freudism. The fake ideology, the first kind of existentialism does not claim the truth, I believe that what everything can be done is a leap of faith ... This ideology asserts "to solve". Is there any problem or concern that anyone has? There is no truth, so there is no god, so there is nothing wrong with the world. • 20th century and 21st century: events in the history of liberal democracy in the 20th and 21st centuries can be expressed as follows. - 21st century: elections that support the basic characteristics of liberal democracy and the Constitution won freedom, fairness and multiple victories in most parts of the world. In order to consider the democratic system at the present time, it is necessary to protect the rights of individuals and ethnic minorities as well. In other words, we need to guarantee the freedom or freedom of the people. This type of guarantee is usually included in the written constitution and the government is bound and bound by the rule of law. Democracy so understood is often referred to as constitutional or liberal democracy. The history of modern liberal democracy can be roughly divided into three categories. The early modern LDP, the 18th century to the 19th century LDP, the 20th century, and the 21st century Liberal Democratic Party. The era of modern freedom and democracy can be briefly explained as follows. • Modern era: modern times are the same as the 18th century and the medieval era. A summary of the events in the early modern early liberal democratic history can be explained as follows - 1789: The declaration of human rights and civil rights is the basic document of liberalism and human rights. Of course, the 19th century is the century of socialism, liberalism and democracy, not the meaning that the 20th century must be the century of socialism, liberalism, democracy. Political doctrine has gone; the state still exists We can freely believe that this is an authoritative century, a century that is "right", a century of fascist. If the 19th century is a personal century (where liberalism means individualism), we can freely believe that this is the "collective" century and therefore the nation's century.

Several scholars believe that changes in the nature's nature are part of various general discussions during the era of globalization. In this article we will explore neoliberalism and globalization, and the impact on India after colonization. Certain features of neo-liberal countries have been accepted in general. By understanding and comparing the two government - sponsored development plans belonging to different eras, the implication is to develop a view that may give us reasons to rethink these characteristics. The main form of globalization is neo-liberal globalization. Critics believe that neo - liberal policies aim to minimize investment costs, reduce social security, and aim to create a framework for the economy to increase profits by promoting individualism. They believe that with the emergence of neo-liberalism, society is increasingly dominated and will penetrate economic logic - product logic and financial capital accumulation. Conversion to national state of competition: There are good economic investment conditions among the nation states, so the nation-state is privatization, deregulation and wage deterioration, welfare policy to attract labor law and international capital It is forced to promote. I'm interested. Capital and multinational corporations are active on a global scale, but each country is obliged to carry out political actions at the national level. The annihilation of neo-liberalism seems to be embedded in the expression of neo-liberalism itself. Neo-liberalism and accompanying globalization bring inequality and poverty to the majority of people, economically poorly and politically marginalized many people. This caused inevitable political reactions, anger and populism. On the other hand, the left center (Old Hillary Clinton) and the central right (Old Jeb Bush) are neo-liberal globalization (Donald Trump) while the left wing (formerly Barney Sanders) actively attacked part of Neoliberalism Praised. It attacks the part of "globalization" violently. Today, progressiveists do not like neo - liberalism, but they also argue that extreme right insults against all forms of globalization use foreigners and colored people as scapegoats, distraction of fundamental problems and I believe it is a misunderstanding. Globalization and neoliberalism make immigrants central to domestic policy. Global expansion of poverty is due to active implementation of capitalism by developing countries, implementation promoted by the International Monetary Fund and World Bank policy (Davis, 2006). Robinson (2006) discusses the push-pull factor that affects the flow of immigrants. "If capital is cheap for the center of the world economy, the main" pull factor "of Latin immigrants to the United States is the demand for plastic and forced labor. Destruction has been left by neoliberalism for twenty years "(p. 85). These factors, as well as the development of modern transportation technology, removed many natural restrictions on migration flow (Zolberg, 2006). The challenge of the immigration movement is to identify opportunities for rural, provincial, and national states that effectively promote neo-liberalism.

Neoliberal Failure: Despair, division and corruption were overwhelmed by the instability of the economy in the latter part of the 20th century (1970 - 1980s). The Ecuadorian government uses oil revenues for state expenditure and international credit payments. Due to the economic crisis and intensified external debt, the country began to implement neo-liberalism. As a result, the Ecuadorian government withdrew from the role of maintaining social order and welfare, multinational oil companies prosper and the oil business destroyed their society and land, so maintain the environment and the living and health of the country I worked hard to make it (Sawyer 2004: p. 14). This goes back to the rise of neo-liberalism, and to the fact that Keynesian theory was revived in common discourse during the time of the great recession. In terms of traditional theory, neoliberal failure is unsustainable and expectations for a great and unified structure promoted by old hegemony are smaller. We reintroduced social programs at all levels from preserving banks from conservative Bush to Leadership of Liberal Party leader for 8 years. And, thinking that this is not the method of the past, but rather incorporated into the conservative philosophy of the United States, it strengthened the defense of neoliberalism. . Some Keynes resurrection makes public programs more representative of their customers, and even companies that follow method of neoliberalism in methodology rely on free subsidies and subsidies. Today, the whole generation of companies, founder, and employees in good position to ask the entire game based on their actual failed life experience of the new generation. First of all, neo - liberalism is insufficient to urge people to drive away people every day with a whetstone. On the other hand, there is too much evidence, such as inequality statistics, slowing growth, long-term social problems. However, as long as the neoliberal idea is still embedded in the product or platform mechanism we are building, there is a possibility that nothing simply changes from simply denying neo-liberal credo. Graber explained that "the ultimate project" of neo-liberalism "puts every aspect of life under market logic". If we give up on them, it is almost painful how we map our networks and applications to our world.

Chile 's neoliberalism In this article I believe neo - liberalism is a product of extreme leftist movement and intervention in the United States. In the process, Chile transformed into an economic power. Cold war era. In this article, we first analyze the American concern about Communist roots in Latin America, and the extreme measures taken by the United States to brainwash military personnel throughout Latin America and to promote military coups. Over the years, Chile is under Pinochet's dictatorship, whose regime is known for its massive and extreme human rights abuses and suppresses any movement against the established regime (Winn 19). However, due to the economic crisis frustration is increasing, especially in the workers' movement (Winn 43). The protest action led to the fighting power and frustration of heavy grassroots workers, which stimulated Pinochet's invincibility and forced Chile's transformation (Winn 44) After 1973 CIA-supported Chile coup died down democratically elected Salvador Agende socialist government and founded the dictator Augusto Pinochet, Milton Friedman and the "Chicago Boys" were run Their ideal Neo-liberalism economic plan has disastrous consequences for the working class. Neo-liberalism later became the basic idea of ​​promoting modern politics of Ronald Reagan under the control of the US government and Margaret Thatcher. Neo-liberalism is not only a conscious belief but also a subconscious ideology that influences our thinking, behavior, and relationships. According to Wendy Brown's view in the book "Restore Democratic Party: The Invisible Revolution of Neoliberalism", neo-liberalism puts the market at the center of all interpersonal relationships, It is "rationality of governance" to make. Competition between infinity. The ultimate goal of human life is to develop and improve my market value to "win" the game. Neo-liberalism is "normative rational order, according to the concrete image of the economy, human beings and human beings work together for change." Brown is a heroic neo-liberalism contrary to our will, We will change our people. The more neo-liberal in our economic, political and social structure, our psychology and subjectivity are more neo-liberal

In the late LDS church, liberalism insisted on selflessness and generosity everywhere in the pulpit and the scriptures. We understand what an ideal society looks like - poverty, class, people living in harmony with each other, and only God. It sounds beautiful, and the spirit urges us to imitate it. In addition, we know that certain things are wrong in the Lord's view, such as homosexual behavior, addiction, gambling. You should avoid these things. On the contrary, liberalism promotes governments that do not require voters to provide aid to the poor. Liberal is a rare character in British politics because we are civilized excess country. You can almost say that we were civilized. Liberalism is a frontier, but in the era of Julius Caesar, the UK was the last frontier. The Romans tamed us, and we have been domesticated ever since. This is not that the UK has no liberal tendency. That is that they are worse than the United States and are left behind. Strangely, it may be that the remnants of the aristocracy hold a generous individualized generous attitude. Furthermore, again here we deal with extremely deteriorated individualism and rough expression. Liberal absolutely object to everything. In fact, liberal factions may spend more time discussing with other liberal factions than any other group. My days are usually incomplete until I heard from other liberals at least five times that I am not a liberal. This is an ideologically pure everyday thunder. It is also known as natural rights Natty Rites. (If you are not a beer drinker, this joke may not be interesting.) Shortening a long story: You have the right anyway, no one - I repeat, but no one - they You can not infringe. This includes the right to make a bad joke that you might not get. Left wing liberals collide most frequently with ordinary liberals, which Carson calls "vulgar liberalism" and Rodelick Lang's so-called "right-wing accusations". This includes judging American business in today's nationalistic environment as if it were a market that occurred when it was released. Therefore, non-liberal liberalists theoretically recognize that large enterprises enjoy monopoly privileges, but the reason that competing markets will punish them unless they serve consumers Protect the company when attacked by the left wing. "A defender of capitalist vulgar liberalism uses the term" free market "in an ambiguous sense. They seem to be struggling to remember whether they are advocating from one moment to the next moment. Actual capitalism or free market principle "

Liberalism liberalism is a political ideology based on equality and freedom. According to liberalism, life, freedom, and wealth are the right people have inherently and should not be deprived. In Liberia, the main political party is the Unification Party, the Liberal Party focusing on economic liberalism. In South Africa, the democratic alliance is the Liberal Party wishing to build a free opportunity society. Although the two countries face many problems with their civil liberties, they are hoping to improve their country through liberal ideology. 47 John Rock / Natural Rights ■ John Rock - British political thinkers oppose absoluteism and believe that everyone has natural rights - they have rights such as life, freedom, wealth I was born. ■ The first book written by Locke as "Two Papers of the Government" in 1679 and 1680 was thought to be radical and dangerous to publish. They first appeared in 1690. In his essay, especially in the second essay, Rock objected to absolute domination of men. He explained how the government was formed and the rationality of the government. ■ Unlike Hobbes, I believe that ROC has been living in an equally free state, not in a state of war, prior to social organization. In this natural state, no one should have sovereignty over any other person. ■ However, like Hobbes, Locke believes that there is a problem with the state of nature. People feel that it is difficult to protect their natural rights In enlightenment, people like John Rock and Thomas Hobbes opposed each other by saying how people are human rights and initially cruel. In a more optimistic view, John Locke initially stated that initially it was not bad generally, and that when born all had the same rights, life, freedom, and wealth. "As already mentioned, humans are born as free, equally, and independent people. There is no one outside of this real estate, and without the consent of their own, the influence of the political power of others "John Locke In this sentence, Rock has completed that the natural rights of mankind must be a human choice.When they choose not to like government, they believe that their beliefs The perfect government of Locke is a government with limited power that all citizens can entrust. In worse things, Thomas Hobbs is a government who is in a cruel and rude state I believe that I was born in

The extent to which the United States actually realized its ideals of its liberalism in history and modern times. Not all essence of free thought is incorporated into American customs. As long as men are not slaves but slaves, the founders considered universal male voting rights. Racial and gender inequality will last for a long time and is still being arranged today. However, the rights set by the founders are essential to understanding as they apply to these "minority" groups later. The United States is a country based on the principles of liberalism, ie ideology that emphasizes equality, individuality and freedom. These three ideals are in the center of the country, but they are not well mixed. In a sense, each will offset others. Most people do not take time to stop, actually think "the way to the USA" and think about how complicated and complicated it actually is. Thomas Jefferson, John Rock, and Adam Smith are all people's ideas of liberalism and individual freedom. The conflict between American political culture and the tradition of liberal competition, and contradictory inequality ideology. Liberalism has most of our political philosophy of freedom, equality, individualism, but these ideas are often found in difficult political pastes such as gender discrimination, racial discrimination, homosexuality and classmates It is inconsistent with equal practice. Doctrine. This confrontation is the most obvious when compared to the problems that make up many races and ethnic minorities in the United States. Liberalism is a political philosophy based on the principle of freedom and equality (the principle of a democratic nation), and this ideal arises from enlightenment. Classical liberalism emphasizes the role of freedom (sometimes at the expense of social justice), and social liberalism emphasizes the importance of social equality (classical conservatives "rather than classical liberalism" Government "and" National Control "). It should be noted here that from a modern perspective, when we say "liberalism" we usually refer to "leftist socialist liberalist progressiveism", but indeed it has already been pointed out There are other forms as well. Liberalism (almost all ideologies are in the West) has several liberal elements). For example, from a free point of view, the liberals are leftist liberals (not collective equality imposed on the state, bias the freedom of individuals), and the right wing Republican is also governed by the king I do not want it "can be regarded as a liberal. Therefore, liberalism exists only in a corrupted form in today's world. True and fake fake and showy. Of course, we will never follow our ideals - we can only try - but in the case of true liberalism and neoliberalism the difference between the ideal shape and degeneracy is so wide that they It can be said that it is original idea, insight. The purpose and meaning is fair. "Liberalism" is completely left behind and the rest are simple, convenient and convenient - freedom as shopping, life as work, citizen as consumption, meaning as position, purpose as money. Big truth of origin, purpose, meaning, liberal heart - they are forgotten

Thesis "On Freedom", J. S. The personal civilization mill in the last two chapters discussed several different themes about personal civilization. I think that an important example starts from page 92. Here, he discusses his view on whether society can help or change someone's decision about their lifestyle. The decisions they make and the action they take are entirely up to the individual. I will further study the role of society in my civilization and the discussion Mill made to explain this situation. J. S. Mill's father, James Mill, is a powerful utilitarian theorist. His faith and the Utilitarian work of British philosopher Jeremy Bentham are JS. I grew up for Mill. In a paper on Muller's freedom, he can study how he defends individualism through utilitarian arguments, hence creating a critical view. Muller believes in the ethics of utilitarianism. Because states and individuals should be judged by their ability and action to promote "maximum happiness of the largest number of people", as the traditionalists see the greatest social benefit. Accompanied by loss of certain rights. Because the happiness of most people is greater than a few happiness, please sacrifice individuals and their happiness. Therefore, early forms of Utilitarianism and Muller's belief in personality and self-development are controversial. Utilitarianism complements the philosophical defense of classical liberalism. This was proposed by Jeremy Bentham, James Mill, and J S. Grinding They believe that the purpose of society is to "maximize maximum happiness". In order to achieve this goal, there must be a representative government to support freedom. (Gingell, Little and Winch 225-228) Classical liberalism has had a great influence on politics for centuries. It influenced a unified, independent, constitutional state based on the principle of expression and the rule of law. Following the glorious revolution, under the influence of the Whig Party who was the pioneer of today's Liberal Party, the rule of classical liberalism dominated the British for a long time. In France, the Third Republic achieved the liberalistic goal in 1871. Another big success is that America was discovered in 1776.

Communism and socialism are economic and political structures that promote equality and try to eliminate social class. These two are interchangeable in some respects, but in other respects In Communist society, everything is in the working class, and everyone works toward the same common goal. It is neither wealthy nor poor - all are equal and the community only assigns what they produce as needed. Nothing is done through work that exceeds requirements Communism often leads to low yields, massive poverty and limited progress. In the 1980s, the poverty of the Soviet Union spread very broadly and its citizens rose. As with communism, the main focus of socialism is equality. However, workers can earn wages that can be earned according to their choice, but the government owns and manages the production materials, not citizens. Workers get what they need to create and survive, but they are more motivated and motivated Some countries have adopted socialism. Regardless of working hours and energy, the UK provides everyone with basic needs such as health care. In the United States, welfare and public education systems are a form of socialism. Both are the opposite of capitalism, capitalism is unlimited, and the reward goes beyond the minimum. In a capitalist society, owners can maintain overproduction they earn. Competition happens naturally and promotes progress. Capitalism tends to cause serious discord between the wealthiest citizen and the poorest citizen, but the wealthiest people have most of the resources of the country. The difference between communism and socialism is simple: socialism is the rhetoric method before the revolution, communism (or fascism) is the reality after the revolution. Democratic socialism is an embarrassing way to infect democracy through socialist policies through ballot box rather than guns: they are socialist Pepsi, but still to replace the free market economy central plans and bureaucratic rules there is. What the Democrats say, in other words, warriors of social justice work hard for the future without freedom of choice. Vladimir Lenin declared that "the purpose of socialism is communism." Kevin Williamson, author of the author, said: And under Communism, the central plan starts with a gun on your face. " When witnessing the development of the world today, I have to analyze the differences between socialism, communism and capitalism. Socialism is considered to be a gradual realization of nationalization by the Constitution and democratic methods, in this way the necessary production means are executed and the basis of the distribution is based on the amount and quality of work of each person A system that limits freedom of Communist human beings, which is fair remuneration. Today, capitalism and free markets are regarded as the only solutions to existing problems. Direct Communism itself has many forms. The main difference between socialism and communism is that socialism usually means to create a social program (by some means), while communism (not capitalism) a complete communist economic system It means that it means. The form of socialism is as much as liberalism, treating all of them the same, or linking them directly to the liberalism itself (especially classical liberalism) is wrong. Sometimes we have to think about economics on our own as people often have different economic views than political views. Types of economic liberalism and conservatism include financial conservatism (relaxation in economics), financial liberalism and economic liberalism (liberal market in economics), social marketism (in economics International intervention). Other free market; integration of today's new Keynesian or new neoclassical) and communism (free market, purely socialist economy; based on Marx)

This content is available through online browsing (free) program dependent on page scan. Screen readers can not currently scan, so please contact JSTOR user support for access. We will provide PDF copy of your screen reader Feeling helpless in the moribund economy. The government has four political ideological groups. Political ideology is the fundamental belief of the group on power, political value and the role of the government. This belief comes from education, economics, society, and experience. For the purposes of this article, conservatives, liberalists, and radical ideologies will be discussed while considering their views on welfare, poverty, and the poor. Political ideology Popple & Leighninger (1999) says, "What do you think? Political ideology is a series of values ​​and beliefs about the purpose and scope of the government. The central political ideology such as conservatism, liberalism, socialism and others forms the position of the individual in the government's role in economic and social issues. In addition, political ideology acts as "social cement", linking beliefs and values ​​with individuals who are similar in government role in society. From the beginning of our country, the political regime of the United States was influenced by the political ideology that was prevalent in a particular era. When economic, social or political turmoil occurred, a new political ideology emerged to cope with the confusion. As the capitalization and modernization of the United States progresses, the core political ideology has changed. For example, classical liberalism is divided into two ideologies: modern liberalism and modern conservatism.

First, the principle of equality liberalism is that human beings have the same value. Everyone has the right to handle in the same way. The classic liberalist of the 19th century proposed a society in which an individual is basically unlimited. Therefore, in a free society, people can "be free to inequality". The result of this society will result in some people failing and some people failing. Therefore, the life game has to be done in a flat stadium. Liberal justice theory is based on equality beliefs. Individualism is the core value of all liberalists and means the commitment to equality in the foundation. This ... show details Many members of society pass through their unhappy birth conditions, do not have their own mistakes and have no opportunity to benefit from the "free society" proposed by classical liberals. Liberals firmly believe that all different groups of society should have equal opportunities for their lives. In order to overcome this inequality, Liberal Party leader William Gladstone believes that expansion of opportunity equality is one of its goals. Equal opportunity means that everyone should have the same opportunity to rise or fall in society. It can be promoted through universal education, on the other hand orders the state to exclude any human obstacles and other social problems that might hinder individuals. These are small advances of equality of opportunity, but it shows how much liberals support the principle of equality. William Beveridge founded a welfare state in the UK and promoted the next major advancement. He suggested that regardless of the situation of birth, the welfare of all people, especially education, medical care and social security provide opportunities for all people. This shows that liberalists support a completely equal opportunity After all, the view of the liberal on the principle of equality is different from the classical liber who believes that only the free market economy includes the smallest country. Liberalists who support equality and justice for the principles of their own ideas, but only those who support it. Regarding women's equality compared to women and men, there are lots of information, quotations, and many others recently. How can you make the two different things equal? Women are different, but they are weak rather than men. Weaknesses and differences are two very different things. We have to ignore it, but it is not so. About 200 people in Paris died of revenge. This may be much easier in our country, India. We are burned, but do not forget that burned smoke is more dangerous than dry leaves that are not dried. Remember that freedom is our ultimate wish. Everyone can not deprive the right to release Liberalism is a political philosophy held by people who believe in all people the principles of freedom and equality. Classical liberalism pays more attention to freedom and individual freedom, and social liberalism equally pay more attention. Some examples of the principles of liberalism supported by supporters include freedom of speech, freedom of religion, freedom of press, civil rights and gender equality. In order to explore this concept, please consider the definition of the following liberalism. People first began accepting the concept of liberalism in the age of enlightenment, and it became increasingly popular as it rejected social and political norms of time, including state religion and absolute monarchy did. British philosopher John Rock of the 17th century was admired as a "founder" of liberalism, and his work influenced American revolutionaries. Liberalism is a political philosophy or a worldview based on the concept of freedom and equality. Classical liberalism emphasizes the role of freedom and social liberalism emphasizes the importance of equality. Liberalists support various perspectives based on the understanding of these principles, but generally speaking freedom of speech, press freedom, freedom of religion, free mark

In liberation, rebellion, and relevance "Rebellion against the human rebellion", Albert Camus (1956) thought that disobedience and absurd origin of art and its importance to individuals and society. As I read the coronation ceremony, I began thinking about the importance of art and how stubborn the trends in education and art financing are. This is the reason I got to write this paper, but my aim is not to solve many issues of public funding for art education and art directly. The purpose of this paper is to clarify the art as an adaptive tool in sociology and psychology processes of antisocial liberation and the inevitable function of art is to clarify the importance of art in everyday life It is to show that. What is the role of art in rebellion and liberation? These roles are similar in type and scale among people, and why is this important? - Los Angeles County Museum of Art (LACMA) As we all know, the Los Angeles County Museum of Art (LACMA) is one of North America's largest collections, especially one of the most popular collections in the western United States. (Compton 165). The giant museum houses more than 100,000 works of art from ancient times to today (Gilbert and Mills 174). Lisa McGirr explains the story of this book in "Suburban Warriors: New Americans' Rights and New American Rights". Most people believe that the 1960s are anti-culture, rebellion against the present situation, and the liberalization of the country, but most people do not fully reflect the situation in the United States. Along with the rise of hippies, the rise of the grassroots conservative crusade, the Crusades emerged and was rebuilt as a country of Christians. In addition, the civil rights movement and the poverty war are the causes of the "small revolution" of these suburban warriors, they are threatened by government's economic initiative based on the interests of ethnic minorities and their "taxation" Those people "to help. Contemporary anti-American leftist species germinate in Neorehutz's rebellion against classical liberalism after World War II. Like the New Deal tradition, liberalism strongly supports the civil rights movement and eradicates social causes based on poverty and other inequality improvement. Internationally, this 'central' post-World War II liberalism adamantly objected to Communist totalitarianism. In fact, recognizing the threat of the Soviet Union and participating in the Soviet Union through containment policies was not a conservative movement, but a "Cold War liberal".

In the world there are numerous cultures composed of various lifestyles. Liberalism is usually unheard of subculture. These features have most of the features related to everyday life. Capitalist culture combines commercialized food, organizational structure, "hygienic cleanliness", ease of access to food, and more individuality. On the other hand, Freegan culture includes free food, unorganized structures, "dirty" foods that can be eaten or corrupted, slow food and lifestyle, and more social connections (Edwards and Mercer). Despite liberalism and anti-conspiracy, anti-capitalist ideology, and participation in a broader alternative life strategy (such as voluntary unemployment), liberalism often means synonyms of waste "dump into trash" It is seen. . Abandoned buildings, and "guerrilla gardening" in an empty city park. In the 1960s, in collaboration with Diggers, an anarchist street theater group in Haight-Ashbury in San Francisco, we shared a goal of freelancers to reduce capitalist participation and a strategy to regain wasteful products. I saved the food. The term "freegan" was founded in 1994 by Keith McHenry, an anarchist organization that distributes free food from vegetarians to protest militarism and provides a "solidarity rather than charity" approach It is. It refers to vegetarian who finds animal food in garbage The word "freegan" comes from the drama labeled "vegetarianism", and in a survey by Freegan.info in New York, most participants were found to be vegetarian or vegetarian before being free. However, in many cases, freelancers criticize vegetarians by asserting that vegetarians ignore the environmental and labor impact of the company's ownership of the products and many vegan product lines they buy. In some cases, if found in the trash can, a one-time vegetarian returns to food animal products sometimes called "meaganism". Liberalism is a practice and ideology related to traditional economy and the least consumption of resources, especially waste of goods such as food recycling. The word "freegan" is a depiction of "free" and "vegetarian". Vegetarians may avoid buying animal products as a way to protest the use of animals, but at least theoretically avoid buying something as a protest against the freelancer - food system. Despite liberalism and anti-conspiracy, anti-capitalist ideology, and participation in a broader alternative life strategy (such as voluntary unemployment), liberalism often means synonyms of waste "dump into trash" It is seen. . Abandoned buildings in vacant urban parks and "guerilla gardening"

As long as there is mutual dependence, economic freedom can not be fully realized. The reason is that interdependence directly affects economic freedom. The basic idea of ​​these two terms is optional. Economic freedom means having unlimited and unlimited choices, interdependence is a finite choice. These two ideas can not coexist completely with their definitions. The government has always enacted and amended rules, rules and laws that constitute restrictions on economic choices and options. Foreign trade: Globalization (global economic markets should be integrated and interdependent) and self sufficiency (national or government should strive for economic independence). In the early history of the Australian Commonwealth, this was a major political continuum. At that time it was called free trade and protectionism. Participation: The rationality of philosophers by democracy (majority vote) and nobility control (enlightened, dominated by elitism) and tyrant (aristocratic domination is completely declining) philosopher rationality is not a common interest in tyrant I will lead him to pursue his own desires. ) Political focus: Communism and individualism. These labels support "liberalism" (anti-liberty) and "liberalism" (liberalism) (freeism) as people can pay political attention to the community without totalitarianism and undemocratic conditions ) I am contrary to the words. Council Communism is a political philosophy that is regarded as communism on this axis, but it is not totalitarian or non - democratic. Correspondence to conflict: According to political philosopher Charles Blatterberg, people responding to conflict of conversation should be considered to be on the left side, negotiate at the center and exercise force on the right side. Please look at his thesis "political philosophy and political thought". Economic interdependence is the basic concept of geography. Ecological interdependence is the foundation of biology and chemistry. Political interdependence is at the center of all causality research in history. Cultural interdependence including integration, crossover, and mutual influence and borrowing is a recurrence of art, design, theater, literature, music and technology. Actually, the situation is more complicated than this because the school's curriculum is composed of different subjects. Contemporary main problems facing today's world - topics such as sustainable agriculture, gender and development, population, sustainable community, tourism - this part is sustainable future education and learning - interdisciplinary

August Pinochet, born in Valparaiso, Chile on November 25, 1915, graduated from the San Diego Military Academy and was promoted to the Chilean army. Pinochet served Communist prison, military school commander, director and author commander during duty at the military. In 1970, the socialist leader El Salvador Agendé was elected president of Chile and promoted Pinochet as commander of San Diego Garrison. For over three years, Pinochet helped Allende suppress oppression of Ellend's policy, but the Chilean economy was confused. After 1973 CIA-supported Chile coup died down democratically elected Salvador Agende socialist government and founded the dictator Augusto Pinochet, Milton Friedman and the "Chicago Boys" were run Their ideal Neo-liberalism economic plan has disastrous consequences for the working class. Neo-liberalism later became the basic idea of ​​the promotion of Ronald Reagan's modern politics under the control of the US government and Margaret Thatcher. Neo-liberalism is not only a conscious belief but also a subconscious ideology that influences our thinking, behavior, and relationships. According to Wendy Brown 's opinion in "Revival of the Democratic Party: The Invisible Revolution of Neoliberalism", neo - liberalism puts the market at the center of all interpersonal relationships and makes people and people " It is governance rationality. Competition between infinity. The ultimate goal of human life is to develop and improve my market value to "win" the game. Neo-liberalism is "normative rational order, according to the concrete image of the economy, human beings and human beings work together for change." Brown is a heroic neo-liberalism contrary to our will, We will change our people. The more neo-liberal in our economic, political and social structure, our psychology and subjectivity are more neo-liberal Theoretically, neoliberalism is usually related to the work of Friedrich August von Hayek and Monte Perelin Association, Milton Friedman and Chicago School of Economics. Its name is Politics of Chile, President Augusto Pinochet, President of Ronald Reagan, Prime Minister. Margaret Thatcher is in the UK. Politically, it is supported by various right-wing think tanks like billionaires like the traditional foundation and the Koch brothers. Democracy, common interests, neoliberal hatred over social contracts, white supremacy, extreme nationalism, fanatism, and enthusiasm for immigration gathered in a toxic combination of state violence and disposable politics Fascist is releasing the general elements of the past. . The pattern of fascist expressions adapts to various political and historical backgrounds, ensuring Post America separation and camps and extinction of Nazi · Germany.

Individual freedom is often seen as the core value of liberalism. However, freedom can be categorized into two categories: negative and positive. Negative freedom, traditionally associated with classical liberalism, promotes incoherent beliefs and lacks all external constraints on individuals. This means that individuals should be able to freely pursue their own interests without external restrictions or pressure. Nevertheless, negative freedom does not mean that an individual should have absolute and unlimited freedom. These conceptual difficulties are reminiscent of the distinction between Isaiah Berlin's negative freedom and positive freedom. In a negative sense, the subject of freedom should "leave an answer to a question" - a person or a group of people - to do what they can and do, or when there is no interference from others. next? '1 Freedom in the positive sense, so why or Berlin's participation in what is the cause of control or interference can determine the answer to someone's question, or is not it What? 2 Individual freedom is often seen as the core value of liberalism. However, freedom can be categorized into two categories: negative and positive. Negative freedom, traditionally associated with classical liberalism, promotes incoherent beliefs and lacks all external constraints on individuals. This means that individuals should be able to freely pursue their own interests without external restrictions or pressure. Nevertheless, negative freedom does not mean that an individual should have absolute and unlimited freedom. J. S. A classical liberal like Mill can bring the right to display more content, that is "permission", ie harm to others, or ... if freedom is infinite I believe Freedom: (Positive and negative): Negative freedom refers to an area where an individual is self-deterministic and an individual is not disturbed by others. Positive freedom is especially "one person". To some extent is free, you can control your life and rule yourself. In this sense, this word is very close to "autonomy". - CDP, p. 723. Basic principle: n. 1. Usually religious movements or views characterized by regression to basic principles, strict observance of these principles, not accepting other views, and opposition to secularism. In an organizational and radical evangelical movement that began in the United States from the second half of the 19th century to the beginning of the 20th century, against the Protestant liberalism and secularism, he insisted on the correctness of the Bible.

In contrast to conservatives, the liberals are political left wings. In addition, the free attitude to something means greater tolerance to change. Liberalism has many meanings, but they are mainly related to freedom and openness. A teacher with a relaxed policy will be tolerant on the day I miss it. Banks that are tolerant of your money can be terrible: if they are loose and free, some things are terrible. But if you use a lot of ketchup with your fried, no one makes you hard. Recently I heard many negative comments from liberalists in the news when I was dating other people. Liberal has failed. The Liberal Party has not done anything. Liberal factions need to summarize actions. Liberal is responsible for the current difficulties in the United States. Irresponsible liberal. Liberal, liberal, liberal. Liberal criticism seems to be continuing. The most important aspect for becoming a liberal is that you do not care about other people's thoughts. Well, do you feel this way? Sounds good. Liberals respect whatever they want and respect the rights of others to believe. Liberals do not interfere. We respect the freedom of others' human rights. What we are really looking for is that you are keeping your IQ above a certain level. For a while, I did not call the Democratic liberal to confront the facts. In practice, these people are not free. They are not classical liberals. They do not support the principle of freedom, personality and individual freedom. They do not want you to live a simple life alone. They are not free. All these things, American Democrats, and all that the European Union did in Europe use the word "liberalism" to express that they use it as a shield. They know that they rely on feelings. They rely on a positive opinion related to the term "liberalism". As they rewrite history to convince people that fascism and Nazism are right wing ideologies, they try to convince everyone that the values ​​they support and their agenda are liberal agendas I will. When considering western liberalism, you may think of many things: a thousand years, feminism, "cultural diversion". These views are technically liberal, but on the left they are not representative of liberalism. Liberalism is a belief that, for example, everyone has individual rights and should do whatever they want, usually a belief or conservative who is related to Republicans. The truth is that liberalism is formed by the Liberal Party, a party that is often forgotten. However, although liberalism was born from the Democratic Party and the Republican Party, it is usually carried out by the Republican Party (not complete).

The first thing to note is that the political philosophy of Rock is divided into two recognizable era - his Oxford era (1652-66) and his Shaftesbury era when he was hired by Anthony. Sir Ashley Cooper (later Shaftesbury Count) 1666 - 1683, after Shaftesbury's death. "Two locks" can be distinguished to a certain extent, even though it focuses only on his "two arguments", he should ignore his earlier idea. Nonetheless, his subsequent incarnation of an incarnation should not only be read as a classic, but it should also be a creative and insightful theory as a climax of the political philosophy of rock. John Locke wrote two articles on human development, a paper on human understanding, and some thought on education. In this article, Cooncerning humans understand that John Locke explains how humans have the materials they bring in front of them. He said that their ideas were blank when people were born, and that the heart gained knowledge through contact with the world. In his view, external substances are the subject of emotion, our internal manipulation is the subject of reflection. He said that the experience in the world and society gives you an idea as you see material things, and your ideas reflect these ideas. When this happens constantly, you will have an understanding of what you see. He believes that productivity will bring wisdom if you have the right environment and education. In his other article "Thinking about Education," he explained how to educate children. A prominent political philosopher John Rock left his achievement in history through his work on his work, his political philosophy, and his research on knowledge, understanding and education. Rock was well trained, educated at Westminster in London, and completed his master's degree in 1658. Rock learns logic, metaphysics, and ancient languages. (Biography Channel, 2013) Locke's research on logic and understanding in the work of his life is obvious. - Thinking to be "father of classical liberalism", John Rock established the central values ​​of classical liberalism including freedom, individualism, protection of natural rights, consent and constitutionalism. While classical liberalism developed in the United States focuses on the "minimal state" of government restrictions, John Roc has focused on personal social and political instruments.

Comparative Analysis of Norwegian-American Cultural Ideology The purpose of this paper is to study individualistic and communityistic cultural ideologies in two different political environments. The first challenge when comparing the two countries is to decide which method is best suited. There are several ways in political science to prove that it is most useful when compared. In this study, we will examine the political system, process, constitution, and government functions in the selected two countries using the comparative government approach. There is a limit to trying to compare the United States with Norway, Denmark, Sweden and Iceland - this book emphasizes the four countries with Viking's pedigree. Needless to say the differences in culture, population, politics, the United States is far beyond these countries. Living in the Scandinavian countries is not always idyllic. Nordic countries are always one of the countries with the highest quality of life, but they are not immune to anti-immigrants and authoritarian political impulses. American political ideology refers to various American ideologies and ideological demographics. American citizens usually classify themselves as a position in the political realm, such as liberal, progressive, moderate, conservative. Contemporary American liberalism is aimed at protecting and expanding the guarantee of human rights, social and civic rights, and the government providing positive rights. It is a combination of social progressiveism and some degree of liberalism, very similar to social liberalism in Europe. American conservatism usually refers to a combination of economic liberalism and liberalism and social conservatism. It is aimed at protecting the concept of small government and individual freedom, while promoting the traditional value of some social problems.

The classical economic theory of the Keynesian revolution believes that the "free market" economy is a comprehensive employment equilibrium and is a "self-regulating" system that tends to bring the best economic benefits to all people. Therefore, the best government economic policy is "to forgive ourselves", to provide maximum freedom for individual business. An important element of the Keynesian Revolution proves that these fundamental assumptions are theoretically and practically wrong and the most appropriate government macroeconomic policy treats the entire economy as a large enterprise It is to claim that there is overall management The Keynesian Revolution was associated with the rise of Western modern liberalism after the war. As Keynes' idea became very popular as Adam Smith represented the ideal of classical liberalism, some scholars pointed out that Keynes represents the ideal of modern liberalism. After the war, Winston Churchill attempted to examine the rise of British Keynes policy decision, and in 1945 strategy used a mixed economic rhetoric method. Churchill was welcomed as a hero of war, but his economic policy had overwhelming victory from Clement Atree who was continually being influenced by Keynesian thought. The Keynesian revolution is often seen as a major change in macroeconomics. According to John Kenneth Galbraith, Say's law dominates the economic thought of more than a century before Keynes and it was difficult to switch to Keynesianism. Economists who violate the law suggest that unemployment and under investment (and over investment) are virtually impossible and they may lose their careers. In his wonderful work Keynes quoted one of his predecessors, John A. Hobson, who repeatedly refused to serve at college for his heresy theory. John Maynard Keynes is undoubtedly a major figure in economics of the 20th century. His reputation transcended His most recognized work, "General Theory of Employment, Interest, and Money" (1936), it caused the Keynesian Revolution and the other his work, especially the "Papers on Probability" . Year) and "money theory" (1930). He is an economist, politician, journalist, art collector, collector and art patron. In "Economic consequences of peace" (1919), he criticized the Peace Treaty between Versailles (1919) and Germany. This made him famous overnight, effectively voiding the public's support for the treaty. During the crisis of the 1920s, he regarded conservative economic policy as the cause of British economic problems. From this point, he developed a new theory of income determination

Owen Christopher's Pornography, Obscenity, and Review Case After reading Owen Kristol's articles "Erotic, Obscene" and "Review Cases", we found positive and negative examples to summarize his work . Kristol made a big claim in his article. Some examples of these main propositions are in paragraphs [7-9] when using a story about an old man in a ward where he died of painful death. The old man lost control of his intestines and they poured himself him. Owen Kristol was born in New York in 1920 and is one of the founders of modern conservatism, especially the brand of new conservatism. He was originally a Marxist, but he soon became conservative. Since the 1950's, he edited some of the most influential conservative journals and wrote numerous books. Regarding non-conservatism, Kristol said, "This is promising and not annoying, forward-looking and not nostalgic." People are not good because they generally think it will bring more money to the rich, they are good. He thinks that the welfare state is extremely dangerous and needs to evaluate other alternatives to help those who need it to come up with the same main idea. The advent of modern conservatism in the 20th century is the response to welfare's liberalism. Economic conservatives in the 1950s (including Owen Kristol) believed that the state became too strong for welfare's liberalism. Contemporary conservatism claims the principle of classical liberalism. The main job of the government is to protect life, freedom, wealth and keep away from the market. It also needs strong police and military. Consequently, modern conservatives need fewer governments (ie social project spending reductions) and more governments (ie strong police, military, FBI, CIA etc). It emphasizes a declaration of tax (for tax redistribution from the tax increase to the poor), expenditure on social programs tended to be supported by welfare liberals, powerful military and criminal justice system, and a solid position of international relations ing. Anti-Communism supports "war on terror".

Many African Americans are reluctantly reassured as assets of slave owners and families, and this property prevents the possibility of escaping the unexpected danger of slavery. African Americans who are restricted slaves can create educated and imprisoned lives. Many of them can not escape due to the trials and suffering of their new lifestyle. Olaudah Equiano is one of the few people who can overcome slavery and make action plans to experience slavery free life. Uncontrolled freedom of movement is dangerous. In Asian countries, pirated software and DVD sales are very common. Such freedom of movement allows human sins to escape punishment. If there is full movement freedom, anyone can ask for any territory. ... (Continue other forms of behavior such as arts and music and use examples to explain them in detail. People always have to be careful of what he says. Sensitive words are religious If we do not want to be unhappy if we have the possibility of tension, we must control the freedom of speech ... (Continuing events around the world related to freedom of speech ) Free will take intentional and selective actions based on conscious need. Therefore, all free behavior is a match between necessity and freedom. The concept of freedom is ambiguous. For example, when a person completes himself and gains the opportunity to realize his essential power, he will be free in a positive sense. In Marcus' words, people keep "their true personality by positive power, not avoiding it or avoiding it by negative power." Freedom, choice and responsibility form complex interrelationships in existential philosophy. Students can freely form and pursue their own values, but this freedom includes full responsibility for these values. Existential students are responsible for their value, emotion, and behavior, as they are self-producing rather than being determined by the authorities. The society of free people is organized so that they can draw their own blueprints. There is a risk of having such a free society, but freedom always includes freedom of freedom. Later liberalism tried to remove these risks by organizing a strong 'liberal' doctrine. Instead, they weaken the most complete meaning of freedom itself. Therefore, there is no direct boundary between Jefferson and the European liberalism, but there is clearly much in common with respect to individual nontransferable rights. The focus of Jefferson is not only personal human rights but also government participation, but later liberalism focuses on political thought and political parties.

America's Liberal heritage Do you want to live in a society of peace, prosperity and freedom? As long as you do not hurt others, you want to earn more money than your parents. You can do whatever you want, little of the threat of violence and war. Whether you want to live in an era of artistic freedom and rapid scientific progress seems to be possible in this era. Such a world is not only possible - it is also part of our history. In the past 50 years between the conclusion of the civil war in 1865 and the beginning of the First World War in 1914, America was the most freely and prosperous society in the world. Liberalism is what you may believe ... Liberalism values ​​are America's values. Liberalism is a legacy of America's freedom, patriotism, and sincere work, and it will build a future for your family. This is the idea that freedom and independence are good ways of living. Each of us is a unique individual with great potential. You have yourself and you have the right to decide what is best for you. Americans of all races and beliefs established a great and prosperous country with these liberal ideals. Let's build the future of America with them Liberalists focus on individuals and their individual rights. It is said that this is the only political organization that respects someone as a unique and competent person. The legacy of American freedom, business and personal responsibility is what the liberal believers believe. Obviously, the liberalists believe that the government should not play an important role in American life, but they firmly believe that freedom and independence are wonderful lives. . The government's sole role is to help individuals protect themselves against arms and fraud. The liberal faction certainly opposed the parents' style, but the liberal factions are not only rejecting it. It is inconsistent with the whole heritage of classical liberalism. John Stuart Mill says "What is the main purpose of Cath Saint Stein in" on freedom "(on freedom" Why is it a nudge? "): The politics of liberal fatherism are the antiparents of Mill I suspect the style of "his only purpose is to exercise his power against any member of the civilized community to prevent harm to others and to prevent harm to others. It is not a sufficient guarantee. "(Sunstein quotes Mill's On Liberty here.)

The following is based mainly on chapter 2 of 'Prohibition of racial discrimination' (2010) by Duke University sociology professor Eduardo Bonilla-Silva. He studied color blind socialism and this more subtle racism replaced the Jim Crow racism in the American white people since the 1960s. Eduardo Bonilla-Silva questioned one of the white Americans born between 1940 and 1980 mostly racial issues. He noticed that at least half of the next four frames are in use. Abstract liberalism - The key word here is "abstract". Unlike Jim Crow's racist, most Caucasians agree that all Americans, regardless of race, should have equal rights and equal opportunities. But that is just a lip service. When asked about government policies that could result in such equality, such as positive actions and buses, most Caucasians will find some reason for opposing them without providing other reliable means . Freedom, democracy, equality are not to be achieved, empty words for dressing up American stuff and dressing white racial discrimination Minimizing racial discrimination - Most white people believe that there is still discrimination against black people, but it is not as bad as ever, and that is no longer the main reason for blacks. Instead, this is their culture: Cultural Racist Discrimination - Unlike Jim Crow's racist, most Caucasians do not believe that there are any biological problems in black people anymore. Instead, it is cultural: mainly accusing bad families, bad values, and bad occupational ethics - black morbid, victims. It is pointed out that black people are using racial discrimination as an excuse and looking forward to the handout materials. Naturalization of racial discrimination - racially discriminatory behavior in society such as highly isolated schools and communities, and low racial marriages are not the result of white racial discrimination, but one of human nature It is regarded as "natural" as a part. This means that no one is wrong, you can not change it. Mix and match the frames according to the parameters at hand. The framework will help each other. For example, minimizing racial discrimination makes it easier for abstract liberalism to be accepted. The framework can be used directly ("Black Lazy") or smarter ("difficult to become a single mother" is difficult). Especially black people tend to imagine race discrimination rather than black people, so I think white people can judge race discrimination more than black people. The truth is that the black people can hardly imagine. Discrimination against employment, housing, education is well documented. Regardless of race, the infringing value equal opportunities for Americans, the government should take strong action to end it. However, Caucasians rarely say this. Instead, they use a framework to avoid saying something similar. At best they recognize discrimination, but then ignore that effect. Or they say they believe in equal opportunities, but I have found a reason to oppose any policy to achieve that. According to Bonilla-Silva (2003) there are four color vision anomalies framework, abstract liberalism, naturalization, cultural racial discrimination and racial discrimination minimization. Abstract liberalism applies abstract concepts to colored people, but actually it happens to verify opportunities and circumstances of racial injustice. Naturalization depends on the principle of how things are because it is "natural". Cultural racial discrimination means that people believe that people should stick to their own culture in the social environment. People believe that racial discrimination is no longer the basis of social discrimination but a group or individual itself in the system. According to an interview analysis of university students and respondents of DAS, color blind racist discrimination has four central frameworks, most white respondents use these frameworks. The four frameworks are abstract liberalism, naturalization, cultural

Over the past few decades, the United States has made great progress in women's rights. Women stand out in the workplace, live independently, even even in public office. In history, women are enslaved, deprived of voting rights and treated as property. Through the history of mankind, women have been abused by men. Thirty years after the conclusion of the American Revolutionary War, white men enjoyed the freedom as a gift of God, but women were forgotten and even seemed to have been excluded from the constitution ("men are all equal"). American Freedom According to John Rock's theory, the eyes of people are open to reality, in fact, all of us are free. John Rock believes and believes that humans are free and equally nature, not the idea that God appointed monarchs to rule others. Some of Locke's aims are people's basic rights, including rights to life, freedom and property rights. These concerns are the fundamental foundation of today's specific social law (Taknes). Looking closer to what John Locke is fighting is more about building other concrete foundations that you can serve as a basis for other rules and laws you prepare. British, John Rock. John Rock has a philosophical influence on both political theory and theoretical philosophy, and this influence was reflected in the concept of the period between 1789 and 1914 and the concept of human rights equality. John Locke's work has influenced the work of multiple diplomats on freedom and social contract between the society and the government. Rock 's human and power ideology is the foundation of the concept of power separation. As an enlightening thinker, John Locke wrote two articles. The famous political philosopher John Rock left his marks in history through his work on his work, his political philosophy, and his research on knowledge, understanding and education. Rock was well trained, educated at Westminster in London, and completed his master's degree in 1658. Rock learns logic, metaphysics, and ancient languages. (Biography Channel, 2013) Locke's research on logic and understanding in the work of his life is obvious. - Thinking to be "father of classical liberalism", John Rock established the central values ​​of classical liberalism including freedom, individualism, protection of natural rights, consent and constitutionalism. While classical liberalism developed in the United States focuses on the "minimal state" of government restrictions, John Roc has focused on personal social and political instruments.

"... ... indeed, they help each other" (p. 165). When Athos and Jacob moved to Toronto, Canada, Jacob decided to marry, devoted himself to poetry and translation, and the war ended. The "shadow" of Jacob's childhood tragedy was "overwritten" to some extent by the love of his first married female Alex, but Jacob could not understand what happened to Bella, but in his heart There was a bad wound. . He knows whether he is still alive and is always injured. I was born in Vietnam and the war affected everyone I know. There are five uncle around my mother; they all serve the armies of both sides, and they all drunk a lot of wine. Two of them are lifelong alcoholism. The war destroyed half of their lives; the alcohol spoiled the other half. One of my two alcoholics is probably receiving cancer treatment caused by smoking and drinking. When I grew up, I witnessed how alcoholism depleted my family's happiness and wealth. Because people are drunk and can not control themselves, the celebration of the New Year changes from joy to incongruity, anger, violence, bitter taste. I personally dislike drinks; I can manage glasses of wine and beer from time to time, but I can not do too much. American society is terrible for everyone. Industrialism harms the physical environment, the food and pharmaceutical industry harm our health, infotainment (most on the screen) harm the cognitive environment, schools soothe descendants before fighting. Is there progress on this? Can you really say that my grandfather has spent his 20-year life in the American dream? What are the benefits of millions of young people whose lives are restricted by geographical conditions and destiny? Myth of progress is myth of disguise of Sisyphus Modern liberalism and conservatism for many generations have contested to weaken the wonderful contemporary civilization built by primitive liberalism. . Nevertheless, since the corruption and collapse of primitive liberalism both the left and the right have carried out a nationalistic duality with regard to the ideological imagination of the world, this savage attack in these two directions remains unabated. This duality needs to be broken. Our civilization promotes it and first we need to remember the long forgotten liberal tradition that humans can see what we really have. This is the mandate of today's liberalism.

The view of liberalists or "classical liberals" is that "as free as possible" and "as few government as possible" promote peace, prosperity and social harmony. Hundreds of years of tradition of knowledge, personal rights, economic freedom and limited government liberalism have brought about historical changes such as abolition of death penalty, women's suffrage and civil rights movement . Liberal is not a single point of view, but it contains various ideas. Liberalists range from market anarchists to supporters of limited welfare states, but they are all united by beliefs about individual freedom, economic freedom, and government power doubt. Liberals agree that the government acts to promote equality, while conservatives agree that the government will take action to promote order. Liberals support freedom and oppose the government to take action to promote equality or order The central idea of ​​liberalism is to allow people to live their lives according to their own wishes. Liberalism believes that as long as they respect the equal rights of others, everyone has the right to live their lives as he likes. Before the government was founded, the liberals defended the rights to the lives, liberties and fortune that people have in nature. From the perspective of the liberals, all interpersonal relationships should be voluntary, and the only action forbidden by law is for those who do not exercise power, such as murder, rape, robbery, kidnapping, fraud It is an action including the start of force. Some liberals combine liberalism and other such ideologies. Like Frank Mayer, fusionists try to combine liberal freedom and small government and socialist conservative values ​​(in an individual way). Left liberalists focus on personal freedom (women's choice, anti-war policy, etc.) and anti-enterprise elements (such as the exclusion of corporate interests and protection provided by the state). Roderick T. Lang meets this explanation Think of liberalism and socialism. Although I am simplifying things, I regard the main political value of liberalism as freedom, and regard the main political value of socialism as equality. Now let us consider a junior high school that places emphasis on most liberalists and socialists (it does not matter which is more valuable). The most intelligent liberal idea will produce intelligent internal and external analysis. There is a remarkable debate about sports and a sharp criticism of a proposal by a competitor's ideology. For the centralist of the type I explain, this is an analysis that I can not miss. The same can be said about the work done by socialist thinkers. Centralists will accept proposals from various sources based on the best suggestions for the proposal. I am a stubborn liberalist, and he has broadly defined liberalism. If you think that independence is seriously underestimated and the government is seriously overestimated, you are a liberal in my book. Regardless of the political point of view, I will treat others. It also includes free apostates. According to my broad definition, people are no longer liberalists - when this happens, the right response is not anger and exclusion, but kindness and curiosity. In recent years, I have heard many liberalists express new appreciation to the welfare state. This is the most obvious at the Niskanen center, but this is only a part of the wider trend. If the position of the revisionists is clear, "Of course, most welfare states are terrible, but there is no problem other than that, social spending needs to be reduced by 80% instead of 100%," their liberal Evidence will not be revealed. problem

Sherman Aleksey's novel 'Absolutely true diary of part-time Indians' is centered on American indigenous boys living in Indian settlements. The boy always lived in the same reserve as the family lived in. He was a white school in the first year of high school. Through transformation of his cultural boundaries, teenagers meet white Americans who speak white, normal, and American teenage words. Through his experience, Junior wrote a diary. • Automatic demographics (200 points) Automatic demographics is an analysis of your experience over a period of time. It reflects a thoughtful consideration of the interaction between self and culture. This article should be a personal story that understands the cultural background of anomalies in modern American history (and what is taught during study abroad), including information from the distribution of reactive journals and introspective observations. As a class discussion. Paper should be at least 7 pages in length, enter, double and label properly (using APA). In the last lesson, we will share your insights in the last paper. Students should introduce things that can share papers. We need to participate in this final evaluation The purpose of this paper is to review literature on automatic demography as research method. It first explains the meaning of automatic demographic, or evokes a story and takes into account the special features of this approach. This article continues to explore the advantages, limitations, and criticisms of this research method since its appearance in the 1980s. Finally, I will explain another approach to evaluate automatic ethnography. For more information on the translation project, please visit the website. Primerosedescriiráloqueificaeltéminoautootetnografíaonarrativaevocativa, yseanalizaránlascatrííasasassalessalessalesdeestemétododededeacacíon. The back artists explore Las Vegas, restricted lifestyle, liberalism, liberalism, liberalism, liberalism, liberalism. Finalmente, los diferentes are using utilities for evaluation

Rent from the world's largest e-book store and save it. Read notes on the Web, tablet and on the phone and highlight it and take notes Fascism is a mixture of extreme conservatism and extreme social liberalism. It includes Stalin's "Big C" communism and a national socialist movement (some socialism, the rest of death). Despite its social liberalism, it is highly authoritative. This right and left government is called "fascism". Interpretation of fascists Review of world history Hitler is liberal, conservative, or socialist? He is a tyrant of three people, an authoritative right wing, driving up the name of Western democracy to strife. He was abandoned in several ways and in other respects. It is difficult to master, but it is. Prior to liberalization in the late 1600s war often occurred among the kingdoms. Hitler returned to the old road with new technology. Any authority theory can return to this authoritative fascism Radical Identity The rise of politics is only a sign of greater and more concerned change. The radical ideology that is not free is penetrating the left western part. In the past, in the politics of the West, the left was generous and the right was conservative. Due to the memory of World War II and the gradual end of the Cold War, the overton's window in Western politics has changed, and it is becoming socially acceptable for generations to accept super-leftist ideas for the first time. Therefore, we saw the liberal political ideology being incorporated into mainstream thinking. The fundamental ideology is often just socialist justice to gain popularity, indeed, it is an innovative ideology that tears society. Movement of social justice absorbed and hurt by extreme ideology is not actually new. It happened more than 50 years ago. In addition, radical identity politics violate the morality implied by liberalism. When radical radical identity politics is practiced, it will spew effectively effectively before liberal ideals. Furthermore, not taking a tough stance towards radical radical identity politics will ensure that the right commentators do not trust mainstream liberals and progressiveists using radical actions. I may be trying to do this under any circumstances, but the liberalists have taken a strong stand against radical identity politics and do not overpower any attempt to link the two Hmm.

Individualism and other ideologies "Liberalism expresses a comprehensive view of human life, a way people want to make individuals as freely as possible to shape their lives in a meaningful direction," Ronaldo In the opinion of Ronald Beiner by Bernard, the practice of liberalism is not the same as the inevitable practice. Ronald Peana criticized liberalism and communism. In his diary, the individual must get more choices and what will they do? But it can only be utopia. Also, it is not advisable to classify individuals in the community. Tradition, ideology or personal opinion emphasizing the advantage of individualist individuals and their rights, independence, and other individuals. Collectivism Tradition, ideology or personal orientation that emphasizes the superiority of groups or communities rather than all people. A group of groups belonging to an arbitrary group or becoming identical with any group. In particular, unlike other groups, groups that are generally considered superior to other groups. Outside the group - Focus on people belonging to other groups. They pay more attention to team membership, believe that these relationships are stable and sustainable, and tend to treat the boundaries between groups as relatively opaque groups. They are not going to abandon their membership. In contrast, individualists tend to interact with more external group members, so they do not limit their relationship with internal groups. Individualism and other ideologies "Liberalism expresses a comprehensive view of human life, a way people want to make individuals as freely as possible to shape their lives in a meaningful direction," Ronaldo In the opinion of Ronald Beiner by Bernard, the practice of liberalism is not the same as the inevitable practice. Ronald Peana criticized liberalism and communism. In his diary, the individual must get more choices and what will they do? But it can only be utopia. - ... as long as you change it to something similar to yours before you release it, it will change something. "(Bradberry 156-157) This is a common dream of many people - being able to leave permanent marks, planting your own history, being separated from ordinary people, becoming someone else

In his article 'The End of History', Fukuyama discusses the emergence and reduction of various ideologies in history, and the prevalence of Western liberal democracy as the ultimate form of human government. Fukuyama suggests that history can be summarized by different ideologies. He pointed out that Karl Marx also called for "the end of history" when he proposed communism as the final and perfect form of the government. According to Fukuyama, Marx borrowed a view of the middle and late history from Hegel. Francis Fukuyama's article "The End of History" discusses the changes in the world's leading ideologies, including fascism and communism, and that human history should be seen / understood as a struggle between ideologies I point out. This battle is over with the trend of Western ideology such as liberalism and democracy. Mr. Fukuyama said these ideologies have not been fully developed and are still realized in the material world, but the complete lack of feasible alternative systems, the global spread of Western consumerism, and We think that these Western ideas, such as previous support of other agencies, won. Democratization and liberalization of countries with ideologies Fukuyama is best known for "the end of history and the last person", where he believes that the progress of human history as a struggle between ideologies has basically ended, the world has liberalism after the end of the world We established democracy. The cold war and the collapse of the Berlin wall in 1989 Francis Fukuyama's article "The End of History" celebrated clear and academically the victory of liberal democracy. Using somewhat strange historical definition, Fukuyama no longer has ideological contradictions and concluded that all competitors of modern liberalism had defeated. To support his conclusion, Fukuyama pointed out a similar position in the early 19th century Hegel where the principles of freedom and equality expressed in the American and French revolution were won. Along with the modern decline of fascism and communism, Francis Fukuyama wrote a book titled "The End of History and the End of Mankind." Wikipedia believes that "the progress of human history as a struggle between ideologies has basically ended, after the end of the Cold War and the collapse of the Berlin Wall, the world established liberal democracy." " I have never read this book, although I do not think it is true, another historical theory (at least in this summary) is that ideologies such as savage, dynasty, Christianity, communism and the like promote human civilization Liberalism

Many excellent philosophers examined the concept of humanity, for works that have not been referred to as humanity and ideal society time goes by. In almost every society, human motives are taken into consideration. By establishing this premise, many people continue to create an ideal society, and we aim to develop this idea. In this article, I will examine the idea of ​​Plato, Aristotle, Rock and Marx and show how each theorist view of humanity displays in its own ideal village. "Human beings are strictly defined, social and cultural influences.When people live in a selfish and greedy society, people act in a selfish and greedy way.This is a human being, socialism and human beings On the contrary, the generation of several human socialist societies "will be fully compatible, but later, thought to be unstable, in any case, I It is a weak theory as we assume that you know and how we can know the human nature properly; because we can predict it ;. As you can see in this way How can we infer the nature of human beings, so we start looking for another possible objection? Classical liberal ideology is concerned about the concept of ideal society. The term refers to the early period classical liberal form of booming for many in the nineteenth century. Human nature is essentially selfish, thought to be reasonable. Therefore, ideal society people have maximum freedom to pursue interests in competition with other people. The origin of classical liberal ======= is the process of history, the distinction between liberalism and conservatism, especially in politics, became clearer than each variety ... ... from all kinds of The player expressed his opposition to the country. It is the future. Basic beliefs and conservative liberalism The opposite belief of the other side, this is controversial. Definitions were given here for each term, and how to explain both mutual opposition. Liberalism is a proud political ideology All ideologies, including conservatism, liberalism, Islamism, fascism, communism, etc., contain elements of truth about human condition. These are all attempts to understand the ideal conditions of the existence of human beings and they capture the elements of human condition from blood condensation and obscenity to glory and transcendence. "Racial discrimination", "sexism", and allies' ism are always a problem. Because we conceptualize and think about these things in various ways. Our conceptual difference ultimately comes from our position on life. The end of all logic and all parameters is a precondition. What depends on these places? belief

Rent from the world's largest e-book store and save it. Read notes on the Web, tablet and on the phone and highlight it and take notes Fascism is a mixture of extreme conservatism and extreme social liberalism. It includes Stalin's "Big C" communism and a national socialist movement (some socialism, the rest of death). Despite its social liberalism, it is highly authoritative. This right and left government is called "fascism". Interpretation of fascists Review of world history Hitler is liberal, conservative, or socialist? He is a tyrant of three people, an authoritative right wing, driving up the name of Western democracy to strife. He was abandoned in several ways and in other respects. It is difficult to master, but it is. Prior to liberalization in the late 1600s war often occurred among the kingdoms. Hitler returned to the old road with new technology. Any authority theory can return to this authoritative fascism Radical Identity The rise of politics is only a sign of greater and more concerned change. The radical ideology that is not free is penetrating the left western part. In the past, in the politics of the West, the left was generous and the right was conservative. Due to the memory of World War II and the gradual end of the Cold War, the overton's window in Western politics has changed, and it is becoming socially acceptable for generations to accept super-leftist ideas for the first time. Therefore, we saw the liberal political ideology being incorporated into mainstream thinking. The fundamental ideology is often just socialist justice to gain popularity, indeed, it is an innovative ideology that tears society. Movement of social justice absorbed and hurt by extreme ideology is not actually new. It happened more than 50 years ago. In addition, radical identity politics violate the morality implied by liberalism. When radical radical identity politics is practiced, it will spew effectively effectively before liberal ideals. Furthermore, not taking a tough stance towards radical radical identity politics will ensure that the right commentators do not trust mainstream liberals and progressiveists using radical actions. I may be trying to do this under any circumstances, but the liberalists have taken a strong stand against radical identity politics and do not overpower any attempt to link the two Hmm.

Analysis based on the regional aspect is important for studying the possibility of the effect of neoliberalism in modern Africa. Regions can be understood as political and social projects where various entities contribute to the maintenance, protection, or transformation of general structures, so in certain regional situations, multiple strategies and approaches to governance fuse , Mixed, and even contradictory. This market and government's method, often referred to as neo-liberalism by critics, has become increasingly dominant. When this theory is removed from the page and the blackboard, people who want to live according to neoliberal principles encountered a basic problem. This is a particular way of dealing with the market even though it is in principle devoted to capitalism. Therefore, as more and more governments and businesses take market measures as much as possible, people begin to talk about many aspects of life, including work and career. After all, every lifestyle requires its own vocabulary. By understanding the history of the term, we can create a more detailed concept of Neoliberalism. In stark contrast to its neo-liberalism, particularly its earlier form, which is understood to be involved in particular, opponents are currently using neo-liberalism as a form of absoluteism in the free market. People like Lippmann and Rust are far from taking a liberal attitude towards economic problems, and they have a complex view on the role of the government as an economic participant. Decades ago, Alexander Rastow created a significant discussion about the role of government in the economy, and that discussion was very similar to the discussion we have today. Rust strongly disagrees with corporatism and thinks that between large capitalism and communism, large corporations give excessive power to the market, distort them, and not allow small businesses and individuals to compete . According to Neoliberalism plan, this will not happen. Under neoliberalism, the government is separated from the economy and control by the private sector is allowed. They take the "abandonment" approach. And as we saw when analyzing the UK housing market, this could lead to reduced supply and higher prices. First of all, we need to "cooperate" and pay taxes to secure sufficient funds for all of us to invest. At the moment, men are doing this on the street, but many large companies are not doing it. Jeremy Corbyn will abolish the 12 billion pound tax loop every year and invest in the tax office to ensure that these taxes are levied.

E.H. Carl originally explained that Hans Morgenthau's work is too realistic and too little utopianism. For this evidence, this article examines Carl's "Twenty Years' Crisis: 1919-1939" and Hans Mogenenthau's "Intergovernmental Politics". This article will focus on three important themes. The relationship between the role of utopianism and its realism, the concept of realism as a commitment, and the value to our knowledge of life. At this time, this article regards Morgenthau's work as valuable regardless of discipline, whether it is state protection or diplomacy. The 20th century is considered to be the cornerstone of classical realism. Scholars such as E. H. Carr and Hans Morgenthau have developed this theory. It is known for pursuit of power in international disorder and pessimistic view of the world. The paper argues that classical realism is either immoral or immoral, mainly focusing on Hans Morgans and his critics' debate. First, it will define classical realism and establish its main argument. Secondly, it explores the meaning of "immorality", "immorality", and "moral". It then studies the position of morality in realism (if any), and finally it will compare how realists and liberals treat morality. answer Several of the greatest thinkers of history devoted most of their work to this problem, but fail to provide a comprehensive explanation yet: Thucydides, Hippo Augustine, St. Thomas Aquinas, Clausewitz, E .; H. Carr, Morgenthau ... This list is still in progress. The truth is, there is no clear answer However, putting realism under positivism is not without problems. "What is History" by E. H · CAR is a prudent critique of positivism, and Hans Morgan's goal in "scientists and power politics" is to be able to scientifically study international politics / power politics It is to destroy the idea. Morgenthau's belief in this area is part of his reason that it was classified as a "classical realist" rather than a realist. According to liberalism, individuals are basically kind and can make meaningful cooperation to promote positive change. Liberalism believes that the country, non-governmental organizations, and intergovernmental organizations play an important role in international systems. The state is a sovereign state, but they have many benefits, not necessarily single and autonomous. Liberalism emphasizes the interdependence of state, multinational corporations, and international organizations

Eye of the believer's automatic psychology closes the face of an angel of sacred prayer, Hindu slang, breath taking gas, gin balin valine, unadjusted guitar, rattles, bell, stick, probably powerful but tablass , Rehearsal was not good ... "She is a gasping guy," they said. In many cases there is little evidence to complicate label minimization. "Well, basically, we gather, breathe and sing a little." This is usually a line that emphasizes that I am involved in "the art of life" - in a nutshell Present as outsider If you play in the fly habitat, you will probably feel it. Carolyn ELLIS published five books and four editing collections, and the latest one is "Ethnic I: Automatic Ethnographic Method Fiction"; Revision: Automated Psychology of Life and Work Learn, and automatic music photography: sing automated human behavior / make music personal. She has published many articles, chapters and personal stories in descriptive performance of qualitative research, focusing on sadness, loss, and trauma. Her current research focuses on interactive interviews with co-survivors of the Holocaust and co-witnesses. The purpose of this paper is to review literature on automatic demography as research method. It first explains the meaning of automatic demographic, or evokes a story and takes into account the special features of this approach. This article continues to explore the advantages, limitations, and criticisms of this research method since its appearance in the 1980s. Finally, I will explain another approach to evaluate automatic ethnography. For more information on the translation project, please visit the website. Primerosedescriiráloqueificaeltéminoautootetnografíaonarrativaevocativa, yseanalizaránlascatrííasasassalessalessalesdeestemétododededeacacíon. The back artists explore Las Vegas, restricted lifestyle, liberalism, liberalism, liberalism, liberalism, liberalism. Finalmente, los diferentes are using utilities for evaluation Here, I will explain the simple history of automatic ethnography, especially in the field of communication. Next, I will explain the main functions of automatic ethnography and decide the purpose of performing automatic ethnography survey. Finally, we provide three examples of how we deal and write automated demographic methods. The term "automatic electrocardiogram" first appeared for the first time in the 1970s. Heider (1975) uses "ethnographic magazine" to explain the practices of cultural members explaining culture. Goldschmidt (1977) states that all ethnographic magazines are "ethnographic magazines" and ethnographic expression gives personal beliefs, opinions and observations (p. 294). Hayano (1979) refers to "Ethnic magazine" (p. 99) to explain researchers who "wrote an ethnographic magazine for their own race".

It explains the relationship between business, labor, and government during the gold plating era, the 1920s, and the Second World War. How does progressive movement and World War I affect this relationship? Contents Acknowledgments ix Introduction 1 Part 1: Politics and ideology in liberal reform of liberalism 1. Economic people education: "labor problems", "active republicanism" and "roots of freedom reform" 23 2. citizen's usage: progress And property: the collapse of economic development and entrepreneurialism 86 4. State and people: freedom to reform political and administrative issues 110 Part II: new forged liberalism 5. American scholars revisit: democracy, Occupation, and New Political Economy 143 6. Toward the Future: The Crisis of the 1890s and the Invention of Modern Liberalism 177 7. Acquisition of Progressive Democracy: American Liberalism of Golden Age Reconstruction 217 Notes 257 References 297 Index 311 By the late 1880s, at the peak of the gold-plated era, a doctrine that backed a limited government's commercial regulation was the main force of the Constitution of the United States. This raises the question whether this version of classical liberalism is the long-term ideal natural product of the United States, or whether it began in the golden era. To the eyes of most American legal historians and constitutional scholars, the answer to this question is that the modern American liberalism brand began in golden era. The majority of people not only insist that neutral states or free countries win by political thought of the United States but also famous legal historian Morton Horwitz who dominates the doctrine of the American Constitution from the time of its creation I agree. 1987) United States Supreme Court and Business Elite: Origin of contemporary American liberal gold era 1 Historical Background The phrase "golden age" in the golden era comes from a book published by Mark Twain and Charles Dad Warner in 1873. This book is part of political and commercial corruption after the end of the Civil War in 1865, but this sentence is used today to explain the last three-thirds of the situation in the United States. Economically, this age is known by the development of industry. The population has changed from rural to urban areas, and the growth of urban areas is expanding the production facilities of labor. The railroad expands nationwide - The transcontinental railroad was completed in 1869 at Cape, Utah (Promontory). It is now possible to use materials for production and transport almost anywhere on the continent of Africa. Between 1870 and 1900, the use of coal-derived coal in the electric power industry has increased by a factor of ten, and the use of rolled iron and steel has increased twelve times. Content ................................................. .. .......................... ... ......................... 2

My paper: After the civil war ended, the United States experienced a sudden increase in American business size. Large enterprises organized by companies dominate the US economy. With industrialization, division of labor between urbanization and economic classes continues to develop. At the same time, the western part of the state of Mississippi has been integrated into the train into the real domestic market from the Atlantic to the Pacific Ocean. © Copyright 2010-17 Peter Catapano All rights reserved - This document can not be copied for online display. Industrial capitalism won in 1973 faced a crisis in 1873. Due to the reason Marx indicated, the profit margin collapsed. Capital reacts in two ways: concentration and globalization. The new monopoly forfeited the rent charged on all surplus value created by labor exploitation and accelerated the conquest of the colonial Earth. These structural changes have given them new interests to rise, and from 1890 to 1914 - opened 'good times' to world dominance of monopolies. At that time, the mainstream discourse praised colonialization ("civilized mission") and stated that globalization is synonymous with peace. Social democracy of European workers oppose this discourse Modern imperialist battlefield: Conditions for effective response from South by MRZine Probably the opposite arrangement should be taken if capitalism breaks democracy and creates a new era of political incompetence. In some cases, democracy should defeat capitalism. Health insurance should be a universal guarantee - not another adaptation test - rich and poor are equal, never bankrupt due to health misfortune and misfortune. Therefore, democratic socialist political project, redistribution of interest of this elite seems to be a clear map. For me, neo-liberalism is primarily a model of capitalism than anything else. This model defeated and expanded the falling trend of the capitalist's fourth long cycle. As I mentioned in the book, even if we include a neoliberal core and a group of countries that absorbs the resulting imbalance by rejecting neo-liberalism, we describe the global economy You can use neo - liberalism to do. It means so-called neoliberal Mercantilists (China, Germany, Japan). In this sense, I believe that "New liberalism has been broken" as I mentioned in the first chapter of my book. Of course, neo-liberalism as a consistent ideology became disparate from September 2008 to October. Since then, that relationship with the economic policy of the elite is like a relationship between the Ten Commandments and the life of Italian peasant village.

Burgess's "Cross Stripe Orange" The existential analysis of Orange liberalism and liberalism is a popular term that often appears in philosophical and political rhetoric. A free person can choose his behavior and his value system, express his views, and develop his true character. However, this idealistic liberalism seems to forget that freedom does not mean human values ​​such as improvement of society, improvement of life, equality and justice. Among his novels "The Clockwork Orange" (1962), Anthony Burgess shows a way of finally drawing free individuals and can not cope with the freedom society pursues enthusiastically in their words . Film Analysis of Clockwork Orange In 1962, Anthony Burgess' s novel "Clockwork Orange" was first published. This novel is about antiparty allegory in the near future, Youth gang is threatening the residents of the aged big cities habitually. The main focus of this novel is that human beings are sinners, but they are insufficient to be sinners, you should get the disaster to accumulate in him. This is a manga book about a tragic fate of a man. (Bergonzi 152) In 1971, Stanley Kubrick changed Burgess' s novel to a 136 - minute color film produced by Warner Brothers. Anthony Burgess's contemporary novel "Crosse Orange" and Stanley Kubrick's excellent movie "The Clockwork Orange" are based on novels and have many important similarities and differences. The same points and differences are useful in shaping one of the best novels and movies of our time in my opinion. After reading A Clockwork Orange, I finally thought about what the future world would be like. An important similarity between Anthony Burgess 's novel and Stanley Kubrick' s outstanding movie, Clockwork Orange, is that the real meaningful interpretation of "clockwork orange" is important. The overall story is based on the fact that he has been brainwashed by the brain and the government allows him to act as he wants to act. In the clock-like orange color, Alex is mechanically a seemingly organic clock-like orange. Alex is a human being, but he can say whatever he chooses and can think, but he really can not. In fact, he uses it as a machine for the government to do what he wants.

The basic elements of liberal democracy are regular elections governing government and individual freedom within the law such as free discussion, freedom of association, and the right to protest (Carter & Stokes, 2002). To maintain a fair election, regular elections should include the competitiveness of the parties and voters should understand their interests. Furthermore, as Carter and Stokes (2002) states, "There are parliaments that can govern the government, all of which are done within the framework of the rule of law" (p. 10). The term "liberalism" in "liberal democracy" does not mean that such a democratic government must obey liberal political thought. It simply means that the early framework of modern liberal democracy was created during the enlightenment era of philosophers who defended liberty. They emphasize that individuals have the right to be released from arbitrary exercise of power. There are many different political ideologies that support liberal democracy. Examples are conservatism, Christian democracy, social democracy, and socialism of some sort. The history of modern liberal democracy can be roughly divided into three categories. The early modern LDP, the 18th century to the 19th century LDP, the 20th century, and the 21st century Liberal Democratic Party. The era of modern freedom and democracy can be briefly explained as follows. • Modern era: modern times are the same as the 18th century and the medieval era. A summary of the events in the early modern early liberal democratic history can be explained as follows - 1789: The declaration of human rights and civil rights is the basic document of liberalism and human rights. Freedom and democracy are free political ideologies, and representative democracy is a form of government that operates under the principle of classical liberalism. It is also known as the democracy of the West and it includes elections among different political parties, separation of power to different government departments, rule of law in daily life as part of an open society, equal protection of human rights, It is characterized by citizens of citizenship owners. To actually define the freedom and political freedom system, liberal democracy often uses formal written or unedited constitution to define government power and incorporate social contracts. After the continued expansion in the 20th century, liberal democracy has become a major political regime of the world.

Jack Shelton's "how the bill becomes a law" lacks several different ways. It does not mean that some similarities can not be obtained about how to make the law even if you change it. I do not give a detailed explanation of the whole process. There is little question about how to submit a bill to the House of Representatives or the Senate. The law is handed over to the House of Representatives officials or placed in the funnel. In the Senate, members must be approved by moderators to announce bill introduction in the morning. The bill became law. Political ideology and culture are some of the most important aspects of our country. They shape the way we think in our country and act accordingly. Political ideology is dynamic and political culture is static. This seems to be quite obvious when definitions and related examples are described in a later paragraph. The ideology of liberalism or conservatism will be clarified and defined below. French philosopher Destad de Tracy first created the term "ideology" at the end of the 18th century to create science that provides research and critical thinking. Instead of a reasonable basis, this term became a very challenging and versatile concept. The term "ideology" is used to refer to interdependent thoughts, principles, traditions, gatherings, and even folklore schemes as normal reference frames. These conventional ideas are adopted From the beginning of our country, the political regime of the United States was influenced by the political ideology spreading in a particular era. When economic, social or political turmoil occurred, a new political ideology emerged to cope with the confusion. As the US became more capitalistic and modern, the central political ideology changed. For example, classical liberalism is divided into two kinds of ideological pressures: modern liberalism and modern conservatism. Political ideology is a group of beliefs about the values ​​of the group and the purpose and scope of the government. The central political ideology such as conservatism, liberalism, socialism and others forms the position of the individual in the government's role in economic and social problems. In addition, the political ideology acts as "social cement", which links individuals with beliefs and values ​​that are similar to government roles in society. From the beginning of our country, the political regime of the United States was influenced by the political ideology spreading in a particular era. When economic, social or political turmoil occurred, a new political ideology was born to cope with the confusion. As the US became more capitalistic and modern, the central political ideology changed. For example, classical liberalism is divided into two kinds of ideological pressures: modern liberalism and modern conservatism.

Neo-liberalism is a global capitalist system formed at the center of neo-liberal practices and institutions, led by widely voluntarily replicating ideologies and dominated by elite acting neo-liberalism It is. There is what kind of confusion and positive thinking is in his head. For me, neo-liberalism is primarily a model of capitalism than anything else. This model defeated and expanded the falling trend of the capitalist's fourth long cycle. As I mentioned in the book, even if we include a neoliberal core and a group of countries that absorbs the resulting imbalance by rejecting neo-liberalism, we describe the global economy You can use neo - liberalism to do. It means so-called neoliberal merchant: China, Germany, Japan) Neo-liberal development theory appeared with the end of capitalist "Golden Age" in the 1970s. When the world economy entered a recession, the old strategy ceased to function, and neoliberalism claimed to overcome the crisis. The core of the theory is to assume that poor policy is rooted in the broad scope of government intervention economics. Policies that ensure the competitiveness of the world economy can restore economic growth. Neo-liberal development theory promotes growth, creates free markets, replaces Keynesian which is proved weak, eliminates national intervention in the economy, and has poor economic performance in many countries (Harrison, 2005). Major international organizations such as the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the World Bank adopt this approach to speed up the transition. The majority of multilateral institutions that promised "development" comply with investment strategies aimed at capital accumulation, privatization, and neoliberal growth. These institutions, including the World Bank, have consistently ignored the evidence that growth does not necessarily alleviate poverty, and that there is a possibility of actually exacerbating poverty. A number of relevant non-governmental organizations are promoting small-scale social development programs in poor countries, but as long as systematic economic and social policies continue to benefit richly, most people around the world are still on a global scale We face the tough reality of poverty.

The world around us is an increasingly complex network of interactions, relationships and events that shape the reality of our lives. The theoretical theory which claims to understand this network and international relations that appear accordingly is increasing more and more. In these theories realism and constructivism stand out as an obvious example of their diversity. Both of them claim they explain the basic framework of our world society and understand the seemingly chaotic world around us. Constitutionalism began with a paradigm of realism and liberalism that could not explain the collapse of the Soviet Union. Constitutionalists believe that individuals with personal opinions and norms will promote international relations. If people in one country hate the other country, the people themselves will not establish a relationship with the enemy because of the people's ideals. Non-governmental organizations such as Habitat for Humanity and Amnesty International are very important for this paradigm as they can spread ideas and norms to the population within the state. Realism, liberalism, constructivism are three important theories of international relations. Under realism, there is state of existence of superpower. China's rise is considered a threat to its growing political, economic and military capabilities. Neighboring countries should be cautious about 'unsatisfactory China' (1/2) to change the regional system. Liberalism thinks that increasing economic interdependence increases economic interdependence and therefore reduces the possibility of political conflict (21111). Because of the high opportunity cost, you can avoid violence to protect the country's serious interests. These two theories focus on obvious facts in international relations, but there are some invisible factors.

Please discuss the Vienna conference. Who is the leader. - Australia's rebuilding after the destruction of Napoleon I. Austria: Prince Metter Niche Ⅱ. Russia: Alexander I iii. Prussia: King Frederick William III IV. England: George III, but by that time he was abnormal, so Sir Castries filled in France: Tarryland cited Emperor of Russia from 1814 to 1914. Alexander I: I am helping killing Napoleon and going to the Vienna conference. Nicholas I: Prevented the 'revolution in December' c. Alexander II: I stopped the Crimean war and released serfs. Global Study Vienna Conference on 10th February 1997 This article describes the influence the French Revolution has on Europe, the Vienna Conference and its goals. It talks about the role of nationalism, liberalism, conservatism in this era. It will also talk about the European revolution between 1830 and 1848. The main purpose of the Vienna conference was to end the Napoleonic war and regain the peace of Europe. There are two opposing political philosophies that greatly influenced events in the 1800s. They are liberalism and conservatism. Liberalism is a philosophy that supports individual freedom, political change, and social reform. During the Vienna conference, the Liberal Party supported the idea of ​​the Enlightenment and the French Revolution. Metelnic ruled the Vienna Conference, an international peace conference held at the end of the Napoleonic war in 1814. The reconciliation which reached Vienna in 1815 is the reconciliation between Austrian representative METERNICH, Representative of Britain's representative Castle Lee, French representative Talilan and former liberal Russian emperor Alexander I It was based on a common conservative principle. These principles are traditionalism, response to rapid changes in 25 years, legitimacy (genetic monarchy is the only legal rule), recovery and restoration of forced repatriated lords since 1789.

Adaptation to pluralism: neutrality freedom and compulsory education summary: In this article we looked at the general neutral principle of Rawls' liberalism, then in the case of a non-neutral influence of compulsory education system on a particular social group, The instinct of accommodation and the caring principle were tested. For a long time various neutral principles have been linked to liberalism. Today, I would like to study the general neutral principle that Rawls is related to his own liberalism. (1) I would like to first clarify what this principle is. In the field of political philosophy, the most extensive controversy about pluralism involves relations with liberalism. This discussion overlaps with questions on the relationship between pluralism and relativism, but to a certain extent liberalism seems to depend, to some extent, on the beliefs of universal values ​​and fundamental human rights, which is the destruction of relativism It is. However, although pluralism is superior to relativism over relativism, it is relatively radical and destructive to liberal reconciliation (or, on the contrary, liberalism is universal or absoluteism is pluralism It is compatible with). . The main supporter of this view is John Gray (John Gray, especially Gray 1995), and the emergence of this problem and extensive discussion are more responsible than any other thinker. Pluralism in political science is that the power of liberal democracy should not be (or is not) made up of a group of elites or elites and should be dispersed among pressure groups of different economies and ideologies I assert there is. Pluralism is based on the premise that diversity is beneficial to society, and various functional or cultural groups of society, such as religious groups, labor unions, specialized agencies, minorities, etc., should enjoy autonomy. A group of writers, including Frederick Maitland, Samuel G. Hobson, Harold Raschi, Richard H. Tony, George Douglas Howard Cole in the early 20th century, is a so-called alienation under unlimited capitalistic conditions I opposed the feeling.

Conservatives, ideologies put value on the present situation. They believe that it is difficult to accept the change and that change should go slowly. They believe that the human system is a product of the gradual experience process. Conservatives believe that slow changes will become more effective for a long time. It's time. They believe that changes in institutions and practices will affect fundamental structures. Conservatives think that it is unrealistic to expect changes in institutions and practices that replace existing institutions and systems without causing confusion. Ideological divisions between conservative and liberal views consume US health policy. Liberal philosophy based on moral principles and utilitarian arguments tries to balance individual needs and concerns of the entire population. As a factor in the viewpoint of free health care, health care is an equal right for all people, and this right is a universal health insurance, equitable funding for medical treatment, and social insurance promising health and equality It includes the belief that it is brought by the system. Care This article sometimes explores a liberal view, as opposed to a conservative viewpoint; it is an interpretation of liberalism in medical care, not defense. Not all liberals agree with this statement because my interpretation contains only one of many aspects of the liberal tradition. After all, the internal difference is the complete meaning of liberalism. Classical liberalism in the 17th century was a response to an autocratic monarchy that promoted individual freedom. As shown in the Declaration of Independence and the Bill of Rights, the concept of equality and the rule of law were added to the classical liberalism of the 18th century. The free medical declaration begins with a belief that medical care should be an equal right for everyone. "Right" means that the government guarantees something to everyone. Rights fall into two categories: personal freedom and population-based rights. Several conservatives and classical liberalists before the 19th century supported only the former category, but modern liberals supported both. Insurance Claims Government requests another entity to provide appropriate funds for services or to pay for services. For example, educational or medical rights. 6 5 The center is getting smaller and smaller. Currently, 39% of Americans are taking about the same number of liberal and conservative positions from 49% of the surveys of 1994 and 2004. People who have mixed ideas and ideas are not necessarily "moderate". Despite the mixture of common opinions, many people express very conservative or very free opinions according to specific issues. As a result, many current policy debates such as immigration control, gun control, medical policy, etc. are provoking in the center of the same idea as left or right.

Compared to the life of the Soviet Union in the 1960s, like the Soviet Union of the 1960s and 1970s, American life was an amazing phenomenon of a declining life expectancy in highly developed countries. The result of the Soviet average life expectancy rate shows that there are only a few real informal changes in living conditions. However, the weakness of the average lifetime measurement is very important. However, since war is not suitable for risk selection, it is not very beneficial both internationally and internationally. To compare socialism and communism, you first need to understand these terms and some of their goals. Socialism is not a decision of an individual or the power of a market but a system of social organizations where the distribution of property and income is managed by society. Because the government has most of its basic business, profits can be evenly distributed among people. This situation is apparent in France, where 75% of telecommunications companies own France Telecom and more than 44% of Renault Motors by the government. The same applies to most parts of Africa and other parts of the world. In socialism, private companies and individuals are strictly subject to the payment of social programs. Direct Communism itself has many forms. The main difference between socialism and communism is that socialism usually means to create a social program (by some means), communism means a complete communist economic system (not capitalism) is. The form of socialism is about the same as liberalism, it is wrong to regard them all as identical, or to link them directly to the liberalism itself (especially classical liberalism). Sometimes we have to think about economics ourselves, as people often have different economic views than political views. Types of economic liberalism and conservatism include financial conservatism (relaxation in economics), fiscal liberalism and economic liberalism (liberal market in the economy), social marketism (international intervention in economics, others) . Free market; integration of today's new Keynesian or new neoclassical) and communism (free market, purely socialist economy; based on Marx) Comparing socialism and communism ideology with liberalism, it is easy to see various ways to define individual freedom. The most basic problem that socialists oppose liberals is the concept of humanity. Socialist thinkers do not agree with the existence of something like mankind, but I believe that human behavior and value can be formed into cooperation with society through institutions established by the government and society as a whole. Socialists say that liberalism is not good for people, as liberalism does not provide a sufficient basis for society. Liberalism is inherently unfair and emphasizes personality when the working class is exploited and defends the interests of bourgeoisie. Socialist ideology promotes the influence of the class on individuals. Socialists think that people should work together, not about individuality, but improve society as a whole. Socialism does not promote private property

This content is available through online browsing (free) program dependent on page scan. Screen readers can not currently scan, so please contact JSTOR user support for access. We will provide PDF copy of your screen reader Feeling helpless in the moribund economy. The government has four political ideological groups. Political ideology is the fundamental belief of the group on power, political value and the role of the government. This belief comes from education, economics, society, and experience. For the purposes of this article, conservatives, liberalists, and radical ideologies will be discussed while considering their views on welfare, poverty, and the poor. Political ideology Popple & Leighninger (1999) says, "What do you think? Political ideology is a series of values ​​and beliefs about the purpose and scope of the government. The central political ideology such as conservatism, liberalism, socialism and others forms the position of the individual in the government's role in economic and social issues. In addition, political ideology acts as "social cement", linking beliefs and values ​​with individuals who are similar in government role in society. From the beginning of our country, the political regime of the United States was influenced by the political ideology that was prevalent in a particular era. When economic, social or political turmoil occurred, a new political ideology emerged to cope with the confusion. As the capitalization and modernization of the United States progresses, the core political ideology has changed. For example, classical liberalism is divided into two ideologies: modern liberalism and modern conservatism.

The role of opponents in the National Liberation Movement Generally, the change of government in the latter half of the 20th century means that the leftist movement for national liberation exceeds oppression, but the purpose stated whether the new administration will contribute to the justice of the people It does not prove this standard model. Although the African National Congress (ANC) and other liberation campaign in South Africa can successfully transform the role as a revolutionary "freedom combatant" to democratic participating countries (Cornell, 9), Castro's Cuban revolution And other exercise realized political change and could not be realized Trump principle / new right / classic liberalism: island of wrong toy of political movement. A big tent ruled by negative reunification: against the principle of new Marxist principles, against the rulers of the company (both sides) against the recovery of the death cultural war of the 1990s. Non-negotiation is rooted in classical liberal values, freedom of speech, freedom of thought, private property rights, and open discussion. Individual sovereignty is highest (not collective sovereignty). Anti-political justification (whether rude or rude) is acceptable As we all know, liberalism is difficult to define. This term is used to describe numerous ideas, practices, exercise and political parties in various social and historical periods. Regardless of whether it is feudal privilege, absolute monarchy, colonialism, theocracy, communism or fascism, liberalism is usually the opposite philosophy, liberalism is the power of liberation, or It is at least the power of liberalism. Open a free active channel. As a political philosophy of Britain and the United States, liberalism has two main meanings. In a broader sense it refers to the basic principles of the constitutional government and the rights of individuals shared by modern liberals and conservatives, but they often interpret different interpretations. Since liberalism is deeply rooted in the land of the United States, in the years after World War II many historians and social scientists believe that the liberalism project is about the same as the American citizens' belief It was. Everyone's proposition The opposition between the Conservative Party and the Liberal Party is characterized by classical capitalism, the opposition between the Liberal Party (now the Conservative Party) and the Social Democratic Party defines professional capitalism. All of the capitalist models discussed here are professional capitalist models. Indeed, in European and Japanese models, experts are getting more power than the capitalist liberal model. However, the professional course is powerful in all these courses. In all countries the Conservative Party or Central Right Party and Progressive Party or Social Democratic Party are in power. But the victory of Conservatives and Liberal Parties does not mean that capitalism returns to classical capitalism, capitalism is still technocratic and social democracy.

The first paradigm of international relations is the theory of realism. Realism is related to the concept of self-interest and power balance. Realism is also divided into two categories, classical realism and neolitism. A famous political theorist Hans Morgenthau is a classic realist who believes that national interests are based on three elements of power balance, military power and self-interest (Kleinberg 2010, 32). He will evaluate the power of the country using a four-step analysis. Firstly, power and influence are not necessarily the same. International relations theory studies international relations (IR) from a theoretical point of view. It tries to provide a conceptual framework that can analyze international relations. Ole Holsti explains international relations theory as colored sunglasses and wearers can see only remarkable events related to theory; for example, realistic supporters can see events that constitutionalists may suddenly happen You can completely ignore it. . The most famous three theories are realism, liberalism, and constitutionism. Institutionalism proposed and developed by Keohane and Nye is sometimes discussed as a paradigm different from liberalism. This memo outlines a liberal approach to the theory of international relations. As with realism, institutionalism, or irrational methods, it is the name of a family member of international relations theory. Here, many people use it in international relations to identify the theory emphasizing the importance of international organizations. It is also not a theory that emphasizes the importance of selfless or utopian worth such as the universality of liberalism, human rights and democracy. It is not a theory that it likes US left party ("freedom") political parties and policies. Rather, it is a theory emphasizing the role of various social and national values ​​and their relevance to world politics. Part of the new intellectual landscape in international relations research is formed by postmodern and critical theory. According to postmoderns, the international structure proposed in the theory of realism and other international relations is a social structure that reflects the view of the world in line with the interests of the elite. Critique theory was developed by Frankfurt social and political philosophers, especially Jürgen Habermas and Herbert Marcuse (1898-1979) in the 1920s. For critical theory, the important issue is how to release mankind from social systems and practices that suppress it. Although inspired by Marxism, critical theorists allow forms of control other than class control, including forms of control based on gender, race, religion, race, nationalism.

Over the years, humans idealized the words related to "heaven" or "perfection" without actually noticing that there is no such thing by picking up a book. Utopian society can not exist due to human needs and desire for success. People are never happy in a society that is inherently competitive, everyone is equal and has no opportunity for promotion. Sir Thomas Moore is dreaming of a land very similar to Britain, but he never can exceed his time. Everyone wants to make utopia. There is no exception. The problem is that not just a little bit about the existence of utopia, everyone is doing different views. Today I read an article about bitcoin Utopia 's dream, and although the intent is reasonable, it is appropriate to observe that the application is still in progress. Most dreams are true. I also noticed that there is no tree in the rendering of this 'utopia' artist. There is no representative of any nature. It is certainly not a utopia I defined! If you know what I'm saying, Saturday night will look like Mordor. I am an alternative to decentralization of the economy and control. This concept is a sustainable and productive path The utopian dreams of finding a job in a place that stimulates you are as follows. Utopia. Strangely, this kind of work is maintained in terms of wages and inspiration. As someone in the X generation's timeframe, I can wish for that utopia but I understand that labor is like this for most people and most of the work. My previous generation, in most cases, regards the work as a work, and the house as a writer. My believer often takes self-actualization as the highest goal and complains when seeking payment or inspiration. Socialism / Marxism has an idealistic dream. A dream is a leader, and soon it tends to become an oligarch or rich. Socialism / Marxism, and capitalism and fascism are the correct wing - philosophy of wing. Socialism, fascism, and theocracy sharply decline with the passage of time, sometimes sharing utopian dreams that call themselves liberalism. When Hegel designed the terms "right wing and left wing," he was considering enlightenment to the enlightenment of Catholic theology. The latter led to liberalism, liberalism, and anarchism. The church and the monarchy it supports are right-wing / dictatorial for him.

There is a clear difference between demand and quantity requirements and demand, and they have their own meanings in the field of economics. In economics, the term demand refers to the willingness to buy products that people can buy. In other words, the price must be included in the financial scope of the consumer. Demand is also a combination of the desire to have something, the ability to pay, and the willingness to repay. As an example, citizens have the ability to pay educational expenses and purchase basic food workers. Many scholars believe that neoliberal economic theory and its influence, one of the pillars of today's economic order, are one of the pillars of today's economic order. As the production area points out, neo-liberalism is neo-liberalism. The classical liberalism began to develop in the 18th century, its essence is to advance freedom "leave passers-by". The so-called invisible hand as the guiding principle of the economy was designated as the basic premise of the original economic theory and political economy, but it proved to have some suspicious influence and influence on social development. In the days after World War II, a new movement has developed since globalization began. This is an exercise that allows the state to intervene in the economic process. But it makes it possible for state intervention to promote profit maximization associated with effective functionalization of market mechanism Keynesian economics focuses on the demand side's solution when the recession happens. Government intervention in the economic process is an important part of Keynes' arsenal related to unemployment, unemployment and low economic demand. Keynesian theorists highlighted the fact that the government intervened directly in the economy with people who insisted on restrictions on market participation by the government. Reducing the interest rate is a way for the government to meanfully intervene in the economic system to create positive economic needs. Keynesian theorists believe that the economy itself can not stabilize itself rapidly and will require active intervention to stimulate the short-term demand in the economy. They believe that wages and employment are slow to respond to market demand and that government intervention is necessary to get on track.

American democracy became famous from the early 19th century to the middle of the 19th century. Andrew Jackson, the seventh president of the United States of America, took office in 1829. The most noteworthy is the mainstream democracy of the United States. Because he is from a humble background, he is a "real ordinary man". (Foner, p. 303) He claims that he recognizes people's needs and speaks on behalf of the majority (farmers, workers). However, Jackson and Democratic critic called him "King Andrew I". Part V: Democracy in Germany: The relationship between Germany and democracy in the 19th century must be seen in a unique and unique environment in the history of the country. This is the first time German people united. Before the French Revolution they were the kingdom of a unified unity that is faithful to the holy Roman Empire, but for centuries this event was almost magically connected under the Prussian flag. The series of actions is full of modest timidity, gambling, fraud and pure diplomacy insight, whose Prime Minister Otto von Bismarck united the German people, and from the bondage of Austrian rule to their people Release it. (Snell, 1976, p. 3, 4) However, it does not mean Germany is united and realizing the long-term and cherished dreams of Germany, democracy is in place. (Turk, 1999, pp Of course, the 19th century is the century of socialism, liberalism and democracy, not the meaning that the 20th century must be the century of socialism, liberalism, democracy. Political doctrine has gone; the state still exists We can freely believe that this is an authoritative century, a century that is "right", a century of fascist. If the 19th century is a personal century (where liberalism means individualism), we can freely believe that this is the "collective" century and therefore the nation's century. The history of modern liberal democracy can be roughly divided into three categories. The early modern LDP, the 18th century to the 19th century LDP, the 20th century, and the 21st century Liberal Democratic Party. The era of modern freedom and democracy can be briefly explained as follows. • Modern era: modern times are the same as the 18th century and the medieval era. A summary of the events in the early modern early liberal democratic history can be explained as follows - 1789: The declaration of human rights and civil rights is the basic document of liberalism and human rights.

For decades, new realism and liberal approach to globalization has been controversial. Traditionally, while the liberalistic view of globalization exaggerates the concept of globalization, the view of Neolarias has made it clear the importance of globalization. The word "useful" can be defined at various levels to draw conclusions. You can see how each approach helps you to understand the usefulness of globalization, but usefulness can also be used to explain the impact of different methods. Global Initiatives Firstly, we need to consider the power of the world very seriously, but at the same time globalization of capitalism (for Liberals and Marxists) or global power competition (for new realists) is homogeneous It will not be changed. Individuals need to understand how the world functions in a particular context. Since they are generally very important and powerful globally, they must be the central stage of our analysis. The choice of what is going on at the world level is not enough for a deep doubt of magnificent stories and great historical stories. For this reason, repeated dualism supports a great many liberal writing about international relations and world order. A careful study of changes in development model in the modern globalized world shows that globalization has become a reality. Globalization is rooted in the theoretical concept of liberalism and neoliberalism, and the only way to see global development is to promote a free-for-nationist country globally. In this way it is easy to stimulate development for the opening up of trade and other political exchanges. The center of my confusion is "liberalism" indicated by "new" intention. Whether it is American liberalism or if it is used in most parts of the world, is it a liberalism or if it is a global definition of liberalism, "neoliberalism" means family life , Art and science, education, even geopolitics, to a broader range of previous non-market activities, fundamental application of market logic and practice. Trump 's deal deals with foreign policy). In addition, it focuses on radical efforts to make the market runaway without political intervention. If the purpose of reference is a unique way of American liberalism, "neo-liberalism" is a political innovation in the New Deal tradition, national and market mechanisms to achieve understanding of the rest of the world It will be reflected in the relationship. Social democracy termination These two definitions are clearly different.

Ideology based on liberty "Through painful experiences, the oppressor knows not to give freedom voluntarily, people oppressed need to demand freedom ... persistence for a while The man is no longer willing to fall into the abyss of despair ... as long as it is covered but must be opened with the ugly nature of natural air and light medicine, like a boil that can not be healed, Every tension can be healed before the air of national opinion created in human conscience ... Ideology based on liberty "Through painful experiences, the oppressor knows not to give freedom voluntarily, people oppressed need to demand freedom ... persistence for a while The man is no longer pleased into the abyss of despair ... it is covered but as long as it is covered but opened with the ugly nature of natural air and light medicine can not heal like a boil , It must be unjust, subject to all tension In the classical sense, liberalism is the mainstream ideology of the modern world. To discuss liberalism as an ideological tendency, we must be able to define it to discuss and critize its role in modern society. Since Marx showed that the dominant thinking of civilization is the dominant thought of its ruling class, liberalism is a spiritual expression of global capitalism, it can be said that it is rationalization and justification of profit control. Kathleen G. Donohue pointed out a liberal in a book titled "Freedom from Desire: American Liberalism and Consumer Recognition" It is a new view based on the classical ideology of political ideology. Initially, classical liberalism was based on the concept of citizens freedom and political freedom, emphasizing freedom of free market capitalism. Neo-liberalism is a new perspective on this. Neoliberalism is usually associated with postwar seasonal economics. Keynesian opinion is often associated with laissez - faire. License fair means getting more power from the government until the state does not interfere with the national economic system.

This idea is called "Chicago school" of economics and is the concept of free market capitalism. (Placeholder 2) In the 1960s, Milton Friedman was called "not like free lunch." If the government uses dollars, the dollar must come from producers and workers of the private economy. There is no magic "multiplier effect" to win invalid Paul from productive Peter. "(Placeholder 4) Friedman is known for explaining the role of money supply in economic and inflation fluctuations. Introduction Although the idea of ​​Milton Friedman is considered extreme, he is the most authoritative person in the 20th century economics (placeholder 2), and his free enterprise, classical liberalism, And the most famous government 's view with limited liberalism (placeholder 3) His views formed modern capitalism. (Placeholder 2) He opposed government intervention and backed the free market (placeholder 6). "If you want the federal government to handle Sahara, his" blindness "written by John Milton within five years will reflect how religious people will accept that person's perspective It is Italian sonnet. It is effective as he communicates the struggle and challenge that people with disabilities have endured using figurative images and religious references. "About his blindness" is a poem that reveals the acceptance of lack of sight of religious people. "Patience" Dialogue Milton Friedman Milton Friedman is known as one of the world's top economists. He received his doctorate from Columbia University, received the Nobel Prize in Economics, and has obtained many honorary degrees from other US universities. As you can see, Milton Friedman played an important role in supporting the solution of global economic problems. You may have heard all the achievements and awards he has earned, but how Milton Friedman plays ... Milton Friedman's idea is considered extreme, But he is the twentieth century The most well-known person in the economic field (Placeholder 2) is best known for his views on free companies, classical liberalism, and the limited government. (Placeholder 3) His views formed modern capitalism. (Placeholder 2) He opposed government intervention and backed the free market (placeholder 6). "If you let the federal government handle Sahara, it will be five years later.

My paper is trying to demonstrate the consistency of John Dewey's non-individualism. It details Dewey's argument that traditional dualism against individuals and society is politically weak. For example, we believe that Dewey in the 20s and 1930s eliminates the expansion of artificial disparities between sociality and personality, or rather real publicity that eliminates artificial increase in sociality and personality I believe that the place of the god was created. The gap between itself has been hindered by inherited, outdated but still dominant practices known as individualism. Through "liberalism", Deneen is more than just a meaning of the political program on the left. Instead, he points to a wider liberalistic order conceived by John Rock, Thomas Jefferson, John Dewey, and others: to achieve personal pursuit of personal independence and personal ambition Natural transformation of. He insisted that this order resulted in social economic superhierarchy, political alienation, hollowing out education, and ecological destruction. Deneen considers liberalism as the last survival of three contemporary ideologies, the other two are fascism and communism. He thinks that seeking autonomy (independence and self-orientation) is one of the driving forces of liberalism, and liberalism is "a condition of free behavior within freedom not bound by a positive law" . My paper is trying to demonstrate the consistency of John Dewey's non-individualism. It details Dewey's argument that traditional dualism against individuals and society is politically weak. - "All sentences are contextual" can understand the motivation behind literature only through referrals to the non-literary world. During Nazism, Stalin and the civil war in Europe, Orwell 's disillusionment against politics and society grew rapidly, and his thoughts and criticisms were published in various articles on political and literary traditions. John Dewey is at least a famous philosopher who clearly grasps this obligation clearly and opposed it. In the letter citing the following C.I. Lewis, Dewey criticized the blind introduction to the humanities from physics of materialization and abstraction. For Dewey, the abstraction is our matrix, all the information flows in and out. It is essential to establish a primitive abstraction based on the abstraction under the care of craftsmen until we achieve the trivial, sincere and accurate world (or specific field) theory. Metamodanism is approaching this basic upgrade vision, and we think this is a clue to the whole history of thinking:

"... ... indeed, they help each other" (p. 165). When Athos and Jacob moved to Toronto, Canada, Jacob decided to marry, devoted himself to poetry and translation, and the war ended. The "shadow" of Jacob's childhood tragedy was "overwritten" to some extent by the love of his first married female Alex, but Jacob could not understand what happened to Bella, but in his heart There was a bad wound. . He knows whether he is still alive and is always injured. I was born in Vietnam and the war affected everyone I know. There are five uncle around my mother; they all serve the armies of both sides, and they all drunk a lot of wine. Two of them are lifelong alcoholism. The war destroyed half of their lives; the alcohol spoiled the other half. One of my two alcoholics is probably receiving cancer treatment caused by smoking and drinking. When I grew up, I witnessed how alcoholism depleted my family's happiness and wealth. Because people are drunk and can not control themselves, the celebration of the New Year changes from joy to incongruity, anger, violence, bitter taste. I personally dislike drinks; I can manage glasses of wine and beer from time to time, but I can not do too much. American society is terrible for everyone. Industrialism harms the physical environment, the food and pharmaceutical industry harm our health, infotainment (most on the screen) harm the cognitive environment, schools soothe descendants before fighting. Is there progress on this? Can you really say that my grandfather has spent his 20-year life in the American dream? What are the benefits of millions of young people whose lives are restricted by geographical conditions and destiny? Myth of progress is myth of disguise of Sisyphus Modern liberalism and conservatism for many generations have contested to weaken the wonderful contemporary civilization built by primitive liberalism. . Nevertheless, since the corruption and collapse of primitive liberalism both the left and the right have carried out a nationalistic duality with regard to the ideological imagination of the world, this savage attack in these two directions remains unabated. This duality needs to be broken. Our civilization promotes it and first we need to remember the long forgotten liberal tradition that humans can see what we really have. This is the mandate of today's liberalism.

Author's Life and Ideas Mary Sherry was born with greatness. "As a radical novelist, daughter of William Godwin and feminist Mary Worth Craft, and one of the leaders ... as a romantic poet's wife, she ... ... literally in the UK One of the heirs "(Allingham 1) This legacy gave her a unique view of life that affected all her sentences. For example, in her book Frankenstein there are countless references to how women should act. Even the birth of a monster reveals Sherry's mother's belief. Author Fawcett of "Liberalism: Lifetime of Concept" issued the second edition this month and freed space with President Donald Trump, Brexit, and other political shakes this month. Before retiring in 2003, I was a journalist of The Economist for 30 years. There is no answer in a sentence, but you can fill in a library of complex academic answers. What we are insisting is that we are all acknowledging liberalism, especially as liberalism is threatened. When thumbnail is pressed, the four important liberalism that society always conflicts, excessive power - nation, wealth, or overwhelming majority - must resist, whether human progress is possible or not Choose a belief. Who, everyone should be respected from society. Every idea has an old root. Finding them in a political way before the 19th century is like looking for an Athenian bicycle or a medieval microchip. The theme is the potential meaning, information or main idea of ​​the author he is trying to convey. A topic may be an author's idea of ​​a topic such as his / her view on life, society, or human nature. Themans often explore eternal and universal thoughts that can be implied rather than being clearly stated. The title of the story usually points to a topic When the author writes, they have the idea that they are about to pass. This is especially true when the author writes paragraphs. The author supports the main idea and details of each paragraph to support the theme or central theme, and each paragraph supports the preceding paragraph. A topic sentence announces a general topic (or part of a topic) to be processed within a paragraph. A topic sentence can appear anywhere in a paragraph, but it is usually the first one - for legitimate reasons. This sentence will focus on the authors at the time of writing and reading. If you find a topic sentence, be sure not to emphasize it, make it stand out, make it stand out after reviewing.

"Decisions are not bad - even if you have what you have, reducing poverty is a big enemy that brings happiness to mankind, it certainly destroys liberty, it makes something not to work with some virtues, It is very difficult. " Global localization occurs concurrently in the generalization and specialization of modern society, politics and economic systems. This term is a mixture of globalization and localization, promoted by sociologist Roland Robertson and proposed by Japanese economists to explain Japan's global marketing strategy. The concept of global localization is a simple concept of the globalization process, a challenge to linear expansion of geographical size. Global localization shows that continental and world level importance is increasing and regional and regional levels are becoming more prominent. Homogeneity and concentration trends occur with heterogeneity and decentralization trends. However, the concept of global localization requires a more fundamental perspective change. It shows the interrelationship between the global level and the local level. Briefly, neoliberalism is a broad ideology that reached the worldwide popularity peak in the 1980s, becoming common in the political, economic, governmental circles in the 1970s. Neo-liberalism represents the political paradigm we are currently facing, the political situation of modern society. As its name suggests, it calls for revitalization of the view of classical liberal economic policy. To understand that "classical liberalism" means understanding of older words than contemporary America - not a contemporary thinker but Adam Smith and John Rock "Liberalism of the age of enlightenment" I quote it. Freedom of expression is important for social liberalism, which was embodied by Barack Obama and other Democratic party members. Regarding specific policies, neoliberalism means free trade, low tax, deregulation, privatization and balanced budget.

Introduction and Conclusion Many political studies on civil warfare have focused on the institutional role in societies of ethnic division. "Constitutional technicians" assert specific rules and institutional arrangements such as proportional representation or decentralization to help divide the society and maintain peace (Lijphart 1977, 1999; Fearon / Laitin 2003; Reynal-Querol 2005), they only reflect the parting lines in these societies (Lipset / Rokkan 1967; Collier / Hoeffler 2004). Politics is the creation, maintenance, and revision of social norms or regulations. Politics as a solution to conflict is aimed at establishing social order, but today's order is based on law. It can not be denied that religion and other ancient institutions have lost their central role as a source of order. It is now a law and builds institutions as an obvious order. Modern countries and international organizations rely on the validity and effectiveness of the law to satisfy the people's demand for domestic and international peace. Therefore, politics in a broad sense means dispute settlement by creating, maintaining and revising social norms and regulations. There may be contradiction between the two. But this is not the only problem. The requirement of the rule of law outweighs the other principles and objectives that a free state may pursue, and the practices of other institutions characterized by a free society. More specifically, liberal states and other liberal systems are subject to rule of law; if a free political or liberal system violates the rule of law, in particular the principle of equality, governance Is not a political or institutional practice but a rule of law. In fact, this implies that the rule of law is the foundation of free law and politics. The complete concept of the rule of law is to first clarify the canonical source of the liberal political system itself and then clarify the proper relationship between the rule of law and the system of other liberal politics and social identity I have to do. Political liberalism, including the rule of law, depends on what is called philosophical liberalism. The principle accepted by free society is that only individuals can count, everyone is equal, and everyone is just because they are human beings. These principles constituting the legal and political base of liberalism are provided by philosophical liberalism whose burden is the fundamental characteristic of human condition. In other words, our political arrangements, including the source of the rule of law, are not in the arrangement itself but in a broader perspective on the meaning of being a person.

In this article I will explain why democracy and equality are desirable and why democracy is an important step in achieving equality in the real sense. Political philosophers need to understand one person, transcending the democratic concept of democracy, why these theories continue social and economic inequality. Many democracy do not meet our expectation of providing equality, but there are ways to explain and overcome them. b) Democracy as a sign of 'common intention' may be incompatible with the principle of individualism defended by liberalism. If liberalism shows freedom, democracy is equal. Trying to achieve both of these values ​​is the foundation of all the historical conflicts. The value of liberalism has been claimed to be freedom, tolerance, privacy, constitutionalism and the rule of law (separation of representation and power). If freedom is the main value of liberalism, we have to answer three questions - where does freedom come from? What do you do freely? Who is freedom? In this article I will explain why democracy and equality are desirable and why democracy is an important step in achieving equality in the real sense. Political philosophers need to understand one person, transcending the democratic concept of democracy, why these theories continue social and economic inequality. - Lunatics takes over asylum: cultural turmoil in the 1960s All you need is annoyance. (Marshall Berman, The Sixties) formed one of the most culturally complex times of American history in the 1960 's, and analysis of this era is similarly problematic. It shows us perhaps the most unique experiment in human history, ie instability of social democracy. We can not achieve the dignity, equality and equal opportunity of all people with other political and economic systems. Of course, it eliminates a lot of people from a global perspective, but that would allow us if there is a political will to change our institution so that they will benefit everyone . It is also a solution as neoliberal criticism is approaching. Naomi Klein has long been a system critic. "Not enough: resisting the shocking politics of the playing cards and winning the world we need" she said that we can begin to make us the substitute that we need in a timid manner I showed the method to us. ...) Neo-liberal status of leader's failure to be considered representative is not commensurate with incendians and new fascists

There are several perspectives on robust determinism to consider whether we are free when taking decisions and taking action. One of the ideas is a difficult determinism. J. Mackie explains the difficult determinism as "every action can be interpreted according to the reason, so it is inevitable". (J. Mackie) This is an outline of the basic idea that behavior and decision are not free. This is based on the view that there are several factors that can be taken to ensure that actions are done. 'Our choice, decision, intention, other psychological events, and our behavior Hard determinism (or metaphysical determinism) is a view of free will, determinism is realistic and not compatible with free will, so there is no free will. Hard sentence usually refers to law, but it can also be a position to be taken about other forms of determinism that also needs the whole future. Hard determinism is totally in contrast to soft determinism, which is a form of compatibility in determinism, arguing that there is the possibility of free will despite the existence of determinism. It is also totally in contrast to metaphysical liberalism, the main form of incompatibility, I believe that there is free will and determinism is wrong. Soft determinism is totally in contrast to hard determinism and liberalism, sometimes also called metaphysics. The difficult determinism believes determinism is correct and denies that we have free will. Metaphysical liberalism (not to be confused with the political doctrine of liberalism) determinism is wrong. Because when we act freely, it leads to a specific part of our behavioral process (our desires, our decisions, ours, etc.). Will act) is not intended. The problem faced by soft decision makers is to explain how our actions are determined in advance or whether they are free. Most of them insist on understanding the concept of free or free will in a specific way. They refuse the idea that the free will must include some of the strange metaphysical abilities that each of us has - that is, the ability to initiate events (our will and our behavior, etc.) It is not itself determined by causality.

In this article, I will discuss one of the biggest and most meaningful theories in economic history. It is a division of labor that changes manufacturing and production aspects. The systems, methods and intents derived from today's theory seem to be different from those of the 18th century (when the book was first written), but there are still many similarities in world manufacturing after the second century Yes. Advantages, disadvantages and problems indicated in the text. Therefore neo-liberalism is not different between market economy and market society. Through the above attitude and ethics, market only sells itself to other market participants, market society, market culture, market value, market people. In a sense, neo - liberalism has returned to the state of early liberalism - early liberalism also combines culture, value, morality and economics. But neo-liberalism has brought a more intensive "market" - not only to replace the traditional social form but also to replace the concept of private life. At the same time, this 'market' is far from the necessity of production. It also applies to early liberals - famine often occurred in Europe at that time then. In fact, it is far from the existing 'market' cultural concept, so it may be better to use other words. Professor Michael Sandell of Harvard University, when talking about "a society with markets", caught the essence of the problem and became a "market society". The nation and civil society should positively socialize and humanize the economy, but the government allows the market to gradually save social inhumanization. In a wonderful review of Ron Williams 'Michael Sundel' Money can not buy prospective customers ', he pointed out that Sandell' s premise of overmarketing criticism is as follows:

There are four political theories formed throughout the period. All theories include who has the power and the influence of the masses. The theory includes pluralist democratic theory, hyper diversity, elite pluralism, and traditional theory. Each theory is completely different, but they all share a common idea; as individuals and groups, people can play a role in the government. Pluralism affects various aspects of the United States, including military spending, education, and medical care for the elderly. In modern times, there are four revised categories of political philosophy. First is liberalism, and liberalism can be understood as political tradition including values ​​and human concepts, political philosophy, general philosophical theory, moral theory, political philosophy (Stanford). From a non-expert point of view, liberalism thinks that individuals should have the same freedom as others. After all, do people take care of people? Political theory - the science people use to explain political laws and principles that explain and evaluate political events and situations. It will help analyze, explain and infer political events. There are two popular political theories, conservatism and liberalism, which are greatly compared and contrasted. Political theory is also a set of clear actions and attitudes, commonly referred to as political ideology, that presents the most elusive concept of social science. However, the most widely accepted text of undisputed political ideology refers to it as a belief in the appropriate social order and structure, and how to achieve it. In addition, political thinkers divide political ideology into symbolic and operational aspects of political ideology. Symbolic aspects refer to common ideological labels and labels, but, on the contrary, operational aspects are inherent to the left or right end. In this article we distinguish between the two terms political theory and ideology. I will also try to clarify the meaning used by political theorists. All theories and ideologies are outstanding, but they are also controversial or misleading. These views form a contemporary political landscape and shape the society in which we live. Political theory is the study of the concepts and principles people use to describe, interpret and evaluate political events and institutions. Traditionally, the field of political theory has studied this research from two different perspectives: the history of political thought and the modern political philosophy. Princeton University's political theory teacher has advantages in both areas, and certainly some teachers are actively involved. Princeton's political theorists gathered the main fields of research, democratic theory, international political theory, political thought history. Princeton theorists have a strong commitment to interdisciplinary research. Graduate students regularly participate in seminars of philosophy, classical, religious, and historical departments and participate in activities of the University Humanities Value Center.

The British Revolution (also known as the British Civil War) is an era of armed conflict and political turmoil between 1642 and 1660, which made up a supporter of Congress against the royal family, executed Charles I, The system was replaced by the federal government. UK (1649-1653), Oliver Cromwell emerged as a virtual military dictatorship, eventually restoring the monarchy. The end result of the revolution is that the Diet is the best about political issues and that the British monarch must be ruled in a way restricted by the Constitutional Agreement, that is, the defamation of the constitutional monarchy concept. The revolutionary period is important for the development of the concept of freedom for the temporary collapse of censorship in the early 1640s, and numerous political pamphlets have appeared, in which groups like Leveler appear in individual rights, We asserted the theory of liberty based on rights. Self-Owned and Private Property Congress can freely discuss important matters such as the rule of law, strict restrictions on the power of the king, freedom of the press and freedom of religion. The revolution produced military dictators in the form of Cromwell and eventually led to the recovery of the Stuart monarchy, which laid the foundation for a new monarchy that dominated Europe. The "absolute" monarchy in this area is quite different. . Especially since 1688, the monarchy that appeared in the UK was a constitutionally restricted monarchy. It also produced a series of ideas that would have a significant impact on the development of British and American politics in the 18th century and the constitutional mindset. David M. Hart is Project Director of the Free Online Library at Liberty Fund, translated into 6 volumes, is an editor of Free Fund's Fédéric Bastiat collection, Gustave de Molinari (1849), at St. Lazarus Street. He received a doctorate. History at the University of King Cambridge, and education at the College of History of Adelaide University in South Australia. Recent works include Robert Leroux, two collections of French classical liberalism of the 19th century. French liberalism of the 19th century: Anthology (London and New York: Routledge, 2011) and French, L 'dadd' or Liberalism French anthology XIXesiècle (Oval, the golden age of French liberalism) (Oval, coming soon). On his personal website <http://davidmhart.com/liberty>, David has quite a number of classic liberal intellectual resources of the 19th century. The most important constitutional and political achievements of John C. Calhoun are in online free libraries. Biography, Author: Irving H. Bartlett (1993), two excellent biographies, John Calhoun, Union Price is John Niven (1988) and John Calhoun. For more information on Calhoun family life, see Ernest McPherson, Little Calhoun and Thomas Green Clemson: Fatherland's southern patriarch's decline (1983). Owen Bartlett concluded that descendants decided to oppose Calhoun's claims on indefinite protection of slavery over 130 years ago. Large online global free community involving people all over the world. Thousands of thoughtful postings, member libraries, forums, and interesting downloadable guides. It is worth checking Isaac Morehouse's Rethinking Education and checking out a huge downloadable library. If you want to know exactly about this alternative educational philosophy, this wonderful and informative website is your best choice. It explains the content, method, reason, and timing of independent education. The basics are clearly explained and they have a wealth of informative articles to help you understand the principles of independent education.

The massive English that I am talking about will see a reasonable existence when the liberals see the person He develops his own ability if he gains the necessary resources Let life be better and fulfilled. We achieved it. This is actually against the conservative party's view of human nature. They say that humans are morally corrupt and their rationality is unreliable (Heywood, 2012). They say that human capabilities are limited, and we are seeking safety from what they already know and deciding. Ashesi? Well, in my first year here, I have to write this paper to you not to repeat my social theory course. This article focuses on the political ideology that I believe is closest to my own political belief. Maybe your present is different from mine. After all, 32 years is a long time. The political ideology that reflects my own ideas is liberalism. Liberalism says that everyone should have the greatest freedom, if you forget. Ideology is usually of political or religious nature. Not all political and religious beliefs constitute ideology, but legitimacy should be considered synonymous. For example, merely falling to the left or right of the political range does not make that person a theorist, only to exclude other alternatives with specific political doctrine. Likewise, striped religious fundamentalism inevitably means to insist on the exact interpretation of the Bible and other doctrines, despising all other interpretations and religious traditions. Many methods of classifying political ideologies have been proposed, but each creates a specific political range. Ideology also expresses itself through their position in the political scope (eg left, center, or right), although the accuracy in this field is often controversial. Finally, ideology can be distinguished from political strategies (such as populism) and a single problem (such as legalization of marijuana) that one party can establish. A good definition of ideology by philosopher Michael Oakeshott is "the formal origin of the hypothetical sublayer of rational truths included in the tradition". Michael Frieden's authority over "ideology and political theory" is an important contribution to modern political theory and systematically studies political ideology from a conceptual morphology point of view. In this chapter, focusing on Frieden's statement on "American philosophical liberalism" that I think is "an ideological phenomenon like other liberal doctrine", between political philosophy, ideology, and political ideology Consider the relationship. This chapter discusses two issues. (1) Can we completely distinguish between liberalism and the philosophical theory of ideology and liberalism? (2) The first level theory like American philosophical liberalism depends on false allegations rather than becoming the other first-level theory and second research like Frieden's political doctrine Can you criticize it?